Democracy Spraffa

Supplementary Pack

Argyll and Bute Council · 4 December 2024
Back to Mid Argyll, Kintyre & the Islands Area Committee — 4 December 2024 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Argyll and Bute Council
Comhairle Earra-Ghàidheal Agus Bhòid 
Executive Director:  Douglas Hendry 
Kilmory, Lochgilphead, PA31 8RT
Tel:  01546 602127  Fax:  01546 604435
DX 599700 LOCHGILPHEAD 
2 December 2024 
SUPPLEMENTARY PACK 
MID ARGYLL, KINTYRE & THE ISLANDS AREA COMMITTEE - ON A HYBRID BASIS IN THE
KNOCKSCALBERT SUITE, KINTYRE COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTRE, CAMPBELTOWN,
AND BY MICROSOFT TEAMS on WEDNESDAY, 4 DECEMBER 2024 at 10:00 AM 
I enclose herewith appendix 1 and 2 in relation to item 7 (CAMPBELTOWN ESPLANADE AND
KINLOCH PARK ACTIVE TRAVEL PROGRESS REPORT) which were marked to follow on the
Agenda for the above meeting. 
Douglas Hendry
Executive Director 
APPENDICES MARKED TO FOLLOW 
7. CAMPBELTOWN ESPLANADE AND KINLOCH PARK ACTIVE TRAVEL
PROGRESS REPORT (Pages 3 - 166)  
Report by Executive Director with responsibility for Development and Economic
Growth 
Mid Argyll, Kintyre & the Islands Area Committee 
Councillor John Armour (Chair) Councillor Jan Brown
Councillor Garret Corner Councillor Anne Horn
Councillor Jennifer Kean Councillor Tommy MacPherson
Councillor Dougie McFadzean (Vice-Chair)
Councillor Dougie Philand Councillor Alastair Redman   
Contact: Iona Campbell, Senior Committee Assistant - 01436 658 801
Public Document Pack

Page 2

This page is intentionally left blank

Page 3

Campbeltown Esplanade and Kinloch Park Active Travel Study 
Stage 1&2, Options Feasibility Report
DATE:  November 2024  REF:  501056 VERSION:  Draft
Page 3
Agenda Item
7

Page 4

MARK RINKUS                                   
Managing Director                                   
Mark.rinkus@connectedtp.com 
Contents
1 OUTLINE BUSINESS CASE ................................................................................................................................................................ 3
2 OPTIONS DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL .................................................................................................................................... 26
3 DEVELOPING THE CONCEPT .......................................................................................................................................................... 40
4 DESIGN PROCESS QUALITY AND INNOVATION ............................................................................................................................ 58
5 PROJECT DELIVERABILITY AND DESIGN COLLABORATION ......................................................................................................... 66
APPENDIX A – SOCIAL AND EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (SEQIA) ................................................................................................ 68   Page 4

Page 5

2 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com  OUTLINE BUSINESS CASE
Page 5

Page 6

3 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
1 OUTLINE BUSINESS CASE
1.1 Introduction and Study Overview
The Campbeltown community consists of around 4,4251 people with the town
providing the service centre for the Kintyre Peninsula. The town is one of the
main settlements in Argyll and is located around Campbeltown Bay. The
Esplanade connects the communities to the north of the bay with the main town
centre located to the south.  Kinloch Park is a central feature of the community
formed from largely reclaimed land. The park includes a war memorial and is the
main location for outdoor community events and festivals. The Esplanade passes
along the coastal side of the park and the south end connects to the A83 trunk
road. The A83 provides the primary vehicular route into and out of the peninsula
and is managed by Transport Scotland.
The proposed study route spans between the A842 towards the northern end of
the park (B842 High Street) to the A83 Kinloch Road to the south.  The route is
bounded by the Esplanade and the sea to the east and Lochend / Saddell Street
to the west. The study area includes footpaths which criss-cross the park.  
This Outline Business Case (OBC) seeks to provide a ‘snapshot’ of the options to
improve walking and cycling within the study extent, setting out a baseline from
which future monitoring and evaluation can be referenced. The project is
proposed as a phase 4 of a future cross-town route.  The route consists of the                                                
1 Census 2022
partially constructed Phase 1A Ralston Road and Meadows Avenue, Phase 1B
Limecraigs Road to Cutting (delayed due to external influences), Phase 2 Cutting
and Quarry Green to the CALMAC Ferry Terminal and Phase 3 linking the CALMAC
Ferry Terminal along the A83 Hall Street/Kinloch Road.  Phase 3 which follows the
A83 is currently being considered by Transport Scotland. 
If realised the completion of the routes would support improved walking and
cycling connectivity north and south across and through the town.
This report should be considered in conjunction with the Community Feedback
and Monitoring and Evaluation Report; reported separately.   
Campbeltown active travel route
Page 6

Page 7

4 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
1.2 Recent Study History
Following the completion of the partial Ralston Road Phase 1A section of the
route during 2019, consideration of the next stages is being considered.  
Phase 1A of the route is currently delayed at the time of writing awaiting the
outcome of an Air Accident Investigation Board (AAIB) report.  The incident being
relating to a helicopter related fatality in the south of England which is relevant to
phase 1B as the route will pass close to the Campbeltown Hospital helipad.
Phase 2 of the route is being progressed by ABC and will improve the existing
shared use path through the Cutting, provide new dropped kerbs to cross
Kilkerran Road and a new cyclepath across the Quarry Green to adjacent to the
CALMAC Ferry terminal.
Transport Scotland have initiated early conversations with ABC to develop the
route options for phase 3, linking along the A83 that will link Kinloch Park to the
town centre and the CALMAC Ferry Terminal.  Details of this section of the route
are unknown at the time of writing. 
1.3 Project Alignment with National and Local Strategy / Policy 
As an active travel enabler2, this project seeks to support the connection of 20-
minute neighbourhoods3, linking people and places whilst enabling the movement                                                
2 A project which enables travel behaviour change.
of people of all ages and abilities.  The project will seek to reduce car
dependency, reducing the need for car based short-journey trips whilst enabling
the benefits of the healthier options of walking and cycling in undertaking
everyday journeys by sustainable travel modes.
The project seeks to directly contribute to safety and resilience objectives through
the creation of safe walking and cycling spaces.
The project is therefore directly and indirectly aligned with national, regional and
local policy and aligned with the strategic objectives of Argyll and Bute Council
(ABC).  
The following strategies and policies are considered relevant to this study:
 The Scottish Government’s National Performance Framework
 Scottish Government Infrastructure Investment Plan
 Active Scotland Outcomes
 Physical Activity Implementation Plan – A More Active Scotland
 Scottish Government Creating Places
 Preventing Obesity in Scotland
 The National Walking Strategy
 The Cycling Action Plan for Scotland (CAPS)
 The Climate Change Plan
 The Road Safety Framework; and
3 https://www.sustrans.org.uk/our-blog/get-active/2020/in-your-community/what-is-a-20-minute-
neighbourhood
Page 7

Page 8

5 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
 The National Transport Strategy (NTS)
A figure summarising the Scottish government's journey towards reducing car
dependency for single occupancy trips is presented as follows. 
1.4 Population and Demographic Assessment
Campbeltown currently has a population of 4,4254 residents based on a 2022
estimate. The population shows an overall decline since 2001, summarised in the
following table.                                                
4 https://citypopulation.de/en/uk/scotland/argyll_and_bute/S19002043__campb
eltown/
Year Population
2001 5,220
2011 4,852
2022 4,425
The population is evenly split between males and females and weighted towards
ages 60 – 69 years old and upwards.   
1.5 SIMD Assessment
To understand Campbeltown’s social challenges, the Scottish Index of Multiple
Deprivation (SIMD) area statistics for 2022 were examined.  The results indicate
The National Picture
Page 8

Page 9

6 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
that Campbeltown’s is ranked low overall at 734 out of 6,976 places, all social
indexes receiving a low score of between 1-3 out of 10.  
Thirteen out of the ABC area’s 125 data zones were identified as being amongst
the 20% most overall deprived data zones in Scotland.  These thirteen data zones
all located in the towns of Rothesay, Dunoon, Campbeltown, Helensburgh and
Oban. 
All of these data zones are located in the area’s towns, however, deprivation can,
and does, occur elsewhere.  Because the SIMD identifies concentrations of
deprivation, smaller pockets and instances of individual deprivation are not
identified by the index.
The town has a low level of car ownership with 35.9%5 of households in
Campbeltown not having access to a car or van when compared with the wider
Scotland (31%).  The low ownership presents opportunities through the study
scope to positively influence travel mode choice and access to essential services
through improvements to infrastructure to support everyday travel by walk and
cycle modes. Limited access to a private car may limit accessibility to services and
opportunity by restricting the ability to move around with evidence showing that
residents in smaller communities are typically disadvantaged by being more
reliant on car ownership and exposed to greater costs of accessing goods and
services.                                                
5 2022 census 
Most people living within Campbeltown commute to work within the town or
indicate no fixed place of work. A small portion work in Tarbert, Lochgilphead and
off-shore. Reliance on private car and the A83 are two key notable observations.
The community’s primary employment industries are agricultural, whisky and
tourism with many attractions of scenic southern Kintyre. The town suffers from
comparably high levels of unemployment, above the average rates across Argyll
and the Islands, Highlands and Islands and Scotland. The annualised Jobseekers
Campbeltown SIMD low ranking
Page 9

Page 10

7 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Allowance claimant count rate in 2013 was 4.4 per cent in Campbeltown, 3.2 per
cent in Argyll and the Islands, 2.4 per cent in Highlands and Islands and 3.7 per
cent across Scotland. 
6 The Scottish Rural Policy Centre (SRUC) published a report entitled ‘Rural
Scotland in Focus’
1.6 Rural Deprivation
In recent years there has been a greater understanding of the impacts of
transport poverty; where people lack access to services or work and the
contributions that a lack of affordable transport options creates.    
It is important to consider the aspect of rural inequalities, which creates
challenges to living that are different from communities within larger urban
areas6. In reviewing employment in rural areas, the SRUC report highlights a
significantly larger percentage of those in part-time or smaller contract jobs, often
with lower hourly rates or salaries than counterparts in urban population centres.
Many rural areas have become increasingly reliant on the tourism industry, as a
result, many jobs are seasonal and in demand, reducing the overall hours or
contracts available over the year. 
Fuel Poverty Living outside larger urban areas is likely to increase the costs of
goods overall – primarily due to the cost of the supply chain network required.
This can be seen in the fuel cost with a predominant market of independent
providers, unable to offer the prices of larger national outlets. This issue raises a
secondary cost to residents, with rural communities relying more on private
transport, and often having to travel further for services. Ultimately, for residents
of communities such as those in the town, more fuel often is required to travel
for day-to-day work and leisure. 
Page 10

Page 11

8 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
A report on the Minimum Income Standard for Remote Rural Scotland and
research on the subject highlights that the cost of food and consumable goods
are between 10-50% higher in rural areas, whilst clothing and household goods
are between 30-50% higher. These estimates do not consider the impact of living
in the most remote locations where the costs associated with the movement of
goods and services can be even more disproportionate. 
The cycling organisation Sustrans through their research has identified three key
areas which can assist in addressing transport poverty.  These are:
 People-centred transport planning;
 Provision of quality accessible, frequent and affordable public transport
service; and
 Development of a transport network that supports the movement of
people to places irrespective of user’s social status. 
Whilst these options may not address the inequalities of rural / local transport
challenges; improving accessibility and access to goods and services, through
sustainable travel modes, will provide the community with improved travel
choices better aligned with the National Transport Policy.  In time, these
measures have the potential to reduce car dependency for short journey trips
whilst contributing to people’s health and well-being through increasing daily
physical activity.  The reprioritisation of our streets to a more equitable
distribution of limited public space, combined with the reallocation of road space
to support sustainable travel, landscaping, ecological and placemaking will
improve the social and environmental experience of the area.  Transport and
access within the community are a core consideration in helping to mitigate some
of the challenges of rural social deprivation. 
1.7 Understanding Place
Campbeltown
The town is the westernmost mainland town in Scotland (if the port of Mallaig is
not counted as a town) and has a port and a central close grid of historic streets.
Its position near the end of the long Kintyre peninsula makes for a time-
consuming road journey, and to some extent the area relies on sea and air
transport, similar to islands in the Inner Hebrides. However it is linked to the rest
of Scotland by the A83 trunk road. Bus service is provided under contract to ABC
by West Coast Motors, who also operate services to Glasgow for Scottish Citylink. 
Ferries sail from Campbeltown to Ballycastle in Northern Ireland, operated by
Kintyre Express. The service, which operates to Ballycastle every Friday to
Monday during summer months and on Mondays and Fridays during the winter
months, commenced in 2011. 
Campbeltown supports access to multiple everyday community services including:
 Campbeltown High Street, supplying most everyday service essentials;
 Castlehill and Dalintober Primary Schools and Campbeltown Grammar
School;
Page 11

Page 12

9 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
 Equilibrium Leisure centre;
 Esplanade and Kinloch Park; 
 Distilleries;
 Daavar island;
 Campbeltown Picture House; and
 Various churches. 
Campbeltown Esplanade
Campbeltown Esplanade is a feature of the town.  The Esplanade connects to the
A83 trunk road at the town centre and follows the bay to towards Dalintober and
the B842 and northern communities.  The route consists of a wide (18m
carriageway) with 2m wide footways provide along both the coastal and inland
side. The route is lit on the inland side of the carriageway.
The Esplanade provides connection to the town’s war memorial and main bus
stances located towards the southern end, nearest the town. 
The route benefits from a formal surface water drainage system that drains the
carriageway untreated into the bay. Between the bus stance and Esplanade,
recent improvements include the formation of a seating and landscaped area.
During the peak summer months, the town caters for a number of tourist visitors.
The Esplanade is used to parking campervans and caravans overnight and can
become busy. 
The Esplanade is also used during the town festival events, supporting vehicular
access to Kinloch Park.
The route is designated cycle route with a permanent cycle and pedestrian loop
counter installed near the junction with the A83. A number of wayfinding ‘finger’
signs are provided to support tourist / visitor navigation through the area whilst
The Esplanade is a wide by modern road design standards
Page 12

Page 13

10 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
benches and bins are provided at either end of the route and at the war memorial
(c.250m apart).
The route is owned and maintained by ABC and is subject to a 30mph speed
limit.   
Kinloch Park
Placemaking seating area between bus stance and Esplanade The Esplanade is a signed posted cycle route
Page 13

Page 14

11 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Kinloch Park is the towns primary green space and is used to host festivals and
events.  Bounded by the Esplanade to the east, Lochend Street to the west the
B842 to the north and the A83 trunk road to the south, the park is formed on
reclaimed land. 
The park is mostly laid to grass formed on a level surface. The park is cris-
crossed by remote footpaths supporting access across the park.  The footpaths
are formed of bound surface materials but unlit which may inhibit access by some
user groups, particularly during darker winter nights.
The park is featureless and undeveloped.  It is understood that storm surges can
cause flooding across the Esplanade in to the park which often results in seaweed
being deposited on the grass areas.
The towns swimming poor and gym (Aqualibrium) along with two children’s play
areas bound the park on the western side. Both play areas have a limited
selection of play equipment. 
Play area located on Kinloch Park
War memorial located on Kinloch Park
Page 14

Page 15

12 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Campbeltown Harbour
Campbeltown Harbour is a commercially flexible port at the southern tip of the
beautiful Kintyre peninsula. The Quays and Marina are home to a multitude of
activities - fishing, cargo, timber, leisure and cruise ships, with modern facilities,
storage and 24-hour CCTV. The Marina has 54 berths. Calmac operate a summer
vehicle and passenger service from Ardrossan on the Ayrshire coast to
Campbeltown. 
The Kintyre Express is a passenger ferry service which operates trips between
Campbeltown and Ballycastle in Northern Ireland with links to the Island of Islay.
The harbour caters for the transportation of wind turbine component parts which
are transported via the A83, which is also a designated Abnormal Indivisible Load
Haul Route (AIDL).
A83/ Kinloch Road
The A83 trunk road is a major 98 mile/158 km road in the south of Argyll and
Bute in the Scottish Highlands. The A83 is a vital artery route through Argyll,
spanning from Tarbet on the western shore of Loch Lomond, where it splits from
the A82, to Campbeltown at the southern tip of the Kintyre peninsular. 
The route is part of the Kintyre Way, one of Scotland’s long distance walking
routes, which passes along the A83 along Kinloch Road towards the cutting on
the south eastern edge of the town.
The A83 is well trafficked, supporting the movement of vehicles into and out of
the town and through the peninsula. The route caters for a range of Heavy Goods
Vehicles (HGVs) including abnormal loads such as windfarm components.
With the extent of the study area, the A83 / Kinloch Road is formed on an east /
west axis as a 12m wide carriageway supporting the bi-directional movement of
traffic. Footways are provided on both the north and south sides of the
carriageway with the footways being in general c.2m wide. The route is lit and
subject to a 30mph speed limit. The road includes a parking lay-by on its
southern edge to support on-street parking.  The northern edge is subject to a
parking and loading restrictions with double yellow lines present. 
The A83 / Kinloch Road
Page 15

Page 16

13 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Lochend Street
Lochend Street forms the western boundary of the study area and Kinloch Park.
The route is formed on a north / south axis consisting of a c.14m wide
carriageway with 2m wide footways located on both the east and western sides.
The road is lit from both sides of the carriageway and is subject to a 30mph
speed limit.
The route provides access to the A844 and is used by children walking to
Dalintober Primary school from the residential areas along the side of Kinloch
Park and to the south.  
The route supports access to the Tesco supermarket and bus operators service
yard as well as a number of smaller residential access roads such as John Street.
The carriageway is in generally good condition although many of the junctions
and accesses across the route do not include dropped kerbs or tactile paving to
support the movement of those less able.
On-street parking does occur along the route length and the route is part of an
established bus route.  Lochend Street is part of an established bus route
Page 16

Page 17

14 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
7 The esplanade was resurfaced during 2024 
A842 High Street
The A842 provides an east west route from the Esplanade across Saddell Street.
The route is formed as a c.7.3m wide carriageway with c.2m footways provided
on both the north and south sides of the carriageway.
The route is lit from both sides of the carriageway and is subject to a 30mph
speed limit.
Similar to other roads in the study area, the road does not include dropped kerbs
or tactile paving at its junctions or accesses across the route.
Dalintober Primary School takes access from the A842 with the school children
required to cross the route to access the school which is located on the northern
side of the carriageway.
1.8 Infrastructure Condition
The Esplanade is predominately surfaced using a bound surface asphalt behind
the sea defence wall7. The surface is in generally good condition. Lighting is
provided via lighting columns installed on the inland side. 
Lochend Street is wide and accommodates on-street parking 
Page 17

Page 18

15 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
The route does not include any dropped kerbs to support the movement or
crossing of pedestrians with the exception of the connections to the bus stance
located on the southern extent of the route. Overall, the infrastructure within the
study area is in generally good condition. 
1.9 Tourism, Visitors and Local Economy
Campbeltown Main Street provides a core function as the heart of the
Campbeltown Community and provides a service centre to the wider region.
The Main Street consist of a wide range of retail and commercial uses supporting
everyday services. Like all towns, Campbeltown businesses face a challenging
economic headwind having suffered through the COVID-19 pandemic with the
cost-of-living crisis, fuel cost rises adversely impacting the viability of businesses
to be able to afford occupying high street spaces.  As a peninsula community, the
decline in footfall due to alternative online / home delivery options is less
pronounced. 
Tourism is a core component of the community’s economy, architecture and
heritage such Davaar Island.  The area is popular among whisky tourists with
many visiting during the summer months as part of the whisky trail.  
1.10 Utilities and Known Constraints
To understand the utilities within the area, a search of utility apparatus within the
study area was undertaken.  These are summarised as follows:
Water supply 
Scottish water GIS plan has indicated a 90mmm HPPE pipe below Lochend Street
along the extent of the route. Consideration should be taken for any works
undertaken within the vicinity of the pipe work in line with Scottish water
guidance.  
Electricity
Line search before you dig has indicated multiple HV main cables in the vicinity
of the project route. Consideration should be taken for any works undertaken
within the vicinity of the cables In line with SSE guidance. 
Dropped kerbs are provided at the bus-stance 
Page 18

Page 19

16 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Foul/Surface Water
Scottish water GIS plan has indicated a water main is present along the
Esplanade.  
Communications
Telecommunication apparatus was noted to be located along Victoria Street. 
Gas
Gas apparatus was noted to be located along Lochend Street. 
Flood Risk
An extract of the SEPA flood risk for the project area is supplied separately.  The
extract confirms that the project route is not at risk of flooding from a 1:200-year
event.
1.11 Landownership and Rights of Access
The project route extent consists of road space publicly adopted by Argyll and
Bute Council.  The Esplanade and Kinloch Park are also owned by ABC.
The project area is flanked by commercial and residential properties. 
1.12 Understanding Travel Behaviour
The study route forms one of the only two major traffic north south routes
through the town.  The route will complement the ongoing phase 1 and phases 2
and 3 that are being developed which together will provide a wider area walking
and cycling network.  Once complete, the route will provide a key route for the
town centre supporting access from key trip generators to key trip attractors. 
This will include trips to and from the town centre north and south towards the
residential areas.
1.13 School Travel
The design team met with the Campbeltown Grammar School pupils’ council to
discuss the project.  Following introduction to the project and a review of the
projects aims and objectives, the scope and challenges of the project along with
the barriers to walking and cycling in Campbeltown were discussed.
The school engagement has confirmed that a number of the town's younger
members do own bikes and regularly walk or cycle along or within the study area. 
The engagement highlighted a number of challenges which were recorded
through the project survey feedback. 
Page 19

Page 20

17 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
1.14 Public Transport
Bus services around the town are operated under contract to ABC by West Coast
Motors who provide public transportation services in various regions of Scotland.
They offer a schedule of bus services connecting the various towns to
Campbeltown including Drumlemble and Westport. 
A review of the bus services offered suggests that the town benefits from an
effective public transport service with a range of services operating on a 30-
minute service frequency.
The town’s main bus stances are located to the southern end of the Esplanade
and benefits from a bus only access from the A83.  The stances includes three
bus bays (two on northern side of carriageway and one on south side).
1.15 Stage 1 Baseline Data
To support this project, a number of data sources were consulted to provide a
snapshot of people and traffic volumes speeds and movements during February
2024.  The town is a known tourist destination with the peak of visitors between
May and September.  Any traffic surveys undertaken out with the peak seasonal
period of May to September will therefore reflect seasonal off-peak (primarily
reflecting local community and business use) results.
The surveys consisted of Automatic Traffic Counters (ATC) installed for 7 days
along the Esplanade and A844.   Junction Turning Counts (JTC) were located at
A844, Esplanade and Kinloch Street junctions.  The counters recorded all vehicle
movements including vehicles speeds and volumes by direction continuously.  
To support an understanding of parking behaviours in the area, parking surveys
were also commissioned to capture on-street parking behaviours along the
Esplanade.
In addition to the ATCs, Non-Motorised Users (NMU) surveys were also
undertaken during the same period.  The NMU surveys were located at the
busiest locations along the route corridor. 
Stage 1 - Campbeltown Grammar school pupil council engagement
Page 20

Page 21

18 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
1.16 Stage 1 ATC Results
The results of the surveys indicate that the typical traffic volumes along Kinloch
Road to the south of the study area are around 2,200 vehicles consisting of 1,500
per day in eastbound direction and 700 in the southbound direction. These
volumes are noted to be comparably low when compared with the roads
theoretical design capacity.  The difference in flow may be explained by how
vehicles are travelling through the town centre with drivers choosing to travel
westbound along Longrow. Vehicle speeds were noted to be within the speed
limit with an 85th percentile speed of 25mph being recorded (30mph limit). 
Mid-way along the Esplanade, northbound vehicle numbers are similar at around
2,600 vehicles per day with vehicle speeds marginally lower at 20mph. 
At the north shore end of the Esplanade, the number of vehicles reduces to
around 500 vehicles northbound and 700 vehicles southbound (1,200 vehicles
total).  The corresponding vehicle speeds are around 28mph and again within the
speed limit.                                       
Traffic composition along this route is 86% cars or light vans with 14% classed as
Heavier Goods Vehicles (HGVs).   
Location and range of survey data
Collection
ATC results by location did not highlight any capacity issues
Page 21

Page 22

19 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
1.17 Stage 1 Non-Motorised Users (NMU’s)
The NMU surveys were located on the junction Princess Street / George Street /
B842 junction and at the bus stance on the south side of the Esplanade. The
surveys recorded a three day snapshot of pedestrian and cyclist movements.  The
surveys captured all pedestrian and cyclist numbers by travel direction within a
12hr day 09:00 to 19:00 over a typical off-peak weekday and weekend. 
The results of the surveys indicated that the Esplanade is well trafficked by
pedestrians with 359 people recorded over the busiest day.  The coastal side
footway was noted to be most popular footway with only 71 people recorded to
walk along the inland footway. 
Unsurprisingly, cycling numbers is low at this location noting the time of year with
only four cyclists recorded over the course of the day, favouring the coastal side
footway.
The bus stance junction at Kinloch Street was the most heavily trafficked by
pedestrians of the three locations surveyed. A maximum of 435 people being
recorded along with 5 cyclists.
The A842 junction survey indicated the A842 is well trafficked by pedestrians with
116 people recorded to walk along the southern side footway.  Cyclist numbers
were again low with only 5 cyclists being recorded.   
Off-peak (February) 12hr pedestrians and cyclist
Off-peak (February) 12hr pedestrians and cyclist movements
Page 22

Page 23

20 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
1.18 ABC Cycle Counters
ABC have installed a permanent pedestrian and cycle loop counters on the
Esplanade.  With the exception of when the counter has malfunctioned, the
counter captures data continually 24 hours per day and each day of the year.
The data can be used to understand how the number of pedestrians and cyclists
change over the year. 
A review of the data indicates that the counter has year on year overall poor data
coverage. Examination of the data that is available indicates that the counter is
malfunctioning and cannot therefore be used. 
1.19 Stage 1 Parking Analysis
Parking surveys were undertaken during early February 2024. The surveys
included on-street parking within the study area focused on the Esplanade route.
The survey results indicate that the Esplanade is used for parking with parking
demand toward the north of the route (zone A) typically low relative to available
on street capacity. A maximum demand equated to only 56% within zones A and
B with the west side (inland side) of the carriageway busiest.
Parking along zone F nearest the town is notable busier with demand maximum
of 98% noted for the 6 spaces available on the western side of the carriageway. 
Adjacent to this zone E, parking demand reduces to a maximum of only 45%.  It
is noted that zone E is immediately adjacent to zone E, requiring only a short
walk of less than 30 seconds.
The parking duration for vehicles parking regular within the zone F is also noted
to be comparably longer with an average duration of stay at over 5 hours
suggesting that the spaces are used by the staff of nearby businesses or local
residents. 
Summary of Esplanade counter walk / cycle data
On-street weekday and weekend parking by zone
Page 23

Page 24

21 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
8 https://www.crashmap.co.uk/
1.20 Seasonal Variation
As noted previously, the town is subject to seasonal traffic variation with traffic
numbers understood to increase over the summer peak months.
1.21 Road Safety 
A review of the Crash Map Road Safety8 website indicated that there have been
no incidents documented in the vicinity of the study route between 2018 and
2023. The nearest recorded accidents occurred in Lochend Street just south of
the Tesco. The incident was slight, involving only one vehicle and one casualty.
It's important to note that this does not necessarily imply that no accidents have
taken place within the study route, but rather that emergency services were
either not required or not notified. 
Accident history 2018 - 2023
On-street parking survey zones
Page 24

Page 25

22 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
1.22 Parking, Access and Management
Parking within the study area consists of on-street parking.
There is adequate parking space provided along the Esplanade noting that there
are no designated parking bays and few parking restrictions. 
ABC is a decriminalised parking authority which enables parking to be enforced by
the councils own civil officers. The council has a limited number of enforcement
wardens to cover a wide geographical area.  Wardens accessing Campbeltown
have to travel for at least two hours to make the 87-mile trip – meaning the
wardens reportedly arrive around the middle of the day and have time for one
patrol before returning.
At the time of writing, an additional parking officer is being considered by ABC.
1.23 Current Travel Patterns
The 2022 census data for Campbeltown was examined to understand current
travel behaviours and travel patterns within the project area.     
It is noted that more rural locations are more likely to be more dependent on
private car use when compared with the Scottish average.  Travel mode
preference in Campbeltown is anticipated to reflect this trend. 
9https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/files/statistics/council-area-data-sheets/argyll-
and-bute-council-profile.html
1.24 Understanding The Communities Demographics
The National Records of Scotland data as at 2022 shows of the Campbeltown
population of 4,514 14.8% were children aged 0-15 years, 59.3% were people
aged 16-64 years and 26.0% were people aged 65 years and over. There is a
greater percentage decrease in the population aged 0-15 years compared to
Highland or Scotland. The National Records of Scotland shows the population has
increased by 19% in the period 2002 to 2022 with a difference between age
groups concerning population change. There was a 63% increase in the 65+ age
group, which occurred year on year since 2002. A greater percentage decrease in
the population aged 0-15 years is evident when compared to Highland or
Scotland.
The overall population is forecast to increase between 2018 and 2030 and the
population will continue to age. The number and proportion of people in the 65-
84 and 85+ age groups are projected to increase, whereas the population aged
0- 15 years and 45-64 years are projected to decrease.9 
Page 25

Page 26

23 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
1.25 Where do People Currently Cycle?
Campbeltown is part of the Kintyre Cycle Network a 62-mile (100km) route
following NCN 78 from Inverness through to Campbeltown and right along the
Esplanade which is the site of the proposed project. 
A review of the cycle and walking activity app Strava shows the Esplanade is a
popular walk and cycle route.
This demonstrates a good demand of cycling in the Campbeltown area, and a key
tourist attraction.   
Extract from national records of Scotland 
The Caledonia Way (previously NCN 78) links from Campbeltown to Inverness
Page 26

Page 27

24 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
1.26 Health and Wellbeing
Being more physically active can benefit everyone and can reduce the chances of
developing preventable conditions such as diabetes and heart disease. Active
travel as promoted by this project will encourage individuals to be more physically
active as part of their daily routine by incorporating physical activity into everyday
tasks.  This reduces the need to find extra time, money or motivation for
exercise. 
The route could also offer savings to some users by saving on fuel and vehicle
running costs. Making short journeys using active travel helps to reduce the
number of vehicles on the road and improves local air quality and environmental
amenities.
Investment in active travel can also deliver economic benefits with shoppers who
access shops by active travel spending less per visit but making more frequent
visits and spending more over a month. Active travel is affordable and delivers
value for money in achieving health, transport and wider policy objectives. 
Studies on the economic benefits of walking and cycling interventions in the UK
revealed an average return of £13 for every £1 invested and returns as high as
£19 for every £1 invested.  
Study Extent
Strava walk / cycle extract
Study Extent
Page 27

Page 28

25 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
OPTIONS DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL
Page 28

Page 29

26 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
2 OPTIONS DEVELOPMENT AND APPRAISAL
2.1 Investigating the Network
In advance of the Stage 1 Community engagement process undertaken during
February 2024, the design team worked with the steering group to conceptualise
route concepts which could be used to help identify the community’s appetite for
change and set the ambition for the design.  
Following design team discussion, it was agreed that the most effective approach
to developing a walking and cycle improvement through the study area would be
through first working with the community to understand their preference for
which route corridor should be developed.  Options included the Esplanade but
also Kinloch Street, Saddell Street and the A842 High Street and the footpaths
through the park.
To support this approach, the study area was set out to include 4 waypoints
labelled A, B, C and D.  Each waypoint being located at a key route decision point
within the study area plan.
The route corridors were developed in stages set out as follows:
 A constraints plan was developed to capture all known geographic,
ecological and physical considerations within the identified route
corridors.  Following engagement with Campbeltown Community Council
and ABC a land ownership register was produced to accompany a land
ownership plan.  A suite of data collection surveys was commissioned,
including traffic surveys, NMUs. The results were consolidated and
considered.
 The results of the traffic surveys were considered in conjunction with the
route design guidance provided within Transport Scotland’s Cycle by Design
2021 update.  
 It was noted that the Esplanade already provides a good quality walking and
cycling route which should ideally support the majority of the route design.
The use of the Esplanade was also noted to be a key objective of previous
studies.  The Esplanade was debated within the design team and the
number of technical challenges were identified. These included avoiding
alteration to the sea defence and considering impacts on Kinloch Park and
the war memorial. On reflection it was agreed that the Esplanade must be
promoted as a potential route corridor option.
The route corridor options considered are summarised as follows and graphically
overleaf. 
Page 29

Page 30

27 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Waypoints used to help the community identify the most appropriate route for development
Page 30

Page 31

28 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
2.2 Understanding the Route Corridor Options
Each of the route options are described in greater detail as follows.
Route Option 1: Route formed on Esplanade. North Shore Street
connect to Kinloch Road.
Length 393m
Description Existing route is wide enough for to put a cycle route and
provide improved layout for parking and pedestrians
Key 
Challenges
 Avoid impact on sea defences
 Busy during summer peaks
 Coastal exposure
Key
Opport’ies
 Most direct route for tourists 
 Car parking route
 Lower capital costs
 No impact on bus,
 More pleasing environment
 Limited impact on existing drainage systems
 Limited impact on the Kinloch Park area 
Route Option 2: Widen existing footpath on Kinloch Park.
Length 261m
Description The route would be formed on the inland side of the Esplanade.
The route cross into Kinloch Park and would be maintained with
the whole route being widened into the Kinloch Park area by
around 3m
Key 
Challenges
 Major impact on drainage and services as floods are common
in the park
 Increased risk of cycle / pedestrian conflict
 Possible higher capital cost
Key
Opport’ies
 Cyle route on busiest inland side nearest all key trip attractors
 Most direct route connecting John Street and Kinloch Road
and Esplanade
 Avoid changes to front green
 Simpler creates a safer route towards the primary school for
safer journeys  
Route Option 3: Route on Kinloch Road
Route
Length
168m
Description Following Kinloch Road and connecting route to Saddell Street,
the route would be formed for both pedestrians and cyclists.
The footways would be widened to reduce road width to allow
pedestrians and cyclist to cross over safely.
Key 
Challenges
 Major impact on kerbs, drainage and services
 A bus route carriageway
 Higher capital cost
Key
Opport’ies
 Cyle route near all key trip attractors
 Most direct route
 Simpler interface with Ferry Terminal Junction
 No impact on existing green 
Page 31

Page 32

29 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Route Option 4 - Route on Lochend Street/Saddell Street
Length 198m
Description Following from Kinloch Road. The route is existing to join
Saddell street and has potential to improve for safer travel.
Key 
Challenges
 Major impact on kerbs, drainage and services
 Some impact on front green area
 Higher capital cost
Key
Opport’ies
 Cycle route near all key trip attractors
 Most direct route 
2.3 Considering an Appropriate Route Design Standard
The route design standard was subjected to review using Transport Scotland’s
Cycling by Design 2021 guidance.  Noting the results of the vehicle traffic/speeds,
the number of potential NMUs that the route standard appropriate for a shared
use facility (mixed street).  
As the majority of the route corridor options are located within a 30mph speed
limit and traffic speeds and volumes are low.  Shared use paths and segregated
cycle routes were considered appropriate.
The type and standard of route will vary based on the corridor option progressed
and evaluation of available land space.
2.4 Considering The Technical Challenges
The War Memorial
The main issue along the Esplanade is parking near Kinloch Park which is a
central feature of the community. The park includes the war memorial and is the
main location for community events and festivals. The community have noted
issues associated with insufficient parking because of cars and campervans in
addition to parking occurring close to the memorial or blocking the sea views.  
Bus Stance
The bus stances located at the south of the Esplanade currently support two-way
movement of bus-only traffic with bus stops located on both sides of the
carriageway.  A bus gate limits access to the stance by general traffic.
General parking at the Esplanades southern end is noted to be in greatest
demand.
A review of the bus stance indicated that the three bus bays are rarely all
occupied.  During observation, only two bays were used simultaneously with the
size of the bays larger than the occupying buses. The stance is also noted to be
‘isolated’ from the wider network and requires crossing of a road to access the
southbound stops.  Recent landscape design work has sought to improve the
appearance of the bus stance island although its value as a place to dwell is
expected to be limited, primarily due to being surrounded by roads and traffic.
Traffic Volumes 
It is noted to be challenging to accurately predict any changes to traffic volumes
as a result of the concept being implemented.  This is primarily due to the
Page 32

Page 33

30 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
challenges in forecasting drivers route decision making within a complex urban
area which reflects the level of congestion and vehicles speeds at that time.
HGV numbers are noted to be in excess of 300 vehicles per day along the
Esplanade which caters for over 10% of Heavy Goods Vehicles and occasionally
all HGVs.  As a result, a facility segregated from the carriageway would be
appropriate for this route. As the route is within a 30mph area, the segregation
strip may be 0.5m subject to agreement of technical standards.
Loading and Servicing
Currently, loading and servicing along Lochend Street is catered for by frontage
access.  With the exception of the Tesco store, bus depot and distillery, service
vehicles park where they can and utilise pallet trucks to make deliveries through
business’s front doors.  There are few businesses directly fronting the study area
where service and loading is a notable consideration.
Road Safety
Feeback received through the stage 1 engagement combined with on-site design
team observation indicates that there are a number of road safety challenges that
could be addressed through the project design process. These include:
 Pedestrians crossing Kinloch Road which often required pedestrians to
cross between parked cars. A lack of formal crossing points limits the
mobility of those less able. The most obvious points for crossing support
are the bus stance and outside the Aqualibrium.  Higher vehicle speeds
and lower level of lighting during the darker winter months exacerbate
this issue.
 Cycling along the Esplanade is not attractive to less confident or younger
cyclists are required to cycle on the live carriageway between parked cars
and moving vehicles.
 Cyclist / pedestrian conflicts along the Esplanade could be addressed
through segregation of the user groups.
 Pedestrian routes across the Esplanade are not well presented,
particularly for the mobility challenged.
 The unlit footpaths across Kinloch Park are unwelcoming to some user
groups and limiting to use during the darker winter months.
Street Trial 
Street Trials are normally reserved for Category 4 (large and complex) Transport
Scotland funded Places for Everyone (PfE) projects (administered by Sustrans)
where the scale of the project would justify the additional costs of trialling the
concept.  Notwithstanding, Campbeltown is a small scheme with a likely small
cost associated with producing a Temporary Traffic Regulatory Order (TTRO) and
temporary surfacing works required to test parts of the concept. The preparation
of the temporary order will however take time requiring public notification and
collaboration with the Council.   
Page 33

Page 34

31 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Maintaining the Design
A key challenge to all design options relates to the development of a robust
maintainable design. Often the choice of materials that meet the maintainability
criteria will be restrictive as the council will need to maintain a store of the
materials to support future repair works.
A number of services are noted to be present along Kinloch Street.  Evidence
recorded on site indicates that ongoing repair and replacement works by utility
service providers will continually disturb any new design.
It is unlikely to be possible to relocate the services as part of the design process
due to the likely disproportionate costs.  Alternatively, the design and material
selection should take cognisance of the need to access services and be provided
to improve the quality of any repair works.
The choice of design materials will require careful consideration as part of the
next stages of the project and will be discussed in greater detail in the next
chapter of this report.
Preliminary Flood Risk Assessment 
The site has been reviewed for potential sources of flooding following ABC
Supplementary Guidance on Flood Risk. These are outlined below along with a
qualitative assessment of the risk they pose to the route. 
 Fluvial Flooding: The SEPA Indicative Flood Map shows that the
location of the site is within the area of fluvial flood risk. 
 Pluvial flooding: The SEPA Indicative Flood Map shows that the
location of the site is within the area of high pluvial flood risk. 
 Coastal Flooding: The SEPA Indicative Flood Map shows that the
location of the site is within the area of high coastal flood risk.
To summarise, the site is considered to be at risk of flooding and further
investigation is considered necessary.
Community Feedback
Reference is drawn to the results of the community and stakeholder feedback
reported within the Community Feedback Report.  A summary of the community’s
feedback is summarised as follows.
Concerns relating to the use of the existing road route
 Parking is a premium within the town. Many of the town’s frontage
buildings do not have alternative parking locations.  Parking stresses
increase with the influx of summer tourists.
 Parking along the Esplanade is suggested by the community to be
challenging. Campervans and coaches often park along the route during
the summer tourist months.
 The Esplanade is well trafficked by a number of HGVs (14%). These are
often larger tractors or lorries.
 Kinloch Park should be protected.
Page 34

Page 35

32 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
 Crossing by pedestrians of the A83 / Kinloch Road is noted as a
challenge. The proposed new community gardens being developed just
west of the Aqualibrium may generate additional crossing demand and a
formalised crossing point would be desirable.
 There is a lack of crossing opportunities along the Esplanade to support
the movement of pedestrians and cyclists.
 Improve cycle walking connectivity between the north shore and the
Esplanade and the town centre would be desirable.
Stakeholder Feedback
Reference is drawn to the results of the community and stakeholder feedback
reported within the Community Feedback Report.  
A summary of the stakeholder feedback received is summarised relevant to this
stage of the concept design is as follows. 
2.5 Route Appraisal Against Cycling by Design (CbD) 2021 
The route corridor was subjected to a review using the Sustrans route
assessment criteria in combination with Cycling by Design 2021.  The concepts
were scored ranging between 1 – 3 with 1 reflecting a ‘high level’ of service and 3
a ‘low level’ of service. The assessment was undertaken by the design team as a
workshop discussion to allow each route option and assessment criterion to be
discussed and scored.
The criteria considered in the assessment included:
 Indicative Cost;
 Deliverability;
 Accessibility;
 Local Need;
 Coherence;
 Directness;
 Comfort;
 Attractiveness; and
 Adaptability.
The resulting assessment identified that a number of the concepts, unsurprisingly
would need further investigation to determine an appropriate standard of design
provision.  
No consideration of the relative weighting of the evaluation criteria has been
undertaken. 
Page 35

Page 36

2 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
#
Route /
Option
Length
(m)
Proposed Intervention
Structures
Required 
1 High level of Service 10-14
2 Medium level of Service 15-23
3 Low level of Service 24-30
Costs
Deliverability
Accessibility
Local Need
Safety
Cohesiveness
Directness
Com
fort
Attractiveness
Adaptability
Total
Option 1  393m Route Option 1: Path formed on Esplanade. North
Shore Street connect to Kinloch Road.
no 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 17
Option 2 261m Route Option 2: Widen existing footpaths on
Kinloch Park.
no 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 13
Option 3  168m Route Option 3: Widen existing route on Kinloch
Road
no
3 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 15
Option 4  198m Route Option 4 - Widen Existing Route on
Lochend Street/Saddell Street
no 3 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 15 
Page 36

Page 37

38 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
2.6 Recommended Stage 1 Outcomes
Following a review of the route corridors presented and acknowledging the low
level of community feedback, it is proposed that all route options are developed
to concept design.  The provision of a concept design will assist the community in
engaging with the design at the next stage of the project as it is easier to
comment and engage with a visual presented proposal.
2.7 Considering Those with Protected Characteristics
An appraisal of the project has been undertaken using a Social and Equality
Impact Appraisal template (SEQiA). The results of the assessment are included in
Appendix A.
Taking cognisance of the appraisals summarised previously it is noted that all
concepts would be provided to achieve a Cycle by Design ‘high standard’ of
provision10.  
Once a preferred route(s) alignment has been determined the design should
consider best practices to maximise the route accessibility for all user groups and
abilities. 
10 Subject to reducing total traffic flow 
Page 37

Page 38

39 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com  DEVELOPING THE CONCEPT
Page 38

Page 39

40 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
3 DEVELOPING THE CONCEPT
3.1 Deciding the Extent of the Design
A key ambition of the concept design process is to identify a preferred single
route corridor for consideration and development. 
During stage 1, the community were asked to identify which combination of
routes around the park could be developed to offer the most useful corridor(s)
which would encourage everyday travel by sustainable travel modes.  Overall,
the routes through the park were less popular and no clear recommendation
was made regarding which of the route corridors would be most appropriate for
consideration in stage 2.   
The overall level of stage 1 feedback was also comparably low confirming that
the community’s voice had not been fully heard.  Taking these points into
consideration, the design team decided to develop a concept for the whole area
including the streets surrounding the park.  The resulting stage 2 concept
would be developed to provide a visual concept which will assist the public in
understanding the scope of the funding and what could be achieved.  This may
in turn generate a greater level of community feedback during stage 2. 
The team worked with Transport Scotland (TS) to ensure alignment between
the emerging Kinloch Road design and the interfaces with the Esplanade for
this project.
The resulting design was presented as a video ‘fly-through’ to assist in
communicating the design to the public. 
3.2 Designing with Nature
A key consideration of the design process is to avoid an impact on flora and
fauna.  A Preliminary Ecological Appraisal (PEA) commissioned during stage 1 was
used in support of the concept development process. The assessment identifies
and reports on a limited number of ecological points of note within the study
route. 
The ecological constraints plan was overlaid on the concept option plan to check
that the concept does not impact on any ecological matters.
The check confirmed that the concept is not likely to have any impact.  Further
validation should be undertaken during stage 3, detailed design.
3.3 Investigating the Network
The concept was subject to continual development to address the challenges
noted.  On some of the routes limited corridor width is available to
accommodate competing demands on road space. The resulting approach
included:
 Redesigning the Esplanade to include a minimum route design standard
to incorporate ‘high level of provision’ segregated cycle route. This
approach is validated as the route is expected to cater for a higher level
of end users. The resulting constraints plan was then used to identify the
Page 39

Page 40

41 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
minimum space requirements of the facility that would best
accommodate all competing public space considerations.
 Examine narrowing of the road corridors but retaining existing corridor
heel kerb lines.  This approach will minimise overall construction capital
costs, reduce drainage impacts and impacts on the adjacent sea defence.
 Maintain a vehicle parking free space in front of the war memorial,
aligned with stage 1 feedback.
 Provide dedicated coach, lorry and campervan parking as identified
through stage 1 feedback.
 Formalise on-street parking by introducing marked parking bays.  These
will assist in maximising parking capacity by supporting drivers to park
within the spaces provided.
 Reduce the overall operational carriageway width to a standard 6.5m. 
This will allow improved crossing opportunities for pedestrians, whilst still
catering for large goods vehicles that require to use the route.
 Increase the number of pedestrian crossing points along the route. Many
of the crossing points are located where the community expressed a need
for improved crossing. 
 Only apply minimal changes to Kinloch Park, as identified by the
community.
 Redesigned the Esplanade / Kinloch Road access junction to provide
additional parking spaces at the town end of the Esplanade where
parking demand is known to be at its greatest.
The emerging concept design is shown in the following figure.
Page 40

Page 41

42 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Stage 2 – Emerging concept
Page 41

Page 42

43 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
3.4 Maintaining the Concept
A key challenge of any design is ensuring the robustness and minimising future
maintenance requirements of any changes.  To support this, a series of
workshops were held with Argyll and Bute Network Management
Representatives in advance of developing the final concept design.  In advance
of each workshop a concept option plan was shared to support discussion.  The
key points of each workshop are summarised in the remainder of this chapter. 
3.5 Working with Stakeholders
Argyll and Bute Network Management (Workshop 1)
 Due to carriageway construction and drainage arrangements, developing
the route on the Esplanade route on coastal footway side was agreed to
be the beneficial route option.
 The operational carriageway width must be maintained at a standard
6.5m to give sufficient road space allowance for HGV and buses.  It was
agreed that the road width reduction to a more typical design standard
would improve pedestrian crossing opportunities and help encourage
lower vehicle speeds.
 Improvements to parking capacity along the route are supported. Any
changes should consider seasonal parking impacts and the demand for
coach and campervan parking where possible.
 Improved access for pedestrians to visit the war memorial by reducing
car parking spaces on the inland side of the carriageway and /or
preventing campervans from parking in front of the memorial.
Based on the feedback received, the concept design was developed considering
the above noted points. The emerging design was again subject to review by
ABC network management and maintenance representatives. 
Argyll and Bute Network Management (Workshop 2)
A second stakeholder workshop was initiated to discuss the approach to review
the emerging concept. The current revised design includes:
 Considering the Esplanade in three sections.  An addition boulevard type
space has been created in the middle of the route adjacent to the war
Page 42

Page 43

44 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
memorial including placemaking (seating, planting and dwell space).  This
approach creates three ‘blocks’ of placemaking design along the route
and minimises the design impact on parking along the route. The ‘blocks’
of placemaking providing seating and dwell spaces ‘dotted’ along the
route and offering a symmetry to the existing landscape blocks located at
Kinloch Road and North Street.
 Consideration of how the design will terminate at the north of Saddle
Street and provide onward connection to Dalintober Primary School. 
Introduction of a pedestrian footway build-out at the junction to aid
pedestrian crossing movements was discussed.  Concerns relating to
vehicle movements from the adjacent distillery was also discussed.
 Adding additional parking to the southern extent of the route achieved by
widening into the Kinloch Park by c.1m. Converting a bus parking lay-by
into additional parking bays for general use.
 The junction to the south of the route with Kinloch Park was presented to
operate as a one-way in a clockwise gyratory with the existing bus gate
removed and access by general traffic promoted.
Argyll and Bute Network Management (Workshop 3)
A third stakeholder workshop was initiated to discuss the approach to review the
emerging concept. Key consideration include:
 Discussion regarding extending the scheme to Dalaruan Street to better
interface the design with Dalintober Primary School.  Noted that the
limited road corridor space would require introduction of a wider traffic
management scheme extending to include Mill Street or New Parliament
Place.  The conclusion of the optioneering workshop confirmed that the
concept should terminate at the junction of Dalarauan Street with Saddell
Street.
Transport Scotland (TS) Network Management (Workshop 1)
A stakeholder workshop was initiated to discuss the approach to review the
emerging concept and alignment of the concept with the Kinloch Road scheme
being developed by TS. Key design considerations include:
 Detail of proposed crossing points and use of signal pedestrian crossing
control.  It was noted that as the road widths had been significantly
narrowed and crossings may operate effectively as uncontrolled.
 Use of raised table crossings was discussed and noted that these would
not be acceptable to ABC due to ongoing noise and maintenance
concerns.
 TS generally supportive of the proposed one-way gyratory system at
Esplanade end, subject to further operational assessment.
 Noting feedback from the public regarding improved crossing opportunity
at Kinloch Road.  This should integrate the triangular island to the west
within which a community garden is being developed.
Page 43

Page 44

45 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
 TS currently reviewing options to improve cycle and pedestrian provision
along A83 including pedestrian crossing improvements in the vicinity of
the Aqualibrium.
 TS still to explore other options including use of northern footway of
Kinloch Road.
Transport Scotland Network Management (Workshop 2)
A second TS stakeholder workshop was initiated to discuss the approach to
review the emerging concept. Key design considerations include:
 Subject to funding TS planning to identify the Kinloch Road design by
year end 2024.  This may change and is subject to funding availability;
 Recognising the likely programme for delivery TS agreed that the one-
way gyratory change proposed within the concept at the town end of the
Esplanade may be best promoted as part of the TS design. This would
provide a logical method to safely deliver any change and avoid abortive
construction costs.
3.6 Understanding Parking Challenges
A further parking survey of the Esplanade was undertaken during June 2024 to
capture the summer visitor use. Using this parking data, an assessment of
forecast parking capacity impacts has been estimated.  
A minimum parking bay space of 6m in length has been assumed to allow space
for vehicle manoeuvring.
For each section of the route as defined by the February parking survey sections,
an estimate of theoretical capacity of the current road layout has been
undertaken by measuring the length of available road space by section available
for legal parking and dividing this by the 6m bay length. The calculation includes
allowance to avoid parking across accesses and on existing parking restrictions.
The results of the comparisons for the on-street parking provision are shown in
the following table.  
The results indicate that as a result of the concept design, the total number of
parking bays along the Esplanade would marginally decrease by around 19
spaces overall. The majority of these are located around the war memorial and
towards the north end of the Esplanade where parking demand is lower.  The
concept design would also reduce the number of spaces between the war
memorial and bus station but increase the number of spaces between the bus
station and Kinloch Road junction where the February parking surveys and stage
1 community feedback have indicated parking demand is at its greatest.
The resulting parking analysis including a comparison with the February survey
results is shown overleaf. 
Page 44

Page 45

46 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Stage 1 – February 2024 Parking Beat Survey
Stage 2 – June 2024 Parking Beat Survey Page 45

Page 46

47 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
3.7 Parking Enforcement and Management
A key component of the concept as noted through conversations with
stakeholders and through public feedback relates to the impacts of public on-
street parking.  The key points being raised by the public relating to:
 Long duration parking of on-street spaces by local business as part of
their everyday business operation. Parking long term on-street within the
southern end of the Esplanade reduces access to higher demand parking
spaces at Kinloch Road end of Esplanade; 
 Campervan and coach parking along the Esplanade often park
indiscriminately and for longer durations blocking the war memorial and
sea views; and
 Requests for parking enforcement to assist in managing parking space
turnover.
At the time of writing, ABC are examining options to improve parking
enforcement within the community.  The promotion of parking bays within the
concept design will align with any future parking enforcement strategy. 
3.8 Developing Route Cross-Sections
The proposed concept design route cross-sections showing the route concept at
various locations across the scheme are shown in the following figure.   
Page 46

Page 47

48 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Page 47

Page 48

49 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
3.9 Coach, Taxi and Bus Parking 
The proposed concept includes three 17m long coach, campervan or mini-bus
parking bays located on Princes Street.  The coach parking will be accessed via
the Esplanade and will allow campervan parking staying overnight to maintain a
sea view whilst keeping the Esplanade free from parking by larger vehicles. This
will support the intended use of the space.
The bus-stop located within the terminus at the Kinloch Road end of the
Esplanade currently includes parking for four buses within three marked bus
bays.  These will be reduced from three to two bus bays for two buses which it
is proposed that all bus services would use, thereby making it easier to change
buses in Campbeltown when required.  These will be located on the northern
side of the carriageway. The bus bay on the southern side will be repurposed to
provide additional public parking aligned with the communities stage 1 feedback
and concerns regarding the need for additional parking at the ‘town’ end of the
route.
A change is proposed to revise the operation of the Kinloch Road / Esplanade
junction from its current bus only access to support access by all vehicles but as
part of a one-way eastbound direction only.  General traffic including buses will
be able to exit the Esplanade in a westbound direction only.
On Saddell Street, to accommodate a wider shared use footway, the
northbound bus stop will be relocated from the current lay-by to on-street. 
This may result in some queuing delay for drivers stopped behind a bus whilst
patrons embark or disembark. These delays are forecast to be minimal and
infrequent. 
Page 48

Page 49

50 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
3.10 Route Safety Audit
The emerging concept design were submitted to Drummond Black Ltd who
undertook an independent Stage 1 Road Safety Audit in support of the design. 
Full details of the audit and designers’ response are supplied separately.
3.11 Vehicle Tracking Analysis
The concept design was subject to a vehicle tracking analysis using vehicle
tracking simulation software.  The tracking was undertaken at the locations
where the design was estimated to impact on the operational layout and
included: 
 The western extent of the Esplanade at the junction with Kinloch Road;
 Access, egress and access to parking bays on the Esplanade;
 Access, queuing and exit of the bus stances;
 Distillery junction on Saddell Street; and
 The resized junctions along the route’s length.
Vehicle tracking results are shown as follows.   
Page 49

Page 50

51 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Bus access vehicle tracking at Esplanade - HGV tracking
Page 50

Page 51

52 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Bus access vehicle tracking at Esplanade - Coach tracking
Page 51

Page 52

53 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Saddell Street HGV tracking
Page 52

Page 53

54 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
`
Saddell street HGV tracking
Page 53

Page 54

55 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
3.12 Initial Cost Estimates
An initial assessment of the capital cost of constructing each of the concept
option is set out in the following table.  
The estimates have been prepared by the design team using SPONS cost
information and relevant previous experience. The cost estimates should be
treated as indicative until complete estimates of construction costs are prepared
during the stage 3 detailed design.
The option includes a 44% Optimism Bias reflecting the early concept design
stage.   
3.13 Concept Re-Appraisal Against Cycling by Design (CbD) 2021 
The concept design was subjected to a review using the route assessment within
Cycling by Design 2021.  The concepts were scored ranging between 1 – 3 with 1
reflecting a ‘high level’ of service and 3 a ‘low level’ of service. The assessment
was undertaken by the design team as a workshop discussion to allow
assessment criterion to be discussed and scored.
The criteria considered in the assessment included:
 Indicative Cost;
 Deliverability;
 Accessibility;
 Local Need;
 Coherence;
 Directness;
 Comfort;
 Attractiveness; and
 Adaptability.
The resulting assessment identified that a number of the concepts, unsurprisingly
would need further investigation to determine an appropriate standard of design
provision.  
No consideration of the relative weighting of the evaluation criteria has been
undertaken. 
Page 54

Page 55

56 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Route /
Option
Length
(m)
Proposed Intervention
Structures
Required 
1 High level of Service 10-14
2 Medium level of Service 15-23
3 Low level of Service 24-30
Costs
Deliverability
Accessibility
Local Need
Safety
Cohesiveness
Directness
Com
fort
Attractiveness
Adaptability
Total
1 393m Route formed on Esplanade. North Shore Street
connect to Kinloch Road.
no 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 17
2 261m Widen existing footpaths on Kinloch Park. no 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 13
3 168m Route formed on Kinloch Road no 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 15
4 198m Route formed along Lochend Street/Saddell Street no 3 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 15
Page 55

Page 56

57 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com  DESIGN PROCESS QUALITY AND INNOVATION
Page 56

Page 57

58 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
4 DESIGN PROCESS QUALITY AND
INNOVATION
4.1 Outline Design Process
The project will be developed to align with the Placed for Everyone (PfE) design
development programme.
4.2 Design Guidance and Quality
A wide range of design guidance and standards have been used to develop the
project proposals.  The core documents include: 
 Designing Streets;
 Cycling by Design (2021);
 The National Roads Development Guide (NRDG); and
 Inclusive Mobility (2021).
The detailed design process will use these standards and include:
 Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB);
 Traffic Signs and Regulations and General Directions (TSRDG);
 Local Transport Notes (LTN); and
 Traffic Advisory Leaflets (TAL).
These references represent the core design guidance however other documents
such as Sustrans Design Guidance Documents and other examples of best
practice have also been considered. 
Page 57

Page 58

59 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
4.3 Considering Wider Area Improvements
The concept design process will include several key considerations in support of
the emerging network. These include:
 Improvement to accessibility, walking and cycling links between people
and place;
 Developing a signage and wayfinding strategy;
 Promoting cycle-friendly intervention;
 Introducing a Travel behaviour change programme; and
 Providing cycle parking and storage measures.
4.4 Considering Streetscape and Landscape Improvements
The route on its own will not create an environment which will support the
movement of people, create a place and encourage community ownership. 
Campbeltown is a key service centre for the regional community which relies
heavily on the use of motorised travel to support the movement of the
community.  
To support lasting change to travel behaviours the design process must include
placemaking potential giving priority to maximising the communities’ assets and
access to public transport as well as the opportunity to walk and cycle. 
4.5 Planting, Drainage and Local Environment
Within the proximity of any areas where there would be works such as seating,
way finders, and shared surfaces, planting of native species will enhance the
environmental improvements.  
Not only will planting create an attractive setting but it will also be encouraging
and increasing biodiversity. Salt-tolerant species can be used for foraging and can
be educational.  The changing seasons are marked with the advent of spring with
blossom flowers followed by autumn leaf colour changes. 
Page 58

Page 59

60 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
4.6 Developing Streetscape
Sensitively designed street furniture and public art can be incorporated as part of
the design process and is aimed at enriching the experience of everyday journeys
and visits to the area.  
Whilst keeping in mind the coastal environment; seating, opportunities for
incidental play, and way-finders would be appropriate.
As an urban area with existing street lighting, the lighting design must be
provided sensitively. Lighting can become a design feature in its own right, by
marking at ground level or by enhancing seating areas by incorporating lighting
into the structures. 
Paving materials will avoid any garish colours and patterns which would be more
associated with a larger urban area, as they are not in keeping with the style of
the road. The linear nature of the site naturally establishes a physical connection
through the study area which can be punctuated with environmental
improvements such as seating areas and viewpoints. 
Examples of bike stands combined with seating
Examples of bike stands Page 59

Page 60

61 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Example of seating and planting
Example of route signage
Example of paving
Page 60

Page 61

62 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Examples of route lighting solutions
Page 61

Page 62

63 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
4.7 Designing for Equality and Accessibility
The proposed Active Travel network must support access by all user’ groups that
includes accessibility by all ages and abilities.  As the route corridor design
progresses, consideration must be given to ensuring that the network remains
safe and inviting to everyone.  This includes how those more vulnerable in our
society will be supported by the design.
4.8 Considering Those with Protected Characteristics
An appraisal of the project has again been undertaken using ABC Social and
Equality Impact Appraisal template (SEQiA). The results of the assessment are
included in Appendix A.
Taking cognisance of the appraisals summarised previously it is noted that the
concept design options would achieve a Cycle by Design ‘High standard’ of
provision on the Esplanade and ‘Medium standard’ of provision on the other
roads/paths which would help support some individuals with protected
characteristics choose to travel most actively when they wished to.  
4.9 Flood Prevention
With a changing climate, the importance of designing with flood risk in mind is
paramount.  The SEPA flood risk maps indicate that much of the road route will
be at high risk of coastal flooding in the near future.  A summary of the flood risk
map is supplied separately 
4.10 Traffic Modelling
No traffic modelling is considered necessary at this stage of the concept
development. 
4.11 Preliminary Ecological Appraisal (PEA)
A Preliminary Ecological Appraisal has been undertaken for the existing route
corridor.  The PEA is supplied separately
4.12 Considering Construction Phasing
Due to the overall route length and complexity of delivery, it is highly unlikely
that the identified route corridors will be constructed as a single delivery project. 
It is more likely that the route will be delivered in a staged order as funding
becomes available.
Taking cognisance of the known challenges at this stage of the network
development, the following construction order is suggested. 
Ref Route Section Route
Length(m)
Phase 1 Esplanade / Kinloch Road junction  393m
Phase 2 Esplanade to North Street 261m
Phase 3 Saddell Street 168m
Phase 4 Kinloch Road (to Esplanade) 198m
Page 62

Page 63

64 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
4.13 Recommendations and Next Steps
Following consideration of the material provided within this assessment, it is
recommended that the concept route is promoted and developed further during
the stage 3 design process.
 Revisit the proposed junction layout of the Esplanade with Kinloch Road
and determine the suitability of the one-way gyratory.
 Revisit the concept impacts on bus lay-by.
 Investigate progress of Transport Scotland’s Kinloch Road route.
 Undertake traffic modelling of concept operation.
 Explore options for crossing the carriageway and route at locations
beyond the designated crossing points.
 Examine and confirm options for crossing types at each location. 
Page 63

Page 64

65 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Page 64

Page 65

66 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
5 PROJECT DELIVERABILITY AND DESIGN
COLLABORATION
5.1 Landownership
The project route is predominately located within council-owned or adopted
lands.  There are no sections of the route where third-party land ownership may
be required. (Landownership details supplied separately)
Additional frontage landowners may need to be consulted at the next stage of the
design development depending on the route design developed.
5.2 Designer Risk Register
Similar to the Project Risk Register, the Designer Risk Register provides a
summary of the risks and risk management associated with the technical delivery
of the design.  The Designer Risk Register is supplied separately.
5.3 Project Budget Forecast
A whole-life project forecast is provided and supplied separately.   
Page 65

Page 66

67 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Option 4 – Reallocation of road space to suit new widened footpath on
coastal side. 
Following Victoria Street, the route would be formed on the inland side of the
street. The road cross section would be adjusted to narrow the carriageway
width to avoid impact with the gardens area by around 2m   
Page 66

Page 67

68 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
APPENDIX A – SOCIAL AND EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (SEQIA)
Section 1: About the proposal  
Title of Proposal
Campbeltown Esplanade and Kinloch Park, Active Travel Study  
Description of Proposal
Stage 2 Concept design of a 0.95km Active Travel Route through Campbeltown  
Purpose and Aims of Proposal
To provide safe walking and cycling route between Esplanade and Kinloch Park, local community services. To encourage everyday cycling and walking as an alternative to private car
use. To improve the community travel and mobility options. To improve access for those less able.  
Intended outcome of proposal
Concept design for the route aligned with the funding requirements of the HITRANS programme.  Intervention to be proportionate and affordable to the communities’ requirements
and maintain the islands character whilst providing some level of infrastructure improvement.  
Business Outcome(s) / Corporate Outcome(s) / National Policies to which the proposal contributes/relates
Aligned with National and local policy interventions regarding promotion of sustainable travel modes, reduction in single journey car dependency. Design reflects use of Cycle by
Design 2021 update.  
Lead officer details: 
Name of lead officer Colin Young
Page 67

Page 68

69 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Job title Strategic Transportation Delivery Officer
Service / Company ABC
Contact Details colin.young@argyll-bute.gov.uk  
Appropriate officer details: 
Name of appropriate officer 
Job title 
Service / Company 
Contact Details 
Sign off of EqSEIA
Approver Signature  
Approver Name 
Approver Job title 
Date of sign off  
Revision Number 1  
Who will deliver the proposal?
ABC Strategic Transportation Team  
Individuals involved in developing the EqSEIA 
Name Colin Young
Job title Strategic Projects Officer
Service / Company ABC
Contact Details colin.young@argyll-bute.gov.uk
Name Mark Rinkus
Job title Managing Director
Page 68

Page 69

70 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Service / Company Connected Transport Planning Ltd
Contact Details mark.rinkus@connectedtp.com
Name Jack Munro
Job title Engineer
Service / Company CFME
Contact Details Jack  Munro <JMunro@CFMEngineers.onmicrosoft.com> 
Section 2: Evidence used in the course of carrying out EqSEIA     
Who does the proposal impact?
Will impact on everyone as it is a community asset and part of core infrastructure.  Key receptors include local frontage property owners, local residents and visitors to the community     
Are there any aspects which explicitly address discrimination, victimisation or harassment?
No.  The project is a supporting element of infrastructure that will connect people with place.     
Are there any aspects which explicitly promote equal opportunities?
No.  Through good design aligned with current guidance and design standards, the project will be designed to support access by all user groups and abilities.  Through appropriate
design, the project will promote a safe environment for all user groups seeking to support the movement of people     
Are there any aspects which explicitly foster good relations?
Potential concerns regarding project location and the negative impact of unwanted social intrusion on some frontage properties. Loss of access by some residents through impacts on
parking     
Are there any aspects which explicitly promote socio-economic equality?
Page 69

Page 70

71 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
No.  The project will contribute towards socio economic growth through better provision of a safer route between people and place     
Consultation / engagement undertaken
Consultation Details Date(s) Summary of Findings
Online via Facebook study page and community pages Various. See Consultation
Report Support for the project
Community visit x4 Various. See Consultation
Report Support for the project
Public Consultation x2 in including digital dial in workshop Various. See Consultation
Report
Support for the project. Some
landownership concerns
Local Community Primary School x1 Various. See Consultation
Report
Support for the project.  Include colourful
infrastructure
Local Community High School x1 Various. See Consultation
Report Support.  No interest in play equipment
LGBTQIA+ Pride community Various. See Consultation
Report Support for the project
Community Social Services x1 Various. See Consultation
Report
Support. Concerned relating to speeding
cyclists and cycle priority scheme
General interactions with the community x10 Various. See Consultation
Report
Supportive. Concerns raised relating to
off-road routes around rear of
Campbeltown
Regular steering group sessions Various. See Consultation
Report
Helped guide engagement with the
community     
Have people who identify with any protected characteristic(s) been involved in the development of the proposal?
Yes, the more mature and those with mobility challenges have been directly involved. Survey results indicate that people with gender dysphoria have engaged in community
consultation     
Data Sources
Census 2011 and 2022, 2019 previous project outputs, project traffic data (2023 off and on peak), community feedback     
Page 70

Page 71

72 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Other information
Various design standards but primarily Cycle by Design 2021 update.     
What is known currently about the experience of people under each characteristic?
Protected characteristic What is currently known Source(s) Gaps in Evidence
Age
Including the experiences of young people
(age 18 and under) and older people.
Young adults live in the community and use a bus or parent
transport to get around.  Older populations have expressed
concerns regarding cycle priority vs. pedestrian priority. 
Kerbs, poor visibility, changes in surface delineation are
challenges to mobility.  Ensuring older people do not need to
step into the cycle route and have sufficient time to hear an
oncoming cyclist.
Meetings and feedback
with primary, secondary
schools.  Community care
facility and the general
public and through
previous project
experience such as
conversations with the
RNIB.
none
Disability
Physical and mental. Including the
experiences of people with long term
limiting health conditions.
Older mobility challenged residents live in the community. 
They use mobility aids to get around.  Changes in surface
levels such as kerbing can limit some people’s ability to
physically move their bike.  Those with hearing impairment
have expressed concerns regarding ability to hear and see
oncoming traffic or cyclists and have sufficient time to take
action
Face to face meeting with
residents in the community
and survey feedback from
the public.  Previous
experience from other
projects.
none
Ethnicity
Including impact relating to skin colour,
nationality, language spoken and country
of origin. People identifying as Gypsy /
Travellers are protected by this
characteristic.
Some users from some ethnic groups have a view that they
may be more vulnerable to assault or verbal abuse as
members of particular ethnic groups.  Safety concerns relate
to the creation of unsupervised spaces and places where
would be assailants might lurk.  Promotion of natural
surveillance and appropriate lighting is important to inclusive
/ welcoming design. Challenges also relate to signage and
language barriers. 
Online data search.  Points
shared through design
team conversation
No empirical evidence to support what
might be a generalised viewpoint. 
Feedback reflects subjective view of
some individuals and may not reflect the
group overall.  Not all ethnic groups
surveyed or viewpoints have been
recorded so there is a high risk of
generalisation.
Sex
Some user groups feel they are unsafe passing through or
along spaces which is less well lit.  Appropriate levels of
lighting and natural surveillance can help address these
perceptions.
Online data search.  Points
shared through design
team conversation.
No evidence to support what is likely to
be a personal view held by the individual. 
No safety concerns relating to sex have
been received via the community survey.
Gender reassignment
Where someone is living part / full time as
the opposite gender to their assigned sex
at birth.
Some user groups suffering from gender dysphoria feel they
are unsafe passing through or along spaces which is less
well lit.  Appropriate levels of lighting and natural surveillance
can help address these perceptions.
Online data search.  Points
shared through design
team conversation.
No evidence to support what is likely to
be a personal view held by the individual. 
No safety concerns relating to gender
Page 71

Page 72

73 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
have been received via the community
survey.
Marriage and Civil Partnership
Some male or females living together out with marriage or in
a civil partnership may feel less secure or victimised by other
people using the travel route. This perception of risk may be
the result of religious belief.
No data available.
No evidence to support what is likely to
be a personal view held by the individual. 
No safety concerns relating to marital
status have been received via the
community survey.
Pregnancy and Maternity
This covers women as soon as they
become pregnant. In the workplace this
includes pregnancy-related illness. When a
woman gives birth or is breastfeeding, this
characteristic protects them for 26 weeks.
Younger parents in the community do walk the project route
but numbers are low as there are few younger aged children
in the community.  Use of private car is preferred for ease
and convenience noting the excessive space between
places, weather and concerns have been raised regarding
shared use of the road and safety challenges of stepping
onto unstable road verges or cycle lane verge.
Face to face meeting with
residents in the community
and survey feedback.
Few participating younger mothers to
provide comment by anecdotal evidence
provided from wider community
Religion / Belief
Including the experiences of people with no
religion or belief.
Some user groups have a view that they may be more
vulnerable to assault or verbal abuse as members of
particular religious groups.  Safety concerns relate to the
creation of unsupervised spaces and places where would be
assailants might lurk.  Promotion of natural surveillance and
appropriate lighting is important to inclusive design. A church
on the island supports some religious groups and can be
accessed via the road.
Online data search.  Points
shared through design
team conversation
No empirical evidence to support what
might be a generalised viewpoint. 
Feedback reflects subjective view of
some individuals and may not reflect the
group overall.  Not all religious groups
surveyed or viewpoints have been
recorded so there is a high risk of
generalisation.
Sexual Orientation
Some people can feel they are unsafe passing through or
along spaces which they believe they have less than
appropriate lighting and natural surveillance.  In these
situations, their perception of risk due to verbal or physical
assault is elevated.  The inclusion of spaces with limited
natural surveillance can also present opportunities to
individuals with protected characteristics.
Online data search.  Points
shared through design
team conversation.
No evidence to support what is likely to
be a personal view held by the individual. 
No safety concerns relating to sexual
orientation have been received via the
community survey.
Other marginalised groups
Including but not exclusive to the
experiences of unpaid carers, homeless
people, current and ex-offenders, people
with addictions, care experienced people,
people living in rural areas.
Some people from some marginalised groups have a view
that they may be more vulnerable to assault or verbal abuse
as members of particular marginalised groups.  Safety
concerns relate to the creation of unsupervised spaces and
places where would be assailants might lurk.  Promotion of
natural surveillance and appropriate lighting is important to
inclusive design. As a rural community the distance and
acceptance of the challenge of access to everyday services
is considerably greater than that on the mainland. 
Online data search.  Points
shared through design
team conversation
No empirical evidence to support what
might be a generalised viewpoint. 
Feedback reflects subjective view of
some individuals and may not reflect the
group overall.  Not all marginalised
groups surveyed or view points have
been recorded so there is a high risk of
generalisation.
Page 72

Page 73

74 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Cross Cutting
Where two or more characteristics overlap
and the proposal affects those people in a
specific way
The project will support access to improved walking and
cycling travel.  The promotion of walking is at odds with the
needs of cyclists and vice versa.  Some user groups are at
'odds' with the needs of local drivers who wish to access
places quickly.  These needs are in turn at 'odds' with the
actions of tourists who often just stop to take pictures of
wildlife or scenic views.
Conversations and
Community feedback. Conversations and Community feedback.   
What is currently known Source(s) Gaps in Evidence
Mainland rural population
The community co-exists through a dependency with the
adjacent island of Islay and with Tayvallich through the
passenger ferry service.  Access to Campbeltown is via car,
ferry and bus service provides support.  The equality
challenges are typical to those associated with rural island
living.
Community conversations. 
Census and Placemaking
tool results.
No gaps identified.
Island populations
The community consists of many people who live throughout
the area, have many different aspects of travel with no
difficulty.
Community conversations. 
Census and Placemaking
tool results
No gaps identified
Low income
There is no single definition or measure of
low income. Some indicators suggest that
low income is where individuals living in
households receive below 60% of UK
median income. Scottish Government’s
Children in Families With Limited
Resources Across Scotland 2014-2016
defines low income as ‘household income
below 70% of the Scottish median after
housing cost’.
Access to travel is not a challenge for Campbeltown. The
movement of goods and services are often at a great
comparable cost to the mainland.  This cost disparity can
exacerbate difference in wealth, health and welfare.
Online research. Published
research no gaps identified
Low wealth
Not having access to wealth (including for
example, financial products, equity from
housing, decent pension, accessible
saving). People who have low wealth lack
protection from socio-economic
disadvantage.
Access to travel is not a challenge for the community.  The
movement of goods and services is often at a great
comparable cost to the mainland.  This cost disparity can
exacerbate difference in wealth, health and welfare.
Online research. Published
research. No gaps identified.
Page 73

Page 74

75 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Material deprivation
Inability to access basic goods and
services.
Access to travel is a challenge for rural communities and
remote communities.  The movement of goods and services
is often at a great comparable cost to Bute.  This cost
disparity can exacerbate difference in wealth, health and
welfare.
Census and place standard
tool feedback None
Area deprivation
Areas where there are concentrations of
deprived households.
Access to travel is not a challenge for area deprivation as
many residents own cars and drive quite often, some areas
also have bus stops which can pass in and out of
Campbeltown.
Online research. Published
research no gaps identified
Socio-economic background
Relates to the context in which a person
has been raised or in which they live.
Disadvantage may arise from parents’
education, employment and income (social
class).
Access to travel is a challenge for rural communities and
remote communities.  The movement of goods and services
is often at a great comparable cost to the mainland.  This
cost disparity can exacerbate difference in wealth, health and
welfare.
Online research. Published
research. No gaps identified.
Communities of place
Refers to people who are bound together
because of where they live, work, visit, or
otherwise spend a continuous portion of
their time. This may include rural, remote
and island areas.
Challenges associated with community living including higher
car dependency and cost of living
Census and place standard
tool feedback. None. 
Section 3: Impact of proposal         
Impact on service users
Protected characteristic Negative No Impact Positive   Don’t Know
Action
required
for impact
be known  
Details
(incl. action taken to minimise negative and/or
maximise positive impact)
Page 74

Page 75

76 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Age
Including the experiences of
young people (age 18 and
under) and older people.   
Any proposal
will have some
positive and
negative
challenges to
people of
different ages
and abilities. 
Overall, the
proposal wont
prioritise one
age group
over another
Consider
user group
design
separation if
space
allows  
Many of the community’s younger generation are
independently mobile.  The distances in the
community between places mean travel by car is the
only practical option even though many of the
children show a willingness to walk and cycle and do
walk and cycle regular. Personal safety is not
currently a community concern with some of the
younger adults often cycling and walking through the
park during the hours of darkness on their way
home.  The more mature generation has expressed
concerns relating to accessibility challenges, noting
the limited road width, perception of excessive car
speeds and often unstable road side verge are
points for consideration.  Steep gradients should be
best minimised or avoided.  Cycle speeds can be
intimidating to some older people and measures to
clarify the priority of the route to pedestrians and
provide cycle speed control measures have been
considered but cannot be included on a narrow path.
The concept will seek to minimise road crossings by
keeping the route on one side of the carriageway as
much as reasonably practicable.  This will promote
pedestrian and cyclist access.  The design includes
additional benches as requested by the community
to provide more frequent rest opportunities for the
less able-bodied noting the overall length of the
route. Due to limited space the design does not
include for user segregation on some sections
meaning that multiple user groups will continue to
share the same space.  No additional play areas are
promoted as the community did not identify them as
preference.  Lighting is not promoted within the park
as the community does not want any lighting.  
Consideration should be given to low level reflective
lighting during stage 3.  
Page 75

Page 76

77 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Disability
Including the experiences of
people with long term limiting
health conditions.        
Any proposal
will have some
positive and
negative
challenges to
people of
different
abilities. 
Overall, the
proposal will
be a net
improvement
overall as it
provides
infrastructure
where there is
currently  none
Consider
user group
design
separation
Instal
measures to
manage
cyclist
speeds.  
We have considered accessibility by those less able,
noting the design is a shared use path which does
not support segregation of user groups. By using the
existing road route, we have avoided steep or
lengthy inclines and declines which keeps the route
accessible by the mobility impaired. We have
ensured pedestrian priority in the project as far as
possible with the route changes seeking to provide a
more coherent and continual route path.  We have
sought to improve visibility to improve the reaction
time for slower moving individuals, the young and
old.  This is achieved by maintaining sightlines.   As
on short sections of the path are provided remote
and offer continuous cycling, this will manage cyclist
speeds by reducing the likelihood of cyclists
travelling at excessive speeds.  All proposed path
crossing points include dropped kerb crossings. 
Additional benches are provided at regular intervals
to support those less able by providing an
opportunity for occasional rest.
Ethnicity
Including impact relating to
skin colour, nationality,
language spoken and country
of origin. People identifying as
Gypsy / Travellers are
protected by this
characteristic.  
The route
concept includes
good practice
design to
minimise people
accessing dark
or unwelcoming
spaces that
might discourage
use by some
user groups. 
However, the
island is a
remote
community and
much of the route
does not benefit
from natural
surveillance          
The ethnicity of the population in the community is
Scottish / white.  The spoken language is English
and Gaelic.  Route signage will be provided bi-
lingual. The route is being designed to support
access by all races and we are unaware of any
design features that would influence users within this
category.  There are no published details of the 
design considerations relevant to race that are not
equally as relevant to other user group criterion.
Page 76

Page 77

78 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Sex  
The route
concept includes
good practice
design to 
minimise people
accessing dark
or unwelcoming
spaces that
might discourage
use by some
user groups. 
However, the
island is a
remote
community and
much of the route
does not benefit
from natural
surveillance          
The concept design supports mobility by all user
groups.  The route design is promoted to support
mobility by an unaccompanied 12 year old.  We are
not aware of any design criterion relevant to path
design that is unique to this category.  We also note
par
Gender reassignment
Where someone is living part /
full time as the opposite
gender to their assigned sex at
birth.  
The route
concept includes
good practice
design to 
minimise people
accessing dark
or unwelcoming
spaces that
might discourage
use by some
user groups. 
However, the
island is a
remote
community and
much of the route
does not benefit
from natural
surveillance          
The concept design supports mobility by all user
groups.  The route design is promoted to support
mobility by a unaccompanied 12 year old.  We are
not aware of any design criterion relevant to path
design that is unique to this category.  We also note
patriation of two individuals within the community
feedback who suffer from gender dysphoria.
Marriage and Civil Partnership   Not a
measurable item            
Page 77

Page 78

79 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Pregnancy and Maternity
This covers women as soon as
they become pregnant. In the
workplace this includes
pregnancy-related illness.
When a woman gives birth or
is breastfeeding, this
characteristic protects them for
26 weeks.    
The separation of
user groups to
provide level-
priority walking
route that is not
shared with
vehicles will
improve the
projects
attractiveness.        
The concept design supports mobility by all user
groups.  The route design is promoted to support
mobility by a unaccompanied 12 year old.   The
provision of benches and regular places to take rest
will benefit all user groups.  The route segregation
along the Esplanade will provide safer spaces for
parents with prams to avoid oncoming vehicles.  No
consideration has been given to the provision of
more enclosed rest spaces as it was considered by
the community that simple unobtrusive design would
be better aligned with the community’s character.
Religion / Belief
Including the experiences of
people with no religion or
belief.  
The intervention
will include good
practice design
to  minimise
provision of dark
or unwelcoming
spaces that
might discourage
use by some
user groups. 
However, the
area is a remote
community and
much of the
project does not
benefit from
natural
surveillance          
The concept design supports mobility by all user
groups.  The route design is promoted to support
mobility by a unaccompanied 12 year old.   The
provision of benches and regular places to take rest
will benefit all user groups.  No consideration has
been given to the provision of more enclosed rest
spaces as it was considered by the council that
vegetation such as trees will have an adverse
maintenance impact. The route will continue to be
available to persons of any religion or belief. The
location of the path nearer the coast may appeal to
some individuals with a religious belief rooted in
nature.
Sexual Orientation                
Page 78

Page 79

80 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Other marginalised groups
Including but not exclusive to
the experiences of unpaid
carers, homeless people,
current and ex-offenders,
people with addictions, care
experienced people, people
living in rural areas.  
The intervention
will include good
practice design
to  minimise
provision of dark
or unwelcoming
spaces that
might discourage
use by some
user groups. 
However, the
area is a remote
community and
much of the
project does not
benefit from
natural
surveillance          
The concept design supports mobility by all user
groups.  The route design is promoted to support
mobility by an unaccompanied 12 year old.   The
provision of benches and regular places to take rest
will benefit all user groups.  No consideration has
been given to the provision of more enclosed rest
spaces as it was considered by the council that
vegetation such as trees will have an adverse
maintenance impact. The route will continue to be
available to persons of any religion or belief. The
location of the path nearer the coast may appeal to
some individuals with a religious belief rooted in
nature.
Cross Cutting
Where two or more
characteristics overlap and the
proposal affects those people
in a specific way  
Conflicts
between cyclists,
pedestrians and
vehicles.          
The standard of design includes a mix of mixed
street and shared use route.  In both instances user
groups are expected to interact sensibly.  This may
present a risk to some user groups such as the older
and less able who have difficulty in hearing
oncoming vehicles or cyclists.  The design will
include some basic wayfinding signage that should
seek to reinforce pedestrian priority. The route has a
low level of coherence requiring user groups to
navigate between and across sections. At these
locations, user conflict risk is increased.  There is
little can be done from a design perspective to
manage user group behaviours.  It is also noted that
visiting drivers can often choose to stop on the road
to take pictures.  In these instances, other user
groups can become delayed behind them.  It is noted
that tourists’ campervans can cause a nuisance
along the Esplanade.  
Fairer Scotland Duty
Mainland rural population                
Island populations   x            
Page 79

Page 80

81 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Low income
There is no single definition or
measure of low income. Some
indicators suggest that low
income is where individuals
living in households receive
below 60% of UK median
income. Scottish
Government’s Children in
Families With Limited
Resources Across Scotland
2014-2016 defines low income
as ‘household income below
70% of the Scottish median
after housing cost’.    
Improved access
to services will
address the
challenges noted
through the SIMD
and Place scoring
tool.        
Accessible paths will support the movement of
people on all points of the social scale.  The path
should provide some support to social interaction
between the community. During the stage 1
engagement, it was noted that all routes would
benefit from improvement and re used by the
community. Whilst no data is known about low-
income families within the community the principle of
providing improved access to people to place by
improved sustainable travel options is known to
support individuals from all income abilities.
Low wealth
Not having access to wealth
(including for example,
financial products, equity from
housing, decent pension,
accessible saving). People
who have low wealth lack
protection from socio-
economic disadvantage.    
Improved access
to services will
address the
challenges noted
through the SIMD
and Place scoring
tool.        
Accessible paths will support the movement of
people on all points of the social scale. The path may
support new business opportunities through tourist
cycling groups which could contribute to wealth
creation. Whilst the path is not directly linked to
wealth it is again supportive of wealth creation.
Material deprivation
Inability to access basic goods
and services.  
Intervention is
unlikely to create
a significant
enough impact to
address the
areas overall
rural remoteness
and the cost of
living in a
community.          
The intervention is unlikely to create a significant
enough impact to address the areas overall rural
remoteness and the cost of living in a community. 
The route links Campbeltown’s Esplanade and
Kinloch Park which might provide some betterment
for communities noting these folks will still need to
travel to Campbeltown to access goods and services
in any case.  The path will not provide any
improvement to the location of services but may
accessing services more comfortable.
Area deprivation
Areas where there are
concentrations of deprived
households.  
Intervention is
unlikely to create
a significant
enough impact to
address the
areas overall
rural remoteness
and the cost of          
Intervention is unlikely to create a significant enough
impact to address the areas overall rural remoteness
and the cost of living in a community.
Page 80

Page 81

82 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
living in a
community.
Socio-economic background
Relates to the context in which
a person has been raised or in
which they live. Disadvantage
may arise from parents’
education, employment and
income (social class).    
Improved access
to services will
address the
challenges noted
through the SIMD
and Place scoring
tool.        
Accessible paths will support the movement of
people on all points of the social scale.
Communities of place
Refers to people who are
bound together because of
where they live, work, visit, or
otherwise spend a continuous
portion of their time. This may
include rural, remote and
island areas.    
Improved access
to services will
address the
challenges noted
through the SIMD
and Place scoring
tool.        
Accessible routes will support the movement of
people on all points of the social scale.  The route
should support social interaction between the
community. The route will be located along the
existing road as promoted by the community. This
will continue to support community social interaction
and maintain a community connection with the
residents.
Communities of interest
Refers to groups of people
who share an identity or an
experience. They do not need
to live in the same area,
however.    
Improved access
to services will
address the
challenges noted
through the SIMD
and Place scoring
tool        
Benches are to be basic and robust and aligned with
current provided style.  Accessible paths will support
the movement of people on all points of the social
scale.  The path should support social interaction
between the community         
If you have identified any impacts on service users, explain what these will be.           
Impact on service deliverers (including employees, volunteers etc)
Protected characteristic Negative No Impact Positive   Don’t Know
Action
required
for impact
be known  
Details
(incl. action taken to minimise negative and/or
maximise positive impact)
Page 81

Page 82

83 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Age
Including the experiences of
young people (age 18 and
under) and older people.  
x           As per Service Users.
Disability
Including the experiences of
people with long term limiting
health conditions.  
x           As per Service Users.
Ethnicity
Including impact relating to
skin colour, nationality,
language spoken and country
of origin. People identifying as
Gypsy / Travellers are
protected by this
characteristic.  
x           As per Service Users.
Sex   x           As per Service Users
Gender reassignment
Where someone is living part /
full time as the opposite
gender to their assigned sex at
birth.  
x           As per Service Users.
Marriage and Civil Partnership   x           As per Service Users.
Pregnancy and Maternity
This covers women as soon as
they become pregnant. In the
workplace this includes
pregnancy-related illness.
When a woman gives birth or
is breastfeeding, this
characteristic protects them for
26 weeks.  
x           As per Service Users.
Religion / Belief
Including the experiences of
people with no religion or
belief.  
x           As per Service Users.
Sexual Orientation   x           As per Service Users.
Page 82

Page 83

84 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Other marginalised groups
Including but not exclusive to
the experiences of unpaid
carers, homeless people,
current and ex-offenders,
people with addictions, care
experienced people, and
people living in rural areas.  
x           As per Service Users.
Cross Cutting
Where two or more
characteristics overlap and the
proposal affects those people
in a specific way  
x           As per Service Users.
Fairer Scotland Duty
Mainland rural population   X           As per Service Users.
Island populations   x           As per Service Users.
Low income
There is no single definition or
measure of low income. Some
indicators suggest that low
income is where individuals
living in households receive
below 60% of UK median
income. Scottish
Government’s Children in
Families With Limited
Resources Across Scotland
2014-2016 defines low income
as ‘household income below
70% of the Scottish median
after housing cost’.  
x           As per Service Users.
Low wealth
Not having access to wealth
(including, for example,
financial products, equity from
housing, decent pension,
accessible saving). People
who have low wealth lack
protection from socio-
economic disadvantage.  
x           As per Service Users
Page 83

Page 84

85 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Material deprivation
Inability to access basic goods
and services.  
x           As per Service Users.
Area deprivation
Areas where there are
concentrations of deprived
households.  
x           As per Service Users.
Socio-economic background
Relates to the context in which
a person has been raised or in
which they live. Disadvantage
may arise from parents’
education, employment and
income (social class).  
x           As per Service Users.
Communities of place
Refers to people who are
bound together because of
where they live, work, visit, or
otherwise spend a continuous
portion of their time. This may
include rural, remote and
island areas.  
x           As per Service Users.
Communities of interest
Refers to groups of people
who share an identity or an
experience. They do not need
to live in the same area,
however.  
x           As per Service Users. 
Section 5: Assessment & Lessons Learned   
Select the overall assessment result, 1-4, which applies
Overall Assessment Result Justification
No major change
If this is selected you are confirming that
the EqSEIA demonstrates the proposal is
robust and there is no possible adverse
impact.
-
Page 84

Page 85

86 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Continue the proposal
If this is selected you are confirming that
the EqSEIA identifies possible adverse
impact or missed opportunities but the
proposal can be justified.
At this early stage, the project options can be developed to provide a positive influence on all user groups within the community. 
Consideration of a project alignment which supports access by those less able will increase the interventions attractiveness for use by a
wider audience.
Adjust the proposal
If this is selected you are confirming that
the EqSEIA identifies possible adverse
impact or missed opportunities which
suggest the proposal needs to be
adjusted.
-
Stop and remove the proposal
The proposal shows actual or possible
unlawful discrimination. It must be halted
or significantly changed.
-
High Level Amendments made to Proposal due to EqSEIA     
Protected characteristic Specific Adjustments made due to
EqSEIA Lessons Learned
Age
Including the experiences of young
people (age 18 and under) and older
people.
None None
Disability
Including the experiences of people with
long term limiting health conditions.
None None
Ethnicity
Including impact relating to skin colour,
nationality, language spoken and country
of origin. People identifying as Gypsy /
Travellers are protected by this
characteristic.
None None
Sex None None
Page 85

Page 86

87 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Gender reassignment
Where someone is living part / full time
as the opposite gender to their assigned
sex at birth.
None None
Marriage and Civil Partnership None None
Pregnancy and Maternity
This covers women as soon as they
become pregnant. In the workplace, this
includes pregnancy-related illness. When
a woman gives birth or is breastfeeding,
this characteristic protects them for 26
weeks.
None None
Religion / Belief
Including the experiences of people with
no religion or belief.
None None
Sexual Orientation None None
Other marginalised groups
Including but not exclusive to the
experiences of unpaid carers, homeless
people, current and ex-offenders, people
with addictions, care experienced
people, people living in rural areas.
None None
Cross Cutting
Where two or more characteristics
overlap and the proposal affects those
people in a specific way.
None None
Fairer Scotland Duty
Mainland rural population None None
Island populations n/a n/a
Low income
There is no single definition or measure
of low income. Some indicators suggest
that low income is where individuals
living in households receive below 60%
of the UK median income. Scottish
Government’s Children in Families With
Limited Resources Across Scotland
2014-2016 defines low income as
None None
Page 86

Page 87

88 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
‘household income below 70% of the
Scottish median after housing cost’.
Low wealth
Not having access to wealth (including
for example, financial products, equity
from housing, decent pension,
accessible saving). People who have low
wealth lack protection from socio-
economic disadvantage.
None None
Material deprivation
Inability to access basic goods and
services.
None None
Area deprivation
Areas where there are concentrations of
deprived households.
None None
Socio-economic background
Relates to the context in which a person
has been raised or in which they live.
Disadvantages may arise from parents’
education, employment and income
(social class).
None None
Communities of place
Refers to people who are bound together
because of where they live, work, visit, or
otherwise spend a continuous portion of
their time. This may include rural, remote
and island areas.
None None
Communities of interest
Refers to groups of people who share an
identity or an experience. They do not
need to live in the same area, however.
None None 
Page 87

Page 88

This page is intentionally left blank

Page 89

& 
Campbeltown Esplanade to Kinloch Park Active Travel Project
Stage 1&2 Engagement Report
DATE:  November 2024     REF:  501056 VERSION:  Draft
Page 89

Page 90

MARK RINKUS                      
Managing Director                       
Mark.rinkus@connectedtp.com                 
Contents
1 APPROACH TO TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR CHANGE AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ....................................................................... 1
2 STAGE 1 SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS ........................................................................................................................... 15
3 STAGE 1 COMMUNITY FEEDBACK TOOL (CFT) RESULTS........................................................................................................... 27
4 STAGE 1 STAKEHOLDER FEEDBACK .......................................................................................................................................... 33
5 STAGE 1 BARRIERS AND OPPORTUNITIES ............................................................................................................................... 36
6 STAGE 2 – COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ..................................................................................................................................... 38
7 STAGE 2 - SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS ......................................................................................................................... 44
8 STAGE 2 - COMMUNITY FEEDBACK TOOL (CFT) RESULTS ........................................................................................................ 56
9 STAGE 2 - STAKEHOLDER FEEDBACK ........................................................................................................................................ 63
10 OUR LESSONS LEARNT .............................................................................................................................................................. 67
APPENDIX A – WEST COAST TODAY NEWS ARTICLES ....................................................................................................................... 70
APPENDIX B – CONSULTATION EVENTS EVIDENCE OF ATTENDANCE ............................................................................................... 71
APPENDIX C – STAGE 2 SURVEY COMMENTS ..................................................................................................................................... 72
Page 90

Page 91

2 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
`
APPROACH TO TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR CHANGE AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Page 91

Page 92

1 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
1 APPROACH TO TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR CHANGE
AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
1.1 Relevant Previous Engagement and Consultation
This project builds on the legacy of recently completed active travel projects
within the community.   The project seeks to improve pedestrian links into
Esplanade to Kinloch Park and surrounding area, and make allowance for
potential future active travel connections.
During 2021/22, the Ralston Road Active Travel route (Phase 1A of the longer
Campbeltown north-south route) was partially constructed. The route supports
access between Campbeltown Grammar school, hospital, health centre and
Castlehill Primary school. This project will form a future section in the overall
route linking north-south across Campbeltown.
1.2 Stakeholder Mapping
A stakeholder mapping matrix was developed in conjunction with the design
team's relevant experience. The stakeholder mapping aims to identify all
stakeholders to be involved within the study and seeks to quantify each
stakeholders forecast level of interest in the project and likely influence over the
project.
The stakeholder’s mapping process was led by the council and supported by the
community council using their knowledge of the community.  The stakeholders
were categorised into engagement tiers reflecting their engagement hierarchy
using the mapping matrix (shown below). 
The process was collaborative with members of the study steering group
including the community council helping to define the stakeholder mapping which
evolved through the project lifecycle.
1.3 Engagement Planning
A Consultation and Engagement Plan was developed setting out the studies Stage
1 engagement programme.  The plan was used to identify all proposed activities,
the activity order, potential audience and engagement method.   
Tiered stakeholder mapping developed mapping matrix
Page 92

Page 93

2 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
The plan provides a reference point to ensure that all parties were made aware of
forthcoming actions and had a chance to contribute. This provided the
opportunity to incorporate local knowledge and best practices. The plan identified
a range of activities, which would support comprehensive engagement.  
A summary of the key project engagement activities considered in support of
stage 1 is summarised as follows:
 Study Branding Identity.
 Project Press Release.
 Study Facebook Page.
 Regular Community Visits.
 Study Website Space.
 Engagement with Local Groups.
 Press and Media Support.
 Community Feedback Tool (CFT).
 Schools Engagement.
 Public Community Engagement Event.
 Community Group Meetings.
 Stakeholder Meetings (virtual and face to face). 
A summary of each action plan is provided in the remainder of this chapter. 
1.4 Study Branding / Study Identity
Whilst some active travel studies can benefit from the development of a bespoke
study branded title and logo, it was agreed with the project steering group, at the
project outset that no branding should be applied to this project.  The primary
reason being that the strong community ethos in Campbeltown was felt to be
able to spread awareness of the project far better than any bespoke branding
and that the design team time would be better spent working with the
community.
1.5 Project Press Release (PPR)
Public Notification
The council’s Marketing and Communications (M&C) team was engaged for
support.  The PPR is typically authored by the lead council sponsor in conjunction
with the M&C team.  The resulting PPR would then be circulated internally to all
council departments and issued externally to local press and media outlets.
Councils’ Services Notification
From our experience of other active travel projects, whilst the project is managed
by Argyll and Bute Council (ABC) strategic transportation team, other council
services have an important role to play in enabling active travel projects to
progress. This means it is important that all council services which have a role to
play or interest in the project are informed and engaged from the start of the
Page 93

Page 94

3 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
project. ABC manage a portfolio of active travel projects, where all projects are
advertised and communicated within and across the council.  The portfolio
supports the sharing of project information. The PPR was issued to this portfolio
by ABC. 
1.6 Facebook Study Page
As part of the study lifecycle, a bespoke study Facebook Page was developed. 
The Campbeltown Community Facebook page was also utilised as the community
council advised that it has a wide following in the community and to be the best
way to raise awareness of the project.
The design team posted updates that encouraged anyone with an interest in the
study to engage.  The Facebook page was effective with the community engaging
to ask questions throughout the duration of the study.  The page was used as a
direct channel of communication between the design team and the community.
Our study team managed the page to maintain responsiveness.  The page was
used to inform the community of upcoming project events, advertise the teams’
visits to the community and publish our visit itinerary.  The page was also used to
share post visit photos and videos. These were produced to provide a post event
snap-shot of the design team's community interaction and to assist those unable
to attend in person. 
Page 94

Page 95

4 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
1.7 Community Visits
A key ambition of the project was to ensure the community remained central to
the project delivery and would feel strong collaboration through ‘face to face’
meetings.  
To achieve this aim, our engagement strategy centred around the design team
being physically present within the community where appropriate.
Using the community Facebook Pages, we advertised our intended visits which
included a day within the community where the design team invited and met with
available local groups, school and community councils. We advertised an itinerary
of our visits providing an opportunity for the community to ‘drop-in’ to our
evening public event.
To support the conversations, we used our digital ‘platform’ of materials.  These
included our pre-prepared constraints mapping used to record ideas and note
comments, barriers and aspirations.  
The plan was then digitised, comments added to our Community Feedback Tool
(CFT) and used as the foundation of the constraints mapping process and route
development. 
The ability to demonstrate to the community how their comments had been
considered is key to developing trust and engagement between the design team
and the community. 
Page 95

Page 96

5 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
1.8 Study Website 
To support the lifecycle of the project, a study webpage was developed and
hosted within the Connected Transport Planning Ltd (CTP) website. 
The website utilised a project template which was personalised to reflect the
project community using images of Campbeltown’s recognisable buildings to
assist in making the space familiar to the community. 
The website provided a key consultation tool for the community to access the
project, designed to be accessible 3 weeks during the consultation time and not
just a ‘bolt on’ point of reference.  The site provided access to all public exhibition
and materials, videos, a range of feedback tools and general project information. 
The site also incorporated a range of functions including a news feed, a Facebook
link and an interactive constraints and option map from where a series of micro-
animations visualisations could also be accessed. These animations were
developed from local photos taken at key points along the study route and
designed to present a vision to the audience that would assist their understanding
of the project’s possible outcomes.
The website enabled those unable to speak with us in-person to view and
comment on any of the materials at any time during the consultation period that
suited them.  Noting the challenges of consultation with a busy community, the
use of the website was a perfect tool to support wide-reaching engagement
within the community. 
Constraint mapping using face to Face meetings were constructive
Page 96

Page 97

6 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
The website was open to access by the public for a period of three weeks
following the stage 1 public event.   
1.9 Bespoke Survey Questionnaire 
A survey questionnaire was developed for the project to provide an opportunity
for the community to share their existing travels habits and existing travel modes,
requirements for a new route appetite for a route and improvements to active
travel.  The survey was designed using our experience of supporting similar
projects, where we noted that to maximise community feedback, the survey
should be less than 15 questions to minimise survey fatigue and maximise the
chance of receiving complete responses.
Using questions from previous studies as a reference, a bespoke stage 1 survey
questionnaire was developed that would capture key respondent demographics
and sought to learn how the community currently travel and their aspirations for
any future improvement. The survey formed a core component of the
engagement process and was the primary informant of quantitative feedback,
used to support the design process.
To maximise accessibility by all possible user groups and abilities, the survey was
hosted online via the study website using QR codes, website URLs and by contact
email.  The survey also included links to the study website tools such as the
Community Feedback Tool (CFT) which would assist the community in providing
comments by location on a map.
Physical copies of the survey were also distributed at various locations including
the Aqualibrium and Town Hall.  The leaflets were also hand issued by the design
team for a period during a day within the foyer of the Tesco supermarket with a
number of community representatives supporting wider distribution.
Project website using local recognisable images
Page 97

Page 98

7 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
1.10 Media Support
To raise the community’s general awareness of the study, the local press and
radio stations that cover Campbeltown were contacted, however the radio station
did not respond to multiple contact attempts.  The local newspaper in
Campbeltown; West Coast Today assisted in promoting awareness to the local
community. The paper prints provided physical and digital advertisement of the
study and was again used to advertise our contact details. ABCs Communications
Team also promoted the study and consultation events on the council's social
media pages. The community Facebook study group was another source used to
raise the community’s awareness.   
Around 1,000 event advertisement leaflets were printed to advertise the
community events.   A number of the locations planned to post the flyers either
couldn’t accept the flyer or were unable to display it. Notwithstanding, the flyers
were successfully posted at various locations. These included:
 Various frontage businesses,
 Local residential properties;
 Tesco;
 Some town centre businesses;
 Town Hall. 
Flyers were also utilised to communicate post-event ‘Thank You’ to the
community and to continue the promotion of the digital feedback options offered
via the project website.
This approach meant that those members of the community unable to attend the
advertised event would still have the option to provide feedback or ask the design
team questions, enabling wide-reaching community engagement. 
Page 98

Page 99

8 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Media coverage of the study helped raise awareness of the project stage 1 
Page 99

Page 100

9 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
1.11 Community Feedback Tool (CFT)
Our bespoke engagement platform supports community feedback using a project
map and comment pins. The tool allows comments to be added by location with
comments visible to everyone.  The tool was hosted within the project website
and again used a series of QR codes, website URLs and a named email contact to
support access to other feedback methods and information platforms.  The CFT
was pre-populated with comments noted by the community on the constraint
plan at the drop-in event. 
1.12 Event Pop-Up
To raise the community’s general awareness of the study the study team set up a
pop-up event within the foyer of the Tesco food store.  The event lasted for
around 3 hours within which the team issued advertising leaflets to passers-by to
raise awareness of the evening public event within the Town Hall. 
Page 100

Page 101

10 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
1.13 Schools Engagement
Campbeltown Grammar School
Campbeltown Grammar School catchment extends to include the community of
Campbeltown.  The school role includes 371 secondary aged pupils.
The design team arranged to visit the year 6 pupil council (15 pupils) for a 1-hour
period to learn more about the younger generation's concerns regarding walking
and cycling.  The timing of the meeting worked well as it developed on the
classes ongoing theme of problem identification and solutions.  
Following introductions and a project discussion, the class was engaged in a
conversation where the projects and project aims was introduced.
The class then participated in a project conversation discussing the challenges of
access and mobility and the options for where improvement would offer the most
value to the community.   
Campbeltown Grammar School student council meeting  
Page 101

Page 102

11 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
1.14  Parent Teacher Association (PTA)
To maximise the reach of the engagement, the school was approached to
advertise awareness of the project through communication with the local parents
via the Parent Teacher Association (PTA).
1.15 Community Public Event
Following the physical and digital advertisements, an event was hosted by the
design team and ABC within Campbeltown Town Hall Members Room on the 28th
of February 2024.  The event opened to the public at 17:30 to 20:45 with the
start time set to maximise attendance. 
10 large format, graphically designed A0 presentation boards were displayed to
provide the audience with a story map of the study, process and consultation
purpose. The event was advertised to the community through the use of banners
and bunting that was installed.  The team also posted live Facebook updates.
All attendees were given the choice of completing the project survey
questionnaire in person or accessing our range of digital tools to provide feedback
via QR codes and URL links.  A key advantage of the digital platform is that the
materials could still be accessed and commented upon at a time that best suited
the consultees. 
This was particularly relevant noting the event took place on a dark winter’s
weekday night with only 40 people managing to meet the team. A register extract
as evidence of those attending the event is shown in Appendix B. 
Page 102

Page 103

12 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Page 103

Page 104

13 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
1.16 Micro-Visual Transition Animations
To assist the public in understanding how and what an active travel route may
look like within their community a series of transition animations and sketches of
the future were developed.  Each animation was based on a photographed
viewpoint of locations along the route that the public would recognise.
The transitions lasted 10 seconds and showed the transformation of the existing
viewpoint to a proposed future vision.
The animations were hosted as part of the study website experience and
embedded within the large format constraints and options maps. 
1.17 Community Group Meetings
A number of requests to meet were issued to the various local groups within the
community.  
Unfortunately, no responses were received from the groups noting their members
may still have provided representation through the public survey questionnaire
and online materials. 
Page 104

Page 105

14 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
STAGE 1 SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
Page 105

Page 106

15 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
2 STAGE 1 SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
2.1 Sources of Community Feedback
The multiple engagement platforms made available to the community
supported them to engage with the project providing feedback both digitally
and in person.  
A summary of the received feedback by the various engagement platforms
used is summarised in the following table.
Format Responses Received
Survey (Paper) 7
Survey (Digital) 30
Community Feedback Tool (Digital) 69
Total Quantitative Responses 106
Community Public Event Attendees 40
Stakeholder Meetings 0
Total Non-Quantitative Responses 40 
1
https://www.citypopulation.de/en/uk/scotland/argyll_and_bute/S19002472_ca
mpbeltown/
2.2 Survey Sample Validation
A total of 106 quantitative responses were received from Campbeltown
population of 4,4251 residents.  
This represents a sample size of 1% which is slightly lower than the 10 – 15%
typically aimed for.  The winter dark nights / changing of the season may have
impacted on the community’s appetite to attend the public event. 
Page 106

Page 107

16 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
2.3 Survey Participant Demographics
2.4 Participant Demographics
This question was asked as it is important to capture the views of people with
varying levels of life experience to assist in the design process.
Of the participant responses received 
 16% were between 40-59 years old (27% Census 2022).  
 24% were aged between 60-79 (26% census 2022). 
 19% were 80 or over (8% census 2022).
The results indicate that the survey was completed by a disproportionately
greater number of people over the age of 80-years-old.  
32% of participants were younger than 40 (39% Census 2022). 3% preferred not
to say how old they were. 
These results highlight that the survey has been completed by more people older
than 80 and too few people aged 40-59.  
The school engagement event was well attended and their views have been
recorded through less prescriptive measures than the survey questionnaire and
are not therefore included in this summary. 
Page 107

Page 108

17 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
2.5 Participants by Gender
Of the total respondents, 50% were women / girls (49% census 2022) and 42%
as men / boys (46% census 2022).  
8% of the respondents indicated that they would prefer not to say.
Overall, the results reflect a reasonable cross-section of the community and are
broadly aligned with the census demographic split, albeit slightly less respondents
identifying as men / boys.   
2.6 Participants Relationship with the Area
Respondents were asked if they lived in Campbeltown.  This question was
relevant to ask as it is important to understand if the respondent is responding
with longer term experience of the community or as a tourist/visitor.  95% of
respondents are full time residents in the community and 5% of the respondents
have either lived in the community historically, or visited at least once a year. 
Page 108

Page 109

18 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
2.7 Participants Health
The majority of participants considered themselves to be able-bodied and did not
have a health or disability that impacted on their everyday mobility (73%). None
of the respondents indicated they did have some health or disability which limits
their day-to-day activity a lot, 19% indicated their disability or health issue would
affect them a little.  8% of respondents indicated that they would prefer not to
say. 
2.8 Participants Health Issues
Of the respondents indicating they did have a health-related disability, no one
indicated their disability was related to mobility or stamina but not breathing
related.  10% indicated a challenge relating to hearing, 0% related to poor vision,
and 30% indicated they’d prefer not to say.  
These questions are important to ask as they assist the design team in designing
for all user groups, including those with protected characteristics. 
Page 109

Page 110

19 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
2.9 Participants Employment Status
Participants were asked to qualify their employment status. This question was
relevant to ask as the design team will need to consider how the project would
support economic activity and support the movement of people to and from
places of work. 
35% of respondents indicated that they are currently not employed. 8% indicated
they were employed either part time and 16% full time, 0% indicated they were
self-employed and 41% of respondents said they were retired or not applicable. 
2
https://www.citypopulation.de/en/uk/scotland/argyll_and_bute/S19002469__ca
mpbeltown/ 
2.10 Comparison with 2022 Census
To assist in understanding more about how representative the study
demographics are, the survey results were compared with the 2022 Census for
Campbeltown2.  The results indicate that the project feedback demographic by
age and all genders is broadly comparable with the census analysis. The
community has a marginally higher proportion of female to males and has been
completed by more people older than 80 and too few people aged 40-59.   
Page 110

Page 111

20 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Overall, the study results are considered to capture a reasonable sample of the
community, capturing the views of both able bodied and those less able, those in
work and those unemployed.
2.11 Views on Opportunities and Barriers to Walking, Cycling &
Wheeling?
Participants were asked how often they walked or cycled.  This question is
relevant as it helps us understand the popularity of walking and cycling within the
community at present.  54% of respondents indicate that they walk or cycle twice
a week, 31% occasionally, and 15% every day.  These results indicate the
community is relatively active and that cycling and walking is a popular travel
mode. 
2.12 Frequency of Travel through Kinloch Park?
Participants were then asked how often they typically travelled through Kinloch
Park.
Only 11% of respondents indicated that they travel along the route once a day,
8% said twice a week, 59% indicated they travel through the park occasionally,
9% every day, and 14% said they don’t travel through Kinloch Park.
The results of this question indicate that participants don’t regularly travel
through the park frequently with the largest majority only travelling occasionally. 
Page 111

Page 112

21 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
2.13 Frequency of Travel Along Esplanade or Kinloch Park?
Participants were then asked how often they travel along the Esplanade or
Kinloch Park.
 81% of respondents indicated said occasionally, 
 11% said every day, and 
 8% said they don’t travel along the esplanade.
The results of this question indicate that participants somewhat regularly travel
along the Esplanade or around the park.   
2.14 Car Parking Frequency
Participants were then asked how often or if they park a car on the Esplanade,
John Street, or Saddell Street.
20% of respondents indicated said occasionally, 70% said they don’t have a car,
and 10% said they park elsewhere.
The results of this question indicate that parking in the study area is not a regular
requirement by those participating in the survey. 
Page 112

Page 113

22 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
2.15 Main Concerns that would Discourage Walking
Participants were asked to what their main concerns were that would discourage
them from walking along the Esplanade, john street, or Saddell Street.
33% of respondents said it’s too narrow, 22% complained about speeding traffic,
22% said they think there is a lack of lighting, 11% indicated that there is a large
volume of traffic, and 11% complained about blind spots. 
2.16 Support for Car Free Corridor
To assist the design team in developing the most appropriate route corridor, the
community was asked if a car free route along the Esplanade or Saddell Street
would encourage them to walk or cycle more.  57% of respondents said that it
would encourage them to walk along the esplanade or saddle street more, and
the other 43% said it would not. 
Page 113

Page 114

23 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
2.17 Route Corridor Preference
Another question which was asked was, which of the route options are the most
important.  30% of respondents indicated that A-B, 10% said A-C.  None of the
respondents said A-D would be preferred, 20% of respondents said C-B would be
preferred, 20% said C-D, and 20% chose D-B.
Based on a slim margin and small sample, A-B, C-B, C-D and D-B were the
preferred routes to be progressed. 
2.18 Changes to Kinloch Park
The community was then also asked what changes are needed in Kinloch Park.  
 20% of respondents indicated flat ground, 
 50% said improved Lighting, 
 10% said Kinloch Park needs bike lanes, 
 10% said widened pavements, and 
 10% said it needs to be well maintained. 
Page 114

Page 115

24 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
The community was then also asked if they would prefer a walking/cycling rote
through or around Kinloch Park.  
 50% said they would prefer it to go through, 
 10% around, and 
 40% indicated they have no preference. 
2.19 Encouraging More Active Travel
Participants were asked if they thought this project will encourage more
walking/cycling.  
 60% indicated that they thought it would, and 
 40% said they didn’t think it would. 
Page 115

Page 116

25 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
2.20 Participants Thoughts and Aspirations for Improvements
Participants were then asked about their thoughts, aspirations and considerations
the proposed design should take cognisance off. To enable the processing and
presentation of the responses, the responses were categorised into a number of
themes.  A summary of the themes is presented as follows and shown in the
chart opposite.
 Improved Lighting
 More Bins
 More Parking Spaces
 More Benches/Seats
The feedback from the community to this question provides a good level of
insight into the challenges the design is required to address and highlights the
challenges in maintaining a design balance that will address all the points
proportionately. Bar chart figure is shown below.   
Page 116

Page 117

26 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com  STAGE 1 COMMUNITY FEEDBACK TOOL (CFT) RESULTS
Page 117

Page 118

27 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
3 STAGE 1 COMMUNITY FEEDBACK TOOL (CFT)
RESULTS
3.1 Summary of Results
48 initial responses were received through the Community Feedback Tool (CFT)
followed by a further 21 which were provided to the design team to add (69 in
total).  These captured the publics views following the public engagement.  The
responses were provided anonymously and no age or origin details of the
recipient were recorded.
Participant's comments were located along the route.  In the majority, comments
were positive with participants providing concerns relating to visibility, a lack of
provision for pedestrians to cross with concerns at the Esplanade as more traffic
generated.  
Some of the comments provided detailed summaries of localised challenges which
will greatly assist the design development process.
Stage 1 comments are shown from number 1 to 69 in the following figure.
The feedback received is presented graphically and verbatim as follows. 
Page 118

Page 119

28 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Page 119

Page 120

29 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
1 Kinloch Road needs 2 safe crossings. This would slow down traffic speeding into
town. Also there is a need for a bus/lorry park to take traffic off promenade.
Widen road to allow people to walk safely away from bikes. Roundabout at Big
Kiln to slow down speeding traffic coming into town from Machrihanish road.
2 A steep street - wheels can go at high speed down this hill. Dangerous for
walkers as has been shown on occasion when someone was knocked to the
ground entering her close. Lost 4 teeth.
3 Leave kinloch green and esplanade alone. Please
4 Large vans and motor homes are often sitting parked here. They are an eye sore
and have often been parked on the pavement.
5 Disability accesible housieng is here with no where to go due to lack of drop
kerbs
5 A crossing is really needed here, often used if walking from co-op to tesco you
can have a long wait unless cars stop for you 
6 A crossing is really needed here, often used if walking from co-op to tesco you
can have a long wait unless cars stop for you
7 A crossing is really needed here, often used if walking from co-op to tesco you
can have a long wait unless cars stop for you 
8 re-surface the road at the Esplanade 
9 New cycle path between the tesco and co-op please 
10 New Zebra/ Toucan crossing required here 
11 New Zebra/ Toucan crossing required here 
12 Disability accessible housing is here 
13 New Zebra/ Toucan crossing required here 
14 This is another initiative to isolate C'town. There are plenty open areas within the
town, but many families are finding it difficult to benefit from the surrounding
countryside and beaches. this is not an inland urban area 
15 Linking up the proposed plan is key otherwise we are left with disjointed
pathways 
16 Flooding, high winds, loch debris, linking north to south with existing one-ways
preventing walking and cycling 
17 Weather is a factor - high winds/ high tides and flooding happens - reclaimed
land! 
18 Weather is a factor - high winds/ high tides and flooding happens - reclaimed
land! 
19 People in wheelchairs do not go out in windy weather! In future - helpers do
shopping for them 
20 Burnside garage using streets within area and outwith 
21 Parking an issue around Esplanade 
22 Where will all the cars park - Why? 
23 dropped kerbs needed here 
24 A safe crossing tot he pool/ library is very much needed. It is a fast, dangerous
road, especially for children and anyone who cant walk very quickly 
Page 120

Page 121

30 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
25 Esplanade - please no bikes/people together in one lane - Dangerous! 
26 Cars/ Campervans where can they park? Some new car park? 
27 junction accross from B/Bank garage i sdangerous, viewing on leaving B/Bank
road double yellow lines accross vehicle parking 
28 Improved crossings to social housing 
29 Extend Aqualibrium car park 
30 Definitely not! 
31 Cycle path needed here 
32 poor line of sight due to parking
33 Dangerous junction needs to be changed! or lights
34 No! 
35 Where will all the cars park? 
36 New parking outwith town - encourage more walking = less parking =>not
obstructing dropped kerbs/line of sight and campore etc 
37 There are very few drop kerbs for anyone in a wheelchair and they dont offer
ANY circular routes 
38 Total waste of money. No way! Ridiculous 
39 Paths are on all the car parking places, wide streets and pavements so I dont
think the paths are necessary here. 
40 Crossing needed for Pool 
41 Large vehicles / and bus garage 
42 Links to Primary school eg Dalintober 
43 Has a survey been done on how well cycle path or meddows is used for cycling -
not as many! as kids are now jumping on to the road from the kerb on
skateboards 
44 Existing footpaths through Kinloch park are perfectly adequate for walkers/
cyclists 
45 Resurface the road on esplanade 
46 There needs to be a circular route 
47 Improve the exisiting road along the esplanade 
48 Resurgace esplanade to allow cyclists/ drivers avoid potholes 
49 Safe cycle path will encourage more people to cycle 
50 Existing paths are good to walk and cycle along 
51 Existing footpaths through Kinloch park are perfectly adequate for walkers/
cyclists - perfect as it is! 
52 Existing footpaths through Kinloch park are perfectly adequate for walkers/
cyclists 
53 Money spend on traffic crossings on Aqualibrum road 
54 Parking needs addressed at the sailing club 
55 Parking needs addressed at the sailing club 
Page 121

Page 122

31 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
56 Need a safe crossing from Royal Hotel accross to the esplanade 
57 Cycle lanes need to join up if the are going to be safe, otherwise cyclists have to
go back to the road 
58 Resurface the cutting please 
59 Machirhanish to Campbeltown cycle route please 
60 But where do they go after this? High Askomil dangerous for cycling
61 We need campervan facilities - for waste this is being deposited into the sea 
62 Route Z - existing footpaths on Kinloch green are adequate, kinloch green used
as an event space
63 safer crossing at Aqualibrum and Royal hotel
64 Car park needed- resurface road on esplanade - safety for existing cyclists -
removal of overnight parking on esplanade 
65 No removal of where people park 
66 Good idea to surface the cutting 
67 Cycle route to Craigsfarm on A83 which would provide a safe circular route to
moss road and back via stewarton to town 
68 I approve of all as I cycle 
69 Walking/cycle route from C'Town to Machirhanish 
Page 122

Page 123

32 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
65
STAGE 1 STAKEHOLDER FEEDBACK
Page 123

Page 124

33 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
4 STAGE 1 STAKEHOLDER FEEDBACK
To support the design optioneering process, a number of stakeholders identified
within the stakeholder mapping were engaged with. A range of engagement
methods were used for each group.
4.1 Stakeholder Meetings
The study team met with a range of stakeholders identified through the study
mapping process.  We utilised consultation mandates to plan 1-2-small group
workshop sessions with key stakeholders to introduce the team and discuss the
study.  Stakeholders included:
 Key council staff;
 Key local groups; 
 Local Community Council; and
 Other key stakeholders. 
The workshops followed a similar format providing an introduction to the study,
setting ambitions, and introducing the team.  
4.2 ABC Network Management
The team met with the ABC Traffic and Development Officer, Network
Management virtually to discuss the Campbeltown project. Following a
presentation of the project to date, a constructive conversation explored a
number of topics including: 
 Route alignment challenges, particularly relating to the community desire
to retain on street car parking.
 Agreement that provision for larger vehicles / campervans in an
appropriate location would help support council objectives.
 Support for improved parking management, including marked parking
bays.
 Discussion re potential for removal of small area of parking to improve
visibility of the war memorial.
 Discussion re need to minimise future maintenance requirements.  
Page 124

Page 125

34 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
4.3 Council Statutory Consultees
A summary of the other stakeholder feedback received is summarised as follows. 
4.4 Non-Council Statutory Consultees
A summary of the non-council stakeholder feedback received is summarised as
follows. 
4.5 Community Groups
Community groups have been engaged through the public engagement process. 
No direct responses have been received. 
4.6 Traditionally Harder to Reach Groups / Individuals
The Royal National Institute for the Blind (RNIB) was consulted and highlighted
that there is no specific representation for Campbeltown.
4.7 Landowners and Affected Parties
The design team worked with the local community / stakeholder feedback to
identify potentially impacted landowners.  The Registry of Scotland (ROS) was
contacted to obtain current legal land ownership details.  The ROS confirmed that
the study area is within the ownership of Argyll and Bute Council (ABC).  
ABC Marine Operations Not Consulted
ABC Fleet Public Transport No Issue
ABC Outdoor Access No Issue
ABC Youth Services No Issue
ABC Community Development
Team
No Issue
ABC Economic Development No Issue
SEPA Not Consulted. 
Scottish Water No Issue
SSE No Issue
Page 125

Page 126

35 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
STAGE 1 BARRIERS AND OPPORTUNTIES 
Page 126

Page 127

36 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
5 STAGE 1 BARRIERS AND OPPORTUNITIES 
5.1 The Challenges to Active Travel
The community engagement programme has identified a number of barriers to
travelling sustainably.  These have been categorised and summarised as follows:
 Lack of lowered curbs;
 Poorly surfaced pavements;
 Parking along esplanade to be maintained;
 Protecting Kinloch Park is a concern;
 Lack of provision for disabled and minority user groups;
 Lack of pedestrian crossings;
 Difficult road crossings at points;
 Connection across Kinloch Road to connect social housing and community
allotments; 
 A preference for no impact on parking; and
 More provision for campervans and overnight parking.   
Page 127

Page 128

37 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
STAGE 2 – COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Page 128

Page 129

38 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
6 STAGE 2 – COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 
6.1 Further Engagement
Following from the conclusion of the stage 1 consultation and completion of the
stage 1 options feasibility report, all options were shortlisted for further
development and further consultation. 
The decision to progress the stage 2 development of all route corridors was partly
due to the limited responses received during stage 1 and the anticipation that by
providing an example of what could be achieved, a greater proportion of the
public would engage during stage 2.
To support the process, the engagement plan as described within the stage 1
section of this report was repeated and included the following key actions:
 A second public event was held in Campbeltown Town Hall on the 28th of
August 2024 between 16:30pm and 20:30pm.  The team tested a different
presentation approach to present the concept to the public. 
 A video infomercial was used as an alternative to large format A1 boards. The
infomercial was presented as four chapters, each considering the most asked
about topics relating to the project.  These included ‘funding’, ‘why this
project’, ‘the project process’ and ‘stage 1 outcomes.  
 A ‘flythrough’ narrated video of the concept design was presented for the
public and provided the main feature of the consultation. 
 Two very large format 1.2m x 2.0m long concept design prints were
displayed for attendees to add notes to. 
 Graphically designed A3 presentation sheets with FAQs were also displayed
for the community to view.  
 The event was advertised to the community through the use of local press
coverage in Appendix A (West Coast Today), local poster advertising and
support offered by the Campbeltown Community Council.  
 The team again posted regular updates using social media. These updates
being reposted by the community multiple times across the community’s own
social media spaces including the ‘What’s on Campbeltown’ Facebook page.
It was noted that during the stage 1 event some attendees experienced some
difficulty in working with the map-based images. To improve on the community’s
interface with the study materials a ‘flythrough’ video was produced for stage 2
using a combination of Google Earth and the scheme concept design. The ‘fly
through’ was projected onto the Town Hall wall using a large format projector
and supported by narration provided by the study team.
All visitors attending the event were given the choice of completing the project
survey questionnaire in person or accessing our range of digital tools to provide
feedback via QR codes and URL links.  A key advantage of the digital platform is,
that even with the poor impact of weather on attendance, the materials could still
be accessed and commented upon at a time that best suited the consultees. 
Page 129

Page 130

39 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
The event took place on a wet rainy weekday night. A total of 117 people
managed to meet the team (90% increase from the 61 attendees for stage 1). 
During the event, the majority of visitors were observed by the design team to
engage with the infomercial before progressing to visit the ‘fly through’ video and
then congregating around the large format plans to discuss the concept.  Overall,
the event was considered a success with the majority of visitors taking time to
engage with the materials provided and then asking questions.
It is noted, the value offered by the online engagement platform also allowed the
community to still provide their feedback for a period of six weeks post event. A
register extract of those attending the event is shown in Appendix B.
Post event, leaflets and surveys were left on the counter of the Town Hall front
desk and the large format concept plans left on display for a period of four weeks
before being moved to the Aqualibrium.
6.2 Event Advertising
The advertising approach to stage 2 was similar to stage 1 with the key
difference of scaling back the event leaflet distribution following further advise
and support from the community council.  It was agreed that the use of paper-
based leaflets would have limited value within the community is more reliant on
digital media (Facebook) and word of mouth.  Accordingly, only 500 leaflets were
printed for stage 2 and advertised through the town three weeks in advance of
the planned public event. Leaflets were again distributed by ‘Keeping it Local’
whilst the design team issued leaflets directly to the library, local businesses,
Town Hall and Tesco.
The study Facebook page alongside the community page were used to advertise
the project with a number of post prompts issued in advance of public
engagement events.
A paid for advertisement was also take out within the Argyllshire Advertiser who
subsequently printed a number of editorial extracts.
During the design team visit to the community, the digital advertising totem was
also deployed to raise community awareness of the forthcoming event and
project.
Campbeltown Grammar also agreed to circulate information to parents and pupils
through the PTA and student council.
The public engagement event was open to the public for comment for a total
period of six weeks (three weeks in stage 1) to maximise the opportunity for
public feedback. 
The project consultation period was supported again through the use of an
updated virtual engagement room which had subsequently also been revised to
improve accessibility and incorporate software updates. 
Page 130

Page 131

40 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
6.3 High School Engagement
Campbeltown Grammar School pupils were provided with QR tear off slips to gain
access to the online project survey. Some of the pupils preferred to have paper
copy’s which they filled in and handed back to the team to process it digitally.
The feedback from the younger generation of Campbeltown provided overall
positive feedback about the project and thought that Campbeltown would benefit
from the scheme proposal. Some had said that it would encourage them to use
the Esplanade more and make them feel safe to cycle around the town.
All school pupils engaged in project conversation and either completed a survey
response on their own or provided feedback that the team used to complete a
survey on their behalf at that time. 
6.4 Aqualibrium Drop-In
On the day of the public event the design team dropped into the Aqualibrium and
set up a project pop up display within the foyer.  The digital display Toblerone
was again used and was successful in attracting interest from the public.
As the centre was ‘quiet’ on the day, the design team was only able to speak to a
few people to discuss the project. 
Page 131

Page 132

41 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Stage 2 - The town hall public project engagement
Page 132

Page 133

42 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Stage 2 – Concept 3D flythrough extract
Page 133

Page 134

43 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com  STAGE 2 – SURVEY QUESTIONAIRE RESULTS
Page 134

Page 135

44 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
7 STAGE 2 - SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS
7.1 Sources of Community Feedback
The multiple engagement platforms made available to the community
supported the community to engage with the project providing feedback
both digitally and physically.  
A summary of the received feedback by the various engagement platforms
used is summarised in the following table.
Format Responses Received
Survey (Paper) 4
Survey (Digital) 78
Community Feedback Tool (CFT Digital) 13
Total Quantitative Responses 95
Community Public Event Attendees 117
Stakeholder Meetings 3
Community Council Public Meeting Attendance 4
Total Non-Quantitative Responses 124 
3 Census 2022
7.2 Survey Sample Validation
A total of 95 quantitative responses were received from Campbeltown’s
population of 4,4253. This represents a sample size of around 3% which is lower
than the 10 – 15% typically aimed for. 
However, the stage 2 results are higher than the stage 1 results which were 1%.  
The lower-than-aimed sample does not reflect the effort invested to engage with
the community and the value of extending the consultation period and giving
them a final ‘nudge’ to get involved.  
The stage 2 public event was undertaken during cloudy, rainy summer’s day
which will also have had an adverse impact on the community’s appetite to make
their voices heard or leave their homes. 
Page 135

Page 136

45 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Stage 2 – Section A - Participant Demographics
7.3 Participants Age
This question was asked as it is important to capture the views of people with
varying levels of life experience to assist in the design process.
Of the participant responses received: 
 31% were between 40-59 years old (27% Census 2022).  
 40% were aged between 60-79 (26% census 2022). 
 3% were older than 79 (8% census 2022).
The results indicate that the survey was completed by a disproportionately
greater number of people between 40- and 79-year-old.  
23% of participants were younger than 40 (39% Census 2022). 4% preferred not
to say how old they were. 
These results highlight that the survey has been completed by more people aged
40 – 79 and too few people aged under 40 or over 80.  
The school engagement event was well attended and their views have been
recorded through less prescriptive measures than the survey questionnaire and
are not therefore included in this summary. 
Page 136

Page 137

46 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
7.4 Participants Gender
Of the total respondents, 48% were women / girls (49% census 2022) and 46%
as men / boys (46% census 2022).  
1% of respondents identified as non-binary and 3% of the respondents indicated
that they would prefer not to say.
Overall, the results reflect a reasonable cross-section of the community and are
broadly aligned with the census demographic split, albeit slightly less respondents
identifying as men / boys.   
7.5 Participants Health
The majority of participants considered themselves to be able-bodied and did not
have a health or disability that impacted on their everyday mobility (74%). 6%
indicated they have some health or disability which limits their day-to-day activity
a lot, However, 13% of respondents did indicate that their disability or health
issue would affect them a little. 5% participants preferred to not say anything.
Compared with stage 1 results, stage 2 has less responses from those with more
severe limiting health issues (6% stage 1 vs. zero in stage 2). 
Page 137

Page 138

47 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
7.6 Details of Participant Health
Of the respondents indicating they did have a health-related disability, 33%
indicated they preferred not to say, 24% disability was related to mobility, 10%
have mental health issues, 10% have issues of hearing and 5% have stamina and
breathing related issues.
These questions are important to ask as they assist the design team in designing
for all user groups, including those with protected characteristics. 
7.7 Participants Employment Status
Participants were asked to qualify their employment status. This question was
relevant to ask as the design team will need to consider how the project would
support economic activity and support the movement of people to and from
places of work as part of ‘everyday’ journeys.
18% of the respondents indicated that they are currently not employed.  38%
indicated they were employed either part time or full time, 6% indicated they
were self-employed and 38% of respondents said they were retired or not
applicable. 
Page 138

Page 139

48 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
7.8 Comparison with 2022 Census4
To assist in understanding more about how representative the survey
demographics are, the survey results were compared with the 2022 census5 for
Campbeltown.  The results indicate that the project feedback demographic by age
and all genders is broadly comparable with the census.
Overall, the study results are considered to capture a good sample of the
community, capturing the views of both able bodied and those less able, those in
work and those unemployed or studying.
The results also show an improvement on the stage 1 results with the
demographics presenting a more representative match with the census. 
4 https://www.citypopulation.de/en/uk/scotland/argyll_and_bute/S19002469__campbeltown/ 
7.9 Participants Residential Status
Respondents were asked if they lived in Campbeltown. This question was
relevant to ask as it is important to understand if the respondent is responding
with longer term experience of the community or as a tourist/visitor.
• 97% of respondents are full time residents in the community.
• 3% have either lived in the community historically, or visited at least once a
year.
The results indicate that nearly all of the respondents are commenting as longer-
term members of the community. 
5https://www.citypopulation.de/en/uk/scotland/argyll_and_bute/S52000547__rothesay/ 
Page 139

Page 140

49 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Stage 2 – Section B - Participant Travel Habits
7.10  Walking, wheeling, cycling and future mobility
All participants (residents and visitors) were asked if they think this project will
help to improve walking, wheeling and future mobility for the community. 
A summary of the results is presented below.
 66% of the participants had said yes to improving walking, wheeling, cycling
and future mobility
 34% had said no or don’t think this would bring any improvement to walking,
wheeling, cycling and future mobility for the community. 
7.11 Views if the Concepts Offers Benefit to the Community
Participants were asked which of if they think this concept will be beneficial and
well suited for the community’s needs.  This question helps us understand the
communities’ support on the design choices from stage 2.  
 55% of respondents indicate that they ‘Yes’ (Support) to the project 
 27% of respondents ‘No’ (Don’t Support). 18% participants responded to
‘Don’t know’. 
 These results indicate the community is leaning more to the ‘Yes’ option
with a more positive ambitious outcome. 
Page 140

Page 141

50 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
7.12 Parking Along the Esplanade
All participants were asked How often do they park at the Esplanade.
 61% of the participants answered they never park
 15% say they park twice a week
 13% said they park three times a week
 6% said they park once a day
 4% said they park daily
Overall, a relatively large proportion of the total survey respondents say they
never park their vehicle within the study area on a regular basis. 
This is relevant when considering in conjunction with the number of comments
provided by respondents in relation to overall parking deficiency within the study
area. These are qualified later within this chapter.   
Page 141

Page 142

51 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
7.13 Is the Concept Design aligned with the needs of the community?
To help us understand how participants currently feel about the concepts,
participants were then asked whether they are ‘pleased’ or ‘concern’ of the
concept.  58% of respondents said they are pleased with the outcomes brought
from stage 1s feedback in the stage 2s concept design. 42% indicated that they
have concerns and didn’t think it was sufficient enough.
Considering the results cumulatively. Most of the community are on balance
pleased with the overall design that meets the community feedback needs and
would prefer a more ambitious enhanced scheme. 
7.14 Provisions for Seats and Bins
The community was asked whether or not that they though the provision of seats
and bins were sufficient enough.  64% thinks the provision of bins and seats is
sufficient, and the 36% left, thinks that the provision of seats and bins are
insufficient.
These results are fairly conclusive that the provision for placemaking and facilities
to support user welfare is well aligned with community expectations. 
Page 142

Page 143

52 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
7.15 Respondents Views Regarding Perception of Project Value
and Intended Use
The results of the survey feedback were further interrogated to better understand
how the community have responded to the concept.  Each survey response was
interrogated to further understand how well informed the respondents are whilst
providing feedback.  The comments were varied in detail with some statements
including excessive detail and the use of explanative language.  These types of
response are not typically associated with a civilised community.
220 of comments in total were provided individual across the 78 surveys received. 
In the majority, most respondents when providing a comment, they supported
the concept very positively (15% of total responses and 20% of all comments
provided). From a review of the surveys a number of observations were made.
 14% of all responses commented as ‘non-supportive’ of the concept and have
left feedback on what they don’t like or what their concerns may be. 5% of
all comments received indicated the respondent were still unsure about the
proposal or have many questions to be answered. 5% of the commented that
the project was not needed or unwanted (6% of total comments made). 
 10% had commented about more crossing needed in the scheme at the
Esplanade and Saddell street, most insisted the main road at Kinloch Road
A83 (The Aqualibrium) to be the area where crossing is needed for the
communities to cross safely.  10% felt made comment regarding the extent
of placemaking provided.  A total of 10% of respondents felt the project
would need more parking enforcement for campervans and cars parking
along the Esplanade i.e. park and pay meters. This compares with 7% of all
comments relating to concerns regarding the overall number of parking
spaces provided.
 3% suggested for the cycle route to be removed as it was a safety concern
for pedestrians using the footway.
 positive support for parking provisions along the Esplanade and seem to be a
solution to help people to park safely.
7.16 Respondents Views on the Suitability of the Design
10% of all comments received mentioned about the community landscape about
having more placemaking items in the scheme, like more benches, litter bins,
playparks, football pitch, basketball and a canopy shelter.
 A total of 5% of all comments received suggests that the project would be
best relocated elsewhere. 2% respondents had requested for the scheme to
extend to Machrihanish or The Prom.
 A total of 5% of all comments received suggests that the project would be
best relocated elsewhere instead of Campbeltown. 2% respondents had
requested for the scheme to extend further towards Machrihanish or the
Promenade.
 A summary of the comments received by percentage popularity and a
summary of comments received as a percentage of total survey responses
received is presented in the following charts. 
Page 143

Page 144

53 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
The results are summarised below.   
Page 144

Page 145

54 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Page 145

Page 146

55 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
STAGE 2 - COMMUNITY FEEDBACK TOOL (CFT) RESULTS
Page 146

Page 147

56 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
8 STAGE 2 - COMMUNITY FEEDBACK TOOL
(CFT) RESULTS
8.1 Summary
A total of 13 additional responses were received through the Community
Feedback Tool (CFT) for the stage 2 consultation (83 total).  The responses were
provided anonymously and no age or origin details of the recipients were
recorded.
Participant's comments were located along the route. Comments covered a wide
range of subjects including providing challenge on the detail of the concept
operation with a focus on septic tank conflicts, parking and access to the church
and approach to the project.
The stage 2 CFT feedback received is presented by location and verbatim in the
following figure and table. Each stage 2 comment reference is shown in them
figure.
Stage 2 comment reference are shown from number 70 to 83. (13 comments)
The stage 2 feedback received is presented graphically and verbatim in the
following figure and table which can be found below. 
Page 147

Page 148

57 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Page 148

Page 149

58 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
70 If the council can't afford to upkeep the planting in the Burnside Square, how are
they going to afford the upkeep of the planting area on North Shore Street. 
71 crossings should be proper pedestrian crossings and not just a strip of a different
colour. That way all know it is an official crossing and traqffic should adhere to
the appropriate crossing rules. 
72 A zebra crossing here would be beneficial - very wide road which doesn’t give
pedestrians with buggies , small children, wheelchair users etc time to cross 
73 Wouldn’t see a need for a cycle lane here - short stretch of road, single track and
very wide. Wide enough for bikes on the road and plenty of room for pedestrians
on the pavement 
74 crossing needed here 
75 A crossing is desperately need here as traffic travels at at high speed along this
road as it is the main road into town is very busy. Narrowing of road with crossing
would provide safe crossing and slow traffic. 
76 Regularly traffic is seen going wrong way down this one way street. Recently
there was a serious accident involving a gas tanker and a car. Gas tanker tried to
go wrong way down Lochend street and car hit it. This street would beneift from
being made a cul de sac with the aqualibrium avenue end of Lochend street
being closed offand turning area created on waste ground at the side of fiddlers
bar. 
77 Like the idea of widening pavements at war memorial to prevent parking and
making a nicer space. Not sure about one way system at the kinolch road end of
the esplanade, could cause more confusion although a crossing is needed there.
78 This junction is a total disaster. Accident waiting to happen. Impossible for cars to
see what is comong along kinloch road when exiting burnbank street. Parking
should be banned on the lower half of burnbank street where the kintyre hire
garage is and either side of the junction onto kinloch road. 
79 I cannot see how any of your plans would be an improvements. We could do with
a crossing on Kinloch road but this road did not seem to be on your plans 
80 two unnecessarily wide-mouthed junctions here at Princes St/N Shore Street -
not very pedestrian friendly especially for children, elderly people and disabled
people. These could be narrowed without inconveniencing anyone but appear
untouched in the latest plans 
81 There needs to be a formal pedestrian crossing with traffic lights stopping traffic
here to allow people to cross this busy road safely to the Aqualibrium/Football
Pitches and Park beyond. Just luck there have been no serious accidents here to
date. 
82 Pedestrian have to wait too long at these signals
83 A96 route signage directs drivers to use The Brae to access Cawder and Croy.
Page 149

Page 150

59 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Page 150

Page 151

60 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Page 151

Page 152

61 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Summary of Respondents Views by Category
In order to enable processing of the wide range of comments received, an
analysis of the CFT comments received was undertaken.  From an initial review of
the comments a number of categories were identified, which the design team
believes best summaries the points being raised in the comments.  
By grouping comments into categories, a better understanding of the
communities’ overall views on the concept can be understood.  
Each individual locational specific comment will be utilised as part of any stage 3
design development.
A total of 12 CFT were done during stage 2 and reviewing the data indicates that:
 21% of the comments are supportive of the scheme. Some of the
supported responders also mentioned about more crossings need to be in
places like Saddell Street and Kinloch Road A83 (Infront of the
Aqualibrium). These comments accounted of more crossings are 24%.
 14% of the CFT comments related were unsure or don’t know what to
think about the new layout. It has been mentioned about concerns of
parking on the esplanade, but also having a one-way system being put in
place at the south where the bus station is located which 7% expressed
concerns of the new bus station layout. 
 10% of the comments have expressed a mis understanding or may have
been mis informed about the project and the funding. 3% of these
responders had mentioned about the whole thing being a waste of
money or not needed for the remote community.
 7% of the community responders had spoken about not having a cycle
lane passing through the Esplanade. Footways should be widened and
made to be a more shared path. The Esplanade is wide enough to create
a larger footway and respondents feel this would be a safer approach
then having a cycle lane with crossings.
 A total of 14% mentioned about parking provisions and parking
enforcement concerns within the scheme, 7% were happy with the
general support of parking provision throughout the scheme. The other
7% think more enforcement is needed, issues should be tackling the
larger vehicles who park overnight i.e. Campervans on the Esplanade.
Some even suggested about having parking wardens and parking meters
along the Esplanade should be considered as it can get very busy,
especially in the summer season. 
Page 152

Page 153

62 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
STAGE 2 - STAKEHOLDER FEEDBACK
Page 153

Page 154

63 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
9 STAGE 2 - STAKEHOLDER FEEDBACK
Following the public engagement process, the emerging network was refined
through a workshop with key stakeholders. A range of engagement methods
were used for each group.
9.1 Council Statutory Consultees
A summary of the stakeholder feedback received is summarised as follows: 
9.2 Working with Stakeholders
Argyll and Bute Network Management (Workshop 1)
 Due to carriageway construction and drainage arrangements, developing
the route on the Esplanade route on coastal footway side was agreed to
be the beneficial route option.
 The operational carriageway width must be maintained at a 6.5m to give
extra space allowance for HGV and Buses.  It was agreed that the road
narrowing would improve pedestrian crossing opportunities and help
encourage lower vehicle speeds.
 Improvements to parking capacity along the route are supported. Any
changes should consider seasonal parking impacts and the demand for
coach and camper van parking where possible.
 Improved access for pedestrians to visit the war memorial by reducing
car parking spaces on the inlands. To stop cars and campervans from
parking in front of the memorial.
 Based on the feedback received, the concept design was developed
considering the above noted points. The emerging design was again
subject to review by ABC network management and maintenance
representatives. 
ABC Roads 4 workshops / meetings in total concluding
with no issues with resulting concepts as
presented to the public.
ABC Marine Operations No known issue
ABC Fleet Public Transport No known issue
ABC Outdoor Access No known issue
ABC Planning No known issue
ABC Youth Services No known issue
ABC Community Development
Team
No known issue
ABC Economic Development No known issue
Page 154

Page 155

64 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Argyll and Bute Network Management (Workshop 2)
A second stakeholder workshop was initiated to discuss the approach to review
the emerging concept. The current revised design includes:
 Considering the esplanade in three sections.  An addition boulevard type
space has been created in the middle of the route adjacent to the war
memorial including seating and planting.  This approach creates three
‘blocks’ of placemaking design along the route and minimises the design
impact on parking along the route. The ‘blocks’ of placemaking providing
seating and dwell spaces ‘dotted’ along the route and offering a
symmetry to the existing landscape block at Kinloch Road and North
Street.
 Consideration of how the design will terminate at the north of Saddle
Street and provide onward connection to Dalintober Primary School. 
Introduction of a build-out at the junction to aid pedestrian crossing
movements was discussed.  Concerns relating to vehicle movements from
the adjacent distillery was also discussed.
 Adding additional parking to the southern extent of the route achieved by
widening into the Kinloch Park by around 1m. Converting a bus parking
into additional parking bays for general use.
 The junction to the south of the route with Kinloch Park was presented to
operate as a one-way in a clockwise gyratory with the existing bus gate
removed.
Argyll and Bute Network Management (Workshop 3)
A third stakeholder workshop was initiated to discuss the approach to review the
emerging concept. Key consideration include:
 Discussion regarding extending the scheme to Dalaruan Street to better
interface the design with the school.  Noted that the limited corridor
space would require introduction of a wider traffic management scheme
extending to Mill Street or New Parliament Place.  The conclusion of the
optioneering workshop confirmed that the concept should terminate at
the junction of Dalaruan Street with Saddell Street. 
Page 155

Page 156

65 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Transport Scotland (TS) Network Management (Workshop 1)
A stakeholder workshop was initiated to discuss the approach to review the
emerging concept and alignment of the concept with the Kinloch Road scheme
being developed by TS. Key design considerations include:
 Detail of proposed crossing points and use of signal control.  It was noted
that as the road widths had been significantly narrowed, these crossings
may operate effectively as uncontrolled.
 Use of raised tables was discussed and noted that these would not be
acceptable to ABC due to ongoing noise and maintenance concerns;
 TS generally supportive of the proposed one-way gyratory system at
Esplanade end;
 Noting feedback from the public regarding improved crossing opportunity
at Kinloch Road.  This should integrate the triangular island to the west
within which a community garden is being developed.
 TS promoting introduction of advisory on street cycle lanes, removal of
some parking bays and pedestrian crossing improvement adjacent to the
Aqualibrium;
 TS will be exploring other options including use of northern footway of
Kinloch Road. 
Transport Scotland (TS) Network Management (Workshop 2)
A second stakeholder workshop was initiated to discuss the approach to review
the emerging concept. Key design considerations include:
 Subject to funding TS planning to implement the Kinloch Road design by
year end 2024.  This may change;
 TS agreed that the one-way gyratory change planned at the town end of
the Esplanade may be best promoted through the TS design. 
9.3 Non-Council Statutory Consultees
A summary update of the non-Council stakeholder feedback received is
summarised as follows: 
9.4 Community Groups
Community groups have been engaged through the public engagement process.
9.5 ABC Economic Development
A stakeholder workshop was initiated to discuss the concept and were overall
supportive 
SEPA Not Consulted
Scottish Water No response received
SSE No response received
Page 156

Page 157

66 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
9.6 West Coast Motors (WCM)
Unfortunately, no contact with WCM was possible prior to the stage 2 public
event.  However, during the event WCM did provide comment on the concept.
The main points of concerns relating to:
 The ‘opening up’ of the bus stance to general traffic and potential safety
related concerns due to vehicle and passenger interaction;
 Reduction in the number of the bus stances provided by repurposing the
south side carriageway bus bay into general parking bays.  Further
investigation may be required to confirm the operational impacts of this
change;
It was agreed that further conversation would be required with WCM at stage 3
to understand their concerns in greater detail. An option to reinstate the south
side bus laybys was discussed which might provide an agreeable compromised
solution.
As identified through conversation with Transport Scotland, further assessment of
the operational impacts of the proposed change to junction would be required as
part of the detailed design next stage. 
9.7 Traditionally Harder to Reach Groups / Individuals
Consultation with The Royal National Institute for the Blind (RNIB) was again
attempted and again noted that there is no specific representation for
Campbeltown.
It is noted that feedback received does include representation by minority groups
and those with protected characteristics.
9.8 Landowners and Affected Parties
It is noted that the scheme is located on council land and retained within public
adopted road. 
Page 157

Page 158

67 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
10 OUR LESSONS LEARNT
During the engagement plan, records of each activity were maintained to assist in the evaluation of how effective the engagement process has been.  The review
process included two design team workshop sessions, where the teams’ thoughts and ideas were shared to assist in ‘destressing’ and improving future engagement
both during Stage 2 of this study but also all future studies.  The summarised results of the workshop sessions are summarised as follows:
Observation / Issue Mitigation
Face to Face meetings have been most effective in supporting feedback Maximise time within the Community
Lack of engagement with traditionally harder to reach groups Work with care centres to capture views of older and younger community members
including those with registered disabilities 
Under representation from younger adults Focused workshop with younger adults during Stage 2
Use of digital engagement materials, podcast, flythrough offers greater audience
participation
Progress service offers in the future using more interactive digital material
Facebook and social media study page offers limited value to project feedback and are
best reserved for use as event advertising
Use community pages as alternative to study page
Mis-information distributed via social media cannot be controlled if using community
social media pages
Minimise messaging and provide references. Social media also provides an "echo
chamber" for views and can encourage some respondents to adopt views of the loudest
voices rather than taking the time to fully understand the project for themselves
Project materials note being effectively engaged with or understood Consider using easier to understand materials to assist the public to engage with the
materials provided.  Options include videos and infomercials as alterative to presentation
boards
Terminology including "active travel" and "wheeling" are not well understood across the
whole community
Consider use of project language. Avoid use of Active Travel and explain on wider
mobility improvement in plain English
Working with local press can influence the effectiveness of published information. 
Reporters will revert to ‘making up’ information to fill in blanks.
Provide press information pack. Work with press reps direct
Page 158

Page 159

68 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Survey questionnaire design too long to be completed effectively.  Reduce the number of free form responses to aid in survey analysis. This introduces a
risk that the public perceive a ‘closed’ already decided survey.  Open form format
questions must be character restricted to 100 characters max. 
Page 159

Page 160

69 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
Page 160

Page 161

70 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
APPENDIX A – WEST COAST TODAY NEWS ARTICLES 
Page 161

Page 162

71 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
APPENDIX B – CONSULTATION EVENTS EVIDENCE OF ATTENDANCE 
Stage 1 – Feb stage 1 registration Stage 2 – Aug stage 2 registration
Page 162

Page 163

72 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
APPENDIX C – STAGE 2 SURVEY COMMENTS
Within the Stage 2 survey respondents were offered the opportunity to provide a free text comment.  Each respondent had the opportunity to provide multiple
comments. 
How is the design aligned with the needs of the community?
Greater feature seating points established on the waters edge of the esplanade north towards between war memorial and north shore street, this would offer a
lovely seat and focal of the loch mouth and the wider views of Beinn Ghuilean
Improved parking areas MUST, and i repeat MUST omit commercial vehicle parking and motor homes, furthermore you must establish parking charge or at least
minimum stay
Cycle route should have potential to be extended east towards the trench point, and it should join up towards quarry green, and then onward to the hills of Beinn
Ghuilean. There surely can be an option to paint on a cycle way for the areas outside of your plan.
I would not widen the pathways within kinloch green to 3meter, the current paths are fit for purpose already and wide enough, I'd rather see inclusion of a band
stand and or a purposeful hang out point designed respectfully for the youth to hang out.
The current playpark adjacent to Tesco, re-purpose to a bike pump track for kids
more seating and gathering points, inclusion of town heritage and bygone era story boards at the seating's, possibly sponsored by local businesses to ensure
careful upkeep
More seating & gathering, smart lighting and water features, as a suggestion, creative surfaces and design of good quality standards to be applied.
I want to credit you for this engagement you deserve applause for making the initiative, naturally people will moan and groan but its looking great and should
definately go ahead, but please consider many of my points, in its current design scope it appears more of missed opportunity. Get more creative with seating and
view points.
Remove parking at junction exits
Add 2 lanes to roundabout to help better flow of traffic 
There is very little bins and seating throughout the town
A very poor design that will ruin the esplanade. Filled with vans and camoervans these days since the other useless road gor built for the non existent wind
turbines. 
Absolutely no community interest in this going ahead  
Ban campervans 
One way system 
Better pavements 
Better roads
Page 163

Page 164

73 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
This ignores what the community require
Campbeltown to Machrihanish walkway needed
Machrihanish to Campbeltown far better use of funds
Machrihanish to Campbeltown walkway
Cross walks nearer the main roads 
Parking restrictions on main street 
Longrow lay out changes 
Move it to busier area 
Cut the cost 
Move it completely to more needed area 
Parking restrictions on main street 
Longrow lay out changes
Safe cycle routes on fast roads towards Machrihanish and Westport.
The entire plan is overengineered. As someone who cycles regularly in the area, including on the newly installed routes towards the secondary school, I know
there are more straightforward and cheaper ways to achieve your ends.   For starters, two-way cycleways are nearly always unnecessary
Personally I feel more seating would be beneficial for those of us who are older/not so fit it would certainly encourage me to go further if I knew I could safe sit
down 
Adherence to Highway Code i.e not parking within 32 feet of a junction (Highway Code 243). Why is this not enforced?
More respect for dropped kerbs and disabled vehicles such as electric scooter/wheelchair. Dropped kerbs that are maintained properly.
The design does not take into consideration cyclists who may access the Town along the A 83.
flower beds/ planting
smooth weed free surfaces- do not include designs that require weeding eg cobbles or pavers 
Space out parking spaces as people will inevitably cross between cars and especially camper vans and will not use zebras- you can't design this out. Plan for desire
paths.
How will you avoid rat runs in the surrounding streets when speed calming measures are introduced? Are you aware of current "boy racer" routes round Big Kiln?
Apply parking charges to vehicles over 6ft eg. motorhomes, as they severely impact visibility for pedestrians and cyclists. 
Pedestrian crossing, and parking regulations in forced to prevent parking on corners 
This seems like a vanity project and the money would be better used on something more worthwhile. 
Bus lane should be kept as it is a safe place to get on and off the buses.
Mini roundabout at the junction of Kinloch Road and the Esplanade.
Page 164

Page 165

74 | P a g e
www.connectedtp.com 
I don't believe it will benefit anyone.There is ample room for cyclists plus cars .These plans will exacerbate car parking in Campbeltown leading to more traffic e.g.
Cars driving around looking for space to park.Also the pavements around the areas proposed are in my opinion are more than adequate
I think the whole proposals are ridiculous 
Better lighting on the paths across the green 
More seating on the green 
More car parking 
Segregation of cyclists and pedestrians 
Avoidance of adding more solid surfaces in the Kinloch Green area. 
Strict speed limits within this area -20 mph for motor vehicles. 
Speed restrictions for cycles, e bikes and scooters. 
Ideally there would be more space for pedestrians and seating.  I would also like to see a 20 mph restriction across this area for motor vehicles, and a speed
restriction of cycles, e bikes and scooters. 
Pleased that active travel is promoted, with reservations.  Car use should be discouraged in the town centre.  Integration of pedestrians and cyclists can be
dangerous when e-bikes and scooters are using the same space.  Page 165

Page 166

This page is intentionally left blank