Democracy Spraffa

Audit and Scrutiny Mid Year Complaints Report - 260129

North Ayrshire Council · 29 January 2026
Back to Audit and Scrutiny Committee — 29 January 2026 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL 
29 January 2026 
Audit and Scrutiny Committee 
Title:    2025/26 Mid-Year Complaint Report 
Purpose:  To inform the Audit and Scrutiny Committee of the Council's
complaint performance and volumes and trends of complaints
received in the first six months of Financial Year 2025/26. 
Recommendation:  That the Committee notes the report and the information
provided. 
1. Executive Summary 
1.1 This report details complaint handling performance relating to North Ayrshire Council
covering the period 1 April 2025 to 30 September 2025 and is referred to in the report
as H1 2025. The detailed report is attached at Appendix 1. 
1.2 To allow comparisons to be made the report also details some complaint data relating
to H1 2024 and H1 2023. 
1.3 Performance is measured through several Scottish Public Services Ombudsman
(SPSO) performance indicators, some of which have national targets. 
2. Background 
2.1 This section contains statistical information and commentary on key complaint
performance indicators.  More information relating to the indicators can be found in the
attached report. 
2.2 Volume of complaints received and closed 
2.2.1 A 7% decrease in complaints received and closed is seen when compared to H1 2024
and a 9% decrease when compared to H1 2023.
1,117 1,086
1,012
H1 2023 H1 2024 H1 2025

Page 2

12%
34%
44%
10% Upheld
Partially Upheld
Not Upheld
Resolved
2.3 Complaints closed at each Stage 
H1 2025
Stage One 86%
Stage Two 14% 
2.3.1 Whilst there is no national target for the number of complaints to be closed under each
stage, the Council always seeks to maximise closure at Stage One as complainants
receive a quicker resolution compared to Stage Two, reduces the impact on complaint
handler time and service delivery and reduces the possibility of SPSO referrals. 
2.4 Complaint outcomes 
Stage One                                                            Stage Two 
2.4.1 Resolved complaints are where the Council has taken action to address a problem or issue
without deciding on whether there were any failings (this would happen where we agree a
solution with the complainant at the outset without needing to investigate the complaint). 
2.4.2 Most complaints not upheld related to policies, regulations or complaints that were proven
unfounded after investigation. 
2.5 Average time in working days for a full response at each Stage 
Stage One                                                        Stage Two 
2.5.1 The average time in working days for a response under both Stages is better than the
SPSO target response timescales for the last three years. An improvement in our
performance to this time last year for Stage One complaints should also be noted. 
4.1
3.3 3
0
5
H1 2023 H1 2024 H1 2025
Average days to close
16 14.8 15.6
0
20
H1 2023 H1 2024 H1 2025Average days to close
32%
10%18%
40%
Upheld
Partially Upheld
Not Upheld
Resolved

Page 3

2.6 Complaints closed within timescale 
Stage One                                                            Stage Two 
2.6.1 The national target for complaints closed under Stage One is 80% or above.  The national
target for complaints closed under Stage Two is 85% or above. The Council’s performance
in closing complaints timeously was better than the national target under both stages.
Further details of complaints not closed on time are contained in the attached report. 
2.7 Trends identified from upheld/partially upheld complaints 
2.7.1 Key complaint topics for upheld or partially upheld complaints are detailed on page 8 of
the attached report. 
2.8 Changes or Improvements as a result of complaints 
2.8.1 Not all services can implement improvements because of complaints due to several
factors, including the feasibility of making changes and resource/budget considerations.
That said, improvements were made in some services as a result of complaints received
during the period and a selection are noted in page 13 of the attached report. 
2.9  Compliments 
2.9.1 The Council received some compliments during the period.  Some praised specific
individuals or teams, some related to more than one service and some were raised by
employees complimenting other employees. 
3. Proposals 
3.1 It is proposed the Committee notes the report and recognises the Council’s complaint
handling performance in relation to Section 2 above. 
4. Implications/Socio-economic Duty 
Financial 
4.1 None. 
Human Resources 
4.2 None. 
93%
7%
Closed on time
Not closed on time
92%
8%
Closed on time
Not closed on time

Page 4

Legal 
4.3 None. 
Equality/Socio-economic 
4.4 None. 
Climate Change and Carbon 
4.5 None. 
Key Priorities 
4.6 The Two Stage Complaint Handling Procedure supports the Council's key priority of
delivering more effective and efficient service provision. It demonstrates commitment
by identifying trends and focussing on service improvements whenever possible for
North Ayrshire residents, customers and visitors. 
Community Wealth Building 
4.7 None. 
Islands Communities Impact Assessment (ICIA) 
4.8 None. 
United Nations Rights of the Child (UNCRC) 
4.9 If a young person under the age of 18 makes a complaint, or an adult makes a complaint
on behalf of a young person or about an issue that affects them, we will use an
enhanced child-friendly complaints process. This process ensures the young person's
views are heard and considered and follows the SPSO Child Friendly Complaints
Handling Principles and Child Friendly Complaints Handling Process Guidance. 
Consumer Duty 
4.10 None. 
5. Consultation 
5.1 None. 
Aileen Craig
Head of Service for Democratic Services 
For further information please contact Darren Miller, Complaint Manager, on (01294)
322988. 
Background Papers
2025/26 Mid-Year Complaint Report

Page 5

Page | 1 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
PUBLIC INFORMATION 
2025/26 Mid-Year
Complaint Report

Page 6

Page | 2 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
PUBLIC INFORMATION
Contents 
Page 
Introduction         3 
1 Volume of complaints closed      4 
2  Volume of complaints closed on time  at both Stages   6 
3 Volume of complaints not closed on time per Directorate     6 
4 Key complaint topics       8 
5 Average time in working days for a full response   9 
6  Extended complaints       11 
7 Complaint Outcomes                                                                    12 
8  Improvements made as a result of complaints                        13 
9 Compliments        14 
10 Glossary         15

Page 7

Page | 3 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
PUBLIC INFORMATION
Introduction 
North Ayrshire Council always seeks to deliver the best services possible to its
customers and residents but it is recognised that dissatisfaction will sometimes occur. 
When it does, we want to know what went wrong, why it went wrong and what we can
do to make things right. 
The Council recognises valuable lessons can be learnt from complaints which are
defined as being expressions of dissatisfaction from members of the public about
actions, or lack of actions, or about the standard of service provided by or on behalf of
the Council.  
The Council’s complaint handling procedure (CHP) has two stages for handling
complaints from members of the public:- 
Stage One complaints (also known as Frontline Resolution) are
straightforward, non-complex complaints the Council can address at the
initial point of contact or as close to the point of service delivery as
possible.  The Council has up to five working days to handle these. 
Stage Two complaints (also known as Investigations) are complaints the
Council are typically unable to address at Stage One and require more
time to carry out further investigation. This may be because the
complaint is complex, serious or high risk. The Council has up to 20
working days to address these. 
This report details the Council’s complaint handling performance covering the first six
months of financial year 2025 (1 April to 30 September) and is referred to in the report
as H1 2025.  Performance is measured via several Scottish Public Services Ombudsman
indicators (some of which have national targets) and complaint data relating to
previous years has been included in certain sections to allow comparisons to be made. 
Reporting complaints is a statutory requirement and is monitored by Audit Scotland. 
1
2

Page 8

Page | 4 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
PUBLIC INFORMATION
1   Volume of complaints closed 
1,005 complaints were received during the period and 1,012 closed.  The chart below provides
a breakdown of the closed complaints per Directorate: 
The following tables highlight complaint volumes per Directorate under each Stage: 
Education Stage One Stage Two
Education (HQ) 3 11
Education (Schools) 34 28
Facilities Management 9 -
Total 46 39 
Communities and Housing Stage One Stage Two
Building Services 107 11
Community Facilities 4 -
Housing 71 16
Information & Culture 1 -
Planning 2 3
Protective Services 10 3
Sport and Outdoor Activity 2 -
Total 197 33 
Place Stage One Stage Two
Property Management and Investment 41 10
Roads 44 6
Streetscene 32 -
Transport 2 -
Waste Services 322 1
Total 441 17 
85
230
458
80
154
Education
Communities and Housing
Place
Corporate Services
HSCP
Multi-Service (5)

Page 9

Page | 5 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
PUBLIC INFORMATION 
Corporate Services Stage One Stage Two
Customer Services 67 4
Finance 1 1
IT 1 -
Legal Services 6 -
Total 75 5 
Health & Social Care Partnership Stage One Stage Two
Children, Families & Justice 18 14
Finance & Transformation 11 1
Health & Community Care 69 23
Mental Health 9 7
Support Services 2 -
Total 109 45 
Multi-Service Stage One Stage Two
Complaints involving more than one service - 5
Total - 5 
• Although there is no target for the volume of complaints handled under each Stage,
the Council seeks to maximise closure at Stage One wherever possible and 86% were
handled at this Stage during the period.   
• Some services handled all their complaints at Stage One. 
• Whilst 32% of all complaints closed related to Waste Services (the majority relating
to missed collections), the service empty over 102,000 household waste bins each
week.  As this equates to approximately 2.5 million collections during the period,
0.01% of these collections resulted in complaints being raised.   
• Multi-Service complaints have a table of their own as they are not attributable to a
particular service. 
Year on Year comparison 
The graph below compares the volume of complaints received over the half year period in the last
three years: 
1,117 1,086
1,012
H1 2023 H1 2024 H1 2025

Page 10

Page | 6 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
PUBLIC INFORMATION
• The national target for closing Stage One complaints on
time is 80% and above. 
• The volume closed on time includes extended
complaints that met their new due dates. 
2   Volume of complaints closed on time at both Stages 
Stage One       
Stage Two       
3   Volume of complaints not closed on time per Directorate 
This section provides details of complaints not closed on time under each Stage and includes
extended complaints that did not meet their new timescales. 
Stage One                             
Education 
Communities and Housing  
3
2
Facilities Management
Education (schools)
3
9
3
7
Protective Services
Housing
Community Facilities
Building Services
• The national target for closing Stage Two complaints on
time is 85% and above. 
• The volume closed on time includes extended
complaints that met their new due dates. 
The two school complaints did not meet timescale due to
difficulties meeting/communicating with complainants. 
For two of the Facilities Management complaints, no
reasons were recorded as to why they breached timescale
There were several reasons why complaints breached in this
Directorate, including resourcing issues, employee
availability, administrative errors and complaints being
routed to incorrect services initially.
93%
7%
Closed on time
Not closed on time
92%
8%
Closed on time
Not closed on time

Page 11

Page | 7 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
PUBLIC INFORMATION
Place 
Corporate Services 
HSCP   
Stage Two 
Communities and Housing  
HSCP 
5
1
3
2
8
Waste Services
Transport
Streetscene
Roads
PMI
1
2
Legal Services
Customer
Services
1
2
9
1
Support Services
Mental Health
Health & Comm Care
Children & Families
3
3
1
Protective Services
Housing
Building Services
1
1
3
Mental Health
Health & Comm Care
Children & Families
The main reasons for complaints breaching in this
Directorate were reduced resources and awaiting
information from third parties.   
Some of these complaints could have had their timescales
extended or escalated to Stage Two given the difficulties
encountered.
One Customer Services complaint breached because the
complainant could not be contacted to discuss their
complaint and the other complaint breached due to a system
issue. Both these complaints could have been escalated to
Stage Two given the difficulties encountered. 
The Legal Services complaint related to a resource issue.
Various reasons given why these complaints breached
timescale, including individuals not being available to
progress complaints, complaint complexity (some of which
could have been escalated to Stage Two given the difficulties
encountered) and system issues.
Various reasons recorded as to why these complaints
breached timescale.  No trends or themes identified.
The main reason these complaints breached was due to
delays encountered at response approval stage.

Page 12

Page | 8 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
PUBLIC INFORMATION
4   Key complaint topics 
Key topics for upheld and partially upheld complaints for services are listed below.  Services
will not be listed if there were low complaint volumes that did not allow meaningful analysis. 
Education
Service Key complaint topic(s)
Education (HQ and Schools) • Sensitive issues relating to teachers
and/or pupils
• Service delivery/provision 
• Employee actions (alleged or perceived)
Facilities Management • School Crossing patrols 
Communities and Housing
Service Key complaint topic(s)
Building Services • Quality issues
• Communication
• Employee actions (alleged or perceived) 
Place
Service Key complaint topic(s)
Property Management and Investment • Gas Central Heating issues
Roads • Parking/parking enforcement
Waste Services • Failed bulky uplifts
• Missed waste bin collections (all colours)
• Missed assisted bin collections (all
colours)
• Waste bins not delivered (any colour) 
Corporate Services
Service Key complaint topic(s)
Customer Services • Employee actions (alleged or perceived) 
HSCP (Social Work complaints) 
Service Key complaint topic(s)
Children & Families  • Employee actions (alleged or perceived)
Health & Community Care • Service delivery/provision
• Employee actions (alleged or perceived)
Mental Health • Service delivery/provision

Page 13

Page | 9 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
PUBLIC INFORMATION
5   Average time in working days for a full response 
The average time in working days to close complaints under both Stages during the period is
noted below.   
Values for previous years have been included to allow comparisons to be made and any
complaints that had their timescales extended have been excluded from the calculations. 
Stage One 
Stage Two 
The average number of days to close Stage One and Stage Two complaints within target in
the last three years have been consistently surpassed. 
4.1
3.3 3
0
5
H1 2023 H1 2024 H1 2025
Average days to close National Target (5 days or less)
16 14.8 15.6
0
20
H1 2023 H1 2024 H1 2025
Average days to close National  Target (20 days or less)

Page 14

Page | 10 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
PUBLIC INFORMATION
.
No Stage Two complaints for this service met the 20-working day timescale.  Various
reasons were provided and no trend or theme was identified.
Stag One
The bar charts below detail services that did not meet the average time in working days for
a response under either Stage.  Services that met the target are not listed and any complaints
that had their timescales extended have been excluded from the calculations.   
Housing & Public Protection 
Stage One 
One complaint was closed on working day 43, resulting in the target not being met. 
This was due to an oversight and the complainant being unavailable to assist with the
complaint investigation. 
Stage Two 
8
Protective Services
Average days to close National Target (5 days)
37.8
Protective Services
Average days to close National Target (20 days)

Page 15

Page | 11 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
PUBLIC INFORMATION
.
.
Sustainability, Transport & Corporate Property 
Stage One 
A small number of Property Management & Investment complaints were closed just
outwith the 5 working day timescale, resulting in the target not being met. 
One Transport complaint was closed on working day 17 as information was awaited
from the complainant. 
HSCP 
Stage One 
One complaint was closed on working day 16 as further information was required
from the complainant to progress the investigation. This complaint could have been
escalated and handled at Stage Two given the circumstances. 
6   Extended complaints 
• 91 complaints had their timescales extended during the period (74 at Stage One and
17 at Stage Two).  The complaints related to multiple services across all Directorates.
There were various reasons for extensions, including complainants and/or employees
not being available to assist with investigations, reduced resources, additional
information having to be sought to support investigations and system issues. 
5.3
9
PMI Transport
Average days to close National Target (5 days)
8.5
Mental Health
Average days to close National Target (5 days)

Page 16

Page | 12 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
PUBLIC INFORMATION
12%
34%44%
10%
Upheld Partially Upheld Not Upheld Resolved
• Of the 91 complaints that had their timescales extended, 78% were closed within
their new timescales (84% for Stage One and 94% for Stage Two). 
7   Complaint Outcomes 
The charts below detail the number of complaints upheld, partially upheld, not upheld or
resolved under both Stages. 
Stage One   
Stage Two 
*Resolved complaints are where the Council has taken action to address the problem/issue without deciding whether there
were any failings (this would happen where we agree a solution with a complainant at the outset without needing to
investigate the complaint). 
**Partially Upheld complaints are complaints that contain more than one complaint element and at least one is upheld.
32%
10%18%
40%
Upheld Partially Upheld Not Upheld Resolved
• Complaints closed as Resolved* related to multiple
services across all Directorates, with one third relating to
Waste Services (mainly missed waste bin collections). 
This indicates those complainants simply wanted their
bins collected. 
• Complaints that were not upheld related to policies and
regulations or they were complaints that were poor
quality/unfounded. 
• Complaints that were upheld or partially upheld**
related to numerous services across all Directorates. 
• Complaints that were not upheld were similar to the
reasons Stage One complaints were not upheld.

Page 17

Page | 13 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
PUBLIC INFORMATION
8   Improvements made as a result of complaints 
Some improvements/changes were made because of complaints received during the period
and a small selection is noted below. 
What happened What we did
A complaint was received regarding a
parent’s concerns over the safeguarding of
their child while attending school.
The matter was investigated and a parental
meeting held with the Head Teacher and others
to discuss all concerns raised. The parent was
happy with the actions agreed and the pupil was
taken through all safeguarding procedures. Key
Adults, safe places and various supports
throughout the pupil’s timetable were shared
with a summary card of support actions to be
completed by the pupil. The pupil accepted the
card and agreed it would be helpful.
A complaint was received that a window
cleaner working on behalf of the Council
asked a tenant in a sheltered housing
complex if they could gain access to the
inside of the complex via the tenant’s
property to clean the windows.
It was determined it was a window cleaner from
a contracted company and the contract only
covers the outside of the windows plus
communal areas. The Council now receive a list
of dates in advance from the company, stating
when they will be carrying out cleaning in each
housing complex.  We also now have a system in
place that they can gain access to the front door
(public areas only) of housing complexes without
having to call any flats or houses.
A resident set up a mygov.scot account but
was unable to link two properties to the
Council Tax system.
The issue was investigated and it was discovered
there was a problem within the system that
prohibited more than one property being added. 
This was fixed and the resident was thanked for
bringing this matter to our attention.
A resident complained that rats were
causing damage to their garden and the
nest was on unattended waste ground
between the resident’s property and a
Council property boundary.
The relevant services attended the area to
ensure access could be gained to clear it and the
Council is now reviewing its land ownership
plans to make sure maintenance responsibilities
are established going forward.

Page 18

Page | 14 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
PUBLIC INFORMATION
9   Compliments 
Many compliments were recorded during the period and of these: 
• A number were cross-Council, with customers commending or praising more than one
service 
• Some were internal, with employees complimenting other employees 
• Some related to specific individuals as well as teams 
Whilst the compliments received cannot all be highlighted in this report, the word cloud below
illustrates some of the feedback the Council received from tenants, customers, residents and
visitors:

Page 19

Page | 15 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
PUBLIC INFORMATION
10   Glossary 
Term   Explanation 
Stage One  Stage One (aka Frontline Resolution) aims to resolve straightforward
customer complaints that require little or no investigation. Any employee
may deal with complaints at this stage and they can be resolved via any
channel. The main principle is to seek resolution at the earliest
opportunity and as close to the point of service delivery as possible. Stage
One complaints must be responded to within five working days unless an
extension is requested (an additional five working days) and approved by
a senior manager or above. The Council should, however, always aim to
conclude these types of complaints within five working days. 
Stage Two Not all complaints are suitable for Frontline Resolution and not all
complaints will be satisfactorily resolved at that stage. Complaints
therefore handled at Stage Two (aka Investigation) typically require a
detailed examination before the Council can state its position. These
complaints may already have been considered at Stage One, or they may
have been identified from the outset as being complex, serious or high
risk and needing immediate investigation. The investigation under a
Stage Two should establish all the facts relevant to the points made in the
complaint and give the customer a full, objective and proportionate
response that represents our final position. Stage Two complaints must
be responded to within 20 working days unless an extension is approved
by senior manager in conjunction with the customer. Stage Two
complaints require a written response, signed by a senior manager or
above. 
Complaint criteria 
When an expression of dissatisfaction is received the Council determines if the issue falls into one
of six complaint categories: 
• A service the Council should be providing is not being provided (or is not available)
• A request for a service was provided but not to an appropriate standard 
• A request for service has not been answered or actioned within the agreed timescale
• A Council employee was rude, unhelpful or unprofessional
• A Council employee did not attend an appointment or call-out on a date/time agreed
• The complaint relates to an internal or external policy (but only where the complaint
relates specifically to the way the matter was administered) 
If the issue being raised relates to one or more of the above, the matter is considered a complaint
and will be recorded and handled as such.  If not, it is deemed to be something else and will be
actioned under the relevant process. 
END OF REPORT