Democracy Spraffa

Budget Monitoring - 7 months to 31 October 2024

Argyll and Bute Council · 27 November 2024
Back to Argyll and Bute HSCP Integration Joint Board (IJB) — 27 November 2024 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

1 
Integration Joint Board   
Date of Meeting: 27 November 2024 
Title of Report: Budget Monitoring – 7 months to 31 October 2024 
Presented by: James Gow, Head of Finance 
The Integration Joint Board is recommended to:
• Note that the HSCP has overspent its budget by £1.6m.
• Note that an overspend of £2.9m is forecast.
• Note actions are required to reduce spend and additional funding is required
from Argyll & Bute Council who hold pension saving resource on behalf of
the IJB;  
• Note that savings of £4.7m have been delivered, 72% of target. 
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
1.1 This report provides a summary of the financial position as at the end of month
7 and a forecast for the year. The forecast has deteriorated further and remains
of concern as costs within social work services in particular are in excess of
the approved budget. Steps are required to manage this through reduced
spend and / or increased use of reserves and non-recurring pension fund
savings. Specific cost pressures relate to on-going high levels of agency and
locum spend, increasing high-cost placements within Children’s and Families
service and high demand and agency costs within Older Adult Services. 
1.2  The forecast is currently an overspend against budget estimated at £2.9m. The
approach to managing this will be to: 
• Increase scrutiny of spend and vacancy management.
• Progress the savings programme.
• Implement additional controls to reduce spend within Social Care.
• Request Argyll & Bute Council make available additional resourcing
from the pension fund savings. 
It is the case that the Health and Social Care sector continues to be in a very
difficult and unsustainable financial position. 
2.  Recommendations 
2.1  • Note that the HSCP has overspent its budget by £1.6m.
• Note that an overspend of £2.9m is forecast.

Page 2

2 
• Note actions are required to reduce spend and additional funding is
required from Argyll & Bute Council who hold pension saving resource
on behalf of the IJB;  
• Note that savings of £4.7m have been delivered, 72% of target. 
3. DETAIL OF REPORT 
3.1  7 Months to 31 October 2024 
The table below provides the year to date figures, Social Work/Care services
report on a cash basis whereas Health report on an accruals basis.  Appendix
1 provides an analysis of the variances: 
Service Actual
£000
Budget
£000
Variance
£000
%
Variance
COUNCIL SERVICES TOTAL  49,138 48,052 (1,086) (2.3%)
HEALTH SERVICES TOTAL 152,482 151,887 (595) (0.4%)          
GRAND TOTAL 201,620 199,939 (1,681) (0.8%) 
3.1.1  For social care budgets there are several areas of concern: 
• Number of external placements for children;
• Demand for older adult care and management of delayed discharges; 
• Spend on agency staff remains too high, the 10% planned reduction is
not being achieved. 
Absence is particularly problematic as services are often paying staff plus an
enhanced rate for agency cover which can amount to 150% of the cost of the
underlying staffing gap,1 FTE of resource can cost the equivalent of 2.5 FTE
in these circumstances. 
3.1.2  The NHS budget is also overspent, the main drivers continue to be the use of
agency staffing and medical locums along with an increase in high-cost
external mental health placements. It is recognised that agency staff are only
employed to cover for essential posts which are either vacant or there is an
absence. 
3.2 
3.2.1
Forecast Outturn 
The forecast is of concern, particularly for social work services where there are
several services overspending. In addition to the implications in the current
year, the budget is already reliant upon reserves which are reducing and
largely committed. Forecast spend is summarised below with detail in appendix
2. Members will recall that the budget relies upon the use of reserves and an
allocation from the non-recurring pension fund saving.

Page 3

3 
Service Annual
Budget
£000
Forecast
Outturn
£000
Variance
£000
%
Variance
COUNCIL SERVICES TOTAL 91,795 93,845 (2,050) (2.2%)
HEALTH SERVICES TOTAL 277,477 278,288 (811) (0.3%)          
GRAND TOTAL 369,272 372,133 (2,861) (0.8)% 
3.2.2  Within Social Work, children’s and families, mental health and older adult
budgets are all overspending and a £2.0m adverse variance forecast. 
The main driver relating to Children’s Services is the increased number of
children in out of area placements. These are considered to have been
unavoidable and each one is carefully reviewed and considered before being
contracted. This cost pressure was not foreseen at the time the budget was
prepared. The forecast overspend on this heading is £0.6m on a budget of
£6.7m. A detailed report on this aspect of the underspend was provided to the
Finance & Policy Committee in September.   
Spend on older adults is also above budget with agency staffing a particular
issue. The budgets summarised below were increased from £35.6m to £38.5m
(8%) to allow for increasing demand and inflation. Social Care agency spend
is currently at £2.1m for 7 months. The cost of accommodation for agency staff
on islands is adding to costs. Alternative arrangements on Isla will be available
in the coming weeks to reduce this.   
Adult Services Budget  Forecast
Spend 
Variance
External Residential Placements –
demand led @ national contract rate
£11.4m £12.3m (£0.9m)
Care @ Home Service £19.6m £20.5m (£0.9m)
Internal Care Home Placements £7.5m £  7.2m  £0.3m
Total £38.5m £40.0m (£1.5m) 
The new Care at Home contract has been implemented in and will reduce costs
in the last half of the year, the savings have been built into the forecast. The
national focus on reducing delayed discharges from acute services continues
and is adding to pressure to ensure people are placed in residential care or
provided with care at home packages as quickly as possible. Services continue
to be provided beyond the staffing levels and available budget, in order to meet
demand. Recovery actions are now required for the HSCP and care at home
activity is an area of focus. To date no action has been taken to restrict
provision of care for financial reasons. 
A recovery plan is under development for the current and future years as the
outlook remains difficult. The Social Work budget assumed that £1.3m of the
pension fund saving (£3.5m is held by the Council) would be allocated to
revenue costs in 2024/25. The HSCP has informed Council officers that it
expects to require additional support from this funding, now close to the full
£3.5m available. This has also been highlighted as a risk to the HSCP
leadership group. The table below summarises the extent of forecast reliance
upon non-recurring savings:

Page 4

4 
Social Work  £m
Budgeted Reliance on Pension Fund
Savings  
1.3
Forecast revenue budget variance (M4)   2.0
Underlying budget gap   3.3 
General reserves carried forward for social work totalled £2.6m, these are
largely committed to projects (such as key worker housing, the shared service
approach to catering and the care homes and housing project with Hub North),
and the completion of the Tigh a Rudha remodelling. 
3.2.3  NHS services are likewise reporting an increasing overspend of £0.8m. The
main concerns are: 
- Agency staff – agency, locum and bank staff costs continue to be the
single largest cost pressure. The gross spend on agency, locum and
bank staffing across all services is £7.1m.  LIH is currently the highest
spending service area, reporting a gross cost of £3.12m most of which
relates to medical staffing.
- 2c GP practices (directly operated) – the HSCP has taken over the
running of 2 further practices.  This is creating additional locum cost
pressures and is driving a £0.5m overspend.  There is a lack of certainty
about the funding impact of the GMS uplift on 2c practice funding.
- High cost out of area referrals – the 8 admitted patients have created a
cost pressure of £454k at the end of October.  
- GP prescribing – costs are expected to be £350k or around 1.4% higher
than budgeted at present. 
Some excess costs will continue to be offset by vacancies. However, the
Health budget is already dependent upon the use of reserves and there is little
scope to increase reliance on reserves. The plan was to utilise £4.3m of
reserves to fund the revenue spend. A tightening of spend controls is now being
implemented to bring NHS spend back in line with budget, progress on
agency/locum staffing is critical to achieving this. NHS Highland are aware of
this overspend and the HSCP is continuing to work towards bringing the budget
into line. 
A further issue which has added to the forecast overspend has been that SG
have cut Multi Disciplinary Teams funding in-year by £14% (£5.7m for the
sector and £106k for the HSCP). The SG health finance team have confirmed,
in writing, that the UK budget announcement does not make any additional
funding available for the NHS in the current financial year. The national context
within the NSH is that Boards are collectively projecting a £464m overspend
this year.   
3.2.4  Overall the HSCP is operating in excess of its approved budget. Steps are in
place to try and mitigate this including: 
• Continuing vacancy management processes.
• Increased controls and reporting of agency and locum spend.

Page 5

5 
• New approval process for agency staffing. 
The Social Work overspending has been reported within the Council and it is
anticipated that further mitigations are required, these overlap with actions
associated with the work on the budget: 
• A request for more of the pension fund saving held by council to balance
the revenue budget; 
• A moratorium on any new agency social care staff and all renewals are
short term and subject to an exit strategy (in reality this may mean a cut
in service);
• Recovery of direct payment balances where these are not being fully
spent (non recurring);
• Prioritising of care to priority 1 to reduce care at home hours to be
managed within each area;
• Reconsideration of assessment thresholds and;
• Assessments to ensure other care provision (eg family in receipt of
carers allowance) are taken into account in assessments. 
These measures are likely to result in some reduction in service and increase
in unmet need or waiting times for care packages. It is not possible to bring
spend back into line with budget without impact on service. 
The position is consistent with the national situation in the Health and Social
Care sector with many IJBs taking similar action. Concerns about financial
sustainability was highlighted again this year by Audit Scotland but there has
not been a Government response to address the issue. 
There are a number of risks including: 
• The Council pay award has been implemented but not yet agreed by all
unions;
• In year budget cuts have been announced by the Scottish Government
to fund the pay increases, including a reduction in the Health and Social
Care Budget;
• The impact of NI increases next year may be viewed as a risk for 3rd
sector and commissioned service providers in the short term while
funding is uncertain;
• There are staff re-grading exercises underway which could result in
increased pay costs; and
• Demand for services, impact of winter pressures and the priority given
to managing delayed discharges remain risks in the current year. 
3.3 Savings Delivery 
3.3.1  The service improvement team, finance teams and management continue to
progress, monitor and report on savings projects. As at Month 5, £4.7m (72%)
of the £6.6m target has been declared:

Page 6

6 
3.3.2 
3.3.3 
3.4 
3.4.1 
3.4.2 
2024/25
Savings    Year to 31 October 2024    
Target Achievement Balance %  
£' 000 £' 000 £' 000  
Fully Achieved 4,091 4,091 0  
Partially
Complete 2,522 228 2,294  
Non Recurring - 425 (425)  
Total 6,613 4,744 1,869 72% 
Appendix 3a lists the fully delivered savings and 3b summarises the remaining
savings, risk rated: 
Savings regarded as low risk £456k 
Savings unlikely to be achieved in full in 2024/25 £1,100k 
Savings unlikely to be deliverable in 2024/25 £738k 
Work is on-going to deliver as much of the balance as possible. There are a
number of projects where change processes are required and are taking time
to progress. The new medical staffing model in Cowal is now starting to be
implemented and it is hoped that the savings relating to FME contracts can be
progressed soon. The amber and red rated savings projects represent a
financial risk already incorporated in forecasts. 
Reserves 
Earmarked reserves of £19.9m were carried into 2024/25 including £4.7m for
sustainability and value, this has been passed back to NHS Highland and
replaced with a recurring allocation. To date £10.7m has been committed,
including £4.3m to fund the NHS revenue budget gap and the £4.7m described
above. The reserves position is summarised in Appendix 4. Remaining
reserves are reduced to £9.2m, many of these are earmarked for specific
purposes. The Scottish government have suggested that there is some scope
for reallocating reserves to help fund cost pressures. 
The IJB is in the process of allocating reserves to projects. To some extent
these are compensating for insufficient investment in infrastructure by partners: 
• £600k for the Prevention / Wellbeing project;
• Estimated £529k for remodelling the Campbeltown Hospital to better
locate new radiography equipment;
• £366k for NHS houses on Coll (net of £100k from the Strategic
Housing Fund); and
• £800k for the Tigh a Rudha renovation and remodelling (Reserves are
match for Council capital and Island Programme Funding). 
Much of the strategic development work has been paused due to capital
funding constraints, the Care Homes and Housing project is continuing. The
use of reserves to balance the revenue position is not sustainable and a proper
solution to the mis-match between recurring funding and spend requires to be
identified as reserves reduce and the pension fund saving will not be available
beyond 2025/26.

Page 7

7 
4
4.1 
5
5.1   
6
6.1 
6.2 
6.3 
RELEVANT DATA AND INDICATORS 
Information is derived from the financial systems of both partners. 
CONTRIBUTION TO STRATEGIC PRIORITIES 
The Integration Joint Board has a responsibility to balance its budget and
ensure spend and investment is aligned to the Strategic Plan. 
GOVERNANCE IMPLICATIONS 
Financial Impact – the forecast outturn position is a projected overspend.
The Council are holding a pension fund saving which could be accessed
if the HSCP continues to overspend, the HSCP is required to progress its
recovery planning.   
Staff Governance – None directly from this report but there is a strong link
between HR management and delivering a balanced financial position. 
Clinical Governance – None directly, however if costs savings are
required there are likely to be implications for care. 
7. 
7.1 
8.
PROFESSIONAL ADVISORY 
Professional Leads have been consulted with on the implications of the budget
and savings programme. 
EQUALITY AND DIVERSITY IMPLICATIONS 
8.1 None directly from this report. 
9. 
9.1 
10.
GENERAL DATA PROTECTION PRINCIPLES COMPLIANCE 
None. 
RISK ASSESSMENT 
10.1 There are a number of financial risks and these are reported to the Finance &
Policy Committee: 
• Continuing impact of high service demand and winter pressures;
• Inability to reduce supplementary staffing;
• Pressure on support services relating to HR, administrative and finance
processes; and
• Delivery of the balance of the savings programme. 
The HSCP is not in a sustainable financial position as spend and service
demand exceed available funding. Financial recovery and development of the
savings programme for 2025/26 are priorities. It does not expect to return to
a position where it requires additional funding that it will need to repay as a
result of its overspending in 2024/25.

Page 8

8 
11. PUBLIC AND USER INVOLVEMENT AND ENGAGEMENT 
11.1  None directly from this report, engagement on activities relating to savings and
transformation forms part of the project plans where appropriate. The HSCP is
transparent in respect of its finances and this report is publicly available. 
12. CONCLUSIONS 
12.1 
12.2 
This report provides a summary of the financial position as at the end of month
7. The forecast is of concern and the management team are seeking to manage
spend down during the remainder of the year. The reliance upon non-recurring
resourcing is an increasing problem for 2025/26 and future years. 
The HSCP will require to seek additional support from the non-recurring
savings relating to pension costs from Argyll and Bute Council to fund the
overspend. This will restrict flexibility in future years, adds to the longer-term
gap between spend patterns and available resources. This will also limit
funding for development and transformation as the balance shifts further
towards managing immediate pressures rather than longer term change. 
13. DIRECTIONS   
Directions
required to
Council, NHS
Board or
both.
Directions to: tick
No Directions required √
Argyll & Bute Council 
NHS Highland Health Board 
Argyll & Bute Council and NHS Highland
Health Board 
14. PREVIOUS REVIEW OF THE REPORT 
Meeting  Title of report Date Output (if
relevant)
SLT Budget Monitoring M7 20/09/24 TBC
SLT Budget Monitoring M7 22/09/24 TBC 
APPENDICES:
Appendix 1 – Year to Date Position 
Appendix 2 – Forecast Outturn for 2024-25 
Appendix 3a and 3b  – Savings Programme
Appendix 4 – Reserves   
AUTHOR NAME: James Gow, Head of Finance 
EMAIL: james.gow@argyll-bute.gov.uk