Democracy Spraffa

Printed minutes

Argyll and Bute Council · 15 September 2026
Back to NDR and BID Appeals Committee — 15 September 2026 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

MINUTES of MEETING of NDR AND BID APPEALS COMMITTEE held BY MICROSOFT
TEAMS on TUESDAY, 15 SEPTEMBER 2026 
Present: Councillor Gordon Blair (Chair) 
Councillor Kieron Green  Councillor Liz McCabe 
Attending: Stuart McLean, Committee Manager
Shona Barton, Governance Manager
Susan Mair, Legal Manager
David Walker, Solicitor
Fergus Walker, Revenue and Benefits Manager – Council’s Representative 
1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 
There were no apologies for absence. 
2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 
There were no declarations of interest. 
The Committee resolved in terms of Section 50(A)(4) of the Local Government (Scotland)
Act 1973 to exclude the press and public for the following item of business on the grounds
that it was likely to involve the disclosure of exempt information as defined in Paragraph 6
of Part 1 of Schedule 7A to the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973. 
3. STAGE 2 APPEAL REPORT - BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (BID)
LEVY APPEAL 
The Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting.  The parties (and any representatives)
were given the options for participating in the meeting today.  The options available were
by video call, by audio call or by written submission.  For this hearing the Appellant opted
to proceed by way of written submission and a copy of this was contained within the
Agenda pack for Members’ consideration. 
The Council’s representative opted to proceed by way of video call and Fergus Walker
joined the meeting by MS Teams. 
The Chair outlined the procedure that would be followed and invited the Council’s
representative to speak in support of his report. 
COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE 
Mr Walker spoke to the terms of his report and confirmed that Members were being asked
to determine whether the BID levy was improperly charged having regard to the
Appellant’s written submission; the information held on the Non-Domestic Rate Valuation
Roll; the relevant BID arrangements; and the applicable legislative framework. 
MEMBERS’ QUESTIONS 
The Members were given the opportunity to ask the Council’s representative questions.

Page 2

SUMMING UP 
Council Representative 
The Council’s representative was given the opportunity to sum up. 
When asked, Mr Walker confirmed that he had received a fair hearing. 
DEBATE 
The Members debated the terms of the Appeal. 
DECISION 
The Committee agreed not to uphold the Appeal and noted that the Appellant would
receive written notification of this within 7 days. 
(Reference: Report by Revenue and Benefits Manager dated 20 July 2026, and
Appellant’s Written Submission dated 31 August 2026, submitted)