Democracy Spraffa

Update on Performance Scorecared and App 1

North Ayrshire Council · 10 June 2022
Back to Ayrshire Shared Services Committee — 10 June 2022 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

AYRSHIRE SHARED SERVICE JOINT COMMITTEE 
10 June 2022 
Report by the Head of Roads - Ayrshire Roads Alliance   
_____________________________________________________________ 
SUBJECT: AYRSHIRE ROADS ALLIANCE
UPDATE ON PERFORMANCE SCORECARD
______________________________________________________________ 
PURPOSE OF REPORT 
1. The purpose of this Report is to advise the Joint Committee regarding the
progress made to date against the Performance Scorecard. 
RECOMMENDATIONS 
2.   It is recommended that the Joint Committee: 
i Notes the performance scorecard presented in this report; 
ii Continues to receive the performance scorecard updates; and 
iii  Otherwise, notes the content of the report.
BACKGROUND 
3  The purpose of the performance management and benchmarking is to work
collaboratively to deliver tangible and sustained improvements within the
Ayrshire Roads Alliance in order to manage the on-going development and
delivery of benchmarking frameworks. 
4. Improved performance management is fundamental to supporting the
Ayrshire Roads Alliance.  This drives change and improvement within the fully
integrated roads service and support improved outcomes, better performance,
and more effective use of resources.   
5. The Performance Indicators are regularly refreshed when new useful
performance measures are introduced by the Ayrshire Roads Alliance or there
is an agreement to include a specific indicator.  This will be a regular item for
the Ayrshire Shared Service Joint Committee to review. 
MAIN REPORT/MAIN ISSUES 
6. This scorecard is collated by the Business Support Manager and used to: 
• monitor the progress in meeting the Ayrshire Roads Alliance’s
objectives;
• help managers to have performance-related conversations with staff;
and

Page 2

• identify any problem areas that need addressed. 
7. Some indicators are collated at different frequencies and so these will be
included as appropriate. 
8. The Performance Scorecard is presented in Appendix 1.  Commentary
against the specific red and amber performance measures are included in
Appendix 1. There are a number of green performance measures which
should be highlighted, especially: 
• Traffic Light Repairs with respect to the percentage of traffic lights
repairs completed within timescale.  This is currently above target for this
financial year. 
• Priority 1 Faults – with respect to the percentage of priority 1 faults
completed within timescale.  This is currently above target for this
financial year. 
• Safety Inspections – with respect to the percentage of safety inspections
completed within the timescale.  The service has achieved a 100%
record for this financial year. 
9. The Process Improvement and Integration Plan continues to identify
improvements to a number of existing processes for re-design within The
Ayrshire Roads Alliance. 
POLICY/COMMUNITY PLAN IMPLICATIONS 
10.   A well maintained road network will contribute to achieving the Community
Plan objectives in relation to Economy & Skills and Safer Communities to
maintain good access to our communities within East Ayrshire. 
11.   The matters referred to in this report contribute to South Ayrshire Council
strategic objective of ‘Enhanced Environment through Social, Cultural and
Economic Activities’ and within that to the outcome ‘Work with partners to
improve roads and other infrastructure, to encourage house building and
business investment that sustains local communities’. 
LEGAL IMPLICATIONS 
12 The Performance Scorecard summarises the pertinent Statutory Performance
Indicators and this does not replace the existing statutory returns for
performance information. 
HUMAN RESOURCES IMPLICATIONS 
13 The Performance Scorecard has no direct impact on human resources. 
EQUALITY IMPACT IMPLICATIONS

Page 3

14 The Performance Scorecard complements the Equality Impact Assessment by
ensuring that any issues arising are adequately prioritised, managed and
either eliminated or mitigated. 
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS 
15 The Performance Scorecard facilitates the existing scrutiny arrangements to
manage, prioritise, and review the budget provided by East Ayrshire Council
and South Ayrshire Council to the Ayrshire Roads Alliance. 
RISK IMPLICATIONS 
16.    The Performance Scorecard assists in the prioritisation of risks that need to
be mitigated by the Ayrshire Roads Alliance in order to reduce the overall risk
to either Council and to comply with the Community Plan/Council Plan in both
partner bodies. 
TRANSFORMATION STRATEGY 
17 This Report aligns with the following design principle stated in the
“Transformation Strategy 2017-2022”. 
• “Maximum value for our communities”, by ensuring the various
elements of the Ayrshire Roads Alliance improves transport provision
throughout East Ayrshire. 
Person to contact: Kevin Braidwood, Head of Roads - Ayrshire Roads
Alliance
Tel No. 01563 503164  
E-mail: kevin.braidwood@ayrshireroadsalliance.org 
Implementation officer: Kevin Braidwood, Head of Roads - Ayrshire Roads
Alliance 
Tel No. 01563 503164  
E-mail: kevin.braidwood@ayrshireroadsalliance.org

Page 4

2014/16 2015/17 2016/18 2017/19 2018/20 2019/21 2021/22 2013/15 2014/16 2015/17 2016/18 2017/19 2018/20 2019/21 2021/22
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 % of A Class roads that should be considered for
maintenance 27.06% 21.30% 19.10% 19.80% 21.20% 23% 22.10% 17.20% 42.20% 40.50% 38.60% 38.20% 36.10% 34.40% 34.10% 28.90%
Number of people killed or seriously injured in road
accidents per 100,000 population 25 29 29 33 59 46 36 36 % of B Class roads that should be considered for
maintenance 31.89% 34.20% 34.00% 35.70% 32.20% 32.50% 32.60% 26.80% 50.40% 48.90% 43.90% 40.70% 38.10% 36.90% 37.30% 34.40%
Number of slightly injured casualties per 100,000
population 147 176 138 150 181 86 65 49 % of C Class roads that should be considered for
maintenance 34.22% 40.30% 38.50% 40.50% 40.60% 38.80% 33.50% 29.50% 49.50% 43.90% 40.20% 41.40% 42.40% 42.20% 40.80% 37.90%
% of unclassified roads that should be considered
for maintenance 39.84% 44.90% 45.60% 44.00% 43.70% 42.10% 42.30% 40.90% 42.00% 43.30% 43.30% 41.40% 42.90% 42.30% 43.30% 42.90%
Overall % of road network that should be considered
for maintenance - 39.40% 39.10% 39.00% 38.40% 37.80% 36.80% 33.80% 45.00% 44.10% 42.30% 41% 41.30% 37.80% 40.90% 34.20%
MONTHLY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS APSE
Average Target Current
Status APRIL MONTHLY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS APSE
Average Target Current
Status APRIL
No of invoices paid within 30 days Average days lost per employee - - 0.38
No of Invoices Received
% of invoices paid within 30 days Visits to the ARA Website every month -
49,000
per
annum 
6,059
Average Year to date of Number of Invoices paid
within 30 days No of Twitter Followers every month - - 4,254
Monthly visits to the website from social media - 1,800 per
annum       1,446
Number of ARA Safety Inspections Completed within
Timescale 52
Number of ARA Safety Inspections Scheduled 52
% of ARA Safety Inspections Completed within
timescale 100%
Number of Health and Safety Incidents Reported to
the Health and Safety Section 7
Average Number of days to report an incident to the
Health and Safety Section 6
Target Current
Status APRIL Target Current
Status APRIL Comments Target Current
Status APRIL Target Current
Status APRIL
Number of staff who have received annual FACETIME
review 11 13
% of staff who have received annual FACETIME
review 13% 17%
Number of Public Liability claims closed 6 4 Number of General Bridge Inspections - 80 21
Number of Public Liability claims received 10 7 Number of General Bridges Inspected Year to Date 80 21
Total number of open claims 1 2 Number of Special Bridge Inspections - 7 25
Number of Public Liability Claims that were
successful 0 1 Number of Special Bridge Inspections Year to Date 7 25
% of Public Liability Claims that were successful 0% 25% Number of Principal Bridge Inspections - 88 0 56 8
372
FACETIME
PRIORITY 1 FAULTS
- -
HEALTH AND SAFETY
EAST AYRSHIRE COUNCIL SOUTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL
APSE
Average MONTHLY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
SOUTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL
92.02% 90%
- -
100%
435 448
150
- 100% - 20%
EAST AYRSHIRE COUNCIL
-
ROADWORKS PROGRAMME
BRIDGES
100%--
-
PUBLIC LIABILITY CLAIMS
MONTHLY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS APSE
Average
Physical % of Roadworks Programme Completed
- -
100% 20%
FINANCE
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(CALENDAR YEAR)
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS                                                                                              
(FINANCIAL YEAR)
98%
AYRSHIRE ROADS ALLIANCE
-
Comments
AYRSHIRE ROADS ALLIANCE
Comments
WELL ENGAGED
APSE
Average
ABSENCE MONITORING
April Information currently not
available from Finance Dept
AYRSHIRE ROADS ALLIANCE PERFORMANCE SCORECARD DETAILED MONITORING REPORT
UPDATE : JOINT COMMITTEE  -  10 JUNE 22
AYRSHIRE ROADS ALLIANCE EAST AYRSHIRE COUNCIL SOUTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL
Comments
STREET LIGHTING
X0A1HX0A3HX0A4H

Page 5

Target Current
Status APRIL Target Current
Status APRIL Comments Target Current
Status APRIL Target Current
Status APRIL
EAST AYRSHIRE COUNCIL SOUTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL
APSE
Average MONTHLY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
SOUTH AYRSHIRE COUNCILEAST AYRSHIRE COUNCIL
MONTHLY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS APSE
Average Comments
Number of Priority 1 Road Emergency defect repairs
made safe within 2 hours 2 5 Number of Street Lighting repairs completed within 7
working days 117 38
Number of Priority 1 Repair Lines issued 2 5 Number of Street Lighting Repair Lines Issued 131 39
% of Priority 1 Road Emergency defect repairs made
safe within 2 hours 100% 100% % Street Lighting repairs completed within 7 working
days 89% 97%
Number of Priority 2 Road Emergency defect repairs
made safe within 5 working days 4 12 Number of Traffic light repairs completed within 48
hours 19 9
Number of Priority 2 Repair Lines issued 6 13 Number of Traffic light repair lines issued 19 9
% of Carriageway Priority 2 Defects repaired within 5
working days 67% 92% % of Traffic light repairs completed within 48 hours 100% 100%
Number of Stage 1 Complaints responded to within
allotted timescales 1 0 Number of enquiries responded to within allotted
timescales 49 22
Numer of Stage 1 Complaints received 2 0 Number of enquiries received 60 33
% of Stage 1 Complaints responded to within allotted
timescales 50% - % of enquiries responded to within allotted
timescales 82% 67%
Number of Stage 2 complaints responded to within
allotted timescales 0 0
Number of Stage 2 complaints received 0 0 Number of FOI & EIR requests responded to within
20 working days 6 12
% of Stage 2 complaints responded to within allotted
timescales - - Number of FOI & EIR requests received 6 12
% of FOI & EIR requests responded to within 20
working days 100% 100%
Running Average Year to date of FOI & EIR requests
responded to within 20 working days 100% 100%
Number of parking appeals accepted 42 40
Number of parking appeals received 106 101
% of parking appeals accepted 39% 39%
PARKING
PRIORITY 2 FAULTS
- - - - -
Running Average Year to date of Stage 2 Complaints
responded to within allotted timescales
- 100%
-
100%
-
50%
COMPLAINTS
100%
50%
95%88.07%
76.23%
75% 75%91.20%
100%
88.23% 95% 95%
80%- 100%
ENQUIRIES
83.44% 80%
88.52% 100%
95%
One
complaint
took longer
to respond
to due to the
complexity
of the
complaint. 
Continuing
issues with
supply of
discharge
lamps / access
issues
Officers are
reminded of the
importance of
responding to
enquiries within
timescales
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
TRAFFIC
X0A0HX0A2HX0A5HX0A6H
X0A7H