Democracy Spraffa

6. Ayrshire Transformation Board right Care, Right Place Transfer of Care Programme Update FINAL

North Ayrshire Council · 20 August 2026
Back to Integration Joint Board — 20 August 2026 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Integration Joint Board
20 August 2026
Subject : Ayrshire Transformation Board – Right Care, Right
Place Transfer of Care Programme Update
Purpose : To update IJB on the Whole System Flow Plan aligned to the
Ayrshire Transformation Board Right Care, Right Place
programme following completion of the Transfer of Care Business
Case and to seek endorsement of North Ayrshire HSCP's
contribution to implementation of the agreed programme.
Recommendation : The Integration Joint Board is asked to
• Note the approval and progression of the Ayrshire-wide
Transfer of Care Business Case. 
• Note confirmation of the conditions to delegate authority to the
Chief Officer to progress with operationally implementing plans
as described in the update to IJB on 18 June 2026.
• Note and endorse the North Ayrshire investment plans
supporting delivery of Home First, Discharge Without Delay
and Transfer of Care objectives, with agree performance
trajectories and planned benefits/improved outcomes 
• Agree ongoing monitoring through the existing IJB performance
and financial reporting frameworks. 
Direction Required to
Council, Health Board or
Both
Direction to :- 
1. No Direction Required X
2. North Ayrshire Council 
3. NHS Ayrshire & Arran 
4. North Ayrshire Council and NHS Ayrshire & Arran 
Glossary of Terms
ATB Ayrshire Transformation Board
D2A Discharge to Assess
DWD Discharge Without Delay
HSCP Health and Social Care Partnership
IJB Integration Joint Board
NHS AA NHS Ayrshire and Arran
PGC Performance Governance Committee

Page 2

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1 This report provides the Integration Joint Board with an update on the Whole System
Flow Plan, developed through the Ayrshire Transformation Board and NHS Ayrshire
and Arran Flow Assurance Board. The Ayrshire Transformation Board (ATB)
continues to provide strategic leadership and oversight of whole-system
transformation across Ayrshire and Arran. The Right Care, Right Place Programme
remains a core component of this work and is focused on improving flow through acute
and community services, reducing delays in discharge and shifting the balance of care
towards community-based support.
1.2 NHS Ayrshire and Arran continues to experience significant operational pressures,
including sustained high hospital occupancy, increasing delayed discharges,
Emergency Department congestion and the continued use of non-standard capacity
across acute hospital sites. These pressures impact on patient experience, safety,
quality of care and the ability of the system to meet performance standards.
1.3 To respond to these pressures, NHS Ayrshire and Arran and the three Ayrshire Health
and Social Care Partnerships together with acute services have developed a Transfer
of Care Business Case. The Business Case is aligned to national policy including the
Health and Social Care Service Renewal Framework, the Discharge Without Delay
Programme and national priorities for Unscheduled Care. The Business Case and
associated programme of improvement activity is a short term, more immediate
approach and seeks to implement a Home First approach through the expansion of
community capacity and redesign of discharge pathways.  It is recognised that this will
not fully address systemic issues and a further and final phase of implementation
would be required however is seen as a positive step in shifting the balance of care
and realignment of resources into community services. 
1.4 At its June 2026 meeting, the IJB agreed delegated authority to the Chief Officer to
progress operational plans subject to specific conditions being met. These conditions
included formal pan-Ayrshire and system-wide endorsement, recurring funding
formally underwritten by NHS Ayrshire and Arran or Scottish Government, assurance
that there would be zero financial risk or liability to the IJB, and confirmation that plans
would improve outcomes in priority areas including delayed transfers of care and
unmet need.  This report confirms that these conditions have been fully met and that
operational plans have begun progressing towards implementation.
1.5 Phase 2 of the improvement programme, set out in the Business Case, proposes a
phased approach to reducing hospital occupancy, improving flow and reducing
delayed discharge through investment in community services, intermediate care,
rehabilitation and discharge to assess pathways. This will support more people to
receive care in appropriate community settings while helping to improve performance
and sustainability across the health and social care system.

Page 3

1.6 North Ayrshire HSCP has been actively involved in the development of the Business
Case and will contribute through expansion of social care capacity, development of
discharge to assess pathways, provision of step-up and step-down care and
strengthening of community alternatives to hospital admission and prolonged hospital
stays.  
2. BACKGROUND AND CASE FOR CHANGE
2.1 Health and Social Care services across Scotland continue to face real pressures,
including demographics, growing demand, healthcare needs, and increasing financial
pressures. Unscheduled care performance, and in particular delayed discharge
performance, is utilised as one of the key indicators to measure the efficiency and
effectiveness of our health and care system. 
2.2 The Scottish Government confirmed £10.079m funding for NHS Ayrshire & Arran in
June 2025 for the Operational Improvement Plan aligned to Unscheduled Care, with
a programme of initiatives progressed since that time - this is referred to as Phase 1
of the Whole System Implementation Plan.   
£1.081m was ring-fenced at that time for North Ayrshire to enhance hospital-based
MDT capacity (£746k) and Mental Health Officer (MHO) capacity (£335k).  This has
been fully implemented. 
2.3 An Ayrshire Transformation Board has been established in early 2026 by senior
partners across Ayrshire to respond collectively to increasing financial, operational
and performance pressures across health and social care.  
The ATB provides a senior officer forum to oversee whole-system transformation,
support improved flow, reduce variation and duplication, and progress shared
priorities under a “Once-for-Ayrshire” approach. At the core of the initial model are five
major programmes: Shared Services/Lead Agency work, Right Care Right Place,
Adults with Incapacity (AWI), Digital Transformation, and Communications. Together,
these programmes reflect the major areas of system pressure and opportunity
identified across the region. 
2.4 NHS Ayrshire and Arran has also stepped up a Flow Assurance Board, chaired by the
NHS Ayrshire and Arran Chief Executive, to oversee key whole-system improvement
areas including Discharge Without Delay, virtual capacity, Adults with Incapacity,
integrated discharge hub arrangements, performance and digital, SAFER, the general
medicine target model, emergency department operations improvement and mental
health flow.

Page 4

2.5 Following mobilisation of Phase 1 of the Operational Improvement Plan enacted in
2025/26, the Transfer of Care Programme, referred to as Phase 2 of the Whole
System Improvement Plan, has been developed in response to evidence
demonstrating that Ayrshire and Arran continues to experience:
• Higher than average lengths of stay.
• High levels of delayed discharge.
• Increased Emergency Department waiting times.
• Ambulance turnaround delays.
• High occupancy within acute hospitals.
• Increased reliance on escalation and non-standard capacity.
Day of Care analysis undertaken across Ayrshire and Arran identified that a significant
proportion of patients occupying acute hospital beds were clinically ready for
discharge but unable to leave hospital due to system constraints. The findings
demonstrated that many delays are attributable to challenges across community
pathways and social care capacity. 
NHS AA remains in escalation for financial management, the pressures in acute
services, where there are unfunded ward areas and the use of additional patient
spaces is contributing significantly to the Health Board’s deficit position.  The Business
Case sets out a programme of phased investment which will support a programme of
acute bed closures and support the Health Board’s financial recovery. 
2.6 Within North Ayrshire, it is recognised that the principal factors contributing to delayed
discharge and reduced flow include:
• Financial resource constraints.
• Delays associated with complex discharge planning.
• Capacity pressures within Care at Home services.
• Availability and choice of care home placements.
• Discharge to Assess pathway and capacity constraints.
• The impact of meeting the needs of our local population with continued high
demand for services.
• Adults with Incapacity processes and associated legal requirements
2.7 Without significant improvement in patient flow and transfer of care arrangements, the
Ayrshire and Arran acute health care system will continue to experience increasing
pressure on capacity, performance and workforce sustainability. The Transfer of Care
Programme therefore represents a coordinated whole-system approach to addressing
some of these challenges through investment in community capacity and redesign of
pathways at the interface between acute and community services.

Page 5

3. TRANSFER OF CARE MODEL
3.1 The Transfer of Care Programme is based upon the principles of Home First and
Discharge Without Delay. The programme seeks to ensure that people are supported
to return home, or to an alternative community-based setting, at the earliest point of
clinical readiness wherever it is safe and appropriate to do so.
3.2 Implementation of the programme will be supported through:
• Expansion of Discharge to Assess pathways.
• Increased community social care capacity.
• Enhanced intermediate care and rehabilitation provision.
• Strengthened discharge coordination arrangements.
• Improved multidisciplinary working across acute and community services.
• Greater utilisation of community alternatives to hospital admission and
prolonged stays.
3.3 The programme will be delivered through a phased approach:
Phase 1 – Stabilisation
• Phase 1 of the improvement plan was enacted in 2025/26 and focused whole
system improvements on reducing delayed discharge, reducing long length of
stays, improving discharge processed and stabilising existing initiatives.  
Phase 2 – Scaling
• Phase 2 of the programme, as described within the business case, enables
stabilisation of Phase 1 activity and mobilisation of short term and immediate
plans to expand community social care capacity, to further develop discharge
pathways and accelerate flow improvements.
Phase 3 – Sustainability
• Phase 3 of the programme represents the delivery of full system sustainability
and the wider transformation that will be required to meet the totality of system
demand.  Mobilisation of Phase 3 is dependent on the successful delivery of
Phase 1 and 2, and will require further development as the next stage of the
programme.
4. NORTH AYRSHIRE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
4.1 North Ayrshire HSCP's contribution to the programme focuses on expanding
community social care capacity and strengthening discharge to assess arrangements
to support timely discharge and reduce dependence on acute and community hospital
provision.  These plans have been directly developed through analysis of the specific
North Ayrshire challenges and are intended to directly benefit residents of North
Ayrshire.

Page 6

4.2 The North Ayrshire workstream(s) are focused on expansion of Care at Home and
reablement capacity, further development of Discharge to Assess pathways,
increased use of intermediate care pathways, development of step-up and step-down
care arrangements, access to additional care home capacity where required to
support flow and improved integration between acute and community services.  This
will be delivered through direct investment in the following areas:
1. Additional Care Home Capacity
• Investment to secure up to 25 additional care home placements.
• This will help reduce delays experienced by people requiring funding for
ongoing 24/7 care and support following discharge. 
2. Increased Care at Home Capacity
• Expansion of Care at Home capacity and Reablement capacity for up to 35
Care at Home packages. 
• This will support more people to return home safely, linking with the MDT
team in the hospital and further promote the Discharge to Assess ethos. 
3. Discharge to Assess Step Down beds
• Use of the Anam Cara facility, stepping up 5 vacant beds as part of North
Ayrshire's integrated discharge pathway.
• These beds will provide additional capacity for people who do not require
an acute hospital bed but would benefit from further assessment,
rehabilitation or recovery support before returning home. 
4.3 The North Ayrshire investment plan is expected to deliver benefits for individuals,
carers, staff and the wider health and social care system, including:
• More people supported to remain at home or return home sooner.
• Reduced deconditioning associated with prolonged hospital stays.
• Increased access to rehabilitation and recovery-focused support.
• Improved patient and carer experience through earlier discharge and
reduced transfers between care settings.
• Greater utilisation of intermediate care pathways as alternatives to acute
admission.
• Improved flow through acute hospitals and community services.
• Reduced dependence on escalation beds and non-standard capacity.
• Better alignment of resources with Home First principles.

Page 7

5. PERFORMANCE TRAJECTORIES AND IMPROVEMENT MEASURES
5.1 The Transfer of Care Programme is underpinned by a set of phased improvement
trajectories which are intended to demonstrate the expected impact of investment in
community capacity, discharge pathways and acute flow. These trajectories provide a
framework for monitoring whether the programme is delivering the required
improvement in delayed discharge, non-delay discharge activity, Emergency
Department performance and ambulance turnaround.
5.2 North Ayrshire Health and Social Care Partnership Trajectories
The North Ayrshire trajectories show the expected sustained reduction in delayed
discharge levels across both acute and community hospital settings during 2026/27.
These trajectories will be used to monitor whether the additional community capacity
is supporting improved discharge flow and reducing the number of people delayed in
hospital or other care settings.
The trajectories have been set by the HSCP based on an assessment of when
additional capacity will become available, including factoring in recruitment
timescales.
North Ayrshire
Trajectory
Jun
26
Jul
26
Aug
26
Sep
26
Oct
26
Nov
26
Dec
26
Jan
27
Feb
27
Mar
27
Acute Delayed
Discharge Trajectory 81 62 67 67 67 58 54 52 50 49
Non-Acute Delayed
Discharge Trajectory 48 44 43 42 42 39 38 37 36 36
TOTAL 129 106 110 109 109 97 92 89 86 85 
For August 2026, delayed discharge performance within the North Partnership is on
target and aligned with the agreed trajectory, with 67 acute delays and 41 non-acute
delays recorded for the reporting period. 
5.3 NHS Ayrshire and Arran Acute Services Trajectories
The acute trajectories provide a broader set of whole-system measures, including
non-delay discharges, Emergency Department performance, Scottish Ambulance
Service turnaround and daily average 8-hour and 12-hour breaches. These measures
are included to ensure performance improvements are assessed across the whole
urgent and unscheduled care pathway, not solely through delayed discharge
performance.

Page 8

Acute
Performance
Measure
Apr-
Jun 26
Jul
26
Aug
26
Sep
26
Oct
26
Nov
26
Dec
26
Jan
27
Feb
27
Mar
27
Non-Delay
Discharges 178 189 178 170 160 150 140 142 131 120
4-Hour Target 66% 66% 67% 68% 70% 72% 75% 75% 76% 78%
SAS Turnaround
Time 54.7% 59% 68% 70% 75% 78% 82% 85% 87% 90%
12-Hour Delays,
Daily Average
Breaches
31 29 25 23 22 18 14 14 12 8
8-Hour Delays,
Daily Average
Breaches
57 42 38 34 30 26 22 22 12 10 
ED performance continued to be challenged throughout July, with overall performance
increasing slightly to 54.7% of all patients being admitted, discharged or transferred
within 4 hours.  This small improvement also resulted in a decrease in 12 hour waits,
however there were still 910 across the month, an average of 29 per day, 11 at UHA
and 18 at UHC.
In the week ending 2nd August, 4 hour performance increased again to 57.8% overall,
however 12 hour waits remain high, with an average of 30 per day, 13.6 per day at
UHA and 16.4 per day at UHC.  
These long waits for admission continue to have a direct impact on the assessment
and treatment of newly arriving patients, particularly those arriving by ambulance.
The most recent SAS operational publication (5th August) shows that Ayrshire and
Arran are still above the Scottish median with a turnaround time of 55 mins, compared
to 49 mins nationally. Whilst this is an improvement from the previous week (1 hr 4
mins) challenges remain at both sites but particularly at UHC with a median of 58
mins, compared to 49 mins at UHA.  
5.4 A reporting and accountability framework will be established to support delivery of the
agreed trajectories, and this will be supported by the development of a local reporting
framework. Reporting will be aligned through the Performance Governance
Committee, Scottish Government Assurance Board, the 3 Integration Joint Boards
and Ayrshire Transformation Board. This framework will require clear ownership,
escalation routes and evidence of progress against trajectories, including 
accountability for the Director of Acute Services and Chief Officers in respect of the
agreed areas of delivery.

Page 9

6. PROPOSALS
6.1 It is proposed that the IJB:
• Note the approval and progression of the Ayrshire-wide Transfer of Care Business
Case. 
• Note confirmation of the conditions to delegate authority to the Chief Officer to
progress with operationally implementing plans as described in the update to IJB
on 18 June 2026.
• Note and endorse the North Ayrshire investment plans supporting delivery of
Home First, Discharge Without Delay and Transfer of Care objectives, with agree
performance trajectories and planned benefits/improved outcomes 
• Agree ongoing monitoring through the existing IJB performance and financial
reporting frameworks. 
6.2 Anticipated Outcomes 
Implementation of the Transfer of Care Programme is expected to deliver
improvements across four key domains – Performance, Quality and Safety,
Population Health and System Sustainability.  
6.3 Measuring Impact
Impact will be monitored against the agreed trajectories and delivery milestones
included in the approved Right Care, Right Place business case as described in
section 5. Regular updates on implementation and performance will be provided and
the North Ayrshire IJB will retain responsibility for evidencing impact through its
statutory and local governance arrangements.
7. IMPLICATIONS
7.1 Financial
The Transfer of Care Programme is supported through a combination of recurring
Scottish Government funding, non-recurring transitional funding and planned savings
associated with reduced acute bed utilisation. The programme is designed to support
a planned transfer of resources from acute services into community-based models of
care, facilitating the closure of unfunded acute hospital beds.

Page 10

The financial planning identifies the following North Ayrshire Phase 2 investment
areas:
North Ayrshire Phase 2
Investment Area
Planned
Capacity 2026/27 Cost Full Year
Cost
Care Home Places 25 placements £600,000 £800,000
Care at Home / In-house
Reablement 35 packages £787,500 £1,050,000
Anam Cara Discharge to
Assess Step Down Model 5 placements £274,500 £366,000
TOTAL  £1,662,000 £2,216,000 
This is in addition to the Phase 1 investment of £1,078k for North Ayrshire which has
now been confirmed as recurring investment as part of the business case.  Bringing
the total additional recurring funding to £3,294k for North Ayrshire.  This funding has
been confirmed as recurring, and whilst we have signed up to shared plans to deliver
on performance improvement which the Partnership are confident to deliver on, the
provision of funding is not contingent on the performance improvements being
delivered in full.    
Written confirmation has been received that NHS Ayrshire and Arran will meet the
agreed recurrent costs of Phase 1 and 2 delivery and that the IJB and Council will not
be liable if the anticipated acute savings, occupancy reductions or efficiency
assumptions are not achieved. 
7.2 Human Resources
Delivery of the programme will require expansion and redesign of community-based
workforce capacity alongside changes within acute hospital services. Workforce
planning will be undertaken on a phased basis to ensure staffing arrangements remain
aligned to service redesign and changing patterns of demand. 
The programme aims to:
• Strengthen community and multidisciplinary services.
• Support recruitment to priority services.
• Improve workforce sustainability.
• Reduce reliance on temporary staffing arrangements.
• Promote integrated working across organisational boundaries. 
All workforce implications will be progressed in partnership with staff representatives
and in accordance with relevant workforce governance and consultation
arrangements.

Page 11

7.3 Legal
The Ayrshire Transformation Board and Flow Assurance Board operate within existing
statutory frameworks. They do not alter the statutory responsibilities of the IJB, NHS
Ayrshire and Arran or North Ayrshire Council. Any decision requiring IJB approval will
continue to be progressed through existing IJB governance routes.
7.4 Equality/Socio-Economic
The programme supports the delivery of care closer to home and seeks to reduce the
adverse impact associated with prolonged hospital stays, particularly for older people,
people with frailty and individuals with complex care needs. 
The Home First approach promotes independence, rehabilitation and recovery within
community settings and aims to improve outcomes and experiences for individuals
and carers. 
Equality and socio-economic impacts will continue to be monitored and assessed as
individual service changes are developed and implemented. 
7.5 Risk
Key risks associated with implementation of the Transfer of Care Programme include:
• Community capacity not increasing at the pace required to support
discharge trajectories.
• Recruitment and workforce challenges impacting service mobilisation.
• Delays in implementation of Discharge to Assess pathways.
• Ongoing Adults with Incapacity and legal process delays.
• Failure to achieve anticipated reductions in delayed discharge and length
of stay.
• Failure to realise planned reductions in acute bed utilisation.
• Financial sustainability risks should recurring funding not be maintained.
• System-wide dependencies requiring coordinated delivery across NHS
Ayrshire and Arran and all three HSCPs.
• Cultural and operational change associated with implementation of Home
First approaches. 
Whilst increased community capacity is expected to improve discharge performance
and flow, implementation may also generate increased demand for community
assessment, rehabilitation and reablement services as pathways mature and
confidence increases. Monitoring arrangements will therefore include measures
relating to referral volume, response times, caseloads, throughput and service
capacity to ensure that community services remain able to deliver intended outcomes
while sustaining performance trajectories.

Page 12

These risks will continue to be monitored through established governance
arrangements including the Ayrshire Transformation Board, NHS Ayrshire and Arran
Flow Assurance Board and local IJB governance structures.
7.6 Community Wealth Building
There are no direct Community Wealth Building implications arising from this report.
Where additional local capacity is commissioned or developed, opportunities to
support local procurement, workforce wellbeing and community benefit should be
considered.
7.7 Key Priorities
The plan supports strategic priorities to shift the balance of care, reduce reliance on
acute hospital provision, improve unscheduled care performance, reduce delayed
transfers of care and strengthen community-based alternatives. It also aligns with the
IJB’s role in ensuring that delegated health and social care functions are planned and
delivered in a way that improves outcomes and makes best use of available resources. 
8. CONSULTATION 
Senior officers from North Ayrshire Council, North Ayrshire IJB and NHS Ayrshire and
Arran have been involved in development of the proposals through the Ayrshire
Transformation Board and NHS Ayrshire and Arran Flow Assurance Board
arrangements. Further engagement is ongoing with operational services, staff,
partners and governance forums as implementation plans and the reporting and
accountability framework are progressed. 
Caroline Cameron, Director / Chief Officer
Author: Kerry Logan, Head of Service (Health and Community Care) 
Appendices
• Appendix 1 -  RCRP Business Case

Page 13

Page 1 of 24 
Paper 06p
Right 
Care
Right Place

Page 14

Page 2 of 24 
Ayrshire and Arran 
Delivering Right Care, Right Place: Transfer of Care Business Case 
1.0 Introduction
NHS Ayrshire and Arran is experiencing sustained system pressure, including high
occupancy, delayed discharges, Emergency Department (ED) congestion and insufficient
community capacity. These pressures are resulting in escalating patient safety risks, use
of non-standard capacity, and challenges in delivering timely, person-centred care across
both acute hospital sites.
This business case seeks approval for a whole-system transfer of care model, requiring
Health and Social Care Partnerships (HSCPs) to expand community-based alternatives to
admission and discharge. This will support a planned and sustained reduction in acute
hospital occupancy, aligned to the Unscheduled Care Operational Improvement Plan and
national policy direction.
2.0.  Purpose and Context
2.1 National Context
This proposal aligns with:
• The Health and Social Care Service Renewal Framework
• The Top 10 Priorities for Unscheduled Care (2026/27)
• The Discharge Without Delay (DWD) programme
Collectively, these policies prioritise a shift in the balance of care from hospital to
community, with a focus on improving flow, reducing delays, and delivering care closer to
home.
Figure 1 – Health and Social Care Strategic Objectives

Page 15

Page 3 of 24 
Figure 2 – Top 10 Areas of Focus for Unscheduled Care 
Figure 3 – DWD Principles and Priorities

Page 16

Page 4 of 24 
2.2. Local Context - Ayrshire and Arran Unscheduled Care 
Ayrshire and Arran has been identified as an outlier across a number of key indicators,
including:
• Higher than average length of stay (LOS)
• High levels of delayed discharges
• Increased ED waits and ambulance delays
• High bed occupancy, particularly in frailty and medicine pathways
The Centre for Sustainable Delivery (CfSD) has supported improvement activity since
2023, highlighting the need for system-wide redesign. Progress has been made across
key areas; however, sustained improvement is constrained by limited community capacity
and whole-system integration challenges
The improvement actions from the CfSD Discovery exercise carried out late 2024 are set
out below in Table 1 with a current update position.
Table 1 - CfSD Recommendations: Summary of Current Position
Recommendation Current Status / Position
1. Develop a
Realistic Care
Improvement
Programme 
A 3-year Realistic Care Improvement Programme launched in April
2025. Progress includes divisional transactional programmes,
unwarranted variation projects, income generation initiatives,
reduction in unnecessary tests, SAFER rollout acceleration, and
specialty-level reviews to improve quality, performance, and
productivity. 
2. Strengthen
strategic and
operational
system
relationships 
Key processes (e.g. MDT board rounds, LOS reviews) reset at
Crosshouse with escalation to HSCP. Progress constrained by
financial recovery pressures and high occupancy. Whole Systems
funding supporting delayed discharge reduction and capacity
improvements. Engagement strengthened via DWD programme
and system-wide working. Frontline awareness is high; however,
empowerment and culture change require further development.
Data and digital tools (e.g. Shrewd platform, dashboards) improving
visibility and performance monitoring. 
3. Focus on
improving patient
journeys 
Being advanced through the multi-agency DWD programme. Work
commenced May 2025 with continued engagement sessions and
workshops aligned to the Whole Systems Operational Improvement
Plan. Improvement resources in place for priority areas such as
frailty pathways (linked to HIS workstream). Progress ongoing with
strong multiagency involvement. 
4. Create
meaningful data
packs for frontline
teams 
Unscheduled Care (USC) dashboards and data packs developed
and routinely shared via Performance and Flow Board. BI support
enables analysis of trends and variation. Ward-level data (e.g.

Page 17

Page 5 of 24 
LOS, discharge metrics) established in line with Discharge Without
Delay principles. Foundations in place with further refinement
underway. 
5. Socialise and
finalise vision and
high-level aims 
Vision statement co-produced through leadership engagement.
Decision taken to align formal launch with Whole Systems
Improvement and DWD programmes to maximise impact.
Positioned to support multidisciplinary working and delivery of a
person-centred, “care closer to home” model. 
2.1 Operational Improvement Plan
In June 2025, the Scottish Government confirmed £10.079m of non-recurring funding for
NHS Ayrshire & Arran to support delivery of the Unscheduled Care Operational
Improvement Plan. This allocation was lower than the original submission, which had been
developed to fully deliver the agreed objectives.
A programme of initiatives has been in progress since late 2025/26. For the purposes of
this business case, this initial period is described as Phase 1. The non-recurring nature of
the funding has, however, constrained the organisation’s ability to recruit to posts and to
mobilise services that require recurrent investment to be sustainable.   Additional detail for
Phased 1 plans is detailed in Appendix 1 to provide additional background in context of the
plans set post funding allocation in August 2025.
As a result, while Phase 1 activity has supported progress in specific areas, it has not
delivered operational improvement at the scale or pace required to release recurring
resource or to materially address the ongoing quality, safety and flow challenges within
acute hospital settings across Ayrshire and Arran.
The recurring funding requirement to fully deliver Phase 1 is estimated at £4.6m, against
an identified recurring budget of £3.2m. There is sufficient funding to support delivery in
2026/27, primarily as a result of in-year slippage; the shortfall along with phase 2
investments will be the first call on acute bed closure savings subject to confirmation of
any additional resources in 2027/28.
3.0  Case for Change
This section provide the rationale and evidence on why this change is needed to improve
pathways and processes across the interface, improve delayed discharges, and reduce
length of stay. 
There are significant challenges facing the EDs and wards on both hospital sites with
crowding of patients and this impacts staffs’ ability to provide dignified person-centred
care.  Addressing the lack of flow through and out of the acute sites is a must for the
organisation. 
3.1 Current pressures are creating significant risks including:
• Patient deterioration and deconditioning associated with prolonged hospital stays
• Overcrowding in ED and extended waits for assessment and admission

Page 18

Page 6 of 24 
• Use of non-standard care areas, impacting dignity, privacy and safety
• Delays in ambulance offload, increasing risk to patients in the community
• Inability to meet key national standards for stroke, critical care and paediatric
pathways
• Workforce fatigue and challenges with recruitment and retention 
3.2 Performance Case for Change
Performance remains below national standards, driven by high occupancy and delays in
discharge. This impacts:
• ED 4-hour and 12-hour performance
• Length of stay across key specialties
• Hospital flow and patient experience
A consistent approach across both acute sites has reduced variation; however, system
pressures continue to limit sustained improvement.
Appendix 2 provides the supporting performance data for the Transfer of Care Business
Case. It outlines key trends across urgent and unscheduled care, including Emergency
Department performance, ambulance flow, occupancy, length of stay and delayed
discharges. Collectively, the data demonstrates the scale, trajectory and underlying drivers
of current system pressures.
Outlined below are critical factors highlighting the challenges of the three HSCPs.  The
tables below show poorer health outcomes for Ayrshire and Arran residents, the variation
across HSCP areas and the different solutions to meet local population need. 
Metric East North South Ayrshire &
Arran Scotland
Population (000s) 121.5 134 112.3 367.8 5,546.90
Population Share (%) 33.00% 36.40% 30.50% 100% —
Over 65s (000s) 25.2 30.9 28.9 85 1,067.00
% Aged 65+ 20.70% 23.00% 25.80% 23.10% 19.20%
Population in the Least Deprived (SIMD %) 10.90% 9.70% 19.60% 13.10% 20%
Population in the Most Deprived (SIMD %) 30.60% 40.90% 16.70% 30.10% 20%
Working Age (16–64, 000s) 76 82.3 66.6 224.9 3,583.00
% Working Age 62.60% 61.40% 59.40% 61.20% 64.60%
Male Healthy Life Expectancy (years) 55.8 52.6 58.4 55.4 59.6
Female Healthy Life Expectancy (years) 55.4 52.5 58.9 55.3 60
Children (0–15, 000s) 20.3 20.9 16.7 57.9 896.8
% Under 16 16.70% 15.60% 14.90% 15.70% 16.20%
Looked After Children (per 1,000) 18.2 16.9 10.2 — 11.7

Page 19

Page 7 of 24 
This case for change incorporates the change required to shape service redesign from
varying service profiles which will need to improve outcomes and experiences for patients,
staff and the wider health and care system. 
3.3  Whole System Analysis (Day of Care Insight) 
Day of Care audit findings highlight a fundamental mismatch between acute capacity and
patient need, with over a quarter of inpatients clinically ready for discharge but unable to
leave hospital.
South HSCP – key drivers of delay:
• Limited Care at Home capacity
• Delays in social work assessment and decision-making
• Access to step-down and rehabilitation provision
• Legal and placement processes
North HSCP – key drivers of delay:
• Delays associated with complex discharge planning, including Discharge to Assess
(D2A) pathways and social work assessment
• Limited community social care capacity (including Care at Home and care home
placements)
• Access to step-down and rehabilitation provision
• Adults with Incapacity considerations, including requirements of associated legal
processes
East HSCP – key drivers of delay: 
• Social care capacity in the care home sector which impacts on flow across the
system
• Flow through social care itself in transitions home from hospital, through reablement
and on to locality care at home
• Persistent legal, guardianship and decision-making processes (including AWI)
which slow discharge pathways
• Insufficient community health capacity in district nursing and East Ayrshire
Community Hospital to create further flow and rehabilitation/end of life resource
Collectively, these factors indicate that current pressures are driven by system-wide
capacity and process constraints, rather than hospital demand alone.

Page 20

Page 8 of 24 
Delivery of the planned delayed discharge reduction trajectories for September and
December 2026 is dependent on timely mobilisation of Phase 1 activity from early July
2026.
There is a direct link between pace of implementation and delivery of trajectory milestones.
Any delay to approval or mobilisation will impact the system’s ability to deliver these
trajectories and realise the benefits associated with the proposed investment. 
3.4 Financial Case for Change
Overcrowding across the front doors is driving a financial overspend across both sites. 
Both the Emergency Departments regularly require additional staffing to care for the higher
volume of patients safely as well as an increase in the number of one-to-one supervisions
for frail and vulnerable patients.
Length of stay across both acute hospital sites continues to challenge the organisation
financially with unfunded wards filled with medically fit patients/ delayed discharges waiting
on packages of care, placement, or step down community bed provision. Length of stay
within the HSCP led community sites are also challenging leading to unavailability of
downstream beds, lack of flow as associated costs. 
It is acknowledged there are financial pressures for the HSCPs, although these do not
carry the same risks relating to clinical quality and safety being escalated on a regular
bases from staff and staff side colleagues on a regular basis.  
Without accelerated whole-system transformation, including improved partnership working,
seven-day services, reduction in delayed discharges, and investment in community-based
alternatives, acute capacity will remain constrained. A coordinated, pan-Ayrshire approach
is therefore essential to deliver sustainable improvement, reduce inequalities, and shift
care closer to home for an increasingly complex and ageing population
4.0  Proposal 
This proposal sets out a structured and phased approach to redesigning service delivery
across acute and community settings in Ayrshire and Arran. It responds to sustained
system pressures by focusing on improving patient outcomes, experience and flow, while
establishing a more sustainable and integrated operating model aligned to national policy
and local population needs.
4.1 Approval Required
Approval is sought for a combined Phase 1 and Phase 2 investment and delivery
approach to the Unscheduled Care Programme, recognising that:
• Phase 1 requires confirmation of recurring funding to sustain and stabilise existing
service developments initiated through non-recurring investment
• Phase 2 requires approval to proceed at pace and scale to deliver whole-system
transformation and achieve the agreed performance trajectories

Page 21

Page 9 of 24 
Approval is therefore requested to:
• Enable immediate mobilisation across both phases, recognising that delivery of the
September and December 2026 trajectories is dependent on implementation
commencing from early July 2026
• Support the transition to a sustainable, whole-system Transfer of Care model,
shifting the balance of care from acute hospitals to community-based provision
• Approve the phased transfer of resources from Acute Services to HSCPs, explicitly
linked to improvements in flow, length of stay and delayed discharge performance
• Approve the planned and controlled reduction in acute bed capacity, including ward
closures, with associated reinvestment of released resource into community
services on a recurring basis as detailed in the phase 1 and 2 commitments.
This approval establishes the financial and operational framework required to deliver a
safe, paced transition, ensuring that community capacity is developed in advance of, and
alongside, reductions in acute capacity, in line with the phased delivery model set out in
this business case.
Given the complex landscape in which this business case is presented, the following
conditions have been stipulated by Ayrshire Integration Joint Boards (IJBs) in progressing
implementation in order to provide sufficient levels of assurance:
• The Plan has pan-Ayrshire and system-wide support and is formally endorsed at a
meeting of the Ayrshire Transformation Board.
• Funding is provided on a recurring basis, with assurance that this is formally
underwritten by NHS Ayrshire and Arran or Scottish Government. This ensures
there is zero financial risk or liability to the IJBs.
• HSCPs are assured that plans will target improvement in performance and patient
outcomes in areas of priority for the IJBs, including delayed transfers of care and
unmet need.
• This business case is finalised and brought back to the IJBs following the summer
recess.
4.2 Models of Care
The proposal is aligned to the principles of the national Discharge Without Delay
programme and supports the consistent adoption of a Home First approach across
Ayrshire.  This approach recognises and prioritises the importance of sufficient social care
capacity within our communities. It will enable individuals to be discharged at the earliest
point of clinical readiness and, wherever possible, to be assessed within their usual place
of residence.

Page 22

Page 10 of 24 
Delivery will be supported through: 
• Discharge to Assess (D2A) pathways
• Expansion of community social care capacity 
• Enhanced Intermediate care and rehabilitation provision
• Strengthened discharge coordination arrangements 
4.3 Phased Delivery Approach
Delivery will follow a structured, phased trajectory:
• Phase 1 (Stabilisation): Reduce delays and long stays through targeted
interventions and improved discharge processes
• Phase 2 (Scaling): Expand community capacity and embed new pathways
• Phase 3 (Sustainability): Achieve safe reduction in bed capacity and long-term
system redesign
Phase 3 represents the delivery of full system sustainability and the wider transformation
required to meet the totality of system demand. It will require further development of
detailed plans beyond phases 1 and 2, including optimisation of community hospital
provision, mental health inpatient pathways, and preventative community-based supports.
Any movement to a Phase 3 model will be dependent on all stakeholders delivering the
benefits articulated within this case.
Phase 3 will therefore be developed as the next stage of the programme, building on the
foundations established through phases 1 and 2, and will be brought forward for further
approval as detailed plans and funding arrangements are confirmed.
This will enable a progressive reduction in acute bed base, aligned to improvements in
flow and performance which is sustainable.
4.4 Improvement Trajectory 
The programme will deliver:
• Reduction in length of stay across key pathways
• Reduction in delayed discharges towards national benchmarks
• Improved ED flow and elimination of extended waits
• Increased discharge rates and improved ward productivity

Page 23

Page 11 of 24 
4.5 Whole System Transformation 
Area Key Actions Outputs Impact / Benefit Financial Value
East
HSCP
Enhance
community
rehabilitation,
enablement and
advanced
practice capacity
through:
Allied Health
Professional
capacity within
ICT;
Increase social
care capacity to
support flow;
Advanced
practice and
Mental Health
Officer support;
Care home
placements to
address flow. 
Increased
discharge
capacity,
improved flow
capacity,
improved
rehabilitation
and
enablement
availability.  
Further leverage from
existing resource through
investment addressing key
reasons for delay identified
in Scotland (awaiting
community support, care
home place,
assessment/reassessment,
equipment/adaptation or
family choice). 
Accelerate flow to enable
response to higher acuity
needs
Reduce unnecessary
hospital stays and delayed
discharge
Increase availability of
appropriate useable acute
beds/reduce occupancy of
high-cost acute capacity
Impact on reduced
average length of stay
Prevention of avoidable
admission
Enabling functional
recovery
North
HSCP
Expansion of
community
social care
capacity and
strengthening of
discharge to
assess pathways
including step
up/step down
and intermediate
care 
Increased
availability of
community-
based care,
enhanced
utilisation of
D2A and
intermediate
care capacity,
improved flow
through
hospital and
community
settings 
Reduction in delayed
discharges and overall
length of stay, improved
outcomes and experience
for individuals through
timely, person centred
discharge and more
effective use of hospital
capacity 
Significant cost avoidance
through reduced bed days
and improved system flow,
opportunity to reinvest in
sustainable community-
based models of care 
South
HSCP  Enhanced
intermediate
care provision;
Strengthening of
discharge to
assess
pathways;
Advanced
practice and
nursing resource
to support IC
and Home First
approaches;
Moving and
Handling,
appropriate
access to
equipment and 
Increased
availability of
community
based care,
access to IC
beds,
strengthening
of pathways to
facilitate
discharge to
assess,
expanded care
at home
capacity,
improved
access to
appropriate
equipment,
home first 
Increased discharge
capacity and improved flow
Reduction in delayed
discharges and length of
stay; improved outcomes
for service users and
carers.
Efficient use of local
resources – community
based services aligned to
community led supports
Care closer to home;
financially more
sustainable in comparison
to acute based care
Workforce investment;
financial impact from
workforce
growth/development linked
to wellbeing.

Page 24

Page 12 of 24 
person centred
care.
approach and
linkage with
acute frailty
and community
frailty
pathways.
Acute
Services
Address gap in
service provision
with 7 days
frailty and COTE
MDT workforce
provision
including
psychology and
AHP. Key focus
on admission
avoidance and
timely
interventions.
Admission
avoidance,
CGAs to
support system
wide care
delivery, 7 day
AHP front door
and
assessment
provision.
Integrated
discharge
planning on
admission to
assessment
units. Improved
flow and
discharge rates
Delivery against
Emergency Care
Standards, GIRFE,
achieve frailty standards,
improve flow, reduce LOS
and as a result reduce
occupancy and patient
safety risks arising from
high occupancy
Releases recurring acute
costs aligned to reduced
bed utilisation  
Whole
System
Resource
shift/integration -
Rebalancing
investment
towards
community-
based provision,
with
strengthened
integration
across health
and social care
services
Community
alternatives
established -
Expanded
community
social care
capacity,
Discharge to
Assess (D2A)
pathways, and
intermediate
care enabling
Home First
delivery 
Reduced hospital
utilisation -
Indicative reduction of
approximately 129 hospital
beds through improved
flow and reduced delayed
discharge
Long-term sustainability -
More sustainable whole-
system model, supporting
improved outcomes,
reduced reliance on acute
capacity, and system-wide
cost avoidance 
The detailed trajectories against each phase of the investment areas, with timelines for
delivery and bed closure plans are included as Appendix 3. 
Delivery of the delayed discharge reduction trajectories for September and December
2026 is contingent on plans being progressed and mobilisation commencing in early July
2026. Any delay to this timeline will directly impact the ability to deliver in line with the
trajectories set out in the appendices. 
5.0 Workforce Implications
The delivery of the proposed phased reduction in acute bed capacity, alongside the
expansion of community-based services, has significant workforce implications across
NHS Ayrshire and Arran and partner HSCPs.  These changes are aligned to the NHS
Scotland policy direction, which supports a shift in the balance of care from hospital to
community, improvement in patient flow, and delivery of care closer to home.

Page 25

Page 13 of 24 
Across both acute hospital sites, there are existing vacancies and workforce pressures
within nursing and medical staffing establishments.  These vacancies, alongside
anticipated natural turnover, provide an opportunity to support a planned and managed
transition to a reduced inpatient bed base, avoiding the need for large-scale workforce
displacement while maintaining safe staffing levels and service continuity.
The phased nature of this programme allows time to undertake structured workforce
planning between now and the implementation of ward closures, enabling:
• alignment of workforce capacity to a smaller, more clinically appropriate inpatient
footprint
• use of natural attrition and vacancy management to support workforce realignment
• redeployment of staff to priority areas, including front door services, frailty
pathways, and community interfaces
• strengthening of workforce models in areas critical to Discharge Without Delay
(DWD) and Home First delivery
For nursing workforce, the reduction in both core beds and non-standard escalation
capacity will support a transition towards more sustainable staffing models, consistent with
Health and Care (Staffing) (Scotland) Act 2019 principles, including:
• improved alignment between staffing levels and patient need
• reduced reliance on bank and agency staffing, particularly where non-standard
beds have required staffing outwith established workforce models
• improved working conditions and patient care environments
For the medical workforce, the planned reduction in inpatient capacity provides an
opportunity to review and optimise Consultant job plans across both hospital sites. This will
support:
• increased senior decision-making presence within remaining inpatient wards
• more timely clinical review, discharge planning, and escalation
• improved multidisciplinary team working, supporting patient flow and reduced length
of stay
Workforce planning will be undertaken in line with NHS Scotland workforce governance
expectations and will be delivered through a phased, clinically-led approach, ensuring:
• workforce changes are aligned to service redesign and capacity changes, not in
advance of them
• safe staffing levels are maintained at all times, with oversight through appropriate
governance arrangements
• workforce risks are actively managed through programme and Board-level
assurance structures
All workforce planning and implementation will be progressed in full partnership with Staff
Side organisations and in collaboration with the operational and professional leads for
each area.

Page 26

Page 14 of 24 
This will ensure that all changes are:
• professionally led and clinically safe
• compliant with national workforce policy and legislation
• informed by appropriate engagement, consultation, and communication processes
This programme presents an opportunity not only to align workforce to a more sustainable
model of care, but also to deliver against wider NHS Scotland ambitions to:
• improve staff experience and wellbeing
• reduce reliance on temporary staffing
• strengthen integrated, multidisciplinary working across health and social care
Overall, the proposed approach supports a managed transition of workforce aligned to
system transformation, ensuring that staffing models evolve in parallel with the shift
towards a Home First, community-focused model of care, while maintaining patient safety,
service quality, and workforce sustainability.
6.0  Financial Implications
The financial model underpinning the Transfer of Care programme has been developed to
provide clear line of sight between investment, delivery of capacity, and the release of
recurring savings, ensuring that the proposed transformation is both affordable and low
risk at a system level.
The programme requires targeted pump-priming investment to expand community
services and enable transformation.  The model represents a shift from high-cost reactive
care to more efficient, preventative community-based provision, delivering long-term
financial sustainability.
This investment will:
• Support safe reduction in acute bed utilisation
• Release recurring acute costs
• Enable reinvestment across the system
6.1  Funding Position and Profile
The programme is supported by a combination of Scottish Government funding, non-
recurring carry forward (in 2026/27), and planned system savings, providing a robust
funding envelope across the transition period.
Total resourcing for 2026/27 is £10.2m, rising 
This includes:
- £3.2m recurring Scottish Government funding aligned to Unscheduled Care priorities
- £4.0m non-recurring carry forward supporting transition and pump-priming investment
- £2.2m indicative additional funding from 2027/28
- £3.0m–£8.8m of gross savings from acute bed closures, which support the reinvestment
in out of hospital services and financial recovery within the Health Board

Page 27

Page 15 of 24 
6.2  Investment Requirements (Spend Profile)
The programme requires targeted investment across Phase 1 and Phase 2 to expand
community capacity, improve flow, and enable the shift to a Home First model.
Total planned spend is £10.2m in 2026/27, reducing to £9.3m on a recurrent basis.
6.3  Savings and Cost Avoidance
The financial model is predicated on the progressive release of savings from reduced
acute bed utilisation, aligned to improvements in flow and length of stay.
The programme supports a total reduction of approximately 129 beds across the acute
system, delivered through a combination of whole-system improvements and acute service
redesign. Failure to deliver these bed reductions all other things being equal leaves a
deficit for the health board to fund of £3m in 2026/27 rising to £4m in 2027/28.
Of these, 98 beds are directly linked to the delivery of delayed discharge reduction
trajectories and are supported by clearly identified financial savings of £3.0m in 2026/27,
rising to £8.8m recurrently. These reductions are dependent on the successful expansion
of community capacity and delivery of the Transfer of Care model, enabling patients to be
discharged at the point of clinical readiness.
The remaining 31 beds relate to non-standard capacity, including escalation beds and
additional ward spaces that are routinely opened to manage congestion and variability in
demand. The planned reduction of these beds will be achieved through improvements
within acute services, including reduced length of stay, more timely clinical decision-
making, and improved flow across the inpatient pathway within the financial year.
While these 31 beds are not associated with a defined recurrent budget line, they are
sustained in practice through increased reliance on bank and agency staffing, reflecting
their position outside established ward baselines. As these beds are removed, a
corresponding reduction in premium staffing costs is expected, and this will be closely
monitored to ensure delivery of the anticipated financial and operational benefits.
Taken together, this approach provides a balanced and deliverable plan, where:
• 98 beds are released through whole-system change and community capacity
expansion, and
• 31 beds are released through improved efficiency and patient flow within acute
services
This ensures that the overall bed reduction is both clinically safe and operationally
achievable, while supporting improved patient outcomes, reduced overcrowding, and more
sustainable use of resources.

Page 28

Page 16 of 24 
The full funding profile is noted in the table below. 
6.4  Overall Financial Position
The programme delivers a managed transition from short-term pressure to recurrent
sustainability. While 2026/27 reflects a break even in-year position due to the timing of the
phased bed closures, a recurring surplus of approximately £4.8m is achieved as
transformation benefits are realise, as the Health board is underwriting the IJB’s risk in
terms of funding these commitments recurrently the surplus is used to support Health
Board financial recovery. 
The expenditure in phase 2 is assumed to be a nine month in year spend.  Late
commencement of much of this is likely and this could generate slippage. 
6.5  Financial Risk and Assurance
The model minimises financial risk through phased investment, conditional bed closures,
managed double running, and clear linkage between savings and deliverable service
changes.
Overall, the programme demonstrates a financially viable and sustainable model, providing
assurance that investment will translate into measurable, recurring benefits while
maintaining control of financial risk.
Funding will be released on a monthly basis subjected to confirmation of associated spend
and recruitment activity where applicable as identified in the plan. 
7.0 Outcomes and Benefits
The programme will deliver measurable improvements across four key domains as
outlined below and set out in more detail within Appendix 2. 
Financial profile
East North South Acute Total 26/27 Total Recurring
Phase 1 400             258                688                380                1,725             -                        
Phase 2 300                300                -                        
Total Non-recuring costs 400             258                988                380                2,025             -                        
Phase 1 883             1,078             1,180             1,526             4,667             4,667                     
Phase 2 (9 months 26/27) * 678             1,662             1,148             3,487             3,487                     
Total Recurring costs (26/27) 1,561          2,740             2,327             1,526             8,154             8,154                     
Phase 2 (FYE of the 9 months above) 226             554                383                -                 1,162                     
Total Committed Recurring costs (27/28 onwards) 1,787          3,294             2,710             1,526             8,154             9,317                     
TOTAL COSTS 2,187          3,552             3,698             1,906             10,180           9,317                     
Funding Available (£000'S)
Total 26/27 Total Recurring
Non-recurring carry forward 3,986            
SG allocation 3,200             3,200                     
Additional 27-28 SG £30m investment 2,175                     
Total bed closure savings 3,020             8,807                    
TOTAL FUNDING -              -                 -                 -                 10,206           14,182                   
BALANCE (retained) 26                  4,865                     
£000's

Page 29

Page 17 of 24 
Performance
• Reduced length of stay
• Improved ED performance
• Reduction in delayed discharges
Quality and Safety
• Reduced overcrowding and corridor care
• Improved dignity and patient experience
• Reduced harm from prolonged stays
Population Health
• Increased independence
• More care delivered at home
• Reduced reliance on institutional care
System Sustainability
• Reduced acute bed dependency
• Improved workforce utilisation
• Better alignment to safe occupancy levels 
7.1 Quality, Safety and Cost Avoidance Benefits
The proposed reduction of 129 beds represents a significant quality improvement
opportunity and a substantial source of cost avoidance across the whole health and social
care system. Current data demonstrates that patients who are clinically ready for
discharge can experience prolonged delays whilst awaiting care at home packages, social
work assessment, guardianship processes, rehabilitation or longer-term care
arrangements. 
Across Ayrshire and Arran, delays associated with care at home provision range from 5.8
to 37.2 days, whilst delays associated with social work and guardianship processes range
from 33.6 to 65.6 days. Consequently, many individuals remain within an acute hospital
bed for between one and two months after they have been deemed medically fit for
discharge.
Prolonged hospitalisation is associated with a range of recognised and avoidable harms
including deconditioning, falls, pressure ulcers, healthcare associated infections (HAIs),
loss of independence and deterioration in physical and cognitive function. These harms
are particularly significant for frail and older people and can result in increased
dependency, poorer outcomes and a greater likelihood of requiring ongoing care and
support following discharge. National evidence demonstrates that pressure ulcers can
increase hospital length of stay by up to 10 days and incur substantial treatment costs,
whilst falls continue to represent one of the most significant causes of avoidable harm for

Page 30

Page 18 of 24 
older adults. Importantly, Scottish evidence estimates that approximately 60% of the total
costs associated with falls are borne by social care services through increased care
needs, care home placements and long-term support requirements.
Reducing delayed discharges and supporting earlier transfer of care will therefore deliver
benefits that extend well beyond the release of acute bed capacity. Earlier discharge to the
right care setting will reduce exposure to hospital-associated harm, maintain
independence, support rehabilitation and improve patient experience and outcomes. It will
also reduce the risk of escalation in care needs, thereby avoiding additional costs across
both NHS Ayrshire & Arran and the three Health and Social Care Partnerships.
There is also a direct link between reduced length of stay and infection prevention. NHS
Ayrshire & Arran's Infection Prevention and Control review estimates that healthcare
associated infections account for approximately 6,758 excess bed days annually and cost
in excess of £5.4 million per annum. Extended hospital stays increase patients' exposure
to infection risk, antimicrobial treatment and associated complications. By reducing
unnecessary hospital days and improving patient flow, the Transfer of Care model will
contribute to reducing infection risk, avoiding excess bed days and supporting safer, more
effective care.
Taken together, the reduction in delayed discharges should be viewed as a whole-system
quality and safety intervention that delivers recurring cost avoidance through reduced
hospital-associated harm, lower treatment costs, reduced demand for long-term care,
improved utilisation of acute and community resources and better outcomes for the
population of Ayrshire and Arran. The anticipated benefits will be realised across both
health and social care through improved patient flow, reduced dependency, enhanced
independence and a shift in the balance of care towards community-based support in line
with the Health and Social Care Service Renewal Framework. 
8.0 Risks and Mitigations 
The delivery of the proposed transfer of care model represents a significant whole-system
transformation and, as such, carries a number of strategic, operational and financial risks.
These risks have been carefully considered within the development of the business case,
and mitigating actions have been embedded within the programme design, phased
delivery approach, and governance arrangements.
8.1  Strategic and Operational Risks 
A key risk relates to the ability of community services to scale at the pace required to
support increased discharge volumes and the shift towards a Home First model. The
business case explicitly recognises that current system pressures are driven by whole-
system constraints, particularly limited Care at Home capacity and delays in social care
provision. 
To mitigate this, a phased delivery approach has been adopted, ensuring that increases in
discharge activity, including the planned expansion of Discharge to Assess (D2A), are
aligned with demonstrable increases in community capacity. Investment in Care at Home,
intermediate care and reablement services forms a core component of the proposal, and

Page 31

Page 19 of 24 
progression to acute bed reduction will be conditional on evidence of sustained
improvement in flow, length of stay and delayed discharge performance. Daily MDT and
IDT processes will provide real-time oversight of patient flow, with escalation through the
Flow Assurance Board where constraints are identified.
A related risk is the ability to deliver consistent seven-day working across both acute and
community services, which is essential to improving patient flow and enabling timely
discharge. The programme addresses this directly through the development of Acute
Frailty Units operating on a 7-day basis, enhanced weekend discharge processes, and
planned consultant job plan changes in Phase 2. These changes are aligned to Discharge
Without Delay principles and will be monitored through performance metrics including
weekend discharge rates and length of stay variation.
Workforce capacity represents a further critical risk, particularly in relation to AHP
provision, frailty services, and community-based care delivery. The business case includes
a defined workforce plan, with recruitment to Phase 1 posts already underway and a clear
focus on addressing gaps at the front door, in frailty pathways and within the medicine bed
base. Alongside recruitment, the programme incorporates workforce redesign, including
new roles and skill mix changes, to support sustainable delivery. Workforce assumptions
and risks will be routinely reviewed through programme governance to ensure alignment
with activity and demand.
The reduction of the long length of stay (LLOS) cohort is a key enabler within Phase 1, but
also presents risk given the complexity of these patients, including legal, housing and care
placement challenges. This risk is being mitigated through a targeted, system-wide
approach, including dedicated oversight of the top 75 LLOS patients across all three
HSCPs, supported by regular review and escalation processes. This work is integrated
with the wider Discharge Without Delay programme, ensuring earlier identification and
proactive management of delays.
Effective implementation of Integrated Discharge Teams (IDTs) is also critical. There is a
risk that without consistent application of MDT board rounds and clear accountability for
discharge decisions, delays and duplication may persist. To address this, the programme
includes a standardised operating model aligned to DWD principles, supported by ward-
level performance data, routine LOS reviews at 72 hours and 7 days, and strengthened
clinical leadership. These arrangements will ensure discharge planning is embedded as a
core component of daily clinical practice.
Digital and information sharing constraints are recognised as a further risk, particularly
given current system fragmentation and the impact this has on timely discharge planning.
The business case outlines ongoing work to improve data visibility, including the
development of dashboards and meaningful data packs for frontline teams. 
This will be supported through a dedicated digital workstream, ensuring improved access
to real-time information and consistent documentation across the system.
Finally, there are inherent patient safety risks associated with implementing a D2A / Home
First model, particularly for individuals with complex needs or where community capacity is
under pressure. These risks will be mitigated through robust multidisciplinary assessment,

Page 32

Page 20 of 24 
the use of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment within frailty pathways, timely capacity
assessments, and access to 7-day community support. Patient outcomes, including
readmissions and experience, will be closely monitored to ensure that the model delivers
safe, person-centred care.
8.2   Financial and Resource Risks
A critical risk for the programme relates to the transfer of financial resources from Acute
Services to HSCPs, which underpins the shift in the balance of care. There is a risk that
funding may be insufficient, non-recurrent, or not aligned to actual demand, potentially
leading to financial instability within HSCPs and an inability to sustain community capacity.
The business case directly addresses this through a phased and planned transfer of
resources, linked to delivery of service change and capacity expansion. Financial risk
associated with delivery does not sit with the IJBs provided that the recovery trajectories
identified are achieved.
Financial modelling has been developed to demonstrate how reductions in acute bed
utilisation will release resources for reinvestment in community services. Importantly, no
significant reduction in acute capacity will be undertaken without assurance that
community capacity is in place and sustainable, ensuring that risks associated with cost
shunting or system destabilisation are minimised.
There is also recognition of double running costs during the transition period, where both
acute and community services may need to operate in parallel. This has been built into the
financial planning assumptions, with pump-priming investment identified to support the
transformation phase. This is expected to be time-limited, with clear trigger points linked to
flow improvements and bed reduction milestones.
A further financial risk relates to the ability to realise cash-releasing savings from
reductions in length of stay and delayed discharges. The programme mitigates this by
focusing on whole ward and service redesign, rather than incremental bed reductions,
ensuring that savings are realised at scale and aligned to service change.
8.3 System and Interdependencies and Cultural Change
The success of the programme is dependent on strong alignment between acute services
and HSCPs. There is a risk that improvements in one part of the system are not matched
by capacity or change in another, resulting in continued bottlenecks. This is mitigated
through the adoption of a whole-system transformation approach, with shared objectives,
joint accountability, and integrated performance monitoring.
Cultural change is also a key risk, particularly the need to shift from hospital-based
assessment to a Home First model. The programme addresses this through clinical
leadership, ongoing engagement, and embedding Discharge Without Delay principles into
routine practice, including MDT board rounds, LOS reviews and discharge planning
processes. Sustained improvement will depend on consistent application of these
principles across all teams.

Page 33

Page 21 of 24 
9. Governance, Oversight and Assurance
Robust governance and oversight arrangements are in place to ensure that risks are
actively managed and mitigations delivered. As set out within the business case, oversight
will be provided through:
• Ayrshire Transformation Group – providing strategic leadership and oversight of
delivery, including financial alignment and system-wide risk
• Flow Assurance Board – providing monthly executive level oversight of delivery,
performance and resource transfer.
• DWD Programme Board – providing monthly operational oversight of patient flow,
discharge performance and escalation of risks
• Defined workstreams – responsible for delivery of key enablers and monitoring of
associated risks
These structures are supported by routine performance reporting, including indicators such
as length of stay, delayed discharges, discharge rates and occupancy. This ensures real-
time visibility of system performance, early identification of emerging risks, and the ability
to take corrective action where required.
Overall, the programme is designed as a controlled and phased transformation, with clear
dependencies, defined enablers and strong governance. Risks are fully aligned to the case
for change and delivery model set out in the business case, and mitigating actions are
embedded within programme delivery.
The combination of:
• phased implementation
• conditional financial transfer
• investment in community capacity
• and robust governance and oversight
provides a high level of assurance that risks can be effectively managed, and that the
programme can be delivered safely while improving patient outcomes, system
performance and long-term financial sustainability.
In addition to the above it is proposed that each organisation via their structures will be
accountable for the delivery of their element and trajectories identified in the programme.
This will include a performance objective for the responsible Director and through the line.
Full details outlining roles and responsibilities is set out within Appendix 4.

Page 34

Page 22 of 24 
10.0 Conclusion 
NHS Ayrshire and Arran continues to experience sustained and escalating system
pressure, with overcrowding across both emergency departments and inpatient wards now
a persistent feature of daily operations. This is resulting in an increasing number of
patients being cared for in non-standard care environments, including corridor spaces and
surge areas, which fundamentally compromises privacy, dignity and the ability to deliver
safe, person-centred care.
Patients who remain in these environments, or who experience prolonged stays in hospital
due to delayed discharge, are exposed to avoidable harm, including deconditioning,
increased risk of falls, infection, and loss of independence. These impacts are most
acutely felt by older people and those with complex needs, who represent a significant
proportion of the current inpatient population. The current model is therefore not only
operationally unsustainable, but also clinically and ethically unsatisfactory.
The position is further compounded by the number of individuals who remain in hospital for
extended periods despite being clinically ready for discharge. For these patients, hospital
is no longer the most appropriate setting for care. This raises important considerations in
relation to:
• safeguarding individual rights and wellbeing
• avoiding unnecessary institutionalisation
• ensuring timely access to appropriate care and support in the community
• supporting people to live as independently as possible, in line with a Home First
approach
Extended delays in discharge represent a system failure to meet these responsibilities,
with individuals experiencing prolonged hospital stays due to capacity and process
constraints rather than clinical need. This underlines the urgency of shifting to a model that
enables timely, safe and person-centred transitions of care.
Phase 1 of the Unscheduled Care Programme has provided important insight and has
enabled progress in targeted areas; however, the non-recurring nature of the funding has
limited the scale, pace and sustainability of improvement. As a result, the programme has
not yet delivered the system-level change required to reduce length of stay, eliminate
delays, or relieve pressure on acute services.
Approval of a combined Phase 1 and Phase 2 approach is therefore essential. This will:
• secure the recurring investment required to sustain and stabilise Phase 1
• enable rapid progression to Phase 2, delivering transformation at the scale required
• support immediate mobilisation to meet the September and December 2026
trajectories
• establish a whole-system Transfer of Care model, aligned to Discharge Without
Delay and Home First principles

Page 35

Page 23 of 24 
Central to this transformation is the planned and phased reduction of acute bed capacity,
including ward closures, enabled by:
• demonstrable improvements in flow and discharge performance
• expansion of community and intermediate care capacity
• strengthened partnership working across Acute Services and HSCPs
This will be accompanied by a phased transfer of resources from acute services to
HSCPs, ensuring that investment follows the patient and supports the shift in the balance
of care. This approach will enable the system to move from a position of reactive, high-
cost acute provision to a more sustainable, preventative and community-focused model.
While this business case focuses on Phases 1 and 2, it is recognised that further
transformation will be required to deliver full system sustainability. This will be progressed
through Phase 3 of the programme, which will set out the longer-term investment and
service redesign required across the wider system.
Critically, this programme is not solely about performance improvement or financial
sustainability. It is about restoring the quality, safety and dignity of care for patients,
ensuring that:
• patients are treated in appropriate care environments
• unnecessary hospital stays are avoided
• discharge is timely, planned and supported
• care is delivered as close to home as possible
Without approval and immediate mobilisation, the organisation will be unable to deliver the
required trajectories, and the risks associated with overcrowding, delayed discharge and
poor patient experience will continue to escalate.
This business case therefore sets out a clear, phased and deliverable plan to address
current system pressures, improve outcomes and experiences for patients and staff, and
establish a sustainable whole-system model of care for the future
11. Recommendation
It is recommended that the Board:
1. Approve the full programme of investment and delivery across Phase 1 and Phase
2 of the Unscheduled Care Programme, recognising that:
• Phase 1 requires confirmation and approval of recurring funding to sustain
and stabilise existing improvements
• Phase 2 requires approval to proceed at pace and scale to deliver the
planned whole-system transformation and associated performance
trajectories

Page 36

Page 24 of 24 
2. Approve the transition to a whole-system Transfer of Care model, enabling delivery
of a Home First approach through:
• Expansion of community-based capacity
• Embedding Discharge to Assess (D2A) and Discharge Without Delay (DWD)
principles
• Strengthened integration between Acute Services and HSCPs.
• The planned and controlled reduction in acute bed capacity, including ward
closures
• Demonstrable establishment of sustainable community capacity
3. Note that delivery of the September and December 2026 performance trajectories is
contingent upon immediate approval and mobilisation, including:
• Implementation commencing from early July 2026
• Timely recruitment and service mobilisation across Phase 1 and Phase 2
• Coordinated system-wide execution
4. Support the governance and assurance arrangements outlined within the business
case, including oversight of:
• Phased delivery and associated risks
• Financial performance and resource transfer
• Achievement of agreed outcomes and benefit