Democracy Spraffa

Agenda Document Pack - Community Planning Board - 11/02/2026

Moray Council · 11 February 2026
Back to Community Planning Board — 11 February 2026 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Community Planning Board 
Wednesday, 11 February 2026 
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Meeting of the Community Planning Board is to be
held at Committee Room, Council Office, High Street, Elgin, IV30 1BX on
Wednesday, 11 February 2026 at 14:00. 
BUSINESS 
1.  Sederunt 
2.  Minute of the meeting held 26 November 2025  5 - 12 
3.  Whole Systems Approach - Physical Activity (Update) and Healthy
Weight (New)
Report by Executive Director Education Housing and Communities, and
Consultant in Public Health, NHS Grampian 
13 -
126 
4.  Update on Poverty in Moray
Report by Elizabeth Robinson, Consultant in Public Health, NHS
Grampian 
127 -
142 
5.  Director of Public Health Annual report 2024-25
Report by Professor Shantini Paranjothy, Director of Public Health 
143 -
146 
6.  Place Director and Community Planning Partnership Charter
Report by Chief Executive, Moray Council 
147 -
150 
7.  Health and Transportation Action Plan (2024-2029)
Report by Timothy Mackay, Service Manager Transportation 
151 -
158 
8.  Wildfire Update
Verbal Update by Head of Operations and Environment, Moray Council 
9.  AOCB 
Page 1

Page 2

Page 2

Page 3

THE MORAY COUNCIL 
Community Planning Board 
SEDERUNT 
Councillor Kathleen Robertson  (Chair)
Councillor Amber Dunbar  (Depute Chair)  
Ms Connie Calvo  (Member)
Ms Karen Greaves BEM  (Member)
Councillor Sandy Keith  (Member)
Councillor Scott Lawrence  (Member)
Ms Jackie Maclaren  (Member)
Councillor Marc Macrae  (Member)
Mr Grant Moir  (Member)
Ms Shantini Paranjothy  (Member)
Mr David Reid  (Member)
Mr Dennis Robertson  (Member)
Chief Superintendent Kate Stephen  (Member)
Councillor John Stuart  (Member)
Ms Caroline Webster  (Member)
Mr Andrew  Wright  (Member)
Councillor Bridget Mustard  (Outside Body Appointee)  
Gp Capt Sarah Brewin  (Non-Voting Member)
Ms Sarah Medcraf  (Non-Voting Member)
Lt Col James Walker  (Non-Voting Member)
Clerk Name: Lindsey Robinson
Clerk Telephone: 07966 120593
Clerk Email: committee.services@moray.gov.uk 
Page 3

Page 4

Page 4

Page 5

Minute of Meeting of the Community Planning Board 
Wednesday, 26 November 2025 
Committee Room, Council Office, High Street, Elgin, IV30 1BX 
PRESENT 
Ms Connie Calvo, Councillor Amber Dunbar, Ms Karen Greaves, Councillor Sandy
Keith, Councillor Scott Lawrence, Councillor Marc Macrae, Councillor Bridget Mustard,
Ms Shantini Paranjothy, Mr David Reid, Mr Dennis Robertson, Councillor Kathleen
Robertson, Chief Superintendent Kate Stephen, Mr Andrew Wright. 
SUBSTITUTES 
Sarah Riley-Evans (Community Development Officer, RAF Lossiemouth) attended on
behalf of Group Captain Sarah Brewin.
Sarah Kane (Barrack Staff Officer, 39 Engineers, Kinloss) attended on behalf of
Lieutenant Colonel James Walker.
Gavin Miles (Director of Planning and Place, Cairngorms National Park Authority)
attended on behalf of Grant Moir. 
APOLOGIES 
Group Captain Sarah Brewin, Ms Jackie Maclaren, Ms Sarah Medcraf, Mr Grant Moir,
Councillor John Stuart, Lieutenant Colonel James Walker, Ms Caroline Webster 
IN ATTENDANCE 
The Executive Director Economy, Enterprise and Operations; Executive Director
Education, Housing and Communities; Chief Officer Moray Integrated Joint Board;
Head of Growth, Planning and Climate (Chief Planning Officer); Head of Operations
and Environment; and Lindsey Robinson, Committee Services Officer, all Moray
Council, and the Place Director for Moray, Scottish Government. 
1.         Chair 
Councillor Kathleen Robertson chaired the meeting. 
2.         Minute of meeting held 20 August 2025 
The minute of the meeting of 20 August 2025 was submitted and approved as an
accurate record of the meeting.
Item 2.
Page 5

Page 6

3.         Proposed Schedule of Meetings for 2026 and 2027 
The meeting had before it a report by the Executive Director Education, Housing and
Communities, Moray Council, inviting the Board to agree the schedule of meetings for
2026 and 2027.  
Following consideration, the Board unanimously agreed the meeting dates for 2026
and 2027 as undernoted:  
• Wednesday 11 February 2026
• Wednesday 3 June 2026 
• Wednesday 19 August 2026 
• Wednesday 2 December 2026 
• Wednesday 10 February 2027 
• Wednesday 9 June 2027 
• Wednesday 1 September 2027 
• Wednesday 24 November 2027 
4.         2025-26 Quarter 2 LOIP Performance Monitoring Report 
The meeting had before it a report by the Executive Director Education, Housing and
Communities, Moray Council, informing the Board of the performance against the
Local Outcome Improvement Plan (LOIP) for the period to 30 September 2025.  
During consideration, Councillor Robertson sought assurance that the current
indicators would show outcomes and not just actions.  
In response, the Executive Director Economy, Enterprise and Operations, Moray
Council, advised that some outcomes had a lot of activity, and the indicators were a
good way to show the activity happening on the ground. She further advised that it was
not always easy to link back to the outcomes.  
The Executive Director Education, Housing and Communities, Moray Council, added
that the long-term indicators often had factors out with our control. She further added
that can lead to tracking outputs rather than outcomes but that it would be focused on
further for the next LOIP.  
The Interim Director of Public Health, NHS Grampian, was of the opinion that the
report needed to show an indication of progress towards specific targets and asked if
this could be picked up in future reports.  
This was agreed.  
Councillor Keith sought clarification on whether the focus of the childcare
development was primarily on the hard-to-reach groups.  
In response, the Executive Director Economy, Enterprise and Operations, Moray
Council, advised that it was a targeted approach towards supporting those not in work
to find employment.  
The Chief Executive, Moray Council, added that more childcare places would be made
available through different providers and childminder flexibility.
Page 6

Page 7

Following consideration, the Board unanimously agreed to note progress reported in
the templates hyperlinked to the report. 
5.         Wildfires - Notice of Motion 
The meeting had before it a report by the Executive Director Economy, Enterprise and
Operations, Moray Council, inviting the Board to consider the actions arsing from the
Notice of Motion relating to Wildfires submitted to a meeting of Moray Council on 27
August 2025 and agree the next steps.  
Councillor Robertson advised that the draft letter included at Appendix 1 should be
edited by partners and responses collated before the letter is sent to remove any
political slant.  
The Board joined the Chair in thanking the Scottish Fire and Rescue Services (SFRS)
and other agencies for their work during the wildfires.  
Area Commander Wright welcomed the work done by the Cairngorms National Park
Authority (CNPA) but sought clarification on how the by-laws would be policed.  
In response, the Director of Planning and Place, CNPA, advised that policing of the by-
laws would be at priority, high visitor areas, as they could not be everywhere.  
Chief Superintendent Stephen added that policing the by-law would be a geographical
challenge and would require the public and CNPA rangers to report it to Police
Scotland.  
The Head of Operations and Environment, Moray Council, was of the opinion that the
benefits to the by-laws were clear, but enforcement would be difficult. She added that
to form an action plan there would need to be commitment from partners to the action
points raised in the notice of motion.  
Councillor Robertson advised that the action points should be taken in order to get an
idea of where partners were on each of them. She added that action 1 should be
looked at by partners and also include Scottish Land and Estates (SLE), renewable
energy companies, RAF, and Army, and should be viewed form Moray as a whole.  
The Scottish Government Place Director for Moray was of the opinion that a summit
discussing local issues was a good starting point. He advised that debriefs were
happening at Government level with the SFRS and other agencies and that would feed
into a national Wildfire Strategic Plan. He further advised that prevention was key and
that the feedback from the public awareness campaigns and wildfire summit could be
feedback into the local summit.  
Councillor Robertson and the Chief Executive, Moray Council, advised the Board and
the Scottish Government Place Director for Moray that Moray Council had not been
invited to any of the Scottish Government wildfire discussions.  
The Scottish Government Place Director for Moray advised that he would take that
back to the team involved.  
Page 7

Page 8

The Director of Planning and Place, CNPA, stated that although CNPA were the first to
introduce by-laws, they would have liked to have seen a national approach. He added
that it was a bigger regional issue rather than just local.  
The Head of Operations and Environment, Moray Council, stated that it was an issue
that affects us on a local, regional and national level but action needs to start
somewhere and suggested that the Scottish Government provide an update as to the
national plan, as the agenda for any local summit would be informed by the direction
of the Scottish Government.  
Area Commander Wright was of the opinion that a summit in early spring would be
more beneficial to allow work to get underway before the warmest of the weather
began. He was also of the opinion that the letter being sent should be delayed until
after the Scottish Government update has been received.  
The Chief Executive, Moray Council, invited the Scottish Government to attend the
summit and present their plan and speak to local partners.  
The Scottish Government Place Director for Moray stated that he was happy to support
what had been suggested and would provide an update for the clerk to circulate.  
The Interim Director of Public Health, NHS Grampian, advised that public and
environmental health could feed into the summit by supporting any communication on
prevention and providing psychological support for those affected by the wildfires.  
The Area Manager Moray and Orkney, Skills Development Scotland (SDS) sought
clarification on whether learning had been looked at from other local authorities.  
The Director of Planning and Place, CNPA, advised that Moray was the first local
authority to look at this.  
Area Commander Wright added that Aberdeenshire Council have asked questions
around it but have not tested anything yet.  
Councillor Lawrence was of the opinion that prevention should be a large part of the
strategy and that every agency should be working on a communication strategy.  
The Chair of the Moray Integration Joint Board (MIJB) suggested that Dumfries and
Galloway could share their experiences of the wildfires with us and that he agreed that
the summit should be held earlier in the year.  
The Chair of the MIJB left the meeting at this juncture.  
The Scottish Government Place Director for Moray advised that it was colleagues in
environment and justice who were taking this forward, but he would ask the question.  
The Chief Executive, Moray Council, asked the Head of Operations and Environment,
Moray Council, to also check with her networks.  
The Director of Planning and Place, CNPA, advised that they had employed a
communications agency to look at how their communication was dealt with and he
added that he would give an update at the summit.
Page 8

Page 9

Following lengthy consideration, the Board unanimously agreed to:  
i. note the notice of motion; and  
ii. support and deliver actions 1 and 2 within the Notice of Motion to hold a summit by
Spring 2026 with all stakeholders affected by the recent wildfires including private
and public agencies to develop an Integrated Wildfire Management Plan for Moray,
and to work with the Park Authority to learn from the work underway in the
Cairngorms;  
iii. delay action 3 until after the summit has taken place; and  
iv. all partners editing the draft letter and comments being collated before the letter is
sent from the Board Chair, as described in action 4.  
6.         Highland and Islands Regional Economic Partnership - Recent Strategic
Developments 
The meeting had before it a report by the Executive Director Economy, Enterprise and
Operations, Moray Council, outlining the progress with delivery of the Highlands and
Islands Regional Economic Strategy (RES) and also providing a short update on
governance changes at Moray Economic Partnership.  
It was agreed that this paper would be heard in conjunction with item 7 “Regional
Transformation Opportunities” as this report concerned raising awareness amongst
Board members of Regional Transformational Opportunities (RTOs) that have the
potential to drive economic growth in Moray and consideration of the role of the Board
and its members in realising these opportunities.  
The Depute Chair of the MIJB left the meeting at this juncture.  
During consideration, Councillor Lawrence sought clarification on how we see the
community benefit as most investment in the area is in infrastructure not people.  
In response, the Executive Director Economy, Enterprise and Operations advised that
the infrastructure needs to be in place to help the community and will provide a lasting
impact of creating more jobs and industry support.  
The Head of Growth, Planning and Climate (Chief Planning Officer), Moray Council,
advised that there would be a paper to committee early next year showing the link to
the Local Development Plan.  
The Area Manager Moray, Highlands and Islands Enterprise (HIE) was of the opinion
that the new RTOs were good, but the existing developments also need to be looked
after. He advised that conversations between partners were needed to ensure that
Moray was a competitive area in its own right so that we can keep people here. He
further advised that there were a lot of unknowns when looking at structure and
process, but the conversations needed to start. He was further of the opinion that
anything undertaken should be a public/private collaboration that linked into the
community wealth building agenda and futureproofed.  
Page 9

Page 10

Councillor Robertson advised that community wealth building was on the agenda for
the next Convention of the Highlands and Islands (CoHI) meeting and that the Moray
Council community wealth building plan needs to be embedded into the wider
partnership.  
The Chief Executive, Moray Council, was of the opinion that the Council community
wealth building plan needs to be expanded to include all partners do that there is one
partnership plan.  
The Area Manager Moray (HIE) suggested a session on community wealth building as a
subject in its own right as each partner will have its own definition. He added that all
partners would be bound by their own governance structures but there should be areas
that everyone could agree on. 
The Interim Director of Public Health, NHS Grampian advised that she would get her
team to make the connection between community wealth building and different NHS
strategies and she would feed back to the Board.  
Councillor Robertson advised that North Ayrshire Council had a video about their
experience and would see if it could be shared with the Board.  
Following consideration, the Board unanimously agreed to:  
i. note the progress to date with the Regional Economic Strategy Delivery Plan;  
ii. note work on going in Moray Economic Partnership and recent governance
changes;  
iii. note Highlands and Islands Regional Transformational Opportunities (RTOs) and
what could be realised in Moray;  
iv. consider the part each member can play in helping to maximise these
opportunities; and  
v. support the Skills Summit for Moray on 4 December 2025. 
7.         Moray Pathways Energy Skills and Workforce Summit 
The meeting had before it a report by the Regional Skills Planning Lead, SDS, providing
an update on the planned Moray Pathways Energy Skills and Workforce Summit to be
held on 4 December 2025 at UHI Moray, in partnership with the Moray Pathways
network and wider stakeholders. The summit is being organised as a place-based
approach to embedding the Highlands and Islands specific Workforce North project –
an action from the May 2025 Convention of the Highlands and Islands (CoHI) in
response to the Regional Transformational Opportunities (HIE, 2025).  
During consideration, Councillor Lawrence sought clarification on whether state
pensionable age was the defining age it used to be with regards to stopping work. He
questioned whether people stop work completely or do they go part time or change
jobs.  
Page 10

Page 11

In response the Area Manager Moray (HIE) advised that it was a bit of everything, and
people do keep working longer. The jobs that will come into the area would be driven by
industry but their needs to be the right curriculum and choices in place to make people
want to come to the area, but working from 16 to 65 is no longer the norm.  
The Area Manager Moray and Orkney (SDS) stated that the population was aging so the
care sector would need to be looked at and also that the population in the area was
declining so partners need to look at how we get people into the area and keep them
here.  
The Chief Executive, Moray Council, was of the opinion that public and private sector
will be competing for the same people, so we need to look into attractive options such
as part time and flexible working. She further stated that young people were no longer
looking for a job for like, they were looking for opportunities around on the job training.  
The Area Manager Moray (HIE) advised that we need to sell the opportunity not just the
job. He further advised that to keep people we need to look at people moving within our
organisations and support the upskilling of staff.  
Following consideration, the Board unanimously agreed to:  
i. note the purpose, structure, and focus of the Moray Skills Summit 2025;  
ii. recognise the Summit as a key action in responding to the Regional Transformation
Opportunities within Moray and the Workforce North Project established via the
Convention of the Highlands and Islands; and  
iii. support ongoing collaboration through the Moray Workforce Group and partners to
deliver agreed outcomes and ensure alignments with regional and national
workforce planning framework. 
8.         AOCB 
Councillor Robertson stated that a report on the partnership approach to attainment
for young people and how the Board can work together to support our young people
will be brought to a future meeting. 
Page 11

Page 12

Page 12

Page 13

REPORT TO: COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD ON WEDNESDAY 11 FEBRUARY
2026
SUBJECT: WHOLE SYSTEMS APPROACH – PHYSICAL ACTIVITY (UPDATE) AND
HEALTHY WEIGHT (NEW) 
BY: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR EDUCATION HOUSING AND COMMUNITIES
& CONSULTANT IN PUBLIC HEALTH, NHS GRAMPIAN 
1. REASON FOR REPORT 
1.1 To provide the Board with an update on the development of the Systems Based
Approach to Physical Activity in Moray and ask Community Planning Partner
leadership teams to embed the priorities of this approach into relevant local and
regional strategies and provide capacity within their teams to support the practical
delivery of this approach. 
1.2 To provide the Board with information on a new Whole Systems Approach model for
Healthy Weight in Moray and request support and endorsement for this approach. 
1.3 To set these programmes within the context of the Scottish Government and COSLA
Population Health Framework for Scotland, published in 2025. 
2. RECOMMENDATION 
2.1  It is recommended that the Community Planning Board;
Item 3.
Page 13

Page 14

i.   Continues to recognise the importance of these programmes in creating and
maintaining good health and preventing ill health, focussing support on the
people and communities who need it the most, and changing systems and
environments to support individuals to stay healthy.
ii.  notes the progress made in relation to the Systems Based Approach to
Physical Activity (which will be branded Active Moray), scrutinise the plan
and strategy content to ensure alignment with strategic outcomes for Moray; 
iii. embed the priorities from the strategy into relevant local and regional
strategies of community planning partners and provide capacity within their
teams to support the practical delivery of Active Moray; 
iv. raise awareness of Health and Social Care Moray’s commitment to lead and
progress a Whole Systems Approach to Healthy Weight; and 
v.  endorse the collaborative intentions of the 2 approaches whilst
acknowledging the separate working groups to drive forward the distinct
actions. 
3. BACKGROUND
3.1 At the meeting of the Community Planning Board on 23 October 2024 the Board
agreed the following (paragraph 7 of the minute refers);
i) note the progress made in relation to developing the Systems Based Approach to
Physical Activity in Moray; 
ii) that Officers would consider looking at a more holistic approach to include
healthy eating and obesity; 
iii) scrutinise the emerging themes and high-level actions to ensure alignment with
strategic outcomes for Moray; and 
iv) encourage and liaise with partners to ensure this approach is embedded within
relevant strategies and plans to ensure a whole system contribution.
4. KEY MATTERS RELEVANT TO RECOMMENDATION 
4.1  Scotland’s Population Health Framework (PHF) 2025–2035 is a ten-year plan,
produced by the Scottish Government and COSLA to improve life expectancy and
Page 14

Page 15

reduce the life expectancy gap by 2035, emphasizing prevention, a whole-system
approach, and cross-sector actions to create healthier food environments and tackle
social determinants of health.
Local partners are expected to use the PHF priorities and actions to inform the
development and delivery of their Local Outcome Improvement Plans.  Improving
healthy weight is one of the two initial priorities for the Population Health Framework. 
This involves:
• developing legislation to improve the food environment
• increasing the availability and affordability of healthy foods
• adopting evidence-based interventions for tackling overweight and obesity
• supporting innovation to improve the health of people affected by obesity-related
conditions, including type 2 diabetes
• supporting wider government priorities such as Good Food Nation, Scottish Dietary
Goals, food security, malnutrition and the just transition to net zero to support
reducing inequalities
A second action is to support the implementation of evidence-based physical activity
policy actions as outlined in the National Physical Activity for Health Framework.
This will involve:
• strengthening collaborative leadership and accountability to actively champion our
vision of a more active Scotland through a whole systems approach
• creating active environments, policies and opportunities across all places of
learning
• prioritising active travel infrastructure and support and encouraging active travel
behaviour
• strengthening access and ensure sustainability of good quality public and green
spaces, green networks, recreational spaces, play and sports amenities
• embedding the provision of appropriate physical activity opportunities and
programmes between NHS Scotland, health practitioners and physical activity
providers
• integrating communications and public education into both national and local
strategies for physical activity
• ensuring that sport and active recreation opportunities target people and
communities where the need is greatest, whilst supporting those who are already
active to remain so
• working towards ensuring that everyday physical activity is supported in workplaces
in Scotland 
Page 15

Page 16

4.2 Since the initial endorsement from the CPB of the Systems Based Approach to
Physical Activity in Moray back in February 2024 and the update report presented in
October 2024, stakeholders have continued to develop the emerging themes and
high-level actions into a tangible action plan. The culmination of this continued work
is the final draft action plan which is available as Appendix 1. 
4.3 Since the last update report, the new Physical Activity for Health framework for
Scotland has been launched with system partners including COSLA, Scottish
Government, sportscotland, Public Health Scotland, Community Leisure UK, Paths
for All, Transport Scotland, and Nature Scot. This framework aligns exactly to the
approach being taken in Moray which will ensure both local and national synergies
and strengthen the potential of success. 
4.4 The action plan has been populated through a stakeholders perspective based on
evidence, research, and local knowledge. It is acknowledged that the content of the
plan is not ideal for public consumption and therefore it was concluded that a
strategy document highlighting the key priorities of the action plan be the
recommended document for publishing into the public domain. For ease of reference
and for national consistency it has been determined to classify this strategy and plan
as ‘Active Moray’ moving forward. The strategy document is available as Appendix 2. 
4.5 In January 2026 the working group have started to engage and connect with the public
on the new strategy through various video reels via support from the Council’s
Communications Officer. The action plan is already underway in regard to
implementation across the various stakeholders. This plan will be an evolving
document that will be reviewed and updated regularly based on stakeholder
feedback and public engagement.
Healthy Weight
4.6 A Steering Group has been guiding this work locally, and progress has been made
following the Leeds Beckett Whole Systems Approach to Obesity method.  The Local
Levers for Diet and Healthy Weight Report is another guiding document being used by
the steering group and is available as Appendix 3.
4.7   The first workshop was delivered in June 2025 where stakeholders began to map the
perceived local causes of obesity, exploring the complex and interconnected social
determinants of health. A second workshop was delivered in September 2025
focusing on mapping current actions to support healthy weight within the system.  A
summary of the progress of the healthy weight approach is captured in Appendix 4.
Page 16

Page 17

4.8    We are now preparing for the next Action Planning Workshop, with the aim of co-
designing a Healthy Weight Action Plan that reflects shared priorities and drives
meaningful change. 
4.9 The Whole Systems approach to healthy weight is governed through the NHS
Grampian Public Health Directorate, however, it is important for the local CPB to be
aware of this new approach.  The draft action plan will be brought back to CPOG/CPB
in due course for noting and final endorsement. 
Collaborative intentions
4.10 As is noted in Appendix 3 physical activity is one of the seven local levers for diet and
healthy weight in Scotland. To avoid duplication, it has been agreed that the Active
Moray action plan will be the reference point of any physical activity components
within the Healthy Weight Action Plan for Moray. A number of stakeholders sit on both
the Active Moray working group and the Healthy Weight steering group so awareness
of both approaches will be monitored.
4.11 A national Good Food Nation Plan will be published in due course and local
authorities, and NHS trusts are required to lead and support the development of local
Good Food Nation Plans. Cognisance of the Healthy Weight Action Plan for Moray will
be required when developing this plan to ensure alignment and avoid duplication.
5. SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS
(a) Corporate Plan and 10 Year Plan (Local Outcomes Improvement Plan (LOIP)) 
Corporate Plan;
Tackle poverty and inequality
Build thriving, resilient, empowered communities
LOIP:
Building a better future for our children and young people in Moray
Empowering and connecting communities
Improving wellbeing of our population
(b) Policy and Legal 
Improving the health and wellbeing of the Moray community through the creation of
an environment that supports healthy eating and physical activity is an integral part of
the local vision, and a national priority.
Page 17

Page 18

(c) Financial implications 
None arising directly from this report. 
(d) Risk Implications and Mitigation 
Failure to endorse and prioritise these whole system approaches will result in
continuing pressures on the economy, sickness absence levels, public services and
our NHS system due to obesity, long-term medical conditions such as diabetes and
coronary heart disease.  Our poverty and health inequalities gap will continue to
worsen.
(e) Staffing Implications 
None are arising directly from this report. 
(f) Property 
None arising directly from this report. 
(g) Equalities/Socio Economic Impact 
The report identifies the importance that physical activity and healthy eating places
on equalities, social inclusion, and impact on our economy. These recommendations
aim to further strengthen our service direction across these 3 priority areas.
(h) Climate Change and Biodiversity Impacts 
None arising directly from this report.
6. CONCLUSION
6.1     The Community Planning Board is asked to;
i. Continue to recognise the importance of these programmes in creating and
maintaining good health and preventing ill health, focusing support on the
people and communities who need it the most, and changing systems and
environments to support individuals to stay healthy.
ii. notes the progress made in relation to the Systems Based Approach to
Physical Activity (which will be branded Active Moray), scrutinise the plan
and strategy content to ensure alignment with strategic outcomes for Moray; 
iii.  embed the priorities from the strategy into relevant local and regional
strategies of community planning partners and provide capacity within their
teams to support the practical delivery of Active Moray;
Page 18

Page 19

iv. raise awareness of Health and Social Care Moray’s commitment to lead and
progress a Whole Systems Approach to Healthy Weight; and 
v. endorse the collaborative intentions of the 2 approaches whilst
acknowledging the separate working groups to drive forward the distinct
actions. 
Author of Report:  Kim Slater (Leisure & Culture Service Manager – Moray Council),
Lisa Taylor (Health Improvement Team Lead, Moray Health &
Social Care Partnership) and Elizabeth Robinson (Consultant in
Public Health, NHS Grampian)
Background Papers: Appendix 1: Active Moray Action Plan
Appendix 2: Active Moray Strategy
Appendix 3: Local Levers for Diet and Healthy Weight
Appendix 4: Reflecting on 2025 progress on Healthy Weight
approach 
Page 19

Page 20

Page 20

Page 21

Active Moray Action Plan 2025-2035
Tasks highlighted in green are short term 2026 priority actions
Tasks highlighted in orange are long term priority actions
1. Active System
Objective: Collaborative actions established, enabling a whole systems approach to physical activity. 
Ref Emerging Action Ref
No.
Tasks (How will it be achieved?) Lead Support Indicator
Evidence Base: Create and strengthen leadership, governance, and accountability for physical activity strategically across the system.
1.1 Strengthen leadership,
governance and
accountability in
relation to physical
activity
1.1.1 Active Moray Strategy & Action Plan is created
and approved by Moray Community Planning
Partnership (CPP) as the oversight governance
document to the systems based approach
Leisure &
Culture
Service
Active Moray
Working
Group &
Stakeholders 
Making
Recovery
Real in Moray
Partnership
Number of adults in
Moray participating in
sport or physical
activity in the
previous 4-week
period: Including
Walking: 87%
(National 82%)
Excluding Walking:
56% (National 51%) 
Baseline data for
participants with
disabilities.
1.1.2 Active Moray Action Plan is adopted by partner
agencies.
All  
1.1.3 Active Moray Action Plan is reported against
every 6mths to CPP.
Leisure &
Culture Service
Manager 
Bi-annual CPP report
produced.
1.1.4 Identify internal and external funding streams
that could support successful delivery of
All  Funding streams and
investment identified.
Item 3.
Page 21

Page 22

areas within systems based approach –
collective investment/resource
1.1.5 Utilise the Actify platform to access tools,
resources, best practice and share best
practice relating to Active Moray 
All  Moray content on
Actify.
1.1.6 Conduct an Integrated Impact Assessment
on the Active Moray strategy and plan
Leisure &
Culture Service
Manager (with
input from all
partners) 
Integrated Impact
Assessment
completed.
Evidence Base: Establish collaborative ways of working via multisectoral partnerships as a mechanism to maximise the impact of resources and
enable the coordinated implementation of action to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour.
1.2 Strengthen cross
policy/partner
cohesion, maximising
the impact of
resources 
1.2.1 Strategic Champions identified to oversee and
challenge the Active Moray working group and
delivery of the action plan and champion the
cross-policy benefits of physical activity to
identify policies/strategies/plans where
physical activity has an evidenced role and
seek opportunities to integrate this over time.
Leisure &
Culture
Service
Manager
Active Moray 
Working
Group &
Stakeholders
Strategic Champions
identified.
1.2.2 Collaborate on any cross over synergies with
the whole systems approach (WSA) on healthy
weight for Moray. Merge relevant sections
across both system approaches for physical
activity/healthy weight.
Health
Improvement
Team
Active Moray
Working
Group &
Stakeholders
Evidence of
collaboration between
the WSA to healthy
weight and Active
Moray.
1.2.3 Scottish Disability Sport (SDS) to support the
embedding of inclusion for participants with
disabilities across all sub-systems of this
approach
SDS  
1.2.4 Engage and connect with the COSLA Sport
and Physical Activity Network and Special
Interest Group as required to ensure national
and local developments are working in
synergy
Leisure &
Culture Service
Manager and
Local Elected
Member
representative  
Evidence Base: Utilise national and local data and evidence to identify priority populations and enable data driven decision making.
Page 22

Page 23

1.3 Develop a
stakeholder map to
understand who is
involved in the
physical activity
system and the
connections between
stakeholders
including outcomes,
actions and
performance
indicators.
1.3.1 Use A Local Information System for Scotland
(ALISS) as the platform to assist with this
stakeholder map. 
Sport & Leisure/Physical Activity asset map
produced to promote/showcase opportunities
available in Moray 
Active Moray
Working Group
Locality
Network 
1.4 Develop and utilise
data/evidence to
better effect to
improve physical
activity levels 
1.4.1 Research group established to look at physical
activity levels in Moray, identify social value
and develop consistent data for ongoing
monitoring.
Moray
Council 
NHS 
National
Partners
Scottish
Government 
Evidence Base: Strengthen policy cohesion and finance mechanisms that enable opportunities aimed at increasing physical activity and reducing
sedentary behaviour.
1.5 Explore how physical
activity could be
integrated into
participatory
budgeting.
1.5.1 Identify opportunities for PB involvement connected
with physical activity 
Moray Council Third Sector 
Page 23

Page 24

2.  Active Health and Social Care
Objective: Physical activity embedded into routine NHS health care and social care services. 
Ref Emerging Action Ref
No.
Tasks (How will it be achieved?) Lead Support Indicator
Evidence Base: Integrate the NHS Physical Activity Pathway into routine healthcare and existing clinical pathways as part of treatment and
rehabilitation for people diagnosed with long term conditions e.g., heart disease, stroke, diabetes, cancer, and mental health conditions, as well as
into the care and services for pregnant women, people with disabilities and older adults.
2.1 Integrate physical
activity into all
relevant clinical
settings including
primary and
secondary care
2.1.1 Social Prescribing models embedded in clinical
settings and Making Every Opportunity Count
(MEOC) Physical Activity Toolkits circulated as
relevant to raise awareness of local activities
Health
Improvement
Team 
Community
Wellbeing and
Development
Team  
2.1.2 Adopt the principles of the Activity Inclusion
Model within the pathway
SDS NHS 
2.1.3 Ensure people with disabilities and those living
with long term health conditions have
interventions in place to engage in the pathway
when involved in clinical services
SDS NHS 
2.2 Develop partnerships
and co-location
opportunities with
health care and
physical activity
providers
2.2.1 
Link SDS member branch with the NHS PA
Pathway to ensure joined up provision/standards
SDS
NHS  
2.2.2 Explore co-location opportunities in Moray for
delivery of health and wellbeing services through
community hub model.  Consideration of public
and voluntary location options.
As required
Moray Council
NHS
Asset Owners  
2.3 Utilise the research,
learning and
development of the
Digital Health &
2.3.1  Promotion and population of Community
connections Moray website and associated
products – ensuring it becomes a well-recognised
guide for all Moray citizens
DHI  
Page 24

Page 25

Innovation (DHI)
programmes 
2.3.2 Expand the Heart of Moray programme wider
across the Local Authority area – engaging with all
relevant partners
DHI
Moray Leisure
Centre (MLC)
Moray Council
NHS  
Evidence Base: Develop partnerships with NHS Scotland and physical activity providers across Scotland to embed the provision of appropriate
physical activity opportunities and programmes for different patient populations.
2.4 Apply the PHS Tiered
Model of Physical
Activity Interventions to
review, design and
deliver appropriate
physical activity
services across Moray.
2.4.1 Use the Community Wellbeing Development
Team as part of the referral pathway to access re-
ablement health groups ran by the community for
the community.  Distribute the activity programme
to wider networks.  Utilise ALISS tool
Community
Wellbeing &
Development
Team
Health and
Social Care
Moray
(HSCM) 
2.4.2 Ensure a range of appropriate opportunities are
available to meet the needs of people with
disabilities and long-term health conditions by
adopting the principles of the Activity Inclusion
Model
SDS  
Evidence Base: Integrate physical activity into pre-service and in-service training for all healthcare and social care staff and associated roles, which
is medics, nurses and allied health professions, healthcare support workers employed by NHS Scotland and all social care staff governed by the
Care Inspectorate.
2.5 Develop and deliver
physical activity
learning to the health
and social care
workforce
2.5.1 Deliver Grow Well Choices Early Years training to
Nursery Nurses and Early Years establishments
Health
Improvement
Team
Education 
Active
Schools 
2.5.2 Identify Physical Activity champions or volunteers
in all Health & Social Care settings to undertake
health walk leader training
Health
Improvement
Team 
Walk Moray
Project  
2.5.3 Learning and development opportunities for allied
health professions around physical activity and
inclusion delivered by Scottish Disability Sport
(SDS) to ensure equality and inclusion underpins
all areas of work
SDS NHS 
Page 25

Page 26

Evidence Base: Implement the learning from the Care Inspectorate Care About Physical Activity Improvement Programme to enable social care
providers to build physical activity into the daily lives of those they support within care settings, residential care homes and care at home.
2.6 Design and deliver
physical activity
referral services
2.6.1 Work with organisations, such as SDS, to provide
clarity on the standards and requirements to
achieve these. 
SDS are currently part of referral programme
within NHSG and can support people with
disabilities to be active – enable and promote this
across Moray
SDS  
2.6.2 Embed the referral standards within all processes
connected to physical activity referral services
All  
2.6.3 Create and establish connections with care
settings and providers to identify physical activity
opportunities 
All through a
single conduit
within working
group   
Page 26

Page 27

3.  Active Sport & Recreation for All
Objective: Active participation in sport and active recreation increased across the life course through
equitable and inclusive access to appropriate places, spaces and services 
Ref Emerging Action Ref
No.
Tasks (How will it be achieved?) Lead Support Indicator
Evidence Base: Provide universally, welcoming, inclusive, affordable, accessible programmes and mass participation events for people of all ages
and abilities across multiple settings; urban and natural environments, community recreation and sports facilities, schools, workplaces and
healthcare settings.
3.1 Provide inclusive,
accessible and
sustainable
programmes and
events 
3.1.1 Active Schools (AS) team continue to offer a
universal programme of free activity sessions for
school aged pupils across Moray, complimented
by events calendar.
AS Team  39% of Moray School
roll involved in
2023/24 programme
(national average
40%) 
3.1.2 Moray Council Sport and Leisure Team and Moray
Leisure Centre continue to provide activities
including swimming, gym and fitness classes via
their Fit Life Membership scheme.
Sport & Leisure
Team
MLC 
Fit Life Memberships
3.1.3 Community participation events such as Parkrun
and Junior Parkrun are supported and progressed.
Park Run
Committee
Active
Schools &
Community
Sport Team
Park run usage stats
3.1.4 Moray Council Club Accreditation scheme
progressed to include all local sport clubs,
promoted via Sport in Moray website.
Leisure &
Culture Service 
30 clubs accredited
as of July 2025
Evidence Base: Prioritise the least active individuals in Moray
3.2 Prioritise the least
active individuals in
Moray
3.2.1 Moray Disability Sport Hub Project plan created
and delivered to improve opportunities for all
Moray residents with disabilities to increase
physical activity levels.  
Community
Sports Hub
Officer
SDS,
Grampian
Disability
Sport, UHI
Moray, Outfit
Moray
SDS national survey -
73% of participants
would like to take part
in more physical
activity.  
Page 27

Page 28

3.2.2 Mental Health Accreditation for Sport project
developed to ensure individuals experiencing
mental health challenges are supported by club
coaches. 
Community
Sport Hub
Officer 
11 coaches from 9
clubs accredited
2024
3.2.3 Further exploration and development of poverty
and sport projects 
All  
3.2.4 Further develop Moray Pride Inclusion Sports Hub
project with UHI Moray
UHI 
Community
Sports Hub
Officer and
Clubs  
3.2.5 Create Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Map for
Active Moray partners – utilising template from
Active Schools and Community Sport
All   
3.3
Support community
based interventions  3.3.1
Walk Moray (collaboration between HIT and
Walking Scotland).  Health Walks available for all
population groups across Moray – elderly,
pregnant, families, school children
Health
Improvement
Team (HIT) 
16 Health Walks
currently operating
Evidence Base: Build workforce capacity; enhance the knowledge, skills and competency of the workforce to engage, motivate and enable, inclusive
and equitable opportunities.
3.4 Build workforce
capacity; enhance the
knowledge, skills and
competency of the
workforce to engage,
motivate and enable,
inclusive and
equitable
opportunities. 
3.4.1 UHI Moray to offer courses from level 5 to degree
level in Sport & Fitness. 
CPD opportunities to be offered in Sports
Psychology and Nutrition.
UHI Moray  UHI Moray stats
3.4.2 Active Schools & Community Sport Team to co-
ordinate coach education programme open to
school staff, volunteers, young leaders and
community club coaches. 
AS & CS Team 
Sport National
Governing
Bodies
UHI Moray 30 courses delivered
in 2023/24 academic
year, with 340
participants.
3.4.3 Provide volunteer and paid workforce with
inclusive learning and development opportunities
to support embedding of inclusion in practice (i.e.
Disability Inclusion Training)
AS & CS Team Sport
National
Governing
Bodies 
Page 28

Page 29

4.  Active Workplaces
Objective: Everyday physical activity enhanced through the workplace 
Ref Emerging Action Ref
No.
Tasks (How will it be achieved?) Lead Support Indicator
Evidence Base - Provide leadership by implementing workplace health initiatives to support employees increase physical activity and reduce
sedentary behaviour, particularly through increasing incidental physical activity during the working day
4.1 Engage employers to
take on a leadership
role to adopt a healthy
workplace model -
that encourages a
holistic approach and
culture to inclusive
physical activity in the
workplace.
4.1.1 Encourage workplaces to sign up to walk at work
award and NHSG Step Count Challenge
All Employers Paths for All 
Chamber of
Commerce 
Moray
Federation of
Small
Businesses 
4.1.2 Support through NHSG Workplace team to be
explored
Health
Improvement
Team  
4.1.3 Develop the cycling culture at workplaces through
the Cycle to Work Scheme, provision of staff pool
bikes (and bike maintenance).  Provide staff
training and deliver led rides.
Council Travel
Planning
Group 
All Employers
Chamber of
Commerce 
Moray
Federation of
Small
Businesses 
4.1.4 Workplaces adopt the principles of the Activity
Inclusion Model to ensure employees with
disabilities access physical activity and sport
opportunities
SDS Chamber of
Commerce 
Moray
Federation of
Small
Businesses 
Page 29

Page 30

Evidence Base – Develop and disseminate guidance and promote implementation of workplace health programmes aimed at increasing physical
activity, reducing sedentary behaviour and promoting incidental physical activity during the working day for employees, in different occupations and
settings, with a priority focus on the least active.
4.2 Develop a Moray
workplace health
programme with tools
and resources
available
4.2.1 Identify and collate tools and resources to support
a workplace embed physical activity
All Chamber of
Commerce 
Moray
Federation of
Small
Businesses 
4.2.2 Populate an online platform for Active Workplaces
on guidance, tools and resources to access as
required
All Chamber of
Commerce 
Moray
Federation of
Small
Businesses 
Evidence Base – Create workplaces that are designed to enable employees and visitors to be physically active in and around the buildings, and
access by pedestrians, cyclists and public transport.                 
Page 30

Page 31

5.  Active Travel
Objective: Active travel behaviour influenced and infrastructure for walking, wheeling, and cycling
organised across Scotland 
Ref Emerging Action Ref
No.
Tasks (How will it be achieved?) Lead Support Indicator
Evidence base: Continue to prioritise investment in walking, wheeling and cycling infrastructure that enables access to destinations and services,
as well as actions that influence active travel behaviour to encourage modal shift.
5.1 Support delivery of
the Moray 5 Year
Active Travel Strategy.
5.1.1 Further develop the Active Travel (AT) network by
increasing the Active Travel network with an extra
5% infrastructure over the next 5 years
Sustainable
Transport
Officer
National/local
partners
Increase the AT
network with an extra
5% infrastructure
over the next 5 years
5.1.2 Develop Active Travel Masterplans for key
settlements over 1,200 in population across
Moray
Sustainable
Transport
Officer
Transport
Development
and Traffic
Teams 
Strategic
Plans and
Development
Team)
Completion of
masterplans for all
communities over
1,200 population
5.1.3 Embed Active Travel opportunities within new
developments through applying Local
Development Plan policies to ensure that
residential streets are designed to encourage
walking and cycling over the use of the private car
by providing well connected, safe and appealing
routes
Scottish
Government 
Transport
Development
and Strategic
Plans and
Development
Team
Sustainable
Transport
Officer 
5.1.4 Encourage and facilitate walking and cycling as
leisure and tourist activities to provide benefits to
health and the local economy through continued
Local and
National
Partners
Sustainable
Transport
Officer
Numbers of
participants at events
and promotional
activities. Cycle
Page 31

Page 32

partnership working with local organisations such
as Outfit Moray, NHS Grampian and Cycling UK. 
Moray to organise events and activities to trial
electric bikes, pedal bikes etc. to promote the
health benefits of cycling and walking to residents
and visitors to the area.
count data from
permanent count
sites.
5.1.5 Provide new/improved cycle parking at key
destinations and transport interchanges in Moray
Sustainable
Transport
Officer 
HITRANS  
5.1.6 Work with local employers (including Moray
Council) and their staff to encourage more
walking and cycling to and from work.
Sustainable
Travel Officer
Staff Travel
Plan Working
group 
National
Partners 
Local
Employers
Results of Moray
Council staff surveys
5.1.7 Work with students and school pupils, staff and
parents to encourage more walking, cycling and
scooting to and from school/further education
through a program of work including Bikeability,
School Travel Plans, Daily Mile and School Route
Audits.
Sustainable
Transport
Officer 
Outfit Moray 
Living Streets 
Education
Team 
UHI
Number of schools/
further education
sites with an up-to-
date Travel Plan,
School Route Audit
and Bikeability
delivery numbers. 
Results of HUSS and
Travel Tracker
5.1.8 Continue to seek funding from existing sources
such as Transport Scotland, HITRANS and Cycling
Scotland to Identify new funding opportunities as
they emerge to secure funding for Active Travel
interventions, as appropriate. 
Sustainable
Transport
Officer
Local and
National
Partners
Level of funding
received through
grant applications for
new/improved active
travel infrastructure
Page 32

Page 33

and behaviour
change programmes.
Evidence Base: Engage communities in urban and rural transport planning processes to enhance the design of connected and walkable
communities.
5.2 Address issues of
transport poverty
across Moray.
5.2.1 Work with M.Connect service to ensure residents
can travel and access leisure and recreational
facilities across Moray as required within opening
hours or alternatively use M.Connect to transport
individuals/groups to events
Transportation 
Leisure &
Culture  
Evidence Base: Accelerate implementation of policy actions to improve road safety and the implementation and enforcement of traffic speed
restrictions (for example 20 mph in residential areas and 30 mph on urban roads).
5.3 Utilise tools and
partners to inform
Active Travel
infrastructure 
5.3.1 All new and existing infrastructure schemes to be
scored through the Active Travel Prioritisation Tool
Sustainable
Transport
Officer  
Evidence base: Upskill local authority transport and planning workforce to create inclusive and equitable active travel infrastructure.
5.4 Provide learning
opportunities for the
transport and
planning workforce
connected to active
environments 
5.4.1 Ensure individuals with lived experiences are part
of these discussions
Sustainable
Transport
Officer  
5.4.2 Disability Inclusion training delivered on a needs-
based approach
SDS   
Page 33

Page 34

6. Active Places of Learning
Objective: Whole school approach to physical activity adopted by all places of learning 
Ref Emerging Action Ref
No.
Tasks (How will it be achieved?) Lead Support Indicator
Evidence Base: Whole School Approach to Physical Activity
6.1 Strengthen physical
activity provision
within the curriculum 
6.1.1 Involvement, promotion, embedding and input in
the Moray Physical Education Activity & Sport
Health & Wellbeing Learning, Teaching and
Assessment Framework
Quality
Improvement
Officer
Active
Schools 
Local
Partners 
6.1.2 Create policies to strengthen commitment to
physical activity in schools as significant factor
contributing to attainment and achievement such
as including physical activity within Moray
Education Improvement Plans and individual
school plans
Active Schools 
Education
Local
Partners 
6.1.3 Lobby national bodies to support the
reintroduction of specialist PE in Primary Schools
and explore locally how this could be achieved (or
suitable alternative ensuring skilled providers to
develop agility, balance, co-ordination skills and
core introduction of individual and team
sports/activities)
Active Moray
Working Group 
CPP  
6.1.4 Explore the continued rollout of Active Play
training through CALA across early years and
primary schools to promote physical activity to
support emotional, social and cognitive
development
Early Years
Service
Manager 
2 schools and 1
nursery to date in
Moray
6.2 Ensure the delivery of
2hrs quality PE per
week in all schools in
Moray.
6.2.1 Undertake an audit (and true baseline) of PE
provision across all Moray Primary and Secondary
Schools based on the national guidelines (for all
pupils)
Leisure &
Culture Service 
Education  
Page 34

Page 35

6.2.2 Identify and implement support mechanisms to
ensure quality PE is provided 
Quality
Improvement
Officer
Education
Scotland 
6.2.3 Re-establish a PEPAS group for Moray (PE,
Physical Activity & Sport) that will focus on Moray
wide objectives such as 2hrs quality PE, Daily
Mile/Walking initiatives, Bikeability etc
Active Schools 
Education  
6.2.4 Inclusion training delivered to support the delivery
of PE to pupils with disabilities
SDS  
6.3 Maintain and enhance
physical activity
opportunities before,
during and after the
school day.
6.3.1 Re-establish and promote the Daily Mile (or
suitable alternative) commitment across all
schools – supported by HMIe
Education The Daily Mile
Foundation 
6.3.2 Work with Early Years/Education to implement
Play on Pedals programme (funded through
Cycling Scotland)
Early Years
Service
Manager  
6.3.3 Encourage all Primary and Secondary Schools to
work towards the sportscotland School Sport
Award 
Active Schools Education 
6.3.4 Active Schools delivery in all Primary and
Secondary Schools across Moray (ensuring
inclusive opportunities are available for pupils
with disabilities by adopting the activity inclusion
model)
Active Schools Education 
6.3.5 Encourage internal and external partners to apply
to be a delivery partner within the Flexible
Framework (alternative curriculum) and be
promoted on community asset map
Leisure &
Culture 
Education  
Evidence Base: Whole of campus approaches to physical activity in colleges and universities
6.4 Enhance
opportunities within
higher/further
education settings 
6.4.1 Ensure individuals with lived experiences are part
of these discussions
UHI  
6.4.2 UHI Moray to work with local industries to
coordinate volunteering and work experience for
students. 
All UHI Moray
Sport staff  
Page 35

Page 36

*Senior Phase developing leadership: 10 hours
leading in community 
*2 x 6-week projects for HNC sports coaching
students 
*To provide FE level 5 & 6 sport and fitness
students with 30 hours of volunteering.   
6.4.3 To provide CPD opportunities at HNC level to
upskill volunteers, and current workforce.
All UHI Moray
Sport staff  
6.4.4 To offer PT/FT courses from Further Education,
Higher Education to Degree to develop a
workforce of sport, health and fitness
professionals. 
Link to all courses at UHI Moray: Subjects - Sport
and Fitness
All UHI Moray
Sport Staff  
6.4.5 To support the delivery of Active Schools and NGB
programmes, for example: SDS para sport event
All UHI Moray
Sport Staff
Active
Schools 
6.4.6 To work with Moray Justice System and NHS to
provide physical activity and sport sessions at
UHI.  Student and staff led sessions.
Curriculum
Team Leader
Moray Justice
System 
NHS 
6.5 Active Campus Co-
ordinator acts as key
conduit for working
with partners on
opportunities through
co-ordinated
approach. 
6.5.1 Work closely with community sports hub to create
opportunities for marginalised students. This is
being completed through the Moray Pride Hub for
LGBT students and community members
providing opportunities to become more active.
Active Campus
Co-ordinator
Community
Sports Hub
Officer 
6.5.2 UHI Inter-Campus sports festival providing
students the opportunity to compete against their
fellow UHI students on other campuses.
Active Campus
Co-ordinator  
6.5.3 Sport and physical activity for participants with a
disability – SFL students participating in various
governing body led initiatives such as curling 360
and tartan touch rugby. Partnership formed with
Active Campus
Co-ordinator
SDS 
Page 36

Page 37

local groups for disabled adults to participate in
boccia festival, and disability sport festival.
6.5.4 Duke of Edinburgh for Level 5 students –
Encouraging local volunteering opportunities, and
outdoor activity with Council DofE Officer.
Provides secondary award for students on top of
their level 5
Active Campus
Co-ordinator
Council DofE
Officer 
6.5.5 UHI Moray active travel improvements – working
with Outfit Moray, Cycling UK, Cycling Scotland
and HISA to make students aware of active travel
to and from campus. Events such as bike fayres
have been organised with key partners.
Active Campus
Co-ordinator  
6.5.6 Partnership delivery with Active Schools – Curling
sessions and festival held at Moray UHI
Active Campus
Co-ordinator
Active
Schools 
6.5.7 CLD summer programme – Support CLD summer
programme with organised activity for new
students. 
Active Campus
Co-ordinator  
Evidence Base: Preservice and in-service workforce development for teachers; enhance knowledge and teaching skills on the value of active play,
physical education, adaptative physical activity, fundamental movement skills and physical literacy, and on how to include people with disabilities
and the least active.
6.6 Develop and deliver
physical activity
learning for the
education workforce 
6.6.1 Inclusion training delivered as part of in-service
days
SDS  
6.6.2 Provision of training, coach education and in-
service sessions to support all school/teaching
staff to embed physical activity and sports
opportunities as part of learning 
Active Schools  Education
Scotland 
Evidence Base: Develop and implement design guidelines for education and childcare facilities; create accessible and safe environments for
children and young people to be physically active.
6.7 Create education and
childcare facilities
that are active places
and spaces by design.
6.7.1 Utilise the Out to Play practical guidance
document (which focusses on outdoor play) from
Inspiring Scotland/Care Inspectorate and Scottish
Government when creating/changing space
Learning Estate
Programme
Manager
Early Years
Service
Manager 
Page 37

Page 38

6.7.2 Strategic group representatives act as consultees
and involved in the design of physical activity
places and spaces
Learning Estate
Programme
Manager   
7. Active Places & Spaces
Objective: Places and spaces are appropriately designed, created, and maintained to enable people
to be physically active in their community 
Ref Emerging Action Ref
No.
Tasks (How will it be achieved?) Lead Support Indicator
Evidence Base: Integrate urban design and land-use policies; to enable and promote walking, cycling and other forms of physical activity by creating
connected, walkable communities, with equitable and inclusive public space, as well as pedestrian access to a range of local amenities for daily
living.
7.1 Create connected,
walkable/wheelable
communities that
support healthier
lifestyles 
7.1.1 The Moray Local Development Plan will set out
policies and site requirements to create
walkable, connected communities to support
local living and healthier lifestyles.  Masterplans
will be prepared for strategic growth areas (e.g.
new neighbourhoods).
Strategic
Planning &
Development 
The Moray LDP Delivery
Plan will measure
progress of policy
implementation.
Evidence base: Strengthen access to good quality public and green open spaces, recreational spaces, play spaces and sports amenities through
spatial design and community engagement.  Ensure equitable and inclusive access to places and spaces to help reduce inequalities.  Ensure
places and spaces enhance active play to support healthy growth and development in early childhood and adolescents.
7.2 Strengthen access
to good quality
public open spaces,
green networks,
recreational spaces
(including blue
spaces such as river
and coastal areas),
play spaces and
sports amenities 
7.2.1 Undertake a Play Sufficiency Assessment (PSA)
and prepare an updated Open Space Strategy
(OSS) as part of the preparation of the new
Moray Local Development Plan which can be
used as evidence for developer requirements
and to inform other Council services.
Strategic
Planning &
Development 
Robust evidence base to
inform LDP policies and
proposals and identify
priority areas for
improvement/investment
across Council Services.
7.2.2 Develop a Leisure/Recreational Facilities and
Sports Pitch strategy to identify gaps and
priorities for future planning and investment to
support healthier lifestyles and economic
growth.
Leisure and
Culture Service
SDS 
Outfit Moray
Robust evidence base to
inform LDP developer
requirements and
Council Capital Plan
Page 38

Page 39

Ensure engagement and consultation with SDS
on place and space changes/developments
7.2.3 Work with community groups to develop
proposals such as those identified in LPPs and
funding bids to improve open space and play
provision.  
Community
Support Unit 
Successful funding
bids/projects delivered
by community groups. 
Support the delivery
of the core paths
plan 
7.2.4 Review delivery of Core Paths Action Plan 2023-
2026 and develop proposals for a new Core Path
Action Plan to support prioritised actins for
maintenance and removing barriers to access on
Moray’s Core Path network
Open Space
team
Moray Local
Outdoor
Access Forum
Approval of Core Path
Action Plan review and
development of new
Core Path Action Plan
(though Committee). 
Maintain play areas
to a suitable
standard 
7.2.5 Undertake monthly condition inspections to
Moray Council managed and maintained play
areas to ensure play areas are safe for use; and
carry out an annual independent condition
inspection to help prioritise investments in
renewal of provision or replacement equipment
(subject to capital funding being available from
relevant asset owners).
Open Space
team
Asset
Managers in
Learning
Estate,
Housing and
Open Space
teams
Overall Play Area
Condition Scores
Evidence Base: Develop and or apply design guidelines for public amenities; schools, health care, sports and recreation facilities, workplaces and
social housing, designed to enable people to be physically active.
7.3 Design public sector
facilities to enable
people to be
physically active.
7.3.1 Cross-service working by public sector
organisations to co-ordinate investment to co-
locate facilities.  
Community
Planning
Partnership 
Co-ordination of
planning and investment
in public facilities
Evidence Base: Co-locate local services and destinations e.g. schools, healthcare, workplaces, shops and leisure.
7.4 Support the co-
location of services
and facilities to
promote local living 
7.4.1 As part of Council transformation of leisure
service/estate identify co-location opportunities
to support sustainability
Leisure &
Culture Service 
Strategic
Planning &
Development  
7.5 Support the third
sector to acquire,
7.5.1 Moray Council Sport & Leisure team to support,
as required, opportunities for the third sector to
Sport & Culture
Service
Estates and
Community 
Page 39

Page 40

asset transfer or
develop new
amenities that can
support physical
activity
opportunities.
submit expressions of interest for community
asset transfers
Support Team
(Moray
Council) 
Evidence Base: Increase the knowledge and skills of planners, transport engineers and architects to create inclusive active environments.
7.6 Increase the
knowledge and
skills of planners,
transport engineers
and architects to
create inclusive
active environments
7.6.1 Engage with the Public Health and Sustainable
Transport Partnership Group to utilise training,
knowledge and information sharing for all
employees
Active Moray
Working Group   
8. Active Communication & Public Education
Objective: Communications and public education established as an integral component of a
systems-based approach to physical activity in Scotland. 
Ref Emerging Action Ref
No.
Tasks (How will it be achieved?) Lead Support Indicator
Evidence Base: Follow the ‘best practice principles’ for physical activity communications to develop and implement a physical activity for health
communications plan that operates alongside the proposed actions identified across physical activity system.
8.1 Create a
communications
strategy and plan
for Active Moray
8.1.1 Create communications strategy – ensuring
demystifying what a systems based approach
is.  Work with national partners. 
Ensure strategy considers appropriate ways to
engage people with disabilities (e.g. often
starts with socialisation as a catalyst to
activity).   Consider multiple and intersecting
barriers to meet the communication needs of
people with disabilities.
All All PR teams
(Moray
Council/
NHS/UHI etc) 
Page 40

Page 41

Ensure strategy considers appropriate ways to
ensure protected characteristics can access
communications where relevant
8.1.2 Utilise the Moray Engage platform to ensure we
continually engage the community with Active
Moray and listen and embed their feedback in
priority areas
Leisure &
Culture Service
PR Team
(Moray
Council) 
8.1.3 Utilise local case studies to bring this approach
to life – generates human interest
Sport & Culture
Service
All PR Teams 
8.2 Create central
platform for
physical activity for
all 
8.2.1 Audit of current platforms and identification of
most efficient and effective single source
(considerations include Sport in Moray website,
ALISS, Community Connections, Discover
Pathways to Wellbeing in Moray)
All  
8.2.2 Create/Refine identified platform to act as that
single source and promote accordingly 
All  
8.3 Public education
campaigns for
physical activity 
8.3.1 Ensure messaging uses consistent, inclusive
languages and appropriate imagery – nationally
and across Local Authorities to ensure the
public can relate to this approach regardless of
where they reside/visit. 
Create consistent branding. 
SDS to share best practice, language,
terminology and imagery as appropriate.
National and
local groups 
Page 41

Page 42

Page 42

Page 43

Active Moray
Strategy
254559
Item 3.
Page 43

Page 44

2Page 44

Page 45

Contents
Introduction 5
Our Strategic Priorities 10
Priority 1 – Active System 12
Priority 2 – Active Health and Social Care 13
Priority 3 – Active Sport and Recreation for All 14
Priority 4 – Active Workplaces 15
Priority 5 – Active Travel 16
Priority 6 – Active Places of Learning 17
Priority 7 – Active Places and Spaces 18
Priority 8 – Active Communication and Public Education 19
3Page 45

Page 46

4Page 46

Page 47

Introduction
What/Where?
Active Moray is the comprehensive physical
activity strategy designed for the residents
of Moray. This strategy focusses on a holistic
approach, connecting physical activity with
various aspects of daily life, including travel,
work, recreation, learning and community
spaces.
With constraints to budgets, resources and
capacity it is more important now than ever
that to improve physical activity levels in Moray
we need to do this through collaboration.
Creating a more active
Moray through the places
where we live, work, learn,
care and play.
– Our Vision
5Page 47

Page 48

Why?
Public Health Scotland identifies physical
inactivity as a leading cause of premature
death and a significant risk factor for diseases
such as coronary heart disease, Type 2
diabetes and certain cancers. Public Health
Scotland estimate that over 3,000 deaths in
Scotland per year are attributable to physical
inactivity and approximately 47 of these occur
in Moray.
The 2024 Scottish Health Survey reported
that 62% of adults in Scotland met the
guidelines for moderate or vigorous physical
activity. The proportion of adults meeting
the recommended levels decreased as area
deprivation increased. 68% of children were
reported to meet the recommended levels of
physical activity – meaning 32% of children are
not meeting the daily recommended levels.
Older children were less likely to meet the
physical activity guidelines.
Being physically active is
a fundamental to our overall
health and wellbeing.
6Page 48

Page 49

Being physically active is a fundamental to our
overall health and wellbeing.
Engaging in physical activity offers numerous
benefits including;
• Reducing the risk of chronic disease
• Improving cardiovascular health
• Manage weight
• Strengthening bones and muscles
• Reducing stress, anxiety and depression
• Improve mood and self-confidence
• Enhancing cognitive function
• Improving sleep pattern
• Increasing energy levels
• Fostering social connections
• Providing enjoyment
• Reducing sick days
• Supporting the economy
Based on national health data –
approximately 60-65% of adults in Moray meet
the recommended physical activity guidelines,
this drops to between 45-40% for children
and young people. 21% of Primary 1 children
in Moray were classified as at risk of being
overweight of obesity.
A range of factors influence physical activity
levels in Moray including socio economic
status, geography, cultural factors and
infrastructure. Some of the barriers include
transport, health conditions (ageing
population), socioeconomic constraints and
lack of awareness of opportunities available.
7Page 49

Page 50

Elements of this plan include
strengthening colleague
and citizen engagement to
improve health.
8Page 50

Page 51

When/How?
This strategy aligns to and contributes to other
key policy drivers in Moray such as the;
Moray Local Outcome Improvement Plan
– in particular the priority areas of building
a better future for our children and young
people in Moray, empowering and connecting
communities and improving wellbeing of our
population.
Moray Health and Social Care Strategic Plan
(Partners in Care) – in particular focussing on
prevention and tackling inequality. The plan
also aims to continue to build communities
where people are safe and care for each other.
NHS Grampian Delivery Plan – elements of
this plan include strengthening colleague and
citizen engagement to improve health, creating
the conditions for sustainable change and
improving preventative and timely access to
care.
Local Development Plan – help shape future
land use and development across Moray.
The key principles that underpin this strategy are:
• Addressing inequalities
• Equality, diversity and inclusion
• Sustainability
• Partnership working and collaboration
• Taking an evidence-based approach
This strategy will be implemented between
2025-2035, with annual review periods. A
plan accompanies this strategy, and this plan
will evolve and change over time dependant
on community need, strategic priorities and
capacity.
A working group of key stakeholders across
the public, private and third sector with a
responsibility for physical activity, in its widest
sense, have been involved in the creation
and development of this plan and strategy.
This working group will be responsible for the
delivery of this plan and will meet regularly
to review and update the plan and ensure
timelines are being achieved. The Moray
Community Planning Board will have oversight
of this plan and strategy. The plan will be
monitored on a 6 monthly basis with evidence
of progress reported to the Moray Community
Planning Board (facilitates agreement from key
partners on strategic priorities for Moray and
scrutinises performance).
8 9Page 51

Page 52

Our Strategic Priorities
Active System
Establish collaborative actions to enable a
whole system approach to physical activity in
Moray
Active Health & Social
Care
Integrating physical activity into routine NHS
health and social care services
Active Sport and Recreation
for All
Participation in sport and recreation
throughout life via equitable and inclusive
access to appropriate places, spaces and
services
Active Workplaces
Everyday physical activity enhanced through
the workplace
10Page 52

Page 53

Active Travel
Encourage active travel and influence the
infrastructure for walking, wheeling and cycling
in Moray
Active Places of Learning
Universal approach to physical activity
adopted by all places of learning
Active Places and Spaces
Places and spaces are designed, created and
maintained to enable people to be physically
active in their community
Active Communication &
Public Education
Ensure that communications and public
education is an integral part of highlighting the
importance of physical activity in Moray and
ensuring the public are aware of the opportunities
11Page 53

Page 54

Priority 1 – Active System
Objectives
• Strengthen leadership and accountability in
relation to physical activity
• Strengthen cross policy/partner cohesion,
maximising the impact of resources
• Develop and utilise data/evidence to better
effect to improve physical activity levels
Aim
• To ensure everyone involved in getting
more people, more active, more often work
collectively to make a positive impact to the
people of Moray and help influence positive
change as a strategic force.
12Page 54

Page 55

Priority 2 – Active Health and Social Care
Objectives
• Integrate physical activity into all relevant
clinical settings including primary and
secondary care
• Develop partnerships and co-location
opportunities with health care and physical
activity providers
• Utilise the research, learning and
development of the Digital Health and
Innovation (DHI) programmes
• Develop and deliver physical activity
learning to the health and social care
workforce
• Design and deliver physical activity referral
services
Aim
• Ensure physical activity is embedded into
routine NHS health and social care services
in Moray.
13Page 55

Page 56

Priority 3 – Active Sport and Recreation for All
Objectives
• Provide inclusive, accessible and
sustainable programmes and events
• Prioritise the least active individuals in
Moray
• Build workforce capacity
• Support community based interventions
Aim
• Ensure all ages and abilities can participate
in sport and recreation equitably through
places, spaces and services in Moray.
14Page 56

Page 57

Priority 4 – Active Workplaces
Aim
• Work with employers to embed physical
activity opportunities through the workplace
across Moray.
Objectives
• Engage employers to adopt a healthy
workplace model
• Develop a Moray workplace health
programme
15Page 57

Page 58

Priority 5 – Active Travel
Objectives
• Connect the existing cycling infrastructure
in Moray
• Provide learning opportunities for
the transport and planning workforce
connected to active environments
• Utilise tools and partners to inform Active
Travel infrastructure
Aim
• Support the delivery of the Moray 5yr Active
Travel Strategy
16Page 58

Page 59

Priority 6 – Active Places of Learning
Aim
• Ensure physical activity is a core
component of lifelong learning within early
years, schools and further/higher education
Objectives
• Strengthen physical activity provision within
the curriculum
• Maintain and enhance physical activity
opportunities before, during and after
school
• Enhance opportunities within higher/further
education settings
• Develop and deliver physical activity
learning for the education workforce
• Create educational facilities that are active
spaces by design
17Page 59

Page 60

Priority 7 – Active Places and Spaces
Objectives
• Create connected, walkable/wheelable
communities that support healthier
lifestyles
• Strengthen access to open and recreational
spaces and sports amenities
• Support the delivery of the core paths plan
• Design public sector facilities to enable
physical activity
• Support co-location of services to promote
local living
• Support the third sector to acquire, asset
transfer or develop new amenities
Aim
• Create environments that enable all ages
and abilities to be physically active in Moray
18Page 60

Page 61

Priority 8 – Active Communication and Public Education
Objectives
• Create a communications strategy and plan
for physical activity in Moray
• Create central information platform for
physical activity for all
• Public education campaigns for physical
activity
Aim
• To ensure communications and public
education is consistent and co-ordinated
and highlights the importance of physical
activity and the opportunities available
across Moray.
19Page 61

Page 62

The Moray Community Planning Partnership is a collaboration between Moray Council, Police
Scotland, NHS Grampian, Moray College UHI, • Scottish Fire & Rescue Service, Highlands & Islands
Enterprise, HITrans, Skills Development Scotland, and tsiMoray.
Page 62

Page 63

REPORT
LOCAL LEVERS
FOR DIET AND
HEALTHY WEIGHT
TOP EVIDENCE-BACKED OPPORTUNITIES
August 2023
Item 3.
Page 63

Page 64

Page 64

Page 65

LOCAL LEVERS FOR DIET AND HEALTHY WEIGHT | REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Foreword 5
Abbreviations 6
Introduction 7
1.   Restrict food advertising 11
2.   Utilise planning to improve food environments 15
3.   Strengthen public food procurement and
provision standard 18
4.   Work with the out of home sector to reduce
calories on the menu 21
5.   Improve uptake of school meals 25
6.   Promote and support physical activity 29
7.   Protect, promote, and support breastfeeding
and healthy diets for children 32
References 37
Appendix. List of documents reviewed for intitial local lever list 40
Page 65

Page 66

Page 66

Page 67

5
LOCAL LEVERS FOR DIET AND HEALTHY WEIGHT | REPORT
FOREWORD
From 2019 to 2023, Obesity Action Scotland (OAS) has been delighted
to support the early adopter phase of a Whole Systems Approach
(WSA) to Diet and Healthy Weight in Scotland. OAS recognise that
the levers to change our food system exist at local and national level
and that actions across the whole system will be required to deliver
healthy weight for all in Scotland. This report is one of a series of
outputs designed to share learning from the early adopter phase
and inform and support future WSA work across Scotland.
In considering Local Levers for Diet and
Healthy Weight, this report has reviewed the
evidence in finding and recommending seven
measures which can be utilised as part of a
place-based approach to addressing diet and
healthy weight.
Whilst individual-based interventions remain
popular, it is population-level change which
have the most impact on health. The various
levers described in this report are those that
exist at local level that are likely to have the
greatest benefit on the largest number of
people living in Scotland.
They should be used first and foremost in our
local authorities and health boards, whose
remit includes promoting the health of their
populations. But some of the interventions in
the report also should be considered, where
relevant, by voluntary and private sector
organisations who wish to support their staff,
their communities and their customers.
Lorraine Tulloch
Programme Lead
Obesity Action Scotland
For areas who wish to take a WSA to Diet and
Healthy Weight, it is recommended that these
levers are used to inform your approaches and
help guide you in your action planning.
I would thank Professor Lindsay Jaacks,
University of Edinburgh for her expertise in
preparing this report and together we hope
that this report can provide guidance and
support to those working to make a difference
locally. Together we can all shape our food
and physical activity environments to support
healthy weight and protect and improve the
health of the Scottish people.
Page 67

Page 68

6
HFSS
High in fat, sugar, or salt
HRS
Healthcare Retail Standard
NEC
National Entitlement Card
NHS
National Health Service
NICE
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
NPF4 
National Planning Framework 4
OECD
Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development
SIMD
Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation
SYP
Scottish Youth Parliament
WHO
World Health Organization
ABBREVIATIONS
Page 68

Page 69

LOCAL LEVERS FOR DIET AND HEALTHY WEIGHT | REPORT
1 Throughout this report, “unhealthy food and drink” primarily refers to food and drink high in fat, sugar, or salt. 7
The circumstances and environments in which we live, work, learn,
play and socialise shape our health and wellbeing. To improve
health in Scotland, we must address the social and commercial
determinants of health. Education and willpower are no match for
the flood of unhealthy food and drink1 options we are faced with
every day.
We know environmental interventions work for other commercial
determinants of health. The 2006 smoke-free legislation resulted in a 39%
reduction in salivary cotinine (a marker of exposure to smoking) among
both adults and children living in Scotland within just one year (1, 2).
Furthermore, following implementation, support for smoke-free policies
increased, including among smokers (3). Building on the success of smoke-
free legislation, in 2013, the Scottish Government announced an ambitious
aim for a tobacco-free generation by 2034 (4).
INTRODUCTION
Social determinants
of health include poverty and
deprivation; the built environment
including food outlets, transport
systems, leisure centres, and green
space; cultural norms around
eating and drinking as well as
breastfeeding; and schools.
Commercial determinants
of health include the marketing
and sale of unhealthy food and
drink; and the marketing of
infant formula.
As we did with tobacco, we need to focus our efforts on transforming our
local environments to stem the tide of unhealthy food and drink, and put
healthy food and drink options in reach.
“
Page 69

Page 70

8
Social and economic factors like income also influence our health. Over the
past decade, the association between income and health has potentially
grown stronger in Scotland. A recent independent review of health
inequalities in Scotland published by the Health Foundation attributed
this to three underlying factors: (i) the accumulation of severe multiple
disadvantage; (ii) a lack of improvement in living standards; and (iii) austerity
(5). The cost-of-living crisis is likely to exacerbate these inequalities.
The recent Health Foundation review highlighted the health and
experiences of infants and children in their early years as one of
three areas of particular concern, citing widening inequalities in risk of
obesity at the start of primary school (5). Twenty years ago, 76% of primary
1 children had a healthy weight in both the most and least deprived areas
of Scotland (see Figure 1) (6). However, since then, the health of children
living in these areas has diverged. Today, children living in the most
deprived areas of Scotland are much less likely to have a healthy weight
compared to children living the least deprived areas: 70% versus 81% (6).
Figure 1
Trends in the percentage of primary 1 children with a healthy weight in Scotland from 2001/2002 to
2021/2022. SIMD, Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation.
80.0%
85.0%
%
Prim
ary 1 children with a healthy weight
School Year
75.0%
70.0%
65.0%
60.0%
01/02
02/03
03/04
04/05
05/06
06/07
07/08
08/09
09/10
10/11
11/12
12/13
13/14
14/15
15/16
16/17
17/18
18/19
19/20
20/21
21/22
SIMD Quintile 1 (Most Deprived)            SIMD Quintile 2            SIMD Quintile 3            SIMD Quintile 4            SIMD Quintile 5 (Least Deprived)
Page 70

Page 71

LOCAL LEVERS FOR DIET AND HEALTHY WEIGHT | REPORT
9
Whilst outside the scope of this report, it is important to emphasise that
actions taken to address child poverty are likely to have beneficial
effects for diet and healthy weight.
“
We refer to relevant Scottish Government guidance published elsewhere for local
levers for tackling child poverty (see resources).
When it comes to diet and healthy weight, no one action is going to result in huge
benefits. A package of synergistic actions, each having a small effect on their own, and
together having a larger effect, is needed. We suggest prioritising the implementation
of actions in this report, monitoring progress, celebrating successes, and adapting to
strengthen what works and drop what doesn’t work. Committing to an iterative process
of implementation, evaluation, and adaptation is key.
The scientific consensus is that the rise of obesity has largely been
driven by changes in food consumption rather than changes in physical
activity (7). However, physical activity can help people maintain a healthy
weight and has many health benefits independent of any impact on
body weight. The role of place is also recognised within this document.
The places where people live, work and play can have an impact on
their health and are shaped by many factors including but not limited to
national and local policy. If we want to create places that enable health
and realise the full potential of communities, we must take action to
make them health supporting, health enabling places.
In order to identify local levers for diet and healthy weight, several
documents were reviewed, as summarised in the Appendix. An
emphasis was placed on documents published in the past 5 years with
the exception of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines
for working with local communities on obesity, which were published in 2012. From
this document review, a long list of effective actions for diet and healthy weight was
created. From this long list, many actions were excluded because they were beyond
the scope of local areas. For example, fiscal measures such as taxation. Other actions
were excluded because they focused on individual behaviour change. For example,
the World Health Organisation’s (WHO) best buy, “Nutrition education and counselling
in different settings to promote healthy diets.” Ultimately, seven actions remained on
the list. For each of these local levers, a separate web search was conducted to identify
evidence specific to the UK / Scottish context.
Tackling Child Poverty
“Best Start, Bright Futures: tackling
child poverty delivery plan 2022 to
2026”
“Developing a local child poverty
action report: guidance”Policy
Toolkit” Policy Toolkit”
Page 71

Page 72

10
The seven local levers for diet and healthy weight2 in Scotland are:
1. Restrict food marketing
2 .  Utilise planning to improve food environments
3. Strengthen public food procurement and provision standards
4.  Work with the out of home sector to reduce calories on the menu
5.  Improve uptake of school meals
6.  Promote and support physical activity
7.  Protect, promote, and support breastfeeding and healthy diets for children.
In the chapters that follow, we outline how to take each local lever forward, why each
lever is important in the Scottish context, and evidence of effectiveness particularly in
the UK or Scottish context, when available.
There are significant opportunities to shape our food environments including the
implementation of the Good Food Nation (Scotland) Act 2022 and associated Good
Food Nation plans and the National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) and associated
local development plans.
It is possible to halt the rise in obesity in Scotland and achieve a healthy
weight for all. No one of the local levers alone will have a huge impact, but with
continued evaluation and improvement, together they can.
Local levers for diet and
healthy weight are actions
available at the local level – for
local authorities, health boards
and schools, as well as the private
and third sectors – to support
community health by ensuring
everyone can get affordable,
healthy food and drink, and
integrate safe and enjoyable
physical activity into their daily lives.
2 Not in priority order. No one of the local levers alone will have a huge impact. As many of the levers as feasible should be considered for local
implementation to maximise impact. Page 72

Page 73

11
LOCAL LEVERS FOR DIET AND HEALTHY WEIGHT | REPORT
3 For example, Lothian Buses Ltd is owned by the City of Edinburgh Council (through Transport for Edinburgh Ltd), Midlothian Council, East Lothian
Council, and the West Lothian Council. See Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ending 31 December 2019: https://www.lothianbuses.com/
wp- content/uploads/mdocs/200622_Consolidated_Financial_Statements.pdf. However, further evaluation of Arm’s Length External Organisations such as
Lothian Buses Ltd is needed to understand the feasibility and likely impact of HFSS advertising restrictions.
4 HFSS is based on the UK Nutrient Profiles Model. The council adopted the idea of “no brand is banned,” meaning that products, rather than companies,
were directly affected by the policy.
5 These restrictions include a 9pm watershed for HFSS products and restrictions on paid-for advertising of HFSS products online.
HOW TO TAKE THIS LOCAL LEVER FORWARD
1.  Restrict advertising of products high in fat, sugar, or salt (HFSS) by local
authorities themselves.
2.  Restrict HFSS product advertising on transport networks owned by local
authorities.3
3.  Restrict HFSS product advertising by third parties on council-owned
spaces, assets, and events.
RESTRICT FOOD
ADVERTISING1
These actions are aligned with those taken by Bristol City Council, which prohibits HFSS
product4 advertising for all advertising generated by the Council and advertising and
sponsorship by third parties on council-owned spaces, assets, and events. The Bristol
policy also prohibits the advertising of a food or drink brand where no food or drink
product is featured directly. The policy did not apply to local sponsorship deals such as
sports teams. An estimated 30% of all advertising space in Bristol is council-owned (8).
We suggest starting with HFSS food and drink, but allowing the list to expand in the
future based on emerging evidence regarding the impacts of, for example, brands that
sell predominantly unhealthy food and drink. Ultimately, people – especially children
– should be protected from any advertising of unhealthy food and drink as well as
brands that primarily sell unhealthy food and drink.
WHY IT’S IMPORTANT IN SCOTLAND
New restrictions on the advertising of HFSS food and drink will not come into effect
in the UK until 1 October 20255. Moreover, these new restrictions only cover TV and
online; outdoor advertising is excluded. Therefore children will continue to be exposed
to HFSS product advertising on buses, bus shelters, billboards, and at sporting events.
Indeed, exposure to outdoor marketing is likely to increase once the new restrictions
on TV and online marketing come into effect in 2025. A modelling study by Kantar
Page 73

Page 74

12
estimated that this displacement from TV and online to outdoor marketing will be
about 26% (9). This is concerning because outdoor marketing has been shown to be
effective: repeated exposure on the way to school or work promotes the purchase of
products from that brand.
A study by researchers at the University of Glasgow used Google
Street View to identify 9,701 bus stops across the Central Belt of
Scotland, 1,845 (19%) of which had advertisements, and linked this
to accelerometer data from a subset of children in the Growing Up in
Scotland study (10). The most commonly advertised products were fast
food (15% of advertisements) and confectionary (7% of advertisements)
(10). Children living in more deprived areas and in urban areas had
greater exposure to unhealthy food and drink advertisements because
they had greater exposure to bus stops (10). Similar results were
observed in an Edinburgh-specific evaluation of bus stop advertising
(11). Taken together, these findings suggest that advertising restrictions
that target the transport network may help to address health inequalities.
In addition, no current or proposed advertising regulations restrict
brand advertising. Some research has shown that advertising by
unhealthy brands alone – regardless of the product advertised – is
enough to promote unhealthy behaviour. For example, one study
conducted by researchers at the University of Liverpool found
“exposure to adverts for ‘healthy’ meal bundles did not drive healthier
choices in children, but did promote liking for fast food” (12).
With regards to the scale of local authority owned and/or controlled
outdoor advertising spaces, a 2021 report by Obesity Action Scotland
and East of Scotland Partnership and funded by Scottish Government
evaluated this for four local authorities: The City of Edinburgh Council,
Scottish Borders Council, Fife Council, and West Lothian Council (13). The scale
varied widely across local authorities, though many unknowns remained, particularly
with regards to phone boxes, wayfinders, fleet advertising, and real time passenger
transport information (see Table 5 in the report adapted below in Table 1). All local
authorities planned to expand the scale of their current advertising and expressed
some concern regarding restricting the content of their owned outdoor advertising
spaces due to potential revenue losses.
Box 1 - Resources
Restrictions on the advertising of less
healthy food and drink on television
programme services, on-demand pro-
gramme services, and online services:
“Health and Care Act 2022, Schedule 18:
Advertising of less healthy food and drink”
“Nutrient Profiling Technical Guidance”
from the Department of Health and
Social Care (2011)
Existing restrictions on advertising and
promotion of infant formula and follow-
on formula: “The Foods for Specific
Groups (Infant Formula and Follow-on
Formula) (Scotland) Regulations 2020”
Bristol City Council Advertising and
Sponsorship Policy
Sustain’s local government guide for
restricting unhealthy food advertising:
“Healthier Food Advertising Policy Toolkit”
Page 74

Page 75

13
LOCAL LEVERS FOR DIET AND HEALTHY WEIGHT | REPORT
6 The London Underground was also among the first public places to ban smoking, in 1987, decades before it was banned in all workplaces. See “Smoking
in Public Places Investigative Committee. Scrutiny of Smoking in Public Places in London.” London: Greater London Authority; 2002.
Table1
Scale of local authority owned and/or controlled outdoor advertising spaces across four local
authorities in Scotland (13).
Billboards Bus 
shelters Taxis Public
transport
Events /
sponsorship
City of Edinburgh
2 large
hoardings, 4
digital screens
coming soon
29 digital
6-sheets
Licensing
agreements
Controlled by
Arm’s Length
External
Organisations
Roundabouts, parks and
green spaces, events:
Oktoberfest, Christmas and
Hogmanay, Edinburgh Festival
Fife None
6 owned
by Fife, 153
owned by
Clear Channel
Only signage
relating to taxi
business is
allowed
None Roundabouts - mainly for
local business sponsorship
West Lothian Unknown
69 owned by
Clear Channel
431 without
advertising
Licensing
agreements None Unknown
Scottish Borders Insignificant outdoor advertising, owned by local authority or otherwise. Planned expansion to refuse
vehicles and possibly bins, primarily for signposting and local business promotion.
EVIDENCE OF EFFECTIVENESS
The Transport for London restrictions on advertising of HFSS products came into
effect in February 2019. Restrictions covered the London Underground6; rail network;
some buses, trains, taxis; bus stops and land outside train stations. Researchers at
the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine looked at trends in household
HFSS purchases for 36 pre-restriction weeks and 44 post-restriction weeks in London
and, for comparison, North of England (where such a restriction had not been
implemented) (14). They found a relative reduction in average weekly household
energy purchased from HFSS products of 1,001 kcal (7%) in London compared to
North of England (14). Significant relative reductions in average weekly household
purchases of fat (58 g), saturated fat (26 g), and sugar (81 g) were also observed
(14). It is important to point out that these relative reductions were in the context of
increasing HFSS purchases. This means that the restrictions were associated with a
reduced rate of growth of HFSS purchases in London compared to North of England
rather than an absolute reduction in purchases.
Changes were largely driven by reductions in chocolate and confectionery and
puddings and biscuits rather than sugary drinks, sugary cereals, or savoury snacks (14).
This could be because sugary drinks, sugary cereals, and savoury snacks have non-
HFSS substitutes (e.g., low or zero calorie drinks). No differences were observed across
population subgroups, but given the small sample size (977 households in London
and 993 households in North of England), subgroup results should be interpreted with
caution (14).
Page 75

Page 76

14
These reported changes are larger than those reported following the implementation
of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy (average weekly household purchases of sugar
declined by 30 g) (15). This suggests that restrictions on the marketing of HFSS
products across transport networks has the potential to be a highly effective
intervention. A modelling study estimated that the policy likely resulted in ~95,000
fewer individuals with obesity (16). And, the good news for local authorities is that
advertising revenue was shown to increase by £1 million in the first quarter following
the restrictions, not decrease (17).
The Bristol City Council HFSS advertising restrictions did not come into effect until
April 2022, and so only results of the baseline, pre-implementation survey (conducted
between January and March 2022) are currently available for Bristol and the
comparator area of South Gloucestershire (8). In the week prior to baseline survey
completion, 41% of respondents (53% in Bristol and 31% in South Gloucestershire)
reported noticing advertisements for HFSS products (8). Younger respondents
were more likely to report noticing advertisements for HFSS products than older
respondents: 73% in 11-34 year-olds versus 42% in 65+ year-olds in Bristol; 45% in
11-34 year-olds versus 27% in 65+ year-olds in South Gloucestershire (8). In Bristol,
respondents living in less deprived areas were less likely to see advertising for HFSS
products, but this area patterning was less consistent in South Gloucestershire (8).
Of the 836 advertisements on display in Bristol, 21% were on foods and 4% on non-
alcoholic drinks. Thirteen percent of advertisements would be subject to the new
Advertising and Sponsorship Policy (which restricts not only HFSS but also alcohol,
gambling, and pay-day loans – though no current advertisements were on alcohol or
pay-day loans and just 0.1% were on gambling, so most of the advertisements affected
would be HFSS foods) (8).
What does this mean for Scotland? The results are likely to be smaller than those
observed in London considering that 68% of London participants in the above-
mentioned study typically used public transport (14) whereas just 26% of workers in
Edinburgh report taking the bus to work (the highest proportion in Scotland), according
to the 2011 Census (18). However, those walking to work or school may also be
exposed to outdoor HFSS advertisements including on bus shelters; in 2021, 16% of
working adults in Scotland travelled to work by walking and 56% of children travelled to
school by walking (19).
Page 76

Page 77

LOCAL LEVERS FOR DIET AND HEALTHY WEIGHT | REPORT
15
HOW TO TAKE THIS LOCAL LEVER FORWARD
Apply the National Planning Framework 4 (NPF4) approach to the food environment,
which includes food growing, retail and non-retail outlets, promoting a town centre
first approach and consideration of clusters of outlets that may be affecting
community wellbeing.
NPF4 was adopted in 2023, and alongside local development plans,
forms the development plan for the area. Local development plans
will be reviewed in light of NPF4 within 5 years of its adoption. Local
development planning guidance has been published to support the
implementation of NPF4 and should be referred to in the preparation
of local development plans. The following table (continued on the next
page) summarises relevant principles from NPF4.
2
UTILISE PLANNING7
TO IMPROVE FOOD
ENVIRONMENTS
Box 2 - Resources
Scottish Government commissioned
research project, “To Explore the
Relationship Between the Food
Environment and the Planning System”
“National Planning Framework 4”
Local Development Planning Guidance
7 This local lever focuses on planning given existing evidence has largely related to planning. Local Authorities also have licensing powers covering some
aspects of food premises, e.g. late hours catering and mobile street traders. There is potential for an improved licensing system to be part of the solution
to improve local food environments but more work is required to understand this lever and how it could be used.Page 77

Page 78

16
Table 2:
Relevant Principles from NPF4
Policy 23 ‘Health and
safety’ •  Spatial strategies to seek to tackle health inequalities
particularly in places experiencing the most disadvantage
•   Create healthier places including through opportunities for
healthier lifestyles, land for food growing and allotments
Policy 27 ‘City, town, local
and commercial
centres’
•  Support sustainable futures for city, town and local centres
•  Consider where clusters of non- retail outlets may be
adversely affecting community wellbeing
•   Consider where drive-through facilities may be acceptable
in relation to local living principles and sustainable travel
Policy 28 ‘Retail’
•  Consider where there may be need for further retail
provision
•  Identify areas where healthy food and drink outlets can be
supported
Policy 14 ‘Design, quality
and place’
Development proposals will be supported where they are
consistent with the six qualities of successful places, including
‘healthy’
Policy 15
‘Local living
and 20 minute
neighbourhoods’
Consider the level and quality of interconnectivity including
local access to opportunities for food growth and allotments
Policy 23 ‘Health and
safety’
Supporting development proposals likely to have positive
effects on health and not supporting those that are likely to
have a significant adverse effect on health
Policy 27
‘City, town, local
and commercial
centres’
•  Supporting proposals that enhance and improve the
viability of city, town and local centres
•  Not supporting further provision of non-retail development
proposals where that would undermine the health and
wellbeing of communities, particularly in disadvantaged
areas, and including takeaways (which can include
permanently sited vans)
Policy 28 ‘Retail’
Support development proposals for retail in existing city,
town and local centres or edge of centre areas or commercial
centres if allocated for new retail development in the local
development plan
For local developm
ent 
plan preparation
For decision m
aking on proposed
developm
ents
Page 78

Page 79

17
LOCAL LEVERS FOR DIET AND HEALTHY WEIGHT | REPORT
WHY IT’S IMPORTANT IN SCOTLAND
One in six adults in Scotland eat out at least once a week according to a survey
conducted by Food Standards Scotland in January 2023 (1,764 respondents 16+
years of age) (20). However, the food environment encompasses more than just the
out of home sector.8 The food environment is all food available to people in their
surroundings. Limited data have been published on the built food environment across
Scotland, which includes the number and density of all places where people can access
food in their community.9 An unpublished systematic review of studies of the UK food
environment found only 21 recent (i.e., past decade) studies in Scotland that described
the local food environment or evaluated the association of local food environments
with diets, overweight and obesity. Nearly all studies have focused on Glasgow.
One study mapped all food outlets in Viewpark, east Glasgow in 2009 (21). They found
very high availability of fast food (18 fast food outlets in an area of 11.69 sq km) as
well as high availability of fresh fruits and vegetables (a majority of the nine stores
in the area sold apples, oranges, bananas, onions, potatoes and tomatoes) (21). In
a convenience survey of 94 residents of Viewpark, 91% reported that their main
supermarket was a large supermarket outside Viewpark (21). More recently (data
collected in 2018 and 2019), a University of Edinburgh PhD student thesis mapped the
food environment in Whitewood, Glasgow, finding one-third of outlets were takeaways,
fast food outlets and convenience stores (22).
Another study in Glasgow found clustering of quick service restaurants in more
deprived areas looking at data from 2012 (23), but a fourth study in Glasgow did not
find clustering of these outlets looking at data from 2003 (24). An analysis of all of
Scotland using data on the locations of four popular quick service restaurants in 2005
found evidence of clustering of these outlets in more deprived areas (25). We were not
able to identify more recent published data on this topic.
EVIDENCE OF EFFECTIVENESS
Given its recent publication (in February 2023), the implementation and impact of
NPF4 has yet to be evaluated. Nonetheless, it is well recognised that the built food
environment influences people’s access to both healthy and unhealthy food (26, 27),
and that planning is an upstream tool that can be used to influence the built food
environment over the long-term (28, 29).
8 The out of home sector typically includes quick service restaurants, full service restaurants, cafes and coffee shops, pubs and bars, and bakery and
sandwich shops.
9 The Food environment assessment tool (Feat) allows for detailed exploration of the geography of food retail access in Scotland but is currently offline.Page 79

Page 80

18
3
STRENGTHEN PUBLIC
FOOD PROCUREMENT
AND PROVISION
STANDARDS
HOW TO TAKE THIS LOCAL LEVER FORWARD
The following should be considered in all facilities owned and/or operated by local
authorities and health boards including, for example, leisure centres and National
Health Service (NHS) premises providing non-patient food and drink.
1 .  Increase the proportion of healthy food and drink on offer to at
least 75%.10
2 .  Offer price promotions on healthier options.
3 .  Reduce the calorie content of foods on offer – either through
reformulation or smaller portions. Consider a mandatory calorie
cap per item sold.11
4 .  Provide free drinking water.
It is important to take into consideration the taste of healthy food and
drink on offer to ensure that the above-mentioned actions do not
negatively impact uptake of meals in these settings.
This local lever is closely linked with local lever #4, Work with the out of
home sector to reduce calories on the menu, and actions mentioned for
that local lever should also be considered by facilities owned and/or
operated by local authorities and health boards.
10 Further research is needed to confirm 75%. This number comes from a small online choice experiment of 159 Scottish adults that found when 75% of
product options were healthy, 58% of participants selected a healthy option compared to just 41% of participants selecting a healthy option when only
50% of product options were healthy. See Allan et al. Nutr Health. 2021;27(3):321-7.
Box 3 - Resources
Existing NHS food regulations: “Criteria
for the Healthcare Retail Standard”
Food Standard Scotland’s Healthier
Catering Guidance covering seven
specific sectors: children’s menus,
Chinese, chip shops, Indian and South
Asian, Italian, Pizza, and sandwich shops
(available in multiple languages)
Scottish Government’s Out of Home
Action Plan and forthcoming voluntary
Eating Out, Eating Well Framework
which will include a Code of Practice for
Children’s Menus
Food Standard Scotland’s MenuCal – a
free tool for food businesses to provide
information about the calories and
allergens in their dishes
Page 80

Page 81

19
LOCAL LEVERS FOR DIET AND HEALTHY WEIGHT | REPORT
11 George Eliot Hospital in England has set a calorie cap of 250 kcal for confectionery and sweets and 400 kcal for pre-packed sandwiches and other
savoury pre-packed meals (wraps, salads, and pasta salads).
WHY IT’S IMPORTANT IN SCOTLAND
Annual public sector expenditure on food and drink in Scotland is nearly £150 million
(30). With the passing of the Good Food Nation (Scotland) Act in 2022, local authorities
and health boards have a significant opportunity to use this public spend to promote
healthy diets and support healthy weights.
The health and social care workforce in particular represents one of the most
important opportunities to lead by example when it comes to diet and healthy weights.
Over 400,000 people across Scotland are employed in NHS, Social Care and Social
Work (31) and can both benefit from healthier workplace food environments and play
an import role in demonstrating the benefits of healthier food environments in general.
Significant progress has been made in recent years in Scotland towards implementing
positive changes on NHS premises that improve the healthfulness of food and drink
on offer. In 2015, the Healthcare Retail Standard (HRS) was introduced in Scotland and
sets mandatory requirements for all retail outlets in NHS premises, including that at
least 50% of available foods meet nutritional standards (32).
EVIDENCE OF EFFECTIVENESS
An observational audit of 13 outlets immediately before HRS implementation (July to
November 2016) and after (July to November 2017) found that the mean number of
chocolate confectionery products on offer declined, as did the number of promotions
for these products (33). All hospital retail sites are required under the terms of their
contract to adhere to the HRS criteria and sites are assessed by Scottish Grocer’s
Federation Healthy Living Programme.
It is important to not just increase healthier options, but to tackle the abundance of less
healthy options. Changes in the availability of less healthy options may have a greater
effect on choice than comparable changes in healthy options (34). Making healthy
food the easier, more obvious option, is critical. If 50% of food options are healthy and
50% are less healthy, people will tend to choose the less healthy option. In contrast,
if 75% of options are healthy, and just 25% are less healthy, they may tend to choose
the healthy option. A small online choice experiment of 159 Scottish adults found that
when 75% of product options were healthy, 58% of participants selected a healthy
option compared to just 41% of participants selecting a healthy option when only 50%
of product options were healthy (35). An audit of HRS adoption across NHS Scotland
Page 81

Page 82

20
found that only three outlets had more than 70% of food on offer meeting HRS
nutritional standards (36). This may help explain why a majority of purchased snack
items between January and May 2017 in Aberdeen hospital food outlets were not
healthy options (35). As stated by the authors of that study, “Despite equivalence in the
number of healthy and unhealthy (individual) products available across each retail unit
as a whole, within the single-serve snack category, only 30% of unique product lines were
healthy options. This indicates that consumers intending to purchase just a snack are
not presented with equivalent numbers of healthy and unhealthy options; rather, they
must select from a range where there is a greater variety of unhealthy options.” Many
customers continue to purchase less healthy items, even when healthy alternatives are
available, suggesting further interventions may be required to tip the balance towards
healthier options as the norm.
A systematic review of food environment interventions to improve the
healthfulness of diets of healthcare staff published before May 2017,
commissioned by the behavioural insights team at Public Health England,
concluded (37):
»  Labelling is unlikely to be effective on its own.
»  Offering a smaller size of the main meal of the day is effective – no
compensatory purchasing was observed or decline in sales of the smaller-
sized meal.
»  Making healthier options more accessible than unhealthy options is effective.
For example, putting healthier options at eye-level and putting lower-calorie
options at the front in the most accessible positions.
Page 82

Page 83

21
LOCAL LEVERS FOR DIET AND HEALTHY WEIGHT | REPORT
12 In a survey by Food Standards Scotland conducted in January 2023 (1,764 respondents 16+ years of age), 74% of adults agreed slightly (42%) or strongly
(32%) that “food establishments should offer the option of smaller portion sizes.” In that same survey, half of respondents agreed that “food businesses
have a responsibility to encourage people to eat more healthily” and that they would be more likely to choose a food establishment that offered healthier
choices.
13 The emphasis is on reducing fat given the higher energy density of fat compared to carbohydrates and protein. A modelling study found that a 20%
reduction in fat across both manufactured and out of home food in the UK could reduce average calorie intake by 67.6 kcal/d/person, resulting in a
reduction in average body weight of 2.7 kg over 5 years. See Roberta Alessandrini et al. Am J Clin Nutr 2021;113:1312-1321.
HOW TO TAKE THIS LOCAL LEVER FORWARD
1 .  Work with the out of home sector to calculate and display the
calories of menu items.
2 .  Encourage the out of home sector to reduce the default portion
size offered.12
3 .  Work with the out of home sector to encourage the use of
lower-calorie versions of standard ingredients such as lower fat
mayonnaise and tinned tuna in water instead of oil.13
4 .  Work with the out of home sector to encourage the adoption
of healthier cooking practices such as “shake bang and hang
technique” for fried food and draining food on kitchen roll
before service.
5 .  Work with wholesalers to enable supply of smaller portion sizes
(e.g., smaller takeaway boxes and smaller fish fillets or beef burgers).
Efforts to reduce calories should be careful not to increase salt in
order to increase consumer acceptability. Interventions should not
have a noticeable impact on palatability, should not reduce sales, and,
where possible, should try to minimise the need for special skills /
training /equipment or more time than current practices. A Takeaway
Masterclass offered to the out of home sector including both takeaways
and restaurants is one approach of working with these stakeholders
that has been shown to be acceptable in northern England (38).
This local lever is closely linked with local lever #3, Strengthen public
food procurement and provision standards, and actions mentioned for that local lever
could also be considered in the private sector.
4
Box 4 - Resources
Food Standard Scotland’s Healthier
Catering Guidance covering seven
specific sectors: children’s menus,
Chinese, chip shops, Indian and South
Asian, Italian, Pizza, and sandwich shops
(available in multiple languages)
Scottish Government’s Out of Home
Action Plan and forthcoming voluntary
Eating Out, Eating Well Framework
which will include a Code of Practice for
Children’s Menus
Food Standard Scotland’s MenuCal – a
free tool for food businesses to provide
information about the calories and
allergens in their dishes
Guidance for local authorities, schools,
retailers, caterers and other partners on
what they can do to influence the food
environment around schools: “Beyond
the School Gate - Improving Food
Choices in the School Community”
WORK WITH THE OUT OF
HOME SECTOR TO
REDUCE CALORIES ON
THE MENU
Page 83

Page 84

22
14 This includes all food and drink consumed outside the home and from takeaways consumed inside the home.
15 Included restaurant/pub/night club, fast food outlet, coffee shop/cafe/deli/sandwich bar.
WHY IT’S IMPORTANT IN SCOTLAND
In 2021, people in Scotland, on average, took three out of home food14 trips per week
(39). Quick service restaurants, particularly fish and chip shops and Chinese takeaways,
make up a large proportion of these trips (39). The taste, ease, and quickness of eating
out of home are the main motivators (39). However, out of home food tends to have
larger portion sizes, resulting in greater caloric intake when eating out of home more
frequently as compared to in the home (40). Even for the same brand, portion sizes are
larger in out of home settings versus at the grocery store (41).
An analysis of the National Diet and Nutrition Survey, combining years 2008-2014,
found that food outlets15 accounted for 26% of calories in adults 19-34 years, 24% of
calories in adults 34-49 years, and 23% in adults 50-64 years (42). Since the start of
the pandemic, the percent share of out of home trips that were takeaways (including
deliveries) has more than tripled, with burgers, chicken meals, Chinese, fish, and pizza
the top five purchased products from takeaways (39). Thus, the proportion of calories
coming from these outlets is likely to be even higher today.
In an evaluation of major UK restaurant chains, the average calorie content of a fast
food restaurant meal was 751 kcal and the average calorie content of meals at full
service restaurants was 1,033 kcal, both higher than the recommended 600 kcal per
meal for lunch and dinner (43). A more recent study found that there has been a very
slight, non-significant downward trend in calorie content of restaurant meals, but, on
average, calorie content remains too high (44). Thus, both takeaways and full service
restaurants have lots of scope for reducing calories and helping communities achieve a
healthy weight.
EVIDENCE OF EFFECTIVENESS
Evidence suggests that menu labelling can support food businesses in reformulating
their products or reducing the portion size sold in order to reduce the calorie content
(45). In addition, FSS has reviewed the global evidence of the impact of calorie labelling
on the number of calories purchased or consumed (46). Whilst the evidence base is
mixed, overall it shows a reduction in the number of calories purchased or consumed
when calorie information is present (46). The Scottish Government published a
consultation on mandatory calorie labelling in the out of home sector in April 2022
(47). In England, from April 2022, businesses with over 250 employees are required to
display the calorie information of all items prepared and sold for immediate consumption.
Page 84

Page 85

23
LOCAL LEVERS FOR DIET AND HEALTHY WEIGHT | REPORT
16 Values are standardised mean difference, which is the size of the intervention effect relative to the variability in that effect.
Many takeaway owners currently offer a large portion size out of a desire to offer
customers “value-for-money” but there is a higher profit margin for smaller portion
sizes offered at the same price. One study worked with a fish and chip shop wholesaler
supplying more than 2,500 shops across northern England and Scotland to offer a
smaller portion size option (48). The impact evaluation was limited, but data from seven
of eleven shops that provided sales information showed that the proportion of all
meals sold which were a smaller portion increased from 14% to 21% over six weeks’
intervention (48). Importantly, the wholesale supplier and shop owners were broadly
willing to introduce – and promote using posters (see below) – a smaller portion size
option (48).
The following figure, showing data from Cadario and Chandon (49), compares the
size of effect16 on selection or consumption of a given food or drink according to
different types of interventions (299 effect sizes were included). It clearly shows
that providing nutrition information is less effective than physical changes – for
example, providing pre-sliced fruit, placing healthier options in the “grab and go”
section, using smaller takeaway boxes, or making a smaller portion the default
option. To put the effect sizes in perspective, cognitive-oriented nudges like
providing nutrition information result in, on average, a reduction of calories of 64
kcal whereas behaviour-oriented nudges like making the default option a smaller
portion result in, on average, a reduction of calories of 209 kcal (49).
Examples of promotional posters for smaller portion sizes offered at select fish and chips shops
in northern England. Reproduced without modification from (48). Licensed under CC- BY by Louis
Goffe et al.
Page 85

Page 86

24
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Size of Effect
Smaller portion size of unhealthy options
Physically easier to select healthy options
Encourage healthy options
Increase visibility of healthy options
Smaller portion size of unhealthy options
Colour-coding nutrition information or special logos
Nutrition information
Figure 2
Size of effect of varying intervention types (49)
Page 86

Page 87

25
LOCAL LEVERS FOR DIET AND HEALTHY WEIGHT | REPORT
17 And continue the planned roll out of free school meals to P6 and P7 as soon as local and/or national resources allow
IMPROVE UPTAKE OF
SCHOOL MEALS
HOW TO TAKE THIS LOCAL LEVER FORWARD
1 .  Continue to provide free school lunches to children in primary 1 to 5 (P1-5).17
2 .  Continue to provide and encourage uptake of free school lunches to eligible pupils
in Primary 6 to Secondary 6.
3 .  Remove barriers to uptake, for example, reduce queuing times.
For a flavour of what is working to improve uptake of school meals across Scotland,
readers are referred to the 2021 report for the Poverty and Inequality Commission,
“Tackling Food Insecurity in Scottish Schools: Case Studies of Strengthening Free School
Meal Provision In Scotland.”
WHY IT’S IMPORTANT IN SCOTLAND
Overall, only 50% of pupils in Scotland eat meals (free or paid for)
provided by their school, and this percent continues to decline year on
year (50). The percent is substantially higher in primary school pupils
(60%) compared to secondary school pupils (36%) (50). There is also
substantial variability between schools, ranging from 0-100% of pupils
eating meals (free or paid for) provided by their school, and between
local authorities (Figure 2) (50).
5
Box 5 - Resources
Existing school food regulations:
“Nutritional Requirements for Food and
Drink in Schools (Scotland) Regulations
2020”
Statutory guidance supporting the
implementation of the Nutritional
Requirements: “Healthy eating in schools:
guidance 2020”
Page 87

Page 88

26
East Lothian
Clackm
annanshire
City of Edinburgh
South Ayrshire
Dundee City
W
est Lothian
Renfrewshire
W
est Dunbartonshire
Glasgow
City 1
Angus
East Dunbartonshire
Stirling
Fife
M
oray
East Ayrshire
M
idlothian
Perth &
Kinross
South Lanarkshire
North Ayrshire
Inverclyde
Aberdeen City
Scottish Borders
Falkirk
Highland
Argyll &
Bute
Aberdeenshire
North Lanarkshire
Dum
fries &
Galloway
Na h-Eileanan Siar
Orkney Islands
East Renfrewshire
Shetland Islands
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
Percentage of P1-7 pupils taking school m
eals
(Free or paid for) on census day in 2022
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
Figure 3.
Percentage of P1-7 pupils taking school meals (free or paid for) by local authority in
2022. Data are from the Healthy Living Survey, Supplementary Table 9.
Promoting uptake of school meals is important because analyses of UK-wide
data (Scotland- specific data are not yet available)18 show that children and
young people who consume school lunches are more likely to meet minimum
recommendations for vegetables, protein- rich foods, and fibre compared
to those consuming packed lunches (51). They are also less likely to exceed
recommendations for salt and savoury and sweet snacks (51). Ongoing work to
assess the diets of children and young people aged 2-15 years living in Scotland
will provide up-to-date information on diet quality of school lunches versus packed
lunches specifically in the Scottish context.
While recent evidence (i.e., post-COVID19) is not available, before the pandemic,
the purchase of unhealthy food at lunchtime “beyond the school gate” was
common among pupils in Scotland (52, 53).
Page 88

Page 89

27
LOCAL LEVERS FOR DIET AND HEALTHY WEIGHT | REPORT
19 The survey was completed by 15,582 pupils in more than 200 secondary schools in November- December 2021.
20 A total of 846 young people aged 12-26 years (93% were aged 12-17 years) responded to the survey across 26 local authorities. The question asked: “If
every secondary school pupil in Scotland was given a free school meal at lunchtime in school, would you use it? If you have left school, think back to what
you would have done.”
EVIDENCE OF EFFECTIVENESS
Research in Scotland suggests that long queuing times, poor food quality, an
unwelcoming dining environment, staffing (i.e., presence of teachers in the dining
area), and set dining times for each year group are some of the barriers to school
meal uptake (54, 55). “Fuelled in School? A nation-wide survey of secondary school
pupils’ opinion on school meals in Scotland,” published in 2022,19 confirmed that these
continue to be barriers to uptake in secondary schools across Scotland, particularly the
long queuing times and short lunch breaks.
A briefing by NHS Health Scotland on interventions to prevent childhood overweight
and obesity within schools found that improving the aesthetics of school dining areas
and encouraging positive social interactions in school dining areas may encourage
uptake of school meals (56). However, what interventions are effective at improving the
aesthetics and social interactions in school dining areas remains unclear.
A Food Active report, “Free School Meals: What are the barriers to uptake among
primary and secondary school children?” (57), cited many of the barriers to uptake
mentioned above and gave the following recommendations for schools:
1 .  Create a pleasant dining environment.
2 .  Protect time for lunch.
3 .  Implement a staggered lunch time system to avoid long queues.
4 .  Involve pupils in the development of menus.
5 .  Adopt a system that enables pupils to obtain free school meals in a
dignified and discrete way.
Several evaluations in Scotland have demonstrated that making free school meals
universal increases uptake (58, 59). An evaluation of universal free school meals
for P1-3 pupils in Scotland following their introduction in January 2015 found an
increase of overall school-meal uptake (both free and paid) among primary pupils
from 53% in 2014 to 65% in 2015 (59). The author of the evaluation concluded
this overall increase was due to increased uptake of free school meals among
P1-3 pupils: 79% of P1-3 pupils took a free school meal compared with 53% of
P4-7 pupils (both free and paid) (59).
Page 89

Page 90

28
21 Restricted to members of the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD)
A study conducted in Scotland of the 2007-08 free school meal pilot (P1-P3)
suggested that peer-group take-up of school meals reduced non-participation
by 29-35%, by reducing stigma and signalling that the school meal is a desirable
option (58). This remains important today because while the Education (Scotland)
Act 1980 states that educational authorities must take reasonable steps to ensure
that the fact that a pupil receives school lunches free of charge remains private,
stigma remains a barrier to uptake among young people in Scotland according
to a survey conducted by the Scottish Youth Parliament (SYP) in October and
November 2022 (60). More than 80% of respondents to the SYP survey said that
if universal free school meals were extended to secondary schools, they would
make use of it on a regular basis (41%) or sometimes (42%)20 (60). Around three-
quarters (76%) of young people who responded to the SYP survey said free school
meals would make them more likely to eat lunch at school (60).
An international systematic review21 identified 47 studies that evaluated universal
free school meals (61). Nearly all studies found positive effects on school meal
uptake and that the increases in uptake tended to be largest among students
who previously did not qualify for free school meals (61). Most studies also found
improvements in pupils’ diet quality, particularly when mandatory nutritional
standards for school food and drink were present (61). Of the small number of
studies that evaluated associations with body mass index, results were mixed
with some finding that universal free school meals reduced the risk of obesity and
others finding no significant effect (61).
Space limitations in secondary schools make logistics of increasing uptake of
school meals a major challenge in some parts of Scotland. This is why a linked-
up, long-term approach is needed, including utilising planning to improve food
environments (local lever #2) and working with the out of home sector to reduce
calories on the menu (local lever #4).
Page 90

Page 91

29
LOCAL LEVERS FOR DIET AND HEALTHY WEIGHT | REPORT
PROMOTE AND SUPPORT
PHYSICAL ACTIVITY
HOW TO TAKE THIS LOCAL LEVER FORWARD
In 2022, Public Health Scotland published a report, “A systems-based approach to
physical activity in Scotland. A framework for action at a national and local level,” which
presents a seven-stage evidence-based process “designed to enable practitioners and
policy makers to take forward a systems-based approach to physical activity in Scotland”
(62). In order to ensure alignment with this existing guidance, here we present verbatim
the strategic delivery outcomes and associated actions from that report (see Figure 5b
on pages 20 & 21) (62). Those interested in adopting this local lever should refer to that
document for all other elements associated with delivery.
6
Strategic delivery outcomes Associated actions
Active travel
•  Upskill transport and planning to enhance active
travel infrastructure.
•  Walking, wheeling and cycling infrastructure.
•  Engage communities in transport planning.
•  Road safety and traffic restrictions.
•  Strengthen walking data.
Active places and spaces
•  Integrate urban design, transport and land use
policies.
•  Design guidelines for public amenities.
•  Workforce development for planners, transport
engineers and architects.
•  Develop guidance for National Planning
Framework 4 (NPF4).
•  Access to quality green and open space, green
networks, blue space, active recreational space,
play spaces and sports amenities.
Page 91

Page 92

30
Active workplace
•  Seek opportunities through health board
workplace teams to provide leadership for
workplace policies.
•  Develop national standards for workplace
physical activity.
Active place of learning
•  Health promoting universities framework.
•  Accessible activities in schools, colleges and
universities.
•  Physical education.
•  Initial teacher training and in-service training.
•  Active classrooms and outdoor learning.
Sport and active recreation
•  Enable authorities to fulfil their statutory duties,
in the ‘adequate’ provision of active recreation
and sport.
•  Prioritise public funds to target the least active,
as well as to retain existing and returning
participants.
•  Strengthen access to community assets – places,
spaces, facilities and services across the public
sector.
•  Maximise the public health contribution of
community sport clubs.
•  Enhance the knowledge, skills and competencies
of the sport and active recreation workforce.
Active systems
•  Research, evidence and evaluation.
•  Data and intelligence.
•  Local delivery plans.
•  National delivery plans
•  Capacity.
•  Systems-based approach.
•  Financial mechanisms.
•  Accountability.
•  Leadership.
•  Physical activity as a human right.
Page 92

Page 93

31
LOCAL LEVERS FOR DIET AND HEALTHY WEIGHT | REPORT
22 At least 150 minutes of moderately intensive physical activity or 75 minutes vigorous activity per week or an equivalent combination of both.
23 At least 60 minutes of activity on average per day.
WHY IT’S IMPORTANT IN SCOTLAND
In 2021, 69% of Scottish adults self-reported meeting physical activity guidelines,22
continuing an upward trend since 2012 (63). The percent is similar for children
with 71% meeting the physical activity guidelines (again, according to self-report).23
Adults living in the most deprived areas of Scotland are least likely to meet the
recommendations – 57% versus 77% among adults living in the least deprived
areas (63).
EVIDENCE OF EFFECTIVENESS
The evidence to support each of the eight strategic delivery outcomes
in the table above is summarised in Appendix 2 of the report, “A
systems-based approach to physical activity in Scotland. A framework
for action at a national and local level” (62).
Box 6 - Resources
Public Health Scotland: A systems-based
approach to physical activity in Scotland.
A framework for action at a national and
local level
Active health and social care
•  Physical activity established as a core component
of a world class public health system.
•  Apply learning from Care About Physical Activity.
•  Integrate physical activity into pre-service and
in-service training of medics, nurses, allied health
professionals and social care workers.
•  Engage and support the Movement for Health.
•  Integrate NHS Physical Activity pathway into
routine care and clinical pathways.
•  Partnerships between NHS and physical activity
providers.
Communications and public
education
•  National physical activity communications
subgroup to coordinate targeted campaigns.
•  Adopt best practice principles for communications
and public messaging.
•  Integrate communications and public education
into the Active Scotland Delivery Plan.
Page 93

Page 94

32
PROTECT, PROMOTE, AND
SUPPORT BREASTFEEDING
AND HEALTHY DIETS FOR
CHILDREN
7
HOW TO TAKE THIS LOCAL LEVER FORWARD
Improving nutrition of infants and in early childhood is key for ensuring a healthy
weight as they grow into adults. This involves (i) protection, promotion, and support for
breastfeeding, as well as (ii) the appropriate and timely introduction of complementary
foods, and (iii) ensuring a wide and varied healthy diet throughout early childhood.24
With regards to (i) breastfeeding, “Becoming Breastfeeding Friendly Scotland:
report,” published by the Scottish Government in 2019, includes a priority list of
eight recommendations, almost all of which have relevance to local areas (pasted
verbatim from the report):
1 .  Develop and implement a breastfeeding advocacy and promotion strategy
which brings together and builds upon activity happening at local,
regional and national levels, in order to build awareness of and support
for breastfeeding at multiple levels from community to government.
This will include building a cohesive network of Scottish advocates and
developing a coordinated events calendar building on existing activity.
(page 11)
2 .  To gain and maintain support from policy officials as well as other
influential officials (for example, councils and the relevant Royal Colleges)
in order to collaborate and formalise efforts for legislative change and
advocacy for breastfeeding. (page 17)
3 .  Provide guidance to employers and inform mothers and families about
their rights. (page 27)
4 .  Scottish Government Ministers, officials, and all public sectors employees
should adopt the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk
Substitutes and subsequent relevant WHA resolutions principles within
their work place and in dealings with the public and private sector
through a Code of Conduct. (page 32)
24 This local lever covers children up to their third birthday in order to align with the Framework for Improving Maternal and Infant Nutrition. Scottish
Government advice is that there are nutritional benefits for infants to be breastfed for up to 2 years of age and so the scope should go beyond infants
(which is up to 1 year). Moreover, as discussed in the Framework, nutritional requirements of children vary between 1-3 years and 4-6 years, and so a
practical decision was made to limit the scope to up to 3 years.
Page 94

Page 95

33
LOCAL LEVERS FOR DIET AND HEALTHY WEIGHT | REPORT
25 Over the period April 2020 to June 2021, 23% of eligible people had not claimed the benefit.
5 .  There are nationally coordinated, consistent learning outcomes for
all groups who care for mothers and babies, both in service and pre-
registration, and also volunteers and lay supporters. These outcomes are
based on a competency framework for each group and underpinned by
training and mentorship, supervision and monitoring; together these will
ensure consistency for each group and appropriate, quality assured and
standardised provision. (page 35)
6 .  Women have equitable access to high quality, evidence-based models of
care through sufficient coverage, spread and awareness of audited and
registered core, peer and specialist support providers. Well developed
and maintained referral structures are in place to ensure women receive
the right information and support where and when they need it.
(page 41)
The “Improving Maternal and Infant Nutrition: A Framework for Action,”
published in 2011, highlighted that although there has been a national and
international focus on breastfeeding, there has not been the same focus
on nutrition of young children beyond milk feeding. A review published
in 2019 by NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde provided an update on any
new and relevant studies published since 2011, and came to a similar
conclusion regarding the lack of evidence on effective interventions to
promote nutrition of young children beyond milk feeding (64).
Therefore, with regards to (ii) the appropriate and timely introduction
of complementary foods and (iii) ensuring a wide and varied healthy
diet throughout early childhood, local areas should:
1 .  Continue activities under the Framework to encourage the
introduction of healthy complementary foods at around six months
of age and to gradually increase the amount and variety of foods such
that by 12 months, food rather than milk is the main part of an 
infant’s diet.
2 . Continue to promote Best Start Foods.25
Box 7 - Resources
Scottish Government’s recommendations
for actions which can be taken by NHS
Boards, local authorities, and others
to improve the nutrition of pregnant
women, babies, and young children:
“Improving maternal and infant nutrition:
a framework for action”
Scottish Government’s recommendations
for the continued protection, promotion,
and support for breastfeeding:
“Becoming Breastfeeding Friendly
Scotland: report”
Best Start Foods payments that can be
used to buy healthy food and drink like
milk or fruit
Public Health Scotland’s nutritional
guidance and food standards for early
years childcare providers: “Setting the
Table”
Public Health Scotland’s “Fun first foods:
An easy guide to introducing solid foods”
(available in multiple languages)
First Steps Nutrition Trust’s “Eating Well
Sources”
Parent Club Resources
Page 95

Page 96

34
WHY IT’S IMPORTANT IN SCOTLAND
The percentage of babies born in Scotland who are breastfed has increased steadily
over the past 20 years (65). In 2021/22, 65% of babies were breastfed for at least some
time after their birth (65). However, there are important disparities in breastfeeding
rates: babies born into the most deprived areas of Scotland are substantially less
likely to be breastfed (40%) compared to babies born into the least deprived areas of
Scotland (73%) (65).
With regards to appropriate and timely introduction of complementary foods,
Scottish Government policy recommends that complementary foods should be
introduced to infants around six months of age (66). Some infants may be introduced
to complementary foods earlier than six months for a variety of reasons, however,
current recommendations state that this should never happen before four months
(66). The 2017 Scottish Maternal and Infant Survey (67) found that 96% of respondents
reporting waiting until four months to introduce complementary foods and 46%
reporting waiting until six months or later. Respondents who lived in the most deprived
areas were less likely to wait until six months or later (44%) than respondents who
lived in the least deprived areas (50%). The use of commercial baby foods (for example,
pouches, snacks, jars, tubs, bars, etc.) is common in Scotland: 41% of respondents
reported giving these items to their infant five days or more per week. Respondents
Exclusive Breast
Mixed Breast and Formula
Formula
SIMD 4
SIMD 5 (Least Deprived)
SIMD 3
SIMD 2
SIMD 1 (Most Deprived)
0 20 40 60 80 100
Percent of babies in Scotland 2021/22
Figure 4.
Disparities in Breastfeeding Rates in Scotland
Page 96

Page 97

LOCAL LEVERS FOR DIET AND HEALTHY WEIGHT | REPORT
1 Throughout this report, “unhealthy food and drink” primarily refers to food and drink high in fat, sugar, or salt. 35
who lived in the most deprived areas were more likely to give commercial baby foods
to their infant on a daily basis (38% versus 25% in the least deprived areas) and
less likely to give fruit (61% versus 76%, respectively), vegetables (44% versus 61%,
respectively), and dairy (33% versus 44%, respectively). Treats (for example, chocolate
buttons, ice cream, crisps, or cheese puffs) were given to their infant on a daily basis by
29% of respondents. Respondents who lived in the most deprived areas were more
likely to report giving treats to their infant on a daily basis (39%) than those who lived in
the least deprived areas (18%).
EVIDENCE OF EFFECTIVENESS
Studies, including in the UK, have shown that children who are breastfed have a slightly
lower risk of developing obesity in childhood. For example, an analysis by the Office
for Health Improvement & Disparities found a small inverse association between the
percent of children breastfed in a local area and the prevalence of children living with
obesity and overweight at ages 4-5 years (68). This was independent of other factors
such as deprivation, maternal age, and health behaviours during pregnancy (68). These
findings are consistent with 26 previous studies, which together found that one month
of breastfeeding was associated with a 4.0% decrease in risk of obesity among children
aged 2-6 years (69).
Evidence from the Millennium Cohort Study also suggests that infants who receive
complementary foods before four months are more likely to be overweight at 3 years
of age (70). In addition to the timing of introducing food, the type of foods and drinks
given to infants is also important for later health and establishing eating habits.
A Cochrane review published in 2017 identified 73 trials of breastfeeding support
(71). They concluded that providing extra organised breastfeeding support to
women significantly increases the duration and exclusivity of breastfeeding (71).
The effectiveness of programmes is higher in places with high initiation rates
(71). Characteristics of effective support included: offered as standard by trained
professionals or lay/peer supporters or a combination of both during antenatal
or postnatal care, ongoing scheduled visits so women can predict when support
will be available, face-to-face support, and tailored to the needs of the population
group (71). The aforementioned 2019 review by NHS Greater Glasgow and
Clyde concluded “Evidence from the literature and learning from local models
suggest that the most effective, evidence-based strategy is a combination of health
professional and trained volunteer delivering support to women from the antenatal
period through hospital stay and into the postnatal weeks at home” (64).
Page 97

Page 98

36
26 It should be noted that given the nature of the data collected, findings are based on the participants’ perceptions of impact, rather than objective
measures of impact and may not be generalisable to all Best Start Foods recipients.
The effectiveness of interventions to improve infant and young child feeding
practices has been mixed. Two recent systematic reviews evaluated the evidence
for interventions to improve diets and prevent overweight and obesity in children
under 2 years of age (72, 73). They concluded, “Improving dietary intake at this
age appears challenging based on a relatively limited number of studies” (72) and
that early benefits on child’s body mass index are not sustained (73).
This stage of life is a good opportunity to promote whole family healthy eating
habits (64). Evidence from the Southampton Women’s Study suggests that the
quality of an infant’s diet at six and 12 months is determined by the quality of
the mother’s diet (74), thus interventions that improve mothers’ diets could have
an impact on infant diets. However, more research is needed to understand
“what works.”
Best Start Foods, which replaced the UK Healthy Start Vouchers in Scotland from
August 2019 with the transition complete by March 2020, was designed to provide
financial support for low income families with young children to access nutritious
food. It is one of a range of Scottish Government policies set out in the Tackling
Child Poverty Delivery Plan. An evaluation involving 33 in-depth interviews with
Best Start Foods recipients across Scotland conducted between December 2021
and February 2022 found that the programme has enabled mothers and children
to eat more healthy foods (75).26 “For example, recipients purchase healthier
snacks for their children, instead of processed foods like crisps, and some use
payments to experiment with new healthy recipes. Recipients also say the benefit
gives them more freedom to let their children try a greater range of healthy foods
without worrying about wasting money or food” (75). Continued evaluation of
Best Start Foods will help establish its impact on infant and young child diets and
healthy weight.
Page 98

Page 99

37
LOCAL LEVERS FOR DIET AND HEALTHY WEIGHT | REPORT
REFERENCES
1.  Akhtar PC, Currie DB, Currie CE, Haw SJ. Changes in child
exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (CHETS) study
after implementation of smoke-free legislation in Scotland:
national cross sectional survey. BMJ. 2007;335(7619):545.
2.  Haw SJ, Gruer L. Changes in exposure of adult non-smokers
to secondhand smoke after implementation of smoke-free
legislation in Scotland: national cross sectional survey. BMJ.
2007;335(7619):549.
3.  Hyland A, Hassan LM, Higbee C, Boudreau C, Fong GT,
Borland R, et al. The impact of smokefree legislation
in Scotland: results from the Scottish ITC: Scotland/UK
longitudinal surveys. Eur J Public Health. 2009;19(2):198-205.
4.  Scottish Government. Creating a Tobacco-Free Generation.
A Tobacco Control Strategy for Scotland. Edinburgh:
Scottish Government,; 2013. https://www.gov.scot/
binaries/content/documents/govscot/publications/
strategy-plan/2013/03/tobacco-control-strategy-creating-
tobacco-free-generation/documents/creating-tobacco-free-
generation-tobacco-control-strategy-scotland/creating-
tobacco-free-generation-tobacco-control-strategy-scotland/
govscot%3Adocument/00417331.pdf
5.  Finch DW, Heather; Bibby, Jo. Leave no one behind. The
state of health and health inequalities in Scotland. London:
The Health Foundation; 2023.
6.  National Statistics. Primary 1 Body Mass Index (BMI)
statistics Scotland. School year 2021 to 2022 Edinburgh:
Public Health Scotland; 2022 [Available from: https://
publichealthscotland.scot/publications/primary-1-
body-mass-index-bmi-statistics-scotland/primary-1-
body-mass-index-bmi-statistics-scotland-school-year-
2021-to-2022/#:~:text=Marked%20socioeconomic%20
inequalities%20in%20child,in%20the%20least%20
deprived%20areas
7.  Harper HH, Michael. Counting Calories. How under-
reporting can explain the apparent fall in calorie intake.
London: Behavioural Insights Ltd; 2016. https://www.
bi.team/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/16-07-12-Counting-
Calories-Final.pdf
8.  de Vocht F NJ, Scott L, Jago R, Horwood J, Sillero Rejon C,
Cummins S, Rowan Brockman, Sarah Blake, Toumpakari Z.
Reducing population exposure to unhealthy commodity
advertising: evaluation of the Bristol Advertising and
Sponsorship Policy (pre-intervention Data Collection). NIHR
Open Research,. 2023.
9.  Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and the
Department for Digital C, Media and Sport (DCMS);.
Adjusting for displacement London: UK Government;
2021 [Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/
consultations/total-restriction-of-online-advertising-
for-products-high-in-fat-sugar-and-salt-hfss/evidence-
note#adjusting-for-displacement
10.  Olsen JR, Patterson C, Caryl FM, Robertson T, Mooney
SJ, Rundle AG, et al. Exposure to unhealthy product
advertising: Spatial proximity analysis to schools and socio-
economic inequalities in daily exposure measured using
Scottish Children’s individual-level GPS data. Health Place.
2021;68:102535.
11.  Robertson T, Jepson R, Lambe K, Olsen JR, Thornton LE.
Socio-economic patterning of food and drink advertising at
public transport stops in Edinburgh, UK. Public Health Nutr.
2022;25(5):1131-9.
12.  Boyland EJ, Kavanagh-Safran M, Halford JC. Exposure to
‘healthy’ fast food meal bundles in television advertisements
promotes liking for fast food but not healthier choices in
children. Br J Nutr. 2015;113(6):1012-8.
13.  Scotland; EoSPaOA. Outdoor Advertising. Policy
Arrangements in the East of Scotland. Glasgow: Obesity
Action Scotland; 2021. https://www.obesityactionscotland.
org/publications/reports/outdoor-advertising-policy-
arrangements-in-east-of-scotland/
14.  Yau A, Berger N, Law C, Cornelsen L, Greener R, Adams
J, et al. Changes in household food and drink purchases
following restrictions on the advertisement of high fat,
salt, and sugar products across the Transport for London
network: A controlled interrupted time series analysis. PLoS
Med. 2022;19(2):e1003915.
15.  Pell D, Mytton O, Penney TL, Briggs A, Cummins S, Penn-
Jones C, et al. Changes in soft drinks purchased by British
households associated with the UK soft drinks industry
levy: controlled interrupted time series analysis. BMJ.
2021;372:n254.
16.  Thomas C, Breeze P, Cummins S, Cornelsen L, Yau
A, Brennan A. The health, cost and equity impacts of
restrictions on the advertisement of high fat, salt and
sugar products across the transport for London network: a
health economic modelling study. International Journal of
Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2022;19(1):93.
17.  Reynolds J. TfL ad revenues unscathed by junk food ban
London: The Media Leader; 2019 [Available from: https://
the-media-leader.com/tfl-ad-revenues-unscathed-by-junk-
food-ban/
18.  Census; Ss. Transport Edinburgh: Scottish Government;
2022 [Available from: https://www.scotlandscensus.gov.uk/
census-results/at-a-glance/transport/
19.  Transport Scotland. Scottish Transport Statistics 2022.
Summary Transport Statistics. Glasgow: Transport Scotland;
2023. https://www.transport.gov.scot/media/53065/
summary-chapter-scottish-transport-statistics-2022.pdf
20.  JRS. Consumer Attitudes Towards the Diet and Food
Environment in Scotland. Aberdeen: Food Standards
Scotland; 2023. https://www.foodstandards.gov.scot/
publications-and-research/publications/consumer-attitudes-
towards-the-diet-and-food-environment-in-scotland-
research-report
21.  Sauveplane-Stirling V, Crichton D, Tessier S, Parrett A, Garcia
AL. The food retail environment and its use in a deprived,
urban area of Scotland. Public Health. 2014;128(4):360-6.
22.  Pacheco AF. PhD thesis: Examination of the community
food environment and the drivers affecting and impacting
obesogenicity in a deprived urban neighbourhood in
Scotland. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh; 2020. https://
era.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/37601]
Page 99

Page 100

38
23.  Macdonald L, Olsen JR, Shortt NK, Ellaway A. Do
‘environmental bads’ such as alcohol, fast food, tobacco,
and gambling outlets cluster and co-locate in more deprived
areas in Glasgow City, Scotland? Health & Place. 2018;
51:224-31.
24.  Macintyre S, McKay L, Cummins S, Burns C. Out-of-home
food outlets and area deprivation: Case study in Glasgow,
UK. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical
Activity. 2005;2.
25.  Macdonald L, Cummins S, Macintyre S. Neighbourhood fast
food environment and area deprivation—substitution or
concentration? Appetite. 2007;49(1):251-4.
26.  Atanasova P, Kusuma D, Pineda E, Frost G, Sassi F, Miraldo
M. The impact of the consumer and neighbourhood food
environment on dietary intake and obesity-related outcomes:
A systematic review of causal impact studies. Soc Sci Med.
2022;299:114879.
27.  Mah CL, Luongo G, Hasdell R, Taylor NGA, Lo BK. A
Systematic Review of the Effect of Retail Food Environment
Interventions on Diet and Health with a Focus on the
Enabling Role of Public Policies. Curr Nutr Rep. 2019;
8(4):411-28.
28.  Ironside Farrar. Research Project: To Explore the Relationship
Between the Food Environment and the Planning System.
Edinburgh: Scottish Government; 2018.
29.  Bird EL, Ige JO, Pilkington P, Pinto A, Petrokofsky C, Burgess-
Allen J. Built and natural environment planning principles for
promoting health: an umbrella review. BMC Public Health.
2018;18(1):930.
30.  Soil Association, editor Food systems change through public
procurement: Scottish experiences. Northern Real Farming
Conference; 2021; Online: Soil Association.
31.  Government CS. National Workforce Strategy for Health and
Social Care in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Government;
2022. https://www.gov.scot/publications/national-workforce-
strategy-health-social-care/documents/
32.  Population Health Directorate. Criteria for the Healthcare
Retail Standard Edinburgh: Scottish Government; 2016
[Available from: https://www.gov.scot/publications/criteria-
healthcare-retail-standard-9781786525673/pages/7/
33.  Stead M, Eadie D, McKell J, Sparks L, MacGregor A, Anderson
AS. Making hospital shops healthier: evaluating the
implementation of a mandatory standard for limiting food
products and promotions in hospital retail outlets. BMC
Public Health. 2020;20(1):132.
34.  Pechey R, Marteau TM. Availability of healthier vs. less healthy
food and food choice: an online experiment. BMC Public
Health. 2018;18(1):1296.
35.  Allan JL, Duthie S, Heddle M, McKenzie F, Webb S, Johnston
M. Healthy snacks in hospitals: Testing the potential effects of
changes in availability. Nutr Health. 2021;27(3):321-7.
36.  Shipton D. Evaluation of the implementation and impact
of the Healthcare Retail Standard in Scottish hospitals and
other NHS facilities in 2017. Edinburgh: NHS Health 
Scotland; 2019.
37.  Al-Khudairy L, Uthman OA, Walmsley R, Johnson S, Oyebode
O. Choice architecture interventions to improve diet and/
or dietary behaviour by healthcare staff in high-income
countries: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9(1):e023687.
38.  Hillier-Brown F, Lloyd S, Muhammad L, Summerbell C, Goffe
L, Hildred N, et al. Feasibility and acceptability of a Takeaway
Masterclass aimed at encouraging healthier cooking
practices and menu options in takeaway food outlets. Public
Health Nutr. 2019;22(12):2268-78.
39.  Kantar. Out of home - Scotland 2021. Aberdeen: Food
Standards Scotland; 2022. https://www.foodstandards.gov.
scot/publications-and-research/publications/out-of-home-
scotland-2021
40.  Goffe L, Rushton S, White M, Adamson A, Adams J.
Relationship between mean daily energy intake and
frequency of consumption of out-of-home meals in the UK
National Diet and Nutrition Survey. International Journal of
Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2017;14(1):131.
41.  Davies S. Time to Solve Childhood Obesity. An Independent
Report by the Chief Medical Officer, 2019. Professor Dame
Sally Davies. London: Department of Health and Social Care;
2019. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/time-to-
solve-childhood-obesity-cmo-special-report
42.  Ziauddeen N, Almiron-Roig E, Penney TL, Nicholson S,
Kirk SFL, Page P. Eating at Food Outlets and “On the Go”
Is Associated with Less Healthy Food Choices in Adults:
Cross-Sectional Data from the UK National Diet and
Nutrition Survey Rolling Programme (2008-2014). Nutrients.
2017;9(12).
43.  Robinson E, Jones A, Whitelock V, Mead BR, Haynes A. (Over)
eating out at major UK restaurant chains: observational study
of energy content of main meals. BMJ. 2018;363:k4982.
44.  Huang Y, Theis DRZ, Burgoine T, Adams J. Trends in energy
and nutrient content of menu items served by large UK chain
restaurants from 2018 to 2020: an observational study. BMJ
Open. 2021;11(12):e054804.
45.  Rincón-Gallardo PS, Zhou M, Da Silva Gomes F, Lemaire R,
Hedrick V, Serrano E, et al. Effects of Menu Labeling Policies
on Transnational Restaurant Chains to Promote a Healthy
Diet: A Scoping Review to Inform Policy and Research.
Nutrients. 2020;12(6).
46.  Garden LW, Laura; Davidson, Lyndsay; Milne, Anne Rapid
Evidence Review: How Effective is Calorie Labelling in the
Out of Home Sector? Aberdeen: Food Standards Scotland;
2022. https://www.foodstandards.gov.scot/publications-and-
research/publications/rapid-evidence-review-how-effective-
is-calorie-labelling-in-the-out-of-home-sector
47.  Scottish Government. Mandatory calorie labelling in the out
of home sector in Scotland. Edinburgh Scottish Government;
2023. https://consult.gov.scot/population-health/mandatory-
calorie-labelling/
48.  Goffe L, Hillier-Brown F, Hildred N, Worsnop M, Adams J,
Araujo-Soares V, et al. Feasibility of working with a wholesale
supplier to co-design and test acceptability of an intervention
to promote smaller portions: an uncontrolled before-and-
after study in British Fish & Chip shops. BMJ Open.
2019;9(2):e023441.
49.  Cadario R, Chandon P. Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work
Best? A Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments. Marketing
Science. 2019;39(3):465-86.
50.  National Statistics. School Healthy Living Survey statistics
2022. Edinburgh: Scottish Government; 2022. https://
www.gov.scot/publications/school-healthy-living-survey-
statistics-2022/
Page 100

Page 101

39
LOCAL LEVERS FOR DIET AND HEALTHY WEIGHT | REPORT
51.  Haney E, Parnham JC, Chang K, Laverty AA, von Hinke S,
Pearson-Stuttard J, et al. Dietary quality of school meals
and packed lunches: a national study of primary and
secondary schoolchildren in the UK. Public Health Nutr.
2022:1-12.).
52.  Crawford F, Mackison D, Mooney JD, Ellaway A.
Observation and assessment of the nutritional quality of
‘out of school’ foods popular with secondary school pupils
at lunchtime. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):887.
53.  Macdiarmid JI, Wills WJ, Masson LF, Craig LCA, Bromley C,
McNeill G. Food and drink purchasing habits out of school
at lunchtime: a national survey of secondary school pupils
in Scotland. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition
and Physical Activity. 2015;12(1):98.
54.  Wills W, Backett-Milburn K, Gregory S, Lawton J. The
influence of the secondary school setting on the food
practices of young teenagers from disadvantaged
backgrounds in Scotland. Health Educ Res.
2005;20(4):458-65.
55.  Wills W, Danesi G, Kapetanaki AB, Hamilton L. Socio-
Economic Factors, the Food Environment and Lunchtime
Food Purchasing by Young People at Secondary School.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(9).
56.  Martin L. Evidence for environmental interventions to
prevent childhood overweight and obesity within schools.
Edinburgh: NHS Health Scotland; 2017.
57.  FoodAct!ve. Free School Meals: What are the barriers to
uptake among primary and secondary school children?
. Liverpool: FoodAct!ve; 2022. https://foodactive.org.uk/
new-school-food-resources-school-food-update-barriers-
to-free-school-meal-uptake/
58.  Holford A. Take-up of Free School Meals: Price Effects and
Peer Effects. Economica. 2015;82(328):976-93.
59.  McAdams R. Evaluating universal infant free school meals,
Scotland: second monitoring report of school-meal
uptake. Edinburgh: NHS Health Scotland; 2016. https://
www.healthscotland.scot/publications/universal-free-
school-meals-second-monitoring-report
60.  Scottish Youth Parliament. Young People’s Right to Food.
Edinburgh: Scottish Youth Parliament,; 2023. https://syp.
org.uk/right-to-food-report-launch/
61.  Cohen JFW, Hecht AA, McLoughlin GM, Turner L,
Schwartz MB. Universal School Meals and Associations
with Student Participation, Attendance, Academic
Performance, Diet Quality, Food Security, and Body Mass
Index: A Systematic Review. Nutrients. 2021;13(3):911.
62.  Public Health Scotland. A systems-based approach to
physical activity in Scotland. Edinburgh: Public Health
Scotland,; 2022. https://publichealthscotland.scot/
publications/a-systems-based-approach-to-physical-
activity-in-scotland/
63.  National Statistics. The Scottish Health Survey. 2021
Edition. . Edinburgh: Scottish Government; 2022.
64.  NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde. Maternal and
Infant Nutrition Framework (MINF) Evidence Review
Glasgow: NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde; 2019
[Available from: https://www.stor.scot.nhs.uk/bitstream/
handle/11289/580041/MINF%20Literature_Review.
pdf?sequence=20&isAllowed=y
65.  Public Health Scotland. Infant feeding statistics. Financial
year 2021 to 2022 Edinburgh: Public Health Scotland,;
2022 [Available from: https://publichealthscotland.scot/
publications/infant-feeding-statistics/infant-feeding-
statistics-financial-year-2021-to-2022/#:~:text=Almost%20
two%20thirds%20(65%25),some%20time%20after%20
their%20birth
66.  Public Health Scotland. Fun first foods: An easy
guide to introducing solid foods Edinburgh: Public
Health Scotland,; 2022 [Available from: https://www.
healthscotland.com/documents/303.aspx
67.  Scottish Government. Scottish maternal and infant
nutrition survey 2017 Edinburgh: Scottish Government,;
2018 [Available from: https://www.gov.scot/publications/
scottish-maternal-infant-nutrition-survey-2017/
68.  Office for Health Improvement & Disparities. Small area
associations between breastfeeding and obesity. London:
Office for Health Improvement & Disparities,; 2022.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/
uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1079224/
Small-area-associations-between-breastfeeding-and-
obesity.pdf
69.  Qiao J, Dai LJ, Zhang Q, Ouyang YQ. A Meta-Analysis of the
Association Between Breastfeeding and Early Childhood
Obesity. J Pediatr Nurs. 2020;53:57-66.
70.  Hawkins SS, Cole TJ, Law C, Group atMCSCH. An
ecological systems approach to examining risk factors
for early childhood overweight: findings from the UK
Millennium Cohort Study. J Epidemiol Community Health.
2009;63(2):147-55.
71.  McFadden A, Gavine A, Renfrew MJ, Wade A, Buchanan
P, Taylor JL, et al. Support for healthy breastfeeding
mothers with healthy term babies. Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews. 2017(2).
72.  Butler ÉM, Fangupo LJ, Cutfield WS, Taylor RW. Systematic
review of randomised controlled trials to improve dietary
intake for the prevention of obesity in infants aged 0–24
months. Obes Rev. 2021;22(2):e13110.
73.  Koplin JJ, Kerr JA, Lodge C, Garner C, Dharmage SC, Wake
M, et al. Infant and young child feeding interventions
targeting overweight and obesity: A narrative review.
Obes Rev. 2019;20(S1):31-44.
74.  Robinson S, Marriott L, Poole J, Crozier S, Borland S,
Lawrence W, et al. Dietary patterns in infancy: the
importance of maternal and family influences on feeding
practice. Br J Nutr. 2007;98(5):1029-37.
75.  Scottish Government. Best Start Foods: evaluation
Edinburgh: Scottish Government; 2022 [Available from:
https://www.gov.scot/publications/evaluation-best-start-
foods/
Page 101

Page 102

40
APPENDIX
LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED FOR
INITIAL LOCAL LEVER LIST
1.  UNICEF (2019). “UNICEF programming guidance. Prevention of overweight
and obesity in children and adolescents.” Available from: https://www.
unicef.org/media/92336/file/Programming-Guidance-Overweight-
Prevention.pdf
2.	 	WHO	(2022).	“Draft	Updated	Appendix	3	of	the	WHO	Global	NCD	action	plan	
2013-2030.” Available from: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/
ncds/mnd/2022_discussion_paper_final.pdf?sfvrsn=78343686_7
3.	 	WHO	(2022).	Science	and	Technology	in	childhood	Obesity	Prevention	
(STOP)	series	of	policy	briefs.	Available	from:	https://www.stopchildobesity.
eu/policy-briefs/
4.	 	Chief	Medical	Officer	(2019).	“Time	to	solve	childhood	obesity:	CMO	
special	report.	An	independent	report	by	former	Chief	Medical	Officer	
(CMO)	Professor	Dame	Sally	Davies.”	Available	from:	https://www.gov.uk/
government/publications/time-to-solve-childhood-obesity-cmo-special-
report
5.	 	Arnot,	Julie	(2019).	“Scottish	Public	Health	Network	(ScotPHN).	An	Overview	
of Local Authority Powers Relating to Public Health.” Available from: https://
www.scotphn.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019_09_09-LA-Powers-
Final-Draft.pdf
6.  National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) (2022). “How can
local	authorities	reduce	obesity?	Insights	from	NIHR	research.”	Available	
from: https://evidence.nihr.ac.uk/how-local-authorities-can-reduce-obesity/
7.	 	NICE	(2012).	“Obesity:	working	with	local	communities.”	Available	from:	
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ph42
8.  Public Health Scotland (2022). “A systems-based approach to physical
activity in Scotland. A framework for action at a national and local level.”
Available from: https://publichealthscotland.scot/publications/a-systems-
based-approach-to-physical-activity-in-scotland/
9.	 	Obesity	Health	Alliance	(2021).	“Turning	the	Tide.	A	10-year	Healthy	Weight	
Strategy.” Available from: https://obesityhealthalliance.org.uk/turning-the-
tide-strategy
10.  Hawkes, Corinna; Walton, Stephanie; Haddad, Lawrence; Fanzo, Jessica
(2020). “Centre for Food Policy Research Brief. 42 policies and actions to
orient food systems towards healthier diets for all.” Available from: https://
researchcentres.city.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/583517/42-Actions-
v5-ALT-updated.pdf
Page 102

Page 103

LOCAL LEVERS FOR DIET AND HEALTHY WEIGHT | REPORT
41
11.  Holmes, Jonathon (2021). “Tackling obesity. The role of the NHS in a
whole-system approach.” Available from: https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/
publications/tackling-obesity-nhs
12.	 	Bagnall,	Anne-Marie;	Radley,	Duncan;	Jones,	Rebecca;	Gately,	Paul;	Nobles,	
James; Van Dijk, Margie; Blackshaw, Jamie; Montel, Sam; Sahota, Pinki (2019).
“Whole systems approaches to obesity and other complex public health
challenges: a systematic review.” Available from: https://bmcpublichealth.
biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-018-6274-z
13.	 	Theis,	Dolly;	White,	Martin	(2020).	“Is	Obesity	Policy	in	England	Fit	for	
Purpose?	Analysis	of	Government	Strategies	and	Policies,	1992-2020.”	
Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-
0009.12498
14.	 	Daniell,	Shaun;	Coffey,	Tom;	Ashrafian,	Hutan;	Darzi,	Ara	(2021).	“Systematic	
review into city interventions to address obesity.” Available from: https://
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589537020304545?via%3Dihub
In addition to the above-mentioned documents, we reviewed Food Active position
statements and whole-systems approach to obesity case studies from England and
Scotland	published	by	the	Local	Government	Association,	Public	Health	England,	
Obesity	Action	Scotland,	Public	Health	Scotland,	and	the	National	Children’s	Bureau.
Page 103

Page 104

Page 104

Page 105

LOCAL LEVERS FOR DIET AND HEALTHY WEIGHT | REPORT
Page 105

Page 106

44
www.obesityactionscotland.org
Twitter - @obesityactionsc
E-mail - info@obesityactionscotland.org
Obesity Action Scotland
232-242 St Vincent Street Glasgow
G2 5RJ
This report was compiled and published by Obesity Action Scotland, Royal College of
Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow in conjunction with University of Edinburgh Global
Academy of Agriculture and Food Systems
Page 106

Page 107

Reflecting on 2025 :Progress in Moray’s
Whole Systems Approach to Healthy
Weight
Item 3.
Page 107

Page 108

In This Issue 
What you will find in this reflection includes but not limited to the following;
• Understanding Whole Systems Approach
• Why it's important- national context
• Why it's important -local context
• What we did
• What we achieved together
• Partner spotlight
• Next steps- Looking ahead to 2026!
• Appreciation from the Core Working Team
Page 108

Page 109

Key Highlights 
• Stakeholder Engagement Workshops: We successfully hosted three workshops
bringing together partners across sectors to Identify perceived causes of overweight
and obesity in Moray, map existing actions, identify gaps, and co-create solutions.
These sessions strengthened local partnerships  and  produced system causal map.  
• Action Mapping & Gap Analysis: Through collective effort, we identified factors
reinforcing overweight and obesity locally and prioritised actions (draft) that address
both the environment and individual lifestyle factors. for example the Google map
produced through student placement activity showed the connection between the
built environment and unhealthy weight ( Asset Map) - Click this link Here for more
information.
• Community-Centred Actions: Several proposed actions focused on improving access
to healthier food options, promoting active lifestyles, and supporting wellbeing in
workplaces and communities.
• Data-Driven Insights: Improved use of local insights has informed decision-making,
ensuring that our draft action plan is evidence-based and tailored to Moray’s unique
needs.
Page 109

Page 110

• Shared Vision for 2026: We’ve laid the groundwork for a comprehensive draft action
plan that will guide our efforts in the coming year.
• Previous workshop report click this link-Here 
Page 110

Page 111

In Moray, Food Insecurity is significantly lower than the Scottish average
This suggests that people in Moray generally have better access to food resources than the
national average, possibly due to local economic conditions? community support? or food
supply system?.
However, lower food insecurity does not necessarily mean better diet quality, as  data
shows, fruit and vegetable uptake among children is still low. This highlights that
affordability and access might not be the only barriers; cultural preferences, habits, and
convenience also play a role. So, while basic access to food may be less of a problem as
shown in the SHS, diet quality and healthy eating habits remain key challenges.
Source: Scottish Health Survey 2024 
See below Family and School community engagement briefing. 
Click link for full evaluation report Here
Page 111

Page 112

Page 112

Page 113

What we did? 
Page 113

Page 114

Identified perceived causes of overweight and Obesity in Moray 
Page 114

Page 115

Identified Key themes 
Page 115

Page 116

Mapped current actions against identified causes 
Produced Draft Vision Statement
“Our vision is a Moray where healthy choices are easy, appealing, and accessible for
everyone - a place where communities, organisations, and workplaces connect to create
healthy lives, and where collective leadership drives collaboration, accountability, and
shared action.” 
Page 116

Page 117

Action Planning Workshop -Tuesday 2nd December 
Page 117

Page 118

Produced Draft Action Plan 
2026 Vision board 
Page 118

Page 119

Next step
Refine Vision Statement  click the link Heathy Weight Moray
Voices from Our Stakeholders
“The workshops gave us a platform to align our efforts and think beyond traditional
health interventions. It’s about creating environments where healthy choices are easier.”
“Collaboration has been key. By working together, we’ve identified gaps and opportunities
that no single organisation could tackle alone.”
''As it was the first of such workshops which I have attended I was heartened by meeting
other participants from different organisations. It was good to connect with and hear the
ideas and testimonies of the other participants''.
Page 119

Page 120

‘’How interactive it was, seated exercises, table conversations’’ 
Page 120

Page 121

Partner Spotlight 
• Moray Council: Led efforts to merge the Whole Systems Approach (WSA) to Physical
Activity Plan with the WSA to healthy weight , The transport team supported our
Page 121

Page 122

student placement in mapping transport links in Moray, this information encourage
considerations into local planning and transport strategies.
• Free venue for future workshops and meetings- Elgin Library
• Schools & Youth Groups (Elgin Youth Café): Delivered engagements on healthy
eating, and mental wellbeing through the Snack-Tember Campaign in September
empowering young voices and families in decision-making.
• Third Sector Organisations: TSI Moray  links and active promotion of the WSA work
at the Health and Wellbeing Hub
• Local Businesses: Moray Leisure Centre provided delicious spread for lunch and led
on seated exercise session at our last workshop supporting healthier food options
and active breaks.
• Elgin Sports Community Trust- Offer of free venue for future workshop and meetings
Thank you to all partners, stakeholders, and community members who have contributed to
this journey. Together, we are building a healthier future for Moray. 
Page 122

Page 123

Page 123

Page 124

Page 124

Page 125

Thank you for a productive year! 
Wishing  You and Yours a Healthy Christmas and New Year!
WSA Core Working Team 
Page 125

Page 126

Contact Us 
Report Produced by : Nonye Agbaza
Area Public Health Coordinator-  HEAL / WSA
Health Improvement Team, Health and Social Care Moray
Visit us on - Facebook
Page 126

Page 127

REPORT TO: COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD ON WEDNESDAY 11 FEBRUARY
2026
SUBJECT: UPDATE ON POVERTY IN MORAY INCLUDING CHILDREN IN LOW
INCOME FAMILIES (CILIF) AND CHILD POVERTY 2023-24 –
NATIONAL AND LOCAL ANALYSIS 
BY: ELIZABETH ROBINSON, CONSULTANT IN PUBLIC HEALTH, NHS
GRAMPIAN
IAIN SNEDDON, RESEARCH AND INFORMATION OFFICER, MORAY
COUNCIL 
1. REASON FOR REPORT
1.1 To update the Board on Child Poverty Data for Moray and progress towards a new
strategic approach to child poverty reduction.
2. RECOMMENDATION
2.1  It is recommended that the Community Planning Board (CPB) consider and note the
latest Child Poverty Data for Moray and the development of a Lived Experience panel
and Delphi method to build a consensus set of 3–5 priority anti-poverty interventions
for Moray (short-, medium-, and longer-term). 
3. BACKGROUND
3.1 Every year the lives of children and their parents across the UK are cut short by
poverty. The harm that poverty causes to the health of individuals also affects: 
• our economy, by reducing people’s ability to work and contribute fully 
• public services, such as healthcare, education, housing and social care
Item 4.
Page 127

Page 128

• government budgets, through increased spending on welfare and reduced tax
income
3.2 The Scottish Budget 2026 includes a commitment to increasing the Scottish Child
Payment, funding for breakfast clubs and activity clubs, employability and childcare. 
3.3 A priority of the Moray Community Planning Partnership (CPP) is to reduce Child
Poverty.  The Board receives an annual update on progress towards this target.  As
noted in a paper of July 2025, while individual agencies continue to deliver activity to
tackle poverty in Moray, and recognising the commitment to national action, we are
not yet reversing the trend.  
4.  KEY MATTERS RELEVANT TO RECOMMENDATION 
4.1  Child poverty in Scotland is due to causes, or drivers, partially or wholly outside
parents’ control and always outside of children’s control. These drivers include: 
• income from employment
• cost of living
• income from social security and benefits in kind 
4.2 Solutions therefore include:
• improving employment rights, including better access to paid parental and carers
leave, and more flexible working options 
• raising the National Living Wage to match the Real Living Wage and extending it to
younger parents 
• creating good jobs in areas with the highest levels of poverty, using targeted
investment and economic development 
• embedding fair work principles in public sector contracts and spending, ensuring
parents have access to well-paid, secure jobs 
4.3 To support this we are working with a Lived Experience Panel and a Delphi method to
build consensus across Moray of 3–5 priority anti-poverty interventions (short-,
medium-, and longer-term), which will then be brought back to the Poverty Event
already committed to by the Moray CPB. 
4.4 A Delphi method is a systematic interactive way of gaining opinions/forecasts from a
panel of independent experts (i.e. people with lived experience) over 2 or more
rounds. It is a type of consensus method which does not require face to face
Page 128

Page 129

meetings, recommended by Healthcare Improvement Scotland and will be used in
conjunction with existing community engagement methodologies being utilised
within Moray. 
4.5 Outputs of this session will include:
• A costed action plan with owners, timelines, equality impact assessment (EqIA),
and measurable indicators.
• A Lived Experience Advisory Panel (LEAP) embedded in CPP governance for ongoing
monitoring.
• A data & insight baseline and draft public dashboard for accountability. 
5. CONCLUSION
5.1  The Community Planning Board is asked to note and continue to provide support for
the local child poverty data for Moray and the activity being undertaken to support a
local strategic action plan. 
Author of Report: Elizabeth Robinson (Consultant in Public Health, NHS
Grampian) 
Background Papers: Appendix 1: Children in Low Income Families (CILIF) and Child
Poverty 2023-24 – National and Local Analysis
Delphi Model: Navigating policy complexity: a Delphi method
approach | Nesta 
Page 129

Page 130

Page 130

Page 131

1 
Children in Low Income Families (CILIF) and Child
Poverty 2023-24 – National and Local Analysis 
AUTHOR: Iain Sneddon, Research & Information Officer, Moray Council
INTRODUCTION
On March 27, 2025, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) published the most recent UK-wide
Children (aged 0-15) Living in Low Income Families (CILIF) dataset for 2023/24, detailing the proportions
of children in low-income families across all UK Local Authorities. While numerical data is also available
for individuals aged 0–19, due to changes within the 16–19-year-old cohort, DWP does not provide
proportional data for this age group. It is important to note that CILIF statistics, though foundational for
deriving ‘Child Poverty’ figures, are distinct from the official measure of ‘Child Poverty’ due to differences
in methodology. The CILIF dataset reports the number and proportion of children living in both relative
and absolute low income1 before housing costs (BHC) at the small local area level2. In contrast, the
recognised measure of Child Poverty is based on after housing costs (AHC)3, which generally results in
higher reported rates of children in poverty.
In June 2025, updated UK-wide Relative Child Poverty4 data was released (End Child Poverty 2023/24),
providing a resource commonly used by all UK local authorities. Unless otherwise specified, all
references to ‘Poverty’ in this report pertain to ‘Relative Poverty’. Furthermore, child poverty data
encompasses a wider age range, including children aged 0-15 as well as those aged 16-19 who are
engaged in full-time non-advanced education5, thereby maintaining eligibility for Child Benefit and the
Child Element of Universal Credit for their parents or carers.
Previous two editions of this report incorporated data from the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation
(SIMD 2020), alongside information from Moray Council and partner agencies, to provide additional
context. This year, SIMD data has not been included. At five years old, SIMD 2020 is now considered too
dated to add meaningful insight. The delay of Scotland’s Census has postponed the release of new SIMD
data until late 2026. Previous analysis has shown that including local data makes little difference to the
overall picture of poverty levels in Moray. While useful, the extra time and resources required to
incorporate local data cannot be justified for this report.
Small area population estimates are released less frequently than mid-year estimates. The current
analysis is based on 2022 estimates—the latest available—as the National Records of Scotland (NRS) will
not publish figures for 2023 and 2024 until winter 2025. Figures, proportions, and related calculations
may change when the new data becomes available. Comparisons of mid-year estimates for Moray
between 2022 and 2024 for the 0-15 and 0-19 cohorts show no significant statistical variation affecting 
1 The ‘Income’ measure used is ‘Net Income’ (Gross Income + Benefits – Tax, National Insurance & Pension
contributions).
2 Intermediate Zone (24 in Moray), Data Zone (126), Output areas (799) & Local Authority.
3 Housing Costs (Rent or mortgage interest payments, water rates, structural insurance payments and ground rent
and service charges)
4 Relative Poverty / Child Poverty – described as: People / Children living in households whose equivalised income is
below 60% of UK median income in the same year after housing costs (AHC).
5 Non-advanced Education – 12 hours or more/week in educational programs below university degree level.
Item 4.
Page 131

Page 132

2 
findings at the Local Authority level; however, greater fluctuations may occur within specific intermediate
zones, which could influence calculated proportions at that scale.
This report is likely to be the last directly comparable with previous years. Since 2011, Moray has
comprised 126 data zones, each containing approximately 750 residents. As residential development
progresses, population distribution shifts, necessitating the redrawing of geographical boundaries to
maintain balance. Previously conducted every decade, this process was delayed in 2021 due to the
COVID-19 pandemic, but resumed during 2024-25, resulting in an increase to 138 data zones for Moray.
SCOTLAND AND UK
Scotland's child poverty rate in 2024 was 23%, lower than England and Wales (both 31%) and slightly
below Northern Ireland (24%). Scotland and the East of England had the lowest rates among UK regions in
2023/24. Over the past decade, child poverty rose by 3.4% in England and 1% in Scotland, was stable in
Wales, and fell by 1% in Northern Ireland. Recently, only Scotland has seen a decline. The Scottish Child
Payment is expected to cut child poverty in Scotland by about 4 percentage points from 2020–23 to
2024/25, according to the Joseph Rowntree Foundation:
“The introduction of the Scottish Child Payment (SCP) and the reforms to how disability benefits
are delivered show initial steps to an improved system. With that in mind we predict that the SCP
could reduce child poverty in Scotland by around 4 percentage points between 2020–23 and
2024/25.” Joseph Rowntree Foundation, Poverty in Scotland 2024, October 2024
MORAY AND SCOTLAND
CILIF data shows a reduction in the number of children aged 0–15, from 2,652 in 2022/23 to 2,478 in
2023/24, representing a 1% fall to 15.9%. Relative child poverty also records a similar decline in the
proportion of children aged 0–19, from 23.9% (4,182) in 2022/23 to 23% (3,942) in 2023/24. Considered in
isolation, these figures are encouraging, indicating a fall in the number of children affected by low
incomes and poverty.
However, compared with most other Scottish local authorities, Moray does not perform as well. The
median change in poverty levels across Scottish local authorities, between 2022/23 and 2023/24 (-1.8%),
is twice the rate of Moray. In relative terms, poverty in Moray has worsened when compared with the most
other local authorities, with the ranking shifting from 20th highest in 2014/15, to 16th in 2022/23, and 13th
in 2023/24.
Long-term data also paints an unfavourable picture, with poverty in Moray rising by 2.2% over the past
decade, while the Scottish median shows a smaller increase of 1%. Within its comparator authority
group, Moray has recorded the second highest rise in poverty levels between 2014 and 2024, and in 2024
holds the third highest level of poverty overall.
The data suggests that although poverty levels in Moray are currently moving in the right direction, they
are not keeping pace with the average reductions seen across Scotland.
Figures 1 & 2 show poverty levels within all Scottish Local Authorities, Moray’s relative position and the
change in levels between 2014/15 and 2023/24. In both figures Moray and comparator authorities have
been highlighted. Additional illustrations of local authority comparisons can be found in Table 6 and
Figures 4 & 5 in Appendix 1.
Page 132

Page 133

3 
Figure 1 
Figure 2 
The average gross full-time hourly pay (earnings by place of work) in Moray in 2024 at £16.526, is
significantly less than Scotland (£19.17) and ranks Moray 32/32 (lowest) of Scottish local authorities, a
decline of four places from 2023.  Unlike most other Scottish local authorities, in Moray full-time female
workers earn more per hour (£16.49) than their male counterparts (£16.43), although the gap has closed
since 2023 (F=£16.09, M=£15.55). Calculations based on weekly wage data, for all employed in Moray,
shows an average working week of 38.9hrs, compared with the Scottish average of 37 hrs/week. Even by
working more hours/week, the average full-time weekly pay in Moray (£688.80) is significantly less than
the national average (£739.70).  Moray's low wage economy makes it less resilient to increases in the cost
of living compared to other Scottish local authorities. This may partly explain why Moray is not keeping
pace with the national reduction in poverty rates. To compound the income challenges faced by Moray; as
wages rise so will the median average wage on which poverty measures are based, resulting in a rise of
the poverty ‘Threshold’. If wages in Moray fail to keep pace, reducing poverty in Moray will prove more
difficult. 
In Scotland between 2021 and 2024 it is estimated that three quarters of children in relative poverty live in
‘Working Households’. In 2012-15 this figure was significantly lower at 59%. In contrast both adults and
children living in ‘Workless households’ have witnessed decreases in poverty over the same period. This
may be indicative of low wages having more of an impact than benefit awards, or perhaps decisions have
been made to direct more resources towards workless households, with the assumption being they are
more in need. Either way this is an increasing and concerning trend. As poverty is defined as an income-
based measure it is clear that not all work pays enough to ensure the household is above the poverty 
6 NOMIS – Official Census and Labour Market Statistics 2024
Page 133

Page 134

4 
threshold. With a low wage economy and the lack of senior and professional job roles in Moray it is
difficult to see how changes in poverty levels can keep pace with elsewhere in Scotland.
Children living in ‘Priority Groups’7 are at a far greater risk of being in ‘Relative Poverty’. Across all priority
groups poverty levels are higher among Scottish households, with those with three or more children
reaching 41% in 2021-24. In all other groups, levels were greater than 26%.
Households where the household head is aged 16-24 have been consistently more likely to be in relative
poverty compared to older households. In 2021-24, 37% of these households were in relative poverty
compared to 18% - 21% for other age groups. In 2024 17% (120) of the 690 live births in Moray were to
mothers under the age of 25, this compares with 14% nationally.
Other societal groups in Scotland do not experience poverty to the same levels as children. Scottish
Government figures (2021-24) show that 20% of working-age people and 15% of pensioners were living in
poverty. 
METHODOLOGY OF LOCAL ANALYSIS
Most nationally published data is unable to show any insight into levels of poverty within Local Authorities
unless available at smaller geography level, which is uncommon. CILIF data is available in smaller
geographies and can therefore be aggregated to show data at Data Zone and Intermediate Zone.
Unfortunately, poverty data is not available to the same detail.
Analysis of data from the past 10-years makes it possible to identify the average proportional increase
from CILIF to relative child poverty. By using the average proportional increase and applying an algorithm
to CILIF data, levels of poverty can be estimated to a high degree of accuracy within smaller geographies.
This method was tested on several previous years data to determine accuracy, prior to the publication of
official Local Authority poverty data. The testing established accuracy to within 0.2% at Local Authority
level. In future years it may be possible to estimate poverty levels prior to publication of national data. 
The 2023/24 CILIF publication estimated 3,052 Moray children, aged 0-19, were living in low-income
families. ‘End Child Poverty’ data estimates the number of children living in relative poverty to be 3,942,
representing an increase of 29.2%. Figures calculated for smaller geographies using this method assume
that the increase from CILIF to Relative Child Poverty is consistent, which may not account for local
variations or unique circumstances affecting certain communities. At the smallest of geographical levels,
more data is redacted to maintain anonymity. To provide the most accurate data analysis for smaller
geographies Intermediate Zone Level data has been used.
WITHIN MORAY
Moray is classed as a rural Local Authority. Nationally 17% of the population live in rural locations, in
Moray the figure is significantly higher at 41.6%. Long-term trend analysis shows the Urban/Rural
population demographic has remained stable. The costs of living rurally tend to be higher, often due to
food, fuel and travel costs. While it might be expected that poverty levels would be higher in rural areas
due to increased living costs, the available data for Moray does not support this assumption. This may be
due to higher incomes in rural areas of Moray. However, there is currently no detailed income data
available for rural Moray to support this premise. Whilst the data shows that poverty appears lower in 
7 Households where there is/are: 3 or more children, Disabled member(s), Youngest child is under one, Minority
ethnic, Single parent and Mother under the age of 25.
Page 134

Page 135

5 
rural areas of Moray, it may be, where there is poverty, the severity is higher. 40.1% of children aged 0-15
live in rural locations, indicating a lower population density for this age group. Almost two thirds (63.6%)
of children aged 0-15, living in poverty, reside in urban areas of Moray . This suggests that, despite a lower
overall population density of children in urban areas, child poverty is disproportionately concentrated
there compared to rural areas. Table 1 shows the population distribution for urban and rural areas of
Moray.
Table 1
Urban / Rural Population Demographics in Moray (0-15)  
Population 0-15 Population Data Zones Location of Poverty
Number % Number % Number % Number %
Urban 55,098 58.4% 9,366 59.9% 75 59.5% 2,085 63.6%
Rural 39,202 41.6% 6,280 40.1% 51 40.5% 1,190 36.4%
TOTALS 94,300   15,646   126   3,282  
CHILDREN IN LOW INCOME FAMILIES (CILIF)
Prior to calculating poverty for small geographies, a full analysis of CILIF data was undertaken. An
emerging trend between 2021/22 and 2023/24 is a significant change in the proportion of children within
age groups, as shown in Table 2. There is a clear movement of proportions from the younger to older
groups, indicating that poverty is becoming more acute in the older age groups, and particularly the 16-19
group. In relation to the 16-19 group a possible reason may be due to entitled parental benefits. According
to HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC), parents of children in this age group are not effectively claiming
benefits for their children, with the rules for continued claims, especially what constitutes ‘approved
education or training’ not being well-understood, leading to the assumption that benefits cease when the
child reaches the age of 16. Targeted outreach or policy adjustments may be necessary to ensure families
with older children are aware of their entitlements, to potentially reduce poverty rates in this group.
Regardless of reason, it is a concerning and increasing trend. 
Table 2
% Age distribution of children in Low Income Families  
0-4 5-10 11-15 16-19
2021/22 25.07% 30.99% 28.05% 15.88%
2022/23 23.93% 30.30% 28.62% 17.15%
2023/24 23.66% 28.93% 28.60% 18.81%
Difference -1.42% -2.06% 0.56% 2.92%
CILIF data can be broken down by household demographic. Single parent households are one of the
‘Priority’ poverty groups. Scotland’s Census 2022 estimates that in Moray 21.5% of all households with
dependent children are ‘Lone parent’ families, nationally the figure is 26.4%.  In Moray 61.6% (1,879) of
CILIF in 2023/24 were within single parent households - a 9% increase from 2021/22. Both Moray and
Scotland show rising trends, however national proportions are lower (53% in 2021/22 & 57% in 2023/24). 
There is strong correlation, at intermediate zone level, between single parent households and levels of
poverty, but it is not always the case that higher proportions of CILIF for single parent families leads to
higher poverty levels. Table 5 in Appendix 1 shows the proportions of children in single parent households
and CILIF in these households along with the links between the rankings for single parent households and
estimated poverty at intermediate zone level. There is only one major outlying intermediate zone (Rural
Keith and Strathisla) which ranks 9th for poverty and 22nd for single parent households, this suggests that
for couple families in this zone the effects of poverty are more acute.
Page 135

Page 136

6 
In Moray 71.5% (2,180) of CILIF are living in ‘Working Families’, higher than the national figure of 66.3%. As
mentioned earlier in this report, the Scottish government estimates 75% in poverty are within ‘Working
Families’. If the same increase were to be applied to Moray, it would indicate levels of child poverty in
‘Working Families’ would be in the region of 80%.
ESTIMATED CHILD POVERTY IN SMALLER GEOGRAPHIES
The data in Table 3 shows the number and proportion of Moray children, aged 0-19, living in poverty in
2023/24 at Intermediate zone level. To allow for comparisons 2021/22 & 2022/23 data has been included.
The table has been ranked from highest to lowest in 2023/24. Estimated proportions of poverty are shown
for every zone. This data has also been aggregated into Quartiles to show on a larger scale how average
levels have changed over the period. It is estimated that almost 40% (1,557/3,942) of children living in
poverty in Moray are within Quartile 1 (highest levels of poverty), in comparison with 19% (752/3,942) in
Quartile 4 (lowest levels of poverty).
In 2023/24 seven from the top 10 Intermediate zones are within urban areas. There is little ranking change
between 2021/22 and 2023/24 within the Quartile 1. Whilst individual zone rankings have changed, five of
the top six in 2023/24 appear in both 2021/22 and 2022/23. From 2021/22 to 2023/24, place rankings for
seven zones remain unchanged. Five of these are the top five within Quartile 1, all of which have
witnessed reductions in poverty levels. Level reductions in Quartile 1 are however not consistent with four
zones showing rises between 2022/23 and 2023/24. Nine zones have seen increases in ranking, with
poverty proportions also increasing. In eight zones, rankings have decreased, with seven showing
reductions in poverty levels. Zones within Quartile 2 have witnessed both the highest ranking and
proportional poverty increases. The most significant positive ranking changes are within Quartiles 3 & 4.
Between 2021/22 and 2023/24, positive changes in poverty levels are most significant for Quartile 1 (-
2.4%) and Quartile 4 (-5.3%), showing that children living in the Quartile with the lowest levels of poverty
(Quartile 4) benefiting more than those living in the Quartile with the highest levels (Quartile 1).  This
indicates that the gradually reducing levels of poverty in Moray is more so due to these levels falling in the
areas with the least poverty than those with the most. Investment of resources to reduce poverty has
traditionally been directed to the ‘Poorest’ areas; however for Moray, data may suggest this investment
hasn’t made the differences required to bring about significant positive change and that current
intervention strategies are less effective in areas with entrenched poverty, highlighting a need for tailored
approaches or additional support.
The most significant negative changes are witnessed within Quartile 2 which increased by 5.4% between
2021/22 and 2023/24. The data indicates a movement in the levels of poverty from both the highest and
lowest Quartiles into the centre two Quartiles, which has resulted in a reduction in the gap between the
most and least in poverty from 42.2% in 2021/22 to 33.8% in 2023/24. Direct comparisons can be made
as the most and least Intermediate zones are identical in both periods. Whilst this reduction is
encouraging, we must be cognisant of the changing geographical poverty demographic in Moray and
consider whether changes in the delivery of interventions and areas targeted need to be made.
A outlier in the table is the Findhorn, Kinloss and Pluscarden Valley Intermediate Zone which ranked
significantly higher in both 2021/22 and 2022/23.  Further analysis of CILIF data over the period 2021/22 to
2023/24 shows a 23% reduction in the number of children in low-income households over the period. This 
zone takes in the MOD camp at Kinloss which has a transient population that may have a bearing over the
population data used in calculating figures.
Page 136

Page 137

7 
Table 3
No in
Poverty
(0-19)*
% 0-19 in
Poverty* RANK
Quartile
%
Poverty
No in
Poverty
(0-19)*
% 0-19 in
Poverty* RANK
Quartile
%
Poverty
No in
Poverty
(0-19)*
% 0-19 in
Poverty* RANK
Quartile
%
Poverty
1 New Elgin East 309 41.6% 1 368 48.4% 1 370 48.3% 1
2 Elgin Cathedral to Ashgrove and Pinefield 280 40.2% 2 266 37.2% 2 313 43.9% 2
3 Keith and Fife Keith 258 35.4% 3 228 30.5% 6 271 36.3% 3
4 Cullen, Portknockie, Findochty, Drybridge and Berryhillock 273 34.1% 4 258 31.6% 4 291 35.4% 4
5 Forres South West and Mannachie 270 30.7% 5 304 33.7% 3 310 34.3% 5
6 Elgin Bishopmill East and Ladyhill 167 30.1% 6 165 29.0% 7 153 27.0% 8
7 Buckie Central East 198 30.1% 7 209 31.0% 5 200 29.8% 6
8 Fochabers, Aultmore, Clochan and Ordiquish 127 27.5% 8 106 22.4% 13 124 25.9% 10
9 Rural Keith and Strathisla 115 24.7% 9 116 24.3% 11 116 23.9% 11
10 New Elgin West 159 24.4% 10 147 21.9% 14 123 18.4% 16
11 Forres Central East and seaward 107 24.3% 11 118 25.7% 9 74 16.1% 21
12 Lossiemouth West 202 23.5% 12 246 27.9% 8 233 26.4% 9
13 North Speyside 121 22.2% 13 106 19.1% 17 103 18.3% 17
14 South Speyside and the Cabrach 123 19.8% 14 150 23.6% 12 150 23.6% 12
15 Mosstodloch, Portgordon and seaward 115 19.6% 15 124 20.6% 16 115 19.0% 15
16 Lhanbryde, Urquhart, Pitgavney and seaward 149 19.2% 16 144 18.2% 18 144 18.2% 18
17 Findhorn, Kinloss and Pluscarden Valley 138 18.9% 17 184 24.4% 10 206 27.3% 7
18 Lossiemouth East and Seatown 80 17.1% 18 79 16.3% 19 102 21.0% 13
19 Burghead, Roseisle and Laich 178 17.0% 19 155 13.9% 23 135 12.0% 23
20 Heldon West, Fogwatt to Inchberry 213 15.1% 20 228 15.8% 21 217 15.0% 22
21 Buckie West and Mains of Buckie 136 14.6% 21 154 16.2% 20 160 16.6% 19
22 Rafford, Dallas, Dyke to Dava 105 12.4% 22 180 20.7% 15 180 20.7% 14
23 Elgin Bishopmill West and Newfield 83 12.4% 23 102 14.9% 22 113 16.4% 20
24 Elgin Central West 37 7.8% 24 47 9.4% 24 31 6.2% 24
MINIMUM 37 7.8% 47 9.4% 31 6.2%
MAXIMUM 309 41.6% 368 48.4% 370 48.3%
DIFFERENCE 272 33.8% 321 39.0% 339 42.2%
3,942  23.0% 4,180  23.9% 4,226  24.1%
* The cohort of 16-19 year-olds changes anually, %'s are based on the 0-15 population + 16-19 year-old cohort, hence why reducing numbers in poverty do not always equal reducing %'s
TOTAL
35.4%
25.7%
19.5%
14.0%
37.8%
20.3%
18.6%
19.3%
RELATIVE CHILD POVERTY (0-19 Years) 2021-2024 (Sorted Highest - Lowest 2023-24)
2021-222023-24 2022-23
35.2%
23.1%
19.1%
18.1%
Intermediate Zone
Page 137

Page 138

8 
Whilst SIMD2020 data has not been used in this analysis, SIMD methodology has been used to show the
internal deprivation of Moray. Using the SIMD data zone rankings internal deprivation can be established
by ranking each of Moray’s 126 data zones from 1 to 126 and placing them into deciles, similar to SIMD (1-
10, high to low deprivation). Table 4 & Figure 3 show the 0-19 population8, the number of children in
poverty and the percentage of children in poverty per Moray decile. Figure 3 shows a clear link between
poverty and deprivation with the percentage of poverty decreasing as deprivation decreases. Table 4
details the levels within deciles showing that half of children living in the most deprived 13 data zones are
in poverty. Children living in the most deprived 40% (deciles 1-4) account for 36% of the 0-19 population
but 59% (2,311) of all children in poverty. In contrast almost half (48%) of the 0-19 population live in
deciles 7-10 (least deprived 40%), yet only account for 25% (1,005) of all Moray children in poverty. This
concentration of poverty in more deprived areas highlights significant inequalities within Moray,
Table 4
Deciles
0-19
Population*
% of  0-19
population
No in
Poverty
% in
Poverty
1 1,071 6.3% 541 50.5%
2 1,747  10.2% 737 42.2%
3 1,724  10.1% 568 32.9%
4 1,636  9.6% 473 28.9%
5 1,322  7.8% 337 25.5%
6 1,371  8.0% 281 20.5%
7 1,549  9.1% 313 20.2%
8 2,374  13.9% 337 14.2%
9 2,555  15.0% 250 9.8%
10 1,696  10.0% 105 6.2%
TOTAL 17,045 100.0% 3,942 23.0%
* Children aged 0-15 + 16-19 if in non-advanced education 
Figure 3 
8 Children aged 0-15 + 16-19 if in non-advanced education
50.5%
6.2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Deciles
% Poverty & population by decile
0-19 Population* No in Poverty % in Poverty
Page 138

Page 139

9 
CONCLUSION
Local authorities are limited by external factors in efforts to reduce poverty. Inflation and rising fuel costs
are factors out with the control of authorities, tackling these issues in more rural authorities are likely to
be more challenging. Although poverty in Moray, amongst the 0-19 age group, has decreased over the
past three years (1.1%), the ten year average (22.7%) would indicate it as plateauing. The physical
numbers of children living in poverty have increased between 2014/15 and 2023/24, whilst the population
of the same age group has decreased, showing no progress has been made in the numbers of children
affected.
Moray isn’t keeping pace with other Scottish local authorities. When ranked against all other authorities
Moray’s position has declined, from being placed 20th in 2014/15 to 13th highest in 2023/24. With ‘Poverty’
being an income-based measure, it is probable that the low wage economy and the lack of senior and
professional job roles continues to hinder progress.
It is positive to see the number and proportion of children aged 0-10 living in low-income families
declining but, at the same time it is concerning to see the consistent increase in numbers and proportions
for those aged 11-19.
Where can a difference be made? Simplistically, with the measure of ‘Poverty’, whether that be ‘Relative’,
‘Absolute’ or ‘Persistent’, being income based, the only way to reduce poverty is to increase incomes. To
do so requires either wage growth, increasing benefits and/or ensuring that all people who are entitled to
benefits can access them. Increasing wages in Moray is challenging given the range and quantity of higher
paid work while raising benefits requires changes in government policy. Increasing access to benefit
entitlement however is achievable locally. Services and resources directed at helping families in poverty
cope with the effects will not reduce poverty, they will only help mitigate the impact.
It is the authors opinion that investment in income maximisation services to ensure that families receive
benefit entitlements are where the biggest differences can be made; particularly if these services are
focussed towards families with children aged 16-19.
Page 139

Page 140

10 
APPENDIX 1: ADDITIONAL FIGURES AND TABLES 
Table 5 
% of single parent
households with
dependent
children* 
% CILIF in Single
Parent Families 
Single Parent
Household
Rank  Poverty Rank
Elgin Cathedral to Ashgrove and Pinefield 35.7% 61.1% 1 2
New Elgin East 34.0% 68.4% 2 1
Forres South West and Mannachie 30.2% 57.4% 3 5
Buckie Central East 28.4% 66.0% 4 7
Keith and Fife Keith 27.8% 66.0% 5 3
Fochabers, Aultmore, Clochan and Ordiquish 25.9% 48.5% 6 8
Cullen, Portknockie, Findochty, Drybridge and Berryhillock 25.1% 62.3% 7 4
Mosstodloch, Portgordon and seaward 24.7% 55.4% 8 15
Elgin Bishopmill East and Ladyhill 23.0% 54.5% 9 6
Lossiemouth West 22.4% 66.9% 10 12
Lhanbryde, Urquhart, Pitgavney and seaward 22.1% 71.4% 11 16
New Elgin West 22.1% 68.6% 12 10
North Speyside 20.0% 58.5% 13 13
Lossiemouth East and Seatown 19.9% 67.8% 14 18
Forres Central East and seaward 19.9% 55.3% 15 11
Findhorn, Kinloss and Pluscarden Valley 18.7% 51.9% 16 17
South Speyside and the Cabrach 18.6% 44.8% 17 14
Burghead, Roseisle and Laich 16.7% 56.3% 18 19
Rafford, Dallas, Dyke to Dava 15.2% 54.8% 19 22
Heldon West, Fogwatt to Inchberry 14.2% 66.5% 20 20
Buckie West and Mains of Buckie 14.2% 75.2% 21 21
Rural Keith and Strathisla 14.0% 52.9% 22 9
Elgin Bishopmill West and Newfield 13.7% 76.7% 23 23
Elgin Central West 12.1% 44.8% 24 24
MORAY 21.5% 61.6%
* Children aged 0-15 + 16-19 if in non-advanced education
Proportion of children in single parent households (2023/24)
Page 140

Page 141

11 
Table 6 
Figure 4 
Ranking 2023/24 2022/23 2014/15
Scotland 23.0% Scotland 24.0% Scotland 22.0%
1 Glasgow 36.1% Glasgow 32.9% Glasgow City 27.1%
2 Clackmannanshire 28.5% North Ayrshire 29.2% North Ayrshire 24.8%
3 Dundee 26.1% Clackmannanshire 29.2% East Ayrshire 24.4%
4 West Dunbartonshire 25.2% Dundee 28.2% Clackmannanshire 24.2%
5 Falkirk 25.1% West Dunbartonshire 28.0% North Lanarkshire 23.9%
6 Fife 25.0% East Ayrshire 27.9% Dundee 23.8%
7 North Lanarkshire 24.9% North Lanarkshire 26.9% Fife 23.6%
8 Midlothian 24.6% Dumfries and Galloway 26.9% West Dunbartonshire 23.4%
9 North Ayrshire 24.3% Fife 26.6% Dumfries and Galloway 23.3%
10 West Lothian 24.1% Falkirk 26.2% Falkirk 22.7%
11 Angus, Scotland 24.1% Inverclyde 26.1% South Ayrshire 22.7%
12 East Ayrshire 23.6% South Ayrshire 25.0% East Lothian 21.9%
13 Moray 23.0% Angus, Scotland 24.9% Midlothian 21.8%
14 Edinburgh 22.8% West Lothian 24.6% South Lanarkshire Council 21.5%
15 Dumfries and Galloway 22.7% Renfrewshire 24.0% Highland 21.4%
16 Inverclyde 22.4% Moray 23.9% West Lothian 21.3%
17 Highland 22.1% Scottish Borders 23.6% Angus, Scotland 21.1%
18 East Lothian 22.1% South Lanarkshire Council 23.6% Inverclyde 20.9%
19 Scottish Borders 21.5% Argyll and Bute 23.5% Scottish Borders 20.9%
20 Argyll and Bute 21.2% Highland 23.3% Moray 20.8%
21 Renfrewshire 21.0% Midlothian 23.2% Argyll and Bute 20.7%
22 South Ayrshire 20.7% Aberdeenshire 21.8% Orkney 20.3%
23 Stirling 20.4% Perth and Kinross 21.7% Perth and Kinross 19.9%
24 Na h-Eileanan Siar 19.7% East Lothian 21.3% Stirling 19.6%
25 South Lanarkshire Council 19.5% Stirling 20.8% Renfrewshire 19.3%
26 Perth and Kinross 19.2% Edinburgh 20.4% Aberdeen 18.7%
27 Aberdeen 19.1% Orkney 19.3% Edinburgh 18.6%
28 Orkney Islands 18.6% Na h-Eileanan Siar 18.5% Na h-Eileanan Siar 17.5%
29 Aberdeenshire 15.0% Aberdeenshire 16.5% Aberdeenshire 15.6%
30 East Dunbartonshire 14.9% Shetland 16.4% East Dunbartonshire 15.2%
31 Shetland 14.5% East Dunbartonshire 15.7% East Renfrewshire 15.0%
32 East Renfrewshire 12.0% East Renfrewshire 14.0% Shetland 13.3%
Figure 5
Page 141

Page 142

12 
APPENDIX 2:
MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME EXPLANATION
Determining the Income threshold by which poverty is measured is a complex procedure. The Households
Below Average Income (HBAI) data set is the source used by the Uk government to identify UK average incomes.
The median income is the income where half of all households have more, and half have less. The government
uses the median value from the HBAI data for each year as the official measure for determining poverty. A
household is considered to be low income if their equivalised net disposable income is below 60% of the
median. Equivalisation standardises household income to account for different household composition, making
it possible to compare different households. Income thresholds can be calculated both before and after housing
costs, for poverty the After Housing Cost (AHC) measure is used. For 2023, 60% of the median income
for households below average income (HBAI) data was approximately £17,300 after housing costs. Different
government reports may provide slightly different figures depending on their specific scope, methodology, and
the exact period they are reporting on, however it is widely accepted that the ‘Poverty’ threshold ranges between
£17K & £17.3K.
NATIONAL SOURCES
1. Scotland’s Census 2022
2. National Records of Scotland (NRS): Mid-year population estimates by Data Zone, 2022
3. National Records of Scotland (NRS): Small area household estimates by Data Zone, 2022
4. Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) Stat-Xplore: Children living in Low Income Families, 2023/24
5. End Child Poverty, 2023/24
6. Households Below Average Income (HBAI) 2023
7. HM Revenue & Customs
8. Official Census and Labour Market Statistics (NOMIS), December 2024 
Page 142

Page 143

REPORT TO: COMMUNITY PLANNING OFFICERS BOARD ON WEDNESDAY 11
FEBRUARY 2026 
SUBJECT:             DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC HEALTH ANNUAL REPORT 2024/25 
BY: PROFESSOR SHANTINI PARANJOTHY, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC
HEALTH 
1. REASON FOR REPORT 
1.1 It is usual practice for the Director of Public Health (DPH) to provide an annual
report. The DPH annual report for this year is focused on children and is
presented to the Board for information, along with an accompanying appendix
that provides an updated overview of population health data for Grampian. 
2. RECOMMENDATION 
2.1 It is recommended that the Community Planning Board: 
i.  Reflect on how we continue to incorporate the voices of children and
young people into decision making and planning of services; and 
ii.  Note the commitment to the production of comprehensive population
based needs assessments for children and young people in Grampian
during summer 2026 to inform the development of plans for Children’s
Services, Child Poverty, Corporate Parenting and Children’s Rights. 
3. BACKGROUND 
3.1 The focus on Children in this year’s DPH annual report is in recognition of the
importance of the early years on health and wellbeing during the life course.
Children’s experiences during this formative time are a key driver of inequalities
in population health outcomes. The report has been informed by engagement
with children and young people across Grampian. Community engagement
groups across Grampian were contacted with a view to organise focus groups
with young people. Due to the number of already scheduled events in Aberdeen
City and Moray, focus groups were held in four locations across Aberdeenshire.
Participants (aged 12-17) were asked about how they feel now, what they would
like to keep and what they needed for the future. In addition to these engagement
activities in Aberdeenshire, this report incorporates insights from recent
Item 5.
Page 143

Page 144

consultations with children and young people in Aberdeen City and Moray. These
conversations have collectively helped us to examine the four threats to
population health that were described in the previous DPH reports through the
lens of children. The Children’s Services Board in Aberdeen City, Getting it Right
for every Child (GIRFEC) Strategic Group in Aberdeenshire and GIRFEC
Leadership Group in Moray were also engaged in to inform the production of this
report. 
3.2 Overall, children in the most deprived communities face significantly shorter
lives than those in the least deprived. In Aberdeen City, boys born in the most
deprived areas can expect to live 9 years less than their peers in the least
deprived areas; for girls the gap is over 8 years. Aberdeenshire tells a similar
story, with a 6.5 year gap for males and a 5 year gap for females. Even in Moray,
where outcomes are slightly better overall, boys in the most deprived area still
live 6 years less than those in the least deprived areas. This difference is 2 years
for girls. 
3.3 The report covers four themes - growing up in poverty, inequalities, mental health
and neurodiversity, and climate change. Under each theme, we present what
children and young people said, contextual information relevant to the theme
including data and examples of work that is underway to address these issues. 
3.4 Whilst there are many examples of good practice highlighting where we are
making a positive difference to the health and wellbeing of children, there are
also areas where inequities persist and further action is needed. These include
breastfeeding, maintaining healthy weight, oral health, HPV vaccinations and
teenage pregnancies. 
4. NEXT STEPS 
4.1. Through our work with health and social care partnerships and our contribution
to community planning partnerships we have the opportunity to ensure a whole
system joined up approach to reduce inequities and provide the best quality of
services for children and families. The following sets out the actions that will be
taken to progress this: 
4.1.1 Within NHS Grampian we will progress work to look at how we can
‘poverty proof’ our health and care services, using the learning from the
Health Equity Learning Project that was highlighted in the report 
4.1.2 We will develop an innovative whole-system pathway to provide early
identification, assessment, and tailored support for children with neuro-
developmental differences. The developmental aspects of this work will
be supported by NHS Grampian Charity funding, with a clear plan
embedding this into usual practice to ensure the change is sustained in
the longer term. 
4.1.3 We will continue to progress ongoing work to address inequities in breast
feeding drop-off rates, oral health, HPV vaccinations and teenage
pregnancies, and supporting children to maintain healthy weight. 
Page 144

Page 145

4.1.4 The Child Health strategy for Grampian will be reviewed and refreshed for
publication during summer 2026. 
4.1.5 The Public Health team will continue to work with partners in the
Integrated Children’s Services Board in Aberdeen City, to develop and use
comprehensive population based needs assessments for children and
young people in each area to inform the development of plans for
Children’s Services, Child Poverty, Corporate Parenting and Children’s
Rights. These will also be published during summer 2026. 
5. CONSULTATION
This report has been prepared with input from Public Health and wider NHS
colleagues and Partners, and engagement on early drafts with the Integrated
Children’s Services Board in Aberdeen City, Getting it Right for every Child
(GIRFEC) Strategic Group in Aberdeenshire and GIRFEC Leadership Group in
Moray. 
Author of Report:  Shantini Paranjothy (Director of Public Health) 
Background Papers:    DPH Annual Report 2024/25  director-of-public-health-dph-
annual-report-2024---children-and-young-people.pdf
DPH Annual Report Data Appendix 2024/25  dph-annual-
report-2024-data-appendix.docx
DPH Annual Report 2024/25 video DPH Report 
Page 145

Page 146

Page 146

Page 147

REPORT TO: COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD ON 11 FEBRUARY 2026 
SUBJECT:  PLACE DIRECTOR / COMMUNITY PLANNING     
PARTNERSHIPS CHARTER 
BY: CHIEF EXECUTIVE, MORAY COUNCIL 
1. REASON FOR REPORT 
1.1  To raise awareness of the work undertaken by Scottish Government 
and COSLA to develop a Place Director Charter, setting out 
expectations and how they will be supported by Community Planning 
Partnerships (CPP). 
2. RECOMMENDATION 
2.1  It is recommended that the Board – 
(i) Consider and provide endorsement in principle for the draft
charter. 
3. BACKGROUND 
3.1  Scottish Government and COSLA have been working to refresh their 
Shared Priorities Plan, which sets out how they will work with partners 
to enhance community planning.  The Plan includes a review of Place 
Directors to maximise their role as ambassadors to Community 
Planning Partnerships (CPP). 
3.2 Development of a Place Director Charter sets out expectations of Place
Directors, and how they will be supported by CPP partners.  Engagement
with key stakeholders at a national level on the Charter has been positive. 
3.3 CPP were invited for feedback over ten days in December, feedback 
was unanimously supportive for the principle of having a Charter in 
place, with the final draft presented (Appendix 1). 
Item 6.
Page 147

Page 148

3.4 The aim is to launch the Charter with COSLA and key stakeholders at an
event in late March to reconfirm the Scottish Government’s commitment
to CPP and community planning. 
4. SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS 
4.1  There are no direct financial, workforce, equalities, policy or legal 
issues from this report. 
5. CONCLUSION 
5.1. The Community Planning Board considers and endorses in principle the
Place Director Charter. 
Author of Report:   Louise Marshall, Strategy and Performance Manager
Background Papers: 
Ref:       
Page 148

Page 149

APPENDIX 1 
Page 149

Page 150

Page 150

Page 151

REPORT TO: COMMUNITY PLANNING BOARD ON 11 FEBRUARY 2026 
SUBJECT:  HEALTH & TRANSPORT ACTION PLAN (2024-2029) 
BY: TIMOTHY MACKAY, SERVICE MANAGER TRANSPORTATION 
1. REASON FOR REPORT 
1.1. The purpose of this report is to update Board members regarding the review of
the Health & Transport Action Plan (HTAP) (2024-2029) and implementation of
new structures to support action-focussed delivery of objectives. 
2. RECOMMENDATION 
2.1. It is recommended that the Board: 
i. Note the contents of this report and the new Health & Transport
Action Plan 2024-2029; 
ii  Note the ongoing work of partners to ensure all partner
organisations are engaged and committed to the new HTAP; and 
iii. Support the delivery of actions agreed by the HTAP Steering Group. 
3. BACKGROUND 
3.1. In the Grampian region there has been an established partnership between
health and transport partners since 2008.  The purpose of HTAP is: “to enable
providers of transport, health and social care services to work together in a
more co-ordinated manner in order to improve outcomes and efficiency of
service delivery, both in reducing the adverse impacts of transport choices on
public health and in improving access to health and social care.” 
3.2. Since the time of the first review in 2014, there have been a number of
significant challenges and changes. These changes necessitated the need to
undertake a review of the HTAP and the priorities for Grampian partners. 
Item 7.
Page 151

Page 152

3.3. During 2023 the Programme Manager led a review of the HTAP, supported by a
group of partners providing advice. Extensive stakeholder engagement,
evidence review, and consultation has taken place. Effort has been made to
seek alignment with existing and emerging strategies across organisations. 
3.4. The new, refreshed HTAP was launched on the 3rd of February 2025. Action
Plan launched to address health and transport challenges | Nestrans 
3.5. Partners have been meeting to develop the Governance Structure, the Terms of
Reference and Priority Projects. 
3.6. It has been agreed that a slimmer governance structure will be adopted. The
two themed Sub-Groups will be replaced by a single Reference Group formed of
liaisons to each partner organization. As well as supporting the delivery of the
agreed Projects, the Reference Group will serve to support the HTAP network
generally and feed into the Steering Group. 
3.7. A summary of the new Governance Structure and priority projects is shown in
Appendix A as a supporting document.  The background papers will be
uploaded as additional meeting documents. 
3.8. In lieu of an annual report, this paper serves as the update on HTAP to partners. 
3.9. In addition to finalising the review, its creation and launch, partners have
continued to bring together local partners to exchange information, provide
THInC and THInC in the City, presenting to the Public Health Scotland
conference in November 2024 and supporting the local delivery of Public Health
Scotland and SCOTS (Scottish Collaboration of Transport Specialists) in person
event in Aberdeen on 5th of February 2025. 
4. SUMMARY OF IMPLICATIONS 
4.1. Since the 2014 review of the Plan there have been a number of challenges and
changes that have presented themselves and required a review of the plan and
it’s priorities. The result of which is the updated Plan, revised Governance
Structure, Terms of Reference and Priorities, and the replacement of the two Sub
Groups with a single Reference Group, that will continue to feed into the Steering
Group. 
5. CONCLUSION 
5.1. It is hoped that review of the HTAP and implementation of new structures to
support action-focussed delivery of objectives will lead to further collaboration,
engagement and exchange of information between health and transport
partners. 
Author of Report: Andrew Stewart, HTAP Programme Manager (post jointly
funded by NHS Grampian and Nestrans). 
Page 152

Page 153

Background Papers:   HTAP Annual Report 2022-23
HTAP Terms of Reference 
HTAP Project Plans
Ref: 
Page 153

Page 154

Page 154

Page 155

1 
Appendix A
Next Steps, Deliverables & Delivery Structure Discussion Paper
The new HTAP was launched on the 3rd of February 2025. 
The new HTAP Governance Structure 
The HTAP Steering Group has agreed a new structure to promote delivery of projects, new Terms
of Reference and priority projects. 
Three core project groups, reporting through a reference group that is comprised of members of
the previous two subgroups. The Reference Group would then report to the Steering Group: 
Key Considerations
1. A need to be both efficient and effective
2. A need to demonstrate collective ownership and delivery.
3. A need to retain our network of members and contacts but reduce the burden on time
for key partners.
4. A wish to drive motivation and engagement through successful completion of simple,
tangible deliverables. 
HTAP Steering
Group Reference Group
Project Group 1
Project Group 2
Project Group 3
Overarching Purpose:
“To enable providers of transport, health and social care services to work together in a more co-
ordinated manner in order to improve outcomes and efficiency of service delivery, both in
maximising the health promoting aspects of the transport system and reducing the adverse impacts
of transport choices on population health and in improving access to health and social care.” 
Item 7.
Page 155

Page 156

2 
The HTAP partnership will focus on four elements:
1. A Centre of Excellence for Health & Transport; 2. A co-ordinating role; 3. Delivery of
exemplars; 4. Strategic Alignment 
The specific projects proposed are:
Group Project Title Focus
Project
1
Sustainable Model for Community Transport
a) Improving Current Systems
• Raising visibility of THInC to patients
• Improving NHSG travel webpages
b) Developing a New Model
• Influencing change across the system –
appointment times flexibility,
reimbursement of travel costs.
• Adapting community transport to address
gaps in provision (Volunteer driver
recruitment, working with third sector to
develop a funding application to the NHS
Grampian Charities Fund.
• Co-ordinating
role
• Delivery of
exemplars
Project
2
Creating a Centre of Excellence
• Short life group focused on co-producing the best
practice steps needed to make the HTAP group
Centre of Excellence. 
• Coordinating
role
• Centre of
excellence 
Project
3
Health & Transport Data Sharing Group
• Did Not Attend data gaps – evidence needed to
support funding transport for health.
• Strategic
alignment
Page 156

Page 157

3 
• Whole system thinking requires more data sharing.
• Collation of lived experience work on transport
poverty. 
• Co-ordinating
role 
Any questions: Andrew.Stewart@aberdeenshire.gov.uk 
Page 157

Page 158

Page 158