Democracy Spraffa

Performance Scorecard

North Ayrshire Council · 6 June 2025
Back to Ayrshire Shared Services Committee — 6 June 2025 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

AYRSHIRE SHARED SERVICE JOINT COMMITTEE 
6 June 2025 
Report by the Head of Roads – Ayrshire Roads Alliance 
AYRSHIRE ROADS ALLIANCE
PERFORMANCE SCORECARD 
Purpose of report 
1. The purpose of this Report is to advise the Joint Committee regarding the
progress made to date against the Performance Scorecard.  
Recommendations 
2  It is recommended that the Joint Committee:
i. Notes the performance scorecard presented in this report;
ii. Continues to receive the performance scorecard updates; and
iii.  Otherwise, notes the content of the report. 
Background 
3.    The purpose of the performance management and benchmarking is to work
collaboratively to deliver tangible and sustained improvements within the
Ayrshire Roads Alliance in order to manage the on-going development and
delivery of benchmarking frameworks. 
4. Improved performance management is fundamental to supporting the Ayrshire
Roads Alliance.  This drives change and improvement within the fully integrated
roads service and support improved outcomes, better performance, and more
effective use of resources.   
5.      The Performance Indicators are regularly refreshed when new useful performance
measures are introduced by the Ayrshire Roads Alliance or there is an
agreement to include a specific indicator.  This will be a regular item for the
Ayrshire Shared Service Joint Committee to review 
Main report/main issues 
6.       This scorecard is used to: 
• monitor the progress in meeting the Ayrshire Roads Alliance’s objectives;
• help managers to have performance-related conversations with staff; and 
• identify any problem areas that need addressed.

Page 2

7. Some indicators are collated at different frequencies and so these will be
included as appropriate. 
8. The Performance Scorecard is presented in Appendix 1.  Commentary against
the specific red and amber performance measures are included in Appendix 1.
There are a number of green performance measures which should be
highlighted, especially: 
• Finance with respect to the percentage of invoices paid within 30 calendar
days.  This is currently at 99% for the financial year. 
• Priority 1 and Priority 2 Faults – with respect to the percentage of priority 1
and 2 faults completed within timescale.  This is currently above target for
the financial year. 
• Street Lighting Repairs – with respect to the percentage of street lighting
repairs completed within the timescale.  The service has achieved an
average of 98% for the financial year. 
• Traffic Light Repairs – with respect to the percentage of traffic light repairs
completed within the timescale.  The service has achieved an average of
99% for the financial year. 
9. The Process Improvement and Integration Plan continues to identify
improvements to a number of existing processes for re-design within The
Ayrshire Roads Alliance. 
Implications 
Implications  Yes  No
Paragraph
number in
report
1. Policy/Strategic Planning Yes  10 and 11
2. Governance Yes  12
3. Human Resources Yes  13
4. Equality and Fairer Scotland Duty Yes   14
5. Financial Yes  15
6. Risk Yes  16
7. Community Wealth Building Yes  17
8. Net Zero Yes  18 
Policy/strategic planning implications 
10.      A well-maintained road network will contribute to achieving the 2015-2030 
Community Plan objectives and associated 2024-2027 Delivery Plans 
11.      The matters referred to in this report contribute to Priority 1 of the South Ayrshire       
Council Plan: Spaces and Places/ Moving around and the environment       
(Outcome 1).

Page 3

Governance Implications 
12. The work of the Ayrshire Roads Alliance is undertaken in accordance with 
relevant legislation. 
Humans resources Implications 
13.     The Performance Scorecard has no direct impact on human resources. 
Equality impact and Fairer Scotland duty implications 
14. The Performance Scorecard complements the Equality Impact Assessment by     
ensuring that any issues arising are adequately prioritised, managed and either
eliminated or mitigated. 
Financial implications 
15.   The Performance Scorecard facilitates the existing scrutiny arrangements to
manage, prioritise, and review the budget provided by East Ayrshire Council and
South Ayrshire Council to the Ayrshire Roads Alliance. 
Risk implications 
16.    The Performance Scorecard assists in the prioritisation of risks that need to be 
mitigated by the Ayrshire Roads Alliance in order to reduce the overall risk to
either Council  and to comply with the Community Plan/Council Plan in both
partner bodies. 
Community Wealth Building implications 
17. The works programme provides economic levers to develop resilient, inclusive
local economies with more local spend and fair employment, as well as ensuring
that wealth is more locally owned and benefits local people 
Net zero implications 
18.   The Ayrshire Roads Alliance Service Plan supports and links to East Ayrshire
Climate Strategy Themes 
Theme 2: Transport
Theme 4: Natural Environment

Page 4

Appendices (if applicable) 
1. Performance Scorecard 
Background papers 
None 
Person to contact 
Jane Corrie, Head of Roads - Ayrshire Roads Alliance 
Tel No. 01563 503164  
E-mail: jane.corrie@ayrshireroadsalliance.org 
Implementation Officer 
Jane Corrie, Head of Roads - Ayrshire Roads Alliance 
Tel No. 01563 503164  
E-mail: jane.corrie@ayrshireroadsalliance.org

Page 5

2019/21 2019/21
Scotland 2020/22 2020/22 
Scotland 2021/23 2021/23
Scotland 2022/24 2022/24
Scotland 2023/25 2023/25
Scotland 2019/21 2019/21
Scotland 2020/22 2020/22 
Scotland 2021/23 2021/23
Scotland
` % of A Class roads that should be considered
for maintenance 22.10% 29.80% 17.20% 27.60% 15.60% 27.40% 17.60% 28.90% 17.70% 30.60% 34.10% 29.80% 28.90% 27.60% 23.00% 27.40%
2021 2022 2023 2024 2021 2022 2023 2024 % of B Class roads that should be considered
for maintenance 32.60% 34.00% 26.85% 33.60% 27.00% 31.50% 26.10% 32.50% 25.20% 34.60% 37.30% 34.00% 34.40% 33.60% 32.50% 31.50%
Number of people killed or seriously injured in road
accidents per 100,000 population 36 42 48 34 37 54 28 54 % of C Class roads that should be considered
for maintenance 33.50% 33.60% 29.50% 33.20% 29.60% 32.70% 31.00% 33.40% 30.80% 34.20% 40.80% 33.60% 37.90% 33.20% 38.90% 32.70%
Number of slightly injured casualties per 100,000
population 49 58 82 57 41 52 30 58 % of U Class roads that should be considered
for maintenance 42.30% 38.30% 40.90% 36.70% 40.60% 36.40% 39.00% 36.20% 37.00% 36.20% 43.40% 38.30% 42.90% 36.70% 41.00% 36.40%
Overall % of the road network that should be
considered for maintenance 36.80% 35.50% 33.80% 34.20% 33.50% 33.60% 33.00% 34.10% 31.70% 34.70% 40.90% 35.50% 39.00% 34.20% 37.40% 33.60%
MONTHLY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS APSE
Average Target Current
Status Apr MONTHLY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS APSE
Average Target Current
Status Apr Comments
No of invoices paid within 30 days 333 Average days lost per employee - - 1.43
No of Invoices Received 341
% of invoices paid within 30 days 98% Visits to the ARA Website every month - 49,000 per
annum  1,751
Average Year to date of Number of Invoices paid
within 30 days 98% No of Twitter Followers every month -  4,576
Monthly visits to the website from social
media - 1,800 per
annum             140
Number of ARA Safety Inspections Completed within
Timescale 25
Number of ARA Safety Inspections Scheduled 25
% of ARA Safety Inspections Completed within
timescale 100%
Average Number of days to report an incident to the
Health and Safety Section 1.5
Target Current
Status Apr Target Current
Status Apr Target Current
Status Apr Target Current
Status Apr
Number of Public Liability claims closed 5 10
Number of Public Liability claims received 6 7
Total number of open claims 57 65
Number of Public Liability Claims that were
successful 0 0
% of Public Liability Claims that were successful 0% 0% Number of Principal Bridge Inspections - 0 0  9
Number of Priority 1 Road Emergency defect repairs
made safe within 2 hours 0 3 Number of Street Lighting repairs completed
within 7 working days 53 50
Number of Priority 1 Repair Lines issued 0 3 Number of Street Lighting Repair Lines Issued 54 50
100%
-
75%
- -
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(CALENDAR YEAR) East Ayrshire South Ayrshire
AYRSHIRE ROADS ALLIANCE
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS                                                                                              
(FINANCIAL YEAR)
-
95%
- 
EAST AYRSHIRE COUNCIL SOUTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL
APSE
Average MONTHLY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
FINANCE
98% -
AYRSHIRE ROADS ALLIANCE
Comments
HEALTH AND SAFETY
92.02%
EAST AYRSHIRE COUNCIL
MONTHLY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS APSE
Average
100%
75%
-
91.20%
Number of staff who have received annual
FACETIME review 2 0
-
Comments
1%
ROADWORKS PROGRAMME
BRIDGES
Physical % of Roadworks Programme
Completed 100% 20%
7 27
WELL ENGAGED
20 
- 100% 
40
Number of General Bridge Inspections 50 36
Number of Special Bridge Inspections -
ABSENCE MONITORING
AYRSHIRE ROADS ALLIANCE
East Ayrshire Council South Ayrshire Cou
AYRSHIRE ROADS ALLIANCE PERFORMANCE SCORECARD DETAILED MONITORING REPORT
UPDATE : JOINT COMMITTEE  - 6 JUNE 2025
Comments
SOUTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL
FACETIME
Managers are
aware of the
importance of
completing
FACE reviews
PUBLIC LIABILITY CLAIMS
PRIORITY 1 FAULTS STREET LIGHTING
95%88%

Page 6

Target Current
Status Apr Target Current
Status Apr Target Current
Status Apr Target Current
Status Apr
EAST AYRSHIRE COUNCIL SOUTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL
APSE
Average MONTHLY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
EAST AYRSHIRE COUNCIL
MONTHLY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS APSE
Average CommentsComments
SOUTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL
% of Priority 1 Road Emergency defect repairs made
safe within 2 hours - 100% % Street Lighting repairs completed within 7
working days 98% 100%
Number of Priority 2 Road Emergency defect repairs
made safe within 5 working days 8 20 Number of Traffic light repairs completed
within 48 hours 26 22
Number of Priority 2 Repair Lines issued 10 21 Number of Traffic light repair lines issued 26 23
% of Carriageway Priority 2 Defects repaired within 5
working days 80% 95% % of Traffic light repairs completed within 48
hours 100% 96%
Number of Stage 1 Complaints responded to within
allotted timescales 0 0 Number of enquiries responded to within
allotted timescales 88 52
Numer of Stage 1 Complaints received 0 0 Number of enquiries received 90 55
% of Stage 1 Complaints responded to within
allotted timescales - - % of enquiries responded to within allotted
timescales 98% 95%
Number of Stage 2 complaints responded to within
allotted timescales - 0 1
Number of Stage 2 complaints received 0 1 Number of FOI & EIR requests responded to
within 20 working days 28 25
% of Stage 2 complaints responded to within allotted
timescales - 100% Number of FOI & EIR requests received 28 25
% of FOI & EIR requests responded to within
20 working days 100% 100%
Number of parking appeals accepted 30 62
Number of parking appeals received 99 182
% of parking appeals accepted 30% 34%
- ----
100% 100%
- 100%100%
76.23%
88.52% 100% 100%
88.23% 95% 95%
80%
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
50% 50%
Officers are reminded
of the importance of
responding to
enquiries within
timescales
80%
COMPLAINTS
PARKING
PRIORITY 2 FAULTS TRAFFIC LIGHTS
ENQUIRIES
83.44%