Democracy Spraffa

Printed minutes

Argyll and Bute Council · 21 May 2025
Back to Planning, Protective Services and Licensing Committee — 21 May 2025 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

MINUTES of MEETING of PLANNING, PROTECTIVE SERVICES AND LICENSING
COMMITTEE held BY MICROSOFT TEAMS on WEDNESDAY, 21 MAY 2025 
Present: Councillor Kieron Green (Chair) 
Councillor John Armour
Councillor Gordon Blair
Councillor Jan Brown 
Councillor Graham Hardie
Councillor Fiona Howard
Councillor Dougie Philand 
Attending: Stuart McLean, Committee Manager
David Walker, Solicitor
Sergeant David Holmes, Police Scotland
Richard Hassan, Licence Holder 
1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 
Apologies for absence were received Councillors Audrey Forrest, Amanda Hampsey,
Daniel Hampsey, Mark Irvine, Andrew Kain and Paul Kennedy, Liz McCabe and Peter
Wallace. 
2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 
There were no declarations of interest. 
3. CIVIC GOVERNMENT (SCOTLAND) ACT 1982: REQUEST FOR
SUSPENSION OF TAXI DRIVER LICENCE (R HASSAN, HELENSBURGH) 
The Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting.  In line with recent legislation for Civic
Government Hearings, the parties (and any representatives) were given the options for
participating in the meeting today.  The options available were by video call, by audio call
or by written submission.   
For this hearing Police Scotland opted to proceed by way of audio call and Sergeant
Holmes joined the meeting by telephone. 
The Licence Holder also opted to proceed by way of audio call and Mr Hassan joined the
meeting by telephone. 
The Chair outlined the procedure that would be followed and invited the Police Scotland to
speak in support of the Chief Constable’s complaint.   
POLICE SCOTLAND 
Sergeant Holmes referred to a letter dated 29 April 2025 which advised that the Chief
Constable requested, in terms of Paragraph 11(1) of Schedule 1 of the Act that the
Committee suspend Mr Hassan’s taxi driver licence.   
The Chief Constable complained, in terms of Paragraph 11(2)(a) Schedule 1 of the Act,
that Mr Hassan was no longer a fit and proper person to hold the licence by virtue of
convictions Mr Hassan received as a result of incidents which took place on 28 April 2023
and 7 September 2024.

Page 2

QUESTIONS FROM LICENCE HOLDER 
Mr Hassan confirmed that he had no questions. 
LICENCE HOLDER 
Mr Hassan advised that he felt his taxi driver licence should not be taken away.  He said
that he had never had any trouble or issues connected with his job as a taxi driver in Argyll
and Bute and that he was always professional.  He referred to the 2 incidents and advised
that it was regretful that they had happened.  He said that the assault took place over 2
years ago and that he has been driving his taxi in a professional manner since that
incident occurred.  He referred to his court appearance and advised that the outcome did
not go his way on the day.  He advised that the incident was self-defence.  He referred to
the other incident and said this involved an argument with his partner.  He said there were
no serious issues and that he had been advised that this conviction in respect of this
incident would be removed from his record on 2 September 2025. 
Mr Hassan advised that he was a young man with a young family and that he supported
them with 2 jobs.  He said he felt that it would be unfair to have his licence taken away as
a result of a conviction which would be removed from his record on 2 September and for
another incident which occurred over 2 years ago.  He said that he has been driving his
taxi with no issues and that he was totally professional and hard working.  He said he did
not deserve to lose his licence over these incidents. 
QUESTIONS FROM POLICE SCOTLAND 
Sergeant Holmes confirmed that he had no questions. 
MEMBERS’ QUESTIONS 
Councillor Hardie referred to Police Scotland asking for the suspension of his licence as
they did not think Mr Hassan was a fit and proper person to be the holder of the licence. 
He asked Mr Hassan to comment on that.  Mr Hassan said he thought it was untrue to say
he was not a fit and proper person.  He advised that he has been driving taxis for years
without incident and that there had been no complaints received when working his taxi. 
He said he was totally professional in his cab and that he did not pose a danger to the
public and that this would not change. 
Councillor Brown sought and received confirmation from Mr Hassan that he was still with
his partner.  Councillor Brown said the offences were quite serious, especially the first
one.  She asked if alcohol was involved.  Mr Hassan said there was.  He advised that the
incident sounded worse than it was.  He said the person needed 3 stitches and that the
scar could not be seen. 
Councillor Brown commented that Mr Hassan did not appear to be apologetic about the
incidents and that he did not appear to be professional in his private life.  She asked Mr
Hassan if he was a Jekyll and Hyde character, a different person in private to what he was
at work.  Mr Hassan said this was not the case.  He said the incidents were very regretful
and that he wished they had never happened.  He said he was always a good guy and not
a different person. 
Councillor Green noted that Mr Hassan said he was not a different person.  He asked if he
was a different person when drinking alcohol.  Mr Hassan said not necessarily.  He

Page 3

advised that he was 31 years old and had never been in trouble with the Police before
these incidents.  He said that he’d had too much to drink on both occasions.  He said that
he was also injured in the fight.  He said that he rarely drank alcohol and that the incidents
were 100% regrettable. 
Councillor Blair sought and received confirmation from Mr Hassan that he worked 3 weeks
on and 3 weeks off on the rigs off Aberdeen.  He said that when he was not on the rigs he
did taxi work. 
Councillor Blair sought and received confirmation from Mr Hassan that the serious
incidents that occurred would not happen again.  Mr Hassan said he never wanted to be in
trouble with the Police again.  He said he had never been in trouble apart from these 2
incidents.   
Councillor Blair asked the Council’s Solicitor if the Council had a policy in place on zero
tolerance.  Mr Walker said he did not know if there was a policy.  He advised that in terms
of the fit and proper person test, there were no hard and fast rules for the Committee and
that they were given a wide discretion when considering whether a person was a fit and
proper person. 
Councillor Armour referred to Mr Hassan’s sentence in respect of the second incident
being deferred until 2 September 2025.  He asked if the incident, which was the subject of
the court appearance on 9 April, was taken into account.  Mr Hassan said no. He advised
that on 2 September the charge in respect of the second incident would be taken off his
record subject to good behaviour for 6 months.  Mr Hassan explained that the case that
went to court on 9 April was in connection with an incident which took place in 2023 and
was not being taken into account.  He confirmed the Sheriff told him in court that the
sentence would be taken off his record subject to good behaviour for 6 months.  He
explained that he would not need to return to court in September and that his lawyer
would attend to confirm his good behaviour. 
Councillor Blair sought and received confirmation from Sergeant Holmes that Police
Scotland had not brought the first incident to the attention of the Committee as it was sub
judice and it was decided at that time to monitor the situation moving forward and wait to
see if Mr Hassan received a conviction.  He said that his conviction coincided with the
court appearance in respect of the second incident. 
SUMMING UP 
Police Scotland 
Sergeant Holmes advised that he had nothing further to add. 
Licence Holder 
Mr Hassan said that he could guarantee that he would never be in trouble with the law
again.  He referred to the 2 incidents being regretful and advised that he has been working
professionally since they happened with no issues with his taxi work.  He said this would
continue if he was allowed to keep his licence. 
When asked, both parties confirmed that they had received a fair hearing. 
DEBATE

Page 4

Councillor Hardie said he would like to believe Mr Hassan but due to the nature of the
crimes he would be looking for an immediate suspension of his licence. 
Councillor Brown said she agreed with Councillor Hardie.  She advised that she
appreciated that one of these incidents happened over 2 years ago but noted that the
other was more recent.  She said she was not convinced by Mr Hassan and that he gave
the impression of being 2 different people, one in his private life and another in his
professional life.  She said she was concerned that how he behaved privately could spill
over into his working life. 
Councillor Blair said he felt there needed to be an acknowledgement of what happened
here and that he thought that suspension of the licence would be appropriate.  He advised
that he took on board the comments made by Mr Hassan but he felt there still needed to
be a strong emphasis that the Committee had a zero tolerance towards that type of
behaviour and that there would be consequences.  He said he was aware that Mr Hassan
had said he was a hard-working person and that he presumed this was without incident. 
He suggested a suspension of the licence for 3 or 6 months and that he would be happy
to include the proviso that if any further incidents happened during that time the licence
would be withdrawn completely.  He said that zero tolerance was something that the
Committee needed to stick to.  He said that suspension of the licence would be the best
way to emphasise the Committee’s resolve. 
Councillor Green pointed out that at this point discussion was not about the length of any
potential suspension. 
Councillor Armour said that like Councillor Blair he did not think the Committee could let
this go without any action.  He noted that the incidents happened out with the work
environment but said it still did not look good.  He advised that he did not think Mr Hassan
had helped himself and that he could have been a bit more contrite.  He noted that Mr
Hassan had said it was not his fault but from the paperwork he could see that an event
was cancelled because of his behaviour and that he had then went on to punch someone. 
He felt that Mr Hassan could not argue that he played a part in his own downfall. 
Councillor Armour said he would like to look at some sort of temporary action rather than a
full suspension. 
Councillor Philand agreed with what Councillor Blair had said about zero tolerance.  He
advised that he thought that Mr Hassan was remorseful but, looking at the cold facts, they
happened, and if the Committee condoned this and did not look at a temporary
suspension, the Committee would be condoning this behaviour which, he said, was not
acceptable. 
Councillor Green advised that he largely agreed with what had been said and
acknowledged what had been said about Mr Hassan’s attitude at this meeting.  He
advised that he thought there had been some effort to portray some of the actions as
being trivial in manner and he said he was not impressed by that.  He said that it was not
for the Committee to determine guilt or not and noted that had been done by the Sheriff. 
He advised that if Mr Hassan had conducted himself in a different way at this hearing the
Committee may have been having a different discussion at this point.  He advised that
given the nature of the offences, not helped by Mr Hassan’s conduct in this meeting, he
thought that a suspension was necessary in this case.

Page 5

At this point Mr Hassan was given the opportunity to speak in respect of the
commencement and duration of any suspension of his licence. 
Mr Hassan said that he would accept whatever the Committee decided.  He said that he
knew that these were serious incidents.  He said he was not 2 different people and that he
was a young family man.  He said the 2 incidents were very regretful and that he wished
they had never happened.  He said he just wanted to get on with his life and keep working
for his family and that he did not want to go through this again.  He confirmed that he
would accept whatever suspension the Committee decided and that he would get back to
taxiing at the end of the suspension and hoped not to be back in front of the Committee
again. 
At this point the Committee were invited to debate the commencement and duration of the
licence. 
Councillor Hardie said that he thought the licence should be suspended with immediate
effect for 6 months. 
Councillor Green agreed that the licence should be suspended with immediate effect but
thought 6 months was a bit harsh and not necessary.  He suggested a 2 month
suspension. 
Councillor Howard agreed with the suggestion of a 2 month suspension. 
Councillor Blair said he would be quite happy with a 3 month suspension with immediate
effect which would mean Mr Hassan could be back to working as a taxi driver in
September/October time. 
Councillors Brown, Armour and Philand all agreed with the suggested 3 month
suspension. 
Councillors Green, Hardie and Howard also agreed to support a 3 month suspension. 
DECISION 
The Committee agreed to suspend Mr Hassan’s Taxi Driver Licence (Number 6558) with
immediate effect for a period of 3 months and noted that Mr Hassan would receive written
notification of this within 7 days. 
(Reference: Report by Head of Legal and Regulatory Support, submitted)