Democracy Spraffa

2024-25 Complaint Report

North Ayrshire Council · 28 August 2025
Back to Audit and Scrutiny Committee — 28 August 2025 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL 
28 August 2025 
Audit and Scrutiny Committee 
Title:    2024/25 Complaint Report 
Purpose:  To inform the Audit and Scrutiny Committee of the Council's
complaint performance and volumes and trends of complaints
received in Financial Year 2024/25. 
Recommendation:  That the Committee notes the report and the information
provided. 
1. Executive Summary 
1.1 This report details complaint information relating to North Ayrshire Council during
Financial Year 2024/25, covering the period 1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025. 
1.2 To allow comparisons to be made the report also includes some complaint data
relating to 2022 and 2023. 
1.3 Performance is measured through several Scottish Public Services Ombudsman
(SPSO) performance indicators, some of which have national targets. 
2. Background 
2.1 This section contains statistical information and commentary on some of the key
complaint performance indicators. More information relating to the indicators can be
found in the attached report. 
2.2  Volume of complaints received 
Year Volume of complaints
2022/23 2,576
2023/24 1,948
2024/25 2,039 
2.2.1 A slight increase in complaints received when comparing 2024 with 2023 but still a
21% drop when compared with 2022.   
2.3 Complaint outcomes for closed complaints in 2024/25

Page 2

Stage One
Outcome 
% closed as Resolved* 47%
% closed as Upheld 21%
% closed as Partially Upheld 11%
% closed as Not Upheld 21% 
Stage Two
Outcome 
% closed as Resolved* 10%
% closed as Upheld 9%
% closed as Partially Upheld 26%
% closed as Not Upheld 53% 
2.3.1 *Up to 31 March 2021, a complaint that meets our complaint criteria could be upheld,
partially upheld or not upheld. From 1 April 2021 a fourth outcome became available to
use called ‘Resolved’. Resolved complaints are where the Council has taken action to
address a problem or issue without deciding on whether there were any failings (this
would happen where we agree a solution with the complainant at the outset without
needing to investigate the complaint). 
2.3.2 Complaint outcome analysis can be found in the attached report. 
2.4  Average time in working days for a full response at each Stage 
Stage One Average number of
working days to close
Target
2022/23 4.2 5 workings days or less
2023/24 3.8 5 workings days or less
2024/25 3.3 5 workings days or less 
Stage Two Average number of
days to close
Target
2022/23 14.9 20 working days or less
2023/24 16.8 20 working days or less
2024/25 15.5 20 working days or less 
2.4.1 The average time in working days for a response under both Stages has exceeded
the SPSO target response timescales for the last three years. 
2.5  Complaints closed within timescale in 2024/25 
Stage % closed on
time
Target
Stage One  92% 80% and above
Stage Two 93% 85% and above 
2.5.1  The volume closed on time includes extended complaints that met their new due dates. 
2.5.2  Further details of complaints not closed on time are contained in the attached report.

Page 3

2.6  Changes or Improvements made as a result of complaints 
2.6.1 Services cannot always implement improvements because of complaints due to
several factors, including the feasibility of making changes and resource/budget
considerations. That said, improvements were made in some Services and a selection
are noted in the attached report. 
2.7   Compliments 
2.7.1 The Council received and recorded many compliments during the year. Some praised
specific individuals or teams, some related to more than one Service and some were
raised by employees complimenting other employees. A selection can be found in the
attached report. 
3. Proposals 
3.1 It is proposed the Committee approves the report and recognises the Council’s
complaint handling performance in relation to Section 2 above. 
4. Implications/Socio-economic Duty 
Financial 
4.1 None. 
Human Resources 
4.2 None. 
Legal 
4.3 None. 
Equality/Socio-economic 
4.4 None. 
Climate Change and Carbon 
4.5 None. 
Key Priorities 
4.6 The Two Stage Complaint Handling Procedure supports the Council's key priority of
delivering more effective and efficient service provision. It demonstrates commitment
through focussing on, and determining, trends for service improvement and delivery
for North Ayrshire residents, customers and visitors. 
Community Wealth Building

Page 4

4.7 None. 
Islands Communities Impact Assessment (ICIA) 
4.8 None. 
United Nations Rights of the Child (UNCRC) 
4.9 None. 
Consumer Duty 
4.10 None. 
5. Consultation 
5.1 None. 
Aileen Craig
Head of Service for Democratic Services 
For further information please contact Darren Miller, Complaint Manager, on 01294 322
988. 
Background Papers
North Ayrshire Council Complaint Report 2024/25

Page 5

North Ayrshire Council 
Annual Complaint Report 
2024 to 2025

Page 6

Introduction         3 
1 Volume of complaints closed      4 
2  Volume of complaints closed on time  at both Stages   6 
3 Volume of complaints not closed on time per Directorate     6 
4 Key complaint topics       9 
5 Average time in working days for a full response   10 
6  Extended complaints       11 
7 Complaint Outcomes                                                                    12 
8  Improvements made as a result of complaints                        14 
9 Compliments        15 
10  SPSO complaint referrals      16 
11 Glossary         18

Page 7

Introduction
North Ayrshire Council always seeks to deliver the best services possible to its tenants, residents
and customers but it is recognised that dissatisfaction will sometimes occur. When it does, we want
to know what went wrong, why it went wrong and what we can do to make things right.
The Council recognises that valuable lessons can be learned from complaints which are defined as
being expressions of dissatisfaction from members of the public about actions, or lack of actions, or
about the standard of service provided by or on behalf of the Council.
The Council’s complaint handling procedure (CHP) has two stages for handling complaints from the
public.
Stage One complaints (also known as Frontline Resolution) are straightforward, non-complex
complaints the Council can resolve at the initial point of contact or as close to the point of service
delivery as possible. The Council has up to 5 working days to resolve these.
Stage Two complaints (also known as Investigations) are complaints the Council is typically unable
to resolve at Stage One and needs more time to carry out further investigation. This may be
because the nature of the complaint is complex, serious or high risk. The Council has up to 20
working days to resolve these.
This report details the Council’s complaint handling performance covering financial year 2024 to
2025 (1 April 2024 to 31 March 2025). Performance is measured via several Scottish Public Services
Ombudsman indicators (some of which have national targets) and complaint data relating to
previous years has been included in certain sections to allow comparisons to be made. 
Reporting complaints is a statutory requirement and is monitored by Audit Scotland.
This report has been reviewed for accessibility prior to publication.

Page 8

1 Volume of complaints closed
The Council received 2,039 complaints during the year and closed 2,022. 
The table below provides a breakdown of the closed complaints per Directorate:
Directorate Volume
Communities & Housing 435
Corporate Services 131
Education 234
Health & Social Care 143
Place 1,076
Multi-Service 3
The following tables highlight complaint volumes per Directorate under each Stage:
Corporate Services
Team Stage One Stage Two
Committee & Member Services 0 1
Communications 1 0
Customer Services 104 9
Finance 4 0
IT 3 0
Legal Services 6 2
Policy, Performance & Elections 1 0
Total 119 12
Communities & Housing
Team Stage One Stage Two
Building Services 237 10
Community Facilities 2 1
Housing 121 28
Information & Culture 5 0
Planning 8 4
Protective Services 15 4
Total 388 47
Education
Team Stage One Stage Two
Education (HQ) 23 22
Education (Schools) 132 38
Facilities Management 19 0
Total 174 60
Health & Social Care
Team Stage One Stage Two
Children, Families & Justice 24 12

Page 9

Team Stage One Stage Two
Finance & Transformation 2 3
Health & Community Care 76 12
Mental Health 3 10
Support Services 1 0
Total 106 37
Place
Team Stage One Stage Two
Growth & Investment 1 0
Property Management & Investments 168 13
Regeneration 2 0
Roads 80 17
Streetscene 99 8
Sustainability 2 0
Transport 3 0
Waste Services 676 7
Total 1,031 45
Multi-Service
Team Stage One Stage Two
Complaints involving more than one Service 0 3
Total 0 3
Although there is no target for the volume of complaints handled under each Stage, the Council
seeks to maximise closure at Stage One wherever possible and 90% were handled at this Stage
during the period.
Some Services handled all their complaints at Stage One.
Some Services that received high complaint volumes handled few of them at Stage Two, notably
Building Services, Property Management & Investments, Streetscene and Waste Services due to the
straightforward nature of the complaints received.
Whilst most of Waste Services complaints related to missed bin collections and assisted pullouts,
the number of complaints received for the service in 2024/25 showed a reduction of 27%
compared to 2023/24. Despite ongoing challenges regarding absence levels, the service remains
focused on service delivery. 102,000 household waste bins are emptied each week, which equates
to 5.3 million collections over the year. The number of complaints therefore received in 2024/25 is
equivalent to 0.013% of all bins collected. 
Year on Year comparison
The table below shows a comparison of the volume of complaints received over the last three
years:
Year Volume of complaints
2022/23 2,576

Page 10

Year Volume of complaints
2023/24 1,948
2024/25 2,039
Whilst there has been a slight increase in complaints received when comparing 2024 with 2023, it is
still a 21% drop when comparing 2024 with 2022. The sustained lower volume could be partly
attributable to the complaint page on the Council’s website being enhanced in 2023, which now
includes more information on what the Council does not consider a complaint and offers
appropriate routes to raise such matters.
2 Volume of complaints closed on time at both Stages
Stage Percentage
closed on time
Target
Stage One  92% 80% and above
Stage Two 93% 85% and above
The volume closed on time includes complaints that had their timescales extended and met the
new due dates.
3 Volume of complaints not closed on time per Directorate
This section provides details of complaints not closed on time under each Stage and includes
extended complaints that did not meet their new timescales.
Stage One
141 complaints did not meet timescale during the year and the volumes are noted below.
Corporate Services 
Department Volume
Customer Services 2
Communities & Housing
Department Volume
Building Services 18
Community Facilities 1
Housing 16
Planning 1
Protective Services 3
Education
Department Volume
Education (HQ) 7
Education (Schools) 11

Page 11

Health & Social Care
Department Volume
Children & Families 5
Health & Community Care 10
Mental Health 1
Place
Department Volume
Property Management 13
Roads 2
15Streetscene 15
Waste Services 36
Multiple reasons were noted as to why the above complaints did not meet timescale, including
administrative errors, complaint handlers awaiting information to progress complaints, employee
availability, resourcing issues and operational pressures.
Of the 141 Stage One complaints that did not meet timescale, 38 had their timescales extended the
additional 5 working days but none met their new due dates. 
In relation to the 103 complains that did not have their timescales extended, many could have been
extended given 77% were closed within the additional 5 working day timescale allowance.
Stage Two
14 complaints did not meet timescale during the year and the volumes are noted below.
Corporate Services
Department Volume
Legal Services 2
Communities & Housing
Department Volume
Building Services 1
Housing 4
Education
Department Volume
Education (Schools) 4
Health & Social Care
Department Volume
Mental Health 1
Place
Department Volume
Waste Services 1
Multi-Service

Page 12

Department Volume
Multi-Service 1
Reasons noted as to why the above complaints did not meet timescale are similar to those that did
not meet timescale at Stage One.
Of the 14 Stage Two complaints that did not meet timescale, 2 had their timescales extended but
neither met their new due dates.

Page 13

4 Key complaint topics
Key topics for upheld and partially upheld complaints for Services are listed below. Services will not
be listed where there were low complaint volumes that did not allow meaningful analysis.
Corporate Services
Service Key complaint topic
Customer Services Communication
Customer Services Incorrect information provided
Communities & Housing
Service Key complaint topic
Building Services Communication
Building Services Follow up work not done
Building Services Quality issues (work incomplete or poor workmanship)
Education
Service Key complaint topic
Education (HQ & schools) Sensitive issues relating to teachers and/or pupils
Education (HQ & schools) Service delivery/provision
Education (HQ & schools) Employee Actions (alleged or perceived)
Health & Social Care
Service Key complaint topic
All HSCP Services Service delivery/provision
All HSCP Services Employee Actions (alleged or perceived)
Place
Service Key complaint topic
Property Management & Investment Gas Central Heating (maintenance etc.)
Property Management & Investment Planned Works
Roads Parking or Parking Enforcement Team
Streetscene Tree/grass/verge/hedge cutting issues
Waste Services Delays with new waste bin deliveries
Waste Services Failed bulky waste collections
Waste Services Missed waste bin/assisted collections (all colours)
‘Employee Actions (alleged or perceived)’ appears as a key topic for some Services but the
definition is broad and has been used where complainants alleged or perceived employee actions
or behaviour to be unacceptable. Whilst investigations may determine this is not always the case,
where unacceptable behaviour is identified Services will take the appropriate action to address.

Page 14

5 Average time in working days for a full response
The average time in working days to close complaints under both Stages during the year is noted
below. Values for previous years have been included to allow comparisons to be made. Any
complaints that had their timescales extended have been excluded from the calculations.
Stage One Average number of
working days to close
Target
2022 4.2 5 workings days or less
2023 3.8 5 workings days or less
2024 3.3 5 workings days or less
Stage Two Average number of days
to close
Target
2022 14.9 20 working days or less
2023 16.8 20 working days or less
2024 15.5 20 working days or less
The average time to close complaints under both Stages has consistently exceeded target. 
The tables below detail Services that did not meet the average time in working days for a response
under either Stage. Services that met the target are not listed and any complaints that had their
timescales extended have been excluded from the calculations.
Corporate Services
Stage Two Average number of
working days to close
Target
Legal Services 42.5 20 workings days or less
Two Legal Services complaints were closed on working days 24 and 61.  Clarification was sought
from one complainant which took a significant number of days for them to respond and a delay
was encountered with the other due to several factors, including an oversight on the part of the
complaint handler. 
Communities & Housing
Stage One Average number of
working days to close
Target
Community Facilities 9.5 5 workings days or less
One Community Facilities complaint was closed on working day 15 and this resulted in the average
days target being breached. No reason was given as to what caused the delay.

Page 15

Education
Stage One Average number of
working days to close
Target
Education (HQ) 5.4 5 workings days or less
One HQ complaint was closed on working day 34 and this resulted in the average days target being
breached. The delay was due to employee availability.
Health & Social Care
Stage One  Average number of
working days to close
Target
Mental Health 7.5 5 workings days or less
One Mental Health complaint was closed on working day 11 and this resulted in the average days
target being breached. No reason was given as to what caused the delay. 
6 Extended complaints
202 complaints had their timescales extended during the year (167 at Stage One and 35 at Stage
Two). The complaints related to various Services across all Directorates.
There were various reasons for extending, including complainants, third parties and employees
being unavailable to assist or support with investigations and/or letter approvals, obtaining
additional information to support investigations and resourcing/operational issues. Of the 202
complaints that had their timescales extended, 80% were closed within their new target due dates.

Page 16

7 Complaint Outcomes
The Council has four categories of complaint outcomes. 
• Resolved complaints are complaints where the Council has taken action to address a
problem/issue without needing to decide if there were any failings. 
• Upheld complaints are complaints where something has gone wrong/not happened and the
Council needs to take steps to address.
• Partially Upheld complaints are complaints that have multiple complaint elements, some of
which are upheld, the rest not.
• Not Upheld complaints are complaints that have not been upheld for the following reasons:
• they related to internal or external policies
• they related to external regulations
• upon investigation they were proven to be unfounded/unsubstantiated
The tables below detail the number of complaints upheld, partially upheld, not upheld or resolved
under both Stages.
Stage One
Outcome Percentage
Closed as Resolved 47%
Closed as Upheld 21%
Closed as Partially Upheld 11%
Closed as Not Upheld 21%
Of the 591 complaints that were upheld and partially upheld at Stage One, three services had the
highest volume, with Property Management & Investment at 15%, Building Services at 19% and
Waste Services at 28%. 
53% of all Resolved complaints related to Waste Services (mainly missed bin collections), indicating
those complainants simply wanted their bins collected without any need for investigation. 
Complaints that were not upheld related to internal or external policies and regulations or were
complaints that were found to be unsubstantiated.
Stage Two 
Outcome Percentage
Closed as Resolved 10%
Closed as Upheld 9%
Closed as Partially Upheld 26%
Closed as Not Upheld 53%
Stage Two complaints that were upheld or partially upheld were divided across multiple Services
across all Directorates.
The reasons for Stage Two complaints being closed as not upheld are the same as those for Stage
One.

Page 17

The tables below detail the outcomes at each stage covering the last three years: 
Stage One complaints
Year Resolved Upheld Partially Upheld Not Upheld
2022/23 47% 30% 9% 14%
2023/24 39% 32% 12% 17%
2024/25 47% 21% 11% 21%
Stage Two complaints
Year Resolved Upheld Partially Upheld Not Upheld
2022/23 3% 11% 40% 46%
2023/24 4% 13% 39% 44%
2024/25 10% 9% 26% 53%

Page 18

8 Improvements made as a result of complaints
Council Services continually seek to identify improvements in service delivery and complaint
information is analysed regularly to inform service improvements. Some improvements were
implemented as a result of complaints received during the year and a selection is noted below.
What happened? What we did
A school organised a trip to an outdoor
amenity centre and a complaint was raised
after a child was accidentally left out of a
visit to a nearby local attraction.
The centre amended its risk assessment to
include roll calls as well as clarify whose
responsibility this is and in which situation i.e.
onsite/offsite and how/when that is
communicated by instructors to visiting group
staff. The school also amended its offsite risk
assessment regarding head count and staff have
been briefed on this. 
An employee repeatedly parked a Council
vehicle across the entrance to a set of
garages, contrary to signage in the area not
to block the entrance.
An apology was offered and the employee in
question reminded of their responsibilities when
parking a Council vehicle and not to park
anywhere where they would cause an
inconvenience. 
A customer contacted the Council to
request a refund of Council Tax given
double payments had been made. The
employee that spoke with the customer
explained why the double payments had
been made and advised when the refund
would be complete. This timescale was not
met as the full refund process was not
explained. 
An apology was offered to the complainant and
the refund subsequently received. 
A briefing was cascaded to all relevant
employees reminding them of the full process
for a refund being actioned and to ensure that
process was fully explained to customers where
refunds are being made.
A communication error between internal
departments resulted in the Residents
Notifications of upcoming road works not
being delivered within the timescale. 
A service has been appointed that will notify all
appropriate residents prior to road works
commencing.
A complaint was received regarding a
contractor undertaking work on a property
where a series of quality issues affecting a
neighbouring property were raised.
Improvements made to communication during
works on Council properties. The contractor was
also instructed to utilise a liaison officer to assist
with this improvement.

Page 19

9 Compliments
Over 340 compliments were recorded cross-Council during the year, which is a 48% increase on the
previous year.  Whilst they cannot all be highlighted in this report, a selection is noted below.
• “This is a compliment to thank the Roads Service on the quick response to a streetlight service request.
The streetlight was out and the repair done within 2 days. Great work. My mum was well chuffed” 
• “Just returned from a 10-day holiday in Largs and wanted to compliment the Council on how
beautifully clean and tidy the streets were. Did not notice any litter anywhere and all the public toilets
were spotlessly clean. Hope you pass on well-deserved praise for all the hard work involved. Will
definitely holiday here again. Thank you so much.” 
• Thank You card received from a service user’s daughter to allocated HSCP Social Worker: 
“When you became involved in this case, matters proceeded quickly and effectively. This is a short
note to express our gratitude to you for the care, attention and consideration you gave to my mum's
care, which was appreciated by all the family." 
• “To the Waste Services men who regularly empty my bins - no matter whether it’s rain, snow or sun,
they always have time to wave and smile to my 3-year-old son. Makes my son’s morning every time.
Driver is the same - when my son sees him always makes effort to give him a wave. Small thing maybe
but a huge hit in our house. Much appreciated.” 
• A customer wanted to compliment a Customer Services Adviser for the outstanding service provided
on a call. The issue was resolved and the caller was very happy with the service provided. 
• “Thanks so much to Community Facilities for helping book the astro for my son's birthday. They had
a great time. We have had a lot going on this last year so to see him and friends just having fun running
around together was so good” 
• “This is a compliment for Streetscene for cleaning the street in New Street, Stevenston. This was only
reported today and the street has already been cleaned – the team also went into the garden and
removed the litter as well - well done” 
• “I recently camped at Eglinton Park for a show. We were all made very welcome by everyone, the
venue was beautiful, the toilets were always clean and well stocked and we were extremely well
catered for throughout the show. Everyone camping or attending the show on a daily basis were full
of praise and I therefore thought it was only right to thank you for all their hard work”

Page 20

10 SPSO complaint referrals
The Scottish Public Services Ombudsman (SPSO) is the final stage for complaints about Local
Authorities in Scotland. The SPSO has published its 2024/25 referral statistics and the table below
details the volume of complaints (relating to North Ayrshire Council) that were referred to the SPSO
during the year: 
Type of complaint Volume
Building Control 0
Consumer Protection 0
Economic Development 0
Education 7
Environmental Health and Cleansing 2
Finance 6
Fire & Police Boards 0
Housing 14
Land and Property 0
Legal and Admin 0
National Park Authorities 0
Other 0
Personnel 0
Planning 3
Recreation and Leisure 0
Roads and Transport 1
Social Work 3
Subject unknown or Out of Jurisdiction 1
Valuation Joint Boards 0
Welfare Fund - Community Care Grants 0
Welfare Fund - Crisis Grants 0
Total 37 
• The SPSO received 1,561 complaints about Scottish Local Authorities during 2024/25 and 2.4%
related to North Ayrshire Council. This referral rate is consistent with previous years (typically
between 2% to 3%). 
• The highest number of referrals made to the SPSO about the Council related to Housing but
this was expected given many of the Local Authority referrals made to the SPSO during the year
related to Housing or housing services.

Page 21

The outcomes of the North Ayrshire Council complaints referred to the SPSO are noted below. 
Stage Outcome Volume
Advice Advice & Guidance - Complaint submissions - mature 5
Advice & Guidance - Complaint submissions - premature 2
Advice & Guidance - Enquiries 3
Early
Resolution
Discretion – Good complaint handling 14
Discretion – Insufficient benefit would be achieved by investigation  5
Discretion – Referred back 3
Time limit 1
Investigation Fully upheld 0
Not duly made or withdrawn 0
Not upheld 0
Partially upheld 0 
• All referrals made by North Ayrshire complainants were resolved by the SPSO at the Advice
or Early Resolution stages. No complaints were taken to investigation. 
• Most complaint referrals handled at Early Resolution were discretionary in nature, meaning
the Council had discretion in terms of how to consider them. It is pleasing to note many were
considered ‘good complaint handling’ complaints, meaning the SPSO was satisfied with the
way the Council handled them. 
More details regarding complaint referrals for North Ayrshire Council can be found on the SPSO
website at Our findings | SPSO.

Page 22

11 Glossary
Terms & Explanations
Stage One 
Stage One (also known as Frontline Resolution) aims to resolve straightforward customer
complaints that require little or no investigation. Any employee may deal with complaints at this
stage and they can be resolved via any channel. The main principle is to seek resolution at the
earliest opportunity and as close to the point of service delivery as possible. 
Stage One complaints must be responded to within 5 working days unless an extension (a
maximum of 5 additional working days) is requested and approved by a senior manager or above.
The Council should, however, always aim to resolve these types of complaints within 5 working
days.
Stage Two
Not all complaints are suitable for Stage One and not all complaints will be satisfactorily resolved at
that stage. Complaints therefore handled at Stage Two (also known as Investigations) typically
require a detailed examination before the Council can state its position. These complaints may
already have been considered at Stage One, or they may have been identified from the outset as
being complex, serious or high risk and needing immediate investigation. 
Stage Two complaints must be responded to within 20 working days unless an extension is
approved by senior manager in conjunction with the customer. Stage Two complaints require a
written response, signed by a senior manager.
Complaint criteria 
When an expression of dissatisfaction is received the Council determines if the issue falls into one
(or more) six complaint categories:
• A service the Council should be providing is not being provided or is not available
• A request for a service was provided but not to an appropriate standard 
• A request for service has not been answered or actioned within the agreed timescale
• A Council employee was rude, unhelpful or unprofessional
• A Council employee did not attend an appointment or call-out on a date/time agreed
• The complaint relates to a policy (internal or external)
If the issue being raised relates to one or more of the above, the matter is considered a complaint
and will be recorded and handled as such. If not, the matter will be handled as a request for a
service, observation or enquiry and actioned accordingly.