Democracy Spraffa

5. Complaint Report - Appendix

North Ayrshire Council · 30 May 2024
Back to Audit and Scrutiny Committee — 30 May 2024 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

North Ayrshire Council 
Annual Complaint Report 
2023 to 2024

Page 2

Contents
North Ayrshire Council  Annual Complaint Report  2023 to 2024 ................ 1
Stage One ................................................................................................. 3
Stage Two ................................................................................................. 3
1 Volume of complaints closed ................................................................... 4
Chief Executive’s ....................................................................................... 4
Communities & Housing .......................................................................... 4
Education .................................................................................................. 4
Health & Social Care ................................................................................ 5
Place ......................................................................................................... 5
Multi-Service ............................................................................................ 5
Year on Year comparison ......................................................................... 6
2 Volume of complaints closed on time at both Stages ............................. 6
3 Volume of complaints not closed on time per Directorate ..................... 6
Stage One ................................................................................................. 6
Stage Two ................................................................................................. 8
4 Key complaint topics ................................................................................ 9
5 Average time in working days for a full response ................................. 10
Chief Executive’s ..................................................................................... 10
Communities & Housing ........................................................................ 10
Education ................................................................................................ 11
Health & Social Care .............................................................................. 11
6 Extended complaints .............................................................................. 11
7 Complaint Outcomes ............................................................................. 12
Stage One ............................................................................................... 12
Stage Two ............................................................................................... 12
8 Improvements made as a result of complaints ..................................... 13
9 Compliments .......................................................................................... 14
10 Glossary ................................................................................................ 15

Page 3

Introduction
North Ayrshire Council always seeks to deliver the best services possible to its customers and
residents but it is recognised that dissatisfaction will sometimes occur. When it does, we
want to know what went wrong, why it went wrong and what we can do to make things
right.
The Council recognises that valuable lessons can be learnt from complaints which are
defined as being expressions of dissatisfaction from members of the public about actions, or
lack of actions, or about the standard of service provided by or on behalf of the Council.
The Council’s complaint handling procedure (CHP) has two stages for handling complaints
from the public.
Stage One complaints (also known as Frontline Resolution) are straightforward, non-complex
complaints the Council can resolve at the initial point of contact or as close to the point of
service delivery as possible. The Council has up to 5 working days to resolve these.
Stage Two complaints (also known as Investigations) are complaints the Council is typically
unable to resolve at Stage One and needs more time to carry out further investigation. This
may be because the nature of the complaint is complex, serious or high risk. The Council has
up to 20 working days to resolve these.
This report details the Council’s complaint handling performance covering financial year
2023 to 2024 (1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024). Performance is measured via several Scottish
Public Services Ombudsman indicators (some of which have national targets) and complaint
data relating to previous years has been included in certain sections to allow comparisons to
be made. 
Reporting complaints is a statutory requirement and is monitored by Audit Scotland.
This report has been reviewed for accessibility prior to publication.

Page 4

1 Volume of complaints closed
The Council received 1,948 complaints during 2023 and closed 2,039. 
The table below provides a breakdown of the closed complaints per Directorate:
Directorate Volume
Chief Executive’s 100
Communities & Housing 421
Education 182
Health & Social Care 113
Place 1,212
Multi-Service 11
The following tables highlight complaint volumes per Directorate under each Stage:
Chief Executive’s
Team Stage One Stage Two
Chief Executive Service 1 0
Customer Services 79 6
Finance 2 1
IT 4 0
Legal Services 5 2
Total 91 9
Communities & Housing
Team Stage One Stage Two
Building Services 261 11
Community Facilities 2 1
Community Learning & Development 1 0
Housing 100 12
Information & Culture 8 2
Planning 4 3
Protective Services 14 2
Total 390 31
Education
Team Stage One Stage Two
Education (HQ) 18 7
Education (Schools) 102 43
Facilities Management 12 0
Total 132 50

Page 5

Health & Social Care
Team Stage One Stage Two
Children, Families & Criminal Justice 27 6
Finance & Transformation 4 0
Health & Community Care 46 12
Mental Health 3 7
Support Services 6 2
Total 86 27
Place
Team Stage One Stage Two
Community Wealth Building 0 1
Property Management 103 9
Regeneration 2 1
Roads 58 2
Streetscene 103 2
Sustainability 1 2
Waste Services 921 7
Total 1,188 24
Multi-Service
Team Stage One Stage Two
Complaints involving more than one Service 1 10
Total 1 10
Although there is no target for the volume of complaints handled under each Stage, the
Council seeks to maximise closure at Stage One wherever possible and 93% were handled at
this Stage during the period.
Some Services handled all their complaints at Stage One.
Some Services that received higher complaint volumes than other Services handled very few
complaints at Stage Two, notably Building Services, Housing, Streetscene and Waste Services
due to the nature of the complaints received.
Whilst 46% of all complaints received during the year related to Waste Services (the majority
being missed bin collections/assisted pullouts), the Service empties over 102,000 household
waste bins each week. As this equates to approximately 4.9 million collections over the year,
only 0.02% of all bins collected resulted in complaints being received. Good progress
continues to be made in the service with a 31% reduction in complaints compared to the
previous year and a 40% reduction when comparing complaints from 2021. Ongoing
challenges remain in the service such as absence levels and these are being handled and
managed appropriately.

Page 6

Year on Year comparison
The table below shows a comparison of the volume of complaints received over the last
three years:
Year Volume of complaints
2021 2,827
2022 2,629
2023 1,948
A 26% drop in complaints received when comparing 2023 with the previous year.  The
decrease could be partly attributable to the complaint page in the Council’s website being
enhanced, which now includes more information what the Council does not deem a
complaint and offers appropriate routes to raise such matters.
2 Volume of complaints closed on time at both Stages
Stage Percentage
closed on time
Target
Stage One  87% 80% and above
Stage Two 88% 85% and above
The volume closed on time in the table above includes extended complaints that met their
new due dates.
3 Volume of complaints not closed on time per Directorate
This section provides details of complaints not closed on time under each Stage and includes
extended complaints that did not meet their new timescales.
Stage One
Chief Executive’s 
Department Volume
Customer Services 1
Finance 1
Legal Services 1
These complaints breached timescale because a complaint handler was unable to contact a
complainant to discuss their complaint, a complaint was passed to a complaint handler who
was unavailable due to sickness absence and operational pressures. Extensions could have
been considered for two of these complaints given they were closed within the extra 5
working day extension allowance.

Page 7

Communities & Housing
Department Volume
Building Services 17
Housing 9
Protective Services 1
Multiple reasons were noted as to why these complaints did not meet timescale, including
delays in complaints being directed to the correct Services, awaiting information to progress
complaints and employee availability. Extensions could have been considered for the vast
majority of these given they were closed within the extra 5 working day extension allowance. 
Education
Department Volume
Education (HQ) 2
Education (Schools) 8
Various reasons were provided as to why these complaints did not meet timescale, with the
main reason being complainants not being available to assist with investigations.
Health & Social Care
Department Volume
Children & Families 1
Health & Community Care 5
Mental Health 1
Support Services 1
There were various reasons these complaints did not meet timescale, including complaint
handlers, employees and/or complainants not being available to progress investigations. 
Place
Department Volume
Property Management 3
Roads 3
Streetscene 19
Sustainability 1
Waste Services 173
Multiple reasons were given for complaints not closed on time, including complaint handlers
and complainants being unavailable to progress complaints, complainants/third parties
being unavailable to assist with investigations and resourcing issues (including employee
availability).
Of the 199 Place complaints not closed on time, 66% could have been considered for
extension as they were closed within the extra 5 working day extension allowance.
Regarding Waste Services complaints, see additional commentary in next section.

Page 8

Stage Two
Chief Executive’s
Department Volume
Legal Services 1
This complaint breached timescale because the complainant requested a change in complaint
handler.   This complaint should have been considered for timescale extension.
Communities & Housing
Department Volume
Building Services 2
Housing 2
Planning 1
Protective Services 1
These complaints breached timescale due to various reasons, with the main reasons being employee
availability and operational pressures. All six complaints could have been considered for timescale
extensions.
Education
Department Volume
Education (HQ) 1
Education (Schools) 9
Several complaints breached timescale due to a change in senior manager and a small
number breached as the complainants were unavailable.  Some of these could have had
their timescales extended.
Health & Social Care
Department Volume
Mental Health 1
This complaint breached timescale as additional checks were required at response approval
stage.

Page 9

4 Key complaint topics
Key topics for upheld and partially upheld complaints for Services are listed below. Services
will not be listed if there were low complaint volumes that did not allow meaningful analysis.
Chief Executive’s
Service Key complaint topic
Customer Services Council tax issues
Customer Services Employee Actions (alleged or perceived)
Education
Service Key complaint topic
Education (HQ & schools) Sensitive issues relating to teachers and/or pupils
Education (HQ & schools) Service delivery/provision
Education (HQ & schools) Employee Actions (alleged or perceived)
Health & Social Care
Service Key complaint topic
All HSCP Services Service delivery/provision
All HSCP Services Employee Actions (alleged or perceived)
Place
Service Key complaint topic
Building Services Follow Up appointments
Building Services Quality of work issues
Housing Estate Management
Property Management & Investment Gas Central Heating (maintenance etc.)
Property Management & Investment Planned Works
Streetscene Tree/grass/verge/hedge cutting issues
Streetscene Employee Actions (alleged or perceived)
Waste Services Employee Actions (alleged or perceived)
Waste Services Issues with new bin deliveries
Waste Services Missed waste bin/assisted collections (all colours)
Waste Services Recycle scheme issues (shortage of food waste
bags etc.)
‘Employee Actions (alleged or perceived)’ appears as a key topic for some Services but the
definition is broad and has been used where complainants either alleged or perceived
employee actions or behaviour to be unacceptable. Whilst investigations may determine this
is not always the case, where unacceptable behaviour was identified by Services appropriate
action will have been taken to address.

Page 10

5 Average time in working days for a full response
The average time in working days to close complaints under both Stages during the year is
noted below. Values for previous years have been included to allow comparisons to be
made. Any complaints that had their timescales extended have been excluded from the
calculations.
Stage One Average number of
working days to close
Target
2021 4.2 5 workings days or less
2022 4.2 5 workings days or less
2023 3.8 5 workings days or less
Stage Two Average number of days
to close
Target
2021 15.4 20 working days or less
2022 14.9 20 working days or less
2023 16.8 20 working days or less
The average time to close complaints under both Stages has consistently exceeded target. 
The tables below detail Services that did not meet the average time in working days for a
response under either Stage. Services that met the target are not listed and any complaints
that had their timescales extended have been excluded from the calculations.
Chief Executive’s
Stage One Average number of
working days to close
Target
Finance 13 5 workings days or less
One Finance complaint was closed on working day 21, resulting in the 5 working day average
target not being met for the Service.
Communities & Housing
Stage Two Average number of
working days to close
Target
Planning 23 20 workings days or less
Protective Services 45 20 workings days or less
One Planning complaint was closed on working day 47 due to employee unavailability and
one Protective Services complaint was closed on working day 45 due to the complexity of
the issues raised.  These complaints could have been considered for timescale extension.

Page 11

Education
Stage Two Average number of
working days to close
Target
Education (Schools) 21 20 workings days or less
A small number of complaints were closed out with the 20 working days timescale, resulting
in the target not being met. Some of these complaints could have had their timescales
extended. 
Health & Social Care
Stage One  Average number of
working days to close
Target
Mental Health 9.5 5 workings days or less
A Mental Health Stage One complaint was closed on working day 15, resulting in the target
not being met.   
6 Extended complaints
103 complaints had their timescales extended during the year (81 at Stage One and 22 at
Stage Two). The complaints related to various Services across all Directorates.
There were various reasons for extending, including complainants, third parties and
employees being unavailable to assist or support with investigations and/or letter approvals,
obtaining additional information to support investigations and resourcing/operational
issues. Of the 103 complaints that had their timescales extended, 80% were closed within
their new due dates.

Page 12

7 Complaint Outcomes
Up to 31 March 2021, a complaint that meets our complaint criteria could be upheld,
partially upheld or not upheld. From 1 April 2021, a fourth outcome became available to use
called ‘Resolved’. Resolved complaints are where the Council has taken action to address the
problem/issue without making a decision on whether there were any failings (this would
happen where we agree a solution with the complainant at the outset without needing to
actually investigate the complaint). 
The charts below detail the number of complaints upheld, partially upheld, not upheld or
resolved under both Stages.
Stage One
Outcome Percentage
Closed as Resolved 39%
Closed as Upheld 32%
Closed as Partially Upheld 12%
Closed as Not Upheld 17%
Of all complaints upheld and partially upheld at Stage One, just over half related to Waste
Services and in particular bin collections. 
55% of all Resolved complaints also related to Waste Services (again mainly missed bin
collections), indicating these complainants simply wanted their bins collected without the
need for investigation. 
Complaints that were not upheld related to policies, regulations or were complaints that
were poor quality/unfounded.
Stage Two 
Outcome Percentage
Closed as Resolved 4%
Closed as Upheld 13%
Closed as Partially Upheld 39%
Closed as Not Upheld 44%
All Stage Two complaints that were upheld or partially upheld were split across multiple
Services across all Directorates.
Of the 44% of complaints not upheld, those decisions were reached for various reasons,
including the application of polices and regulations and complaints that were
unsubstantiated.
Note - Partially Upheld complaints are complaints that contain more than one complaint
element and at least one of them is upheld.

Page 13

8 Improvements made as a result of complaints
Council Services continually seek to identify improvements in service delivery and complaint
information is analysed regularly to inform service improvements.  Some improvements
were implemented as a result of complaints received during the year and a selection is
noted below.
What happened? What we did
A complaint was received about grass
cutting where litter was not being removed
prior to cutting, which resulted in the litter
being shredded and distributed across the
park.
A refresher with the team responsible was
arranged to ensure they are aware of their
obligations in terms of litter removal and every
effort will be made in the future to ensure litter
is removed prior to any grass cutting activities.
A tenant encountered problems when
radiators were incorrectly fitted and applied
for a disturbance allowance payment for
the inconvenience.  
An apology was offered and the matters
addressed.  Discussions then took place
between the Council and the contractor
regarding the importance of replacing fixtures
like for like as far as is practical and to rectify
errors in a timeous manner. The processing of
disturbance allowance payments is also being
monitored more closely to minimise
inconvenience to tenants.
A trader encountered problems when
completing and returning a paper
application to obtain a licence, including the
incorrect fee being paid as the fees listed on
the Council’s website were out of date.
An apology was offered for the inconvenience
caused, the application processed and licence
granted.  The Council is in the process of placing
the application form online to help speed up
the process and the appropriate webpage has
been updated with the correct fees.
A resident changed their bank details and
experienced problems trying to change
their Council Tax Direct Debit details to the
new account.
An apology was offered to the complainant and
the Direct Debt set up.  The complainant asked
if there could be an online option to amend the
bank details for Council Tax rather than just an
option to set up a new one each time.  The
service is currently considering this feedback.
A visitor to a Recycle Centre encountered
problems in terms of parking at the site due
to excessive public use of the site that day.
An apology was offered to the visitor for the
problems encountered.  The site has been
upgraded to accommodate a larger volume of
people wanting to recycle and a daily update
was placed on the internet regarding footfall at
the site to reduce disruption.

Page 14

9 Compliments
Over 230 compliments were recorded cross-Council during the year and whilst they cannot
all be highlighted in this report, a selection is noted below.
• “I just wanted to let you know how impressed I am with the Recovery Development Worker.
Yesterday was the first time I spoke with him and I was really struck by his high level of
motivation, honesty and very obviously genuine desire to help and support people.  He is like
a breath of fresh air.  We don’t give positive feedback often enough so wanted to let you
know”
• “I’ve had an issue regarding arranging a special uplift and made a number of calls to your
Contact Centre. Every time I called your operators were very helpful and considerate. 
They’ve to be commended because every time they answer a call they don’t know what that
call is going to be about and have to rely on their considerable knowledge to try and answer
or resolve it”
• “Thank you to Waste Services for following up on a complaint I made about my waste bins
being missed.  They have not been missed since so thank you!”
• A number of people have complimented the Licensing Team regarding their help and
support regarding a short term let process for a number of hosts
• “I just want to highlight how fantastic the team at Ardrossan Library are. They go out of their
way to show a welcoming, friendly environment. The time and effort they put in with kids
(and adults alike) at the Monday toddler club is just brilliant. The kids look forward to it all
week long”
• “To the staff at Bartonholm Recycling Centre, every time I go there I see them out helping
folk get their discarded stuff away safely. And it’s always done with a smile. It must be a
tough job in all weathers but they’re still so cheery and polite! Good on you, guys.  You could
deliver lessons in customer care!”
• “I recently wrote to you regarding the little garden area outside Largs station.  I was
absolutely delighted to see that the area has been cleared of weeds and litter and bedding
plants have been planted.  It all looks really pretty so thank you to Streetscene who carried
out the planting. What a difference it makes”
• “I recently made a complaint to your Property Management department about some issues
with scaffolding. Just wanted to say it got fixed immediately and you even fixed up the gate.
Thank you to whoever came out to fix it. Absolute brilliant job”
• Exceptional feedback received for the Universal Early Years service which has resulted in an
employee being invited to present at a European Conference on infant feeding.
• “My family and I like everything your Refugee Team does for us Ukrainians. Just want to say
big thank you for everything. Incredible attitude towards us and everything is easy and
simple”

Page 15

10 Glossary
Terms & Explanations
Stage One 
Stage One (also known as Frontline Resolution) aims to resolve straightforward customer
complaints that require little or no investigation. Any employee may deal with complaints at
this stage and they can be resolved via any channel. The main principle is to seek resolution
at the earliest opportunity and as close to the point of service delivery as possible. 
Stage One complaints must be responded to within 5 working days unless an extension (a
maximum of 5 additional working days) is requested and approved by a senior manager or
above. The Council should, however, always aim to resolve these types of complaints within
5 working days.
Stage Two
Not all complaints are suitable for Stage One and not all complaints will be satisfactorily
resolved at that stage. Complaints therefore handled at Stage Two (also known as
Investigations) typically require a detailed examination before the Council can state its
position. These complaints may already have been considered at Stage One, or they may
have been identified from the outset as being complex, serious or high risk and needing
immediate investigation. 
Stage Two complaints must be responded to within 20 working days unless an extension is
approved by senior manager in conjunction with the customer. Stage Two complaints
require a written response, signed by a senior manager.
Complaint criteria 
When an expression of dissatisfaction is received the Council determines if the issue falls
into one (or more) six complaint categories:
• A service the Council should be providing is not being provided or is not available
• A request for a service was provided but not to an appropriate standard 
• A request for service has not been answered or actioned within the agreed timescale
• A Council employee was rude, unhelpful or unprofessional
• A Council employee did not attend an appointment or call-out on a date/time agreed
• The complaint relates to a policy (internal or external)
If the issue being raised relates to one or more of the above, the matter is considered a
complaint and will be recorded and handled as such. If not, the matter will be handled as a
request for a service, observation or enquiry and actioned accordingly.