Democracy Spraffa

Agenda Document Pack - Performance, Review and Scrutiny Committee - 03/02/2026

Midlothian Council · 3 February 2026
Back to Performance, Review and Scrutiny Committee — 3 February 2026 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Notice of Meeting and Agenda 
Performance, Review and Scrutiny Committee 
Venue:  Normandy Court/ Hybrid, 
Normandy Court, 20 Normandy Dr, Dalkeith, EH22 1JG 
Date:  Tuesday, 03 February 2026 
Time:  11:00 
Executive Director : Place 
Contact:
Clerk Name: Democratic Services
Clerk Telephone: 
Clerk Email: democratic.services@midlothian.gov.uk 
Further Information: 
This is a meeting which is open to members of the public.  
Privacy notice: Please note that this meeting may be recorded. The
recording may be publicly available following the meeting. If you would
like to know how Midlothian Council collects, uses and shares your
personal information, please visit our website: www.midlothian.gov.uk 
Page 1 of 58

Page 2

1          Welcome, Introductions and Apologies   
2          Order of Business 
Including notice of new business submitted as urgent for consideration at the
end of the meeting. 
3          Declaration of Interest 
Members should declare any financial and non-financial interests they have in
the items of business for consideration, identifying the relevant agenda item
and the nature of their interest. 
4          Minute of Previous Meeting
4.1 Minute of the Meeting of Performance, Review and Scrutiny
Committee 9 December 2025 submitted for approval
3 - 10
4.2 Action Log 11 - 16 
5          Public Reports
5.1 Inspection of St David’s RC Primary School and Nursery, report
by Chief Education Officer
17 - 28
5.2 Inspection of Midlothian Council’s Fostering, Adoption and Adult
Placement Services, report by Chief Officer Children’s Services,
Partnerships and Communities and Deputy Chief Social Work
Officer
29 - 34
5.3 Food Standards Scotland: Food Law Enforcement Actions Audit
2025-26, report by Executive Director Children, Young People
and Partnerships (Acting)
35 - 58 
6          Private Reports 
No items for discussion 
7          Date of Next Meeting 
The next meeting will be held on Tuesday 24 March 2026. 
Page 2 of 58

Page 3

1-1 
Minute of Meeting 
2024 
Performance, Review and Scrutiny Committee 
Tuesday 3 February 2026 
Item No 4.1 
No 4.1                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
Performance Review and Scrutiny Committee 
Date Time Venue
Tuesday 9 December 2025 11:00am MS Teams 
Present: 
Councillor Milligan (Chair)  Councillor Bowen
Councillor Curran  Councillor Drummond 
Councillor Imrie Councillor McCall
Councillor McEwan Councillor Russell
Councillor Smaill  Councillor Virgo 
Councillor Winchester   
In attendance: 
Councillor Alexander 
Councillor McKenzie 
Councillor Parry 
Dr Grace Vickers, Chief Executive
Kevin Anderson, Executive Director Place
Nick Clater, Head of Adult Services & Deputy Chief Social Work Officer 
Derek Oliver, Executive Director Children, Young People and Partnerships (Acting) 
Saty Kaur, Chief Officer Corporate Solutions 
Michelle Strong, Chief Education Officer 
Rebecca Hooton, Chief Officer Children’s Services, Partnerships and Communities
and Deputy Chief Social Work Officer
Hannah Forbes, Democratic Services Officer 
Page 3 of 58

Page 4

1 Welcome, Introductions and Apologies 
The Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting of the Performance Review and
Scrutiny (PRS) Committee. 
Apologies were received from Councillor Pottinger. 
2 Order of Business 
The order of business was as detailed within the agenda. 
3 Declarations of interest 
No declarations of interest were received. 
4 Minutes of Previous Meetings 
4.1 The Minute of the meeting of the Performance Review and Scrutiny Committee
held on the 28 October 2025 was submitted and was unanimously approved as
a correct record. 
4.2 The Action Log was noted and the Committee agreed that the items
recommended for closure can be closed. 
The Chief Officer Children’s Services, Partnerships and Communities and
Deputy Chief Social Work Officer asked for clarification from the Committee on
whether action 1 required a written or verbal update. The Committee confirmed
that an email to all Elected Members was required. The Chief Officer Children’s
Services, Partnerships and Communities and Deputy Chief Social Work Officer
advised this would be circulated. 
5.  Reports 
Agenda No. Report Title Presented by:
5.1 Inspection of Community Access Team
(CAT)
Head of Adult Services
and Chief Social Work
Officer
Outline of report and summary of discussion
The Head of Adult Services and Chief Social Work Officer presented the report
which advises of the outcome of the short notice announced inspection for the
Community Access Team (CAT) and the recommendations that will be included
within the improvement plan. The Head of Adult Services and Chief Social Work
Officer noted that this was a positive report and thanked the staff and management
involved in the inspection. 
The Chair thanked the Head of Adult Services and Chief Social Work Officer for
the report and invited comments or questions 
The Committee noted the positive report and thanked all the staff involved in the
inspection.
Page 4 of 58

Page 5

Decision
Performance Review and Scrutiny Committee noted the report and the
recommendations.   
Agenda No. Report Title Presented by:
5.2 Q2 Education Performance Report
2025/26
Chief Education Officer 
Outline of report and summary of discussion
The Chief Education Officer presented the Q2 Education Performance Report
highlighting the key achievements and challenges throughout. The Chief Education
Officer thanked Education, the Communities, Lifelong Learning and Education
(CLLE) teams and partners for the positive impact they are having and their
contribution to this quarter’s performance. 
The Chief Education Officer added that they hope staff enjoy a well-deserved rest
over the holidays and passed on their best wishes for 2026. 
The Chair thanked the Chief Education Officer for the report and invited any
comments or questions. 
The Committee noted the positive report however highlighted that the number of
complaints had risen.  The Committee asked if there was an improvement plan for
addressing these and whether any were due to resourcing issues. 
The Chief Education Officer highlighted that there are currently 6 complaints
logged, which is very low, and explained that response times can vary depending
on the nature of a complaint. Education are working with school leaders to ensure
systems are in place to respond to complaints in the correct timeframe to avoid
escalation. 
The Chair raised concerns regarding the use of subject specialists as described in
the report, the ongoing staff shortages in key subjects and the impact this has on
attainment.  It was noted that in some schools there has been a reduction in class
time to address the issue. The Chair asked if this was a national problem and if
there is anything the Council can do to help avoid the reduction of class time. 
The Chief Education Officer advised the staff shortages in Midlothian are also being
seen nationally. Maths graduates are going into the private sector and are not
opting into teaching. Midlothian are trying to address the issue by using primary
school staff to support the delivery of maths in secondary schools. Human
Resources (HR) are also looking for opportunities to train graduates in the local
area through university partnerships. 
The Committee raised a serious incident that had occurred recently in one of
Midlothian’s schools and asked if there is an opportunity to adapt or amend the
mobile phone policy. 
Page 5 of 58

Page 6

The Chief Education Officer advised the mobile phone policy was discussed in April
2025 where a set of principles were agreed for secondary schools to adopt. The
non-statutory guidance, that the Scottish Government provided, gave permission
for the Head Teachers to decide to ban or manage mobile phone usage in schools.
The Chief Education Officer advised they would be happy to open a discussion at
the next Head Teachers meeting. 
The Executive Director Children, Young People and Partnerships (Acting) added
that the mobile phone policy is currently being discussed when visiting the Head
Teachers and there is a review across schools to see what policies and procedures
are in place. 
Decision
Performance Review and Scrutiny Committee noted the report and the
recommendations. 
Action
Provide information on the policies and procedures in Midlothian schools in relation
to mobile phones - Executive Director Children, Young People and Partnerships
(Acting). 
Agenda No. Report Title Presented by:
5.3 Q2 Children’s Services, Partnership and
Communities Performance Report
2025/26
Chief Officer Children’s
Services, Partnerships
and Communities and
Deputy Chief Social
Work Officer
Outline of report and summary of discussion
The Chief Officer Children’s Services, Partnerships and Communities and Deputy
Chief Social Work Officer presented the Q2 Children’s Services, Partnership and
Communities Performance Report 2025/26 detailing the key achievements and
challenges throughout. 
The Chief Officer Children’s Services, Partnerships and Communities and Deputy
Chief Social Work Officer thanked all the staff for the ongoing work over the
quarter. 
The Chair thanked the Chief Officer Children’s Services, Partnerships and
Communities and Deputy Chief Social Work Officer for the report invited any
comments or questions. 
The Committee raised the Child & Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS)
list as a concern, highlighting the time it takes for referrals to become a diagnosis
and the loss of income for families that are on the referral waiting list that qualify
for benefits to support them. The Committee asked if there is a system that can be
put in place for families on the referral waiting list for CAMHS to receive benefits to
avoid any additional stress and loss on income for the families.    
The Chief Officer Childrens Services, Partnerships and Communities and Deputy
Chief Social Work Officer highlighted that it is a consistent topic at the Getting It
Page 6 of 58

Page 7

Right For Every Child (GIRFEC) Board. The National Health Service (NHS) advise
that there are two separate processes in CAMHS, one being the core mental health
issues, where the NHS have a statutory obligation to report on the timescale on
how quickly someone can be assessed, over the last few years there has been a
reduction in waiting periods. 
Neurodiversity is also a key discussion point at the GIRFEC Board regularly, the
Chief Officer Children’s Services, Partnerships and Communities and Deputy Chief
Social Work Officer advised they have spoken to the Children’s Commission for the
NHS regarding the inadequacy in terms of waiting lists. It was stated that there are
currently 2000 young people waiting for an assessment which means a lot of the
young people will age out of the system by the time they can be assessed. 
The Chief Officer Children’s Services, Partnerships and Communities and Deputy
Chief Social Work Officer advised that work continues around the single point of
access to evaluate what the partnership can do. However, it is continually raised
that it is inadequate that the money that has been allocated to health to address
neurodiversity has been allocated to strategic planning. It was further highlighted
that any families that are on the waiting list, and are struggling with benefits, should
contact Citizens Advice as some families may be able to access some benefits they
are entitled to. 
It was suggested by the Committee that the Chief Executive write to Lothian Health
regarding the extensive impact the waiting list of CAMHS is having on families and
society. The Chair agreed to take this forward as an action. 
The Chair raised concerns regarding the shortage of skilled staff and the
dependency on agency staff and asked if there was any progression on retaining
permanent staff. 
The Chief Officer Children’s Services, Partnerships and Communities and Deputy
Chief Social Work Officer explained that this is a national issue, but there has been
some positive recruitment and discussions are ongoing with Human Resources
(HR) to have alternative options. Sponsorship is the next step as well as targeted
recruitment; therefore, it is hoped in the new year there will be a reduction on the
reliance of agency workers.
Decision
Performance Review and Scrutiny Committee noted the report and the
recommendations.
Action
Write to Lothian Health regarding the extensive impact the waiting list of CAMHS
is having on families and society – Chief Executive. 
Page 7 of 58

Page 8

Agenda No. Report Title Presented by:
5.4 Q2 Adult Social Care Performance
Report
Head of Adult Services and
Chief Social Work Officer
Outline of report and summary of discussion
The Head of Adult Services and Chief Social Work Officer presented the Q2 Adult
Social Care Performance Report noting the key achievements and challenges
throughout. The Head of Adult Services and Chief Social Work Officer highlighted
the successful launch of Trauma Awareness Week in September; this was the
first one in Scotland that was well supported. 
The Head of Adult Services and Chief Social Work Officer thanked all staff in the
partnership for their work and passed on their best wishes for the festive season. 
The Chair thanked the Head of Adult Services and Chief Social Work Officer for
the report and invited questions or comments. 
The Committee thanked all staff for their work in this quarter. 
Decision
Performance, Review and Scrutiny Committee noted the report and the
recommendations. 
Agenda No. Report Title Presented by:
5.5 Q2 Place Performance Report Executive Director
Children, Young People
and Partnerships (Acting)
Outline of report and summary of discussion
The Executive Director Children, Young People and Partnerships (Acting)
presented the Q2 Place Performance Report noting the key achievements and
challenges. The Executive Director Children, Young People and Partnerships
(Acting) thanked all services and colleagues across the Place Directorate for their
work. 
The Chair thanked the the Executive Director Children, Young People and
Partnerships (Acting) for the report and invited comments and questions. 
The Committee congratulated the team on re-let times now being reduced to 42
days. It was noted that these have been higher due to the change in the Scottish
housing regulatory policies, where flip tenancies are now excluded.  The
Committee asked for more information to explain why these are now being
excluded. 
The Executive Director Children, Young People and Partnerships (Acting)
advised that they will gather more information on the exclusion of flip tenancies
and report back. 
The Committee asked for the statistics regarding the length of stays regarding the
Councils temporary emergency accommodation such as Jarnac Court. The
Executive Director Children, Young People and Partnerships (Acting) confirmed
they would provide this information. 
Page 8 of 58

Page 9

The Chair shared their concern around the difficulties in contacting Housing
Officers as they are often given this feedback. The Chair emphasised the
importance of the review of the number of staff and housing the Council has in
comparison to other Local Authorities as this will provide an understanding of
what the ratio of Housing Officers is. 
The Executive Director Place confirmed that a report will be provided to Council,
therefore will be available to members into the new year. 
The Chair highlighted the feedback that has been relayed from constituents and
staff regarding the problems they face when dealing with tenants who have
complex learning difficulties. It was noted that a lot of tenants do not have the
capacity to fill in basic forms, and it was asked if the Council should have a
dedicated resource within Housing to assist tenants who need the additional
support. 
The Executive Director Place confirmed that the Council have a provision in the
team for youth homelessness that has different pathways for people that are care
experienced. Specific provision has been included in terms of complex needs and
learning disabilities in recent years. 
The Chair and the Executive Director Place agreed to have a discussion offline to
discuss the service structure. 
Decision
Performance Review and Scrutiny Committee noted the report and the
recommendations.
Action
Provide information on why flip tenancies are now being excluded due to a
change in the Scottish housing regulatory policies - Executive Director Children,
Young People and Partnerships (Acting). 
Provide the statistics and data around the length of stays on the Councils
temporary emergency accommodation such as Jarnac Court - Executive Director
Children, Young People and Partnerships (Acting) 
Agenda No. Report Title Presented by:
5.6 Q2 Corporate Solutions Performance
Report
Chief Officer Corporate
Solutions
Outline of report and summary of discussion
The Chief Officer Corporate Solutions presented the Q2 Corporate Solutions
Performance Report and noted the key achievements and challenges. 
The Chief Officer Corporate Solutions thanked all staff in Corporate Solutions and
across the Council for their hard work and commitment and noted that the work on
transformation has progressed this year. 
The Chair thanked the Chief Officer Corporate Solutions for the report and invited
comments and questions.
Page 9 of 58

Page 10

The Committee recognised the 8% increase in library memberships and the
increase in physical visits and thanked the staff for their work. 
The Committee asked if there was an opportunity to tie in promotions from the
cafes and asked if uncontested invoices are paid before the Christmas break. 
The Chief Officer Corporate Solutions and the Executive Director Children, Young
People and Partnerships (Acting) will discuss cafes offline to discuss the work
that is underway. Communications will be sent to staff this week reminding
everyone that all payments are made and up to date to ensure the maximum
number can be completed before the break. 
The Committee thanked all the staff for their hard work.
Decision
Performance Review and Scrutiny Committee noted the report and the
recommendations. 
Agenda No. Report Title Presented by:
5.7 Q2 Midlothian Council Performance
Report & Balanced Scorecard
Chief Executive
Outline of report and summary of discussion
The Chief Executive presented the Q2 Midlothian Council Performance Report &
Balanced Scorecard; this report is a summary of actions in line with the Single
Midlothian Plan that compliments the reports from the Chief Officers today. The 
Chief Executive, and Head of Paid Service, thanked staff for their hard work over
the course of 2025. 
The Chair thanked the Chief Executive for the report and invited comments and
questions.
Decision
Performance Review and Scrutiny Committee noted the report and the
recommendations. 
6 Date of the Next Meeting 
The date of the next meeting is Tuesday 3 February 2026 at 11:00am. 
The meeting terminated at 12:06pm.
Page 10 of 58

Page 11

PRS Committee Action Log
Performance, Review and Scrutiny Committee
Tuesday 3 February 2026
Item No 4.2 
Item
No
Date of
Meeting
Item No and Title Action Action Owner Expected
completion
date
Comments
1 26/11/2024 5.3 Children
Services,
Partnerships and
Communities
Performance
Report Quarter Two
2024/25
Provide an update on progress with
the asylum-seeking children and
adults following the changes from
the Scottish Government.
The Head of Adult
Services and Chief
Social Work/ The
Chief Officer
Children’s
Services,
Partnerships and
Communities 
February 
2025
A meeting was held in January
to begin this work, and the
Working Group was established
under the leadership of the
Head of Children’s Services.
Discussions regarding where
this fits with Community
Planning. 
2 25/03/2025 5.10 Newbyres Care
Home Inspection by
Care Inspectorate
Review staffing algorithm and
impact of previous decision to put
an additional £500k into Newbyres
Care Home for additional nursing
staff. 
Head of Adult
Services and Chief
Social Work
Officer
TBC 
3 10/06/2025 5.2 National
Thematic Inspection
of local authority
approaches to
Provide information on plans for the
UNCRC Pupil Parliament, including
the recent proposals on Learner
Voice to a cross-party working
Education Chief
Operating Officer
Complete  Recommended for Closure
Pupil Parliament established in
September 2025.  
Page 11 of 58

Page 12

Item
No
Date of
Meeting
Item No and Title Action Action Owner Expected
completion
date
Comments
supporting school
improvement 
group.
5 10/06/2025 5.3 Education
Performance Report
Quarter Four 2024/25
Provide details on the outcome of
the Education HR Business Partner
review of staff absences. 
Education Chief
Operating Officer
Complete Recommended for closure. 
HR updated CPWG.
6 10/06/2025 5.5 Adult Social Care
Services
Performance Report
Quarter Four 2024/25
Update the performance reporting
in relation to the occupancy rates
achieved at Newbyres, taking into
account the number of beds in use. 
Head of Adult
Services and Chief
Social Work
Officer
TBC 
7 10/06/2025 5.5 Adult Social Care
Services
Performance Report
Quarter Four 2024/25 
Provide information on previously
agreed funding of 6 nurses from
Council.
Head of Adult
Services and Chief
Social Work
Officer
TBC 
8 10/06/2025 5.5 Adult Social Care
Services
Performance Report
Quarter Four 2024/25
Provide details on the average
length of stay at the Royal
Edinburgh.
Head of Adult
Services and Chief
Social Work
Officer
September
2025 
9 10/06/2025 5.5 Adult Social Care
Services
Performance Report
Quarter Four 2024/25
Provide a breakdown of the
£4.4millon received for Welfare
Rights.
Head of Adult
Services and Chief
Social Work
Officer
TBC 
Page 12 of 58

Page 13

Item
No
Date of
Meeting
Item No and Title Action Action Owner Expected
completion
date
Comments
10 10/06/2025 5.10 Place
Performance Report
Quarter Four 2024/25
Consider the commercial waste
offering, and the benefits of the
local authority managing this and
report back.
Chief Officer Place TBC In progress.
11 10/06/2025 5.10 Place
Performance Report
Quarter Four 2024/25
Consider ways to further publicise
information on what goes into each
recycling bin to avoid contaminated
loads.
Chief Officer Place TBC In progress.
12 28/10/2025 5.6 Education
Performance Report
2025/26
Review the suggestion made by
Primary Schools in Midlothian for a
Business Manager. 
Educating Chief
Operating Officer
October 2025 Recommended for Closure
Costing provided to CPWG for
ASG Business Manager
provision.
13 28/10/2025 5.6 Education
Performance Report
2025/26
Provide more details in relation to
staff absence.  Educating Chief
Operating Officer
Complete  Recommended for Closure 
Complete.
14 28/10/2025 5.6 Education
Performance Report
2025/26
Provide details regarding the new
peer group set up in Dalkeith. Heather Fleming,
CLL Officer 
Complete Recommended for Closure. 
Meeting set up with CLLE and
Cllr Russell.
15 28/10/2025 5.8 Q1 Adult Social
Care Performance
Report
Review the Lancashire report with
the Alcohol and Drug Partnership
(ADP) coordinator to see if nasal
sprays would be viable in
Midlothian.
Head of Adult
Services and Chief
Social Work
Officer
TBC 
16 28/10/2025 5.9 Q1 Place
Performance Report
Write to Colin Beattie current MSP
to apologise to staff for their
remarks made around school
Chief Officer Place TBC 
Page 13 of 58

Page 14

Item
No
Date of
Meeting
Item No and Title Action Action Owner Expected
completion
date
Comments
meals. 
17 9/12/2025 5.2 Q2 Education
Performance Report
2025/26, report by
Chief Education
Officer 
The Executive Director Children,
Young People and Partnerships
(Acting) to report back on the
policies and procedures in
Midlothian Schools regarding
mobile phones.
The Executive
Director Children,
Young People and
Partnerships
(Acting)
TBC 
18 9/12/2025 5.3 Q2 Children’s
Services, Partnership
and Communities
Performance Report
2025/26, report by
Chief Officer
Children’s Services,
Partnerships and
Communities and
Deputy Chief Social
Work Officer
The Chief Executive to write to
Lothian Health regarding the
extensive impact the waiting list of
CAHMS is having on families and
society.
The Chief
Executive 
TBC 
19 9/12/2025 5.5 Q2 Place
Performance Report,
report by Executive
Director Children,
Young People and
Partnerships (Acting)
The Executive Director Children,
Young People and Partnerships
(Acting) to explain why flip
tenancy’s now being excluded. 
The Executive
Director Children,
Young People and
Partnerships
(Acting)
TBC 
20 9/12/2025 5.5 Q2 Place
Performance Report,
The Executive Director Children,
Young People and Partnerships The Executive
Director Children,
TBC 
Page 14 of 58

Page 15

Item
No
Date of
Meeting
Item No and Title Action Action Owner Expected
completion
date
Comments
report by Executive
Director Children,
Young People and
Partnerships (Acting)
(Acting) to provide the statistics
and data around the length of stays
on the Councils temporary
emergency accommodation such
as Jarnac Court.
Young People and
Partnerships
(Acting) 
Page 15 of 58

Page 16

Page 16 of 58

Page 17

Performance, Review and Scrutiny Committee
Tuesday 3 February 2026
Item No 5.1
Inspection of  St David’s RC Primary School and Nursery
Report by Michelle Strong, Chief Education Officer
Report for Information
1 Recommendations
Performance, Review and Scrutiny Committee is asked to:
(i) Note the content of the 16 December 2025 inspection report.
(ii) Congratulate the headteacher, pupils, parents and staff
connected with St David’s RC Primary School and nursery on
the key strengths highlighted in the report.
2 Purpose of Report/Executive Summary
The report outlines the outcome of the Education Scotland inspection
of St David’s RC Primary School and nursery class. The nursery class
was inspected as part of Education Scotland’s pilot inspection phase
using the Quality improvement framework for the early learning and
childcare sectors.
Date: 16/12/25
Report Contact: 
Julie Fox, Quality Improvement Manager
Julie.Fox@midlothian.gov.uk
Page 17 of 58

Page 18

3 Background/Main Body of Report
3.1 In September 2025, a team of inspectors from Education
Scotland visited St David’s RC Primary School and their ELC setting. 
The report was published on 16 December 2025 and is now available
here St David's RC Primary School | Inspection Report | His Majesty’s
Inspectorate of Education in Scotland.
This is also attached as Appendix B.
3.2  Education Scotland is responsible for inspecting education
settings throughout Scotland. This inspection was a full model
inspection using core quality indicators from How Good is Our School
and the new Quality Improvement Framework for Early Years and
evaluations were as below;
School
QI 1.3 Leadership of change, evaluated as Good 
QI 2.3 Learning, teaching and assessment evaluated as Good
QI 3.1 Ensuring wellbeing, equality & inclusion evaluated as Good
QI 3.2 Raising attainment and achievement evaluated as Good
Nursery
HM Inspectors gathered evidence to evaluate the nursery using three
quality indicators from the new Quality Improvement Framework for the
early learning and childcare sectors. As this inspection is part of
Education Scotland’s inspection pilot phase these quality indicators
have not been graded.
Quality indicators focused on during this inspection were;
Curriculum
Learning, teaching and assessment
Wellbeing, equality and inclusion
3.3 Strengths
The strengths identified in the Education Scotland report of 16/12/25
are:
Children in the nursery class and school are supported by very positive,
warm and nurturing relationships. This helps them be happy and
achieve well in the setting.
Children in the nursery class who require additional support to achieve
are supported very well. Staff ensure planning and strategies to
improve outcomes for children are focused clearly on meeting the
needs of children and families. This supports children in the nursery to
make very good progress in their learning and wellbeing.
Page 18 of 58

Page 19

Children in the primary school and nursery class are happy, polite and
hardworking. They embody fully the school’s values of loyalty,
responsibility and kindness. Children learn in a settled and supportive
environment. 
The headteacher provides strong leadership which supports a culture
of continuous improvement. Across the school and nursery, children,
staff and parents work together effectively to lead change. This is
having a positive impact on outcomes for children. 
Staff work well together to achieve the best for children and families.
They ensure carefully considered action is taken to build consistency in
learning, teaching and assessment. This is improving children’s
learning experiences. 
3.4  Areas for Improvement
The main areas for improvement are:
In the primary school, the headteacher and staff should continue to
improve planning to meet the needs of children who require additional
support. Child’s plans should include clear, measurable targets which
are timebound and reviewed regularly. 
Teachers should ensure that all learning activities are set at the correct
level of difficulty for all children. In doing so, they should ensure
engaging learning experiences which challenge children capable of
achieving even more. 
In the nursery class, children would benefit from greater use of digital
technology to support their learning. This should extend children’s
learning and help them develop further their skills. 
3.5 Conclusion
Education Scotland inspectors concluded that they were confident that
the school has the capacity to continue to improve and so will make no
more visits in connection with the school and nursery. 
4 Report Implications (Resource, Digital and Risk)
4.1 Resource
There are no resource implications.
4.2 Digital 
There are no Digital implications.
4.3 Risk
Education Scotland’s team of Inspectors visit a sample of education
settings every year to find out how they are performing.  A report is
Page 19 of 58

Page 20

published which informs parents about the key strengths of the setting
and its capacity for further improvement. 
Following the publication of the report further visits may be made to the
setting, by the Education Authority to assist improvement and monitor
progress. 
Monitoring, review and evaluation of progress by central officers in the
Education Team is the control measure in place to reduce the risk of
failure of settings to demonstrate their capacity to improve.
4.4 Ensuring Equalities (if required a separate IIA must be
completed)
The School Improvement Plan will be screened for equalities
implications. 
4.5 Additional Report Implications (See Appendix A)
See Appendix A
Appendices
Appendix A – Additional Report Implications
Appendix B – Report
Page 20 of 58

Page 21

APPENDIX A – Report Implications
A.1 Key Priorities within the Single Midlothian Plan
• Getting it right for every Midlothian child
• Improving opportunities in Midlothian
A.2 Key Drivers for Change
Key drivers addressed in this report: 
Holistic Working 
Hub and Spoke 
Modern 
Sustainable 
Transformational 
Preventative 
Asset-based 
Continuous Improvement 
One size fits one 
None of the above
A.3 Key Delivery Streams
Key delivery streams addressed in this report: 
One Council Working with you, for you 
Preventative and Sustainable 
Efficient and Modern 
Innovative and Ambitious 
None of the above
A.4 Delivering Best Value
Noted within.
A.5 Involving Communities and Other Stakeholders
A link to the published report has been made available to Elected
Members, parents of children currently attending Newbattle High
School and other interested parties.
A.6 Impact on Performance and Outcomes
The setting will continue to improve its work in line with the school
improvement plan and central officers in the Education Team will
continue to challenge and support the setting in relation to developing
and implementing a range of quality improvement strategies.
A.7 Adopting a Preventative Approach
The Education (Scotland) Bill aims to take preventative action in order
to close the attainment versus deprivation gap by implementing key
Page 21 of 58

Page 22

policies and programmes which are designed to target support to
children and young people from disadvantaged communities.
Midlothian is highly committed to closing the poverty related attainment
gap.
A.8 Supporting Sustainable Development
The School Improvement Plan allows for sustainable development and
improvement.
Page 22 of 58

Page 23

APPENDIX B – Inspection Report
Page 23 of 58

Page 24

Page 24 of 58

Page 25

St David’s RC Primary School and Nursery Class, Midlothian Council, 5543029
© Crown Copyright
16 December 2025
Dear Parent/Carer
In September 2025, a team of inspectors from Education Scotland visited St David’s RC
Primary School and Nursery Class. During our visit, we talked to parents/carers and children
and worked closely with the headteacher and staff.  
The nursery class was inspected as part of Education Scotland’s pilot inspection phase using
the Quality improvement framework for the early learning and childcare sectors.
The inspection team found the following strengths in the school’s work.
• Children in the nursery class and school are supported by very positive, warm and
nurturing relationships. This helps them be happy and achieve well in the setting.
• Children in the nursery class who require additional support to achieve are supported very
well. Staff ensure planning and strategies to improve outcomes for children are focused
clearly on meeting the needs of children and families. This supports children in the
nursery to make very good progress in their learning and wellbeing.
• Children in the primary school and nursery class are happy, polite and hardworking. They
embody fully the school’s values of loyalty, responsibility and kindness. Children learn in a
settled and supportive environment.
• The headteacher provides strong leadership which supports a culture of continuous
improvement. Across the school and nursery, children, staff and parents work together
effectively to lead change. This is having a positive impact on outcomes for children.
• Staff work well together to achieve the best for children and families. They ensure
carefully considered action is taken to build consistency in learning, teaching and
assessment. This is improving children’s learning experiences.
The following areas for improvement were identified and discussed with the headteacher and
a representative from Midlothian Council.
• In the primary school, the headteacher and staff should continue to improve planning to
meet the needs of children who require additional support. Child’s plans should include
clear, measurable targets which are timebound and reviewed regularly.
• Teachers should ensure that all learning activities are set at the correct level of difficulty
for all children. In doing so, they should ensure engaging learning experiences which
challenge children capable of achieving even more.
• In the nursery class, children would benefit from greater use of digital technology to
support their learning. This should extend children’s learning and help them develop
further their skills.
Page 25 of 58

Page 26

St David’s RC Primary School and Nursery Class, Midlothian Council, 5543029
© Crown Copyright
We gathered evidence to enable us to evaluate the school’s work using four quality indicators
from How good is our school (4th edition). 
Quality indicators help schools, local authorities and inspectors to judge what is working well
and what needs to be improved. Following the inspection of each school, the Scottish
Government gathers details of our evaluations to keep track of how well Scottish schools are
doing.
Here are Education Scotland’s evaluations for St David’s RC Primary
School
Quality indicators for the primary stages Evaluation
Leadership of change good
Learning, teaching and assessment good
Ensuring wellbeing, equality and inclusion good
Raising attainment and achievement good
Descriptions of the evaluations are available from:
How good is our school? (4th edition), Appendix 3: The six-point scale
We gathered evidence to enable us to evaluate the ELC’s work using three quality indicators
from the Quality improvement framework for the early learning and childcare sectors. As this
inspection is part of Education Scotland’s pilot inspection phase using the Quality
improvement framework for the early learning and childcare sectors, these quality indicators
have not been graded.
Quality indicators for the nursery class
Curriculum
Learning, teaching and assessment
Wellbeing, inclusion and equality
A more detailed document called Summarised Inspection Findings (SIF) will be available on
the Education Scotland website at: 
St David's RC Primary School | Inspection Report | His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Education in
Scotland
Page 26 of 58

Page 27

St David’s RC Primary School and Nursery Class, Midlothian Council, 5543029
© Crown Copyright
What happens next?
We are confident that the school has the capacity to continue to improve and so we will make
no more visits in connection with this inspection. Midlothian Council will inform parents/carers
about the school’s progress as part of its arrangements for reporting on the quality of its
schools.
Fraser Forsyth
HM Inspector
Page 27 of 58

Page 28

Page 28 of 58

Page 29

Performance, Review and Scrutiny Committee
Tuesday 3 February 2026 
Item No 5.2 
Inspection of Midlothian Council’s Fostering, Adoption and Adult Placement
Services 
Report by Rebecca Hooton, Chief Officer Children’s Services, Partnerships
and Communities   
Report for Information 
1 Recommendations 
Performance, Review and Scrutiny Committee is recommended to note: 
1. the outcome and grading of the short notice announced inspection for
Fostering, Adoption and Adult Support which took place between 25th August
2025 and 16th September 2025; and 
2. a further report providing an update and assurance will be presented to
Cabinet on 19th May. 
2 Purpose of Report/Executive Summary 
The report summaries the finding and grades of the most recent inspection of our
Fostering, Adoption and Adult Placement services. The Care Inspectorate reports are
published on their website and available to the public.   
01/12/2025
Report Contact:
Lesley Watson Tel No 0131 271 3720 
lesley.watson@midlothian.gov.uk 
Page 29 of 58

Page 30

3 Background 
3.1 The Care Inspectorate is responsible for inspecting care services throughout
Scotland. This includes registered services for Fostering and Adoption of children
and Adult Care, often referred to as Continuing Care, placements. 
Inspections are carried out using the Health and Social Care Standards. The core
standards are: 
1: I experience high quality care and support that is right for me.
2: I am fully involved in all decisions about my care and support.
3: I have confidence in the people who support and care for me.
4: I have confidence in the organisation providing my care and support.
5: I experience a high-quality environment if the organisation provides the premises. 
The inspection uses a descriptive statement and/or statements to evaluate how the
service meets the 5 high-level standards. The final grade is then calculated using an
overall six-point scale ranging from unsatisfactory (1) to excellent (6). 
3.2 In Midlothian the Fostering, Adoption and Adult placements services are managed by
one small, discrete team. This includes 1.6 FTE Social work Team Leaders, 7.5 FTE
Social workers and one FTE practitioner. 
3.3  For the purposes of this short notice (announced) inspection the descriptive
statements used and associated grades were as follows: 
Fostering Services 
How well do we support people's
wellbeing?
3 - Adequate
How good is our leadership? 3 - Adequate 
How good is our staff team?  3 - Adequate 
How well is our care and support
planned?
4 - Good 
Adoption Services 
How well do we support people's
wellbeing?
3 - Adequate
How good is our leadership? 3 - Adequate 
How good is our staff team?  3 - Adequate 
How well is our care and support
planned?
3 - Adequate 
Adult Placement/Continuing Care Service 
How well do we support people's
wellbeing?
4 - Good
How good is our leadership? 3 - Adequate 
Page 30 of 58

Page 31

How good is our staff team?  3 - Adequate 
How well is our care and support
planned?
4 - Good 
Midlothian Council was awarded an overall Grade 3 for all three services inspected.
The inspection determined that the overall practice across all three service areas
was adequate. It is important to note there are many measures that were noted to be
of a good standard, this is an indication of progress and improvement from the last
inspection. However the overall grade always relates to the lowest grade provided. 
Several areas of Good Practice highlighted during the inspection. These included; 
• Young people experienced stable, enduring and attuned care from nurturing
caregivers.
• The service showed a clear commitment to ensuring brothers and sisters
remained together.
• The importance of young people understanding their life story and of
promoting a positive sense of identity was clear within caring households.
• Young people's views were known, and their voice had influence on the
direction of their care and support. 
3.4 Inspectors noted that there is a clear vision in place for our Fostering/Adult
Placement and Adoption service and inspectors were confident that this vision will be
driven forward by the Service Manager and Team Leaders. 
Progress made on Requirements and Areas for Improvement 
3.5  The inspection also identified areas of requirement and improvement. Whilst
inspectors identified evidence of improvements across all key performance areas
since the last inspection, the requirements and areas for improvement reflect the
ongoing staffing challenges experienced since the last inspection which has
continued to impact on the service’s capacity to provide consistent support to our
carers and adoptive parents. The feedback acknowledged the impact of staffing
pressures on the ability of the service to drive forward and sustain improvements,
including the progress made in relation to quality assurance structures which
evidence good practice. Detail of the requirements and area for improvement are
noted in the full reports (Appendix B). 
3.6  Improvement plans for all three services have been devised and implemented that
support the identified Requirements and Areas for Improvement. Improvement work
has progressed at pace following the inspection. 
3.7 Improvement work completed to date includes:
• The FCC team is now fully staffed which in turn has underpinned increased
and consistent support to all foster carers and adopters. Increased staffing
has allowed for all foster carers to have an allocated Supervising Social
Worker. Practice standards now reflect that in the event that this changes a
FCC Team Leader will be allocated to the carer(s) on an interim basis to
ensure regular supervision and support; (Fostering Requirement 1, Adult
Placement AFI 1, Adoption Requirement 1 & AFI 1 & 2)
• Increased staffing has also supported the review and further embedding of
quality assurance structures into practice to support and evidence best
Page 31 of 58

Page 32

practice. These include robust tracking in relation to Care Inspectorate
notifications, unplanned endings and out with approvals. The FCC case file
audit tool has also been strengthened to incorporate adoption and continuing
care practice These structures are currently being built into the Council’s
recording systems to ensure quality reporting and monitoring moving forward.
(Fostering Requirement 3 & AFI 1, Adult Placement Requirement 1 & AFI 1,
Adoption Requirement 2)
• Additional Out with Approval safeguards have been built into practice. There
is now a requirement that any out with approval recommendation is approved
by the Agency Decision Maker or Depute Agency Decision Maker prior to any
placement being approved. Additional slots at the Midlothian Fostering Panel
have been ringfenced to allow capacity for any out with approvals to return to
panel as necessary within a 4-week period. Out with approval guidance has
been developed and will be rolled out across the service and panel members.
(Fostering Requirement 2)
• Unplanned Endings and Continuing Care policies have been further reviewed
and amended in line with Care Inspectorate guidance and statutory
regulations. These will be rolled out at a planned two-day Children’s Services
conference in late January 2026. Tracking mechanisms and case file audit
tools are in place to monitor practice in both areas. (Fostering Requirement 4,
Adult Placement AFI 2) 
• A supervision and support framework for adopters has been developed that
reflects Midlothian Children’s Services post adoption support guidance
(Adoption Requirements 1,3 & 4). 
3.8    The FCC Service Manager and FCC Team Leaders met with the Inspectors on 10th
December 2025 to review the improvement planning post inspection. The Inspectors
have confirmed that they are satisfied with the improvement planning and with the
work that is progressing to meet the Requirements and Areas for Improvement. This
was followed up with written correspondence from the Care Inspectorate on 8th
January which confirmed this position – they stated that they were satisfied with the
content of the action plans and had a productive discussion about the team’s
capacity to implement them. Consequently, Inspectors do not require to meet with
the service again out with standard monitoring, the next meeting of which is in March
2026. 
The relevant Service Manager and Team Leaders will manage this plan and regularly
report on progress to the Children’s Services Senior Leadership Group and on a
monthly basis at Social Work Assurance Group (SWAG). 
3.9 To ensure progress is expedited, the Chief Officer Children’s Services, Partnerships
and Communities will monitor and provide weekly updates to the Directorate
Management Team meetings, chaired by the Acting Executive Director – Children,
Young People & Partnerships. 
3.10 A further report will be brought to Cabinet on 19th May which will provide an update
and assurance that the outstanding Requirements and Areas for Improvement have
been met. 
Page 32 of 58

Page 33

Report Implications (Resource, Digital and Risk) 
4.1 Resource 
The budgeted resource in place for the team should allow for the improvement of
service delivery. The challenges in recruiting staff and the impact of absence
including sickness and maternity leave have had a direct impact on service provision
and the inspection grading. Two newly recruited staff will be in place by January
2026 and we are confident with a full complement of staff that the improvement plan
is achievable and will result in improved grading for the next inspection. 
4.2 Digital 
There is ongoing consideration about the future of AI to support social work services
which would enhance capacity of front-line staff to support our children, young people
and their carers. 
4.3 Risk 
Lack of consistent staffing impacts on the care and support that is provided to
children, young people and carers. Any further challenges with staffing need to be
addressed in a manner that ensures a consistent level of capacity to meet the needs
of our children, young people and carers to ensure we improve the current gradings. 
The leadership team raised the impact of being a small local authority and that any
absence in a small team has a large impact. This was acknowledged by the Care
inspectorate.   
4.4 Ensuring Equalities 
The service’s mission is for all care experienced children and young people to be
provided with quality services. 
4.5 Additional Report Implications (Appendix A)   
Page 33 of 58

Page 34

Appendices 
APPENDIX A – Report Implications 
A.1 Key Priorities within the Single Midlothian Plan 
The inspection feedback endorses our local approach to delivering services 
A.2 Key Drivers for Change 
Key drivers addressed in this report: 
Holistic Working 
Hub and Spoke 
Modern 
Sustainable 
Transformational 
Preventative 
Asset-based 
Continuous Improvement 
One size fits one 
None of the above 
A.3 Key Delivery Streams 
Key delivery streams addressed in this report: 
One Council Working with you, for you 
Preventative and Sustainable 
Efficient and Modern 
Innovative and Ambitious 
None of the above 
A.4 Delivering Best Value 
Staff continue to strive to support children and young people and carers to deliver
best value and this is supported by the inspection improvement plans. 
A.5 Involving Communities and Other Stakeholders 
Staff work with many stakeholders including young people and their families to
deliver holistic, sustainable services 
A.6 Impact on Performance and Outcomes 
The recent grades are below the current performance measure however the
inspection improvement plan will support improved practice standards across all of
the services inspected. 
A.7 Adopting a Preventative Approach 
Not applicable 
A.8 Supporting Sustainable Development – not applicable
Page 34 of 58

Page 35

Performance, Review and Scrutiny Committee
Tuesday 3 February 2026
Item No 5.3 
Food Standards Scotland: Food Law Enforcement Actions Audit 2025-26 
Report by Derek Oliver, Executive Director Children, Young People and
Partnerships (Acting) 
Report for Information 
1 Recommendations 
It is recommended that the Performance, Review and Scrutiny Committee
note: 
i. Midlothian Council’s Environmental Health Service was subject
of a statutory Audit of Food Law Enforcement by Food
Standards Scotland (FSS) between 19 June - 6 August 2025. In
the Presentation of Audit Findings, the Auditors concluded that
whilst recognising the significant staffing resource issues, which
is being experienced nationally, the service was performing well
in fulfilling its enforcement roles and responsibilities;
ii. the Audit report is published on the FSS website;
iii. the exemplary work of the Environmental Health Service to
enable the Authority to achieve a positive outcome to the Food
Law Enforcement Actions Audit 2025. 
2 Purpose of Report 
The purpose of this report is to bring to the attention of Performance, Review
and Scrutiny Committee the findings of the Food Standards Scotland: Food
Law Enforcement Actions Audit of Midlothian Council’s Food Service carried
out between June and August 2025. 
Date
Report Contact: Gail McElroy
Tel No: 0131 271 3559
gail.mcelroy@midlothian.gov.uk 
Page 35 of 58

Page 36

3 Background/Main Body of Report 
3.1 Food Standards Scotland (FSS) has responsibility to monitor the
performance of Local Authority Food Service’s enforcing food safety
legislation in Scotland with the aim to provide assurance that the
delivery of official controls for food is compliant with Scottish and UK
legal requirements and official guidance. 
Midlothian Council received notification of audit from Food Standards
Scotland on 19 June 2025 that they had been selected for the Local
Authority Food Law Enforcement Actions Audit 2025-2026. The aim of
the audit was to assess and verify the arrangements in place to ensure
the adequate and effective delivery of food law enforcement systems,
procedures and actions. The audit scope and process were defined,
and specific information was requested. 
The outcome of the audit was presented by FSS Audit Team on 6
August 2025 in Midlothian House to: Chief Officer - Place, Senior
Manager Protective Services, Team Manager Business Regulation
(Lead Food Officer/Audit Liaison Officer) and Principal Environmental
Health Officer (Food & Safety).  Presentation of Audit Findings –
Midlothian Council is enclosed at Appendix B.1. 
3.2 Feedback from the audit team was overall very positive. Midlothian
Council has a Food Service Plan for 2025/26, approved by Cabinet on
20 May 2025 and a Food Law Enforcement Policy, approved on 28
May 2024, with Standing Orders and a Scheme of Administration in
place. There are up to date Operational Procedures available and
internal monitoring to enable a consistent and proportionate approach
to enforcement. 
Food Law Interventions are effectively managed with around 330
inspections carried out per year of the 995 food businesses registered
within Midlothian. However, it was also noted that there were 143
missed inspections in 2023-24 and 284 missed inspections in 2024-25
due to staffing shortfall. This was highlighted and recognised by
Cabinet in May 2025 in the Review of Service Performance against the
2024-2025 Food Service Plan. 
3.3 At the time of audit, the Food Service had 2.45 FTE in post from 4.1
FTE posts on the establishment. The final outcome of the Required
Resource Exercise in May 2025 calculated that 6.5 FTE is required in
Midlothian Council to deliver the full range of food law-related activities. 
There was acknowledgement by the Audit Team of the difficulties faced
nationally within Local Authority Environmental Health Teams to recruit
qualified Environmental Heath Officers and Food Safety Officers that
impact the Food Service. These workforce sustainability challenges are
being strategically addressed by The Society of Chief Officers of
Environmental Health in Scotland. 
During the audit process, Midlothian Council was recognised for its
considerable efforts and innovative progress to address the staffing
Page 36 of 58

Page 37

shortfall in the face of the national shortage of Environmental Health
Officers and Food Safety Officers.  Midlothian Council has employed
two trainee Food Safety Officers, a Regulatory Services Modern
Apprentice and appointed temporary contractors to help alleviate the
pressures on the team and has a clear commitment to train and
develop new officers. 
The service will continue to build on this concept through its Service
Review and collaborate with other Local Authorities to develop and
implement a framework that supports alternative regulatory models,
‘grow your own’ capacity and strengthens the sustainability of the
workforce. 
3.4 Enforcement action taken by the Food Service was deemed effective,
resulting in improvements in standards. However, it was reported that
in some cases the copy quality of the handwritten notices served on
site were difficult to read owing to the manual method used. A new
procedure has been implemented using technology to improve the
copy quality of handwritten enforcement notices issued on site to food
businesses. 
3.5 Midlothian Council’s Food Enforcement Activity data is collected by our
Management Information System (MIS), IDOX Uniform and uploaded
to the Scottish National Database (SND) a central repository within
FSS. This is the prescribed mechanism for Food Authorities to provide
real time information to FSS on all Official Control activity, which is
undertaken by the Food Service. 
The audit identified that Midlothian Council’s Enforcement Action data
is not accurately represented on SND with a number of actions missing
from the national database.  The Lead Food Officer has previously
attempted to take action to verify the data, however further intervention
is required to ensure the current and future accuracy of this
information.  A specialist/development provision will be considered as a
priority as part of the Service Review of Protective Services.  This will
assist the Council meet our responsibilities regarding accurate
reporting to the SND but would also assist the service with digital
solutions to modernise and improve efficiency and productivity.  Further
significant changes to our systems will be required with the
implementation of the Scottish Authorities Food Enforcement Rebuild
(SAFER) programme which aims to reform and modernise the food law
delivery system in Scotland. 
Page 37 of 58

Page 38

4 Report Implications (Resource, Digital and Risk) 
4.1 Resource 
At present there is no capacity within the existing establishment to fulfil
the duties required by FSS to check and verify the food enforcement
activity date and ensure it is and remains accurate. This requires a
dedicated role to be incorporated into the structure through the Service
Review. 
Growth is highlighted as required if the Authority were to meet the
staffing resources identified as required through the FSS resource
calculator; without such growth the Service will only be able to
undertake the highest identified risk matters. 
4.2 Digital 
The use of existing digital platforms has no anticipated impact on
Digital Services or IT infrastructure. 
4.3 Risk 
As sufficient qualified staff cannot currently be recruited to fill the
existing establishment, Midlothian Council Food Service is taking steps
to address the staffing shortfall by training new officers to build the
Environmental Health workforce. In order to address resource shortfall
and the development role for the SND, the Service Review will address
these requirements. 
4.4 Ensuring Equalities (if required a separate IIA must be completed) 
There are no known equality issues arising from the outcome of this
audit.   
4.4 Additional Report Implications (See Appendix A) 
See Appendix A 
Appendices 
Appendix A – Additional Report Implications
Appendix B – Background information 
Page 38 of 58

Page 39

APPENDIX A – Report Implications 
A.1 Key Priorities within the Single Midlothian Plan 
Ensuring the Food Service is well resourced and can provide accurate
and up to date data is imperative to reducing the gap in health
outcomes not only in Midlothian but also nationally. 
A.2 Key Drivers for Change 
Key drivers addressed in this report: 
Holistic Working 
Hub and Spoke 
Modern 
Sustainable 
Transformational 
Preventative 
Asset-based 
Continuous Improvement 
One size fits one 
None of the above 
A.3 Key Delivery Streams 
Key delivery streams addressed in this report: 
One Council Working with you, for you 
Preventative and Sustainable 
Efficient and Modern 
Innovative and Ambitious 
None of the above 
A.4 Delivering Best Value 
This report relates to the outcomes of an 3rd party audit which identifies
areas of continuous improvement in performance. Implementing the
solutions above we have an opportunity to improve our efficiency and
effectiveness thereby protecting public health. 
A.5 Involving Communities and Other Stakeholders 
Food Standards Scotland are the Competent Authority responsible for
monitoring the performance of Food Authorities in Scotland. Midlothian
Council Food Service is required to engage with FSS and rectify any
non-conformities by introducing appropriate solutions. 
A.6 Impact on Performance and Outcomes 
Implementing the solutions identified will improve our performance to
provide the accurate and up to date data required by FSS. 
Page 39 of 58

Page 40

A.7 Adopting a Preventative Approach 
Any increase in staffing within the Food Service allows the Food and
Safety Team to allocate resources to other preventative activities. 
A.8 Supporting Sustainable Development 
N/A 
Page 40 of 58

Page 41

APPENDIX B 
Background Papers/Resource Links 
1/ Local Authority Food Law Enforcement Actions Audit 2025-26,
Presentation of Audit Findings – Midlothian Council 
Page 41 of 58

Page 42

Page 42 of 58

Page 43

Date: June – August 2025
Audit Assurance Division
Title slide
Local Authority                            
Food Law Enforcement Actions Audit
2025 - 26
Presentation of Audit Findings
– Midlothian Council
Page 43 of 58

Page 44

2
Audit Aim
• The aim of the audit programme is to assess and verify the arrangements in place at Local Authorities to ensure the
adequate and effective delivery of Official Controls, specifically enforcement actions in LA enforced establishments.
Audit Scope
• The audit covered the organisation, planning, implementation and review of official controls carried out by Midlothian
Council’s Environmental Health Service.
Audit Process
• The Audit primarily consisted of a documentation review with one online meeting held with the Audit Liaison Officer
over the course of 10 days.
• The findings of the audit will be presented here and will also be compiled into an overall summary report at the end of
the Audit Programme.
Introduction
Page 44 of 58

Page 45

• The Authority has an up-to-date 2025-26 Food Service Plan that was approved
by Cabinet on 20 May 2025.
• The plan outlines how food safety will be monitored and controlled within
Midlothian. The Authority’s approach to interventions out-of-hours is included
in the Plan.
• A review of service performance against the 2024-25 Plan was also completed
and submitted. 87% of planned inspections at highest-risk premises were
stated to have been completed.
• The Authority has 993 registered food premises and 11 Approved
Establishments (AE) in total.
• FHIS – there are 691 premises on the platform and 92% have a Pass. Due to
‘missed’ inspections, some data contributing to this calculation is historic. As a
comparison, only 76% of Midlothian food businesses inspected achieved
a Pass rating between April 2024 and March 2025. Down 10% from 2023-24.
• On SND, there are 215 premises showing as unrated – equating to 21% of the
database cohort. It is acknowledged that the number of unrated premises has
reduced from 254 in 2024. The majority of that 215 are risk rated under
FLCOP, Annex 5 and have been scheduled to receive an FLRS inspection. 45
new businesses are unrated and await inspection.
• A process exists for triaging and prioritising new and unrated establishments.
Organisation
&
Management
Page 45 of 58

Page 46

• The Authority provided an Enforcement Policy that was approved by Cabinet
on 28th May 2024, with a review scheduled biennially.
• The Authority has Standing Orders and a Scheme of Administration that were
last reviewed in 2022 and are currently under review.
• Copies of photographic ID Instrument of Appointment officer authorisations
were submitted.
• Recently reviewed Operational Procedures were submitted for a wide range of
enforcement notices.
• An Employee Charter and Code of Conduct was provided that sets out
standards of behaviour expected. Forms are used routinely to require staff to
declare any outside employment or other potential conflicts of interest.
• A recently reviewed Monitoring Procedure for Food Law Enforcement was
provided that outlined how the Authority ensures a consistent approach to
enforcement.
• Staff can access documented procedures via a share drive and/or MS Teams.
Policies &
Procedures
Page 46 of 58

Page 47

• In accordance with the Enforcement Policy and Food Law Codes of Practice, most
interventions are carried out unannounced.
• An Excel spreadsheet exported from the FED was provided, showing that 995 interventions
had been carried out in Midlothian in the past 3 years.
• OCV, Group 1, Group 2&3 Band D&E and initial Group 1&2 inspections are being
prioritised.
• There were 143 missed inspections in 2023-24 and 284 were missed in 2024-25 due to a
staffing shortfall. 16 food premises were found to have significant or sustained non-
compliances (risk rated Band D or E) necessitating an additional 26 unplanned
interventions to be carried out.
• Currently, in SND there are 215 premises showing as unrated – 21% of database. The
majority of that 215 are risk rated under FLCOP, Annex 5, low-risk Category D’s and E’s,
and have been given a scheduled FLRS inspection date. 45 new businesses are unrated
and await inspection.
• Procedures exist detailing how officers should record FLRS Food Law Interventions, and
any Food Law Notices served or withdrawn in the Food Enforcement Database (FED).
• Staffing - 2.45 FTE is filled out of 4.1 posts and considerable efforts have been made to
address the shortfall, with 2 EHO contractors being employed temporarily and 2 trainee
FSOs and a Regulatory Services Modern Apprentice also recently being appointed.
• A Required Resource Exercise carried out in January 2025 and revised in conjunction with
FSS in May 2025 calculated that 6.5 FTE would be required to deliver the full range of food
law-related activities and a further 2 FTE to deliver other work carried out by the Food and
Safety team.
Interventions 
Page 47 of 58

Page 48

• Authorised Officers decide on the appropriate enforcement action, using a
graduated approach where possible, and are required to discuss any formal
enforcement action (including voluntary undertakings) being considered with a
manager. 
• In 2024-25 14 food enforcement notices, plus 1 voluntary closure and 1
voluntary surrender were issued. 1 report was submitted to the COPFS, which
resulted in a guilty plea and successful prosecution.
• The service of notices was proportionate in that these were in response
to higher FL rating scores. Notices, specifically HINs, were served within 5
working days following interventions.
• Some high score anomalies were identified where no notices were served. The
Authority has provided a satisfactory explanation.
• RANs – the copy quality of handwritten notices was generally worse than those
that were typed. In some cases, the handwriting was difficult to read, and it was
not clear whether some options had been stroked through or underlined.
• Revisits to check compliance are done during and after Notice expiry dates.
Enforcement
Arrangements 
Page 48 of 58

Page 49

The Authority provided evidence that 64 enforcement actions had been 
taken on 31 establishments since 1st April 2022, as follows: 
On SND for the same period, there were 31 enforcements on 28
establishments. The Lead Food Officer is taking appropriate action to
ensure that enforcement activity taken since 01/04/2022 is checked and
verified on SND to ensure that data held there accurately correlates with
the data held on the Authority’s Food Enforcement Database.
Enforcement
Actions
Enforcement
Action
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Total
HIN 8 1 9
RAN 8 9 11 2 30
RAN
withdrawn
3 6 6 1 16
Voluntary
Closure
1 1 2
Voluntary
Closure Lifted
1 1
Voluntary
Surrender
1 1 1 3
HEPN 1 1
HEPO 1 1
Prosecution 1 1
21 17 23 3 64
Page 49 of 58

Page 50

Reasons cited and
effectiveness of
Enforcement Action
9 Hygiene Improvement Notices – HACCP, maintenance and facilities.
30 Remedial Action Notices – lack of hot water, significant pest issues, extending shelf life,
allergens.
2 Voluntary Closures – poor and unsatisfactory standards.
3 Voluntary Surrenders – potential contamination by pests and counterfeit vodka.
1 HEPN – rat activity.
1 HEPO – rat activity.
1 Prosecution – 1 rat infestation/repeated visits and poor history of compliance (pled guilty).
Overall, it appears that enforcement action was effective, resulting in improvements in standards and FLRS scores afterwards.
Page 50 of 58

Page 51

• The Authority has qualified, trained and experienced officers.
• Authorised Food Enforcement Officers are required to undertake regular
training activities to maintain their proficiency and expertise. The
Authority has sourced and funded a bespoke legal procedures training
course for officers, to be delivered in October 2025.
• The Principal Officer (Food & Safety) reviews training requirements at
workplan review meetings and as part of annual planned appraisal
system operated by the council.
• Communication - general outcomes and performance reports are
discussed at Food & Safety team monthly meetings, monthly
consistency workshops and weekly catch ups.
Competence  
Page 51 of 58

Page 52

• The Authority uses its FED to schedule due dates for all its food
premises including OCV activity in Approved Establishments.
• There are detailed FED data entry procedures in place for the
Service.  These detail (using screenshots) how data is entered and
checked including a reference to FED/SND accuracy.
• There were no Enforcement Actions code errors (Value not
recognised) on SND.
• The Authority identified an issue with its FED not picking up missed
Band D and E inspections and has initiated a process to track high
risk inspections.
• The Authority’s Enforcement Action data is not accurately
represented on SND. A significant number of enforcement actions
are missing on SND. Further data checking and verification is
required to ensure that the Authority's work output is accurately
depicted in SND.
• Discussions are ongoing with FSS regarding automated upload of
FHIS data.
Food
Enforcement
Database
Page 52 of 58

Page 53

• An annual sampling plan is prepared each year.
• In 2023-24, 130 samples were taken - 34 from approved establishments,
46 from manufacturers and 50 for FSS surveys.
• In 2024-25 134 food samples were taken - 109 from approved
establishments and manufacturers, 24 FSS surveys and 1 complaint
sample.
• There was no enforcement action requiring to be taken in the last 3 years in
response to unsatisfactory sample results, the majority being minor
labelling errors.
• None of the Approved Establishments in Midlothian operates with a Private
Water Supply.
Sampling   
Page 53 of 58

Page 54

• The Authority has a Monitoring Procedure for Food Law Enforcement and
a new spreadsheet process for checking FLRS and OCV interventions and
enforcement notices served.
• Quarterly internal monitoring procedures exist for checking FLRS and
OCV interventions and approving Food Law Notices. Draft reports to the
COPFS via SRA web also require to be approved prior to submission.
• The database review revealed that 995 premises had had official control
inspections in the past 3 years. Several premises were subject to multiple
visits.
• FLRS scores were consistent with the Interventions Food Law Code of
Practice. Premises with high scores mainly resulted in enhanced 
enforcement action including statutory notices being served but there were
some exceptions. The ALO provided an explanation which has been
accepted.
• Enforcement action taken appeared effective, resulting in improvements in
standards and FLRS scores afterwards.
Internal
Monitoring
Page 54 of 58

Page 55

Conclusions
• The Authority provided an Enforcement Policy that was approved by Cabinet on 28th May 2024 an up-to-date 2025-
26 Food Service Plan that was approved by Cabinet on 20 May 2025.
• There is a lack of resilience in that 2.45 FTE is filled out of 4.1 posts on the establishment and a Required Resource
recently calculated to be 6.5 FTE. The number of missed inspections and unrated premises is a cause for concern,
but it is acknowledged that good and innovative progress is being made in addressing the staffing shortfall.
• Recently reviewed Monitoring and Operational Procedures for Food Law Enforcement outline how the Authority
ensures a consistent approach to enforcement.
• 64 enforcement actions had been taken in 31 establishments since 1 April 2022, but more than 30 of these
enforcement actions had not been captured in SND. Further checking and verification of data accuracy is required.
• Enforcement action taken was effective, resulting in improvements in standards and FLRS scores afterwards.
• Officers taking enforcement action were suitably authorised.
• A sampling plan is prepared and adhered to each year, with sampling targeted at the highest risk establishments as
well as FSS surveys.
Page 55 of 58

Page 56

Midlothian Council’s Comments &
Feedback
• The national shortage of Environmental Health Officers and/or trained Food Safety Officers coupled with the
extremely limited options to achieve the necessary qualifications and fully funded training opportunities nationally has
negatively impacted the LA. Midlothian Council have taken considerable efforts to address this locally by ‘growing our
own’.
• Midlothian Council supports the introduction of a licensing scheme to ensure compliance with standard conditions
prior to a food business starting operations, with retrospective licensing to be applied to all existing
establishments. This would provide a valuable (ring-fenced) income stream commensurate with the size of the
authority to the resource required for interventions; improve initial compliance to protect public health; and potentially
reduce enforcement action taken on business through pre-requisite conditions.
• The limitation of the LAs MIS and compatibility with SND, such that the LA under report food law enforcement
activity, had previously been identified by the Authority and discussed with FSS in an attempt to resolve this matter.
Further action by the Authority is required to identify and implement a solution to ensure that enforcement activity is
accurately uploaded to SND. This will require a specialist role.
• From now on for all notices served on site the officer will take a photograph of the original notice served on the FBO to
ensure an accurate and clear copy of the notice is retained for our records.
Page 56 of 58

Page 57

Next Steps
• Midlothian Council is the first Authority to have been audited under the programme.
• The programme will run until the end of financial year or until an adequate representation of Authorities has been
achieved.
• The findings from each audit, including your comments and feedback, will be published on FSS’ website and collated
into an overall summary report which will be produced and published at the end of the programme.
• The presentation once agreed, will be sent to your Chief Executive along with a covering letter.  There is an
expectation that the Local Authority will use the findings of the audit to help improve their performance.  You may
consider sharing the audit findings with elected members within the appropriate local public committee.
• Any feedback you provide will also be incorporated into the summary report. The report will be made available on our
website, and you will be notified once it has been published.
Page 57 of 58

Page 58

Page 58 of 58