Democracy Spraffa

Printed minutes

Argyll and Bute Council · 20 June 2024
Back to Argyll and Bute Local Review Body — 20 June 2024 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

MINUTES of MEETING of ARGYLL AND BUTE LOCAL REVIEW BODY held BY MICROSOFT
TEAMS on THURSDAY, 20 JUNE 2024 
Present: Councillor Gordon Blair (Chair) 
Councillor Mark Irvine  Councillor Andrew Kain 
Attending: Iain Jackson, Governance, Risk and Safety Manager (Adviser)
Fiona McCallum, Committee Services Officer (Minutes) 
1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 
There were no apologies for absence. 
2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 
There were no declarations of interest. 
3. CONSIDER NOTICE OF REVIEW REQUEST: LAND WEST OF
STRATHHOLM, CLACHAN, TARBERT (REF: 24/0009/LRB) 
The Chair, Councillor Gordon Blair, welcomed everyone to the meeting.  He explained that
no person present would be entitled to speak other than the Members of the Local Review
Body (LRB) and Mr Jackson, who would provide procedural advice if required. 
He advised that his first task would be to establish if the Members of the LRB felt that they
had sufficient information before them to come to a decision on the Review. 
Councillor Kain said he felt he had enough information. 
Councillor Irvine said he did not think he had enough information and the gap for him
was the lack of context regarding the flooding.  He suggested it might be beneficial to
have a site inspection with the Council’s Flood Risk Adviser present. 
Councillor Blair agreed that a site inspection might be advantageous.  He commented
that he was concerned about any further delay in the process and hoped that this
could be arranged as quickly as possible 
Mr Jackson advised that a site inspection may be appropriate but he wanted to
highlight to the Members that the crux of the matter was that SEPA and the Flood
Risk Adviser have not been able to make an assessment of any flood risk issues as
there has been no Flood Risk Assessment undertaken.  He advised that as detailed
in the paperwork before Members, the onus was on the Applicant to produce this.  He
pointed out that SEPA have advised that they cannot make a judgement on this until
a Flood Risk Assessment is submitted by the Applicant. 
The Members of the LRB took on board the advice from Mr Jackson and agreed not
to proceed with a site inspection at this time.  They agreed that the Applicant should
be requested to produce the Flood Risk Assessment as requested by SEPA and the
Council’s Flood Risk Adviser in their consultation responses and that he be given
until 31 July 2024 to provide this information.

Page 2

It was noted that the Applicant would also need to send a copy of the Flood Risk
Assessment to all interested parties by 31 July 2024.  This would then give SEPA
and the Council’s Flood Risk Adviser the opportunity to consider and comment on the
Flood Risk Assessment before the LRB met again. 
The Members of the LRB also agreed to request from the Planning Officer
appropriate conditions and reasons to attach to any consent in the event the LRB
were minded to approve the application taking account of the outcome of comments
received from SEPA and the Council’s Flood Risk Adviser. 
Decision 
The Members of the Local Review Body agreed: 
1. To request the Applicant to submit, by 31 July 2024, the Flood Risk Assessment
as requested by SEPA and the Council’s Flood Risk Adviser in their consultation
responses submitted in respect of this proposal; 
2. To request SEPA and the Council’s Flood Risk Adviser to make a judgement and
advise the LRB accordingly on the proposed development based on the Flood
Risk Assessment submitted; and 
3. To request Planning to submit appropriate conditions and reasons, taking account
of the outcome of comments received from SEPA and the Council’s Flood Risk
Adviser, to attach to any consent in the event the Members of the LRB were
minded to approve the application. 
(Reference: Notice of Review and Supporting Documents and Comments from
Interested Parties, submitted)