Democracy Spraffa

Argyll & Bute HSCP - Performance Report - Fq2 2025/26 (July - September)

Argyll and Bute Council · 5 March 2026
Back to Community Services Committee — 5 March 2026 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

1   
Community Services Committee       
Date of Meeting:  5th March 2026 
Title of Report:  Health & Social Care Partnership - Performance Report – FQ2 2025/26                  
(July - September)
Presented by:     Kristin Gillies Head of Strategic Planning, Performance & Technology    
The committee is asked to: 
• Acknowledge performance for FQ2 2025/26 (Jul - September) 
• Note the Performance KPI's will be reviewed for Q3 with improved alignment to the
Operational Improvement Plan indicators and National measures and the format of
the A&B performance reports with Head of Service collaboration will be reviewed 
• Note Delayed Discharge Sitrep as of 15 December 2025 (Appendix 1) 
• Acknowledge performance update on the National Health & Wellbeing Outcomes
and Ministerial Steering Group Integration Indicators (Appendix 2) 
• Note supporting Service Feedback commentary from Heads of Service and Service
Leads (Appendix 3) 
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
This report details performance for the Financial Quarter (FQ) 2 2025/26 (July - September), the
performance outputs are taken from the Integrated Performance Management Framework (IPMF)
Reporting Dashboard with the focus on twelve key service areas. 
Overall performance for FQ2 notes of 77 measures reported 35 (45%) are on track and 42 (55%)
off- track. The report details performance against each of the service areas and supporting IPMF
Key Performance Indicators. Latest National Delayed Discharge Sitrep and the National Health &
Wellbeing Indicators performance is also noted. The use of the new performance Dashboard within
SharePoint is designed to offer a more focused approach to the access and analysis of data, offering
scope for self-service.   
2. RECOMENDATIONS
The committee are asked to note and consider FQ2 25/26 performance. 
3. DETAIL OF REPORT
The report details the HSCP (Health and Social Care Partnership) performance for FQ 2
2025/26 (July - September), highlighting key performance trends across the 77 KPIs (Key

Page 2

2
Performance Indicators). For 2025/26, the latest national benchmarking update on Delayed
Discharges (Appendix 1), alongside the latest performance on the National Health and
Wellbeing Outcomes Indicators (Appendix 2).  Supporting Service Feedback commentary from
Heads of Service and Service Leads is provided at (Appendix 3). 
4. RELEVANT DATA & INDICATORS 
4.1 FQ2 2025/26 (July – September) Performance Summary                                   
Overall performance for FQ2 notes that 77 KPI’s are scoring against target, with 35 (45%) reporting
on track. This is down 10% on FQ1 position, where 42 (55%) KPIs were reported as on track. The
KPI’s report performance against the target and include the target, actual and variance and is a mix
of both quantitative and qualitative indicators. The use of the green, amber and red graphics within
the Dashboard is used to give an overview of the HSCP’s total performance for each of the twelve
services and 77 KPI’s. The use of only green and red for the KPI’s is used to focus delivery with
regards to sustaining performance on or above target.   
4.2 Analysis of Key Performance  
This analysis identifies performance across the 12 service reporting categories within the Integrated
Performance Management Framework (IPMF). 
4.2.1 Children & Families
FQ2 performance across 5 KPI’s, for Children & Families and Justice notes 1 KPI (20%) on track,
and 4 KPIs (80%) off track. This is down 60% from the 4 (80%) KPIs noted as on track for FQ1.
Performance on or above target:   
• Improve the number of statutory Health Assessments commenced within 4 weeks of
coming into care: For the past two quarters this KPI has been reported at 100%, above the
target of 96%.

Page 3

3
Performance below target & areas for improvement:  
• Improve the percentage of Child Protection Register (CPR) cases that have an allocated
social worker (at end of quarter): For Q2 this KPI was 3% below the target (100%), and
performance was down from Q1 which met the target.
• Children and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAHMS) will see 90% of children and
young people within 18 weeks of referral: For Q2 79% of referrals were seen within 18
weeks, missing the Q2 target (90%). This is a decline in performance from Q1 which did
meet the target.
• Improve the number of teams that have delivered 85% or more of the Universal Health
Visiting Pathway (UHVP): For Q2, the KPI target (85%) was missed by 2% (83% met the
target). This is down on Q1 where the target of 85% was met.
• Percentage of CJ social work reports submitted by 12 noon, 2 days before court: Q2 failed
to meet the target of 90% (achieving 83%). This was an improvement on Q1, of which only
80% met the KPI target. 
4.2.2 Strategic Planning, Performance & Technology
FQ2 performance across 11 KPIs for Strategic Planning, Performance & Technology Services
shows 5 KPIs (45%) on track, with 6 KPIs (55%) reported as off track against the targets set for
FQ2 25/26. This is a reduction of 10% compared to the 6 (55%) KPIs noted as on track for FQ1.
Performance on or above target: 
• New Telecare clients: Q2 performance was 215 new clients receiving Telecare services
against a target of 200, meeting the target. This declined from 242 new clients in Q1.
• Telecare service reviews completed: Q2 performance was 125 reviews against a target of
85, meeting the target. This declined from 167 reviews in Q1. 
• Patients utilising ‘Near Me’ clinics: Q2 performance was 972 patients against a target of
800, meeting the target. This declined from 1,126 patients in Q1.
• Patients using ‘Connect Me’ for blood pressure monitoring: Q2 performance was 124
patients against a target of 42, meeting the target. This represents a small improvement
from 120 patients in Q1.
• Transformation & Improvement projects on track: Q2 performance was 9 of 10 projects on
track (90%) against a target of 85%, meeting the target. This declined from 18 of 18
projects on track (100%) in Q1. 
Performance below target & areas for improvement: 
• New referrals to Silvercloud: This indicator measures the number of new referrals to
the Silvercloud mental health support platform. Q2 performance was 52 new referrals (74%)
against a target of 70, below target. This is a 63% increase from 32 referrals in Q1 (46%),
though performance in both quarters remained off target. 
• Waiting times for cancer appointments at 31 day target: Q2 performance was 5 patients
exceeding waiting time targets against a target of 0, below target. This decreased
from 7 patients in Q1. 
• New OP waiting time breaches >12 weeks: Q2 performance was 48% of patients in breach
against a target of 46%, below target. This is a decline from 46% in Q1. 
• OPWL long waits >52 weeks: Q2 performance was 7.1% of patients waiting more than 52
weeks against a target of 0%, below target. This is slightly declined from 7.0% in Q1.

Page 4

4
• Freedom of Information requests responded to within statutory timescale: Q2 performance
was 28 of 30 requests, achieving 93% against a target of 100%, below target. This is a
slight decline from Q1, which recorded 29 of 31 requests (94%). 
• IT support request resolution: This indicator measures the number of IT support requests
logged and resolved strictly within Q2. During Q2, 835 IT requests were logged and 816
were resolved within the quarter, achieving 98% against a target of 100%.
This represents an improvement from Q1, when 1,013 requests were logged and 844 were
resolved (83%) 
4.2.3 Primary Care
Performance across 6 KPIs for Primary Care shows 3 (50%) on track, with 3 (50%) reported as off
track against the targets set for FQ2 25/26. This matches FQ1 performance also reported as 3 (50%)
KPIs on track.  
Performance on or above target: 
• Fluoride varnish: This indicator measures the proportion of children who received a fluoride
varnish application and did not require referral for further dental treatment. Q2 performance
was 80% against a target of 80%, meeting the target and decreasing from the Q1 result of
84%. 
• 6-in-1 vaccination uptake: This indicator measures the percentage of children who received
the 6-in-1 vaccination by age one. Q2 performance was 98% against a 95% target,
exceeding target and increasing from the Q1 figure of 94%. 
• Contingency measures in HSCP-run GP practices: This indicator records the number of
HSCP-managed GP practices that enacted contingency measures during the reporting
period. Q2 performance remained at 0 against a threshold of 14, unchanged from Q1. 
Performance below target & areas for improvement: 
• Oral Health Improvement Programme activity: This indicator measures the percentage of
planned National Oral Health Improvement Programme activity delivered against the
service plan. Q2 performance was 73% against a target of 100%, which is below target and
lower than the Q1 position of 85%. 
• Vaccination delivery: This indicator measures the percentage of the eligible population
receiving seasonal COVID-19 vaccination, benchmarked against national uptake trends. Q1
figures reflected the end of the Spring 2025 programme, while Q2 relates to the start of the
next seasonal programme. Q2 performance was 2.4% against a target of 6%.
• Utilisation of HSCP dental clinic appointments: This indicator measures the proportion of
available appointments used within HSCP dental clinics. No Q2 data was provided, so the
Q1 figure of 58% has been repeated. The target remains 75%. 
4.2.4 Public Health
Performance across 6 KPIs for Public Health shows 4 (67%) on track, with 2 (33%) reported as
offtrack against the targets set for FQ2 25/26. This is an increase of 34% from FQ1, where 2 (33%)
KPIs were noted as on track. 
Performance on or above target: 
• Increase the number of successful quits – Reporting is undertaken a quarter in arrears.  For
Q1, which is being reported in Q2, we exceeded our target.  The actual performance was

Page 5

5
16, compared to a revised target of 10, reflecting a positive increase of 78% compared to
Q4, which was reported in Q1. 
• Increase the number of people in A&B attending training to deliver training in Money
Counts, Behaviour Change, Speakeasy, Mental Health and Suicide Prevention. Q2,
performance noted 126 against a rolling target of 43, performing above target of 17
additional clients per quarter.  
• Mitigate health inequalities through increasing the number of referrals to Community Link
workers through We Are With you – Performance has remained consistently above the
target in both Q1 and Q2.  Q2 recorded an actual of 219 against target of 110, representing
a 26% increase on Q1, where the actual was 174. 
• Report on the number of engagements relating to planning with people with lived or lived
experience of alcohol and/or drugs – In Q2, our actual of 6 placed us well above the target
of 4, representing a 200% increase over Q1, where we achieved 2 and were below target. 
Performance below target & areas for improvement: 
• Increase the number of people in A&B attending training to deliver CRAFT to families. 
There are currently no recorded attendances for this KPI at present.  The target was set at
15 per year. 
• Number of instances working with Scottish Government or national agencies on national
strategy and policy development.   In Q2, our actual was 6 against a target of 11, reflecting
a 25% decrease from 8 achieved in Q1. Performance in both quarters remained below
target. 
4.2.5 Finance 
Across the 7 KPIs, Financial services performance notes 3 (43%) on track, with 4 (57%) off track
against the targets set for Q2 25/26.  This is an increase of 14% from the 2 (29%) KPIs recored as
on track for FQ1.  
Performance on or above target:
• Monitor Older People Homecare Budget Spend: There has been an improvement in spend
on this budget, 13% overspend noted in FQ1, this has reduced to the target of 0%
overspend for Q2. 
• Monitor NHS saving recovery to ensure this remains on track: For Q2 the target saving
remains on track with actual savings running at 50% against target, following on from Q1.  
• Monitor Social Work savings recovery to ensure this remains on track: For Q2, the actual
saving remains 49% of the annual savings target, matching Q1, with trend data suggesting,
as the financial year progresses, this KPI may meet its savings target. 
Performance below target & areas for improvement: 
• Monitor Older People Internal Residential Budget Spend: Following on from Q1 the budget
spend remains above target and the overspend has increased with an overspend of 23%
for Q2. 
• Monitor Older People External Residential Budget Spend: There has been a drop of 2% in
overspend from Q1 to Q2, however there remains an overspend of 5% against this budget. 
• Monitor Lorn & Islands Hospital Overall Budget: For Q2 the budget is running at 7%
overspend, a slight reduction (0.9%) from Q1 which had a 7.9% overspend. 
• Monitor the HSCP total budget to ensure this remains on track currently off track for the

Page 6

6
quarter by £2m: As with Q1, Q2 remains slightly above the target. 
4.2.6 Carers
Performance across 5 KPIs for Carers shows 3 KPIs (60%) on track, with 2 KPI (40%) reported as
off track against the targets set for FQ2 25/26.  This is a reduction of 20% from the 4 (80%) reported
as on track in FQ1.  
Performance on or above target: 
• Increase the number of Unpaid Adult Carers supported across A&B Carers Centres –
Performance exceeded the target of 2600 (2731) and remained stable compared to the
previous quarter. 
• Increase the number of Unpaid Young Carers supported across A&B Carers Centres – For
FQ2 performance exceeded the target of 783 (850). There has been a slight increase (5%)
over the past quarter. 
• Increase the number of ACSP reviews completed by the various Carers Centres – FQ2
performance exceeded the target of 1800 (2307). These have increased by 25% since FQ1,
mainly driven by increased activity in one of the Carers Centres. 
Performance below target & areas for improvement:  
• Increase the number of Adult Carer Support Plans completed across A&B Carers Centres –
below the target of 120 (103).  This is a decrease of 19% since FQ1. 
• Increase the number of Young Carer Statements completed across A&B Carers Centres –
below the target of 39 (23). This reflects a decrease of 21% this quarter, from 29 to 23. 
4.2.7 Allied Health Professionals 
Performance across 5 KPIs for Allied Health Professionals shows no KPIs (0%) on track, with all 5
KPIs (100%) reported as off track against the targets set for FQ2 25/26. This is a reduction of 20%
from the 1 (20%) noted as on track in FQ1. 
(It should be acknowledged that nationally waiting time breaches are measured against a zero target and it is a clear
indicator of how many actual people are waiting. Local trajectory reporting allows monitoring of progress and
improvements to reduce the number of patients on waiting lists across varied health specialties.)   
Performance on or above target: 
None. 
  
Performance below target & areas for improvement:   
• Reduce New Outpatient Referral waits breaching > 4 weeks for Musculoskeletal (MSK) –
above the target of 0 (1212). These have increased significantly, rising by 49% this quarter. 
• Reduce New Outpatient Referral waits breaching >12 week waits for AHP services – above
the target of 0 (485). This has remained largely stable, with only a 2% increase from the
previous quarter. 
• Reduce P1 and P2 Community Patient Referral waits breaching > 4 weeks for AHP Services
– above the target of 0 (96). There has been a notable increase of 60% this quarter, although
numbers remain relatively small.

Page 7

7
• Reduce P3 and P4 Community Patient Referral waits breaching >12 week waits for AHP
services – above the target of 0 (1067). There has been a slight increase of 10% this quarter. 
• Increase the number of monthly AHP Outpatient Completed Waits – below the target of 945
(768). There has been a significant drop in completed waits, decreasing by 24% this quarter.   
4.2.8 Delayed Discharges 
Performance across 6 KPIs for Delayed Discharges shows 2 KPI (33%) on track, with 4 KPIs (67%)
reported as off track against the targets set for FQ2 25/26. This is a reduction of 17% from the 3
(50%) KPIs noted as on track in FQ1. 
(It should be acknowledged nationally Delayed Discharges are measured against a zero target. Local targets have been
set to monitor progress and improvements to reduce the number of patients showing as a Delayed Discharge.)   
Performance on or above target: 
• Reduce the number of people delayed in hospital awaiting a care home placement at monthly
census - Actual Q2 performance was 5 against a reducing target of 10, improving on our Q1
actual of 8.  This represents a 38% reduction compared with Q1. 
• Reduce the number of people delayed with assessment code at monthly census point – Q2,
performance data noted 5 against a reducing target of 10, improving on our Q1 actual of 7. 
This represents a 29% reduction compared with Q1. 
Performance below target & areas for improvement: 
• Reduce the number of people delayed at monthly census - In Q2, the actual was 47 against
a target of 34. This represents being approximately 38% above target in Q2. Performance
has decreased, reflecting pressures experienced during this period.  
• Reduce the overall length of stay in hospital at monthly census point – In Q2, performance
data noted 908 against a target of 634, and 43% above target. 
• Reduce the number of people delayed in hospital with AWI code at monthly census point –
In Q2, actual was 7 against a target of 4, and 75% above target.  This is further increase
compared to Q1. 
• Reduce the number of people delayed in hospital at monthly census point - In Q2, our actual
was 30 against a target of 10, 200% above target.  In Q1, the actual was 15, 50% above
target, showing a 100% increase in actual from Q1 to Q2. 
4.2.9 Adult Social Care 
Performance across 4 KPIs for Adult Social Care shows 3 KPIs (75%) on track, with 1 KPI (25%)
reported as off track against the targets set for FQ2 25/26.  This is consistent with the FQ1 position
where 3 (75%) KPIs were also noted as on track. 
Performance on or above target: 
• Increase the percentage of Older People who had their homecare monitoring review
completed within 6 months - In Q2, data noted 60%, which matches the target of 60%. 
Whilst performance has continued to meet target in Q2, this is an 8% reduction from
Q1(68%).

Page 8

8
• Increase the occupancy rates across A&B Care Homes – Performance for Q2, achieved
96%, exceeding the target of 95%.  This represents a 1% improvement from Q1 (95%).
• Reduce the number of hours of unmet need for care at home – This KPI aims to reduce the
number of hours, with a target set of 500 hours. In Q2, performance remained on target
recording 349 hours. 
Performance below target & areas for improvement: 
• Reduce unplanned admissions to A&B hospitals directly from a care home – This KPI has a
target of 18.  In Q2, performance noted 21, compared to 24 in Q1.  This represents a 13%
reduction from Q1, and continues to be off target by approximately 17% 
4.2.10 Community Hospitals 
Performance across 5 KPIs for Community Hospitals shows 3 KPIs (60%) on track and 2 KPI’s off
track (40%) in FQ2 2025/26. This is a decrease of 40% from the 5 (100%) KPIs reported as on track
in FQ1. 
Performance on or above target:
• Reduce the rate of unplanned admissions to Community Hospitals for 65+ population –
Performance for Q2 remains on target, recording an actual of 416 against a target of 450. 
In Q1, actual was 449. This demonstrates a further 7% reduction in unplanned admissions
between Q1 and Q2. 
• Maintain A&B Community Hospitals Bed occupancy rates below 80% target – Q2, remains
on target, recording a rate of 70.1% against a target of 80%.  In Q1, the rate was 61.8%. 
This reflects an increase of 8% in occupancy rates from Q1 whilst still remaining within
target. 
• Reduce the number of falls being reported in a Community Hospital setting in A&B –
Continues to be on target, achieving an actual of 16 against a target of 38.  Q1 noted an
actual of 12.  
Performance below target & areas for improvement: 
• Reduce the average length of stay for inpatients in A&B Community Hospitals – In Q2, the
actual was 8.1, against a target of 7.5.  This represents a 17% increase from Q1.
• A&E attendances meeting the 4 hrs wait target - The national target for attendances
meeting the 4 hours target is 95%, FQ2 performance was 94.6%, slightly below the target. 
This represents a 1% increase from Q1 against target (96%). 
4.2.11 Adults with Long Term Conditions / Adult Support & Protection / Alcohol Drugs
Partnership 
Performance across 8 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for Adults with Long Term Conditions
Services shows 2 KPIs (25%) on track, with 6 KPIs (75%) reported as off track against the targets
set for FQ2 25/26.  This is a reduction of 13% from the FQ1 position where 3 (38%) were noted as
on track. 
(It should be acknowledged that nationally waiting time breaches for New Mental Health Outpatients (12 weeks) and
Psychological Therapy (18 Weeks) are measured against a zero target. Local targets have been set to monitor progress
and improvements to reduce the number of patients on waiting lists across varied health specialties)

Page 9

9 
Performance on or above target: 
• Monthly waiting for psychological therapy services (>18 weeks): During Q2, 27 people were
waiting, compared with a target of 175, meeting the target. This continues the improving
trend from previous quarters, following 34 people waiting in Q1.
• MH Urgent Care Referrals Response Timescales (<2 hours): During Q2, 99.6% of urgent
care referrals were responded to within 2 hours, exceeding the target of 90%. This is
broadly unchanged from Q1, when 100% of 260 referrals were responded to within 2 hours.
The total number of referrals in Q2 (274) was similar to Q1 (260), showing consistent
performance across both quarters. 
Performance below target & areas for improvement: 
• Reduce the number of clients on Dynamic Support Register with category Amber/Red:
During Q2, 16 clients were on the register, compared with the target of 10. This is a
decrease from 18 clients in Q1, but performance remains below the target.
• Reduce the number of people waiting for a new Mental Health Outpatient service (>12
weeks): During Q2, 827 people were waiting, compared with the target of 390. This is an
increase from 757 people in Q1 and continues to fall short of the target.
• MH Social Circumstances Report Overdue: During Q2, 64% of reports were overdue (7 of
11 reports), exceeding the target of 33% and therefore off target. This is a deterioration
from Q1, when 40% of reports were overdue (2 of 5 reports).
• ASP Screening Duty to Inquire Assessments completed within 5 working days: During Q2,
188 assessments were completed, of which 85 (45%) were completed within 5 working
days, below the target of 70%. This is an improvement in total assessments compared with
Q1, when 134 assessments were completed, of which 54 (40%) were completed on time.
• ASP Investigations completed within 15 working days of Screening Duty to Inquire
completion date: During Q2, 32% of investigations were completed within 15 working days,
below the target of 70%. This represents a decline from 42% in Q1.
• Drug & Alcohol Completed Waiting Times from Referral to First Treatment (LDP): During
Q2, 83.0% of patients were treated within target waiting times, below the target of 90%.
This is broadly unchanged from 83.3% in Q1. 
4.2.12 Rural General Hospitals (Lorn & Island Hospital) 
Performance across 9 KPIs for Rural General Hospitals (LIH) shows 6 KPIs (67%) on track, with 3
KPIs (33%) reported as off track against the targets set for FQ2 25/26. This reflects no change from
the 6 (67%) reported as on track at FQ1   
Performance on or above target: 
• Reduce the total number of unplanned bed days in LIH – Performance in Q2 remained
below target with an actual of 2876, against a reducing target of 3323.  In Q1 the actual was
2819 noting a 2% increase in Q2. 
• Reduce the Average Length of Stay for inpatients in LIH – In Q2, the actual was 3.6 against
reducing target of 5.0
• Maintain LIH Bed Occupancy Rates below 90% target – Q2 actual was 76.4% against a
target of 90%. In Q1 the actual was 74.6%.

Page 10

10
• Reduce the number of LIH A&E Attendances that result in an unplanned admission. Actual
was 88.2% in Q2 and 93% in Q1 against a target of 95%.  Remaining below the target with
an overall 4.8% reduction from Q1. 
• Reduce the number of falls being reported in a hospital setting in LIH. With a reducing
target set at 26, actual was 10 in Q2 and 17 in Q1. This represents strong progress and a
41% improvement from Q1. 
• Reduce number of instances of tissue viability in Lorn & Islands Hospital.   Against a
reducing target of 4, actual for FQ2 was 2.     
Performance below target & areas for improvement: 
• Reduce the rate of unplanned admissions to LIH 65+ population. Q2 actual was 359
against a target of 345, moving off target from Q1, when the actual was 314.  This
represents a 14% increase in unplanned admissions from Q1.
• National target of 95% of A&E attendances to meet the 4-hour wait target. The target was
set at 95%.  Q2 data noted 88.2% performance.
• Reduce the number of medication errors in LIH. In Q2, performance has remained off target
with an actual of 13 against a reducing target of 6, this is against a 13% improvement from
Q1. 
4.2.13 National Health & Wellbeing Outcome Indicators & Ministerial Steering Group
Integration Indicators 
The National Health and Wellbeing Outcomes provide a strategic framework for the planning and
delivery of health and social care services. This suite of outcomes serves to focus on improving the
experiences and quality of services for people using those services, carers, and their families. These
indicators form the basis of the annual reporting requirement for Health and Social Care
Partnerships across Scotland.   
The national indicators will be updated and reported within A&B HSCP’s Integrated Performance
Management Framework to provide the national performance position alongside the local service
Key Performance Indicators suite. 
The latest data in relation to 26 HWBOI and MSG Indicators reports 50% on track, with 13 on track
and 13 off track. An overview of A&B HSCP’s latest performance against the 26 measures is
reported in Appendix 1. It should be noted that reporting periods vary across the suite of national
indicator measures, with some measures reported quarterly affected by national reporting data lag. 
5. CONTRIBUTION TO STRATEGIC PRIORITIES
The monitoring and reporting against Key Performance Indicators using the Integrated Performance
Management Framework and Dashboard ensures the HSCP is able to deliver against key strategic
priorities. This in-turn is aligned with the Strategic Plan and key objectives. 
6. GOVERNANCE IMPLICATIONS
6.1 Financial Impact
Financial performance is evidenced within the IPMF Dashboard ensuring best value as well as
evidencing the impact and performance against organisational budget savings. 
6.2 Staff Governance

Page 11

11
Key performance indicators within the IPMF ensure that staff governance requirements continue to
be progressed and developed include health and safety, wellbeing and new service redesign and
working practices. 
6.3 Care and Clinical Governance
Clinical Governance and patient safety remain at the core of prioritised service delivery against the  
new IPMF Dashboard and National Health & Wellbeing Outcomes Indicators. The new governance
structure supporting the IPMF ensures that the Clinical & Care Governance Committee remain
central to performance improvement. The development of the IPMF is focussed on moving away
from previous traditional styles of reporting to a fully collaborative approach with Head of Service
and Service Lead commentary. 
7. PROFESSIONAL ADVISORY 
Data used within the performance dashboard is fully accessible in SharePoint with data trends and
forecasting are identified to give wider strategic context. This provides the HSCP professional
advisors with self –service performance information to inform their role in maintaining professional
standards and outcomes. 
8. EQUALITY & DIVERSITY IMPLICATIONS
The Integrated Performance Management Framework captures relevant indictors used to inform the
HSCP E&D work.
8.1 PROTECTED CHARACTERISTICS
Performance detailed within this report acknowledges the rights of the Child (UNCRC), Islands.
Fairer Scotland, Socio-economic Duty, Equalities - protected characteristics.  
9. GENERAL DATA PROTECTION PRINCIPLES COMPLIANCE 
Data use and sharing within this report and IPMF performance dashboard is covered within the
Argyll and Bute Council & NHS Highland Data Sharing Agreement 
10. RISK ASSESSMENT
Risks and mitigations associated with performance data sources and reporting are managed and
identified within the monthly Performance & Improvement Team- Work Plan. 
10.1 STRATEGIC, OPERATIONAL OR CLIMATE RISK
Performance reports are used by operational management to identify service delivery risk and to
inform mitigation action accordingly. 
11. PUBLIC & USER INVOLVEMENT & ENGAGEMENT
Performance reporting is available for the public via Argyll and Bute Council and NHS Highland
websites. The IPMF dashboard utilises SharePoint to support manager and staff access across the
HSCP. 
12. CONCLUSION 
The Committee is asked to considerer and acknowledge FQ2 2025/26 (July - September)
performance as detailed in the IPMF Dashboard.

Page 12

12 
Note the Performance KPI's will be reviewed for Q3 with improved alignment to the Operational
Improvement Plan indicators and National measures and the format of the A&B performance reports
with Head of Service collaboration will be reviewed. 
13. DIRECTIONS 
Directions
required to
Council, NHS
Board or
both.
Directions to: tick
No Directions required x
Argyll & Bute Council 
NHS Highland Health Board 
Argyll & Bute Council and NHS Highland Health Board 
14. PREVIOUS REVIEW OF THE REPORT 
Meeting  Title of report Date Output (if relevant)     
REPORT AUTHOR AND CONTACT 
Author Name: Douglas Hunter- Senior Manager Performance & Improvement
Email: douglas.hunter@argyll-bute.gov.uk

Page 13

13 
Appendix 1 - Delayed Discharge Sitrep – 15th December 2025

Page 14

14
Appendix 2 – HWBOI & MSG Integration Indicators. 
Core Suite of Integration Indicators 
HWBOI-Outcomes 
Data notes 55.5% (5 of 9) HWBOI Outcomes measures reporting as above the national Scotland Rate. It is worth noting that performance will be influenced and
vary in line with the total number of respondents participating in this voluntary survey. As such, caution should be noted with regards to previous comparison
and trends. Benchmarking performance against 7 comparator HSCPs is noted below. 
HWBOI – Outcomes - Benchmarking 
HWBOI- Performance Data

Page 15

15
Data notes 66.7% (6 of 9) HWBOI Performance measures reporting as above the national Scotland Rate. Note Indicators 17 and 19 are reported at FY 24/25
with measures 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18 reported as at Calendar year 2024 as a proxy for 2024/25 due to the national data for 2024/25 being incomplete. This
is in line with guidance issued by Public Health Scotland which was communicated to all Health and Social Care Partnerships. Using more complete calendar
year data for 2024 should improve the consistency of reporting between Health and Social Care Partnerships. 
HWBOI- Performance Data – Benchmarking

Page 16

16
Ministerial Steering Group Indicators 
MSG Indicators 1.1, 1.2 and 2.1 are reported at Calendar Year 2024 as a proxy form 2024/25. This is in line with guidance issues by Public Health Scotland
which was communicated to all Health and Social Care Partnerships/ MSG Indicators data notes that all MSG measures have sustained higher activity or
have increased in the last reporting year. Activity around Emergency Admissions, Unplanned Bed Days, A&E attendances and Delayed Discharge Bed Days
all noted performance exceeding pre –Covid levels. This highlights the necessity to consider approaches to alleviate systems pressures around Urgent and
Unscheduled Care and expedite hospital flow, particularly around A&E Admissions and Delayed Discharges.
Ministerial Steering Group Indicators 2018/19 2019/20 2020/21 2021/22 2022/23  2023/24 2024/25
MSG 1.1 - Number of emergency admissions* CY 8,374 8,231 6,917 7,820 7,928 8,933  8,879
MSG 1.2 - Number of Admissions from A&E* CY 5,244 4,945 3,668 5,040 4,957 5,097  5,502
MSG 2.1 - Number of unplanned bed days acute
specialties* CY 65,794 64,008 53,390 67,255 77,094 77,882 80.655
MSG 2.2 - Number of unplanned bed days MH
specialties 13,747 13,204 11,208 9,049 9,212 11,575  11.380
MSG 3.1 - Number of A&E attendances 13,985 14,171 10,091 15,646 16,774 17,740  22,456
MSG 3.2 - % A&E attendances seen within 4 hours  93.4% 91.7% 93.1% 88.9% 83.9% 83.0%  83.0%
MSG 4.1 - Number of DD bed days occupied  9,530 7,863 5,354 7,742 11,929 12,757  14,042
MSG 5.1 - % of last six months of life by setting
community & hospital 90.0% 89.6 90.80% 90.80% 89.60% 89.40%  N/A
MSG 6.1 - % of 65+ population at Home (unsupported)  92.1% 92.1% 92.5% 92.6% 93.2% 93.4%  N/A 
Data notes 67% (6 of 9) HWBOI Outcomes measures reporting as above the national Scotland Rate. It is worth noting that performance will be influenced and vary in line with the total number of respondents
participating in this voluntary survey. As such, caution should be noted with regards to previous comparison and trends

Page 17

17
Appendix 3 – Service Feedback and Risk commentary 
IPMF Section 1 – Children & Families & Justice 
Please identify any influencing factors impacting on performance against off target KPIs: 
• There has been staffing issues within Justice services. It is noted that appointments have been made and steady progress is
expected towards the 90% target indicated in KPI 5. 
• All KPIs are vulnerable due to staffing vacancies and absence. For example if CAMHS are required to respond to a critical
mental health incident this will impact the waiting list targets. All progress is fragile

Page 18

18
IPMF Section 2 – Strategic Planning, Performance & Technology 
Please identify any influencing factors impacting on performance against off target KPIs: 
• There is continuing improvement in the number of Telecare reviews during Q2, building on the progress in made in Q1.    
• Silvercloud remains a challenge as referrals are dependent upon medical professionals referring to the service and then the
user taking up the service. Staff absence within the TEC team in Q4 of 24/25 led to a pause in new referrals being accepted and
this drop in Q1 is most likely attributed to this pause. However, there has been an increase over Q2 and Q3 already has an
increase in activity, so this is positive. 
• Most cancer treatments for Argyll & Bute residents are carried out at NHS GG&C sites. The number of breaches has reduced.
Planning and performance are monitoring the data to understand the 5 breaches that have been reported and to address any
data quality issues.

Page 19

19
• Performance against the 12-week standard is very near targeted levels but sustained pressure within the Oral Surgery and
Ophthalmology specialties continues to lengthen waiting times.   
• There are plans to eliminate Oral Surgery waiting times beyond >52 by the end of March. The HSCP is using the Outsourcing
Framework from Health Improvement Scotland to bring in additional capacity. Longer term, service redesign in collaboration
with NHSH hospital oral surgery and the public dental service is required to ensure better performance against >12-week target. 
• Opthalmology will remain a pressured speciality for the foreseeable future. NHS GG&C is struggling to provide agreed number
of sessions for outreach clinics, but redesign of the service is underway to support and improve delivery. 
IPMF Section 3 – Primary Care 
Please identify any influencing factors impacting on performance against off target KPIs:  
• FQ2 Vaccination delivery. This KPI tracks our performance against the Scottish delivery rate % and the rate noted at FQ2 (Sep
2025) is low down to seasonality of the delivery programme. Our latest Covid uptake rate is 64%.

Page 20

20 
• In relation to dental KPIs, the shortfalls are due to vacancies, maternity leave and sickness - we are recruiting and hope to
achieve the KPIs in 26/27.
IPMF Section 4 – Public Health 
Please identify any influencing factors impacting on performance against off target KPIs:  
• I note the progress with several of the Public Health KPIs in Q2 since Q1. The success with people stopping smoking is
particularly welcome due to the significant impact of smoking on health. Several of the Public Health KPIs are annual targets,
therefore progress will fluctuate over the course of quarterly reporting periods. This is the case for the CRAFT training indicator
and training took place during Q3 that will be reported in the next cycle. In relation to the KPI about working with Scottish
Government to influence and respond to national public health policy and strategy, this remains a relatively new target and the
team is still finding a balance between a target that is sufficiently stretching and one that is achievable. Again, there is a
seasonal element to this target with potentially less opportunities existing over summer months.

Page 21

21 
IPMF Section 5 – Finance 
Please identify any influencing factors impacting on performance against off target KPIs:  
• Monitor Older People Internal Residential Budget Spend: This is due to agency staffing within the care homes, however the
situation is improving, and income recovery is increasing and performance is expected to improve in the second half of the
year.  
• Monitor Older People External Residential Budget Spend: This is due to continuing high demand for placements.
• Monitor Lorn & Islands Hospital Overall Budget: The situation is expected to continue to improve as permanent medical staff
have been appointed and reliance of locum medical staffing is reducing.
• Monitor the HSCP total budget to ensure this remains on track. The HSCP is continuing to overspend but there are some signs
of improvement. Children’s external placements are currently the biggest single area of concern with a £1m overspend
forecast.

Page 22

22
• The HSCP is overspending and forecasting an overspend. It is working to reduce spend through reductions in agency, delivery
of savings and implementation of the threshold of care. Vacancies are also being held in anticipation of further service
reductions for 2026/27. 
• At present it is expected that the HSCP will be able to fund its overspending from reserves and therefore does not, at present,
expect to rely upon additional support from the funding partners.   
IPMF Section 6 – Carers 
Please identify any influencing factors impacting on performance against off target KPIs:  
• Following the Fair Access and Efficiencies of Care paper presented to the IJB in November, there has been a notable increase in
the number of concerned families seeking and receiving support from the carer services. Routine welfare calls with families
supporting an older adult have taken considerably longer, with staff spending additional time providing reassurance and
explaining the reasons behind the changes. The IJB paper did acknowledge this potential impact on families.

Page 23

23
• Although fewer formal reviews have been carried out this quarter, a substantial amount of time has been dedicated to
supporting families. It was also noted that significant time was spent providing support to individuals with an ACSP who fall
within the low to moderate risk categories, rather than the substantial or critical levels. 
IPMF Section 7 – Allied Health Professionals 
Please identify any influencing factors impacting on performance against off target KPIs:  
• Noting the shift to a zero target for waiting times as a true reflection of performance targets and the need to monitor this new
KPI target. 
• The ability to achieve lower waiting times is impacted on staff capacity and availability; this is impacted by vacancy rates, time
to recruit being lengthy and the overall reduction in the use of supplementary staffing (locum).

Page 24

24
• Planned establishment reviews for 2026 will also indicate staffing levels compared to demand and activity. 
IPMF Section 8 – Delayed Discharges 
Please identify any influencing factors impacting on performance against off target KPIs: 
• Reduce the number of people delayed at monthly census.  This has been a challenging period, new template for reporting was
introduced, our delayed discharge co-ordinator was in post, our approach shifted to focus on being solution focussed with a
planned date of discharge was now in place.  However, despite the best efforts to address our delays the data shows a

Page 25

25
significant reduction in performance.  Our bed delays have been a direct response to the availability of being able to progress
AWI which are significantly high numbers, the availability of care home placements due to outbreak of norovirus and availability
of care at home.  These areas have all been address with additional resource to support the flow specifically in these 3 key
areas.  
• Reduce the overall length of stay in hospital at monthly census point. This is the impact of the above and being able to progress
these areas in a timely manner which has resulted not only in increased delays but also increase in the length of stay.  
• Reduce the number of people delayed in hospital with AWI code at monthly census point. The numbers of people requiring
statutory measures to be able to move from hospital has increased significantly this period, additional resource has been
identified to enable this to be progressed as a priority.  This will commence in January 2026 and will be ring-fenced purely for
the purpose of hospital discharge.  
• Reduce the number of people delayed in hospital at monthly census point. There is work going on around this as often when
patients are in GGC hospitals there is an expectation that people will be discharged with a higher package of care to ensure they
are able to fully recover at home.  Our recent meeting with GGC highlighted that in A&B we are often unable to meet these
demands.  We now have a discharge co-ordinator on the wards, attending MDT meetings and liaising with families to establish
what informal networks of support are available therefore reducing the demand on care packages.  We are confident this will
start to show in our data moving forward in terms of unmet need.  
IPMF Section 9 – Adult Social Care

Page 26

26 
Please Identify any influencing factors impacting on performance against off target KPIs:  
• Reduce unplanned admissions to A&B hospitals directly from a care home This KPI has been out with target in both Q1 and Q2,
although Q2 notes a slight improvement.  The plan is to work closely with our colleagues within our whole system approach to
early intervention and prevention, we will analyse the data in relation to this and work closely with the lead nurse for care homes
to looks at possible solutions to this moving forward, identifying any themes and establishments.
• We are taking a full system approach to managing unmet need which includes reviewing our assessment and care management
processes. This means increased scrutiny around levels of care required which results in lower levels of unmet need overall.
• Staff absence and vacancies have impacted review activity , and we have 4 temporary social work assistants in post to support
with Care at Home review activity.
IPMF Section 10 – Community Hospitals

Page 27

27 
Please identify any influencing factors impacting on performance against off target KPIs: 
• Reduce the average length of stay for inpatients in A&B Community Hospitals. We have experienced some challenges over this
quarter with care home placements being restricted due to outbreak of norovirus, this has resulted in people remaining in
hospital beds longer than anticipated.  We also have a significant number of patients awaiting AWI intervention again resulting
in longer length of stays.  The implementation of a holistic view of delays will allow such challenges to be identified earlier in the
process and solutions sought.  
• A&E attendances meeting the 4 hrs wait target. This quarter noted a slight increase in waiting times in comparison to Q1, this
will be monitored closely with analysis on specific areas to allow us to establish the cause and solutions sought. 
IPMF Section 11 – Adults with Long Term Conditions & ASP

Page 28

28 
Please identify any influencing factors impacting on performance against off target KPIs:
• Monthly waiting for psychological therapy services (>18 weeks): This demonstrates continued service improvement, particularly
through the streamlining of referral management and administration processes.
• Reduce the number of clients on Dynamic Support Register with category Amber/Red: During Q2, The client have complex
needs and this does not always support client return to the immediate area. Minimal infrastructure and support impacting the
KPI.
• Reduce the number of people waiting for a new Mental Health Outpatient service (>12 weeks): The mental health outpatient
service remained subject to sustained and increasing operational pressure. This was due in part to a continuing rise in referrals
for neurodevelopmental assessment, particularly in relation to ADHD. In addition, a vacancy in the Consultant Psychiatrist post
covering Kintyre and Islay during the reporting period led to routine psychiatric reviews being deferred, including those
typically completed by the resident doctor under consultant supervision.
• MH Social Circumstances Report Overdue: work around the completion of a SCR policy continues, which will be a guide for
MHOs, emphasising the importance of providing the MWC and RMO with a copy of a SCR (or at least the front page and
explaining why a full SCR has not been provided).
• Adult Support & Protection: KPI targets consistently not met owing to increase in referrals (wider client group to be potentially
considered as adults at risk promoted in the revised Code of Practice 2022). Development of daily referral screening and Huddle
for allocation has resulted in all referrals received being considered - there is no longer any ‘screening out’ before completion of

Page 29

29
an ASP Inquiry where the referral has suggested that the adult is at risk of harm. Use of ‘Investigative Tasks’ undertaken, as part
of an Initial Inquiry, as encouraged by the revised Code of Practice, has changed the way in which data recording for Inquiries
and Investigations might best be recorded and this needs further consideration in terms of our existing standalone
‘Investigations’ KPI. We have less staff able to undertake ASP work and of staff able there are increasing competing priorities
and a shift in the prioritisation of adult SW activity away from ASP. 
• Drug & Alcohol Completed Waiting Times from Referral to First Treatment (LDP):The quarter under question coincides with a
period of increased leave during school/summer holiday period and has significant impact on small teams of 2 to 3 team
members. 
IPMF Section 12 – Rural General Hospital (Lorn & Islands Hospital)

Page 30

30 
Please Identify any influencing factors impacting on performance against off target KPIs:  
• Work is ongoing to develop reports to increase scrutiny on A&E long waiting patients which will highlight trends over time by
breach reason so these can be improved. 
• Performance against the 4hour target continues to be very good at mostly above 90%, dropping slightly due to increased
seasonal tourism pressures in summer.