Democracy Spraffa

APPENDIC A - Engagement Report (Ryder)- FINAL - 19-07-23

Argyll and Bute Council · 12 September 2023
Back to Helensburgh & Lomond Area Committee — 12 September 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Helensburgh Waterfront
Community Engagement

Page 2

Ryder Architecture Limited
Newcastle
London 
Glasgow
Liverpool
Manchester
Hong Kong
Vancouver
Amsterdam 
www.ryderarchitecture.com

Page 3

Contents
4
6
8
9
11
13
15
17
19
20
22
24
Project number
2010:07
Document reference
11203-RYD-00-XX-RP-A-0000-S2
Revision
P3
Date
19 July 2023
Author
Soo Darcy
Checked by
Chris Malcolm
This document has been designed to be
viewed / printed A4 double sided.
Introduction and Methodology
Key Findings
Feedback by Option
Convenience Retail / Fast Food
Open Space / Community Use
Multi Storey Retail / Residential / Exhibition Space
Multi Storey Retail / Hotel
Retail / Community Space
EV Charging
General Comments
Schools Engagement
Schools – Pictures

Page 4

4
Introduction and Methodology
In order to gather opinions and
feedback on potential development
options for the Helensburgh
Waterfront site, stakeholder
engagement was held over the
course of a week from 17 to 23
June 2023.  This included both drop
in sessions and targeted sessions
to cover a variety of age groups
and interests.  This activity was not
a formal public consultation, but
was targeted engagement to help
achieve an inclusive approach.
Invites were sent to 63 community
groups, eight Community Councils
and published several times on
social media to broaden the reach
and generate interest.  This was
to ensure people with a variety of
interests, and those who may be
lesser heard voices or who tend not
to get involved with engagement
activities, had the opportunity to
have their say.
In total, 83 people participated in the
engagement events.
With the exception of the schools
engagement, at each session
attendees were shown five sets of
images to aid discussion. These
sets were grouped to represent the
range of options currently being
put forward for the Waterfront site,
in terms of broad function or type. 
It was explained to all attendees
upon arrival that the images were
for illustrative purposes only, and
were not intended to represent any
particular brands, size or design of
building.
Attendees were invited to identify
any images they particularly liked or
disliked, and discuss the pros and
cons of each option (or individual
parts thereof).
At the schools engagement, pupils
were invited to talk about what they
would like to see in their town, and
draw their ideas for the Waterfront
site.
The schedule of engagement
sessions is shown on the next page.

Page 5

5
Engagement Sessions
Date Times Session Type Location / Venue Invites
Saturday 17 June 10:00 – 16:00 Drop in session HLCC Annex Community Groups
Monday 19 June 09:30 – 15:30
17:00 – 20:00
Schools
Drop in session
Hermitage Academy Conference Room
HLCC Annex
Schools
Community Groups
Tuesday 20 June 18:00 – 20:00 Community Councils HLCC Community Room Community Councils
Wednesday 21 June 17:30 – 18:30
19:00 – 20:00
Targeted group
Targeted group
HLCC Community Room
HLCC Community Room
Grey Matters Active Aging
Royal Navy Family Support
Thursday 22 June 18:00 – 20:00 Business evening HLCC Community Room
Friday 23 June 18:00 – 20:00
10:30 – 11.30
12:00 – 14:00
Targeted group
Targeted group
Drop in session
HLCC Annex
HLCC Annex
HLCC Annex
Mid Point Youth
H&L Autism
Community Groups

Page 6

6
Key Findings
There was no single consensus on any of the five
options, with each generating a range of pros and cons.
Several attendees felt strongly that anything much higher
than a single storey building would not be desirable, as
it would block the views across the water.  The site is felt
to be a prime spot to attract visitors and enjoy the open
aspect so, whilst many are not averse to some kind of
building or units on the site, they would like an attractive
design that is in keeping with the existing leisure centre.
Overall there was a strong preference for an option with
at least some outdoor recreation space, ideally with
seating and activities suitable for locals and visitors. 
Whilst some liked the idea of event space, others pointed
out that there is already plenty of provision such as Civic
Centre indoor / outdoor event area, Colquhoun Square
event area, Hermitage Park event area, Kidston Park,
Helensburgh Pier car park pop up events facilities.
Several attendees acknowledged that a fully open,
non commercial public space would struggle to
secure funding and was therefore unlikely.  Many also
commented that the town lacks indoor attractions, and
an open air space would not be particularly useful in
poor weather for much of the year, therefore a combined
indoor / outdoor offer might be preferable.
The prospect of retail / fast food was of considerable
concern to some attendees, who are worried that
it will have a damaging impact on local businesses
which are already struggling.  Concerns included an
overprovision of certain types of retail or food offerings,
creating more competition, and a concentration of
business in the centre of town which could detract from
those businesses based further along the promenade. 
However, younger people were particularly interested in
high street chains such as Starbucks.
Others would welcome a retail or hospitality option,
provided it is in keeping with the needs of the town.  For
some, this could be a supermarket.  For others, a clothes
shop would be desirable since the recent loss of clothing
retailers in the town.  Some noted the setting would be
ideal for a bar or restaurant looking out over the water to
create a destination with a real wow factor.
The lack of indoor recreation space in Helensburgh
was a recurring theme across most sessions, and this
was felt to be lacking in the current options for the site. 
Many people would like to see something that appeals to
both locals and visitors, perhaps with a flexible, multi use
space that could change uses throughout the year.

Page 7

7
Key Findings (Cont’d)
Suggestions ranged from indoor sports courts to
activities such as bowling and climbing walls, as well as
some kind of art space or museum dedicated to local
history, such as John Logie Baird.  
The option including a general community space
received mixed feedback.  People were generally positive
about such a space in theory, however some pointed
out that there are already many such spaces available in
Helensburgh in church halls and private buildings.  There
was positive feedback for an event / exhibition space, if
perhaps it could be combined for community use.
Likewise, the prospect of a hotel received mixed
feedback.  It was considered by some attendees to be a
real need in Helensburgh, as they struggle to find rooms
for friends and family.  The Waterfront site could provide a
very attractive spot for visitors to enjoy the view, perhaps
with associated restaurants and bars.  For others, there
is sufficient existing provision and they were concerned
a new hotel would take away customers from local
businesses.
The issue of a skate park was discussed at every
session, and is clearly a subject close to the hearts of
many Helensburgh residents.  There are strong feelings
both for and against having the skate park at the
Waterfront site, but most agree a park would be an asset. 
Those who would like to see it at the Waterfront argue
that the views, central accessibility, nearby facilities
such as cafes and the leisure centre, and the ability
for the community to passively supervise the park due
to its open aspect, make it the ideal location with the
potential for a park that attracts national visitors.  Those
who would like to see it elsewhere (such as Hermitage
Park) argue that the skate park would cause noise and
disruption to those round them, and would benefit from
more space than can be afforded at the Waterfront.
Coach parking was also a hot topic, with many people
observing the need for Helensburgh to maintain its visitor
numbers to support local businesses – with more coach
parking a necessity. Whilst some could see the value
of having coach parking on the Waterfront site, most
however thought it should go elsewhere, with perhaps
only a drop off and pick up point at the Waterfront.

Page 8

8
Feedback by
Option

Page 9

9
Convenience Retail / Fast Food
Pros
Outdoor seating was very popular,
with many people commenting that
the site is a prime spot to attract
visitors and locals with the right mix
of food, coffee and pleasant seating
to take in the view.
Several people thought more
parking would be of benefit, as it is
felt to be lacking in the town centre.
The prospect of a tea / coffee
stand is appealing, perhaps an
independent local brand.
The opportunity to incorporate
local businesses or pop ups, rather
than established chains only, was a
welcome idea to make the most of
retail and food offering.
Cons
Helensburgh is perceived to already
have plenty of good quality food
outlets offering a wide choice, with
several people commenting that
more food outlets are not needed.
Potentially poor sustainability
credentials of fast food and
convenience retail, such as
packaging and air miles.
A general negative perception of fast
food and large chains, which are not
felt to be in keeping with a town like
Helensburgh or contributing towards
the community and its existing
businesses.
Potential for litter and attracting gulls
around seating areas.

Page 10

10
Convenience Retail / Fast Food
“Whatever it is, make it
an attractive, sustainable,
high quality build.”
“A vibrant, independent
retail, food and craft
boutique [offering], to
be a social and tourist
attraction.”
“Small local businesses
are unlikely to be able
to afford this type of
development.”
“Food retail of this sort
[convenience] is not
sustainable and net zero
– high food miles, plastic
wrapping adds to the
carbon footprint.”
“No drive throughs!”
“[There are] enough
fast food outlets in
Helensburgh – keep
Helensburgh unique, not
generic!”
“Outdoor seating would
be really nice, but with a
kiosk / coffee rather than a
fast food outlet.”
“I really like the public
realm and seating by
the leisure centre.  We
could have car parking
and seating, particularly
for visitors – especially
if boats are coming in
again.”
“It would be ok as
a fast food point if
local businesses were
encouraged to move
there, freeing up units for
shops.  But I doubt there’s
capacity for an additional
food offering [on top of
what we already have].”

Page 11

11
Open Space / Community Use
Pros
Attractive to both locals and visitors. 
Could blend nicely with the existing
leisure centre if outdoor activities
were on offer, such as the outdoor
gym.
Providing a large open space for
events throughout the year, such as
music festivals and food markets
– but it was noted that this type of
facility is available at the Civic Centre
(hosting the recent gin festival and
street food Sunday events) along
with the redeveloped Colquhoun
Square and Hermitage Park multi
use area.
A number of attendees felt that, with
the right investment, a skate park
could be a considerable draw for
tourists and sports enthusiasts on
a national level, drawing in tourism
and money to local businesses. 
Attendees noted the support of
internationally renowned BMX rider
Kriss Kyle, who lives in Helensburgh.
It was felt that a skate park in this
location would be easy to supervise,
helping to keep any potential
antisocial behaviour to a minimum.
It could provide a central facility
for young people centred around
healthy hobbies – something that is
felt to be lacking in Helensburgh.
In relation to coach parking, a drop
off and pick up point could be
attractive for visitors on tours and
arriving / leaving by boat.  This could
be tied in with pier redevelopment. 
Some people commented that older
visitors need to go back and rest
during the day, therefore coaches
should be able to stay on site if a
drop off point is provided, however
note that most thought coaches
should park elsewhere to free up
space on the Waterfront site.
The prospect of outdoor community
space also opened up discussion
about an outdoor pool, which was
not part of the options but some
people would like to see reinstated.

Page 12

Open Space / Community Use
Whilst coach parking is felt to be
much needed in the town, many feel
the Waterfront is not a suitable place
– too many vehicles taking up too
much space. 
Outdoor gyms received mixed
reviews as a concept – although the
idea is felt to be good, some people
do not think they are well used in
practice. Wind turbines were not
thought to be a compelling offer. 
Few people seemed particularly
concerned about the aesthetic
appearance, rather they felt they
would not be especially functional
nor cost effective in this location.
“A multi use seasonal site,
eg ice rink in winter, mini
golf in the summer, skate
park and soft play all year
round.”
“Ideally a mix of indoor
and outdoor things to do.”
“I would use an outdoor
gym, but it wouldn’t really
appeal to visitors.”
“A skate park would be
a massive benefit to the
young people in the area
and further afield.”
“A skate park – it needs
to be in the right place,
though.  We wouldn’t put
it there – it needs to be
in a park somewhere so
the noise doesn’t affect
people relaxing nearby. 
Could it go in Hermitage
Park?”
“We don’t want the skate
park in Hermitage Park
– the people using it are
fine, but the location and
environment attracts
antisocial behaviour.  We
don’t want to create more
of a problem with that.” 
“We do need coach
parking, and it would
be useful in the centre
of town, but you don’t
want to stare at a load of
coaches there.  Could it be
a drop off point, and park
coaches elsewhere?” 
“You can’t have allotments
there – nothing will grow!”
Cons
Whilst the skate park was a very
popular offering, there was mixed
feedback about its location.  Some
people do not think the Waterfront
site is the right place for it, with
concerns about noise and lack of
space.
Allotments were almost unanimously
felt to be a poor idea on this site as
the weather would make it difficult
to grow plants.  There are felt to be
plenty of other suitable places for
allotments.
This option would have limited use
in inclement weather – most people
thought outdoor space would need
to be complemented by at least
some shelter, and many suggested it
be combined with indoor recreation
space.
12

Page 13

13
Multi Storey Retail / Residential / Exhibition
Pros
The prospect of some exhibition
space was very welcome, provided
it does not impact negatively on
existing businesses.  Some people
suggested a heritage or civic
space, such as a John Logie Baird
exhibition, which could be rotated
for different events. 
Some attendees liked the idea
of pleasant shops and galleries
combined, creating a destination
for people to relax, shop and eat –
attractive to tourists and locals.
Overall, few people seemed to have
strong opinions on the prospect
of residential development on the
site.  Positive comments related to
the possibility of an aesthetically
pleasing, high quality development
that would raise the profile of the
waterfront, and deliver benefits for
the local economy.
Cons
A development of more than
one storey sparked considerable
concerns about the loss of the view
across the water.  Many people felt
that a smaller development would
be acceptable, but not multi storey.
Many attendees were concerned
about the impact of large scale
retail, particularly national chains,
on local businesses – and pointed
out that there are some empty
retail units in the town already,
questioning whether the market can
support more retail.  There were
strong feelings that large brands
would put independent retailers out
of business and / or concentrate
shoppers in the town centre, losing
the spread of retailers further along
the promenade.

Page 14

14
Multi Storey Retail / Residential / Exhibition
“Multinational retailers are
not needed in town.  We
should be encouraging
and supporting local
independent businesses
to grow and develop.”
“Clothes shops have
closed because the rents
are too high.  Young
people go elsewhere to
buy things all in one go,
and people shop online.”
“I’d be completely against
a multi storey building. 
The thing that’s good
about Helensburgh is the
water and views.  Towns
that have developed their
waterfronts have died.”
“The Local Development
Plan prioritises
Helensburgh for housing,
so this is in line with the
Plan.  Increasing the
population is in line with
the area’s objectives
for things like heating
networks.  Mixed use
residential and retail
would boost the economy,
and it’s close to the
train station and local
amenities.”
“We don’t have many
places for museum /
cultural type exhibitions –
it would be good to have
something for tourists to
do in poor weather.”
“There are two art galleries
on the sea front, and
exhibition opportunities
at the library, community
hub, Oak Tree Gallery,
Destination Helensburgh
and Hermitage Park
Pavilion.”
“I don’t have an objection
to retail etc, but would
question if it’s the right
site.”
Much of the feedback concentrated
on a desire for the site to be more
focused on local community benefits
and independent business owners. 
The cons for residential tended to
relate to a preference to keep the
site for more general community
use, rather than a select few who
can afford to live there.  It was also
questioned whether there is a need
for more residential development.
“See NPF4 and
community empowerment
legislation, which is all
about place.  A focus on
retail is wasteful.”
“Multi storey just seems
like a bizarre suggestion
– why would we want to
lose the view?”

Page 15

15
Multi Storey Retail / Hotel
Please note that the pros and cons
related to multi storey retail were the
same for this option as for the mixed
use retail, residential and exhibition
space – primarily a concern about
competition which would negatively
affect local businesses, and losing
the views with a multi storey
development.
Pros
There were very mixed views
about the need for a hotel, with
some attendees advocating for
the benefits of a hotel while others
questioned the need.  For those
who would welcome a hotel,
comments tended to focus on their
struggles to find accommodation
nearby for family and friends to visit,
and the benefits of the waterside
location for an attractive tourism
destination combined with some
shops and restaurants.
Cons
Several people felt that Helensburgh
already has plenty of hotels so there
would not be sufficient demand
for another.  It was also noted
that an additional hotel could take
customers away from existing
businesses.
There was a suggestion that the
service areas for a retail and hotel
development of this type would
negatively impact the aesthetics of
the location and the public realm
around the leisure centre, making it
appear messy and attracting vermin.

Page 16

16
Multi Storey Retail / Hotel
“A hotel would be nice
for a few people taking
rooms, but spoils the view
for everyone else.”
“An assessment should
be made of existing hotels
to see if it’s viable.  The
people who come here
to visit are usually day
trippers.”
“There’s a massive
demand for hotel rooms,
but this is not the right
location – it would be too
high and spoil the views.”
“There’s not enough
demand for a hotel.”
“A hotel would be
acceptable, and could be
a conference centre etc. 
It would bring people into
the town and be beneficial
for businesses.”
“Three or four storeys [for
a hotel] would be out of
scale with the town.”
“No multi storey – a low
level development would
be more appropriate.”
“I’ve struggled to get
hotels for family.  A nice
hotel, with some nice
shops and restaurants,
would be lovely.  It’s such
a nice spot looking out
over the bay – people
who visit want to look out
over the sea, and that’s a
perfect spot for it.  People
will pay a premium to sit
and look out over the bay.”

Page 17

17
Retail / Community Space
Pros
A community space was particularly
appealing to many attendees,
particularly if it provided facilities for
young people, families and visitors. 
This option sparked a lot of debate
about the need for indoor recreation
and leisure areas, particularly for
younger people, which could make
the most of being close to the
existing leisure centre.  Many people
felt that it is not the right spot for a
supermarket, but that the site could
support both a leisure and some
kind of retail offering if the building
itself were an attractive design and
single storey.
A pleasant, single storey building
could complement the leisure
complex well and would not be
too obtrusive, given the desire to
maintain views across the water as
much as possible.
Cons
Whilst some people felt that another
supermarket would be welcome
in Helensburgh, however some
questioned whether the Waterfront
is the right location.  This largely
stemmed from the feeling that
the site should be dedicated to
community use and recreation, so a
suggested solution was to combine
the community space with other
civic or leisure provision.
As with the other retail options,
some attendees were concerned
that a retail offering, particularly
a supermarket, could impact on
local businesses such as butchers,
fishmongers and delis, risking
putting smaller independent retailers
out of business.

Page 18

18
Retail / Community Space
“Something like an Aldi
or Next would be ideal –
people need cheaper food
options and there are no
clothes shops.  You could
even put a leisure offering
above it on a second
floor.”
“We are lacking
supermarkets, but that’s
not the place for it.  It
would be sacrilege to put
a supermarket on that
site.”
“A mix of small retail and
community (outdoor) use
would be ideal.  However,
how many businesses can
you support here – would
it be viable?”
“Is there an opportunity
to combine open
space with something
commercial and covered,
to complement the leisure
centre?”
“There’s community space
in the Pavilion, and hardly
anyone uses it.  There are
rooms in the tower, church
etc that are well used.  But
we could certainly use a
bigger community space /
hall.”
“Community and retail
is very ‘Meh…’ – think
different!”
“We could really use
a multi use room for
community and visitors
– a building [on that site]
would be fine, but [keep it]
lower level with things for
visitors to do.”
Whilst the concept of community
space was attractive, several people
commented that there is plenty of
existing provision in the town that
is well used, but not at capacity –
therefore an additional space might
not be useful, depending on size
and cost compared to the existing
provision.
“People go out of town for
clothes shopping – they
close here because people
don’t shop here enough. 
Kids want Primark, older
people want M&S, but
neither shop enough to
make it worthwhile.”
“Everyone wanted a Lidl
or Aldi, but that’s not the
place for it and it’s too
small.”

Page 19

19
EV Charging
Please note, most of the options
were presented alongside EV
charging to gauge reactions to
buildings of various types with
parking.  Overall it was positively
received, with many attendees
seeing the benefits of more
sustainable options and the
possibility of bringing in visitors to
use the charging points.  Several
commented that more parking
in general is needed in the town
centre.
A counterpoint to this was an
argument that Helensburgh should
be trying to reduce car usage and
parking, to increase the use of active
travel and reduce pollution.
“EV charging can bring
people to the town who
can then spend their
money on the existing
businesses and support
the town.”
“EV parking can help with
people’s decisions on their
destinations for days out.”
“If you were going to put
multiple chargers you’d
need fast charging ones,
and I don’t think the grid
there would support it.”
“Additional parking would
be a waste of space and
doesn’t benefit the town
(other than disabled
parking).  We want to
see people walking and
cycling around, in line with
a ‘strong towns’ approach
and avoiding car heavy
communities.”
“Any parking / EV charging
should be covered and
have solar panels on the
roof.”

Page 20

20
General Comments
Throughout the course of the
engagement, attendees provided
additional comments and
suggestions that were not directly
related to a particular option,
but touched on their broader
perceptions of Helensburgh and
its needs.  Below is a summary of
these comments and conversations.
Sale or Lease?
A small number of attendees talked
about the potential sale or lease of
the land, and were keen that it be
leased rather than sold.  There was
a suggestion that selling the land...
“...would encourage
developers to put a large
commercial building on
it – a lease might leave it
more open to sympathetic
development.” 
This theme was echoed by another
attendee who commented that the
site is a valuable and attractive spot
in Helensburgh, which the Council
should keep control of:
“The land is too valuable
for single storey – if you’re
selling it, someone will
build multi storey.  More
sustainable for the Council
would be to put business
units on it and rent them
out, ideally with a park. 
Smaller business units
would be more sustainable
and allow smaller local
businesses to take them,
and the town becomes
more resilient.
“This land is a key piece of
Helensburgh’s waterfront.
“We need to make
sure the land is used
responsibly, the Council
should keep control of it. 
Once it’s gone, it’s gone.”  
Visitors and Young People
Several conversations centred
around the need to attract more
visitors to the town, with the
Waterfront site providing an ideal
spot for this.  Likewise, attendees
commented that there is little for
young people to do in Helensburgh
therefore some kind of civic space,
multi use exhibition space, or leisure
facility would be useful.  Some
people also lamented the loss of the
outdoor swimming pool, and would
like to see it resurrected.
“We’re missing the big
picture here: the indirect
cost benefit of a facility
that attracts visitors to the
town and doesn’t affect
existing businesses.  [That
would have] wider benefits
to the town.”
Some attendees tied this in to the
potential for developing the pier to
receive tourists by boat. 
“To develop the pier we
need facilities for marine
tourism – cruise ships
brought ashore, not just
getting on a coach and
going elsewhere.  ‘Step
ashore’ facilities so people
stay in Helensburgh for
the day.”

Page 21

21
General Comments
It was suggested that the site could
be used to signpost visitors to other
attractions, such as an information
point to send people along the
promenade or to local parks. 
More broadly, it was suggested
that Helensburgh could be better
connected to events and attractions
outside the town, by creating a hub
for coach and boat trips to places
like Edinburgh.
The issue of activities for young
people also came up in most
sessions, with a suggestion that this
would likely be a similar offer to a
visitor attraction:
“We have a huge
demographic of families
because of the naval base. 
We need something to
keep families here at the
weekend rather than going
out of town.”
“We often forget there are
a lot of kids here.  It’s seen
as a town for bus tours,
but kids need things to
do.”
“There’s nothing here to
attract young people,
other than swimming.  The
submarine museum is
too old for [primary age]
children.  Without a car,
you’re stuck.”

Page 22

22
Schools
Engagement

Page 23

23
Schools Engagement
Primary and high school pupils
were asked to tell us what they
would like to see in Helensburgh,
and discuss the reasons behind
their suggestions.  The exercise
generated a wide range of ideas,
from parks and community gardens
to cafes and shops, via trampoline
parks and bowling alleys.
A key theme for many young people
was the lack of things to do in
Helensburgh, with many travelling
to Dumbarton for shopping trips
or activities.  For some, this is a
negative as they would prefer to
have shops and familiar chain stores
/ cafes closer to home.  For others,
they are happy to travel elsewhere
and spend a day out with family,
perhaps combining shopping, eating
out and / or recreation in one trip.
There were no strong themes or
differences emerging by age group,
although this may largely be due
to the relatively small number of
participants – the activity was
designed to gather ideas rather
than  carry out quantitative analysis. 
However, it is interesting to see
the wide range of ideas the young
people came up with spontaneously
and through discussion with their
peers at the workshop.
The table on the right shows the
main suggestions, followed by a
selection of drawings produced
during the workshops.
Suggested Activity Mentions
Actviity centre (eg bowling, trampolines) 9
Small shops / cafes / stalls 8
Outdoors sports pitches / courts 8
Grass / trees / fountains 8
Skate park 7
Large retail (eg Sports Direct, clothing) 6
Arcade 6
Supermarket (suggestions included M&S, Lidl) 5
Coffee chain (eg Starbucks) 5
Play park 3
Car park 3
Museum 2
Cinema 2
Fast food chain (eg McDonalds) 2
Vegetable garden 2

Page 24

24
Schools – Pictures

Page 25

www.ryderarchitecture.com