Democracy Spraffa

LEARNING ESTATE INVESTMENT PROGRAMME (LEIP) Report

Argyll and Bute Council · 25 August 2022
Back to Community Services Committee — 25 August 2022 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL             COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE
EDUCATION 
COMMERCIAL SERVICES                       25 AUGUST 2022   
LEARNING ESTATE INVESTMENT PROGRAMME (LEIP) UPDATE
POTENTIAL BID FOR NEW MULL CAMPUS 
1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
1.1 The Learning Estate Investment Programme (LEIP) is the Scottish Government’s
flagship programme for investment in education and is now into Phase 3.  It is
the successor to the ‘Schools for the Future’ programme which our Council has
delivered new builds or substantial refurbishments across our education estate
at Oban, Kirn, Dunoon, Campbeltown, Lochgilphead etc.  Our Council has not
applied for previous phases of LEIP and there has been encouragement for a
Scotland wide engagement with the programme. There is currently no assurance
there would be a subsequent phase of LEIP or prioritised funding for education
in future years of this parliament until 2026.   
1.2 The Scottish Government has recently clarified the timescales and application
process for LEIP Phase 3 and this report aims to update Community Services
Committee where our team are with the development of a potential bid for this
nationally competitive fund.   It also seeks to update on engagement recently
taken place with our communities that will assist our bid and inform the next steps
of the application process should we progress to the next stage following backing
from the Scottish Government.   
1.3 The Council’s Learning Estate Strategy (adopted November 2021) has identified
the priorities in terms of education new build are focussed on delivery of new
campus opportunities on our islands of Mull and Islay based on the assessed
fabric condition and learning suitability.  Of these two locations, Mull is our
preferred bid for LEIP funding and top priority based on a number of suitability
criteria, most notability the current suitability of our current estate in Tobermory. 
Given that LEIP will only fund up to 50% of construction costs with remainder
having to be resourced by Council or other sources it would be unaffordable to
progress with 2 bids at this current time.  Furthermore, given the nationally
competitive nature and likelihood of oversubscription to this fund we are also
looking to consolidate with a single unified bid for Mull – rather than twin tracking
multiple applications.   
1.4 Given the financial – which will be measured in several tens of millions of pounds
- and political commitment it is essential there is a clear mandate by Council to
progress with a bid of this scale and significance.  To this extent, a report with
outcomes from the community engagement process will be presented to full
Council on 29th September 2022 and will seek a direction to make a submission
to LEIP, or not.

Page 2

ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL              COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMITTEE 
EDUCATION 
COMMERCIAL SERVICES                                             25 AUGUST 2022   
LEARNING ESTATE INVESTMENT PROGRAMME (LEIP) UPDATE
POTENTIAL BID FOR NEW MULL CAMPUS 
2.0  RECOMMENDATION 
That the Community Services Committee note and consider: 
2.1.1  The Scottish Government has recently confirmed the timescales for the next
round of the Learning Estate Investment Programme (LEIP) i.e. inviting
submissions by 31st October.   
2.1.2  That an Outline Business Case is being prepared for a potential submission to
the LEIP process for a new Campus on Mull in line with the adopted Learning
Estate Strategy; 
2.1.3  That pre-engagement activity has been ongoing with Mull community about the
potential LEIP bid over recent weeks and there have been a number of
workshops and meetings in August 2022.  Further statutory consultation will take
place if a bid is made and successfully progresses to the next stage; 
2.1.4 The financial position and affordability of a LEIP bid is set out in attached
Appendix B.  This appendix is publically exempt due to the commercially
sensitive nature of financial forecast information contained.   
2.1.5 That a paper outlining our approach to LEIP, including feedback from the pre-
engagement with the Community, will be presented to Council on 29th September. 
If a bid is progressed a submission will be required by 31st October 2022.   
3.0 Background
3.1 The Scottish Government launched the Learning Estate Investment Programme
(LEIP) in 2019 and aims to deliver over £2bn of education estate jointly funded by
them and Local Government.  There have been 2 phases of LEIP already and 37
projects across the country are now underway at various stages with some nearing
completion of construction.  The 3rd phase was launched following the Local
Government elections in May this year.  Argyll and Bute Council are in the minority
as we have not applied for any LEIP funding thus far and it is notable that only 1
Island project (Barra) has been successful in obtaining funding from across the
country.  There is a keenness for a wide and equitable sharing of this government
fund and Scottish Futures Trust (SFT) have encouraged Argyll and Bute’s (and

Page 3

others) participation in round 3 of LEIP.  We anticipate it will be a very competitive
process with oversubscription of applications due to this being last round of
government funding on offer plus financial challenges of all Councils.  To this extent,
there can be no guarantee that if a bid from Argyll and Bute is submitted it would be
successful.   
3.2 The funding model for LEIP differs from the ‘Schools for the Future Programme’.  In
summary, successful local authority applicants will benefit from the Scottish
Government providing revenue funding for the new builds through an annual
payment over 25 years on the basis that certain criteria are met.  These criteria
include ‘condition of the building’ (to be maintained as Grade A or B for lifetime),
‘energy efficiency’, ‘digitally enabled’ and ‘supportive of economic development’.
Recently added criteria also apply to things like embodied carbon, EV charging
infrastructure, outdoor learning and infection control.  The Scottish Government
is likely to meet around 50% of the build costs over the 25 year lifetime.   Costs
for elements such as purchase of land, residential / hostel accommodation,
operational or running / revenue costs and design development fees are also
excluded from the LEIP funding that is provided so Council would need to meet
these in full.   
4.0 Timescales for Phase 3 – Political, Financial & Community Commitment 
4.1 In December 2021 the Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills outlined to
Parliament that LEIP Phase 3 would seek projects within 12 months.  The following
are the most up to date timescales for the programme:- 
 1st July 2022 – LEIP Board wrote to CEO to invite submissions;
 11th August 2022 – Pre-engagement Community Meetings Mull;
 29th September 2022 – Argyll and Bute Full Council to consider;
 31st October September – Local Authority Submissions;
 December 2022 – LEIP Board announcement of successful bids;
 December 2027 – New facilities to be opened 
A more detailed routemap can be seen at Appendix A. 
4.2 The Scottish Government have set out a number of detailed requirements for
submissions and are encouraging Councils in their applications to cover: 
a) Local investment priority(s) and their context within the ‘Place’
b) The proposed Vision, Strategic Outcomes and Objectives for the
project(s)
c) Alignment with Learning Estate Strategy 2019 Guiding Principles
d) Ensuring political and financial commitments are in place for the
investment priority(s)
e) Demonstrating implementation of the terms and conditions of the
programme on Phase 1&2 projects (where applicable). 
4.3 The project team developing the bid are well progressed with the proposition for
LEIP 3 in the context of the above. 
5.0 Strategic Outline Case - Mull
5.1 In accordance with the Council’s adopted Learning Estate Strategy the Council has
prioritised cases for strategic change on Islay and Mull.  This is based on current

Page 4

suitability and condition aspects of the current infrastructure / estate but also noting
the majority of mainland towns have had new campus developed within the last 15
years and seeking to address our islands on an equitable basis.  Previous Scottish
Government funding has been accessed to deliver new schools at Hermitage
Academy, Dunoon Grammar, Oban High, Oban Primary Campus, Campbeltown
Grammar, Rothesay Joint Campus, Lochgilphead Joint Campus, Dunoon Primary
(significant refurbishment) and Kirn Primary at a cost of around £180m.   
5.2 Consistent with all local authorities our Schools are assessed in terms of suitability
(from an educational perspective) and condition (from a building fabric perspective). 
The current assessments highlight:- 
SCHOOL CONDITION CRITERIA SUITABILITY CRITERIA
ALL Islay B B
ALL Mull (excluding
Tobermory)
B B
Tobermory
Campus
B C 
Definition of Condition 
B = ‘Satisfactory’    Condition C = ‘Poor’ 
5.3 Given current Tobermory Campus is assessed to be ‘C - poor’ in terms of suitability
there is a requirement to improve the situation and that is therefore our top priority.
The lower grading of Tobermory is largely driven by accessibility, restrictive drop off
space, lack of social spaces and restricted specialised classes.  Given that LEIP
will only fund up to 50% of construction costs of eligible spaces with the remainder
having to be resourced by Council or other sources it would be unaffordable to
progress with 2 bids at this current time.  Given the nationally competitive nature
and likelihood of oversubscription to this fund we are also looking to consolidate
with a single unified bid for Mull – rather than twin tracking multiple applications.   
5.4 Analysis of the council expenditure on Mull also highlights a trend of increasing
reactive or maintenance spend and a sizable sum of investment on degrading
fabric at the high school over the past 5 years. Items like water ingress in roofs +
electrical upgrading is common source of expenditure.  The condition of the building
can be improved from further investment, however the suitability is much more
challenging to be upgraded without wholesale remodelling.  Such year on year
construction can be detrimental on both pupils and learners over long period of time
or require decanting of operations for periods.  Other environmental (climate
change) standards or digital enhancements will also remain below the minimum
standard compared to a new build LEIP school.   
5.5 The services of Hub North (who assisted in development of some of our previous
school projects) and the Northern Alliance (an Education focussed support network)
have led to the development of a ‘Business Case’ for Mull.    The Strategic Case, is
in essence, the first step of the recognised Five Case Model of the Scottish Capital
Investment Manual and Treasury Green Book guidance for capital projects.  This
is comparable to other major projects delivered by the Council and compatible
with the development of a LEIP bid.

Page 5

5.6 As this is a strategic or initial business case no specific sites or models have been
tested.  The bid, if progressed, would be an application for funding to benefit the
entire island of Mull.  More detailed site selection and analysis of costs will require
to be completed if we are selected by the Scottish Government to proceed to the
next stage of the process.     
6.0 Financial Case & Affordability 
6.1 As we know from experience the construction of new public infrastructure –
particularly the education estate and on islands – comes with significant financial
commitment.  As a benchmark the new Oban High and Campbeltown Grammar
cost in excess of £36m and £26m, respectively.  At this stage high level numbers
and financial forecasts are being worked on to allow for budget planning and
decision making.  It will be necessary to identify suitable ‘island weighting’ and
construction sector inflation to budgets given the nature of building on Mull.
Budgetary figures will be refined and crystallised if successful in progressing to the
next stages of process and during site selection process.   
6.2 Information relating to finance is contained within Appendix B for elected Member
consideration.  Some of the financial information is sensitive due to commercial and
competitive nature of the bid at this stage and is therefore publicly restricted.   
7.0 Engagement 
7.1 For such a significant transformational investment to succeed it is essential to
understand and engage with our communities.  There is no statutory or Government
requirement to consult with our communities prior to a LEIP Submission being made
in October.  However, submitting evidence that we have commenced some form of
awareness raising and engagement with our communities is likely to strengthen our
submission in this competitive process. If successful in our application a formal and
statutory period of community consultation would follow as outlined at Appendix A.     
7.2 The team have commenced a pre-engagement exercise with appropriate
stakeholders on Mull and a number of workshops have been held on 11th August. 
The engagement and message has been at a high level with the purpose of the
pre-engagement being primarily to allow stakeholders to influence the format and
timings of the formal consultation process. Some of the messaging has been about
the background to LEIP Process, headlines from the business case, photos / videos
of schools Council has developed in past, next steps and timescales.   
7.3 The Stakeholders have included: 
 Ward Councillors
 HT & School Staff
 Parent Councils
 Pupils
 Community Councils
 Wider Public 
7.4 A summary of the feedback obtained thus far is contained at Appendix C.

Page 6

8.0 Summary and Next Steps
8.1 Note that a paper outlining approach to LEIP will be reported to the Full Council
on 29th September which will also include feedback from pre-engagement with
community.   
8.2 This report is seeking to update and obtain political direction on the proposal to
make LEIP submission for a new Mull Campus in October.  This decision needs
to be considered in the context of the educational priorities, learning benefits,
regeneration, condition / suitability of the current building, community and overall
affordability.   
9.0  Implications 
9.1  Policy –  The Council’s Learning Estate Strategy 2021 sets out that the 
ambition is to provide a property school estate that is of category A   
or B in terms of suitability and condition plus a number of other   
modern standards.  Seeking to access LEIP funding to deliver new   
build estate on our priority location, Mull, supports that ambition. 
9.2      Financial  -  Accessing LEIP is a significant financial commitment to the Council   
as the entire design development, associated cost like land 
acquisition (if required) and construction costs will be required to be   
met in full by the Council.  The SG would then provide up to 50% of   
eligible capital costs back over 25 year annual payment if criteria is   
met.  There is risk in this model should criteria not be met and also   
in terms of risk of construction in current climate so specific financial   
and affordability advice from Section 95 Officer has been afforded.   
9.3      Legal –  Accessing LEIP is a significant contractual and legal commitment to   
the Council  which will be duly considered if move to next stage.   
9.4      HR –   None at this stage.  Considered at future stages if progress.   
9.5      Fairer Scotland Duty               
9.5.1 Equalities –  None at this stage.  Considered at future stages if progress.                 
9.5.2 Socio-economic Duty – The level of investment in a new Campus will be 
substantial and Scottish Government have set requirements to    
deliver socio economic benefits if progressed.               
9.5.3 Islands –  Positive implications given top priority in this competitive process    
has been identified as Mull.   
9.6 Climate Change – Scottish Government have set requirements to key climate change    
criteria and benefits if progressed 
9.7 Risk –   Risks exists both in terms of financial and reputational.  If progress    
to next project stages a risk register will be developed.   
9.8 Customer Service – Pre-engagement has commenced and will be ongoing 
throughout process as progress.

Page 7

Douglas Hendry – Executive Director with responsibility for Commercial
Services and Education. 
Yvonne McNeilly – Policy Lead for Education 
For further information contact: 
Ross McLaughlin, Head of Commercial Services              
Ross.mclaughlin@argyll-bute.gov.uk 
Appendices 
Appendix A - Routemap      
Appendix B - Financial & Budget Position (PUBLICALLY RESTRICTED) 
Appendix C - Pre-Engagement Feedback