Democracy Spraffa

Annual Status and Options Report 2025

Argyll and Bute Council · 20 March 2025
Back to Environment, Development and Infrastructure Committee — 20 March 2025 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL  ENVIRONMENT, DEVELOPMENT AND
INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE                                                                           
ROAD AND INFRASTRUCTURE                                            20 MARCH 2025 
ANNUAL STATUS AND OPTIONS REPORT 2025 
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1  The Annual Status and Options Report (ASOR) provides an overview of road
infrastructure assets within Argyll and Bute Council based on 2023-24 and
2024-25 data for asset condition, previous investment, asset valuation and
other relevant information. The report provides information, based upon
current available data, on the condition of the asset and future options which
can be considered in terms of investment. 
The ASOR provides details on each of the following assets: 
• Roads
• Footways
• Structures such as Bridges
• Street Lighting and Traffic Signals
• Street Furniture
• EV Chargers 
1.2   The annual scanner survey programme measures several properties of the
carriageway surface. The Road Condition Index (RCI) measures, Surface
Texture, Cracking, Rutting (Transverse profile), 3m Longitudinal profile
(potholes), 10m Longitudinal profile (ride quality). The RCI score is the
cumulative value of these main parameters and consequently the higher the
RCI score, the poorer the overall condition of that section of the network. It
should be noted that in the past 3 years, the external Road Condition Index
(RCI) report did not survey our full area with most of our Islands missed. A full
survey was carried out in the second part of 2024 and details were received in
December which officers have reviewed and analysed. 
1.3   In future years, as officers are not getting the RCI scoring until late December
and must analyse this prior to producing schemes and carrying out
engagement with Elected Members at proposed business days, it is
recommended we use the previous year’s scoring to produce the Capital
Programme Schemes for the following year (as was done last year). Provided

Page 2

an annual survey is carried out by the external contractor, the RCI does not
usually fluctuate to any significant degree, indeed it is normally based over a
two year period; however, as this has not happened for the last three years,
as well as the islands being our most vulnerable roads, we have seen a
change from our RCI being 49.8% in the red/amber (needing work) to 50.7%
over the past 4 years However, this still shows a continued improvement
overall, since 2018-20. 
1.4   The ASOR appendix lists have used last year’s figures as the most up to date
RCI score. The report sets out the 2024 road and associated infrastructure
condition and forecasts future condition based on different proposed levels of
investment. 
1.5   The ASOR demonstrates previous investment in the Roads Reconstruction
Programmes has slightly improved the overall road condition, through support
from Elected Members allowing an average budget of nearly £8M. Whilst the
condition has improved slightly, without the increased investment from the
Council, the road condition will continue to deteriorate, resulting in our road
network being in an extremely poor condition. The condition surveys carried
out nationally have a lag of 2 – 4 years (due to not all of the network being
surveyed in one year). Argyll and Bute’s condition survey is anticipated to
worsen should there be a reduction in available investment. Currently Argyll
and Bute Council are listed as having the highest RCI within our family group
consisting of roads authorities with similar roads networks, effectively our
roads index is the poorest of the 8 family group members for rural authorities
in Scotland. 
1.6   Within the ASOR report, the respective asset groups are identified with four
investment options presented to allow members to consider appropriate future
funding which will allow a more informed budget setting process for the
maintenance and improvement of Roads and Infrastructure assets. 
1.7   The ASOR links into the Priority Investment Plans (PIPs) (previously known
as Service Asset Management Plan (SAMP)) which forms part of the overall
Capital budget decision making process. The ASOR is a useful tool in
assisting Elected Members to make informed strategic decisions regarding
investment of our limited capital resources. 
RECOMMENDATIONS 
It is recommended that the Environment, Development and Infrastructure
Committee:- 
• Endorses the Annual Status and Options Report and the positive
analytical feedback it provides and agrees to use the information for
future budget setting.  
• Agrees that going forward officers use the previous years RCI to
programme the coming years programme.

Page 3

ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL  ENVIRONMENT, DEVELOPMENT AND
INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE                                                                           
ROAD AND INFRASTRUCTURE                                          20 MARCH 2025 
ANNUAL STATUS AND OPTIONS REPORT 2025 
2.0 INTRODUCTION
2.1 This report introduces the Annual Status and Options Report which makes an
analytical assessment of the condition of the Council’s Road Network and
associated infrastructure as well as setting out projected conditions based on
varying levels of investment.  
3.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
3.1 It is recommended that the Environment, Development and Infrastructure
Committee:- 
• Endorses the Annual Status and Options Report and the positive
analytical feedback it provides and agrees to use the information for
future budget setting.  
• Agrees that going forward officers use the previous year’s RCI to
programme the coming years programme. 
4.0 DETAIL
4.1 The ASOR is a report which forms part of a suite of documents which are
recommended by Scottish Collaboration of Transportation Specialists (SCOTS)
for Local Authorities use. The documents have been developed in collaboration
with all Scottish and Welsh authorities and aim to improve processes and
continue the development and implementation of the wider use of recognised
asset management techniques. When authorities have fully developed the use
of these documents, they will enable better value for money to be delivered and
prudent stewardship of the road asset to be demonstrated. 
4.2  SCOTS have focused on carriageway condition including backlog value and
steady state figures due to carriageways being the single most valuable Council
asset.

Page 4

4.3  The ASOR is also a tool which Elected Members can use to help set priorities
for investing the limited resources available to the Council. 
4.4  At the Argyll and Bute Council Budget Meeting in February 2025, an £10M
investment programme for roads reconstruction was approved. This continued
investment coupled with the level of revenue investment over the last few years
will help to halt the decline in our roads network condition. 
RCI for 2018-20 = 54.2% of roads needing improvement 
RCI for 2020-22 = 49.8% of roads needing improvement 
RCI for 2021-23 = 48.8% of roads needing improvement 
RCI for 2023-24 = 49.8% of roads needing improvement 
RCI for 2023-25 = 50.7% of roads needing improvement 
Previous levels of investment have halted the deterioration of the surfacing and
acted as a contributory factor in reducing the number of CAT 1 & 2 road defects.
4.5  The RCI survey data is utilised along with other relevant available data such as
SCRIM (sideway-force coefficient routine investigation machine), Accident
Statistics, Road Hierarchy, Inspection data and local engineering judgement to
develop an initial list of suitable schemes for inclusion in the road reconstruction
programme. The WDM pavement management system interrogates all the
available data to identify and rank potential schemes. Once a draft list is
compiled further analysis is carried out by local staff to establish scheme costs,
treatment options etc this is then matched to available funding. The selection
process is under regular review and has been steadily improved over time. 
5.0 CONCLUSION
5.1 This ASOR report has been developed in line with the SCOTS Asset
Management Project and provides a useful resource aimed at providing
relevant decision makers with information which will allow a more informed
choice to be made in respect of future investment options. 
6.0 IMPLICATIONS
6.1 Policy – The ASOR contributes towards policy for infrastructure and roads.
6.2 Financial – Current investment levels provide a steady state for the roads
network.  
6.3  Legal – None known.
6.4  HR – None known.
6.5  Fairer Scotland Duty: None known.
6.5.1   Equalities - protected characteristics – None known.
6.5.2   Socio-economic Duty – None known.

Page 5

6.5.3 Islands – The reduction in the Ferry Prices (RET) has increased numbers of
vehicles on island roads which has caused more damage to the island road
network.
6.6  Climate Change – The impact of climate change on key infrastructure is expected
to increase in the coming years.   
6.7 Risk – Road Network will deteriorate due to underfunding, as such we need to
prioritise roads which may well affect island and more rural communities more.
6.8  Customer Service – None known.  
6.9 The Rights of the Child (UNCRC) – None arising from this report. 
Executive Director with responsibility for Development and Infrastructure:
Kirsty Flanagan
Policy Lead for Roads, Transport and Amenity: Councillor John Armour 
February 2025                                              
For further information contact: 
Stephen Hall, Interim Head of Road and Infrastructure Services 
stephen.hall@argyll-bute.gov.uk 
Hugh O’Neill, Network and Standards Manager
hugh.oneill@argyll-bute.gov.uk  
APPENDICES
Appendix 1 – ASOR Report 
Appendix 2 – Photographs of work carried out to our network assets in 2023-24