Agenda Document Pack - Cabinet - 18/02/2025
North Ayrshire Council · 18 February 2025
Back to Cabinet — 18 February 2025 and its agenda
Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.
Page 1
North Ayrshire Council, Cunninghame House, Irvine KA12 8EE Cabinet A Meeting of the Cabinet of North Ayrshire Council will be held in the Council Chambers, Ground Floor, Cunninghame House, Irvine, KA12 8EE on Tuesday, 18 February 2025 at 14:30 to consider the undernoted business. Meeting Arrangements - Hybrid Meetings This meeting will be held on a predominantly physical basis but with provision, by prior notification, for remote attendance by Elected Members in accordance with the provisions of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 2003. Where possible, the meeting will be live-streamed and available to view at https://north-ayrshire.public- i.tv/core/portal/home. 1 Declarations of Interest Members are requested to give notice of any declarations of interest in respect of items of business on the Agenda. 2 Minutes The accuracy of the minutes of meeting of the Cabinet held on 21 January 2025 will be confirmed and the Minutes signed in accordance with Paragraph 7 (1) of Schedule 7 of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 (copy enclosed). Reports by the Chief Executive 3 Petition - 'Save Saltcoats and Ardrossan Libraries from Budget Cuts' Submit a report by the Head of Democratic Services to advise of the outcome of consideration by the Audit and Scrutiny Committee of a petition in relation to Saltcoats and Ardrossan Libraries (copy enclosed). 1
Page 2
North Ayrshire Council, Cunninghame House, Irvine KA12 8EE 4 Petition - 'Possible Parking Charge Enforcement in Kilwinning' Submit a report by the Head of Democratic Services to advise of the outcome of consideration by the Audit and Scrutiny Committee of a petition in relation to possible parking charge enforcement in Kilwinning (copy enclosed). 5 Petition - 'Possible Closure of Dreghorn Library' Submit a report by the Head of Democratic Services to advise of the outcome of consideration by the Audit and Scrutiny Committee of a petition in relation to Dreghorn Library (copy enclosed). 6 Petition - 'Proposed Closure of Beith Library' Submit a report by the Head of Democratic Services to advise of the outcome of consideration by the Audit and Scrutiny Committee of a petition in relation to Beith Library (copy enclosed). 7 Petition - “Proposal to Cut the Eglinton Park Rangers Service and Closure of the Community Garden” Submit a report by the Head of Democratic Services to advise of the outcome of consideration by the Audit and Scrutiny Committee of a petition in relation to Eglinton Park rangers service and community garden (copy enclosed). Reports by the Executive Director (Communities and Housing) 8 Proposals for Community Investment Fund (CIF) Expenditure Submit a report by the Executive Director (Communities and Housing) to determine applications by Locality Partnerships to allocate CIF funding to proposed projects (copy enclosed). 9 Community Asset Transfer – Brisbane Centre Submit a report by the Executive Director (Communities and Housing) seeking approval for the transfer of ownership of the Brisbane Centre, Bath Street, Largs, KA30 8BL to the Clyde Coast and Cumbrae Men’s Shed (copy enclosed). Reports by the Executive Director (Education) 10 Public Conveniences Submit a report by the Executive Director (Education) to provide advice in relation to the provision of public conveniences following a series of recent engagement (copy enclosed). Reports by the Executive Director (Place) 2
Page 3
North Ayrshire Council, Cunninghame House, Irvine KA12 8EE 11 UK Shared Prosperity Fund 2025/26 Submit a report by the Executive Director (Place) to provide an update on the UK Shared Prosperity Fund (SPF) and seeking approval for the proposed approach to the additional year of funding for 2025/26 (copy enclosed). 12 Urgent Items Any other items which the Chair considers to be urgent. Exclusion of the Public - Para 9 Resolve in terms of Section 50(A)4 of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973, to exclude from the Meeting the press and the public for the following item of business on the grounds indicated in terms of Paragraph 9 of Part 1 of Schedule 7A of the Act. Non Disclosure of Information In terms of Standing Order 21 (Disclosure of Information), the information contained within the following report is confidential information within the meaning of Section 50A of the 1973 Act and shall not be disclosed to any person by any Member or Officer. 13 Lease to a Nominated Party: Lease of two areas of Cunninghame House to Airwave Solutions Limited Submit a report by the Executive Director (Place) to seeking approval to lease an area within the Lift Motor Room and an area at roof level of Cunninghame House to Airwave Solutions Limited, to enable the relocation of telecommunications equipment and associated aerial from Bridgegate House (copy enclosed). 14 Disposal of the former Greenwood Conference Centre, Greenwood Gate, Irvine KA11 4GZ Submit a report by the Executive Director (Place) to provide an update on the outcome of the marketing exercise and offers received at the Closing Date in respect of the former Greenwood Conference Centre, Greenwood Gate, Irvine KA11 4GZ (copy enclosed). 3
Page 4
North Ayrshire Council, Cunninghame House, Irvine KA12 8EE Webcasting Please note: this meeting may be filmed/recorded/live-streamed to the Council's internet site and available to view at https://north-ayrshire.public- i.tv/core/portal/home, where it will be capable of repeated viewing. At the start of the meeting, the Provost/Chair will confirm if all or part of the meeting is being filmed/recorded/live-streamed. You should be aware that the Council is a Data Controller under the Data Protection Act 2018. Data collected during the webcast will be retained in accordance with the Council’s published policy, including, but not limited to, for the purpose of keeping historical records and making those records available via the Council’s internet site. Generally, the press and public will not be filmed. However, by entering the Council Chambers and using the press or public seating area, you acknowledge that you may be filmed and that any information pertaining to you contained in the video and oral recording of the meeting will be used for webcasting or training purposes and for the purpose of keeping historical records and making those records available to the public. In making this use of your information the Council is processing data which is necessary for the performance of a task carried out in the public interest. If you have any queries regarding this and, in particular, if you believe that use and/or storage of any particular information would cause, or be likely to cause, substantial damage or distress to any individual, please contact dataprotectionofficer@north-ayrshire.gov.uk 4
Page 5
North Ayrshire Council, Cunninghame House, Irvine KA12 8EE Cabinet Sederunt Marie Burns (Chair) Shaun Macaulay (Vice-Chair) Tony Gurney Alan Hill Margaret Johnson Christina Larsen Chair: Apologies: Attending: 5
Page 6
6
Page 7
Cabinet 21 January 2025 IRVINE, 21 January 2025 - At a Meeting of the Cabinet of North Ayrshire Council at 2.30 p.m. Present (Physical Participation) Marie Burns, Tony Gurney, Alan Hill, and for consideration of Education Authority Business Elizabeth Turbet and Jacqui McKenzie. In Attendance C. Hatton, Chief Executive; S. Anson, Executive Director; and A. McClelland, Head of Education (Education); D. Hammond, Executive Director; and F. Ellis, Senior Manager (Housing Strategy and Development) (Communities and Housing); C. Cameron, Director (Health and Social Care Partnership); L. Kirk, Head of Economic Development, Growth and Regeneration (Place); M. Boyd, Head of Finance; and D. Forbes, Senior Manager (Strategic Business Partner) (Finance); A. Craig, Head of Democratic Services; I. Hardy, Senior Manager; and A. Hale, Team Manager (Policy and Performance) (Policy, Performance and Democracy); L. Jolly, Communications Officer (Public Relations); and S. Wilson, Committee Services Officer (Democratic Services) (Corporate Services). Apologies Margaret Johnson, Christina Larsen, Shaun Macaulay and Andrew Bruce. Chair Marie Burns in the Chair. 1. Declarations of Interest There were no declarations of interest by Members in terms of Standing Order 11 and Section 5 of the Code of Conduct for Councillors. 2. Minutes The Minutes of the Meeting of the Cabinet held on 3 December 2024 were confirmed and the Minutes signed in accordance with Paragraph 7 (1) of Schedule 7 of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973. 3. School Attendance Analysis Report 2023-24 Submitted a report by the Executive Director (Education) providing a summary analysis of school attendance statistics and trends in North Ayrshire and an update on current and future planned activity to improve attendance and reduce persistent absence. Officers responded to Members’ questions and the Cabinet agreed to note the contents of the report; and to receive further updates, for example through the Standards and Quality Report and through a subsequent separate annual attendance report, as necessary. Agenda Item 2 7
Page 8
4. Our Council Plan Six Monthly Progress Report 1 April to 30 September 2024 Submitted a report by the Head of Democratic Services for approval of Our Council Plan Six Monthly Progress Report 1 April to 30 September 2024 attached at Appendix 1 to the report. Officers responded to Members’ questions and the Cabinet agreed to approve Our Council Plan Six Monthly Progress Report 1 April to 30 September 2024 attached at Appendix 1 to the report, which was presented to the Audit and Scrutiny Committee for consideration on 23 January 2025. 5. Ayrshire Shared British Sign Language (BSL) Local Plan 2018 – 2024 Final Report and Ayrshire Shared BSL Operational Plan 2024-2030 Submitted a report by the Head of Democratic Services for approval of the Ayrshire Shared British Sign Language (BSL) 2018 – 2024 Final Report and the Ayrshire Shared BSL Operational Plan 2024-2030 attached at Appendix 1 and 2, respectively, to the report. Officers responded to Members’ questions and the Cabinet agreed to approve the Operational Plan and Final Report attached at Appendix 1 and 2, respectively, to the report. 6. Capital Programme Performance to 30 November 2024 Submitted a report by the Head of Finance advising of progress in delivering the Capital Investment Programme 2024/25. The Cabinet agreed to note (a) the revisions to budgets outlined in the report; (b) (i) the General Services and HRA revised budgets at 30 November 2024; and (ii) the forecast expenditure to 31 March 2025; and (c) the estimated performance against the Prudential Indicators set out in the Treasury Management and Investment Strategy. 7. Revenue Budget 2024/25: Financial Performance to 30 November 2024 Submitted a report by the Head of Finance advising of the financial performance for the Council at 30 November 2024. Officers responded to Members’ questions and the Cabinet agreed to (a) note (i) the information and financial projections outlined in the report; (ii) the latest financial projection for the Health and Social Care Partnership highlighted at 2.6; and (b) approve the virements detailed in Appendix 8 to the report. 8. Local Housing Strategy 2023 – 2028 Progress Update Submitted a report by the Executive Director (Communities and Housing) providing an annual update on progress of the Local Housing Strategy 2023-2028 attached at Appendix 1 to the report and seeking approval for the update to be submitted to Scottish Government. Officers responded to Members’ questions and the Cabinet agreed to (a) note the content of the report and progress against the Local Housing Strategy Action Plan; and (b) approve (i) the addition of the action detailed in Appendix 2 to the report; and (ii) submission of the Local Housing Strategy update to the Scottish Government. 8
Page 9
9. Urgent Items There were no urgent items. The meeting ended at 3:30 p.m The full meeting proceedings can be viewed at https://north-ayrshire.public-i.tv/core/portal/home 9
Page 10
10
Page 11
ropo NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL 18 February 2025 Cabinet Title: Petition: “Save Saltcoats and Ardrossan Libraries from Budget Cuts” Purpose: To advise Cabinet of the outcome of consideration by the Audit and Scrutiny Committee of a petition in relation to Saltcoats and Ardrossan Libraries. Recommendation: Cabinet is recommended to refer the petition to a meeting of Council for consideration as part of the Council’s budget engagement and budget setting process for the coming year. 1. Executive Summary 1.1 At a meeting of the Audit and Scrutiny Committee on 23 January 2025, Members considered a report by the Head of Service (Democratic) on the terms of a petition received in relation to “saving Saltcoats and Ardrossan Libraries from Budget Cuts”. 1.2 The petitioners and Executive Director (Communities and Housing) were heard at the Committee and it was agreed that the terms of the petition be accepted and a recommendation made to Cabinet that the petition be considered as part of the Council’s budget engagement and budget setting process for the coming year. 2. Background 2.1 The report presented to Audit and Scrutiny Committee on 23 January, setting out the terms of the petition, is attached as Appendix 1 and is also outlined below:- “Our libraries are more than just buildings filled with books; they are vital community hubs where learning and imagination flourish. For our children, they serve as safe havens to explore their curiosity, develop their literacy skills and grow their confidence. The amazing staff at Ardrossan and Saltcoats libraries—Anne, Jean, Richard, and Yvette—provide invaluable support and resources to everyone in the community. With the proposed cuts opening hours will now be cut by 50% and the staffing will be dropped from 4 amazing people to 2 who will be spread across both libraries. The libraries offer a multitude of classes/groups including but not limited to Bookbug, Football memories, Crafting Group, Book group, ESOL group, hearing aid clinic, school visits and many more. As well as organised groups the library is also a community safe space where you can visit with no obligation to spend a penny. It is a place to meet, chat, explore and learn. Reducing hours and making cuts would be a devastating blow to these essential services and result in 2 dedicated staff members losing their jobs. Agenda Item 3 11
Page 12
Let's ensure that our libraries remain open and fully operational for future generations. Sign this petition to protect our community's lifeline!” 2.2 The principal spokespersons outlined their objections to the proposal and highlighted the following points:- • The library facilities were a valuable and vital community resource and, in particular, allowed parents, and others, to meet up and form friendships (while promoting wellbeing and a sense of community) and also participate in programmes and activities which were considered essential particularly during a cost-of-living crisis. The proposed closure of Saltcoats Library and the reduction of hours in Ardrossan Library would adversely impact on this; • Combatting adult loneliness and isolation through the promotion of positive mental health, achievement and sense of community; • The central location of Saltcoats Library, allowing ease of access to the local community and the possible reduction in footfall for local traders if any closure went ahead; • The benefits of encouraging digital and computer use, in the local community and promoting equality of access; and • The vitality of the libraries, in positively stimulating the minds of service users, and their significant contribution and great use by the local community, and the potential loss of all these benefits, if these proposals were to go ahead. 2.3 Having heard from the petitioners, the Executive Director (Communities and Housing) was heard in answer to Members’ questions and in clarification of certain matters raised in the petition correspondence, particularly in relation to the point that no decisions had been made in relation to these budget consultation proposals. In this respect, a briefing note by the Head of Service (Connected Communities) was appended to the original report to the Audit and Scrutiny Committee (attached as Appendix 1 hereto). 2.4 The Audit and Scrutiny Committee agreed to accept the petition and recommended to Cabinet that the petition is considered as part of the Council’s budget engagement and budget setting process for the coming year. 3. Proposals 3.1 That Cabinet considers the recommendation of the Audit & Scrutiny Committee for the petition to be considered as part of the Council’s budget engagement and budget setting process for the coming year. 4. Implications/Socio-economic Duty Financial 4.1 None arising from this report. Human Resources 4.2 None arising from this report. Legal 4.3 None arising from this report. 12
Page 13
Equality/Socio-economic 4.4 None arising from this report. Climate Change and Carbon 4.5 None arising from this report. Key Priorities 4.6 None arising from this report. Community Wealth Building 4.7 None arising from this report. 5. Consultation 5.1 This report follows as a result of the budget engagement process with communities. Aileen Craig Head of Service (Democratic) For further information please contact Craig Stewart, Committee Services Officer, on 01294 324130 or by email, craigstewart@north-ayrshire.gov.uk Background Papers Audit and Scrutiny Committee Minute – 23 January 2025 13
Page 14
NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL 23 January 2025 Audit and Scrutiny Committee Title: Petition: “Save Saltcoats and Ardrossan Libraries from Budget Cuts” Purpose: To advise the Committee of the terms of a petition regarding “saving Saltcoats and Ardrossan Libraries from Budget Cuts”. Recommendation: That the Committee considers the terms of the petition and agrees, or otherwise, to make a recommendation to Cabinet. 1. Executive Summary 1.1 In terms of the Scheme of Administration, the Audit and Scrutiny Committee has a remit: “To receive all petitions and deputations submitted to the Council except those relating to the Council’s planning functions, which shall be considered by the Planning Committee. The arrangements for receiving petitions are as set out in Appendix B to the Standing Orders relating to Meetings and Proceedings of the Council and Committees”. 1.2 This report sets out the background to the receipt by the Council of 1,285 signatories on an online petition, together with a paper copy containing some 65 signatories, addressed to the Chief Executive concerning “saving Saltcoats and Ardrossan Libraries from Budget Cuts” which was acknowledged as a valid petition in terms of the Council’s Deputations and Petitions Procedure on 4 December 2024. 2. Background 2.1 The wording of the petition is detailed below: “Our libraries are more than just buildings filled with books; they are vital community hubs where learning and imagination flourish. For our children, they serve as safe havens to explore their curiosity, develop their literacy skills and grow their confidence. The amazing staff at Ardrossan and Saltcoats libraries—Anne, Jean, Richard, and Yvette—provide invaluable support and resources to everyone in the community. With the proposed cuts opening hours will now be cut by 50% and the staffing will be dropped from 4 amazing people to 2 who will be spread across both libraries. The libraries offer a multitude of classes/groups including but not limited to Bookbug, Football memories, Crafting Group, Book group, ESOL group, hearing aid clinic, school visits and many more. As well as organised groups the library is also a community safe space where you can visit with no obligation to spend a penny. It is a place to meet, chat, explore and learn. Reducing hours and making cuts would be a devastating blow to these essential services and result in 2 dedicated staff members Appendix 1 14
Page 15
losing their jobs. Let's ensure that our libraries remain open and fully operational for future generations. Sign this petition to protect our community's lifeline!” 2.2 There is provision in Standing Orders for accepting petitions relating to decisions that the Council is about to take. 2.3 The Head of Service (Connected Communities) has provided a briefing note on the background to this matter, which is detailed at Appendix 1 to the report (copy of briefing note to follow). 2.4 In terms of the procedure for petitions and deputations set out in Standing Orders, representatives of the petitioners have been invited to attend the meeting to address the Committee. Spokespersons should be restricted to addressing the specific points raised in their petition. 2.5 The spokespersons have, collectively, 10 minutes to address the Committee. This may be extended at the discretion of the Chair. 2.6 Once the Committee has heard from the spokespersons for the petitioners, the Chair will invite Members of the Committee to ask questions of the spokespersons. 2.7 While it is for the Chair to decide the stage at which officers should speak to their briefing, previous Committee practice has been for the Cabinet Member or Officer to speak to this after the Committee has heard from the petitioners. The Cabinet Member or Officer will then respond to any questions that Members of the Committee may have. In this case, as no decision has yet been made by Council, no Cabinet Member will address the committee. After the submissions and questions have been heard by the committee the parties will be given to opportunity to sum up prior to the committee taking its decision. 3. Proposals 3.1 It is proposed that the Committee considers the terms of the petition and agrees, or otherwise, to make a recommendation to Cabinet. 4. Implications/Socio-economic Duty Financial 4.1 No direct financial implications arising from this report. Human Resources 4.2 None arising from this report. Legal 4.3 None arising from this report. Equality/Socio-economic 4.4 None arising from this report. 15
Page 16
Climate Change and Carbon 4.5 None arising from this report. Key Priorities 4.6 None arising from this report. Community Wealth Building 4.7 None arising from this report. 5. Consultation 5.1 The Head of Service (Connected Communities) has been consulted and made aware of the terms of the petition and has provided a briefing note which is attached as Appendix 1 to the report. Aileen Craig Head of Service (Democratic) For further information please contact Craig Stewart, Committee Services Officer, on 01294 324130 Background Papers Correspondence with lead petitioner 16
Page 17
Petition: Save Saltcoats and Ardrossan Libraries from Budget Cuts Briefing Background At the North Ayrshire Council meeting of 28th February 2024 the following saving was approved: Reduction of libraries opening hours by 20% and review all supplies and operational budgets. The proposal also includes a re-designed school library service.' The total saving decided was £438,437, with 9.5 FTE staffing posts impacted. Approach and Rationale Detailed proposals were developed to deliver the 20% reduction in hours across the public library estate, taking into account the following: • The existing locality library hub model, and future land and property transformation options • The range of services provided at each individual library, including additional services such as employability, banking etc. at certain locations • Customer Management System information and footfall information from individual branches • Community usage at each individual library • Additional demands to align staffing and ensure delivery of core services • Options to mitigate impacts upon the community including keyholding by groups. Staff helped create the initial draft plans, involving their local intelligence to assist in making small changes to the plans that had a big impact locally. A key consideration was the provision of contracts which provided meaningful employment hours for staff which were aligned to role profile responsibilities and working arrangements. In the overall planning, other key considerations were island proofing service delivery, and delivering on 'Forward - Scotland's Public Library Strategy'. The proposed future delivery model takes into consideration potential future needs, e.g. considering a locality based model of delivery with fewer buildings but a greater focus on the remaining buildings being locality hubs and the services which could be provided within them. Engagement has taken or will take place with stakeholders including staff, trade unions and elected members, The aim has been to design a service which meets community needs within the available financial envelope. As part of this individual discussions will take place with user groups to discuss how the changes may affect Appendix 1 them and what we can do to assist them mitigate any changes through co-design 17
Page 18
principles Summary of Revised Opening Times The revised opening times have been planned at locality basis, meaning that the average reduction in opening times across the branches totalled 20%. This approach allowed for opening hours to compliment those in nearby branches to ease the impact on the public. It also allowed for locality staff teams to cover the different branches, ensuring continuity of service and more meaningful contracts to the staff working there. As seen below, the reduction for the two libraries mentioned in this petition is a total of 16 opening hours, while the main locality library in Stevenston, which also serves as a staffing base, will have unchanged opening hours. The reduction across the locality will be from 78 to 62 hours of library service. This does not include any use of the facilities by groups who are part of keyholding arrangements. Locality Branch Current Proposed 3 Towns Ardrossan 24 16 Saltcoats 24 16 Stevenston 30 30 Rhonda Leith Head of Service (Connected Communities) 17th January 2025 18
Page 19
ropo NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL 18 February 2025 Cabinet Title: Petition: “Possible parking charge enforcement in Kilwinning” Purpose: To advise Cabinet of the outcome of consideration by the Audit and Scrutiny Committee of a petition in relation to possible parking charge enforcement in Kilwinning. Recommendation: Cabinet is recommended to refer the petition to a meeting of Council for consideration as part of the Council’s budget engagement and budget setting process for the coming year. 1. Executive Summary 1.1 At a meeting of the Audit and Scrutiny Committee on 23 January 2025, Members considered a report by the Head of Service (Democratic) on the terms of a petition received in relation to “Possible parking charge enforcement in Kilwinning”. 1.2 The petitioners and Head of Service (Neighbourhood Services) were heard at the Committee and it was agreed that the terms of the petition be accepted and a recommendation made to Cabinet that the petition be considered as part of the Council’s budget engagement and budget setting process for the coming year. 2. Background 2.1 The report presented to Audit and Scrutiny Committee on 23 January, setting out the terms of the petition, is attached as Appendix 1 and is also outlined below:- “Please find enclosed a petition on behalf of Dino and Sons, supported by our customers, expressing unanimous opposition to the potential introduction of parking charges in North Ayrshire. This petition represents not only the concerns of our business but also those of the wider community, who stand firmly against any new financial burdens placed on local residents and workers. As you are aware, the cost of living crisis continues to escalate at an alarming rate, with no relief in sight for your constituents. Unfortunately, this marks the second time in as many years that Kilwinning’s Main Street has faced the threat of parking charges, which would impose yet another financial strain on families already struggling to make ends meet. These charges would affect workers trying to support their families, local households, and even those seeking essential healthcare. We understand that North Ayrshire Council has received over 4,400 responses to your recent budget engagement exercise. Rather than organizing a collective petition with local businesses and residents, we decided to take a different approach. From our shop on Kilwinning Main Street, Dino and Sons, we have gathered over 1,000 Agenda Item 4 19
Page 20
signatures from our loyal customers who strongly oppose these proposed charges. In addition, an online survey conducted via our Facebook page has yielded over 800 additional objections. We urge the Council to take these voices into account and reconsider the introduction of parking charges. Over 1,100 written submissions from our customers, along with over 800 online signatures from the broader public, clearly show that these charges are not acceptable. The question is not only whether it is fair to impose such fees but whether it is justifiable to ask constituents to pay for the basic necessities of life – such as food, healthcare, and the right to park at their homes. We sincerely hope that the Council will take heed of these concerns and protect the livelihoods of those already facing significant economic challenges. A few quotes from our invaluable customers on the subject of Parking Charges in Kilwinning’s Main Street: 1. If I just want broccoli, instead of costing 69p, that would have cost me more than double just to park my car, doesn’t this council care about the cost of living crisis? 2. Picking on the easy targets, why don’t they charge retail parks instead? 3. Myself and friends often enjoy wee day trips to Kilwinning from Neilston, visiting shops and stay for lunch. It’s one of the last streets anywhere that has independent family bakers, fruit and veg, butchers and even has clothes shops, gift shops, your council should be helping it all it can instead of the constant parking charge threats. 4. I come here from Kilmarnock, our council destroyed the high st, now there’s no food shops left. Can’t believe your council is willing to sacrifice a great wee town due to taxing shopkeepers and its customers. 5. I depend on Dino’s delivering my shopping every Saturday – it’s a disgrace the council’s threatening the only way I can get what I want and not at the unaffordable quantities supermarkets want me to buy. 6. Feels like they are trying to turn my street into a ghost town. 7. Council’s booking everyone generating cash, enough is enough trying to kill off the street, parking charges=death sentence for this street. We have also included a video taken a few weeks ago showing clearly why there is zero credence to any claims that there is nowhere to park in Kilwinning’s Carparks – with more than ample spaces available to park whether college is open or closed: ” 2.2 The principal spokesperson outlined their objections to the proposal and highlighted the following points:- • Imposition of parking charges on shoppers, workers and traders of Kilwinning’s main street and the adverse effects this would have in term of footfall in the local area; • Extremely difficult trading conditions, given the current cost-of-living crisis, and the struggle for local businesses to remain open; • Transfer of the land at the Oxenward car park through a Compulsory Purchase Order to the former Cunninghame District Council (which was supported by the shop owners 20
Page 21
and residents) on the condition that the land would be used to support the growth of Kilwinning and therefore the importance of honouring that commitment and protecting the community from additional financial burdens; • That, in light of the above, Kilwinning main street should be freed from the unnecessary strain of any proposed car parking charges; • The adverse effect on the local community of the parking charges, and the financial strain on families trying to make ends meet; and • The potential reduction in footfall in Kilwinning main street, if the imposition of parking charges was to go ahead, regardless of the amount “not just £2”, which could exacerbate difficult trading conditions which have already resulted in recent business closures on the Main Street. 2.3 Having heard from the petitioners, the Head of Service (Neighbourhood Services) was heard in answer to Members’ questions and in clarification of certain matters raised in the petition correspondence, particularly in relation to the point that no decisions had been made in relation to these budget consultation proposals. In this respect, a briefing note by the Head of Service (Neighbourhood Services) was appended to the original report to the Audit and Scrutiny Committee (attached as Appendix 1 hereto). 2.4 The Audit and Scrutiny Committee agreed to accept the petition and recommended to Cabinet that the petition is considered as part of the Council’s budget engagement and budget setting process for the coming year. 3. Proposals 3.1 That Cabinet considers the recommendation of the Audit & Scrutiny Committee for the petition to be considered as part of the Council’s budget engagement and budget setting process for the coming year. 4. Implications/Socio-economic Duty Financial 4.1 None arising from this report. Human Resources 4.2 None arising from this report. Legal 4.3 None arising from this report. Equality/Socio-economic 4.4 None arising from this report. Climate Change and Carbon 4.5 None arising from this report. Key Priorities 4.6 None arising from this report. 21
Page 22
Community Wealth Building 4.7 None arising from this report. 5. Consultation 5.1 This report follows as a result of the budget engagement process with communities. Aileen Craig Head of Service (Democratic) For further information please contact Craig Stewart, Committee Services Officer, on 01294 324130 or by email, craigstewart@north-ayrshire.gov.uk Background Papers Audit and Scrutiny Committee Minute – 23 January 2025 22
Page 23
NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL 23 January 2025 Audit and Scrutiny Committee Title: Petition: Possible parking charge enforcement in Kilwinning Purpose: To advise the Committee of the terms of a petition regarding “possible parking charge enforcement in Kilwinning”. Recommendation: That the Committee considers the terms of the petition and agrees, or otherwise, to make a recommendation to Cabinet. 1. Executive Summary 1.1 In terms of the Scheme of Administration, the Audit and Scrutiny Committee has a remit: “To receive all petitions and deputations submitted to the Council except those relating to the Council’s planning functions, which shall be considered by the Planning Committee. The arrangements for receiving petitions are as set out in Appendix B to the Standing Orders relating to Meetings and Proceedings of the Council and Committees”. 1.2 This report sets out the background to the receipt by the Council of 1276 signatories on a petition addressed to the Chief Executive in relation to “possible parking charge enforcement in Kilwinning” which was acknowledged as a valid petition in terms of the Council’s Deputations and Petitions Procedure on 7 January 2025. Separately, in the petition correspondence there is reference within (and annotated below) to an online survey in their Facebook page, comprising of “over 800 additional objections.” 2. Background 2.1 The wording of the petition is detailed below: “Please find enclosed a petition on behalf of Dino and Sons, supported by our customers, expressing unanimous opposition to the potential introduction of parking charges in North Ayrshire. This petition represents not only the concerns of our business but also those of the wider community, who stand firmly against any new financial burdens placed on local residents and workers. As you are aware, the cost of living crisis continues to escalate at an alarming rate, with no relief in sight for your constituents. Unfortunately, this marks the second time in as many years that Kilwinning’s Main Street has faced the threat of parking charges, which would impose yet another financial strain on families already struggling to make ends meet. These charges would affect workers trying to support their families, local households, and even those seeking essential healthcare. We understand that North Ayrshire Council has received over 4,400 responses to your recent budget engagement exercise. Rather than organizing a collective petition Appendix 1 23
Page 24
with local businesses and residents, we decided to take a different approach. From our shop on Kilwinning Main Street, Dino and Sons, we have gathered over 1,000 signatures from our loyal customers who strongly oppose these proposed charges. In addition, an online survey conducted via our Facebook page has yielded over 800 additional objections. We urge the Council to take these voices into account and reconsider the introduction of parking charges. Over 1,100 written submissions from our customers, along with over 800 online signatures from the broader public, clearly show that these charges are not acceptable. The question is not only whether it is fair to impose such fees but whether it is justifiable to ask constituents to pay for the basic necessities of life – such as food, healthcare, and the right to park at their homes. We sincerely hope that the Council will take heed of these concerns and protect the livelihoods of those already facing significant economic challenges. A few quotes from our invaluable customers on the subject of Parking Charges in Kilwinning’s Main Street: 1. If I just want broccoli, instead of costing 69p, that would have cost me more than double just to park my car, doesn’t this council care about the cost of living crisis? 2. Picking on the easy targets, why don’t they charge retail parks instead? 3. Myself and friends often enjoy wee day trips to Kilwinning from Neilston, visiting shops and stay for lunch. It’s one of the last streets anywhere that has independent family bakers, fruit and veg, butchers and even has clothes shops, gift shops, your council should be helping it all it can instead of the constant parking charge threats. 4. I come here from Kilmarnock, our council destroyed the high st, now there’s no food shops left. Can’t believe your council is willing to sacrifice a great wee town due to taxing shopkeepers and its customers. 5. I depend on Dino’s delivering my shopping every Saturday – it’s a disgrace the council’s threatening the only way I can get what I want and not at the unaffordable quantities supermarkets want me to buy. 6. Feels like they are trying to turn my street into a ghost town. 7. Council’s booking everyone generating cash, enough is enough trying to kill off the street, parking charges=death sentence for this street. We have also included a video taken a few weeks ago showing clearly why there is zero credence to any claims that there is nowhere to park in Kilwinning’s Carparks – with more than ample spaces available to park whether college is open or closed: 2.2 There is provision in Standing Orders for accepting petitions relating to decisions that the Council is about to take. 2.3 The Head of Service (Neighbourhood Services) has provided a briefing note on the background to this matter, which is detailed at Appendix 1 to the report. 24
Page 25
2.4 In terms of the procedure for petitions and deputations set out in Standing Orders, representatives of the petitioners have been invited to attend the meeting to address the Committee. Spokespersons should be restricted to addressing the specific points raised in their petition. 2.5 The spokespersons have, collectively, 10 minutes to address the Committee. This may be extended at the discretion of the Chair. 2.6 Once the Committee has heard from the spokespersons for the petitioners, the Chair will invite Members of the Committee to ask questions of the spokespersons. 2.7 While it is for the Chair to decide the stage at which officers should speak to their briefing, previous Committee practice has been for the Cabinet Member or Officer to speak to this after the Committee has heard from the petitioners. The Cabinet Member or Officer will then respond to any questions that Members of the Committee may have. In this case, as no decision has yet been made by Council, no Cabinet Member will address the committee. After the submissions and questions have been heard by the committee the parties will be given to opportunity to sum up prior to the committee taking its decision. 3. Proposals 3.1 It is proposed that the Committee considers the terms of the petition and agrees, or otherwise, to make a recommendation to Cabinet. 4. Implications/Socio-economic Duty Financial 4.1 No direct financial implications arising from this report. Human Resources 4.2 None arising from this report. Legal 4.3 None arising from this report. Equality/Socio-economic 4.4 None arising from this report. Climate Change and Carbon 4.5 None arising from this report. Key Priorities 4.6 None arising from this report. Community Wealth Building 4.7 None arising from this report. 25
Page 26
5. Consultation 5.1 The Head of Service (Neighbourhood Services) has been consulted and made aware of the terms of the petition and has provided a briefing note which is attached as Appendix 1 to the report. Aileen Craig Head of Service (Democratic) For further information please contact Craig Stewart, Committee Services Officer, on 01294 324130 Background Papers Correspondence with lead petitioner 26
Page 27
Appendix 1 Petition against the potential introduction of car parking charges Overview The Council is facing unprecedented financial challenges which may impact on its ability to deliver front line services. An engagement exercise regarding the future budget was carried out in late 2024. This put forward a range of potential savings or ways to generate income and invited the public to feed back on the impact that these would have, should they be implemented. This exercise allowed for early engagement with residents to find out how the 2025/26 budget may affect communities across North Ayrshire. The feedback will help inform any decisions made by the Council. Proposal The engagement exercise included the following proposal around car parking charges: Following the successful introduction of Decriminalised Parking Enforcement (DPE) across North Ayrshire the proposal will introduce charging for car parking at some Council owned car parks across North Ayrshire. The car parks include; Irvine It is proposed to introduce parking charges in 3 town centre car parks at Kirkgate, West Road and East Road. It is also proposed to introduce resident parking permits for residents of Hill Street affected by the introduction of the parking charges. It is proposed that the first permit would be free of charge, and it is suggested that an additional permit should incur an administration fee of £100. It is also proposed to introduce a small number (6 bays) of time limited free (30 mins) free parking at East Road Car Park to assist with short stops required to access local businesses in the town centre. Kilwinning It is proposed to introduce car parking charges in 2 car parks, these being at Almswall Road and at Oxenward. It is proposed that resident parking permits are issued to the residents that are fronting and abutting Almswall Road car park and also the residential properties affected on Almswall Road. It is proposed that the first permit would be free of charge, and that any additional permit should incur an administration fee of £100. It is also proposed that there should be some time limited free patient parking (up to 60 minutes) on Almswall Road for up to 5 vehicles and time limited patient parking at Oxenward Surgery for 2 vehicles (up to 60 minutes). In addition, it is proposed some time limited free parking (up to 60 minutes) in Woodwynd West for up to 6 spaces and Oxenward (Boulevard) for to 2 vehicles to assist with short stops required to access local businesses in the town centre. Saltcoats It is proposed to introduce car parking charges in Vernon Street, and Kirkgate. Residential parking permits are not considered necessary in any of the car parks. Largs There is already car park charges in place at the Seafront Car Park and at Bellman’s Close. It is proposed to introduce further parking charges in the car park at Gateside Street. It is 27
Page 28
proposed to introduce resident parking permits in the Gateside Street car park for residential properties in the immediate vicinity of the car park. It is proposed that the first permit would be free and that any additional permit should incur an administration fee of £100. In addition, it is proposed to introduce time limited free parking in Fraser Street and Morris Street (up to 60 minutes) for visitors. This will remain unlimited to the residents of Fraser Street and Morris Street who have no access to off street parking. Tariffs The proposed car parking tariffs are - Up to 1 hour - £1.50 2 hours - £2.00 4 hours - £3.50 Benefits It is anticipated that through this proposal a more regular flow of car parking availability would be achieved at Council owned car parks and improve accessibility to town centres which should help local businesses. It will also reduce car usage and encourage the use of public transport to help with Climate Change. To help tackle Climate Change, North Ayrshire Council has pledged to become a net zero local authority by 2030. Less car usage and switching to public transport will help contribute to this pledge. Further information The engagement exercise received over 4,000 responses in total, and 38 conversations regarding the proposals were held with different community groups. The feedback regarding all proposals which were part of the engagement exercise is currently being analysed. No decisions have been made regarding any budget savings for the 2025/26 financial year and the results of the engagement will help inform the budget process. Conclusion At this stage we are unsure what proposals may be considered by the Council in order to meet its requirements for a balanced budget. However, the Council will consider the responses to the engagement as part of the budget setting process for 2025/26. North Ayrshire Council will meet on the 26th February 2025 to agree its budget for 2025/26. Thomas Reaney Head of Service (Neighbourhood Services) North Ayrshire Council 14 January 2025 28
Page 29
ropo NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL 18 February 2025 Cabinet Title: Petition: “Possible closure of Dreghorn Library” Purpose: To advise Cabinet of the outcome of consideration by the Audit and Scrutiny Committee of a petition in relation to Dreghorn Library. Recommendation: Cabinet is recommended to refer the petition to a meeting of Council for consideration as part of the Council’s budget engagement and budget setting process for the coming year. 1. Executive Summary 1.1 At a Special meeting of the Audit and Scrutiny Committee on 6 February 2025, Members considered a report by the Head of Service (Democratic) on the terms of a petition received in relation to “possible closure of Dreghorn Library”. 1.2 The petitioners and Head of Service (Connected Communities) were heard at the Committee and it was agreed that the terms of the petition be accepted and a recommendation made to Cabinet that the petition be considered as part of the Council’s budget engagement and budget setting process for the coming year. 2. Background 2.1 The report presented to Audit and Scrutiny Committee on 6 February, setting out the terms of the petition, is attached as Appendix 1 and is also outlined below:- “Purpose: As long time customers of Dreghorn Library, we are deeply saddened by the proposed closure. This institution has been a cornerstone of our community, providing a wide array of educational resources, enhancing literacy and fostering a deep sense of community. Not only will the closure of our local library be a devastating loss to our educational landscape, but it will also leave many without access to critical services, such as Internet and printing access. Libraries are a vital part of communities providing a safe space for people to learn, explore and connect with others. Preserving our local library, is more than just books; it’s about preserving our community and its assets. Please join us in saving our library. Sign our petition today.” 2.2 The principal spokespersons outlined their objections to the proposal and highlighted the following points:- • The library was considered to be an essential hub of the community and was a warm and welcoming place for friends, families, groups and individuals; • The regular events that were hosted, within the library, and the considerable benefits to the local community in terms of being able to access them including book bug, story time and promotion of children’s reading; Agenda Item 5 29
Page 30
• The ongoing cost-of-living pressures, affecting members of the community, and the benefits in being able to access free digital and computer facilities, particularly for the unemployed and potential loss of these benefits if the library was to close; • Combatting adult loneliness and isolation by bringing people together, particularly those who are elderly or vulnerable, while assisting in promoting a sense of community; • The central location of Dreghorn Library, allowing ease of access to the local community of Dreghorn, as well as those in Bourtreehill and Springside; and • The social interaction and mental health benefits and their contribution and significant use by the local community, and the potential loss of all these benefits, if these proposals were to go ahead. 2.4 Having heard from the petitioners, the Head of Service (Connected Communities) was heard in answer to Members’ questions and in clarification of certain matters raised in the petition correspondence, particularly in relation to the point that no decisions had been made in relation to these budget consultation proposals. In this respect, a briefing note by the Head of Service (Connected Communities) was appended to the original report to the Audit and Scrutiny Committee (attached as Appendix 1 hereto). 2.5 The Audit and Scrutiny Committee agreed to accept the petition and recommended to Cabinet that the petition is considered as part of the Council’s budget engagement and budget setting process for the coming year. 3. Proposals 3.1 That Cabinet considers the recommendation of the Audit & Scrutiny Committee for the petition to be considered as part of the Council’s budget engagement and budget setting process for the coming year. 4. Implications/Socio-economic Duty Financial 4.1 None arising from this report. Human Resources 4.2 None arising from this report. Legal 4.3 None arising from this report. Equality/Socio-economic 4.4 None arising from this report. Climate Change and Carbon 4.5 None arising from this report. Key Priorities 30
Page 31
4.6 None arising from this report. Community Wealth Building 4.7 None arising from this report. 5. Consultation 5.1 This report follows as a result of the budget engagement process with communities. Aileen Craig Head of Service (Democratic) For further information please contact Craig Stewart, Committee Services Officer, on 01294 324130 or by email, craigstewart@north-ayrshire.gov.uk Background Papers Audit and Scrutiny Committee Minute (Special) – 6 February 2025 Click here to enter text. 31
Page 32
NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL 6 February 2025 Audit and Scrutiny Committee (Special) Title: Petition: “Possible closure of Dreghorn Library” Purpose: To advise the Committee of the terms of a petition regarding “possible closure of Dreghorn Library”. Recommendation: That the Committee considers the terms of the petition and agrees, or otherwise, to make a recommendation to Cabinet. 1. Executive Summary 1.1 In terms of the Scheme of Administration, the Audit and Scrutiny Committee has a remit: “To receive all petitions and deputations submitted to the Council except those relating to the Council’s planning functions, which shall be considered by the Planning Committee. The arrangements for receiving petitions are as set out in Appendix B to the Standing Orders relating to Meetings and Proceedings of the Council and Committees”. 1.2 This report sets out the background to the receipt by the Council of 776 signatories on a petition addressed to the Chief Executive in relation to “possible closure of Dreghorn Library” which was acknowledged as a valid petition in terms of the Council’s Deputations and Petitions Procedure on 29 November 2024. 1.3 At the meeting of the Audit and Scrutiny Committee on 23 January 2025, Members’ agreed to continue the matter to a Special meeting of the Committee in February, to give the group (who submitted the petition) a further opportunity to attend and speak to their petition should they so wish. 2. Background 2.1 The wording of the petition is detailed below: “Purpose: As long time customers of Dreghorn Library, we are deeply saddened by the proposed closure. This institution has been a cornerstone of our community, providing a wide array of educational resources, enhancing literacy and fostering a deep sense of community. Not only will the closure of our local library be a devastating loss to our educational landscape, but it will also leave many without access to critical services, such as Internet and printing access. Libraries are a vital part of communities providing a safe space for people to learn, explore and connect with others. Preserving our local library, is more than just books; it’s about preserving our community and its assets. Please join us in saving our library. Sign our petition today.” Appendix 1 32
Page 33
2.2 There is provision in Standing Orders for petitions relating to decisions that the Council is about to take. 2.3 The Head of Service (Connected Communities) has provided a briefing note on the background to this matter, which is detailed at Appendix 1 to the report. 2.4 In terms of the procedure for petitions and deputations set out in Standing Orders, representatives of the petitioners have been invited to attend the meeting to address the Committee. Spokespersons should be restricted to addressing the specific points raised in their petition. 2.5 The spokespersons have, collectively, 10 minutes to address the Committee. This may be extended at the discretion of the Chair. 2.6 Once the Committee has heard from the spokespersons for the petitioners, the Chair will invite Members of the Committee to ask questions of the spokespersons. 2.7 While it is for the Chair to decide the stage at which officers should speak to their briefing, previous Committee practice has been for the Cabinet Member or Officer to speak to this after the Committee has heard from the petitioners. The Cabinet Member or Officer will then respond to any questions that Members of the Committee may have. In this case, as no decision has yet been made by Council, no Cabinet Member will address the committee. After the submissions and questions have been heard by the committee the parties will be given to opportunity to sum up prior to the committee taking its decision. 3. Proposals 3.1 It is proposed that the Committee considers the terms of the petition and agrees, or otherwise, to make a recommendation to Cabinet. 4. Implications/Socio-economic Duty Financial 4.1 No direct financial implications arising from this report. Human Resources 4.2 None arising from this report. Legal 4.3 None arising from this report. Equality/Socio-economic 4.4 None arising from this report. Climate Change and Carbon 4.5 None arising from this report. 33
Page 34
Key Priorities 4.6 None arising from this report. Community Wealth Building 4.7 None arising from this report. 5. Consultation 5.1 The Head of Service (Connected Communities) has been consulted and made aware of the terms of the petition and has provided a briefing note which is attached as Appendix 1 to the report. Aileen Craig Head of Service (Democratic) For further information please contact Craig Stewart, Committee Services Officer, on 01294 324130 Background Papers Correspondence with lead petitioner 34
Page 35
Appendix 1 Petition – Possible Closure of Dreghorn Library Overview The Council is facing unprecedented financial challenges which may impact on its ability to deliver front line services. An engagement exercise regarding the future budget was carried out in late 2024. This put forward a range of potential savings or ways to generate income and invited the public to feed back on the impact that these would have, should they be implemented. This exercise allowed for early engagement with residents to find out how the 2025 to 2026 budget may affect communities across North Ayrshire. The feedback can then inform any decisions made by the Council. Proposal The engagement exercise included the following proposal around the library service: This proposal is to retain the following libraries: • North Coast and Cumbrae - Millport, Largs, West Kilbride • Three Towns - Ardrossan, Stevenston • Arran - Brodick and Mobile library • Kilwinning – Kilwinning • Irvine – Irvine • Garnock Valley – Kilbirnie The proposal will involve the closure of the following six branch libraries – Skelmorlie, Fairlie, Dalry, Beith, Saltcoats and Dreghorn. Further information The engagement exercise received over 4,000 responses in total, and 38 conversations regarding the proposals were held with different community groups. The feedback regarding all proposals which were part of the engagement exercise is currently being analysed. No decisions have been made regarding any budget savings for the 2025/26 year and the results of the engagement will help inform any proposals which will be carried forward. Conclusion The Council will consider the responses to the engagement as part of the budget setting process for 2025/26. North Ayrshire Council will meet on 26th February to agree its budget for the following year. Rhonda Leith Head of Service (Connected Communities North Ayrshire Council 10 January 2025 35
Page 36
36
Page 37
ropo NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL 18 February 2025 Cabinet Title: Petition: “Proposed closure of Beith Library” Purpose: To advise Cabinet of the outcome of consideration by the Audit and Scrutiny Committee of a petition in relation to Beith Library. Recommendation: Cabinet is recommended to refer the petition to a meeting of Council for consideration as part of the Council’s budget engagement and budget setting process for the coming year. 1. Executive Summary 1.1 At a Special meeting of the Audit and Scrutiny Committee on 6 February 2025, Members considered a report by the Head of Service (Democratic) on the terms of a petition received in relation to “proposed closure of Beith Library”. 1.2 The petitioners and Head of Service (Connected Communities) were heard at the Committee and it was agreed that the terms of the petition be accepted and a recommendation made to Cabinet that the petition be considered as part of the Council’s budget engagement and budget setting process for the coming year. 2. Background 2.1 The report presented to Audit and Scrutiny Committee on 6 February, setting out the terms of the petition, is attached as Appendix 1 and is also outlined below:- “Please find enclosed the following signatures from the people of Beith who are very concerned at the closure of Beith Library. The people of Beith rely on the various services the library provides for them for all ages in the community. Please can we ask you to pass on this petition to the relevant parties before the February budget meeting. Please do not close this library as it has been at the heart of the community for many years and our town cannot have the eyesore of another empty building.” 2.2 The principal spokespersons outlined their objections to the proposal and highlighted the following points:- • The library offered a safe and easily accessible hub, for all ages, as well as encouraging and fostering community spirit and friendship; Agenda Item 6 37
Page 38
• Combatting adult loneliness and social isolation, especially in the elderly population by bringing the community together through the many social and group activities available within the library, particularly given difficulties of older citizens and those with disabilities in accessing public transport; • The loss of educational facilities if the proposal was to go ahead as it was extensively used by Beith Primary and Nursery children due to its close location and ease of getting there; • The central location of the library, allowing ease of access to the local community and if the closure went ahead, another empty building in the town, the possible reduction in footfall for local traders and the difficulty for residents to access facilities in other locations due to the lack of public transport in the Garnock Valley; • The benefits of encouraging digital and computer use, in the local community particularly those affected by cost-of-living pressures including those using the library facilities for seeking employment opportunities; and • The value of the libraries, in bringing people together through the many group activities on offer, and the potential loss of all these benefits, if this proposal was to proceed. 2.3 Having heard from the petitioners, the Head of Service (Connected Communities) and the Executive Director (Communities and Housing) were heard in answer to Members’ questions and in clarification of certain matters raised in the petition correspondence, particularly in relation to the point that no decisions had been made in relation to these budget consultation proposals. In this respect, a briefing note by the Head of Service (Connected Communities) was appended to the original report to the Audit and Scrutiny Committee (attached as Appendix 1 hereto). 2.4 The Audit and Scrutiny Committee agreed to accept the petition and recommended to Cabinet that the petition is considered as part of the Council’s budget engagement and budget setting process for the coming year. 3. Proposals 3.1 That Cabinet considers the recommendation of the Audit & Scrutiny Committee for the petition to be considered as part of the Council’s budget engagement and budget setting process for the coming year. 4. Implications/Socio-economic Duty Financial 4.1 None arising from this report. Human Resources 4.2 None arising from this report. Legal 4.3 None arising from this report. Equality/Socio-economic 4.4 None arising from this report. 38
Page 39
Climate Change and Carbon 4.5 None arising from this report. Key Priorities 4.6 None arising from this report. Community Wealth Building 4.7 None arising from this report. 5. Consultation 5.1 This report follows as a result of the budget engagement process with communities. Aileen Craig Head of Service (Democratic) For further information please contact Craig Stewart, Committee Services Officer, on 01294 324130 or by email, craigstewart@north-ayrshire.gov.uk Background Papers Audit and Scrutiny Committee Minute (Special) – 6 February 2025 39
Page 40
NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL 6 February 2025 Audit and Scrutiny Committee (Special) Title: Petition: “Proposed closure of Beith Library” Purpose: To advise the Committee of the terms of a petition regarding “proposed closure of Beith Library”. Recommendation: That the Committee considers the terms of the petition and agrees, or otherwise, to make a recommendation to Cabinet. 1. Executive Summary 1.1 In terms of the Scheme of Administration, the Audit and Scrutiny Committee has a remit: “To receive all petitions and deputations submitted to the Council except those relating to the Council’s planning functions, which shall be considered by the Planning Committee. The arrangements for receiving petitions are as set out in Appendix B to the Standing Orders relating to Meetings and Proceedings of the Council and Committees”. 1.2 This report sets out the background to the receipt by the Council of 408 signatories on a petition addressed to the Chief Executive in relation to “proposed closure of Beith Library” which was acknowledged as a valid petition in terms of the Council’s Deputations and Petitions Procedure on 28 January 2025. 2. Background 2.1 The wording of the petition is detailed below: “Please find enclosed the following signatures from the people of Beith who are very concerned at the closure of Beith Library. The people of Beith rely on the various services the library provides for them for all ages in the community. Please can we ask you to pass on this petition to the relevant parties before the February budget meeting. Please do not close this library as it has been at the heart of the community for many years and our town cannot have the eyesore of another empty building.” Appendix 1 40
Page 41
2.2 There is provision in Standing Orders for petitions relating to decisions that the Council is about to take. 2.3 The Head of Service (Connected Communities) has provided a briefing note on the background to this matter, which is detailed at Appendix 1 to the report. 2.4 In terms of the procedure for petitions and deputations set out in Standing Orders, representatives of the petitioners have been invited to attend the meeting to address the Committee. Spokespersons should be restricted to addressing the specific points raised in their petition. 2.5 The spokespersons have, collectively, 10 minutes to address the Committee. This may be extended at the discretion of the Chair. 2.6 Once the Committee has heard from the spokespersons for the petitioners, the Chair will invite Members of the Committee to ask questions of the spokespersons. 2.7 While it is for the Chair to decide the stage at which officers should speak to their briefing, previous Committee practice has been for the Cabinet Member or Officer to speak to this after the Committee has heard from the petitioners. The Cabinet Member or Officer will then respond to any questions that Members of the Committee may have. In this case, as no decision has yet been made by Council, no Cabinet Member will address the committee. After the submissions and questions have been heard by the committee the parties will be given to opportunity to sum up prior to the committee taking its decision. 3. Proposals 3.1 It is proposed that the Committee considers the terms of the petition and agrees, or otherwise, to make a recommendation to Cabinet. 4. Implications/Socio-economic Duty Financial 4.1 No direct financial implications arising from this report. Human Resources 4.2 None arising from this report. Legal 4.3 None arising from this report. Equality/Socio-economic 4.4 None arising from this report. Climate Change and Carbon 4.5 None arising from this report. 41
Page 42
Key Priorities 4.6 None arising from this report. Community Wealth Building 4.7 None arising from this report. 5. Consultation 5.1 The Head of Service (Connected Communities) has been consulted and made aware of the terms of the petition and has provided a briefing note which is attached as Appendix 1 to the report. Aileen Craig Head of Service (Democratic) For further information please contact Craig Stewart, Committee Services Officer, on 01294 324130 Background Papers Correspondence with lead petitioner 42
Page 43
Appendix 1 Petition – Possible Closure of Beith Library Overview The Council is facing unprecedented financial challenges which may impact on its ability to deliver front line services. An engagement exercise regarding the future budget was carried out in late 2024. This put forward a range of potential savings or ways to generate income and invited the public to feed back on the impact that these would have, should they be implemented. This exercise allowed for early engagement with residents to find out how the 2025 to 2026 budget may affect communities across North Ayrshire. The feedback can then inform any decisions made by the Council. Proposal The engagement exercise included the following proposal around the library service: This proposal is to retain the following libraries: • North Coast and Cumbrae - Millport, Largs, West Kilbride • Three Towns - Ardrossan, Stevenston • Arran - Brodick and Mobile library • Kilwinning – Kilwinning • Irvine – Irvine • Garnock Valley – Kilbirnie The proposal will involve the closure of the following six branch libraries – Skelmorlie, Fairlie, Dalry, Beith, Saltcoats and Dreghorn. Further information The engagement exercise received over 4,000 responses in total, and 38 conversations regarding the proposals were held with different community groups. The feedback regarding all proposals which were part of the engagement exercise is currently being analysed. No decisions have been made regarding any budget savings for the 2025/26 financial year and the results of the engagement will help inform any proposals which will be carried forward. Conclusion The Council will consider the responses to the engagement as part of the budget setting process for 2025/26. North Ayrshire Council will meet on 26th February to agree its budget for the following year. Rhonda Leith Head of Service (Connected Communities North Ayrshire Council 10 January 2025 43
Page 44
44
Page 45
ropo NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL 18 February 2025 Cabinet Title: Petition: “Proposal to cut the Eglinton Park rangers service and closure of the community garden” Purpose: To advise Cabinet of the outcome of consideration by the Audit and Scrutiny Committee of a petition in relation to Eglinton Park rangers service and community garden. Recommendation: Cabinet is recommended to refer the petition to a meeting of Council for consideration as part of the Council’s budget engagement and budget setting process for the coming year. 1. Executive Summary 1.1 At a Special meeting of the Audit and Scrutiny Committee on 6 February 2025, Members considered a report by the Head of Service (Democratic) on the terms of a petition received regarding “proposal to cut the Eglinton Park rangers service and closure of the community garden”. 1.2 The petitioners and Head of Service (Connected Communities) were heard at the Committee and it was agreed that the terms of the petition be accepted and a recommendation made to Cabinet that the petition be considered as part of the Council’s budget engagement and budget setting process for the coming year. 2. Background 2.1 The report presented to Audit and Scrutiny Committee on 6 February, setting out the terms of the petition, is attached as Appendix 1 and is also outlined below:- “North Ayrshire Council are proposing to CUT the park ranger service from Eglinton Country Park as part of their annual budget review. Removing the rangers service will result in Eglinton losing it's 'Country Park' status and instead it will become open land that the council is not required to maintain as much. It will also bring an end to education visits, several volunteer programmes, irreplaceable knowledge about the park and many more key attributes that the service currently delivers. The community garden which has prospered over the last 4 years under the stewardship of the rangers service and many dedicated volunteers will be closed and left abandoned. The council will meet in February 2025 to decide on the fate of the park - help us lobby the council to keep Eglinton Country Park a place for all to enjoy and keep the only country park in North Ayrshire!” Agenda Item 7 45
Page 46
2.2 The principal spokespersons outlined their objections to the proposal and highlighted the following points:- • The benefits in keeping the rangers service at Eglinton Park and all the associated initiatives; • The strength of feeling as shown in the growth of signatures on the online petition which has been shared widely on social media, as well as featuring in local newspapers and radio; • The value of volunteers including the hours contributed and potential loss of volunteering opportunities in and around the park; • The removal of the park ranger service would likely result in the loss of the Eglinton Path Stewards, a dedicated group of volunteers who maintain some of the park’s gardens and pathways; • The loss of skills and specialist knowledge in relation to countryside management and biodiversity; • The loss of social value for a relatively small financial saving; • The potential, though disputed, ‘loss of country park status’; • The loss of the community garden; and • The proposed cuts to the rangers service, the Council’s duties in terms of the Nature Conservation (Scotland) Act 2004 and the feeling that the proposal is at odds with the North Ayrshire local biodiversity action plan. 2.3 Having heard from the petitioners, the Head of Service (Connected Communities) and the Executive Director (Communities and Housing) were heard in answer to Members’ questions and in clarification of certain matters raised in the petition correspondence, particularly in relation to the point that no decisions had been made in relation to these budget consultation proposals. In this respect, a briefing note by the Head of Service (Connected Communities) was appended to the original report to the Audit and Scrutiny Committee (attached as Appendix 1 hereto). 2.4 The Audit and Scrutiny Committee agreed to accept the petition and recommended to Cabinet that the petition is considered as part of the Council’s budget engagement and budget setting process for the coming year. 3. Proposals 3.1 That Cabinet considers the recommendation of the Audit & Scrutiny Committee for the petition to be considered as part of the Council’s budget engagement and budget setting process for the coming year. 4. Implications/Socio-economic Duty Financial 4.1 None arising from this report. Human Resources 4.2 None arising from this report. Legal 4.3 None arising from this report. 46
Page 47
Equality/Socio-economic 4.4 None arising from this report. Climate Change and Carbon 4.5 None arising from this report. Key Priorities 4.6 None arising from this report. Community Wealth Building 4.7 None arising from this report. 5. Consultation 5.1 This report follows as a result of the budget engagement process with communities. Aileen Craig Head of Service (Democratic) For further information please contact Craig Stewart, Committee Services Officer, on 01294 324130 or by email, craigstewart@north-ayrshire.gov.uk Background Papers Audit and Scrutiny Committee Minute (Special) – 6 February 2025 47
Page 48
NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL 6 February 2025 Audit and Scrutiny Committee (Special) Title: Petition: “Proposal to cut the Eglinton Park rangers service and closure of the community garden” Purpose: To advise the Committee of the terms of a petition regarding “proposal to cut the Eglinton Park rangers service and closure of the community garden”. Recommendation: That the Committee considers the terms of the petition and agrees, or otherwise, to make a recommendation to Cabinet. 1. Executive Summary 1.1 In terms of the Scheme of Administration, the Audit and Scrutiny Committee has a remit: “To receive all petitions and deputations submitted to the Council except those relating to the Council’s planning functions, which shall be considered by the Planning Committee. The arrangements for receiving petitions are as set out in Appendix B to the Standing Orders relating to Meetings and Proceedings of the Council and Committees”. 1.2 This report sets out the background to the receipt by the Council of ‘over 5,000 signatories’ on an online petition addressed to the Chief Executive concerning “proposal to cut the Eglinton Park rangers service and closure of the community garden” which was acknowledged as a valid petition in terms of the Council’s Deputations and Petitions Procedure on 28 January 2025. 2. Background 2.1 The wording of the petition is detailed below: “North Ayrshire Council are proposing to CUT the park ranger service from Eglinton Country Park as part of their annual budget review. Removing the rangers service will result in Eglinton losing it's 'Country Park' status and instead it will become open land that the council is not required to maintain as much. It will also bring an end to education visits, several volunteer programmes, irreplaceable knowledge about the park and many more key attributes that the service currently delivers. The community garden which has prospered over the last 4 years under the stewardship of the rangers service and many dedicated volunteers will be closed and left abandoned. The council will meet in February 2025 to decide on the fate of the park - help us lobby the council to keep Eglinton Country Park a place for all to enjoy and keep the only country park in North Ayrshire!” Appendix 1 48
Page 49
2.2 There is provision in Standing Orders for petitions relating to decisions that the Council is about to take. 2.3 The Head of Service (Connected Communities) has provided a briefing note on the background to this matter, which is detailed at Appendix 1 to the report. 2.4 In terms of the procedure for petitions and deputations set out in Standing Orders, representatives of the petitioners have been invited to attend the meeting to address the Committee. Spokespersons should be restricted to addressing the specific points raised in their petition. 2.5 The spokespersons have, collectively, 10 minutes to address the Committee. This may be extended at the discretion of the Chair. 2.6 Once the Committee has heard from the spokespersons for the petitioners, the Chair will invite Members of the Committee to ask questions of the spokespersons. 2.7 While it is for the Chair to decide the stage at which officers should speak to their briefing, previous Committee practice has been for the Cabinet Member or Officer to speak to this after the Committee has heard from the petitioners. The Cabinet Member or Officer will then respond to any questions that Members of the Committee may have. In this case, as no decision has yet been made by Council, no Cabinet Member will address the committee. After the submissions and questions have been heard by the committee the parties will be given to opportunity to sum up prior to the committee taking its decision. 3. Proposals 3.1 It is proposed that the Committee considers the terms of the petition and agrees, or otherwise, to make a recommendation to Cabinet. 4. Implications/Socio-economic Duty Financial 4.1 No direct financial implications arising from this report. Human Resources 4.2 None arising from this report. Legal 4.3 None arising from this report. Equality/Socio-economic 4.4 None arising from this report. Climate Change and Carbon 4.5 None arising from this report. 49
Page 50
Key Priorities 4.6 None arising from this report. Community Wealth Building 4.7 None arising from this report. 5. Consultation 5.1 The Head of Service (Connected Communities) has been consulted and made aware of the terms of the petition and has provided a briefing note which is attached as Appendix 1 to the report. Aileen Craig Head of Service (Democratic) For further information please contact Craig Stewart, Committee Services Officer, on 01294 324130 Background Papers Correspondence with lead petitioner 50
Page 51
Appendix 1 Petition – Possible Removal of the North Ayrshire Countryside Rangers Service Overview The Council is facing unprecedented financial challenges which may impact on its ability to deliver front line services. An engagement exercise regarding the future budget was carried out in late 2024. This put forward a range of potential savings or ways to generate income and invited the public to feed back on the impact that these would have, should they be implemented. This exercise allowed for early engagement with residents to find out how the 2025/26 budget may affect communities across North Ayrshire. The feedback can then inform any decisions made by the Council. Proposal The engagement exercise included a proposal relating to the removal of the Countryside Ranger Service based at Eglinton Country Park. This would see the loss of volunteering opportunities in and around the park, the loss of skills and specialist knowledge in relation to countryside management and biodiversity and the potential closure of the Eglinton Community Garden. The proposal includes the retention of the existing Caretakers and Visitor Services Assistant who will carry on delivering the core, day to day operations at the park, facilitate use of the assets and support events. An additional post would be added to this team to support this aspect of the work at Eglinton Country Park. Further information The engagement exercise received over 4,000 responses in total, and 38 conversations regarding the proposals were held with different community groups. The feedback regarding all proposals which were part of the engagement exercise is currently being analysed. In addition to the engagement exercise, the Council also received detail feedback from a range of specialists including the Scottish Countryside Rangers Association and the local Biodiversity Action Group. The petition advises that if the saving was to be implemented, the park will lose its ‘Country Park’ status. The formal designation of a Country Park is not contingent on the provision of a ranger service. No decisions have been made regarding any budget savings for the 2025/26 financial year and the results of the engagement will help inform any proposals which will be carried forward. The Council will consider the responses to the engagement as part of the budget setting process for 2025/26. North Ayrshire Council will meet on 26th February to agree its budget for the following year. Rhonda Leith 51
Page 52
Head of Service (Connected Communities North Ayrshire Council 10 January 2025 52
Page 53
NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL 18 February 2025 Cabinet Title: Proposals for Community Investment Fund (CIF) Expenditure Purpose: To determine applications by Locality Partnerships to allocate CIF funding to proposed projects. Recommendation: That Cabinet: a) Reviews the application from Kilwinning Locality Partnership in line with CIF criteria; and b) Approves the CIF application in relation to Corsehill Community Association (see Appendix 1). 1. Executive Summary 1.1 Within its budget for 2017-18, North Ayrshire Council provided a funding allocation for the creation of an innovative fund to enable communities to address the priorities they have identified through Local Planning Partnerships and within the context of North Ayrshire Community Planning Partnership’s Fair for All Strategy and the Council’s Community Wealth Building Strategy. In June 2021, Cabinet approved a further £1m top-up for the funding, with a further £2m added in November 2021. 1.2 Locality Partnerships have subsequently continued to work on their local action plans and refining proposals for expenditure in line with their locally identified needs. It is a testament to the dedication of the Locality Partnerships and their community partners that proposals are continuing to emerge to provide creative approaches to addressing local challenges. 1.3 This report brings forward proposals which respond to the specific needs of the local community, and which have been developed based on local circumstances and opportunities. 2. Background 2.1 Within its budget for 2017-18, North Ayrshire Council provided an allocation for the creation of an innovative fund to enable communities to address the priorities they have identified through Locality Planning Partnerships and within the context of North Ayrshire Community Planning Partnership’s Fair for All Strategy and the Council’s Agenda Item 8 53
Page 54
Community Wealth Building Strategy. A further £3m was added to the funding in 2021, to be distributed among localities as follows: 2.2 It was agreed that the CIF awards would range between £5,000 and £100,000 for community organisations, as defined in the CIF guidance, in order to support proposals and projects that connect with: • The North Ayrshire Fair for All Strategy, with consideration for how applications contribute to community support for the cost-of-living crisis; • The Community Planning Partnership and locality priorities; • North Ayrshire Council’s values, priorities, and business objectives; and • The Community Wealth Building and Environmental Sustainability and Climate Change Strategies And will also: • Fulfil a compelling need and not duplicate existing services or facilities. • Provide long-term, sustainable, positive results for the greatest number of people possible; • Exhibit project and/or organisational innovation in their approaches to their work in their way of addressing community challenges and in their request to Locality Partnerships and the Council; • Come from (an) organisation(s) that is financially viable (can provide financial statements upon requests) and efficiently and effectively managed. This can include an organisation to be created to deliver the project; • Include options or potential for NAC and CPP employee engagement and volunteering where possible; and • Include measurable outcomes and can report to NAC on outcomes on a regular basis. Locality Value of CIF from first funding allocation (2017-18) Expenditure to date Value of CIF from second funding allocation (June 2021) Value of CIF from third funding allocation (Nov 2021) Total balance available Irvine £754,000 £958,358 £290,000 £580,000 £665,642 Kilwinning £286,000 £322,190 £120,000 £240,000 £323,810 Three Towns £598,000 £1,194,411 £240,000 £480,000 £123,589 Garnock Valley £390,000 £456,103.04 £150,000 £300,000 £383,896.96 North Coast £468,000 £688,717 £170,000 £340,000 £289,283 Arran £104,000 £125,079 £30,000 £60,000 £68,921 TOTAL £2,600,000 £3,744,858.04 £1,000 000 £2,000,000 £1,855,142.96 54
Page 55
2.3 The proposal development and application process has been agreed as follows: • Locality Partnerships should continue to engage with their communities and stimulate interest in the CIF. Each Locality Partnership will then strategically access the applications, make links, and look at the funding ‘in the round’. • If the partnership supports a bid then the group will be encouraged to submit a full application form, which they will decide upon before making a proposal to Cabinet for final approval. • The proposal will go to the next suitable Cabinet for final approval. 2.4 The enclosed application at Appendix 1 has been developed by community partners and North Ayrshire Council officers and is now recommended for approval by Cabinet. 2.5 The Kilwinning Locality Partnership The allocation and funds committed to date are outlined in the table below. The Kilwinning Locality Partnership CIF allocation to date: £646,000 Kilwinning McGavin Park £35,000 Multi-Purpose Youth and Community Hub £41,190 Multi-Purpose Youth and Community Hub – Phase 2 £15,000 Kilwinning McGavin Park – Phase 3 £45,000 Almswell Park Pitch replacement £45,000 Corsehill Playpark £50,000 Kilwinning Tennis Club £55,000 Corra Foundation £33,000 Balance £323,810 2.6 Proposal: Corsehill Community Association (£25,000) (see Appendix 1) 2.6.1.Corsehill Community Association is an unincorporated charity and have the aims of promoting the wellbeing of the inhabitants of Kilwinning, promoting social activities, and fostering community spirit to advance education. They also have responsibility for maintaining and managing the Corsehill Community Centre (Love Hall). The current committee are active in delivering a range of new programmes within the area. 2.6.2. The project that is proposed is for the development of a play park. Access to play facilities will improve children’s wellbeing and social interaction and respect their right to engage in play. The £25,000 funding sought is in addition to a previous CIF grant of £50,000 which is detailed above. This previous award was made some time ago and was expected to be enough to deliver the project at the time. The original application was made by the Corsehill Primary School Parent Council; the lead on the project has now moved to the Community Association. Costs have now risen; the further funding will allow the project to be delivered by the group who will adjust their designs to the funding available if needed. 2.6.3. The group are working with a range of partners and Council services to plan the play park. It will be accessible for all children and will have an inclusive design to ensure that this is the case. North Ayrshire Council’s Neighbourhood Services have agreed to the 55
Page 56
upkeep and maintenance of the playpark once the project is concluded. 2.6.4. The project supports the locality priorities of Improving our Local Environment, Alleviation Poverty and Promoting Equality of Access to Opportunities and Improving Community Wellbeing, as well as the Community Planning Partnership priority of Wellbeing. 3. Proposals That Cabinet: a) Reviews the enclosed applications from Kilwinning Locality Partnership in line with CIF criteria; and b) Approves the CIF application in relation to Corsehill Community Association. 4. Implications/Socio-economic Duty Financial 4.1 CIF funding is allocated within existing resources. Human Resources 4.2 None. Legal 4.3 None. Equality/Socio-economic 4.4 The purpose of Locality Planning is to reduce inequalities, increase community cohesion and advance community empowerment. Each of the CIF proposals is tested against that purpose before being presented to Cabinet. Climate Change and Carbon 4.5 Environmental and sustainability along with climate change and carbon reduction opportunities are considered in relation to each CIF application. This proposal supports recycle and re- use principles. 56
Page 57
Key Priorities 4.6 The proposals contained within the report support the North Ayrshire Council Plan strategic aims: • To transition to a wellbeing economy, delivering prosperity, wellbeing and resilience for local people. • We will have active, inclusive, and resilient communities. • A Community Wealth Building Council that is efficient and accessible, maximising investment and focusing resources towards our priorities. Community Wealth Building 4.7 The application supports the following pillars of community wealth building: • Financial Power: Listening to communities and local enterprises to maximise the impact of financial investment and grow local business, enhance innovation and empower communities. • Land and Assets: Maximising the function and ownership of local physical assets for the benefit of communities and enterprises. 5. Consultation 5.1 The proposals contained within this report have been developed by the Locality Partnerships, through consultation with local people, including young people. David W. Hammond Executive Director (Communities and Housing) For further information please contact Rhonda Leith, Head of Service (Connected Communities), on 01294 324415. Background Papers Appendix 1: CIF Application Corsehill Community Association 57
Page 58
Community Investment Fund Application Form: Kilwinning Locality The CIF will support proposals and projects that: • Connect with: o The North Ayrshire Fair for All Inequalities Strategy; o the Community Planning Partnership and Locality priorities; and o North Ayrshire Council’s values, priorities and business objectives. • Fulfil a compelling need and do not duplicate existing services or facilities; • Provide long-term, sustainable, positive results for the greatest number of people possible; • Exhibit project and/or organisational innovation in their approaches to their work in their way of addressing community challenges and in their request to Locality Partnerships and the Council; • Come from (an) organisation(s) that is financially viable (can provide financial statements upon request) and efficiently and effectively managed. This can include an organisation to be created to deliver the project; • Include options or potential for NAC and CPP employee engagement and volunteering where possible; and • Include measurable outcomes and can report to NAC on outcomes on a regular basis. When to apply and how? • LPs should continue to engage with their communities, and stimulate interest in the CIF. The Locality Partnership will then strategically assess the applications, make links and look at the funding ‘in the round’. • If the partnership supports a bid then the group will be encouraged to submit a full application form, which they will decide upon before making a proposal to Cabinet for final approval. • The finalised proposal will go to the next suitable Cabinet for final approval. • Forms should be returned to your Locality Co-ordinator, by email if possible: Louise Riddex Locality Coordinator (Kilwinning & North Coast) Economy and Communities Community Development Team St John's Primary School Morrison Avenue Stevenston KA20 4HH Email: lriddex@north-ayrshire.gov.uk Tel: 01294475910 Mob: 07980964858 Support and information will be available for groups who are not successful. For more information see the guidance form here: http://www.northayrshire.community/wp- content/uploads/sites/60/2018/06/community-investment-fund-guidance-notes-17-12-17.pdf Appendix 1 58
Page 59
APPLICATION FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE Community Investment Fun 1. Details of your organisation Name of Organisation: Corsehll Community Association Postal Address for Correspondence: Name of Contact Person: Mrs Tracy Wilson Position in Organisation: Chair Contact Telephone Number: E mail address 2. Brief description of your organisation Please include - [a] Legal status, e.g. voluntary organisation, public/private limited by shares or guarantee; [b] How long has organisation been in existence? [c] Aims & objectives; [d] General activities or services provided Corsehill Community Association is a unincorporated charity and has been running for a number of years. The community associations aim/objective, as per the constitution is to promote the wellbeing of the inhabitants of Kilwinning, promote social activities, and foster community spirit to advance education and to achieve other such aims as may be determined by the association. They also have responsibility for maintaining and managing the Corsehill Community Centre (Love Hall), and to carry out any extension of the premises or facilities that are provided which may at the time seem necessary or desirable. The present committee are a fairly new committee who have already made a huge difference to the centre in terms of the range of programmes that are being delivered from it. These range from youth groups, to retirement groups, to bingo, to fundraising events. The committee this year have also brought back the Corsehill Gala, which hadn’t happened since before COVID. The association were also instrumental in the provision of free holiday meals this year, and its something they want to continue being involved in moving forward. 59
Page 60
3. Title and summary of proposal Tell us a bit about your idea. Please describe in as much detail as possible, what the funding will be used for. Please include where it will be held / delivered, who is your target audience, who will benefit from it and how and indicate any partners that are involved. Please include - [a] What outcomes your organisation wishes to achieve; [b] Is this a new service / project? [c] Does a new organisation need to be set up? Please ensure that all of the above information is supplied. Failure to do so may result in your application being rejected. The idea is to use the funding to build a play park within the community of corsehill. At present corsehill is the only area within Kilwinning that does not have its own play park making the children and young people in the community feel socially excluded from the right to play out doors in a safe area. The United Nation Conventions on the Rights of the Child state in article 31 states “Parties recognize the right of the child to rest and leisure, to engage in play and recreational activities appropriate to the age of the child and to participate freely in cultural life and the arts.” It also states “Parties shall respect and promote the right of the child to participate fully in cultural and artistic life and shall encourage the provision of appropriate and equal opportunities for cultural, artistic, recreational and leisure activity.” This funding would allow work to be started as a new project but with existing organisations working in partnership to achieve positive outcomes for the whole of the corsehill community. The target audience who will benefit from this are children and young people although adults will also feel the benefits from either also using it on their own or with their children. Play parks provide great opportunities for parents to bond with children in a physically engaging way that shared digital or TV time can’t. The resources are already there for parents or carers who struggle with knowing how to play with their children. As you can see there are many different age groups who will be able to benefit from having this area available. Conversations with relevant council departments are still ongoing with regards to the site we will use for the swing park. After putting in a Town Charitable Trust Application, the Locality Partnership advised, as there wasn’t enough money in the Trust fund, that they would like this proposal to come for CIF therefore this is our second application to CIF. 60
Page 61
4. What difference will this project make within the locality and to local services and programmes? Please include - [a] How you will approach reducing inequality [b] How this proposal fits with Kilwinning’s priorities The play park will have access and resources for play equipment that comply with both The Disability Discrimination Act 1995 as well as the more recent Equality Act 2010 from initial build to ensure inequality is reduced. Play helps to teach children social skills including how to share fairly, play cooperatively, and be part of a group. Inclusive playground design can create a space that intentionally provides opportunities for every visitor to have a successful experience, regardless of age and abilities. Having these play environments may help kids learn to accept and tolerate differences while valuing diversity and demonstrating compassion. Again, the inequality of not having a play park in corsehill or relatively close will be reduced if this project goes ahead. There will be opportunities for work to be created including North Ayrshire Council. Komplan (the company who build the play park). Where the area is situated it is easily accessible by walking to it so this would reduce traffic or the need for parking. There is on street parking that could be used if needed. This area would also benefit the local environment by bringing in charities or organisations that could use it. 61
Page 62
5. Please give an overview of the engagement that has taken place in relation to the project Please include the number of people that have been engaged with/ consulted Data was collected via survey monkey (online) and a paper petition was within the premises of the local grocery store in Corsehill. 431 people responded through both of these; the original copy can be viewed if needed. Of these respondents only 3 said no from the online one and 1 via the paper petition. Engagement with Aberlour, corsehill primary parent and pupil councils as well as the local community has taken place about the project. As previously mentioned, the Locality partnership have been engaged with as we initially put in a Town Charitable Trust application, and they asked us to come back for CIF. 62
Page 63
6. Please tell us how the project will be managed Please include - [a] How the finances will be managed [b] Does the proposed project contribute to volunteering or employment opportunities in Kilwinning? Please include the number of volunteering opportunities and employment opportunities [c] If there are any staff requirements, please outline your HR plans [d] Is there evidence of partnership working in relation to the project within Kilwinning locality? If successful, once the money is released, it will be ringfenced in Corsehill Community Centre bank account until it is ready to spend. The accounts are monitored monthly through Community Association meetings, as well as externally verified at the end of the financial year. This is a partnership working project with Corsehill Community Association, NAC and the local community. Aberlour who were previously involved, are no longer working in Kilwinning. The parent council supported/completed the first application but it has been decided to be transferred over to the Community Association. 63
Page 64
7. Amount of funding being requested Please supply details of the amount of funding being requested and any other funding you have had over the past 5 years, both financially and ‘in kind’. Amount of funding requested: £25,000 Please include detail on - [a] Breakdown of costs if available; [b] Recent quotations where appropriate The total cost estimated for this project is £75,000. Currently there is a quote for some of the work from the company Kompan which has a total of £72, 161.84 which includes preliminaries, fence, groundworks, surfacing, equipment and the delivery charge. However, this quote is out of date and we think it will have increased. This quote could be viewed if needed. If the planned project costs is now more than £75k, we will tailor it to fit the budget. 8. Monitoring and evaluation process Please include detail on – [a] What monitoring and evaluation processes are planned/ in place Coreshill Community Association will be responsible for monitoring and evaluating this project. Corsehill Community Association will maintain contact with North Ayrshire council partners throughout the duration of the project, including neighbourhood services who have agreed to the upkeep and maintenance of the swingpark once the project is concluded, as arranged by Cllr Donald Reid. Data has already been collected in relation to community interest and need for this project. Corsehill Community Association will capture views and data of residents, school, parents/carers throughout the process and once the project is completed. This will ensure that the success of the project can be measured against it’s intended outcomes. This may be done via survey, survey monkey – shared with the community and via the local primary school. All data will be captured and can be shared as and when required. 64
Page 65
NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL 18 February 2025 Cabinet Title: Community Asset Transfer – Brisbane Centre Purpose: To seek approval for the transfer of ownership of the Brisbane Centre, Bath Street, Largs, KA30 8BL to the Clyde Coast and Cumbrae Men’s Shed Recommendation: That Cabinet: Agrees to the asset transfer of the Brisbane Centre from North Ayrshire Council to Clyde Coast and Cumbraes Men’s Shed (Scottish Charitable Incorporated Organisation – SCIO); b) Approves the recommended terms of transfer on this occasion at 5% of the property valuation of £74,000 (totalling £3,700); and c) Approves that officers conclude the associated legal and community asset transfer processes for the Brisbane Centre. 1. Executive Summary 1.1 This report proposes the community asset transfer of the Brisbane Centre, Bath Street, Largs from North Ayrshire Council to "Clyde Coast and Cumbraes Men’s Shed (SCIO)”. 1.2 The transfer of the asset will provide a sustainable base for local, community- based activity, focusing on the group’s key priorities and providing a space for men to come together, create and support each other. 1.3 It is recommended that Cabinet agrees to the transfer of the Brisbane Centre with an associated fee of 5% of the valuation price of £74,000 (£3,700 in total) applied. This reflects the condition of the facility, the organisation’s investment to date, savings made against future upkeep and the potential social return on investment. The report also recommends that officers are delegated to conclude the process under these terms. Agenda Item 9 65
Page 66
2. Background 2.1 North Ayrshire Council wishes to support its communities to make the best use of land and assets which are available as part of our Community Wealth Building ambitions. Under the terms of the Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015, community asset transfer (CAT) provides an opportunity for people to be involved in developing and providing opportunities or services for their local communities. It may also allow groups to develop commercial ventures which will support community benefit. Asset transfer may also mean that public assets get used more frequently and more effectively. Furthermore, community-led ownership may allow additional opportunities for groups to secure additional funding or resources. 2.2 The Brisbane Centre is located on Largs seafront, at the south end of Largs Promenade, with access from Bath Street (see plan at Appendix 1). The transfer will provide a sustainable base for the local Men’s Shed provision. 2.3 The proposed uses include a range of events and activities which contribute to the group’s key objective: “to provide recreational facilities and advance the social needs, health and wellbeing of men of all ages and backgrounds living in the Largs, Skelmorlie, Cumbraes, Fairlie, West Kilbride and Seamill areas.” They will achieve this by - • Creating, developing and maintaining a Men’s Shed • Offering opportunities for men in the Clyde Coast and Cumbraes area to meet and undertake creative, physical, purposeful and recreational activities of their choice. • Reducing isolation of men in the area thus contributing to their physical and mental wellbeing • Developing the capacity of men in the Clyde Coast and Cumbraes area to share their skills and knowledge with others in the community 2.4 The concept of developing a local Men’s Shed started back in 2017 and the need for the facility deepened as result of the pandemic lockdown. After the initial community scoping of interest in July/August 2021, the organisation was officially formed and Clyde Coast and Cumbraes Men’s Shed (CC&CMS) came into being at the end of 2021. 2.5 CC&CMS moved into the Brisbane Centre in October 2022. Since then, they have been delivering a valuable service and successfully operating the facility in the heart of the local community. Having ownership of facility will allow them to further develop in a variety of ways to better serve their community. These include: • Opportunity to care for and enhance the facility in order to meet the specific needs of the Men’s Shed - allowing the club and its members to expand and grow • Increase membership, thus widening their involvement with the local community and deepening the impact of their work 66
Page 67
• Provide stability and a strong base from which to operate and deliver events and activities to support the wider community 2.6 CC&CMS have been successfully operating and caring for the asset since October 2022 and have proven their ability in this regard. The asset is equipped with the necessary tools and equipment for members to engage in the wide range of activities they are interested in. A variety of health and safety features accompany each piece of equipment. In addition, through a generous donation and community support, the group have had a new kitchen installed. 2.7 Since opening in the Brisbane Centre, the membership has increased significantly and more members are benefitting from attending the group. The members participate in a number of local events (including Largs Viking Festival, local craft fares etc.) where they sell the goods they have made and simultaneously raise awareness of their organisation and the benefits of membership. 2.8 During their regular opening times, CC&CMS use the outdoor space adjacent to the Brisbane Centre to promote their work. Its location allows the public to engage with the group and have the opportunity to find out more about the Shed and to purchase goods. CC&CMS are requesting the asset that they occupy in order that they can carry on delivering a programme of improvements as they build on delivering an increasing range of opportunities within the community. 2.9 The CC&CMS have embraced the opportunity to deliver a Men’s Shed to the local community in the North Coast and their work continues to benefit members of all ages and abilities. The individual, personal testimonies of members clearly demonstrate the breadth the depth of the benefits that its members experience by attending. 2.10 Having ownership, enhancing the asset and increasing the range of events and activities within an improved facility will encourage a wider range of people to get involved. This will support several strategic and policy areas relating to physical activity as well as positive mental health and wellbeing. Opportunities for local volunteering will increase, stimulating involvement in shaping and regenerating community life, building self-esteem and confidence. 2.11 The ownership will have wider community benefit as the care and maintenance of the asset will be carried out by local businesses, contributing to the local economy and supporting the principles of Community Wealth Building. 2.12 The property was valued in March 2023 by the Council’s Property Management & Investment service and updated in 2024 as part of the CAT assessment process. The Valuation Assessment details the combined value of the land and building at £74,000. Given the significant community benefits and the anticipated social return on the investment, the recommended discount on the property on this occasion is 95%. This reflects the condition of the facility, the organisation’s investment to date, savings made against future upkeep and the potential social return on investment. The group have no issues with this valuation and are in a position to fund the requested amount of £3,700. 67
Page 68
2.13 The statutory community consultation has taken place with no objections received. 3. Proposals 3.1 That Cabinet: (i) Agrees to the asset transfer of theBrisbane Centre from North Ayrshire Council to Clyde Coast and Cumbraes Men’s Shed (Scottish Charitable Incorporated Organisation – SCIO) (ii) Approves the recommended terms of transfer on this occasion at 5% of the property valuation of £74,000 (totalling £3,700); and (iii) Approves that officers conclude the associated legal and community asset transfer processes for the Brisbane Centre. 4.Implications/Socio-economic Duty Financial 4.1 Through the transfer of the assets, the Council will achieve an overall capital receipt of £3,700 and be relieved of ongoing care and maintenance costs. Human Resources 4.2 None. Legal 4.3 The Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973 places a statutory obligation on the Council to obtain the best price or the best rent when it disposes of any asset by sale or lease. These regulations permit a disposal at less than the best price achievable where either (a) the property is valued at less than £10,000, or (b) the Council has compared the financial cost of transfer against the community benefits and determined that the transfer is reasonable and promotes either economic development or regeneration, health, social well-being or environmental well-being. Equality/Socio-economic 4.4 There will be considerable socio-economic benefits from the transfer and the value proposed reflects the community benefits. Environmental and Sustainability 4.5 The transfer seeks to provide sustainable community facilities through securing the asset in Largs for the key purposes of Clyde Coast and Cumbraes Men’s Shed as detailed in 2.3 above. 4.6 The group are currently investigating options around alternative energy supplies, in particular solar energy, and are seeking advice in relation to Planning 68
Page 69
Regulations on the listed building. Funding from the Community Asset Transfer Start Up Fund is assisting the group with this work. 4.7 Many of the items created at the Men’s Shed are made from wood and other materials that are destined for landfill. Many items are also created via “up cycling” or by creating something new from pieces salvaged from another item. Key Priorities 4.8 The proposals contained within the report support the following North Ayrshire Council Plan priorities: • Wellbeing – To transition to a wellbeing economy, delivering prosperity, wellbeing and resilience for local people, through providing opportunities for people to come together to support each other. • Communities and Local Democracy - We will have active inclusive and resilient communities, through supporting networking and community ownership. • Climate Change – Achieving net zero by 2030, through environmental and sustainability considerations outlined in 4.5 - 4.7 of this report. Community Wealth Building 4.9 This proposal supports the following pillars of community wealth building: • Advancing community enterprises; • Advancing local ownership of underused land and buildings; and • Supporting local business activities and increasing the variety of ownership models. 5. Consultation 5.1 The consultation required in terms of the Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015 for a community asset transfer application has now concluded. The outcome is outlined in section 2.12 above. 5.2 Consultation has taken place with, Streetscene, Finance, Estates, Property Maintenance and Investment, and Legal Services. All services are supportive of the proposal for the asset. David W. Hammond Executive Director (Communities and Housing) For further information please contact Rhonda Leith, Head of Service, Connected Communities) Appendix 1 – plan 69
Page 70
"This map is reproduced from the OS map by North Ayrshire Council with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number :AC0000825715 " Ü 1:1,250 0 10 205 Meters Date - 26/11/2024 LAURENCE CREE Head of Service/Chief Officer SUS, TPT & CORP PROPERTY CUNNINGHAME HOUSE, IRVINE, KA12 8EE TEL: (01294 22500 FAX (01294) 225044 THIS IS THE PLAN REFERRED TO IN THE FOREGOING DISPOSITION BY THE NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL IN FAVOUR OF CLYDE COAST & CUMBRAES MEN'S SHED, OF: Brisbane Centre, Largs Drawn: HRTitle: Brisbane Centre 30A Bath Street Largs KA30 8BL Area within red boundary - 153 m2 Appendix 1 70
Page 71
NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL 18 February 2025 Cabinet Title: Public Conveniences Purpose: To provide Cabinet with advice in relation to the provision of public conveniences following a series of recent engagement. Recommendation: It is recommended that Cabinet: a) Notes the engagement undertaken in relation to the future provision as detailed the report; and b) Approves the proposals for the future operation of Council- operated facilities as set out in the report. 1. Executive Summary 1.1 In January 2024, Cabinet agreed to a consultation with community groups to gauge the appetite of local groups to take over the operation of some/all council owned public conveniences. Briefings were held with ward members for both areas to discuss the consultation results and agree a way forward prior to reverting to Cabinet with next step proposals. 1.2 In Saltcoats there is a strong aspiration from a community group to progress a Community Asset Transfer (CAT) for Melbourne Gardens, with The Braes also under consideration at a later stage. An Expression of Interest, which is the early stage of the CAT process, has been submitted to the Council. 1.3 Following extensive discussions with the North Coast ward members, officers reached an agreed position on the proposals for the future of the five sites in Largs. 1.4 The objective of this consultation and engagement and subsequent proposals, is to ensure a good standard of public convenience provision is available and delivered within an affordable and sustainable model. 2. Background 2.1 Historical decisions regarding the provision of public conveniences have led to a variety of models of service provision being developed as well as some strategic closures of sites. These models range from community groups having Temporary Operational Licences for an existing facility to a CAT which resulted in the demolition and rebuild of an enhanced facility for the community (Ardrossan Community Development Trust Hub and Cafe). Over time, different funding routes have also become available via local funding (Largs Car Park Fund) and national funding streams (Islands Pit Stop Project) which has allowed ongoing funding for sites and/or the enhancement of facilities. Opportunities to reconsider the model of operation for the remaining Council owned sites Agenda Item 10 71
Page 72
continue to be taken. 2.2 There are six council owned facilities currently in operation in North Ayrshire and one which has been closed for several years due to fire damage. The current provision of Council operated sites is concentrated in two towns – Largs and Saltcoats. Site Location Opening Schedule Notes Largs - Gallowgate Full Year Largest of the sites and income used from the Largs Car Park Fund to recently refurbish to a high standard. Pay on entry. Largs - Broomfields Full Year Requires capital investment to be sustainable in the medium to long term. Six-minute walk from Mackerston facility. Largs – The Pencil 1st April-30 September Requires capital investment to be sustainable in the medium to long term Largs - Mackerston 1st April-30 September Requires capital investment. Six-minute walk from Broomfields facility. Largs – Aubery Park 1st April-30 September Requires capital investment. Additional gender inequality due to the female facility being closed for over 6 years due to a significant drainage issue. Saltcoats – The Braes Full Year Requires capital investment Saltcoats – Melbourne Gardens N/A Closed due to fire damage 2.3 In January 2024, Cabinet gave approval to engage with recognised community groups in Saltcoats and Largs to assess the appetite of local groups to take over the operation of any or all of the sites. The objective of this was to explore alternative models and funding options which would support an affordable and sustainable provision of good standard facilities in key sites for residents and visitors. 2.4 In February 2024 a survey for community groups was launched and was open for six weeks. Additionally, condition surveys were carried out by the Property Team to provide an updated assessment of the sites and components therein. All bar one of the remaining facilities requires capital investment as well as regular repair and maintenance due to ongoing vandalism or ageing components. Consultation Results 2.5 A survey was developed and issued to constituted community groups in Saltcoats and Largs. Groups were supported during the consultation period by the Connected Communities Locality Officer for their area. • Largs – two groups responded. One group noted potential interest in all five sites in Largs and the second group noted interest in the Broomfields site only. • Saltcoats – four groups responded. Two groups did not have any interest in this proposal and two responded positively: one for The Braes and one for Melbourne Gardens. 72
Page 73
2.6 Of the two positive responses for Saltcoats, one group, Ripple Effect Saltcoats (RES), was already engaging with council officers with a view to progressing plans for the Melbourne Gardens area including the toilet facility, via a CAT. Notice was received after the consultation that the two Saltcoats groups who registered interest for the separate sites would align their aspirations and RES would be the lead group for both sites for a potential community asset transfer of both facilities with Melbourne Gardens being their priority. Actions Since January 2024 Saltcoats 2.7 In February 2024 a condition survey was carried out for The Braes which identified required capital spend of c£90k. Following the closure of the consultation, separate briefing sessions were held with ward members to advise them of the results and gather feedback from members. 2.8 It was agreed that there had been and continued to be, positive engagement across council services and The Ayrshire Community Trust (TACT) with RES regarding progress of the group’s readiness for a project of this scale for the Saltcoats facilities. It was also agreed that support would continue to be offered to progress their aspirations for both Melbourne Gardens and any future consideration for The Braes. Largs 2.9 In February 2024, condition surveys were carried out for four of the five sites in Largs. A survey was not carried out for Gallowgate as this site had recently been refurbished to a high standard. The outcome of the surveys for the four sites (Broomfields, Aubery Park, The Pencil and Mackerston) deemed all four to be in poor condition and set out estimated capital costs totalling c£160k, required to replace components based on their useful life cycle or condition. There is not currently any allowance for such capital funding within the council’s budget. 2.10 The Largs Car Park Fund currently contributes £35,000 annually to Facilities Management for the cleaning of the five sites in Largs, however this does not fully cover the costs and results in a shortfall of c£45,000 which is met by the service. There are also costs for utilities of c£25k. 2.11 Pay gates were installed early in 2024 at the Gallowgate site and are contributing the income available for redistribution to agreed Largs projects. 2.12 Several meetings have taken place with North Coast ward members as well as site visits to all facilities to allow ward members to discuss each site in turn with officers and the Executive Director (Education). These meetings have acknowledged a shared aim to maximise access to good standard facilities in Largs. This aim recognises the importance of such access both to residents and to the tourism industry. 2.13 Details of communications with North Coast ward members including meetings, briefing papers and site visits are listed below: • 2nd September 2024 – Meeting (Ward members, Executive Directors for Education and Communities & Housing, Senior Manager Facilities Management) • 5th November 2024 – Site visits to all five facilities (3 ward members, Executive Director Education, Senior Manager Facilities Management, Team Manager PMI) 73
Page 74
• 10th November 2024 – Briefing paper issued to all ward members responding to model/funding proposals at 2nd September meeting. • 13th November 2024 – Meeting (Ward members, Executive Director (Education), Senior Manager Facilities Management). • 5th December 2024 – Final summary paper issued to ward members • 10th December 2024 - Meeting to agree final proposals/way forward (Executive Director Education, ward members, Senior Manager Facilities Management). 2.14 During this time, different ideas for both recurring revenue solutions (for day to day running costs) and capital investment solutions (to address condition survey results) were explored by officers. Proposals Agreed with Ward Members (Largs) Gallowgate 2.15 This site has recently been refurbished with loan fees and charges being met by the Largs Car Park Fund. Income generation from the pay gates is being held in the Car Park Fund. As a result, it was agreed that this site would remain in Council ownership and be fully funded from the Car Park Fund (to include all running costs cleaning, repairs and utilities etc). Broomfields & The Pencil 2.16 The condition surveys for both sites shows that capital investment is required if they are to remain open over the medium-to long-term. The Pencil is open April-October each year and there is no electricity on site. Due to the location of this site and the distance from the facilities in the hub of the town, there was an appetite for this site to remain. A future revenue funding model is required to ensure all recurring revenue costs are covered. It was proposed that recent changes to the car park charging structure may lead to an increase in income. As a result, income from the pay gates at Gallowgate along with the Car Park Fund could be sufficient to fully fund both of these sites. It was agreed to test this projected income model for one year. If this model results in an in- year deficit, one-off revenue reserves of the car park fund will be deployed to offset the shortfall. Equally, if at the end of the year it is evident that the income position will not support these sites for future years, alternative models will be explored. In contrast, if this funding model is sufficient to cover the recurring revenue costs on a sustainable basis, the priority will turn to the need to identify funding for the future required capital works. Mackerston 2.17 This site is open part year from April-October and is within a six-minute walk to the Broomfields facility. There is a kiosk in the middle of the building which is under lease and there is commercial interest in the rest of this building via a lease which would not be for use as a public convenience. It was agreed that this building would remain closed, and an alternative use explored. Aubery Park 2.18 This is the smallest of the facilities in Largs and due to historical drainage issues, it only offers a male facility. Earlier exploration of the work required deemed the cost was prohibitive. There was a suggestion that the male facility could be made unisex however there are concerns regarding the safety of users in a shared space and particularly in 74
Page 75
one which has the smallest footprint of the sites. There was previous interest in using this site for storage by a local group. It was agreed that this site remains closed, and an alternative use could be explored to determine if further alternative options were viable for this site. Summary of Current Position 2.19 Saltcoats: RES is being heavily supported by TACT and the Locality Officer and has now submitted an Expression of Interest for a CAT for Melbourne Gardens. At this point, Estates has raised no objection and responded to this effect to the group. We currently await Legal Services feedback on the suitability assessment document which assesses the group’s constitution. TACT advised that they would support RES with any required amendments to allow them to move to the next stage. TACT also confirmed that there is a continuing strong aspiration and group support for this project with RES. The group’s plan is to progress a CAT for Melbourne Gardens in the first instance and consider The Braes at a later stage. Based on estimates from the Council’s Property Team and loss adjuster, £150k has been reserved for reinstatement on a like for like basis for Melbourne Gardens, this funding is available to support the group’s work to reinstate this facility. 2.20 Largs: Communication with ward members has been ongoing throughout 2024 and the current agreed position for the sites is noted above in 2.15-2.18 and was issued in an email to members on 11 December 2024. This period has involved many different proposals being explored from both officers and members with consideration to balancing access to good quality facilities, with the financial means to support them. Financial sustainability was a key factor when exploring models to provide some stability for a future provision in the town. Recommendations 2.21 Due to the situation outlined above, the following is recommended: Saltcoats 2.21.1 Melbourne Gardens: continue to support RES to progress the CAT application to achieve their aspirations for this site and which compliments the wider community aspirations at the shore front in Saltcoats. 2.21.2 Melbourne Gardens: approve the use of the insurance fund reserve of £150k as a contribution to the required capital work to support RES to bring the building back into use via a CAT. 2.21.3 The Braes: will remain open for the financial year 2025-26 to allow the CAT process to progress for Melbourne Gardens, and close thereafter. Largs 2.21.4 Gallowgate: remain open and in Council ownership and all running costs to be fully funded by the Largs Car Park Fund from April 2025. 2.21.5 Broomfields & The Pencil: to remain open for the next year to allow monitoring of income levels of the Car Park Fund. If the funds are insufficient, an alternative model/funding will be required from 2026-27 onwards. 2.21.6 Mackerston: to remain closed and explore alternative commercial interest in the site. 2.21.7 Aubery Park: to remain closed and explore alternative use of the site. 75
Page 76
3. Proposals 3.1 It is recommended that Cabinet: a) Notes the engagement undertaken in relation to the future provision as detailed in the report; and b) Approves the proposals for the future operation of Council-operated facilities as set out in the report. 76
Page 77
4. Implications/Socio-economic Duty Financial 4.1 The proposals for the closure of two sites and funding of recurring revenue costs for the Largs sites would result in all costs for Facilities Management and utilities being met by the Car Park Fund rather than service budgets, resulting in a service budget saving of c£70k p.a. There is also cost avoidance for future repairs for the two sites proposed for closure and capital costs of £55k for Mackerston. There is no capital estimate for Aubery Park as investment works are deemed prohibitive. Income streams from the Largs Car Park Fund following the changes to the charging structure will be monitored over the next year to assess the viability of the proposed model of funding. In-year LCPF reserves will be used for any shortfall incurred during this year. Melbourne Gardens: Insurance fund of £150k to be available to support the CAT process and reinstatement of a facility at this site by a community group. Reinstatement costs will be in excess of this value however RES plan to apply to other funding sources to augment the available funds. Human Resources 4.2 A review of hours and work patterns would be required to service the remaining public conveniences. Legal 4.3 None. Equality/Socio-economic 4.4 Under the proposals, three sites would remain open in Largs with Gallowgate being the exemplar site with a large number of facilities in the building as well as a changing places space and located in the hub of the town centre. Aubery Park, Largs only has a male facility available, and no fix is for the female facility is foreseeable due to costs being prohibitive. The proposals in this paper address this inequality to ensure all operational sites offer an equality of service. Supporting a local community group in Saltcoats to progress a CAT helps to deliver on the wider aspirations of the community for this area and will ultimately provide good quality services for the area. An equality impact assessment has been undertaken using the Council’s integrated assessment toolkit. Climate Change and Carbon 4.5 A new building or improvements to the existing site at Melbourne Gardens would incorporate climate and sustainability considerations. Key Priorities 77
Page 78
4.6 These proposals will address all four Council plan priorities: • Wellbeing – to transition to a wellbeing economy, delivering prosperity, wellbeing, and resilience for local people. • Communities and Local Democracy – we will have active, inclusive, and resilient communities. • Climate Change – achieving net-zero by 2030. • A Sustainable Council – a Community Wealth Building Council that is efficient and accessible, maximising investment and focusing resources towards our priorities. Community Wealth Building 4.6 A focus on quality local facilities will be achieved through these proposals, and community organisations will be supported to achieve their aspirations. The repurposing of under-utilised facilities through community asset transfer or commercial use would contribute to the land and assets pillar by bringing them into productive use for community benefit. 5. Consultation 5.1 A survey was issued to community groups in February 2024 to gauge the interest in taking over the running of the current sites in Saltcoats and Largs. 5.2 In respect of Saltcoats, extensive discussions have taken place with Inspiring Scotland and RES with council officers from many services including Estates, FM, Connected Communities, Estates, Legal and Economic Development & Regeneration. 5.3 Elected members have also been consulted for both areas. Due to the various options available for Largs, the consultation process has been lengthy but proved valuable in coming to an agreed position. SAM ANSON Executive Director (Education) For further information please contact Carolyn Hope, Senior Manager. Background Papers Cabinet paper 23 January 2024 Public Conveniences 78
Page 79
NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL 18 February 2025 Cabinet Title: UK Shared Prosperity Fund 2025/26 Purpose: To update Cabinet on the UK Shared Prosperity Fund (SPF) and seek approval for the proposed approach to the additional year of funding for 2025/26. Recommendation: That Cabinet: a) Notes the update on the UK Shared Prosperity Fund; b) Approves the proposed approach to the allocation of the £2.697m award and continuation of the previously approved Investment Plan in 2025/26; and c) Provides delegated authority to the Executive Director (Place) to agree changes to the funding allocations in consultation with the Portfolio Lead as required. 1. Executive Summary 1.1 The UK Shared Prosperity Fund (SPF) formed part of the UK Government’s Levelling Up Agenda, providing £2.6bn of funding across the UK between April 2022 and March 2025. This replaced European Union funding which historically supported employability and skills projects and local business activity in North Ayrshire. The overarching objective of SPF was to build pride in place and increase life chances, underpinned by four Levelling Up objectives and three investment priorities. 1.2 North Ayrshire Council’s Investment Plan for the £6.2m allocation between 2022/23 and 2024/25 was approved by Cabinet in August 2022 and subsequently by the UK Government in December 2022. In the Autumn Budget in October 2024, the UK Government announced an additional year of funding. A total of £2,697,397 has been awarded to North Ayrshire to continue delivery of the programme. 1.3 This report provides an update on the Fund and seeks approval for the proposed approach to the continuation of the previously approved Investment Plan in 2025/26. 2. Background 2.1 The UK Shared Prosperity Fund (SPF) formed part of the UK Government’s Levelling Up Agenda and a significant component of its support for places across the UK. The Fund is delivered centrally by the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) with awards made directly to local authorities. It is a replacement for the European Social Fund (ESF) and European Regional Agenda Item 11 79
Page 80
Development Fund (ERDF) funding. In North Ayrshire this has funded employability and skills and business support services, alongside regeneration project delivery. 2.2 A three year programme of funding under the fund was confirmed by UK Government in April 2022. North Ayrshire Council’s Investment Plan for the £6.2m allocation was approved by Cabinet in August 2022 and subsequently by the UK Government in December 2022. This included the development of a competitive grant scheme and participatory budgeting programme for communities under the Communities and Place investment priority. 2.3 In the Autumn Budget 2024, the UK Government announced an additional year of funding for the SPF. This is subject to the following changes: • Multiply, the adult numeracy programme, has not continued as a specific, ringfenced programme. • The core capital and revenue split has changed with a higher proportion of capital in comparison to previous years. • Allocations have been adjusted to prioritise areas with the highest level of deprivation, informed by the 2020 Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD). 2.4 A total of £2,697,397 has been awarded to North Ayrshire to continue delivery of the programme for an additional year, equating to a 17% reduction in 2025/26 compared to 2024/25. This additional year of funding does not require an updated Investment Plan for delivery. Delivery is to continue in this year as detailed in the previously approved investment plan. 2.5 The programme has been streamlined into five themes reflecting the UK Government’s ‘Five Missions.’ These are aligned with the three investment priorities for the initial SPF programme illustrated at Appendix One: Communities and Place; Supporting Local Business; and People and Skills. 2.6 Delivery in 2025/26 requires to support the delivery of the UK Government’s Mission: pushing power out to communities everywhere, with a specific focus to help kickstart economic growth and promoting opportunities in all parts of the UK. 2.7 The SPF allocations for North Ayrshire over the life of the programme are noted below, including the proposed 2025/26 allocations. This illustrates the removal of Multiply and the decrease in overall support of 17% in 2025/26. Investment Priority Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 2022/23 (£) 2023/24 (£) 2024/25 (£) 2025/26 (£) People & Skills 107,630 822,104 2,000,395 1,618,439 Supporting Local Business 7,400 367,600 300,000 296,714 Community & Place 0 427,780 850,870 674,348 (of which capital) (0) (300,744) (650,794) (576,535) Multiply 123,393 573,869 373,533 N/A Administration Costs (4%) 26,923 107,693 110,924 107,896 Total 946,284 2,299,046 3,635,722 2,697,397 80
Page 81
2.8 Informed by the budget allocations, the following proposals are recommended for 2025/2026: • People and Skills: continue to support the delivery of the Employability and Skills programme as in years 2 and 3 with essential skills support being delivered through the Community Learning & Development Team closely aligned with the Employability programme. • Supporting Local Business: continue to deliver support to local business as in years 2 and 3 with the addition of capital investment to complement the revenue support. • Communities and Place: continue to deliver the Communities and Place Fund as in years 2 and 3, with a smaller scale competitive grant fund, smaller scale council-led regeneration projects and 1% of the overall fund towards participatory budgeting. 2.9 The Multiply adult numeracy programme has not been continued as a specific ring fenced programme within the Fund in 2025/26. The scope of the People and Skills investment priority now includes essential skills, which aims to contribute to the delivery of the Employability and Skills themes through numeracy, literacy and other employment related skills. The Employability theme focuses on supporting people, including those who are economically inactive, to progress towards and into sustained employment and support for young people who are at risk of becoming not in education, employment or training (NEET). 2.10 The proposed essential skills programme is informed by learning outcomes from the Multiply project, with a specific focus on core skills in line with the requirements of the People and Skills investment priority. The programme will be further defined by the outputs and outcomes for 2025/26 which will be published by the UK Government. It will seek to enhance employability for individuals with varying levels of literacy, numeracy, English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL), and digital literacy. The programme will provide flexible, person-centred support while ensuring that services are integrated and aligned with other community and employment services. 2.11 The UK Government has selected north Ayrshire to participate in an evaluation exercise by Ipsos. This will evaluate the delivery of the fund in North Ayrshire and within other local authorities across the UK. The results set of this evaluation are set to inform and shape any forthcoming programme, with further information anticipated from MHCLG in 2024/25. The approach to SPF or any successor programme in future years will be the subject of a further Cabinet report. 3. Proposals 3.1 That Cabinet: a) Notes the update on the UK Shared Prosperity Fund; b) Approves the proposed approach to the allocation of the £2.697m award and continuation of the previously approved Investment Plan in 2025/26; c) Provides delegated authority to the Executive Director (Place) to agree changes to the funding allocations in consultation with the Portfolio Lead as required. 81
Page 82
4. Implications/Socio-economic Financial 4.1 SPF will provide £2,697,397 of funds directly to the Council in 2025/26. The cost of delivering the Investment Plan and overall SPF Programme including the Programme Manager and Monitoring and Compliance roles will be predominantly funded by the SPF admin fee allocation. The balance will be met by the Regeneration budget or other external funding sources due to the 17% decrease in the overall allocation. Human Resources 4.2 The SPF Programme will continue to be managed by the Programme Manager, with monitoring and compliance undertaken by the Claims and Compliance Officer. Both roles will be predominantly funded by the SPF admin allocation and a contribution from the Regeneration budget or other external funding sources. Legal 4.3 The approved Investment Plan was informed by advice from Legal Services and has informed the development of the Communities and Place Fund guidance and application documentation. Equality/Socio-economic 4.4 The approved Investment Plan aims to deliver on social and economic outcomes and was subject to the following impact assessments: Equality and Children’s Rights; Islands and Fairer Scotland Duty. The Communities and Place Fund aims to provide a flexible and inclusive source of funding for communities to meet local need and achieve local outcomes across a broad range of activities. The application and assessment process ensures alignment with the Fairer Scotland Duty and Council priorities, to address socio-economic inequality and embed a Community Wealth Building approach. Climate Change and Carbon 4.5 The approved Investment Plan aims to improve the North Ayrshire and Ayrshire economies in accordance with net zero ambitions. This links with the ambitions of the Sustainable North Ayrshire Strategy and the ambition for a fairer, greener and more inclusive economy as set out in the Council’s Economic Recovery and Renewal Approach. A key aspiration of the Communities and Place theme is to deliver measures to support net zero and energy efficiency and enhance the natural environment. Several of the interventions specified by the Fund can deliver on these aims. Key Priorities 4.6 The continued implementation of the investment plan will contribute to achieving the Council Plan priority outcomes and will contribute to the ambitions for wellbeing, communities and local democracy and climate change. 82
Page 83
Community Wealth Building 4.7 The approved Investment Plan was informed by the Community Wealth Building strategy with the SPF themes cross referenced with the five pillars and respective related Regeneration Delivery Plan, Economic Recovery and Renewal Plan and Island Plans. The Investment Plan approach was considered by the CWB Expert Panel and advice provided on embedding CWB into the proposals. 4.8 The approach proposed for the Communities and Place Fund ensures investment is targeted locally to add value to and enhance existing activities across the funding landscape. It empowers local communities to deliver on their own priorities and encourages added capacity through partnership working, creating a resilient and robust local delivery ecosystem. 5. Consultation 5.1 The approved Investment Plan was developed by a cross-service team of officers through a short life steering group with representation from Economic Policy, Business Support, Employability, Regeneration, Connected Communities, Health & Social Care Partnership, Procurement, Finance, Legal Services and HR. 5.2 The Communities and Place Fund approach was developed in consultation with Elected Members (at the Policy Advisory Panel), Connected Communities, community organisations and community stakeholder representatives as outlined in Appendix One. This has been further tested through consultation with The Ayrshire Community Trust and Arran Council for Voluntary Services. RUSSELL McCUTCHEON Executive Director (Place) For further information please contact Calum Couston, Programme Manager – Shared Prosperity Fund, on 07867159975. Background Papers Cabinet Report: UK Shared Prosperity Fund, 23 August 2022 Policy Advisory Panel Report: UK Shared Prosperity Fund – Communities and Place, 18 April 2023 Cabinet Report: UK Shared Prosperity Fund – Communities and Place Fund, 30 May 2023 Cabinet Report: UK Shared Prosperity Fund – Communities and Place Fund Update, 23 January 2024 83
Page 84
Appendix One: Shared Prosperity Fund Investment Priorities 84