Appendix 1 DM_ELT-PPSL_Report_250401 end FQ4 25-26
Argyll and Bute Council · 21 May 2025
Back to Planning, Protective Services and Licensing Committee — 21 May 2025 and its agenda
Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.
Page 1
Classification: OFFICIAL# Volumes FY21/22 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY22/23 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY23/24 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY24/25 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 Statutory 517 478 508 509 511 451 508 512 457 468 404 422 469 423 412 386 2012 75.9% 1982 76.1% 1751 74.3% 1690 76.1% Non-Statutory 5 20 21 10 10 10 14 17 15 26 25 21 14 22 23 26 56 2.1% 51 2.0% 87 3.7% 85 3.8% PREAPP 136 158 122 166 153 146 121 150 122 137 120 141 119 104 107 117 582 22.0% 570 21.9% 520 22.1% 447 20.1% Totals 658 656 651 685 674 607 643 679 594 631 549 584 602 549 542 529 2650 2603 2358 2222 This data is unfiltered - it shows all casework received. data source = UNIform (Access queries) Commentary: The data set covers the last 16 financial quarters and confirms that demand for the determination of planning applications and other statutory activity of the Council as the Planning Authority remains high and relatively constant in its volume. End March2025: Submission rates for FQ4 25/26 are slightly below average but do not give cause for concern at this time. FY24/25 Split of Casework ReceivedNew Casework Received FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 This tab provides information on the volume of DM case work received by financial quarter and includes a breakdown between statutory items (planning and related applications), non- statutory items (consultations from other regulatory bodies), and pre-application enquiries. 517 478 508 509 511 451 508 512 457 468 404 422 469 423 412 386 5 20 21 10 10 10 14 17 15 26 25 21 14 22 23 26 136 158 122 166 153 146 121 150 122 137 120 141 119 104 107 117 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 FY21/22 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY22/23 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY23/24 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY24/25 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 Volume of New Casework Received PREAPP Non-Statutory Statutory 76.1% 3.8% 20.1% Split of Casework Received: FY24/25 Statutory Non-Statutory PREAPP Appendix 1
Page 2
Classification: OFFICIAL# Volumes FY21/22 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY22/23 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY23/24 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY24/25 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 Statutory 410 411 393 396 410 369 402 368 476 421 458 423 464 464 427 425 1610 72.4% 1549 74.5% 1778 75.1% 1780 76.5% Non-Statutory 12 12 9 13 9 8 5 11 19 18 21 17 17 31 15 25 46 2.1% 33 1.6% 75 3.2% 88 3.8% PREAPP 134 172 117 145 149 119 124 104 150 109 121 133 106 122 115 116 568 25.5% 496 23.9% 513 21.7% 459 19.7% 2224 2078 2366 2327 This data is unfiltered - it shows all casework closed. data source = UNIform (Access queries) This tab provides detail on the volume of DM casework that has been closed and includes a breakdown between statutory items (planning and related applications), non-statutory items (consultations from other regulatory bodies), and pre-application enquiries. The data set covers the last 16 financial quarters and demsonstrates that regardless of performance issues in respect of timeliness output remains high. There has been a notable improvement in productivity from FQ1 2023/24 which corresponds with the increasing availability of officer resource and a more settled position following the significant disruption to workflow arising from NPF4 (FQ4 2022/23); this improving position has continued into FQ1 2024/25. End March 2025: Productivity during 2024/25 to date has been excellent and builds on the improved performance seen across 2023/24. Output during FQ4 has been maintained at an acceptable level. Commentary: FY21/22 FY22/23 FY23/24 Casework Closed FY24/25 Split of Casework Closed 410 411 393 396 410 369 402 368 476 421 458 423 464 464 427 425 12 12 9 13 9 8 5 11 19 18 21 17 17 31 15 25 134 172 117 145 149 119 124 104 150 109 121 133 106 122 115 116 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 FY21/22 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY22/23 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY23/24 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY24/25 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 Volume of Casework Closed PREAPP Non-Statutory Statutory 76.5% 3.8% 19.7% Split of Casework Closed: FY24/25 Statutory Non-Statutory PREAPP
Page 3
Classification: OFFICIAL# Volumes FY21/22 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY22/23 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY23/24 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY24/25 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 Closed 422 423 402 409 419 377 407 379 495 439 479 440 481 495 442 450 Validated 405 460 438 450 462 455 436 509 462 428 366 428 425 425 370 400 Difference (no) 17 -37 -36 -41 -43 -78 -29 -130 33 11 113 12 56 70 72 50 This data is unfiltered - it shows the number of cases closed vs number of cases validated. data source = UNIform (Access queries) Casework Turnover - Volume This tab shows a comparison between the volume of new statutory and non-statutory casework and output per financial quarter. The Y axis has been formatted to track the cumulative backlog of applications that have accrued since FQ1 2021/22. Commentary: The graph shows that after 7 financial quarters (FQ2 2021/22 - FQ4 2022/23) where output was lower than input, a backlog of 375 casework items were accumulated. During this period the DM Service were impacted by Covid restrictions/recovery and required to operate with a number of key vacancies due to a national shortage of planning professionals. Improving performance during 2023/24 has however reduced the backlog at the end of that period to 206 items. As significant improvement in performance is evident from FQ1 2023/24 which corresponds with the resolution of key staffing issues within the Service, this improving position has been maintained moving forward from that point and throughout 2024/25 to date. End March 2025: Turnover during FQ4 has agaian seen output exceed demand for new applications. The cumulative backlog since FQ2 21/22 has now been addressed however it has been identified that there is still a significant number of legacy items over and above normal case load volume to be addressed. 17 -37 -36 -41 -43 -78 -29 -130 33 11 113 12 56 70 72 50 FY21/22 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY22/23 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY23/24 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY24/25 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 -400 -350 -300 -250 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 Casework Turnover Rate
Page 4
Classification: OFFICIAL# Volumes FY21/22 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY22/23 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY23/24 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY24/25 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 Closed 134 172 117 145 149 119 124 104 150 109 121 133 106 122 115 116 Validated 129 162 118 153 159 137 117 140 117 132 120 130 115 92 103 116 Difference (no) 5 10 -1 -8 -10 -18 7 -36 33 -23 1 3 -9 30 12 0 Number of PREAPP's closed vs number of PREAPP's validated. data source = UNIform (Access queries) PREAPP Turnover - Volume This tab shows a comparison between the volume of new pre-application casework and output per financial quarter. The Y axis has been formatted to track the cumulative backlog of pre- application enquiries that have accrued since FQ1 2021/22. Commentary: The Graph shows the accumulation of a backlog of pre- application enquiries over the period FQ3 2021/22 - FQ4 2022/23 during a period where the DM Service operated with a number of key vacancies and has experienced significant workflow disruption with the introduction of NPF4. It had previously been identified that the backlog amounted to around 180 applications; however following a review of the data input and accuracy of the data available (see detail of correction below) it has become evident that earlier reports included cases that were invalid and cases that had not been closed off proprerly in the back office system. The updated report confirms that the backlog of pre-application enquiries reached a maximum of just over 50 items; this position has seen significant improvement. End March 2025: The backlog of pre-apps is currently neglibible with new submissions being turned over on a regular and timely basis. Work remains ongoing to review and improve the pre-application advice service. 5 10 -1 -8 -10 -18 7 -36 33 -23 1 3 -9 30 12 0 FY21/22 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY22/23 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY23/24 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY24/25 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 PREAPP Turnover Rate
Page 5
Classification: OFFICIAL# FY21/22 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY22/23 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY23/24 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY24/25 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY21/22 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY22/23 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY23/24 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY24/25 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 < 6 months 8.5 9.7 10.6 10.8 10.9 10.2 11.0 13.3 11.8 11.6 11.8 12.0 9.6 9.6 10.1 8.5 < 6 months 87 80 92 79 71 69 82 51 43 67 63 54 50 56 52 60 < 1 year 9.1 9.7 10.8 13.3 12.4 12.4 12.0 17.3 17.8 15.4 14.6 18.3 12.4 12.6 12.6 9.8 6 months - 1 year 2 0 1 8 5 6 4 11 13 12 9 19 6 8 5 4 < 2 years 9.1 9.7 11.8 13.8 12.4 13.1 12.0 17.3 18.5 18.1 16.8 20.0 16.1 19.0 13.5 12.2 1 - 2 years 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 4 3 2 4 7 1 3 All Determined 9.1 9.7 11.8 13.8 12.4 13.1 12.0 17.3 21.6 18.1 16.8 20.0 16.1 26.1 15.9 14.2 Over 2 years 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 1 1 Total 89 80 94 88 76 76 86 62 59 83 75 75 60 75 59 68 This data is filtered - as per Scottish Government statistical returns - to allow benchmarking. "Householder" = Development Type N01. data source = UNIform (Access queries) Commentary: The line graph shows performance over time; the bar graph shows the proportionate split between 'legacy' casework and newer items. A comparison of the two demonstrates that the 'All Determined' average can be readily impacted by the determination of a small number of 'legacy' applications. The improving resource availability has allowed the focus of the DM Service from FQ1 2023/24 to move from addressing the most urgent applications to also addressing the wider backlog of application casework. Increasing output does however mean that a high volume of 'legacy' applications continue to be determined with significant deteriment to average time measures as is seen with the deterioration of performance across FQ4 2022/23 to FQ4 2023/24. In order to provide some context additional information is provided that demonstrates the effect of removing older applications from reporting to provide a truer picture of the time taken to deliver the larger proportion of casework. The bar graph provides this breakdown in a format which shows the increasing volume of older applications currently being determined but also confirms that a significant proportion of output is still undertaken in a timely manner. Peformance during FQ1 2024/25 has shown a marked improvement which demonstrates that the majority of householder applications are now being determined in much shorter time periods. End March 2025: During FQ4 to date 4 householder 'legacy' items have been determined with the effect of adding 4.4 weeks to the overall avereage time measure. During FQ4 2025/26 Householder Applications have been determined in an average of 14.2 weeks (improvement from 15.9 weeks in FQ3 24/25). The underlying performance on the larger volume of newer applications determined is much healthier; in this respect it is highlighted that more applications are being determined at an early stage with 88% of all householder applications in FQ4 were newer items determined in an average time of 8.5 weeks (previously 88% in 10.1 weeks during FQ3 24/25). Average Time to Determine Applications: Householder ( <6 Month, <1 Year, <2 Year, All) Volume of Applications Determined: Householder - Time Taken The Average Time Taken to Determine Householder Planning Applications This tab provides detail on the average time taken to determine 'householder' planning applications, this is based on raw data which does not take into account any delays that might arise from matters outwith the control of the planning authority. 8.5 9.7 10.6 10.8 10.9 10.2 11.0 13.3 11.8 11.6 11.8 12.0 9.6 9.6 10.1 8.5 9.8 12.2 9.1 9.7 11.8 13.8 12.4 13.1 12.0 17.3 21.6 18.1 16.8 20.0 16.1 26.1 15.9 14.2 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 FY21/22 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY22/23 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY23/24 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY24/25 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 Average no. of weeks to determine: Householder (<6 Month, <1 Year, <2 Year, All) < 6 months < 1 year < 2 years All Determined 87 80 92 79 71 69 82 51 43 67 63 54 50 56 52 60 2 1 8 5 6 4 11 13 12 9 19 6 8 5 4 1 1 1 4 3 2 4 7 1 3 1 2 4 1 1 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% FY21/22 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY22/23 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY23/24 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY24/25 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 % Split: Householder (<6 Month, <1 Year, <2 Year, All) < 6 months 6 months - 1 year 1 - 2 years Over 2 years
Page 6
Classification: OFFICIAL# FY21/22 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY22/23 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY23/24 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY24/25 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY21/22 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY22/23 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY23/24 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY24/25 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 < 6 months 10.8 11.3 11.1 11.5 12.4 10.1 10.2 12.9 13.5 14.0 12.7 12.1 11.6 11.5 12.7 12.2 < 6 months 158 142 118 125 114 110 104 69 87 106 95 79 97 106 104 110 < 1 year 12.7 14.1 13.5 13.4 14.5 14.0 18.0 19.2 19.3 18.7 18.8 21.0 19.0 16.3 17.0 15.6 6 months - 1 year 12 20 13 11 14 19 43 25 31 27 32 40 39 26 22 17 < 2 years 14.6 15.3 13.9 14.2 15.7 16.1 19.9 23.6 21.9 25.0 25.8 29.3 26.1 24.5 25.6 20.7 1 - 2 years 6 3 1 2 3 6 6 10 7 20 22 19 23 25 22 13 All Determined 14.6 16.7 18.5 16.7 16.8 17.0 19.9 24.5 27.6 27.4 30.2 33.4 30.0 37.8 31.2 26.4 Over 2 years 0 2 4 3 1 1 0 1 4 3 6 6 4 19 7 7 Total 176 167 136 141 132 136 153 105 129 156 155 144 163 176 155 147 This data is filtered - as per Scottish Government statistical returns - to allow benchmarking. "Local (excluding Householder)" = Development Types N02B/C, N03B/C, N04B/C, N05B/C, N06B/C, N07B/C, N08B/C, N09B/C, N10B/C. data source = UNIform (Access queries) Commentary: The line graph shows performance over time; the bar graph shows the proportionate split between 'legacy' and newer items. A comparison of the two demonstrates that the 'All Determined' average can be readily impacted by the determination of a small number of 'legacy' applications. The improving resource availability has allowed the focus of the DM Service is to move during 2023/24 from addressing the most urgent applications to also addressing the wider backlog of application casework. Increasing output does however mean that a higher volume of 'legacy' applications will be determined with significant deteriment to average time measures as is seen with the deterioration of overall average time performance measures from FQ2 2022/23 to FQ4 2023/24. In order to provide some context additional information is provided that demonstrates the effect of removing older applications from considerations to provide a truer picture of the time taken to deliver the larger proportion of casework that has been determined. The bar graph provides this breakdown in a format which shows the increasing volume of older applications currently being determined but also confirms that a significant proportion of output is still undertaken in a timely manner. Performance during FQ1 2024/25 has markedly improved and appears to indicate the start of an improving trend with decreasing time periods. End March 2025: FQ4 has seen 20 legacy applications cleared with the effect of adding 10.8 weeks to the overall average time measure which now sits at 26.4 weeks (improvement from 31.2 weeks in FQ3 2024/25). It is highlighted that the volume of legacy determinations has come as a result of significant progress in clearing the backlog of applications and, depist the significant adverse impact on average time measures, is a noteable achievement. It is also noted that some of the negative impact is attributed to delays to determination which were outwith the control of the planning authority and which will be adjusted in statutory reporting by the Scottish Government. Discounting the effect of legacy cases it is however evident that performance overall is continuing to show improvement. During FQ4 the determination of non-legacy local applications were undertaken in an average of 15.6 weeks (improvement from 17 weeks in FQ3 24/25). It is also highlighted that more applications are being determined at an early stage with 75% of all local applications in FQ4 to date were newer items determined in an average time of 12.2 weeks (previously 66% in 12.7 weeks in FQ3 2024/25). Average Time to Determine Applications: Local (Excluding Householder) ( <6 Month, <1 Year, <2 Year, All) Volume of Applications Determined: Local (Excluding Householder) - Time Taken The Average Time Taken to Determine Local (excluding Householder) Planning Applications This tab provides detail on the average time taken to determine 'local' planning applications, this is based on raw data which does not take into account any delays that might arise from matters outwith the control of the planning authority. 10.8 11.3 11.1 11.5 12.4 10.1 10.2 12.9 13.5 14.0 12.7 12.1 11.6 11.5 12.7 12.2 12.7 15.614.6 20.7 14.6 16.7 18.5 16.7 16.8 17.0 19.9 24.5 27.6 27.4 30.2 33.4 30.0 37.8 31.2 26.4 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 FY21/22 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY22/23 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY23/24 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY24/25 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 Ave no. of weeks to determine: Local (Excluding Householder) (<6 Month, <1 Year, <2 Year, All) 158 142 118 125 114 110 104 69 87 106 95 79 97 106 104 110 12 20 13 11 14 19 43 25 31 27 32 40 39 26 22 17 6 3 1 2 3 6 6 10 7 20 22 19 23 25 22 13 2 4 3 1 1 1 4 3 6 6 4 19 7 7 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% FY21/22 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY22/23 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY23/24 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 FY24/25 FQ1 FQ2 FQ3 FQ4 % Split: Local (excluding Householder) (<6 Month, <1 Year, <2 Year, All) < 6 months 6 months - 1 year 1 - 2 years Over 2 years