Democracy Spraffa

Agenda reports pack

Argyll and Bute Council · 13 October 2025
Back to Argyll and Bute Local Review Body — 13 October 2025 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Argyll and Bute Council
Comhairle Earra-Ghàidheal Agus Bhòid 
Executive Director:  Douglas Hendry 
Kilmory, Lochgilphead, PA31 8RT
Tel:  01546 605522
DX 599700 LOCHGILPHEAD 
6 October 2024 
NOTICE OF MEETING 
A meeting of the ARGYLL AND BUTE LOCAL REVIEW BODY will be held BY MICROSOFT
TEAMS on MONDAY, 13 OCTOBER 2025 at 4:00 PM, which you are requested to attend. 
Douglas Hendry
Executive Director 
BUSINESS 
1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 
2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 
3. CONSIDER NOTICE OF REVIEW REQUEST: LAND SOUTH OF FERNBANK,
RAHANE (REF: 25/0006/LRB) 
(a) Further written information from Roads Officer (Pages 3 - 8)  
(b) Comments from Applicant (Pages 9 - 10) 
Argyll and Bute Local Review Body 
Councillor John Armour Councillor Gordon Blair (Chair)
Councillor Peter Wallace 
Contact: Fiona McCallum   Tel: 01546 604392
Public Document Pack

Page 2

This page is intentionally left blank

Page 3

Classification: OFFICIAL  
ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL
ROADS RESPONSE
LOCAL REVIEW BOARD
REFERENCE NUMBER 25/0006/LRB
PLANNING APPLICATION
REFERENCE NUMBER 24/01389/PP
LOCATION: Land South Of Fernbank Rahane
Roads Response 2
September 2025
Page 3 Agenda Item 3a

Page 4

Roads Review – 25/0006/LRB – Erection of dwellinghouse and detached double garage– September 2025 
(rev 0) 
Classification: OFFICIAL
Document history 
This document has been issued and amended as follows:
Version Date Description Created by
0 15/09/2025 Roads Response R.Kane             
Page 4

Page 5

Roads Review – 25/0006/LRB – Erection of dwellinghouse and detached double garage– September 2025 
(rev 0) 
Classification: OFFICIAL
Contents
1. Overview 1
2. Roads Response to Appeal Comments 2 
Page 5

Page 6

Roads Review – 25/0006/LRB – Erection of dwellinghouse and detached double garage– September 2025 
(rev 0) 
Classification: OFFICIAL
1. Overview 
This document provides a detailed Roads response to the AB7 from presented in conjunction with:  
Planning permission for the erection of dwellinghouse and detached double garage, installation of
sewage treatment plant and formation of vehicular access, land south of Fernbank, Rahane, Argyll
and Bute (LPA Reference 24/01389/PP) 
Page 6

Page 7

Roads Review – 25/0006/LRB – Erection of dwellinghouse and detached double garage– September 2025 
(rev 0) 
Classification: OFFICIAL
2. Roads Response 
Information Required:
Referring to the planning history of Ach-Na-Cloich Lodge, to review guidance provided to similarly located
developments on this stretch of road which allowed developments to commence, with appropriate
conditions ensuring road safety was not compromised.
Argyll and But Roads Response
Roads are being asked to draw similarities with a neighbouring development that obtained approval in
2011, some 14 years ago.
In this time we have seen numerous changes to roads design and safety guidance, some of which
include:
•  Scots – National Roads Development Guide (2017)
•  Transport Scotland – Roads for All (2013)
•  Argyll & Bute Roads Technical Guidance (2024)
Furthermore, as detailed previously, both urban and rural communities have seen a significant increase
in both vehicle ownership and use of the carriageway since 2010. A review of Transport Scotland
statistics outlines that the number of motor vehicles licensed in Scotland in 2010 was 2.7 million. In
contrast, there were 3.13 million vehicles licensed for use on the roads in Scotland in 2023 (the highest
number on record) and a 16% increase since the planning application referenced above.
It should be noted however that in the above application/ permission for development was conditioned
with the same visibility splay requirements of 75m in both directions. Roads did not condition an
absence from this requirement and therefore expected the condition to be delivered. It can therefore be
acknowledged that whilst undertaken 14 years previous, the Roads assessment and response is
consistent, with due recognition for the location and the associated Health and Safety concerns that
demand the full visibility splay be achieved.
Whilst the applicant/ agent details improvement to the existing accesses of neighbouring properties,
such as Ach-Na-Cloich, it should be noted that:
• The proposed development does not achieve the minimum visibility requirements
required for a new access.
• The neighbouring property, some 14 years previously was approved on the condition that
the very same visibility splay requirements be achieved.
• It is a failure of the Planning and monitoring process that the neighbouring property did
not delivery the access required, this is not justification for ignoring the consistent Roads
assessment for the creation of a new access at this location, and the associated Health
and Safety factors.
Finally, I would reiterate a point raised within my previous response, that being that whilst Road Safety
Statistics detail that between 2014 and 2023 the recorded number of roads related casualties has
reduced from 194,477 in 2014 to 132,977in 2023, some 32%,. These are not as a result of local
Authorities accepting lesser standards from developers. Contrary, they are as a result of improved
Roads knowledge and design guidance that demands higher standards and safer roads, not by
accepting (further) below standard accesses. 
Page 7

Page 8

This page is intentionally left blank

Page 9

25/0006/LRB Re: Roads’ AB7 Response

26th September 2025
This document comments on the response from Argyll and Bute Roads Department to the request for further
information regarding Local Review Board case 25/0006/LRB and planning application 24/01389/PP.

The information presented by Argyll & Bute Roads is used to imply that strict application of standards is the cause of a
reduction in roads-related casualties. Presumably this is to justify the refusal to consider any departures from standard.
However, no data is presented on adherence to standards over the period 2014 to 2023, and correlation is not proof of
causation. Indeed, there have been a number of departures from standard that would have been included in the
underlying dataset, contradicting the claim that the reduction in casualties could not have happened by allowing any
such departures from standard.

Additionally, the statistics cover the whole of Scotland and do not consider the merits of this particular case. The
specific visual obstruction in question has had no real-world effect on safety over the last 25 years. In terms of risk
assessment, actual data refutes the theoretical risk implied by failing to meet the standard on paper.

As such, and considering the overall visibility/safety improvements that would accrue, a minor departure from standard
is proposed with the following conditions:

	
Visibility splay to the south of the proposed new access measuring 75 x 2 x 1.05 metres

	
Visibility splay to the north of the proposed new access measuring 40 x 2 x 1.05 metres

If further mitigation is considered necessary, the applicants are amenable to funding signage or road markings that
would enhance road-user awareness.

The roads design guidance allows for departures from standards specifically because the limitations of standards when
applied to the real world are understood. Thus, the proposed access would be non-standard, it would not be sub-
standard.

Additionally, visibility would be improved for the accesses to:

	
Ach-Na-Cloich Cottage - from 0 m to at least 60 m (north)

	
The electricity sub-station - from 0 m to at least 60 m (north)

	
Mambeg Farm - from 0 m to 75 m (south) and 0 m to at least 55 m (north)

	
Ach-Na-Cloich - achieving the original 75 m condition (north)

	
Ach-Na-Cloich Lodge - achieving the original 75 m condition (north)

	
Fernbank

	
Rosnevyth

This would achieve a higher standard for all of these accesses and make the road significantly safer than it currently is.
Page  of  11
Page 9 Agenda Item 3b

Page 10

This page is intentionally left blank