Democracy Spraffa

Revenue Budget Overview 2025-26 to 2029-30

Argyll and Bute Council · 20 February 2025
Back to Budget Pack — 20 February 2025 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL COUNCIL
FINANCIAL SERVICES 27 FEBRUARY 2025
REVENUE BUDGET OVERVIEW 2025-26 to 2029-30  
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
1.1 This report summarises the position with regard to the key issues
surrounding the revenue budget estimates and setting of council tax for
2025-26.  It also provides budget estimates for 2026-27 to 2029-30;
within the report the mid-range estimates are noted, with the best case
and worse case estimates included in Appendix 1. 
1.2  The Local Government Finance Circular 10/2024 was published on 12
December 2024 and provides detail of the provisional total revenue and
capital funding allocations for 2025-26.  The Council’s provisional
General Revenue Grant is £254.995m in addition to Revenue Specific
Grant of £4.539m.       
1.3 Following the publication of Finance Circular 10/2024 there has been
some changes to distributions in addition to previously non-distributed
funding now having an agreed distribution methodology.  These changes
will not be confirmed until the Finance Order is approved on 27 February
2025, but I have reflected what I consider to be a reasonable estimate of
the changes that are expected.  This increases the General Revenue
Grant for 2025-26 to £259.134m and £4.539m in specific grants.   
1.4 The Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Local Government announced
on Tuesday 4 February 2025 that Scottish Government has now agreed
to provide an additional £144m to Local Government in respect of the
Employer’s National Insurance increase and this funding represents
60% of direct staffing costs.  This announcement was made to provide
some certainty for councils as part of their budget setting.  The
increased cost is estimated to be £4.314m for 2025-26 (Council
£3.450m and HSCP £0.864m).  Based on the announcement it is
estimated that we will receive £2.578m of funding. 
1.5 On 29 November 2024 the Council received a letter from the
Department of Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) providing
our authority’s estimated payment amount in respect of Extended
Producer Responsibility in relation to Waste Packaging.  Our estimated
payment for 2025-26 is £3.847m. The final allocation will be confirmed in
Autumn 2025.  As it is unclear at this stage what requirements will be
attached to this additional funding, in addition to not knowing the final
allocation until Autumn 2025 it is recommended that only a proportion of
the funding is used to support the 2025-26 budget.  There is a non-pay
inflation pressure for waste/landfill tax for £0.790m and a cost pressure
for BMW Ban for £0.558m and it is recommended that £1.348m is used

Page 2

for these purposes with the remaining £2.499m carried forward to 2026-
27.   
1.6 The Council Tax budget for 2024-25 was set at £63.278m.  Growth has
been increased for 2025-26 to 0.75% to help rebase the position
following a review undertaken by the Assessor at Dunbartonshire and
Argyll and Bute Valuation Joint Board.  Future years growth has been
assumed as 0.25% in the worst case scenario, 0.5% in the mid-range
scenario and 0.75% in the best case scenario.   The 0.75% growth in
2025-26 amounts to an estimated increase of £0.472m.   
1.7 The budget for 2024-25 has been rolled forward into 2025-26 and the
main changes to the 2025-26 base budget are summarised below: 
• Removal of cost pressures relating to 2024-25 only of £0.130m
• Removal of one-off Management/Operational savings of £1.694m
• Release of Contingency back to general fund in 2024-25 of
£0.200m
• Adjustment to re-base contribution to Joint Boards of £0.114m
• Adjustment for re-basing NDR (unbudgeted 2024-25 Rate
poundage increase) of £0.300m
• Adjustment to right-size ferries budgets ensuring income and
expenditure match as this is specific grant funded £0.037m
• Adjustments relating to pay within 2024-25 for Children’s Social
Work (Education service) - £0.063m
• SJC Pay Award 2024-25 - £2.636m
• Pay Award Elected Members 2024-25 - £0.033m
• Settlement Directions (Council services) of £2.992m.   
1.8 The employee cost changes amount to £8.686m.  This relates to
estimated pay inflation for 2025-26, increments, employee base changes
and the increase to employer’s national insurance.   
1.9 Only unavoidable/inescapable inflation has been included within 2025-
26 and this amounts to £2.978m.  This includes utilities, catering
purchases, contract inflation, insurances and landfill tax. 
1.10 There are a number of cost and demand pressures for 2025-26,
amounting to £4.771m summarised as follows:  
• ASN Support - £0.202m
• Maintenance/Repair of School Estate - £0.360m
• Additional Staff Required in Hostels as per Care Inspectorate -
£0.055m 
• Education ICT Network Infrastructure - £0.295m
• Airports Maintenance - £0.040m
• Increase to borrowing costs as a result of investment agreed at
February 2024 - £0.282m
• Universal Credit HB Admin Grant - £0.040m
• NDR Reliefs - £0.068m

Page 3

• Compliance with BMW Ban - £0.558m
• Bus Transport Contracts - £1.735m
• Roads and Amenity Services Income Saving no longer achievable - 
£0.100m
• School Transport for ASN pupils - £0.500m
• Loans Charges for Weather Incident - £0.080m
• Insurance premium increases - £0.309m
• Valuation Joint Board requisition increase - £0.147m. 
1.11 The revised payment to the Health and Social Care Partnership, reflects
2024-25 in year adjustments and the net changes to the settlement in
respect of Social Work that we have been directed to pass over to the
Health and Social Care Partnership.  Due to the significant financial
pressure that the Health and Social Care Partnership is facing as a
result of the increasing number of older persons and the increased
demand, it is recommended that Council consider passing over a further
increase to the HSCP, this will pass over a share of the additional
funding that the Council has received without conditions attached.  It is
recommended to pass over £0.370m equivalent to 1% pay award to
ensure that the HSCP have sufficient budget to match the public sector
pay policy for social work staff as well as £0.346m in relation to the
anticipated shortfall in the Employer’s National Insurance funding.  The
revised payment amounts to £81.492m. 
1.12 The budget gap prior to any measures to balance the budget is a deficit
of £10.938m in 2025-26. 
1.13 There are a number of measures to balance the budget that have
previously been agreed at the Council’s budget meeting on 22 February
2024 which have a net effect of reducing the 2025-26 budget gap by
£0.283m. 
1.14 During 2024-25 a review was undertaken of all earmarked reserves to
establish whether they were still required for the originally intended
purpose. The results of the review were presented to Council on 26
September 2024 where Members agreed to release £1.558m of existing
earmarked reserves back to the General Fund to help bridge the budget
gap in 2025-26. This is one-off in nature and therefore reduces the gap
in 2025-26 only. 
1.15 There are a number of other measures to balance the budget that are for
Council approval, summarised as follows:
• General inflationary increase of 6% to fees and charges resulting in
£0.363m of additional income. 
• New management/operational savings amounting to £2.102m.
• New policy options savings amounting to £0.991m. 
1.16 The budget gap after the measures to balance the budget is a deficit of
£2.471m in 2025-26.

Page 4

1.17 The setting of Council Tax should happen on the same day as the
Council sets its revenue budget as once all proposals are considered,
Council Tax is the balancing figure.  The gap outlined in paragraph 1.16
above is based on a 5% Council Tax increase (this is the assumption
that has been in the budget outlook during the year).   In order to get to a
balanced budget, Council will need to increase Council Tax to 8.9%.  
The alternative to increasing Council Tax further is that Council would
need to fund the gap using reserves or other funds held, which would be
a one-off fix, however, Members need to be mindful of the significant
gap in future years as well as the pressures facing the capital plan. 
1.18 The budget gap over the period 2026-27 to 2029-30 across each
scenario is summarised in the table below.   
Budget Gap 2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
Total
£000
Best Case (5,907) (7,343) 262 (344) (13,332)
Mid-Range (9,528) (10,373) (4,424) (5,212) (29,537)
Worst Case (16,131) (16,763) (10,981) (12,124) (55,999) 
1.19 The Council are asked to consider funding requests summarised within
Appendix 8.  Members are asked to give consideration to these requests
and how they would be funded.

Page 5

ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL COUNCIL
FINANCIAL SERVICES 27 FEBRUARY 2025
REVENUE BUDGET OVERVIEW 2025-26 to 2029-30  
2. INTRODUCTION 
2.1 This report summarises the position with regard to the key issues
surrounding the revenue budget estimates and setting of council tax for
2025-26.  It also provides budget estimates for 2026-27 to 2029-30;
within the report the mid-range estimates are noted, with the best case
and worse case estimates included in Appendix 1. 
2.2 Regular reports on the budget outlook 2025-26 to 2029-30 have been
presented to Members throughout the year.  Reports were presented to
the Policy and Resources Committee on 9 May 2024, 15 August 2024,
10 October 2024 and 5 December 2024. 
3. DETAIL 
3.1 Funding 
Finance Settlement 
3.1.1 The Scottish Budget was announced by the Cabinet Secretary for
Finance and Local Government on 4 December 2024 and the Local
Government Finance Circular 10/2024 was published on 12 December
2024. This circular provides detail of the provisional total revenue and
capital funding allocations for 2025-26 (one year only). The provisional
total funding allocations form the basis for the annual consultation
between the Scottish Government and COSLA ahead of the Local
Government Finance (Scotland) Order 2024 presented to the Scottish
Parliament, currently scheduled for the end of February 2025.   
3.1.2 The Circular outlines that the Scottish Government will work in
partnership with local government to implement the budget and the joint
priorities in return for the full funding package worth £15 billion which
includes: 
• A further £524.9 million of funding has now been baselined as
General Revenue Grant, as part of our commitment under the
Verity House Agreement to review ring-fenced funding;
• Additional General Revenue Grant of £289 million to support
local priorities;
• An additional £15 million to support the expansion of Free School
Meals; £125 million for adult social care workers in
commissioned services;
• £10 million to support provision of Free Personal and Nursing
care;

Page 6

• An additional £25.7 million to improve pay for early learning and
childcare workers;
• An additional £41 million investment to maintain or restore
teacher numbers to 2023 levels;
• An additional £28 million for additional support for learning; 
• £33 million to support development of people working in
children’s social work;
• £40 million to tackle the climate emergency;
• An additional £10 million to improve play parks for children; and
• An additional £8.6 million resource and £20 million capital to
improve inter-island connectivity. 
Scottish Government Funding for Argyll and Bute Council 
3.1.3 The General Revenue Grant for 2024-25 noted within the February
2024 budget pack was £240.804m.  The General Revenue Grant for
2025-26 is £254.995m as outlined within Finance Circular 10/2024. 
There is also £4.539m of specific grants.   
3.1.4 Following the publication of Finance Circular 10/2024 there has been
some changes to distributions in addition to previously non-distributed
funding now having an agreed distribution methodology.  These
changes will not be confirmed until the Finance Order is approved on 27
February 2025, but I have reflected what I consider to be a reasonable
estimate of the changes that are expected.  This increases the General
Revenue Grant for 2025-26 to £259.134m.  The specific grants remain
unchanged at £4.539m.   
3.1.5 The table below represents the changes in General Revenue Grant
between 2024-25 and 2025-26: 
£000 £000
Funding Budget 2024-25 as per budget
pack 
240,804
SG Policy Commitments – Health and
Social Care:  
Children’s Social Care Pay Uplift 2024-25 180 
LG Pay 2024-25 339 
519
SG Policy Commitments – Council:  
No-one left behind 63 
Council Tax Freeze 2,860 
£62.7m Additional Funding (linked to
Council Tax Freeze)
1,109 
Children’s Social Care Pay Uplift 2024-25 63 
Islands Cost of Living 705 
Climate Intelligence Service 2 
Building Standards Hub (26) 
SNCT Pay Offer 2024-25 456 
Ed Psychology Refund 8

Page 7

Teachers Pensions (change to figure
previously estimated in budget pack)
1,389 
Scottish Welfare Fund 258 
LG Pay 2024-25 1,032 
Teacher Numbers 2,125 
School Milk 15 
Ukraine 91 
Teacher Induction 31 
Temporary Accommodation 15 
10,196
Rounding   (2)
Updated Funding 2024-25 (FC 10/2024)  251,517
Updating of Indicators   882
Change to the floor  (2,951)
Indicators Removed/Reduced  (64)
One-off funding Removed  (599)
SG Policy Commitments – Health and
Social Care 
2,601
SG Policy Commitments – Council  700
Teacher Numbers – share of additional
£41m 
615
Additional Support for Learning – share of
£28m 
392
Teachers Pay – Full year effect 2025-26  223
Islands Cost of Living Fund Increase  17
Changes Column  5,801
Rounding  1
Estimated Settlement 2025-26  259,134 
3.1.6 If you compare the settlement of £259.134m to the finalised cash
funding in 2024-25 the funding has increased by £7.617m – in cash
terms.  However, this is not a like-for-like comparison as there is some
funding in 2024-25 that was one-off and a full year effect of the teachers
pay increase to be reflected.  The like-for-like cash terms comparison is
an increase of £7.993m or 3.19%   
£000 £000
2024-25 Settlement 251,517 
Ukraine (91) 
Temporary Accommodation (15) 
Island Cost of Living (Community Share) (141) 
Scottish Welfare Fund Top Up (258) 
No-one left behind (63) 
Teachers Induction (31) 
2024-25 Settlement for comparison  250,918
2025-26 Settlement 259,134 
Teachers Pay Full Year Effect (223) 
2025-26 Settlement for comparison  258,911

Page 8

Increase  7,993
Increase %  3.19% 
3.1.7 Although there has been a cash increase, an element of the increase is
due to additional funding to support Scottish Government Policy. 
Adjusting for these amounts (£2.601m, £0.700m, £0.615m and
£0.392m) the increase reduces to £3.685m or 1.47% for core services.       
3.1.8 In considering the assumption related to future years funding, I have
reflected on the funding change in the last 5 years (at budget time) after
accounting for new policy commitments: 
• 2021-22 funding increase of 0.39%.
• 2022-23 funding decrease of 0.01%
• 2023-24 funding increase of 0.09%
• 2024-25 funding decrease of 0.98%
• 2025-26 funding increase of 1.47% 
3.1.9 The level of increase for 2025-26 was unexpected and it was significant
in comparison to previous years, however, it is difficult to suggest that
we should assume increases like this in future years.  As our Council
relies on the floor mechanism, our funding is always lower than the
Scottish average.  The floor percentage was set at 0.75% this year,
resulting in us receiving 0.75% less than the Scottish average (on
funding lines within the floor, which is the large majority of funding
lines).  Therefore, a flat cash settlement for Scotland would result in us
having a 0.75% reduction.  At this stage I would suggest that in the mid-
range scenario we assume an all Scotland increase of 0.5%, resulting in
a decrease for Argyll and Bute Council of 0.25%.  The best and worst
case scenarios would be varied by 0.50% resulting in range of between
0.75% reduction (worst case) and a 0.25% increase (best case).  This
will be kept under close review and may be updated following the
publication of the Scottish Government’s Medium Term Financial
Strategy which is usually published around May each year.     
Funding for Increase to Employer’s National Insurance
Contributions 
3.1.10 As part of the UK Budget announced on 30 August 2024, the Chancellor
announced an increase to Employers National Insurance Contributions
effective from 1 April 2025.  The rate that employers pay in contributions
will rise from 13.8% to 15% on a worker's earnings above £175 from
April. The threshold at which employers start paying the tax on each
employee’s salary will be reduced from £9,100 per year to £5,000. The
Secretary of State for Scotland wrote to the Council Leader on 1
November 2024 to confirm that the Chancellor will provide funding to
the public sector to support with the additional costs associated with
these changes.  Given the impacts of the policy change are complex,
the Scottish Government settlement for 2025-26 announced in
December does not reflect this additional support. HM Treasury will lead

Page 9

a technical process, which will include consultation with Devolved
Governments, to understand requirements in more detail.  During
January, it became apparent that the Barnett Consequentials are likely
to only fund circa 50% of the Employer’s National Insurance increase for
public sector bodies.   
3.1.11 The Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Local Government announced
on Tuesday 4 February 2025 that Scottish Government has now agreed
to provide an additional £144m to Local Government which represents
60% of direct staffing costs.  This announcement was made to provide
some certainty for councils as part of their budget setting.  The
increased cost is estimated to be £4.314m for 2025-26 (Council
£3.450m and HSCP £0.864m).  Based on the announcement it is
estimated that we will receive £2.578m of funding.  The distribution will
not be confirmed until after the Council sets its budget but it is the best
estimate at this stage.  There is no funding for Commissioned Services
and Arms Length Organisations.  The estimated funding is outlined in
the table below: 
2025-26
£000
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
Estimated NIC
Funding – Council
Share
2,062 2,057 2,052 2,047 2,042
Estimated NIC
Funding – Social
Work Share
516 515 514 513 512
Total 2,578 2,572 2,566 2,560 2,554 
Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) – Funding from DEFRA 
3.1.12 Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) is an environmental policy
approach that holds producers accountable for the entire lifecycle of
their products, including the post-consumer phase. Under EPR,
manufacturers are required to take responsibility for the collection,
recycling, and safe disposal of their products once they are no longer in
use.  The key idea behind EPR is to shift the financial and/or physical
responsibility for waste management from municipalities (taxpayers) to
producers (manufacturers). This creates an incentive for companies to
design products that are easier to recycle, more durable, and have less
environmental impact. 
3.1.13 On 29 November 2024 the Council received a letter from the
Department of Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) providing
our authority’s estimated payment amount (£3.847m) pursuant to the
draft Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging and Packaging
Waste) Regulations 2024 (the Draft Regulations) for the financial year
April 2025 to March 2026.  These draft regulations relate to Extended
Producer Responsibility for Packaging.  The indicative payment amount
is provisional and subject to further review and adjustment.  Payments
provided via EPR for packaging are intended to enable local authorities

Page 10

to maximise the collection and recycling of packaging materials in order
to support the transition to a circular economy. The final allocation will
be confirmed in Autumn 2025.  
3.1.14 It has been confirmed that the funding will be paid direct from DEFRA
and is additional to the Scottish Government settlement in 2025-26, if it
is spent on waste management.  It is uncertain if the Scottish
Government settlement may be adjusted in future years on the basis
that we continue to receive funding from DEFRA.   
3.1.15 As it is unclear at this stage what requirements will be attached to this
additional funding, what further pressures there may be in future years,
in addition to not knowing the final allocation until Autumn 2025 it is
recommended that only a proportion of the funding is used to support
the 2025-26 budget.  There is a non-pay inflation pressure for
waste/landfill tax for £0.790m and a cost pressure for BMW Ban for
£0.558m and it is recommended that £1.348m is used for these
purposes with the remaining £2.499m carried forward to 2026-27.  No
assumption has been made around recurring funding at this stage
although it is hoped funding will continue without any downward
adjustment to the Scottish Government settlement in respect of this.   
Council Tax 
3.1.16 The Council Tax base for 2024-25 was set at £63.278m which reflected
no inflationary increase as agreed by the Council on 15 April 2024. This
is the starting position for 2024-25.   
3.1.17 Financial Services have concluded a review of Council Tax income
received on second homes and projections indicate receipts will be
£0.328m over budget.  This is a positive position and is very close to the
original budget agreed in February, however, Members will be aware
that the budget was amended in April in response to the level of
representations that had been received.  It is assumed that a similar
level of income will be received in future years and the budget outlook
can be updated to reflect this. 
3.1.18 In terms of Council tax growth, following a review undertaken by the
Assessor at Dunbartonshire and Argyll and Bute Valuation Joint Board,
a number of self catering properties have been added to the Council
Tax register.  Growth has been increased for 2025-26 to help rebase
the position and for future years growth has been assumed as 0.25% in
the worst case scenario, 0.5% in the mid-range scenario and 0.75% in
the best case scenario.   
3.1.19 As reported in the previous budget outlook reports, as part of the 2023-
24 budget setting process a business process review was undertaken of
the Revenues and Benefits Service where one of the outcomes was
anticipated increased Council Tax recoveries equating to £0.200m in
2025-26 which have been built into the budget outlook. This is a
reduction of £0.149m from 2024-25 as recoveries are expected to be

Page 11

higher in the first two years of inception dropping down to an almost
steady state from 2025-26 onwards. 
3.1.20 The estimated Council Tax income over the next five years (excluding
future years Council Tax increases, which are dealt with later in the
report) is noted in the table below. 
Draft
2025-26
£000
Mid-
Range
2026-27
£000
Mid-
Range
2027-28
£000
Mid-
Range
2028-29
£000
Mid-
Range
2029-30
£000
Council Tax
Base
63,278 63,278 63,278 63,278 63,278
Council Tax
Growth
472 789 1,108 1,428 1,750
Council Tax
income on
Second
Homes in
excess of
budget
328 328 328 328 328
Adjustment to
additional
Council Tax
recoveries
(para 3.1.14)
(149) (147) (145) (143) (143)
Total
Council Tax
Income 
63,929 64,248 64,569 64,891 65,213 
General Fund 
3.1.21 As reported in the budget pack in February 2024, reduced employer
contribution rates payable to Strathclyde Pension Fund will result in
one-off savings in 2024-25 and 2025-26. It was agreed that the saving
in each of these years be transferred to the General Fund, with some
being used to fund capital expenditure. £9.928m of savings will be
transferred to reserves in 2025-26 in relation to this, this amount relates
to the saving for the Council and the HSCP. 
3.1.22 It was also agreed at the budget meeting in February 2024 that £2m of
the pension fund gain would be released each year for a period of 3
years (2024-25 through to 2026-27) in order to help bridge the budget
gap.   
Total Funding 
3.1.23 The table below summarises the total estimated funding over the next
five years within the mid-range scenario.

Page 12

Draft
2025-26
£000
Mid-
Range
2026-27
£000
Mid-
Range
2027-28
£000
Mid-
Range
2028-29
£000
Mid-
Range
2029-30
£000
Scottish
Government
funding as per
Circular
259,134 258,486 257,840 257,195 256,552
Assumed
funding from
Employers NIC
increase
2,578 2,572 2,566 2,560 2,554
Extended
Producer
Responsibility
(EPR)
Indicative
Funding
3,847 tbc tbc tbc tbc
Earmark EPR
funding for
future
pressures
(2,499) 2,499 0 0 0
Council Tax
income
63,929 64,248 64,569 64,891 65,213
Transfer to
Reserves in
relation to
Strathclyde
Pension Fund
(9,928) 0 0 0 0
Released
Strathclyde
Pension Fund
Gain
2,000 2,000 0 0 0
Total Funding  319,061 329,805 324,975 324,646 324,319 
3.2  Base Budget
3.2.1 As with previous years the base budget for 2025-26 is the current years
approved budget adjusted for any:
• one-off items included within 2024-25 that are not carried forward
into 2025-26;
• previously agreed items for future years; and
• other adjustments since the 2024-25 budget was agreed. 
3.2.2 As previously reported in the budget outlook report last year, funding
was received during 2024-25 in respect of the Children’s Social Care
pay uplift of which £0.063m relates to staff within Education and
therefore the base needs adjusted for his amount.

Page 13

3.2.3  The SJC and Chief Officers pay awards have been implemented for
2024-25 with Councils having to provide 3.2% towards the pay award
and Scottish Government providing the remaining funding.  The
Teachers had a pay award already agreed up to 31 July 2024 as part of
a previous 28 month deal and they have now accepted a 4.27% pay
offer.  As with the SJC and Chief Officers, Councils are expected to fund
up to 3.2% of the offer with SG funding for the remainder.  The
employee budgets for 2024-25 have been rebased due to the 2024-25
pay award.   
3.2.4 On 4 April 2024 a Scottish Statutory Instrument was passed regarding
increasing councillors pay with effect from 1 April 2024, the detail of
which was presented to Council on 25 April. The financial impact of this
is an increase of £0.033m which has been adjusted for as it was not
included in the 2024-25 base budget. 
3.2.5 Although the majority of the funding from the Scottish Government is not
strictly ring-fenced, there are elements of the funding that are directed to
deliver on Scottish Government policy.   The base budget needs to be
adjusted to reflect the additional costs for delivering on these directions
and the budget increase is limited to the funding provided. There is also
a decrease in funding relating to the creation of a building standards
hub, however, this can be funded from increases to fees and charges
within the service.   The adjustments for the Council are listed in the
table below and it should be noted that any relating to the HSCP are
detailed at section 3.6 of the report. 
Increase /
(Decrease)
£000
Early Learning and Child Care Real Living Wage for
Commissioned Providers
138
School Meals 202
Teacher Numbers (previous specific grant)  2,125
CYP Community Mental Health 235
Scottish Assessors Barclay Implementation 2
Discretionary Housing Payments – Uplift to Grant 123
ASN Additionality (Difference between additional
funding and cost pressure in 2025-26)
190
Building Standards Hub (23)
Total 2,992 
3.2.6 The revised base budget is noted in the table below.   
Draft
2025-26
£000
Mid-
Range
2026-27
£000
Mid-
Range
2027-28
£000
Mid-
Range
2028-29
£000
Mid-
Range
2029-30
£000
Base Budget 2024-
25
301,965 301,965 301,965 301,965 301,965

Page 14

Adjust for one-off
2024-25 cost
pressures
(130) (130) (130) (130) (130)
Adjust for one-off
2024-25
Management/
Operational savings
1,694 1,694 1,694 1,694 1,694
Release of
contingency not
required back to the
general fund
(200) (200) (200) (200) (200)
Adjustment to Joint
Boards
(114) (114) (114) (114) (114)
NDR Poundage
Increase 2024-25
300 300 300 300 300
Right-Size Ferries
budget matching
income and
expenditure
37 37 37 37 37
2024-25 Pay Base
Adjustment -
Children’s Social
Care Pay Uplift –
Education 
63 63 63 63 63
2024-25 Pay Base
Adjustments - Staff
2,636 2,636 2,636 2,636 2,636
2024-25 Pay Base
Adjustment –
Elected Members
33 33 33 33 33
Settlement
Directions
2,992 2,992 2,992 2,992 2,992
Revised Base
Budget
309,276 309,276 309,276 309,276 309,276 
3.3 Employee Costs 
Pay Inflation Estimates 
3.3.1 For future years pay awards for SJC staff, Teachers and Chief Officers,
the previous mid-range assumption was a 2% increase to pay.  The
Public Sector Pay Policy was published alongside the Scottish Budget
and it sets out a multi-year framework of a 9% pay envelope covering
2025-26, 2026-27 and 2027-28.  It would be prudent to budget for 3%
across each of the three years (in both the best case and mid-range
scenarios).  The worst case scenario assumes a 5% increase.  For
2028-29 and 2029-30, the best case scenario has been reduced to 2%,
mid-range remains at 3% and worst case remains at 5%.   Negotiations
have not commenced yet for 2025-26 and there remains a risk that the
pay award is higher than budgeted.  Every 1% over and above what is
budgeted would add an additional pressure of circa £1.5m for Council
staff (excluding HSCP).

Page 15

3.3.2 In terms of Councillors pay from 1 April 2025, The Scottish Local
Authorities Remuneration Committee has undertaken an independent
review of councillor remuneration with a number of recommendations
proposed in respect of pay for all Councillors.  Regulations have now
been passed in Parliament and the cost of implementing the Local
Governance (Scotland) Act 2004 (Remuneration) Amendment
Regulations 2025 is estimated at £0.206m and Members will be asked
to agree to implement these Regulations as per recommendation (f). 
Detailed Employee Costing Exercise 
3.3.3 Financial Services have populated salary templates with details of the
current establishment and where necessary liaised with budget holders
to confirm their staff.  The templates calculate the next years pay bill
including superannuation and national insurance contributions.  The
cost of the employees from the template is compared to the previous
year and reasons for differences explained. 
3.3.4 In terms of the level of employee budgets for 2025-26, the expectation
would be that the budget would reflect the 2024-25 budget plus any
increase due to incremental progression, pay inflation and any other
unavoidable employee cost increases less previously approved
employee budget savings.  For 2025-26 there is an overall increase in
the employee budget base of £0.133m.   (excluding Social Work). 
There are a number of small variances to the employee base, both
positive and negative as well as an increase as a result of posts within
the Rural Growth Deal team now made permanent. 
Increments 
3.3.5 The cost of employee increments have been updated following the
salary template exercise.  The employee increments for 2025-26 equate
to £0.599m.  For future years it has been assumed that the best case
will be half the previous year cost with mid-range and worst case, equal
to the cost in 2025-26.   
Strathclyde Pension Fund 
3.3.6 As detailed in the budget pack presented to Council in February 2024,
the employer contribution rate paid to the Strathclyde Pension Fund
decreased/will decrease from 19.3% to 6.5% in both 2024-25 and 2025-
26 and thereafter rise to a sustainable long-term rate of 17.5% from
2026-27. The reduction in the first 2 years equates to reduced costs of
£6.875m per annum relating to Council employees (excluding HSCP).
From 2026-27 the costs will rise again to 17.5% therefore this increase
is required to be built into projections from 2026-27 onwards. 
Teacher Numbers 
3.3.7  In 2024-25 Scottish Government removed £145.5m from the General
Revenue Grant and issued this as a specific grant, conditional on

Page 16

maintaining teacher numbers at the level set out in each Council’s grant
letter.  For Argyll and Bute Council the funding amounted to £2.125m
and there was an expectation that we maintain 848 teachers.  As part of
the Scottish Budget in December 2024 it was agreed that the funding
would not be withheld and was returned to General Revenue Grant and
this remains the case for 2025-26, however, for 2025-26, there is again
an expectation that we will maintain 848 teachers, even although this is
not the number we require to staff our schools.  The budget equates to
837 FTE teachers which is slightly short of the target, however, officers
are of the view that this is a risk based approach and should we not be
able to deliver on our target, there will be mitigating circumstances to
justify.  The Scottish Government have indicated mitigations that will be
taken into consideration and include changes to pupil roll and inability to
fill posts.  To budget for 848 teachers would result in an additional
budget requirement of circa £0.800m and this is deemed to be both
unaffordable and not required.   There remains a risk that if we do not
maintain the teacher numbers some funding could be withheld.   
Employer’s National Insurance Increase 
3.3.8 With reference to paragraph 3.1.10 and 3.1.11, as part of the UK
Budget there are increases to Employers National Insurance
Contributions effective from 1 April 2025.  The increase was originally
anticipated to be fully funded, however, the Cabinet Secretary for
Finance and Local Government announced on Tuesday 4 February
2025 that Scottish Government has now agreed to provide an additional
£144m to Local Government which represents 60% of direct staffing
costs.  The cost for Council staff amounts to £3.450m and is
summarised in the table below.  It should be noted that these figures
exclude Social Work.   
£000
Increase from reduction in threshold 2,156
Increase from increase in rate from
13.8% to 15%
1,294
Total 3,450 
3.3.9 The changes to the employee budgets estimated over the next five
years for Council services are summarised in the table below.  The
employee cost increases relating to Social Work within the Health and
Social Care Partnership are summarised within paragraph 3.6.9. 
Draft
2025-26
£000
Mid-
Range
2026-27
£000
Mid-
Range
2027-28
£000
Mid-
Range
2028-29
£000
Mid-
Range
2029-30
£000
Pay Award 2025-
26
4,298 9,050 13,944 18,985 24,177
Full year effect of
2024-25 pay
0 496 496 496 496

Page 17

award for teachers
in 2025-26 base
SLARC
Recommendations
– Elected
Members
206 206 206 206 206
Change to
employee base for
2025-26
133 133 133 133 133
Increments 599 1,194 1,789 2,384 2,979
Increase to
Employers
National Insurance
3,450 3,450 3,450 3,450 3,450
Increase in costs
after one-off
reduction in
Strathclyde
Pension Fund rate
ceases
0 6,875 6,875 6,875 6,875
Total Employee
Increases
8,686 21,404 26,893 32,529 38,316 
3.4 Non-Pay Inflation 
3.4.1 The position remains that only unavoidable/inescapable inflation has
been included for 2025-26, this is with a view to only including a
provision in the budget for an inflationary increase where it is absolutely
required. 
3.4.2 The table below summarises the non-pay inflation in the mid-range
scenario for Council services with more detail available in Appendix 2. 
The non-pay inflation increases relating to Social Work within the Health
and Social Care Partnership are summarised within paragraph 3.6.9. 
Inflation Category 2025-26
Previous
estimates
(Dec 2024)
£000
2025-26
Updated
estimates 
£000
Increase/
(Decrease) 
£000
Utilities - Electricity, Gas,
Oil, Water
175 157 (18)
Street Lighting Electricity 30 27 (3)
Vehicle Fuel 34 30 (4)
Vehicle Charging Point
Electricity
6 6 0
Central Repairs-Outside
Contractors
79 72 (7)
Waste/Landfill Tax 797 790 (7)
NPDO/HUB Schools 404 370 (34)
Community Pool Subsidies 25 25 0
Residential Schools 36 30 (6)

Page 18

Pre-Primary Partner
Providers
197 197 0
ICT 214 217 3
Catering Purchases and Milk 66 59 (7)
Insurance 459 459 0
Bitumen – Roads 16 14 (2)
Contribution to Joint Boards 39 35 (4)
Annual External Audit Fee 10 9 (1)
Public Transport 237 237 0
School Transport 153 153 0
SEPA – Waste Disposal 7 7 0
Non-Domestic Rates 162 10 (152)
Strathclyde Passenger
Transport Requisitions
0 12 12
Refuse Vehicle Ferry Fares 0 13 13
Housing Support Contracts 0 49 49
Total 3,146 2,978 (168) 
3.4.3 In terms of the budget outlook for 2026-27 to 2029-30 the estimated
impact of unavoidable / inescapable non-pay inflation has been
calculated based on projected inflation rates at this point in time. The
worst case scenario is 0.5% higher than the value included within the
mid-range and the best case is 0.5% less than the mid-range scenario. 
An allowance for unidentified inflation has been included from 2026-27
onwards at £0.250m per annum within the mid-range scenario and
£0.500m per annum within the worst case scenario. 
3.4.4 The overall additional budget requirement for non-pay inflation
estimated over the next five years is summarised in the table below.
Further detail is provided in Appendix 2.  The estimated inflationary
increases relating to Social Work within the Health and Social Care
Partnership are summarised within paragraph 3.6.9. 
Draft
2025-26
£000
Mid-
Range
2026-27
£000
Mid-
Range
2027-28
£000
Mid-
Range
2028-29
£000
Mid-
Range
2029-30
£000
Unavoidable/
inescapable
Non-Pay
Inflation
2,978 5,723 8,610 11,654 14,868 
3.5 Cost and Demand Pressures 
3.5.1 For a number of years, services have worked on the basis of having to
contain any cost and demand pressures within current resources where
possible.  An allowance for unidentified cost and demand pressures has
been included from 2026-27 onwards at £0.250m per annum in the best
case scenario in the best case scenario, £0.500m per annum within the

Page 19

mid-range scenario and £1.000m per annum within the worst case
scenario. 
3.5.2 Since the Policy and Resources Committee on 5 December 2024 the
following changes have been made to the cost and demand pressures: 
• NEW – Additional Staffing requirement in hostels - £0.055m
• Amended – Waste BMW Ban – an updated financial appraisal
has been completed in respect of the cost pressure as a result of
the Waste BMW ban.  The pressure for 2025-26 has been
increased by £0.096m with larger increases in future years.   
• NEW – Airports - £0.040m – increase to maintenance budget
which is no longer sufficient.  
• NEW – Valuation Joint Board – increase to requisition as advised
by letter on 30 January 2025. 
3.5.3 The estimated cost and demand pressures identified for Council
services are noted in the table below, with further detail provided in
Appendix 3.  The cost and demand pressures relating to Social Work
within the Health and Social Care Partnership are summarised within
paragraph 3.6.9. 
Draft
2025-26
£000
Mid-
Range
2026-27
£000
Mid-
Range
2027-28
£000
Mid-
Range
2028-29
£000
Mid-
Range
2029-30
£000
ASN Support 202 410 624 624 624
Maintenance/Repair
of School Estate
360 360 360 360 360
Additional Staff
Required in Hostels
as per Care
Inspectorate
55 55 55 55 55
Election costs 0 0 350 0 0
Education ICT
Network
Infrastructure 
295 295 348 348 348
Local Development
Plan
0 50 0 0 0
Airports
Maintenance
40 40 40 40 40
Increase to
borrowing costs as
a result of
investment agreed
at February 2024.  
282 282 282 282 282
Universal Credit –
HB Admin Grant
40 80 120 160 200
Civica Revenue and
Benefits System
0 0 63 63 63
NDR Reliefs 68 68 68 68 68
Compliance with
BMW Ban
558 3,037 3,609 3,609 3,609

Page 20

Bus Transport
Contracts
1,735 2,003 2,003 2,003 2,003
Roads & Amenity
Services Income -
Saving no longer
achievable 
100 100 100 100 100
School Transport
for ASN pupils has
seen a significant
increase due to an
increase in number
of pupils requiring
school transport as
well as increased
costs.  
500 500 500 500 500
Loans Charges for
Weather Incident as
agreed at P&R
Committee
80 80 80 80 80
Migration from
Skype for Business
to Teams
Telephony
0 63 300 300 300
Insurance premium
increases
309 309 309 309 309
Valuation Joint
Board requisition
increase
147 402 448 448 448
Allowance for
pressures in future
years
0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
Total Cost and
Demand
Pressures
4,771 8,634 10,659 10,849 11,389 
3.6 Health and Social Care Partnership (HSCP) 
3.6.1 The Council agreed an allocation to the HSCP of £78.611m for 2024-25
at its meeting on 22 February 2024 as well as an indicative flat cash
allocation for 2025-26.  The indicative allocation for 2026-27 onwards
increases by £3.053m to account for the cessation of the one-off
employer contribution rate saving relating to the Strathclyde Pension
Fund. 
3.6.2 As previously reported in the budget outlook report last year, funding
was received during 2024-25 in respect of the Children’s Social Care
pay uplift of which £0.180m is a straight pass through to the HSCP and
will therefore increase their payment each year by this amount.

Page 21

3.6.3 Additional funding was allocated by the Scottish Government for the
SJC pay award during 2024-25.  As in previous years we agreed to
pass over a proportionate share of this funding to the HSCP and this
amounts to £0.339m within 2024-25 and increases their future
payments by the same amount.   
3.6.4 It was agreed during 2024-25 that the Hostels should transfer from the
Health and Social Care Partnership to the Education Service.  As a
result of this, the budgets that were included in the indicative 2025-26
payment will be removed.  This will have no bottom line impact on the
HSCP.   
3.6.5 The Local Government Finance Circular 10/2024 included additional
funding to be passed over to the Health and Social Care Partnership for
2025-26. Funding for Mental Health Recovery and Renewal passed
over to the HSCP in 2021 was time limited and ended in 2024-25 and
therefore now needs to be removed from payment to HSCP.  The net
amount to be passed over to the HSCP is summarised below: 
• £125m for adult social care workers in commissioned services –
ABC share £2.344m.
• £10m to support provision of Free Personal and Nursing Care –
ABC share £0.257m.
• £3.7m for Mental Health Recovery and Renewal funding has
come to an end – ABC share passed to HSCP in 2021 was
£0.066m.   
3.6.6 The Health and Social Care Partnership had been estimating a 2%
increase in respect of pay for Social Work staff, this is same as the
assumption that was made for Council staff.  The Public Sector Pay
Policy was published alongside the Scottish Budget and it sets out a
multi-year framework of a 9% pay envelope covering 2025-26, 2026-27
and 2027-28.  It would now be prudent to increase the budget
assumption from 2% to 3%.  As the Council received additional funding
without conditions attached, this has enabled the increase to be built
into future estimates for Council staff and it is recommended that the
Council fund the extra 1% for Social Work staff in 2025-26 in light of the
significant financial challenges that the IJB are currently facing.  The
increase to the assumption by 1% equates to £0.370m.   
3.6.7 As outlined in paragraph 3.1.10 and 3.1.11, as part of the UK Budget
there are increases to Employers National Insurance Contributions
effective from 1 April 2025.  The increase for Social Work staff is
summarised in the table below.   
£000
Increase from reduction in threshold 553
Increase from increase in rate from
13.8% to 15%
311
Total 864

Page 22

Whilst initially it was expected that this would be fully funded by UK
Government via the Barnett Consequentials, this is now not the case. 
The Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Local Government announced
on Tuesday 4 February 2025 that Scottish Government has now agreed
to provide an additional £144m to Local Government which represents
60% of direct staffing costs.   It is recommended that the Council
allocate budget to the HSCP for the 40% shortfall, recognising the
significant financial challenges the HSCP are currently facing.  If we
assume 60% funding from Scottish Government and 40% funding from
the Council, the payment to the HSCP will increase by £0.864m, equal
to the estimated additional cost.   
3.6.8 The revised payment to the Health and Social Care Partnership is noted
below. 
Draft
2025-26
£000
Mid-
Range
2026-27
£000
Mid-
Range
2027-28
£000
Mid-
Range
2028-29
£000
Mid-
Range
2029-30
£000
Base Payment
(as per Budget
2024)
78,611 81,664 81,664 81,664 81,664
2024-25
Children’s
Social Care
funding
180 180 180 180 180
2024-25 share
of SJC pay
award funding
339 339 339 339 339
Hostels
Transfer 
(1,407) (1,407) (1,407) (1,407) (1,407)
Settlement
Changes
2,535 2,535 2,535 2,535 2,535
To fund 1%
increase to
pay award
assumption
370 370 370 370 370
Employer’s
National
Insurance
Funding (60%
SG and 40%
Council)
864 864 864 864 864
Payment to
HSCP
81,492 84,545 84,545 84,545 84,545 
3.6.9 Members should note that the payment assumes that the HSCP will
absorb any inflationary and cost and demand pressures.  The latest
estimated inflation and cost and demand pressures for Social Work

Page 23

have been discussed with the HSCP Chief Financial Officer. The mid-
range estimates are summarised in the table below and further detail is
contained within Appendix 4.  These pressures are not included within
the Council’s budget gap but are included within this report for
information. Note that these only extend to three years rather than the
five years that the Council’s budget outlook extends to.  Extending the
outlook to five years is a decision for the HSCP to take and their Chief
Financial Officer is of the view that a five year planning window is not
appropriate at the current time. 
Draft
2025-26
£000
Mid-
Range 
2026-27
£000
Mid-
Range
2027-28
£000
Increase to pay base due to
2024-25 pay award (partly
funded)
384 384 384
Pay Inflation at 3%  1,197 2,430 3,700
Pay Increments 203 406 609
Increase to employee base 282 282 282
ENICs increase 864 864 864
Non-Pay Inflation 875 1,830 2,844
Non-Pay Inflation on NHS
posts recharged to Social
Work
90 182 277
Older People Demand Growth 500 1,000 1,500
Younger Adults Demand
Growth
0 121 184
Mental Health Budget
Adjustment
0 131 199
Budget Adjustment to reflect
2024-25 levels of overspend
on Older Adult Services
2,000 2,000 2,000
Looked after Children – to
reflect significant increase in
demand for placements in
external residential care.
700 700 700
Mental Health Budget
Adjustment
0 265 397
Allowance for unknown cost
and demand pressures
200 400 600
Social Work Pressures 7,295 10,995 14,540
Pay Award 2024-25 funding
from Council (see para 3.6.3)
(339) (339) (339)
Pay Inflation funding from
Council for 2025-26 (see para
3.6.6)  
(370) (370) (370)
ENICs funded 60% SG, 40%
Council (see para 3.6.7)
(864) (864) (864)

Page 24

Net Social Work Pressures
after Council funding
5,722 9,422 12,967 
3.7 Live Argyll 
3.7.1 During the year the management fee for Live Argyll was assumed to
change in line with the Scottish Government funding variance.  A saving
is now included within the policy savings options (see paragraph 3.9.5)
and therefore within this section the management fee is assumed to
remain flat cash across the years.  There is also a change from 2026-27
onwards to increase the management fee by £0.118m to account for the
cessation of the one-off employer contribution rate saving relating to the
Strathclyde Pension Fund.   
Draft
2025-26
£000
Mid-
Range
2026-27
£000
Mid-
Range
2027-28
£000
Mid-
Range
2028-29
£000
Mid-
Range
2029-30
£000
Management
Fee Base
Change 
0 0 0 0 0
Cessation of
SPF
contribution rate
saving
0 118 118 118 118
Change to
Management
Fee
0 118 118 118 118 
3.8 Budget Gap PRIOR to Measures to Balance the Budget 
3.8.1 The budget gap prior to factoring in any previous savings decisions or
potential options towards balancing the budget is summarised in the
table below.     
Draft
2025-26
£000
Mid-
Range
2026-27
£000
Mid-
Range
2027-28
£000
Mid-
Range
2028-29
£000
Mid-
Range
2029-30
£000
Base Budget 309,276 309,276 309,276 309,276 309,276
Employee Cost
Changes
8,686 21,404 26,893 32,529 38,316
Non-Pay
Inflation
2,978 5,723 8,610 11,654 14,868
Cost and
Demand
Pressures
4,771 8,634 10,659 10,849 11,389
(Decrease)/
Increase to
HSCP allocation
4,288 7,341 7,341 7,341 7,341

Page 25

(not already in
Council base)*
Adjustment to
Live Argyll
Payment (prior
to savings)
0 118 118 118 118
Total Net
Expenditure
329,999 352,496 362,897 371,767 381,308
Total Funding 319,061 329,805 324,975 324,646 324,319
Budget
Surplus / (Gap)
Cumulative
(10,938) (22,691) (37,922) (47,121) (56,989) 
*The transfer of hostels from HSCP to Education does not need to be
included in the budget gap calculation as this budget is included within
base budget. 
3.9 Measures to Balance the Budget 
3.9.1 Some of the policy options that were agreed at the Council meeting on
22 February 2024 impacted on 2025-26 and beyond.   These are now
factored into the budget outlook, reducing the budget gap. 
3.9.2 During 2024-25 a review was undertaken of all earmarked reserves to
establish whether they were still required for the originally intended
purpose. The results of the review were presented to Council on 26
September 2024 where Members agreed to release £1.558m of existing
earmarked reserves back to the General Fund to help bridge the budget
gap in 2025-26. This is one-off in nature and therefore reduces the gap
in 2025-26 only. 
3.9.3 There is a separate report included in the budget pack which relates to
fees and charges together with the detailed schedule of charges for
2025-26.  The general inflationary increase to fees and charges is
proposed at 6% for 2025-26.  The general inflationary increase would
give additional income of £0.363m.  There is no general inflationary
increase applied to Piers and Harbours to ensure that any income
generated is not in excess of expenditure.   In terms of the outlook for
2026-27 to 2029-30, fees and charges have been estimated at a 6%
increase in the mid-range scenario (3% in worst case and 9% in best
case). 
3.9.4 Savings options totalling £3.093m for 2025-26 were included in the
Budget Outlook report presented to the Policy and Resources
Committee on 5 December 2024.  The options have been categorised
as either: 
• Management / Operational – meaning they do not result in either
redundancies or any change in policy and can be implemented
without Council approval

Page 26

• Policy – meaning they require Council approval due to having
staff or policy implications. 
The management/operational savings are set out in Appendix 5 to this
report and the proposed policy savings are set out in Appendix 6
alongside savings templates for each of the policy savings options.   
3.9.5 A summary of the savings identified are noted in the table below.  The
changes since the report in December are summarised below:
• New Management/Operational Saving – Elections - £0.032m in
25-26
• New Policy Saving – Governance - £0.033m in 25-26
• Property Saving moved from Policy to Management/Operational -
£0.050m in 25-26. 
Saving
Type
2025-26
£000
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
Management/
Operational 2,102 990 1,029 1,029 1,029
Policy 991 1,527 1,627 1,627 1,627
Total 3,093 2,517 2,656 2,656 2,656 
3.9.6 The number of staff affected by potential redundancy required the
Council to undertake a statutory 45 day consultation.  This has been
concluded in accordance with the Council’s redundancy policy and
procedures seeking to avoid compulsory redundancy wherever
possible. 
3.9.7 Throughout the year there was as assumption of an increase to Council
Tax of 5% in the mid-range scenario across each of the next 5 years. 
This estimate is included within the budget gap figure in Section 3.10.   
3.9.8 The table below summarises the proposed measures to balance the
budget in the mid-range scenario. 
Draft
2025-26
£000
Mid-
Range
2026-27
£000
Mid-
Range
2027-28
£000
Mid-
Range
2028-29
£000
Mid-
Range
2029-30
£000
Previously agreed
Policy Savings 
248 724 1,360 1,829 1,943
Previously agreed
Management/
Operational Savings 
35 35 35 35 35
Earmarked Reserves
released to the
General Fund
1,558 0 0 0 0
Fees and Charges
Increase
363 748 1,156 1,588 2,046
NEW Management/
Operational Options 2,102 990 1,029 1,029 1,029

Page 27

NEW Policy Options 991 1,527 1,627 1,627 1,627
Council Tax Increase  3,170 6,530 10,075 13,812 17,753
Total Measures to
Balance the Budget
8,467 10,554 15,282 19,920 24,433 
3.10 Budget Gap AFTER Measures to Balance the Budget 
3.10.1 The table below summarises the estimated budget gap in the mid-range
scenario. 
Draft
2025-26
£000
Mid-
Range
2026-27
£000
Mid-
Range
2027-28
£000
Mid-
Range
2028-29
£000
Mid-
Range
2029-30
£000
Budget Gap Prior
to Measures to
Balance Budget
(10,938) (22,691) (37,922) (47,121) (56,989)
Savings
Measures 
8,467 10,554 15,282 19,920 24,433
Estimated
Budget Surplus /
(Gap)
Cumulative
(2,471) (12,137) (22,640) (27,201) (32,556)
Estimated
Budget Surplus /
(Gap) In Year
(2,471) (9,666) (10,503) (4,561) (5,355) 
3.10.2 The setting of Council Tax should happen on the same day as the
Council sets its revenue budget as once all proposals are considered,
Council Tax is the balancing figure.  The gap shown in the table above
is based on a 5% Council Tax increase(this is the assumption that has
been in the budget outlook during the year).   In order to get to a
balanced budget, Council will need to increase Council Tax to 8.9%.  
The alternative to increasing Council Tax further is that Council would
need to fund the gap using reserves or other funds held, which would be
a one-off fix, however, Members need to be mindful of the significant
gap in future years as well as the pressures facing the capital plan.  
The table below summarises the position across the years if Council tax
is increased by 8.9% in 2025-26 reverting back to an estimated 5% in
future years.   
Draft
2025-26
£000
Mid-
Range
2026-27
£000
Mid-
Range
2027-28
£000
Mid-
Range
2028-29
£000
Mid-
Range
2029-30
£000
Budget Surplus /
(Gap) in Year as
noted in 3.10.1
above
(2,471) (12,137) (22,640) (27,201) (32,556)
Council Tax
additional income
2,471 2,609 2,739 2,876 3,019

Page 28

based on a
further 3.9%
increase (total
Council Tax of
8.9%)
Final Budget
Surplus / (Gap)
Cumulative
0 (9,528) (19,901) (24,325) (29,537)
Final Budget
Surplus / (Gap)
In Year 
(9,528) (10,373) (4,424) (5,212) 
3.10.3 Appendix 7 provides a summary of the draft budget for 2025-26 at
service level.     
3.10.4 Members should note the recurring nature of proposals and how this
impacts future year’s budget estimates.  As an example, should Council
reject a budget saving that is recurring in nature, say for £0.150m and
replace with a one-off measure, the next year budget gap will be
increased by £0.150m.   
3.11 Balancing Future Years Budget 
3.11.1 The budget gap in the period 2026-29 to 2029-30 across each scenario
is summarised in the table below. 
Budget Gap 2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
Total
£000
Best Case (5,907) (7,343) 262 (344) (13,332)
Mid-Range (9,528) (10,373) (4,424) (5,212) (29,537)
Worst Case (16,131) (16,763) (10,981) (12,124) (55,999) 
4. CONCLUSION 
4.1 This report summarises the position with regard to the key issues
surrounding the revenue budget and setting of council tax for 2025-26. 
It also provides estimates of the budget outlook for the period 2026-27
to 2029-30. 
4.2 All proposals included within this report result in a balanced budget for
2025-26.   
4.3 There remains a significant budget gap in future years and officers will
continue to explore options to generate future savings or additional
income.   
4.4 The Council are asked to consider the funding requests summarised
within Appendix 8.  If Members are minded to support the funding
request consideration needs to be given as to how they would be
funded.

Page 29

5. IMPLICATIONS 
5.1 Policy – There are policy implications associated with the new saving
options and also previously agreed savings options which impact 2025-
26 and beyond.   
5.2 Financial – The report outlines the budget position over 2025-26 to
2029-30. 
5.3 Legal – Any legal implications have and will be considered when
developing savings options. 
5.4 HR – Any HR implications have and will be considered when developing
savings options. 
5.5 Fairer Scotland Duty – See below 
5.5.1 Equalities – Equality and Socio-Economic Impact Assessments have
been carried out where appropriate for savings options already agreed
or developed. 
5.5.2 Socio Economic Duty – Equality and Socio-Economic Impact
Assessments have been carried out where appropriate for savings
options already agreed or developed. 
5.5.3 Islands Duty - Equality and Socio-Economic Impact Assessments have
been carried out where appropriate for savings options already agreed
or developed. This includes consideration of Islands Duties. 
5.6 Climate Change – The Council is committed to addressing climate
change and reviews of how Services are delivered is ongoing within the
available budget resources. 
5.7 Risk – There is a separate report assessing financial risks and there is
also an overall assessment of risk included within the separate report on
Reserves and Balances.    
5.8  Customer Service – There may be some customer service implications
arising from the new savings options.  Future customer service
implications will be considered when developing savings options. 
5.9 The Rights of the Child (UNCRC) – None. 
Kirsty Flanagan
Executive Director /Section 95 Officer
13 February 2025 
Councillor Ross Moreland, Policy Lead for Finance and Commercial Services 
APPENDICES:
Appendix 1 – 2025-26 to 2029-30 Budget Outlook Scenarios 
Appendix 2 – Non-Pay Inflation Estimates 2025-26

Page 30

Appendix 3 - Cost and Demand Pressures 2025-26 to 2029-30
Appendix 4 – Health and Social Care Partnership Cost Pressures
Appendix 5 – New Management/Operational Savings
Appendix 6 – New Policy Options Savings Summary and Templates 
Appendix 7 – Service Summary of Budget Position 
Appendix 8 – Funding Requests 
For further information contact Carolyn Earl, Interim Head of Financial Services
carolyn.earl@argyll-bute.gov.uk

Page 31

BUDGET OUTLOOK 2025-26 to 2029-30 APPENDIX 1
BUDGET PACK - 27 FEBRUARY 2025
DRAFT
2025-26
£000
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
Base Budget 301,965 301,965 301,965 301,965 301,965 301,965 301,965 301,965 301,965 301,965 301,965 301,965 301,965
Base Budget Adjustments 7,311 7,311 7,311 7,311 7,311 7,311 7,311 7,311 7,311 7,311 7,311 7,311 7,311
Revised Base Budget 309,276 309,276 309,276 309,276 309,276 309,276 309,276 309,276 309,276 309,276 309,276 309,276 309,276
Pay Award - All Employees 4,298 9,050 13,944 17,305 20,733 9,050 13,944 18,985 24,177 12,217 20,532 29,263 38,431
Full year effect of 2025-26 pay award for teachers in 2026-27 base 0 496 496 496 496 496 496 496 496 496 496 496 496
SLARC Recommendations - Elected Members 206 206 206 206 206 206 206 206 206 206 206 206 206
Base Increase 2025-26 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133
Pay Increments 599 897 1,194 1,492 1,789 1,194 1,789 2,384 2,979 1,194 1,789 2,384 2,979
Employer's National Insurance Increase 3,450 3,450 3,450 3,450 3,450 3,450 3,450 3,450 3,450 3,450 3,450 3,450 3,450
One-off element SPF 0 6,875 6,875 6,875 6,875 6,875 6,875 6,875 6,875 6,875 6,875 6,875 6,875
Total Employee Cost Changes (Council Services) 8,686 21,107 26,298 29,957 33,682 21,404 26,893 32,529 38,316 24,571 33,481 42,807 52,570
Non-Pay Inflation - Council Services 2,978 4,749 6,989 9,359 11,871 5,723 8,610 11,654 14,868 6,670 10,237 13,990 17,946
ASN Support 202 410 624 624 624 410 624 624 624 410 624 624 624
Maintenance/Repair of School Estate 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360
School Hostels 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
Election Costs 0 0 327 0 0 0 350 0 0 0 370 0 0
Education ICT Network Infrastructure 295 295 348 348 348 295 348 348 348 295 348 348 348
Planning (Local Development Plan) 0 50 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 50 0 0 0
Airport Maintenance 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Borrowing to pay for weather incident costs 282 282 282 282 282 282 282 282 282 282 282 282 282
Housing Benefits Admin Grant 40 80 120 160 200 80 120 160 200 80 120 160 200
Civica Revenue and Benefits System 0 0 37 37 37 0 63 63 63 0 137 137 137
Compliance with BMW Ban 558 2,733 3,248 3,248 3,248 3,037 3,609 3,609 3,609 3,341 3,970 3,970 3,970
Bus Transport Contracts 1,735 2,003 2,003 2,003 2,003 2,003 2,003 2,003 2,003 2,003 2,003 2,003 2,003
Saving no longer achievable in full (TB13b) - Roads and Amenity Services Charging
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Loans Charges relating to Weather Incident as agreed at P&R Committee 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80
Migration from Skype for Business to Teams Telephony 0 19 282 282 282 63 300 300 300 108 318 318 318
Insurances 309 309 309 309 309 309 309 309 309 309 309 309 309
Valuation Joint Board 147 402 448 448 448 402 448 448 448 402 448 448 448
Allowance for Cost and Demand Pressures Future Years 0 250 500 750 1,000 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000
Total Cost and Demand Pressures 4,771 8,036 9,731 9,694 9,984 8,634 10,659 10,849 11,389 9,483 12,132 12,802 13,842
Adjustment to Health and Social Care Partnership Payment 4,288 7,341 7,341 7,341 7,341 7,341 7,341 7,341 7,341 7,341 7,341 7,341 7,341
Adjustment to Live Argyll Management Fee 0 118 118 118 118 118 118 118 118 118 118 118 118
Transfer to/from Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Estimated Expenditure PRIOR to measures to balance the budget 329,999 350,627 359,753 365,745 372,272 352,496 362,897 371,767 381,308 357,459 372,585 386,334 401,093
Scottish Government Grant 263,060 264,865 263,021 263,678 264,337 263,557 260,406 259,755 259,106 262,248 257,801 255,868 253,949
Transfers to/from Reserves - Strathclyde Pension Fund (7,928) 2,000 0 0 0 2,000 0 0 0 2,000 0 0 0
Council Tax 63,929 64,407 64,888 65,373 65,859 64,248 64,569 64,891 65,213 64,090 64,251 64,412 64,572
Total Funding 319,061 331,272 327,909 329,051 330,196 329,805 324,975 324,646 324,319 328,338 322,052 320,280 318,521
Budget Surplus / (Gap) PRIOR to measures to balance the budget (10,938) (19,355) (31,844) (36,694) (42,076) (22,691) (37,922) (47,121) (56,989) (29,121) (50,533) (66,054) (82,572)
Measures to Balance the Budget:
Fees and Charges 363 940 1,569 2,255 3,002 748 1,156 1,588 2,046 555 753 957 1,167
Council Tax Increase 5,643 9,119 12,793 16,675 20,775 9,111 12,768 16,624 20,689 9,103 12,744 16,575 20,606
Council Tax Increase (Growth element) 0 113 182 256 334 28 46 64 83 56 91 127 166
Management/Operational Savings agreed Feb 2023 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35
Policy Savings Agreed Feb 2023 248 724 1,360 1,829 1,943 724 1,360 1,829 1,943 724 1,360 1,829 1,943
Earmarked Reserves Released to the General Fund 1,558 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NEW Management/Operational Options 2025 2,102 990 1,029 1,029 1,029 990 1,029 1,029 1,029 990 1,029 1,029 1,029
NEW Policy Options 2025 991 1,527 1,627 1,627 1,627 1,527 1,627 1,627 1,627 1,527 1,627 1,627 1,627
Rounding Adjustment (2) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Measures to Balance the Budget 10,938 13,448 18,595 23,706 28,745 13,163 18,021 22,796 27,452 12,990 17,639 22,179 26,573
Budget Surplus / (Gap) Cumulative AFTER measures to balance the budget 0 (5,907) (13,249) (12,988) (13,331) (9,528) (19,901) (24,325) (29,537) (16,131) (32,894) (43,875) (55,999)
Budget Surplus / (Gap) In Year AFTER measures to balance the budget 0 (5,907) (7,343) 262 (344) (9,528) (10,373) (4,424) (5,212) (16,131) (16,763) (10,981) (12,124)
Mid-Range Scenario Worst Case ScenarioBest Case Scenario

Page 32

NON-PAY INFLATION (COUNCIL) Appendix 2
Service Category Basis of Inflation Inflation
Percentage
Mid Range
2025/26
Council Wide Electricity Based on the November 2024 Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee CPI Forecast for 2025 Q1, with a 0.5% tolerance for best
and worst case.
2.40% 104,206
Council Wide Gas Based on the November 2024 Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee CPI Forecast for 2025 Q1, with a 0.5% tolerance for best
and worst case.
2.40% 21,579
Council Wide Heating Oils Based on the November 2024 Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee CPI Forecast for 2025 Q1, with a 0.5% tolerance for best
and worst case.
2.40% 10,148
Council Wide Solid Fuel Based on the November 2024 Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee CPI Forecast for 2025 Q1, with a 0.5% tolerance for best
and worst case.
2.40% 7,413
Council Wide Water Charges Based on the November 2024 Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee CPI Forecast for 2025 Q1, with a 0.5% tolerance for best
and worst case.
2.40% 14,439
Council Wide Vehicle Fuel Based on the November 2024 Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee CPI Forecast for 2025 Q1, with a 0.5% tolerance for best
and worst case.
2.40% 30,034
Council Wide Central Repairs - Outside Contractors Based on estimate for RPI at 2025 Q1 tracking the Bank of England forecast for CPI at November 2024, with 0.5% tolerance for best
and worst case.
3.40% 72,143
Council Wide Insurances Mid-point set at 20% for 2025/26 per uplifts in 2024/25. Reduced to 15% in subsequent years, with 0.5% tolerance for best and worst
case.
20.00% 459,473
Council Wide Contribution to Joint Boards Based on the November 2024 Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee CPI Forecast for 2025 Q1, with a 0.5% tolerance for best
and worst case.
2.40% 34,987
Council Wide Non-Domestic Rates Estimate for the increase in Non-Domestic Rates, with a tolerance of 0.5% for best and worst case. 0.19% 10,000
Council Wide Contingency for unidentified/insufficient inflation estimate £250k built in to mid-range and £500k built in to worst case scenario 0
764,422
Education Pre-Primary Partner Provider Uplift Reflects the increase in the Real Living Wage from £12/hr to £12.60/hr, with a tolerance of 0.5% for best and worst case. 5.00% 197,070
Education External School Placements Based on the November 2024 Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee CPI Forecast for 2025 Q1, with a 0.5% tolerance for best
and worst case.
2.40% 30,119
Commercial Services Catering Purchases Based on the November 2024 Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee CPI Forecast for 2025 Q1, with a 0.5% tolerance for best
and worst case.
2.40% 58,882
Legal & Regulatory Support Leisure SLA-MAKI/Islay Pools Based on estimate for RPI at 2025 Q1 tracking the Bank of England forecast for CPI at November 2024, with 0.5% tolerance for best
and worst case.
3.40% 6,806
Legal & Regulatory Support Leisure SLA-Atlantis Based on the movement in RPIX between September 2023 and September 2024 per the SLA, with 0.5% tolerance for best and worst
case.
2.70% 18,310
Legal & Regulatory Support NPDO-Variable Element Based on estimate for RPI at 2025 Q1 tracking the Bank of England forecast for CPI at November 2024, with 0.5% tolerance for best
and worst case.
3.40% 296,746
Legal & Regulatory Support NPDO-Utilities Rebate Based on estimate for RPI at 2025 Q1 tracking the Bank of England forecast for CPI at November 2024, with 0.5% tolerance for best
and worst case.
3.40% (11,226)
Legal & Regulatory Support NPDO-Electricity Based on the November 2024 Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee CPI Forecast for 2025 Q1, with a 0.5% tolerance for best
and worst case.
2.40% 16,274
Legal & Regulatory Support NPDO-Gas Based on the November 2024 Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee CPI Forecast for 2025 Q1, with a 0.5% tolerance for best
and worst case.
2.40% 6,595
Legal & Regulatory Support NPDO-Heating Oil Based on the November 2024 Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee CPI Forecast for 2025 Q1, with a 0.5% tolerance for best
and worst case.
2.40% 2,586
Legal & Regulatory Support NPDO-LPG Based on the November 2024 Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee CPI Forecast for 2025 Q1, with a 0.5% tolerance for best
and worst case.
2.40% 2,251
Legal & Regulatory Support NPDO-Water Based on the November 2024 Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee CPI Forecast for 2025 Q1, with a 0.5% tolerance for best
and worst case.
2.40% 9,672
Legal & Regulatory Support HUB-Variable Element Based on estimate for RPI at 2025 Q1 tracking the Bank of England forecast for CPI at November 2024, with 0.5% tolerance for best
and worst case.
3.40% 46,444
680,529
Customer and Support Services ICT Estimate added at 10% to reflect input from ICT on increasing costs. 10.00% 216,698
Financial Services Annual External Audit Fee Based on the November 2024 Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee CPI Forecast for 2025 Q1, with a 0.5% tolerance for best
and worst case.
2.40% 8,471
Roads and Infrastructure Public Transport Reflects a 3% uplift for annual inflation set within the terms of the contracts between the Council and the service providers. 3.00% 237,431
Roads and Infrastructure School Transport Reflects a 3% uplift for annual inflation set within the terms of the contracts between the Council and the service providers. 3.00% 152,562
Roads and Infrastructure Waste PPP-Private Contractor Inflation Based on a general inflationary uplift of 3%, with a 0.5% tolerance for best and worst case. 3.00% 224,792
Roads and Infrastructure Waste PPP-Central Government Inflation Based on Landfill Tax increase between 23/24 and proposed 24/25 rate with a 0.5% tolerance for best and worst case. 21.65% 508,770
Roads and Infrastructure Helensburgh Waste Disposal Costs Based on estimate for RPI at 2025 Q1 tracking the Bank of England forecast for CPI at November 2024, with 0.5% tolerance for best
and worst case.
3.40% 55,756
Roads and Infrastructure Scottish Environmental Protection Agency Reflects the annual inflation trend in the 2023/24 and 2024/25 financial years with a 0.5% tolerance for best and worst case. 8.00% 7,211
Roads and Infrastructure Roads - Bitumen for Road Surfacing Based on the November 2024 Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee CPI Forecast for 2025 Q1, with a 0.5% tolerance for best
and worst case.
2.40% 13,901
Roads and Infrastructure Electricity - Street Lighting Based on the November 2024 Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee CPI Forecast for 2025 Q1, with a 0.5% tolerance for best
and worst case.
2.40% 26,591
Roads and Infrastructure Electricity - Vehicle Charging Points Based on the November 2024 Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee CPI Forecast for 2025 Q1, with a 0.5% tolerance for best
and worst case.
2.40% 5,590
Roads and Infrastructure Strathclyde Passenger Transport Requisitions Based on the 2025/26 Scottish Government Revenue Funding floor adjustment value for the Council, with a 0.5% tolerance for best
and worst case.
1.95% 12,125
Roads and Infrastructure Refuse Vehicle Ferry Fares Reflects impact on the budget of the published increase in Calmac Ferry Fares for 2025/26, with a tolerance of 0.5% for best and
worst case.
5.00% 13,380
Development & Economic
Growth
Housing Support Contracts Reflects the increase in the Real Living Wage from £12/hr to £12.60/hr, with a tolerance of 0.5% for best and worst case. 5.00% 48,947
1,532,225
2,977,176
Council Wide Total
Executive Director Douglas Hendry - Total
Executive Director Kirsty Flanagan - Total
Total Non-Pay Inflation in the Mid Range

Page 33

COUNCIL COST AND DEMAND PRESSURES 2025-26 to 2029-30
Department Service Cost/Demand Pressure 2025-26
£000
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
2025-26
£000
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
2025-26
£000
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
Executive Director -
Douglas Hendry
Education The demand for ASN support in Argyll and Bute has continued to grow with a significant increase in, and
early identification of children and young people presenting with complex additional support needs,
including mental health difficulties which manifests often in dysregulated behaviours.  It is anticipated
that growth continues over the next 5 years however the extent of this growth is difficult to determine. 
Scottish Government statistics show that the number of pupils identified with ASN has increased markedly
since 2010 and there continue to be year on year increases. These increases are likely due to continue as
we see the impact of the Covid 19 pandemic on children and young people who were born from 2020
onwards and as we work with partners to streamline assessment processes which help us to understand
need more thoroughly.  Scottish Government statistical datasets show that the percentage of school roll
in mainstream schools of pupils with ASN has increased by approximately 3% year on year.  Within many
authorities, this means increased numbers of children accessing specialist provision. As Argyll and Bute do
not have equitable access to Specialist provision in all areas, the cost pressure associated with offering
appropriate support within our local schools continues to increase in line with need.
202 410 624 624 624 202 410 624 624 624 202 410 624 624 624
Executive Director -
Douglas Hendry
Education There is an ongoing need for the Council to manage the maintenance/repair of Schools estate through the
education central repairs budget.  The demand on this budget has continued to increase due to the
amount of statutory maintenance work and emergency repairs which no longer allows for any planned
maintenance to be carried out.  The cost of planned maintenance has fallen on the service which cannot
be sustained.  Failure to carry out planned maintenance will impact significantly on the cost of emergency
repairs in the future.  The Council has over 75 school buildings to maintain and more reactive
maintenance work is required from Education Central Repairs due to reduced capital funding.
360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360 360
Executive Director -
Douglas Hendry
Education Following an inspection at Dunoon Hostel by the Care Inspectorate the service require additional staff on
rota to support pupils that are currently attending Dunoon Hostel. 
55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55
Executive Director -
Douglas Hendry
Legal and Regulatory
Services
Estimated cost (to be borne by the Council)  of carrying out local Government elections in May 2027 (and
in financial year 2027/28). Operating approx. 100 polling stations and carrying out poll and count for 11
Multi member wards – requiring 11 separate counts
0 0 327 0 0 0 0 350 0 0 0 0 370 0 0
Executive Director -
Douglas Hendry and
Kirsty Flanagan
Education and ICT The Education ICT Network infrastructure in its current design is no longer suitable to
support the future delivery of the education digital learning vision and strategy. It
requires a transformative technology upgrade, improved security, and reconfiguration
to support in-school and at home learning. There are increased security threats and risks to the corporate
and education networks by retaining the education network in its present state.  ICT does not have the
resource or capacity to undertake a strategic transformation of this scale and complexity without
significant investment in hardware and software solutions, and additional engineering resources. It is
anticipated a programme of works could take up to two years to fully deliver, and due to the rising
security threats, commencement by Summer 2024 is recommended.  Capital Costs and revenue costs for
2024-25 have been identified through repurpose of earmarkings. The cost pressure for Education from
2025-26 is £180k for specialist software licensing and an annual revenue requirement for additional
engineering resource of £115k as a future cost pressure for ICT.
295 295 348 348 348 295 295 348 348 348 295 295 348 348 348
Executive Director -
Kirsty Flanagan
Development &
Economic Growth
Local development plan will require to be done under the new Planning legislation which is a revised
process from the current one and will have a 10 year life. The new process has 2 stages where there is
likely to be a cost pressure - a gate check followed by an examination some time later.
0 50 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0
Executive Director -
Kirsty Flanagan
Development &
Economic Growth
Argyll and Bute Council operate three licensed aerodromes at Oban, Coll and Colonsay. These aerodromes
are licensed by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) as required by law to allow scheduled passenger flight
services (for use by paying members of the public) to land and take off. The license stipulates the required
safety standards and fire cover required for each aircraft movement. Operations at the licensed
aerodromes are audited on a regular basis by the CAA and require the appropriate level of resource.  The
maintenance budget is no longer sufficient due to price increases and this cost pressure represents an
increase to right-size the budget to reflect the pattern of necessary spending over the last few years.
40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Executive Director -
Kirsty Flanagan
Financial Services At the budget setting meeting in February 2024 it was agreed to borrow to pay for the £4.348m of costs
relating to the weather incident that were not claimable through the Bellwin scheme. Whilst the Council
secured additional funding in relation to the weather related costs, this allowed the Council to freeze the
Council Tax, therefore the borrowing is still required, some in relation to the weather cost and some in
relation to other capital investments. 
282 282 282 282 282 282 282 282 282 282 282 282 282 282 282
Best Case Mid-Range Worst Case
APPENDIX 3

Page 34

COUNCIL COST AND DEMAND PRESSURES 2025-26 to 2029-30
Department Service Cost/Demand Pressure 2025-26
£000
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
2025-26
£000
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
2025-26
£000
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2028-29
£000
2029-30
£000
Best Case Mid-Range Worst Case
APPENDIX 3
Executive Director -
Kirsty Flanagan
Financial Services Universal Credit “Full” Service went live in Sept 2018, managed migration for working age claimants began
in August 2023 and will be completed by December 2025. Details of the migration of Pension age Housing
Benefit claimants have not yet been released initial indications was that the overall migration to Pension
Credit will be completed in 2028/2029 although that looks unlikely now. The DWP will reduce the Housing
Benefit Administration Subsidy they pay to the Council as some claimants come off of Housing Benefit
processed by Council staff and go onto Universal Credit processed by the DWP.  The Council’s caseload has
reduced since implementation of Universal Credit but it is hard to predict just how quickly the rest of the
caseload will migrate from Housing Benefit to Universal Credit between now and 2028/2029.  These
figures represent our best estimates at this time.
40 80 120 160 200 40 80 120 160 200 40 80 120 160 200
Executive Director -
Kirsty Flanagan
Financial Services The Council has been engaged in discussions with the supplier of the Revenues and Benefits Management
System and also the Electronic Document Management System.  We expect cost increases in the future as
the supplier moves the systems to the Cloud.  The cost presure is an estimate at this time and will be
refined as we get nearer to 2027-28.
0 0 37 37 37 0 0 63 63 63 0 0 137 137 137
Executive Director -
Kirsty Flanagan
Financial Services This is due to the increase in NDR charges resulting from the Scottish Government’s rise in medium and
large business rates poundage for 2025/26. This cost is expected to be recurring but subject to potential
adjustment following legislative enactment and future revaluations.
68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68 68
Executive Director -
Kirsty Flanagan
Roads & Infrastructure
Services
Achieving compliance with ban on biodegradable municipal waste (BMW) which comes into place on 1
January 2026.  The costs are the best estimates at this stage and consultants have assisted in producing
the estimates.  The best case and worst case scenarios are based on the mid-range with a +/- 10% change
558 2,733 3,248 3,248 3,248 558 3,037 3,609 3,609 3,609 558 3,341 3,970 3,970 3,970
Executive Director -
Kirsty Flanagan
Roads & Infrastructure
Services
Bus Transport contracts have seen a siginificant increase in new contract prices due to increased costs for
fuel, insurance, maintenance, regualtory compliance and driver wages.  New contracts have seen a
combined annual increase of £975k across Argyll and Bute during 2024-25 with further contract renewals
due in 2025-26.  Work ongoing on whether savings could be made by reducing services or providing
services in a different manner.
1,735 2,003 2,003 2,003 2,003 1,735 2,003 2,003 2,003 2,003 1,735 2,003 2,003 2,003 2,003
Executive Director -
Kirsty Flanagan
Roads & Infrastructure
Services
Previously agreed saving from 2018-19 for Roads and Amenity Services Charging (TB13b) is now not fully
achievable with a shortfall of £100k.  Limited resources within Roads and Infrastructure Services has
hampered the ability to procure external work and therefore the income generation expected as part of
this saving.  Further possible methods to secure external income will be looked at as part of the RIS
Review.
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Executive Director -
Kirsty Flanagan
Roads & Infrastructure
Services
School Transport for ASN pupils has seen a significant increase due to an increase in number of pupils
requiring school transport as well as increased costs.  This trend is likely to continue over the coming years
with the demand for ASN support expected to increase.
500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500
Executive Director -
Kirsty Flanagan
Roads & Infrastructure
Services
Loans charge for borrowing agreed at P&R on 15 August 2024 to cover £2.029m of the Weather Incident
costs.  £50k of the loans charges has been funded from elsewhere within the current budget.
80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80
Executive Director -
Kirsty Flanagan
ICT Migration from Skype for Business to Teams Telephony to ensure those staff who need to make and
receive external calls can do so. This was agreed at Policy & Resources Committee on 15 August.
0 19 282 282 282 0 63 300 300 300 0 108 318 318 318
Council Wide Council Wide Rightsize Council Insurance Budget - Insurance premiums have risen higher than previous inflationary
forecasts due to changes in law,  Increase in building values, higher contractor costs for building works,
repairs and higher component parts for cars - Inflation 22%
309 309 309 309 309 309 309 309 309 309 309 309 309 309 309
Council Wide Council Wide A letter from the Dunbartonshire and Argyll and Bute Valuation Joint Board was received on 30 January
2025 advising of the financial challenges facing the Board and the estimated 2025-26 to 2027-28 budget
gaps along with a request to increase the level of contribution that we make to the Board.  Since 2012-13
the core constituent funding to the Board has either reduced or been flast cash for the past 7 years with
the Board heavily reliant on reserves.  As the reserves will be fully depleted by 2025-26 there is a required
for the requisitions to increase.
147 402 448 448 448 147 402 448 448 448 147 402 448 448 448
Council Wide Council Wide General provision for unidentified Cost and Demand Pressures 0 250 500 750 1,000 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000
TOTAL 4,771 8,036 9,731 9,694 9,984 4,771 8,634 10,659 10,849 11,389 4,771 9,483 12,132 12,802 13,842

Page 35

SOCIAL WORK COST AND DEMAND PRESSURES - 2025-26 to 2027-28 APPENDIX 4
Service Cost/Demand Pressure 2025-26
£000
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2025-26
£000
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2025-26
£000
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
All Social Work Increase to pay base due to 2024-25 pay award (this is partly funded) 384 384 384 384 384 384 384 384 384
All Social Work Estimated Pay inflation reflecting a best case 2%, and mid-range of 3% and
a worst case of 5%.
798 1,612 2,442 1,197 2,430 3,700 1,995 4,090 6,289
All Social Work Estimated Pay increments, 2025-26 is based on calculated position
following salary template exercise, for future years the best case assumes
only 50% of the increments in 2025-26 are required and in the mid-range
and worst case, the increase is in line with the increase in 2025-26.
203 305 407 203 406 609 203 406 609
All Social Work Change to employee base for 2025-26 based on the salary template
exercise.  A significant element of the increase relates to the regrading of
staff within Children’s Houses.
282 282 282 282 282 282 282 282 282
All Social Work NIC Increase 864 864 864 864 864 864 864 864 864
All Social Work Non-pay inflation, best and worst case based on unavoidable/inescapable
inflation and worst case.
761 1,589 2,458 875 1,830 2,844 987 2,073 3,237
All Social Work Non-pay inflation impact of payroll inflation on NHS posts which are
recharged to Social Work.
75 151 230 90 182 277 105 213 325
Adult Care Older People Demand Growth: The number of older people is increasing
and older people are living longer with significant health and support
needs and significant expectations of the support they are entitled to
receive. Best case assumes that this will be offset by efficiency
improvement and increasing unmet need / demand. The mid range allows
for a 1% increase each year. Worst case is 2% per year on the older adult
services budget.
0 0 0 500 1,000 1,500 1,000 2,000 3,000
Adult Care Younger Adults Demand Growth - Physical Disability: services have been
operating within budget following delivery of savings and previous budget
increases. Best case is no additional demand pressures beyond inflation,
mid range makes some allowance in 2026/27 onwards.
0 0 0 0 121 184 90 183 279
Worst CaseMid RangeBest Case

Page 36

SOCIAL WORK COST AND DEMAND PRESSURES - 2025-26 to 2027-28 APPENDIX 4
Service Cost/Demand Pressure 2025-26
£000
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2025-26
£000
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
2025-26
£000
2026-27
£000
2027-28
£000
Worst CaseMid RangeBest Case
Adult Care Mental Health Demand Growth - As above, services operating within
budget overall. The best case assumes a 0% increase in spending reflecting
the limited service capacity in the area, the mid-range reflects 2% growth
in 26/27 and 27/28 and the worst case reflects 3% growth.
0 0 0 0 131 199 97 198 302
Adult Care Budget Adjustment to reflect 2024/25 levels of overspending on Older
Adult Services. This is in addition to future demand growth highlighted
above. It is not expected that the overspending can be addressed quickly
enough to enable this to be reduced in 2025/26. Best case assumes
progress in 2026/27 and would require systems improvements and
reductions in agency staffing utilisation.
2,000 1,500 1,500 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,500 2,500 2,500
Children and
Families
Looked After Children Budget Adjustment - to reflect significant increase in
demand for placements in external residential care facilities.
700 700 700 700 700 700 700 900 1,100
Adult Care Mental Health Budget Adjustment - Services are operating within budget at
present and therefore best case is to assume that this will continue in
2025/26.  The budget will be reviewed annually to reflect spending
patterns.
0 0 0 0 265 397 112 265 397
All Social Work Allowance for unknown cost and demand pressures which could arise. Per
James Gow this is to reduce to £200k pa
0 0 0 200 400 600 200 400 600
TOTAL COST AND DEMAND PRESSURES 6,067 7,387 9,267 7,295 10,995 14,540 9,519 14,758 20,168

Page 37

MANAGEMENT/OPERATIONAL SAVINGS OPTIONS - 2025-26 APPENDIX 5
Saving
£'000
FTE H/Count Saving
£'000
FTE H/Count Saving
£'000
FTE H/Count
FS 001 25/26 Financial Services Increase in Agency Income from
Scottish Water and a reduction in
supplies and services budgets following
a review.
51 0.0 0.0 51 0.0 0.0 51 0.0 0.0
RIS 002 25/26 Commercial Waste A high level review of self-catering units
has highlighted that some do not have
commercial waste contracts.  A further
more detailed review will be carried out
but it is anticipated that there is
additional income that can be budgeted
for.  This saving will be monitored and
reported during the year.
700 0.0 0.0 700 0.0 0.0 700 0.0 0.0
CW 001 25/26 Council Wide Following a review of some supplies and
services budget, there are a number of
small efficiences that can be made
within various cost centres will limited
impact.
47 0.0 0.0 49 0.0 0.0 88 0.0 0.0
CS 002 25/26 Council Catering Service Over the last year the department has
been revising delivery models to
increaes efficiency and effectiveness of
the service and are able to reduce the
budget as a result of this.
50 0.0 0.0 50 0.0 0.0 50 0.0 0.0
CS 003 25/26 Property Services Condition Survevys - due to favourable
market conditions and the frequency to
undertake the condition surveys a one-
off saving of £50k can be made in
2025/26.
50 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
2027-28Ref Service Area Saving Summary 2025-26 2026-27

Page 38

MANAGEMENT/OPERATIONAL SAVINGS OPTIONS - 2025-26 APPENDIX 5
Saving
£'000
FTE H/Count Saving
£'000
FTE H/Count Saving
£'000
FTE H/Count
2027-28Ref Service Area Saving Summary 2025-26 2026-27
LRS 001 25/26 Schools Contracts - NPDO/DBFM As part of contract management
measures there has been a contractual
review of the ongoing base budget
requirements and the base can be
reduced on a recurring basis going
forward.
108 0.0 0.0 108 0.0 0.0 108 0.0 0.0
LRS 002 25/26 Elections The annual budget for elections of
£36,751 covers the running costs of the
election office £4,848 with the balance
of £31,903 being available to fund by-
elections for the Council and
Community Councils. Given that these
are unpredictable and as such outwith
our control it is proposed that this is
treated as a centrally funded cost
pressure going forward with the budget
of £31,903 being removed from the core
budget.
32 0.0 0.0 32 0.0 0.0 32 0.0 0.0
Loans Fund Loans Fund A detailed review of the loans fund will
be undertaken, however, it is
anticipated that a one-off saving of at
least £0.500m will be achievable within
2024-25 that could be earmarked and
used to balance the 2025-26 budget. 
The saving is a result of slippage in the
capital programme and a better return
on interest rate estimates. 
500 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0

Page 39

MANAGEMENT/OPERATIONAL SAVINGS OPTIONS - 2025-26 APPENDIX 5
Saving
£'000
FTE H/Count Saving
£'000
FTE H/Count Saving
£'000
FTE H/Count
2027-28Ref Service Area Saving Summary 2025-26 2026-27
Funding Funding After the Council set its 2024/25 budget,
the SG allocated the Island Cost Crisis
Funding that was to be used to support
increasing service costs in islands.  As
our budget was already set, this funding
was set aside and can be carried
forward and used to help balance the
2025/26 budget on a one-off basis.
564 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0
2,102 0.0 0.0 990 0.0 0.0 1,029 0.0 0.0

Page 40

POLICY SAVINGS OPTIONS - 2025-26 APPENDIX 6
Saving
£'000
FTE H/Count Saving
£'000
FTE H/Count Saving
£'000
FTE H/Count
RIS 001 25/26 Roads and Infrastructure
Services
A reivew of Roads and Infrastructure is
currently being carried out.  Stage 1 was
reported to EDI in June 2024 and Stage 3-
4 are progressing.  Savings are expected
to be identified and Members will be
asked to agree each saving option when
it is identified.  The savings figure
represents a target level of savings.
300 tbc tbc 800 tbc tbc 800 tbc tbc
EDU 001 25/26 Education Services Education Service are about to
commence a review of the service, in a
similar way to Roads and Infrastructure. 
The savings figure represents a target
level of savings for Year 1 only at this
stage, as the review progresses, further
savings will be identified.
200 tbc tbc 200 tbc tbc 200 tbc tbc
CPD 001 25/26 Community Planning and
Development
Staffing efficiencies through workforce
planning and service re-shaping to
better meet needs from communities on
assets and funding.
38 1.0 1.0 63 1.0 1.0 63 1.0 1.0
DEG 001 25/26 Development Policy Re-organisation of the service and the
posts therein that carry out specific
functions creating a better structure for
the future.
44 1.0 1.0 44 1.0 1.0 44 1.0 1.0
2026-27 2027-28Ref Service Area Saving Summary 2025-26

Page 41

POLICY SAVINGS OPTIONS - 2025-26 APPENDIX 6
Saving
£'000
FTE H/Count Saving
£'000
FTE H/Count Saving
£'000
FTE H/Count
2026-27 2027-28Ref Service Area Saving Summary 2025-26
DEG 002 25/26 Development Projects (Planning) Introduction of new charges for returned
applications, retrospective planning
applications and discharge of planning
conditions/confirmation of compliance.  
For future years assumed increase
income as a result of SG review of
statutory planning fees.
45 0.0 0.0 45 0.0 0.0 145 0.0 0.0
LRS 003 25/26 Governance Following a review of the Governance
Team it is proposed to take advantage of
a retirement within the team to re-
structure. The revised team structure
will allow for better use of available
resource and ensure that key priority
areas service levels are maintained.
33 2.0 2.0 44 2.0 2.0 44 2.0 2.0
LA 001 25/26 Live Argyll 10% cut to Live Argyll Management Fee -
savings options to deliver this level of
saving will be determined by the Live
Argyll Board.
311 tbc tbc 311 tbc tbc 311 tbc tbc
CS 001 25/26 Community Sport Removal of payments to Camanachd
Association and Scottish Rugby at
£10,000 each. 
20 0.0 0.0 20 0.0 0.0 20 0.0 0.0
991 4.0 4.0 1,527 4.0 4.0 1,627 4.0 4.0

Page 42

2025-26 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Executive Director with Responsibility for Roads and
Infrastructure 
Ref: RIS 001 25/26
Service Delivery Area  Roads and Infrastructure 
Saving Target 
Detail of Savings Proposal 
During 2023/24 external consultants carried out a full review of the Roads and Infrastructure
Service. Findings from stage 1 were reported to the EDI Committee, and subsequently the Council
approved that officers move onto the next stages of the Review. 
Officers will now examine the recommendations in detail and opportunities for service
improvements. Delivery of savings and detailed proposals on how the savings target will be met will
be brought forward throughout 2025/26 for members approval and a target figure of £300k has
been set. 
Saving 
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
£000 FTE H/Count Cumulative
£000
FTE H/Count Cumulative
£000
FTE H/Count
300 X X 800 X X 800 X XX

Page 43

2025-26 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Executive Director with Responsibility for Education  Ref: EDU 001 25/26
Service Delivery Area  Education 
Saving Target 
Detail of Savings Proposal 
Given the many challenges currently faced by the Education Service it is essential to ensure that our
service design and delivery model is both efficient and effective. Our goal is to achieve improved
outcomes for our children and young people, while also providing best value and supporting the
Council’s ongoing financial savings requirements. 
Therefore a review of the Education Service is being commissioned which will address the Service’s
current structure, identify potential savings, as well as ideas for further innovation, collaboration,
commercialisation, externalisation and/ or participatory budgeting of elements of the Service. 
As the review is in the early stages an estimated savings figure of £200k has been identified for
2025-2026. 
Saving 
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
£000 FTE H/Count Cumulative
£000
FTE H/Count Cumulative
£000
FTE H/Count
200 X X 200 X X 200 X XX

Page 44

2025-26 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Chief Executive  Ref: CPD 001 25/26
Service Delivery Area  Community Planning and Development 
Saving Target £63k 
Detail of Savings Proposal 
Over the past few years we have been doing the following in preparation of asks to reform service
and deliver differently to meet council priorities within the reducing budgets: 
Tests of change- income, collaboration
• Trialling delivering CPP to another council through SLA
• Initiating trial linking health improvement work (HSCP/NHSH) and community development
work to support community organisations.
• Creating shared budget posts for project work in CPP
• External funding around posts, i.e. levelling up. 
Digital 
• Online tools and resources for community organisations 
• Online collaborative space, Basecamp, to enable partnership document sharing and
communication 
Workforce -Trialling tests of change within team,
• Team members trained in supporting communities on assets/ asset transfer, to strengthen offer
and test this to come from the community development resource (x 4 officers) rather than one
dedicated officer. 
• Knowledge transfers from post preparing for retirement and trials of work packages into
different parts of team e.g. enhancing offer of funding support to communities by testing this in
another area of team. 
Savings proposals are from the results of the above: 
Year 1 (2025-26) – 
£38k staffing efficiencies through workforce planning and service re-shaping to better meet needs
from communities on assets and funding. 
Year 2 (2026-27)
£25k test of change – collaborative working between NHS and Council Community Development
service to support the capacity of community organisations who’s purpose supports people at most
vulnerable stages such as those experiencing addictions, into positive outcomes. ‘One authority’
approach to setting up systems to address prevention, social need, community capacity,
community-led recovery. This builds on test of change from 2024/25 joining health improvement
and community development approaches to empower communities and those most in need.

Page 45

Saving 
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
£000 FTE H/Count Cumulative
£000
FTE H/Count Cumulative
£000
FTE H/Count
38 1 1 63 1 1 63 1 1

Page 46

2025-26 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Head of Development and Economic Growth   Ref: DEG 001 25/26
Service Delivery Area   Development Policy 
Detail of Savings Proposal 
Re-organise department:   
Re-organising the team will result in a better designed and more efficient team structure.  The
current Development Management team already possess the necessary expertise which will
continue to develop over time.  Existing Development Policy staff have the required expertise,
even if not in full time roles. Re-organising will create a better structure for succession planning
and a saving of £44k can be delivered by 2025/26. 
• Delete 1 Senior Strategies Office at LGE12 to create one LGE13 post to act as team
lead for whole of Development Policy including GIS, planning policy and the
specialists. 
• The other Senior Strategies Officer at LGE12 takes responsibility for LDP3 delivery and
planning officers.
• Delete vacant LGE11 Conservation and Design Officer post. If and when expertise is
required this will be obtained from consultants (this cost can be capitalised in project
work if supporting regeneration activity). 
Saving 
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
£000 FTE H/Count Cumulative
£000
FTE H/Count Cumulative
£000
FTE H/Count
44 1 1 44 1 1 44 1 1

Page 47

2025-26 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Head of Development and Economic Growth   Ref: DEG 002 25/26
Service Delivery Area   Development Projects
Detail of Savings Proposal 
Development Management (DM):  
Increased Fee Income from Future Scottish Government Review of Statutory Planning Fees:  
Potential Saving: Increased Income £100k from April 2027  
The Scottish Government have set out the aspiration that development management activity
(i.e. the processing of planning and related applications) should be undertaken on a full cost
recovery basis. Based on the 2024/25 budget for DM additional surplus income of £115k would
be required to reach a cost recovery position for DM and Planning Enforcement activities. 
Whilst planning fee regulations have recently been updated in 2022, the Scottish Government
have subsequently acknowledged that the current statutory fee structure still does not support
full cost recovery across Scotland and have provided an undertaking for further review of
statutory fees although there is no firm commitment as yet on the timescale for this to be
realised. The Scottish Government have also indicated that with any increase in fee income
there will also be an expectation that additional funds will be invested in the improvement of
performance. Accordingly, it is proposed that any further saving to be drawn from an increase
in statutory planning fee income is deferred until 2027/28 and may require to be reviewed in
respect of any commitment imposed by the Scottish Government in relation to performance
improvement. 
Introduction of Administration Charge for Returned Applications: 
Proposed Saving: Additional Income £10k from April 2025  
The Development Management Service currently return an average of 200 planning and related
applications per annum that have been submitted but which fail to meet the minimum legal
criteria for consideration and determination. At present the cost of administering the
registration and validation check of returned applications is borne entirely by the Council. The
introduction of a £50.00 administration charge would generate additional income of approx.
£10k per annum which is currently lost when planning fees are returned with the invalid
application. There would be no additional cost to the Council in implementing this saving as this
additional income would be raised by deducting the administration charge prior to returning an
application and the balance of any statutory planning fee.  
Introduction of a Surcharge for Retrospective Planning Applications:  
Proposed Saving: Additional Income £10k April 2025  
The Town and Country Planning (Fees for Applications)(Scotland) Regulations 2022 introduced
scope for a planning authority to impose a surcharge on retrospective applications for planning
permission as a means of discouraging this type of submission through the imposition of a
financial disincentive for beaching planning control and seeking to regularise this at a later date.

Page 48

The Fee Regulations set out that the surcharge can be a maximum of 25% of the statutory fee
payable. In order to implement the surcharge the Council would require to publish information
that identifies how the surcharge is calculated and the circumstance in which it will be imposed.
Based on a review of previous years income identified as a retrospective submission, the
imposition of a 25% surcharge would be expected to raise additional income of £10k per annum.  
Introduction of a Discretionary Charge for Discharge of Planning Conditions / Confirmation of
Compliance:  
Proposed Saving: Additional Income £25k from April 2025  
A significant portion of 1000+ statutory planning and related permissions granted annually by
the Council are subject to planning conditions which either seek to address a shortcoming in the
information provided post determination, or to impose mitigation measures that are required
to ensure that the development as built is compliant with the requirements of the Development
Plan. The handling of post determination discharge of details pursuant to condition are an
additional burden on both the admin and professional resource of the DM Service, as are
requests from an applicant to confirm that mitigation measures have been satisfactorily
completed.  
The Town and Country Planning (Fees for Applications)(Scotland) Regulations 2022 introduced
scope for a planning authority to introduce discretionary charges in relation to providing written
compliance with the terms of a planning condition. Benchmarking with other authorities would
indicate that the imposition of a discretionary charge of £100 per submission is a reasonable
cost for this service. Whilst the discharge of conditions is a regular activity within the
Development Management Service the manner in which workflow and data is currently
recorded for post determination submissions precludes detailed analysis. As a conservative
estimate however it is expected that some 250 post determination requests to discharge
conditions will be processed annually with potential income of £25k per annum. Development
of workflow for the handling and recording of post determination submissions would be
required prior to implementation but is expected to be capable of being addressed through
adaption of existing IDOX/Civica systems. 
Saving
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
£000 FTE H/Count Cumulative
£000
FTE H/Count Cumulative
£000
FTE H/Count
45 0 0 45 0 0 145 0 0

Page 49

2025-26 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Head of Legal and Regulatory Support  Ref: LRS 003 25/26
Service Delivery Area  Governance
Potential Savings 
Governance Team 
Following a review of the Governance Team it is proposed to take advantage of a
retirement within the team to re-structure. This re-structure will see the deletion of one
LEG 12 post and one LGE 7 post and the creation of an LGE 9 post. The revised team
structure will allow for better use of available resource and ensure that key priority areas
service levels are maintained. 
Total gross annual Saving with this option is £43,513 
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 
£000 FTE H/Count £000 FTE H/Count £000 FTE H/Count
Governance
restructure
33 2.0 2 44 2.0 2 44 2.0 2

Page 50

2025-26 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Head of Commercial Services  Ref: LA 001 25/26
Service Delivery Area  LIVE Argyll 
Saving Target 10%  reduction in Management Fee
Detail of Savings Proposal 
LIVE Argyll (LA) are a charitable trust which deliver a number of statutory and discretionary functions
on behalf of the Council including Leisure, libraries, cultural services and learning development.   
Similar to previous years, this option, proposes a reduction to the annual management fee that is
paid to LA by the Council.  The management fee equates to 44% of LA operational costs with the
remainder being underpinned by self-generated income (56%).  There has been reduction in reliance
on Management Fee in recent years from £4.07m to £3.2m whilst retaining full service provision. 
There was a 10% reduction in Management Fee in 2024/25 and as a result LA proposed a number of
balancing actions in their Business Plan including a revised management structure, increasing income,
closure / reduction of library services and utilisation of reserves, and these actions appear to have
been implemented by LA.   
This option will require LA to produce a revised Business Care for Council to consider. It is possible
that LA will come to a view that they make compulsory redundancies and this is a matter for them. 
It should be noted that the directors of the LA have a responsibility to ensure the ongoing viability of
the company. Management Fee reductions alongside continuing unfunded cost pressures when
taken in conjunction increases the risk of noncompliance and places a risk that directors deem the
company no longer viable.   
Saving 
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
£000 FTE H/Count Cumulative
£000
FTE H/Count Cumulative
£000
FTE H/Count
311 Tbc Tbc 311 Tbc Tbc 311 Tbc Tbc

Page 51

2025-26 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Head of Commercial Services  Ref: CS 001 25/26
Service Delivery Area  Community Sport – Shinty and Rugby 
Saving Target £20,000
Detail of Savings Proposal 
For over 10 years the Council have supported the development of community sport through the
direct financial payment to Camanachd Association (CA) and Scottish Rugby (SR).   
In this year 2024/25 both SR and CA received a payment of £10,000 each.  This figure has been
consistent at this level for approximately 10 years.   
The funding is a joint partnership between CA / SR, Sport Scotland, Live Argyll and Argyll & Bute
Council and it employs a dedicated Regional Development Officer in the Argyll & Bute Region to
lead the plan for the promotion and development of each sport in Argyll & Bute. 
The 2x regional development officers (1 for each sport) work with Live Argyll, support schools
(Active Schools) as well as local clubs to increase participation, improve accessibility to sport,
improve the quality of development and support community development.   
There is no direct Council staff employed and agreement to fund the posts are on a 3-year basis but
with 1 year funding support commitment.  There is a high likelihood that the Regional Development
Officers posts would be removed if any of the 3 funding partners pulled funding.   
Both CA and SR have been informed that this is a potential strategic savings option that is being
considered.   
Camanachd Association
The Camanachd Association have stated that Council funding supports Camanachd Association to: 
• Enhance shinty’s reach into communities through teacher training and
collaboration with schools and active schools to maximise their contribution to
shinty.
• Empower young people to develop shinty participation and awareness in their
community.
• Foster corporate partnerships to further support the growth and development
of shinty in Argyll and Bute.
• Sustain and increase the number of boys and girls playing shinty that is inclusive
for all.
• Develop well organised run clubs and associations.
• Recruit and train volunteers. 
Scottish Rugby 
SR have confirmed in January 2025 that the Council funding is essential to continue the Rugby
Development Officer Post.  The Argyll Post has been vacant for a few weeks but is currently out to
recruitment with the outcome of this Savings Template now being a factor to Scottish Rugby to
consider before appointment.  The Development Officer works to:-

Page 52

• Extend rugby’s reach through collaboration with schools, teachers, and active schools
programs to increase participation.
• Empower young people to grow rugby’s presence and visibility within their communities,
through developing local leaders and national and regional youth panels. 
• Build corporate and community partnerships that strengthen rugby’s foundation and
future.
• Sustain and grow the number of boys and girls participating in inclusive rugby activities.
• Support the development of well-organized and high-performing clubs.
• Recruit, train, and empower volunteers essential to the sport's development. 
It is likely the SR DO would cease with near immediate effect if this saving is made subject to
appropriate notice or freeze on the current recruitment.  
Saving 
2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
£000 FTE H/Count Cumulative
£000
FTE H/Count Cumulative
£000
FTE H/Count
20 0 0 20 0 0 20 0 0

Page 53

APPENDIX 7
SERVICE SUMMARY OF BUDGET POSITION 2025-26
Department Service 2024-25
Budget
Other Base
Budget
Adjustments
Settlement
Commitments
Updated Base
Budget
Employee
Budget
Changes
Non-Pay
Inflation -
Inescapable
Cost and
Demand
Pressures
Live Argyll
Management
Fee
Adjustment
Measures to
Balance the
Budget
Social Work
Pressures
Absorbed by
HSCP
DEFRA
Finance
Order
Updates
Post Meeting
Adjustments Preprofiling 2024-25 Draft
Budget
£000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000
Council Departments:
Chief Executive's Unit Chief Executive 900 5 0 905 51 0 0 0 (38) 0 0 0 0 0 918
Executive Director (Douglas Hendry) Executive Director (Douglas Hendry) 29 2 0 31 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56
Executive Director (Douglas Hendry) Head of Commercial Services 10,265 171 0 10,436 595 155 0 0 (466) 0 0 0 0 0 10,720
Executive Director (Douglas Hendry) Head of Education 115,495 1,990 2,700 120,185 4,589 337 797 0 (201) 0 0 0 0 0 125,707
Executive Director (Douglas Hendry) Head of Legal and Regulatory
Support
21,228 37 0 21,265 247 377 0 0 (342) 0 0 0 0 0 21,547
Executive Director (Kirsty Flanagan) Executive Director (Kirsty Flanagan) (366) 2 0 (364) 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (344)
Executive Director (Kirsty Flanagan) Head of Customer Support Services 8,794 59 0 8,853 573 124 115 0 (27) 0 0 0 0 0 9,638
Executive Director (Kirsty Flanagan) Head of Development and Economic
Growth
7,897 110 (23) 7,984 554 64 40 0 (128) 0 0 0 0 0 8,514
Executive Director (Kirsty Flanagan) Head of Financial Services 6,756 (31) 123 6,848 410 51 40 0 (132) 0 0 0 0 0 7,217
Executive Director (Kirsty Flanagan) Head of Roads and Infrastructure
Services
33,315 348 190 33,853 1,301 1,327 2,893 0 (1,340) 0 (1,348) 0 0 0 36,686
0 0 0 0 0 0 0Non Departmental: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Joint Boards Joint Boards 1,458 (114) 0 1,344 0 35 147 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,526
Other Operating Income & Expenditure Elected Members 1,199 33 0 1,232 272 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,504
Other Operating Income & Expenditure Sundry Services 577 1,399 0 1,976 37 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,052
Other Operating Income & Expenditure Unfunded Pensions 1,554 0 0 1,554 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,554
0 0 0 0 0 0 0Non Controllable Costs: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Insurances 1,989 0 0 1,989 0 459 309 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,757
Non Domestic Rates 5,091 300 0 5,391 0 10 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,469
Apprenticeship Levy (Council) 612 7 2 621 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 633
Capital Charges (loans charges) 7,967 0 0 7,967 0 0 362 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,329
0 0 0COUNCIL TOTAL 224,760 4,318 2,992 232,070 8,686 2,978 4,771 0 (2,674) 0 0 0 0 244,483
Health and Social Care Partnership:
Social Work Chief Officer (3,245) 0 2,278 (967) 36 0 0 0 0 (1,093) 0 0 0 0 (2,024)
Social Work Acute and Complex Care 21,474 0 0 21,474 350 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21,824
Social Work Children & Families 15,200 0 0 15,200 1,060 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16,260
Social Work Health and Community Care 43,289 0 257 43,546 1,370 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44,916
Social Work Strategic Planning and Performance 486 0 0 486 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 516
0 0SOCIAL WORK TOTAL 77,204 0 2,535 79,739 2,846 0 0 0 0 (1,093) 0 0 0 0 81,492
Rounding 1
TOTAL 301,964 4,318 5,527 311,809 11,532 2,978 4,771 0 (2,674) (1,093) 0 0 0 0 325,976
Funding:
Scottish Government Funding 259,134
Scottish Government Funding for ENICs 2,578
Council Tax Income 69,570
Saving Options Funded by Reserves 1,064
Transfer from Reserves to General Fund 1,558
Balance to Reserves - Council (6,875 one off pension saving less 2,000 released for 25-26) (4,875)
Social Work - one off pension saving to be held in Council reserves (3,053)
OVERALL FUNDING SURPLUS / (GAP) 0

Page 54

Appendix 8
FUNDING REQUESTS 
1. Introduction 
1.1 Funding requests have been received to be considered as part of the Budget
as outlined below.   
2. MacTaggart Leisure Centre, Islay 
2.1 During the budget process over the past two years MacTaggart Leisure Centre
in Islay has benefited from a £30,000 uplift in their Service Level Agreement
Payment.  The Leisure Centre have said that the extra £30,000 above the
Service Level Agreement has kept them afloat over the last 2 years. 
2.2 The ever rising costs to run the Centre, electricity, utility bills, chemicals,
insurance and staffing costs are becoming even more of a challenge and
difficult to find the extra monies to cover these rising costs.  The Centre also
had unexpected plant faults, and it was essential they were repaired.   
2.3 The waste heat from the Distillery has also contributed to their financial
challenges, with the Distillery stopping production during August and October
(and for a month at Christmas).  When the Distillery started back up on 22
October, the Centre was not able to utilise the waste heat again due to the
return flow pipe being burst underground to the Distillery from the Centre.  The
implications of this are that the Centre are now relying on oil usage which costs
significantly more.  The engineer working on this fix has advised that it is not a
quick fix and as at January the Centre were still waiting on timescales for the
repairs.   
2.4 The Centre have asked for another year of the extra £30,000 due to the
outcomes of this financial year being more financially challenging for the Centre
than predicted.   
2.5 The request is for funding of £30,000.  Members are asked to consider this
request and how it would be funded. 
3 Argyll and Isles Tourism Cooperative (AITC) 
3.1 Argyll and Isles Tourism Cooperative has received vital financial support from
Argyll and Bute Council over a number of years. Combined with membership
fees and other grant support, they have invested in campaign and search
engine optimisation (SEO) content development.   Primary websites Wild About
Argyll and Love Oban, significantly uplift the reach of new and existing visitors
and support businesses across the sector.

Page 55

3.2 This investment has led to the best visitor reach they have achieved in their 13-
year tenure, meaning the destination is reaching and inspiring more visitors
than ever before.
• Over 500,000 unique visitors to our websites, delivering over 1m user
sessions.
• Almost 50,000 social media followers.
• A newsletter database of 500+. 
3.3 Recent visitor data for 2024 suggests that visitor numbers to Scotland are down
from 2023 due to wider factors such as ongoing ferry issues, poor weather, the
cost of living subduing the domestic visitor market, and rising business costs. 
AITC comment that they must continue to market the destination with
VisitScotland to ensure that Argyll and Bute continue to enjoy the significant
economic impact our visitors bring. 
3.4 AITC will continue to support businesses with understanding and implementing
(if applicable) the Visitor Levy and will continue to provide learning opportunities
around the following themes:
• Marketing practices
• Social media content development
• PR and media relations. 
3.5 The budget requested to support the overall delivery of the marketing activities
for 2025-26 will be delivered by the AITC team and specialist partners as
required. Funds will be drawn from membership fees paid to AITC and
requested £75,000 grant from Argyll and Bute Council. Grants from
VisitScotland and other parties may be utilised if available. Where possible, they
will use existing assets and repurpose relevant content. They will seek
additional assets and campaign opportunities via key regional partners. The 
£75,000 Argyll and Bute Council grant is anticipated to be apportioned as
follows. 
3.6 The £75,000 Argyll and Bute Grant is anticipated to be apportioned as follows: 
ACTIVITY BUDGET OUTCOMES
PR, media – destination
positioning / print
5,000 • Reach new audiences.
Travel Trade Activity 5,000 • Reach new audiences.
Bloggers, Influencers 10,000 • Reach new audiences.
• Extend the season.
Paid social promotion 2,500 • Boost marketing reach
across all campaigns.
New format, license-free
photography and video
5,000 • Assets that can be shared
with Visit Scotland, A&BC
& and AITC Members.
SEO Copywriting and new
content development
10,000 • Insight-based new content
across all Wild About
Argyll & Love Oban areas.
Campaign delivery 32,500

Page 56

Business support initiatives 5,000 
TOTAL £75,000 
3.7 The request is for funding of £75,000 and further information related to this
request has been emailed to all Members on 13 February 2025.  Members are
asked to consider this request and how it would be funded. 
4 Culture, Heritage and Arts Assembly, Argyll and Isles (CHARTS) 
4.1 The Culture, Heritage and Arts Assembly, Argyll and Isles (CHARTS), is
requesting £95,000 of financial support from Argyll and Bute Council for the
year 2025-26.  This will be used to enable development their delivery plan
2025-26, building resilience and profile across the region's culture, arts and
heritage sector.  It aims to drive the sector forward and build on the successes
the organisation has achieved to date, including through the £75,000 support
received from the Council in 2024-25. 
4.2 Since 2020, CHARTS has generated an income in excess of £1.2m for the
culture sector, building on a total of £325,000 support from Argyll and Bute
Council across the same period. This demonstrates significant return on
Council investment that has enabled CHARTS to continue its successful
project delivery and grow reputation for the region. 
4.3 The Board recognises that this request to the Council is higher than those
made in previous years and there is a distinct reason for this. It is now
imperative that CHARTS upgrades its website capabilities as key function to
sustaining the sector, as its original website operations system funded by the
Council in Place Partnership with Creative Scotland (2019), has come to an
end, leaving the organisation at risk with a digital structure which is neither
suitable nor secure for sector and stakeholder communications or to assist
the organisation in generating increased income to help sustain the sector.
As a charitable organisation the Board is conscious of the need to diversify
income streams and this is a priority as the organisation develops in order to
become more sustainable, including with plans to develop ecommerce from
2025, it is vital to upgrade the website, and its visitor offer. 
4.4 CHARTS strategy meets the ambitions of the Argyll and Bute Economic
Strategy (2024 – 2034) with a focus on partnership and collaboration and
delivers across the four strategic key pillars: People, Place, Planet and
Prosperity. The organisation designs innovative projects and programmes to
secure investment for training and work across the sector and is increasing
its work with young people to assist to sustain the regions rich cultural assets.
As a Placemaking organisation, CHARTS assists to build the profile of the
region as an attractive place to live and work. The organisation continually
addresses the decline in the economically active population, improving
workforce skills for members and stakeholders. CHARTS attracts highly
experienced staff to project management roles, and promote equal access to
education opportunity, project commissions and awards, supporting
economic opportunities that help to sustain cultural businesses and creative
ambition.

Page 57

4.5 CHARTS’ purpose is to work towards a sustainable future for the important
culture, heritage and arts business sectors which has been identified as a key
economic driver with real growth potential and which has wide impact on skills
development, supporting young people and other sectors such as tourism
and food and drink, which they have been able to demonstrate across recent
years through collaborations and commissioning. Their work not only aligns
with a key aim of the Council’s Economic Strategy 2024-2034, but also other
key national and local government strategies including the Visitor Economic
Regional Growth Strategy, and the Argyll and Isles Strategic Tourism
Partnership Visitor Economy Recovery and Growth Strategy, to support the
future sustainability of the Argyll and Bute creative industries. 
4.6 The request is for funding of £95,000 and further information related to this
request has been emailed to all Members on 13 February 2025.  Members
are asked to consider this request and how it would be funded. 
5 Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park – West Highland Way 
5.1 Following many months of discussions and agreement amongst the West
Highland Way Management Group partners, a new charitable body – the
West Highland Way Trust – was registered with OSCR in October 2024.  The
charity is currently being set up and once it is fully operational, it will provide
additional fundraising and income generation opportunities to support the
Access Authorities to maintain the route. 
5.2 As a short-term action to ensure that the Trust has a solid base to build from,
there was agreement that contributions from each Access Authority would
provide value for money and, to that end, so far Highland Council and
National Park Authority have committed funding of £10,000 each for financial
year 2024-25 and 2025-26.  As a partnership they are seeking similar from
Argyll and Bute, Stirling and East Dunbartonshire Councils.  The ask, at this
time, to Argyll and Bute Council is a one-off £10,000 contribution. NatureScot
has also responded positively in terms of some financial support for this new
way to help sustain the management and maintenance of long-distance
routes. 
5.3 The Trust presents an opportunity to significantly support the work of the
public bodies, including financially, to ensure the West Highland Way is kept
maintained to the appropriate standard so the communities and businesses
along the route can continue to benefit from this key asset, along with
ensuring access to and protection of the surrounding nature and environment.
For the avoidance of doubt, the intention is that the working group of Access
Authority staff continues to operate to support collaborative management,
maintenance and investment for the whole route. In time, this group should be
supported financially by the Trust with the increased revenue generation. 
5.4 The whole ethos of the Trust is to pursue fundraising opportunities that would
otherwise be unavailable to Access Authorities, so it is hoped that the Council
would see this as a spend to save scenario in the longer term.

Page 58

5.5 The request is for funding of £10,000 and further information related to this
request has been emailed to all Members on 13 February 2025.  Members are
asked to consider this request and how it would be funded.