Democracy Spraffa

7. Complaint Report

North Ayrshire Council · 15 November 2022
Back to Audit and Scrutiny Committee — 15 November 2022 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

2,443
2,541
2,827
2019 2020 2021
NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL 
15 November 2022 
Audit and Scrutiny Committee 
Title:    2021/22 Complaint Report 
Purpose:  To inform the Audit and Scrutiny Committee of the Council's
complaint performance and the volumes and trends of complaints
received in Financial Year 2021/22. 
Recommendation:  That the Committee notes the report and the information
provided. 
1. Executive Summary 
1.1 This report details complaint information relating to North Ayrshire Council during
2021/22, covering the period 1 April 2021 to 31 March 2022. 
1.2 To allow comparisons to be made the report also details some complaint data relating
to 2019 and 2020. 
1.3 Performance is measured through a number of Scottish Public Services Ombudsman
(SPSO) performance indicators, some of which have national targets. Reporting on
complaints is a statutory requirement and is monitored by Audit & Scrutiny.   
1.4    When considering the report it should be noted that the coronavirus pandemic continued
to cause disruption to the Council, however, services continued to operate and critical
and key services were maintained.   
2. Background 
2.1 This section contains statistical information and commentary on some of the key
complaint performance indicators.  More information relating to the indicators can be
found in the attached report. 
2.2 Volume of complaints received and closed

Page 2

2.2.1 Whilst Council services continued to be impacted by the pandemic during 2021, there
was a modest increase in complaints when compared with the previous year. 
2.3 Complaints closed at each Stage 
2019/20 2020/21 2021/22
Stage One 2,302 2,417 2,671
Stage Two 141 124 156 
2.3.1 Whilst there is no national target for the number of complaints to be closed under each
Stage, the Council always seeks to maximise closure at Stage One as complainants
receive a quicker resolution, it reduces the impact on complaint handler time and
reduces the possibility of SPSO referrals. 
2.4 Complaint outcomes 
Stage One         Stage Two                                                                   
2.4.1 Up to 31 March 2021, a complaint that meets our complaint criteria could be upheld,
partially upheld or not upheld. From 1 April 2021 a fourth outcome became available to
use called ‘Resolved’. Resolved complaints are where the Council has taken action to
address a problem or issue without making a decision on whether there were any failings
(this would happen where we agree a solution with the complainant at the outset without
needing to actually investigate the complaint). 
2.4.2 Analysis shows the majority of Resolved complaints related to missed bin collections,
where complainants simply wanted the bins collected.   
2.4.3 Half of all upheld and partially upheld complaints also related to Waste Services, however
it should be noted over 102,000 household waste bins are collected each week.  As this
equates to approximately 5 million collections a year, from a complaint perspective this
results in a small percentage complaint rate of 0.03%. 
2.4.4 Many complaints not upheld related to policies, regulations or complaints that turned out
to be unfounded after investigation. 
30%
8%
15%
47%
Upheld Partially Upheld Not Upheld Resolved
10%
33%55%
Upheld Partially Upheld Not Upheld Resolved (2%)

Page 3

2.5 Average time in working days for a full response at each Stage 
Stage One 
Stage Two 
2.5.1 The average time in working days for a response under both Stages has exceeded the
SPSO target response timescales for the last three years. 
2.6 Complaints closed within timescale 
Stage One                                                  Stage Two             
2.6.1 The national target for complaints closed on time under Stage One is 80% or above and
the target was exceeded.  The national target for complaints closed on time under Stage
Two is 85% or above and again this target was exceeded. 
2.6.2 Further details of complaints not closed on time are contained in the attached report. 
3.3
4.3 4.2
0
5
2019/20 2020/21 2021/22
average days to resolve National Target (5 days or less)
14.5 14.3 14.5
0
20
2019/20 2020/21 2021/22
average days to resolve National  Target (20 days or less)
84%
16%
Closed on time
Not closed on time
95%
5%
Closed on time
Not closed on time

Page 4

2.7 Complaint timescale extensions 
2.7.1 Stage One complaints should be responded to within 5 working days but can be extended
an additional 5 working days under certain circumstances.  Stage Two complaints should
be responded to within 20 working days but again Services can extend the timescale if
certain circumstances are met. 
2.7.2 A total of 106 complaints had their timescales extended during the year and over two thirds
were Stage Ones.  Reasons for extension included complainants and individuals being
unavailable to assist with investigations, additional information having to be sought to
support investigations and issues arising from the ongoing Covid-19 outbreak. 
2.8 Trends identified from upheld/partially upheld complaints 
Key complaint topics for upheld or partially upheld complaints are detailed on page 9
and 10 of the attached report. 
2.9 Changes or Improvements made as a result of complaints 
Not all Services can implement improvements as a result of complaints due to a number
of factors, including the feasibility of making changes and resource/budget
considerations. That said, improvements were made in some Services as a result of
complaints received during the year and a selection are noted in page 15 of the attached
report. 
2.10 Compliments 
The Council recorded over 240 compliments received during the year.  Some praised
specific individuals or teams, some related to more than one Service and some were
raised by employees complimenting other employees. A selection can be found in
page 16 of the attached report. 
3. Proposals 
3.1 It is proposed the Committee approves the report and now the Council’s complaint
handling performance. 
4. Implications/Socio-economic Duty 
Financial 
4.1 None. 
Human Resources 
4.2 None. 
Legal 
4.3 None.

Page 5

Equality/Socio-economic 
4.4 None. 
Climate Change and Carbon 
4.5 None. 
Key Priorities 
4.6 The Two Stage Complaint Handling Procedure supports the Council's key priority of
delivering more effective and efficient service provision. It demonstrates commitment
through focussing on and determining trends to service improvement and delivery for
North Ayrshire residents, customers and visitors. 
Community Wealth Building 
4.7 None. 
5. Consultation 
5.1 None. 
Aileen Craig
Head of Democratic Services 
For further information please contact Darren Millar, Manager Information Governance,
on (01294) 322988. 
Background Papers
0

Page 6

Page | 1 
Corporate Complaints 
2021/22

Page 7

Page | 2 
Contents 
Page 
Introduction         3 
1 Volume of complaints closed      4 
2  Volume of complaints closed on time  at both Stages   7 
3 Volume of complaints not closed on time per Directorate     7 
4 Key complaint topics       9 
5 Average time in working days for a full response   11 
6  Extended complaints       13 
7 Complaint Outcomes                                                                    14 
8  Improvements made as a result of complaints                        15 
9 Compliments        16 
10 ALEO complaints        17 
11  SPSO complaint referrals      20 
12 Glossary         21

Page 8

Page | 3 
Introduction 
North Ayrshire Council always seeks to deliver the best services possible to its
customers and residents but it is recognised that dissatisfaction will sometimes occur. 
When it does we want to know what went wrong, why it went wrong and what we can
do to make things right. 
The Council recognises valuable lessons can be learnt from complaints which are
defined as expressions of dissatisfaction from members of the public about actions, or
lack of actions, or about the standard of service provided by or on behalf of the Council.  
The Council’s complaint handling procedure (CHP) has two stages for handling
complaints from the public:- 
Stage One complaints (also known as Frontline Resolution complaints)
are straightforward, non-complex complaints the Council can resolve at
the initial point of contact or as close to the point of service delivery as
possible.  The Council has up to 5 working days to resolve these. 
Stage Two complaints (also known as Investigation complaints) are
complaints the Council is typically unable to resolve at Stage One and
requires more time to carry out further investigation.  This may be
because the nature of the complaint is complex, serious or high risk. 
The Council has up to 20 working days to resolve these. 
This report details the Council’s complaint handling performance covering financial
year 2021 (1 April 2021 to 31 March 2022).  Performance is measured via several
Scottish Public Services Ombudsman indicators (some of which have national targets)
and complaint data relating to previous years has been included in certain sections to
allow comparisons to be made.   
Reporting on complaints is a statutory requirement and is monitored by Audit Scotland. 
1
2

Page 9

Page | 4 
2,259
159
133 254 Place
Multi-Service (22)
Health & Social Care Partnership
Communities
Chief Executive's
1   Volume of complaints closed 
The Council received 2,859 complaints during 2021/22 and closed 2,827.  The chart below
provides a breakdown of the closed complaints per Directorate: 
The following tables highlight complaints closed per Directorate under each Stage: 
Place Stage One Stage Two
Building Services 208 4
Business Development - 1
Facilities Management 27 -
Housing  166 25
Planning 5 2
Property Management & Investment 74 4
Protective Services 9 1
Regeneration 2 -
Roads 88 6
Streetscene 129 1
Sustainability 2 -
Transport 2 -
Waste Services 1,498 5
Total 2,210 49 
Multi-Service Stage One Stage Two
Complaints involving more than one service 11 11
Total 11 11 
Health & Social Care Partnership Stage One Stage Two
Children, Families & Criminal Justice 31 23
Health & Community Care 65 24
Mental Health 3 4
Support Services 6 3
Total 105 54

Page 10

Page | 5 
Communities Stage One Stage Two
Community Facilities 2 -
Education (HQ) 31 24
Education (Schools) 60 9
Information & Culture 6 -
Sports & Activity 1 -
Total 100 33 
Chief Executive’s Stage One Stage Two
Committee & Member Services - 1
Customer Services 204 7
Financial Services 14 -
Fraud & Internal Audit 1 -
HR 1 -
Information Technology 20 -
Legal Services 5 1
Total 245 9 
• Although there is no target for the volume of complaints handled under each Stage,
the Council seeks to maximise closure at Stage One wherever possible and 94% were
handled at this Stage during the period.   
• Some Services handled all their complaints at Stage One. 
• Whilst 53% of all complaints received related to Waste Services (the majority being
missed bins and assisted pullouts), the Service empties over 102,000 household
waste bins each week.  As this equates to approximately 4.9 million collections over
the year, 0.03% of these collections resulted in complaints being raised. This is worth
highlighting given Waste Services experienced significant operational challenges due
to the Covid pandemic during the year and was still able to maintain a bin collection
service. 
• Multi-Service complaints have a table of their own as they are not attributable to a
specific Service.

Page 11

Page | 6 
Year on Year comparison 
The graph below shows a comparison of the volume of complaints received each year over
the last three years: 
The table below shows the volume breakdown for each Directorate over the last three years
(based on the Council’s new 2020 structure): 
Directorate 2019  2020 2021 Variance
(2020 – 2021)
Chief Executive’s 188 176 254 +44%
Communities 136 90 133 +48%
HSCP (Social Work complaints) 125 127 159 +25%
Place 1,978 2,128 2,259 +6%
Total 2,427* 2,521* 2,805* +11%
*Multi-service complaints have been excluded to allow for true Directorate comparisons 
• Whilst the Council maintained various measures, policies, processes and practices to
combat the ongoing pandemic during 2021/22, there has only been an 11% increase in
complaints when comparing 2021 with the previous year. 
• The 44% uplift in Chief Executive complaints can be attributed to increases in Customer
Services, IT and Finance complaints. Key complaint topics are detailed in section 4 of this
report. 
• The 48% increase in Communities complaints is the result of a considerable uplift in
school-related complaints received. Key complaint topics are detailed in section 4 of this
report. 
2,443
2,541
2,827
2019 2020 2021

Page 12

Page | 7 
• The national target for closing Stage Two
complaints on time is 85% and above. 
• The volume closed on time includes
extended complaints that met their new
due dates.
• The national target for closing Stage One
complaints on time is 80% and above. 
• The volume closed on time includes
extended complaints that met their new
due dates.
84%
16%
Closed on time
Not closed on time
95%
5%
Closed on time
Not closed on time
6
27
Information Technology
Customer Services
1
14
4
2
Sports & Activity
Education (schools)
Education (HQ)
Community Facilities
2   Volume of complaints closed on time at both Stages 
Stage One 
Stage Two       
3   Volume of complaints not closed on time per Directorate 
This section provides details of complaints not closed on time under each Stage and includes
extended complaints that did not meet their new timescales. 
Stage One                    
Notes
Chief Executive’s 
Communities 
Customer Services complaints breached mainly due to
resourcing issues (including self-isolations) and delays in
obtaining information from complainants/3rd parties to
progress complaints.  Extensions could have been
considered for around 70% of these given they were closed
within the extra 5 working day extension allowance. IT
complaints breached due to the complexity of the system(s)
issues, awaiting further information from complainants and
complaints being incorrectly routed.  Extensions could have
been considered for 50% of these for the same reason given
above.
Some complaints breached due to complaint handlers being
unable to contact complainants in order to discuss or agree
the issues.  Some Education complaints also breached as
they were received when the schools were closed. 
Extensions could have been agreed for 60% of all
Communities complaints not closed on time given they were
closed within the extra 5 working day extension allowance.

Page 13

Page | 8 
8
8
Health & Comm Care
Children & Families
288
1
1
26
6
5
3
2
16
Waste Services
Transport
Sustainability
Streetscene
Roads
PMI
Housing
Facilities Management
Building Services
HSCP (Social Work complaints) 
Place 
Waste Services (operations) complaints in 2021/22 
Waste Operations continued to operate under Covid-related restrictions for the full period of
2021/22 and additional labour was carried throughout the year to ensure vehicles could be
resourced.  Additional vehicle hires were also extended throughout 2021/22 as availability of
vehicles became a pinch point causing operational disruption and service disruption.   
The impact of Covid was seasonal with waves of absences following the general trends seen
in the wider community.  There was a particular peak as the omicron variant became prevalent
from the festive period into the second half of the winter. At one point a suspension of the
brown bin service was necessary in January as the omicron surge peaked. 
The service had to make operational decisions to prioritise resourcing beats unfortunately at
the expense of bin deliveries.  A focus has been undertaken to ensure priority is given to any
complaints relating to assisted collections.   
When reviewing the complaint data for Waste Service, particularly Waste Operations, it is
evident that despite significant operational challenges, the majority of bin collections took
place without issue. 
Reasons for complaints not closed on time included
complaint handlers being unavailable to progress
complaints for various reasons, complainants/3rd
parties being unavailable to assist with investigations,
resourcing issues related to Covid-19 and the
complexity of the complaints.   
Of the 348 Place complaints not closed on time, 64%
could have been considered for the extra 5 working day
extension given they were closed within 10 working
days. 
Regarding the volume of Waste complaints that did not
meet timescale, see additional commentary below. 
These complaints breached due to multiple reasons
and no specific trends were identified, however,
extensions could have been considered for some of
these given they were closed within the extra 5 working
day extension allowance.

Page 14

Page | 9 
1Health & Comm Care
1
2
Education (Schools)
Education (HQ)
2
1
PMI
Housing
Stage Two
Communities 
HSCP (Social Work complaints) 
Multi-Service 
Place 
4   Key complaint topics 
Key topics for upheld and partially upheld complaints for Services are listed below.  Services
will not be listed if there were low complaint volumes that did not allow meaningful analysis. 
Chief Executive’s
Service Key complaint topic(s)
Customer Services • Issues with Council Tax
• Communication
• System issues
• Waiting times
Information Technology • Systems issues 
1Multi-Service
These complaints were sensitive in nature and
required detailed  investigation.  Extensions could
have been considered for these.
This complaint breached by one day as approval was
required from a Chief Officer before the response
could be issued.
This complaint breached due to service pressures
caused by resourcing issues as a result of the
pandemic.
These complaints breached due to delays in the
Stage Two response letters being approved prior to
issue.

Page 15

Page | 10 
Communities
Service Key complaint topic(s)
Education (HQ) • Sensitive issues relating to teachers
and/or pupils
• Service provision/delivery 
HSCP (Social Work complaints) 
Service Key complaint topic(s)
Children & Families • Service provision/delivery
• Alleged employee behaviour
Health & Community Care • Service provision/delivery
• Alleged employee behaviour 
Place
Service Key complaint topic(s)
Building Services • Follow Up appointments
• Quality issues
Housing • Anti-social behaviour
PMI • Gas Central Heating (incl. maintenance)
Roads • Road conditions
Streetscene • Quality/lack of grass cutting
Waste Services • Missed collections (all colours)
• Missed pull out collections (all colours)
• Waste Bins not delivered (all colours)
• Failed special uplifts
• Alleged employee behaviour 
• ‘Alleged employee behaviour’ appears as a key topic for some Services but the definition
is broad and has been used where complainants perceived employee actions or
behaviour to be unacceptable.  Where unacceptable behaviour was identified by Services
appropriate action will have been taken to address.

Page 16

Page | 11 
5   Average time in working days for a full response 
The average time in working days to close complaints under both Stages during the period is
noted below.  Values for previous years have been included to allow comparisons to be made
and any complaints that had their timescales extended have been excluded from the
calculations. 
Stage One 
Stage Two 
• The average time to close complaints under both Stages has consistently  exceeded
target. 
The bar charts on the following two pages detail Services that did not meet the average time
in working days for a response under either Stage.  Services that met the target are not listed
and any complaints that had their timescales extended have been excluded from the
calculations.  
3.3
4.3 4.2
0
5
2019/20 2020/21 2021/22
average days to resolve National Target (5 days or less)
14.5 14.3 14.5
0
20
2019/20 2020/21 2021/22
average days to resolve National  Target (20 days or less)

Page 17

Page | 12 
Chief Executive’s 
Stage One 
Two IT complaints that were received were resolved beyond 20 working days,
resulting in the average days to resolve target not being achieved.  One complaint
was hindered due to the delay caused by the complainant not providing further
information.  The other complaint involved a number of services and delays were
encountered in receiving their responses in order to address and fix the issue. 
Communities 
Stage One 
Two complaints were received for Community Facilities and one was closed
significantly beyond the 5 working day target due to resourcing issues in the service
and delays encountered when engaging the relevant community group to assist in
investigating the complaint. 
A small number of school complaints were closed significantly beyond the 5 working
day target as they had been received when the schools were closed for the summer
holidays and so could not be progressed. 
One Sports & Activity complaint was received and closed on day 8, breaching the
target.  This complaint could have been considered for the 5 working day extension.
6.3
IT
Average days to resolve
National Target (5 days)
20
6.7
8
Community
Facilities
Education
(Schools)
Sports & Activity
Average days to resolve National Target (5 days)

Page 18

Page | 13 
Place 
Stage One                                                                                     Stage Two           
A small number of Streetscene complaints were closed significantly beyond the 5
working day timescale, impacting on the average days to close.  Reasons for this
included difficulties in contacting complainants to progress complaints and the
complexities of the complaints.  Some of these complaints could have been
considered at Stage Two. 
Energy & Sustainability received two complaints during the year, one of which was
closed on working day 64.  The delay was due to multiple issues, including
bereavement leave, issues with the complaint being directed to the appropriate team
to investigate and a breakdown in communication between services involved. 
PMI closed a small number of Stage Two complaints during the year, two of which
were closed a few days beyond the 20 working day timescale.  The delay in closing
the complaints was due to the response requiring approval before being issued. 
6   Extended complaints 
• 106 complaints had their timescales extended during the year - 77 at Stage One and
29 at Stage Two.  The complaints related mainly to two Directorates - HSCP (30%) and
Place (40%). 
• There were numerous reasons for extending, including complainants, 3rd parties and
employees being unavailable to assist or support with investigations, additional
information having to be sought to support investigations and issues arising from the
ongoing pandemic (particular lack of resource through self-isolations). 
• Of the 106 complaints that had their timescales extended, 81% were closed within
their new due dates. 
5.3
34
Streetscene Sustainability
Average days to resolve National Target (5 days)
22
PMI
Average days to resolve
National Target (20 days)

Page 19

Page | 14 
30%
8%
15%
47%
Upheld Partially Upheld Not Upheld Resolved
7   Complaint Outcomes 
Up to 31 March 2021, a complaint that meets our complaint criteria could be upheld, partially
upheld or not upheld. From 1 April 2021, a fourth outcome became available to use called
‘Resolved’. Resolved complaints are where the Council has taken action to address the
problem/issue without making a decision on whether there were any failings (this would
happen where we agree a solution with the complainant at the outset without needing to
actually investigate the complaint). 
The charts below detail the number of complaints upheld, partially upheld, not upheld or
resolved under both Stages. 
Stage One 
Stage Two 
*Partially Upheld complaints are complaints that contain more than one complaint element and at least one of them is upheld
10%
33%55%
Upheld Partially Upheld Not Upheld Resolved (2%)
• All the Stage Two complaints that were upheld or
partially upheld* were split across all Directorates and
multiple services. 
• A very small number of complaints were marked as
‘Resolved’ at Stage Two.  As complaints can only typically
be ‘Resolved’ at Stage One, an investigation is underway
to determine if the outcomes for these complaints are
correct and if not, remedial action will be taken to
address. 
• Of the 55% of complaints not upheld, these related to
various reasons, including polices, regulations and
complaints that were unsubstantiated.
• Of the 38% of complaints upheld and partially upheld*
at Stage One, over half related to Waste Services and in
particular bin collections.  This was anticipated given
issues the service continued to experience as a result of
the pandemic. 
• Over two thirds of all Resolved complaints also related
to Waste Services (mainly missed bin collections) which
indicates many residents simply wanted their bins
collected. 
• The 15% of complaints not upheld related to policies,
regulations or complaints that were poor
quality/unfounded.

Page 20

Page | 15 
8   Improvements made as a result of complaints 
Council officers continually seek to make improvements in service delivery and complaint
information is analysed regularly to inform service improvements. The largest proportion of
complaints raised were experienced within Waste Services and work is ongoing to reflect
learning into service delivery arrangements and complaint processing practices to achieve a
reduction in complaints received. 
Many improvements were made as a result of complaints received during the year and a
selection is noted below. 
What happened? What we did
A customer advised they were in the process
of booking a special waste uplift when the
payment system went down.  This resulted
in the payment being taken but no uplift.
An apology was offered to the complainant, the
special uplift payment refunded and
consideration given to adding a statement to the
website advising customers what to do when
payment receipts are not generated.
This complaint was a sensitive matter
regarding a child and an additional support
needs Early Years (EY) placement.
An apology was offered to the complainant and
it was determined the criteria for the allocation
of places to be more clearly communicated with
families.  It was also agreed EY Management
would clarify the process with EY managers
regarding who makes contact with a new
provider when a child moves locality; EY
Management would clarify the start time for an
Early Years placement (on birthday or term after
birthday); to reconcile the Team Around the
Child process regarding the allocation of any
placement and to improve communication and
sharing of information in a timely fashion; full
assessment of needs to be shared with each
prospective setting to inform and help decisions
to be taken in a timely fashion.
A resident contacted the Council in order to
have their address updated as a new build
property but was unable to speak to
someone using the Street Naming &
Numbering (SNN) telephone number in
order to get issue resolved. 
An apology was offered to the complainant as it
was identified the telephone number was not
fully operational.  Use of a new communications
application has allowed the SNN telephone
phone number to become usable again and the
SNN page on the Council’s website will be
reviewed to ensure the most appropriate
contact details and information.
A customer complained as they called the
Council’s Contact Centre about a matter and
were placed in a queue, however the call
was then prematurely  terminated, resulting
in the customer having to call in a second
time and queue again to speak to someone.
A call-back queue has been introduced in the
Contact Centre which allows customers to
request a call back instead of holding on in a
queue. An apology was offered to the
complainant for the problems encountered.

Page 21

Page | 16 
Compliment letter received from a bowling club
commending an employee from Licensing and an
employee from Environmental Health for their help
and support when adhering to Covid-19 restrictions
9   Compliments 
Over 240 compliments were recorded cross-Council during the year.  Although they cannot all
be highlighted in this report, a selection are noted below. 
“I’d like to commend the Streetscene fly-tipping
team.  Any reports I have made have been dealt
with quickly whether in the town or out in the
country.  Well done to all for which has so far been
an excellent service.”
Multiple compliments received for Waste
Services regarding returning to collect missed
bins, delivering new bins and the attitude of the
employees working at the Recycle Centres
“Quick response and excellent service from Pest
Control Officer from Environmental Health today.
He was very knowledgeable about wasps and bees
that I felt reassured following his inspection. Great
work NAC”
“I’d like to compliment the Money Matters
Team - great support and help with my
child's DLA appeal.  Caring and brilliant at
what they do.”
“I would like to thank Housing and the
Welfare Team for their help and support as
I felt very low and the people I spoke to
were very kind, understanding and helpful.
I am grateful for their kindness and support
during a very difficult time for me”
“I had a plumber from Building Services visit my
property today to carry out some work.  His
workmanship was outstanding and he was also very
polite and courteous. He is a credit to NAC and I would
like his bosses to recognise what an asset he is.”
Several compliments received from residents of
Montgomerie Park regarding ground works
undertaken by Regeneration back in June
“I would like to pass on my thanks to the
Assistant Registrar in Customer Services who
conducted my wedding in June. The ceremony
itself was lovely and she and her colleague let
us delay the start as a guest was running late.
We were kept updated regularly which was
lovely and reassuring.  Thank you.” 
“We have had a new wet room put in
by Building Services. I have nothing
but praise for the three men who fitted
it - what a pleasant experience it was.
Friendly, professional and Covid
aware. Thank you so much” “I would like to express my thanks to two members
of your Streetscene Team who came to my aid
yesterday afternoon when my car broke down in
Largs. They were a very calm presence in an
otherwise very stressful situation. I do not know
what I would have done without them”.

Page 22

Page | 17 
10   ALEO complaints 
An Arms-Length External Organisation (ALEO) is an organisation formally separate from a local
authority but still subject to its control and influence.  North Ayrshire Leisure Limited (NALL)
is an ALEO for North Ayrshire Council and this section highlights complaints handled by NALL
in 2021/22 using the same Two Stage procedure the Council operates.   
Complaints received per Business Area and Complaint Category
Business Area Complaint Category Volume to
date
LEISURE
Irvine Activities & Programming 40
Facilities General 26
Facilities Cleanliness 7
Customer Service 30
Marketing/Promo 1
Policy/General 25
Three Towns Activities & Programming 10
Facilities General 9
Facilities Cleanliness 2
Customer Service 12
Marketing/Promo 0
Policy/General 3
Garnock & Kilwinning Activities & Programming 6
Facilities General 10
Facilities Cleanliness 1
Customer Service 5
Policy/General 2
North Coast & Arran Activities & Programming 8
Facilities General 26
Facilities Cleanliness 0
Customer Service 6
Policy General 6
Marketing/Promo 1
PHYSICAL ACTIVITY
Active Lifestyles Activities & Programming 3
Customer Service 0
Policy/General 3
Community Sport Activities & Programming 1
Customer Service 0 
Support Team Customer Service 2
Policy General 8
Marketing/Promo 0 
• 253 complaints were received by NALL during the year.

Page 23

Page | 18 
Complaints per 1,000 visits for each department
Department Complaint
Volume
Attendances Complaint
Rate
Leisure 221 697,243 0.32
Physical Activity 12 72,205 0.17
Support Team 20 n/a n/a 
• Whilst the above table only highlights complaint volumes for the first three quarters
of 2020/21, the volume of complaints received over the period is small compared to
the number of people visiting NALL facilities/venues during the period. 
Complaint categories by volume
Category Volume
Facilities General 71
Facilities Cleanliness 10
Customer Service 55
Activities and Programming 68
Policy/General 47
Marketing and Promotion 2
Total 253 
Three-year Complaint Category comparison
Category 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22
Facilities General 23 25 71
Facilities Cleanliness 7 12 10
Customer Service 22 56 55
Activities & Programming 27 41 68
Policy/General 17 16 47
Marketing/Promotion 4 0 2
Total 100 150 253 
Complaints handled at each Stage by category
Category Stage One Stage Two
Facilities General 36 25
Facilities Cleanliness 5 3
Customer Service 33 11
Activities and Programming 40 22
Policy/General 28 14
Marketing and Promotion 2 0
Total 144 75

Page 24

Page | 19 
Examples of complaints received
Category Nature of complaints NALL Response/Action
Facilities General Customer complained
regarding the low
temperature of the main
pool at Vikingar first thing
in the morning. 
Apology offered and customer
advised that the thermostat
had now been set to heat the
pool an hour earlier than
normal to benefit early
morning swimmers.
Facilities Cleanliness Customer complained about
the cleanliness of the sports
halls and toilets at
Greenwood Academy.
Apology offered to customer
and comment passed to the
school facility management
team who are responsible for
school cleaning. KA Leisure
staff have also been instructed
to monitor cleanliness in these
areas.
Customer Service Customer complained that
their direct debit payments
were higher than expected.
Apology offered to customer,
direct debit amount corrected
and refund issued for excess
fees collected.
Activities & Programming Customer complained that
live streaming classes were
not starting on schedule or
sometimes not at all.
Apology offered.  Customer
was advised that all instructors
have been told to ensure
classes start at the time
advertised. Customer also
advised that there are
alternative online classes
available via the KA App.
Policy/General Customer complained about
having to pay a joining fee
which was a deciding factor
in joining up.
Apology given but customer
advised that KA Leisure was
running a join now, pay nothing
until January promotion and
provided the customer the
Promo Code to take advantage
of the offer.
Marketing/Promo Customer complained that
they were unable to get in
contact with Arran
Community Sport Hub or
find details on the web site.
Apology offered to customer
and a contact number and full
list of activities on offer
provided.

Page 25

Page | 20 
11   SPSO complaint referrals 
The Scottish Public Services Ombudsman (SPSO) is the final stage for complaints about Local
Authorities in Scotland.  The table below details the volume of complaints relating to the
Council that were referred to the SPSO during 2021/22: 
Type of Complaint Volume
Economic Development 1
Education 1
Environmental Health & Cleansing 3
Finance 2
Housing 11
Legal & Admin 2
Planning 3
Social Work 1
Welfare Fund - Crisis Grants 1 
• The SPSO received 1,189 complaints about Scottish Local Authorities during 2021/22
which equates to 2% relating to the Council.  This referral rate is consistent with
previous years (typically between 2% and 3%). 
• The highest number of referrals made to the SPSO related to Housing but this was
expected given the majority of Local Authority referrals made to the SPSO during the
year related to Housing or housing services. 
The outcomes of the 24 North Ayrshire Council complaints that were referred to the SPSO and
determined are noted below. 
Stage Outcome Volume
Advice Premature 3
Unable to proceed 4
Early
Resolution
Discretion –  Insufficient benefit achieved by investigation  3
Discretion - Good complaint handling 9
Subject matter not in jurisdiction  1
Time limit (s 10) 1
Unable to proceed 3
Investigation None received n/a 
• All referrals made by North Ayrshire complainants were resolved by the SPSO at the
Advice or Early Resolution stages. None were taken to Investigation stage. 
• Some referrals at Advice stage were premature i.e. complainants approached the
SPSO before exhausting the Council’s Two Stage process.

Page 26

Page | 21 
• The majority of complaint referrals handled at Early Resolution were discretionary in
nature, meaning the Council had discretion in terms of how to action them.  It is
pleasing to note many were considered ‘good complaint handling’ complaints,
meaning the SPSO was satisfied with the way the Council handled them. 
More details regarding complaint referrals for North Ayrshire Council can be found on the
SPSO website at https://www.spso.org.uk/decision-reports.

Page 27

Page | 22 
12   Glossary 
Term   Explanation 
Stage One Stage One (aka Frontline Resolution) aims to resolve straightforward
customer complaints that require little or no investigation.  Any
employee may deal with complaints at this stage and they can be
resolved via any channel.  The main principle is to seek resolution at the
earliest opportunity and as close to the point of service delivery as
possible.  Stage One complaints must be responded to within 5 working
days unless an extension (a maximum of 5 additional working days or 10
if the complaint relates to Social Work) is requested and approved by a
senior manager.  The Council should, however, always aim to resolve
these types of complaints within 5 working days. 
Stage Two Not all complaints are suitable for Frontline Resolution and not all
complaints will be satisfactorily resolved at that stage.  Complaints
therefore handled at Stage Two (aka Investigation) typically require a
detailed examination before the Council can state its position.  These
complaints may already have been considered at Stage One, or they
may have been identified from the outset as being complex, serious or
high risk and needing immediate investigation.  The investigation under
a Stage Two should establish all the facts relevant to the points made in
the complaint and give the customer a full, objective and proportionate
response that represents our final position.  Stage Two complaints must
be responded to within 20 working days unless an extension is approved
by senior manager in conjunction with the customer.  Stage Two
complaints require a written response, signed by a senior manager. 
Complaint criteria 
When an expression of dissatisfaction is received the Council determines if the issue falls into one
of six complaint categories: 
• A service the Council should be providing is not being provided (or is not available)
• A request for a service was provided but not to an appropriate standard 
• A request for service has not been answered or actioned within the agreed timescale
• A Council employee was rude, unhelpful or unprofessional
• A Council employee did not attend an appointment or call-out on a date/time agreed
• The complaint relates to a policy (internal or external) 
If the issue being raised relates to one or more of the above, the matter is considered a complaint
and will be recorded and handled as such.  If not, the matter will be handled as something else i.e.
a request for a service, observation or enquiry and processed accordingly. 
END OF REPORT