Democracy Spraffa

LCC minutes 260123

Argyll and Bute Council · 15 November 2023
Back to Argyll and Bute Local Review Body — 15 November 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Lismore Community Council
Minutes of the meeting held on January 26th 2023 at Lismore Public Hall 
1. Present and apologies
Archie McGillivray (AM) Convener, Mandie Currie (MC) Secretary, Mark Willis (MW) and Clare
Howarth (CH).
Cllr Kieron Green (KG) Argyll & Bute Council; Rosemary Barry (RB) minute taker and 5 members
of the public. Apologies: Luna Martin A&B Councillor. 
2. Declarations of interest
MC and AM declared potential interests on an item towards the end of the agenda. 
3. Minutes of meetings held on 08/09/2022 and 15/12/2022
These had been circulated and were proposed by MC and seconded by MW.  The minutes of the
inaugural meeting of the new Council were proposed by AM and seconded by CH. Both sets of
minutes were adopted as a true and accurate record. 
4. Matters arising
There were no matters arising not already on the agenda. 
5.Scottish Government reaching 100% Broadband
Julian Wormleighton (JW) reported that he understood that every existing property would now be
covered by the roll out of this with completion anticipated by the end of the year.  He did propose to
ask for updates but not on a monthly basis,  MC queried the sorting out of wayleaves and how they
were expecting to go about the work. Action – MC to query this. 
6. Health and Social care
MC stated that she had nothing to add with respect to health issues.  She had been going to get
back to the council about the new model for social care but had yet managed to chase this up.  CH
expressed her concern re training and police disclosures.  MC explained the situation to date. 
There followed a discussion about the lack of care workers on the island for the numbers requiring
care and the difficulty of recruiting people because of the low rate of pay. CH added that she had
been to a meeting on the current situation and that there were now some other carers available but
she stressed the need for training and supervision and a proper system to be put in place. The
model utilising direct payments appeared to work in many circumstances. She felt that the
emphasis was on us as a community. KG explained that there were various options including self-
directed care where the money was paid directly to the person after assessment of need in which
case a police check would not be required as it was down to the person or their representative. If
the care was provided through the Council then training and a police check would have taken
place.  He added that the pay rate had been going up with payment of the living wage plus travel
time. KG emphasised that the Council has a duty of care and if there was no viable alternative then
residential care would be put in place.  He added that money was tight everywhere with payment
for care needs reduced to a minimum. Action – CH to follow up – to investigate various
possibilities.
MC mentioned the need to revisit the Emergency Plan and update this regarding resilience and
proposed to convene a resilience sub group.  Also to decide on what we meant by resilience. 
Action  - MC to add this to the agenda for the next meeting.. 
7. Ferries
MC reported that she had gone back to Calmac again to request alternative ferry sailings rather
than cancellations due to tidal restrictions.  She also queried when the improvements would be
made so that fuel could be carried after dark. JW added that he had been assured that the matter
was being attended to and as there were substitute vessels used there should be a standard for
the route.  MW queried whether we needed to have another meeting with Calmac.  He also queried
the possible use of a linkspan but KG replied that there was a technical issue with this. Action –
MC to write to Calmac Area Manager and CEO and also the relevant MSPs. JW said that he
would forward to MC the assurances that he had received so she could pass these on.

Page 2

MC queried the replacement of the Lady of Lismore for the Point/Port Appin crossing and KG
replied that there was no date given for the repairs to be completed. He understood that some of
the cost of repairs was being met by the manufacturer but he wasn’t sure about the cost of hiring
the replacement. 
8. Boreholes
It was reported that Robert Smith had agreed to do the site checks for the boreholes but he
needed help.  MC requested that information on any site checks already undertaken to be passed
to Robert. Action – AM offered to help. 
There were 35 requests for boreholes but it was reiterated that not all sites were suitable. There
was a query as to whether people would know if a borehole wasn’t suitable for them and it was
affirmed that the situation was being discussed with them during site checks. MC stated that it was
hoped to get the drilling done during this summer. 
9. Church and graveyard
MC advised that there was a consultation event on the future of the Church buildings and land on
February 18th from 2-4pm.  MW queried the graveyard extension and MC replied that although the
Church of Scotland had agreed to release space from glebe  land, discussions were still in
process. MC said she had spoken to the Council and the Church of Scotland in the autumn and
that they were in contact but that she would follow up on this. 
11. LCT funding
LCC had previously agreed to help towards costs of hiring the hall for Lismore Community Trust
meetings for a year (a defined number of meetings).  This period has ended and it was agreed that
a decision on any further funding contributions would not be taken until decisions had been taken
on other necessary expenditure but that it should be kept on the agenda. 
12. New correspondence
There was no new correspondence. 
13. AOCB
Future meetings were provisionally booked for 23rd February, 18th May, 6th July, 7th September, 2nd
November, 7th December. 
10. Planning
This item was moved to the end of the agenda as MC and AM wanted to register an interest in the
second of the items to be discussed.
Fish farms – Loch Long Salmon wanted to build a much bigger off- shore development just north of
Appin, close to the Lynn of Lorn National Scenic Area. The application was just at the scoping
stage, so comments might be required if a full planning application is submitted. MW felt that it was
not good environmentally but it might also produce jobs which was a good thing.  It was
emphasised at this point of the need to be objective and keep personal opinions out of the
considerations.  KG emphasised that salmon was a valuable export.  MC felt that there may not be
enough tidal movement in Loch Linnhe and that the farm might not synchronise with neighbouring
fish farms.  AM suggested that it was a scenic area and the associated shore side buildings would
be large. MC said she would circulate the details. KG emphasised that a response could be made
that covered all views.  MC agreed that a balanced response would be made that highlighted the
relevant issues.  Action – MC to liaise with Appin and Duror CCs. She emphasised that
although we weren’t a statutory consultee the island would be affected. 
Planning application. AM and MC declared an interest. AM explained that he was seeking planning
consent for a building but Donald McColl needed to be involved in the discussion as without AM
and MC it wouldn’t be quorate. It was agreed that CH, MW and DC would be emailed the details so
that they could make a decision but it was mentioned that they were also on the Council website.
There was a query as to the date for letters. KG replied that 23rd February was the official
consultation date deadline with determination on 16th March.