Beaufort Wind Limited: Erection of 7 Turbines (Up to 149.9M to Tip) and Ancillary Development and Decommissioning of Existing Beinn Ghlas Wind Farm: Existing Beinn Ghlas Wind Farm, Taynuilt (Ref: 25/01240/Pp)
Argyll and Bute Council · 15 September 2026
Back to Planning, Protective Services and Licensing Committee — 15 September 2026 and its agenda
Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.
Page 1
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 Argyll & Bute Council Development & Economic Growth Planning Application Report and Report of Handling as required by Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (Scotland) Regulations 2013 relative to applications for Planning Permission or Planning Permission in Principle Reference No: 25/01240/PP Planning Hierarchy: Major Applicant: Beaufort Wind Limited Proposal: Erection of 7 turbines (up to 149.9m to tip) and ancillary development and decommissioning of existing Beinn Ghlas wind farm. Site Address: Existing Beinn Ghlas Wind Farm, Taynuilt DECISION ROUTE ☐Delegated - Sect 43 (A) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 ☒Committee - Local Government Scotland Act 1973 (A) THE APPLICATION (i) Development Requiring Express Planning Permission • Erection of 7 turbines (up to 149.9m to tip) • Hardstanding areas at the base of each turbine, with a permanent area of approximately 1,400 m2; • Upgrading of four existing road junctions to support construction and abnormal road traffic; • Upgrading of forestry tracks from the A85 through Fearnoch Forest, Glen Lonan Road (C32) and existing wind farm access track to accommodate the delivery of abnormal loads to the site and use of existing track for access to the first construction compound. An internal network of new onsite access tracks and upgrade of existing Wind Farm access track. The total length of the Site Access and Internal Access Tracks would be approximately 12.83 km of which 2.71 km is new access track (1.6 km floating) with associated new watercourse crossings and 8.52 km is existing access track and watercourse crossings which would need to be upgraded. In total there would be 4 new watercourse crossings and 22 existing crossings; • Upgrading of the existing onsite sub-station/control building; • Installation of Transformers and underground cables to connect the turbines to the onsite substation; • Permanent anemometry mast for wind monitoring, including associated foundation and hardstanding; • Telecommunications equipment; • Decommissioning of Existing Beinn Ghlas windfarm.
Page 2
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 (ii) Other specified operations • Concrete batching plant;(Temporary) • Preliminary temporary construction compound; • Temporary construction compound. Raeshaw Approach The underground grid connection proposals which have been subject to Further Environmental Information (FEI) submissions, do not form part of the Planning Application but inform the evaluation of potential Environmental Impacts of the overall development under the EIA regulations. This additional information has been required as the Planning Authority considers the construction of the windfarm and the provision of a related grid connection to Taynuilt Substation from the windfarm site to be a “single project” for the purposes of EIA evaluation Under the “Raeshaw” approach which has recently become a matter requiring consideration by Planning Authorities in respect of EIA development proposals. (B) RECOMMENDATION Having due regard to the Development Plan and all other material consideration, it is recommended that planning permission be APPROVED subject to the conditions appended to this report. (C) CONSULTATIONS a) External Consultees NatureScot : 12.12.25 & 28.08.26 – No Objection. Summary: There are natural heritage interests of international importance on the site with relation to Loch Etive Woods Special Area of Conservation, but our advice is that these will not be adversely affected by the Proposal. While there are impacts on protected Schedule 1 bird species, these do not raise issues of national interest. We raised initial concerns around impacts on Ben Nevis and Glen Coe National Scenic Area and Wild Land Areas 06 and 09. We also raised concerns around possible impacts from displacement/loss of territory on golden eagle, along with cumulative impacts from other wind farm developments in the area. We then provided post scoping comments in February 2023, when the Proposal was reduced to 12 turbines at 149.9m. We confirmed that based on the new layout, Ben Nevis and Glen Coe NSA could be scoped out, and a Wild Land Impact Assessment was no longer required. In March 2023 we also provided comments regarding impacts to the favourable conservation status for white tailed eagle. We then had post scoping meetings with the Applicant in July 2023 and May 2025 where we were provided with updates to the application and discussed white tailed eagle collision risk at the site. 3. Assessment of impacts on key natural heritage interests
Page 3
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 3.1 Loch Etive Woods Special Area of Conservation The access track for the Proposal is located approximately 100m from Loch Etive Woods Special Area of Conservation (SAC) and Airds Park and Coille Nathais Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), designated for a number of woodland habitats, marsh fritillary and otter. The site’s status means that the requirements of the Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c.) Regulations 1994 as amended (the ‘Habitats Regulations’) apply or, for reserved matters, The Conservation of Habitats and Species Regulations 2017. Consequently, Argyll and Bute Council is required to consider the effect of the Proposal on the SAC before it can be consented (commonly known as Habitats Regulations Appraisal). The NatureScot website has a summary of the legislative requirements: https://www.nature.scot/professional-advice/protected-areas-and species/protected-species/legal-framework/habitats-directive-and-habitats- regulations Our advice is that it is unlikely that the Proposal will have a significant effect on any qualifying interests either directly or indirectly. An appropriate assessment is therefore not required. This is because the track is separated from the SAC by plantation conifers, and any runoff from this track would flow away from the SAC woodland. 3.2 Landscape and Visual Our approach to advising on wind farm applications is to generally focus upon impacts on Scotland’s landscapes that could potentially raise issues of national interest. Having reviewed the supporting information for the Proposal, we do not consider that it would raise issues of National Interest in relation to its landscape, visual or cumulative effects. This is not to say that the development would not result in significant landscape or visual effects, rather that NatureScot does not judge these effects to meet our threshold in respect of our national remit for landscapes. 3.3 Ornithology 3.3.1 Golden eagle The Proposal falls within a known golden eagle territory and is the third wind farm application to be submitted within this territory in the last year. The other two developments are Cruach Clenamacrie (ECU00004841), which we submitted an advice only response to, and Corr Chnoc (ECU00006023), which we submitted a holding objection to on the basis of further ornithological survey requirements. Both developments are waiting to be determined. Due to the three developments within this territory, there is a risk of loss of functional habitat (territory) due to cumulative effects. Based on the confidential GET analysis, the golden eagle territory effected by the Proposal is estimated to be a loss of 1.68% of the functional habitat. On its own this would not be enough to cause displacement, however when considered in combination with Cruach Clenamacrie (2.85%) and Corr Chnoc (11.64%) this would result in 16.17% functional habitat loss. This is likely to cause displacement of the birds in this territory. As the Proposal is a repowering application, the majority of the 1.68% habitat loss has already happened due to the similarity in layout with the Consented Scheme. Therefore the golden eagle will have habituated to this. Corr Chnoc wind farm, which has the highest levels of displacement, currently has a holding objection in place relating to its ornithology work. Due to this holding objection, we do not feel that the cumulative level of displacement from the current Proposal and Cruach Clenamacrie is enough to cause displacement of this territory. However, we do envisage further cumulative pressures arising in this area. 3.3.2 White tailed eagle
Page 4
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 In Chapter 7 Ornithology, the Applicant has stated that “For non-breeding white- tailed eagles, it is considered reasonable to assume they would accommodate any displacement by more intensively exploiting less disturbed areas”. We do not fully agree with this statement. White-tailed eagle will exploit areas where food is available but if these areas are located considerable distances away then this will add unnecessary energetic costs or may cause them to displace. Further to this, there is an increasing cumulative issue with windfarms in NHZ14. This means many suitable areas are no longer available which will result in an increased collision risk as they continue to use more suitable habitat which is being developed. Collision Risk Modelling (CRM) The CRM for white tailed eagle is 6.14 birds every 25 years (sub adult: 1 every 5 years; adult: 1 every 18.6 years). This is high, however is acceptable in isolation. As stated in the EIA, this would mean one less adult would enter the NHZ population every 6 to 10 years. As with golden eagle territory loss, this loss alone does not raise concerns. However, cumulatively with the aforementioned neighbouring windfarms, it adds to the now high cumulative risk in NHZ14. Due to the holding objection on Corr Chnoc, we can accept this level of collision risk in this instance without additional mitigation to reduce this, but it should be noted that we are now reaching an unsustainable level of collision risk for white tailed eagle in NHZ14. 3.3.3 Biodiversity Enhancement Plan Deer fencing around turbines - The Applicant is proposing to install deer and stock fencing around the turbine locations to prevent carrion attracting raptors into the fenced area, therefore reducing the potential for collisions. We do not feel that stock fencing around turbines will necessarily reduce carrion around the turbines, as it may lead to black grouse and other prey species colliding with the fences, and it does not prevent other bird species colliding with turbines and falling inside the fenced area. If fencing is implemented, the following mitigation will be required: - Any fencing should be marked to reduce risk of collisions for black grouse, white tailed eagle and other bird species. - The habitat inside the fence will inevitably become good rough grazing with a lowered grazing pressure and as such needs to be monitored and managed if it is shown to increase the numbers of hunting prey birds such as merlin, kestrel, owl species and red kite. Managing the overall Habitat Management Plan area to lower grazing and improve the condition of this area would create a diversionary feeding area for the species mentioned above and could draw scavenging birds away from the turbine area. Installation of diver rafts - Management of diver rafts, such as targeted predator control, will be required to ensure that they maintain their effectiveness. Riparian planting - While the proposed planting will be beneficial to the overall habitat at this site, it must not come at the expense of the resident golden eagle pair in this territory. Any planting works will need to consider roost sites for golden eagle. Roost sites are protected year-round for Schedule 1/1A birds. There are multiple roost sites which will be impacted by the planting activities, and the Applicant will need to ensure that mitigation (such as timing restrictions) is in place to avoid risk of disturbance or displacement to the golden eagle pair, which could result in the Applicant committing an offence under the Wildlife and Countryside Act (as amended).
Page 5
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 This same applies to the peatland restoration which will also need to consider roost disturbance year-round. Installation of artificial white tailed eagle nest - The installation of a white-tailed eagle platform may not draw any white tailed eagle away from their current nest sites and could potentially introduce a third pair in the area or encourage other raptors such as osprey into the area. If this work is carried out, the siting of the artificial nest needs to be considered, and landowner permission sought. White tailed eagle fatality monitoring and carcass recovery scheme We are supportive of these trials as they help build a picture of collision risk which can assist with the assessment of future proposals. All trials will need to follow the methodology laid out in Caryl et al 2016. This paper hasn’t been referenced in this section, and there are some discrepancies between the proposed methodology and those in the paper that will need to be aligned. We support the removal of carcasses to reduce scavenging activity from the footprint of the Proposal. In relation to this, proposed carcass persistence trials must be done remotely from the wind farm footprint in order to avoid drawing in scavenging eagles and other raptor species. 3.3.4 Other bird species Providing the Applicant complies with the statement in Chapter 7 Ornithology, Section 7.6 that all known breeding bird sites will be buffered during construction and operation of the Proposal then this will be sufficient. A qualified Ecological Clerk of Works should be used to ensure compliance. The only exception being black grouse, which may be affected by the proposed fencing around the windfarm (see above). 3.4 Peatland We note that the Applicant is proposing to restore peatland habitat at a ratio of 1: 9. While this is below our recommendation of 1:10 plus an additional 10%, we accept that the current condition of the peatland does not allow for more restoration on site. The Applicant may wish to consider off-site restoration in order to achieve the restoration recommendations within our guidance. Officer Comment: Although specific conditions are not recommended, matters raised in this response requiring action/control/monitoring not already set out in submissions to safeguard Nature interests within the EIAR and supporting documentation have been introduced as conditions by Officers to ensure that the construction and operation of the development is in accordance with NatureScot requirements. FEI Response Dated 28.08.26 Our advice on the proposed wind farm remains unchanged from our response dated 12 December 2025. Based on the information submitted, the proposed grid connection, alone and in combination with the wind farm, is unlikely to result in any new or increased severity of effect on natural heritage interests that raise, or closely approach, issues of national interest.
Page 6
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 Historic Environment Scotland: 30.10.25 & 28.08.26 No Objection Our view is that the proposals do not raise historic environment issues of national significance and therefore we do not object. Further details on the impacts to settings of assets within our remit and the assessment thereof are included in the annex to this letter. We are content that there will be no direct physical impacts on assets within our remit as a result of the proposed development. A number of assets are assessed in the EIA Report, and the information provided has been helpful in clarifying the likely effects on these sites for our interests. We have no further comments to make for most of those sites. Scheduled Monuments Based on the photomontage visualisations provided, we are content that there would be no adverse impacts on the setting of scheduled monuments that would raise issues of national interest. The impact of the setting on Barguillean Farm, dun 250m SWW of (SM3930) could be reduced, however, by the movement or reduction in height of turbines 6 and 7, so that the hubs would not appear above the skyline to the southwest of the monument. This would make the impacts of the proposals similar in nature to their impacts on the other assets in Glen Lonan. The proposals would be visible in long distance views from Ardchattan Priory, priory, burial ground and carved stones (SM13644), and would add to the spread of turbines on the skyline in views to the south. The turbines would not be more prominent that others already proposed and, while they would have a similar impact on the sense of place, they would not significantly detract from the ability to understand, appreciate or experience the monument in its setting. Gardens & Designed Landscapes We agree with the assessment in the EIA Report that the development would not have a significant adverse impact on the setting of Ardchattan Priory (GDL00019). In respect of the FEI response dated 28.08.26 it is stated that: We have considered the information received and do not have any comments to make on the proposals. … We note that the proposed route for the underground cable is in close proximity to Barguillean Farm, dun 250m SSW of (SM3930). We would expect the presence of the asset to be taken into consideration and, if necessary, appropriate measures be taken to prevent accidental damage to the scheduled monument. Scottish Water 06.08.26 No Objection …the proposed activity falls within a drinking water catchment where a Scottish Water abstraction is located. Scottish Water abstractions are designated as Drinking Water Protected Areas (DWPA) under Article 7 of the Water Framework Directive. Loch Nell supplies Tullich Water Treatment Works (WTW) and it is
Page 7
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 essential that water quality and water quantity in the area are protected. In the event of an incident occurring that could affect Scottish Water we should be notified immediately using the Customer Helpline number 0800 0778 778. Given the location of the activity within the catchment, this should present a low risk to water quality, and no concerns have been raised from a water resource perspective. However, we would request that water quality protection measures are still implemented and best practice is followed. Scottish Water records indicate that there is live infrastructure in the proximity of your development area that may impact on existing Scottish Water assets. The applicant must identify any potential conflicts with Scottish Water assets and contact our Asset Impact Team via our Customer Portal for an appraisal of the proposals. The applicant should be aware that any conflict with assets identified will be subject to restrictions on proximity of construction. Please note the disclaimer at the end of this response. Officer Comment: Water pollution safeguards will be required as part of a suspensive condition relating to a Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) and also a separate water specific pollution prevention plan. SEPA: 02.10.25, 20.05.26 & 25.08.26 – No Objection subject to conditions Initial holding objection of 02.10.25 withdrawn by response dated 20.05.26 following amendments to the locations of turbines 4 & 5 to reduce peat impacts. No further issues relating to FEI in response dated 25.08.26 subject to adherence to EIAR commitments. Maintained objection unless conditions set out below are applied to any grant of consent; • Condition Out with the condition that no micrositing shall take place onto areas of deeper peat than shown on the most up to date site plans (as shown in additional information dated 28 March 2026), we would not support any micrositing of the floating track along the west side of the area of near-natural peat bog between the Temporary Construction Compound 2 (TCC2) and the junction of the track leading to T1. • Condition: that all near-natural condition peatland habitat within 50m of infrastructure is physically demarked prior to construction commencing to ensure construction vehicles do not disturb the habitat during construction. The schedule of mitigation should outline how this habitat will be safeguarded. • Condition: for post-construction monitoring of impacts on near natural habitat in the vicinity of TCC2, which will require a mechanism to take specific action should impacts occur: A schedule of monitoring should ensure the near-natural peatland habitat is safeguarded from direct and indirect impacts and must include: o Proposals for fixed point photography and repeat National Vegetation Classification and hydrological condition surveys. o Frequency of monitoring, supported by justification.
Page 8
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 o Criteria that will trigger additional action should monitoring reveal that the near-natural peatland habitat is no longer sequestering or is degrading to a modified habitat type. Any actions taken are required to adhere to NatureScot’s peatland restoration guidance. • Condition: for a Peat Management Plan. To ensure consistency between energy developments we recommend that the wording of Condition 31 of the Energy Consent Units Standard onshore wind condition be used - Standard onshore wind conditions – Standard onshore wind conditions – section 36 consent and deemed planning permission: form and guidance - gov.scot • Condition: Bottomless arch culverts or span bridges should be used for all new or upgraded watercourse crossings, and all watercourse crossings must be designed to convey the 1:200 plus Climate Change. Officer Comment : Appropriate conditions are proposed. Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO): 22.09.25, 02.02.26 & 08.06.26 No Objection subject to conditions. • Condition - Aviation Lighting Prior to commencing construction of any wind turbine generators, or deploying any construction equipment or temporal structure(s) 50 metres or more in height (above ground level) the undertaker must submit an aviation lighting scheme for the approval of the Argyll & Bute Council in conjunction with the Ministry of Defence defining how the development will be lit throughout its life to maintain civil and military aviation safety requirements as determined necessary for aviation safety by the Ministry of Defence. This should set out: a) details of any construction equipment and temporal structures with a total height of 50 metres or greater (above ground level) that will be deployed during the construction of wind turbine generators and details of any aviation warning lighting that they will be fitted with; and b) the locations and heights of all wind turbine generators and any anemometry mast featured in the development identifying those that will be fitted with aviation warning lighting identifying the position of the lights on the wind turbine generators; the type(s) of lights that will be fitted and the performance specification(s) of the lighting type(s) to be used. Thereafter, the undertaker must exhibit such lights as detailed in the approved aviation lighting scheme. The lighting installed will remain operational for the lifetime of the development. Reason for condition. To maintain aviation safety. • Condition -Aviation Charting and Safety Management The undertaker must notify the Ministry of Defence, at least 14 days prior to the commencement of the works, in writing of the following information: a) the date of the commencement of the erection of wind turbine generators;
Page 9
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 b) the maximum height of any construction equipment to be used in the erection of the wind turbines; c) the date any wind turbine generators are brought into use; d) the latitude and longitude and maximum heights of each wind turbine generator, and any anemometer mast(s). The Ministry of Defence must be notified of any changes to the information supplied in accordance with these requirements and of the completion of the construction of the development. Members are requested to note that following the SEPA request that turbines 4 and 5 were relocated within the site to minimise impacts on deeper peat. DIO were reconsulted on the amended locations and again raised no objection. The final response dated 08.06.26 also evaluated the FEI information relating to the grid connection, again confirming no objection was raised subject to conditions. In summary, and after reviewing the documents submitted, I can confirm that the MOD position set out in our responses dated 22/09/2025 and 02/02/2026 is unchanged. Subject to the two conditions identified in Appendix A being applied to any consent issued, the MOD has no objections to the development. Scottish Forestry : 27.08.26 No Objection subject to conditions. A. Detailed woodland removal plan condition • A condition is applied securing production of a detailed woodland removal plan be produced as part of the route refinement process. • This should include very clear woodland removal proposals for any Ancient woodland, PAWS and other woodland types, including maps and areas. • It should include relevant detail of felling / restocking /compensatory planting relating to works on Barguillean Estate. • It should include a reassessment of the compensatory planting area. This must exceed the area of woodland removed and demonstrate how this will compensate for the loss of environmental value. • The plan should clearly demonstrates application of the NPF 4 hierarchy of mitigation. • SF should be consulted on the plan. B. Compensatory Planting Condition • We advise that compensatory planting should be secured by a condition. Draft wording is provided in Annex 1 of this letter. • The applicant should consider the need for EIA Screening of the compensatory woodland creation (necessary consents) Annex 1 - Suggested Condition for Compensatory Planting “Commencement of Development” means the implementation of this consent by the carrying out of- (a) a material operation within the meaning of section 27(4) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1997; (other than any operations associated with ground or site investigation works); or (b) any deforestation associated with the implementation of this consent.
Page 10
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023
“Necessary Consents” means
a) any consent or permission required by an enactment to enable the approved
Replanting to be implemented in accordance with the phasing and associated
timescales for implementation contained in the approved Replanting Scheme;
and b) any right or permission to take entry to or access over land required by
the Company or parties acting on its behalf to implement the approved
Replanting Scheme.
1. There shall be no Commencement of Development until a woodland planting
scheme to compensate for the removal of XXX hectares of existing woodland
(“the Replanting Scheme”) has been submitted to and approved in writing by
Argyll and Bute Council in consultation with Scottish Forestry.
2. The Replanting Scheme must comply with the requirements set out in the UK
Forestry Standard (Forestry Commission, 2017. ISBN 978-0-85538-999-4) and
the guidelines to which it refers. The Replanting Scheme submitted for approval
must include-
a. details of the location of the area to be planted;
b. details of land owners and occupiers of the land to be planted;
c. the nature, design and specification of the proposed woodland to be planted;
d. details of all Necessary Consents for the Replanting Scheme and timescales
within which each shall be obtained;
e. the phasing and associated timescales for implementing the Replanting
Scheme; f. proposals for the maintenance and establishment of the Replanting
Scheme, including; annual checks; replacement planting; fencing; ground
preparation; and drainage; and
g. proposals for reporting to Argyll and Bute Council on compliance with
timescales for obtaining the Necessary Consents and thereafter implementation
of the Replanting Scheme.
3. The approved Replanting Scheme shall thereafter be implemented in full and
in accordance with the phasing and timescales set out therein, unless otherwise
agreed in writing by Argyll and Bute Council after consultation with Scottish
Forestry.
4. There shall be no Commencement of Development until all relevant Necessary
Consents for implementation of the Replanting Scheme in accordance with the
phasing and timescales set out therein have been obtained.
Reason: To secure compensatory planting to mitigate against effects of
deforestation arising from the Development.
Officer Comment: Appropriate conditions to safeguard these matters and ensure
appropriate consultation with Scottish Forestry are proposed.
National Air Traffic Services (NATS) : (02.09.25 & 30.07.26) No Objection
The proposed development has been examined from a technical safeguarding
aspect and does not conflict with our safeguarding criteria. Accordingly, NATS
(En Route) Public Limited Company ("NERL") has no safeguarding objection to
the proposal
Oban Airport 19.05.26 – No Objection
Argyll and District Salmon Fishery Board: 04.08.26 No Objection
We note that the recent additional to the documents folder of Further
Environmental Information has some relevant information on aquatic ecology.Page 11
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 This recognises the importance of the River Nant, River Nell / Feochan and Allt Nathais which host spawning and nursery habitat for Atlantic salmon and brown trout. Argyll DSFB request that appropriate baseline, real time and post works monitoring is put in place to ensure any issues arising from the proposed development are identified and rectified in a timely manner as to prevent any deterioration of fish habitats and demonstrate that the development does not impact on the salmon populations or the fisheries in the Argyll DSFB area. Argyll DSFB would welcome an opportunity to constructively engage with any such process. Officer Comment: An appropriate condition to safeguard these matters is proposed. The Joint Radio Company Limited ( Arqiva) 16.09.25 & 16.09.26 16.09.25: No Objection to windfarm application. Suggested condition relating to domestic TV and Radio interference survey being undertaken and any required mitigation being carried out in respect of individual properties. A condition to this effect is proposed. 17.08.26 – Objection unless exact route of grid connection provided as grid connection corridor has potential intersection with two links protected by JRC (Refs 0976814/4 & 0929167/2) Officer Comment : The grid connection does not form part of the current planning application, only the EIA submissions and therefore objections to the grid connection on Non-EIA related grounds are not material to the determination of the windfarm application. The grid provider will require to address these matters when detailed proposals for this grid connection are brought forward. Transport Scotland : 10.09.25 & 30.07.26 No Objection subject to conditions 1. Prior to the commencement of the development, the proposed upgraded access on the A85 trunk road, as generally illustrated by RSK nadara Figure 10.4 Access Junction Design Rev 03 dated 17/06/2025, shall be constructed to a layout and type (and method) of construction to be approved by the Planning Authority, after consultation with Transport Scotland Reason : To ensure that the standard of access layout complies with the current standards and that the safety of the traffic on the trunk road is not diminished. 2. Prior to the commencement of the development, visibility splays, as generally illustrated by RSK Figure 2.10a: Indicative Site Access - A85 to Fearnoch Forest Track Rev 03 dated 14/08/2025, shall be provided and maintained to the satisfaction of the Planning Authority, after consultation with Transport Scotland. Reason: To ensure that the standard of access layout complies with the current standards and that the safety of the traffic on the trunk road is not diminished. 3. Prior to commencement of deliveries to site, the proposed route for any abnormal loads on the trunk road network must be submitted to and approved by the Planning Authority, in consultation with Transport Scotland.
Page 12
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 Reason: To ensure that the transportation of abnormal loads will not have any detrimental effect on the trunk road network. 4. Prior to the movement of any abnormal load, any accommodation measures required, including the removal of street furniture, junction widening and traffic management must be approved and implemented to the satisfaction of the Planning Authority, in consultation with Transport Scotland. Reason: To ensure that the transportation of abnormal loads will not have any detrimental effect on the trunk road network. 5. Prior to the movement of any components and/or construction materials, any additional signing or temporary traffic control measures deemed necessary due to the size or length of any loads being transported must be undertaken by a recognised QA traffic management consultant, to be approved by Transport Scotland. Reason: To ensure that the transportation of abnormal loads will not have any detrimental effect on the trunk road network. 6. Prior to commencement of the grid connection element of the development, a Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Authority, after consultation with Transport Scotland. In particular, the CTMP shall identify measures to control the use of any direct access onto the trunk road. Thereafter, all construction traffic associated with the development shall conform to the requirements of the agreed Plan. Reason: To mitigate the adverse impact of construction traffic on the safe and efficient operation of the trunk road network Officer Comment : Appropriate conditions are proposed. Avich and Kilcrennan Community Council : 29.07.26 Email indicating its Terms of Office expire on 28.08.26 which is before the FEI response deadline of 05.09.26. They state this is likely to be the same for all CC’s in Argyll and Bute. Officer Comment. The deadline referenced by the Community Council of 05.09.26 relates only to the FEI information for the grid connection and not the consultations undertaken with Community Councils between 02.09.25 and 09.09.25 relating to the planning application and EIAR for the windfarm. This is the matter before the Planning Authority for determination. Community Councils have therefore been aware of the windfarm application since early September 2025 when notifications were undertaken. No responses have been received. Officers are therefore content that sufficient time and opportunity has been provided for comments to be provided on the planning application and any late FEI responses following the production of this report will be presented to Members in accordance with normal practice. b) Internal ABC Consultees ABC Area Roads: 19.08.26 No Objection subject to conditions
Page 13
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 • New accesses and existing accesses in need of amending or modification to be upgraded in accordance with Operational Services Drg No SD08/001b. • Visibility splays measuring 42m x 2.4m to be cleared and maintained. • Additional road signs and markings will be required, as per TSRGD. Exact specifications and locations to be agreed with this department. • A statement in respect to the materials and plant to be transported over the C32 to serve the works is required. The statement should also state where materials will be imported from along with estimated quantities, so the effect on local quarry roads can be assessed. • A pre start site meeting is required, to discuss planned changes to the C32. • Major works notice will be required for the planned C32 upgrades. • TTRO applications will be required for works within the C32 corridor. • Detailed engineering, technical drawing required in relation to C32 upgrades. Details to be approved by this department. General illustrations as per Fig 2.10b. 2.10c and 2.10d. • A system of traffic management to be in place to accommodate the traversing of abnormal loads over the C32. Details to be agreed with this department. • A pre start road inspection to be carried out. Any extraordinary damage to the C32 road corridor caused by the associated proposal works to be made good at no expense to Argyll and Bute Council. • A pre start site meeting is required, to discuss planned changes to the C32. Officer Comment: Thise matters can be addressed through suspensive conditions requiring a Construction Traffic Management Plan To be approved by the Area Roads Engineer . Specific details referenced by the Area Roads Manager can be referenced in the condition(s). ABC Environmental Health: 04.09.25 This unit advises that Environmental Health are not able to review the application, and we recommend that Planning consider employing a noise consultant to assess the effects that this application may have on the local amenity of the area. Officer Comment: Independent Noise Expert appointed. (see below) ABC Noise Consultant. November 2025 & 26.08.26 No Objection There are no reasons to object to the scheme on noise grounds, but a suitably worded condition to limit the noise levels, tonality and amplitude modulation should be applied as per the example in Annex B. Officer Comment: Additional submissions were made by the applicant comprising an amended condition proposal following the updating of the relevant
Page 14
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 guidance on how to evaluate such matters. This revised condition has been reviewed by the Councils Noise advisor and is considered acceptable. An appropriate Condition is proposed. ABC Consultant Landscape Architect : 09.12.25 & 11.05.26: No Objection The Councils Landscape Architect has raised no objections to the proposals on Landscape impacts in respect of the main application or the additional FEI information provided. The initial evaluation raised a number of questions about methodology and findings within the LVIA. The applicants provided clarification by additional submissions dated 18.12.25. The evaluation of these additional submissions was undertaken by response dated 11.05.26. Relevant Extracts from the Landscape Advisors evaluation of the proposals evaluation Report are set out below: The proposal is predicted to have localised significant direct effects over a limited area approximately 1km from the proposed turbines on the host LCT 7 Craggy Upland. When compared with a theoretical zero future baseline (in which the existing Beinn Ghlas wind farm has been decommissioned to form a blank canvas) direct significant effects would extend to approximately 4km. No significant effects are predicted on any of the landscape designations. However, in the TFB scenario isolated significant effects were identified within the North Argyll LLA within approx. 10km of the proposal which were not predicted to result in a significant effect on the integrity of the designation. The EIAR found that significant visual effects would be experienced at two of the 19 representative viewpoints, at VP2 Clach Bhadan and VP7 Ardchattan Priory. When compared to TFB scenario, this number would increase to six. Significant visual effects are predicted in the EIAR for users of a very limited part of the nearest recreational route (C171). When assessed against TFB scenario, two further core paths were found to be subject to significant effects (Core Path C517 and C158). The assessment of roads found that receptors would experience significant effects from a section of the minor road between A828 and B845 near to Ardchattan Priory. In the TFB scenario significant effects would be experienced from a section of the B845 to the north of Loch Etive. Significant effects on residential properties are predicted for the cluster around Balindore (3.8 km away from the proposal). When compared to a zero-baseline scenario, significant effects would extend to also include some properties within Taynuilt (approx. 4.8 km away) but are not predicted to be of such a scale as to become dominant or overbearing. The LVIA concludes that any significant effects that would arise as a result of the proposal are limited and would be highly localised in their nature, restricted to within 8.3 km of the Site. The proposal is not predicted to significantly affect the Lynn of Lorn or the Ben Nevis and Glen Coe NSAs. I have not undertaken a detailed review to assess whether the overall integrity of the NSA might be compromised. I would expect such an assessment to be undertaken by NatureScot.
Page 15
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 The EIAR does not predict significant effects on the North Argyll or any other LLAs under the current baseline scenario. For the TFB scenario the EIAR predicts isolated significant effects within the North Argyll LLA within approx. 10km of the proposal although these are not predicted to result in a significant effect on the integrity of the designation. Policy 11e requires project design and mitigation to demonstrate how impacts on communities and significant landscape and visual impacts are addressed. In terms of significant landscape and visual impacts, 11e ii states that such impacts are to be expected for some forms of renewable energy and where impacts are localised and/or appropriate design mitigation has been applied, they will generally be considered acceptable. NPF4 provides no guidance on the definition of what constitutes ‘localised’ effects. The EIAR Chapter 2 Proposed Development and Design Evolution and the Design and Access Statement summarise the evolution of the design and mitigation embedded into the design to reduce landscape and visual effects. The initial turbine layout comprising 20 turbines with 180m blade tip height has been reduced to the 7 turbines of up to149.9m to blade tip assessed in the EIAR. In addition to a reduction in the numbers of turbines, the turbines were consolidated within the site, resulting in the layout being more compact and less visible within the landscape. I consider the residual significant effects as fairly ‘localised’ and the above design/mitigation measures appropriate. The Applicant’s landscape consultant responded to the initial Jacobs review in an email to A&BC dated 18 December 2025. The report dated 11.05.26 provides Jacobs’ comments on the Applicant’s clarifications to the Planning Authority. The following updated comments from the Councils Landscape Architect were provided at Section 3.0 of this report as follows; • Agree that the location of Compound 1 in LCT7a will not change the findings of the LVIA and that the overall effect on this LCT would remain not significant. • Content with the amended Figure (5.47) which will not alter the findings of the LVIA. • Clarification that a formal RVAA has not been undertaken due to there being no properties within 2km of the turbines, and thus wirelines from properties have not been provided, is helpful. Jacobs have not been able to locate any reference in the EIAR to discussions with A&BC regarding the provision of a RVAA but agree that the LI RVAA guidance does suggest that this distance would not require a RVAA. • Content with this explanation and that there will be no effects on SLQs or the overall integrity of the Lynn of Lorn NSA. • Content with this explanation of a typographical error. Full information can be found at section 3.0 of this report. The Councils Landscape advisor is content with the clarifications provided by the applicant’s submissions and raises no Objection to the proposals.
Page 16
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 In respect of FEI information. As the grid connection cable is to be wholly underground additional landscape advice on this matter was not taken as Officers are content that this is not a matter that requires additional detailed LVIA consideration. ABC Flood Risk Assessor 22.09.25 & 27.08.26 – no objection subject to conditions. In respect of FEI information, the Councils consultants have raised no objection It is recommended that the following conditions are attached to any consent granted for this application: 1. New or upgraded watercourse crossings along the access tracks should be designed so as to convey at least the same capacity as existing and ideally the 1 in 200 year plus climate change (56% allowance) flood event. 2. Any modifications to watercourse crossings along the route of the proposed grid connection cable should not reduce the existing capacity of the structures. 3. Surface water drainage should be designed in accordance with CIRIA C753 and ensure that post development surface water runoff does not exceed the pre- development surface water runoff. The surface water drainage should be in operation prior to the start of construction. Officer Comment: Appropriate conditions are proposed West of Scotland Archaeologist Service 31.07.26 No Objection I have studied the proposed application which is a repowering of an earlier wind farm development to extend the use of the site. Although the proposed new turbines are taller than the previous one there are fewer of them and they will be less than 150m tall. The development has been designed to avoid disturbing the limited number of known heritage assets within the site and little likelihood of disturbing currently unknown archaeological remains. I am satisfied these effects and the setting of designated and non-designated monuments in the wider landscape have been considered and that no significant impacts will result from the proposals. It should be noted that policy 21 of Argyll and Bute’s Local Development Plan makes provision for the discovery of archaeological remains after development has commenced. The applicant or their agent should therefore prepare a protocol for archaeological discoveries made during development. The PAD is standard "safety net" deployed in offshore windfarm construction. Officer Comment: Appropriate Conditions are proposed. Local Biodiversity Officer. 07.10.25, 19.01.26, 31.03.26 & 19.08.26 No Objection. The original holding objection of 07.10.25 was withdrawn as additional information was provided by the applicant on potential impacts on Ancient Woodland and related biodiversity matters. (Ornithology and protected species matters have primarily been addressed by NatureScot in their consultation response).
Page 17
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 31.03.26 Response There are several trees and woodland habitat along the access track which are of biodiversity value. It is stated that these will aim to be avoided. There also several trees with bat PRF’s either present or with the potential to become a PRF along the access track. Pre-works surveys will determine presence / absence of bats, the results of which will feed into further mitigation measures necessary and the need for any potential licences from NatureScot. I am satisfied that no ancient woodland or rainforest habitat will be impacted upon by the proposed development. I ask that the final design of the access track is agreed with Argyll & Bute Council prior to construction to ensure every effort has been made to avoid impact to notable trees and habitat as outlines in the survey. I welcome the creation of 3 nature networks in addition to the compensation planting. I therefore withdraw my holding objection to this application. 19.08.26 – FEI Grid Connection Response I note that no ecological surveys have been undertaken to inform the appraisal. As ancient woodland is present on site, as well as Class 2 peat and the potential for a range of protected species to be present, I ask that a full set of ecological surveys are undertaken. Ancient woodland and peatland are irreplaceable habitats and any adverse impacts to their integrity must be avoided. If any protected species are present, licenses may be required and again, adverse impact to their habitat should be avoided. There is the potential for bats, otter, badgers, red squirrel, pine marten, water vole, fish, reptiles, amphibians, and invertebrates. I note that the Argyll District Salmon Fisheries Board have responded ‘Argyll DSFB request that appropriate baseline, real time and post works monitoring is put in place to ensure any issues arising from the proposed development are identified and rectified in a timely manner as to prevent any deterioration of fish habitats and demonstrate that the development does not impact on the salmon populations or the fisheries in the Argyll DSFB area. Argyll DSFB would welcome an opportunity to constructively engage with any such process.’ It would be advisable to engage in discussions with Argyll DSFB to ensure minimal impact to fish and their habitat. I am also unclear about the proposed enhancement measures. Can there please be a clarification on proposed enhancement measures for this proposed grid connection route? Officer Comment: The Biodiversity Officer has withdrawn their previous objection to the proposals which form this planning application. However, the FEI information indicating that the underground grid connection has raised questions over the exact detail of these proposals. These grid connection proposals do not form part of the current planning application , only the EIA. It is considered that sufficient detail on this matter has been provided at this stage to allow matters to be considered in terms of potential significance of cumulative environmental Impacts of the overall project.
Page 18
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 Please note: the above are summaries and the full consultee responses can be viewed on Argyll & Bute Council website. (D) HISTORY: Planning history which is relevant to the current application is set out below; • 97/00719/DET The main/original application for development of a wind farm consisting of 14 turbines and associated infrastructure at Beinn Ghlas was Approved August 1998 with 37 planning conditions attached to the Consent and a Section 75 which contained 13 Clauses. • 21/00870/PP A Section 42 application to vary condition 2 relative to planning permission (ref: 97/00719/DET) to allow Beinn Ghlas Wind Farm to operate for an additional 10 years to 21 August 2033 was granted consent in June 2022. The original S75 agreement was amended to remove a number of previously imposed clauses either because they were no longer relevant or due to conditions being used as per best practice advice. • 22/01586/SCOPE A Section 36 application was progressed in relation to Beinn Ghlas Repowering which resulted in a request for a scoping opinion being submitted to Scottish Ministers in July 2022 (scoping opinion received in May 2023). Following further site design work and consideration of ornithology mitigation, a decision was made to reduce the scale of the proposed Beinn Ghlas Wind Farm Repowering project from the 12 turbines presented at public exhibitions held in January 2023 to 7 wind turbines at up to 149.9 m to tip. This change brought the size of the Proposed Development below 50 MW requiring any subsequent planning application to be submitted under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 2017. It is as a result in the reduction in the scale of this scheme that the current application is before the Planning Authority for determination. Officer Comment on S75 Matters: Members are requested to note that unlike 21/00870/PP this is not a variation of the original Planning Permission for the windfarm and therefore the current proposal, if approved and implemented, creates a new planning chapter for the use of the site. Officers are of the view that the use of a S75 agreement is no longer in accordance with good practice for the determination of windfarms and therefore no S75 is proposed in this instance. Officers are content that all relevant matters can be addressed by means of Planning Conditions and by reference to the published good practice advice from the Scottish Ministers on the use of Planning Conditions for Windfarm Proposals. This advice was not available when the original windfarm proposal was approved. (E) PUBLICITY: • Regulation 20 Advert Major Application: Expired 02.10.25 • Environmental Assessment Regulations Advert: Expired 11.10.25
Page 19
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 • (FEI) Environmental Assessment Advert: Expired 05.09.26 (F) REPRESENTATIONS: Representations are published in full on the planning application file and are available to view via the Public Access section of the Council’s website. A list of those who have made representations is contained at Appendix B attached to this report. At time of writing there has been 3 objections, and 26 submissions in support of the proposals. (Officer Note: The single representation identified on the system is in fact a no objection response from Arqiva already referenced in external consultee responses at Section C of this report.) (i) Summary of matters raised: Objections • The proposal will have an unacceptable visual and environmental impact • The proposals will adversely impact on Eagles • Existing turbine bases should be used not new ones to reduce impacts on the site. Officer Comment : These matters are addressed in the main report. (ii) Summary of Issued Matters Raised : Support • The clean energy this will supply is much needed and it is essential that we produce power from renewable energy to support Scotland’s Green Energy Plan. This proposal ticks all the boxes regarding sustainability and green energy. • The site has shown it is well suited to hosting this type of use • Very little visual impact will occur • Site is remote enough not to cause noise nuisance • The Windfarm on this site is an asset to the community it is rarely seen and not heard • The windfarm is visible from my house and a wonderful place to visit • Having lived close by to the windfarm we have had no problems over the past years. Happy to support the proposals. • Proposals cover a very similar envelope to the existing windfarm • Proposals have been reduced by a significant amount to respect protected eagles of very high conservation value. The protection of wildlife has been a key feature of the EIA and project design. • As a neighbouring landowner I support the project. Although the turbines will be larger, they will contribute to the security of our country’s electrical power in uncertain times. • The revised number of turbines makes the proposals more acceptable. Visual impact will increase but larger turbines will be more efficient. • Older sites such as this should be upgraded as the initial environmental impact of establishing the wind farm has already taken place.
Page 20
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 (iii) Matters raised not considered material to determination of Planning Application • The windfarm community benefits package has enabled the Taynuilt Community Council to help finance several significant local projects. If approved, the repowering of Beinn Ghlas will continue to benefit the local environment and the Community Councils investment fund for many years The proposals will boost the community to the tune of £6m. Officer Comment: Members are advised that monetary payments to communities are not a material planning consideration in the determination of this application. (G) SUPPORTING INFORMATION Has the application been the subject of: (i) Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIAR): Yes The EIA Report is presented in 4 volumes • Volume 1: Non-Technical Summary; • Volume 2: Environmental Impact Assessment Report; Chapter 1 – Introduction (this chapter) introduces the Proposed Development and explains the underlying objectives of the proposals, describes the statutory basis for the EIA, outlines the structure adopted in this EIA Report and identifies the team of competent experts responsible for undertaking and reporting the EIA. Chapter 2 – Proposed Development and Design Evolution provides an overview of the Proposed Development, giving a brief description of the permanent and temporary components. This chapter also details construction activities, the indicative construction programme and maintenance, as well as decommissioning activities. Chapter 3 – Environmental Impact Assessment Process summarises the Scoping process undertaken to establish the scope of the EIA, the adopted approach to the EIA and format of the individual technical assessments, and modifications made to the EIA scope that have arisen during the design development and assessment of the Proposed Development. Chapter 4 – Statutory & Policy Framework provides a summary of the legislative and policy framework relevant to the development including an overview on the climate emergency. Chapter 05 to 13 – Technical Assessments report the findings of the detailed environmental assessments and the residual effects on the environment predicted to occur as a result of implementation of the Proposed Development. Chapter 14 – Schedule of Environmental Commitments summarises the additional and embedded environment mitigation suggested in the technical chapters.
Page 21
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 References of the documents used or considered during the EIA are provided at the end of each section, where relevant. • Volume 3: Application Drawings, Figures and Visualisations: Volume 3 comprises a series of plans, figures and photographs, which are referenced in Volume 2, to illustrate the relationship between the existing environment and the Proposed Development. o Volume 3a: Figures o Volume 3b: Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Photomontages o Volume 3c: Cultural Heritage Photomontages • Volume 4: Technical Appendices Comprises technical appendices, referred to in Volume 2, which contain detailed reports of the individual environmental assessments and other relevant supporting documentation. The following additional documents are also included as part of the original EIA Report (EIAR): o Planning Statement; o Design and Access Statement; and o Pre-Application Consultation (PAC) report. Further Environmental Information (FEI) Dated 03.08.26 Additional Information was submitted by the applicant in response to the Raeshaw Court decision. In terms of relevance to this project Officers came to the view that the grid connection was part of the same project as the windfarm under the EIAR Regulations, and therefore information was provided to clarify potential environmental impacts associated with this. The FEI evaluates the future grid proposals against similar criteria to those contained within the main EIAR and considers that no separate of cumulative significant Environmental Impact will occur. Officer Clarification; as the future grid connection cable is underground further detailed LVIA information was not requested by Officers, taking a proportionate approach to matters that cannot as yet be specified in detail, and do not form part of the current planning application. Additional Submissions made by Applicant in support of proposals 23.12.25 – Response and clarifying information to initial Jacobs Landscape Report 27.01.26 – Submissions relating to Ancient woodland and Ecological Monitoring 25.03.26 – Additional Information on Ancient woodland and access track
Page 22
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 31.03.26 – Additional Peat Information 30.07.26 – Additional Noise Submissions following updated National Guidance on Windfarm Noise Evaluation. 26.08.26 – Submission of proposed revised noise condition to accord with new national guidance 02.08.26 – Clarification of Forestry Felling data in EIAR in response to Scottish Forestry consultation comments. 03.09.26 - Project Overview submission (ii) An Appropriate Assessment under the Conservation (Natural Habitats) Regulations 1994:No – NatureScot have advised there is not any requirement for an Appropriate Assessment in their consultation response dated 12.12.25. (iii) A Design or Design/Access statement: Yes. (iv) Sustainability Checklists (with reference to the requirements of LDP2 Policy 04) – Not required Note: As the planning application information requirements for wind farm development are detailed and most require associated Environmental Impact Assessment, it is not intended that the sustainability/sustainable buildings checklist or LVIA will apply to wind farm development proposals unless an EIA is not required. (v) A report on the impact of the proposed development e.g. Retail impact, transport impact, noise impact, flood risk, drainage impact etc.: Not required - All relevant reports are encompassed within the EIAR and FEI information and previously listed in this report. (H) PLANNING OBLIGATIONS Is a Section 75 agreement required: No (I) Has a Direction been issued by Scottish Ministers in terms of Regulation 30, 31 or 32: No (J) Section 25 of the Act; Development Plan and any other material considerations over and above those listed above which have been taken into account in the assessment of the application (i) List of all Development Plan Policy considerations taken into account in assessment of the application. National Planning Framework 4 (Adopted 13th February 2023) Part 2 – National Planning Policy
Page 23
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 NPF4 Policy 1 – Tackling the Climate and Nature Crises NPF4 Policy 3 – Biodiversity NPF4 Policy 4 – Natural Places NPF4 Policy 5 – Soils NPF4 Policy 6 – Forestry, Woodland and Trees NPF4 Policy 7 – Historic Assets and Places NPF4 Policy 11 – Energy NPF4 Policy 22 – Flood Risk and Water Management NPF4 Policy 23 – Health and Safety NPF4 Policy 29 – Rural Development NPF4 Policy 33 – Minerals Annex B – National Statements of Need 3. Strategic Renewable Electricity Generation and Transmission Infrastructure Argyll and Bute Local Development Plan 2 (Adopted 2024) Policy 02 – Outwith Settlement Areas Policy 04 – Sustainable Development Policy 14 – Bad Neighbour Development Policy 15 – Supporting the Protection, Conservation and Enhancement of Our Historic Built Environment Policy 19 – Scheduled Monuments Policy 21 – Sites of Archaeological Importance Policy 30 – The Sustainable Growth of Renewables Policy 31 – Minerals Policy 32 – Active Travel Policy 35– Design of New and Existing, Public Roads and Private Access Regimes Policy 37 – Development Utilising an Existing Private Access or Existing Private Road Policy 38 – Construction Standards for Public Roads Policy 39 – Construction Standards for Private Accesses Policy 41 – Off Site Highway Improvements Policy 43 – Safeguarding of Aerodromes Policy 48 – Developer Contributions Policy 55 – Flooding Policy 56 – Land Erosion Policy 57 – Risk Appraisals Policy 58 – Private Water Supplies and Water Conservation Policy 59 – Water Quality and the Environment Policy 60 – Private Sewage Treatment Plants and Wastewater Drainage Systems Policy 61 – Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS) Policy 62 – Drainage Impact Assessments Policy 63 – Waste Related Development and Waste Management Policy 70 – Development Impact on National Scenic Areas (NSA’s) Policy 73 – Development Impact on Habitats, Species and Biodiversity Policy 77 – Forestry, Woodland and Trees Policy 78 – Woodland Removal Policy 79 – Protection of Soil and Peat Resources
Page 24
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 (ii) List of all other material planning considerations taken into account in the assessment of the application, having due regard to Annex A of Circular 3/2013. • Draft Energy Strategy and Just Transition Plan (January 2023) • Onshore Wind Policy Statement (OWPS) (December 2022) • Historic Environment Policy for Scotland (HEPS, 2019) Managing Change • Climate Change (Emissions Reduction Targets) (Scotland) Act 2019 • Scottish Government Good Practice Principles for Shared Ownership and Community Benefit of Onshore Renewable Energy Developments (May 2019) • Argyll & Bute Landscape Wind Energy Capacity Study (2017) (LWECS) • Siting and Designing Wind Farms in the Landscape, SNH (August 2017) • Onshore Wind Turbines: Planning Advice, Scottish Government (May 2014) • Guidance for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment, 3rd Edition, Landscape Institute, and Institute of Environmental Management & Assessment, (2013) • PAN 1/2011: ‘Planning and Noise’ (March 2011) • The Scottish Government’s Policy on ‘Control of Woodland Removal’ (Forestry Commission Scotland 2009) • PAN 60 – Planning for Natural Heritage (Jan 2008) • Views of statutory and other consultees • Planning history of the site • Legitimate public concern or support expressed on relevant planning matters (K) Is the proposal a Schedule 2 Development not requiring an Environmental Impact Assessment: No (L) Has the application been the subject of statutory pre-application consultation (PAC): Yes (M) Does the Council have an interest in the site: No (N) Requirement for a pre-determination hearing: No (O) Summary assessment and summary of determining issues and material considerations All consultees are satisfied that planning permission can be granted for the proposal subject to appropriate planning conditions. The proposal is consistent with the primary renewable energy policies of NPF4 and LDP2 and other relevant policies providing the recommended conditions are attached. This proposal is EIA development, and the determination of this application is also subject to the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact
Page 25
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 2017. There is a requirement to examine the environmental information submitted and reach a reasoned conclusion on the significant environmental effects of the proposal including those matters set out in FEI relating to the proposed grid connection. The applicant has engaged with important stakeholders such as NatureScot and has reduced the scale of the development to respect and ensure no adverse impact upon protected species or protected landscapes. This is noted and welcomed by officers. The recommendation on this application has been guided by the conclusions of the EIAR, and the proposal has been assessed against the polices of the adopted Development Plan with particular regard to the policies of NPF4 and to the policies of LDP2 as well as other material considerations. In light of the above, it is considered that the proposal is consistent with planning policy, will not cause unacceptable and significant environmental impacts, and that conditional planning permission should be granted. (P) Is the proposal consistent with the Development Plan: Yes (Q) Reasons why Planning Permission or Planning Permission in Principle Should be Granted: As per the detailed assessment in this report, and taking into account all consultee responses, third party representations, the submitted EIAR, FEI and relevant planning policy it is considered that this proposal is acceptable and consistent with the Development Plan. It is therefore recommended that permission is granted subject to the conditions recommended in this report. (R) Reasoned justification for a departure to the provisions of the Development Plan: N/A - the proposal does not constitute a departure from the Development Plan. (S) Need for notification to Scottish Ministers or Historic Environment Scotland: No Author of Report: David Moore Date: 02.09.26 Reviewing Officer: Peter Bain Date: 03.09.2026 Fergus Murray Head of Development & Economic Growth
Page 26
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 CONDITIONS AND REASONS RELATIVE TO APPLICATION REF. NO. 25/01240/PP 1. PP - Approved Details & Standard Notes – EIA Development The development shall be implemented in accordance with the details specified on the application form dated 21.07.25 and the Environmental Impact Assessment Report dated 25.07.25, supporting information and the approved drawings listed in the table below unless the prior written approval of the planning authority is obtained for an amendment to the approved details under Section 64 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997. The developer and subsequent operators shall at all times construct and operate the development hereby permitted in accordance with the provisions of the Environmental Impact Assessment Report (and FEI submissions), accompanying the application with mitigation measures adhered to in full, and shall omit no part of the operations provided for by the permission except with the prior written approval of the Planning Authority. Plan Title. Plan Ref. No. Version Date Received Location Plan Fig 1.1 Rev 05 02.09.25 Site Aerial Context Fig 1.2 Rev 05 02.09.25 Site Layout (Full) Fig 2.5a Rev 05 02.09.25 Site Layout (zoomed) Fig 2.5b Rev 14 10.08.26 Inset 1: Temporary Compound 1 Fig 2.5c - 02.09.25 Inset 2: Temporary Compound 2 Fig 2.5d - 02.09.25 Existing Substation & Indicative Induction Reactor Layout Fig 2.13 Rev 02 02.09.25 Existing Substation & Indicative Induction Reactor Elevation view Fig 2.14 Rev 02 02.09.25 Indicative Wind Turbine Fig 2.6 Rev 03 02.09.25 Indicative Wind Turbine Foundation Fig 2.7 Rev 02 02.09.25 Indicative Crane Hardstanding Fig 2.8 Rev 02 02.09.25 Indicative Permanent Anemometer Mast Details Fig 2.9 Rev 02 02.09.25 Indicative Access Track Details Fig 2.11 Rev 03 02.09.25 Access Junction Design Fig 10.4 Rev 03 02.09.25 Indicative Site Access (A85 to Fearnoch) Fig 2.10a Rev 03 02.09.25 Indicative Site Access (Fearnoch Forest Track) Fig 2.10b Rev 04 02.09.25 Indicative Site Access (Fearnoch Forest Track to C32 Glen Lonan Road) Fig 2.10c Rev 04 02.09.25 Indicative Temporary Construction Compound Fig 2.10d Rev 02 02.09.25
Page 27
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 Access Options -Glen Lonan Road Indicative Cable Trench Details Fig 2.12 Rev 02 02.09.25 Reason: For the purpose of clarity, to ensure that the development is constructed and operated in the manner advanced in the Environmental Impact Assessment Report, upon which the environmental effects of the development have been assessed and determined to be acceptable. 2. Notification of Date of First Commissioning and Final Commissioning. (1) Written confirmation of the Date of First Commissioning shall be provided to the Planning Authority no later than one calendar month after that date. (2) Written confirmation of the Date of Final Commissioning shall be provided to the Planning Authority no later than one calendar month after that date. Reason: To allow the Planning Authority to calculate the date of expiry of the consent. 3. Commencement of Development (1) The Development shall be commenced no later than five years from the date of this consent, (2) Written confirmation of the intended date of Commencement of Development shall be provided to the Planning Authority as soon as is practicable after deciding on such a date and in any event no later than one calendar month prior to the Commencement of Development. Reason: To ensure that the consent is implemented within a reasonable period and to allow the Planning Authority to monitor compliance with obligations attached to this consent and deemed planning permission as appropriate. 4. Period of Permission The planning permission hereby granted shall endure for a period of 35 years from the date of final commissioning. Written confirmation of the date of final commissioning shall be provided to the planning authority no later than one calendar month after that date. Reason: In order to define the terms of this permission, to minimise the level of visual intrusion, and to ensure the satisfactory reinstatement of the site. 5. Decommissioning The development shall cease to generate electricity by no later than the date falling 35 years from the date of final commissioning. The decommissioning and restoration of the site shall be completed within three years from the date on which the development ceases to generate electricity unless otherwise agreed in writing with the planning authority. Reason: In order to define the terms of this permission, to minimise the level of visual intrusion, and to ensure the satisfactory reinstatement of the site.
Page 28
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 6. Decommissioning, Restoration and Aftercare Strategy No development shall commence unless a decommissioning, restoration and aftercare strategy has been submitted to and approved in writing by the planning authority in consultation with SEPA and NatureScot. The scheme shall detail measures for the decommissioning of the development, restoration and aftercare of the site and will include, without limitation, proposals for the removal of the above ground elements of the development, the treatment of ground surfaces, opportunities for habitat and biodiversity enhancement, the management and timing of the works, and environmental management provision. Reason: To ensure the decommissioning and removal of the Development in an appropriate and environmentally acceptable manner and the restoration and aftercare of the site, in the interests of safety, amenity and environmental protection. 7. Redundant Turbines If any wind turbine(s) fails to produce an electricity supply to the grid for a continuous period of 12 months then, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the planning authority, the wind turbine and any associated above ground infrastructure solely required for that turbine(s), together with turbine foundations to a depth of one metre below ground level shall be dismantled and removed from the site and the area around the turbine restored in accordance with a scheme to be submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority in consultation with SEPA and NatureScot. The scheme shall be submitted to the planning authority within three months of the expiry of the 12-month period and shall include a timetable for its implementation. Reason :To ensure that any redundant wind turbine is removed from the site, in the interests of safety, to minimise the level of visual intrusion and to ensure the satisfactory reinstatement of the site. 8. Financial Guarantee (a) At least three months prior to the commencement of development, the developer shall provide to the planning authority written details of the bond or other financial guarantee to cover the cost of all decommissioning, restoration and aftercare of the site as required by condition 6, for the written approval of the planning authority. These written details shall include evidence from a competent independent professional who has relevant experience in such matters that the guarantee is sufficient to meet the requirements of condition 6. (b) No work shall commence on site until the developer has delivered the approved bond or other financial guarantee to the planning authority and the planning authority has provided written confirmation that the bond or other financial guarantee is satisfactory. (c) The developer shall ensure that the approved bond or other financial guarantee is maintained throughout the duration of this permission and until the date of completion of all decommissioning, restoration and aftercare obligations as required by condition 6 of this permission.
Page 29
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 (d) The adequacy of the approved bond or other financial guarantee will be subject to review at five yearly intervals, or such other intervals as agreed by the planning authority, from commencement of development, to be paid for by the developer and conducted by a competent independent professional who has relevant experience in such matters. The findings of such reviews will be provided to the developer and the planning authority within 14 days of the review taking place. Any revisions to the bond or other financial guarantee recommended by the review and agreed in writing by the planning authority shall be made by the developer within 28 days of receiving said written agreement from the planning authority and documentary evidence shall be provided to the planning authority by the developer to that effect. Reason: To ensure there are sufficient funds available for the full costs of decommissioning, restoration and aftercare. 9. Peat Management Plan (1) There shall be no Commencement of Development until a detailed Peat and Carbon Rich Soils Management Plan (PMP) has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority in consultation with SEPA. (2) The PMP shall: (a) take account of site and ground investigations to minimise the loss of peat and other carbon rich soil and minimise carbon loss; (b) include actions, including micrositing, to minimise excavated peat and other carbon rich soils volumes (c) encourage use of excavated peat and other carbon rich soils in an appropriate manner; and (d) follow good practice for handling, storing and reinstating peat and other carbon rich soils. (3) The Peat and Carbon Rich Soils Management Plan shall thereafter be implemented as approved upon the Commencement of Development. having specific regard to the SEPA requirements set out below: a) All near-natural condition peatland habitat within 50m of infrastructure shall be physically demarked prior to construction commencing to ensure construction vehicles do not disturb the habitat during construction. The schedule of mitigation should outline how this habitat will be safeguarded. b) Post-construction monitoring of impacts on near natural habitat in the vicinity of TCC2, and which will require a mechanism to take specific action should impacts occur: c) A schedule of monitoring should ensure the near-natural peatland habitat is safeguarded from direct and indirect impacts and must include: • Proposals for fixed point photography and repeat National Vegetation Classification and hydrological condition surveys. • Frequency of monitoring, supported by justification. • Criteria that will trigger additional action should monitoring reveal that the near-natural peatland habitat is no longer sequestering or is degrading to a modified habitat type.
Page 30
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 d) Bottomless arch culverts or span bridges should be used for all new or upgraded watercourse crossings, and all watercourse crossings must be designed to convey the 1:200 plus Climate Change. e) Any actions taken shall adhere to NatureScot’s peatland restoration guidance. Reason: To ensure that peat is protected, extracted, stored, reinstated or restored in a manner which minimises waste and maximises peat restoration on site. 10. Floating Tracks Prior to commencement of development a plan showing details of the extent and construction methodology of any required floating tracks shall be submitted for the further written approval of the Planning Authority in consultation with SEPA. Thereafter construction of the floating tracks shall be undertaken in full accordance with the approved details. Reason: To minimise the impact on peat 11. Design and operation of wind turbines (1) No turbines shall be erected until details and specification of the proposed wind turbines, (including the size, make and model, power rating and sound power levels, nameplate generating capacity, type, external finish and colour) any anemometry masts and all turbine associated apparatus have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority. (2) For the avoidance of doubt the scale of the turbines shall not exceed the parameters assessed in the EIA Report and set out in the description of the Development approved. (3) The submission shall demonstrate that all wind turbine blades shall rotate in the same direction. (4) Thereafter the wind turbines, any anemometry masts and all associated apparatus shall be constructed and operated in accordance with the details approved under part (1) and shall be maintained in the free from external rust, staining or discolouration, until such time as the Development is decommissioned unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Planning Authority. Reason: To ensure that the environmental impacts of the turbines forming part of the Development conform to the impacts assessed in the EIA Report and in the interests of the visual amenity of the area. 12. Design of Sub-station and ancillary development (1) There shall be no Commencement of Development until final details of any proposed changes to the location, layout, external appearance, dimensions, and surface materials of any substation and control room buildings on the site, any above ground electrical equipment, associated compounds, construction compound, boundary fencing, external lighting and parking areas have been submitted to, and approved in writing by, the Planning Authority. For the avoidance of doubt the details of the sub-station shall not exceed the parameters assessed in the EIA Report and application submissions.
Page 31
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 (2) Thereafter, the substation and control room buildings, any above ground electrical equipment, associated compounds, fencing, external lighting and parking areas shall be constructed in accordance with the details approved under part (1). Reason: To ensure that the environmental impacts of the sub-station and ancillary development forming part of the Development conform to the impacts assessed in the EIA Report and in the interests of the visual amenity of the area. 13. Implementation of mitigation measures (1) No development (including the Site Enabling Works) shall commence until a Schedule of Mitigation has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority. This Schedule shall encompass a list of all mitigation measures from the EIA Report, any other commitments made by the applicant, and all relevant mitigation secured by conditions attached to this permission with defined timescales for implementation of each mitigation measure. (2) Thereafter, the approved Schedule of Mitigation shall be implemented in full unless otherwise approved in writing by the Planning Authority. Reason: to ensure that the identified mitigation through the EIA Report is carried out in accordance with the approved details. 14. Enabling Works (1) No development or works shall commence on the Site unless and until a programme of Site Enabling Works, detailing the extent, area and timings of such works (the ‘Site Enabling Works Programme’) has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority. The Site Enabling Works Programme must as a minimum provide for the following: (a) A plan showing the extent and layout of the enabling works; (b) The employment of a suitably qualified and experienced Ecological Clerk of Works, or equivalent, for the project, with specific responsibility for environmental management and the authority to take action when required, including stopping operations and implementing mitigation measures; (c) The employment of a Planning Monitoring Officer, to discharge and to monitor compliance with this condition, including provision of a quarterly compliance report to the Council; (d) A programme for environmental auditing and monitoring within the Site, before and during the Site Enabling Works, to provide the establishment of an environmental checklist, to monitor and input into the planning of construction activities and ensure implementation of all environmental mitigation measures; (e) A site-specific statement outlining drainage and sediment management for all exploration areas and measures to limit above ground construction (f) activities during periods of high rainfall, including weather forecasting and actions to be taken in advance of adverse forecasts. (g) Working arrangements, including a programme for the phasing of operations, and particularly the movement of plant, materials and rock
Page 32
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 into, across and out of the site to minimise, so far as reasonably possible, impact on communities or businesses adjacent to or in close proximity to the Site.; (h) Waste Management and Pollution Controls including contingency plans in case of pollution incidents; (i) A programme of work for the evaluation, preservation and recording of any archaeological and historic features affected by the Development, including a timetable for investigation, which must be submitted for the written approval of the Planning Authority. The approved programme must be implemented in accordance with the agreed timetable for investigation unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Planning Authority; (j) Measures to protect any scheduled monument(s) within the area of the enabling works; (k) Details for the delivery, storage, loading and unloading of plant and materials to be used in constructing the development, with particular regard for the deployment of HGVs and any abnormal loads; (l) Measures to control the emission of dust and dirt during construction; (m) Provision of welfare facilities on site during construction and the means of disposal of foul drainage; (n) Measures to protect all existing public water, private water and drainage arrangements, with suitable back up arrangements in case of any disruption to these provisions from Site Enabling Works; (o) An Access Management Plan to maintain public access and promote the general safety of walkers, cyclists, and users out-with the principal construction areas and access roads serving the Development during the Site Exploratory Works. A key principle to be advanced within the Plan is to minimise restrictions on public access to important recreational facilities; (p) Wheel washing facilities to prevent vehicles associated with the Site Enabling Works from depositing mud or dirt on the public road network when leaving the Site. (q) Lighting for Site Enabling Works which will minimise illumination, glare or light spillage outwith the site boundary. (2) All Site Enabling Works must be carried out in accordance with the approved Site Enabling Works Programme unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Planning Authority. Reason: To ensure that all Site Exploratory Works are carried out in a manner that minimises their impact on amenity and the environment, and that the mitigation measures contained in the EIA Report accompanying the application are fully implemented. 15. Planning Monitoring Officer (1) There shall be no Commencement of Development until the terms of appointment by the Company of an independent and suitably qualified consultant as Planning Monitoring Officer (“PMO”) have been submitted to, and approved in writing by, the Planning Authority. The terms of appointment shall: (a) impose a duty to monitor compliance with the terms of the deemed planning permission and the conditions attached to it;
Page 33
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 (b) require the PMO to submit a quarterly report to the Planning Authority summarising works undertaken on site, matters of compliance or otherwise with the terms of the deemed planning permission and conditions attached to it, alongside a summary of the incidents recorded and reported by the ECoW and GCoW; and (c) require the PMO to report to the Planning Authority any incidences of non-compliance with the terms of the deemed planning permission and conditions attached to it at the earliest practical opportunity, and no later than 10 working days following the incidence of non-compliance. (2) The PMO shall be appointed on the approved terms throughout the period from Commencement of Development to completion of construction works and post-construction site reinstatement works. (3) Prior to the decommissioning, restoration and aftercare phases of the Development or the expiration of the operational period of the consent (whichever is the earlier), details of the terms of appointment of a and suitably qualified consultant as PMO by the Company throughout the decommissioning, restoration and aftercare phases of the Development shall be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the Planning Authority. (4) the PMO shall be appointed on the terms approved under part (3) throughout the decommissioning, restoration and aftercare phases of the Development. Reason: To ensure compliance with the planning permission and the conditions attached to it. 16. Ecological Clerk of Works (1) There shall be no Commencement of Development until the terms of appointment of a suitably qualified, experienced, and independent Ecological Clerk of Works (“ECoW”) by the Company have been submitted to, and approved in writing by, the Planning Authority. The terms of appointment shall: (a) impose a duty to monitor compliance with the ecological and hydrological commitments provided in any approved Schedule of Mitigation, any approved Construction and Environmental Management Plan, any approved Habitat Management Plan, and any approved species protection plans, (b) require the ECoW to report to the nominated construction project manager any incidences of non-compliance with the ECoW works at the earliest practical opportunity; (c) require the ECoW to submit a quarterly report to the Planning Authority summarising works undertaken on site; and (d) require the ECoW to report to the Planning Authority any incidences of non-compliance with the ECoW works at the earliest practical opportunity, and no later than 5 working days following the incidence of non-compliance. (2) The ECoW shall be appointed on the terms approved under part (1) throughout the period from pre-construction works1, Commencement 1 This may include Site Enabling Works. If the Site Enabling Works condition is included the wording should be updated to reflect this.
Page 34
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 of Development to completion of construction works and post- construction site reinstatement works. (3) Prior to the decommissioning, restoration and aftercare phases of the Development or the expiration of the operational period of the consent (whichever is the earlier), details of the terms of appointment of a suitably qualified, experienced, and independent ECoW by the Company throughout the decommissioning, restoration and aftercare phases of the Development shall be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the Planning Authority. (4) the ECoW shall be appointed on the terms approved under part (3) throughout the decommissioning, restoration and aftercare phases of the Development. Reason: To secure effective monitoring of and compliance with the environmental mitigation and management measures associated with the Development during the construction, post-construction restoration, decommissioning, restoration and aftercare phases. 17. Environmental Clerk of Works (1) There shall be no Commencement of Development until the terms of appointment of an independent Environmental Clerk of Works (“EnvCoW”) by the Company have been submitted to, and approved in writing by, the Planning Authority. The terms of appointment shall: (a) impose a duty to monitor compliance with the environmental commitments provided in the EIA Report, any approved Construction Environmental Management Plan, any approved Habitat Management Plan, and any species or habitat management plans identified in the EIA Report; (b) require the EnvCoW to report to the nominated construction project manager, developer and Planning Authority any incidences of non- compliance with the EnvCoW works at the earliest practical opportunity; (c) require the EnvCoW to submit a monthly report to the construction project manager, developer and Planning Authority summarising works undertaken on site. (2) Prior to the decommissioning, restoration and aftercare phases of the Development or the expiration of the operational period of the consent (whichever is the earlier), details of the terms of appointment of a suitably qualified, experienced, and independent EnvCoW by the Company throughout the decommissioning, restoration and aftercare phases of the Development shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority. (3) the EnvCoW shall be appointed on the terms approved under part (2) throughout the decommissioning, restoration and aftercare phases of the Development. Reason: To secure effective and transparent monitoring of and compliance with the environmental mitigation and management measures associated with the Development during the construction, decommissioning, restoration and aftercare phases
Page 35
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 18. Geotechnical Clerk of Works (1) There shall be no Commencement of Development until the terms of appointment by the Company of an independent and suitably qualified engineer as a Geotechnical Clerk of Works (“GCoW”) have been submitted to, and approved in writing by, the Planning Authority. The terms of appointment shall: (a) impose a duty to monitor compliance with any approved Construction and Environmental Management Plan, any approved Peat Management Plan, and any approved Peat Landslide Risk Management Plan, (b) require the GCoW to report to the Planning Authority and nominated construction project manager any incidences of geotechnical risks at the earliest practical opportunity, and no later than 5 working days following the incidence of non-compliance; and (c) require the GCoW to report to the Planning Authority any incidences of peat land slips at the earliest practical opportunity to SEPA where there are risks to the wider environment, and no later than 5 working days following the incidence of peat land slips. (2) The GCoW shall be appointed on the terms approved under part (1) throughout the period from Commencement of Development to completion of construction works and post-construction site reinstatement works. (3) Prior to the decommissioning, restoration and aftercare phases of the Development or the expiration of the operational period of the consent (whichever is the earlier), details of the terms of appointment of a suitably qualified engineer as a GCoW by the Company throughout the decommissioning, restoration and aftercare phases of the Development shall be submitted to, and approved in writing by the Planning Authority. (4) the GCoW shall be appointed on the terms approved under part (3) throughout the decommissioning, restoration and aftercare phases of the Development. Reason: To secure effective monitoring of and compliance with the mitigation related to geotechnical matters, particularly peat land slip and management measures associated with the Development during the construction, post- construction restoration, decommissioning, restoration and aftercare phases. 19. Construction and Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) (1) There shall be no Commencement of Development until a Construction and Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) containing site specific details of all on-site construction works, post-construction reinstatement, drainage and mitigation, together with details of their timetabling, has been submitted to, and approved in writing by, the Planning Authority. The CEMP shall be informed by the site and ground investigation works and best practice guidance. (2) The CEMP shall provide: (a) a site waste management plan (dealing with all aspects of waste produced during the construction period other than peat and other carbon rich soils), including details of contingency planning in the event of accidental release
Page 36
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 of materials which could cause harm to the environment, evidencing all proposals comply with SEPA’s guidance and the requirements of the waste management licensing regime as appropriate; (b) details of the location, layout, formation of the construction compound, welfare facilities, any areas of hardstanding, turning areas, internal access tracks, car parking, material stockpiles, oil, fuel and chemical storage, lighting columns, and any construction compound boundary fencing required for the construction period; (c) a dust management plan detailing all mitigation/dust suppression measures intended to reduce the impacts of dust on site, including measures to reduce dust on roads; (d) site specific details for management and operation of any concrete batching plant (including disposal of pH-rich waste water and substances); (e) details of measures to be taken to prevent loose or deleterious material being deposited on the local road network including wheel cleaning and lorry sheeting facilities, and measures to clean the site entrances and the adjacent local road network; (f) a Pollution Prevention and Incident Plan incorporating a Pollution Prevention Plan, Pollution Incident Plan and a Pollution Control Monitoring Plan, this shall provide measures to protect watercourses, groundwater, management of natural surface hydrological flows (flushes, springs, etc.) and protection of peatland/soils, arrangements for the storage and management of oil and fuel and other chemicals on the site and sewage disposal and treatment; (g) details of soil storage and management including outline quantities, locations (other than peat and other carbon rich soils) management of long term storage of construction generated to facilitate future site restoration; (h) a drainage management strategy, demonstrating how all surface and waste water arising during and after construction is to be managed and prevented from impacting on the water environment and to mitigate flood risk; (i) a surface water and groundwater management and treatment plan, including details of the separation of clean and dirty water drains, and location of settlement lagoons for silt laden water; (j) details of temporary site illumination, including measures to ensure light spill/pollution is minimised and avoids habitats within the site and does not extend beyond the immediate working area, and not beyond the site boundary; (k) Any required Protected Species Plans. The Plan(s) shall be informed by surveys carried out by a suitably qualified person (and updated surveys should the existing survey information be more than 18 months old at start of development works). The ecological and species surveys shall inform the mitigation measures required to protect protected species during construction of the Development. The Plan shall provide mitigation measures, as required, and a timetable for implementation. (l) details of the construction of the access into the site, including associated drainage and the creation and maintenance of associated visibility splays; (m) Site-specific Construction Method Statements for the following: i. crane pads; ii. turbine foundations; iii. working cable trenches; iv. erection of the wind turbines and meteorological masts; v. Energy storage compound formation and installation of energy storage equipment;
Page 37
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 vi. Substation compound formation, erection of associated buildings and ancillary infrastructure; vii. watercourse crossings including full details and plans of the design and specification of all new and upgraded watercourse crossings to be constructed, ensuring continuous flow and fish passage with no hanging culverts, noting all crossings shall be oversized bottomless arched culverts or traditional style bridges; (n) details of post-construction restoration/reinstatement of the working areas not required during the operation of the Development; (o) Historic Environment Protection Plan including details of protective fencing of the location of the historic environment features to be protected during construction works, including appropriate buffers; (p) a wetland ecosystems survey and mitigation plan; (q) a tree felling and management plan; (r) A Construction Noise Management Plan including details of the management of noise and vibration during construction and post- construction restoration, including that caused by construction traffic, to the lowest practicable levels and in accordance with BS 5228:2009 “Code of Practice for noise and vibration control on construction and open sites – Part 1: Noise and Part 2: Vibration” (or any updated version/document which superseded this document) and how any properties likely to be affected by construction noise will be kept informed; (s) Construction Method Statements for all roads/tracks to be altered/formed associated with the development, including their width, likelihood of widening or passing places, means of drainage (which shall have regard to SUDS principles), means of construction, and edge reinstatement including verge width. The specification shall be accompanied by relevant plans at a sufficient scale; (t) the cable trenches; (u) A phasing plan for the construction works; and (v) A written scheme which details the methodology for dealing with any revisions to any of the documents required under this part (3). Any revised documents will require to be submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority prior to the revisions being implemented on site. (3) The Development shall be implemented in accordance with the CEMP approved under part (1) unless otherwise approved in advance in writing by the Planning Authority. Reason: To ensure that all construction operations are carried out in a manner that minimises their impact on road safety, amenity and the environment, and that the mitigation measures contained in the EIA Report accompanying the application, or as otherwise agreed, are fully implemented.
Page 38
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 20. Construction Hours (1) Construction work shall only take place between the hours of 07.00 to 19.00 on Monday to Friday inclusive and 07.00 to 16.00 on Saturdays, with no construction work taking place on a Sunday or Public Holiday. Outwith these specified hours, maintenance works, emergency works and construction works shall be limited to concrete pours, wind turbine erection, dust suppression, and the testing of plant and equipment, unless otherwise approved in advance in writing by the Planning Authority. (2) HGV movements (excluding abnormal loads) to or from the site during construction of the wind farm shall be limited to [07.00 to 19.00 Monday to Friday (inclusive), and 07.00 to 16.00 on Saturdays, with no HGV movements to or from site taking place on a Sunday or Public Holiday. Outwith these hours, and subject to paragraph (1), HGV movements are to be limited to wind turbine delivery (unless otherwise approved in advance in writing by the Planning Authority). Reason: In the interests of local amenity. 21. Traffic Management Plan (1) There shall be no Commencement of Development until a Traffic Management Plan has been submitted to, and approved in writing by, the Planning Authority in consultation with the Area Roads Manager and Transport Scotland. The Traffic Management Plan shall provide: (a) the routeing of all traffic associated with the Development on public roads; (b) measures to ensure that the specified routes are adhered to, including monitoring procedures; (c) details of all signage and lining arrangements to be put in place; (d) provisions for emergency vehicle access; (e) provision for the submission and agreement of a roads condition survey pre-and post-construction accompanied by an appropriate agreement between the Planning Authority and the Company to ensure the delivery of any post-construction public road restoration that may be required; and (f) identification of a nominated person to whom any road safety issues can be referred. (2) The approved Traffic Management Plan shall be implemented in full, unless otherwise approved in advance in writing by the Planning Authority. Reason: In the interests of road safety. 22. On site Electricity and control cables All electricity and control cables between the turbines, substations and control buildings shall be laid out underground unless as otherwise agreed in writing with the Planning Authority and NatureScot. Reason: In the interests of the protection of Nature Interests and to avoid any additional above ground visual impacts arising from the development.
Page 39
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 23. Biodiversity Enhancement and Habitat Management Plan No development in respect of this planning permission shall take place unless a Biodiversity Enhancement and Habitat Management Plan (BE-HMP) has been submitted to and approved by the Planning Authority in consultation with NatureScot. The BE-HMP shall set out the proposed Biodiversity Enhancement and Habitat Management of the development site during the period of construction, operation, decommissioning and restoration of the site and set out proposals for habitat and biodiversity restoration and enhancement. The approved BE-HMP shall be implemented in full to the agreed timescale. Reason : In order to define the terms of the permission and in order to prevent undue adverse impacts to wildlife and habitats and provide biodiversity enhancement and to protect and improve habitats which may be affected by the development. 24. Programme of Archaeological Works No development shall take place within the development site as outlined in red on the approved plan until the developer has secured the implementation of a programme of archaeological works in accordance with a written scheme of investigation which has been submitted by the applicant, agreed by the West of Scotland Archaeology Service, and approved by the Planning Authority. Thereafter the developer shall ensure that the programme of archaeological works is fully implemented and that all recording and recovery of archaeological resources within the development site is undertaken to the satisfaction of the Planning Authority in agreement with the West of Scotland Archaeology Service. Reason To ensure the protection and recording of archaeological features. 25. Access Management Plan No development shall commence unless and until an Access Management Plan (AMP) has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority. The AMP shall include (but shall not necessarily be limited to): (a) identification of limitations on site access rights during the construction phase; (b) details of appropriate access management during the construction and operational periods of the Development, including such matters as the maintenance of public access and temporary or permanent diversion or stopping up of public rights of way; (c) details of warning and management signage which is appropriate and takes account of both the operational needs and access rights during both the construction and the operational periods of the Development; and (d) set out the access management regime to be implemented during the operational phase of the Development. (e) Provision for operational use of the wind farm tracks/access road for leisure access, including procedures to maintain amenities. The approved AMP shall thereafter be implemented in full.
Page 40
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 Reason: To ensure that public access is managed appropriately throughout the construction and operational period of the Development. 26. Roads and Infrastructure Prior to the commencement of development written confirmation of adherence the following matters shall be submitted for the approval of the Planning Authority in consultation with the Area Roads Manager. All required works to be undertaken in accordance with the requirement of the Area Roads Manager as agreed. • New accesses and existing accesses in need of amending or modification to be upgraded in accordance with Operational Services Drg No SD08/001b. • Visibility splays measuring 42m x 2.4m to be cleared and maintained in perpetuity. • Additional road signs and markings will be required, as per TSRGD. Exact specifications and locations to be agreed with this department. • A statement in respect to the materials and plant to be transported over the C32 to serve the works is required. The statement should also state where materials will be imported from along with estimated quantities, so the effect on local quarry roads can be assessed. • Major works notice will be required for the planned C32 upgrades. • TTRO applications will be required for works within the C32 corridor . • Detailed engineering, technical drawing required in relation to C32 upgrades. Details to be approved by this department. General illustrations as per Fig 2.10b. 2.10c and 2.10d. • A system of traffic management to be in place to accommodate the traversing of abnormal loads over the C32. Details to be agreed with this department. • A pre start road inspection to be carried out. Any extraordinary damage to the C32 road corridor caused by the associated proposal works to be made good at no expense to Argyll and Bute Council. • A pre start site meeting is required, to discuss planned changes to the C32. Reason: To ensure that the construction activities associated with the proposals and transportation of abnormal loads will not have any detrimental effect on the road network. 27. Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) Prior to commencement of the development, a Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Authority, after consultation with Transport Scotland and the Area Roads Manager. Thereafter, all construction traffic associated with the development shall conform to the requirements of the agreed plan.
Page 41
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 This shall include: a) Details of any additional signing or temporary traffic control measures deemed necessary due to the size or length of any loads being transported must be undertaken by a recognised QA traffic management consultant b) Details of proposals for an abnormal load delivery trial-run to be undertaken with the involvement of Police Scotland and prior to the commencement of abnormal loads deliveries. Trial-run proposals shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority in consultation with Transport Scotland. c) Details of any accommodation measures required, including the removal of street furniture, junction widening, over-sail of the trunk road, and traffic management must be approved and implemented to the satisfaction of the Planning Authority, in consultation with Transport Scotland. Reason :To mitigate the adverse impact of construction traffic on the safe and efficient operation of the trunk road network. 28. Decommissioning Traffic Plan Prior to any decommissioning of the development, a Decommissioning Traffic Plan in respect of traffic management shall be prepared and approved in writing by the Planning Authority, in consultation with Transport Scotland. The Development shall be decommissioned in accordance with the approved decommissioning traffic plan. Reason To mitigate the adverse impact of construction traffic on the safe and efficient operation of the trunk road network 29. Aviation Lighting That no turbine shall be erected unless a scheme for aviation lighting for the wind farm, consisting of Civil Aviation Authority-compliant visible aviation lighting and Ministry of Defence (DIO) accredited infra-red aviation lighting, has been submitted and approved by the planning authority in consultation with DIO and Civil Aviation Authority. The turbines shall be erected with the approved lighting installed and the lighting shall remain operational throughout the duration of this permission. Reason In the interests of aviation safety and landscape amenity. 30. Defence Infrastructure Safeguarding (i) Aviation Lighting Prior to commencing construction of any wind turbine generators, or deploying any construction equipment or temporal structure(s) 50 metres or more in height (above ground level) the undertaker must submit an aviation lighting scheme for the approval of the Argyll & Bute Council in conjunction with the Ministry of Defence defining how the development will be lit throughout its life
Page 42
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 to maintain civil and military aviation safety requirements as determined necessary for aviation safety by the Ministry of Defence. This should set out: a) details of any construction equipment and temporal structures with a total height of 50 metres or greater (above ground level) that will be deployed during the construction of wind turbine generators and details of any aviation warning lighting that they will be fitted with; and b) the locations and heights of all wind turbine generators and any anemometry mast featured in the development identifying those that will be fitted with aviation warning lighting identifying the position of the lights on the wind turbine generators; the type(s) of lights that will be fitted and the performance specification(s) of the lighting type(s) to be used. Thereafter, the undertaker must exhibit such lights as detailed in the approved aviation lighting scheme. The lighting installed will remain operational for the lifetime of the development. (ii) Aviation Charting and Safety Management The undertaker must notify the Ministry of Defence, at least 14 days prior to the commencement of the works, in writing of the following information: a) the date of the commencement of the erection of wind turbine generators; b) the maximum height of any construction equipment to be used in the erection of the wind turbines; c) the date any wind turbine generators are brought into use; d) the latitude and longitude and maximum heights of each wind turbine generator, and any anemometer mast(s). The Ministry of Defence must be notified of any changes to the information supplied in accordance with these requirements and of the completion of the construction of the development. Reason In the interests of aviation safety.
Page 43
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 31. Television and Radio Reception Mitigation (1) No development shall commence unless and until a baseline Television and Radio Reception survey has been undertaken. (2) In the event of a claim by any individual person regarding TV picture loss or interference, including radio reception, at their house, business premise or other building, this shall be investigated by an independent qualified engineer, appointed by the Company (at the companies expense), and the results, including any mitigation measures, shall be submitted to the Planning Authority, alongside a copy of the results of the baseline survey undertaken under the terms of part (1). (3) Should any impairment to the TV signal or radio reception be attributable to the Development, the Company shall remedy such impairment so that the standard of reception at the affected property is equivalent to the baseline TV or radio reception as relevant. For the avoidance of doubt, the resolution of disputes shall be determined by an independent arbiter e.g. OFCOM or other professional body as appropriate. Reason: To ensure local radio [and television] services are sustained during the construction and operation of the Development. 32. Operational Noise Planning Condition 1) The rating level of noise from the combined effects of the wind turbines hereby permitted (including the application of any tonal and/or amplitude modulation (AM) character correction), when determined at any residential properties lawfully existing or with planning permission at the time of the consent in accordance with the Assessment and Rating of Wind Turbine Noise 2026 Planning Condition Technical Guidance Notes (“ARWTN Technical Guidance Notes”), shall not exceed the values for the relevant integer wind speed set out in or derived from the table attached to this condition. In the event that a complaint is made, the following steps shall be carried out: 2) The turbines shall be designed to permit individually controlled operation or shut down at specified wind speeds and directions in order to facilitate compliance with noise criteria. 3) The Company shall continuously log power production, wind speed and wind direction at each wind turbine all (in accordance with Guidance Notes). This data shall be retained for a period of not less than 24 months. The Company shall provide this information to the Planning Authority, in the format set out in the Guidance Notes, within 14 days of receipt in writing of a request to do so. 4) Prior to the Date of First Commissioning, the Company shall have submitted to, and received written approval of the Planning Authority of, a list of proposed independent consultants who will undertake compliance measurements in accordance with this condition. Amendments to the list of approved consultants shall be made only with the prior written approval of the Planning Authority. 5) Within 21 days from receipt of a written request of the Local Planning Authority, following a justified complaint to it alleging noise disturbance
Page 44
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 at a specified residential property, the wind farm operator shall, at its own expense, employ an appropriately qualified and experienced acoustician and provide a written protocol (“the Protocol”) to be approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The Protocol shall confirm the applicable noise limit, describe the procedure to assess the level and character of noise from the wind farm at the specified property in accordance with the procedures described in the ARWTN Technical Guidance Notes and set out a timescale within which the assessment described in the Protocol will be completed. The written request from the Local Planning Authority shall set out as far as possible the time or meteorological conditions to which the complaint relates and whether the character of the noise is likely to include tonal noise or AM components if applicable. Measurements to assess compliance with the noise limits shall be undertaken in accordance with the agreed Protocol. If the Local Planning Authority or acoustician determine the character of noise is likely to include tonal or AM components, the Protocol needs to consider the assessment of these characteristics. 6) The wind farm operator shall provide to the Local Planning Authority the acoustician's assessment of the rating level of noise at the specified property. The assessment shall include, if requested by the Local Planning Authority, all data collected for the purposes of undertaking the compliance measurements and analysis, such data to be provided in a format to be agreed with the Local Planning Authority. Certificates of calibration of the equipment shall be submitted to the Local Planning Authority with the acoustician's assessment report. 7) Where a further assessment of the rating level of noise from the wind farm at the specified property is required to correct for other noise sources pursuant to the ARWTN Technical Guidance Notes, the wind farm operator shall submit a copy of the further assessment within 21 days of submission of the acoustician's initial assessment unless otherwise agreed by the Local Planning Authority. The wind farm operator shall facilitate wind turbine shut downs as suitably justified by the acoustician to allow the contribution from other sources to be determined, if suitable data is not already available. D. Wind farm operational and wind data logged by the operator, as defined in the ARWTN Technical Guidance Notes, shall be supplied to the relevant Local Planning Authority on its request, within 14 days of receipt in writing of such a request. Table 1. Simplified operational site-specific noise limits (SSNL) at receptor locations (dB LA90) for day and night periods Receptor Location (Easting, Northing in BNG) Noise limit at standardised wind speeds up to 10 m/s, dB LA90 Duntanachan (196710, 728227) Clachadubh (194756, 727375) Barguillean Farm (198045, 728811) Sithean/Bunanta (198330, 728610) Bar Glas (197764, 728716) Am Barr (197857, 728777) 32 29 34 34 34 34
Page 45
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 Reason: To protect amenity and to ensure that noise limits are not exceeded and to enable prompt investigation of complaints. 33. Compensatory Planting 1) There shall be no Commencement of Development until a woodland planting scheme to compensate for the removal of existing woodland (“the Replanting Scheme”) has been submitted to and approved in writing by Argyll and Bute Council in consultation with Scottish Forestry. 2) The Replanting Scheme must comply with the requirements set out in the UK Forestry Standard (Forestry Commission, 2017. ISBN 978-0-85538-999-4) and the guidelines to which it refers. The Replanting Scheme submitted for approval must include- a. details of the location of the area to be planted; b. details of land owners and occupiers of the land to be planted; c. the nature, design and specification of the proposed woodland to be planted; d. details of all Necessary Consents for the Replanting Scheme and timescales within which each shall be obtained; e. the phasing and associated timescales for implementing the Replanting Scheme; f. proposals for the maintenance and establishment of the Replanting Scheme, including; annual checks; replacement planting; fencing; ground preparation; and drainage; and g. proposals for reporting to Argyll and Bute Council on compliance with timescales for obtaining the Necessary Consents and thereafter implementation of the Replanting Scheme. 3) The approved Replanting Scheme shall thereafter be implemented in full and in accordance with the phasing and timescales set out therein, unless otherwise agreed in writing by Argyll and Bute Council after consultation with Scottish Forestry. 4) There shall be no Commencement of Development until all relevant Necessary Consents for implementation of the Replanting Scheme in accordance with the phasing and timescales set out therein have been obtained. Reason To secure compensatory planting to mitigate against effects of deforestation arising from the Development 34. Water Pollution Protection Plan including Private Water Supply Protection Measures Prior to the commencement of development a Water Pollution Prevention Plan shall be submitted to the planning authority for its approval, providing details related to safeguard any local private water supplies and the water environment generally to ensure pollution does not take place associated with the implementation of this permission. Such details shall be submitted for approval in consultation with Environmental Protection, SEPA and Scottish Water. Reason : To ensure the protection of the water environment 35. Water Quality and Fish Monitoring Plan
Page 46
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 (1) There shall be no Commencement of Development until an integrated Water Quality and Fish Monitoring Plan (WQFMP) has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority in consultation with Argyll District Salmon Fishery Board (ADSFB). (2) The WQFMP must take account of the Marine Directorate’s guidance and shall provide: a) provision that water quality sampling should be carried out prior to Commencement of Development, during construction and for at least 12 months after construction is complete; b) key hydro chemical parameters (including turbidity and flow data), the identification of sampling locations (including control sites), frequency of sampling, sampling methodology, data analysis and reporting; d) Any required site specific mitigation measures including those detailed in the EIA Report. (3) Thereafter, the WQFMP shall be implemented in full within the timescales set out in the WQFMP. Reason: To ensure no deterioration of water quality and to protect fish populations within and downstream of the development area. 36. Forestry Felling Plan (1) No felling shall take place until a Forestry Felling Plan (FFP) has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority in consultation with Scottish Forestry. The FFP shall cover the Development site and shall provide: (a) details of felling and restocking proposals; (b) details of the management measures to reduce the amount of felling required to accommodate the Development; (c) measures to deal with forest waste including brash in line with the UK Forestry Standard; (d) timelines for implementing the plan; (e) details setting out annual monitoring of the felled area and reporting procedures to be carried out by a qualified expert; (f) details of forestry management practices; and (g) details demonstrating compliance with The UK Forestry Standard and the Scottish Government’s Policy on Control of Woodland Removal (as amended or replaced from time to time) (2) The approved FFP shall be implemented in full upon Commencement of Felling. Reason: to minimise and manage the effects of forestry felling required to accommodate the Development. 37. Eskdalemuir Seismic Array (1) Within [three months] of the completion of construction of the turbines, the Company shall provide written confirmation to the Scottish Ministers, the
Page 47
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 Planning Authority, the Ministry of Defence, the Defence Geographic Centre and NATS of the following: (a) the as-constructed position of each turbine in eastings and northings (each to six figures); and (b) the hub height and rotor diameter of each turbine (in metres). Reason: To manage any impact on the Eskdalemuir Seismic Array. 38. Ongoing Operation and Maintenance The wind turbines shall be maintained in the approved colour, free from external rust, staining or discolouration and in accordance with predicted operational noise outputs, until such time as the wind farm is decommissioned. Reason: In the interests of the visual and residential amenity of the area. 39. Site Inspection Strategy (1) Prior to the Date of Final Commissioning, the Company shall submit an outline Site Inspection Strategy (Outline SIS) for the written approval of the Planning Authority. The Outline SIS shall set out a strategy for the provision of site inspections and accompanying Site Inspection Reports (SIR) to be carried out at 25 years of operation from the Date of Final Commissioning and every five years thereafter. (2) No later than 24 years after the Date of Final Commissioning, the Company shall submit a final detailed Site Inspection Strategy (Final SIS), based on the principles of the approved Outline SIS for the written approval of the Planning Authority. The Final SIS shall set out updated details for the provision of site inspections and accompanying Site Inspection Reports (SIR), in accordance with relevant guidance at that time, to be carried out at 25 years of operation from the Date of Final Commissioning and every five years thereafter. (3) At least one month in advance of submitting each SIR to the Planning Authority, the scope of the SIR shall be agreed with the Planning Authority. (4) The SIR shall provide: (a) Details to demonstrate that the infrastructure components of the Development are still operating in accordance with the operational noise condition; and (b) An engineering report which details the condition of tracks, turbine foundations and the wind turbines and sets out the requirements and the programme for the implementation for any remedial measures which may be required. (5) The SIS and each SIR shall be implemented in full following the Date of Final Commissioning unless otherwise agreed in advance in writing by the Planning Authority. Reason: To ensure the Development is being monitored at regular intervals after the first 25 years of operation.
Page 48
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 40. Micro Siting (1) All wind turbines, shall be constructed in the approved locations shown on plan reference ( Fig2.5b ) The locations of wind turbines, buildings, masts, areas of hardstanding and tracks may be adjusted by micro-siting within the redline boundary shown on plan reference (Fig2.5b). Any such micro- siting is subject to the following restrictions unless otherwise approved in advance in writing by the Planning Authority (a) No wind turbine, building, mast or hardstanding shall be moved more than 50m from the position shown on plan reference Fig 2.5b. (b) no access track shall be moved more than 50m from the position shown on plan reference Fig 2.5b (c) No micro-siting shall take place with the result that infrastructure has a greater overall adverse impact on peat than the original location; (d) No infrastructure other than as required for a water course crossing shall be microsited to within 50 metres of a water course; (2) All micro-siting permissible under this condition shall be submitted to, and approved in writing by SEPA, DIO and the Ecological Clerk of Works (“ECoW”) in advance of any works or development associated with the micro-siting request being implemented; (DIO will only require to be consulted in relation to any proposed wind turbine relocation) (3) No later than six months after the Date of First Commissioning an updated site layout plan showing the final position of all wind turbines, buildings, masts, areas of hardstanding, tracks and associated infrastructure forming part of the Development shall be submitted to the Planning Authority. The plan shall also specify areas where micro siting has taken place and, for each instance, be accompanied by copies of SEPA, DIO and ECoW approval, as applicable. Reason: to control environmental impacts while taking account of local ground conditions, DIO aviation safety and SEPA peat impact restrictions on such matters. 41. Trunk Road Authority Requirements Prior to the commencement of development details of the following matters shall be submitted to the planning Authority for its approval in consultation with Transport Scotland; a) Prior to the commencement of the development, the proposed upgraded access on the A85 trunk road, as generally illustrated by RSK nadara Figure 10.4 Access Junction Design Rev 03 dated 17/06/2025, shall be constructed to a layout and type (and method) of construction to be approved by the Planning Authority, after consultation with Transport Scotland b) Prior to the commencement of the development, visibility splays, as generally illustrated by RSK Figure 2.10a: Indicative Site Access - A85 to Fearnoch Forest Track Rev 03 dated 14/08/2025, shall be provided and maintained to the satisfaction of the Planning Authority, after consultation with Transport Scotland.
Page 49
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 c) Prior to commencement of deliveries to site, the proposed route for any abnormal loads on the trunk road network must be submitted to and approved by the Planning Authority, in consultation with Transport Scotland. d) Prior to the movement of any abnormal load, any accommodation measures required, including the removal of street furniture, junction widening and traffic management must be approved and implemented to the satisfaction of the Planning Authority, in consultation with Transport Scotland. e) Prior to the movement of any components and/or construction materials, any additional signing or temporary traffic control measures deemed necessary due to the size or length of any loads being transported must be undertaken by a recognised QA traffic management consultant, to be approved by Transport Scotland. f) Prior to commencement of the grid connection element of the development, a Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Authority, after consultation with Transport Scotland. In particular, the CTMP shall identify measures to control the use of any direct access onto the trunk road. Thereafter, all construction traffic associated with the development shall conform to the requirements of the agreed Plan. Reason: To protect the Trunk Roads Network, ensure compliance with necessary standards and in the interests of traffic safety Advisory notes (1) Notice of the start of development: The person carrying out the development must give advance notice in writing to the planning authority of the date when it is intended to start. Failure to do so is a breach of planning control. It could result in the planning authority taking enforcement action (See sections 27A and 123(1) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 (as amended)). (2) Notice of the completion of the development: As soon as possible after it is finished, the person who completed the development must write to the planning authority to confirm the position (See section 27B of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 (as amended)). (3) Display of notice: A notice must be displayed on or near the site while work is being carried out. The planning authority can provide more information about the form of that notice and where to display it (See section 27C of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997 Act (as amended) and Schedule 7 to the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (Scotland) Regulations 2013). (4) Right to challenge this decision: This decision is final, subject to the right of any person aggrieved by this decision to question its validity by making an application to the Court of Session. An application to the Court of Session must be made within 6 weeks of the date of the decision. Your local Citizens’ Advice
Page 50
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 Bureau or your solicitor will be able to advise you about the applicable procedures. (5) Notification of this decision by the planning authority: The planning authority is required (a) to inform the public and bodies consulted in respect of the EIA report of this decision by publishing a notice on the application website or newspaper circulating the in locality of the proposed development or by other reasonable means and (b) to make a copy of the decision available for public inspection in an office of the planning authority where its planning register may be inspected and on the application website. (6) Requirements relating to works within the trunk road boundary: i. The applicant should be informed that the granting of planning consent does not carry with it the right to carry out works within the trunk round boundary and that permission must be granted by Transport Scotland Roads Directorate. ii. Trunk road modification works shall, in all respects, comply with the Design Manual for Roads and Bridges and the Specification for Highway Works published by HMSO. The developer shall issue a certificate to that effect, signed by the design organisation. iii. Trunk road modifications shall, in all respects, be designed and constructed to arrangements that comply with the Disability Discrimination Act: Good Practice Guide for Roads published by Transport Scotland. The developer shall provide written confirmation of this, signed by the design organisation iv. The road works which are required due to the above Conditions will require a Road Safety Audit as specified by the Design Manual for Roads and Bridges. v. Any trunk road works will necessitate a Minute of Agreement with the Trunk Roads Authority prior to commencement. vi. To obtain permission to work within the trunk road boundary the developer should contact the Area Manager through the general contact number 0141 272 7100. vii. The Operating Company has responsibility for co-ordination and supervision of works and after permission has been granted it is the developer's contractor's responsibility to liaise with the Operating Company during the construction period to ensure all necessary permissions are obtained. (7) Environmental Health Notes to Applicant 1.Regulatory requirements for private water supplies should be discussed with the Council’s Environmental Health Service in the first instance. 2.If the development is likely to use 10m3 water per day then the applicant will need to apply for a registration or licence for water abstraction from SEPA https://www.sepa.org.uk/regulations/authorisations-and-permits/application- forms/#Water 3.If the proposed development is a commercial undertaking including but not limited to; use as a holiday or long term private let, workplace, food business,
Page 51
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 campsite etc. then the applicant must apply to the Environmental Health service 8 weeks before the intended use date for the private water supply to be registered and certified as fit for use. Email: pws@argyll-bute.gov.uk 4.It is recommended that should planning permission be granted, that the applicant contact this Service to discuss further the measures needed to comply with the requirements of Water Intended for Human Consumption (Private Supplies) (Scotland) Regulations 2017 or the Private Water Supplies (Scotland) Regulations 2006, as is applicable ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Regulation 3 of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (Scotland) Regulations 2017, prohibits the granting of permission for EIA development unless an environmental impact assessment has been carried out and that information has been taken into account when undertaking an assessment of the proposal. The applicant has submitted an Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIA Report dated 25.07.25 and Further Environmental Information dated 27.07.26. The environmental information contained within this and the comments made on the application by consultees and representations made by members of the public have been taken into account in coming to this decision. The Council is satisfied that the requirements of the EIA Regulations have been met. Reasoned Conclusion: The Council's assessment of the information presented within the EIA Report and other environmental information in relation to the development is contained within the Report of Handling. Elements of the proposal with the potential to result in likely significant effects are: noise and shadow flicker, landscape and visual impacts, aviation and defence interests including seismological recording, telecommunications and broadcasting installations, road traffic and adjacent trunk roads, historic environment, hydrology, the water environment and flood risk, biodiversity, trees, woods, and forests, decommissioning, site restoration and quality of site restoration plans, cumulative impacts, renewable energy generation targets and greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets. These issues are addressed in the Report on Handling and it is considered that subject to the mitigation measures which are set out in the EIAR and reflected in the planning conditions attached to this permission, no likely significant effects are anticipated as a result of the proposal. The Council is satisfied that this reasoned conclusion is still up to date at the time of this decision. All documents can be viewed online at: https://www.argyll-bute.gov.uk/planning-and- environment/find-and-comment-planning-applications and searching using the case reference number. COMMITTEE REPORT APPENDIX A – RELATIVE TO APPLICATION NUMBER: 25/01240/PP PLANNING LAND USE AND POLICY ASSESSMENT
Page 52
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 1.0 SPATIAL AND SETTLEMENT STRATEGY 1.1 Policy 02 – Outwith Settlement Areas establishes acceptable scales of development in three different zones. The main wind farm site is located within Remote Countryside Area. Within the Remote Countryside Areas, only specific categories of development are supported. This includes renewable energy related development. In principle, Policy 02 supports renewable energy and ancillary developments in these areas, providing they are consistent with all other relevant LDP2 Policies. With respect to the requirement for developments to accord with all other relevant policies of LDP2, particular attention is drawn to the need for proposals to accord with Policies 70 to 76 with respect to landscape and the natural environment. Proposals will also be required to demonstrate that there will be no unacceptable adverse effects (either individually or cumulatively) on natural heritage resources, built and/or cultural heritage resources, and landscape and visual amenity. 1.2 Policy 04 – Sustainable Development requires that in preparing new development proposals, developers should seek to demonstrate the following sustainable development principles (where relevant): a) Maximise the opportunity for local community benefit; b) Make efficient use of vacant and/or derelict land including appropriate buildings; c) Support existing communities and maximise the use of existing infrastructure and services; d) Maximise the opportunities for sustainable forms of design including minimising waste, reducing our carbon footprint, increasing energy efficiency, solar panels, ground, water and air source heat pumps and other forms of renewable energy generation; e) Avoid the use of locally important good quality agricultural land; f) Utilise public transport corridors and active travel networks; g) Avoid the loss of important recreational and amenity open space; h) Conserve and enhance the natural and built environment and avoid significant adverse impacts on biodiversity, natural and heritage assets; i) Respect the landscape character of an area and the setting and character of settlements; j) Avoid places with significant risk of flooding, tidal inundation, coastal erosion or ground instability; and k) Avoid having significant adverse impacts on land, air and water environment. The application is supported by an Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIAR) which sets out in detail the measures proposed to ensure the proposal is ‘Sustainable Development.’ 1.3 Policy 11 – Energy of NPF4 and Policy 30 – Sustainable Growth of Renewables of LDP 2 provide the primary policy framework for assessing wind farms. In this case, it is considered that the Landscape & Visual Impact of the proposal is acceptable, and that all other matters can be suitably mitigated by appropriate conditions. Therefore, it is concluded the proposal is consistent with Development Plan Policy relating to the spatial and settlement strategy. 1.4 For the reasons detailed below in this report, it is considered that this proposal satisfies Development Plan Policy and associated guidance in respect of renewable energy development. 1.5 Having due regard to the above it is concluded that this proposal can be considered ‘sustainable’ and therefore consistent with the provisions of LDP 2 Policy 02 – Outwith Settlement Areas and LDP Policy 04 – Sustainable Development. 2.0 ENERGY & SUPPORTING THE SUSTAINABLE GROWTH OF RENEWABLES
Page 53
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 2.1 Argyll & Bute Council is keen to ensure that Argyll & Bute continues to make a positive contribution to meeting the Scottish Government’s targets for renewable energy generation. These targets are important given the compelling need to reduce our carbon footprint and reduce our reliance on fossil fuels, reinforced by the Climate Change (Emissions Reduction Targets) (Scotland) Act 2019. The Council will support renewable energy developments where these are consistent with the principles of sustainable development, and it can be adequately demonstrated that there would be no unacceptable significant adverse effects. 2.2 This proposal has been assessed primarily against the criterion in the two lead Statutory Development Plan policies relating to renewable energy. These are: Policy 11 – Energy of National Planning Framework 4 and Policy 30 – the Sustainable Growth of Renewables of the Argyll & Bute Local Development Plan 2. Other policies are referred to where relevant. 3.0 LOCATION, NATURE, AND DESIGN OF PROPOSAL 3.1 The Site currently contains the existing Beinn Ghlas Wind Farm comprising 14 wind turbines (approximately 54.1 m to blade tip), each with a capacity of 600 kilowatts (kW) providing an overall installed capacity of 8.4 MW. The Wind Farm has been operational since May 1999. In June 2022, an application to extend the life of the Wind Farm (ref: 21/00870/PP) was approved to allow the Wind Farm to operate to August 2033. 3,2 The Site has therefore already been used for a wind farm since 1999 for a range of reasons which included high average wind speed and access to grid infrastructure. The Site is not located within any area of national environmental importance, and through the undertaking of various technical assessments (including but not limited to feasibility assessments, ecology, ornithology, peat and landscape and visual studies since 2020). The application site area is circa 436ha. 3,3 The nearest settlements to the Site are the town of Oban and village of Taynuilt, which are approximately 12 kilometres (km) and 4 km respectively from the Site. Both are predominantly separated from the Site by a range of hills to the south of Loch Etive. 3,4 The site landscape context comprises low, rugged hills, scattered with small outcrops of rocks and scoured with steep sided streams. There is open moorland, predominantly upland heath and mires including bog pools on the higher ground and a mixture of rough grassland and woodland on the lower slopes. Within the surrounding area there is a combination of native deciduous woodland and commercial coniferous forestry to the north and southeast of the Site. There is evidence in the wider area of cultivated land and improved grazing but generally the land has been used non-intensive. The existing (and to be widened) access track is bounded by Ancient Woodland along part of its length 3.5 The applicants submit that the design of the Proposed Development has been driven by the objective of positioning the turbines and associated infrastructure so that they capture the maximum wind energy within a suitable area, whilst taking into consideration and minimising potential impacts on environmental and technical constraints where possible. 3.6 Proposed Development –The Proposed Development infrastructure would comprise the following components: • Up to seven wind turbines of approximately 4.8 MW each, with a maximum blade tip height of up to 149.9 m; • Hardstanding areas at the base of each turbine, with a permanent area of approximately 1,400 m2; • Upgrading of four existing road junctions to support construction and abnormal road traffic;
Page 54
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 • Upgrading of forestry tracks from the A85 through Fearnoch Forest, Glen Lonan Road (C32) and existing wind farm access track to accommodate the delivery of abnormal loads to the site and use of existing track for access to the first construction compound. • An internal network of new onsite access tracks and upgrade of existing Wind Farm access track. The total length of the Site Access and Internal Access Tracks would be approximately 12.83 km of which 2.71 km is new access track (1.6 km floating) with associated new watercourse crossings and 8.52 km is existing access track and watercourse crossings which would need to be upgraded. In total there would be 4 new watercourse crossings and 22 existing crossings; • Upgrading of the existing onsite sub-station/control building; • Transformers and underground cables to connect the turbines to the onsite substation; • Permanent anemometry mast for wind monitoring, including associated foundation and hardstanding; • Telecommunications equipment; • Concrete batching plant; • Preliminary temporary construction compound; and • Temporary construction compound. 3.7 Connection to Electricity Grid - The grid connection will be the subject of a separate application. However, the FEI information gives general details of the likely route and design of the required underground cable. 4.0 LANDSCAPE AND VISUAL IMPACTS 4.1 Policy 11 – Energy of NPF 4 requires that project design and mitigation demonstrate how significant landscape and visual impacts have been addressed, recognising that such impacts are to be expected for some forms of renewable energy. Where impacts are localised and/or appropriate design mitigation has been applied, they will generally be considered acceptable. Policy 4 a) – Natural Places of NPF4 states that proposals which by virtue of type, location or scale will have an unacceptable impact on the natural environment, will not be supported. Policy 30 – The Sustainable Growth of Renewables of LDP 2 requires all applications for wind turbine developments to be assessed against landscape and visual impacts. 4.2 The site covers 436ha and is situated around Carn Gaibhre summit on the Lorn plateau at an elevation between 335m to 461m AOD. It comprises an undulating upland of rounded knolls, rock outcrops, steep sided streams, lochs and lochans. The site is covered by open moorland, predominantly upland heath and mires on the higher ground and a mixture of rough grassland and woodland on the lower slopes. Within the surrounding area of the site there is a combination of native deciduous woodland and commercial coniferous forestry to the north and southeast. 4.3 The site currently contains the existing Beinn Ghlas Wind Farm which comprises 14 operational turbines of approximately 54.1m to tip, a substation/control building and access from Barguillean Farm, approximately 2.2km north. These existing turbines would be decommissioned and removed either prior to or in parallel with the construction of the proposal and the site would be reinstated except where the existing infrastructure would be used for the repowering. 4.4 Outward views from within the site are generally open, unrestricted and panoramic, looking across the open moorland, coastal transitions and highpoints within National Scenic Areas (NSA), Areas of Panoramic Quality (APQ) and Wild Land Areas (WLA) to the north, east and west. The highest areas within the 35km LVIA study area are found beyond 9km and include Ben Cruachan (1126m AOD) to the northeast and Beinn Mheadhonach (714m
Page 55
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 AOD) to the north. Together with the mosaic of moorland, conifer forest plantation and native woodland the landscape of the site and surroundings is large in scale. 4.5 The submitted Landscape Assessment (LVIA) has focussed on a study area 20km from the proposal and at the time of the LVIA there were three operational wind farms within this area which are considered as part of the baseline. Two consented/under construction wind farms and four proposed wind farms were in planning, and these have been considered within the cumulative impact assessment. Schemes that were at scoping stage at the time of the LVIA, Musdale and Barachander Wind Farms, are considered within Appendix 5.6 to the LVIA. 4.6 Design iterations have taken place over several years with Scoping submitted in 2022 and since then the design has developed in response to environmental data, new policies, economic conditions and consultee response and advice. Since Scoping the proposal has evolved from 18 turbines with a proposed blade tip height of 180m, to the final layout of 7 turbines of up to149.9m to blade tip. The design has undergone six principal iterations of the initial layout (Layout A) which have been developed at different stages in the project design process. Design iterations (A to F) are shown on Volume 3a, Figure 2.4 and are discussed in detail within the Design and Access Statement. • Layout A – 20 turbine initial layout, each with a maximum height to blade tip of 180m, representing a layout which considered basic onsite constraints only. • Layout B – 18 turbine Scoping layout, each with a maximum height to blade tip of 180m, representing a layout that avoided the northern edge of the site to minimise landscape impact and to avoid ornithology constraints; • Layout C – 14 turbine layout, each with a maximum height of 149.5m to blade tip, informed by detailed landscape appraisal and early results of onsite surveys and consultant inputs; • Layout D – 12 turbine refined layout with a maximum height of 149.5m for public consultation informed by the presence of ornithological constraints with a track layout designed to minimise impact on ecological constraints; and • Layout E – 11 turbine refined layout with a maximum height of 149.5m, including reflecting further baseline environmental surveys, alongside further design of ancillary infrastructure. • Layout F – 7 turbine refined layout with a maximum height of 149.9m, accounting for protected ornithology species. 4.7 The submitted Design and Access Statement states that a key consideration has been to reduce landscape and visual effects; this being done by a reduction in the numbers of turbines, consolidation of turbines within the heart of the site and constraining the turbine heights to below 150m, resulting in the layout being more compact and less visible within the landscape and thus reducing landscape and visual effects for receptors whilst reusing existing infrastructure as much as practicable. 4.8 National Landscape Designations - Lynn of Lorn National Scenic Area (NSA) is situated 13.9 km to the northwest and Ben Nevis and Glen Coe NSA 15.3 km to the northeast of the proposal. An assessment of effects on the Special Landscape Qualities (SLQs) of these NSAs is included in Appendix 5.7. Members are requested to note that NatureScot has raised no objections in respect of potential impacts upon these sensitive landscape areas. 4.9 Local Landscape Designations – The following LLA’s are located within 20km of the proposals; • North Argyll LLA (3.8km to the east); • North West Argyll (Coast) LLA (7.9km to the west);
Page 56
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 • Knapdale/ Melfort LLA and (12km to the southwest); and • West Loch Fyne LLA (18.2km to the southeast). 4.10 Potential effects on the North Argyll LLA are illustrated by VPs 8, 9, 10, 11, 14 and 15. The Councils Landscape advisor has stated that: “The EIAR quotes the ABLWECS which states that “the special qualities of the [this LLA] are likely to comprise dramatic mountain landform and the juxtaposition of these mountains with narrow lochs and the sea and with settled loch fringes which produce a richly scenic landscape composition.” The EIAR states that theoretical visibility within the LLA is generally limited to the southern edge of the designation within 10km of the proposal, with isolated locations where views are channelled further north. The EIAR concludes that there would be indirect effects on the LLA resulting from changes to views to the south, however, they would not be significant as the area would continue to be defined by its scenic, panoramic quality and I agree with this assessment. For the TFB scenario the EIAR predicts isolated significant effects within the North Argyll LLA within approx. 10km of the proposal although these are not predicted to result in a significant effect on the integrity of the designation.” 4.11 Wild Land Areas - Seven Wild Land Areas (WLAs) are located within 35km of the proposal. The nearest of those is Loch Etive Mountains WLA located approximately 7.5km to the northeast and illustrated by VPs 9, 14 and 17. This WLA overlaps part of the North Argyll LLA. Indirect effects on WLAs have been scoped out of the assessment. 4.12 Gardens and Designed Landscapes - There are 11 Gardens and Designed Landscapes (GDLs) situated within the 35km study area. Of those, only one, Ardchattan Priory GDL located 8.2 km north of the proposal, is covered by the ZTV and considered in the assessment. The worst-case scenario of effects on views experienced from this GDL is represented by VP 7, where visitors may be approaching or leaving the GDL, but outwith the extent of the designation. The overall effect on the designation is not predicted to be significant due to the intervening walls, buildings and trees and the enclosed nature of the gardens focussed on the relationship of the grounds with Ardchattan House. Historic Environment Scotland have raised no objections in respect of these matters. 4.13 Visual Effects - The nearest settlements are the village of Taynuilt and the town of Oban, which are approximately 4km northeast and 12km west respectively. Settlement close to the site is sparse with theoretical visibility indicated from seven residential properties in Glen Lonan within 3km. There are a number of settlements, routes and other locations from where people are likely to gain views of the proposal. These include: Settlements asset out in the Landscape consultants report at Chapter 8 (Pages 15&16) 4.14 Although some of these viewpoints have been identified as having significant impact, this is localised and therefore is not considered unacceptable in respect of policy evaluation of the proposals. Localised impacts, even if significant, are not normally considered to be a reason to refuse permission for such development as some localised and significant impacts cannot be avoided completely due to the scale and nature of windfarm proposals. 4.15 Based on the advice of the Council’s Consultant Landscape Architect and NatureScot, it is considered that the proposed development does not warrant a refusal on landscape impact or visual impact grounds. 4.19 Having due regard to the above it is concluded that the proposal complies with the provisions of Policies 11 – Energy and 4 – Natural Places of NPF4, and Policy 30 – The Sustainable Growth of Renewables of LDP2 in this respect.
Page 57
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 5.0 BIODIVERSITY ECOLOGY and ORNITHOLOGY 5.1 Policy 11 – Energy of NPF4 requires that project design and mitigation demonstrate how impacts on biodiversity, including birds have been addressed. Policy 3 – Biodiversity of NPF4 requires development proposals to protect biodiversity, reverse biodiversity loss, deliver positive effects from development and strengthen nature networks. Policy 5 – Soils of NPF4 supports the generation of energy from renewable sources that optimises the contribution of the area to GHG emissions reduction targets on peatland, carbon-rich soils, and priority peatland. A detailed site-specific assessment will be required for development on peatland which will include the likely net effects of the development on climate emissions and loss of carbon. Policy 30 – The Sustainable Growth of Renewables of the ABLDP2 requires all applications for wind turbine developments to be assessed against impacts arising from effects on the natural heritage, including birds and to be assessed against impacts on carbon rich soils, using the carbon calculator (including cumulative) Policy 73 – Development Impact on Habitats, Species and Biodiversity requires Development proposals will be encouraged to incorporate, safeguard and enhance existing site biodiversity wherever possible. 5.2 The Ecology and Ornithological chapters of the Environmental Impact Assessment Report (EIAR) predict no likely significant effects on potentially important ecological or ornithological interests after embedded mitigation. Therefore, the elements within the OBE- HMP (Outline Biodiversity Enhancement and Habitat Management Plan) are largely considered enhancement measures as defined in the EIA Regulations and best practice EIA guidance. Where elements are defined as compensation/offsetting, these are clearly identified in the relevant sections. 5.3 As part of the EIAR, Ecology and Ornithology chapters have been written covering both disciplines. As part of that work, a series of ecological and ornithological mitigation and enhancement measures have been recommended. 5.4 A number of biodiversity enhancement measures are proposed as part of the Proposed Development’s OBE-HMP. The OBE-HMP includes provisions for the protection, maintenance, restoration and creation of habitats locally through the implementation of seven discrete ‘objectives’ for which work packages and methods have been identified. This is discussed in greater detail in Technical Appendix 6.10: Outline Biodiversity Enhancement and Habitat Management Plan. 5.5 Delivery of this OBE-HMP is secured through a planning condition. The overall aim of this OBE-HMP is to conserve, enhance and restore important habitats and associated species within the Beinn Ghlas OBE-HMP Study Area (Figure 1). The Existing HMP Area will continue to be an HMP area for the Proposed Development (Figure 1). Given the generality of this overall aim, it has been subdivided into the seven discrete ‘objectives’ for which particular work packages and methods have been identified. • Objective 1: Reduce grazing and browsing pressure; • Objective 2: Peatland restoration; • Objective 3: Creating and strengthening nature networks; • Objective 4: Pond/lochan creation; • Objective 5: Targeted priority species action; • Objective 6: White-tailed eagle fatality monitoring; and • Objective 7: Operational Carcass Recovery Scheme 5.6 The ornithology chapter (Chapter 7) presents the findings of the assessment of likely significant effects of the proposed Beinn Ghlas Wind Farm Repowering development (the ‘Proposed Development’) on ornithological features. It details the methods used to establish
Page 58
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 the bird populations within the Site and its surroundings, the results of the baseline surveys, and the process used to determine the sensitivity of the bird populations present. The ways in which birds might be affected (directly or indirectly) by the construction and operation of the Proposed Development are assessed, prior to and after the application of any required mitigation measures. 5.7. Baseline ornithological conditions to inform the design and assessment of the Proposed Development have been established through desk studies, ornithological field surveys and consultation with stakeholders and specialist recording groups. Based on a combination of field surveys and a desk study, the only species of Nature Conservation Importance that required detailed consideration was golden eagle and white-tailed eagle. 5.8. All other species recorded were scoped out of the assessment due to a lack of potential for significant effects. The identified impact pathways acting on golden eagle and white-tailed eagle were disturbance and habitat loss during construction (and decommissioning) and displacement and collision risk during operation. 5.9. When mitigation and best practice measures were considered (primarily ensuring no disturbance to breeding golden eagle and white-tailed eagle during construction via the Bird Protection Plan), no significant effects were identified. Mitigation and enhancement measures will be delivered through the implementation of a Biodiversity Enhancement and Habitat Management Plan (BEHMP). Additional enhancement measures were also committed to and will form part of the BEHMP. 5.10. The applicant has confirmed by submission that all potential OBE-HMP sites will be surveyed prior to any work commencing to ensure that existing potentially important biodiversity and protected species interests are protected and considered when developing and implementing the finalised and agreed OBE-HMP, whilst also establishing a ‘before management baseline’. Both NatureScot and the Councils biodiversity Officer are content with this approach subject to the imposition of appropriate conditions. 5.11. The applicant also confirms that the number of watercourse crossing have been limited where possible and where required will be designed to improve on existing crossings to improve habitats and fish migration. The replacement of existing culverted crossings with bottomless arches or box crossing could be beneficial to improve migratory fish passage and otter passage particularly along the section of existing access tracks where fish are more likely to be present. 5.12. Argyll District Salmon Fishery Board (ADSFB) note that the recent additional to the documents folder of Further Environmental Information has some relevant information on aquatic ecology. This recognises the importance of the River Nant, River Nell / Feochan and Allt Nathais which host spawning and nursery habitat for Atlantic salmon and brown trout. Argyll DSFB request that appropriate baseline, real time and post works monitoring is put in place to ensure any issues arising from the proposed development are identified and rectified in a timely manner as to prevent any deterioration of fish habitats and demonstrate that the development does not impact on the salmon populations or the fisheries in the Argyll DSFB area. Argyll DSFB would welcome an opportunity to constructively engage with any such process. An appropriate condition to secure this dialog and necessary actions/monitoring is proposed. 5.13. Both NatureScot and the Councils Biodiversity Officer have raised no objection to the proposals subject to the imposition of appropriate conditions. 5.14 Having due regard to the above, and subject to the recommended conditions it is considered that the proposal is consistent with the provisions of Policies 11 –
Page 59
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 Energy, 3 Biodiversity, 5 – Soils of NPF4 and Policy 30 – The Sustainable Growth of Renewables, Policy 73 – Development Impact on Habitats, Species and Biodiversity and Policy 79 – Protection of Soil and Peat Resources of LDP2 6.0 TREES, WOODS, AND FORESTS 6.1 Policy 11 – Energy of NPF4 requires that project design and mitigation will demonstrate how impacts on trees, woods and forests have been addressed. Policy 6 – Forestry, woodland, and Trees of NPF4 intent is to protect and expand forests, woodland, and trees. Policy 77 – Forestry, Woodland, and Trees of ABLDP2 states that there is a strong presumption in favour of protecting our woodland resources. Policy 78 – Woodland Removal of ABLDP2 states that proposals that would involve the removal of woodland resources will be assessed against the criteria for determining the acceptability of woodland removal, in accordance with the Scottish Government’s Control of Woodland Removal Policy. Where this assessment concludes that compensatory planting would be appropriate, developers will need to provide for this in accordance with the advice in the Scottish Government’s Control of Woodland Removal Policy. 6.2 EIAR Chapter 13: Other Issues Section 13.7 addresses forestry impacts. Due to the proposed widening of the Fearnoch Forest access tracks, the proposal would impact some commercial plantation managed by Forestry and Land Scotland. Upgrading the existing access from the A85 would also necessitate the removal of small areas of deciduous woodland adjacent to the A85 within Barguillean Estate. The total felling area would be 1.61 ha, of which 1.02 ha would be permanent and 0.59 ha would be temporary. The Outline Biodiversity Enhancement and Habitat Management Plan in Appendix 6.10, states that the compensatory planting requirement would be met through 14.4 linear km/ circa 7.2ha of broadleaved riparian planting and 1.5ha of ‘nature networking’ planting between blocks of existing woodland onsite and in additional locations between the Loch Awe and Loch Etive catchments. 6.3 Scottish Forestry have advised that they have no objection subject to conditions to secure compensatory planting and a native planting scheme. These have been proposed. 6.4 The Councils Biodiversity Officer is content that appropriate steps have been taken to avoid or minimise impacts on ancient woodland in accordance with policy advice and raises no objection to the application proposals. 6.5 Having due regard to the above it is concluded that subject to the conditions recommended by Scottish Forestry the proposal is consistent with the provisions of Policies 11 – Energy and 6 – Forestry, woodland and Trees of NPF4, and Policies 30 – The Sustainable Growth of Renewables; 77 – Forestry, Woodland and Trees and 78 – Woodland Removal of the LDP2. 7.0 HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT 7.1 Policy 11 – Energy of NPF4 requires that project design and mitigation demonstrates how impacts on the historic environment have been addressed. Policy 7 – Historic Assets and Places of NPF4 intent is to protect and enhance historic environment assets and places, and to enable positive change as a catalyst for the regeneration of places. Policy 30 – The Sustainable Growth of Renewables of LDP2 requires all applications for wind turbine developments to be assessed against impacts on the historic environment, including scheduled monuments, listed buildings and their settings. Policy 15 – Protection, Conservation and Enhancement of Our Historic Environment Policy 19 – Scheduled Monuments Policy 20 – Gardens and Designed Landscapes Policy 21 – Sites of
Page 60
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 Archaeological Importance support the key policies and provide guidance on assessing development proposals against heritage impacts. 7.2 The Archaeology and Cultural Heritage chapter (Chapter 9) of the EIAR considers the likely effects on cultural heritage interests arising from the Proposed Development. The assessment of effects upon cultural heritage has considered potential direct/indirect physical impacts related to construction of the Proposed Development on the fabric of heritage assets (including the decommissioning of the currently operational Wind Farm) and impacts on the setting of a heritage asset that could affect its cultural significance. 7.3. There are seven known heritage assets located within the Application Boundary as shown in Volume 3a, Figure 9.1a and Figure 9.1b. Possible accidental direct physical impact upon HA01 Deirdre Shieling Memorial (a modern memorial and sculpture within the Site) will be mitigated by its fencing off for protection throughout construction. The monument’s location will also be included on construction plans and its presence highlighted in project inductions. 7.4. No direct or indirect physical impacts as a result of the Proposed Development are anticipated upon known heritage assets within the Application Boundary. 7.5. A ‘Stage 1’ Setting Assessment (Volume 4, Technical Appendix 9.1) found the potential for effects through changes within their setting on the cultural significance of one Inventory Garden and Designed Landscape, one Category B Listed Building, and six Scheduled Monuments (Volume 3a, Figure 9.2). These eight heritage assets are assessed in detail in this chapter, supported with photomontage visualisations (Volume 3a, Figures 9.3 – 9.9). 7.6. Of these assets agreed for detailed assessment in this chapter, no impact has been identified within the EIAR upon: • GDL00019 / SM13644 / LB4715 Ardchattan Priory / Ardchattan House Garden and Designed Landscape, Scheduled Monument, Category B Listed Building (Volume 3a, CHVP01 Figure 9.3) • SM4120 Caisteal Suidhe Cheannaidh, dun 470m NW of Achnacraobh (Volume 3a, CHVP05 Figure 9.7) • SM3891 ‘Clachadow, cairn 960m NW of’ (Volume 3a, CHVP06 Figure 9.8) • SM3888 Glenamachrie, cairns 65m & 300m WNW of (Volume 3a, CHVP07 Figure 9.9) 4.6.11 7.7. Residual adverse operational effects which are minor and not significant are predicted upon two Scheduled Monuments: • SM3910 ‘An Dun, dun 500m ESE of Glenamadrie’ (Volume 3a, CHVP02 Figure 10.4 & CHVP03 Figure 9.5) • SM3930 ‘Barguillean Farm, dun 250m SSW of’ (Volume 3a, CHVP04 Figure 9.6) 7.8. The applicants submit that; • In respect of the setting of heritage assets, no additional mitigation beyond that embedded in the design is proposed. • No cumulative effects have been identified. • No significant residual effects upon cultural heritage have been identified through EIA as presented in this chapter.
Page 61
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 7.9. Historic Environment Scotland (HES) have raised no objection to the proposals with a detailed evaluation of the proposals as set out in their consultation response at Section C of this report. 7.10 West of Scotland Archaeology Service (WoSAS) – have advised that they have no objection subject to a condition to secure a programme of archaeological works in accordance with a written scheme of investigation to be submitted by the applicant for the written approval of the Planning Authority in consultation with WoSAS. 7.11 Having due regard to the above subject to the condition recommended by the West of Scotland Archaeology Service it is considered that the proposal is consistent with the provisions of Policy 11 – Energy and Policy 7 – Historic Assets and Places of NPF4, and Policies 30 – The Sustainable Growth of Renewables; 15 – Protection, Conservation and Enhancement of Our Historic Environment; 19 – Scheduled Monuments; 20 – Gardens and Designed Landscapes; and 21 – Sites of Archaeological Importance of the LDP2 8.0 HYDROLOGY, THE WATER ENVIRONMENT, FLOOD RISK AND PEAT 8.1 Policy 11 – Energy of NPF4 requires that project design and mitigation demonstrate how effects on hydrology, the water environment. Peat and flood risk have been addressed. Policy 30 – Supporting the Sustainable Growth of Renewables of ABLDP2 requires all applications for wind turbine developments to be assessed against impacts arising from effects on hydrology, the water environment. Peat and flood risk (including cumulative). Policy 55 - Flooding of ABLDP 2 provides guidance on the type of development that will be generally permissible within specific flood risk areas. Policy 57 – Risk Appraisals requires flood risk assessments, and drainage impact assessments, to accompany applications where required and NPF 4 Policy 5 “Soils” and LDP 2 Policy 79 -Protection of Soil and Peat Resources apply in respect of Peat matters. 8.2 The infrastructure of the Proposed Development will require approximately 12.83 km site access and internal tracks of which 2.71 km is new access track (1.6 km floating) with associated new watercourse crossings and 8.52 km is existing access track and watercourse crossings which would need to be upgraded. The track layout has been designed to avoid watercourses and use existing access tracks where possible, with a preference for crossing of smaller scale watercourses or replacing existing crossings that currently impede fish passage or restrict peak flows. 8.3. A total of 26 watercourse crossings are required for the Proposed Development. Of these, 22 are existing crossings to be reused, extended/upgraded or replaced and four are new watercourse crossings. Of the 22 existing crossings to be re-used, upgrade/extended or replaced, one is a single span crossing and 21 are culverted crossings, 15 are watercourse crossings shown on the 1:50,000 scale OS Mapping and six are of watercourses shown on the 1:25,000 scale OS mapping and one is shown on 1:10,000 OS mapping (minor crossing). (All proposed watercourse crossings are listed in Table 1 and 2 and shown on Figure 8.6a-8.6c of the EIA Report). 8.4. Information submitted as part of the EIA at Technical Appendix 8-7 provides an inventory of information on each watercourse crossing including scale, dimensions, bedload, vegetation and other characteristics, along with the proposed type of crossing to be installed. At design phase these crossings will be sized to allow the 1 in 200 year return period flow event plus allowance for climate change and a freeboard. (This information should be read in conjunction with EIA Report Chapter 8: Geology, Hydrology, Hydrogeology and Peat of
Page 62
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 the EIA Report, Figures 8.6a-c in Volume 3 of the EIA Report and Chapter 2: Project Description of the EIA Report). 8.5 The Site and the Site Access is located within three main surface water catchments: The River Nant, River Nell/Foechan Mhor and the Allt Nathais. • The majority of the Site is within the River Nant and River Nell/Foechan Mhor catchments with • The majority of the Site Access within the Allt Nathais catchment. • The majority of the Site drains to the south within the River Nant catchment via Eas Ruadh and un-named tributaries of the Laggan Burn, the Allt Carnaich and the Garbh Allt into Loch Nant. Loch Nant discharges to the River Nant that flows northwards to discharge to Loch Etive, north of Taynuilt. • The northern section of the Site drains to south via un-named tributaries of River Lonan which flows west to Loch Nell before discharge as River Nell/Foechan Mhor before discharging to Loch Foechan near Kilmore. • There are three small lochans within the site all located to the north or north west of the Carn Cairbhre summit. 8.6. Submissions confirm that the proposals will also be subject to controls under the SEPA Regulatory Methods for Engineering Activities (SEPA, 2019) which lists conservation, environmental standards for morphology and good practice as tests for any licence application. During the determination, SEPA shall consider the specific location, type, size and existing water quality of the local water features. A Construction Site Licence is anticipated to be required. This application process shall be undertaken pre-construction, providing supplementary information to that available at the EIA Report stage as part of compliance with required SEPA enforced regulatory frameworks. 8.7. Critical to these works are ensuring potential impacts on ancient woodland along the access track, impacts on the water environment, and impacts on fish are either avoided or minimised in accordance with best practice requirements. These matters have all been considered and addressed by the use of appropriate conditions and as embedded in the EIAR and appendices. 8.8. Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) have been proposed to ensure that the rate of runoff from the Site post-development is no greater than that prior to development and would not therefore increase any downstream flood risk. The proposed SuDS allow the quality of water to be managed at source, prior to any discharge, thereby helping to prevent any reduction in water quality downstream. 8.9. Potentially groundwater-dependent terrestrial ecosystems have been identified within the Application Boundary and assessed on a case-by-case basis to determine their level of groundwater dependency and potential impacts from development. Location-specific mitigation measures are provided to manage potential impacts arising from construction activities where it has not been possible to avoid these areas. 8.10. The Council’s Flood Prevention Officer – has no objection to this proposal and recommends that the following planning conditions are attached to any grant of planning permission. Any proposed watercourse crossings should not reduce the existing capacity of the channel and ideally should be designed to convey the 1 in 200 year plus climate change (56% allowance) flood event. Surface water drainage should be designed in accordance with CIRIA C753 and ensure that post development surface water runoff does not exceed the pre-development surface water runoff. The surface water drainage should be in operation prior to the start of construction.
Page 63
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 8.11. Peat Impact and Management Proposals 8.12. Details of the proposed approach to minimising impacts on Peat and proposed management and mitigation measures are set out within the EIAR at Chapter 8. This details the current environmental baseline in relation to this topic and identifies and assesses the potential significant effects on identified receptors. The assessment tables present the effects of each infrastructure section on the receptors identified. These effects are then grouped for the assessment section which discusses the overall effects. Where relevant, mitigation, management and monitoring measures are then discussed and the residual effects determined. The Chapter presents associated links to other chapters or appendices such as Chapter 6 and the OBE-HMP, Technical Appendix 6.10. 8.13. A detailed programme of peat depth and peatland condition surveying has been completed and the results used to inform the Site design to avoid areas of deeper peat deposits. A Peat Landslide Hazard Risk Assessment and Outline Peat Management Plan Beaufort Wind Limited Beinn Ghlas Wind Farm Repowering EIA Report Volume 1 have been produced for the Proposed Development, which show that risks to peat slide have been avoided and all excavated peat can be appropriately used on site for peat restoration purposes. 8.14. In respect of the Peat Landslide Hazard Risk Assessment report, an appropriately worded condition has been included to ensure that the submitted Peat Hazard Landslide Report and appropriate safeguarding measures is secured through the appointment of a Geotechnical Clerk of works with expertise in these matters to ensure adherence to best practice during future construction activities. 8.15. The EIAR Chapter 8 submissions clarify that mitigation measures have been identified for all potential impacts, either through the design process or in accordance with good practice guidance. It has been shown, as a consequence of the Proposed Development design and embedded mitigation, that no significant impacts on geology, hydrogeology, hydrology and peat would arise as a result of the Proposed Development. 8.16. No objections to the proposals have been raised in respect of these matters by NatureScot, SEPA or the Councils Biodiversity Officer and Flooding advisor subject to the imposition of appropriate conditions. 8.17. Having due regard to the above, subject to the recommended conditions it is concluded that the proposal is consistent with the provisions of Policy 11 – Energy and Policy 5 Soils of NPF 4, Policy 30 – The Sustainable Growth of Renewables, Policy 55 – Flooding; Policy 57 Risk Appraisals and Policy 79 Protection of soil and Peat Resources of LDP2. 9.0 NOISE & SHADOW FLICKER 9.1 Policy 11 – Energy of NPF4 requires that project design and mitigation will demonstrate how impacts on communities and individual dwellings, including, residential amenity, visual impact, noise, and shadow flicker have been addressed. Policy 30 – the Sustainable Growth of Renewables of the LDP2 requires all applications for wind turbine developments to be assessed in terms of impacts on communities and individual dwellings, including visual impact, residential amenity, noise and shadow flicker (including cumulative). 9.2. Noise and vibration are addressed in detail at Chapter 7 or the EIAR and summarises the assessment of the potential noise and vibration effects of the Proposed Development on the residents of nearby dwellings.
Page 64
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 9.3. Noise levels from operation of the turbines have been predicted for those locations around the site most likely to be affected by noise. Noise limits have been derived following the simplified assessment method stipulated in national planning guidance given the relatively large separation distance of approximately 1.9 km or more between the turbines and the nearest Noise-Sensitive Receptors (NSRs). 9.4. The EIAR confirms that wind developments within 5 km have been considered in the cumulative assessment: the Cruach Clenmacrie and Corr Chnoc Wind Farms. Other, more distant wind farms were not considered as the applicants have submitted that they do not make an acoustically relevant contribution to cumulative noise levels. Predicted operational noise levels have been compared to the limit values to demonstrate that turbines of the type and size which would be installed can operate within the limits so derived. It is concluded that operational noise levels from the Proposed Development will be within levels recommended in national guidance for wind energy schemes. 9.5 The Applicant has provided an updated technical note to reflect recently published guidance on windfarm noise measurement. Importantly the ABC Noise Consultant has evaluated the information submitted and raised no objection to the proposals subject to the imposition of a suitably worded condition which has been agreed between parties and reflects current best practice advice on these matters. 9.6 Residential/Visual Amenity& Shadow Flicker 9.7. Residential properties within 3km of the proposed turbines are shown along with the ZTV in Figure 5.79, except for Barr Bheag (listed in the EIAR as demolished). The LVIA states in paragraph 5.6.162 that the initial assessment of visual receptors (contained in Technical Appendix 5.4) identified ‘24 residential properties within 3 km of the proposed turbines. The closest properties overlapped by the ZTV are Bar-Ghlas and Am-Barr situated to the north of Glen Lonan Road, at approximately 2.1 km and 2.2km respectively. No significant visual effects are predicted in the EIAR on any of the residential properties within 3km of the proposal, due to partial screening by intervening landform and vegetation. The Councils Landscape Advisor is in agreement with this conclusion. 9.8. Shadow flicker is an effect that can occur when the shadow of a blade passes over a small opening (such as window), briefly reducing the intensity of light within the room, and causing a flickering to be perceived. As a result of the distance from the development to the nearest properties, shadow flicker effects are not likely as the nearest residential property is over 10 times the blade tip height away from the development. 9.9. It is noted that the Design and Access Statement included in the EIAR states that consideration of potential effects upon residential visual amenity was part of the design process and resulted in the omission of T14 from layout A (the turbine located closest to residential properties which, given its position within the site, could appear dominant within views from the nearest properties). 9.10. Having due regard to the above it is concluded that the proposal is acceptable in terms of any potential shadow flicker impact, Noise and water supplies subject to the conditions recommended by the Council’s Noise Consultant and Environmental Health Officer and is therefore consistent with the provisions of Policy 11- Energy, and Policy 30 – The Sustainable Growth of Renewables of the ABLDP2 in this respect. 10.0 ROAD TRAFFIC AND ADJACENT TRUNK ROADS
Page 65
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 10.1 Policy 11 – Energy of NPF4 requires that project design and mitigation demonstrate how impacts on road traffic and on adjacent trunk roads have been addressed, including during construction. Policy 30 – the Sustainable Growth of Renewables of ABLDP2 requires all applications for wind turbine developments to be assessed against impacts on road traffic and impacts on adjacent trunk roads. Policy 35 – Design of New and Existing, Public Roads and Private Access Regimes of LDP2 acceptance of development utilising new and existing public roads, private roads and private access regimes is subject to road safety and street design issues being addressed to the satisfaction of the Roads Authority and the Planning Authority. Policy 38 – Construction Standards for Public Roads requires that accesses which connect to or impact significantly on a Trunk Road require consultation with Transport Scotland. 10.2. The application proposals involve; • Upgrading of four existing road junctions to support construction and abnormal road traffic • Upgrading of forestry tracks from the A85 through Fearnoch Forest, Glen Lonan Road (C32) and existing wind farm access track to accommodate the delivery of abnormal loads to the site and • use of existing track for access to the first construction compound • Formation of internal access tracks (this has been minimised by seeking to utilise existing internal tracks where possible) 10.3. The Traffic and Transport chapter of the EIAR assesses the potential effects of the Proposed Development on the road network (in transport terms) and its users. The assessment detailed within Chapter 10 of the EIAR includes worst-case assumptions made for the purpose of forming a robust assessment of the Proposed Development within the parameters identified elsewhere within the EIAR. The Study Area for construction vehicles is focused on the immediate roads surrounding and leading to the Proposed Development, as it is expected that traffic flows outside of this area would be dissipated on the wider road network without any significant effect. This chapter therefore only considers the likely increases in traffic along these routes associated with the Proposed Development. 10.4Given the temporary nature of the construction programmes and with the implementation of mitigation measures through a Construction Traffic Management Plan (CTMP) and Abnormal Load Traffic Management Plan (ATMP), all traffic and transport effects (including cumulative) can be effectively managed. 10.5. ABC’s Area Roads and Transport Scotland have raised no objection to the proposals subject to the imposition of appropriate conditions (previously set out in within Section C of this report). These will involve a Construction Traffic Management Plan, Abnormal Loads Plan, necessary junction improvements and protection of the public road through monitoring. 10.6. The Area Roads Manager has requested pre commencement meetings to discuss these matters and Officers will seek to ensure that both Transport Scotland and the Area Roads Manager meet with the appropriate parties at an early stage to ensure all Traffic and Transport matters are properly addressed 10.7. Having due regard to the above, subject to the recommended conditions it is considered that the proposal is consistent with the provisions of Policy 11 – Energy of NPF4, Policy 30 – The Sustainable Growth of Renewables, Policy 35 – Design of New and Existing, Public Roads and Private Access Regimes and Policy 38 – Construction Standards for Public Roads in this regard.
Page 66
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 11.0 NET ECONOMIC IMPACT, INCLUDING LOCAL AND COMMUNITY SOCIO- ECONOMIC BENEFITS 11.1 Policy 11 – Energy of NPF4 states that proposals will only be supported where they maximise net economic impact, including local and community socio- economic benefits such as employment, associated business and supply chain opportunities. Policy 30 - the Sustainable Growth of Renewables of LDP2 require all applications for wind turbine developments to be assessed in terms of net economic impact, including local and community socio-economic benefits such as employment, associated business and supply chain opportunities. 11.2 Submissions relating to the assessment of whether the Proposed Development will maximise these benefits is based on the commitments and actions that the Applicant has taken on supply chain development, skills development, the empowerment of communities and balancing the development with environmental protection and enhancement. This considered both what the Applicant has direct control over, and how it can enable others to have a positive impact across these areas. 11.3 The Applicant has committed to engaging with local suppliers to maximise local benefits from the wind farm by supporting the local community and working with local contractors whenever the project requirements and conditions allow. A supplier registration page is included on the project website (https://www.beinnghlasrepowering.co.uk/suppliers registration/) to communicate opportunities across all phases of the Proposed Development. In addition, the Applicant will organise a contractors open day / ‘Meet the Buyer’ event to ensure maximum engagement with contractors. This will ensure high local supply chain content and provide opportunities for local employment which are routed in the needs and context of the Argyll and Bute economy. 11.4 The Applicant has also developed an Outline Circular Decommissioning Strategy (Nadara and Reblade, 2025) to identify circular opportunities for the decommissioning of the existing wind farm and has committed to supporting the protection of the local environment by minimising waste, reducing carbon emissions and promoting sustainable material use, and creation of circular jobs, skills and educational opportunities. The Applicant has proactively engaged with local schools to support skills development in the local onshore wind sector, including delivering a STEM workshop at Taynuilt Primary School in partnership with 3DW. An invitation has been extended to Oban High School to provide a similar workshop. These initiatives will provide opportunities for skills development and support the continuation of innovative processes to maximise onshore wind benefits. The Applicant is actively engaging with the communities surrounding their onshore wind farms organising events such as annual forums to give them an opportunity to provide feedback and also keep them informed of the development and associated benefits 11.5 The applicants have also submitted that the Proposed Development is also expected to provide an annual contribution of approximately £168,000 per annum in community benefits. During its operations, the Proposed Development is expected to generate approximately £408,900 in non-domestic rates yearly. These payments will contribute to the funding of local public services and the investment priorities of local communities. Whilst these financial contributions are noted, they are not a material planning considerations for the purposes of the determination of this planning application. 11.6 The applicant contents that: The Applicant has proposed a wide range of initiatives in pursuit of the policy intention of NPF4 Policy 11(c) to “maximise net economic impact”. These are consistent with the Scottish Renewables guidance (Scottish Renewables, 2025), covering the four themes of
Page 67
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 maximising the supply chain, skills and workforce, community empowerment, and natural environment benefits. The comprehensive package of measures is expected to deliver substantial economic and community benefits, in line with the intention of NPF4 Policy 11(c). 11.7 Having due regard to the above it is considered a degree of net economic impact, including local and community socio-economic benefits, typical of such developments will be provided. It is therefore concluded that the proposal is consistent with the provisions of Policy 11 – Energy of NPF4, and Policy 30 – The Sustainable Growth of Renewables of the LDP2. 12.0 IMPACTS ON TOURISM AND RECREATION 12.1 Policy 11 – Energy of NPF4 does not require Impacts on tourism to be considered. Policy 30 – The Sustainable Growth of Renewables of LDP2 requires all applications for wind turbine developments to be assessed against impacts on tourism and recreation. 12.2 Tourism - Policy 11 of NPF4 does not include a requirement for the impact of proposals on tourism to be assessed. However, Policy 30 – The Sustainable Growth of Renewables of the LDP does. In Argyll & Bute the landscape is regarded as being a particularly valued asset both in terms of its intrinsic qualities and in terms of its value to the tourism economy. For all types of development, the maintenance of landscape character is an important facet of decision-making in the countryside in Argyll & Bute, regardless of the scale of development proposed. 12.3 As Tourism and Landscape & Visual matters are intrinsically linked, and there is little evidence to demonstrate whether wind farms adversely affect tourism, it is considered that such impacts are covered in the landscape and visual impact assessment of the proposal. 12.4 Having due regard to the above the proposal is consistent with the provisions of Policy 11 – Energy of NPF4 and Policies 04 – Sustainable Development and 30 – The Sustainable Growth of Renewables of LDP2 in this respect. 13.0 PUBLIC ACCESS 13.1 Policy 11 – Energy of NPF4 requires that project design and mitigation demonstrate how impacts on public access are addressed, including impact on long distance walking, and cycling routes and scenic routes. Policy 30 – the Sustainable Growth of Renewables of LDP2 requires all wind turbine developments to be assessed against impacts on public access, including impact on long distance walking and cycling routes and those scenic routes identified in NPF4. Policy 32 – Active Travel of ABLDP2 requires that requires active travel and recreation are integrated in developments from the start of the wider design process and existing active travel networks should be safeguarded and integrated with the development. 13.2 National Cycle Network (NCN) Route 78 passes 8.7km to the northwest and the reclassified cycle route along Glen Lonan Road is located 1.8 km to the north. 13.3 ABC Core Paths – At time of writing no response has been received. Having due regard to the above subject to the condition to secure an Access Management Plan it is considered that the proposal is consistent with the provisions of Policy 11- Energy of NPF4, Policy 30 – the Sustainable Growth of Renewables; and Policy 32 - Active Travel of the LDP2. 14.0 AVIATION AND DEFENCE INTERESTS
Page 68
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 14.1 Policy 11 – Energy of NPF4 requires that project design and mitigation demonstrate how impacts on aviation and defence interests including seismological recording have been addressed. Policy 30 – the Sustainable Growth of Renewables of LDP2 requires impacts on aviation and defence interests and seismological recording to be addressed. Policy 43 – Safeguarding of Aerodromes of LDP2 stipulates that Development will not be permitted where it would compromise the safe operation of an Aerodrome or Technical Site or constrain their present or future operations. 14.2 Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO) – have advised that, subject to conditions they have no objection and National Air Traffic Services Safeguarding (NATS) have raised no objection. Recommended conditions in respect of these matters have been proposed to safeguard aviation safety. 14.3 Having due regard to the above, subject to the conditions recommended it is concluded the proposal is consistent with the provisions of Policy 11 – Energy of NPF4 and Policies 30 – The Sustainable Growth of Renewables and 43 – Safeguarding of Aerodromes, of the LDP2 in this respect. 15.0 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND BROADCASTING INSTALLATIONS 15.1 Policy 11 – Energy of NPF4 requires that project design and mitigation demonstrate how impacts on telecommunications and broadcasting installations, have been addressed particularly, ensuring that transmission links are not compromised. Policy 30 – The Sustainable Growth of Renewables of LDP2 requires all applications for wind turbine developments are assessed against impacts on telecommunications and broadcasting installations, particularly ensuring that transmission links are not compromised. 15.2 Arqiva -Have raised no objection to the proposals on the potential impact on re- broadcast Links ( which serve local settlements) but recommended that a condition requiring any adverse impacts on individual domestic properties be imposed, or a condition to require these matters to be evaluated in advance of construction , with any necessary mitigation undertaken is imposed on any grant of consent. An appropriate condition requiring these matters to be evaluated and addressed is proposed. 15.3 Having due regard to the above it is concluded that the proposal will not have any adverse impacts on telecommunications, broadcasting installations and transmission links (including cumulative impacts) and is consistent with the provisions of Policy 11- Energy of NPF4 and Policy 30 – The Sustainable Growth of Renewables of LDP2 in this respect. 16.0 DECOMMISSIONING, SITE RESTORATION AND QUALITY OF SITE RESTORATION PLANS 16.1 Policy 11 – Energy of NPF4 requires that project design and mitigation demonstrate how proposals for the decommissioning of developments, including ancillary infrastructure, and site restoration have been addressed. It also requires that project design and mitigation demonstrate how the quality of site restoration plans have been addressed including the measures in place to safeguard or guarantee availability of finances to effectively implement those plans. Policy 30 – The Sustainable Growth of Renewables of the LDP2 requires consideration to be given to the long-term environmental management of the site. 16.2 The operational life of the proposed development is 35 years from the date of commissioning. At the end of the 35-year operational period, it will be fully decommissioned, or an application may be made to extend its operational life or replace the turbines. This
Page 69
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 would involve the dismantling and removal of the wind turbines, hardstandings, electrical equipment, and control building as well as restoring the turbine areas, hardstandings and tracks. A Decommissioning Plan would set out environmental protection measures and restoration principles which would be implemented. This Plan would be agreed with ABC. It is recommended that this matter is covered by planning conditions consistent with other projects across Argyll & Bute and best practice advice. 16.3 Having due regard to the above it is concluded that subject to appropriate decommissioning and site restoration and financial bond condition (s) being attached to the planning permission the proposal is consistent with the provisions of Policy 11 – Energy of NPF4 and Policy 30 – The Sustainable Growth of Renewables of the LDP2 17.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS 17.1 Policy 11 – Energy of NPF4 requires that project design and mitigation will demonstrate how cumulative impacts have been addressed. Policy 30 – The Sustainable Growth of Renewables of the ABLDP2 also requires cumulative impacts to be addressed. Any cumulative impacts which have been identified are covered in the preceding sections of this report. 18.0 RENEWABLE ENERGY GENERATION TARGETS AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS REDUCTION TARGETS. 18.1 Policy 11 – Energy of NPF4 requires that, in considering the impacts of the proposal, significant weight will be placed on the contribution of the proposal to renewable energy generation targets and on greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets. Policy 1 – Tackling the climate and nature crises of NPF4 requires that when considering all development proposals significant weight will be given to the global climate and nature crises. Policy 30 – The Sustainable Growth of Renewables of ABLDP2 require all applications for wind turbine developments to be assessed against the scale of contribution to renewable energy generation targets and greenhouse gas emissions. 18.2 A carbon balance assessment has been undertaken regarding the Proposed Development and is detailed in Technical Appendix 13.4. This assessment uses the Scottish Government’s Carbon Calculator for wind farms on peat to assess the benefit of displacing electricity from fossil fuels with renewable generated electricity, compared to the emissions of carbon required for the construction and operation of the Proposed Development over its approximately 35-year lifetime, including losses of stored carbon from disturbed peatland and reduction of carbon fixing vegetation cover. The Carbon Calculator provides an estimate of the carbon payback time for the Proposed Development. 18.3 The results of the Carbon Calculator show submitted with the application that the Proposed Development is estimated to produce annual carbon savings of around 32,000 tonnes of CO2e per year through the displacement of grid electricity, based on the current average grid mix. 18.4 The assessment of the Proposed Development estimates losses of around 64,000 tonnes of CO2e, nearly all of which come from the lifecycle emissions of the turbines. Ecological site-based losses account for just over 10,000 tCO2e while restoration of areas of degraded bog are estimated to produce gains over the lifetime of the Proposed Development through blocking of drains and re-wetting of peat; these gains are estimated at nearly 16,000 tonnes of CO2e, which is greater than the ecological site-based losses.
Page 70
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 18.5 The estimated payback time of the Proposed Development, using the Scottish Government Carbon Calculator, is 1.5 years, with a minimum/maximum range of 0.87 to 2.3 years. There are no current guidelines about what payback time constitutes a significant impact, but 1.5 years is only 4 % of the anticipated lifespan of the Proposed Development. The carbon intensity of the electricity produced by the Proposed Development is estimated at 0.019 kgCO2e/kWh. This is well below the outcome indicator for maintaining the electricity grid carbon intensity below 0.05 kgCO2e/kWh required by the Scottish Government in the Climate Change Plan update and therefore the Proposed Development is evaluated to have an overall beneficial effect on the carbon balance. 18.6 Having due regard to the above it is considered that the proposal is consistent with the provisions of Policies 1 – Tackling the climate and nature crisis and 11 – Energy of NPF 4, and Policies 30 – The Sustainable Growth of Renewables and 04 – Sustainable Development of LDP2 19.0 GRID CAPACITY & ENERGY STORAGE 19.1 Policy 11 – Energy of NPF4 requires that grid capacity should not constrain renewable energy development. It is for developers to agree connections to the grid with the relevant network operator. Development proposals for all forms of renewable, low-carbon and zero emissions technologies will be supported, which include energy storage. Policy 30 – The Sustainable Growth of Renewables of LDP2 requires the Council to have regard to the opportunities for energy storage. 19.2 Grid Capacity - Connection to Electricity Grid - There is a viable grid connection available as has been set out within FEI. The grid connection does not form part of this planning application and will be the subject of future separate detailed proposals and controls. 19.3 Energy storage – battery storage is not proposed as part of this development. Having due regard to the above it is considered that the proposal is consistent with the provisions of Policy 11 – Energy of NPF 4, and Policy 30 – The Sustainable Growth of Renewables of the LDP2 in respect to Grid Capacity and Energy Storage (opportunities for energy storage have been explored). 20.0 CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATION 20.1. As per the detailed assessment above, and taking into account all consultee responses, third party representations and relevant planning policy it is considered that this proposal is acceptable. It is therefore recommended that planning permission is granted subject to the conditions recommended in this report.
Page 71
Report of Handling Template for PPSL and Delegated Planning Applications – Updated 10.11.2023 Appendix B – List of Representations Objections 3 Support 26 Representation 1 25/01240/PP - 31 August 2026 Objection 1. Mr Phillips 02.10.2025 2. Mrs Phillips 02.10.2025 3. Mr Roni Macdonald Riverside Cottage PA34 4XX 10.10.2025 Support 1. Lorne Nelson Kilmaronaig Connel Argyll PA37 1PW 12.11.2025 2. Aubrey Thompson 12 Mavisbank Kinross KY13 8QR 12.11.2025 3. Ms Janet Lees Westray Deirdre Connel Argyll And Bute 23.01.2026 4. Alison Dawson Dunalba Main Road Connel Oban 08.01.2026 5. Ishbel Inall 03.11.2025 6. Marlyn Turbitt 2 Lagan Taynuilt Argyll And Bute PA35 1JY 03.11.2025 7. Robert Campbell-Preston Allt-An-Dubh Inverawe Argyll And Bute PA35 1HU 03.11.2025 8. Edna Whyte Gallery Cottage Cullipool Road Isle Of Luing PA34 4TX 28.10.2025 9. Roger Soep Railway Cottage Taynuilt PA35 1JE 28.10.2025 10. Maria Soep Railway Cottage Taynuilt PA35 1JE 28.10.2025 11. Miss Fiona MacPherson An-Nuadh Balliemeanoch East Lochaweside PA33 1BW 22.10.2025 12. Mr Anthony Robin Marshall Gorstain Taynuilt Argyll And Bute PA35 1HY 11.12.2025 13. Morag MacCormick Flat L Regent Court 15 Hughenden Lane Glasgow 18.12.2025 14. Douglas Baird The Chalet Corachie Clematis Taynuilt Argyll And Bute 10.12.2025 15. Owner Occupier Ardchaan Glen Lonan Taynuilt PA35 1HY 12.02.2026 16. Sam MacDonald The Willows Bridge Road Connel PA37 1PJ 17. R Sinclair Cruachan View Cottage Connel Oban Argyll 18.11.2025 18. Mr Derek Wilkinson Lora House Upper C52 Connel Village Loop Road Connel 19. PA37 1PA 18.02.2026 20. Mr Neil McGougan Brackendale Taynuilt Argyll And Bute PA35 1JQ 11.12.2025 21. Dr Simon Lawrence 7 Paterson Street Lochgilphead Argyll And Bute PA31 8JP 12.11.2025 22. Colin Griffiths Woodend Cottage Kirkton Taynuilt PA35 1HQ 19.11.2025 23. Mr Martin Charlton Bunanta Taynuilt Argyll And Bute PA35 1HY 17.11.2025 24. Mr James Houston Am Barr Barguillean Taynuilt Argyll And Bute PA35 1HY 01.10.2025 25. Mr Max Bigham 4 Ferryfield Drive Connel Argyll And Bute PA37 1SP 04.09.2025 26. Mrs Melanie Currie Highfield Taynuilt Argyll And Bute PA35 1JQ Representation 1. Mr Keith Waudby Arqiva Ltd Borough Hill Daventry NN11 4NB