Democracy Spraffa

Oban Bay Update

Argyll and Bute Council · 4 August 2022
Back to Argyll and Bute Harbour Board — 4 August 2022 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Some pages contain no extractable text. They may be blank, graphics or scanned pages. OCR has not been applied.

Page 1

ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL  HARBOUR BOARD 
ROADS AND INFRASTRUCTURE
SERVICES 
4 AUGUST 2022 
OBAN BAY UPDATE 
1.0 INTRODUCTION 
1.1 This report is provided to update Members on the progress being made since
the decision of the Special Harbour Board meeting in December 2021 and the
previous update to the Harbour Board meeting in March 2022 in respect of
Oban Bay. 
RECOMMENDATION: 
The Harbour Board is asked to note and consider the update provided in this
report.

Page 2

ARGYLL AND BUTE COUNCIL  HARBOUR BOARD 
ROADS AND INFRASTRUCTURE
SERVICES 
4 AUGUST 2022 
OBAN BAY UPDATE 
2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 
2.1  This report provides an update following the Harbour Board Meeting, which took
place in March 2022, on progress since the Special Meeting in December 2021
and the next steps which officers require to undertake.   
3.0  RECOMMENDATIONS 
3.1 The Harbour Board is asked to note and consider the update provided in this
report.   
4.0 DETAIL 
SPECIAL HARBOUR BOARD, DECEMBER 2021 
4.1 The Harbour Board made the following decision at its Special Meeting in
December 2021: 
The Argyll and Bute Harbour Board:  
1.    Thanked Caledonian Economics for their work on the Options Appraisal;  
2.    Agreed that the Council would not at this time proceed with a transfer of
assets on the basis that there were too many uncertainties around the
proposal;  
3.    Noted that Options 4 or 5 (Argyll and Bute Council or Caledonian Maritime
Assets Limited (CMAL) becoming the Harbour Authority for the
unmanaged section of Oban Bay) provides a quicker route to addressing
the current safety concerns and are therefore the best options available at
this time;  
4.    Agreed that either Options 4 or 5 should move forward and request that
Officers engage with CMAL, through the OBMG, on the basis that the
Council’s preference would be option 5 and that the Council was prepared
to be the Harbour Authority for the unmanaged section of Oban Bay, to
begin the process of application for a Harbour Revision Order covering the

Page 3

unmanaged section of Oban Bay and to expedite the process for such an
order and to report back to members on that process;  
5.    Noted that there was no inherent reason why a Trust Port would not be a
good future option; and  
6.    Agreed that once Options 4 or 5 were delivered there would be a period of
bedding in to monitor the new arrangement and, after that time, there
would be a further report to members on the potential for and exploration of
the future development of a Trust Port. 
HARBOUR BOARD MARCH 2022 UPDATE 
4.2 Since the instruction from the Harbour Board to progress matters, Officers have
held several sessions with key external bodies including CMAL, CalMac,
Transport Scotland and Northern Lighthouse Board with additional support and
assistance from the Council’s external Marine Designated Person. 
4.3 CMAL have agreement from their Board that Argyll and Bute Council will
progress becoming Municipal Port Authority for the unmanaged areas of Oban
Bay. 
4.4 These initial discussions were critical to determining how matters should
progress. It was agreed with the various parties that the Council would begin the
process of developing the process of applying for a Harbour Revision Order
(HRO) covering the unmanaged sections of Oban Bay. 
4.5 A high level project timeline has been shared with the above noted key
stakeholders for their input and is now published on the Argyll and Bute Council
website. This will be updated regularly with information or changes. 
4.6  At the Oban Bay Management Group meeting on 11 January the majority of the
members of the group endorsed the proposal by the Council to become a
Municipal Harbour Authority for the unmanaged waters within Oban Bay. 
4.7 Good progress has been made with the Council’s legal team regarding the
provisions to be drafted for inclusion within the draft order and to further develop
a plan for progression of the Statutory Harbour Authority (SHA) which requires a
HRO to allow the formal management and running of Oban Bay. Good progress
has also been made with the Council’s internal team who have scoped out initial
requirements for: 
 Harbour limits
 Vessel Traffic System
 Extended Oil Spill Response
 Extended bathymetric survey provision
 Work vessel requirements
 Web site enhancement and content
 Operating hours and staffing requirements
 Financial model

Page 4

 Communications strategy – including communication and
engagement with stakeholders.
 Outline business case for extension of North Pier as a concept to
develop. 
Essentially the above points are an extension of the current management of the
Council’s 39 piers and harbours. The systems and expertise are in place across
the existing assets and team, and are being adapted to suit the needs of Oban
Bay.   
PROGRESS SINCE MARCH 2022 
4.8 Meeting held with the Policy Lead for Roads and Transportation; the two
Executive Directors; Heads of Service for Legal and Regulatory and Roads and
Infrastructure, to brief the Policy Lead on Oban Bay matters. 
4.9 ABPmer have been engaged and are working to complete the Navigational Risk
Assessment (NRA) which will inform the decision on the final external harbour
limits as well as the Traffic Management levels which will be required in the bay. 
The requirement for marine traffic data to support the NRA is laid out in MCA
Marine Guidance Note (MGN) 654 and states that:
‘This should include all the vessel and craft types found in the area and total
at least 28 days duration but also take account of seasonal variations and
peak times in traffic patterns and fishing operations. AIS data alone will not
constitute an appropriate traffic survey; radar, manual observations, other
data sources (e.g. for fishing and recreation) and stakeholder consultation will
ensure those vessels that are not required to carry and operate AIS are
included, and it provides an appropriate representation of the base line marine
traffic.’ 
A Marine Traffic Data Collection plan is currently with the MCA for views and
proposes to provide the required 28 days survey duration split into two 14-day
periods: one in the last two weeks in July 2022 and a further two weeks over a
subsequent quiet period. The ‘busy’ data collection period was identified and
refined based on programmed activity, which is planned to occur in addition to
the usual commercial, ferry, aquaculture and recreational activity. Noted 2022
activities include the following:
 Yacht club events:
Monday mayhem: every Monday
Cruising weekend: 16-17 July
Theme series: 19 July
Round Branra Race: 24 July
July Cup Race: 21 July
West Highland Yachting week: 30 July to 05 August
 Sea Tours happening July and August
 Sea Kayaking Trips

Page 5

July: 14, 18, 29
August: 01, 05, 07
July: 21, 22, 24, 25, 28, 29
August: 04, 07, 08
July: 21, 22, 24, 25
August: 01, 08
 Sea Kayaking Courses
July: 27-28 
August: 03-04
August: 06-07
 Sea Kayaking Expeditions:
July: 15-17
July: 30-31 
As part of the data collection method, ABPmer, in association with Argyll and
Bute Council will consult with local operators to obtain additional information
on vessel traffic routing and activity levels within the Oban Bay, its
approaches and Kerrera Sound. The aim of this consultation will be the
quantification of vessel traffic data, especially for vessel moves that may not
occur during the 14-day onsite observations. It should be noted that this
consultation is in addition to the NRA stakeholder engagement, which will be
scheduled separately following the Marine Traffic Data Collection exercise. 
Appendix 1 shows the proposed Harbour Limits which will form the baseline
for the Marine Traffic Data Collection.
4.10 Officers continue to work with the Argyll and Bute Council legal team and
Brodies to pull together the first draft of the Harbour Order.
4.11 A website page has been published with the project plan and will be regularly
updated with supporting information.
4.12 The next key milestones for report to the regular September Harbour Board
meeting are:
(1) Informal stakeholder consultation and briefing carried out during a 6-week
period in July and August. This will be extensive and extra to the other
consultations required by the process encompassing the wider Island
Communities reliant on Oban for commuting and services. 
(2) Marine Traffic Data Collection (summer) including stakeholder consultation
(3) Recommended external Harbour Limits based on summer data &
consultation information.
(4) 1st Draft of the HRO for review and comment including Powers and
Provisions.
(5) Completion / progress of NRA and traffic management assessment. 
5.0 CONCLUSION 
5.1 Since the Special Meeting of the Harbour Board in December 2021, good
progress has been made in preparing to submit a formal Harbour Revision

Page 6

Order. Once the key milestones outlined above are concluded, a further report
will be brought back to Members of the Harbour Board to agree the limits and
powers which will be included in the draft Order. 
6.0 IMPLICATIONS 
6.1 Policy – The Harbour Board agreed in December 2021 that the Council should
proceed to make the arrangements to formally manage the unmanaged
section of Oban Bay.   
6.2 Financial – No financial implications at this stage.  As the proposals develop,
further detail will be brought to the Harbour Board.   
6.3 Legal – the HRO process is a formal legal process set out in the 1964
Harbours Act. 
6.4 HR – HR implications will be identified as the proposal progresses.   
6.5  Fairer Scotland Duty: 
6.5.1   Equalities – None known. 
6.5.2   Socio-economic Duty – None known.
6.5.3 Islands – consultation will be carried out with the island communities as a
continuation and expansion of the Options Appraisal Process reported to the
December Harbour Board.
6.6 Climate Change – due regard will be given to climate change with a view to
minimising any climate change impact and these will be considered as and
when they arise.  
6.7 Risk - The Council progressing to become a Municipal Port Authority for the
unmanaged areas of Oban Bay increases the safety within Oban Bay.  There
is a risk that there could be a number of objections and representations during
the process which could impact on timescale and these will be considered as
and when they arise.  
6.8  Customer Service – None known. 
Executive Director with responsibility for Roads and Infrastructure, Kirsty
Flanagan 
Head of Roads and Infrastructure, Jim Smith 
Policy Lead for Roads and Transport, Councillor Andrew Kain 
June 2022                                 
For further information contact: Jim Smith, Head of Roads and Infrastructure, or
Scott Reid, Marine Operations Manager

Page 7

Appendix 1
Oban Bay Proposed Harbour Limits
Below are the proposed Argyll & Bute Council limits for Oban Harbour which
will be the baseline for data collection. The CMAL area around the Railway pier
has been left out of the chart but will of course be nested within the larger
Municipal area. The limits have been derived following initial consultation with
NLB, CMAL & CFL / CalMac but will be informed and refined based on
information gleaned from the required NRA process. 
The area enclosed by the northern boundary includes the No 1 and No 3
anchorages which are marked with the magenta anchor symbols. 
The southern limit extends to beyond the CFL ferry service to Kerrera but may
be revised south following data collection. 
KEY FOR CHARTS 
Mark Image Description
Purple lines  Indicate the limits of the proposed
Harbour limits – subject to the
NRA and any consultation
feedback 
Star Points  Indicate the points on the
boundaries which define the
limits

Page 8

No embedded text on this page.