Democracy Spraffa

4 Complaint Report

North Ayrshire Council · 27 August 2026
Back to Audit and Scrutiny Committee — 27 August 2026 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

NORTH AYRSHIRE COUNCIL 
27 August 2026 
Audit and Scrutiny Committee 
Title:    2025/26 Complaint Report 
Purpose:  To inform the Audit and Scrutiny Committee of the Council's
complaint performance and volumes and trends of complaints
received in Financial Year 2025/26. 
Recommendation:  That the Committee notes the report and the information
provided. 
1. Executive Summary 
1.1 This report details complaint information relating to North Ayrshire Council during
Financial Year 2025/26, covering the period 1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026. 
1.2 To allow comparisons to be made the report also details some complaint data relating
to previous years. 
1.3 Performance is measured through several Scottish Public Services Ombudsman
(SPSO) performance indicators, some of which have national targets. 
2. Background 
2.1 This section contains statistical information and commentary on key complaint
performance indicators.  More information relating to the indicators can be found in the
attached report. 
2.2 Volume of complaints received 
Year Volume of complaints
2022/23 2,576
2023/24 1,948
2024/25 2,039
2025/26 2,066 
2.2.1 A slight increase in complaints received when compared to 2024/25 but a sizeable
20% drop when compared with 2022.

Page 2

2.3  Complaints closed within timescale in 2025/26 
Stage % closed on
time
Target
Stage One  93% 80% and above
Stage Two 92% 85% and above 
2.3.1  The volume closed on time includes extended complaints that met their new due dates. 
2.3.2  Further details of complaints not closed on time are contained in the attached report. 
2.3.3 For comparison purposes, the table below shows the percentage of complaints closed
on time at both stages over the last three years: 
Year Stage One %
closed on time
Stage Two %
closed on time
2023/24  87% 88%
2024/25 92% 93%
2025/26 93% 92% 
2.4  Complaint outcomes for closed complaints in 2025/26 
Stage One
Outcome 
% closed as Resolved* 39%
% closed as Upheld 35%
% closed as Partially Upheld 10%
% closed as Not Upheld 16% 
Stage Two
Outcome 
% closed as Resolved* 9%
% closed as Upheld 11%
% closed as Partially Upheld 36%
% closed as Not Upheld 44%               
2.4.1 *Resolved complaints are where the Council has taken action to address a problem or
issue without deciding whether there were any failings (this would happen where we
agree a solution with the complainant at the outset without needing to investigate the
complaint). 
2.4.2 Complaint outcome analysis can be found in the attached report. 
2.5  Average time in working days for a full response at each Stage 
Stage One Average number of
working days to close
Target
2023/24 3.8 5 workings days or less
2024/25 3.3 5 workings days or less
2025/26 2.9 5 workings days or less

Page 3

Stage Two Average number of
days to close
Target
2023/24 16.8 20 working days or less
2024/25 15.5 20 working days or less
2025/26 16.4 20 working days or less 
2.5.1 The average number of days to close Stage One and Stage Two complaints is better
than the national targets. 
2.6  Changes or Improvements made as a result of complaints 
2.6.1 Services cannot always implement improvements because of complaints due to
several factors, including the feasibility of making changes and resource/budget
considerations. That said, improvements were made in some Services and a selection
are noted in the attached report. 
2.7   Compliments 
2.7.1 The Council received and recorded many compliments during the year. Some praised
specific individuals or teams, some related to more than one Service and some were
raised by employees complimenting other employees. A selection can be found in the
attached report. 
3. Proposals 
3.1 It is proposed the Committee notes the report and recognises the Council’s complaint
handling performance in relation to Section 2 above. 
4. Implications/Socio-economic Duty 
Financial 
4.1 None. 
Human Resources 
4.2 None. 
Legal 
4.3 None. 
Equality/Socio-economic 
4.4 None. 
Climate Change and Carbon 
4.5 None.

Page 4

Key Priorities 
4.6 The Two Stage Complaint Handling Procedure supports the Council's key priority of
delivering more effective and efficient service provision. It demonstrates commitment
by identifying trends and focussing on service improvements whenever possible for
North Ayrshire residents, customers and visitors. 
Community Wealth Building 
4.7 None. 
Islands Communities Impact Assessment (ICIA) 
4.8 None. 
United Nations Rights of the Child (UNCRC) 
4.9 If a young person under the age of 18 makes a complaint, or an adult makes a complaint
on behalf of a young person or about an issue that affects them, we will use an
enhanced child-friendly complaints process. This process ensures the young person's
views are heard and considered and follows the SPSO Child Friendly Complaints
Handling Principles and Child Friendly Complaints Handling Process Guidance. 
Consumer Duty 
4.10 None. 
5. Consultation 
5.1 None. 
Aileen Craig
Head of Service for Democratic Services 
For further information please contact Darren Miller, Complaint Manager, on (01294)
322988. 
Background Papers
North Ayrshire Council 2025/26 Complaint Report

Page 5

1 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
North Ayrshire Council 
Annual Complaint Report 
2025 to 2026

Page 6

2 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
Introduction         3 
1 Volume of complaints closed      4 
2  Volume of complaints closed on time  at both Stages   6 
3 Volume of complaints not closed on time per Directorate     6 
4 Key complaint topics       9 
5 Average time in working days for a full response   10 
6  Extended complaints       11 
7 Complaint Outcomes                                                                    12 
8  Improvements made from complaints                         14 
9 Compliments        15 
10  SPSO complaint referrals       16 
11 Glossary         18

Page 7

3 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
Introduction
North Ayrshire Council always seeks to deliver the best services possible to its tenants,
residents and customers but it is recognised that dissatisfaction will sometimes occur. When
it does, we want to know what went wrong, why it went wrong and what we can do to make
things right.
The Council recognises that valuable lessons can be learned from complaints which are
defined as being expressions of dissatisfaction from members of the public about actions, or
lack of actions, or about the standard of service provided by or on behalf of the Council.
The Council’s complaint handling procedure (CHP) has two stages for handling complaints
from the public.
Stage One complaints (also known as Frontline Resolution) are straightforward, non-complex
complaints the Council can resolve at the initial point of contact or as close to the point of
service delivery as possible. The Council has up to 5 working days to resolve these.
Stage Two complaints (also known as Investigations) are complaints the Council is typically
unable to resolve at Stage One and needs more time to carry out further investigation. This
may be because the nature of the complaint is complex, serious or high risk. The Council has
up to 20 working days to resolve these.
This report details the Council’s complaint handling performance covering financial year
2025 to 2026 (1 April 2025 to 31 March 2026). Performance is measured via several Scottish
Public Services Ombudsman indicators (some of which have national targets) and complaint
data relating to previous years has been included in certain sections to allow comparisons to
be made. 
Reporting complaints is a statutory requirement and is monitored by Audit Scotland.
This report will meet accessibility requirements when published.

Page 8

4 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
1 Volume of complaints closed
The Council received 2,066 complaints during the year and closed 2,067. 
The table below provides a breakdown of the closed complaints per Directorate:
Directorate Volume
Communities & Housing 417
Corporate Services 155
Education 216
Health & Social Care 312
Place 959
Multi-Service 8
The following tables highlight complaint volumes per Directorate under each Stage:
Corporate Services
Team Stage One Stage Two
Chief Executive Service 1 0
Customer Services 124 12
Finance 7 1
IT 2 0
Legal Services 6 2
Total 140 15
Communities & Housing
Team Stage One Stage Two
Building Services 190 17
Community Facilities 9 0
Community Learning and Development 3 0
Housing 131 31
Information & Culture 2 0
Planning 4 5
Protective Services 17 5
Sports and Activity 3 0
Total 359 58
Education
Team Stage One Stage Two
Education (HQ) 9 12
Education (Schools) 110 70
Facilities Management 15 0
Total 134 82

Page 9

5 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
Health & Social Care
Team Stage One Stage Two
Children, Families & Justice 39 36
Finance & Transformation 17 2
Health & Community Care 138 45
Mental Health 12 13
Support Services 8 2
Total 214 98
Place
Team Stage One Stage Two
Property Management & Investments 95 16
Regeneration 2 0
Roads 87 13
Streetscene 55 2
Sustainability 3 0
Transport 5 0
Waste Services 680 1
Total 927 32
Multi-Service
Team Stage One Stage Two
Complaints involving more than one Service 2 6
Total 2 6
Although there is no target for the volume of complaints handled under each Stage, the
Council seeks to maximise closure at Stage One wherever possible and 86% were handled at
this stage during the period.
Some Services handled all their complaints at Stage One.
Some Services that received high complaint volumes handled few of them at Stage Two,
notably Customer Services, Building Services, Property Management & Investments, Roads,
Streetscene and Waste Services. This will be due to the straightforward nature of the
complaints received.
Regarding Waste Services complaints, the Waste Operations team has an improvement plan
in place and monitors and reviews all complaints received to identify issues and take
appropriate action with them. In the last three years, complaints in respect of Waste
Operations have reduced from 1,371 in 2022/23 to 680 in 2025/26. This equates to a 50%
reduction in complaints over the three-year period. 
Year on Year comparison
The table below shows a comparison of the volume of complaints received over the last four
years:

Page 10

6 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
Year Volume of complaints
2022/23 2,576
2023/24 1,948
2024/25 2,039
2025/26 2,066
Whilst there has been a slight increase in complaints received when comparing 2025 with
2024, it is still a 20% drop when comparing 2024 with 2022. The sustained lower volume
could be partly attributable to the complaint page on the Council’s website being enhanced
in 2023, which now includes more information on what the Council does not consider a
complaint and offers appropriate routes to raise such matters.
2 Volume of complaints closed on time at both Stages
Stage Percentage
closed on time
Target
Stage One  93% 80% and above
Stage Two 92% 85% and above
The volume closed on time includes complaints that had their timescales extended and met
the new due dates.
To allow comparisons to be made, the table below shows the percentage of complaints
closed on time at both stages over the last three years:
Year Stage One %
closed on time
Stage Two %
closed on time
2023/24  87% 88%
2024/25 92% 93%
2025/26 93% 92%
3 Volume of complaints not closed on time per Directorate
This section provides details of complaints not closed on time under each Stage and includes
extended complaints that did not meet their new timescales.
Stage One
123 complaints did not meet timescale during the year and the volumes are noted below.
Corporate Services 
Department Volume
Customer Services 6
Finance 1
Legal Services 1

Page 11

7 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
Communities & Housing 
Education
Department Volume
Education (HQ) 1
Education (Schools) 9
Facilities Management 3
Health & Social Care
Department Volume
Children & Families 3
Finance & Transformation 2
Health & Community Care 16
Mental Health 1
Support Services 1
Place
Department Volume
Property Management 18
Roads 5
Streetscene 5
Sustainability 1
Transport 2
Waste Services 6
Multiple reasons were noted as to why the above complaints did not meet timescale, including
administrative errors, information awaited to conclude complaints, employee availability, resourcing
issues and operational pressures.
Of the 123 Stage One complaints that did not meet timescale, 18 had their timescales
extended the additional five working days however none met the new due dates so these
complaints could have been escalated and handled as Stage Twos. 
In relation to the 105 complaints that did not have their timescales extended, 73% would
have been closed within the five additional working days had extensions been applied.
Stage Two
22 complaints did not meet timescale during the year and the volumes are noted below.
Department Volume
Building Services 11
Community Facilities 3
Community Learning & Dev 1
Housing 22
Planning 2
Protective Services 3

Page 12

8 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
Communities & Housing
Department Volume
Building Services 3
Housing 6
Protective Services 3
Education
Department Volume
Education (Schools) 2
Health & Social Care
Department Volume
Children & Families 2
Health & Community Care 2
Mental Health 3
Place
Department Volume
Roads 1
Reasons noted as to why the above complaints did not meet timescale are similar to those
that did not meet timescale at Stage One.

Page 13

9 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
4 Key complaint topics
Key topics for upheld and partially upheld complaints for Services are listed below. Services
will not be listed where there were low complaint volumes that did not allow meaningful
analysis.
Corporate Services
Service Key complaint topic
Customer Services Incorrect information provided
Customer Services Employee Actions (alleged or perceived)
Communities & Housing
Service Key complaint topic
Building Services Quality issues (work incomplete or poor workmanship)
Building Services Employee Actions (alleged or perceived)
Education
Service Key complaint topic
Education (schools) Sensitive issues relating to teachers and/or pupils
Education (schools) Service delivery
Education (schools)) Employee Actions (alleged or perceived)
Health & Social Care
Service Key complaint topic
All HSCP Services Service delivery
All HSCP Services Employee Actions (alleged or perceived)
Place
Service Key complaint topic
Property Management &
Investment
Gas Central Heating (contractors, maintenance etc.)
Streetscene Tree/grass/verge/hedge cutting issues
Waste Services Missed waste bin/assisted collections (all colours)
Waste Services Employee Actions (alleged or perceived)
Employee Actions (alleged or perceived) appears as a key topic for some Services but the
definition is broad and has been used where complainants allege or believe employee
actions and/or behaviour to be unacceptable. Whilst investigations may determine this is
not always the case, if unacceptable behaviour is identified appropriate action will have
been taken by services to address.

Page 14

10 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
5 Average time in working days for a full response
The average time in working days to close complaints under both Stages during the year is
noted below. Values for previous years have been included to allow comparisons to be
made. Any complaints that had their timescales extended have been excluded from the
calculations.
Stage One Average number of
working days to close
Target
2023 3.8 5 workings days or less
2024 3.3 5 workings days or less
2025 2.9 5 workings days or less
Stage Two Average number of days
to close
Target
2023 16.8 20 working days or less
2024 15.5 20 working days or less
2025 16.4 20 working days or less
The average number of days to close Stage One and Stage Two complaints is better than the
national targets. 
The tables below detail Services that did not meet the average time in working days for a
response under either Stage. Services that met the target are not listed and any complaints
that had their timescales extended have been excluded from the calculations.
Communities & Housing
Stage One Average number of
working days to close
Target
Community Learning &
Development
7 5 workings days or less
Protective Services 6.4 5 workings days or less
One CL&D complaint was closed on working day 13 which resulted in the average days target
being breached. No reason was given as to what caused the delay.
One Protective Services complaint was closed on working day 43 because the complaint was
inadvertently overlooked and the complainant was not engaging with the service regarding
the complaint.
Stage Two Average number of
working days to close
Target
Protective Services 29.6 20 workings days or less
Three Protective Services complaints were closed at 30, 33 and 50 working days, resulting in
the average days target being breached. Various reasons were noted as to why the due dates
were not met and at least one of the complaints could have had its due date extended.

Page 15

11 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
Place
Stage One Average number of
working days to close
Target
Sustainability 10.5 5 workings days or less
Transport 7.4 5 workings days or less
One Sustainability complaint was closed on working day 20, resulting in the average days
target being breached. The delay was due to a processing issue and the complaint being sent
to an incorrect service initially.
Two Transport complaints were closed on working days 16 and 17, resulting in the average
target days not being met. Given the circumstances, both complaints could have been
escalated and handled at Stage Two. 
Health & Social Care
Stage Two  Average number of
working days to close
Target
Mental Health 26 20 workings days or less
Three Mental Health complaints were closed at 31, 51 and 59 working days, resulting in the
average days target being breached. Various reasons were noted as to why the due dates
were not met and all of them could have had their due dates extended given the
circumstances. 
6 Extended complaints
159 complaints had their timescales extended during the year (112 at Stage One and 47 at
Stage Two). The complaints related to various Services across all Directorates.
There were various reasons for extending, including complainants, third parties and
employees being unavailable to assist or support with investigations and/or response letter
approvals, obtaining additional information to support investigations and
resourcing/operational issues. Of the 159 complaints that had their timescales extended,
89% were closed within their new target due dates.

Page 16

12 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
7 Complaint Outcomes
The Council has four categories of complaint outcomes. 
• Resolved complaints are complaints where the Council has taken action to address a
problem/issue without needing to decide if there were any failings. 
• Upheld complaints are complaints where something has gone wrong/not happened
and the Council needs to take steps to address.
• Partially Upheld complaints are complaints that have multiple complaint elements,
some of which are upheld, the rest not.
• Not Upheld complaints are complaints that have not been upheld for the following
reasons:
• they related to internal or external policies
• they related to external regulations
• upon investigation they were proven to be unfounded/unsubstantiated
The tables below detail the number of complaints upheld, partially upheld, not upheld or
resolved under both Stages.
Stage One
Outcome Percentage
Closed as Resolved 39%
Closed as Upheld 35%
Closed as Partially Upheld 10%
Closed as Not Upheld 16%
Of the 807 complaints that were upheld and partially upheld at Stage One, the three
services that had the highest volume were Waste Services with 45%, Building Services with
13% and Education (HQ and schools) with 9%.
33% of all Resolved complaints related to Waste Services (mainly missed bin collections),
indicating those complainants simply wanted their bins collected without any need for
investigation. The other complaints closed as Resolved related to various services across all
Directorates.
Complaints that were not upheld related to internal/external policies, regulations and
complaints that were found to be unfounded.
Stage Two 
Outcome Percentage
Closed as Resolved 9%
Closed as Upheld 11%
Closed as Partially Upheld 36%
Closed as Not Upheld 44%

Page 17

13 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
Stage Two complaints that were upheld or partially upheld related to various services across
all Directorates.
The reasons for Stage Two complaints being closed as not upheld are the same as those for
Stage One.
The tables below detail the outcomes at each stage covering the last three years:
Stage One complaints
Year Resolved Upheld Partially Upheld Not Upheld
2023/24 39% 32% 12% 17%
2024/25 47% 21% 11% 21%
2025/26 39% 35% 10% 16%
Stage Two complaints
Year Resolved Upheld Partially Upheld Not Upheld
2023/24 4% 13% 39% 44%
2024/25 10% 9% 26% 53%
2025/26 9% 11% 36% 44%

Page 18

14 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
8 Improvements made from complaints
Council Services continually seek to identify improvements in service delivery and complaint
information is analysed regularly to inform service improvements. Some improvements were
implemented as a result of complaints received during the year and a selection is noted
below.
What happened What we did
A complaint was received regarding a
parent’s concerns over the safeguarding of
their child while attending school.
The matter was investigated and a parental
meeting held with the Head Teacher and others
to discuss all concerns raised. The parent was
happy with the actions agreed and the pupil was
taken through all safeguarding procedures. Key
Adults, safe places and various supports
throughout the pupil’s timetable were shared
with a summary card of support actions to be
completed by the pupil. The pupil accepted the
card and agreed it would be helpful.
A complaint was received that a window
cleaner working on behalf of the Council
asked a tenant in a sheltered housing
complex if they could gain access to the
inside of the complex via the tenant’s
property to clean the windows.
It was determined it was a window cleaner from
a contracted company and the contract only
covers the outside of the windows plus
communal areas. The Council now receive a list
of dates in advance from the company, stating
when they will be carrying out cleaning in each
housing complex.  We also now have a system in
place that they can gain access to the front door
(public areas only) of housing complexes without
having to call any flats or houses.
A resident set up a mygov.scot account but
was unable to link two properties to the
Council Tax system.
The issue was investigated and it was discovered
there was a problem within the system that
prohibited more than one property being added. 
This was fixed and the resident was thanked for
bringing this matter to our attention.
A resident complained that rats were
causing damage to their garden and the
nest was on unattended waste ground
between the resident’s property and a
Council property boundary.
The relevant services attended the area to
ensure access could be gained to clear it and the
Council is now reviewing its land ownership
plans to make sure maintenance responsibilities
are established going forward.

Page 19

15 
PUBLIC INFORMATION 
9 Compliments
Over 300 compliments were recorded cross-Council during the year. Whilst they cannot all
be highlighted in this report, a selection is noted below (any employee names that were
provided have been redacted).
• “I would like to thank the plumber that attended my property today. He provided a fantastic
service. My husband is restricted in movement and he even came into the room to speak to
him. Such a lovely young man” 
• “I would like to thank X from the Council Tax department. She was excellent at her job, very
helpful and very kind. She dealt with my query immediately and went above and beyond for
me. You have a great employee there” 
• “Big thank you to X and Y at Largs Library today who made me feel so welcome and went over
and above to provide excellent customer service.  Both show that they care about people that
visit the library and give a great service to the community” 
• Caller wanted to thank the team that dealt with an abandoned car. It was handled very quickly
and a fantastic service was given. Praise was also given to X in the Contact Centre that took
the original call. 
• “My dad has recently been admitted to long term care. Before he was admitted we were really
pleased with the fantastic services we received from Care at Home, Dementia Support,
Stevenson Day Care and Anam Cara respite unit. These services all helped us to look after dad
and keep him at home for as long as possible. Support from the social worker to transition to
long term care was also exceptional. We are very grateful to everyone.” 
• “A huge thank you to North Ayrshire Council for the improvements made outside Beith Primary
School. The pavement is kept very clean and there’s a new bin and a sign to remind people to
pick up after their dog. It had been a problem for a while but is now so much better. Thank
you.” 
• “Would just like to say how amazing it was going to Bartonholm Recycle Centre today via the
booking system. So easy to do, no waiting to enter, straight in to be greeted by 2 lovely
gentleman who directed me to skips. Once I moved round I was met by a young guy who was
also friendly and helpful.” 
• “Can you please pass on my thanks to X in the Roads department for assisting in carrying out
pavement repairs near my home. I am delighted. Thanks.” 
• “This is for the Refugee Housing Team in North Ayrshire Council. They are doing the best job
for all of us who are looking for homes here in Scotland. Really thankful for the help and
support. The best people and the best team ever. Thank you so much” 
• “To Streetscene - really happy with the grass cutting at the High Road in Saltcoats - the place
looks so nice and so tidy. Look superb”

Page 20

16 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
10 SPSO complaint referrals
The Scottish Public Services Ombudsman (SPSO) is the final stage for complaints about Local
Authorities in Scotland. The SPSO has published its 2025/26 referral statistics and the table
below details the volume of complaints relating to North Ayrshire Council that were referred to
the SPSO during the year: 
Type of complaint Volume
Building Control 0
Consumer Protection 0
Economic Development 0
Education 6
Environmental Health and Cleansing 1
Finance 6
Fire & Police Boards 0
Housing 17
Land and Property -0
Legal and Admin 3
Local Authority 0
Other 0
Personnel 0
Planning 1
Recreation and Leisure 0
Roads and Transport 6
Social Work 4
Subject unknown or Out of Jurisdiction 5
Valuation Joint Boards 0
Welfare Fund - Community Care Grants 1
Welfare Fund - Crisis Grants 0
Total 50 
• The SPSO received 2,143 complaints about Scottish Local Authorities during 2025/26
and 2.3% related to North Ayrshire Council. This referral rate is consistent with previous
years (typically between 2% to 3%). 
• The highest number of referrals made to the SPSO about the Council related to Housing
but this was not unexpected given 31% of all Local Authority referrals made to the SPSO
during the year related to housing or housing services. 
The outcomes of the North Ayrshire Council complaints referred to the SPSO are noted below. 
Stage Outcome Volume 
Advice/Assessment
Complaint submission - mature 2
Complaint submission - premature 7
Enquiries 12

Page 21

17 
PUBLIC INFORMATION 
Early Resolution
Discretion – Good complaint handling 6
Discretion – Insufficient benefit would be achieved by
investigation 
1
Preliminary
Investigation
Discretion – Good complaint handling 10
Discretion – Insufficient benefit would be achieved by
investigation
6
Discretion – Referred back 1
Subject matter not in jurisdiction 4
Time limit 1 
Investigation
Fully upheld 0
Not duly made or withdrawn 0
Not upheld 0
Partially upheld 0 
• All referrals made by North Ayrshire complainants were resolved by the SPSO at their
advice, early resolution or preliminary investigation stages. No complaints were taken
to investigation. 
• Most complaint referrals handled at early resolution and preliminary investigation
were discretionary and it is pleasing to note many were considered ‘good complaint
handling’ complaints, meaning the SPSO was satisfied with the way the Council
handled them. 
More details regarding complaint referrals for North Ayrshire Council can be found on the SPSO
website at Our findings | SPSO.

Page 22

18 
PUBLIC INFORMATION
11 Glossary
Terms & Explanations
Stage One 
Stage One (also known as Frontline Resolution) complaints are complaints that are
straightforward to address and require little or no investigation. Any employee may deal
with complaints at this stage and they can be concluded via any channel. The main principle
is to seek resolution at the earliest opportunity and as close to the point of service delivery
as possible. 
Stage One complaints must be responded to within five working days unless an extension (a
maximum of five additional working days) is requested and approved by a senior manager or
above. The Council should, however, always aim to conclude these types of complaints
within five working days.
Stage Two
Not all complaints are suitable for Stage One and not all complaints will be satisfactorily
concluded at that stage. Complaints therefore handled at Stage Two (also known as
Investigations) typically require a detailed examination before the Council can state its
position. These complaints may already have been considered at Stage One, or they may
have been identified from the outset as being complex, serious or high risk and needing
immediate investigation. 
Stage Two complaints must be responded to within 20 working days unless an extension is
approved by senior manager in conjunction with the customer. Stage Two complaints
require a written response, signed by a senior manager or above.
Complaint criteria 
When an expression of dissatisfaction is received the Council determines if the issue falls
into one (or more) six complaint categories:
• A service the Council should be providing is not being provided or is not available
• A request for a service was provided but not to an appropriate standard 
• A request for service has not been answered or actioned within the agreed timescale
• A Council employee was rude, unhelpful or unprofessional
• A Council employee did not attend an appointment or call-out on a date/time agreed
• The complaint relates to an internal or external policy (but only where the complaint
relates specifically to the way the matter was administered)
If the issue being raised relates to one or more of the above, the matter is considered a
complaint and will be recorded and handled as such. If not, it is deemed to be something
else and will be actioned under the relevant process.