Democracy Spraffa

Printed minutes

Argyll and Bute Council · 4 August 2026
Back to Argyll and Bute Local Review Body — 4 August 2026 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

MINUTES of MEETING of ARGYLL AND BUTE LOCAL REVIEW BODY held BY MICROSOFT
TEAMS on TUESDAY, 4 AUGUST 2026 
Present: Councillor Kieron Green (Chair) 
Councillor Jan Brown  Councillor Peter Wallace 
Attending: Emma Ledsom, Senior Solicitor (Adviser)
Fiona McCallum, Committee Services Officer (Minutes)
Gordon Harrison, Applicant
Michael MacGregor, Member of Public 
1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 
There were no apologies for absence. 
2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 
There were no declarations of interest. 
3. CONSIDER NOTICE OF REVIEW REQUEST:  LAND NORTH OF TIGH-NA-
CLACHAN, CLYNDER (REF: 26/0004/LRB) 
The Chair, Councillor Kieron Green, welcomed everyone to the meeting.  He explained
that no person present would be entitled to speak other than the Members of the Local
Review Body (LRB) and Ms Ledsom, who would provide procedural advice if required. 
He advised that his first task would be to establish if the Members of the LRB felt that they
had sufficient information before them to come to a decision on the Review. 
The Members agreed they did not have sufficient information to come to a decision on the
Review. 
Councillor Brown referred to the first reason for refusal of the planning application and
advised that having read through the paperwork provided, she said the photographs did
not show enough of the site area.  She said she would like to see what development there
was in the surrounding area and that she would also like more information on what was
meant by ribbon development. 
Councillor Green sought and received confirmation from Councillor Brown that she would
like to request this further information from the Planning Officer and that it would be helpful
to receive photographs and a plan showing where the proposed development would be in
context with other settlements up to a mile away with an explanation why this could lead to
ribbon development.  Councillor Brown said it would be helpful to see where the other
houses were and why this development could not be included with them. 
Councillor Wallace said he would also like the plans and photographs to show the
distance between the proposed development site and the existing houses after the green
space, including the existing farm buildings and farmland.

Page 2

Councillor Wallace also referred to the Planner Officer’s view that if Members were
minded to approve this application, then a Peatland assessment should be prepared and
reviewed by the Local Biodiversity Officer and Planning Officers prior to reaching a
decision.  He advised that he would like to request that the Applicant prepare and submit
this Peatland assessment for consideration by Officers. 
Ms Ledsom noted the requests for further information from the Planning Officer and the
Applicant.  In terms of the timescale for submission of the Peatland Assessment the
Members of the LRB agreed to give the Applicant 2 months to submit this and in the event
that a reasonable extension was required for submission of this information, this could be
requested by the Applicant and subject to the agreement of the Chair.  It was agreed that
Officers be given 14 days to review the Peatland Assessment and that if there was good
reason for extending this timescale this could also be agreed by the Chair. 
Decision 
The Members of the Argyll and Bute Local Review Body agreed: 
1. To request the following further written information from the Planning Officer – 
• Photographs and a plan(s) showing where the proposed development would be in
context with other settlements up to a mile away; the distance between the
proposed development and existing houses after the green space; the location of
the existing farm buildings and farmland; and 
• An explanation as to why the proposed development may lead to ribbon
development and why it could not be considered part of the existing settlement with
reference to the photographs and plan(s). 
2. To request that the Applicant submit a Peatland assessment within 2 months and that
the Local Biodiversity and Planning Officers review this within 14 days following the 2
months deadline and agreed that if a reasonable extension for submission of the
Peatland assessment and its review were required this could be agreed by the Chair. 
3. To adjourn the meeting and reconvene once all the further written information had
been received and all interested parties had been given the opportunity of commenting
on it. 
(Reference: Notice of Review and Supporting Documents and Comments by Interested
Parties, submitted)