Democracy Spraffa

3 Hermitage Park Evaluation Report Revised Final

Argyll and Bute Council · 12 September 2023
Back to Helensburgh & Lomond Area Committee — 12 September 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

May 2023
Evaluation of the Hermitage Park Heritage-led
Regeneration 
Report

Page 2

2 
Contents 
Executive summary 4
Introduction and background 11
Introduction 12
Method 18
The Regeneration of Hermitage Park 19
Park improvements and activities 29
Impacts and outcomes 40
A range of heritage, social and economic objectives
achieved 40
The project will improve social cohesion 41
The park’s heritage will be better managed and environmentally
sustainable 44
Economic and wider impacts 47
Lessons learnt and recommendations 50
Appendices 54
Stakeholders interviewed 54
Outputs achieved 55
Evaluation research matrix 56
Stakeholder Topic Guide 58
Visitor survey questions 64
Contractors 66
Economic impact data 67
Progress against activity plan (April 2023) 69

Page 3

3 
There was a widespread consensus
amongst those interviewed that the
park makes Helensburgh a more
attractive place to visit.  
“The park is like night and day from what it
was before.”
“It works really well as a park.”

Page 4

Executive summary 4 
Executive summary
Background
This is a final report to evaluate and assess the Hermitage Park heritage-led regeneration for
Argyll and Bute Council. The report evaluates the difference the project has made, identifies
lessons learnt and how improvements in future delivery could be made. 
Hermitage Park is close to the centre of Helensburgh and an important green space for local
people and visitors. It had gradually fallen into disrepair as council budgets were cut and
usage was declining. This project aimed not just to restore the park but to capitalise on its rich
heritage to create a space that would engage people and provide wellbeing and economic
benefits to the town. 
This project took a bottom-up approach, with extensive community consultation informing the
master-planning. A strapline for the park, ‘Growing our Park Together’ was created to be
inclusive and pull in all people and groups.  Core funding of a £2,333,300 grant from the
National Lottery Heritage Fund (NLHF) was secured, supplemented by smaller allocations
from partners totalling almost £3.9m.
Figure 1 complete and final funding summary
Funder Amount
Argyll and Bute Council £380,000
NLHF £2,382,300
MoD £253,000
Sustrans £335,332
War Memorial Trust £78,550
Section 75 £75,000
Other funders £105,355
Volunteer Time (in-kind) £102,090
Management & Maintenance commitment £47,200
Other Council funding £173,317 
£3,932,134
The project aims and objectives

Page 5

Executive summary 5 
Funding from NLHF was provided to ensure:
 The park and its heritage will be better managed,
 The park and its heritage will be in a better condition,
 The heritage of the park will be better interpreted and explained; and
 The heritage of the park will be better identified and recorded.
As well as providing a sustainable management regime, the key objectives were to: 
Repair and restore the built heritage and restore Victorian walkways and footbridges, and
plantings. 
Replace the derelict pavilion with a state-of-the-art building containing a café, office, toilets
as well as recreational and activities space.
Move and improve the play area and create informal spaces for recreation.
Engage users with interpretation and signage and through a comprehensive activity plan. 
Increase opportunities for volunteering including training in maintenance skills. 
The restoration and regeneration of Hermitage Park aligns with the redevelopment of
Helensburgh and enables a better strategic integration of the Park with a rejuvenated town
centre. 
What did happen?
The Council and its partners delivered a highly successful heritage-led regeneration project
including the hard and soft landscaping, restoration of heritage, and delivering a programme of
activity that has doubled footfall. The Council worked closely with a local steering group,
which included the Friends of Hermitage Park, to design and develop the park. The contract
was split into three elements. 
1) The capital work and restoration of the park, including installation of new signage and
interpretation panels 
2) The building of a Passivhaus Pavilion t0 house a café and community meeting room.
3) The development and delivery of an Activity Plan
The project repaired the built heritage features in Hermitage Park including the ‘A’-listed War
Memorial and gardens, Japanese Garden, 18th century mill remains, Victorian wishing well and
rebuilt Victorian walkways and footbridges.  Improvements to drainage, paths, walls and

Page 6

Executive summary 6 
structure were made and further planting has taken place. The play park was relocated next to
the Pavilion.  Signage and interpretation panels, incorporating captured spoken memories of
the park’s heritage, were installed. Importantly, the War Memorial, a focal point of local
remembrance ceremonies, which had been identified as “at risk” is no longer on the risk
register. 
The Pavilion is the main facility for visitors and provides community meeting/training space,
toilets, storage, and Park Manager’s office.  An attractive destination café restaurant within the
park generates surplus income to support future park maintenance and meets the needs of
day visitors and families.  The building was designed to Passivhaus standards, creating an
energy-efficient, quiet building suitable for learning and relaxing with superior indoor air
quality and comfort. 
An activity plan was developed and delivered that brought people from different groups and
of all ages and abilities to the park.  
Achievements
All the key objectives have been achieved.  The funding has contributed to the park and
heritage being in better condition, the heritage better explained and the heritage identified and
recorded.  The heritage-led regeneration has also led to improved social cohesion as well as a
healthier community.
There are notable achievements including:
 Annual visitor numbers have more than doubled1 to 146,000 since the park was restored.  
 The Interpretation strategy and associated works provide the park with interactive,
informative signage, not there before the improvements.
 The University of the Highlands and Islands Argyll (UHI), schools and voluntary
organisations use the Park as a venue for the practical elements of their training courses. 
 The Hermitage Park heritage and community opportunities are promoted through Invest in
Argyll (investinargyllandbute.co.uk) and the Argyll and Bute Council website2.  
 Friends of Hermitage Park (who promote their work through Facebook) channel people
interested in becoming involved in volunteering to support future viability of the park
 Receiving a Green Flag Award reflects positively on a park or green space's contribution to
the environment. Hermitage Park first received the award in 2020, with two further awards
in 2021 and 2022.                                                 
1 Compared to pre-COVID numbers. Visitor numbers held up well during the pandemic but visiting patterns were not typical. 
2 https://www.argyll-bute.gov.uk/hermitage-park

Page 7

Executive summary 7 
 Themed events, horticulture, exercise and floristry classes, outreach workshops and work
experience placements.
 Hermitage Primary School have continued to use the Park on an almost daily basis, for PE,
outdoor education as well as secondary schools and scouts using the park.
Challenges
COVID-19 delayed the official opening and restrictions had an impact on project momentum,
affecting the whole of the activity plan, the delivery of the two capital contracts, the
recruitment of a park manager, and the timing of leasing the café. However, the park played a
positive role during the pandemic as a key open-space where people could meet safely and
take their exercise.  The cafe started operating as a business in May 2021, initially as take away
only due to pandemic restrictions and opened for indoor service in November 2021.  Some
early post-lockdown activities were less-well attended due to people’s reluctance to resume
social mixing. 
Towards the end of the project, The Queen’s death affected a planned September harvest
event – part of the Dandelion Scotland project – which was cancelled. This was intended as a
Park Celebration Event, to highlight the improvements, showcase the park as a vibrant
greenspace, and thank funders and contributors. A less formal event was later organised to
mark the opening, branded as a Halloween celebration.
Other challenges overcome were the breakdown in relationships with the original Friends of
Hermitage Park group, and some contractual issues with the company responsible for the
Pavilion construction.
What difference has the project made to people and the community?
Stakeholders interviewed reported improvements made a positive difference to the park and it
is used significantly more. The park complements the attractions and amenities available to
local people and visitors to the town and it is included in the Helensburgh Tourist Trail app.  
Visitors interviewed and stakeholders who use the facilities, agreed the Pavilion offers
everything they think it should and enhances the park visit experience.
Schools use the park on a daily basis for education, recreation and fitness. The demonstration
garden is of particular interest, where school children undertake a complete food growing
cycle from sowing seeds to eating crops.  Volunteering opportunities have been provided for
people taking part in horticulture, general park maintenance and lime-mortaring courses. A
total of 24 attended the latter, were trained in how to use lime mortar to make wall repairs
within the park and War Memorial, and most subsequently became volunteers.

Page 8

Executive summary 8 
The café operator felt the projections in the Council’s business plan had been optimistic but
confident of sustaining the operation even although costs and overheads have risen recently.
Through wildlife refuges, re-use of equipment and building materials, local food production,
LED lighting and the Passivhaus, a positive contribution is being made to carbon reduction. 
Community knowledge of heritage and the environment, including food production, has been
improved through the programme of events and voluntary sector organisations’ engagement,
schools’ use of the park, activities such as Magic Torch’s comic book exploration of heritage,
the Dandelion Scotland project, and 13 horticultural classes all with full attendance.
Investment in furniture and equipment has made the Community Room in the Pavilion more
‘hire friendly’, suitable for use by a wider range of groups such as University course classes, art
classes, craft fairs, art exhibitions and fitness classes. 
Outcomes delivered and impact
NLHF outcomes have been achieved as highlighted earlier.  The park and heritage is in better
condition and better managed. The park’s heritage is now better captured and recorded and
better interpreted and explained.  The park heritage-led regeneration brings additional
benefits beyond those outcomes and highlights include:
 increased participation in heritage and environmental activities such as the inter-
generational comic book activity and the successful horticultural classes
 increased volunteering opportunities in the park which support maintenance and activity
provision for others, such as voluntary sector activity, The Green Gym, gardening and
planting including food crops, working with lime mortar and supporting other park events.
 Increased physical activity, including use of the plaza for ‘free play’ and various outdoor
fitness classes 
 Improved understanding of the environment and increased knowledge of heritage through
events and signage
 Reduced social isolation as people gather and do things with others
 Improved health and wellbeing as people walk and exercise in the park a well as
participate in events and activities
 Improved diet as people better understand how food is produced and how to prepare it,
and
 Improved skills as people are trained in classes or are mentored by the park supervisor or
other volunteers.
Economic impact

Page 9

Executive summary 9 
The park heritage-led regeneration is having a positive economic impact, creating jobs during
the construction phase as well as attracting visitors and tourists to the area.  Most visitors to
the park are from Helensburgh, over 70% in our short survey held during a busy Easter period,
and probably a higher proportion over the course of a full year.  But a significant minority are
from outside the town showing it contributes to the appeal of Helensburgh as a destination. 
Comparisons though with previous years are difficult because of changes in the way visits are
recorded, and the non-typical Covid-19 years.  People-counter data suggests the number of
visits has doubled since work completed. The economic benefit to the town, and more widely
to Scotland, is measured through the direct spend on construction and the additional spend by
visitors to the park.  Estimates use national survey data and impacts calculated using standard
government multipliers. The figures show overall, the impact of visitor spend each year is: 
The construction phase of the project incurred expenditure of nearly £3.4 million which would
support 47 full time equivalent jobs for one year. 
Lessons learnt and recommendations
Many aspects that worked well have been identified and stakeholders gave some examples
they felt worked, such as:
 Having a Park Manager and Park supervisor facilitated the project delivery
 The landscape design and improved drainage works well 
 The Pavilion with its facilities is a simple but a popular and strong concept
 The remembrance garden is done well and has brought armed forces personnel support
 The management throughout the park development and council partnership work with the
Friends of Hermitage Park has been fantastic
 The UHI horticulture courses delivered in the park are popular locally
Economic impact £2.97 million in 2021
Supporting 45.6 FTE jobs
Total construction spend £3.4 million
Supporting 46.9 FTE jobs

Page 10

Executive summary 10 
 A maintenance manual has been developed and available to support sustainability
 The Friends of Hermitage Park are more established and will keep the focus on
improvements
 The kitchen/demonstration garden is popular with children and older people, and
Management of the Park is the responsibility of the Council Roads and Infrastructure Service,
and they will take on some additional duties when the Project Manager post ends. There have
been handover discussions and the Friends will play a role when it comes to events and some
other items, and this is set out in a Memorandum of Understanding.  The park will implement a
plan to:
 Continue providing a safe and attractive space for people to relax and exercise, 
 Highlight the climate change and environmental credentials and improvements made in
the park through a communication plan
 Promote biodiversity and continue to help mitigate the effects of climate change
 Play an ongoing role in heritage and environment through education and continuing to
attract and manage volunteers
More and varied public and themed events could be organised to bring people and generate
additional income to the park. Things being done or planned to ensure further improvements
include:
 Further integrating and promoting the park with the other regeneration and tourism-led
features across Helensburgh
 improved access for disabled people to the raised beds in the demonstration garden
 sponsorship for flower beds, memorial gardens and other areas of the park
 Marketing and communicating facilities in the park to people in Helensburgh and beyond
 Building a larger volunteer base through the Friends group, and
 Adding to the teen area that exists with a space that could accommodate sport activities,
and
 A covered bandstand is on the wish list as a future development project.

Page 11

Introduction and background 11 
Introduction and background
Summary
The heritage-led regeneration project took a bottom-up approach using extensive community
consultation to develop the master-plan and funding bids. The National Lottery Heritage Fund
(NLHF) awarded core funding to support the project, supported by smaller yet significant
allocations from partners to ensure the park and heritage is in better condition and better
managed. The park’s heritage is now better captured and recorded and better interpreted and
explained.  
 The specific objectives from the NLHF application were to:
 Carry out physical repair works to the built heritage features in Hermitage Park,
including the A-listed War Memorial, Japanese Garden, 18th century mill remains and
Victorian wishing well
 Reintroduce Victorian walkways and footbridges along the burn, with repairs to
drystone banking and bank stabilisation work
 Deliver the new Pavilion building which will act as a hub for the park, incorporating a
café, toilets, recreational space and activities space
 Redesign the recreational areas, creating a multi-use space for formal and informal
sports - the children’s play area was moved closer to the new Pavilion
 Install signage, interpretation panels, benches and LED-lighting
 Deliver a wide range of activities as per the Activity Plan
 Provide training opportunities (both accredited and non-accredited) for Argyll and
Bute Council staff, the Friends group, and other volunteers
 Deliver natural heritage improvements and provide learning opportunities related to
natural heritage
 Recruit a full-time Park Manager, and
 Implement a new management and maintenance regime to meet and maintain Green
Flag standards.
 The restoration of Hermitage Park fits with the redevelopment of Helensburgh and enables
a better strategic integration of the park with a rejuvenated town centre and esplanade
bringing benefits to the wider community.

Page 12

Introduction and background 12 
Introduction 
This is a final evaluation report for the heritage=led regeneration of Hermitage Park for Argyll
and Bute Council.  The report aims to meet NLHF requirements, to learn what worked and
consider ways the park could be further improved. 
Background to the park and location3
Hermitage Park covers an area of approximately 3.8 hectares. It was created in 1911, from the
grounds of the now demolished Hermitage House and extended in 1919 to include the former
Millig Mill.  The earliest information about the land that forms Hermitage Park is the reference
to Millig Mill in the Blaeu Atlas of Scotland of 1654. The three-storey mill was water-driven via a
lade from a pond under what was the tennis courts.  At the time, the mill was one of the largest
businesses in the town. The mill was demolished but remains still exist, including standing
parts, buried remains and artefacts, and three date stones. 
Hermitage House and surrounding land was owned by the Cramb family. In 1880 they sold an
area of land, on which Hermitage Primary School was built.  In 1911 the remainder of the Cramb
lands were acquired by the Town Council for use as a public park. Shortly after its acquisition,
a rustic timber bandstand was built in the park next to the Millig Burn and was a major
attraction. The house was used for several different purposes, including a WWI hospital but
was demolished in 1963.  Now, only the stone foundations of this exist.  The land from the
Cramb family, the park and the Millig Mill area became known as Hermitage Park. 
Within the park the ‘A’ Listed war memorial, designed by Alexander Nisbet Patterson, was
erected in the walled garden of the house in 1923. This war memorial and gardens hold the
annual Remembrance Day parade.  This has a special role locally for the large population of
armed services personnel and their families who live in and around Helensburgh. 
For most of the twentieth century the park was a beautifully cultivated public garden where
children could play and visitors (majority arriving from Glasgow on commercial steamships)
and residents could relax, play various sports, and listen to music. The park was considered to
be an important recreation asset and continued to be used and appreciated locally, although
use declined steadily over the years.  Hermitage Park was an underused asset with unrealised
potential. There was previously no interpretation in the park.
Over time, and with the limited resources Argyll and Bute Council could give, the park had
fallen into disrepair. Past and continuing reductions in resources resulted in a neglected and
overgrown appearance and poor condition of many of the important heritage sites within the                                                 
3 Hermitage Park Activity Plan 2015

Page 13

Introduction and background 13 
park.  Pathways were in bad condition, severely washed away, the Pavilion had fallen into
disrepair and the toilets were out of use. There was no programme of events in the park.  
Figure 2 Location of park in relation to other features in Helensburgh
The programme and timescale
This project took a bottom-up approach, with extensive community consultation directly
informing the master-planning.  Local authority staff worked with the original Friends of
Hermitage Park group in the planning and design of the site, and how it would be managed.
Throughout the development phase there was consultation to understand views of local
people and listen to their concerns and needs. The consultation considered the views of
stakeholders, visitors to the park, the council's strategic plans for Helensburgh, and elected
members’ views.
Argyll and Bute Council submitted a first-round application for grant funding to the National
Lottery Heritage Fund in August 2013, with support from the Friends. This was successful and
development funding for an improvement project was granted by NLHF at the end of 2013.
The development work included different specialist skills, with consultants working together (a
list of contractors is included in the Appendix) and with council officers.

Page 14

Introduction and background 14 
A strap line for the park, ‘Growing our Park Together’ was adopted reflecting the inclusive
approach to pull in all people and groups.
Start date: 2013 (first round application)
End Date: December 2022, after an approved extension
Programme extension – an extension to the project was agreed because of Covid-19
restrictions.  The Activity Plan was not implemented fully during the Covid period and a further
12-month extension was needed.
Partners
Core funding (£2,333,300 grant from the National Lottery Heritage Fund) was secured,
supplemented by smaller allocations from other elements such as Sustrans funding to widen
the paths to make them more suitable for cycling and for a road crossing.  The NLHF core
funding was essential in attracting other significant funds from the public, voluntary and
private sector.   
Figure 3 complete and final funding summary
Funder Amount
Argyll and Bute Council £380,000
NLHF £2,382,300
MoD £253,000
Sustrans £335,332
War Memorial Trust £78,550
Section 75 £75,000
Other funders £105,355
Volunteer Time (in-kind) £102,090
Management & Maintenance commitment £47,200
Other Council funding £173,317 
£3,932,134
Approved Purposes of the Grant Award 
Funding from NLHF was provided to ensure:
 The park and its heritage will be better managed,
 The park and its heritage will be in a better condition,

Page 15

Introduction and background 15 
 The heritage of the park will be better interpreted and explained, and
 The heritage of the park will be better identified and recorded.
Aim and objectives  
The heritage-led regeneration project was essential in restoring the key green space of
Helensburgh and a site of significant local heritage and amenity. The aim of the project was to
return Hermitage Park to a central role in the Helensburgh community as a place to relax,
exercise, meet and visit by restoring its most attractive and valuable areas of heritage
importance and adapting its facilities to meet 21st century requirements. The detailed
objectives were to:
 Carry out physical repair works to the built heritage features in Hermitage Park, including
the War Memorial, Japanese Garden, 18th century mill remains and Victorian wishing well
 Reintroduce Victorian walkways and footbridges along the burn, with repairs to drystone
banking and bank stabilisation work
 Deliver the new Pavilion building which will act as a hub for the park, incorporating a café,
toilets, recreational space and activities space
 Redesign the recreational areas, creating a multi-use space for formal and informal sports.
The children’s play area will be moved closer to the new Pavilion
 Install signage, interpretation panels, benches and LED-lighting
 Deliver a wide range of activities as per the Activity Plan
 Provide training opportunities (both accredited and non-accredited) for Argyll and Bute
Council staff, the Friends group, and other volunteers
 Deliver natural heritage improvements and provide learning opportunities related to
natural heritage
 Recruit a full-time Park Manager
 Implement a new management and maintenance regime to meet Green Flag standards
 Ensure key historic features are preserved for posterity
 Provide people-centred interpretation to bring the park’s heritage to life and ensure it is
valued, cared for and enjoyed
 Build a new pavilion with a covered deck overhang area for outside tables
 Re-site and reconfigure the Childrens’ play area  
 Create a demonstration garden growing fruit and vegetables with a bothy space
 Put in place an activity plan and extensive volunteer programme and interventions to
communicate and celebrate the park’s heritage, and
 Create better management of the plants and the landscape, to promote biodiversity,
provide habitats for wildlife and opportunities for learning.
The park complements other town developments

Page 16

Introduction and background 16 
Figure 4 Restoration work at Colquhoun Square
The restoration of Hermitage
Park fits with the timing of
the redevelopment of
Helensburgh and enables a
better strategic integration of
the Park with a rejuvenated
town centre and esplanade.
Argyll and Bute Council
began a programme to
promote regeneration and
economic development in
five of its waterfront towns of
Campbeltown, Helensburgh,
Oban, Rothesay and Dunoon
(CHORD), in 2008. Over £30
million was allocated to the wider programme.  
In Helensburgh’s town centre, a project was unveiled which created an Outdoor Museum in
Colquhoun Square. The project was designed in response to consultation with the people of
Helensburgh during the initial CHORD process. In addition, stepping stones created along the
grass area of the esplanade feature the most popular children’s names in Helensburgh, over
the years.  
There has been over £7 million of investment in regenerating Helensburgh town centre,
making transformational improvements to the town's public places, including:
 Wider pavements
 Better access to local shops
 New parking bays
 New street furniture, and
 Linking the front and the town centre.
This was delivered along with improvements to the esplanade redesigned in consultation with
the community to provide an exciting experience. That project provides facilities like a covered
events and performance place, a children’s play area, landscaped gardens and an informal
grassed area.
Figure 5 Helensburgh Esplanade improvements

Page 17

Introduction and background 17 
The park adds an additional
attractive key element of a
tourist trail from the
esplanade, through
Colquhoun Square to the
park and then on to Hill
House that ties heritage
together within
Helensburgh, it is included
on the Discover Helensburgh
App. 
Benefits to the community and local organisations
Regenerating the park, restoring the heritage providing the pavilion and the objectives listed
earlier was intended provide a neutral space where people can mix across groups including
Armed Forces families.  People will have things to do and the planned interventions will
increase social impact, environmental awareness and sustainability.
The park heritage-led regeneration project gave the council, voluntary organisations, charities
and schools the access to space to carry out activities. These activities have stimulated
people, improved their wellbeing and increased social cohesion.
The park is used by voluntary organisations and training providers to provide learning activities. 
The space is used to provide school children with a natural environment to play and learn in;
visitors, particularly during COVID where high numbers of people accessed space for physical
activity and there is an improved war memorial space to focus remembrance ceremonies
within.
Benefits to volunteers
The Friends of Hermitage Park fully participated with the council in attracting the funds. The
Friends group along with the Park Supervisor have been actively engaging with the council
and attracting new volunteers to support project activity within the park.
Training, developing and supporting volunteers is key to the long-term plans for the park and
is an important element of the Park Supervisor’s role.  For example, The University of the
Highlands and Islands Argyll (UHI), along with the Lime Mortar Training centre provided
practical and horticultural skills people can then pass on to others.  This experience will help
provide in-house training and allow the Friends to continue to develop and train people with

Page 18

18 
skills.  Partners such as the Alzheimer’s Society and Enable also use volunteers to deliver
support and horticultural opportunities to their clients within the park.
Method
The evaluation is based on NLHF guidance and involves a mixed-method approach to data
collection in this study. The different data sources referred to in this report are outlined below:
 Visitor interviews: Depth interviews with frequent and infrequent visitors. Sample: 10.
 Stakeholder interviews: Depth interviews with stakeholders. Sample: 18.
 Visitor survey: Interviewer led surveys that took place at Hermitage Park 11 to 14 April.
Sample: 192 
 E-survey of Friends of Hermitage Park, Sample 27
 Business interview with Park Pavilion proprietor, Sample 1, and
 Partner organisation internal data: Internal evaluation data from project partners.

Page 19

The Regeneration of Hermitage Park 19 
The Regeneration of Hermitage Park
Summary
The Council successfully managed the project to completion with the project manager and
staff working alongside a steering group. The contract was split into three elements. 
a. The capital and restoration work, which included a significant amount of underground
work to deal with water run-off issues as well as the more visible objectives.
b. Building a Passivhaus Pavilion housing a café, toilets and community meeting room.
c. Develop and deliver an Activity Plan.
 The landscape element of the park restoration repaired built-heritage features 
 The play park was moved from a far corner of the park to outside the pavilion
 The new pavilion provides community meeting room, toilets, storage, Park Managers office
and a healthy eating café, designed to energy-efficient Passivhaus standards.   
 The programme had been well-managed by Argyll and Bute Council.
 Visitor numbers have doubled (to 146,000) since the park was restored.  
 The Interpretation strategy and associated works provide the park with informative and
inter-active signage. 
 UHI, schools and voluntary organisations like Enable continue to use the Park as a venue
for training courses. 
 The park is promoted through the Argyll and Bute website and on the Discover
Helensburgh app
 Hermitage Park first received the Green Flag award in 2020 and has met the high standards
required by the award scheme for 2021 and 2022.
 Covid-19 caused complications and delays, holding up construction, recruitment, leasing
the café, delivering the activity plan and working with volunteers. It also led to some post-
lockdown reluctance to participate in some of the group activities.  
Management and delivery of the project
The Friends of Hermitage Park (Friends) was committed to bringing the park back to its former
glory and worked with the Council in developing the original approach to the NLHF for
funding.

Page 20

The Regeneration of Hermitage Park 20 
The application and subsequent delivery of the park renovation was successfully managed by
Argyll and Bute Council. The Council set up and worked closely with a local steering group
(which included the Friends of Hermitage Park) who contributed to the design and
development of the park. This group did some useful work in getting the project up and
running and bringing their ideas to the fore.  
The appointment of a Park Manager using NLHF funds was key to getting the park developed
after the restoration.  Continuation funding for this post will be sought when the current
funding period expires on 31st June 2023. A comprehensive handover plan has been drawn up
by the council, setting out responsibilities for the ongoing management and maintenance of
the park and activities to ensure a viable, sustainable future.
The Council appointed a Park Supervisor in 2018 to help maintain the park and work with
groups using it. This is the only such post in the Council, reflecting its level of commitment to
Hermitage Park. Management and maintenance of the park is shared between the Park
Manager, the Park Supervisor and staff from the Council’s Amenity Services. 
Park regeneration
Figure 6 Millig Mill
The landscape team
(Hawthorn Heights Ltd)
consolidated the remains of
Millig Mill. Also, the war
memorial and the memorial
garden were restored (see
case study). 
We reported earlier that
importantly, the ‘A’-listed War
Memorial identified as “at
risk” is no longer on the risk
register. As stated before, this
war memorial and gardens
hold the annual Remembrance Day parade.  This has a special role locally for the large
population of armed services personnel and their families who live in and around Helensburgh. 
Many hundreds of people attend this ceremony annually.
The overall path network was transformed.  Much of the investment is hidden underground
but this park regeneration work brought significant improvement to drainage utilising SuDS
(Sustainable Drainage System) and adding lighting to the main paths is a key part of the capital

Page 21

The Regeneration of Hermitage Park 21 
works. Lucy boxes installed around the park provide flexible opportunities to stage events in
the park.  Regeneration included the repair of secondary paths and the five foot bridges that
cross the burn, the repair and, in places, rebuilding of the drystone banks of the burn together
with bank stabilisation works. This brought an unusable path network up to a fantastic
standard.  Further bank work will form part of future volunteer activities. 
The former pleasure ground and gardens were restored, including the Japanese Garden,
increasing the biodiversity through adding wildlife-friendly plantings and creating habitat piles.
Outside the Pavilion, designed by Hoskins Architects and built by Stewart and Shields, a multi-
use lawn was incorporated that can facilitate play and events.  This was developed with
spectator facilities on a bank of steps around the paved area known as “the plaza.”  This plaza
is a key feature, popular and heavily used for informal play, as an event space, as a learning
space and an activity space.
Plans to have fountains on the plaza
that could be turned on and off were
abandoned due in part to budget
restrictions for their ongoing
maintenance costs but also because
changing standards in water
treatment meant it became no longer
practically possible to include this
feature
The landscape element of the park
restoration involved additional
physical repair works to the built
heritage features in Hermitage Park,
as outlined in the second round
application. This included the
Japanese Garden and Victorian wishing well. The physical regeneration works are complete
and all aspects of the build contracts are now signed off. All snagging works highlighted have
been completed and also signed off.
One simple element introduced during the restoration work was to lower the height of the
hedge by the main road, allowing local people to see into the park, providing a more
encouraging and welcoming view.
Figure 7  Previous poor state of path network

Page 22

The Regeneration of Hermitage Park 22 
Figure 8 Improvements to the burn 
Planting
Planting has taken place in the formal beds in the main plaza area and on the approaches to
the Pavilion, although consolidation and maintenance of planting is proving to be a challenge
due, in part, to the high levels of use.  As part of the design stage, consideration was given to
the style and maintenance requirements of planting, to ensure the park could be maintained.
The Park Supervisor and park volunteers alleviate this and a final planting programme for the
front of the Pavilion and the memorial garden is now complete. 
Play
The Childrens’ play area was moved to the main recreational and pavilion area.  There was
reuse and replacement of play equipment, some of which was designed in partnership with
local children and schools. The plaza area and the children's play area are complete and
continue to be extremely busy.  In tandem with the cafe now being open, the cluster of
activities in this area act as a ‘honeypot’ for the Park.

Page 23

The Regeneration of Hermitage Park 23 
The large open area on the plaza is extremely popular with cyclists, children learning to cycle,
skaters, skateboarders, families, the local schools, and for fitness.
Figure 9 Children's play area at Hermitage Park
War memorial
Successful improvements were made to the ‘A’-listed war memorial itself, gates, paths, walls
and gardens under the direction of a specialist heritage conservation architect. There is some
final work to be completed on pointing to the west wall. Lime mortar volunteers will repoint
the walls and the park can draw on the active involvement of The British Legion volunteers,
private sector partners and the MOD who will enable this.  For example, staff from Lockheed
Martin are helping to maintain some of the flower beds as part of their Volunteering in the
community programme.

Page 24

The Regeneration of Hermitage Park 24 
Figure 10 Hermitage Park War Memorial 
Case study - Helensburgh War memorial 
The War memorial was designed by Alexander Nisbet Patterson who was a town councillor as well as being one of
the Glasgow Boys group of artists.  He suggested the old walled garden of Hermitage House, already a public park,
as the ideal location. The monument is on a raised platform and in front stretches a long lily-pond, which for Health
and Safety reasons has been kept empty for many years. 
The garden, which has yew trees, roses, and flower beds, is maintained by Argyll and Bute Council. Repairs to the
walls were conducted a few years ago when Helensburgh Heritage Trust obtained a grant from Babcock’s at Faslane. 
The memorial, walls, gate, paths and other elements of the garden were improved during the renovation work.  Part
of the west wall remains to be re-pointed and fully restored. 
Hermitage Park is an important heritage asset to the people of Helensburgh, and the A-Listed war memorial
and gardens play a special role in the Remembrance Day ceremony and to the large population of armed services
personnel and their families who live in and around Helensburgh. Together Faslane, Coulport and the Garelochead
Training Camp make up the largest naval base in the UK This memorial is a central feature during the annual
Remembrance Day ceremonies that are attended by up to 600 people. The newly established Helensburgh branch
of the British Legion are helpful partners in managing and promoting the War Memorial. 
This war memorial could be entered into the Large Community With Gardens category of the Legion Scotland best
kept war memorial campaign. The primary aim of the Best Kept War Memorial Campaign is to foster public
awareness of War Memorials, and to encourage a high standard of continuing maintenance by Local Authorities.

Page 25

The Regeneration of Hermitage Park 25 
Passivhaus Pavilion and its objectives
Figure 11 Pavilion incorporating cafe and community rooms
The Pavilion is critical to the future of the park.  It will play a key role in helping the council
maintain the park and promote heritage. Rental income from the café and renting the
community meeting space to UHI, art clubs and others will allow the Park to generate income. 
An earmarked reserve in the Council budget system ring fences the income. All costs also
come out of this ring-fenced budget, and the aim is to generate a small surplus each year
which will carry forward across financial years.
The Pavilion will help reduce council repair costs and reduce the environmental impact
through the various renewable elements built into the structure. 
Figure 12 The old pavilion
Built to Passivhaus standards and housing a
community room (available for rent), a café facility
(leased to an external operator) and public toilets
managed by the café proprietor, the new Pavilion
was handed over to Property Services in February
2021. The café facility has been successfully let to

Page 26

The Regeneration of Hermitage Park 26 
Arran Foods Ltd. who run The Park Pavilion café from it. 
The Passivhaus standard is met by including triple glazed windows, a PV array on the roof, an
air source heat pump, extensive insulation, and a heat recovery system which capture heat
generated within the building (including the café) and then filters and recirculates the heat
through the building. The cost of the pavilion, as per the final certificate, was £958,041. 
How was it delivered?
The Pavilion was designed to Passivhaus standards. This is a building standard that focuses on
creating energy-efficient buildings with superior indoor air quality and comfort. The goal of
Passivhaus is to reduce the energy consumption of buildings while maintaining a comfortable
and healthy indoor environment.
The Passivhaus standard is based on five principles:
Case study – Hermitage Park Pavilion 
The Pavilion plays a key role in providing a central hub for the park set at the heart of the main recreational facilities
and is a much-needed covered space for a variety of activities that will support the Activity Plan and training,
learning and event activities. 
It provides community meeting room, toilets, storage, bothy, Park Manager’s office and a healthy-eating café with
fresh produce and healthy eating options for park visitors. The café provides an attractive destination
café/restaurant within the park that meets the needs of both day visitors and families looking for a coffee and more
formal dining experiences.  
There is outdoor seating and having the café in the park attracts many people who otherwise may not visit. The
café has capacity to accommodate approximately 42 to 52 people. And there is space for 32 customers outside.  It
also has a kiosk to serve from and this opened up during COVID lockdown.   
The building was designed to Passivhaus standards. The goal of Passive House is to reduce the energy consumption
of buildings while maintaining a comfortable and healthy indoor environment. Passive Houses typically use 75-90%
less energy for heating and cooling than conventional buildings. Challenges with the building contractor meant
that full certification has yet to be achieved. 
The community meeting rooms are used for various events and training. The capacity of a community meeting
room can vary depending on the layout and purpose of the space. However, if the meeting room is intended for
standing-room-only events it could accommodate around 27 to 36 people. Theatre-style it could hold around 36 to
45 people.  And if the meeting room is arranged with tables and chairs in a classroom-style layout, then it could
accommodate around 22 to 27 people depending on furniture arrangement, presence of additional equipment, and
any specific requirements for the event.
Communication and marketing will optimise the potential and income the space can generate for the park.

Page 27

The Regeneration of Hermitage Park 27 
1. Super Insulation: Passivhaus are built with highly insulated walls, roofs, and floors that
significantly reduce the amount of heat loss from the building.
2. Airtightness: Passivhaus are designed to be extremely airtight, which helps to prevent
air leakage and the associated heat loss.
3. High-performance windows: Passivhaus use high-performance triple-glazed windows
to help reduce heat loss and gain.
4. Thermal bridge-free construction: Passivhaus are designed to minimize thermal
bridges, which are areas of the building where heat is easily transferred between the
interior and exterior.
5. Mechanical ventilation with heat recovery: Passivhaus use mechanical ventilation
systems with heat recovery to maintain a constant supply of fresh air while recovering
the heat from the outgoing air.
To achieve Passivhaus standard, a building must meet strict energy performance targets,
measured by airtightness, energy consumption, and indoor air quality. Passivhaus typically use
75-90% less energy for heating and cooling than conventional buildings, which results in
significant energy savings and lower carbon emissions. The Council has received confirmation
that the building meets and exceeds Passivhaus specifications and is now progressing the
formal accreditation.  
Figure 13  Location of pavilion in the park

Page 28

The Regeneration of Hermitage Park 28 
Café within the pavilion
The café was handed over to the operator in April 2021. and started operating as a business in
May 2021, initially as take away only due to pandemic restrictions. The first three months were
rent free to enable his start up, and the tenant walked into a fully fitted out kitchen with all
equipment in place. It then opened for indoor service in November 2021. 
The café provides an attractive destination café/restaurant within the park that meets the
needs of both day visitors and families looking for a coffee or a more formal dining experience.  
Figure 14 Cafe layout within pavilion
There is outdoor seating and having the café in the park attracts many people who otherwise
might not visit. 
The café proprietor feels the park’s attractive location is of commercial benefit to the café but
that trading over the next two years may be a case of ‘keeping their heads above water’
because of increases in costs (energy, food).

Page 29

Park improvements and activities 29 
Park improvements and activities 
Summary
 An Activity Plan was successfully implemented
 Visitors report they have seen a big difference in the park since its restoration
 Visitor numbers have doubled since the work was completed and it was a key asset during
Covid
 The park complements the attractions and amenities available to local people and visitors
to the town.  
 The pavilion offers everything people think it should – a good café and social space
 The outdoor plaza area offers a range of activities
 Educational establishments are key partners
 People were trained in how to use lime mortar essential to make wall repairs 
 Volunteers deliver support to community participants and help maintain the park
 Active engagement with various groups to interpret the park particularly young and older
people
 The redesigned park is working well
 Through wildlife refuges, re-use of equipment, local food production, LED lighting and the
Passivhaus a positive contribution is being made to carbon reduction.
Activity Plan
The activity plan sought to engage with various groups leading to:
 Local schools using the park regularly
 UHI delivering accredited training in the meeting room and at the park
 Schools having areas in the demonstration garden
 Alzheimer’s Scotland using the demonstration garden to grow crops
 The British Legion are heavily involved in supporting the War Memorial
 Completion of a volunteer bothy
 Providing training in horticulture and lime mortar repair to volunteers
 Art club running lessons at the park, and
Many various other activities have taken place including:

Page 30

Park improvements and activities 30 
 A Halloween themed event on the 29th of October 2022 was attended by over 500 people
 Hermitage Primary School have continued to use the Park on an almost daily basis, for PE,
outdoor education as well as secondary schools and scouts using the park
 A series of art as well as horticulture and floristry classes are run in the community room
 To explore theme of heritage, art and learning, Magic Torch ran outreach workshops on the
park’s heritage encouraging people to explore the heritage of the park and the wider
Helensburgh area through storytelling, narration and comic book art.
 Friends collect memories through the Facebook page
 A young person with learning difficulties had a work placement under the Employability
Fund
 Summer holiday events took place
 Regular planting and weeding by the Friends around the park and demonstration garden
 Outdoor classes looking at wildlife in the park
 Tai Chi classes held in the park
 The Green Gym operated in the park
 For a while Fitness classes were delivered by SOS Fitness and Live Argyll continue to use
the park
 A lighting and music event was held in March 2022 as part of the ColmCille 1500
celebrations
 A free for all plant giveaway for Dandelion Scotland attracted 300 people to the park in
June 2022
 Discover Helensburgh featured the park in their app of themed trails
 As part of the Councils COP26 programme, a number of sustainable craft events were
organised in November and December 2021 to run from the Community Room in the
Pavilion.
 A young person had work experience for 6 months through the Kickstart scheme.
 The park manager gained a Carbon Literacy qualification and the supervisor attended a
working with volunteers course.
 The Park supervisor provided training to volunteers and council staff.
Management and staff
Generally, with minor exceptions, stakeholders and survey respondents feel the overall
programme has been well-managed by Argyll and Bute Council. 
The Park Manager was appointed and has been working successfully with the council staff.
This NLHF-funded post ends on 30th June 2023. However, the Park Supervisor, appointed in
2018, will continue working with volunteers and organisations as a key part of the role. The
position of Park Supervisor is the only site-dedicated post of its kind within the Council and
emphasises its commitment to Hermitage Park’s future.

Page 31

Park improvements and activities 31 
Engaging audiences with heritage
Figure 15 Interpretation board
Before the project there were around 62,600 visitors
each year to the park.  Numbers for 2021 show visits
have more than doubled (146,000) since the park was
restored. 
Mechanically-wound interpretation boards (designed by
Campbell and Company) at strategic locations show
pictures, text and use recorded voice to tell visitors
about the places in the park.   These are effective and
actively engage the visitor..
There was agreement among those interviewed that
signposting within the park was adequate, with
references to the signposting being good or “what you
would expect in a park”.  
There was however some criticism of the shortage of
external signage, so access to the park can be difficult to
find for non-locals.  As the park is on a main road into the
town, more and improved signage would encourage drop-in visits.  
Staff training
Numerous opportunities for staff training were undertaken and included the Park Manager
attending a course to gain his Carbon Literacy qualification, and the Park Supervisor attending
a course on Working with Volunteers..  The park supervisor has also delivered horticultural
training to council staff.
Communications and promotion
The park is promoted through the Argyll and Bute website, giving information on the facilities,
the Friends of Hermitage Park group and ways in which people can get involved as volunteers. 
Invest in Argyll has a website link to the Hermitage Park Regeneration.4 The Park Pavilion café
has its own dedicated website (www.theparkpavilion.com).                                                 
4 https://investinargyllandbute.co.uk/hermitage-park-regeneration/

Page 32

Park improvements and activities 32 
There is also a Friends of Hermitage Park Facebook page where Friends of Hermitage Park
took the role of communicating with the general public on project progress.  Information on
the park development was also provided through articles in The
Helensburgh Advertiser.
Friends of Hermitage Park Group
Friends of Hermitage Park started life in 2011 with a few volunteers
and a vision for a restored Hermitage Park fit for the 21st century.
Working in partnership with Argyll and Bute Council they helped to
achieve the NLHF grant. The original office bearers stood down when this
principle aim was achieved and were replaced by new trustees, with fresh impetus to take
things forward to the next stage. The current group of Friends has taken on the role of
managing activities in the park and stimulating developments and improvements. 
Figure 16 Figure 15 What have “Friends “used the park for (n = 25))
Almost all (93%) of the Friends live in
Helensburgh and heard about the group either
through stories in the local newspapers or
through word of mouth. When asked what
they use the park for they stated reasons
including ‘relaxation’ and ‘exercise’, but the
most popular use cited is to visit the pavilion
café (81%) (see Figure 16 below). The Friends
are committed to raising more funds for the
long term sustainability of the park and have
set up a Hermitage Park Development Fund.5 
Green Flag award progress
The Green Flag Award is a recognition given to parks and green spaces that meet certain
criteria related to environmental standards, sustainability, and community involvement. The
award scheme was launched in the UK in 1996 and has since spread to other countries around
the world. To receive a Green Flag Award, a park or green space must meet certain standards
related to management, environmental sustainability, community involvement, safety, and
access. Parks are assessed by trained judges who evaluate the site based on a set of criteria,
and only those that meet a high standard in all areas receive the award.                                                 
5 https://www.argyll-bute.gov.uk/friends-hermitage-park

Page 33

Park improvements and activities 33 
Receiving a Green Flag Award reflects positively on a park or green space's contribution to the
environment because it shows the site is well-managed and maintained to a high standard,
with a focus on sustainability and community involvement. Green Flag parks are places where
visitors can enjoy the benefits of being in nature while also learning about environmental
conservation and sustainability. The award also encourages continuous improvement, as parks
must maintain their standards to retain the award. 
Hermitage Park first received Green Flag Status in
2020 and maintained the standards required by the
scheme to secure consecutive annual awards in
2021 and 2022. Green Flag Status was a condition of
the NLHF grant funding though is a useful award to
maintain beyond this project. 
Impact of Covid-19
The Park was, for many, a lifeline during the pandemic and was extremely busy as people
used it for their daily exercise – and re-established itself as a key local asset. 
The Pavilion café lease was handed over in April 2021 and it started operating as a business in
May 2021, initially as take away only due to pandemic restrictions..
The café seats customers outside and has a kiosk which they opened during restrictions. The
Pavilion building was mostly complete before the pandemic but the associated activity plan
was delayed. Although the project lost a head of steam, the park was exceptionally busy
during Covid-19.  The café business was affected by staff sickness or people in isolation.
The previous Park Manager left just before Covid and because of a council-wide recruitment
freeze there was a gap until the new park manager was appointed in August 2020. The interim
role was taken up by an existing staff member alongside other duties as required during the
Covid period. 
Use of the park
Stakeholders interviewed said the improved park has made a difference to the numbers using
it.  The path infrastructure is more comfortable for people to navigate. Now it is well used as a
vibrant park and a place where people gather. The toilets in the pavilion are essential and
ensure more people can use the park than otherwise would do. Stakeholders who deal with
dementia sufferers report their clients say that they feel more needed and wanted when
participating in events within the park.
“The difference is like night and day”

Page 34

Park improvements and activities 34 
From the visitor survey we identified people come to the park to use the play area and/or to
enjoy the park with family and friends. Of those who do come to the park, 63% attend with
children.
The largest proportion of users (57%) are aged 31-60.
Figure 17 Age of park users (n:192) 
A significant proportion (68%) identify as female. Observation, and stakeholder interviews
confirmed parents meet and bring children after school to the park, where children can play
while the grown-ups meet at the Pavilion for tea/coffee.  The large open area on the plaza is
extremely popular, with bikes, skaters, skateboarders, families, the local schools and fitness.
Figure 18 Watching the kids play after school

Page 35

Park improvements and activities 35 
Over 400 children from Hermitage Primary use the park regularly (weekly) with one teacher
interviewed describing it as “invaluable – almost an extension of the school”.
Over the course of the calendar year 2021, a total of 124,676 pedestrian visits were recorded.
Park management estimates that another 20% of visitors arrive by car taking the total to
149,611. This is significantly more than the target in the NLHF application of 78,048.  Most
visitors to the park are white, with 7% from minority ethnic communities in the survey. 
Figure 20 Data from people counters over one year 2021 
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Monthly visits (pedestrian arivals)
Main entrance Grant Street Victoria Halls Victoria Road
Figure 19 After school in the park

Page 36

Park improvements and activities 36 
Of users surveyed, 9% stated they have a disability although the figure for people with a
disability among the Friends group is higher at 26%. This latter group includes 74% of people
who are over 60.  22% of visitors surveyed were from outside Argyll and Bute.
Figure 21 Where people come from (n:192) 
Fit with other regeneration projects in Helensburgh
Hermitage Park forms part of a local green network and sits on a Helensburgh Trail that
includes:
 The Pier
 West Bay Esplanade
 Colquhoun Square and the outdoor museum
 Hermitage Park
 Hill House at the top of the hill, and
 John Muir Way (passes nearby)
Among the Friends group, most were aware of the development of Helensburgh Pier. But only
52% were aware of the Helensburgh Conservation Area Regeneration Scheme (CARS). This
seems quite low considering most Friends are local and may suggest these initiatives haven’t
been marketed widely or in ways that would be seen by all Friends demographic groups.
We also asked visitors to the park if they were aware of the other regeneration projects in
Helensburgh. Of those surveyed, 60% were aware of redevelopment of the West Bay
Esplanade and 55% were aware of the Conservation Area Regeneration Scheme (around

Page 37

Park improvements and activities 37 
Colquhoun Square).  The park sits alongside the John Muir Way running from Helensburgh to
Balloch. The trail starts/ends in Helensburgh and runs to his birthplace in Dunbar.  The park
complements the attractions and amenities available to local people and visitors to the town. 
So, this makes a visit to Helensburgh a more attractive option for visitors from outside
Helensburgh.
Use of the Pavilion and café 
Of visitors interviewed, 72% said they use the café at some point during visits. Responses to the
Friends of Hermitage Park survey show 81% saying they visit the park café. In terms of regularity
of visits to the park, 29% said they visit weekly and over 50% visit monthly. Over the last year,
the proprietor reports having experienced increasing costs (ingredients, raw materials and
staffing) which has led to prices going up significantly.  According to the proprietor, customers
appear to understand and accept this as it hasn’t yet affected trade.  Custom tends to be
strongest at the weekends though it is difficult to detect distinct patterns. For example, on a
rainy day the park and café could be busy and on a good sunny day business could be slow. 
It was anticipated room hire would be marketed by the council. When the Park Manager
leaves, it will be important for everyone to be clear who has responsibility for managing the
room hires and plans for this are now in place.
Is the Pavilion meeting its potential?
Of the 10 visitors interviewed in more depth, many stated the Pavilion offers everything they
think it should. In particular, specific positives were noted such as:  
Figure 22 Children's craft classes in the meeting room
 The pavilion is a “bonus for the park”
 The pavilion is a “great social space”
 It is ideally located beside the play park
 It has comfortable and useful facilities 
“It’s a brilliant asset for the park”
In addition, catering was praised in terms of the
quality of food/drink and prices representing
good value for money. Other positives were
identified, including:  
 The Pavilion being a comfortable and modern building 
 The tables outside being ideal for those watching their children, and 
 That the Pavilion is used by organisations for a number of purposes

Page 38

Park improvements and activities 38 
As a result, 94% of respondents believe the pavilion is
offering everything they think it should. And are very
satisfied with their visit.
Impact on council maintenance and sustainability of the
park 
It can often be the case that investment in improvements
and infrastructure means an increased cost of maintenance. 
Argyll and Bute Council has agreed an annual maintenance
budget to support the Park Supervisor post and
programmed maintenance activities throughout the year.
This budget is protected from cuts for a period of 10 years,
to ensure adequate maintenance and that Green Flag
standards can be maintained. Therefore the park
regeneration protected the current level of maintenance
spend in the Park.
Education and Training
UHI continues to use the Park as a venue for the practical
elements of their horticulture course. Local schools also run woodcraft courses within the park.
Local schools such as Hermitage Primary boost the park’s education and partnership
credentials by using it as a resource and venue for education. 
The Scottish Lime Centre delivered two Assured Quality courses where 24 people were
trained in how to use lime mortar, an essential skill needed to make wall repairs within the park
and War Memorial. As a condition of attending the training course, people were asked to help
repair the walls in the Park and can pass that knowledge on to others.
Volunteering 
Figure 23 Gates to the war memorial garden

Page 39

39 
The Friends of Hermitage Park
attract and work with volunteers
to pick litter, plant and maintain
the park. Hermitage Park offers a
variety of potential volunteer roles
in a pleasant and accessible
environment such as:
 Gardening volunteers
 Tour guide volunteers
 Event volunteers
 Groups and schools
volunteers
 Historical research
 Administration, marketing and
social media, and
 Project volunteers.
Partner organisations such as Enable and Alzheimer’s Scotland bring their clients to the park
for art therapy and horticulture, supported by their own volunteers.  
The British Legion also brings armed forces personnel to carry out repairs within the war
memorial garden.  
Figure 24 Alzheimer’s Scotland work on a raised bed

Page 40

Impacts and outcomes 40 
Impacts and outcomes
The project and its objectives has evolved over the eight years since the application was made
to the NLCF. As the project has developed and evolved, different funders and user groups
have been involved. Expectations have also evolved with this dynamic – and ground-up –
approach so the project now measures its progress against a set of social, economic and
environmental aims. These have been captured in summary in the logic model (fig X) 
A range of heritage, social and economic objectives achieved
The project aimed to address a range of issues, some longstanding, which was putting the
park’s heritage at risk, and lost opportunities to engage local people, provide social benefits,
and contribute to the wider regeneration of Helensburgh. 
These objectives are summarised in the broad outcomes agreed for the project: 
Hermitage Park and its Heritage will be
better managed  Appointing dedicated staff to manage the park and
ensure it is properly maintained. Any restoration and
improvement work will therefore be sustained. 
Hermitage Park’s heritage will be in
better condition Providing adequate maintenance resources over an
extended period to ensure management, maintenance
and Green Flag accreditation.
Replacing dilapidated visitor facilities with a multi-use
pavilion and hub space. 
The heritage will be interpreted and
explained Addressing the lack of engagement with local people
through interpretation and promoting the rich heritage
of the park. 
The heritage will be identified and
recorded Alongside restoration, the heritage will be recorded
including a digital plant database, bringing features
back to life, including Millig Mill and ongoing recording
of the natural heritage in conjunction with schools.
People will have developed skills Staff and volunteers will participate in training to enable
sensitive upkeep of the heritage assets and develop a

Page 41

Impacts and outcomes 41 
longer term skills bank. Apprentices will be a part of the
restoration work. 
People will have learnt about heritage Involving local people in heritage, learning, outdoor
activities, sports and recreation.
People will have volunteered time Providing more opportunities for well-managed and
rewarding volunteering 
Providing more volunteering opportunities particularly
associated with gaining new skills and supporting park
maintenance.
The local community will be a better
place to live, work and visit Making Helensburgh a more attractive place to live and
work, helping address declining population, and fewer
tourist visits. The project will actively support the
Economic Development Action Plan. 
Environmental impacts will be reduced
The Passivhaus Pavilion will contribute to a very low
carbon footprint, as well as better selection and
management of plants to provide habitats.
The project will improve social cohesion
More people enjoying green space 
The park’s facilities provide the opportunity for inter-generational and family-oriented activity,
bringing young and older people together. Park visitors and stakeholders report that they
mingle and chat around the pavilion and patio/playground area, with 95% saying they feel
there is a good community spirit in the area (Figure 25). Through the work of partner
organisations including UHI Argyll, Alzheimer’s Scotland, British Legion, Enable, and Primary
Schools volunteers are delivering various activities and gardening opportunities for many more
young and older people.   
Figure 25 Community spirit

Page 42

Impacts and outcomes 42 
Park users will be part of a healthier and more active community
More people attending the park and taking part in activities will lead to a healthier more active
community. Figure 26 below shows a significant proportion of users surveyed (75%) felt the
park had a ‘great impact’ on their physical wellbeing. 
Local people, particularly young people, are involved in park activities such as the allotments
and raised beds. Voluntary organisation groups and schools have reported people now being
more appreciate of where their food comes from.
Some primary school children believed food came ready wrapped from Sainsburys
Linked to the outcome above, stakeholders reported people and young children who engaged
in activities in the park now show more understanding of how food is produced and are more
inclined to try fresh fruit and vegetables. 
My child said he didn’t like strawberries but he ate them in the market garden. I was delighted
– I’ll buy them in future.
The outcomes above are short and medium term, delivered as more people participated and
enjoyed the park and continue to attend. It can be seen from the Theory of Change that as
these outcomes are achieved, they will lead to longer term outcomes.

Page 43

Impacts and outcomes 43 
Figure 26 Impact on physical wellbeing
Place-Based: Hermitage Park Evaluation
Improved health and wellbeing
Visits to green spaces, such as park and gardens, have been associated with mental wellbeing
benefits. Examples include:
1. Reduced stress and anxiety: Exposure to nature has also been linked to decreased
symptoms of anxiety.
2. Improved mood: Being in nature has been shown to boost positive emotions and
improve mood.
Three-quarters of visitors to Hermitage Park surveyed (77%) said visits to the park improved
their mental wellbeing to a ‘great extent’. A similar proportion (75%) say it improved their
physical wellbeing to a ‘great extent’. 
Of the Friends of Hermitage Park survey group, 58% reported visits had ‘some impact’ while 23%
reported it impacted to a ‘great extent’ on their physical wellbeing. Almost half (45%) of the
Friends of Hermitage Park surveyed reported their visit impacting to a ‘great extent’ on their
mental wellbeing with 47% saying it had to ‘some extent’. Visitors reported a greater impact on
their physical and mental wellbeing than Friends, but current data doesn’t provide any
evidence as to why this may be. Future visitor and Friends surveys could explore this further
through additional questions and cross-analysis of demographic groups, regularity of visits etc.

Page 44

Impacts and outcomes 44 
Figure 27 Park impact on mental wellbeing (n:192)
People view the park and access to open green space positively, with 97% of visitors
interviewed stating the park enhances their quality of life. When asked how much value they
place specifically on Green Space, 89% said ‘great value’. This chimes with responses to the
survey of the Friends group where 89% ‘strongly agree’ the park enhances their quality of life
and 93% specifically stated they place ‘great value’ on the park green space.  
The park’s heritage will be better managed and environmentally sustainable
Most stakeholders interviewed thought the project was well-run and well-organised by the
Council staff, with good community involvement including input from the local steering group,
Friends of Hermitage Park, local children, schools and older people.  
Increased understanding of the environment and heritage
More visits are being made allowing people to have the opportunity of experiencing the park
environment. Key stakeholders reported bringing groups to the park and engaging them in
activities, such as work on the market garden, that allowed people to appreciate the natural
environment. The improved signage and events helped people appreciate local heritage and
the understanding of the park within the local context.
The park’s location close to public transport, and a limited parking area, encourages visits that
are environmentally friendly. The survey found that around 80% of visitors access the park on
foot, Contributions towards net zero are made through:
 Providing a safe and attractive local place for people in Helensburgh, reducing the
numbers of car journeys they might make out of the town.

Page 45

Impacts and outcomes 45 
 Installing wildlife refuges promotes biodiversity and the plants and trees within the park
help mitigate the effects of climate change.
 Re-use of play equipment when the playground was relocated.
 Using existing leftover stock of granite sets from the construction of Colquhoun Square at
Hermitage Park. During the construction of the patio area outside the pavilion.
 Installing a green moss roof and solar panel on the bothy, reusing materials such as
windows and doors, and filtering rainwater into the existing SUDS system . 
 Adopting a zero-carbon ethos in training programmes run at the park for schools and
others.
 Producing food locally, shortening supply lines.
 Using LED lights in the park to reduce energy consumption
 Reducing electricity needed for the Passivhaus with PVs and an air source heat pump 
More volunteers gaining more skills
There is a core group of Friends which has attracted, and works with, a large number of
volunteers (over 50) and park users.
The park provides a range of activities where members of the community – adults, children,
organisations, and formal volunteers – can gain valuable skills and experience, for example:
 organising, delivering and managing activities
 training courses such as horticultural skills, lime mortar techniques
 participating in other events/activities (gardening, food production etc)
These opportunities for
learning useful skills
increase the
community’s capacity to
deliver more events and
training, contributing to
the ongoing success of
the park and the wider
community through an
active events
programme and
volunteer base.
Figure 28 Flower arranging class in the community meeting room

Page 46

Impacts and outcomes 46 
Figure 29 Logic Model

Page 47

Impacts and outcomes 47 
Providing a space and support to try new things and experience the environment stimulates
people. Two people moved into employment as a result of the restoration work, over and
above the Park Manager post created.  One person moved on after training at the park to work
at Geilston House (a nearby National Trust for Scotland venue) while another picked up work
with the council.  
Trainers reported providing taster sessions and introducing people to the park encouraged
people to move on to other training programmes. The achievement of these outcomes
suggests continued use of the park and participation in the activities within the park will lead to
medium term outcomes highlighted in the Logic Model.
Economic and wider impacts
The park refurbishment is having a positive economic impact, creating jobs during the
construction phase as well as attracting visitors and tourists to the area. Most visitors to the
park are from Helensburgh, 73% in our short survey and probably a higher proportion over the
course of a full year.  But a significant minority are from outside the town showing it
contributes to its destination appeal. 
Figure 30 Where do you live? (n:192)
In our snapshot survey over the Easter period in 2023, 25% of people responding were from
outside Helensburgh – reflecting a seasonal peak for visiting friends and relatives.  Of these
visitors, the mean figure for staying in Helensburgh over the course of a year is 1.7 nights.

Page 48

Impacts and outcomes 48 
Figure 31 How many nights would you stay in Helensburgh
Comparisons with previous years are difficult because of changes in the way visits are
recorded, and the non-typical COVID years. However, people counter data suggests the
number of visits has doubled since work was completed. The economic benefit to the town,
and more widely to Scotland, is measured through the direct spend on construction and the
additional spend by visitors to the park. Estimates use national survey data and impacts
calculated using standard government multipliers. 
The economic impact of a restored Hermitage Park has been assessed in three ways:
 the impact on the economy of overall project expenditure: mainly the construction costs;
 the impact on the economy of expenditure resulting from the park operation: mainly
involving the spend in the area by visitors to the park; and
 the effect this expenditure has on employment – in effect the number of jobs supported by
the additional economic activity. 
Overall, the impact of visitor spend annually is: 
Economic impact £2.97 million in 2021
Supporting 45.6 FTE jobs

Page 49

Impacts and outcomes 49 
Visitor impacts are calculated using data from counters showing annual visits have increased
since the project started, alongside the survey conducted for this study in April 2023. However,
some of the data we are using needs to be treated with caution because of anomalies caused
by COVID.  This means data collected between 2020 and 2022 is liable to be skewed by
changes in visitor behaviour and the loss of key data sets as research programmes were
suspended.  We can calculate the effects at Scottish level at this stage. 
Figure 32 How many nights would you stay in Helensburgh
Construction impacts
The construction phase of the project incurred expenditure of nearly £3.4 million and
supported 54 full time equivalent jobs for one year. 
Gross value added (GVA) is an economic productivity metric that measures the contribution of
a unit engaged in producing goods or services. As outlined in the Appendix (Economic Impact
Data) the Total GVA (including build) for the Hermitage Park restoration project is £9,335,000. 
Total construction spend £3.35 million
Supporting 46.9 FTE jobs

Page 50

Lessons learnt and recommendations 50 
Lessons learnt and recommendations
This section sets out what was successful and how the park and programmes could deliver
more effectively. We will also leave a template in the appendix of how further evaluation can
be delivered.
Summary
 The project has been well managed although issues with the builder brought completion
complications 
 The breakdown of relationships with the original Friends group had an early negative
impact although the new Friends group is now positive and collaborative. 
 The park refurbishments had a positive economic impact on Helensburgh with jobs
created and a GVA of £9.33m
 The landscape design and the remembrance garden is done well
 The training courses are popular locally
 Future clarity on who is responsible for managing tasks is essential and in place
 More public events must be organised to bring people and added income to the park
 Some improvements/changes taking place, planned or on the wish list include improved
access for disabled people to the raised beds; more sponsorship, building volunteer base;
a teen area for sport activity and a covered bandstand 
 The park provides a safe and attractive space for people to relax and exercise, as well as
promote biodiversity and help mitigate the effects of climate change.
Estimate of economic impact of the park
The park refurbishment has had a positive economic impact on Helensburgh. The evidence
suggests a good level of economic return which will be sustained into the future, supporting
jobs and contributing to tourism spend in the area. 
Visitors interviewed and surveyed think Hermitage Park has the potential to boost tourism in
future to a greater extent, but only if there is additional and targeted marketing of it to those
living outside Helensburgh.  
Examples of good practice and what worked well
When asked specifically what worked well, stakeholder responses include:
 The landscape design and the contractor implementing it were effective

Page 51

Lessons learnt and recommendations 51 
 The remembrance garden is done well
 The management has been fantastic
 The UHI horticulture courses are popular locally
 A maintenance manual has been developed
 The Friends of Hermitage Park will keep the focus on improvements
 The kitchen garden is popular with children and older people
 The Pavilion is a simple but strong concept
 Providing steps at the patio area for people to observe activities works well outside the
pavilion and playpark
 Rescuing the War Memorial from the risk register, and
 Free parking and toilet availability was welcomed by many.
The walled garden is stunning
The playpark received positive feedback from interviewees, particularly its relocation next to
the Pavilion. The Council’s own feedback shows that people hold the playpark and Pavilion in
high regard and that the plaza is heavily used, appreciated as an open space for young people
to learn to cycle, play with remote-control toys, or just use for their own imaginative play.
What worked less well
There were no significant findings from interviewees asked what ‘didn’t work’ or ‘could have
been improved’, which reflects positively on the overall project development and delivery.
Some interviewees suggested that the ‘breakdown’ of relationships with the original Friends
group had a negative impact during the early development period. However, the new Friends
group is viewed as positive and collaborative. 
Perhaps unsurprisingly, given the complexity of the build specification, some interviewees felt
the Pavilion development ‘could have been improved’ and specifically that it would have
benefited from a clearer specification for the contractor at the outset. The building has limited
storage space, which some interviewees felt was a design oversight.    
There is no space for teens to play ball games within the park and it was felt by some
stakeholders interviewed, including those who worked with children, this would be beneficial,
particularly for teachers bringing older children to the park.
The Friends group identified some issues with anti-social behaviour which they feel needs
addressing, perhaps by providing young people with alternative options either within the park
or in partnership with other local community and voluntary organisations. However, visitors
interviewed said they had not encountered any antisocial behaviour and thought that this was
a measure of the park’s good management.

Page 52

Lessons learnt and recommendations 52 
What will make a difference over the next three years
1. It is essential there is clarity on who is responsible for park management after the Park
Manager post ends: This planning is now in place to ensure:
 People know who is responsible and how activities and uses in the park are
organised and promoted 
 the relationship with the café is managed
 community meeting rooms can be booked out, and
 events can be organised and other aspects that allow the park to meet its full
potential take place.
A Park Manager would be a positive development to continue the positive impact created by
the last manager. Management of the Park has always been the responsibility of the Council
Roads and Infrastructure Service, and they will take on some additional duties when the park
manager post ends. There have been handover discussions and The Friends will also play a
key role when it comes to events and some other activities.  This is set out in a (draft)
Memorandum of Understanding.
2. More and varied public events could be organised to bring people and income to the park.
This could include:
 Musical shows
 Fitness groups
 Theatre (Hamlet in the Hermitage for example)
 Light shows (making more use of the Lucie boxes around the site)
 Christmas Fayre, Easter event, Halloween, etc
 Local produce markets, and 
 Arts and crafts market etc.
Promoting these widely will be important, as well as capitalising – for promotional purposes –
on more unusual uses of the park such as the Pavilion’s role as a filming location for the BBC’s
Annika drama series.
3. The Friends, who are close to the park and its current state, suggest improving access to
the raised beds for disabled people. 
4. The Friends could seek sponsorship for flower beds, memorial gardens and other areas of
the park from the private sector or commitments to maintain these spaces.
5. Developing the planting and developing more formal flower beds will add to the splendour
of the park.

Page 53

Lessons learnt and recommendations 53 
6. A strong volunteer base will allow more robust and sustainable support to address issues
in the park, train others, educate people about the heritage and organise community
events. Coordinated volunteer management will be an important part of the Park
Supervisor’s role . 
7. Stakeholders who bring young people to the park identified that children 8-16 would
benefit from a fenced area within which to play ball games.  A Multi-Use Games Area
(MUGA) could be considered, but would require external funding and a volunteer group to
take the plan forward . A potential site for this would be at the South-East corner of the
park behind the Victoria Halls.
8. A covered area near the patio and pavilion for outdoor events - a bandstand was
suggested., and this is on the park’s wish list.
The long-term legacy of the project
If the park is well maintained, there are further opportunities to build on its contribution to a
vibrant community where heritage, health and wellbeing is supported.  Continuing
management arrangements should ensure a high standard of cleanliness (bins and dog waste)
and a development programme to capitalise on the ideas put forward in the previous section. 
As the Demonstration Garden continues to develop and mature it is hoped produce can be
distributed.  Groups will use specific beds and are responsible for the management of their
own bed and also the use of the produce grown. So any distribution of produce would be
down to each individual group but also with guidance from the Park Supervisor.
In addition to protecting and promoting the heritage within the park there are economic
benefits. And the park refurbishments have social and environmental benefits for the local
community. The park provides a safe and attractive space for people to relax and exercise, as
well as promote biodiversity and help mitigate the effects of climate change.

Page 54

Lessons learnt and recommendations 54 
Appendices
Stakeholders interviewed 
Name Relevance to Park
Jon Simmons Trustee of Friends
Lead designer for park redevelopment
Chair of the Helensburgh Tree Trust
Simon Henry Hermitage Primary School
Charlie Cairns Hermitage Park Manager
Arlene Cullum Argyll and Bute Council – overseeing park redevelopment
Tom Murphy Argyll and Bute Council - Operations Manager, Roads and
Amenity Services 
Karlyn Marshall Helensburgh Art Hub (community room user)
Jamie Nicholson Park Pavilion Café
Angela Smith Workshop leader
Rebecca Morrow Alzheimer’s Scotland (garden user)
Andrew Garven UHI
Katrina Sayer Jean’s Bothy (Park user)
Norman Muir Helensburgh Community Council
Geoff Coles Helensburgh British Legion
Graham Craig Steering Group Member and neighbour
Dan Lowe Hoskins Architects – design and contract management for
Pavilion

Page 55

Lessons learnt and recommendations 55 
Outputs achieved
Figure 33 Achievements against targets 
Baseline Target Actual 2023
Green Flag score 54 75 75-79
New Jobs 0 1 1
Additional income secured 0 £15,000 £65,400
Buildings repaired  1 1
Historic features repaired/restored  10 9
Enhanced landscape features  10,117 m2 10,117m2
Reconstructed lost features  2 2
Improvements to infrastructure  4160 m2 4160 m2
Area of grassland/heathland protected or created  1,787sqm 1,787
Area of woodland protected or created  1,126sqm 1,300
Area of wetland protected or created  150sqm 150
Area of waterbodies protected or created  40sqm 40 sqm
Number of physical, on-site interpretation methods  8 8
Number of events/activities to interpret/explain
heritage 
17 55
Number of promotional methods or tools used  8 10
Number of learning partnerships formed with other
organisations 
8 3
Number of staff attending structured training activity  3 3
Number of volunteers attending structured training
activity 
50 129
Number of people engaging with heritage/learning
activities 
254 676
Number of volunteer hours  4,761 6552
Visitor numbers 62600 78048 149, 611
Number of volunteers (FTE) 27 80 475
I

Page 56

Lessons learnt and recommendations 56 
Evaluation research matrix 
Initial
scoping/visit
Desk
research
Survey -
Interviews
visitors
Interviews
Stakeholders
Have the NLHF outcomes been delivered?   
Physical repairs done – War memorial, Japanese Garden, Mill and
wishing well    
Walkways and footbridges    
Drystone banking/bank stabilisation   
New pavilion built incl café, toilets, space, activity space   
Redesigned recreational areas   
Installed signage, interpretation panels, benches, lighting   
Activity plan submitted delivered?   
How many attended    
What was their experience like    
Training delivered?    
Learning opportunities delivered?    
Full time manager recruited?    
How did COVID-19 impact the programme?    
Visitors    
Annual number of visits to the park?    
What is the pattern of use (counters)?   
Frequency of visits    
Age, gender, ethnicity, disability    
How satisfied are visitors with the park   
How often do they visit the town    
Do they stay overnight/s    
What is your average spend/day    
What have been the commercial benefits?    
To café    

Page 57

Lessons learnt and recommendations 57 
Jobs in café (direct/indirect)    
Community space    
Jobs (direct/indirect)    
Is pavilion meeting its potential/areas for improvement?    
How do people value the greenspace?    
how did they hear about the park    
What benefit health/wellbeing; physical activity/social space
(use the space)    
Are you aware of Pier, CARS, Argyll Loves Local, Colquhoun Sq    
How does park impact on council (maintenance/management?    
What is quality of heritage management    
How actively were the public involved in design or interpretation?    
What progress towards Green Flag?    
What evidence of carbon reduction is there?    
Data on £ capital; activity elements    
How many volunteers have been involved    
how many hours in total?    
-= what was volunteers experience    
How many trainees were involved?    

Page 58

Lessons learnt and recommendations 58 
Stakeholder Topic Guide
Introduction to interviewee
The requirement is to evaluate the National Lottery Heritage Funded Hermitage Park project for Argyll
and Bute Council.  This evaluation report to be completed by the end of May 2023.  It will include project
description, lessons learned of what works and the achievement against NLHF outcomes listed in the
approved application. 
An evaluation report will be produced that can be shared with NLHF, partners, wider stakeholders and
the local community.
Data protection - Our consultation will be undertaken in line with data protection requirements. Any
information you provide will be destroyed at the end of the research in line with our document retention
policy.  The consultation leader is David Gourlay david.gourlay@hallaitken.co.uk.  The main Hermitage
Park contact is Charlie Cairns charlie.cairns@argyll-bute.gov.uk  
Consent and how this information will be used 
Responses will be anonymised however by taking part in this interview you are agreeing for the data
and text to be collected, reported and potentially used for policy development and reporting on
achievements to the NLHF funder.  
______________________________________________________________________________________________
__________
Date:    
Name:    
Role: 
Individual  o  or  Organisation o  
1) If relevant what type of organisation are you? (Business/Voluntary Sector
Public/Organisation/Other)
2) What area do you operate in? (Local, Argyll and Bute, Scotland, All of UK)
3) What is your organisations relationship with the Hermitage Park? What involvement have you had
with the development, funding, management or operation of the park or activities within it?
4) What elements of this project have you been involved with? (Programme design and management,
Community engagement, Training/learning opportunities, Volunteering, Business delivery,
Other/None
5) What are your views on using the park facilities or the activities you have been involved in (Training,
workshops etc)?
6) What difference do you feel that participating in these activities will make to your life?

Page 59

Lessons learnt and recommendations 59 
7) How actively were/are the members of the community involved in design or interpretation?
8) How did COVID-19 impact on the Park project?
9) What have been the commercial benefits to the business in the park and Helensburgh? And how
does the park development fit with other regeneration projects going on in Helensburgh (CARS ETC)
10) Is the Pavilion and Park meeting its potential? Is it offering everything that you think it should?
11) What is the quality of heritage management?
12) What was achieved against the following targets:
 Apprenticeships and training
 Green Flag
 Carbon reduction
 Volunteering
 More use for physical activity/wellbeing activities 
13) What specifically worked well? Can you identify any specific examples of good practice?
14) What did not work or what could be improved?
15) What has the experience of the park development been like for you and how effectively was the
overall programme managed?
16) What is needed to make a difference in the next 3 years? 
17) Do you have any further points to make not already covered? 
Thanks for your responses.  If you think of anything else that you want to add in the next few days
please email: sandie.dent@hallaitken.co.uk

Page 60

Lessons learnt and recommendations 60 
Survey questions asked of the visitors to the park
These are the questions used during the evaluation, but suggested questions for future
evaluation is included in the Evaluation Template that can be adapted to suit future
circumstances.
Q1. How did you hear about Hermitage Park?
 Live in Helensburgh
 Through advertising
 Through articles/stories in newspapers or magazines
 Through social media
 Through leaflets/posters
 Through a community/voluntary group
 Through word a mouth
 Other 
Q2. How often do you visit Hermitage Park?
 At least once a week 
 At least monthly 
 Less than monthly 
 Not often 
Q3. What will you do in the park today and what have you used the park for in the past? 
 To walk a dog
 To enjoy the play area
 To enjoy the park with friends and family
 To exercise
 For relaxation
 To visit the park café
 As a short cut
 Other (specify) 
Q4. How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following? (see A below) 
The park is well maintained 
The park enhances your quality of life 
There is a good community spirit in the area 
A For each state:
 Strongly Agree 
 Agree 
 Neither Agree Nor Disagree 
 Disagree 
 Strongly Disagree 
 Unsure 
Q5. Overall, how satisfied have you been with your visit today, or your visit to the park in the past?

Page 61

Lessons learnt and recommendations 61 
 Very satisfied 
 Fairly satisfied 
 Fairly dissatisfied 
 Very dissatisfied 
Q6. What one thing could improve the park experience for you? 
Q7. Have you used, or do you intend to use the pavilion where the café is today or have you used it in
the past? 
 Yes
 No 
Q8. How much value do you place on this green space? 
 Great value 
 Some value 
 Little/no value 
 Unsure 
Q9. To what extent do you think your visit to the park today or visits in the past have had an impact on
your ... wellbeing 
Q9A. To what extent do you think your visit to the park today or visits in the past have had an impact on
your Physical wellbeing 
Q9B. To what extent do you think your visit to the park today or visits in the past have had an impact on
your Mental wellbeing 
Against each state:
 Great Extent 
 Some Extent 
 Little/No Extent 
 Unsure 
Q10. How often do you visit Helensburgh? 
 Live in Helensburgh
 Most weeks
 Once or twice a month
 Less often
 First time 
Q11. As a visitor, how many nights per year would you stay in or close to Helensburgh? 
None 
1 
2

Page 62

Lessons learnt and recommendations 62 
3 - 4
4-5
6-10 
More than 10 
Q12. Are you aware of.. 
The Helensburgh Conservation Area Regeneration Scheme 
The redevelopment of the West Bay Esplanade – including Colquhoun Square 
Helensburgh Pier 
For each state:
 Yes
 No 
Q13. Where do you live? 
 In Helensburgh
 Elsewhere in Argyll and Bute
 Somewhere else in Scotland
 Somewhere else in the UK
 Outside the UK 
Q14. Are there children in your group today? 
 Yes
 No 
Q15. What would best describe your ethnicity? 
 White
 Black
 Asian
 Other ethnic minority group 
Q16. Do you belong to the LGBTQ+ community? 
 Yes
 No 
Q17. Do you have a disability? 
 Yes
 No 
Q18. What age are you? 
 Under 30
 31 to 60
 Over 60

Page 63

Lessons learnt and recommendations 63 
 Refused 
Q19. Gender 
 Male
 Female

Page 64

Lessons learnt and recommendations 64 
Visitor survey questions
Introduction to interviewee
The requirement is to evaluate the National Lottery Heritage Funded Hermitage Park project for Argyll and Bute
Council. This evaluation report to be completed by the end of May 2023.  It will include project description,
lessons learned of what works and the achievement against CRF outcomes listed in the approved application. 
An evaluation report will be produced that can be shared with NLHF, partners, wider stakeholders and the local
community.
Data protection - Our consultation will be undertaken in line with data protection requirements. Any
information you provide will be destroyed at the end of the research in line with our document retention
policy.   The consultation leader is David Gourlay david.gourlay@hallaitken.co.uk.  The main Hermitage Park
contact is Charlie Cairns charlie.cairns@argyll-bute.gov.uk  
Consent and how this information will be used 
Responses will be anonymised however by taking part in this interview you are agreeing for the data and text to
be collected, reported and potentially used for policy development and reporting on achievements to the NLHF
funder.  
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Date:    
Name:    
1) Are you a:
Local
Argyll and Bute
Scotland
Rest of UK
2) Do you think the park makes Helensburgh a more attractive place to visit, if so why? (such as allowing
access to Green Space or getting more physical activity or improves your mental wellbeing?)
3) How did COVID-19 impact on the Park and your use of the park?
4) Is the Pavilion meeting its potential? Is it offering everything that you think it should and if not what more
could be done?
5) Is the heritage well signposted and managed, if not how could this be improved?

Page 65

Lessons learnt and recommendations 65 
6) Are you aware of other development projects in Helensburgh such as The Helensburgh Conservation Area
Regeneration Scheme; The redevelopment of the West Bay Esplanade – including Colquhoun Square; and
Helensburgh Pier. And if so how does the park compare as a boost to tourism?
7) What specifically works well? Can you identify any specific examples of good practice of things happening in
the park) and what does not work or what could be improved?
8) Do you have any further points to make not already covered? 
Thanks for your responses.  If you think of anything else that you want to add in the next few days please email:
sandie.dent@hallaitken.co.uk

Page 66

Lessons learnt and recommendations 66 
Contractors
Phase 1 consultants
Gillespies LLP                        Lead consultant / Landscape Architects
Hoskins Architects                Architects
Pick Everard                           Engineers
Bryan Byrne Consultants      QS
Campbell and Co                   Graphic design / interpretation
Amion Consulting                  Business planning
Peter McGowan                     Conservation planner
Headland                                Archaeologist  
Design Team
JSLA                                        Lead consultant / Landscape Architects/Project Manager
Hoskins Architects                Architects
Pick Everard                           Engineers
Bryan Byrne Consultants      QS
Campbell and Co                   Graphic design / interpretation  
Contractors
Hawthorne Heights Ltd         Landscape
Stewart and Shields               Building

Page 67

Lessons learnt and recommendations 67 
Economic impact data
Output
Type I Type II  
Direct & indirect
Direct, indirect &
induced GVA
Construction £3,863,134 1.5 £5,794,701 1.7 £6,567,328 £7,339,955
Day visit £284,216 1.3 £369,481 1.7 £426,324 £426,324
Tourist visit £1,697,292 1.3 £2,206,479 1.7 £2,545,938 £2,545,938       
Employment effect 
Jobs (at Scottish
level) 
Jobs (at Scottish
level) 
Construction £3,863,134 12.3 47.5 14 54.1 
Day visit £284,216 21 6.0 23 6.5 
Tourist visit £1,697,292 21 35.6 23 39.0 
Total visitor spend
annually  £3,368,563   
Supporting FTE jobs  45.6   
Total GVA (inc build)  £10,312,216   
Annual GVA  £2,545,938
Notes
a) Table uses the latest Scottish IO multipliers - closest fit to industry sectors represented
and defined here: https://www.gov.scot/publications/tourism-scotland-economic-
contribution-sector/pages/7/.  The tables are here
https://www.gov.scot/publications/input-output-latest/ 
b) Due to the static nature of the underlying Input-Output model, the multipliers will
always return estimates that assume that all the economic activity is 100% additional.
They will not take any account of displacement of economic activity from elsewhere in
Scotland, the deadweight associated with creating supply where there is already spare
capacity to supply elsewhere in the economy and they will also assume that there is
the demand to meet that supply.
c) Figures are for one year: Construction is the effect of total spend if concentrated into
one year. Visitor figures are annual based on 2021 visitor numbers
d) Day visit spend is the average of the high/low figures calculated from VisitScotland
data https://www.visitscotland.org/research-insights/about-our-visitors/uk/day-
visits-survey and ASVA https://asva.co.uk/

Page 68

Lessons learnt and recommendations 68 
e) Tourist visit figures are the average of the high/low figures modelled.
f) We have assumed for this exercise the park visit is the principal activity undertaken in a
day visit to Helensburgh

Page 69

Lessons learnt and recommendations 69 
Progress against activity plan (April 2023)
From reports to the local authority we see that:
1. Schools continue to use the park on a daily basis for education, recreation and fitness. They
are particularly involved in the demonstration garden where once again they oversaw the
complete food growing cycle from sowing seed, through planting out and tending to plants, to
harvesting and eating.  
2. University of the Highland and Islands continued to use the Park for their NC horticulture
course until the end of the 2022 academic year, giving the student valuable practical lessons
to achieve their learning outcomes, while bringing some maintenance benefits to the Park.  
3. The Green Gym continued to operate in the Park at no further costs to the Park
redevelopment programme, The Conservation Volunteers absorbing the cost into a
programme supported by NatureScot. In particular they worked very closely with Alzheimer’s
Scotland, and many of their clients have achieved positive benefits from their volunteering
days. They built several raised beds in which they grew some crops. 
4. Positive contact has been made with the new branch of the British Legion who are a very
useful conduit to potential work parties from Naval Base Clyde, and several work days have
taken place to date. 
5. The volunteer Bothy is virtually complete with some very small final works still required.
The green roofs in particular looked stunning in late summer, and it has been a useful venue
for schools, students, volunteers and green gym participants. 
6. Volunteering opportunities have been offered in horticulture, general park maintenance,
lime mortaring and event running. 
7. A lime mortar course was delivered by the Scottish Lime Centre in August 2022, fully
attended by 12 trainees who are now willing volunteers. 
8. Fitness classes were delivered by SOS Fitness in the Park as part of their licence to occupy,
until September 2022 when they declined to follow through with a development opportunity
at the South West corner of the Park. Their current business model means that the Park is no
longer a viable venue for them and they have decided to end the licence agreement. Other
fitness providers, including Live Argyll, continue to use the park for fitness lessons on an ad
hoc basis. 
9. Weekly Tai Chi classes (Chi in the Park) take place every Monday morning.

Page 70

Lessons learnt and recommendations 70 
10. A lighting and music event took place in the Park in March 2022 as part of the Colmcille
1500 celebrations. Colmcille was a joint project shared between venues in Scotland and
Ireland to celebrate the 1500th anniversary of the birth of St. Columba. 
11. The Dandelion Scotland project was a national awareness raising and educational
programme highlighting potential for gardens and food growing. Hermitage Park was chosen
as the venue for a Free for All plant giveaway in June, and a harvest event in September.
Although the latter event was cancelled due to the death of Queen Elizabeth II, the Free for All
was very popular and attracted some 300 people to the Park on a lovely sunny day. 
12. The aforementioned Dandelion Free Harvest event was also intended to form part of our
Park celebration event, to mark the improvements to the Park, to thank funders and
contributors and to showcase the Park as a vibrant local greenspace. Again the passing of the
Queen forced the cancellation of this event and this was rescheduled as a Halloween event,
which will be less formal and a bit more subject specific. 
13. Additional planting was carried out in front of the new Pavilion in March and May 2022.
Further planting is planned before the end of the project. 
14. Three free, trial horticultural classes were run in the Spring, delivered by Angela Smith a
trained horticulturalist and florist. Trial classes were for Windowsill Allotments, Kokedamas
and Floral Crowns. Classes were well attended and well received - feedback forms indicate
that charged classes in the future would be popular. Further classes are planned for the
Autumn 2023.
15. To explore our theme of heritage, art and learning, a contract was tendered in July. The
winning response was from Magic Torch who propose a series of outreach workshops
focussing on the Park heritage and expressing the outcomes through comic book art, dramatic
performances and storytelling. 
16. The Activity Plan had indicated that we would seek to create digital trails within the Park.
However our colleagues in Active Transport created a wider app called Discover Helensburgh,
which features 4 themed trails within Hermitage Park. It was therefore considered unnecessary
to create a competing app. 
17. A new webpage for the Park, hosted within the Invest in Argyll pages of the Argyll and Bute
Council website, is active.
18. The park participated in the Kickstart scheme, designed to offer paid employment to young
people trying to access the jobs market. A Kickstart employee started with us in March 2022
for a six month period as Park Grounds Assistant. Both the Park and the Kickstart employee
profited from this arrangement - the Park through extra maintenance staff, and the Kickstart
Employee through workplace experience and training. He now works for the Council.

Page 71

Lessons learnt and recommendations 71 
19. Hermitage Park successfully gained its third consecutive Green Flag award in July 2022.
Maintenance and infrastructure standards were praised within the Report. 
20. Following disruption of the previous Friends of Hermitage Park Group, fresh impetus
towards establishing a renewed group was undertaken by an elected member and some local
enthusiastic supporters of the Park. An AGM took place and a smooth transition has been
achieved.

Page 72

Argyll and Bute Council
Evaluation of the Hermitage Park
heritage-led regeneration project 
Report
produced by 
4th Floor 
45 Hope Street
Glasgow
G2 6AE 
E: info@hallaitken.co.uk
W: www.hallaitken.co.uk