Democracy Spraffa

3 - Participatory Budgeting

North Ayrshire Council · 21 March 2024
Back to Audit and Scrutiny Committee — 21 March 2024 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL 
21 March 2024 
Audit and Scrutiny Committee 
Title:    Participatory Budgeting 
Purpose:  To update the Audit and Scrutiny Committee on the ongoing
development of small grants Participatory Budgeting. 
Recommendation:  That the Audit and Scrutiny Committee: 
a) Reviews the adaptations made to the small grants
Participatory Budgeting process in response to feedback; and
b) Notes the progress made in developing the small grants
programme within localities. 
1. Executive Summary 
1.1 The Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015, Community Wealth Building
approaches and North Ayrshire Council’s own aspirations all support the greater
involvement of local people in democratic and community activities, increased
participation in local financial decision-making and, in particular, the increased use of
participatory budgeting (PB) approaches. 
1.2 Participatory budgeting is a democratic way for people to have a direct say on how
public money is spent.  A PB process gives people the opportunity to identify and
discuss what matters to them in their communities and to vote on their priorities. North
Ayrshire Council’s PB approaches have been recognised as sector-leading, with
successful engagement across small grant-making, thematic and mainstream PB, using
different approaches. PB in North Ayrshire is now mainstreamed into service design
and delivery, with community, elected member and partner support. 
1.3   An update was provided to the Audit and Scrutiny Committee in September 2022
regarding the engagement methods used for PB across North Ayrshire. The Committee
agreed to approve the recommended engagement methods for use in future
Participatory Budgeting events, as set out in the report. 
1.4 A request has been made for a further update detailing the progress around the locality
based small grants PB processes in particular, and changes made to these processes
in response to feedback provided by community members regarding previous rounds.

Page 2

2. Background 
2.1 The Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015, Community Wealth Building and
the Scottish Government’s Open Government Action Plan all support the greater
involvement of local people in democratic and community activities, increased
participation in local financial decision-making and, in particular, the increased use of
participatory budgeting (PB) approaches.   
2.2 Locality Partnerships have been pivotal to North Ayrshire’s success in moving local
decision-making into communities. They have each established their own priorities in
relation to addressing local inequalities. Locality small grants PB has been in place
successfully for several years, helping support public understanding and confidence in
the implementation of mainstream PB within the Council’s budgets. Mainstream PB can
play a central role in collectively defining services which meet the changed (and
changing) needs of communities. 
2.3   The Council’s vision for PB is embedded in the vision for radical, participatory democracy
in which local people take decisions on the things which affect their lives. It is one of a
suite of tools which are used within North Ayrshire to encourage and support
participatory democracy. The small grants PB process puts the decision making as to
how the funds are spend locally directly into the hands of community members, with
local groups applying for funding of up to £1,000 and community members voting to
identify which are most important to them and should receive the funding. 
2.4 There are many benefits to the Council and the communities it serves in participatory
methods of working. These include: 
• Greater involvement in decision making across the Council;
• Improved transparency of decision making;
• The opportunity for a wider range of groups to be involved;
• Improved trust between Council & communities;
• Increased democratic participation;
• A greater sense of ownership and control; and  
• Real devolved power to Localities. 
2.5 North Ayrshire Council has long attracted national recognition for its sector-leading work
in PB, as noted in the 2020 Best Value Audit Report. The approach is recognised by
CoSLA, the Local Governance Review Team and the Scottish Government as good
practice and has previously received recognition nationally as a finalist in awards. North
Ayrshire Council’s Officers play an active role in national PB Working Groups and are
regarded as a source of expertise and advise by colleagues nationally. 
2.6 PB events have to strike a balance between tight deadlines, available resources, wide
participation and workload. PB is one of a range of tools used to support participation
and community empowerment, and the Locality Partnerships and Locality CLD Teams,
and the relationships they build within communities, are key to its success. The support
of community members in reviewing applications is an invaluable part of the process.
We realise that officers, community reviewers and community groups all have limited
time and resources available to them and a key consideration is ensuring the process is
as easy as possible for all involved, while remaining robust in nature, in order to make
the most of times and resources.

Page 3

2.7 With regard to the small grants programme, public voting is one characteristic, however
the ability of local groups to bring forward their projects and to influence the decision-
making is a central component of the process. In the most recent 2023/24 cycle, 236
applications were made, with 184 projects receiving £198, 377 in total and 9,664 votes
being cast.
2.8 When designing this cycle, an intentional and focussed effort was made to ensure that
local people found it as accessible as possible through streamlined processes,
simplified language, new events and a fully hybrid experience that opened PB to a
diverse range of participants. The hybrid experience means that those who can are able
to use the online voting system provided through CONSUL, while recognising that not
all community members are able or comfortable making use of online tools and ensuring
an in person voting option through libraries is available to them.
2.9 The process used was developed in response to the feedback received from the
2022/23 cycle. The success of the 2023/24 cycle has been recognised by both CoSLA
and the Minister for Community Wealth and Public Finance as a national example of
good practice in co-design and the use of digital platforms to promote participation. 
2.10  A full report about the process and the learning has been produced and this is attached
as Appendix 1 for consideration. The key adaptations made to the process as a result
of the previous feedback are as follows: 
Issue You Said We Did
In-person
opportunities
lost during
COVID-19
pandemic
NAC needs to “raise
awareness of the PB process,
of the projects looking for
funding and also offer the
networking opportunity for
partnership working. It was
also clear from the
applications that some had
difficulty with the process
and this would be an
opportunity to
assist with this”
Developed the concept of PB launch
events using feedback from 2022-23
round and community engagement
responses, with one held in each
locality at the start of the
application process. The events
created space for support and advice
from NAC staff, in addition to
networking opportunities (e.g. for
partnership bids to the UKSPF PB).
Funding
criteria
Criteria needs to be reviewed
to identify opportunities to
tighten the language and make
the processes fairer for all. For
example, “multiple groups from
one place are applying.”
Drafted criteria based on 2022-23
feedback and presented for
comment and further
recommendations at Community
Engagement Event. Changes made
based on discussion and approved by
Senior Managers for 2023-24 round.
Application
process
Disproportionately long and
complexgiven the size of grant
available.
Potential barrier to applicants.
Application redesigned for CONSUL,
streamlining from 25 to 11 questions
and making language more
accessible. Ability to save and edit
introduced.

Page 4

Approving
applications
progressing
to public
vote
“Scoring mechanism required
to be
reviewed…ambiguous and
making
the low compliance score very
easy
to obtain”. Shortlisting panels
also
under significant pressure from
paperwork.
Complete redesign resulting in
applications being reviewed against
criteria (either eligible or ineligible to
proceed) rather than scoring,
streamlining paperwork. Volunteers
renamed ‘community reviewers’ to
better reflect the role they played in
the process and attract new faces.
Logging in
to CONSUL
Default option of MyGov.Scot
was
too confusing and complicated
and
posed a major barrier during
the
early voting in the 2022-23
round
Created a local login for CONSUL in
response to issues raised in 2022-23
round.
Retained this option and introduced
Facebook and Google login for 2023-
24 round, with no significant issues
raised in the 2023-24 process. 
2.11 It is vital to note that PB processes are by their nature an iterative process and will
continue to be refined in response to feedback as they progress. The changes which have
been made in the 2023- 24 round have been received positively, with no continued or
further issues raised since the 2022-23 round. 
3. Proposals 
3.1 
That the Audit and Scrutiny Committee: 
a) Reviews the adaptations made to the small grants Participatory Budgeting process in
response to feedback; and
b) Notes the progress made in the small grants programme within localities. 
4. Implications/Socio-economic Duty 
Financial 
4.1 PB funding is allocated within existing resources. 
Human Resources 
4.2  PB is resource-intensive and PB development has to be balanced with staff capacity
and resources within local groups and organisations to engage with PB. 
Legal 
4.3 None. 
Equality/Socio-economic

Page 5

4.4 The purpose of PB is to increase community involvement in local decision-making.
North Ayrshire Council has worked with Locality Partnerships and community  members
to develop its PB approach which will reduce inequalities, increase community cohesion
and advance community empowerment.   
Environmental and Sustainability 
4.5 None. 
Key Priorities 
4.6 Participatory Budgeting supports the North Ayrshire Council Plan strategic aims: 
• To transition to a wellbeing economy, delivering prosperity, wellbeing and resilience
for local people.
• We will have active, inclusive and resilient communities.
• A Community Wealth Building Council that is efficient and accessible, maximising
investment and focusing resources towards our priorities. 
Community Wealth Building 
4.7  PB increases democratic ownership of local financial decision-making and allocation
of resources. 
5. Consultation 
5.1 Co-production is at the heart of our relationship with communities.  Development of PB
processes as outlined within this paper has been created in line with ongoing feedback
from community members, groups and staff as to how the process could be improved
and streamlined. Continued engagement and evaluation will take place in future to
ensure processes remain as accessible as possible. 
Audrey Sutton
Executive Director of Communities and Education 
For further information please contact Rhonda Leith, Head of Connected Communities,
on 01294 324415. 
Background Papers
Participation Budgeting Report 2023-24

Page 6

Co-design, partnership andparticipation
Participatory
Budgeting
20
23-24:
R
eview

Page 7

01
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Introdction and
Executive
Summary
02 Background
03 Reshaping PB
04 How Did It Go?
05
You Said, We
Did: A Co-Design
Approach to PB
06
Reflections and
Recommendations
07
Reflections and
Recommendations:
COSLA Perspective
08 Reflections and
Recommendations:
Ministerial Recognition

Page 8

Executive Summary
Participatory Budgeting (PB) has a long history at North Ayrshire Council, which
has been nationally recognised as a leader in designing and implementing engaging
and impactful PB processes.
The 2023-24 cycle distributed £198,377 of funding through a community-driven
decision making process that gave North Ayrshire residents the say on the projects
and priorities that mattered most to them.
Of 236 applications submitted across Locality, Youth and the new UK Shared
Prosperity Fund (UKSPF) PB, a total of 184 projects received funding. 9,664 votes
were cast online, in libraries and in schools across North Ayrshire.
Local perspectives and experiences were central to the 2023-24 cycle, with feedback
and recommendations from past volunteers and participants shaping the process
from beginning to end. An intentional and focussed effort was made on ensuring
that local people could see themselves in the new cycle through streamlined
processes, simplified language, new events and a fully hybrid experience that opened
PB to a diverse range of participants.
The success of the cycle has been recognised by both COSLA and the Minister for
Community Wealth and Public Finance as a national example of good practice in
co-design and the use of digital platforms to promote participation.
Introduction
and
Executive
Sum
m
ary
pn
1
Introduction
This review has been undertaken by the Capacity and Empowerment Officer
and the Community Economic Development Officer to record the 2023-24
Participatory Budgeting (PB) cycle and provide recommendations for the future.

Page 9

Background
North Ayrshire Council has built a decade of experience of delivering
high quality, innovative PB opportunities for local people. This is often
through the provision of small-grant PB processes where Third Sector
organisations can apply for a small share of funding (around £1,000)
to support projects.
A total of £198,377 was available for the 2023-24 PB cycle:
£97,377 from the central PB fund
£20,000 from the Health and Social Care Partnership
£50,000 ringfenced for youth projects
£31,000 from the UK Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF)
In the 2023-24 round, Locality PB was run in parallel with Youth PB,
streamlining the administration and centralising PB for communities.
Locality and Youth PB were open to applications of up to £1,000. The
allocation of funding from the UKSPF award enabled the creation of
a new ‘pot’, opened to partnership applications from across North
Ayrshire for up to £5,000.
The split of funding for Locality and Youth PB is calculated based on
population in each area:
Locality Locality PB Allocation Youth PB Allocation
Arran £8,979 £4,971
Garnock Valley £15,232 £8,433
Irvine £29,841 £16,520
Kilwinning £11,978 £6,631
North Coast
and Cumbrae £17,621 £9,755
Three Towns £24,725 £13,689
pn
2

Page 10

A
PPLICATION
S
3
Reshaping PB
The 2023-24 PB was designed
based on the learning and
feedback gathered during the
previous round, which formed
the basis for the redesign of the
process. This included the use
of CONSUL to host all
applications to provide better
transparency and visibility; an
amended set of criteria; a
redesigned application review
process and the continuation of
a fully hybrid way of working.
A Community Engagement Event was held in June, with over 20 in
attendance including previous PB volunteers and participants who
signed up through our social media channels. A small number of North
Ayrshire Council staff who found the volunteer opportunity via News
In Brief also participated.  Those attending were key to guiding and
shaping decisions about the look and feel of the new cycle.
Launch events were held in each locality to provide support for
applicants and space to network and bring people together post-
pandemic.. The Capacity and Empowerment Team provided 1-2-1
support on the application form, voting and digital access if required.
As a result, a significant improvement in application quality could be
seen from those who attended the events.
Following the engagement sessions and launch events, new volunteers
were recruited as part of the shift from ‘shortlisting panels’ to
‘community reviewers’, ensuring local participation in checking
applications before public voting began. A new training session was
developed, along with refreshed guidance and review packs based on
the recommendations of previous participants who had found the time
invested in scoring to be disproportionate to the amount being applied
for. By shifting from ‘scoring’ to ‘reviewing eligibility against criteria’,
the transparency of the process was also increased for applicants.
To ensure access to everyone, parallel offline processes were developed
for each stage of the PB, including paper applications available from
libraries or by request, and a fully offline voting process also offered in
libraries.
SUBMITTED
236
Three Towns PB
Launch Event, 2023
Only 1% of
applications were
submitted offline
in the 2023-24
round!
Many groups
trypically seen to
be at risk of
digital exclusion,
such as older
people’s groups,
were able to
complete the
application online
with support,
building their IT
confidence and
skills.

Page 11

How Did It Go?
A total of 9,664 votes were cast by local people, who made the decision
on the 184 projects that benefitted from PB funding, Any underspend
from Locality PB funds was transferred into the Youth PB fund for that
area to boost the number of Youth projects supported, as recommended
by the community reviewers for this round.
With the addition of UKSPF PB funding there was opportunity for
partnership projects to benefit from up to £5,000 each, encouraging
collaboration and impact at a larger scale than would traditionally be
expected through small-grant PB. In a challenging external funding
landscape, this also gives local organisations experience in partnership
working that can be used in future applications, building their capacity
and potential to secure further funds.
One of the outcomes of running Locality and Youth PB together was a
reduction in the number of projects submitted to Locality PB overall, as
eligible projects could only apply to one fund. This suggests that the
previous approach of hosting Locality and Youth PB at different times
of year has ‘double funded’ several projects, potentially reducing the
overall number of initiatives being successful through PB. The issue of
potential 'double funding' was raised by participants in the previous
round, who were concerned that this limited the opportunities for
smaller, less well-known projects to secure funding through PB,
particularly where larger organisations running multiple projects could
mobilise a higher number of voters to support them. This can lead to
disengagement with the process and a feeling that PB is inherently
unfair on new groups or ideas. Future PB rounds should continue to look
at ways to engage smaller, grassroots organisations while balancing the
diverse needs and aspirations of North Ayrshire’s Third Sector in the
design of PB processes.
Funding awards were distributed to successful organisations from mid-
December. In previous rounds of PB, winners were not asked for a
formal report on spend until a year later, but moving forwards short
progress updates are expected on a quarterly basis. This aims to better
capture the progress of projects in ‘real time’, showing communities how
the initiatives they supported are evolving and making a difference.
This is the first step towards broadening the understanding of PB
beyond ‘funding’ and demonstrate the power that local people have to
decide what happens in their community in a tangible way.
4

Page 12

Issue You Said We Did
In-person
opportunities
lost during
COVID-19
pandemic
NAC needs to “raise awarneess of
the PB process, of the projects
looking for funding and also offer
the networking opportunity for
partnership working. It was also
clear from the applications that
some had difficulty with the process
and this would be an opportunity to
assist with this”
Developed the concept of PB launch
events using feedback from 2022-23
round and community engagement
responses, with one held in each
locality at the start of the
application process. The events
created space for support and advice
from NAC staff, in addition to
networking opportunities (e.g. for
partnership bids to the UKSPF PB).
Funding
criteria
Criteria needs to be reviewed to
identify opportunities to tighten the
language and make the processes
fairer for all. For example, “multiple
groups from one place are applying.”
Drafted criteria based on 2022-23
feedback and presented for
comment and further
recommendations at Community
Engagement Event. Changes made
based on discussion and approved by
Senior Managers for 2023-24 round.
Application
process
Disproportionately long and complex
given the size of grant available.
Potential barrier to applicants.
Application redesigned for CONSUL,
streamlining from 25 to 11 questions
and making language more
accessible. Ability to save and edit
introduced.
Approving
applications
progressing
to public
vote
“Scoring mechanism required to be
reviewed…ambiguous and making
the low compliance score very easy
to obtain”. Shortlisting panels also
under significant pressure from
paperwork.
Complete redesign resulting in
applications being reviewed against
criteria (either eligible or ineligible to
proceed) rather than scoring,
streamlining paperwork. Volunteers
renamed ‘community reviewers’ to
better reflect the role they played in
the process and attract new faces
Logging in
to CONSUL
Default option of MyGov.Scot  was
too confusing and complicated and
posed a major barrier during the
early voting in the 2022-23 round
Created a local login for CONSUL in
response to issues raised in 2022-23
round.
Retained this option and introduced
Facebook and Google login for 2023-
24 round, with no significant issues
raised in the 2023-24 process.
You Said, We Did: A Co-Design Approach to PB
5

Page 13

Reflections and Recommendations
The 2023-24 PB represents significant efforts to better design and
run a process that meets the expectations and aspirations of North
Ayrshire residents and build trust in the Council. All changes made
can be traced back to feedback collected from 2022 onwards, with
local people at the centre of the decisions and changes made.
1.
The new UKSPF PB proved extremely popular, with 21 eligible
projects competing to secure a share of £30,000. This
demonstrates the interest in larger pots of funding to be made
available to local projects through PB, and the potential to scale up
the process for larger amounts.
2.
The anecdotal feedback from applicants about the changes made
to the application form has been overwhelmingly positive,
particularly the ability to save and return to in-progress
applications, removing the pressure of ‘getting it all right first time’.
Participants also appreciated being able to see the other projects
in their area and find out what was going on in North Ayrshire, as
all applications were publicly viewable throughout the process.
3.
The investment of staff time in monitoring, supporting and
progressing PB is significant, even where a digital platform can
remove significant volumes of paperwork. High quality, responsive
and dedicated administrative support is crucial to manage the
granular details of a PB process, which can have significant
impacts if missed. Adequately resourcing the support required to
run PB will always be a challenge, but the structures and learning
created during the 2023=24 round in particular set up future staff
for success as far as possible. Handover packs and templates have
been made available centrally for staff to access in future.
4.
Further focus on reporting from grant winners is required, and
early discussions with COSLA indicate that CONSUL is being
developed to allow applicants to provide project updates on the
platform directly. This would greatly increase the transparency of
PB and provide the public with ‘real time’ updates about the
projects they supported.
5.
Additional time was required to create high quality content for
social media and local press linked to PB, such as capturing
success stories from previous rounds and collating images from
past winners. Staff working on future cycles should begin to
identify potential case studies as early as possible to create
engaging imagery promoting PB to encourage participation.
6.
6

Page 14

Reflections and Recommendations: COSLA Perspective
“North Ayrshire Council has now run two rounds of
Participatory Budgeting using the digital engagement
software CONSUL which is supported in Scotland by
COSLA.
The team at North Ayrshire has been ambitious in its use of
the CONSUL software enabling multi locality PB processes
to be carried out online. One of the strengths of the North
Ayrshire PB programme has been the engagement with the
community in designing the processes, providing alternative
participation channels for those not able to take part
digitally and in responding to feedback from users of the
service. It is also worth noting that by using a digital process
the staff were able to deploy their limited staff resource to
support and promote engagement rather than on
administering a paper-based system.
As a result, North Ayrshire now has a transparent, online
repository of project applications which can be analysed to
demonstrate community priorities and which can be further
updated to maintain a public record not only of the projects
but also the impact and outcomes of those projects.
The key staff involved have developed a high degree of
expertise in running digital PB processes and this could be
further exploited by other service areas within the council
both for PB and other forms of engagement. This is already
being demonstrated through good work being done in Arts &
Culture.
At COSLA we have been happy to share North Ayrshire’s
work as an example of good practice in this area.”
John Munro. PB Digital Participation Manager, COSLA
G
O
OD PRACTIC
E      
The CONSUL
platform acts as a
database of
community
initiatives, providing
the Council with a
snapshot of the
needs and priorities
of local people,
which can in turn
shape service
delivery.
Evidence of
initiatives such as
the Spike Wheat
Scots’ ‘Breaking
Bread, Building
Bonds: A Syrian
Culinary Journey’
and BABCA’s
‘Meet and Greet’ for
New Scots
showcase cross-
cultural
engagement and
community
building, described
as ‘political gold
dust’ by COSLA as
working examples of
integration and
inclusion. The
visibility of these
successes through a
platform like
CONSUL
demonstrates the
value of an online
presence to
showcase the work
of North Ayrshire’s
community groups.
7

Page 15

8
Reflections and Recommendations: Recognition of North
Ayrshire’s 2023-24 PB by Mr Tom Arthur, Minister for
Community Wealth and Public Finance
“1% Mainstream PB Target: COSLA are compiling this year’s
1% returns and early indications suggest these will be
positive. COSLA provided examples of the good work local
authorities are doing with PB, such as East Ayrshire
celebrating 10 years of inspiring communities; Aberdeen,
Angus, Shetland and the Borders embedding PB into their
budget process; Glasgow, East Lothian and Perth and
Kinross’ work using CONSUL and highlighted North
Ayrshire’s co-production with the community on how to run
PB processes. COSLA officials also noted specific projects in
Arran, where PB funding was used for a kids book festival
and in Kilwinning, where Syrian New Scots received PB
funding to celebrate their background and cuisines. The
Minister was impressed with this progress and commented
he would be interested to see how PB develops when it
becomes more recognised in communities.
Notes of Scottish Government and COSLA Participatory
Budgeting Meeting 12:30 – 13:30, 6 December 2023
G
O
OD PRACTIC
E
Recognition of our
sector-leading
approach to
meaningfully and
intentionally shape
participatory
processes in
partnership with
our community.
Our challenge
moving forwards is
to be more
ambitious about
what PB means for
North Ayrshire,
revisting
discussions about
mainstreaming and
wider participative
democratic
processes to
encourage local
people to get
involved in the
decisions that
affect their
communities.
Safeguarding high
quality PB
processes and
demonstrating that
a vote really makes
a difference is
central to creating
the space where
engaged and
informed citizens
can continue to
shape their future.