Democracy Spraffa

Budget Outlook 2026-27 to 2030-31

Argyll and Bute Council · 4 December 2025
Back to Policy and Resources Committee — 4 December 2025 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL POLICY AND RESOURCES COMMITTEE
FINANCIAL SERVICES 4 DECEMBER 2025
BUDGET OUTLOOK 2026-27 TO 2030-31  
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
1.1 This report summarises the Budget Outlook for the 5-year period 2026-27 to
2030-31 and provides an update to the position previously reported to the
Policy and Resources Committee in October 2025.  It is underpinned by
planning assumptions that will continue to be updated and refined, on an
ongoing basis, throughout the year. 
1.2 The Budget Outlook has been prepared using three different scenarios, best
case, worst case and mid-range.  The detailed information contained within the
report focusses primarily on the mid-range scenario, however, all three
scenarios are outlined within Appendix 1. 
1.3  There are no changes to suggested planning assumptions in respect of
Scottish Government funding, ranging between an increase of 0.25% (best
case) and a reduction of 0.75% (worst case), with a reduction of 0.25% in the
mid-range scenario.   
1.4 Additional recurring funding to fully meet the increased cost of the 2025-26 pay
award, in respect of both council and Social Work services, continues to be
assumed for planning purposes, with additional funding in respect of the
increased cost of the 2026-27 pay award assumed in the best case scenario
only.  Our current Budget Outlook also continues to assume that the Teachers
pay award for 2025-26 and 2026-27 will have additional match Scottish
Government funding. 
1.5 The Head of Local Government Finance recently confirmed the Scottish
Government’s intention to provide multi-year budgets.  This should provide a
greater level of certainty in respect of our longer-term planning assumptions. 
However, the proposed timing of the Scottish Budget announcement has now
been confirmed as 13 January 2026.  This prolongs the period of uncertainty in
respect of our grant funding and confirmation of the final budget gap. 
1.6 The Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) funding in
respect of Packaging Extended Producer Responsibility for 2025-26 has been
confirmed at £2.786m, providing a reduced carry forward of £1.438m into 2026-
27.  Since last reporting, the anticipated level of DEFRA funding available for
2026-27 has been confirmed at £2.851m.  It remains uncertain as to whether
this funding will be recurring at this level in 2027-28 and future years, and
without a reduction in Scottish Government grant.  At this stage, funding is
assumed to continue into 2027-28 and future years at the 2026-27 level in the
best case, at 50% of the 2026-27 level in the mid-range and £nil in the worst
case scenarios.  Funding conditions and future years budget pressures, in

Page 2

respect of potential new spending commitments, remain unclear. 
1.7 There are no changes to previous assumptions in respect of Council Tax
growth.  The Council Tax base is assumed to grow by 0.25% in the worst case,
0.5% in the mid-range and 0.75% in the best case scenarios.   
1.8 The 2024-25 final outturn included additional income of £1.234m in respect of
2024-25 and prior years, an element of which was expected to be recurring in
2025-26 and future years.  A more sophisticated financial modelling tool has
now been developed to assist with Council Tax income projections.  However,
there is currently a significant level of uncertainty in respect of the classification
of self-catering units as either non-domestic or domestic dwellings, and the
implications for council tax income, presenting a risk to financial planning
assumptions.  At this stage, a re-base of the current Council Tax budget,
estimated at £0.500m in the mid-range scenario (£0.250m in the worst case
and £0.750m in the best case scenarios) continues to be assumed within the
Budget Outlook.  This position will be subject to ongoing review and refinement
throughout the year.     
1.9  There has been no change to the following employee costs assumptions since
last reporting: 
• An increase of 4% for 2025-26 and 3.5% for 2026-27 across all scenarios,
3% for 2027-28 in both the best case and mid-range scenarios, with 5%
assumed in the worst case scenario.  For 2028-29 and 2029-30, the best
case scenario has been reduced to 2%, while the mid-range remains at 3%
and worst case remains at 5%.  
• The Teachers pay award now covers the period August to July and had
been agreed up to 31 July 2025.  However, earlier this month, the teachers
did agree a revised pay offer of 4% from 1 August 2025, rising to 4.25%
from 1 April 2026 with a further 3.25% from 1 August 2026 to 31 July 2027. 
Within the budget outlook, the increase was assumed to be in line with the
SJC agreed pay award.  This new agreement is marginally different, and it
has still to be confirmed whether Scottish Government will provide
additional funding.  Should it not be funded, there is sufficient in the
employee pay inflation earmarking to pay for the increase in 2026-27 as
outlined in paragraphs 4.3.15 and 4.3.16.    
• The cost of pay increments for 2025-26 is estimated at £0.599m.  For future
years, an equivalent cost has been assumed in the mid-range and worst
case scenarios, while half the estimated 2025-26 cost has been assumed in
the best case scenario. 
1.10 Financial Services have almost concluded the annual salary template exercise,
however, the latest estimate suggests that there will be a required increase to
current estimates of circa. £1.2m.  This is primarily due to the implications of
the increased employer’s pension contribution rate from 2026-27 on the 2024-
25 and 2025-26 pay inflation, and the latest teachers pay offer, which totals
7.5% over 2 years but is profiled slightly differently to the SJC and Chief
Officers pay award.  There is an existing earmarked reserve balance of £1.3m,
specifically set aside to provide for employee pay increases beyond budgeted

Page 3

levels.  As such, there will be minimal impact on the forecast budget gap in
respect of these anticipated updates. 
1.11 An increase to the current Standby Rate of pay from December 2025 was
approved by Council 26 November 2025.  The full year recurring impact at an
estimated additional cost of £41k from 2026-27 has now been incorporated into
the Budget Outlook across all budget scenarios. 
1.12  Following a review of Scottish Local Authorities Chief Executive’s pay, COSLA
Leaders at their meeting on 31 October 2025 agreed a new pay framework with
a phased implementation in two steps a year apart with the first phase applying
from 1 November 2025.  The Chief Executive’s new pay framework has
consequential impacts on other Chief Officers.  The additional cost within 2025-
26 is £0.039m and the increased cost, over and above inflation already
accounted for in the budget outlook for 2026-27, is £0.158m across Council
and HSCP (Council £0.129m, HSCP £0.029m).   
1.13 For non-pay inflation, only unavoidable inflation has been provided for within
each scenario, with the mid-range scenario based on current market forecast
data, where available.  A further general inflation contingency has been built
into the mid-range and worst case scenarios.  This position continues to be
monitored in light of market volatility.  However, at this stage, given prevalent
levels of uncertainty, there continues to be no change to the inflationary
assumptions included within the 2025-26 Budget Pack. 
1.14 There are a number of cost and demand pressures for council services built
into each scenario, across all five years, comprising the following: 
• ASN Support
• School Clothing Grants
• Schools Residential
• Education ICT Network Infrastructure
• Election Costs
• Planning (Local Development Plan)
• Universal Credit – HB Admin grant 
• Civica Revenue and Benefits Management System 
• Microsoft 365 Licenses
• Compliance with BMW Ban 
• Bus Transport Contracts
• Valuation Joint Board
• Security Operations Centre Contract Renewal
• Wi-Fi Network Subscription
• Civica Housing Case Management System. 
1.15 In addition to the identified cost and demand pressures, a general allowance
for currently unforeseen or unquantifiable cost and demand pressures
continues to be included in each scenario (best case £0.250m, mid-range
£0.500m and worst case £1m per year).

Page 4

1.16 Political decisions will require to be made in respect of the allocation to the
Health and Social Care Partnership in future years, subject to Scottish
Government grant funding and the council’s overall financial position.  As part
of the 2025-26 budget process, indicative base allocations of £85.045m were
agreed for 2026-27 and 2027-28, subsequently updated in respect of the 2025-
27 pay award and funding assumptions.  The current and forecast financial
position of the HSCP represents a significant risk to the council. 
1.17 The updated budget gap in the mid-range scenario, prior to measures to
balance the budget, either from previous savings decisions or new potential
options, is estimated at £14.229m in 2026-27 and £58.503m over the five year
period 2026-27 to 2030-31. 
1.18 The measures to balance the budget over the next five years have been
updated to include new Management/Operational savings options, impacting
from 2026-27, endorsed by Council in November 2025.  Measures to balance
the budget now comprise the following: 
• Proposed increases to fees and charges of between 3% and 9% each year
(6% mid-range).
• Proposed increases to Council Tax at 5% each year across all scenarios.
• Management/Operational and Policy savings already agreed by Council in
February 2025 and previous years.
• New Management/Operational savings, impacting from 2026-27. 
1.19 The updated budget gap in the mid-range scenario, after measures to balance
the budget, is estimated at £6.196m in 2026-27 and £31.098m over the five
year period 2026-27 to 2030-31.   
1.20 The updated budget gap in the best case scenario is estimated at £1.546m in
2026-27 and £7.933m over five years, increasing to £9.923m in 2026-27 and
£62.838m over five years in the worst case scenario.  A summary of all three
scenarios is included within Appendix 1. 
1.21 It is recommended that the Policy and Resources Committee consider the
current Budget Outlook position for the period 2026-27 to 2030-31.

Page 5

ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL POLICY AND RESOURCES COMMITTEE
FINANCIAL SERVICES 4 DECEMBER 2025
BUDGET OUTLOOK 2026-27 TO 2030-31 
2. INTRODUCTION 
2.1 This report summarises the Budget Outlook for the 5-year period 2026-27 to 2030-31 and
provides an update to the position previously reported to the Policy and Resources
Committee in October 2025.  It is underpinned by planning assumptions that will continue
to be updated and refined, on an ongoing basis, throughout the year.  It should be noted
that relatively small variations in planning assumptions can lead to fairly significant
changes to the budget forecast outcome.   
2.2 The Budget Outlook has been prepared using three different scenarios, best case, worst
case and mid-range.  The detailed information contained within the report focusses
primarily on the mid-range scenario, however, all three scenarios are outlined within
Appendix 1. 
3.  RECOMMENDATIONS 
3.1  It is recommended that the Policy and Resources Committee consider the current Budget
Outlook position for the period 2026-27 to 2030-31. 
3.2 Members are asked to note the revised Chief Executive pay agreed at COSLA Leaders, 
to note the consequential increases in remaining Chief Officers pay to maintain the
Council’s established policy position as set out at paragraph 4.3.12 and to agree that the
cost of implementing these measures will be met from the existing earmarked reserve set
aside for pay inflation increases in 2025-26 and the cost for 2026-27 and subsequent
years will be added into the budget outlook estimates of the Council and IJB. 
4. DETAIL 
4.1 Funding 
Scottish Government Finance Settlement 
4.1.1 
4.1.2 
Estimated future Scottish Government funding levels is one of the key assumptions under-
pinning the Budget Outlook.  Whilst council’s are recommended to prepare longer-term
financial plans, with a focus on financial sustainability, this is more challenging with one
year only finance settlements. Council’s have continued to lobby via COSLA for multi-year
settlements to assist with longer-term financial planning.   
The Head of Local Government Finance recently confirmed the Scottish Government’s
intention to provide 3-year revenue and 5-year capital grant figures, albeit the level of
detail remains to be clarified.  This is very welcome and should provide a greater level of

Page 6

4.1.3 
4.1.4 
certainty in respect of our Budget Outlook planning assumptions.  However, it is also worth
noting that, as a result of the delayed UK budget announcement (confirmed as 26
November), the timing of the Scottish Budget announcement has now been confirmed as
13 January 2026.  Given that the level of government grant funding is a key assumption
within our Budget Outlook, this prolongs the period of funding uncertainty and confirmation
of the budget gap. 
There are no changes to Scottish Government grant funding assumptions since last
reporting.  As part of the 2025-26 budget setting process, members were advised that
despite an unexpected effective increase of 1.47% in our 2025-26 settlement, it would be
imprudent to assume similar increases in future years, with increases over the previous 3
years being as low as 0.01%. Current suggested planning assumptions are for a Scottish
average increase in Scottish Government funding of 0.5% for the mid-range, with a
variation of 0.5% for the best and worst case scenarios.  As this council relies on the floor
mechanism to protect its funding level, our settlement is lower than the Scottish average
change.  The floor was set at 0.75% below the Scottish average in 2025-26 and is likely to
continue at this level.  As such, funding assumptions for this council range between an
increase of 0.25% (best case) and a reduction of 0.75% (worst case), with a reduction of
0.25% in the mid-range scenario.   
Additional recurring funding to fully meet the increased cost of the 2025-26 pay award, in
respect of both council and Social Work services, continues to be assumed for planning
purposes, with additional funding in respect of the increased cost of the 2026-27 pay
award assumed in the best case scenario only.  Our current Budget Outlook also
continues to assume that the Teachers pay award for 2025-26 and 2026-27 will have
additional match Scottish Government funding. 
4.1.5  The table below summarises the mid-range scenario estimates based on a 0.25%
settlement reduction year on year.  This includes additional funding in respect of the
agreed 2025-26 pay award for SJC and Chief Officers, and assumed for Teachers, in
respect of both council and HSCP staff (Social Work services). 
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
2030-31
£000
SG Funding - Base 261,058 260,406 259,755 259,106 258,459
2025-26 Pay Award 2,305 2,300 2,294 2,288 2,282
Total SG Funding 263,363 262,706 262,049 261,394 260,741 
4.1.6 As part of the 2025-26 budget process, £2.499m of the estimated 2025-26 funding
available in respect of Packaging Extended Producer Responsibility (pEPR) from the
Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) was carried forward into
2026-27.  As previously reported, the funding allocation for 2025-26 has been confirmed at
£2.786m, £1.061m less than the original estimate provided by DEFRA of £3.847m,
reducing the carry forward into 2026-27 to £1.438m.  Since last reporting, the anticipated
level of DEFRA funding available for 2026-27 has been confirmed at £2.851m.  It remains
uncertain as to whether this funding will be recurring at this level in 2027-28 and future
years, and without a reduction in Scottish Government grant.  At this stage, funding is
assumed to continue into 2027-28 and future years at the 2026-27 level in the best case,
at 50% of the 2026-27 level in the mid-range and £nil in the worst case scenarios. 
Funding conditions and future years budget pressures, in respect of potential new

Page 7

spending commitments, remain unclear. 
Council Tax 
4.1.7 The Council Tax base for 2025-26 is set at £70.204m, which reflects the 9.9% increase
agreed by the Council on 27 February 2025. 
4.1.8 
4.1.9 
4.1.10
There are no changes to previous assumptions around the growth in Council Tax. It has
been assumed that there will be 0.5% growth in the mid-range scenario for all years from
2026-27 (0.75% in the best and 0.25% in the worst case scenarios). Following the setting
of Council Tax in February, the future years estimates have been updated reflecting the
adjusted base Council Tax budget. 
The 2024-25 final outturn included additional income of £1.234m in respect of 2024-25 and
prior years, an element of which was expected to be recurring in 2025-26 and future years. 
A more sophisticated financial modelling tool has now been developed to assist with
Council Tax income projections.  However, a significant element of the 2024-25 additional
income (some £0.5m) related to the reclassification of self-catering units as domestic
dwellings by the Assessor, following completion of both the 2022-23 and 2023-24
canvasses during the year, which saw the transfer of properties from the Non-domestic
Rates to Council Tax registers.   
There is a significant level of uncertainty in respect of the regulatory environment in
relation to self-catering units, with a risk of appeals being granted and properties returning
to Non-domestic Rates.  This uncertainty in respect of both timing and financial value,
presents a risk to financial planning assumptions.  At this stage, a re-base of the current
Council Tax budget, estimated at £0.250m in the worst case, £0.500m in the mid-range
and £0.750m in the best case scenarios, continues to be assumed within the Budget
Outlook.  This position will be subject to ongoing review and refinement throughout the
year.     
4.1.11  In the first instance, this report presents the budget gap, prior to any measures to balance
the budget.  For this purpose, Council Tax is assumed to remain at the same levels as
2025-26, with only growth in the Council Tax base reflected.   
General Fund 
4.1.12 As reported in prior years, reduced employer contribution rates payable to Strathclyde
Pension Fund will result in one-off savings in 2024-25 and 2025-26. It was agreed by
Council in February 2024 that £2m of the pension fund gain would be released each year
for a period of 3 years (2024-25 through to 2026-27), in order to help bridge the budget
gap.  
Funding Summary 
4.1.13  The following table summarises the estimated total funding in the mid-range scenario over
the 5 years 2026-27 to 2030-31, increased from the previously reported position in respect
of anticipated 2026-27 DEFRA funding, now confirmed. 
2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 2030-31

Page 8

£000 £000 £000 £000 £000
SG Funding 263,363 262,706 262,049 261,394 260,741
pEPR – DEFRA
Funding
2,851 1,426 1,426 1,426 1,426
EPR – 2025-26
Funding C/fwd
1,438 0 0 0 0
Released SPF Gain 2,000 0 0 0 0
Council Tax Base 70,204 70,204 70,204 70,204 70,204
Council Tax Re-base 500 500 500 500 500
Council Tax Growth 354 709 1,066 1,425 1,786
Total Estimated
Funding
340,710 335,545 335,245 334,949 334,657 
4.2 Base Budget 
4.2.1 The 2025-26 budget approved by Council on 27 February 2025 was £328.289m.  This
included the 2025-26 debt charge implications of approved borrowing for additional capital
investment.  There was also a decision to defer a policy saving in respect of Community
Sports until 2026-27 onwards.  As previously reported, the full year effect of these previous
budget decisions on 2026-27 and future years are incorporated as base budget
adjustments. 
4.2.2 The revised base budget is unchanged from the previously reported position, as outlined in
the table below. 
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
2030-31
£000
Base Budget 2025-26 328,289 328,289 328,289 328,289 328,289
Debt Charges Increase 95 95 95 95 95
Approved Policy
Savings
(20) (20) (20) (20) (20)
Revised Base Budget 328,364 328,364 328,364 328,364 328,364  
4.3 Employee Cost Changes 
Pay Award 
4.3.1  The Public Sector Pay Policy, published alongside the Scottish Budget, set out a multi-
year framework of a 9% pay envelope covering 2025-26, 2026-27 and 2027-28.  This
underpinned our original planning assumption of 3% across each of these years. 
However, following agreement of the SJC and Chief Officers pay award for 2025-26 and
2026-27 at 4% and 3.5% respectively, these assumptions were subsequently updated.   
4.3.2 There have been no further changes to pay assumptions since last reporting.  An increase
of 4% for 2025-26 and 3.5% for 2026-27 across all scenarios, 3% for 2027-28 in both the
best case and mid-range scenarios, with 5% in the worst case scenario has been
assumed (at this stage, at 2025-26 prices).  For 2028-29 to 2030-31, the best case
scenario has been reduced to 2%, while the mid-range remains at 3% and worst case
remains at 5%.

Page 9

4.3.3 The Teachers pay award now covers the period August to July and had been agreed up to
31 July 2025.  However, earlier this month, the teachers did agree a revised pay offer of
4% from 1 August 2025, rising to 4.25% from 1 April 2026 with a further 3.25% from 1
August 2026 to 31 July 2027.  Within the budget outlook, the increase was assumed to be
in line with the SJC agreed pay award.  This new agreement is marginally different, and it
has still to be confirmed whether Scottish Government will provide additional funding. 
Should it not be funded, there is sufficient in the employee pay inflation earmarking to pay
for the increase in 2026-27 as outlined in paragraphs 4.3.15 and 4.3.16.     
Increments 
4.3.4  There remains a fairly regular turnover of staff within posts and when this happens, the
cost of increments can, in some cases, be absorbed within the existing budget provision,
as leavers who may be at the top their grade may be replaced by new starts at the grade
entry point. The cost of pay increments for 2025-26 continues to be estimated at £0.599m. 
4.3.5 For future years, an equivalent cost has been assumed in the mid-range and worst case
scenarios, while half the estimated 2025-26 cost has been assumed in the best case
scenario. 
Strathclyde Pension Fund 
4.3.6  As previously reported, the employer contribution rate paid to the Strathclyde Pension
Fund fell from 19.3% to 6.5% in 2024-25 and 2025-26, rising to a sustainable long-term
rate of 17.5% from 2026-27. The reduction in the first 2 years equates to reduced costs of
£6.875m per annum relating to council employees (excluding HSCP).  The increased cost
to 17.5% from 2026-27 has been built into projections for 2026-27 and future years. 
Standby Rate 
4.3.7 An increase to the current Standby Rate of pay from December 2025 was approved by
Council 26 November 2025.  The full year recurring impact at an estimated additional cost
of £41k from 2026-27 has now been incorporated into the Budget Outlook across all
budget scenarios. 
Independent Review of Chief Executive’s Pay 
4.3.8 In 2021 COSLA and the Association of Local Authority Chief Executive’s (ALACE) jointly
commissioned an independent review of Scottish Local Authorities Chief Executive’s pay. 
Prior to this review, Chief Executive’s pay had not been fully reviewed since 2001.      
4.3.9 There is clear justification and rationale behind the proposal to implement a new Chief
Executive pay framework with a built-in cycle of future review. The key rationale for
implementation includes: 
• There have been significant changes in the size of population served by some
councils since the current Chief Executive salary structure, which is based on
population size, was established in 2001. 
• Changes in the political and financial landscape for councils has impacted the size,
scope and demands of the Chief Executive role over the past 20 years. This
includes increased complexity and risk, greater requirement for partnership working,

Page 10

and increased statutory accountabilities.
• Benchmarking against other public bodies demonstrates that salaries of Local
Authority Chief Executives have not maintained their position in the Scottish public
sector marketplace relative to posts of lesser scope, scale, and accountability.
• Nominal differentials set by McIntosh in 2001 against internal Local Government
comparators (Head Teachers) have been significantly eroded. 
• Under the current remuneration framework councils are facing significant
recruitment and retention difficulties in relation to Chief Executive roles as well as
other senior council posts, particularly in islands authorities. There is a clear need to
address this to ensure Local Government can secure the leadership capacity it
requires to deliver for communities and meet current and future challenges. 
4.3.10 COSLA Leaders considered the review findings at their meeting in February and April this
year and most recently at their meeting on 31 October when the following was agreed: 
• Benchmarking of Chief Executive Salaries within Local Government – Accept the
updated metric of a nominal 10% step between Head Teachers and a Director of
Education, and a 20% step between a Director of Education and a Chief Executive
as the new internal Local Government differential for setting the “bottom line”. 
• Proxy Measure of Job Size – Accept Total Estimated Expenditure (TEE) as the new
proxy measure of relative job size (to replace population).
• New Pay Framework Options – Agree to implement a new Chief Executive pay
framework in line with Option 3 in the independent report with the application of an
additional islands supplement and that in future recruitment the default position
should be to use incremental progression and appoint on the first incremental point. 
• Approach to Implementation – Agree implementation of the uplift in new pay
framework taking account of the 4% pay increase agreed in July. 
• Approach to Effective date and Phasing – Agree implementation using
implementation date and phasing option a) ii) - Immediate effect from November
2025 with phasing in two steps a year apart
• Future Cycle of Review – Agree to put in place a 5 yearly cycle of review of Chief
Executive remuneration effective from the date of implementation. 
4.3.11 The Chief Executive’s current salary is £155,014. Within the new agreed pay framework
this will be £177,073.  With the agreed phased implementation in two steps a year apart
the salary increments that will be applied are as outlined below: 
1st November 2025 - £166, 043
1st April 2026 (3.5% pay award) £171, 855
1st November 2026 £183, 270. 
4.3.12 The Chief Executive’s new pay framework has consequential impacts on other Chief
Officers.  Chief Official salaries are set by the Council according to a formula. When the
Council was established in 1995 Directors received 80% of the Chief Executive’s salary
and Heads of Service 75% of the Chief Executive’s salary.  This was revised in 2003 when
the Council approved Strategic Directors, as they were then known, to continue to receive
80% of the Chief Executive’s salary and Heads of Service to receive 74% of the Directors’
salary.  There has been no change to this formula approach.  Chief Officers will need to be
placed onto the closest spinal column point that maintains the integrity of the formula
previously agreed by Council.

Page 11

4.3.13  The table in Appendix 4 outlines the salary changes for all Chief Officials that are
employed by the Council, noting that some staff within the HSCP have an NHS contract
which is outwith the scope of this pay framework.  The additional cost within 2025-26 is
£0.039m and the increased cost, over and above inflation already accounted for in the
budget outlook for 2026-27, is £0.158m across Council and HSCP (Council £0.129m,
HSCP £0.029m).   
Employee Costs Summary 
4.3.14  The table below summarises the employee cost changes in the mid-range scenario, for
council services, over the five years 2026-27 to 2030-31, unchanged from the previously
reported position. Employee cost increases relating to Social Work within the Health and
Social Care Partnership are summarised within paragraph 4.6.6. 
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
2030-31
£000
Pay Award 7,346 12,124 17,046 22,115 27,337
Full Year Effect 2025-26
Teachers Pay Award
661 661 661 661 661
Increments 599 1,198 1,797 2,396 2,995
Reinstatement of  SPF
contribution
6,875 6,875 6,875 6,875 6,875
Standby Rate Increase 41 41 41 41 41
Chief Officers Pay
(Council)
129 132 136 141 145
Total Employee Cost
Changes
15,651 21,031 26,556 32,229 38,054 
Further Anticipated Updates 
4.3.15  Financial Services have almost concluded the annual salary template exercise, providing
detailed costings for the required employee costs budgets for 2026-27.  Further detail will
be provided within the budget report to Council in February 2026, however, the latest
estimate suggests that there will be a required increase to current estimates of circa.
£1.2m.  There are two reasons for this increase.  Firstly, although the employer’s pension
fund contribution rate increase from 6.5% to 17.5% from 2026-27 has been built back into
the base, this was at 2023-24 prices (when the reduced rate of 6.5% was applicable), and
there is a requirement to rebase the employer’s pension costs budget in respect of
applying the contribution rate differential to the 2024-25 and 2025-26 pay awards.  The
second reason relates to the teachers pay agreement, which totals 7.5% over 2 years but
is profiled slightly differently to the SJC and Chief Officers pay award, resulting in an
increase to the current planning estimate of circa £0.080m.  It has still to be confirmed
whether Scottish Government will provide additional funding.     
4.3.16 There is an existing earmarked reserve balance of £1.3m, specifically set aside to provide
for employee pay increases beyond budgeted levels, that will now be utilised to meet the
additional costs of both these items.  Therefore, there will be minimal impact on the
forecast budget gap in respect of these anticipated updates.

Page 12

4.4 Non-pay Inflation 
4.4.1 Non-pay inflation is only provided for within budget plans, where it is deemed to be
unavoidable, for example in respect of contractual obligations.  As not all budget elements
are subject to inflationary increases, inflationary budget pressures may arise in some other
areas and in order to manage spend within available budget resources, service
rationalisation or efficiencies may require to be delivered. 
4.4.2 The Budget Outlook provides for unavoidable non-pay inflation within each budget
scenario.  Market forecast data, where available, is used to inform the mid-range scenario. 
Officers continue to review inflation assumptions on an ongoing basis, however, due to
prevalent market volatility and levels of uncertainty, at this stage, there continues to be no
change to the inflationary assumptions included within the 2025-26 Budget Pack. 
4.4.3 In addition, due to prevailing levels of economic uncertainty, it continues to be deemed
prudent to include a further general inflation contingency within the mid-range and worst
case scenarios at £250k and £500k each year respectively. This contingency will either be
required, reduced or removed to reflect changing circumstances before the 2026-27
budget is set.   
4.4.4  The estimated cumulative inflation over the five years 2026-27 to 2030-31 in the mid-range
scenario is outlined in the table below. 
Non-Pay Inflation
(Unavoidable)
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
2030-31
£000 
2,745 5,632 8,676 11,890 15,140 
4.4.5 An analysis of the 2026-27 cost estimate in respect of the mid-range scenario across key
inflationary drivers is given in the table below.  The non-pay inflationary increases relating
to Social Work within the Health and Social Care Partnership are summarised within
paragraph 4.6.6. 
Inflation Category 2026-27
Estimate
£000
Premises and Utilities
(Rates, Electricity, Gas, Oil,
Water)
280
Waste/Landfill Tax 335
NPDO/HUB Schools 382
Other Contracted Services 883
Insurance 414
Other Supplies and Services 201
General Contingency 250
Total 2,745 
4.5 Cost and Demand Pressures 
4.5.1  For a number of years, services have been required to manage any cost and demand
pressures within current budgetary resources, as far as possible.  However, there are

Page 13

several cost and demand pressures, already identified for future years, which cannot be
contained without a detrimental impact on service provision.  These continue to be
monitored on an ongoing basis and reported within the Budget Outlook.   
4.5.2 Since last reporting in October, the cost and demand pressures have been updated to
include a newly identified budget pressure in respect of required upgrades to the Housing
Case Management System, with an upfront unbudgeted cost of £32k in 2026-27.   
4.5.3  When creating a longer-term budget outlook beyond the current year, there is a greater
risk that currently unforeseen or unquantifiable cost and demand pressures will emerge
across future years.  It is, therefore, deemed prudent to continue to include a general
contingency, proposed at £0.250m, within the best case, £0.500m within the mid-range
and £1m within the worst case scenarios year on year.  This contingency will either be
required, reduced or removed to reflect changing circumstances before the 2026-27
budget is set.   
4.5.4 The cost and demand pressures within the mid-range scenario are detailed in Appendix 2
and summarised in the table below.  These will continue to be subject to ongoing review
throughout the financial year.   
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
2030-31
£000
ASN Support 208 422 422 422 422
School Clothing Grants 56 56 56 56 56
Schools Residential 800 800 800 800 800
Education ICT Network
Infrastructure
0 53 53 53 53
Election costs 0 350 0 0 0
Planning (Local
Development Plan)
50 0 0 0 0
Universal Credit – HB
Admin Grant
40 80 120 160 200
Civica Revenue and
Benefits System
0 63 63 63 63
Microsoft 365 Licenses 30 380 380 380 380
Compliance with BMW
Ban
2,479 3,051 3,051 3,051 3,051
Bus Transport Contracts 400 400 400 400 400
Valuation Joint Board
Requisition
255 301 301 301 301
Security Operations
Centre Contracts
43 43 43 43 43
Wi-Fi Network
Subscription License
15 58 58 58 58
Housing Management
System Upgrades
32 4 4 4 4
Allowance for pressures
in future years
500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500
Total Cost and
Demand Pressures
4,908 7,061 7,251 7,791 8,331

Page 14

4.5.5 The cost and demand pressures relating to Social Work within the Health and Social Care
Partnership are summarised within paragraph 4.6.6. 
4.6 Health and Social Care Partnership 
4.6.1  As part of the 2025-26 budget process, indicative base allocations of £85.045m were
agreed for 2026-27 and 2027-28, with future years’ allocations being subject to Scottish
Government grant funding and the council’s overall financial position. The indicative base
allocation for 2026-27 represents an increase of £3.053m, reflecting the non-recurring
saving in relation to the Strathclyde Pension Fund contribution. 
4.6.2 As previously reported, the base allocations have been updated to reflect the impact of the
agreed pay award for 2025-26 in respect of Social Work services, on the planning
assumption that these additional costs, estimated at £0.411m, will be met by the council,
with additional Scottish Government grant funding assumed in this respect.  An update to
the allocation in respect of the 2026-27 pay award (estimated at £0.206m), funded by
additional Scottish Government grant funding, continues to be reflected in the best case
scenario only. 
4.6.3 Political decisions will require to be made in respect of the allocation to the Health and
Social Care Partnership (HSCP) in future years.  For the purposes of the Budget Outlook,
flat cash allocations, adjusted for the Strathclyde Pension Fund saving and the 2025-27
pay award, continue to be assumed across all scenarios.  These are only indicative
planning assumptions and it will be a matter for Council to consider any changes, as part
of the budget process.   
4.6.4 The HSCPs approved 2025-26 budget in respect of Social Work services included
£0.500m of ‘unallocated savings’.  In order to safeguard the financial position of the
council, the council’s Section 95 Officer sought a financial recovery plan from the IJB,
under the terms of the Integration Scheme, seeking assurance in respect of its current and
future financial position.  This recovery plan was approved by the IJB and reported to
Council in June.   
4.6.5 The HSCP is currently forecasting an overspend of £0.733m for 2025-26 in respect of
Social Work services.  This includes assumptions on the delivery of savings totalling
around £3m, including £0.500m in respect of previously ‘unallocated savings’.  At this
stage, the HSCP expect the forecast overspend to be maintained within available HSCP
reserves, however, there is little headroom in this respect.  The potential use of reserves in
the current year will also have an impact on the forecast budget gap for 2026-27 and
future years, not currently reflected within the HSCPs financial planning assumptions.   
4.6.6 In respect of the budget outlook for 2026-27 and future years, the HSCP is currently
forecasting a budget gap in respect of Social Work services of £6.210m in 2026-27, rising
to £11.248m by 2028-29.  This reflects the required replacement of the £3.050m use of
reserves in 2025-26 in respect of the pension fund saving, non-recurring in 2026-27, but
does not yet reflect any further required use of remaining available reserves in 2025-26. 
The HSCP budget outlook also takes account of cost and demand pressures identified in
respect of Social Work services and these are included as Appendix 3, with the mid-range
scenario summarised below.  These are provided for information purposes and extend to

Page 15

three years, rather than the five years of the council’s Budget Outlook.  It is expected that
the HSCP will manage these budget pressures within the funding allocated.   
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
Pay Inflation 1,450 2,737 4,063
Pay Increments 198 396 594
Chief Officers Pay (HSCP) 29 30 31
Non-Pay Inflation 818 1,616 2,446
Adult Care - Older People 464 935 1,414
Adult Care – Mental Health 73 148 224
Looked After Children 75 152 230
General Contingency 700 900 1,100
Total Social Work Cost and Demand
Pressures
3,807 6,914 10,102    
4.6.7 This financial outlook is extremely challenging, particularly given the significant depletion
of HSCP reserve balances as at 31 March 2026.  In engaging with the HSCP on the
current and forecast financial position, the HSCPs Chief Financial Officer has advised in
relation to the budget gap for 2026-27 and future years ‘Savings of the magnitude required
cannot be delivered without recourse to reductions in employment and the scope and
scale of services offered and supported by the HSCP. Savings proposals on this scale are
anticipated to be damaging to services, communities and care capacity at a time when we
know that demand is increasing and staffing shortages in some areas may also increase.
There is a significant risk that implementation of many of the savings proposals will have
impacts upon future statutory provision and could be counter productive in the medium
term.’ 
4.6.8 There is a significant risk to the council in respect of failure to manage the delivery of
Social Work services within available resources.  Under the terms of the Integration
Scheme, any overspend on Social Work services, which cannot be met from existing
reserve balances, may fall to be met by the council.  In order to safeguard the council’s
position, the financial position of the HSCP and related financial risk to the council will be
closely monitored throughout the year.  This will continue to form part of the regular
reporting to Policy and Resources Committee in respect of the current year revenue
budget monitoring and financial risks, as well as future iterations of this Budget Outlook
report. 
4.7 LiveArgyll 
4.7.1 Political decisions will require to be made in respect of the allocation to LiveArgyll in future
years.  For the purposes of the Budget Outlook, flat cash allocations continue to be
assumed across all scenarios, with the exception of previous budget decisions in respect
of the Strathclyde Pension Fund adjustment relating to the cessation of the one-off
employer contribution rate saving (£0.118m increase) and deferral of the 2025-26
proposed saving in the service fee to 2026-27 (£311k reduction). These are only indicative
planning assumptions and it will be a matter for Council to consider any changes, as part
of the budget process next year.

Page 16

4.8 Estimated Budget Gap PRIOR to Measures to Balance the Budget 
4.8.1 The updated budget gap in the mid-range scenario over the five years 2026-27 to 2030-
31, after allowing for the considerations outlined above and prior to measures to balance
the budget, is outlined in the table below.  This is the budget gap prior to factoring in any
previous savings decisions or potential options towards balancing the budget. 
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
2030-31
£000
Base Budget 328,289 328,289 328,289 328,289 328,289
Base Budget
Adjustments
75 75 75 75 75
Employee Cost
Changes
15,651 21,031 26,556 32,229 38,054
Non-Pay Inflation 2,745 5,632 8,676 11,890 15,140
Cost and Demand
Pressures
4,908 7,061 7,251 7,791 8,331
Adjustment to HSCP
Payment
3,464 3,464 3,464 3,464 3,464
Adjustment to
LiveArgyll Payment 
(193) (193) (193) (193) (193)
Total Estimated Net
Expenditure
354,939 365,359 374,118 383,545 393,160
Estimated Funding 340,710 335,545 335,245 334,949 334,657
Estimated Budget
Surplus / (Gap)
Cumulative 
(14,229)  (29,814)  (38,873)  (48,596)  (58,503) 
4.9 Measures to Balance the Budget 
4.9.1 In 2025-26, a general inflationary increase of 6% was applied to relevant fees and
charges.  For the Budget Outlook, a range of between 3% (worst case) and 9% (best
case), with a mid-range of 6% continues to be assumed each year over the five years
2026-27 to 2030-31.  Further, as a result of 2025-26 budget decisions taken by Council on
27 February 2025 to freeze fees on council-run ferries, as previously reported, the forecast
income from fees and charges in future years has been slightly reduced.  
4.9.2 As previously reported, some of the management/operational and policy savings options
agreed at the Council meeting on 27 February 2025 and in previous years will impact the
2026-27 and future years budgets.  These are reflected within the Budget Outlook over the
five years 2026-27 to 2030-31. 
4.9.3  In terms of Council Tax, a 5% increase continues to be assumed each year in all
scenarios.  The average increase in Council Tax across all Scottish councils in 2025-26
was 9.3%, with 13 increasing theirs by at least 10%.  With a focus on longer term financial
sustainability and in light of the significant forecast budget gap over the next five years, the
level of Council Tax increases in 2026-27 and in future years will require due consideration
by Members, as part of the budget setting for 2026-27 and future years.

Page 17

4.9.4  The table below summarises the proposed measures to balance the budget in the mid-
range scenario, updated from the previous reported position to include new
Management/Operational savings, impacting from 2026-27, endorsed by Council in
November 2025. 
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
2030-31
£000
Fees and Charges
Increase
382 787 1,217 1,672 2,155
Council Tax Increase  3,553 7,319 11,292 15,480 19,897
Management/Operational
Savings – Previously
Agreed
(48) (9) (9) (9) (9)
Policy Savings –
Previously Agreed
1,012 1,748 2,217 2,331 2,445
New
Management/Operational
Savings
3,134 3,137 2,917 2,917 2,917
Total Measures to
Balance the Budget
8,033 12,982 17,634 22,391 27,405 
4.10 Estimated Budget Gap AFTER Measures to Balance the Budget 
4.10.1 The table below summarises the updated estimated budget gap in the mid-range scenario. 
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
2030-31
£000
Estimated Budget Gap
Prior to Measures to
Balance Budget 
(14,229)  (29,814)  (38,873)  (48,596)  (58,503)
Measures to Balance
Budget
8,033 12,982 17,634 22,391 27,405
Estimated Budget
Surplus / (Gap)
Cumulative 
(6,196)  (16,832)  (21,239)  (26,205)  (31,098)
Estimated Budget
Surplus / (Gap) 
In Year 
(6,196)  (10,636)  (4,407)  (4,966)  (4,893) 
4.10.2 In the mid-range scenario, the updated budget gap is estimated at £6.196m in 2026-27
and £31.098m over the five year period 2026-27 to 2030-31.   
4.10.3 The updated budget gap in the best case scenario is estimated at £1.417m in 2026-27 and
£7.788m over five years, increasing to £9.794m in 2026-27 and £62.693m over five years
in the worst case scenario.  A summary of all three scenarios is included within Appendix
1. 
4.10.4 The changes from the previous Budget Outlook in the mid-range scenario, reported to the
Policy and Resources Committee in October 2025, are summarised in the table below.

Page 18

2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
2030-31
£000
Previously reported
Budget Surplus / (Gap) 
Cumulative 
(10,586)  (19,825)  (24,008)  (28,969)  (33,858)
Update to Employee
Costs – Standby Rate
(41) (41) (41) (41) (41)
Updated to Employee
Costs – Chief Officers
Pay
(129) (132) (136) (141) (145)
Update to Cost and
Demand Pressures
(32) (4) (4) (4) (4)
Update to Funding -
DEFRA
1,458 33 33 33 33
Update to Measures to
Balance the Budget –
New
Management/Operational
Savings
3,134 3,137 2,917 2,917 2,917
Revised Budget
Surplus / (Gap) 
Cumulative 
(6,196)  (16,832)  (21,239)  (26,205)  (31,098) 
5. CONCLUSION 
5.1 In the mid-range scenario, the budget gap is now estimated at £6.196m in 2026-27 and
£31.098m over the five year period 2026-27 to 2030-31.  Council officers have identified
Management/Operational savings and are continuing to explore further budget savings
options during 2025-26.  These will be presented to Members in due course.  
5.2  This is a very challenging Budget Outlook position.  Variations to the assumptions,
particularly in respect of future Scottish Government grant funding levels, would have a
significant impact on the Budget Outlook.  All assumptions will be kept under review, with
the Budget Outlook updated, as and when further information becomes available.   
6. IMPLICATIONS 
6.1 Policy -  Sets out the Budget Outlook that provides the financial
envelope for policy decisions.
6.2 Financial -  Sets best, worst and mid-range scenarios in respect of the
Budget Outlook.  The council are actively continuing to
pursue opportunities to mitigate against future budget gaps. 
6.3 Legal -  None directly from this report but the Council requires to set
a balanced budget. 
6.4 HR -  None directly from this report but there is a strong link
between employee numbers and budgets.
6.5  Customer Service –  None directly from this report but any proposals to address
the estimated budget gap will require to consider customer
service.

Page 19

6.6       Risk -  None directly from this report but any proposals to address
the estimated budget gap will require to consider risk.
6.7 
6.8 
6.9
Climate Change - 
Fairer Scotland Duty - 
Equalities – protected
characteristics -
The Council is committed to addressing climate change and
reviews how Services are delivering this on an ongoing
basis, within the available budget resources.
None directly from this report but any proposals to address
the estimated budget gap will require to consider fairer
Scotland issues.
None directly from this report but any proposals to address
the estimated budget gap will require to consider equality
issues.
6.10 Consumer Duty - None directly from this report but any proposals to address
the estimated budget gap will require to consider any
consumer specific issues.
6.11 
6.12
Island Communities - 
Children’s Rights and
Wellbeing -
None directly from this report but any proposals to address
the estimated budget gap will require to consider any island
specific issues. 
None directly from this report but any proposals to address
the estimated budget gap will require to consider any
children’s rights and wellbeing specific issues.   
Kirsty Flanagan
Executive Director/Section 95 Officer
19 November 2025 
Councillor Ross Moreland, Policy Lead for Finance and Commercial Services 
APPENDICES: 
Appendix 1 – Budget Outlook - Best, Worst and Mid-range Scenarios
Appendix 2 – Cost and Demand Pressures (Council Services)
Appendix 3 – Cost and Demand Pressures (Social Work)
Appendix 4 – Chief Officers Pay Adjustments 2025-26 and 2026-27 
For further information contact Carolyn Earl, Interim Head of Financial Services
Carolyn.earl@argyll-bute.gov.uk

Page 20

BUDGET OUTLOOK 2026-27 to 2030-31 APPENDIX 1
Policy and Resources Committee - October 2025
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
2030-31
£000
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
2030-31
£000
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
2030-31
£000
Base Budget 328,289 328,289 328,289 328,289 328,289 328,289 328,289 328,289 328,289 328,289 328,289 328,289 328,289 328,289 328,289
Base Budget Adjustments 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75
Revised Base Budget 328,364 328,364 328,364 328,364 328,364 328,364 328,364 328,364 328,364 328,364 328,364 328,364 328,364 328,364 328,364
Pay Award 7,346 12,124 15,405 18,752 22,166 7,346 12,124 17,046 22,115 27,337 7,346 15,353 23,761 32,589 41,859
Full year effect of 2025-26 pay award for teachers in 2026-27 661 661 661 661 661 661 661 661 661 661 661 661 661 661 661
Pay Increments 300 599 899 1,198 1,498 599 1,198 1,797 2,396 2,995 599 1,198 1,797 2,396 2,995
Re-instate Employers Superannuation Rate 6,875 6,875 6,875 6,875 6,875 6,875 6,875 6,875 6,875 6,875 6,875 6,875 6,875 6,875 6,875
Chief Officers Pay Increase 129 132 136 141 145 129 132 136 141 145 129 132 136 141 145
Standby Rate Increase 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41
Total Employee Cost Changes (Council Services) 15,352 20,432 24,017 27,668 31,386 15,651 21,031 26,556 32,229 38,054 15,651 24,260 33,271 42,703 52,576
Non-Pay Inflation - Council Services 1,771 4,011 6,381 8,893 11,871 2,745 5,632 8,676 11,890 15,140 3,692 7,259 11,012 14,968 18,968
ASN Support 208 422 422 422 422 208 422 422 422 422 208 422 422 422 422
School Clothing Grants 32 32 32 32 32 56 56 56 56 56 79 79 79 79 79
Schools Residential 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800
Education ICT Network Infrastructure 0 53 53 53 53 0 53 53 53 53 0 53 53 53 53
Election Costs 0 327 0 0 0 0 350 0 0 0 0 370 0 0 0
Planning (Local Development Plan) 50 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0
Housing Benefits Admin Grant 40 80 120 160 200 40 80 120 160 200 40 80 120 160 200
Civica Revenue and Benefits System 0 37 37 37 37 0 63 63 63 63 0 137 137 137 137
Microsoft 365 Licenses 30 380 380 380 380 30 380 380 380 380 50 400 400 400 400
Compliance with BMW Ban 2,231 2,746 2,746 2,746 2,746 2,479 3,051 3,051 3,051 3,051 2,727 3,356 3,356 3,356 3,356
Bus Transport Contracts 360 360 360 360 360 400 400 400 400 400 440 440 440 440 440
Valuation Joint Board 255 301 301 301 301 255 301 301 301 301 255 301 301 301 301
Security Operations Centre - Quorum Cyber Contract Renewal 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43
Wi-Fi Network Subscription License Costs 15 58 58 58 58 15 58 58 58 58 15 58 58 58 58
Civica Housing Case Management System 32 4 4 4 4 32 4 4 4 4 32 4 4 4 4
Allowance for Cost and Demand Pressures Future Years 250 500 750 1,000 1,250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000
Total Cost and Demand Pressures 4,346 6,143 6,106 6,396 6,686 4,908 7,061 7,251 7,791 8,331 5,739 8,543 9,213 10,253 11,293
Adjustment to Health and Social Care Partnership Payment 3,670 3,670 3,670 3,670 3,670 3,464 3,464 3,464 3,464 3,464 3,464 3,464 3,464 3,464 3,464
Adjustment to Live Argyll Management Fee (193) (193) (193) (193) (193) (193) (193) (193) (193) (193) (193) (193) (193) (193) (193)
Total Estimated Expenditure PRIOR to measures to balance the budget 353,310 362,427 368,345 374,798 381,784 354,939 365,359 374,118 383,545 393,160 356,717 371,697 385,131 399,559 414,472
Scottish Government Grant 265,742 266,406 267,072 267,740 268,409 263,363 262,706 262,049 261,394 260,741 262,054 260,089 258,139 256,203 254,281
Packing Extended Producer Responsibility Funding - DEFRA 2,851 2,851 2,851 2,851 2,851 2,851 1,426 1,426 1,426 1,426 2,851 0 0 0 0
Transfer from Reserves - EPR funding carried forward from 2025-26 1,438 0 0 0 0 1,438 0 0 0 0 1,438 0 0 0 0
Transfer from Reserves - SPF Gain agreed February 2024 2,000 0 0 0 0 2,000 0 0 0 0 2,000 0 0 0 0
Council Tax 71,486 72,022 72,562 73,106 73,654 71,058 71,413 71,770 72,129 72,490 70,630 70,807 70,984 71,161 71,339
Total Funding 343,517 341,279 342,485 343,697 344,914 340,710 335,545 335,245 334,949 334,657 338,973 330,896 329,123 327,364 325,620
Budget Surplus / (Gap) PRIOR to measures to balance the budget (9,792) (21,148) (25,860) (31,101) (36,870) (14,229) (29,814) (38,873) (48,596) (58,503) (17,744) (40,801) (56,008) (72,195) (88,852)
Measures to Balance the Budget:
Fees and Charges 574 1,199 1,880 2,623 3,433 382 787 1,217 1,672 2,155 191 388 591 800 1,015
Council Tax Increase 3,574 7,354 11,350 15,573 20,034 3,553 7,301 11,255 15,424 19,820 3,532 7,249 11,161 15,277 19,608
Council Tax Increase (Growth element) 0 27 55 85 117 0 18 37 56 77 0 9 18 28 38
Policy Savings Agreed Feb 2023 476 1,112 1,581 1,695 1,809 476 1,112 1,581 1,695 1,809 476 1,112 1,581 1,695 1,809
Management/Operational Options Agreed Feb 2025 (48) (9) (9) (9) (9) (48) (9) (9) (9) (9) (48) (9) (9) (9) (9)
Policy Options 2025 536 636 636 636 636 536 636 636 636 636 536 636 636 636 636
New Management/Operational Options 3,134 3,137 2,917 2,917 2,917 3,134 3,137 2,917 2,917 2,917 3,134 3,137 2,917 2,917 2,917
Total Measures to Balance the Budget 8,246 13,456 18,410 23,520 28,937 8,033 12,982 17,634 22,391 27,405 7,821 12,522 16,895 21,344 26,014
Budget Surplus / (Gap) Cumulative AFTER measures to balance the budget (1,546) (7,692) (7,450) (7,581) (7,933) (6,196) (16,832) (21,239) (26,205) (31,098) (9,923) (28,279) (39,113) (50,851) (62,838)
Budget Surplus / (Gap) In Year AFTER measures to balance the budget (1,546) (6,146) 243 (132) (352) (6,196) (10,636) (4,407) (4,966) (4,893) (9,923) (18,356) (10,834) (11,738) (11,987)
Mid-Range ScenarioBest Case Scenario Worst Case Scenario

Page 21

COUNCIL COST AND DEMAND PRESSURES 2026-27 to 2030-31
Department Service Cost/Demand Pressure 2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
2030-31
£000
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
2030-31
£000
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
2030-31
£000
Executive Director -
Douglas Hendry
Education The demand for ASN support in Argyll and Bute has continued to grow with a significant increase in, and
early identification of children and young people presenting with complex additional support needs,
including mental health difficulties which manifests often in dysregulated behaviours.  IScottish
Government statistics show that the number of pupils identified with ASN has increased markedly since
2010 and there continue to be year on year increases. These increases are likely due to continue as we see
the impact of the Covid 19 pandemic on children and young people who were born from 2020 onwards
and as we work with partners to streamline assessment processes which help us to understand need more
thoroughly.  Scottish Government statistical datasets show that the percentage of school roll in
mainstream schools of pupils with ASN has increased by approximately 3% year on year.  Within many
authorities, this means increased numbers of children accessing specialist provision. As Argyll and Bute do
not have equitable access to Specialist provision in all areas, the cost pressure associated with offering
appropriate support within our local schools continues to increase in line with need.
208 422 422 422 422 208 422 422 422 422 208 422 422 422 422
Executive Director -
Douglas Hendry
Education Rightsize of School Clothing Grant Budget - Argyll and Bute Council  pay  the national minimum rate for
School Clothing Grants.  The payment is currently £120 for Primary School Children and £150 for
Secondary School children.   Over the past two years the number of clothing grants issued has increased
and left Education with a demand pressure.
32 32 32 32 32 56 56 56 56 56 79 79 79 79 79
Executive Director -
Douglas Hendry
Education Rightsize the Schools Residential Budget - The Education Service contribute 38% towards the cost of 
jointly funded out of area Residential Placements with Social Work contributing 62%.  Education also have
a number of out of area day placements which they pay 100% of the cost.  Over recent years the cost of
these placements has risen significantly due to a reduction in subsidy for Grant Aided Special Schools
(GASS) by the Govenment, along with the increase in demand for these type of placements.  This has led
to a cost pressure of £800k.
800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 800
Executive Director -
Douglas Hendry and
Kirsty Flanagan
Education and ICT The Education ICT Network required transformative technology upgrade, with improved security and
reconfiguration to support in-school and at home learning, was approved as part of the budget for 2025-
26.  However, the recommended cost plan included additional revenue consequences from 2027-28,
estimated at £53k per annum, in respect of network equipment licencing costs.  
0 53 53 53 53 0 53 53 53 53 0 53 53 53 53
Executive Director -
Douglas Hendry
Legal and Regulatory
Services
Estimated cost (to be borne by the Council)  of carrying out local Government elections in May 2027 (and
in financial year 2027/28). Operating approx. 100 polling stations and carrying out poll and count for 11
Multi member wards – requiring 11 separate counts
0 327 0 0 0 0 350 0 0 0 0 370 0 0 0
Executive Director -
Kirsty Flanagan
Development &
Economic Growth
Local development plan will require to be done under the new Planning legislation which is a revised
process from the current one and will have a 10 year life. The new process has 2 stages where there is
likely to be a cost pressure - a gate check followed by an examination some time later.
50 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0
Executive Director -
Kirsty Flanagan
Financial Services Universal Credit “Full” Service went live in Sept 2018, managed migration for working age claimants began
in August 2023 and will be completed by December 2025. Details of the migration of Pension age Housing
Benefit claimants have not yet been released initial indications was that the overall migration to Pension
Credit will be completed in 2028/2029 although that looks unlikely now. The DWP will reduce the Housing
Benefit Administration Subsidy they pay to the Council as some claimants come off of Housing Benefit
processed by Council staff and go onto Universal Credit processed by the DWP.  The Council’s caseload has
reduced since implementation of Universal Credit but it is hard to predict just how quickly the rest of the
caseload will migrate from Housing Benefit to Universal Credit between now and 2028/2029.  These
figures represent our best estimates at this time.
40 80 120 160 200 40 80 120 160 200 40 80 120 160 200
Executive Director -
Kirsty Flanagan
Financial Services The Council has been engaged in discussions with the supplier of the Revenues and Benefits Management
System and also the Electronic Document Management System.  We expect cost increases in the future as
the supplier moves the systems to the Cloud.  The cost presure is an estimate at this time and will be
refined as we get nearer to 2027-28.
0 37 37 37 37 0 63 63 63 63 0 137 137 137 137
Executive Director -
Kirsty Flanagan
ICT Microsoft 365 License Costs.  An earmarked reserve, set up to contribute towards the  licensing and set-up
costs for the Microsoft 365 rollout, is projected to be fully depleted during 2026-27, with an estimated
budget pressure of £30k in 2026-27, increasing to £380k in 2027-28.  These estimates are subject to
change, should licence upgrades be required for Power BI or Teams Telephony. 
30 380 380 380 380 30 380 380 380 380 50 400 400 400 400
Executive Director -
Kirsty Flanagan
Roads & Infrastructure
Services
Achieving compliance with ban on biodegradable municipal waste (BMW) which comes into place on 1
January 2026.  The costs are the best estimates at this stage and consultants have assisted in producing
the estimates.  The best case and worst case scenarios are based on the mid-range with a +/- 10% change
2,231 2,746 2,746 2,746 2,746 2,479 3,051 3,051 3,051 3,051 2,727 3,356 3,356 3,356 3,356
Best Case Mid-Range Worst Case
APPENDIX 2

Page 22

COUNCIL COST AND DEMAND PRESSURES 2026-27 to 2030-31
Department Service Cost/Demand Pressure 2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
2030-31
£000
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
2030-31
£000
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
2030-31
£000
Best Case Mid-Range Worst Case
APPENDIX 2
Executive Director -
Kirsty Flanagan
Roads & Infrastructure
Services
Bus Transport contracts have seen a siginificant increase in new contract prices due to increased costs for
fuel, insurance, maintenance, regualtory compliance and driver wages.  New contracts have seen a
combined annual increase of £975k across Argyll and Bute during 2024-25 with further contract renewals
due in 2025-26 and 2026-27.   The cost pressure reflects the estimated increased costs of future renewals
beyond budgeted levels.  An options appraisal is currently being carried out to assess the best and most
cost effective solution for future delivery of the school and public transport service.  Increased certainty
around the value of the budget pressure is expected following the renewal of a number of significant
value contracts during October 2025.
360 360 360 360 360 400 400 400 400 400 440 440 440 440 440
Council Wide Council Wide A letter from the Dunbartonshire and Argyll and Bute Valuation Joint Board was received on 30 January
2025 advising of the financial challenges facing the Board and the estimated 2025-26 to 2027-28 budget
gaps along with a request to increase the level of contribution that we make to the Board.  Since 2012-13
the core constituent funding to the Board has either reduced or been flast cash for the past 7 years with
the Board heavily reliant on reserves.  As the reserves will be fully depleted by 2025-26 there is a required
for the requisitions to increase.
255 301 301 301 301 255 301 301 301 301 255 301 301 301 301
Executive Director -
Kirsty Flanagan
ICT The Security Operations Centre (SOC) contract with Quorum Cyber provides constant monitoring of the
council’s networks and 24/7/365 protection by proactively monitoring, detecting and analysing data, and
providing incident response and recovery. It works alongside the council’s internal security posture to
ensure we can operate securely, at all times. It is now an essential service for the Council and was funded
for the first three years from earmarkings but will require a cost pressure from 2026/27 of £43k per
annum.
43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43
Executive Director -
Kirsty Flanagan
ICT The Council’s Wi-fi network is based on a subscription licensing model from CISCO. Our current
subscription was paid from excess capital and revenue but expires in January 2027 and will need renewed
at a cost of £175k. This will cover a three year subscription.
15 58 58 58 58 15 58 58 58 58 15 58 58 58 58
Council Wide Council Wide General provision for unidentified Cost and Demand Pressures 250 500 750 1,000 1,250 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000
Executive Director -
Kirsty Flanagan
ICT / Housing Works with Civica to upgrade the Civica Housing Case Management System, including the addition of
Multi Factor Authentication and system version upgrades. 2026/27 initial cost of £31,900, with future
annual costs of £3,510 from 2027-28 (subject to inflation).
32 4 4 4 4 32 4 4 4 4 32 4 4 4 4
TOTAL 4,346 6,143 6,106 6,396 6,686 4,908 7,061 7,251 7,791 8,331 5,739 8,543 9,213 10,253 11,293

Page 23

SOCIAL WORK COST AND DEMAND PRESSURES - 2026-27 to 2028-29
Service Cost/Demand Pressure 2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
All Social Work Estimated Pay inflation reflecting a best case at 3% up to 2027/28
reflecting the Scottish Government Public Sector Pay Policy before
reducing to 2% in 2028/29, a mid-range of 3%  and a worst case of 5%.
Adjusted for the impact of the increase in the employer's pension
contribution rate from 6.5% to 17.5% in 2026/27.
1,450 2,737 3,621 1,450 2,737 4,063 1,450 3,595 5,847
All Social Work Estimated Pay increments, best case is that 50% of the incremental
changes based on 2025/26 are absorbed and in the mid-range and worst
case, the increase is in line with the increase in 2025/26.
99 198 297 198 396 594 198 396 594
All Social Work Chief Officers pay increase as a consequence of new Chief Officers pay
framework.
29 30 31 29 30 31 29 30 31
All Social Work Inescapable non-pay inflation across a range of activities and activity
specific inflation rates with a 0.5% tolerance for the best and worst cases.
569 1,127 1,703 711 1,416 2,150 844 1,698 2,595
All Social Work Non-pay inflation impact of payroll inflation on NHS posts which are
recharged to Social Work.
93 169 248 107 200 296 122 231 344
Adult Care Older People Demand Growth: The number of older people is increasing
and older people are living longer with significant health and support
needs and significant expectations of the support they are entitled to
receive. Best case assumes that this will be offset by efficiency
improvement and increasing unmet need / demand. The mid range allows
for a 1.5% increase each year. Worst case is 3% per year on the older adult
services budget.
0 0 0 464 935 1,414 928 1,885 2,872
Adult Care Mental Health Demand Growth - As above, services operating within
budget overall. The best case assumes a 0% increase in spending reflecting
the limited service capacity in the area, the mid-range reflects 2% growth
in 26/27 and 27/28 and the worst case reflects 3% growth.
0 0 0 73 148 224 110 223 340
Children and
Families
Looked After Children Demand Growth - there is a continuing demand for
placements of children who are cared for by the HSCP. The best case
scenario is that the expected additional demand can be funded from
within existing resources as a result of planned improvements to the
service delivery model (eg shift away from high cost external residential
care to local foster and kinship care), the mid case reflects that additional
demand in 26/27 be funded from existing resource with £250k per annum
thereafter and the worst case reflects £250k per annum.
38 76 114 75 152 230 113 229 349
All Social Work Allowance for unknown cost and demand pressures which could arise. 0 0 0 700 900 1,100 700 900 1,100
TOTAL UNFUNDED COST AND DEMAND PRESSURES 2,278 4,337 6,014 3,807 6,914 10,102 4,494 9,187 14,072
Worst CaseMid RangeBest Case
Appendix 3

Page 24

Appendix 4 - Chief Officers Pay Adjustments, 2025-26 and 2026-27
Summary of increase in cost not already included within the 2025-26 budget and to be provided for in the 2026-27 outlook 
Role & No of
Employees
Current
Salary 
£
Revised
Salary Nov
2025 
£
Increase
Nov 25 to
March 26
(5 months)
£
2025-26
In Year
Cost 
£
Revised
Salary April
2026 (3.5%
pay award)
£
Increase
April 26 to
Oct 26
(7 months)
£
Revised
Salary Nov
2026 
£
Increase
Nov 26 to
March 27
(5 months)
£
2026-27
In Year
Cost 
£
Chief Executive (1) 155,014 166,043 4,595 4,595 171,855 9,824 183,270 11,773 21,597
Executive Directors
(2)
127,520
(82.3%)
134,450
(SCP46 -
80.9%)
2,888 5,776 139,156 6,787 148,732 8,838 31,250
Heads of Services
(11)
96,383
(75.6%)
101,158
(SCP 31 -
75.2%)
1,990 21,890 104,698 4,850 110,471 5,870 117,920   
Total 32,261    Total 170,767   
Plus On
Costs 
(21.5%)
6,936    Plus On
Costs
(32.5%)
55,499        
Less
Inflation at
3.5%
already in
outlook
(68,176)   
Total 39,197    Total 158,090