Democracy Spraffa

2025_26_InternalAudit_EducationMaintenanceAllowanceVerification_FinalReport

Argyll and Bute Council · 4 September 2025
Back to Audit and Scrutiny Committee — 4 September 2025 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Argyll and Bute Council
Internal Audit Report
July 2025
FINAL 
High Medium Low VFM
Number of
Findings
0 2 0 0 
Education Maintenance
Allowance-Verification Audit
Audit Opinion: Substantial

Page 2

2 
Argyll and Bute Council – Internal Audit Report – EMA Verification audit, July 2025 
Contents 
1. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 3
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 3
Background ............................................................................................................................................. 3
Scope ....................................................................................................................................................... 4
Risks ........................................................................................................................................................ 4
Audit Opinion ......................................................................................................................................... 4
2. Objectives and Summary Assessment ........................................................................................... 4
3. Detailed Findings ............................................................................................................................ 5
Appendix 1 – Audit Opinion ................................................................................................................... 9 
Contact Details 
Internal Auditor: Mhairi Weldon 
Telephone:  01546 604294 
e-mail:   Mhairi.weldon@argyll-bute.gov.uk 
www.argyll-bute.gov.uk

Page 3

3 
Argyll and Bute Council – Internal Audit Report – EMA Verification audit, July 2025
1. Executive Summary
Introduction
1. As part of the 2025/26 internal audit plan, approved by the Audit & Scrutiny Committee in
March 2025, we have undertaken an audit of Argyll and Bute Council’s (the Council) system of
internal control and governance in relation to Education maintenance Allowance (EMA)
Verification.
2. The audit was conducted in accordance with the Global Internal Audit Standards (GIAS) with our
conclusions based on discussions with council officers and the information available at the time
the fieldwork was performed. The findings outlined in this report are only those which have
come to our attention during the course of our normal audit work and are not necessarily all the
issues which may exist.  It is the responsibility of management to determine the extent of the
internal control system appropriate to the Council.
3. The contents of this report have been agreed with the appropriate council officers to confirm
factual accuracy and appreciation is due for the cooperation and assistance received from all
officers over the course of the audit.
Background
4. Regulation 3 of the Education Maintenance Allowances (Scotland) Regulations 2007 (“the 2007
Regulations”) allows the Scottish Ministers to pay an education maintenance allowance (EMA) to
provide support for eligible 16 to 19 year olds who are engaged in full-time education in school;
undertaking a course of non-advanced education at home which has been approved by the
education authority; or undertaking a course of non-advanced education elsewhere under the
supervision of the education authority (including Learning Agreements/Action Plans). The 2007
Regulations form the basis of the EMA programme which aims to increase participation and
retention in post-compulsory education, thus increasing skills and life chances for this group.
EMA payments are made by the Council to eligible young people in school and other types of
learning within the local authority area in accordance with the 2007 Regulations, and the EMA
(Scotland) Guidance and Processes, provided that a young person is eligible for EMA, that a
young person qualifies based on the EMA eligibility criteria and a signed learning agreement is in
place.
5. The EMA programme offers means-tested financial support of £30 per week in arrears during
term-time to eligible young people from low income households who are planning to continue in
post-compulsory education.  Eligibility for EMA payments depends on the young person's age,
household income, residency, course validity and completion of a learning agreement detailing
targets and attendance requirements.  
6. The Scottish Government (SG) reimburses the Council for payments made to young people
following submission of monthly grant claims and a year-end statement confirming the total of
the monthly claims.  A standard allowance for the costs of administering the programme as well
as an additional £15 for each new application processed is also paid by the SG.
7. Audit Scotland published technical guidelines, TGN/EMA/21 in March 2021 and this was used to
support auditors in the verification of EMA claims.

Page 4

4 
Argyll and Bute Council – Internal Audit Report – EMA Verification audit, July 2025
Scope 
8. The scope of the audit was to assess that the Council is fully compliant with requirements as set
out in the Offer of Grant for EMA 2024/25.
Risks
9.  The risks considered throughout the audit were:
• Audit Risk 1 – The Council fails to comply with the provisions set out in the Offer of grant
for EMA 2024-25
Audit Opinion
10. We provide an overall audit opinion for all the audits we conduct. This is based on our
judgement on the level of assurance which we can take over the established internal controls,
governance and management of risk as evidenced by our audit work.  Full details of the five
possible categories of audit opinion is provided in Appendix 2 to this report.
11. Our overall opinion for this audit is that we can take a substantial level of assurance.  This means
that, Internal control, governance and the management of risk is sound. However, there are
minor areas of weakness which put some system objectives at risk and specific elements of
residual risk that are slightly above an acceptable level and need to be addressed within a
reasonable timescale.
Recommendations
12. We have highlighted two medium priority recommendations where we believe there is scope to
strengthen the control and governance environment.  These are summarised below:
• Schools should ensure that EMA recipient’s attendance records are accurately
maintained to provide a clear indication of when EMA payments are due.  
• School teaching staff authorising EMA payments should be reminded of the attendance
criteria young people are required to meet to qualify for these payments.
13. Full details of the audit findings, recommendations and management responses can be found in
Section 3 of this report and in the action plan at Appendix 1.
2. Objectives and Summary Assessment
14. Exhibit 1 sets out the control objectives identified during the planning phase of the audit and our
assessment against each objective.   
Control Objective Link to Risk Assessment Summary Conclusion
1 The year-end
statement has been
completed in
accordance with
guidance.
Audit Risk 1 High Appropriate arrangements are in place
to process applications and payments
and prepare and submit accurate
monthly claims and year-end
schedules.  All payments and costs
were confirmed on the Council’s
general ledger and verified on the
claims submitted.

Page 5

5 
Argyll and Bute Council – Internal Audit Report – EMA Verification audit, July 2025 
Control Objective Link to Risk Assessment Summary Conclusion
2 Young people have
been correctly
assessed for
eligibility.
Audit Risk 1 Substantial A detailed review of a sample of 10
young people confirmed that EMA was
appropriately awarded following
submission of the required evidence in
support of their applications, however,
attendance records were not always
accurate.  One payment for £30 was
found to have been incorrectly
authorised and one payment
incorrectly withheld.
3 Administration costs
have been
appropriately
applied.
Audit Risk 1 High The additional top-up administration
cost has been applied to the monthly
claims and correctly reflected in the
year-end claim.
4 Completion
procedures have
been appropriately
followed.
Audit Risk 1 High The claim forms submitted accurately
reflected payments made and costs
incurred in accordance with the terms
and conditions of the Offer of Grant. 
Claims and supporting evidence were
reviewed and confirmed to be correct. 
15. Further details of our conclusions against each control objective can be found in Section 3 of this
report.  
3. Detailed Findings
The year-end statement has been completed in accordance with guidance.
16. The Councils arrangements for the completion of the year end statement are adequate. All
relevant parts of the year end statement have been completed and signed by the Council’s
Executive Director/Section 95 Officer including schedules 4 to 6 as required in the Offer of Grant
for EMA 2024-25 letter.  
17. The entries on the year-end statement were reviewed and found to be consistent with the total
of the monthly claims submitted and also with entries lodged on the Council’s general ledger.
Young people have been correctly assessed for eligibility
18. A total of 177 young people were awarded EMA payments in 2024-25, from these, a random
sample of 10 was chosen for detailed review of supporting documentation to confirm they met
the eligibility criteria as set out below: 
• Proof of age to confirm young person is between 16 and 19 years of age
• Household income below £24,421 (one child) or £26,884 (more than one child)
• UK citizen or qualifying non-national who are resident in Argyll and Bute area
• Course(s) being undertaken is/are valid and require attendance of at least 21 hours per week
• An agreement has been completed detailing learning goals and level of attendance required 
• Attendance records confirming eligibility for each weekly payment made
• Back-payments were made in accordance with grant requirements

Page 6

6 
Argyll and Bute Council – Internal Audit Report – EMA Verification audit, July 2025
19. Documentation provided in support of applications made confirmed that all young people within
the sample selected for review were appropriately assessed as eligible for EMA payments.
20. EMA payments were routinely awarded or disallowed in accordance with attendance records,
however, a few anomalies were identified during the course of the audit.  Requests for
additional information revealed that attendance had been incorrectly recorded in some
instances where recipients had been marked as absent but later found to be in attendance in
other areas of the school premises e.g. study rooms or other classrooms and records were not
updated accordingly.  One payment for £30 was found to have been incorrectly authorised and
one payment incorrectly withheld.  
Action Plan 1 & 2
Administration costs have been appropriately applied
21. The Council is in receipt of a flat rate of £25k for administering the EMA programme, in addition
to this, an administration cost of £15 per new applicant in receipt of at least one payment of
EMA is available to claim.  The administration cost was correctly applied to monthly claims, a
total of £2,700 was recovered from the SG in respect of this element and was found to be
consistent with the documented requirements.
Completion procedures have been appropriately followed
22.  Testing carried out confirmed that, with the exception of the 2 errors noted at paragraph 20
above, payments were made in accordance with the grant terms and conditions.  As the value of
errors found totalled £0, there is no requirement to revise the grant claims submitted.

Page 7

Appendix 1 – Action Plan 
No Finding Risk Agreed Action Responsibility / Due
Date
Medium
1
Attendance Records 
Finding:  The audit identified that EMA payments
did not correspond with the recipient’s attendance
records in some instances due to updates not
being recorded.   
Recommendation:    Schools should ensure that
EMA recipient’s attendance records are accurately
maintained to provide clear evidence of EMA
payment entitlement.   
Attendance records do not
accurately support EMA
payment entitlement.
Updated guidance will be
issued to schools at the start
of the new session to ask
schools to ensure that
recipients attendance records
are accurately maintained.
School Services Support
Manager 
December 2025
Medium
2
EMA Payment Entitlement 
Finding:  One payment for £30 was found to have
been incorrectly authorised and one payment
incorrectly withheld.   
Recommendation:  School staff authorising EMA
payments should be reminded of the attendance
criteria young people are required to meet to
qualify for these payments. 
Failure to comply with EMA
grant terms and conditions. 
Incorrect payments may
result in additional work to
rectify. 
Updated guidance will be
issued to schools at the start
of the new session clarifying
the attendance criteria for
young people qualifying for
EMA payments.
School Services Support
Manager 
December 2025

Page 8

8 
Argyll and Bute Council – Internal Audit Report – EMA Verification audit, July 2025
In order to assist management in using our reports a system of grading audit findings has been adopted to allow the significance of findings to be ascertained. 
The definitions of each classification are as follows: 
Grading    Definition
High  A major observation on high level controls and other important internal controls or a significant matter relating to the critical success of the
objectives of the system.  The weakness may therefore give rise to loss or error. 
Medium 
Observations on less significant internal controls and/or improvements to the efficiency and effectiveness of controls which will assist in meeting
the objectives of the system.  The weakness is not necessarily substantial however the risk of error would be significantly reduced if corrective
action was taken.  
Low  Minor recommendations to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of controls or an isolated issue subsequently corrected.  The weakness does
not appear to significantly affect the ability of the system to meet its objectives. 
VFM  An observation which does not highlight an issue relating to internal controls but represents a possible opportunity for the council to achieve
better value for money (VFM).

Page 9

9 
Argyll and Bute Council – Internal Audit Report – EMA Verification audit, July 2025
Appendix 2 – Audit Opinion 
Level of Assurance  Definition 
High  Internal control, governance and the management of risk are at a high standard. Only marginal elements of residual risk have
been identified with these either being accepted or dealt with. A sound system of control designed to achieve the system
objectives is in place and being applied consistently. 
Substantial  Internal control, governance and the management of risk is sound. However, there are minor areas of weakness which put some
system objectives at risk and specific elements of residual risk that are slightly above an acceptable level and need to be
addressed within a reasonable timescale. 
Reasonable 
Internal control, governance and the management of risk are broadly reliable. However, whilst not displaying a general trend,
there are areas of concern which have been identified where elements of residual risk or weakness may put some of the system
objectives at risk. 
Limited  Internal control, governance and the management of risk are displaying a general trend of unacceptable residual risk above an
acceptable level and placing system objectives are at risk. Weakness must be addressed with a reasonable timescale with
management allocating appropriate resources to the issues raised. 
No Assurance  Internal control, governance and the management of risk is poor. Significant residual risk and/or significant non-compliance with
basic controls exists leaving the system open to error, loss or abuse. Residual risk must be addressed immediately with
management allocating appropriate resources to the issues.