Democracy Spraffa

Form AB1 Notice of Review Request March 2025 KMcL redacted

Argyll and Bute Council · 5 June 2025
Back to Argyll and Bute Local Review Body — 5 June 2025 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Ref: AB1 ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL
www.argyll-bute.gov.uk/** 
NOTICE OF REVIEW 
OFFICIAL USE 
23 April 2025 
Date Received 
Notice of Request for Review under Section 43(a)8 of the Town and Country Planning
(Scotland) Act 1997 and the Town and Country Planning (Schemes of Delegation and Local
Review Procedure) (Scotland) Regulations 2013
Important – Please read the notes on how to complete this form and use Block Capitals.
Further information is available on the Council’s website.
You should, if you wish, seek advice from a Professional Advisor on how to complete this
form.
(1) APPLICANT FOR REVIEW  (2) AGENT (if any)  
Name KATHRYN MACLELLAN Name 
Address SEAVIEW Address 
BRUICHLADDICH       
ISLE OF ISLAY      
Post Code PA49 7UN Post Code 
Tel. No. 07964337622 Tel. No. 
Email katie.maclellan3@gmail.com Email 
(3) Do you wish correspondence to be sent to you   x       or your Agent 
(4) (a) Reference Number of Planning Application 
24/01635/PP   
(b) Date of Submission 03/09/24   
(c) Date of Decision Notice (if applicable) 20/03/25   
(5) Address of Appeal Property SEAVIEW
BRUICHLADDICH
ISLE OF ISLAY
ARGYLL
PA49 7UN

Page 2

(6) Description of Proposal ERECTION OF FENCE (RETROSPECTIVE)           
(7) Please set out detailed reasons for requesting the review:- 
The reason given for refusal of planning permission is: 
1. By virtue of it’s prominent siting, design, material and scale the fence has
an unacceptable and harmful effect on the character and appearance of
the surrounding area and the street scene. 
Having sought opinion and support from Councillors Redman and McFadzean,
they also do not understand how a natural material (sustainable timber), tidy
fence placed upon the inside of the existing boundary wall which is uniform in
size and shape has a ‘harmful effect on the character and appearance of the
surrounding area and street scene’. 
To provide some perspective and reference to where our property is situated and
the surrounding area, this is in the same street scene as an area of waste land
(owned by Gleaner oil) which is infested with Japanese knotweed which has
spread into our garden, an ugly oil depot just metres up the road surrounded by
an unsightly metal fence which encloses 2 massive storage tanks visible from well
across the island. On the other side of us is currently an ugly building site covered
in rubble and public toilets whilst directly in front of our property there is a large
ugly black oil pipe running from the pier to the oil depot across an area of waste
land. 
This is also in the same surrounding area where untreated raw domestic effluent
from our own property, the next door property and the public toilets is being
continuously deposited onto a nearby beach due to a broken sewer pipe which
allows raw sewage and toilet waste to be deposited at low tide on a beautiful
sandy beach used by people, domestic animals, wildlife and nesting birds. (I have
reported this to A&B Council, SEPA & Scottish Water with no action) 
This is the same surrounding area where, despite council and police being very
much aware of the issue, vehicles drive past our property at speeds in excess of
50-60mph every few minutes. (A video of this issue is available as additional
evidence if you require it) 
Continued on next page …

Page 3

I would therefore consider the unchecked raw sewage being discharged into the
immediate natural environment and the constant unchecked speeding of vehicles
both of which the council are fully aware to have “an unacceptable and harmful
effect on the character and appearance of the surrounding area and the street
scene” to be infinitely more damaging than the erection of a neat wooden fence
designed to protect life. 
We consciously constructed the fence out of natural sustainable materials and
erected it as an essential security measure, both for our disabled adult son who
experiences many challenges due to having severe autism and learning
disabilities but with a desire to ‘escape’ from our property day and night and
runaway when he becomes anxious and his behaviour becomes challenging and
for our pets which despite our best efforts have succumbed to the speeding
traffic resulting in their deaths. 
Our son possesses zero road safety awareness despite our best efforts and as his
legal guardian I have a duty set in law by the Public Guardian of Scotland to keep
my son safe from harm. 
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) Article 3 states:
“Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person” This therefore
implies a right to safety and security from harm hence the fence. 
Our 2 pet cats were run over (one was completely flattened) and a beloved 18
month old Labrador was killed in September 2024 all by speeding vehicles who
did not even report the incidents and we had to notify the police ourselves. 
These pets could very easily have been my son such is the indiscriminate way
vehicle drivers speed past our property. 
I am extremely concerned that despite me citing safety reasons in my original
submission, the planning officer made the decision that the aesthetic of the
surrounding area be prioritised over this legitimate safety concern for a
vulnerable adult. 
The experience of losing my beloved cats and dog has been traumatic to put it
mildly and every day we are living a nightmare in trying to keep our son safe, this
fence is just part of a list of measures we have put in place to reduce his risks
from this dangerous road. 
There are also large oil tankers turning and reversing on the road at the oil depot
just metres from our property all day and in the early evening, this is happening
right next to the Lochindaal Way, a pedestrian and cycle footpath between
Bruichladdich and Port Charlotte which has a road crossing point next to the oil
depot. The speeding vehicles coming into the village from the south down the hill
are also a huge risk to the pedestrians and cyclists who cross this stretch of road,
metres from our property day and night.

Page 4

The signs that were put up to warn motorists of pedestrians crossing were blown
away in the recent storms and not yet fully replaced however it is our fence that
the council are focusing their efforts and attention on. 
I have also sought help from my local MSP Jenni Minto regarding this issue who
has been in contact with Argyll & Bute Council on my behalf regarding the
speeding vehicles situation. The council responded by stating that they plan to
add the village of Bruichladdich to the areas where speed surveys are undertaken
and added that this would be delayed as the speed monitoring equipment is in
need of replacing. 
I would be more than happy to take down this fence so that me and my family
could enjoy the lovely view we have at the front of our property from our garden,
however until there are robust anti speeding measures put in place in
Bruichladdich and all across Islay in the 30mph zones and when I can be assured
that the council (and the police) take this issue seriously enough and my son’s
safety has been prioritised, I will be appealing the decision to have me remove
the only structure that keeps my vulnerable disabled son from being hit and
possibly fatally injured by a speeding vehicle. 
I note that the roads department had no objection to the fence and stated
1. The fence sits behind a high masonry boundary wall, the fence has not reduced
the sightline. 
I would urge the review panel to reconsider this decision and take into account
the bigger picture and the very reason behind the erection of this fence rather
than considering how it fits in with the surrounding area. 
Who in their right mind would want to obliterate a view of the beautiful loch and
the surrounding area from their garden unless there was a very good reason for
the existence of this fence? (see photo 2 of our view from the garden) 
If insufficient space please continue on a separate page.  Is this attached?   
Please tick to confirm 
(8) Have you raised any matters which were not before the appointed officer at the
time determination of your application was made                   Yes
If yes, you should explain in the box below, why you are raising the new matter, why
it was not raised with the appointed officer before your application was determined
and why you consider it should be considered in your review.

Page 5

Yes but only in so far as citing my son’s safety, who’s dignity and privacy I try to
protect at all times and did not wish to use his challenges to ‘score a point’, the
fact that I now have to do this is humiliating for both him and for me. 
In my original submission the planning officer was fully aware of the death of my
cats during the last few years and the death of my dog last year all caused
directly by speeding vehicles. 
The council and the police are also fully aware of the excessive speeds of vehicles
travelling on the road immediately in front of my house yet choose to take zero
action. 
I note that there was no reference to the safety aspect in the refusal decision and
it is disappointing that the aesthetic of such a fence is prioritised over the safety
aspect in a planning decision, therefore I felt that by raising the issue of the
potential loss of human life of my beautiful son this may be viewed by the council
as a slightly more significant reason for the fence. 
I also attach photos as new evidence of 
1. a sign directly in front of my house requesting drivers to slow down, this
was put up 10 years ago in an attempt to ask drivers to slow their speed in
the absence of any measures put in place by the roads department. 
It is ignored.
2. The view from our garden which is being blocked by our fence so you
understand the sacrifice we are making. 
I would request a site visit for you to appreciate what I have stated in this review
request. 
Come to my house even for 5-10 minutes and you will certainly witness the
speeding traffic. 
(9) If the Local Review Body determines that it requires further information on
“specified matters” please indicate which of the following procedure you would prefer
to provide such information:-
(a) Dealt with by written submission 
(b) Dealt with by Local Hearing 
(c) Dealt with by written submission and site inspection

Page 6

(d) Dealt with by local hearing and site inspection x 
NB it is a matter solely for the Local Review Body to determine if further information is
required and, if so, how it should be obtained.
(10) Please list in the schedule all documentation submitted as part of the application
for review ensuring that each document corresponds to the numbering in the
sections below:-
Schedule of documents submitted with Notice of Review (Note if posting your
paperwork 3 paper copies of each of the documents referred to in the schedule
below must be attached): 
No 
Detail
1 
Photo of sign                                     Sign to encourage drivers to slow down 
2      
Photo of view                                    View we are blocking to prioritise safety 
3 
Video sent in file (if required)                              Video of speeding vehicles
(if required) 
4 Photos of fence 
5 Site plan 
6  
7  
8  
9  
10 
If insufficient space please continue on a separate page.  Is this attached?                                                                                     
Please tick to confirm 
Submitted by
(Please sign) 
Katie MacLellan 
Dated 
18.04.25

Page 7

Important Notes for Guidance
(1) All matters which the applicant intends to raise in the review must be set
out in or accompany this Notice of Review 
(2) All documents, materials and evidence which the applicant intends to rely
on in the Review must accompany the Notice of Review UNLESS further
information is required under Regulation 15 or by authority of the Hearing
Session Rules. 
(3) Guidance on the procedures can be found on the Council’s website -:
http://www.argyll-bute.gov.uk/planning-and-environment/local-review-body 
(4) In in doubt how to proceed please contact 01546 604392/604269 or email:
localreviewprocess@argyll-bute.gov.uk 
(5) Once completed this form can be either emailed to
localreviewprocess@argyll-bute.gov.uk or returned by post to Committee
Services, (Local Review Body), Kilmory, Lochgilphead, Argyll, PA31 8RT 
(6) You will receive an acknowledgement of this form, usually by electronic
mail (if applicable), within 14 days of the receipt of your form and
supporting documentation. 
If you have any queries relating to the completion of this form please contact
Committee Services on 01546 604392/604269 or email: localreviewprocess@argyll-
bute.gov.uk 
For official use only 
Date form issued 
Issued by (please sign)