Democracy Spraffa

Scrutiny - Identification of a Topic 2023-24

Argyll and Bute Council · 20 June 2023
Back to Audit and Scrutiny Committee — 20 June 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL  AUDIT AND SCRUTINY COMMITTEE 
FINANCIAL SERVICES  20 JUNE 2023 
SCRUTINY – IDENITIFICATION OF A TOPIC 2023-24 
1. INTRODUCTION  
1.1 The objective of the report is to provide the Audit and Scrutiny Committee
(the Committee) with an option for a planned approach for the progress and
completion of a scrutiny review in the context of the Scrutiny Manual and
Framework as part of the Committee’s scrutiny role for 2023-24.  
2. RECOMMENDATIONS  
2.1 The Audit and Scrutiny Committee is asked to:  
2.1.2 Consider and approve the planned proposal for work in 2023/24 in relation to
the outstanding scrutiny topic, specifically ‘fly-tipping’ which has been
identified in accordance with the agreed process of assessment which is
detailed in the Scrutiny Framework and Manual.  
2.1.3 Approve the one topic, specifically ‘Fly-Tipping’ having been previously
identified and partly completed due to data sets being unavailable and to
progress this scrutiny review until it is completed allowing maximum benefit
across the authority by adding value and supporting continuous improvement.    
3 DETAIL  
3.1 The development of the scrutiny function has progressed successfully and in
2021/22 two scrutiny reviews were undertaken and reported, specifically ‘fly
tipping’ and ‘community asset transfer’. However, during the ‘‘fly tipping’
review, data which would have been helpful to the review was not available in
which to provide a more accurate assessment. It was agreed that such data
should be captured by the Council and once this information was available for
the Scrutiny Panel to revisit, the information would allow a more complete
picture based on new data. 
3.2 There are no minimum or maximum number of scrutiny reviews that require to
be undertaken but such reviews should flow from identifiable ‘issues’ and
where there is a remit taking cognisance of the limitations. A significant
amount of resource was used in 2022/23 in the review of the non-statutory
public consultations work, which whilst necessary and worthwhile needs to be
balanced with available staff resources. In terms of balance in 2023/24 it
would be helpful for the Committee to consider that the ongoing work in
relation to ‘fly-tipping’ be concluded and this forms the planned work in
relation to Scrutiny for the year, allowing staff resources to be balanced
between this type of work, internal audit work and planned training which
commences this year for a member of staff normally involved in scrutiny work.    
3.3 In 2023/24 the Chief Internal Auditor (CIA) plans to engage with the

Page 2

Committee in identifying scrutiny work for 2024/25 and which can be agreed
by the Committee before the start of the next financial year. This process will
give the opportunity for all outstanding work to be completed in relation to
scrutiny and an advanced plan of areas the Committee may wish to look at as
part of the 2024/25 scrutiny year.     
Approach to Scrutiny previously agreed by the Committee– Context and
Background 
3.4 In order to provide newer Members of the Committee more context to the
development of ‘scrutiny reviews’; a Development Session was held in April
2021 to establish the process to be adopted by the Committee to identify and
prioritise potential scrutiny topics and of the overall approach adopted to
scrutiny topics which has been a combination of panel reviews and ‘scrutiny
lite’ where relevant officers have been asked to present at Committee or at
Development Sessions on topics of interest to the Committee. 
3.5 In particular the CIA asked the Committee to consider some key questions.
These, and the Committee responses, are summarised in the table below.  
3.6 Question Committee Response
Should Scrutiny topics
originate from all members
and senior officers or from
Committee members?
There needs to be a degree of flexibility to
change topics and to be able to react quickly
to an ever changing environment. 
It is for the Committee to determine scrutiny
topics. 
If topics originate from the
committee should this be
via discussions at
Committee or development
sessions? 
We may need to meet as a Committee more
often however these could be less formal
meetings and held virtually. Further thought
can be given to this as to some extent it will
depend on the number of emerging topics to
be considered for scrutiny. 
Do we still need an annual
scrutiny plan or should
topics for scrutiny ‘emerge’
as the year goes by?
We don’t need a plan we should allow items
to emerge. 
Do we still need the detailed
prioritisation process? 
The prioritisation process is there as a tool if
we need it but we don’t need to use to
assess every scrutiny topic. 
Do we have the right
balance between ‘full blown’
panel approach vs Scrutiny
Lite? 
There has been value in having the full
panels but these are resource intensive and
we should look to make use of a scrutiny lite
approach where appropriate.  Once a topic
is decided then the Committee can decide
what the best Scrutiny approach to adopt is. 
3.7 The CIA has reviewed and updated, where identified, the Scrutiny Framework
and Manual in 2022/23 and will do so on an annual basis in order that the

Page 3

approach to scrutiny work is both focused, appropriate and reflects the best
approach taking cognisance of the Committee’s views. 
4. CONCLUSION  
4.1 The scrutiny process continues to evolve as each review is progressed. 
Members and officers continue to identify areas for improvement and these
will be addressed as they are raised.  It is planned that one scrutiny topic will
be taken forward for inclusion in the scrutiny work plan for 2023-24,
specifically, completion of the outstanding work on ‘fly tipping’. 
5 IMPLICATIONS  
5.1 Policy - None
5.2 Financial -None
5.3 Legal -None
5.4 HR - None
5.5 Fairer Scotland Duty - None
5.5.1 Equalities – None
5.5.2 Socio-Economic Duty – None
5.5.3 Islands Duty - None
5.6 Risk – None
5.7 Customer Service - None 
Paul Macaskill 
Chief Internal Auditor
20 June 2023                                                  
For further information contact: 
Paul Macaskill, Chief Internal Auditor (01546 604108)