Gb Wind Farm Limited: Erection of a 120 Metre High Meteorological Mast for a Temporary Period of Up to 4 Years: Land Approximately 2.1 Km Northwest of Dunoon and 1.5Km Southwest of Sandbank (Ref: 24/01926/Pp)
Argyll and Bute Council · 20 August 2025
Back to Planning, Protective Services and Licensing Committee — 20 August 2025 and its agenda
Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.
Page 1
Argyll and Bute Council Development & Economic Growth Planning Application Report and Report of Handling as required by Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (Scotland) Regulations 2013 relative to applications for Planning Permission or Planning Permission in Principle Reference No: 24/01926/PP Planning Hierarchy: Local Application. Applicant: GB Wind Farm Limited Proposal: Erection of a 120 metre high meteorological mast for a temporary period of up to 4 years Site Address: Land Approximately 2.1 KM North West of Dunoon and 1.5 KM South West of Sandbank Argyll and Bute DECISION ROUTE ☐Delegated - Sect 43 (A) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 ☒Committee - Local Government Scotland Act 1973 (A) THE APPLICATION (i) Development Requiring Express Planning Permission • Installation of a 120 metre high meteorological triangular lattice structure with guy wires(for temporary period of 4 years) (ii) Other specified operations • None (B) RECOMMENDATION: That planning permission be approved subject to planning conditions recommended within this report. (C) CONSULTATIONS: Flood Risk Assessor - 06.02.2025 – No objections. The site lies outwith flood risk. The Sprout Burn is located marginally west of the site, before following the steep terrain. West Of Scotland Archaeologist Service - No response Core Paths - No response
Page 2
Loch Lomond And Trossachs National Park - 20.05.2025 – Comments provided on visual effects and special landscape qualities. The mast lies 4-5km from the National Park communities of Rashfield, Ardbeg, Kilmun and Strone. Views southwards focus across the Holy Loch towards the settlements of Sandbank and Dunoon, the forested lower slopes and open summit of Strone Saul, Eilligan and Bishops Seat. There are no vertical structures on the open summits. In these locations, the tall mast will be noticeable manmade element on the prominent open summit of Strone Saul. There will be direct open views. The mast will be temporary structure for a maximum of 4 years and there will be no permanent effects on the visual amenity. Given the temporary nature of the mast it is considered that there will not be significant effects on the Special Landscape Qualities of the National Park. Onsite micro siting should look to avoid visibility from channelled views obtained in a southerly direction from Loch Eck. Roads Bute And Cowal - 28.01.2025 – No objections. The existing access from B836 has adequate width, manoeuvrability and visibility. Local Biodiversity Officer - 02.04.2025 – • 2 Annex 1 habitats (H7130 Blanket Bogs and H4030 European Dry Heaths) • 3 priority peatland habitats (M17, M19, M25) • 4 Scottish Biodiversity List habitats (Upland Heathland, Blanket Bog, Upland Flushes,Fens and Swamps, and Purple Moor Grass and Rush Pastures) • 3 potential GWDTE communities (M6, M23, M25) • Class 2 peat of depths between 0.5-4.0m. • No protected species will be impacted upon. Noted that the use of micro-siting and bog mats to minimise impact on the environment and this will be reinstated once the mast is removed. I am satisfied with these recommendations to ensure the habitats have minimum impact on them. Environmental Protection Officer (inc. Contaminated Land) - No response Arqiva Ltd - 21.01.2025 – No objections. Arqiva is responsible from providing the transmission network for BBC & ITV along with the majority of radio companies. Tall infrastructure has the potential to block links and we have considered the development and have concluded we have no objections. National Air Traffic Services (NATS) - 16.12.2024 – No objection. The proposed development has been examined from a technical safeguarding aspect and does not conflict with our safeguarding criteria. Ministry Of Defence - 13.01.2025 – No objections In this case the development falls within Low Flying Area 14 (LFA 14), an area within which military aircraft may conduct low level flight training. The addition of a development featuring tall or narrow profile structures such as a meteorological mast in this locality has the potential to introduce a physical obstruction to low flying aircraft operating in the area. To address this impact, and given the location and scale of the development, the MOD require that conditions are added to any consent issued requiring that the development is fitted with aviation safety lighting, and that sufficient data is submitted to ensure that structures can be accurately charted to allow de-confliction.
Page 3
Highlands And Islands Airports Limited - 23.12.2024 – No objections. This proposal is out-with HIAL's safeguarding criteria. Civil Aviation Authority - No response Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) - 04.03.2025, 19.01.2025, 28.01.2025 and 28.02.2025 - No Objections Ground water dependant terrestrial ecosystems – standard advice provided stating a phase 1 habitat survey should be carried out. Peat – standard advice provided stating a peat mitigation plan should be carried out. NatureScot - 16.01.2025, 23.01.2025 – No Objections. Designated Sites - The mast does not lie within or have connectivity to any designated sites. Within 20km the nearest site is Loch Eck SSSI and Renfrewshire Heights SPA (10.6km) protected for hen harrier. The nature of the Proposal, lack of clear impact pathways and/or distance from these sites is sufficient to determine that there will be no likely significant effect on the SPA, and the objectives of the SSSI designation and the overall integrity of the area will not be compromised. Landscape - It is understood that the proposed meteorological mast is a temporary structure (4 years) and will no longer be required in the event that the associated wind farm is refused. However, it is worth noting that the supporting info lacks detail on the proposed access track specification. The drawing "Plans - Other - Access Route Plan (23rd October 2024)" shows the use of existing forestry tracks with a presumed additional length of track extending beyond the forestry to the site. We recommend that the Applicant consult NatureScot guidance for Constructed Tracks in the Scottish Uplands (2015) and Peatland Action guidance. This is to ensure that the track design (alignment, cut and fill, exploration of temporary track etc) and reinstatement proposals ensure no lasting adverse effects. Ornithology - To minimise collision risk, we advise that bird diverters should be fitted to guy wires and have the following advice to offer regarding the installation and maintenance of bird diverters: • Bird Flight Diverters (BFDs) should be attached to all guy wires. This is to avoid birds inadvertently flying to wires supporting the structure, including wires located between the outer wire and the met itself. Stops or clamps should be fitted to all guy wires to prevent the deflectors sliding down the wires. • BFDs should be evenly spaced at 5m intervals. • BFDs should be attached to the guy wires prior to raising the mast and maintained for the life of the mast. • Prior to the commencement of each breeding season (April) BFDs must be inspected to confirm that they are still in place and are functional, and any missing/defective diverters should be replaced or repaired, as necessary. The application contains no information on the intended timing of the mast construction. If construction of the mast is undertaken within the bird breeding season (March – September inclusive) then pre-construction surveys to identify breeding birds should be undertaken and a species protection plan prepared, as necessary.
Page 4
Peatland - The NatureScot Carbon & Peatland Map 2016 shows that the Proposal (including access route beyond the existing forestry) is located on ‘Class 2 nationally important carbon-rich soils, deep peat and priority peatland habitat’. We would expect micro-siting of the mast structure and access route to avoid sensitive areas based on peat depth and vegetation data to ensure compliance with the NPF4 mitigation hierarchy to avoid and minimise damage to sensitive peatland habitat. At present there is insufficient information to assess the potential impact of the Proposal on priority peatland habitat. Royal Society For The Protection Of Birds (RSPB) - No Response (D) HISTORY: 06/01197/DET Erection of 60-metre high wind monitoring mast (for a temporary period of 18 months) at Land 500 metres Northeast of Eilligan, Dunoon Approved 25.07.2006 09/01295/PP Extension of temporary permission for 1 x 60 metre meteorology mast for a further period of 18 months at Allt Mhor Ballochyle Estate, Sandbank Road, Dunoon Approved 06.11.2009 09/00569/DET Construction of wind farm comprising eight turbines, anemometer mast, upgraded access track, internal tracks and ancillary development at Strone Saul Hill, Dunoon Refused 10.08.2010 24/00397/SCOPE Scoping opinion for proposed Section 36 application for Giant's Burn Wind Farm at land approximately 2.1km Northwest of Dunoon and 1.5km Southwest of Sandbank Opinion issued 04.04.2024 24/01411/PP Erection of a 120 metre high meteorological mast for a temporary period of up to 4 years Withdrawn 24.10.2024 (E) PUBLICITY: Advert Type: Regulation 20 Advert Local Application Expiry Date: 17.01.2025 Neighbour Notification – No neighbours within 20m of the application site. (F) REPRESENTATIONS: (i) Representations received from:
Page 5
The application at time of writing has received 107 Objections, two submissions in support and no neutral representations. A full list of these is contained at Appendix B of this Report. All third party submissions are published in full on the planning application file and are available to view via the Public Access section of the Council’s website under the application reference number. (ii) Summary of issues raised by objectors: Objectors on the whole have used a ‘form letter / template’ as produced by a group known as ‘Save Cowal’s Hills’ The form letter raises concerns with regard to the following topics: • TEMPORARY CONSENTS Planning Circular 4/1998 ‘The temporary nature of this structure is not grounds for approval. Planning Circular 4/1998: the use of conditions in planning permissions (paragraph 105) states that: 'the material considerations to which regard must be had in granting any permission are not limited or made different by a decision to make the permission a temporary one. Thus, the reason for granting a temporary permission can never be that a time-limit is necessary because of the effect of the development on the amenity of the area'. A development should be acceptable in its own right — this is not the case in this instance. It is concerning that an application can be considered for a structure of this scale, when its stated purpose is connected to a windfarm whose planning application has not yet been lodged with the Energy Consents Unit.’ Officers Comment: The above noted quote is misleading and has been taken out of context. The full paragraph 105 must be read in the round to understand its import / see below For the avoidance of doubt the applicant has requested a temporary consent 1. Principles applying to Temporary permissions 105. In other cases, in deciding whether a temporary permission is appropriate, three main factors should be taken into account. Firstly, it will rarely be necessary to give a temporary permission to an applicant who wishes to carry out development which conforms with the provision of the development plan. Secondly, it is undesirable to impose a condition requiring the demolition after a stated period of a building that is clearly intended to be permanent. Lastly, the material considerations to which regard must be had in granting any permission are not limited or made different by a decision to make the permission a temporary one. Thus, the reason for granting a temporary permission can never be that a time-limit is necessary because of the effect of the development on the amenity of the area. Where such objections to a development arise they should, if necessary, be met instead by conditions whose requirements will safeguard
Page 6
amenity. If it is not possible to devise such conditions and the damage to amenity cannot be accepted, then the proper course is to refuse permission. These considerations mean that a temporary permission will normally only be appropriate either where the applicant himself proposes temporary development or when a trial run is needed in order to assess the effect of the development on the area. • VISUAL IMPACT We note that the proposed mast will be 120 metres tall and prominently sited on high ground overlooking the Holy Loch and standing out on the beautiful vista of the approach to Dunoon by ferry. It will be in clear view of users of core paths and other trails in the area. This is entirely inappropriate for a location so close to the Holy Loch, with Cowal and its approach as a gateway to the Highlands, being nationally and internationally renowned for the quality of the landscapes and wildlife. The site is also remarkably close to the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park. Just as we will object to giant turbines on the upland backdrop to Dunoon, promoted as 'The Maritime Gateway to the National Park', this mast is totally incongruous with the landscape. The mast will be visible from far and wide. Officers Comment - The applicant has submitted a drawing which details the ‘Theorectical Visibility’ of the structure. It shows the potential visibility of the structure at 1, 3, and 5km The applicant states: ‘Given the height and position of the met mast the theoretical visibility appears to be over a wide area when presented like this, however in practice it is a slim, open lattice structure which isn’t particularly noticeable beyond a few kilometres therefore this figure presents the theoretical visibility out to 5km only. For a local comparison, the Rosneath transmitter above Kilcreggan is 126m tall therefore it is comparable in height as well as being a guyed tower so is fairly similar, however it has more significant apparatus attached to it than a met mast would have therefore the visibility of the met mast would be less than the radio mast overall.’ It is noted than none of the statutory consultees or internal consultees have raised an objection with regard to ‘Visual Impact’ The consultee’s included the Loch Lomond & The Trossachs National Park who concluded ‘Given the temporary nature of the mast, it is considered that there will not be significant effects on the Special Landscape Qualities of the National Park’ • LIGHTING …the applicant has failed to detail the likely requirement by the MoD for aviation lighting. This would render the structure even more intrusive in an area so noted for its scenic qualities, and dark skies at night. The upland area's scenic qualities depend to a large degree on its perceived wildness and naturalness — aviation lights are apposite to this. Officers Comment – This matter can be detailed and secured by condition. The applicant has stated ‘…aviation safety lighting requested by the MOD will be infra-red and therefore not visible to the human eye. No other lights would be present on the mast.’
Page 7
• IMPACT ON RESIDENTS …The location is the mast is equally close to residential properties in Glenkin, Ardnadam and those in Sandbank (stretching out from Lazaretto Point in each direction). Officers Comment – any impact will be temporal given that the applicant has expressly requested a ‘time limited’ consent and the structure will not be permanent. This matter can be detailed and secured by condition. • CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONAL ROAD STRUCTURE …In addition, existing forest tracks do not reach the site of the proposed mast, so there would be significant impacts on the landscape in that area in order to build additional road access. Officers Comment – there is no intention to construct ‘additional road access’. The existing road network and forestry tracks are to be utilised for the construction and servicing of the met. mast. Given that the forestry track network terminates short of the site the last 486 m will be traversed with specialist lightweight vehicles and trailers with ‘bog mats’ being used as and when required to protect surfaces. I will be remembered that the met. mast is a lightweight structure that is formed of prefabricated sections that are transported to site and assembled in situ. The Local Roads Officer has raised no objection concluding that the ‘B836 has adequate width, manoeuvrability and visibility. • PEAT … There are areas of peatland around the mast site (of up to 3.1 metres in depth). This is very concerning and although micrositing is mentioned no guarantee of avoiding peatland can be given. The siting will 'aim' to avoid the deepest areas of peatland 'where possible '. Peat instability is mentioned as a risk in the most
Page 8
recent update from the developer — this is very concerning even with micrositing of 20 metres. Officer’s Comment – the Local Biodiversity officer notes: ‘the following habitats of conservation interests are present on the proposed site: 2 Annex 1 habitats (H7130 Blanket Bogs and H4030 European Dry Heaths) 3 priority peatland habitats (M17, M19, M25) 4 Scottish Biodiversity List habitats (Upland Heathland, Blanket Bog, Upland Flushes, Fens and Swamps, and Purple Moor Grass and Rush Pastures) 3 potential GWDTE communities (M6, M23, M25) Class 2 peat of depths between 0.5-4.0m. No protected species will be impacted upon. I note that the use of micro-siting and bog mats to minimise impact on the environment and that the site will be reinstated once the mast is removed. I am satisfied with these recommendations to ensure the habitats have minimum impact on them.’ • SCHEDULE 3 OF THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING REGULATIONS (2013) …In response to the question 'Does the proposal involve a form of development listed in Schedule 3 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure(Scotland)) Regulations, 2013). The applicants states that it does not. However, Section (8) of the aforementioned refers to: 'the construction of buildings, operations and use of buildings or land which will (a)affect residential property by reason of fumes, noise, vibration, smoke, artificial lighting, or discharge of any solid or liquid substance Although the applicant has failed to detail the mast structure sufficiently, a mast of this height will require aviation lights, so on the grounds of 'artificial lighting' I wish to challenge this assertion. Officers Comment – the applicant has submitted a drawing ‘General Arrangement of Met Mast ‘ dated 27.06.2024 which adequately details the elements of the met. mast. In addition the applicant’s Design and Access Statement dated 28.03.2025 statement describes fully the construction of the met. mast. Both documents are in the public domain. As noted above under Lighting the applicant states ‘aviation safety lighting requested by the MOD will be infra-red and therefore not visible to the human eye. No other lights would be present on the mast.’
Page 9
• ILLUSTRATION AND DETAILS OF MAST CONSTRUCTION AND RISKS FOR ORNITHOLOGY …Regarding the proposed mast itself, there is a note of an 'existing cable' on the attached drawing. It is unclear what 'existing cable' this refers to in that location. Figure 4 regarding the general arrangement of the mast is poor in quality and detail. There is no visual provided of the completed structure to assist members of the public in appraising what the proposed structure will look like. This obfuscates concerns which should be raised about not just the visual impact of the structure, but also the possible threats to birdlife known to frequent the area. Officer’s comments - This matter can be detailed and secured by condition. The applicant has submitted a drawing ‘General Arrangement of Met Mast ‘ dated 27.06.2024 which adequately details the elements of the met. mast. In addition the applicant’s Design and Access Statement dated 28.03.2025 statement describes fully the construction of the met. mast. Both documents are in the public domain. With regard to guy ropes and the protection of birds the applicant states in the Design and Access Statement - …bird diverters wiil be installed along the guy wires, spaced at approximately 10m intervals using UF-resistant nylon to minimize avian collision risk…’ Summary of issues raised by supporters: • This will be an important step in ascertaining the viability of the Wind Farm in this location (G) SUPPORTING INFORMATION Has the application been the subject of: (i) Environmental Impact Assessment Report: ☐Yes ☒No (ii) An Appropriate Assessment under the Conservation (Natural Habitats) Regulations 1994: ☐Yes ☒No (iii) A Design or Design/Access statement: ☒Yes ☐No The applicant Statkraft submitted a Design and Access Statement on 28.03.2025 together with details of Ecological Surveys including Protected Species and Peat Depth Survey. The applicant concludes: ‘In summary, it is considered that the erection of the met mast at the location shown on the accompanying Site Location Plan (Figure 1), is acceptable as it is located within the site of the proposed Giant’s Burn Wind
Page 10
Farm where surveys have been undertaken that show there will be minimal impact or disturbance. The slim line design and temporary nature of the proposal means that it will not give rise to significant or unacceptable impacts on the surrounding landscape, or create high levels of disturbance to peat.’ (iv) Sustainability Checklists (with reference to the requirements of LDP2 Policy 04) TN06 Sustainability Checklist TN07 Sustainable Buildings Checklist ☐Yes ☒No ☐Yes ☒No The applicant has submitted a comprehensive Design and Access Statement in lieu of checklists – this is acceptable. (v) A report on the impact of the proposed development eg. Retail impact, transport impact, noise impact, flood risk, drainage impact etc. Ecology Report - Phase 1, NVC and Protected Species Survey (LUC prepared March 2025) Conclusions: The habitats located within the application boundary include M19 blanket bog, M25 wet modified bog and H10 dry heath. Each habitat has varying levels of conservation interest, as shown in Table 1.3. However, due to the temporary nature of the proposals and their limited footprint, it is not anticipated that the Met Mast will negatively impact the habitats within the planning application boundary. However, micro siting will be used to optimise the location of the structure, taking into account environmental constraints such as sensitive habitats and the deepest areas of peat wherever possible. ☒Yes ☐No (H) PLANNING OBLIGATIONS Is a Section 75 agreement required: No (I) Has a Direction been issued by Scottish Ministers in terms of Regulation 30, 31 or 32: No (J) Section 25 of the Act; Development Plan and any other material considerations over and above those listed above which have been taken into account in the assessment of the application
Page 11
(i) List of all Development Plan Policy considerations taken into account in assessment of the application. National Planning Framework 4 (Adopted 13th February 2023) Part 2 – National Planning Policy Sustainable Places NPF4 Policy 1 – Tackling the Climate and Nature Crises NPF4 Policy 2 – Climate Mitigation and Adaption NPF4 Policy 3 – Biodiversity NPF4 Policy 5 – Soils NPF4 Policy 9 – Brownfield, Vacant and Derelict Land and Empty Buildings (includes provisions relevant to Greenfield Sites) Liveable Places NPF4 Policy 14 – Design, Quality and Place Diverse and Sustainable Economy NPF4 Policy 23 – Health and Safety Argyll and Bute Local Development Plan 2 (Adopted 2024) Spatial and Settlement Strategy Policy 02 – Outwith Settlement Areas Policy 04 – Sustainable Development High Quality Places Policy 08 – Sustainable Siting Policy 09 – Sustainable Design Policy 10 – Design – All Development Connected Places Policy 35 – Design of New and Existing, Public Roads and Private Access Regimes Policy 37 – Development Utilising an Existing Private Access or Existing Private Road Policy 39 – Construction Standards for Private Accesses Policy 43 – Safeguarding of Aerodromes Sustainable Communities Policy 55 – Flooding High Quality Environment Policy 73 – Development Impact on Habitats, Species and Biodiversity Policy 79 – Protection of Soil and Peat Resources (ii) List of all other material planning considerations taken into account in the assessment of the application, having due regard to Annex A of Circular 3/2013. • Third Party Representations
Page 12
• Consultation Reponses • Planning History • ABC Technical Note – Biodiversity (Feb 2017) • SEPA Standing Guidance for Development Management (Dec. 2022) (K) Is the proposal a Schedule 2 Development not requiring an Environmental Impact Assessment: ☐Yes ☒No (L) Has the application been the subject of statutory pre-application consultation (PAC): ☐Yes ☒No (M) Does the Council have an interest in the site: ☐Yes ☒No (N) Requirement for a pre-determination hearing: ☐Yes ☒No Although the application has attracted 107 letters of objection, it is considered that Members have sufficient information within the report and supporting documentation on public access to enable them to determine this application and properly evaluate the application against the statutory planning framework having regard to any other material planning considerations. It is therefore not considered by Officers’ that a pre-determination Hearing would add value to the determination process. (O)(i) Key Constraints/Designations Affected by the Development: • None (O)(ii) Soils Agricultural Land Classification: Class 6.3 - Land capable of use as rough grazings with low quality plants. Peatland/Carbon Rich Soils Classification: ☐Class 1 ☒Class 2 ☐Class 3 ☐N/A Peat Depth Classification: 0.5-4.0m. Does the development relate to croft land? ☐Yes ☒No Would the development restrict access to croft or better quality agricultural land? ☐Yes ☐No ☒N/A Would the development result in fragmentation of croft / better quality agricultural land? ☐Yes ☐No ☒N/A (O)(iii) Woodland Will the proposal result in loss of trees/woodland? (If yes, detail in summary assessment) ☐Yes ☒No
Page 13
Does the proposal include any replacement or compensatory planting? ☐Yes ☐No details to be secured by condition ☒N/A (O)(iv) Land Status / LDP Settlement Strategy Status of Land within the Application ☐Brownfield ☐Brownfield Reclaimed by Nature ☒Greenfield ABC LDP2 Settlement Strategy ☐Settlement Area ☐Countryside Area ☒Remote Countryside Area ☐Helensburgh & Lomond Greenbelt ABC LDP2 Allocations/PDAs/AFAs etc: N/A (P) Summary assessment and summary of determining issues and material considerations The proposal is for the erection of a 120m metrological mast which will be sited for a temporary period of up 4 years to gather data in relation to the viability or not of a potential wind farm. 130 people have objected to the siting of the mast raising concerns as detailed above in Section F. Objectors on the whole have used a ‘form letter / template’ as produced by a group known as ‘Save Cowal’s Hills’ The matters raised relate to: • Temporary Consents • Visual Impact • Lighting of Masts • Impact on Residents • Construction of Access Road • Peat • Inaccurate Information No Statutory or Internal Consultee has objected. 1 Council Member has objected – Councillor William Sinclair 1 person has written in support of the application. The relevant material considerations in this instance are: • Settlement Strategy / Principle of Development • Location, Nature and Design of Proposed Development • Landscape and Visual Impact • Natural Environment / Peat and Soil Impacts / Environmental & Biodiversity Considerations • Road Network and Associated Transport Matters • Aviation Space / Low Flying Area for Military Aircraft / Safeguarding of Aerodromes
Page 14
Having assessed the development with due regard to the relevant material considerations, no issues have been identified that cannot be resolved by relevant planning conditions. There is, therefore, nothing to restrict a positive recommendation. Consequently, it is recommended that Planning Permission is granted subject to the recommended condition(s) and reasons appended to this report. For the avoidance of doubt the granting of temporary permission for the erection of this wind monitoring mast does not in any manner imply that the site is considered suitable for a wind farm. (Q) Is the proposal consistent with the Development Plan: ☒Yes ☐No (R) Reasons why Planning Permission or Planning Permission in Principle Should be Granted: The proposal is considered to be consistent with the relevant provisions of the Development Plan, and there are no other material considerations of sufficient significance to indicate that it would be appropriate to withhold planning permission having regard to s25 of the Act. (S) Reasoned justification for a departure to the provisions of the Development Plan N/a (T) Need for notification to Scottish Ministers or Historic Environment Scotland: ☐Yes ☒No Author of Report: Ronnie Hogg Date: 31.07.2025 Reviewing Officer: Sandra Davies Date: 06.08.2025 Fergus Murray Head of Development & Economic Growth
Page 15
CONDITIONS AND REASONS RELATIVE TO APPLICATION REF. NO. 24/01926/PP Standard Time Limit Condition (as defined by Regulation) Standard Condition on Soil Management During Construction Additional Conditions 1. PP - Approved Details & Standard Notes – Non EIA Development The development shall be implemented in accordance with the details specified on the application form dated 22.10.2024; supporting information and, the approved drawings listed in the table below unless the prior written approval of the planning authority is obtained for an amendment to the approved details under Section 64 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997. Plan Title. Plan Ref. No. Version Date Received Location plan *1 of 5 23.10.2024 Site Plan *2 of 5 23.10.2024 Access Route Plan *3 of 5 24.10.2024 Outline Arrangement of Met Mast *4 of 5 24.10.2024 Peat Depth Figure *5 of 5 31.04.2025 Reason: For the purpose of clarity, to ensure that the development is implemented in accordance with the approved details. 2. Duration Restriction The permission shall be for a period of 48 months from the commencement of the development, the date of which shall be notified in writing to the Planning Authority. Within three months of the end of the 48 month period, unless a further planning application is submitted and approved, the meteorological mast and associated equipment shall be dismantled and removed from the site and the land reinstated to the satisfaction of the Planning Authority. Reason: To define the permission and in order to protect the amenity of the locale. 3. Construction Details The wind monitoring mast shall not be erected until full details of ground anchors including mast base, foundations and any fencing to protect both livestock and mast and full reinstatement details and safety and operating maintenance details, have been submitted to and approved by the Planning Authority in consultation with Scottish Natural Heritage. Reason: To allow the Planning Authority to consider these aspects in detail and in the interest of site restoration. 4. Bird Flight Diverters
Page 16
Notwithstanding the provisions of Condition 1 above, bird flight diverters (BFDs) with stops or clamps shall be fitted to all guy wires at even intervals of 5 metres from the ground upwards. The mast thereafter shall be monitored and maintained annually for its lifetime to ensure diverters remain in place and as necessary, missing diverters be replaced. Reason: In the interests of natural heritage, in order to reduce the potential for avian casualties. 5. Aviation Lighting Prior to commencing construction of any meteorological masts, or deploying any construction equipment or temporal structure 50 metres or more in height (above ground level) the undertaker must submit an aviation lighting scheme for the approval of Argyll and Bute Council in conjunction with the Ministry of Defence defining how the development will be lit throughout its life to maintain civil and military aviation safety requirements as determined necessary for aviation safety by the Ministry of Defence. This should set out: a) details of any construction equipment and temporal structures with a total height of 50 metres or greater (above ground level) that will be deployed during the construction of the meteorological mast and details of any aviation warning lighting that they will be fitted with; and b) the location and height of the meteorological mast identifying the position of the lights on the mast; the type(s) of lights that will be fitted and the performance specification(s) of the lighting type(s) to be used. Thereafter, the undertaker must exhibit such lights as detailed in the approved aviation lighting scheme. The lighting installed will remain operational for the lifetime of the development. Reason: To maintain aviation safety. 6. Aviation Charting and Safety Management The undertaker must notify the Ministry of Defence, at least 14 days prior to the commencement of the works, in writing of the following information: a) the date of the commencement of the erection of meteorological masts; b) the maximum height of any construction equipment to be used in the erection of the meteorological masts; c) the date any meteorological masts are brought into use; d) the latitude and longitude and maximum heights of any anemometer mast(s) The Ministry of Defence must be notified of any changes to the information supplied in accordance with these requirements and of the completion of the construction of the development. Reason: To maintain aviation safety.
Page 17
ADDITIONAL NOTES TO APPLICANT • The applicant should be advised that the granting of temporary permission for the erection of this wind monitoring mast does not in any manner imply that the site is considered suitable for a wind farm. • Bird Flight Diverters (BFDs) should be attached to all guy wires. This is to avoid birds inadvertently flying to wires supporting the structure, including wires located between the outer wire and the met itself. Stops or clamps should be fitted to all guy wires to prevent the deflectors sliding down the wires. • BFDs should be evenly spaced at 5m intervals. • BFDs should be attached to the guy wires prior to raising the mast and maintained for the life of the mast. • Prior to the commencement of each breeding season (April) BFDs must be inspected to confirm that they are still in place and are functional, and any missing/defective diverters should be replaced or repaired, as necessary.
Page 18
COMMITTEE REPORT APPENDIX A – RELATIVE TO APPLICATION NUMBER: REF: 24/01926/PP PLANNING LAND USE AND POLICY ASSESSMENT 1. Introduction Planning permission is sought for the erection of a 120 metre high meteorological mast for a temporary period of up to 4 years. 1.1. The Development Plan for Argyll and Bute now comprises NPF4 adopted February 2023 and LDP2 adopted March 2024. Applications require to be assessed taking both National and Local policy into account but affording precedence to the content of LDP2 where there is any conflict between the two. 1.2. NPF4 Policy 1 seeks to prioritise the climate and nature crises in all decisions, and this will be considered as part of the overall assessment below. 1.4 The key issues for consideration are: • Settlement Strategy / Principle of Development • Location, Nature and Design of Proposed Development • Landscape and Visual Impact • Natural Environment / Peat and Soil Impacts / Environmental & Biodiversity Considerations • Road Network and Associated Transport Matters • Aviation Space / Low Flying Area for Military Aircraft / Safeguarding of Aerodromes 2. Settlement Strategy / Principle of Development 2.1 The application site is situated within an area of remote countryside on land Northwest of Dunoon and Southwest of Sandbank on the hillside of Strone Saul on land at 340m. It is within the ‘Remote Countryside’ Area as designated by the Local Development Plan 2 wherein Policy 02 applies. 2.2 LDP 2 Policy 02 requires that all development proposals outwith settlement boundaries to: “demonstrate that there will be no unacceptable adverse effects (either individually or cumulatively) on natural heritage resources, built and/or cultural heritage resources, and landscape and visual amenity. Where a major development is proposed, or for any development where there is preliminary evidence that there may be such adverse effects (and where a formal environmental impact assessment is not required), a landscape and visual impact assessment, natural heritage assessment, or built and/or cultural heritage assessment may be required. In circumstances where there is otherwise evidence of a risk to the environment (for example flood risk or environmental pollution) other assessments may be required. The need for any such assessments would be determined at the development management stage, generally through pre-planning application processes.”
Page 19
2.3 In addition, LDP 2 Policy 02 Part B is applicable to ‘Remote Countryside’ Areas states: Policy 02 – Outwith Settlement Areas continued only specific categories of development on appropriate sites will be supported, these comprise of renewable energy related development, telecommunications/digital or other infrastructure, or development directly supporting agriculture, aquaculture or other recognised countryside activity.” 2.4 The proposal will be supporting a renewable energy related development and has specific locational need to be sited at this location. It therefore fits with the specific categories of development as listed in Policy 02 part B and is acceptable in principle. 2.5 NPF4 Policy 9 sets out that development proposals on greenfield sites will not be supported unless the site has been allocated for development or the proposal is explicitly supported by policies in the Local Development Plan as is the case in this instance. NPF4 Policy 11 sets out that development proposals for all forms of renewable, low-carbon and zero emissions technologies will be supported. It further states that consents for development proposals may be time limited. However, areas identified for wind farms are expected to be suitable for use in perpetuity. NPF4 Policy 18 also gives support to development proposals which provide (or contribute to) infrastructure in line with that identified as necessary in LDPs and their delivery programmes will be supported. NPF4 Policy 29 also sets out that development proposals that contribute to the viability, sustainability and diversity of rural communities and local rural economy will be supported including, in this case, essential infrastructure 2.6 In this case, the proposed mast is a small scale development and is intended to inform the possibility of a wind farm development 2.7 Drawing the above together, the principle of establishing the proposed mast at the site is considered acceptable given that the proposal is in support of renewable energy exploration. However, this is subject to the acceptability of the detailed matters set out below 3. Location, Nature and Design of Proposed Development 3.1 The site occupies a hillside above the settlements of Dunoon and Sandbank and is being sited to gather wind speed and direction to inform the detailed energy yield considerations and turbine selection of the proposed Giant’s Burn Wind Farm. 3.2 The total site area is 1.32ha. 3.3 In terms of design the mast is formed from steel lattice sections and is stablished by a triangular guyed construction. The mast will be 120m in height with a lighting rod above that. The mast will host various anemometer instruments and temperature gauges throughout its structure to measure air velocity, atmospheric pressure and temperature. 3.4 The met mast will be a triangular lattice structure with guy wires extending up to 75m from the base. The mast will be installed on a removable raft foundation with underground steel plates (1.5m x 1.5m) to stabilize the guyed mast. The guy wires, 15 in number, will be anchored using 15 steel plates buried approximately 2m deep
Page 20
(9 with dimensions of 1.15m x 1.35m, 6 with dimensions of 1.5 x 1.75m). The anchors will be removed during decommissioning. Additionally, bird diverters will be installed along the guy wires, spaced at approximately 5m intervals, using UV- resistant nylon to minimise avian collision risk. 3.5 A micro-siting area allowance of 20m from the met mast base has been requested. The micro-siting area would be used to optimise the location of the mast structure during construction to take account of local ground conditions, access and any other technical or environmental constraints identified following detailed site investigations prior to the commencement of works. 3.6 The mast does not require any permanent foundations as it will be dismantled and removed from the site once the temporary consent has expired or sufficient data has been collected, whichever is sooner. 3.7 An aviation safety light has been requested by the MOD; therefore, the mast will be fitted with MOD accredited Infra-Red (IR) lighting. No lights will be visible to the human eye. 3.8 Planning permission is sought for a limited time of 48 months, after which, the mast will be removed from the site. Any planning permission will run from the date of Commencement of Development rather than the date the mast is erected. 4. Landscape and Visual Impact 4.1 As has been set out above, the application seeks to locate a 120 metre Metrological Mast on a site within a remote countryside location. The development will therefore require to address the policies which apply to such development. 4.2 LDP 2 Policy 02 clarifies, inter alia, that applications : will also be required to demonstrate that there will be no unacceptable adverse effects (either individually or cumulatively) on natural heritage resources, built and/or cultural heritage resources, and landscape and visual amenity... 4.3 LDP 2 Policy 04 which relates to sustainable development requires that; In preparing new development proposals, developers should seek to demonstrate the following sustainable development principles, which the planning authority will also use in deciding whether or not to grant planning permission... Respect the landscape character of an area and the setting and character of settlements; 4.4 LDP 2 Policy 08 in respect of sustainable siting states Each of the following will apply when assessing any proposal for development...... The development should integrate into the landscape or existing built form to minimise detrimental effects on the environment. Particularly careful attention should be given to hilltop, skyline or ridge locations, where development will only be acceptable if such a location cannot be avoided and any significant adverse
Page 21
landscape and visual effects are clearly outweighed by social, environmental or economic benefits of community wide importance arising from the development proposal, and have been sufficiently mitigated through an environmental impact assessment or landscape and visual impact assessment. 4.5 LDP 2 Policy 10, which sets out the design principles applicable to all development, requires that; “The design of any development must: Demonstrate an understanding of and appropriate response to the proposed development site and wider context including consideration of character” 4.6 The applicant submitted a series of images of the application site detailing the access route, the plateau where development is proposed and views from the same. 4.7 The application site is located out with any national or local landscape designations. The proposal is not considered to give rise to any permanent impact upon the natural or established environment due to the nature of its construction. 4.8 The development is deemed to have a locational need associated with wind resource monitoring for the purposes of a potential wind farm development at the site. 4.9 The applicant has submitted a drawing detailing the Zone of Theoretical Visibility. 4.10 Due to its height it is estimated that it may be seen from a distance of up to 5km/3miles away. The use of a lattice tower which is a relatively open and permeable structure, will give the impression of allowing views through the mast to the adjoining hillside and surrounding hills. 4.11 It is noted than none of the statutory consultees or internal consultees have raised an objection with regard to ‘Visual Impact’. The consultee’s included the Loch Lomond & The Trossachs National Park who concluded ‘Given the temporary nature of the mast, it is considered that there will not be significant effects on the Special Landscape Qualities of the National Park’ 4.12 It is considered that the slender nature of the mast supported by guywires will not have a significantly adverse effect on the existing landscape given its open lattice structure and the temporary nature of the proposals. 4.13 Further, met. masts are becoming common features in the landscape with 3 similar masts having been granted planning permission in Argyll & Bute in the last 24 months. See planning applications 23/00157/PP, 24/00069/PP and 24/01057PP. 4.14 The mast is required for a temporary period solely for wind monitoring in connection with a prospective wind farm development, hence, it is considered compliant with the relevant provisions of NPF4 Policies 4, 11 and 14; and ABC LDP2 Policies 02, 04, 05, 08, 09 and 10. 5. Natural Environment / Peat and Soil Impacts / Environmental & Biodiversity Considerations Peat and Soil Impacts
Page 22
5.1 NPF4 Policy 5 seeks to protect carbon-rich soils, to restore peatlands and to minimise disturbance to soils from development. NPF4 Policy 5a states that development proposals will only be supported if they are designed and constructed: 5.2 In accordance with the mitigation hierarchy by first avoiding and then minimising the amount of disturbance to soils on undeveloped land; and ii) In a manner that protects soil from damage including from compaction and erosion, and that minimises soil sealing. 5.3 The applicant has stated that: ‘The proposed location for a met mast has been surveyed for peat as part of the Phase 1 peat survey for the proposed Giant’s Burn Wind Farm Depth records for the location indicate that soils are between 0.45m and 3.1m in thickness, and therefore, there are areas of peatland surrounding the proposed met mast location. A 20m micro siting allowance has been proposed, which will be used to optimise the location of the met mast and guy wire to minimise impact on peatland. 5.4 Excavation for the construction of the met mast will be minimal, the met mast will be installed on a removable raft foundation, stabilised by guy wires set to steel anchors buried to a depth of approximately 2m, which will be removed on decommissioning. There will be a total of 15 anchor points, one for each guy wire. Soils will be stripped to avoid cross contamination between distinct horizons. Stripped materials will be side-cast or stockpiled for use in the same area as they are excavated from, or they will be stored in appropriately designed and clearly defined separate stockpiles for re-use elsewhere. 5.5 Access would be taken using low ground pressure vehicles and bog mats where required, and deviations from the indicative route would be minimised to avoid causing damage to sensitive peatland habitat.’ 5.6 Noting the peat depth of the site, and as excavations will be kept to a minimum, it is considered in this instance a peat management plan is not necessary. Careful planning of the route for gaining access to the location, and use of low ground pressure vehicles with bog mats available for crossing areas of wetter ground, would minimise the disturbance of soils, peat and habitats during site activity. Restoration of the site will be controlled by a suitably worded condition. As such the proposed development is considered to be in accordance with NPF4 Policy 5 and LDP2 Policy 79. Environmental & Bio Diversity Considerations 5.7 NPF4 Policy 4 seeks to protect, restore and enhance natural assets making best use of nature-based solutions. The proposed development is not within any designated site. 5.8 NPF4 Policy 3 seeks to protect biodiversity, reverse biodiversity loss and deliver positive effects from development and strengthen nature networks 5.9 The application site is open moorland and no trees will be removed. 5.10 Ecological Surveys including Extended Phase1 Habitat Survey, National Vegitation Classification (NVC) Survey and a Groundwater Dependent Terrestrial Ecosystem
Page 23
(GWTDE) were carried out for the application site plus a 250m buffer added to create a relevant Survey Area. This work was undertaken in March 2025. 5.11 No evidence of protected species has been recorded within the ‘Survey Area’. 5.12 The following habitats of conservation interests are present within the ‘Survey Area’: • 2 Annex 1 habitats (H7130 Blanket Bogs and H4030 European Dry Heaths) • Priority peatland habitats (M17, M19, M25) • Scottish Biodiversity List habitats (Upland Heathland, Blanket Bog, Upland Flushes, • Fens and Swamps, and Purple Moor Grass and Rush Pastures) • Potential GWDTE communities (M6, M23, M25) 5.13 Due to the temporary nature of the proposals and their limited footprint, it is not anticipated that the Met Mast will negatively impact the habitats within the survey area. However, micro siting will be used to optimise the location of the structure, taking into account environmental constraints such as sensitive habitats. Given that the intention is to restore the site after use it is not thought necessary to seek biodiversity enhancement of the site. 5.14 Given the nature of the construction of the mast and in particular its guy wires, it has the potential to affect a range of priority bird species in and around the area. A condition will therefore be utilised stipulating that bird flight diverters to be fitted on the mast wires to mitigate any potential collision risk. 5.15 The proposals comply with the policy intentions of NPF4 Policy 3 and 4 together with LDP2 policy 73. 6. Road Network and Associated Transport Matters. 6.1 Access to the met mast location will be taken from the B836 via an existing forestry track of which a small section of 333m requires upgrading. For the final 486m of access there is no existing track as such all terrain vehicles and bog mats will be utilised to access the site location. A 14-tonne excavator will be required to enter and exit the site once. The construction period of the met mast would be approximately 5 working days. 6.2 Given the limited time taken to construct the mast it is not considered that public access to the hills and the site will be significantly restricted. 6.3 There are no objections from the ABC Local Roads Officer who has stated that the access from the B836 is of sufficient width with and has suitable visibility splays to accommodate the transportation needs of the proposals. 6.4 As such the proposal is deemed consistent with the relevant requirements of NPF4 Policy 13 and ABC LDP2 Policies 35, 37 and 39.
Page 24
7. Aviation Space / Low Flying Area for Military Aircraft / Safeguarding of Aerodromes 7.1 The application has been subject to consultation with National Air Traffic Services (NATS), Ministry Of Defence (MoD), Highlands And Islands Airports Limited, Civil Aviation Authority CAA and the Royal Society For The Protection Of Birds (RSPB). 7.2 Both NATS and Highlands And Islands Airports Limited confirmed the proposal does not conflict with their safeguarding criteria and raised no concerns or objection. 7.3 The MOD highlighted concern that the proposal has the potential to introduce a physical obstruction to low flying aircraft operating in the area but also indicated that this could be addressed through appropriate mitigation in the form of an Aviation Lighting Scheme secured by recommended conditions. This is deemed necessary and therefore appropriate conditions will be applied 7.4 No response has been received from the CAA or RSPB to date to indicate that they have any objection to the proposal. 7.5 The proposal is accordingly considered to be consistent with the requirements of ABC LDP2 Policy 43. 8.0 Conclusion 8.1 Having assessed the development with due regard to the relevant material considerations, no issues have been identified that cannot be resolved by relevant planning conditions. There is, therefore, nothing to restrict a positive recommendation. 8.2 Consequently, it is recommended that Planning Permission is granted subject to the recommended condition(s) and reasons appended to this report. 8.3 For the avoidance of doubt the granting of temporary permission for the erection of this wind monitoring mast does not in any manner imply that the site is considered suitable for a wind farm.
Page 25
COMMITTEE REPORT APPENDIX B – LIST OF REPRESENTATIONS: REF: 24/01926/PP As of date of report being produced on 31.07.2025. Objection 1. Council Member - Councillor William Sinclair 20.01.2025 2. Carol Chapman 3 Marina View Pier Road Sandbank PA23 8QE 23.12.2024 3. Daniel Gillam 85A Marine Parade Dunoon PA23 8HQ 24.12.2024 4. Mrs Janet Holm Ashburn House Strone Argyll And Bute PA23 8RX 30.12.2024 5. Sheila Mumford 1 Moorfield Road Gourock 04.02.2025 6. Lachrie Macquarie 21.01.2025 7. Mr Graham Revill Strathern Clachaig Argyll And Bute PA23 8RE 10.01.2025 8. Douglas C Forrest Crossburn Shore Road Sandbank Argyll And Bute 15.01.2025 9. Jean Tong Novar Kilmun Dunoon Argyll And Bute 15.01.2025 10. Mary Howley 2 Stronsaul Cottages PA23 8RD 16.01.2025 11. Diane Nicholson 16.01.2025 12. Dr Neil Hammatt Honeysuckle Cottage Clachaig PA23 8RE 16.01.2025 13. Karen Dunn 16.01.2025 14. Marco Pellicci 16.01.2025 15. Gillian Yule 16.01.2025 16. Geoff Evans Seanta PA23 8SD 16.01.2025 17. S M Garrick Glenkin Cottage Sandbank Argyll And Bute PA23 8RD 16.01.2025 18. Sandra Marshall 16.01.2025 19. Caroline Munro 16.01.2025 20. Val Borland The Old Schoolhouse Strone Brae Strone Argyll And Bute 17.01.2025 21. Mr Stephen Softley The Old Dairy Dalinlongart Sandbank Dunoon Argyll And Bute 27.02.2025 22. Ms Joanna Ritchie 6 Balmoral Place Cloch Road Gourock PA19 1AN 17.01.2025 23. Rona Baird 20.01.2025 24. James Weir 153 Alexandra Parade Dunoon Argyll And Bute PA23 8AW 16.01.2025 25. Ms Deborah Smith Rainbows End Blairmore Argyll And Bute PA23 8TJ 16.01.2025 26. Katrina Said 13.01.2025 27. G Yule 101 John Street Dunoon Argyll And Bute PA23 7BN 16.01.2025 28. Miss G Yule 101 John Street Dunoon Argyll And Bute PA23 7BN 16.01.2025 29. Campbell Gordon 2 Stronsaul Cottages Sandbank Argyll And Bute PA23 8RD 15.01.2025 30. Alison Sykora Woodbine 2 Shore Road Kilmun PA23 8SB 20.01.2025 31. L Perrett Bow-Lynn PA23 8PD 20.01.2025 32. Brittany Ferguson 127 Ardenslate Road Kirn Dunoon PA23 8HY 20.01.2025 33. Steven Baird 20.01.2025 34. Mrs Diane Nicholson Eachaig Cottage Clachaig Argyll And Bute PA23 8RE 16.01.2025 35. Mr Thomas Lewis 52A Shore Road Innellan Dunoon Argyll And Bute 16.01.2025 36. Mr Kenneth Logan 153 Alexandra Parade Dunoon Argyll And Bute PA23 8AW 16.01.2025 37. Mrs Rhona Altin Altinev Sandbank Dunoon Argyll And Bute 17.01.2025 38. Mr David Nicholson Eachaig Cottage Clachaig Argyll And Bute PA23 8RE 17.01.2025 39. Gordon Holm Ashburn House Strone Argyll And Bute PA23 8RX 10.01.2025 40. Richard Bedding 133 Ardenslate Road Dunoon PA23 8GZ 15.01.2025 41. Claire Martin-Forest Crossburn Shore Road Sandbank PA23 8QD 15.01.2025 42. Andrew McCormick 26 B Inchinnan Road Paisley Renfrewshire PA3 2RA 15.01.2025
Page 26
43. Audrey Cope 15.01.2025 44. Samantha Marshall 15.01.2025 45. Mr David Eaglesham Ardachuidh Colintraive Argyll And Bute PA22 3AR 16.01.2025 46. Chris Bowen The Ferry House, Kilmun, Dunoon PA23 8SB 17.01.2025 47. Marion Bowen The Ferry House Kilmun Dunoon PA23 8SB 17.01.2025 48. Jackie Bushnell 59 Sandhaven Sandbank PA23 8QW 17.01.2025 49. Kristian Scoultz Dunclutha House Midge Lane Strone 17.01.2025 50. Dominica And Gavin King 17.01.2025 51. Susan Le May 17.01.2025 52. Paul Viles Marybank Kilmun PA23 8SE 17.01.2025 53. Fiona Alexander 17.01.2025 54. Steve Oattes 17.01.2025 55. Steve Abbott Riviera, Shore Rd Dunoon Argyll PA23 8TB. 20.01.2025 56. Lorraine Hopkin-Munro 20.01.2025 57. Mike Robinson 59 Sandhaven Sandbank PA23 8QW 20.01.2025 58. Heather Monteith 20.01.2025 59. Marjorie Lowe Burnside Shore Rd Innellan Dunoon Argyll 20.01.2025 60. Johnny Morgan 20.01.2025 61. Scott W 20.01.2025 62. Lynn Gilchrist Marybank Kilmun PA23 8SE 20.01.2025 63. Mary Howley 14.01.2025 64. Mr Thomas McCowan 52 King Street Dunoon Argyll And Bute PA23 7PE 15.01.2025 65. Mr Richard Bedding 133 Ardenslate Road Kirn Argyll And Bute PA23 8GZ 14.01.2025 66. Ms Jayne Tye Rocklea Sandbank Argyll And Bute PA23 8PA 16.01.2025 67. Campbell Gordon 2 Stronsaul Cottages Sandbank Dunoon Argyll And Bute 18.01.2025 68. Mandy Grout The Moorings Shore Road Strone Argyll And Bute 69. Ms Heather Monteith 4 Craignure 30 Shore Road Innellan Argyll And Bute 16.01.2025 70. Mr Mark Jenkins 25 Sandhaven Sandbank Argyll And Bute PA23 8QN 17.01.2025 71. Trevor Ballantyne Hopehill Kilmun Argyll And Bute PA23 8RY 20.01.2025 72. Bill Archibald 17.01.2025 73. K A Garrick Glenkin Cottage Sandbank Argyll And Bute PA23 8RD 21.01.2025 74. Gavin King 21.01.2025 75. Michael Leek Dunclutha House Midge Lane Strone 21.01.2025 76. Janet Lowe Burnside Shore Rd Innellan Dunoon Argyll 21.01.2025 77. Andrew Mumford 14.01.2025 78. Philip Norris Kevington 36 George Street Hunter's Quay Argyll And Bute 14.01.2025 79. Stuart Binnie 14.01.2025 80. Mr Duncan Goldthorp Uisge Soillseach Kilmun Argyll And Bute PA23 8RY 14.01.2025 81. Mrs Margaret Goldthorp Uisge Soillseach Kilmun Argyll And Bute PA23 8RY 14.01.2025 82. Ms E R Thomson Thomson 5 The Meider Toward Argyll And Bute PA23 7UR 06.01.2025 83. Mrs Shelagh Baugh 14 Ferrymans Sandbank Dunoon Argyll And Bute 17.01.2025 84. David Hill 30.05.2025 85. Barbara Howson 30.05.2025 86. Kerry Liddell 27.05.2025 87. Andrew Mumford 27.05.2025 88. Julie Forrester 27.05.2025 89. Marie Burns Ardenholm Sandbank, PA23 8QA 27.05.2025 90. Coby Burns Flat 2 81 Alexandra Parade PA23 8AQ Dunoon 27.05.2025 91. David Burns Flat 2 81 Alexandra Parade PA23 8AQ Dunoon 27.05.2025
Page 27
92. Dave Burns 27.05.2025 93. Amanda Ballantyne 28.05.2025 94. Alyssa Ballantyne 28.05.2025 95. Iris Ballantyne 28.05.2025 96. Simon Ballantyne 28.05.2025 97. Shanya Ballantyne 28.05.2025 98. Yvonne Ferguson Rossarden 105 Bullwood Road Dunoon PA23 7QN 28.05.2025 99. Jonathan Hastings 02.06.2025 100. Joanne Young 02.06.2025 101. Emma Graham 02.06.2025 102. Andrew Parr 27.05.2025 103. Mrs Kathie Mclean 1 Eachaig Kilmun Argyll And Bute PA23 8SJ 104. Kevin C J Poole 03.06.2025 105. Catherine Ballantyne 03.06.2025 106. Mrs Viv Hamilton Woodland Cottage Ferry Road Sandbank Argyll And Bute 14.05.2025 107. Alistair Blyth 04.06.2025 Support 1. Mr David Clough 1 Edward Street Dunoon Argyll And Bute PA23 7JF 14.01.2025