Democracy Spraffa

Strategic Risk Register Review

Argyll and Bute Council · 27 September 2023
Back to Argyll and Bute HSCP Integration Joint Board (IJB) — 27 September 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

1 
Integration Joint Board       
Date of Meeting:  27 September 2023 
Title of Report:    Strategic Risk Register Review 
Presented by:      James Gow, Head of Finance and Transformation 
The Integration Joint Board is asked to: 
 Note that the Strategic Risk Register has been reviewed by the Audit & Risk
Committee in June 2023 and the Contingency, Risk and Resilience Committee in
May 2023.
 Review and approve the Strategic Risk Register.
 Note that a Board Development session is planned for the 25 October to facilitate
a more detailed review of the Risk Register and Risk Appetite. 
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
1.1 An important aspect of the HSCP approach to Risk Management is to regularly
review the Strategic Risk Register. This report summarises the outcome of the
recent reviews of the Strategic Risk Register undertaken by the Contingency
Risk and Resilience Committee and the Audit and Risk Committee. The report
highlights the current perceived risk environment and recommends changes to
the Strategic Risk Register. 
1.2 Overall there are number of environmental factors which are continuing to result
in relatively high levels of risk. High demand faced by NHS and social care
services remain a concern along with on-going staffing shortages. This is
resulting in increased waiting times across the Health and Social Care sector.
Additionally the current socio-economic situation is now impacting directly upon
funding and budgets with high inflation and the cost of living crisis continuing to
be of concern. This situation has multiple strands, many of which are not within
the control or influence of the HSCP. However, there is some perceived
reduction in risk around resilience and contingency planning, covid 19 and the
vaccination programme. Additionally the positive financial performance of the
HSCP during 2022/23 has reduced short term financial risk. 
1.3 It is intended that a Board Development Session in October will provide an
opportunity for a further review of the register and the Risk Appetite Statement.
This will be delivered in partnership with the Internal Audit service who have
recently undertaken an audit of Risk Management processes within the HSCP.

Page 2

2
2. INTRODUCTION 
2.1 The purpose of this report is to provide members of the Integration Joint Board
with the opportunity to review the Strategic Risk Register and endorse changes
agreed by the Contingency Risk and Resilience Committee and the Audit and
Risk Committee. The regular consideration of Risk and how risks are mitigated
is an important aspect of risk management and governance arrangements. The
Strategic Risk Register is scheduled to be reviewed by the IJB twice per year. 
3. DETAIL OF REPORT 
3.1  The Strategic Risk Register is used to identify risks and assess their perceived
likelihood and impact. It is a dynamic document and is reviewed regularly. The
current Strategic Risk Register is attached as appendix 1 and describes 24
strategic risks facing the HSCP and the table below summarises the perceived
level of residual risk relating to these: 
Residual Risks  Very High High Medium Total
May 2021  2 9 9 20
December 2021  4 13 6 23
June 2022  4 14 6 24
December 2022  6 13 4 23
September 2023  4 13 7 24 
3.2 In respect of those risks that are rated as ‘Very High’: 
Financial Sustainability (SSR01) 
The budget gap for next year is substantial and the most recent financial plan
outlines a series of risks relating to funding, cost pressures and severe
challenges relating to public funding more widely. A separate risk has been
added to reflect the more favourable shorter term assessment, although this is
now looking less positive as NHS Highland seek to address their financial
challenges with reference to IJB resourcing. Recent work on the funding model
and demographics also suggests that the Argyll and Bute IJB will face relative
funding reductions due to population decline. The Financial Sustainability risk
therefore remains very high despite the HSCP being in an improved financial
position. 
Sustainability of Commissioned Service Providers (SSR7) 
This risk remains very high as a number of service providers continue to
struggle to recruit staff and provide the services they are being commissioned
to deliver. There are a number of service providers who have indicated that
services are at risk in the relatively near term. Management are considering the
implications and mitigations where there are specific issues. The national Care
Home Contract has now been agreed which provides some assurance that
there is a commitment to maintain the national approach to negotiating key
contracts. 
Workforce Recruitment and Retention (SSR10) 
The HSCP continues to experience difficulty in recruiting staff to a wide variety
of roles. Staffing resource is the main constraint on service delivery in many

Page 3

3
areas. This risk is considered to be both a local and a national issue and
continuing industrial relations difficulties are likely to increase this risk further.
Longer term demographic analysis also indicates that the working age
population is set to reduce which is likely to exacerbate this risk in coming
years. The Health & Care Staffing act presents an additional new challenge in
respect of managing the impact of new legislative requirements but is part of a
national prioritisation of longer term workforce planning and sustainability. 
Socio-Economic Situation (SSR23) 
It is suggested that this risk remains ‘Very High’. It has multiple strands and is
largely outwith the control or influence of the HSCP. It is expected that high
inflation and the potential for recession will result in increased poverty and
increased service demand pressures from within our communities. The Scottish
Government do not appear to be in a position to fully fund inflation and cost
pressures. 
3.3 The table above also indicates that 2 risks that were previously considered to
be ‘very high’ are downgraded in the risk register: 
Business Continuity (SSR17) – this risk was increased last winter as there
were a number of potential resilience and service continuity challenges. Several
of these have eased slightly at present, including the risks of energy shortages
and widespread industrial action. 
Covid-19 (SSR18) – this risk is also perceived to have reduced, the HSCP will
consider whether to recommend its removal from the Strategic Risk Register
over the coming months and in consultation with NHS Highland.    
3.4 Trend arrows have been added to the residual risk scoring to indicate the
management perception in respect the risks on the register, these do not
necessarily mean the overall risk categorisation has changed. 
3.5 In respect of the National Care Service, there has not yet been any formal
update which would enable detailed consideration of the risk implications of the
creation of the NCS. The Verity House agreement perhaps indicates that the
likelihood of very significant structural change is reducing. Argyll & Bute Council
are currently considering how different models for Council and HSCP service
provision Argyll and Bute may be governed going forward.   
3.6 Risk management within the HSCP relies heavily upon processes and
procedures within the partner organisations, particularly in respect of cyber
security, data protection and financial processes and systems. It is recognised
that further work is required to ensure that the Strategic Risk Register is
integrated effectively with service owned risk registers. There are processes in
place to ensure that the HSCP Risk Register aligns to those of Argyll and Bute
Council and NHS Highland. 
3.7 A report on the recent internal audit review of risk management processes has
been provided to the audit and risk committee. This report was largely positive
but did highlight the need to improve the management of operational risk
registers, this was highlighted as a medium grade recommendation in the audit
report and action is now underway to address it.

Page 4

4 
4. RELEVANT DATA AND INDICATORS 
4.1 The identification and rating of risk is based on internal and external data and
indicators as well as a wider environmental scan.    
5 CONTRIBUTION TO STRATEGIC PRIORITIES 
5.1 Robust risk management is an important aspect of the overall strategic
management of the HSCP. 
6. GOVERNANCE IMPLICATIONS 
6.1 Financial Impact – None 
6.2 Staff Governance – None 
6.3 Clinical Governance – None 
7. EQUALITY & DIVERSITY IMPLICATIONS 
7.1 None arising directly from the contents of this report.   
8. GENERAL DATA PROTECTION PRINCIPLES COMPLIANCE 
8.1 None. 
9. RISK ASSESSMENT 
9.1 This report provides a detailed review of the perceived strategic risks facing the
HSCP. 
10. PUBLIC & USER INVOLVEMENT & ENGAGEMENT 
10.1 None arising directly from this report. 
11. CONCLUSIONS 
11.1  Overall the risk environment facing the HSCP continues to be perceived as
being relatively high. On-going difficulties in recruiting staff to a number of roles
and the service demand pressure within the NHS in total are contributing to this
perception of persistently high levels of risk. Wider environmental factors
including financial challenges and the potential impact of the cost of living crisis
and inflation are contributing further to strategic risks facing the Health and
Social Care sector both locally and nationally.

Page 5

5 
12. DIRECTIONS 
Directions
required to
Council, NHS
Board or
both.
Directions to: tick
No Directions required √
Argyll & Bute Council 
NHS Highland Health Board 
Argyll & Bute Council and NHS Highland Health Board 
AUTHOR NAME: James Gow, Head of Finance and Transformation
EMAIL: james.gow@argyll-bute.gov.uk 
APPENDICES: 
Appendix 1:  Strategic Risk Register