260624 Council Minute
North Ayrshire Council · 16 September 2026
Back to North Ayrshire Council — 16 September 2026 and its agenda
Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.
Page 1
PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLIC INFORMATION North Ayrshire Council 24 June 2026 At a Meeting of North Ayrshire Council at 2.00 p.m. involving a combination of participation by remote electronic means and physical attendance within the Council Chambers, Irvine. Present (Physical Participation) Nairn Angus-McDonald, Eleanor Collier, Joe Cullinane, Anthea Dickson, Stewart Ferguson, Robert Foster, Tony Gurney, Alan Hill, Mary Hume, Cameron Inglis, Margaret Johnson, Christina Larsen, Shaun Macaulay, Tom Marshall, Jean McClung, Louise McLaughlan, Matthew McLean, Davina McTiernan, Jim Montgomerie, Ian Murdoch, Donald Reid, Chloé Robertson, Ronnie Stalker, Angela Stephen and John Sweeney. Present (Remote Electronic Participation) John Bell, Marie Burns, Charles Currie, Scott Davidson, Todd Ferguson, Amanda Kerr and Donald L. Reid. In Attendance C. Hatton, Chief Executive; S. Anson, Executive Director (Education); R. McCutcheon, Executive Director, Louise Kirk, Director (Regional Economy) (Place); Y. Baulk, Head of Service (Housing & Public Protection) (Communities and Housing); E. Stewart, Head of Service (Children, Families & Criminal Justice) (Health and Social Care Partnership); M. Boyd, Head of Service (Finance); F. Walker, Head of Service (People and ICT); R. Lynch, Senior Manager, L. Taylor, Team Manager (Litigation) (Legal Services); M. McColm, Senior Manager (Communications), C. Stewart and S. Wilson, Committee Services Officers, and H. Young, Senior Committee Services Officer (Democratic) (Corporate Services). Chair Provost Dickson in the Chair. Apologies Scott Gallacher 1. Provost's Remarks The Provost welcomed those present to the meeting and dealt with preliminary matters, including intimation that the meeting, which was taking place on a hybrid basis, was being recorded. The Provost also took the opportunity to mark the 30th Anniversary of North Ayrshire Council and paid tribute to all elected members and officers, past and present, who had served our communities with dedication and commitment over the past three decades. 2. Apologies The Provost invited intimations of apologies for absence, which were recorded.
Page 2
PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLIC INFORMATION 3. Declarations of Interest In terms of Standing Order 11 and Section 5 of the Councillors' Code of Conduct, Councillor Hill declared an interest in agenda item 12 - 100% Council Tax Premium on Second Homes – Monitoring Report. Councillor Hill left the meeting and took no part in the deliberation or determination of that item. There were no declarations of the Party Whip. 4. Previous Minutes The accuracy of the Minutes of the Meeting of the Council held on 20 May 2026 was confirmed and the Minutes signed in accordance with Paragraph 7(1) of Schedule 7 of the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973. 5. Provost’s Report Submitted report by the Provost for the period from 11 May 2026 to 14 June 2026. Noted. 6. Leader’s Report Submitted report by the Leader of the Council for the period from 11 May 2026 to 14 June 2026. Noted. 7. Council Minute Volume Submitted for noting the Minutes of meetings of committees of the Council held in the period 27 May to 15 June 2026. Noted. 8. Congratulatory Motion In terms of Standing Order 15.4, submitted the undernoted motions, duly proposed and seconded, which sought to congratulate, commend or recognise an individual or group in relation to their achievement or activities within North Ayrshire: (1) “Council congratulates North Ayrshire Table Tennis Club on the selection of two of its players to represent Scotland at next month’s Commonwealth Championships in India. Chris Main from Saltcoats, and Stevenston's Martin Johnson have been chosen as two of only four male players recruited from all over the country. Chris will also be Team Captain!
Page 3
PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLIC INFORMATION Council also commends the sterling work done by NATTC in encouraging people of all ages and abilities to participate in this sport and acknowledges the beneficial effects of this kind of activity on one's mental and physical wellbeing. Council wishes Team Scotland and our two local representatives all the best for the competition”. There being no dissent, the motion was approved. (2) “North Ayrshire Council congratulates North Ayrshire boxers Brooke Nealy and Aaron Cullen on their selection to represent Scotland at the upcoming Commonwealth Games. Council recognises their hard work, dedication and sporting achievements and wishes them every success as they represent Scotland and North Ayrshire on the International stage. Council agrees to record its congratulations and best wishes to both athletes and wishes Team Scotland the best of luck”. There being no dissent, the motion was approved. (3) “To congratulate Megan’s Space for winning the award of Charity of the Year from the SVCO, with congratulations to Robert & Jenny Copeland, family and the rest of the team”. There being no dissent, the motion was approved. 9. Revenue Budget 2025/26: Financial Performance to 31 March 2026 Submitted report by the Head of Service (Democratic Services) to resolve the Council’s position on the use of underspend reported to Cabinet in the Council’s financial performance report 2025/26. The Cabinet report and minute from 2 June 2026 was set out at Appendix 1, comments in relation to the call-in request from the Head of Service (Finance) presented to the Audit and Scrutiny Committee was set out at Appendix 2, the minutes of the Special Audit and Scrutiny Committee of 15 June 2026 was set out at Appendix 3 and the minutes of the Special Cabinet meeting of 19 June 2026 was set out at Appendix 4 to the report. The Senior Manager (Legal Services) clarified that Standing Orders 15.5 would require to be suspended to enable a decision taken by Council in the last 6 months to be reconsidered. Councillor Cullinane, seconded by Councillor Foster, moved a motion to suspend Standing Orders.
Page 4
PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLIC INFORMATION On a division and roll call vote, there voted “to proceed” with suspension of Standing Orders, Councillors Angus-McDonald, Bell, Cullinane, Currie, S. Ferguson, T. Ferguson, Foster, Hume, Inglis, Marshall, McLean, McLaughlan, Montgomerie, Murdoch, D. Reid, D.L Reid, Stalker, Stephen and Sweeney (19) and “not proceed”, Councillors Burns, Collier, Davidson, Dickson, Gurney, Hill, Johnson, Larsen, Macaulay, McClung and McTiernan (11) the motion “to proceed” was declared carried. The Senior Manager (Legal Services) provided clarification that the threshold of 17 members had been met for Council to proceed with the suspension of Standing Orders. Accordingly, the Council agreed to proceed with suspension of Standing Orders to allow consideration of a proposal for a Council Tax rebate. Councillor Hill, seconded by Councillor Larsen, moved that a further report on the proposed Our Places, Our Communities Fund to be brought to Council for further consideration as outlined in the original Cabinet Decision of 2nd June 2026. Members asked questions of clarification of the movers of the motion. Thereafter, Councillor Cullinane, seconded by Councillor Foster, moved an amendment as follows: “In passing its budget, the Council set Council Tax bands at a level required to fund its expenditure requirements, including prioritising investment in areas such as education and roads. The £1.496million underspend should therefore not be spent on another of the administrations pet projects, particularly when the evidence of the last four years shows that these pots of money are not used in a timeous manner. Instead, the underspend should be returned to council taxpayers.” Members asked questions of clarification of the movers of the amendment. Thereafter, Councillor Inglis, seconded by Councillor Stalker, moved the following amendment: That Council agrees to: 1. Reject the proposed allocation of £1.496million of underspend to create an “Our Places, Our Communities Fund”; 2. Agree that the £1.496 million underspend remains within the General Fund unearmarked reserves, to: o Maintain financial resilience; o Mitigate identified risks within the Medium-Term Financial Plan; and o Provide flexibility to respond to in-year financial pressures, within Council services;
Page 5
PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLIC INFORMATION 3. Note the current level of reserves remains at the lower end of the Council’s approved policy (2–4%), and that maintaining this additional balance strengthens the Council’s financial position going into 2026/27. Thereafter, Councillor McLean, seconded by Councillor S. Ferguson, moved the following amendment: “Council agrees to allocate the funds to the capital programme at this time with a view to further developing the programme of works required at Auchengate, with the intent to bring it into public ownership, to bring back for final approval at a future Council.” In terms of Standing Order 6.8, the Provost agreed that the meeting be adjourned at 2.45 p.m. to allow Members to consider the motion and amendments. The meeting reconvened at 3.15 p.m. with the same Members and officers present and in attendance, with the addition of Councillor Robertson. Councillor Cullinane, with the consent of his seconder, intimated that he wished to alter his amendment to read as follows: “Council agrees to use the £1.496 million underspend to deliver additional investment in street cleaning. Council instructs officers to bring a report to the next meeting of full council with an investment plan covering: 1. Investment in Streetscene equipment and operations 2. A local grant fund to support community clean-up organisations, and to help establish new ones.” A point of order was raised by Councillor Gurney, who sought clarification regarding the validity of Councillor Cullinane’s amended proposal. In terms of Standing Order 16.5, and with the agreement of his seconder, Councillor Inglis agreed to withdraw his amendment. Members asked questions of clarification of the movers of the altered amendment. There followed debate and summing up. The Senior Manager (Legal Services) sought clarification from Councillor Burns that she had sufficient information to participate in the vote. Councillor Burns confirmed that she was largely absent during the recess and had sufficient information to participate in the vote.
Page 6
PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLIC INFORMATION On a division and roll call vote, there voted for the first amendment, Councillors Angus-McDonald, Bell, Cullinane, Currie, S. Ferguson, T. Ferguson, Foster, Hume, Inglis, Kerr, McLean, McLaughlan, Montgomerie, D. Reid, Stalker, Stephen and Sweeney (17) and for the motion, Councillors Burns, Collier, Davidson, Dickson, Gurney, Hill, Johnson, Larsen, Macaulay, McClung and McTiernan (11) and Marshall, Murdoch and D.L Reid abstaining and the first amendment became the substantive motion. On a further division and a roll call vote, there voted for the second amendment, Councillors S. Ferguson, and McLean (2) and for the substantive motion, Councillors Angus-McDonald, Bell, Burns, Collier, Cullinane, Currie, Davidson, Dickson, T. Ferguson, Foster, Gurney, Hill, Hume, Inglis, Johnson, Kerr, Larsen, Macaulay, Marshall, McClung, McLaughlan, McTiernan, Montgomerie, Murdoch, D. Reid, Stalker, Stephen and Sweeney (28), Councillor D.L Reid abstaining and the substantive motion was declared carried. Accordingly, the Council agreed as follows: “Council agrees to use the £1.496million underspend to deliver additional investment in street cleaning. Council instructs officers to bring a report to the next meeting of full council with an investment plan covering: 1. Investment in Streetscene equipment and operations 2. A local grant fund to support community clean-up organisations, and to help establish new ones.” 10. North Ayrshire Council Unaudited Annual Accounts 2025/26 Submitted a report by the Head of Service (Finance) on the unaudited Annual Accounts for the year to 31 March 2026. Councillor Larsen, seconded by Councillor Gurney, moved the approval of the recommendations set out in the officer’s report. There being no amendment, the motion was declared carried. Accordingly, the Council agreed to (a) approve the Annual Accounts for 2025/26, subject to audit; (b) note that Audit Scotland plan to complete their audit of the Accounts by mid-September 2026 and will present their annual audit report to the Council’s Audit and Scrutiny Committee thereafter; (c) authorise the Audit and Scrutiny Committee to consider, and approve for signature, the audited annual accounts within the required timeframe.
Page 7
PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLIC INFORMATION 11. North Ayrshire Charitable Trusts: Unaudited Trustees’ Annual Report 2025/26 Submitted a report by the Head of Service (Finance) on the unaudited Trustees’ Annual Report for the year to 31 March 2026, for approval by the Council as trustees. The Trustees’ Annual Report and Financial Statements for all of North Ayrshire Council’s charitable trusts was attached at Appendix 1 to the report. A member asked a question and was provided with further information regarding the current work being undertaken in preparation for the anticipated changes to the Charities Statement of Recommended Practice (SORP). Councillor Larsen, seconded by Councillor Gurney, moved the approval of the recommendations set out in the officer’s report. There being no amendment, the motion was declared carried. Accordingly, the Council agreed, as trustees of the North Ayrshire Council Charitable Trusts, to approve the annual report for 2025/26, subject to audit. 12. Treasury Management and Investment Annual Report 2025/26 Submitted a report by the Head of Service (Finance) on the Treasury Management and Investment Annual Report and Prudential Indicators for 2025/26. The Treasury Management and Investment Annual Report 2025/26 for North Ayrshire Council was set out at Appendix 1 to the report. Councillor Larsen, seconded by Councillor Gurney, moved the approval of the recommendations set out in the officer’s report. There being no amendment, the motion was declared carried. Accordingly, the Council agreed to note (a) the Treasury Management and Investment Annual Report for 2025/26 set out at Appendix 1 to the report; and (b) the Prudential and Treasury Indicators contained therein. Councillor McLaughlan left the meeting at this point. 13. 100% Council Tax Premium on Second Homes – Monitoring Report Submitted a report by the Head of Service (Finance) on the details of the policy impact following one year of implementation of the 100% Council Tax premium for Second Homes within North Ayrshire applied from 1 April 2025. Following an earlier declaration of interest, Councillor Hill left the meeting at this point.
Page 8
PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLIC INFORMATION Members asked questions and were provided with further information in relation to: • the potential adverse impact on Cumbrae and its local economy; • the in-year collection rate of 96.5%; • the removal of the legislative cap that previously restricted councils from charging more than double the standard rate on second homes; • no evidence of significant adverse impacts identified; and • the effect on Arran being more limited than that on Cumbrae. Noted. Councillor Hill rejoined the meeting at this point. 14. Private Sector Housing: North Ayrshire Scheme of Assistance Submitted report by the Executive Director (Communities and Housing) on the updated North Ayrshire Scheme of Assistance, set out at Appendix 1 to the report. Councillor Hill, seconded by Councillor McTiernan moved the approval of the recommendations set out in the officer’s report. In terms of Standing Order 23.1, Councillor Inglis, seconded by Councillor Stalker intimated that they wished to move a suspension of Standing Orders in terms of Standing Order 15.5, to consider a proposal on the establishment of a Mixed Tenure Repairs & Maintenance Grant Fund. On a division and roll call vote, there voted “to proceed” with suspension of Standing Orders, Councillors Cullinane, Currie, S. Ferguson, T. Ferguson, Foster, Hume, Inglis, Kerr, Marshall, McLean, Montgomerie, Murdoch, D. Reid, Stalker, Stephen and Sweeney (16) and “not proceed”, Councillors Angus-McDonald, Bell, Burns, Collier, Davidson, Dickson, Gurney, Hill, Johnson, Larsen, Macaulay, McClung, McTiernan and Robertson (14) D.L. Reid abstaining. The Senior Manager (Legal Services) provided clarification that the threshold of 17 members had not been met for Council to proceed with the suspension of Standing Orders. Accordingly, the Council agreed to approve the updated North Ayrshire Scheme of Assistance set out at Appendix 1 to the report. 15. Three Towns Pride in Place Programme Submitted report by the Executive Director (Communities and Housing) on the proposed Elected Member representation on the Three Towns Neighbourhood Board. Councillor Hill, seconded by Councillor McTiernan, moved the approval of the recommendations set out in the officer’s report. There being no amendment, the motion was declared carried.
Page 9
PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLIC INFORMATION Accordingly, the Council agreed to appoint Councillors Stewart Ferguson, Cameron Inglis, Davina McTiernan and John Sweeney to the Three Towns Neighbourhood Board. In terms of Standing Order 6.8, the Provost agreed that the meeting be adjourned at 4.25 p.m for a short comfort break. The meeting reconvened at 4.40 p.m. with the same Members and officers, present and in attendance, with the exception of Councillors Kerr and Macaulay. Councillor Cullinane rejoined the meeting remotely at this point. 16. Questions In terms of Standing Order 14, submitted: (1) a question by Angus-McDonald to the Cabinet Member for Health and Social Care in the following terms: “To ask the Cabinet Member how many care packages have been rejected, stopped or removed since the implementation of the ‘Critical Only’ policy?” The Leader of the Council thanked the Member for his question and responded in the following terms: “A total of 54 individual care packages have been ceased since 1st April following the introduction of the Critical Only eligibility policy.” As a supplementary question, Councillor Angus-McDonald referenced a quote by East Ayrshire Council IJB regarding a move to critical only care and asked if the Leader of the Council agreed with the quote? The Leader of the Council confirmed that he agreed with the statement and further advised that the HSCP’s current financial position did not need to be as it was and highlighted the removal of funding allocated to the HSCP in the Labour budget amendment. (2) a question by Councillor Inglis to the Cabinet Member for Education in the following terms: "Given that North Ayrshire school leavers in SIMD deciles 9–10 is noted as being well below the national average in attainment performance, what factors may be contributing to this comparatively lower performance, and what targeted strategies will be implemented to improve outcomes for learners in deciles 9-10?” Councillor Johnson thanked the Member for his question and responded in the following terms: “The average total number of tariff points indicate that whilst our SIMD 9&10 leavers are attaining a breadth of qualifications which is better than the virtual comparator - a national benchmarking tool that allows comparison of school performance with statistically similar schools based on shared characteristics - the types of courses
Page 10
PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLIC INFORMATION and the passes associated with those courses are not providing a higher number of tariff points. For those who left school in June 2025 from SIMD 9&10, they have performed as follows regarding key attainment measures: • At least 1 qualification at Level 5 – 98.0% compared to VC of 96.7% • At least 1 qualification at Level 6 – in line with the VC at 85% • At least 5 qualifications at Level 6 – 63% compared to VC of 62% • At least 6 qualifications at Level 6 – 54% compared to VC of 49%. Maximising the opportunity to attain at a learner’s highest level can be managed through course choices and appropriate learner pathways. For example, undertaking an Advanced Higher in a subject area will support increased number of tariff points (a “C” pass at Advanced Higher attracts 400 tariff points compared to 204 at Higher “A” pass). However, learners may choose to undertake additional Highers rather than pursue more specialised study at Advanced Higher level in order to keep their future study options as broad as possible.” (3) a question by Councillor McLean to the Leader of the Council in the following terms: “Does the leader of the council believe that the engagements attended by the Provost are appropriate?” “The Leader of the Council thanked the Member for his question and advised that the Provost does an excellent job of making every resident of North Ayrshire feel included, expressed his admiration for her in that regard, and added that he was proud to have her as Provost. As a supplementary question, Councillor McLean referred to an engagement attended by the Provost with representatives of the Chinese Consulate and asked the Leader of the Council whether the necessary precautions had been taken to guard against any untoward approaches, attempts to influence or exert pressure, and whether staff were appropriately aware? Following response, on a point of order, Councillor McLean advised that comments made by the Leader of the Council were unacceptable. A further point of order was raised by Councillor Larsen, seeking clarification on the relevant Standing Order being referenced by Councillor McLean. The Leader of the Council subsequently withdrew his comment. The Leader of the Council advised that members of the Chinese community were welcome in North Ayrshire, referencing the exemplary conduct of the Provost.
Page 11
PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLIC INFORMATION (4) a question by Councillor Todd Ferguson to the Cabinet Member for Education in the following terms: “What steps is the Cabinet Member taking to ensure North Ayrshire children benefit from the SNP Government’s promised free school bags scheme?” Councillor Johnson thanked the Member for his question and responded in the following terms: “The Scottish Government has indicated its intention to introduce a national free school bags scheme. Details of the proposal and associated delivery mechanisms have not yet been issued to local authorities. However, we continue to engage through national networks, including COSLA and ADES, to support our understanding of the current picture and ensure that North Ayrshire is well placed to maximise the benefits for our children once the scheme is confirmed. In the interim, we remain focused on ensuring that no child is disadvantaged due to financial barriers through a range of supports already in place locally.” As a supplementary question, Councillor Todd Ferguson asked the Cabinet Member if she agreed that it was not appropriate to raise expectations of children and families through high-profile policy announcements unless supported by a clear, funded and deliverable plan to meet those commitments in North Ayrshire? Councillor Johnson advised that active engagement with national policy development through COSLA, ADES and direct dialogue with the Scottish Government, to seek clarity on delivery expectations, funding levels, and timescales were steps required as further details emerge. (5) a question by Councillor Hume to the Cabinet Member for Education in the following terms: "The adverts to recruit new school crossing patrollers to implement February’s budget decisions are now live. Given the tight timeframe between the adverts going live and the start of the school term, what will the administration do to implement the councils budget decisions if they fail to recruit to every position before the start of the school year?” Councillor Johnson thanked the Member for her question and responded in the following terms: “We are doing everything we can to ensure a successful round of recruitment, and information regarding the vacancies is being disseminated through various channels. Job vacancies are promoted via the Council’s social media channels with a direct link to North Ayrshire’s recruitment platform - My Job Scotland. The recruiting service has also made existing staff aware of the forthcoming vacancies as multi-post working is common within the service. Information is also being shared with Parent Councils to disseminate within local communities.”
Page 12
PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLIC INFORMATION (6) a question by Councillor Marshall to the Cabinet Member for Communities, Housing and the Islands in the following terms: “As part of the Pride in Place impact fund award for North Ayrshire and with the approach agreed at cabinet in January 2026 Officers of the council identified projects in the North Coast Ward to the value of £308,000. These were almost exclusively associated with Council services. Were Members of the North Coast invited to make suggestions for projects and if so what were their suggestions and if so why not?” Councillor Hill thanked the Member for his question and responded in the following terms: “The Pride in Place Impact Fund was allocated across the four localities of North Coast, Arran, Garnock Valley and Kilwinning. The funding was distributed by population, with the North Coast receiving a total of £514,000. To align with the short funding timescales and to ensure co-ordinated delivery, 60% of the funding was allocated for Council-led projects. In the North Coast Locality, this is £308,000. The remaining £206,000 is allocated for community projects, through a competitive grant fund. The Regeneration Service undertook a cross-service expression of interest process for the Council-led project element, and proposals were shared with ward members in each of the four localities for their feedback. The Pride in Place Impact Fund will also be the subject of a future report to Cabinet to provide further updates on both the Community and Council-led projects.” As a supplementary question, Councillor Marshall asked why local members were not consulted? Councillor Hill advised this would be addressed going forward although would not apply to the funding agreed at Council today to operate the clean-up services. (7) a question by Councillor McLean to the Cabinet Member for Health and Social Care in the following terms: “To ask the Cabinet Member for Health and Social Care: How many incidents of racism have been a) alleged against staff in the social work department, b) led to an investigation and c) been founded and lead to disciplinary action, and d) what was that disciplinary action over the past 5 years?” Councillor Gurney thanked the Member for his question and responded in the following terms:
Page 13
PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLIC INFORMATION “The information requested by the member is not held in a way in systems which would allow the number of incidents to be reported. However the HSCP would offer assurance that any allegations or incidents of racism would be treated seriously and appropriately in line with North Ayrshire Council’s Code of Conduct and Disciplinary procedures. All registered social service workers and employers in Scotland are bound by the SSSC Codes of Practice. The Scottish Social Services Council (SSSC) treats racism and discrimination as severe breaches of its professional standards, which can lead to Fitness to Practice investigations, suspension or permanent removal from the register.” Councillor Stalker left the meeting at this point. (8) a question by Councillor Todd Ferguson to the Cabinet Member for Green Environment and Economy in the following terms: "What assessment has the Cabinet Member made of the economic, environmental and infrastructure impacts of proposed data centre developments in North Ayrshire?” Councillor Collier thanked the Member for his question and responded in the following terms: “The assessment of such developments is through the planning process. There are currently no live planning applications for data centre developments in North Ayrshire and, as such, no formal assessment of the economic, environmental or infrastructure impacts of proposed development has been undertaken at this stage. However, any future proposals will be subject to a robust statutory assessment process. This includes consideration against the Development Plan—comprising National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) and the Council’s Local Development Plan— as well as environmental assessment requirements, including Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) where applicable. EIA considers a range of factors including Energy & Climate, Water Environment, Air Quality, Noise, Land & Soils, Biodiversity, Population & Human Health, Traffic & Transport, Landscape & Visual, Material Assets & Infrastructure, Cultural Heritage and Cumulative Effects. An EIA Scoping Report was submitted to the Council in February 2026 in respect of a potential development at Hunterston. The Council, in consultation with statutory bodies, has determined that any future planning application for that proposal would require a full EIA, with the scope of assessment defined through that process. NPF4 recognises the potential national significance of “green” data centres and sets out relevant considerations, including renewable energy use, energy efficiency, water consumption and heat re-use. These factors, alongside wider infrastructure capacity and local impacts, would form a core part of any assessment.
Page 14
PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLIC INFORMATION Any future planning application will be subject to statutory consultation and must provide sufficient information to enable full consideration of all material impacts, including economic benefits, environmental effects and infrastructure requirements, before any decision was taken.” As a supplementary question, Councillor Todd Ferguson referenced the 2 potential data centres proposed for North Ayrshire and asked if we were taking a proactive approach to ensure that all necessary strategic testing was undertaken moving forward? Councillor Collier advised that any future planning applications require to give 12 weeks’ notice to the Council as the Planning Authority, with strict pre-applications consultations with the public, including a minimum of two public meetings. Councillor Collier further advised that views of the community would be taken into account on any applications and referred to the global impact of data centres. (9) a question by Councillor Foster to the Cabinet Member for Communities, Housing and the Islands in the following terms: "Is the Forum site in Irvine now safe?” Councillor Hill thanked the Member for his question and responded in the following terms: “The Forum site is in the final stages of being made safe and the area is anticipated to be reopened to the public and adjacent businesses before the end of July 2026.” As a supplementary question, Councillor Foster asked what the plans were for cost recovery given the Forum site was privately owned? Councillor Hill advised that North Ayrshire Council would take all possible steps to recover any sums available. (10) a question by Councillor Marshall to the Cabinet Member for Education in the following terms: "In March 2026 I raised the issue of the continual rise in case of violence and aggression in NAC schools and was assured that our " aim is to ensure safe inclusive learning environments where aggression and violence and neither tolerated nor normalised and where the well-being of pupils and staff is paramount” For the edification and consolation of School Staff can the Cabinet Member give three examples of aggressive and violent behaviours in schools which cross acceptable boundaries naming the boundary in each and also in each case what are the Consequences?” Councillor Johnson thanked the Member for his question and responded in the following terms:
Page 15
PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLIC INFORMATION “Examples of unacceptable behaviour might include verbal abuse, physical assault, destruction on property, aggression and intimidation. However, it would be neither helpful nor responsible to map these to specific consequences, as incidents can vary significantly in nature, severity, context, age and stage of the child or young person, and any additional support needs or other relevant circumstances. A simplistic list risks creating confusion rather than clarity. The key point is that consequences are not optional where aggression or violence occurs, but neither should they be treated as one-size-fits-all. When used effectively, consequences are proportionate, predictable and tailored to the individual child. Our responsibility is to ensure that every incident is taken seriously, responded to appropriately, and followed through in a way that protects staff, supports children and young people, and maintains order and safety in our schools.” Councillor Davidson left the meeting at this point. (11) a question by Councillor McLean to the Cabinet Member for Health and Social Care in the following terms: "How many of North Ayrshires Social Work policies had to be revised or changed after the Scottish Government's anti-racism action plan?” The Leader of the Council thanked the Member for his question and responded in the following terms: “While the Scottish Government’s Anti-Racism Action Plan for the Social Work Sector (2025–27) provides a clear national direction, the action plan outlines the need for enhanced learning and cultural changes rather than policy amendments. Our existing framework is already underpinned by equality and human rights legislation, alongside local equality outcomes and guidance, as well as workforce adherence to the SSSC Codes of Practice and the Health and Social Care Standards, which set clear expectations around dignity, respect, inclusion and non- discrimination. In this context, the emphasis locally has been on strengthening how these standards are applied in practice. Our current anti racist practice training supports this by building awareness, encouraging reflection on bias and privilege, and promoting culturally responsive, inclusive approaches in daily practice.” As a supplementary question, Councillor McLean asked if the Leader of the Council agreed that the Social Services department and its staff by extension were not institutionally or structurally racist? The Leader of the Council advised that the Council has a statutory role, as does the Chief Social Work Officer, including responsibility for professional practice as raised by the Member. The Leader further advised that the Chief Social Work Officer had not raised any concerns in this regard and remained focused on ensuring the delivery of services in a legally and ethically compliant manner in North Ayrshire. Councillor D.L Reid left the meeting at this point.
Page 16
PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLIC INFORMATION (12) a question by Councillor Todd Ferguson to the Cabinet Member for Communities, Housing and the Islands in the following terms: "What confidence does the Cabinet Member have that the Scottish Government’s ferry replacement programme is delivering value for money for North Ayrshire residents?” Councillor Hill thanked the Member for his question and advised that the matter was not within the control of North Ayrshire Council. He noted that the Scottish Government, Transport Scotland, CalMac and Caledonian Maritime Assets Limited (CMAL) were now working on a ferry replacement plan, and that the acquisition of Ardrossan Harbour had now taken place. He further advised that works on the new ferry slip at Cumbrae were well underway, including the provision of a waiting room and toilets. The Largs to Cumbrae route would also benefit from the ferry replacement programme as additional vessels come into service Councillor Hill further advised that he was confident a robust ferry service would be in place in the future and expressed hope that the service would be significantly improved over the next year. As a supplementary question, Councillor Todd Ferguson urged the Cabinet Member to use whatever influence was available to impress upon the relevant bodies the need to begin delivering for island communities. Councillor Hill advised that the Council would continue to press for new and improved services for island communities. (13) a question by Councillor Montgomerie to the Cabinet Member for Communities, Housing and the Islands in the following terms: "To get an update on the dashboard for housing allocations?” Councillor Hill thanked the Member for his question and responded in the following terms: “As advised at the Council meeting on 17 September 2025, housing officers have been progressing the development of a Housing Demand and Allocations Dashboard, which will enable North Ayrshire Common Housing Register applicants to view the number and location of housing allocations made in their areas of interest. The dashboard is at the final stages of development and is currently being validated by the Council’s Common Housing Register team. In relation to public access, the North Ayrshire Housing Register Strategic Working Group will meet again on 25 June, to formally agree the approach and timescales for publishing the housing demand and allocations information on a regular basis.
Page 17
PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLIC INFORMATION Subject to partners’ agreement at the meeting on 25 June, it is anticipated that the initial 2025/26 information will be published on the NAHR website during August 2026.” As a supplementary question, Councillor Montgomerie asked how many applicants had received discretionary points in the last 3 years, the governance arrangements in place for approving the awards and would information about any award of discretionary points be incorporated into the proposed dashboard? Councillor Hill advised that North Ayrshire Council does not award discretionary points to Housing applications, points were awarded based on assessed housing need in line with approved housing allocations policy. Councillor Hill further advised that Group 2 was used for applicants with an agreed strategic housing need, and that all applications placed in Group 2 required approval from the Head of Service or a designated Senior Manager for Registered Social Landlord (RSL) partners. He noted that there were currently 36 applicants in Group 2, comprising 13 cases not covered by policy, 5 subject to demolition, 1 foster parent in North Ayrshire, 2 requiring care and support following discharge from hospital, 1 requiring care and support following discharge from another institution, and 14 requiring care and support on leaving care. Councillor Montgomerie left the meeting at this point. (14) a question by Councillor Marshall to the Cabinet Member for Health and Social Care in the following terms: "The Health and Social Care Partnership has made the decision to only fund constituents whose need is defined as “critical”. Can you please define “critical”? The Leader of the Council thanked the Member for his question and responded in the following terms: “The Integration Joint Board made the decision on 13th March 2026 to implement a revised Eligibility Policy for adult social care services establishing a Critical Only funding threshold for ongoing supports. The Policy came into effect from 1st April. The definition of Critical is included within the policy: By Critical Risk this means the presence of indicators that there are major risks to an individual’s independent living or health and well-being and likely to call for the immediate or imminent provision of social care services such as: • immediate/likely danger to life or serious deterioration in health/safety; • serious self-neglect or inability to carry out vital personal care where no safe alternative exists; • severe risk of abuse/harm or exploitation requiring urgent protective action; • breakdown of essential care/support arrangements leading to unsafe situation; • immediate risk of admission to hospital/care home that could be avoided only through urgent provision of support.
Page 18
PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLIC INFORMATION This applies from 1st April 2026 to all new assessments and to existing service users at their next review.” “As a supplementary question, Councillor Marshall asked whether the Leader of the Council agreed that the information should be made widely available to the public in order to manage expectations? The Leader of the Council advised that all individuals in receipt of care had been fully informed of the current position. (15) a question by Councillor McLean to the Leader of the Council in the following terms: "Can the Leader of the Council explain and advise on why you have instigated an investigation into complaints regarding the Vineburgh community centre, its SLA and management?” The Leader of the Council thanked the Member for his question and advised that, due to the ongoing investigation, he was unable to comment further. As a supplementary question, Councillor McLean what were the terms and scope of the investigation? The Leader of the Council advised he was unable to comment on the matter. (16) a question by Councillor Todd Ferguson to the Leader of the Council in the following terms: "Does the Leader believe his administration’s decision to vote against granting the Freedom of North Ayrshire to The Royal Regiment of Scotland reflected local opinion?” The Leader of the Council thanked the Member for his question and advised that it would not be appropriate to grant a blanket honour to any organisation, adding that he believed this view would be supported by the public. As a supplementary question, Councillor Todd Ferguson referred to the work undertaken by the Royal Regiment of Scotland in North Ayrshire and asked whether the Leader of the Council agreed that the contribution of Armed Forces personnel, both serving and veterans, was something North Ayrshire should be proud of? The Leader of the Council advised that his own father had served in the Second World War and that he would not question anyone’s Armed Forces service. He further advised that the issue was not about the organisation itself, but about the appropriateness of granting blanket honours.
Page 19
PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLIC INFORMATION (17) a question by Councillor Currie to the Cabinet Member for Communities, Housing and the Islands in the following terms: "What progress has been made on the redevelopment of Ardrossan Harbour since the harbour was brought into public ownership?” Councillor Hill thanked the Member for his question and responded in the following terms: “The Harbour was brought into public ownership on 18 March 2026 and is now managed by Caledonian Marine Assets Limited. We understand that their immediate focus has been on three areas. Firstly, the transfer of statutory harbour authority rights and obligations from Ardrossan Harbour Company Limited to CMAL. This was achieved via a Harbour Revision Order approved by Scottish Ministers which took effect on 17 June 2026. Secondly, a programme of initial works to help secure the continued operation of the harbour while preparatory work is undertaken for redevelopment, including: i. Mooring bollard refurbishment ii. Various fencing and gate installations including low-level pedestrian barriers iii. Concrete repairs to copes on the Arran Berth iv. Replacement of lifebuoy equipment v. Replacement of selected quay ladders (underway w/c 15 Jun 2026) vi. Replacement of berthing fenders on Arran Berth and Winton Pier Thirdly, reviewing previous designs with CalMac to assess their continued suitability and preparing to procure design services. Subject to confirming the preferred marine design, they will progress design work for wider aspects of the site including the terminal building, passenger access, civil engineering works etc. and initiate the various licensing and consenting processes required. In addition, they have agreed Heads of Terms with Clyde Marina for a lease to facilitate its continued use of the boatyard on a long-term basis; this allows use of some of the space temporarily to support the redevelopment. CMAL and Transport Scotland attended CalMac’s recent in-person consultation event on Arran and answered questions from residents about the approach and their hopes and concerns for the Ardrossan ferry terminal. Further sessions will be held in Ardrossan and on the island later in the year to give the public and key stakeholders the chance to review plans once prepared.” As a supplementary question, Councillor Currie asked if there were plans for the Harbour working group to meet in the near future?
Page 20
PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLIC INFORMATION Councillor Hill advised that Caledonian Maritime Assets Limited (CMAL) would shortly establish a reference group, which would include representation from the Council to support joint interests, and that Councillor Currie would be advised once a date for the meeting had been set. (18) a question by Councillor Marshall to the Cabinet Member for Health and Social Care in the following terms: "Can the Cabinet Member update me for both the Care at Home Service and Care Home placements the numbers that: 1. are receipt of each service 2. are on a waiting list to be assessed for each service 3. are on a waiting list having been assessed for each service” The Leader of the Council thanked the Member for his question and responded in the following terms: “The numbers of service users are noted below: 1. are receipt of each service: - Care at Home Service Users 1,826 and Care Home Placements 800 2. are on a waiting list to be assessed for each service: - 295 people awaiting a new social care assessment, the assessment would determine if eligibility criteria met and the care plan recommended, ie this could be care at home or care home. New referrals for assessment are received on a daily basis. 3. are on a waiting list having been assessed for each service: - Care at Home 148 and Care Home Placements 72 This includes all individuals whether in the community or hospital.” As a supplementary question, Councillor Marshall asked about the projected trajectory of the figures over the next 12 months? The Leader of the Council advised he would be unable to comment on this. (19) a question by Councillor Murdoch to the Cabinet Member for Finance in the following terms: "Can the Cabinet Member please provide details of any occasion when the SNP Cabinet have not accepted North Ayrshire Council Officers Legal Advice?” Councillor Larsen thanked the Member for his question and advised that any discussions between Cabinet and Officers were confidential, and she would be unable to comment further on this.
Page 21
PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLIC INFORMATION As a supplementary question, Councillor Murdoch asked whether it was appropriate for Elected Members to be challenged when they followed legal advice from Council officers that a funding application did not satisfy the award criteria? On a point of order by Councillor Larsen in terms of Standing Order 14.4, it was advised that the supplementary question must arise directly from the answer given to the original question. Councillor Montgomerie rejoined the meeting remotely as this point. (20) a question by Councillor Marshall to the Cabinet Member for Finance in the following terms: "One notes the decline in business employment and the continued deterioration in the retail environment in our town centres. For each of the financial years 2025/26 and 2026/27 can the Member list the total rateable value for Businesses in North Ayrshire, the poundage applied and the total amount of rates billed for collection?” Councillor Larsen thanked the Member for his question and responded in the following terms: “The total rateable value for businesses in North Ayrshire for 2025/26 was £94.2million and £94.4million for 2026/27. In 2025/26 the poundage applied was across 3 rateable value thresholds, including 49.8p for properties with a rateable value of up to £51,000, 55.4p for properties with a rateable value between £51,001 and £100,000 and 56.8p for properties with a rateable value of more than £100,000. In 2026/27 the poundage levels reduced to 48.1p, 53.5p and 54.8p across the same rateable value thresholds. When applying the poundage levels to the rateable values across all North Ayrshire businesses, the gross billing amount for rates totalled £51.1million in 2025/26 and £49.5million in 2026/27. These figures do not include the various reliefs that are available for businesses, including Small Business Bonus Scheme Relief. From the Scottish Government publication of non-domestic rates reliefs at the end of November 2025, approximately 75% of properties in North Ayrshire receive relief and this represents around 26% of the total rates bill.” As a supplementary question, Councillor Marshall asked whether the Cabinet Member would consider introducing a one-year rates relief scheme for new retail businesses that do not qualify for the Small Business Bonus Scheme? Councillor Larsen advised that policy was not set by the Council, noting that rateable values were determined by the Assessor and poundage by the Scottish Government, and accordingly the Council had no control over the policy. On a point of order, Councillor Gurney, sought clarification on the participation by remote attendees. The Provost requested that Councillor Montgomerie rejoin the meeting once appropriate to do so. Councillor Montgomerie declined to leave the meeting and remained as a remote participant.
Page 22
PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLIC INFORMATION (21) a question by Councillor Murdoch to the Cabinet Member for Green Environment and Economy in the following terms: "Can the Cabinet Member please provide an update on what is planned for the old Brisbane Primary School in Largs?” Councillor Collier thanked the Member for his question and responded in the following terms: “The site is currently classified as a surplus property asset and is being managed accordingly by the Council’s Property Management & Investment service. Following confirmation that the business case for the potential self-build project was not viable, the site has previously been identified within the Council’s potential capital receipt programme and is currently under consideration as part of the Council’s ongoing review of land and property. Should any proposals for the future use of the site be developed, these will be subject to the appropriate governance processes, including Member consideration where required. In the meantime, the Council is taking appropriate steps to ensure the site remains safe and appropriately maintained through the instruction of grounds maintenance works via Streetscene, including grass cutting and general site upkeep, with operatives mobilised as required.” As a supplementary question, Councillor Murdoch asked whether the Cabinet Member agreed that the self-build project had never been viable and that the opportunity presented by this prime site should be maximised? Councillor Collier advised that the build project was disappointing but had been interrupted by COVID-19 and that a post-COVID assessment determined that the project was not financially viable and was no longer an option. She further advised that a review was currently being undertaken to assess the land value and maximise the potential of the site, with any proposals to be brought forward in due course. Councillor Robertson left the meeting at this point.
Page 23
PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLIC INFORMATION 17. Motions In terms of Standing Order 15, submitted: (1) a motion by Councillor Foster, seconded by Councillor Hume, in the following terms: “That full council agrees that there will be a full review of the capital programme during the 2027/28 budget process. To prepare the review, including any lessons learned and learn from previous mistakes, council instructs officers to bring a report to full council detailing every delayed and overbudget capital project over this term (starting May 2022), and the impact this has had on financing the programme”. Members asked questions of clarification of the movers of the motion. At the invitation of the Provost, the Chief Executive provided clarification on the budget process and the arrangements undertaken during consultation with Elected Members. As an amendment, Councillor Larsen, seconded by Councillor Collier, moved the direct negative. There followed debate and summing up. On a division and roll call vote, there voted for the amendment, Councillors Burns, Collier, Dickson, Gurney, Hill, Johnson, Larsen, McClung, McTiernan (9) and for the motion, Councillors Angus-McDonald, Bell, Cullinane, Currie, S. Ferguson, T. Ferguson, Foster, Hume, Inglis, Marshall, McLean, Murdoch, D Reid, Stephen and Sweeney (15) and the motion was declared carried. On a point of order, Councillor Gurney sought clarification regarding Councillor Montgomerie’s participation in the vote. The Provost confirmed that Councillor Montgomerie’s vote would not be taken into account. Accordingly, the Council agreed as follows: That full council agrees that there will be a full review of the capital programme during the 2027/28 budget process. To prepare the review, including any lessons learned and learn from previous mistakes, council instructs officers to bring a report to full council detailing every delayed and overbudget capital project over this term (starting May 2022), and the impact this has had on financing the programme. 18. Provost’s Closing Remarks The Provost closed the meeting by wishing Members a good break over the summer recess. The meeting ended at 5:45 p.m.