Democracy Spraffa

2021_22_InternalAudit_PlanningApplications_Final Report

Argyll and Bute Council · 23 June 2022
Back to Audit and Scrutiny Committee — 23 June 2022 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Argyll and Bute Council
Internal Audit Report
May 2022
FINAL 
High Medium Low VFM
Number of
Findings
1 0 0 0 
Planning Applications
Audit Opinion: Reasonable

Page 2

2 
Argyll and Bute Council – Internal Audit Report – Planning Applications, May 2022 
Contents 
1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 3
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 3
Background ............................................................................................................................................. 3
Scope ....................................................................................................................................................... 4
Risks ........................................................................................................................................................ 4
Audit Opinion ......................................................................................................................................... 4
Recommendations ................................................................................................................................. 4
2. Objectives and Summary Assessment ........................................................................................... 4
3. Detailed Findings ............................................................................................................................ 5
Appendix 1 – Action Plan ....................................................................................................................... 9
Appendix 2 – Audit Opinion ................................................................................................................. 11 
Contact Details 
Internal Auditor: David Sullivan 
Telephone:  01546 604125 
e-mail:   david.sullivan@argyll-bute.gov.uk 
www.argyll-bute.gov.uk

Page 3

3 
Argyll and Bute Council – Internal Audit Report – Planning Applications, May 2022 
1. Executive Summary
Introduction
1. As part of the 2021/22 internal audit plan, approved by the Audit & Scrutiny Committee in
March 2021, we have undertaken an audit of Argyll and Bute Council’s (the Council) system of
internal control and governance in relation to Planning Applications. 
2. The audit was conducted in accordance with the Public Sector Internal Audit Standards (PSIAS)
with our conclusions based on discussions with council officers and the information available at
the time the fieldwork was performed. The findings outlined in this report are only those which
have come to our attention during the course of our normal audit work and are not necessarily
all the issues which may exist. Appendix 1 to this report includes agreed actions to strengthen
internal control however it is the responsibility of management to determine the extent of the
internal control system appropriate to the Council. 
3. The contents of this report have been agreed with the appropriate council officers to confirm
factual accuracy and appreciation is due for the cooperation and assistance received from all
officers over the course of the audit.
Background
4. Planning supports the design and delivery of high quality places which are vital to the social,
environmental and economic success of our towns, rural communities and to our health and
wellbeing.   
5. The primary responsibility for the delivery of the planning service in Scotland lies with the 32
local authorities and the two national park authorities (Cairngorms and Loch Lomond and the
Trossachs).  Planning authorities are responsible for administering the planning system: 
 Development management – is the process of deciding whether to grant or refuse
planning permission and other related consents.  Applications are determined in
accordance with the development plan and decisions must be guided by policies in the
development plan.   
 Enforcement – making sure development is carried out correctly and taking appropriate
action when it is not. Planning authorities, under the provisions of the 1997 Act, have
primary responsibility for taking whatever enforcement action may be necessary in the
public interest, within their administrative area. 
6. Covid-19 had an impact on the planning process, however it was recognised that it was
important that the development planning process continues to function during the period and
that the current situation has consequences on how planning authorities consult and engage
with stakeholders.  The Chief Planner and the Minister for Local Government, Housing and
Planning provided letters to planning authorities outlining some steps and actions to ensure
planning continued to operate. The Coronavirus (Scotland) Act 2020 includes provisions relevant

Page 4

4 
Argyll and Bute Council – Internal Audit Report – Planning Applications, May 2022 
to the operation of the planning system. Regulations were introduced to enable specified
aspects of the planning system to continue to operate.   
Scope 
7. The scope of the audit was to review the Planning Application process to assess compliance with
statutory requirements and Council policy as outlined in the Terms of Reference agreed with the
Development Manager on 28 March 2022.
Risks
8.  The risks considered throughout the audit were: 
 SRR 12: The Council are unable to deliver core services as a result of the Covid 19 virus
with adverse impact to community and the economy
 Audit Risk 1: Failure to meet statutory requirements
 Audit Risk 2: Performance monitoring is not carried out and reported
Audit Opinion
9. We provide an overall audit opinion for all the audits we conduct. This is based on our
judgement on the level of assurance which we can take over the established internal controls,
governance and management of risk as evidenced by our audit work.  Full details of the five
possible categories of audit opinion is provided in Appendix 2 to this report. 
10. Our overall audit opinion for this audit is that we can take a reasonable level of assurance.  This
means that internal control, governance and the management of risk are broadly reliable.
However, whilst not displaying a general trend, there are areas of concern which have been
identified where elements of residual risk or weakness may put some of the system objectives at
risk.
Recommendations
11. We have highlighted one high priority recommendations where we believe there is scope to
strengthen the control and governance environment. These are summarised below: 
 detailed procedures should be prepared 
12. Full details of the audit findings, recommendations and management responses can be found in
Section 3 of this report and in the action plan at Appendix 1.
2. Objectives and Summary Assessment
13. Exhibit 1 sets out the control objectives identified during the planning phase of the audit and our
assessment against each objective.

Page 5

5 
Argyll and Bute Council – Internal Audit Report – Planning Applications, May 2022 
Exhibit 1 – Summary Assessment of Control Objectives 
Control Objective Link to Risk Assessment Summary Conclusion
CO1 The Council has
appropriate
procedures/guidance
and policies in place
that are aligned to
legislative
requirements.
Audit Risk 1 Limited Planning service does not have
established procedural
documentation in place. The
Planning service has extensive
guidance for the public on its website
to facilitate applicants in the
planning application process.
Training is carried out on an ongoing
basis.
CO2 Planning
Applications are
processed in line
with
procedures/guidance
and policies.
SRR 12
Audit Risk 2
Substantial Sample testing was carried out
against a range of processes/checks
expected to be carried out for all
applications. Of the 10 planning
applications selected for review, all
were found to be satisfactory other
than meeting the performance date
set for completion. Only two were
completed within the target date.
CO3 Appropriate
arrangements are in
place for
performance
monitoring and
reporting.
Audit Risk 2 High The Council publish a Performance
Framework document that sets out
the Council’s aims of improving
performance. Planning Services
forward performance data to the
Scottish Government twice yearly.
Performance measures are published
quarterly on pyramid. The Customer
Service Standard (CSE) award was
retained following reassessment in
March 2021.The Planning services
use the corporate complaints
process for complaints regarding
Planning applications. 
14. Further details of our conclusions against each control objective can be found in Section 3 of this
report.  
3. Detailed Findings
The Council has appropriate procedures/guidance and policies in place that are aligned to legislative
requirements
15. The planning application process is principally governed by planning legislation encapsulated
within legislation, for example the Country and Planning (Development Management procedure)
(Scotland) Regulations 2013 and a host of Planning Circulars such as Planning Circular 3/ 2013 :
Development Management procedure. All relevant legislation, statutory guidance and circulars
are available for Council officers to view on SharePoint.

Page 6

6 
Argyll and Bute Council – Internal Audit Report – Planning Applications, May 2022 
16. The Planning service does not currently have an established procedural document in place,
however staff follow a series of workflow processes which are aligned to legislative
requirements and current guidance. Discussions with planning officers noted that work is
currently being carried out towards a fully documented process that will encapsulate all required
steps and will be aligned to current legislation and guidance. The processes involved will include
the following steps: 
 a landscape processing map outlining the “higher information” required;
 a detailed process map outlining all required steps;
 a detailed procedure supporting each step in the process map;
 a procedural help note against appropriate procedures with more detailed information
where appropriate;
 the procedure, process notes and flowcharts will be interactive allowing users to click a
link that enables them to navigate from one document to another. 
Action Plan 1 
17. Roles and responsibilities are clearly outlined within each planning officer’s job description.
These should be incorporated within the procedural document. 
Action Plan 1 
18. Planning have extensive guidance for the public on the website to facilitate applicants in the
planning application process. The planning section of the Council website includes useful
customer information including advice on ‘permitted development’, relevant publications
including the Local Development Plans, non-statutory guidance, information on the planning
process and details of how interested parties can engage with it. The Planning service also
provide an e-mail service, a telephone based service to customers, and continue to utilise social
media as a means of public engagement. The Council’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic has
seen the temporary closure of public offices and the delivery of planning services via home
working and digital communication channels for the duration. 
19. Planning have a wide range of training modules and all planning staff are required to complete
the Council’s online training modules as part of their induction. Training is delivered on an
ongoing basis by the Process and Productivity Improvement Officer and where appropriate is
tailored to meet the requirements of individual officers especially in view of the change to
working from home.
Planning Applications are processed in line with procedures/guidance and policies 
20.  A total of 876 planning applications were processed during 2021/22 from which a random
sample of 10 applications were chosen for review. 
21. As noted in paragraph 16 above there are no formal procedures or processes in place for
planning applications, however sample testing was carried out against a range of
processes/checks expected to be carried out for all applications. These were identified through
discussions with planning officers summarised below :

Page 7

7 
Argyll and Bute Council – Internal Audit Report – Planning Applications, May 2022 
 planning application has been acknowledged by letter; 
 the application has been checked as being valid and if invalid reasons have been
intimated to the applicant;
 advertisements regarding the applications placed where appropriate;
 neighbours have been notified of planning application if applicable;
 sites visited where appropriate and photographs taken;
 conditions of application have been notified to consultees if applicable;
 plans have been stamped as approved if applicable;
 decision notice has been issued with conditions and plans attached;
 Civica has been updated with decision and all appropriate documentation;
 fees and charged has been checked by planning officer;
 performance targets have been met. 
22. Of the 10 planning applications selected for review, all were found to be satisfactory other than
meeting the performance date set for completion. Only two were completed within the target
date. Discussions with Planning Officers noted the following reasons: 
 Covid-19 lockdown resulting in adaptation of working practices;
 restrictions in travel arrangements due to Covid-19 resulting in site visits not being
possible;
 reductions in staffing levels due to savings;
 increased turnover of staff within the department. 
23. Legacy planning applications (applications which have been valid for more than 12 months) are
reviewed regularly as part of caseload management however the resource required to
undertake this has been reduced due to the impact of Covid-19 during 2020/21. Ordinarily,
caseload reviews are undertaken weekly/biweekly at team level and monthly with participation
of a senior manager. Fifty seven applications that are outstanding for more than 12 months
remain undetermined as of 31 March 2021. 
24. Development Management and Development Policy items are reported to the centralised
Planning, Protective Services and Licensing (PPSL) Committee which meets monthly (except for
July) and convenes for site visits and discretionary Local Hearings as required. The PPSL
Committee met on thirteen occasions during 2020/21.
Appropriate arrangements are in place for performance monitoring and reporting 
25. The Council publish a Performance Framework Report, the most recent document being for the
year 2020/21. This is the 10th Planning Performance Framework report that sets out the
Council’s aims of improving performance, meeting customer needs and helping deliver high
quality, sustainable development within Argyll and Bute. The report highlights an approval rating
of 97.5% for planning applications for 2020/21. 
26. The Scottish Government provided feedback on the Performance Framework document to Argyll
and Bute Chief Executive thanking her for the report and the hard work that Councils had put in
especially as a result of Covid-19.

Page 8

8 
Argyll and Bute Council – Internal Audit Report – Planning Applications, May 2022 
27. Planning Services forward Performance data to the Scottish Government twice yearly. The
performance data includes: 
 the number of decisions made for local development;
 the average decision time for local developments;
 the outstanding legacy cases. 
28. The Scottish Government publish statistics twice yearly on the performance of all Councils. Argyll
and Bute are in the upper quartile performance bracket. 
29. Performance measures are published quarterly in Pyramid and these reflect the quarterly
returns forwarded to the Scottish Government and are changed accordingly if the requirements
from the Scottish Government are amended. 
30. The Planning Service, working in partnership with Regulatory Services, attained the Customer
Service Excellence (CSE) Standard in February 2019. The CSE Standard was retained following
reassessment in March 2021. The CSE feedback stated “Planning and Regulatory Services as an
organisation is customer focussed and fully committed to achieving CSE accreditation status as
part of the whole drive of Argyll and Bute Council for excellence in customer service delivery.
Overall quality of the evidence is of a good standard and a lot of effort has been made to
ensuring the evidence covers all strands of the business.” 
31. The Council has a corporate complaints process. Customer information is provided on the
Council website and in Customer Charters. All complaints relating to Planning Applications are
subject to performance reporting and ‘Stage 2’ complaints require to be reviewed by senior
management with the option to seek further review by the Scottish Public Services Ombudsman
(SPSO) where customers are not satisfied with the outcome.

Page 9

Appendix 1 – Action Plan 
No Finding Risk Agreed Action Responsibility / Due Date
High
1 Procedure Document 
There are no established written procedural documents in
place, staff follow a series of workflow processes which
are aligned to legislative requirements and current
guidance.  
Failure to have
documented
procedures may lead to
the loss of skill and/or
knowledge when staff
members leave
resulting in inefficient
service delivery.
Review and update of
existing written
procedures to provide a
collated procedural
document for the
handling of planning
applications.
Process and Productivity
Improvement Officer 
31 December 2022 
In order to assist management in using our reports a system of grading audit findings has been adopted to allow the significance of findings to be ascertained. 
The definitions of each classification are as follows:

Page 10

10 
Argyll and Bute Council – Internal Audit Report – Planning Applications, May 2022 
Grading    Definition
High  A major observation on high level controls and other important internal controls or a significant matter relating to the critical success of the
objectives of the system.  The weakness may therefore give rise to loss or error. 
Medium 
Observations on less significant internal controls and/or improvements to the efficiency and effectiveness of controls which will assist in meeting
the objectives of the system.  The weakness is not necessarily substantial however the risk of error would be significantly reduced if corrective
action was taken.  
Low  Minor recommendations to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of controls or an isolated issue subsequently corrected.  The weakness does
not appear to significantly affect the ability of the system to meet its objectives. 
VFM  An observation which does not highlight an issue relating to internal controls but represents a possible opportunity for the council to achieve
better value for money (VFM).

Page 11

11 
Argyll and Bute Council – Internal Audit Report – Planning Applications, May 2022 
Appendix 2 – Audit Opinion 
Level of Assurance  Definition 
High 
Internal control, governance and the management of risk are at a high standard. Only marginal elements of residual risk have
been identified with these either being accepted or dealt with. A sound system of control designed to achieve the system
objectives is in place and being applied consistently. 
Substantial 
Internal control, governance and the management of risk is sound. However, there are minor areas of weakness which put some
system objectives at risk and specific elements of residual risk that are slightly above an acceptable level and need to be
addressed within a reasonable timescale. 
Reasonable 
Internal control, governance and the management of risk are broadly reliable. However, whilst not displaying a general trend,
there are areas of concern which have been identified where elements of residual risk or weakness may put some of the system
objectives at risk. 
Limited 
Internal control, governance and the management of risk are displaying a general trend of unacceptable residual risk above an
acceptable level and placing system objectives are at risk. Weakness must be addressed with a reasonable timescale with
management allocating appropriate resources to the issues raised. 
No Assurance 
Internal control, governance and the management of risk is poor. Significant residual risk and/or significant non-compliance with
basic controls exists leaving the system open to error, loss or abuse. Residual risk must be addressed immediately with
management allocating appropriate resources to the issues.