Democracy Spraffa

Helensburgh Waterfront Development - Skatepark options

Argyll and Bute Council · 12 December 2023
Back to Helensburgh & Lomond Area Committee — 12 December 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL          HELENSBURGH & LOMOND AREA COMMITTEE
COMMERCIAL SERVICES      12th DECEMBER 2023
HELENSBURGH WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT – SKATEPARK OPTIONS 
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
1.1 The Helensburgh and Lomond Area Committee on 12th September 2023: 
1.1.1 Noted that the reinstatement of the temporary skatepark facilities would
be completed in autumn 2023 meeting the conditions of the leisure
centre planning consent; 
1.1.2 Agreed that the waterfront site is not considered to be a suitable long
term location for an expanded skatepark if a commercial development
is selected as the preferred option for the site but for the avoidance of
doubt the previously existing skatepark area extending to 350sqm or
thereby will be incorporated into the development site unless a suitable
alternative location is identified; and 
1.1.3 Noted that a further report would be brought before the Area Committee
outlining a list of potential permanent locations for the skatepark and a
preferred option would be recommended to be taken forward. Officers
have commenced the identification of potential sites as outlined at
Section 3.7 of the report and would continue to engage with the
skatepark group as part of that process. 
1.2 This report outlines the options which have initially been assessed and seeks
approval to proceed to undertake more detailed investigations on the preferred
locations. 
2.0    RECOMMENDATIONS
2.1 That the Area Committee:
2.1.1 Notes that the new equipment for the temporary skatepark is currently
being manufactured and will be installed as soon as this is completed.
2.1.2 Agrees that officers should proceed to investigate further the option of
developing a new skatepark at Kidston Park and also consider
Hermitage Park as a secondary alternative while noting the challenges
/ benefits of both locations.
2.1.3 Notes that the funding to investigate these options will be taken from
the £80,000 committed by the council to support the skatepark group
to find a permanent location.

Page 2

ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL                 HELENSBURGH & LOMOND AREA COMMITTEE                                                             
COMMERCIAL SERVICES                                                                       12th DECEMBER 2023 
HELENSBURGH WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT - SKATEPARK 
1.0 INTRODUCTION 
1.1 The Helensburgh and Lomond Area Committee on 12th September 2023: 
1.1.1 Noted that the reinstatement of the temporary skatepark facilities would
be completed in autumn 2023 meeting the conditions of the leisure
centre planning consent; 
1.1.2 Agreed that the waterfront site is not considered to be a suitable long
term location for an expanded skatepark if a commercial development
is selected as the preferred option for the site but for the avoidance of
doubt the previously existing skatepark area extending to 350sqm or
thereby will be incorporated into the development site unless a suitable
alternative location is identified; and 
1.1.3 Noted that a further report would be brought before the Area Committee
outlining a list of potential permanent locations for the skatepark and a
preferred option would be recommended to be taken forward. Officers
have commenced the identification of potential sites as outlined at
Section 3.7 of the report and would continue to engage with the
skatepark group as part of that process. 
1.2 This report outlines the options which have initially been assessed and seeks
approval to proceed to undertake more detailed investigations on the preferred
locations. 
2.0    RECOMMENDATIONS
2.1 That the Area Committee:
2.1.1 Notes that the new equipment for the temporary skatepark is currently
being manufactured and will be installed as soon as this is completed.
2.1.2 Agrees that officers should proceed to investigate further the option of
developing a new skatepark at Kidston Park and also consider
Hermitage Park as a secondary alternative while noting the challenges
/ benefits of both locations.
2.1.3 Notes that the funding to investigate these options will be taken from
the £80,000 committed by the council to support the skatepark group
to find a permanent location.

Page 3

3.0      BACKGROUND 
3.1 Prior to the development of the new Helensburgh Leisure Centre there was a
small skatepark at the waterfront which consisted of 3 pieces of equipment. The
original skatepark (approved in 2008) was specified as a temporary consent to
safeguard the long-term redevelopment of the waterfront site and surrounding
area. The Helensburgh Skatepark Group was keen to maintain and expand this
facility and accordingly a planning condition was agreed that the equipment
should be reinstated at the waterfront while the group developed their proposals. 
3.2 Helensburgh Skatepark Group have aspirations to create a larger skatepark to
attract visitors from across the country along with providing much needed
facilities for local people. However if a suitable alternative location is not
identified the facility will be incorporated within the waterfront development
albeit limited to the previously existing skatepark of 350sqm if a commercial
development proceeds on the site. 
3.3 Officers have been working with the group to identify suitable alternative
locations for a new skatepark which would meet their aspirations. Ideally, this
would be a parkland site to avoid high land values, which is overlooked by
passing foot and vehicle traffic creating passive supervision and also not too
close to residential areas to limit noise issues. 
3.4 This has led to a number of sites being considered as summarised in Appendix
1 and noted below: 
1) East Bay Park 
East Bay Park has some positive aspects for a skatepark as it is an open area
for passive supervision, flat and straightforward to develop and is also adjacent
to a petrol station which operates 18 hours a day. However, it is also near to
housing and there are concerns it is too close to the road from a safety
perspective. The skatepark group noted similar positive points but considered
this location unlikely to be suitable due to the proximity to the road and also the
lack of toilet facilities.

Page 4

2) Kidston Park 
Kidston Park has potential to be a suitable location for a skatepark possibly as
part of a wider community recreational hub. It has existing car parking, café and
public toilets and is also adjacent to the road for passive supervision.
Separately officers have been approached by the café ground leaseholder who
is interested in discussing the development of putting facilities which was
mentioned at the recent community engagement event as something which was
missed from the town. 
As part of a wider project this could also incorporate regeneration of the
dilapidated bandstand. The main concerns with this location are whether it is
too far from the centre of the town / station or if it would change the character of
the park. The skatepark group have advised that this is a potential location to
investigate further for the provision of a larger facility. 
3) Iona Stables, Colgrain

Page 5

The site at Iona Stables, Colgrain (next to Morrisons supermarket) is in private
ownership. However, the council is in discussions with the landowner to promote
the development of a business park at this location. During the early site
investigations it was discovered that the ground next to Morrisons is potentially
subject to flooding so can’t be used for the development of business space.
Therefore this site could be available for other uses which are allowed such as
a skatepark. 
The landowner’s agent has advised that they would be happy to discuss this
further. In addition, the site is large enough to accommodate this use and is
adjacent to other commercial uses rather than housing. Another positive factor
is that it is adjacent to the high school which will be a potential user group. The
site also benefits from having a local train station at Craigendoran and nearby
supermarket. 
The skatepark group have advised that this option isn’t considered suitable as
it is too far out from the centre of Helensburgh which would mean it is used less
and wouldn’t bring the same level of benefit to the town centre. The group also
were concerned that it may attract anti-social behaviour due to the remote
location and the risk of flooding. 
4) Hermitage Park 
The multi-use plaza space within the recently redeveloped Hermitage Park,
funded through the National Lottery Heritage Fund (NLHF) Parks for People
fund, is a site which could offer a skatepark location as it is central, overlooked
by other uses and adjacent to the café / toilets. 
However there are concerns from Economic Development and initial contact was
made with NLHF to seek their views on Hermitage Park as a possible location.
NLHF have advised that this would represent a change in the approved
purposes and masterplan and would require a heritage impact assessment to be
undertaken by a specialist consultant in historic parks and accompanied by

Page 6

plans, surveys etc. for consideration by NLHF. As a consequence the final drawn
down of c£100k has been put on hold by NLHF pending further information
being received with regard to the council’s position. This obviously represents a
risk to the council as it may breach the purposes of the £2.3m grant. 
Officers from Development and Economic Growth have also noted the
following: 
1. The plaza itself is not a vacant space. 
2. It is an open space, adjacent to the Pavilion and the children’s play area as
well as to the adjoining care home and residential properties.
3. It forms an integral part of the Park design and hosts a wide range of
activities which would be lost to the Park, including school activities, events,
fitness activities, family activities and a range of other social uses. 
4. It contributes to the practical operation of the park and the day to day use
by visitors, 
5. It functions as part of the approved access route to the Pavilion for the less
able and helps meet our obligations in terms of the Disability Discrimination
Act. 
6. The space itself is designed to allow easy access by all users including the
less able.
7. This use has increased markedly since the completion of the care home
immediately neighbouring the park.
8.  The site is also close to housing and sheltered accommodation and a skate
park in this location would significantly change the character of the Park.
9. All taken together, the park would lose much more than it gains from such a
change. 
There are other areas within Hermitage Park such as the ground behind the
Victoria Hall which could be considered. However, this may also not be
approved by NLHF but more importantly is quite secluded, close to residential
properties and could be more prone to anti-social behaviour from people not
using the skatepark. 
The skatepark group have noted that Hermitage Park would be a suitable
location but their main concern is that they wouldn’t wish to be in a location
where there was conflict with other users, groups or funders. 
3.5 Some other locations were also considered such as Helensburgh Rugby Club
and East End Park but it was considered that the existing use and proposals from
the teams using these areas didn’t allow sufficient space / parking to support
further development. 
3.6 For any proposed location there will be positives and challenges to overcome and
it is apparent that while there is general support for a new skatepark this does
tend to be less enthusiastic when the development is proposed near people’s
own house / business / community activity. 
3.7 When considering any of the above locations it is important to note that a number
of factors will still require to be assessed. These include ownership / title
conditions, planning issues, access / parking, flooding, environmental / noise
concerns and the cost of development.

Page 7

3.8 The Policy & Resources Committee on 10th August has approved the use of place
based investment funding (£80k) to assist the delivery of a permanent skatepark
subject to all conditions being met. It is therefore considered that the next steps
should be to investigate the preferred option of Kidston Park in more detail
utilising some of this funding. In addition the option of Hermitage Park should also
be explored further while noting the concerns of Economic Development
highlighted above. 
4. CONCLUSIONS & NEXT STEPS 
4.1 The Council and wider public are very supportive of the Helensburgh Skatepark
Group and wish to support its aspirations to develop a skatepark in the
Helensburgh area for local people to enjoy and also to attract visitors to the
area. This is signified by the recent allocation of £80,000 to the project by the
council. 
4.2 There are a number of potential locations to consider, each with their own
benefits and challenges, and officers would now like to concentrate resources
on the preferred option of Kidston Park with Hermitage Park also being explored
further. 
5.  IMPLICATIONS
5.1 Policy – The provision of a temporary skatepark at the waterfront is a planning
condition associated with the delivery of the community sports hub.
5.2 Financial – The council has allocated £80,000 to the project. There is a risk that
c£100,000 of funding from NLHF may be withheld if Hermitage Park is selected
as the skatepark location.
5.3 Legal - The terms and conditions of any transactions to follow are intended to
be delegated to the Executive Director of Customer Services.
5.4 HR – None
5.5 Fairer Scotland Duty 
5.5.1 Equalities – Protected characteristics – None
5.5.2 Socio economic Duty – None
5.5.3 Islands – None
5.6 Climate change – The use of ground which is unsuitable for alternative
development for a community use is a positive outcome and also encourages a
healthier outdoor lifestyle. The development of a skatepark, particularly if it is
concrete, is a negative factor.
5.7 Risk – The main risk is that an alternative location is not found which could
impact on the development of the waterfront site and fail to meet the aspirations
of the skatepark group.

Page 8

5.8 Customer Service – None.
Douglas Hendry, Executive Director with responsibility for Commercial Services
Councillor Gary Mulvaney – Policy Lead, Finance and Commercial Services 
13th November 2023 
For further information contact: 
David Allan
Estates & Property Development Manager
The Helensburgh and Lomond Civic Centre
david.allan@argyll-bute.gov.uk 
01436 657 620

Page 9

Appendix 1 
Skatepark locations - initial options
assessment       
Location
Skatepark
group views
Site owned
by the
council 
Central
location
Other risks
(funding,
road safety)
Site has
passive
supervision
Site has
other
amenities
(toilets /
café)
Site near
housing /
residences Total  
East Bay Park 2 3 3 1 3 2 1 15 
Kidston Park 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 19 
Iona Stables 1 2 1 3 2 2 3 14 
Hermitage Park 2 3 3 1 2 3 2 16