Democracy Spraffa

DOCUMENT PACK (Council 01 03 23) Bookmarked

West Dunbartonshire Council · 1 March 2023
Back to West Dunbartonshire Council — 1 March 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Agenda 
West Dunbartonshire Council 
Date:  Wednesday, 1 March 2023
___________________________________________________________________ 
Time:  16:00
___________________________________________________________________ 
Format:      Hybrid meeting 
___________________________________________________________________ 
Contact:    Carol-Ann Burns, Senior Democratic Services Officer  
Email: carol-ann.burns@west-dunbarton.gov.uk 
Dear Member 
Please attend a meeting of West Dunbartonshire Council as detailed above.   
Members will have the option to attend the meeting remotely or in person at the Civic
Space, 16 Church Street, Dumbarton. 
The business is shown on the attached agenda. 
Yours faithfully 
PETER HESSETT 
Chief Executive 
Page 1

Page 2

Distribution:-
Provost Douglas McAllister Councillor Michelle McGinty
Councillor James Bollan  Councillor June McKay
Councillor Karen Conaghan  Councillor John Millar
Councillor Ian Dickson  Councillor Lawrence O’Neill
Councillor Diane Docherty  Councillor Lauren Oxley
Councillor Craig Edward  Councillor Chris Pollock
Councillor Gurpreet Singh Johal Councillor Martin Rooney
Councillor Daniel Lennie Councillor Gordon Scanlan
Councillor David McBride Councillor Hazel Sorrell
Councillor Jonathan McColl Councillor Clare Steel
Councillor James McElhill  Councillor Sophie Traynor
Chief Executive
Chief Officers
Date of issue:  16 Feb 2023
Audio Streaming
Audio recordings of the meeting (including the attendance or contribution of any
party participating or making a contribution) will be published on the Council’s
website and the Council’s host’s webcast/audio stream platform.
You should be aware that the Council is a Data Controller under the General Data
Protection Regulation.  Data collected during this audio stream will be retained in
accordance with the Council’s Privacy Notice* and Retention Schedules including,
but not limited to, for the purpose of keeping historical records and making those
records available via the Council’s internet site.
Page 2

Page 3

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL
WEDNESDAY, 1 MARCH 2023
AGENDA
1 STATEMENT BY CHAIR – AUDIO STREAMING
2 APOLOGIES
3 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Members are invited to declare if they have an interest in any of the items of
business on the agenda and the reasons for such declarations.
4 RECORDING OF VOTES
The Council is asked to agree that all votes taken during the meeting will be
done by roll call vote to ensure an accurate record.
5 5 – 358GENERAL SERVICES BUDGET SETTING 2023/24 AND 
2024/25 – 2027/28 BUDGET ESTIMATES AND COUNCIL TAX
SETTING
Submit report by the Chief Officer – Resources:-
(a) summarising the key issues relating to the revenue budget estimates of
council tax for 2023/24 and providing the budget estimates for 2024/25 to
2027/28;
(b) providing an update in relation to the capital budget; and
(c) seeking approval to set the General Services revenue and capital
budgets for 2023/24 through approval of options to close the 2023/24
budget gap.
6 DUMBARTON COMMON GOOD BUDGET UPDATE 2023/24 359 – 363
Submit report by the Chief Officer – Resources providing an update on the
2022/23 Dumbarton Common Good budget and seeking approval for a revised
2023/24 budget and indicative budgets for 2024/25 and 2025/26.
7/
Page 3

Page 4

7 CAPITAL STRATEGY 2023/24 TO 2031/32 365 – 397
Submit report by the Chief Officer – Resources providing the updated capital
strategy for the period 2023/24 to 2031/32.
8 HOUSING REVENUE ACCOUNT (HRA) ESTIMATES AND  399 – 417
RENT SETTING 2023/2024
Submit report by the Chief Officer – Housing and Employability:-
(a) seeking approval of the updated HRA capital programme;
(b) seeking approval of the HRA revenue budget for 2023/24; and
(c) seeking agreement of the level of weekly rent increase for 2023/24 which
is sufficient to fund the revenue budget for 2023/24 and the associated
capital investment programme.
Page 4

Page 5

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL
Report by Chief Officer - Resources
Council: 1 March 2023
Subject: General Services Budget Setting 2023/24 and 2024/25
– 2027/28 Budget Estimates and Council Tax Setting
1. PURPOSE
1.1 This report summarises the key issues relating to the revenue budget
estimates and setting of council tax for 2023/24. It also provides budget
estimates for 2024/25 to 2027/28. Note this is the first time the budget
estimates have been extended to a five year window. Within the report
the mid-range estimates are noted, with the best case and worst case
estimates summarised at paragraph 4.15.1.
1.2 To provide Members with an update in relation to the capital budget.
1.3 To seek Members approval to set the General Services revenue and
capital budgets for 2023/24 through approval of options to close the
2023/24 budget gap.
2. RECOMMENDATIONS
2.1 Members are asked to:
a) Note the updated position regarding projections for the revenue
budget in 2022/23 as identified at paragraph 4.1.1.
b) Note the projected reserves position of the Council as at
31/03/2023 as identified at paragraph 4.1.5.
c) Agree the revision to the use of the Service Concessionary One-
Off Benefit as identified at paragraph 4.1.6.
d) Note the projected outturn position for capital for 2022/23 as
detailed in Appendix 5 including information in relation to the re-
profiling of a number of projects and resources into future years.
e) Approve the options to be used to set the General Services
revenue budget for 2023/24 and assist with future projected
budget gaps including consideration of proposed saving options
and use of reserves.
f) Note the management adjustments to be used to set the General
Services revenue budget for 2023/24 and assist with future
projected budget gaps.
ITEM 5
Page 5

Page 6

g) Agree the 2023/24 Council Tax rate. 
h) Approve the proposed updated capital plan from 2023/24 as
detailed in Appendix 6. 
i) Agree that a report will be brought to a future meeting of the
Corporate Services Committee to agree the 2023/24 West
Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust management fee. 
3. BACKGROUND 
3.1 The provisional Local Government Finance Settlement for 2023/24 was
published on 20 December 2022. Initial analysis of the settlement
indicated a small detrimental impact on the Council’s budget gap.  
Council were advised of this as part of a verbal update provided at the
Council meeting on 21 December 2022. The main reason for this impact
was that the funding assumption previously reported was a flat cash
settlement however, after, allowing for new policy commitments, the
provisional settlement was marginally worse. 
3.2 After the publication of the provisional settlement there is a period of
review where Directors of Finance across all Scottish Local Authorities
can raise queries with the Scottish Government.  This year the number of
queries exceeded 100 which reflects the complexity of the settlement
and the need for it to be closely scrutinised and checked. This included
the reinstatement of £32.8m of funding which the Scottish Government
had previously provided for the 2021/22 Teacher’s Pay Award and had
committed to baseline. This was removed from the provisional settlement
by the Scottish Government without consultation with COSLA. This
reinstatement, and other amendments, improved the overall settlement
for the Council to a position which is slightly more favourable than flat
cash however is still not a level of funding that reflects inflationary
increases. Therefore it still remains a real terms cut to local government
funding which requires the Council to identify savings options to bridge
the budget gap. 
3.3 A report to Council on 21 December 2022 reported an estimated 2023/24
budget gap of £21.142m in the mid-range and provided a range of
options for Member consideration to close that gap. As a result of
decisions by Council to approve a number of these options, in addition to
£0.899m of management adjustments, the 2023/24, and future year
budget gaps were reduced as set out in Exhibit 1. 
Exhibit 1: Mid-Range Budget Gap After 21/12/22 Council Meeting 
2023/24
£000
2024/25
£000
2025/26
£000
2026/27
£000
2027/28
£000
21/12/22 Council Report  21,142 27,925 34,509 41,141 48,074
Saving Options Agreed
21/12/22
(3,019) (4,042) (4,184) (4,184) (4,184)
Management Adjustments
Reported 21/12/22
(899) (1,167) (1,356) (1,356) (1,356)
Page 6

Page 7

Service Concessionary Savings (2,831) (3,259) (3,963) (4,328) (4,249)
Updated Cumulative Budget
Gap 
14,393 19,457 25,006 31,273 38,285
3.4 This position has been further updated to reflect changes since 21
December 2022. The revised position is set out in the remainder of this
report.
4. MAIN ISSUES
4.1 Budgetary Control Projection for 2022/23 and Review of Reserves 
4.1.1 As at period 9, Officers were projecting a year-end adverse position of
£1.472m. However, at its 26 October 2022 meeting, Council agreed to
revise the allocation of Residential Care Costs to a 72% HSCP/28%
Education split with a proportionate share of the budget being passed to
the HSCP. This, when factored into future budgetary control reports, will
increase the projected adverse variance by £1.419m to £2.891m.  Of
this, it is estimated that the projected impact of COVID is £0.748m which
will be fully funded by Scottish Government COVID funds carried forward
from 2021/22. This leaves an underlying adverse variance of £2.143m.
For the purposes of this budget-setting report this is assumed to be the
year-end position, however it should be noted this positon is subject to
change by the year end.
4.1.2 Based on the updated 2023/24 draft budget (reflecting this report) the
Prudential Reserve level has been calculated as £5.641m, which reflects
3% of net expenditure.  This is a 1% increase to the prudential target
(previously 2%) and was agreed by Council at its meeting on 21
December 2022.  At the same meeting, Council agreed to fund this
increase from the one off benefit generated by the Service
Concessionary Financial Flexibility. The amount needed to meet the
commitment to increase the prudential target to 3% has increased from
the amount reported to Council on 21 December 2022 by £0.392m from
£1.750m to £2.142m.
4.1.3 On 21 December Council also agreed the Service Concessionary
Financial Flexibility one off benefit would be used to fund the Council’s
2022/23 projected overspend which was £1.5m as at the 21 December
meeting but has increased by £0.643m to £2.143m as stated in
paragraph 4.1.1.
4.1.4 On 21 December Council also agreed to earmark £1 million to provide a
further £0.250m cost of living support each year for the next four years
with this to be funded from the Council’s general reserves including the
transfer of the balance of £0.990m from the Service Concessionary one
off benefit.
4.1.5 Projected levels of reserves held by the end of 2022/23 are set out in
Exhibit 2a.
Page 7

Page 8

Exhibit 2a – Summary of Projected Unearmarked Reserves   
£,000
Unearmarked reserves as at 31/03/22  3,503
Changes 
Budgetary Control Projection 2022/23 (2,143)
Allocation of Service Concessionary Financial Flexibility to fund
overspend agreed 21 December 2022
1,500
Allocation of further use of Service Concessionary Financial Flexibility
to fund increase in overspend since 21 December  2022
643
Allocation of Service Concessionary Financial Flexibility to fund
increase in prudential target from 2% to 3% agreed 21 December
2022
2,138
Projected Unearmarked reserves as at 31/03/23 5,641
Prudential Target for 2023/24 (5,641)
Projected Free Unearmarked Reserves 0 
4.1.6 Exhibit 2b sets out the revised use of the one off Services Concessionary
benefit to reflect the need to:
 provide additional amounts for the projected 2022/23 overspend 
 increase the prudential target to 3%
 reduce the voluntary redundancy reserve to counter balance the
additional amounts required 
 reflect the 21/12/22 Council decision to invest in the Cost of Living
Fund. 
Exhibit 2b – Revised Use of Service Concessionary One Off Benefit 
Change
Required
21/12/22 
Use
£,000
Changes
£,000
Revised
Use 
£,000
One Off Benefit None 29,630 0 29,630
Voluntary Redundancy & Early
Retirement Reserve
Decrease 
(para 4.1.6)
(15,000) 1,031 (13,969)
Smoothing Fund for Three Year
Service Transformation Programme
None (6,000) 0 (6,000)
Increase Prudential Target to 3% Increase
(para 4.1.2)
(1,750) (388) (2,138)
Absorb Estimated 2022/23 Overspend Increase 
(para 4.1.3)
(1,500) (643) (2,143)
Scottish Government Pay Award
Funding Provided as Capital Funds in
2022/23 and 2023/24 
None (4,390) 0 (4,390)
Cost of Living Support Increase 
(para 4.1.4)
0 (990) (990)
Remaining Balance into General
Reserves 
990 (990) 0 
4.2 Scottish Government Settlement to Councils 2023/24 
Page 8

Page 9

4.2.1 The Scottish Budget was announced by the Deputy First Minister on 15
December 2022 and the Local Government Finance Circular 11/2022
was published on 20 December 2022 (subsequently revised 10 January
2023) providing detail of the provisional total revenue and capital funding
allocations for 2023/24 (one year only). The provisional total funding
allocations form the basis for the annual consultation between the
Scottish Government and COSLA ahead of the Local Government
Finance (Scotland) Order 2023 to be presented to the Scottish
Parliament in February 2023. 
4.2.2 The Circular outlines that the Scottish Government will work in
partnership with local government to implement the budget and the joint
priorities in return for the full funding package worth £13.2 billion which
includes: 
 £260 million to support the local government pay deal and additional
funding to ensure that payment of Scottish Social Services Council
fees for the Local Government workforce which will continue to be
made on a recurring basis.
 £72.5 million increase to the General Revenue Grant.
 £105 million to give effect to the devolution of Non-Domestic Rates
Empty Property Relief.
 Maintained key in-year transfers worth over £1 billion and added a
further net £102 million of resource to protect key shared priorities
particularly around education and social care.
 £50 million capital to help with the expansion of the Free School
Meals policy.
 Additional funding of £100 million to deliver a £10.90 minimum pay
settlement for adult social care workers in commissioned services
 Consolidation of £30.5 million for the homelessness prevention fund.
2023/24 Scottish Government Funding for West Dunbartonshire Council
4.2.3 Officers have analysed the Scottish Government settlement to confirm
the Council’s total 2023/24 funding compared to the funding made
available in 2022/23 before adjusting for changes in funding which have
associated commitments. This is summarised in Exhibit 3.
Exhibit 3 – Summary of 2023/24 Funding vs 2022/23 Funding
£,000
2022/23 Revenue Support Grant as per Budget Book 209,066
Remove one off Local Authority COVID  Economic
Recovery (LACER) Funding
(774)
Remove one off interim care funding (336)
Add additional 2022/23 pay award funding 4,748
Updated 2023/24 Projected Funding 212,704
Impact of Settlement on Income 4,051
2023/24 Revenue Support Grant 216,755
4.3 Future Years Scottish Government Funding
Page 9

Page 10

4.3.1 In terms of assumptions on future year Scottish Government funding the
spending review published in May 2022 indicated the total budget for
Local Government would remain flat cash until 2026/27.   Whilst the
2023/24 settlement has resulted in a small cash increase it is still
considered prudent to maintain an assumption of flat cash in the best
case and mid-range scenario and a 1% reduction in funding in the worst
case scenario. This assumption will be kept under review throughout
2023/24. 
4.4 Council Tax 
4.4.1 As the setting of Council Tax is subject to a political decision no
assumptions have been made about any increase in 2023/24 or future
years. However a modest growth in the Council Tax base has been
assumed over the next five years as set out in Exhibit 4. 
Exhibit 4: Estimated Council Tax Income 2023/24-2027/28 
2023/24
£000
2024/25
£000
2025/26
£000
2026/27
£000
2027/28
£000
Council Tax Income
(before any increase)
38,126 38,126 38,126 38,126 38,126
Estimated Council Tax
Base Growth
213 477 658 852 1,047
Total Council Tax
Income
38,339 38,603 38,784 38,978 39,173 
4.5 Total Funding 
4.5.1 Exhibit 5 summarises the total estimated funding over the next five years
within the mid-range scenario.   
Exhibit 5: Estimated funding 2023/24-2027/28 
2023/24
£000
2024/25
£000
2025/26
£000
2026/27
£000
2027/28
£000
General Funding  216,755 216,755 216,755 216,755 216,755
Council Tax income 38,339 38,603 38,784 38,978 39,173
Total Funding 255,094 255,358 255,539 255,733 255,928 
4.6 Base Budget 
4.6.1 The base budget for 2023/24 starts off as the 2022/23 revenue budget of
£251.693m and is then adjusted for the changes set out in the following
paragraphs. 
4.6.2 There are elements of Scottish Government funding that are provided as
part of the settlement with the expectation that they are used to deliver
the service/policy intended. The base budget needs to be adjusted to
reflect the additional costs for delivering on these funding commitments
and the budget increase is limited to the funding. These new
Page 10

Page 11

commitments, or changes to previous commitments, are set out in
Exhibit 6. 
Exhibit 6: Funding Commitments 
2023/24
£000
2024/25
£000
2025/26
£000
2026/27
£000
2027/28
£000
HSCP     
Free Personal & Nursing
Care
144 144 144 144 144
Share of Real Living Wage
Funding
1,686 1,686 1,686 1,686 1,686
Increase in Criminal Justice 3 3 3 3 3
COUNCIL     
Whole Family Wellbeing
Fund
602 602 602 602 602
Local Energy Strategy 75 75 75 75 75
Devolution of Empty
Property Relief
862 862 862 862 862
Rapid Rehousing Transition
Plan
13 13 13 13 13
Reduction in Additional
Teachers Funding
(66) (66) (66) (66) (66)
Reduction in Teachers
Induction Scheme
(46) (46) (46) (46) (46)
1+2 Languages Funding
Removed
(34) (34) (34) (34) (34)
Net Funding Commitments 3,239 3,239 3,239 3,239 3,239 
4.6.3 There are a number of base budget adjustments required to reflect prior
year decisions, one off costs in 2022/23 and/or decisions taken at the 9
March 2022 Council meeting.  These are:
 Additional loan charges as consequence of capital growth items
agreed by Council on 9 March 2022.
 Removal of a historic assumption that the HSCP requisition would
reduce in line with the assumption on future Council settlements.
 Adjusting for historic assumption about ongoing recurring and
procurement savings – I have assumed no further savings will be
made from 2025/26 onwards.
 Remove one off contribution to cost of living fund
 Remove one off cost in 2022/23 for COVID related activity
 Remove one off cost in 2022/23 for hosting election
 Remove one off cost in 2022/23 for hosting community council
elections.
 Remove one off cost in 2022/23 for foodbank support
 Remove one off cost in 2022/23 for water safety policy
 Adjust for the end of a commitment in relation to Clydebank Town
Hall and ending loneliness funding
 Adjust to reflect profiling of previously agreed management
adjustments
 Remove investment in Modern Apprenticeship scheme from
Page 11

Page 12

2026/27 onwards. 
4.6.4 In addition there is a need to adjust the base budget for decisions taken
during 2022/23.  These are summarised below. 
4.6.5 When Council agreed the 2022/23 Budget on 9 March 2023 members
agreed two things in relation to the cost of residential care: 
1. Whilst the education budget needed to increase from £2.5m to
£3.225m to cover increased costs, Education’s budget was
capped at £2.5m with a budget assumption that the additional
£0.725m was due to COVID and could be funded by the HSCP
from either COVID funds or their reserves as they related to
previous funding made available to the HSCP by the Council.
2. To move from a 50/50 share of costs to 77.3%/22.7% share
On the grounds that the total budget to be shared was £5m (2x£2.5m)
the 2022/23 education budget was then set at 22.7% of the £5m which
was £1.135m. Subsequent to that decision:
1. A review was carried out which determined that the split should be
72%/28% rather than the 77.3%/22.7% agreed on 9 March 2022.
2. It was agreed that in moving to the revised 72%/28% split it was
appropriate for the corresponding share of the 2022/23 budget to
be passed from the Council to the HSCP.
The total current estimated 2022/23 outturn for residential care costs is
£7.437m. Applying an estimated 4% uplift to that in each of the next four
years will require an uplift to the base education budget as set out in
Exhibit 7.
Exhibit 7: Increase to Education Budget for Share of Residential Care Costs 
2023/24
£000
2024/25
£000
2025/26
£000
2026/27
£000
2027/28
£000
Projected Total Outturn
(inc 4% annual uplift)
7,735 8,044 8,366 8,701 9,049
28% Education Share 2,166 2,252 2,342 2,436 2,534
2022/23 Education
Base Budget
1,135 1,135 1,135 1,135 1,135
Base Budget
Adjustment Required
1,031 1,117 1,207 1,301 1,399 
4.6.6 The following base budget adjustments relate to information reported to
Council on 21 December 2022:
 increase of £5.640m to reflect the extent the 2022/23 pay award
exceeded the 2% assumption already built into the budget
 decrease of £0.978m due to the reversal of the national insurance
contribution increase
Page 12

Page 13

 decrease of £0.300m for removal of historical abuse case redress
provision
 decrease of £0.159m for savings identified through the annual
recurring exercise – this has needed to be reduced by £0.065m as
a review undertaken in January identified some double counting
between these savings and reported management adjustments
 decrease of £0.276m to reflect an assumption about the impact of
the proposed changes to terms and conditions – note this is
subject to negotiations.  
4.6.7 The revised base budget is shown in Exhibit 8. 
Exhibit 8: Revised Base Budget 
Para 2023/24
£000
2024/25
£000
2025/26
£000
2026/27
£000
2027/28
£000
Base Budget  4.6.1 251,693 251,693 251,693 251,693 251,693
Funding
commitments
4.6.2 3,239 3,239 3,239 3,239 3,239
Additional loan
charges 
4.6.3 175 173 170 168 165
HSCP requisition
assumption
4.6.3 725 725 0 0 0
Recurring saving and
procurement
assumption
4.6.3 (600) (1,200) (1,200) (1,200) (1,200)
One off Cost of
Living contribution
4.6.3 (400) (400) (400) (400) (400)
22/23 COVID costs 4.6.3 (385) (385) (385) (385) (385)
22/23 election costs 4.6.3 (150) (150) (150) (150) (150)
22/23 community
election costs
4.6.3 (45) (45) (45) (45) (45)
22/23 foodbank
support
4.6.3 (20) (20) (20) (20) (20)
22/23 water policy 4.6.3 (30) (30) (30) (30) (30)
Clydebank Town Hall
and Ending
Loneliness
4.6.3 (87) (87) (87) (87) (87)
Profile of previous
management
adjustments
4.6.3 (157) (157) (157) (157) (157)
Modern
apprenticeship
scheme
4.6.3 0 0 0 (250) (250)
Residential care
costs
4.6.5 1,031 1,117 1,207 1,301 1,399
22/23 pay award 4.6.6 5,640 5,640 5,640 5,640 5,640
Reverse NI increase 4.6.6 (978) (978) (978) (978) (978)
Historical abuse
redress
4.6.6 (300) (300) (300) (300) (300)
Annual recurring 4.6.6 (94) (94) (94) (94) (94)
Page 13

Page 14

savings (adjusted)
Terms and
conditions
4.6.6 (276) (276) (276) (276) (276)
Revised Base
Budget 
258,981 258,465 257,827 257,669 257,764 
4.7 Employee Costs 
4.7.1 In terms of 2023/24 employee budgets, the expectation would be that the
budget would reflect the 2022/23 budget plus any increase due to pay
awards, incremental progression, and a built in assumption of 4%
savings being generated through turnover.   
4.7.2 The 2023/24 pay award has not been agreed yet and an estimate of 4%
has been built into the budget in the mid-range (3% in best case and 5%
in worst case). In terms of assumptions for years beyond 2023/24 I have
assumed there will be pay awards of 2% in all three scenarios. As the
pay 2023/24 pay award is not yet agreed there is a risk that it will differ
from this estimate which may create a revenue cost pressure during
2023/24.   
4.7.3 Exhibit 9 summarises the estimated changes to the employee budgets
over the next five years for Council services.  This includes an
assumption that savings will be generated through turnover – this is set
at 4% of employee costs for the majority of service areas but at a lower
percentage for specific areas where it is recognised it is harder to
achieve a 4% target. Note though that turnover saving targets are subject
to a management adjustment in 2023/24 and future years. This has been
built into the measures to balance the budget section of this report so is
not included here to avoid a double count. 
Exhibit 9: Estimated Employee Costs 2023/24-2027/28 
2023/24
£000
2024/25
£000
2025/26
£000
2026/27
£000
2027/28
£000      
Pay award 6,296 9,570 12,910 16,316 19,791
Increments 755 1,510 2,265 3,020 3,775
Turnover Saving Assumption (56) (100) (144) (188) (232)
Total Employee Increases 6,995 10,980 15,031 19,148 23,334 
4.8 Non-Pay Inflation 
4.8.1 Inflation has been included in the 2023/24 budget estimates and in future
year estimates where it is considered necessary to ensure budgets are
adjusted to reflect expected increases in costs.  In terms of future years,
an additional £0.500m annual general inflation has been built into the
mid-range scenario (£0.250m in best case and £0.750m in worst case).   
4.8.2 The overall additional budget requirement for non-pay inflation estimated
over the next five years is summarised in Exhibit 10. 
Page 14

Page 15

Exhibit 10: Non Pay Inflation - 2023/24-2027/28 
2023/24
£000
2024/25
£000
2025/26
£000
2026/27
£000
2027/28
£000
General Provision 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000
Utilities – Gas 1,484 1,692 1,829 1,972 2,123
Utilities – Electricity  1,147 1,218 1,354 1,497 1,646
Utilities – Street Lighting 57 118 148 180 213
Non-Domestic Rates 23 45 67 89 111
ICT 30 62 94 126 158
Landfill Tax 12 24 36 48 60
Audit Fee 20 24 28 32 36
PPP Unitary Payment 139 316 457 605 760
West Dunbartonshire Leisure
Trust Management Fee
200 400 600 800 1,000
Increase in recharged income  (376) (742) (1,108) (1,474) (1,840)
Total 2,736 3,657 4,505 5,375 6,267 
4.9 Cost Pressures 
4.9.1 Services operate on the basis of having to contain any cost pressures
within current resources wherever possible however that is not always
possible and it is necessary to ensure budgets are adjusted where
necessary for unavoidable cost increases. The estimated pressures for
Council services are noted in Exhibit 11. An allowance for unidentified
pressures has been included from 2024/25 onwards at £1.0m per annum
within the mid-range scenario, £0.750m in the best case and £1.5m in
the worst case. 
Exhibit 11: Cost Pressures - 2023/24-2027/28 
2023/24
£000
2024/25
£000
2025/26
£000
2026/27
£000
2027/28
£000
SEEMIS Membership Fees 1 3 5 7 9
Apprenticeship Levy 11 22 33 44 55
Impact of bank interest rate
increases on loan charges
4,578 6,249 7,967 9,309 10,426
Waste charges due to
change in legislation
1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400
Roads materials 212 212 212 212 212
2027/28 Local Government
elections 
0 0 0 0 200
Reduction in planning income 255 255 255 255 255
Reduction in licensing income 65 65 65 65 65
IFRS16 Software Costs 16 16 16 16 16
Cost of CCTV Operative Shift
Allowance
14 14 14 14 14
Audit Fee increase in excess
of inflation assumption
7 12 18 25 33
Website Software 16 16 16 16 16
Page 15

Page 16

Organic waste cost increase 63 63 63 63 63
Bus contract renewals 113 113 113 113 113
PPP Uplift in excess of
inflation assumption
548 287 98 97 96
Loss of rental income 63 16 16 16 16
Right size office
accommodation budget for
rates
30 31 31 32 33
Aurora House District Heating
Costs
10 10 10 10 10
Cost of Non Domestic Rates
Revaluations
357 817 974 1,877 2,067
Net increase in ICT License
costs
256 312 367 417 467
Personal Hygiene Costs 10 10 10 10 10
Additional West
Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust
Fee due to 22/23 Pay Award
333 340 346 353 360
Allowance for Unidentified
Pressures
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000
Totals 8,358 11,263 14,029 17,351 19,936 
4.10 West Dunbartonshire Health and Social Care Partnership (HSCP) 
4.10.1 The Council, at the budget meeting on 9 March 2022, agreed an HSCP
requisition of £81.4m (subsequently increased to £81.780m to reflect the
final confirmation by the Scottish Government of the allocation of funding
commitment). In addition there was £1.631m passed through to the
HSCP for Criminal Justice Partnership Funding and £0.063m for
Community Justice Transition Funding. This resulted in an overall
2022/23 requisition to the HSCP of £83.474m 
During 2022/23 there were adjustments made to that requisition as set
out in Exhibit 12: 
Exhibit 12: In year adjustments to HSCP 2022/23 requisition 
£,000
Original Requisition 83,474
Adjustments in year 
Share of Residential Care Budget 1,419
Adult Disability Payment (distributed outwith
2022/23 settlement)
71
Transfer from HSCP to Homeless Service  for
Action for Children and Blue Triangle
(82)
Budget realignment for mobile and ICT licenses (8)
Budget adjustment for SIP Trunking costs (3)
Revised 2022/23 HSCP Requisition 84,871 
4.10.2 There is an ongoing assumption that the Council’s allocation to the
Page 16

Page 17

HSCP will be on the basis of ‘flat cash’ plus the appropriate share of the
Health & Social Care funding commitments detailed in Local Government
Finance Circular (adjusting for any one off funding not recurring). 
4.10.3 Exhibit 13 sets out the requisition to the HSCP over the next five years
based on the assumptions noted above. 
Exhibit 13: HSCP Payment - 2023/24-2027/28 
2023/24
£000
2024/25
£000
2025/26
£000
2026/27
£000
2027/28
£000
Revised 2022/23 Requisition  84,871 84,871 84,871 84,871 84,871
Adjust for non-recurring
interim care money provided
in 2022/23
(336) (336) (336) (336) (336)
Free Personal & Nursing
Care
144 144 144 144 144
Share of Real Living Wage
Funding
1,686 1,686 1,686 1,686 1,686
Increase in Criminal Justice 3 3 3 3 3
HSCP Requisition 86,368 86,368 86,368 86,368 86,368 
4.10.4 The HSCP requisition has already been built into the base budget with
the exception of adjusting for the £0.336m of non-recurring interim care
money. 
4.11 Budget Gap Prior to Measures to Balance Budget 
4.11.1 The estimated budget gap prior to factoring in any potential options
towards balancing the budget is summarised in Exhibit 14.   
Exhibit 14: Estimated Budget Gap Prior to Measures to Balance Budget
Para   2023/24
£000
2024/25
£000
2025/26
£000
2026/27
£000
2027/28
£000
4.6.7 Revised Base
Budget
258,981 258,465 257,827 257,669 257,764
4.7.3 Employee Cost
Changes
6,995 10,980 15,031 19,148 23,334
4.8.2 Non-Pay Inflation 2,736 3,657 4,505 5,375 6,267
4.9.1 Cost Pressures 8,358 11,263 14,029 17,351 19,936
4.10.4 Adjust for Interim
Care
(336) (336) (336) (336) (336) 
Total Expenditure 276,734 284,029 291,056 299,207 306,965
4.5.1 Total Funding 255,094 255,358 255,539 255,733 255,928 
Budget (Surplus) /
Gap Cumulative
21,640 28,671 35,517 43,474 51,037 
4.11.2 Exhibit 14 shows a 2023/24 budget gap prior to measures to balance the
budget of £21.640m. 
4.12 Measures to Balance the Budget – Previously Agreed
Page 17

Page 18

4.12.1 There are a number of measures to balance the budget which were
either agreed by, or reported to, Council on 21 December 2022 or via the
Council’s Long Term Financial Strategy. These are summarised in
Exhibit 15. 
Exhibit 15: Previously Agreed Measures to Balance Budget 
2023/24
£000
2024/25
£000
2025/26
£000
2026/27
£000
2027/28
£000
Savings Options  3,019 4,042 4,184 4,184 4,184
Management Adjustments  899 1,167 1,356 1,356 1,356
Service Concessionary
Recurring Savings 
2,831 3,259 3,963 4,328 4,249
Assumed increase in sales,
fees and charges
316 645 987 1,342 1,712
Total Previously Agreed
Savings
7,065 9,113 10,490 11,210 11,501 
4.13 Measures to Balance the Budget – For Council Approval 
4.13.1 There are a further range of options to assist Members to balance the
2023/24 budget. These options are set out in the following paragraphs
and can be categorised as either: 
 Setting of Council Tax
 Saving Options
 Management Adjustments
 Use of Reserves 
4.13.2 Setting of Council Tax - As per paragraph 4.4.1 the assumptions set
out in this report make no assumptions about any increase in Council
Tax. Each 1% increase in Council Tax would generate approximately
£0.383m in income and increase the weekly bill to a Band D taxpayer by
£0.26. Appendix 1 sets out an analysis of what rises in Council Tax
between 3% and 12% would generate vs the increase in weekly Council
Tax bills. This is provided for illustrative purposes. 
4.13.3 Saving Options – In addition to the options considered by Council on 21
December 2022, officers have identified a further range of saving options
for member consideration.  A number of the saving options submitted for
member consideration have multiple options contained within them which
means there is a higher or lower value associated with them.   
The total value of the ‘higher value’ saving options is a recurring saving
of £10.040m in 2023/24 rising to £11.969m in 2024/25 and £11.994m in
future years.  These options are summarised in Appendix 2 with full
details of each option set out in Appendix 3.  
4.13.4 Management Adjustments – Officers have also identified management
adjustments which do not result in either potential redundancies or
Page 18

Page 19

changes to policy and can be implemented without political approval.  
The total value of these management adjustments is a recurring saving
of £1.232m in 2023/24 declining slightly to £1.020m in future years. 
These options are summarised in Appendix 2 with full details of each
option set out in appendix 4. 
4.13.5 Use of Reserves – On 21 December 2022 the Council agreed to
earmark £6m from the one-off service concessionary financial flexibility to
establish a smoothing fund to support a three year service transformation
programme. There is an option to use this fund to help deliver a balanced
2023/24 budget however it should be noted that this is an option which is
one-off in nature and use of it does not reduce the cumulative budget
gap in future years.  It would also not be prudent to use it all in one year
as it was established to support transformation over a three year period. 
For the purposes of illustration it has been assumed that the £6m will be
used evenly over the three year period. 
4.14 Budget Gap After Measures to Balance Budget 
4.14.1 The budget gap after applying all the measures to balance the budget is
summarised in Exhibit 16. 
Exhibit 16: Budget Gap After Measures to Balance Budget
Para  2023/24
£000
2024/25
£000
2025/26
£000
2026/27
£000
2027/28
£000
4.11.1 Estimated Budget
Gap/(Surplus) Prior
to Measures to
Balance  Budget
21,640 28,671 35,517 43,474 51,037
4.12.1 Measures Previously
Agreed
(7,065) (9,113) (10,490) (11,210) (11,501) 
Updated
Gap/(Surplus)
14,575 19,558 25,027 32,264 39,536
4.13.3 Saving Options for
Approval
(10,040) (11,969) (11,994) (11,994) (11,994)
4.13.4 Management
Adjustments
(1,232) (1,020) (1,020) (1,020) (1,020)
4.13.5 Use of Reserves/
Smoothing Fund
(2,000) (2,000) (2,000) 0 0 
Remaining
Cumulative Budget
Gap / (Surplus)
prior to
Considering
Council Tax 
1,303 4,569 10,013 19,250 26,522 
4.14.2 Exhibit 16 demonstrates that if Members agreed to all the proposals
noted within this report, and the even distribution of the £6m smoothing
fund over the three years, there is a remaining budget gap of £1.303m in
2023/24.  Note though this is before the application of any Council Tax
Page 19

Page 20

increase. If members agree to the assumptions set in exhibit 16 a rise in
Council Tax of 3.4% would be required to deliver a balanced budget.   
4.14.3 Members however may wish to balance the budget through a different
combination of saving options, use of the smoothing fund and Council
Tax increases. However it should be noted that, whilst there are a
number of savings options built into these figures that could be reversed,
accepting them now will assist with the continued challenging position in
future years, especially as use of the smoothing fund is one-off in nature
and, therefore, only delays the need to identify longer term recurring
savings. This is illustrated by the projected budget gaps in 2024/25 and
beyond in Exhibit 17. 
4.15 Balancing Future Years Budget 
4.15.1 The estimated cumulative budget (surplus) / gap in the period 2024/25 to
2027/28, assuming all 2023/24 saving options are approved and the
smoothing fund is allocated evenly across each scenario is summarised
in Exhibit 17.   
Exhibit 17: Future Year Estimated Cumulative Budget Gaps 
Budget Gap 2024/25
£000
2025/26
£000
2026/27
£000
2027/28
£000
Best Case 1,334 5,682 13,383 20,186
Mid-Range 4,569 10,013 19,249 26,522
Worst Case 9,478 17,859 29,959 40,074 
4.16 Capital Plan Update 
4.16.1 An update of the Council’s 10 year capital plan was approved by Council
on 9 March 2022. A review of the plan was conducted during 2022/23
with changes to the plan approved at Council on 21 December 2022.
Following this review projects have been amended or removed as
agreed. Officers have undertaken any necessary reprofiling of the
remaining projects and these are included in the appendices to this
report. 
4.16.2 The updated Capital Plan has some changes to projects from the
previous plan, agreed in March 2022 and updated to reflect decisions
taken by Council on 21 December 2022. The main change being to the
new build Faifley Campus. The original estimated budget for Faifley
Campus was £29.5m.  However the stage 1 report produced by the
appointed contractors and presented to the Learning Estate Project
Board on 20 December 2022 has increased this estimate to £35.618m.
The reasons for this being ongoing national increases in construction
costs and inflation. The scope of the project has not increased and the
project team will continue to drive efficiencies throughout the stage 2
process whilst reviewing the original scope. The funding to be provided
by the Scottish Government is estimated to remain at the initial offer of
£18.416m over 25 years however this will be confirmed at financial close
of the project. In the meantime, unless the overall cost can be reduced
Page 20

Page 21

through redesigning the project scope or delivering further efficiencies
through value engineering, there is an assumption that the Council will
need to fund the full difference between the final cost and the Scottish
Government funding. 
4.16.3 There are four appendices to this report in relation to the capital plan. 
 Appendix 5 shows the forecast 2022/23 outturn
 Appendix 6 shows the anticipated spend on projects (revised capital
plan)
 Appendix 7 shows the current resources available 
 Appendix 8 provides information linking the capital plan to the
Council’s Asset Management Plans. 
The loan charges linked to the capital plan reflect the values within the
draft budget book. There are no new projects proposed for 2023/24. 
4.16.4 In terms of affordability of the proposed plan it is the view of the Council’s
Senior Management Team that the plan is affordable, though clearly it
will have revenue implications for future years, these will require to be
planned for in the normal manner through long term financial strategies
and budget planning processes.  It is intended to undertake a full review
of the Council’s capital reporting process in 2023/24. 
4.17 West Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust Management Fee   
4.17.1 It is normal practice for the Council, as part of the budget setting process,
to approve the West Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust Management Fee
having consideration been given to the Trust’s business plan by the
Corporate Services Committee.  However there is a  savings option
which proposes reducing the Trust’s 2023/24 management fee  and,
consequently, it is not possible for the final fee to be included for
consideration as part of this overall budget report. Once a decision has
been made regarding the savings option, the fee can be confirmed. It
should be noted that an indicative sum based on last year’s fee of
£4.16m has been included within the base budget calculations for
2023/24 with an additional £0.200m for inflationary rises (as per
paragraph 4.8.2) and £0.333m  for the 2022/23 pay award (as per
paragraph 4.9.1). As such it is considered there is sufficient expenditure
already built into the budget to cover any agreed management fee. A
report will be brought forward to a future meeting of the Corporate
Services Committee to agree the revised 2023/24 management fee. 
4.18 Growth Bids 
4.18.1 Due to the scale of the financial challenges facing the Council in 2023/24
and beyond there was a strict approach taken to officer developed
growth bids for this budget.  Growth bids would only be considered if they
were either cost neutral or ‘spend to save’ projects. There are no growth
bids for member consideration as part of this budget report.
Page 21

Page 22

5. PEOPLE IMPLICATIONS 
5.1 The potential staffing implications are shown within the savings options
appended to this report and will be subject to consultation processes
where appropriate and managed in accordance with the Council’s Switch
Policy (Organisational Change).  Given the scale of the savings, a
voluntary release programme has been underway for several months.
While the aim is to secure sufficient numbers of volunteers to allow
achievement of agreed savings without delay, any shortfall in this area
would necessitate progression to consideration of compulsory
redundancy. Discussions with the trades unions have begun on this
possibility and appropriate and equality proofed selection criteria will be
shared in due course. 
6. FINANCIAL AND PROCUREMENT IMPLICATIONS 
6.1 The Financial implications arising from the budget process are detailed in
the report and appendices. The procurement implications arising from
this report are those in relation to proposed savings in the procurement
team, these are detailed in the appendices. 
7. RISK ANALYSIS 
7.1 Some of the capital plan projects have an assumption of match-funding
and grant funding from Scottish Government and other agencies. There
is a risk that some or all of these are not received. The business cases
for these projects will require to be updated as funding becomes clearer
and Members may be required to consider the financial affordability of
continuing with the projects. The risk and impact of the saving options
are detailed in the appendices. 
8. EQUALITIES IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) 
8.1 All individual savings options have been screened and where relevant,
impact assessed.   
9. CONSULTATION 
9.1 The views of all Chief Officers have been requested on this report and
feedback incorporated herein. Discussions on the issues herein have
been had with the Trade Unions and a summary copy of the saving
options was provided to Trade Unions, political group leaders and the
workforce in the week commencing 7 February 2022. 
10. STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT 
10.1 Proper budgetary control and sound financial practice are cornerstones
of good governance and support Council and officers to pursue the five
strategic priorities of the Council’s Strategic Plan. 
Page 22

Page 23

10.2 The General Services revenue budget contributes to all categories by
providing funding in specific areas to help the Council achieve and
develop these priorities.  
Laurence Slavin
Chief Officer - Resources
Date:  15 February 2023
Person to Contact: Laurence Slavin, Chief Officer - Resources, Church Street
Offices, Dumbarton  E-mail: laurence.slavin@west-dunbarton.gov.uk 
Appendices
Appendix 1 – Analysis of Council Tax Increases 
Appendix 2 – Summarised Saving Options and Management Adjustments
Appendix 3 – Detailed Saving Options
Appendix 4 – Detailed Management Adjustments
Appendix 5 – Capital Plan – 2022/23 – Forecast Outturn 
Appendix 6 – Capital Plan – 2023/24 – Proposed Spend 
Appendix 7 – Capital Plan – 2023/24 – Proposed Resources 
Appendix 8 – Capital Plan – 2023/24 – Links to Asset Management Plans 
Appendix 9 – Equality Impact Assessments
Background Papers
Long Term Finance Strategy Report – 27 October 2021
Financial Update Report to Council - 22 June 2022
Financial Update Report to Council - 21 December 2022
Page 23

Page 24

Council Tax Analysis Appendix 1
2022/23 2023/24
Council Tax Council Tax
Band Valuation Band % of Band D £ 3.0%
Weekly
Increase 4.0%
Weekly
Increase 5.0%
Weekly
Increase 6.00%
Weekly
Increase 7.00%
Weekly
Increase 8.00%
Weekly
Increase 9.00%
Weekly
Increase 10.00%
Weekly
Increase 11.00%
Weekly
Increase 12.00%
Weekly
Increase
A Under £27,000 67% 888.24 914.89 0.51 923.77 0.68 932.65 0.85 941.53 1.02 950.42 1.20 959.30 1.37 968.18 1.54 977.06 1.71 985.95 1.88 994.83 2.05
B  £27,000  to  £35,000 78% 1,036.28 1,067.37 0.60 1,077.73 0.80 1,088.09 1.00 1,098.46 1.20 1,108.82 1.40 1,119.18 1.59 1,129.55 1.79 1,139.91 1.99 1,150.27 2.19 1,160.63 2.39
C £35,000  to  £45,000 89% 1,184.32 1,219.85 0.68 1,231.69 0.91 1,243.54 1.14 1,255.38 1.37 1,267.22 1.59 1,279.07 1.82 1,290.91 2.05 1,302.75 2.28 1,314.60 2.51 1,326.44 2.73
D £45,000  to  £58,000 100% 1,332.36 1,372.33 0.77 1,385.65 1.02 1,398.98 1.28 1,412.30 1.54 1,425.63 1.79 1,438.95 2.05 1,452.27 2.31 1,465.60 2.56 1,478.92 2.82 1,492.24 3.07
E £58,000  to  £80,000 131% 1,750.57 1,803.09 1.01 1,820.60 1.35 1,838.10 1.68 1,855.61 2.02 1,873.11 2.36 1,890.62 2.69 1,908.12 3.03 1,925.63 3.37 1,943.14 3.70 1,960.64 4.04
F £80,000  to  £106,000 163% 2,165.09 2,230.04 1.25 2,251.69 1.67 2,273.34 2.08 2,294.99 2.50 2,316.64 2.91 2,338.29 3.33 2,359.94 3.75 2,381.59 4.16 2,403.24 4.58 2,424.90 5.00
G £106,000  to  £212,000 196% 2,609.21 2,687.48 1.51 2,713.57 2.01 2,739.67 2.51 2,765.76 3.01 2,791.85 3.51 2,817.94 4.01 2,844.03 4.52 2,870.13 5.02 2,896.22 5.52 2,922.31 6.02
H Over £212,000 245% 3,264.28 3,362.21 1.88 3,394.85 2.51 3,427.50 3.14 3,460.14 3.77 3,492.78 4.39 3,525.42 5.02 3,558.07 5.65 3,590.71 6.28 3,623.35 6.91 3,656.00 7.53
Additional Income £1,149,000 £1,532,000 £1,915,000 £2,298,000 £2,681,000 £3,064,000 £3,447,000 £3,830,000 £4,213,000 £4,596,000
Page 24

Page 25

2023/24 MARCH BUDGET SAVING OPTIONS Appendix 2
2025/26 2026/27 2027/28
Ref: Chief Officer Saving Option Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving (£,000) FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE
CCF01 A  Graham Co-locate Dalmuir Library and Dalmuir
Community Centre within the existing
Community Centre building
14 0 28 0 28 0 28 0 28 0
CCF02 A  Graham Consider further options for co-location
and closure - in particular potential
options for Balloch, Parkhall, Duntocher,
Faifley and Dalmuir
277 12 427 12 427 12 427 12 427 12
CCF03 A  Graham Reduce West Dunbartonshire Leisure
Trust's management fee  by 10%
416 0 416 0 416 0 416 0 416 0
CCF06 A  Graham Generate additional income through
commercialisation opportunities at
Church Street, Bruce Street Baths and
Aurora House including letting available
space to third parties.
77 0 154 0 154 0 154 0 154 0
CCF09 A  Graham Reduce the number of days Clydebank
Town Hall  is open from either six to four
or six to three.
40 0 40 0 40 0 40 0 40 0
CCF12 A  Graham Replace face to face citizen service
provision at Church Street reception with
phone access to contact centre
30 1 30 1 30 1 30 1 30 1
CCF13 A  Graham Reduce community facility provision
across West Dunbartonshire to a level
more consistent with neighbouring local
authorities  through a combination of
closure and community asset transfers.
Reduction of 7.8 FTE in WDLT staff
257 7.8 257 7.8 257 7.8 257 7.8 257 7.8
CCF16 A  Graham Remove two posts across the
Communications, Culture and
Performance areas which would reduce
resource available to support services
asuch as  Arts and Heritage;
Communications, Marketing and Events
and Performance and Strategy.
80 2 80 2 80 2 80 2 80 2
CCF17 A  Graham Replace the Contact Centre with a single
emergency and right to repair only
manned phone line for Housing Repairs
with all other reports taken via voicemail,
website or email.
120 4 120 4 120 4 120 4 120 4
2023/24 2024/25
Page 25

Page 26

2023/24 MARCH BUDGET SAVING OPTIONS Appendix 2
2025/26 2026/27 2027/28
Ref: Chief Officer Saving Option Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving (£,000) FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE
2023/24 2024/25
CCF18 A  Graham Reduce opening hours and/or days
across the library network
95 4 95 4 95 4 95 4 95 4
CCF19 A  Graham Review provision of library services within
the school estate  to consider part time or
term time only provision
40 2 60 2 60 2 60 2 60 2
CCF20 A Graham Reduce staff numbers in the  Customer
Contact Centre and promote a digital first
approach encouraging more residents to
self serve and submit enquiries via the
Council website.
90 3 90 3 90 3 90 3 90 3
CCF21 A  Graham Reduce funding provided to Shopmobility
by up to 90%
43 0 43 0 43 0 43 0 43 0
CCF22 A Graham Reduce funding provided to Antonine
Sports Centre by up to 90%
44 0 44 0 44 0 44 0 44 0
EDU03 L Mason Reduce the number of learning assistants
in schools by 2.34 FTE from the current
establishment of  28 FTE.
32 2.34 49 2.34 49 2.34 49 2.34 49 2.34
EDU07 L Mason Reduce the school clothing grant to the
statutory level of £120 for primary school
children and £150 for secondary school
children
839 0 839 0 839 0 839 0 839 0
EDU09 L Mason Reduce  the provision of clerical support
hours in primary schools
0 0 120 5 120 5 120 5 120 5
EDU11 L Mason Reduce the Education Maintenance
Allowance payment from £35 every two
weeks to the statutory level of £30 every
two weeks.
47 0 47 0 47 0 47 0 47 0
EDU12 L Mason Remove breakfast club provision in all
primary schools
142 9 213 9 213 9 213 9 213 9
EDU13 L Mason Remove the provision of free swimming
lessons  for children in primary 4
14 0 14 0 14 0 14 0 14 0
EDU15 L Mason Reduce the budget for grounds
maintenance and either reduce frequency
of grass cuts in educational premises or
create areas of biodiversity which would
not require grass cutting
100 4 100 4 100 4 100 4 100 4
Page 26

Page 27

2023/24 MARCH BUDGET SAVING OPTIONS Appendix 2
2025/26 2026/27 2027/28
Ref: Chief Officer Saving Option Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving (£,000) FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE
2023/24 2024/25
EDU16 L Mason Provide statutory education provision
over a four day week with a programme
of activities provided on the 5th day in
secondary schools
1,338 0 2,008 0 2,008 0 2,008 0 2,008 0
EDU17 L Mason Review the role of  Senior Early Learning
and Childcare Officers  enabling the
removal of six Early Learning and
Childcare Officers posts
119 6 179 6 179 6 179 6 179 6
HE01 P Barry Reduce anti-social behaviour service by
removing backshift/weekend provision
and limiting to phone provision within
normal office hours.
272 7 272 7 272 7 272 7 272 7
HE02 P Barry Remove or reduce the Modern
Apprenticeship Pathway Scheme
250 0 250 0 250 0 250 0 250 0
HE04 P Barry Reduce the Communities Team by 50%
or Restructure Communities Team by
bringing W4U Youth Learning Team and
wider Community Planning support into
the Communities Team
447 11.5 447 11.5 447 11.5 447 11.5 447 11.5
HE07 P Barry Reduce the Working 4U Service by up to
25%
1,145 25 1,145 25 1,145 25 1,145 25 1,145 25
HE08 P Barry Reduce funding provided to West
Dunbartonshire Citizen Advice Bureau by
up to 90%
314 0 314 0 314 0 314 0 314 0
HE10 P Barry Reduce funding provided to Y-Sort-it by
up to 90%
141 0 141 0 141 0 141 0 141 0
HE11 P Barry Reduce the number of Tenant Liaison
Officers from four to two
99 2 99 2 99 2 99 2 99 2
HE12 P Barry Mitchell Way Office Accommodation Rent 42 0 42 0 42 0 42 0 42 0
HE13 P Barry Reduce the level of  funding available to
Community Councils
11 0 11 0 11 0 11 0 11 0
PT05 V Rogers Reduce pay preservation period 0 0 33 0 33 0 33 0 33 0
PT06 V Rogers Reduction in ICT Management 50 1 50 1 50 1 50 1 50 1
PT07 V Rogers Reduction in ICT Support 82 2.7 82 2.7 82 2.7 82 2.7 82 2.7
RES01 L Slavin Reduce the size of the Council's Audit &
Fraud team by removing 1.8TE of
vacancies rising to 2.8 in future years
75 1.8 131 2.8 131 2.8 131 2.8 131 2.8
Page 27

Page 28

2023/24 MARCH BUDGET SAVING OPTIONS Appendix 2
2025/26 2026/27 2027/28
Ref: Chief Officer Saving Option Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving (£,000) FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE
2023/24 2024/25
RES03 L Slavin Remove the provision of £15 per annum
to each resident over the age of 67 via
the Elderly Welfare Grant
110 0 120 0 120 0 120 0 120 0
RES04 L Slavin Remove voluntary grant funding provided
to West Dunbartonshire Community &
Volunteering Services and reduce funding
provided to the Clydebank Asbestos
Group by 25%
173 0 173 0 173 0 173 0 173 0
RES05 L Slavin Remove the Provost Hospitality Fund 
which is used for hospitality for provost
hosted events  and for commemorating
special events within the community
37 0 37 0 37 0 37 0 37 0
RES10 L Slavin Reduce the size of the Council's
Insurance Management team from four
officers to three.
50 1 50 1 50 1 50 1 50 1
RES11 L Slavin Reduce manual processing by
automating the generation of debtor and
creditor invoices
25 1 25 1 50 2 50 2 50 2
RES21 L Slavin Reduce the size of the Council's
Automation team from three to two in
2023/24 and by a further one in 2024/25
37.5 1 75 2 75 2 75 2 75 2
RES22 L Slavin Reduce accountancy provision by
removing one vacant post and
transferring 70% of a post to work
charged to the HRA
73 1 76 1 76 1 76 1 76 1
RN01 G Macfarlane Reduce or remove the provision of school
crossing patrollers
95 9.43 190 9.43 190 9.43 190 9.43 190 9.43
RN04 G Macfarlane Review the charging policy for the Care of
Gardens scheme or remove provision
entirely
440 16 440 16 440 16 440 16 440 16
RN06 G Macfarlane Reduce or remove the provision of
weekend litter collection at key
destinations such as parks and town
centres
140 4.8 140 4.8 140 4.8 140 4.8 140 4.8
RN08 G Macfarlane Introduce charging for garden waste
collection
64 0 127 0 127 0 127 0 127 0
Page 28

Page 29

2023/24 MARCH BUDGET SAVING OPTIONS Appendix 2
2025/26 2026/27 2027/28
Ref: Chief Officer Saving Option Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving (£,000) FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE
2023/24 2024/25
RN09 G Macfarlane Reduce provision of grass cutting, bin
clearing, litter collection and street
sweeping
400 22 560 22 560 22 560 22 560 22
RN10 G Macfarlane Improve recycling rates through a review
of the programme  of residual waste
collection
50 0 150 2 150 2 150 2 150 2
RN12 G Macfarlane Reduce or remove provision of footway
gritting
128 0 128 0 128 0 128 0 128 0
RN15 G Macfarlane Transfer the provision of Christmas lights
to community groups or traders
associations with assistance provided by
the Council at switch on events
25 0 25 0 25 0 25 0 25 0
RN16 G Macfarlane Roads Review of Activities to Support
Education
34 2 68 2 68 2 68 2 68 2
RN17 G Macfarlane Environmental Trust Grant Reduction 87 0 87 0 87 0 87 0 87 0
RR12 A Douglas Reduce support provided to local
businesses and organisations including  a
reduction in officers within the Council's
economic development team
169 3 234 3 234 3 234 3 234 3
SDP01 A Wilson Non regulated procurement under £2m to
be carried out by services and remove
need for procurement monitoring activity
for contracts awarded under that
threshold
110 2.3 110 2.3 110 2.3 110 2.3 110 2.3
SDP02 A Wilson Non-Complex procurement  to be carried
out by services and remove need for
procurement monitoring activity for those
contracts
148 3.1 148 3.1 148 3.1 148 3.1 148 3.1
SDP03 A Wilson Review and improve purchase to pay
administration procedures reducing the
need for Corporate Procurement Unit
support and allowing services to fully
undertake purchase to pay  activities
99 2.7 99 2.7 99 2.7 99 2.7 99 2.7
SDP11 A Wilson Reduce Consultancy Services and
Capital Investment Team
212 6 286 6 286 6 286 6 286 6
Page 29

Page 30

2023/24 MARCH BUDGET SAVING OPTIONS Appendix 2
2025/26 2026/27 2027/28
Ref: Chief Officer Saving Option Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving (£,000) FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE
2023/24 2024/25
SDP13 A Wilson Reduce the resource in the Asset
Management team from 22.14 FTE to
19.14 FTE removing three posts.   This
generates a capital budget saving rather
than revenue.
0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 3
SDP14 A Wilson Review the use of Municipal Buildings to
identify alternative uses or commercial
opportunities
37 0 37 0 37 0 37 0 37 0
SDP15 A Wilson Review possible early closure of
Clydebank Town Centre Office with
employees based there relocated to
alternative Council accommodation
108 0.8 108 0.8 108 0.8 108 0.8 108 0.8
SDP16 A Wilson Two week Christmas closedown bar
delivery of essential services
6.5 0 6.5 0 6.5 0 6.5 0 6.5 0
Total 10,040 187 11,970 196 11,994 197 11,994 197 11,994 197
2023/24 BUDGET SAVING OPTIONS - MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENTS
2023/24 2023/24 2024/25 2024/25 2025/26 2025/26 2026/27 2026/27 2027/28 2027/28
Ref: Chief Officer Saving Option Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving (£,000) FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE
CCF14 A  Graham Contribution from the Dumbarton
Common Good Fund to support the
purchase of library resources
10 0 10 0 10 0 10 0 10 0
EDU04 L Mason Fund the Outreach Support Service for
children and families through the Family
Wellbeing Fund.
212 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PT04 V Rogers Remove surplus budget in People &
Change team
29 0 29 0 42 0 42 0 42 0
RES09 L Slavin Increase the  Council’s annual turnover
savings target from £2.698m to £3.410m
712 0 712 0 712 0 712 0 712 0
RES23 L Slavin Right size the Building Insurance Income
budget
80 0 80 0 80 0 80 0 80 0
RES24 L Slavin Right size the Strathclyde Passenger
Transport and Valuation Joint Board
Budgets
77 0 77 0 77 0 77 0 77 0
Page 30

Page 31

2023/24 MARCH BUDGET SAVING OPTIONS Appendix 2
2025/26 2026/27 2027/28
Ref: Chief Officer Saving Option Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving (£,000) FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE
2023/24 2024/25
RR05 A Douglas Remove a vacant section head post
within Regularity and Regeneration
Services
70 0 70 0 29 0 29 0 29 0
RR14 A Douglas Remove a vacant Trading Standards
Authorised Officer post
42 0 42 0 70 0 70 0 70 0
Total 1,232 0 1,020 0 1,020 0 1,020 0 1,020 0
Page 31

Page 32

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer: Amanda Graham/Angela Wilson Saving Ref: CCF01
Saving Title Co-locate Dalmuir Library and CE Centre
Summary of Savings Proposal
Dalmuir Library is open 9.30am-5pm Monday to Friday and 10am-1pm on Saturday.
The library provides free internet and PC access as well as support for learning and
is well used by the community.
Under this option, Dalmuir Library would be co-located with Dalmuir Community
Centre. Library provision will be retained for the benefit of the community, with
savings generated from repairs, maintenance and running costs at the current library
site. This proposal will free up £530,000 of capital committed to create a gallery
space in the existing library, and a further £700,000 committed to building upgrades
on the building. In addition, there is potential to generate a capital receipt of circa
£270,000 from the sale of the current library building.
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
The proposal would result in the Council owning less buildings with associated
reduced costs in utilities, rates, maintenance.
The proposal would safeguard library provision in this area and maximise use of the
community centre. The community centre is situated on the edge of the village and
there is a risk footfall may decrease as fewer people pass. This would be mitigated
by effectively marketing the new location. 
The library would move to a repurposed space within a community centre and there
is a risk this could be viewed as denigration of provision. Every effort would be made
to maximise space and retain existing facilities.
The proposal would not impact on the employee headcount.
Saving
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
14* 0 28 0 28 0
*Does not include capital receipt
Page 32

Page 33

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer: Amanda Graham/Angela Wilson Saving Ref: CCF02
Saving Title Review library estate
Summary of Savings Proposal
The Council owns and operates a number of community facilities across West
Dunbartonshire, including libraries. Currently there are eight libraries across West
Dunbartonshire, three in the main towns of Alexandria, Dumbarton and Clydebank
and the remaining five in villages and estates. Libraries provide access to books,
learning, study, ICT equipment and free wifi but also provide safe space in
communities. Library staff also help citizens access Council services through online
provision.
Under this proposal, there are two options to be considered.
Option 1
Under this option, opportunities to co-locate the libraries which exist outwith the
three main town centres would be identified. If co-locations opportunities were
progressed for Balloch, Parkhall, Duntocher (within Glenhead), and Dalmuir in
alternative Council properties or partner providers, a saving of circa £100,000 could
be generated from running costs in addition to the following capital receipts: 
Parkhall    £200,000
Dalmuir    £270,000
Balloch   £130,000
Glenhead  £560,000
All staff would be retained.
Option 2
Under this option, main branch libraries in Alexandria, Dumbarton and Clydebank
would be retained, with Balloch, Parkhall, Duntocher, Faifley and Dalmuir libraries
closed. If all five closures were progressed, this would result in the deletion of 12
posts.
This proposal would generate a saving of circa £427,000 (£300,000 from staffing
and £127,000 from property running costs including energy and maintenance).
The potential capital receipt income is as stated in Option 1.
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
Option 1 could be perceived as reduction in service as the square metrage of
libraries would be reduced. This could be mitigated through creative use of space
and highlighting to communities the benefits of retaining the asset at a lower cost
rather than ceasing the service. 
Page 33

Page 34

Appendix 3
Option 2 will impact on employee numbers as well as reducing the overall service
available within communities. The model of integrating one stop shops into libraries
was designed to increase access and was only fully implemented on that basis. This
option would also cease this provision. The closure option presents a political and
reputational risk as it could be perceived as a reduction in opportunity to access
resources including books, literacy materials and training for communities
particularly those who are not digitally connected. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
Option 1 50* 0 100* 0 100* 0
Option 2 277** 12 427 12 427 12 
*Excludes capital receipts
** Based on decision in March, building in time to progress with staff and therefore
only half of staffing saving anticipated in 23/24. 
Page 34

Page 35

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer: Amanda Graham  Saving Ref: CCF03 
Saving Title  West Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust 
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council currently provides an annual management fee to WDLT for the strategic
and operational management of its Sport and Leisure Facilities, Community
Facilities, Sports Development, Active Schools, Outdoor Recreation facilities and for
event delivery. In 2022/23 the fee was £4.16m. 
Since the Trust was founded in 2012 the Council has underwritten uplifts in
employee costs and increases in utilities. The Trust is bound to honour Council
terms and conditions for employees and also any nationally agreed pay increases
for the local government workforce. The Trust is responsible for all revenue
expenditure relating to the operation of properties and delivery of services. 
Under this option, the management fee would be reduced, and/or the Council would
not meet the increase in utility charges for this year. The fee reduction would be a
set percentage, which for illustration purposes would equate to
 10% reduction   - £416,107
 7.5% reduction - £312,080
 5% reduction - £208,053  
The Trust’s current utilities bill is £983,000 and it is projected this could be up to
£500,000 more in 23/24. The Council would not pay the increase. 
The Trust has reserves of £1.4m against a target of around £675,000 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
The Council has an SLA with the Trust around delivery of service. There is a risk
that delivering savings results in a reduction of provision of services, facilities or
staffing, and in turn this impacts on the community. This could be mitigated in part by
the Board opting to use some of its reserves in 23/24. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
10% 416 0 416 0 416 0
7.5% 312 0 312 0 312 0
5% 208 0 208 0 208 0 
Page 35

Page 36

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer:  Amanda Graham/Angela Wilson  Saving Ref:CCF06  
Saving Title  Generate additional income from buildings 
Summary of Savings Proposal 
Space in Council buildings is not being fully utilised post-pandemic and opportunity
exists to maximise use of our assets by sub-letting. 
The first opportunity is to generate additional income by letting space within the
publically accessible area of Church Street as a coffee shop. The proposal would
generate circa £12,000 per annum helping to offset operating costs of the building in
addition to providing a facility for both employees and visitors. 
The Bruce Street Baths which adjoin Clydebank Town Hall are currently vacant
following investment in 2017 to enable an exhibition to be staged in the space. There
are no current plans for use of the historic building although it is wind and water
tight. An opportunity exists to market the space and bring the building back into
meaningful use by way of lease. It is estimated the building would generate rental
income of circa £12,000 per annum. 
Currently the Council is seeking to identify space for the Children and Families social
work team to facilitate contact between parents and children. Under this option, the
team would utilise the first floor of Clydebank Leisure Centre which offers multi use
space including offices and play areas and is serviced by its own lift. This has
potential to realise £130,000 of income per annum and in turn provide an opportunity
to generate an income from letting the ground floor of Aurora House.
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
There is a risk that in spite of marketing the spaces for lease, they are not let and
therefore the income would not materialise however this has been mitigated by
keeping projections low. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
77 0 154 0 154 0 
Page 36

Page 37

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Chief Officer Amanda Graham Saving Ref: CCF09  
Saving Title  Amend opening hours of Clydebank Town Hall 
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Town Hall is currently open to the public five days a week. The building
struggled to attract visitors prior to the pandemic and a refurbishment project with
new museum space to attract touring exhibitions was previously planned to address
this but in 2021 committee decided not to proceed with this project, and maintain
static art exhibitions. 
Post Covid, plans are being developed to address the low visitor numbers but in light
of the high operational costs of the building there is opportunity to consider reducing
opening hours. 
Option 1
Under this option, the Town Hall would continue to operate on four days. The
building would open on additional days as required to support pre-booked events. A
review of usage and bookings would be undertaken to ascertain the most
appropriate days for opening and closure. Access for elected members and support
staff would be maintained on four week days. 
Option 2
Under this option, the Town Hall would operate over three days. The building would
continue to open on additional days as required to support pre-booked events as the
cost would be mitigated by the income generated. Access for elected members and
support staff would be maintained on three week days. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
There would be little if any impact on the public from the change as currently visitor
numbers are low. Other than events, the building has not been open on a Saturday
since February 2020 with no challenge or query by the public during this time. 
The revised model would save up to £40,000 a year on gas and electricity. The
number of posts would be unaffected as employees could work from home or
another building. 
Elected member and support staff would continue to have access to the building
three/four days a week, with days for committee and Council business protected.
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2024/25 
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
Option 1 27 0 27 0 27 0
Option 2 40 0 40 0 40 0 
Page 37

Page 38

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer Amanda Graham Saving Ref: CCF12
Saving Title Citizen Services Provision at Church St
Summary of Savings Proposal
Currently Citizen Services operates the Customer Contact Centre, Housing Repairs
Contact Centre and provides a front of house service at 16 Church Street. 
The Council recognises that for many people, their digital skills, literacy or
deprivation can prevent them from accessing the internet and for this reason it is
important to maintain alternative means of contacting the Council.
The front desk at Church Street, supported by one member of staff, is the only office
location where residents can access services face to face. 
Under this option, the service would be removed and residents would be directed to
use the phone lines currently provided in reception to call the contact centre or, in
the case of emergencies, contact the services direct. This would generate a saving
of circa £30,000 per annum. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
There is an expectation from residents that Church Street, as a public building, is
accessible for face to face support. The current customer service staff are fully
trained and can direct people to a range of services.
The impact could be mitigated by the introduction of signage in Church Street to
highlight alternative ways of contacting the Council including using freephones in
reception area to call the contact centre or dial services direct in emergencies. There
is a risk that despite highlighting alternative means of contact, people would continue
to attend in numbers and feel dissatisfied with the level of service.
Saving
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
30 1 30 1 30 1
Page 38

Page 39

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer Amanda Graham Saving Ref: CCF13  
Saving Title Community facilities review
Summary of Savings Proposal 
Currently West Dunbartonshire has 12 Council owned community centres serving a
population of 89,000. In addition, a number of independent community facilities exist
operated by third sector or charitable organisations. There are also several sports
facilities in the area including sports hubs, with many communities having access to
facilities like libraries and church halls within walking distance. 
Council-owned provision is in excess of neighbouring authorities. In Inverclyde, which
is of comparable size and demographic, there are five community halls and hubs with
a further five managed by independent organisations. Argyll and Bute offers three
community centres and East Dunbartonshire has nine for a population of 109,000
people. Many of the centres’ block bookings have not returned post-Covid as sites
were unavailable for so long due to use as testing or vaccination centres. Under this
option, the provision would be reviewed with up to seven centres transferred to
community ownership or closed. Those in scope are:
 Bonhill Community Centre (Ladyton)
 Napier Hall 
 Bowling Hall
 Glenhead Community Centre
 Skypoint Community Centre
 Clydebank East Community Centre
 West Dunbartonshire Activity Centre (Brucehill) 
This option would result in an overall generated of saving of over £450,000 – part of
the figure is from reduction in West Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust staffing of 7.8 FTE
with a total saving for the Council of £257,700. 
There is also a potential to achieve capital receipts from sales of the buildings,
totalling £2,415,000. A further £987,694 could be saved as a result of non-capital
condition survey works programmed not progressing. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
The area currently, per head of the population, has access to a significant number of
facilities and these are not fully utilised.  Opportunity exists to rationalise the estate
and maximise the use of community facilities. While a reputational and political risk
exists this can be mitigated by seeking opportunities for engagement and partnership
with alternative providers, with early engagement and clear communication essential. 
Saving
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
257 7.8 257 7.8 257 7.8 
Page 39

Page 40

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer Amanda Graham  Saving Ref: CCF16  
Saving Title  Review Communications, Culture and Performance
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Communications, Culture and Performance area supports a wide range of
services across the Council incorporating Arts and Heritage; Communications,
Marketing and Events and Performance and Strategy. 
Arts and Heritage supports heritage centres and museum spaces in addition to
managing the Council’s collections including archives and records and delivering a
programme of cultural programming in the community linking with schools ELCCs,
community groups and care homes with a focus on wellbeing. 
Communications manages the reputation of the Council providing media
management, promotion of Council services and achievements, strategic
communications support, social media management, event management as well as
leading on sales, sponsorship opportunities, marketing and graphic design. 
The Performance and Strategy team leads on the strategic plan, benchmarking
information for service improvement and supports strategic consultation and
engagement including the telephone survey and citizens panel. The team is also
responsible for the corporate equalities agenda   
This proposal would see a review of staffing across the three teams with up to two
posts impacted, generating a saving of circa £80k. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
The deletion of the post would impact on the resource available across the service.
The full impact on service delivery would not be determined until it is ascertained
which post would be removed from the structure. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
80 2 80 2 80 2 
Page 40

Page 41

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Chief Officer Amanda Graham  Saving Ref: CCF17 
Saving Title  Revise Housing Repairs Contact Centre Provision
Summary of Savings Proposal 
Currently Citizen Services operates the Customer Contact Centre, Housing Repairs
Contact Centre and provides a front of house service at 16 Church Street. 
The Council recognises that for many people, their digital skills, literacy or
deprivation can prevent them from accessing the internet and for this reason it is
important to maintain alternative means of contacting the Council. 
In 2021/22 there were 50,000 calls received by the Housing Repairs Contact Centre,
with many following up on repairs already reported. Ongoing work to reduce the
number of outstanding repairs along with implementation of full functionality of the
IHMS system to staff within housing and building services will reduce this contact.. 
The option would see the contact centre replaced with a single emergency and right
to repair only manned phone line. All other reports would be via a voicemail service,
the website and email. This would result in the reduction of four members of staff,
generating a saving of circa £120,000 per annum. The emergency controller would
continue to operate out of hours, 365 days a year. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
The option would retain telephone services for those without internet access or for
those requiring urgent assistance. A new process would require to be developed for
housing repairs with the engagement of all stakeholders, particularly the Housing
and Building Services. 
As with any significant change in service, this would require a public awareness
campaign to support the channel shift. 
There is a risk that despite communications highlighting the new process and
signposting to alternatives means of contact, people use the emergency and right to
repair line to attempt to report standard repairs, and this results in waiting times on
this line. This could result in dissatisfaction with the level of service and in turn
increased complaints. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
120 4 120 4 120 4 
Page 41

Page 42

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer Amanda Graham Saving Ref: CCF18 
Saving Title Review library opening hours and staffing structures
Summary of Savings Proposal
In recent years, savings have been taken from the libraries service as part of a
service wide review. These were generated in the main from a restructure of the
service to fully integrate with Citizen Services and reduce post numbers and a
reduction in library opening hours. 
Under this option, a further review of opening hours would be undertaken across all
library branches with a view to reducing hours or days of operation. Any adjustment
to opening hours would be informed by visitor data collated by each branch
identifying peak usage times. The staffing structure would also be reviewed.
This would result in the deletion of up to four posts. This would generate a saving of
circa £95,000. 
This can be taken in addition to the options to co-locate libraries but the saving
would be limited if the option is taken to close branches.
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
Libraries support literacy and digital inclusion providing access to books, other
reading materials and PCs alongside signposting to other Council services via the
integration of citizen services. They are used by a number of services including
Working4U and CL&D to provide outreach and also provide a safe space for people
who are vulnerable and isolated. Any reduction in service would carry a political and
reputational risk.  
Saving
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
95 4 95 4 95 4
Page 42

Page 43

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer Amanda Graham Saving Ref: CCF19 
Saving Title Review school library provision
Summary of Savings Proposal
Currently, there is four-day-a-week staffed library provision across most of West
Dunbartonshire’s five secondary schools, with one school operating five days and
another three days. The service has a workforce of 4.1 FTE librarians.
Under this proposal, the service would operate part-time and on days when
librarians were not present, the space could be utilised for lessons with teaching
staff, or could be supported by senior student volunteers at lunchtimes.
Option 1
Under this option, provision would continue in each secondary school location on
two days a week. This proposal would result in a reduction of staffing with two FTE
posts retained. This would generate a saving of circa £60,000.
Option 2
Under this option, provision would continue in each secondary school, opening for
three days in each location. This proposal would result in a reduction of staffing with
three FTE posts retained. This would generate a saving of circa £30,000.
Option 3
Under this option, provision would continue in each secondary school on a term time
only basis. This would retain staffing with a required contractual change and
consultation in line with this. Saving would be limited, circa £10,000 0.3 FTE.
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
The school library service not only exists to issue books and other materials to pupils
across the five mainstream secondary schools, it supports literacy, provides space
and support for study and projects and is integral to the curriculum in schools with
lessons held in this location. 
Any reduction in service would carry a political and reputational risk.
Saving
2023/24 2024/25 2024/25
Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
1 40* 2 60 2 60 2
2 20 1 30 1 30 1
3 10 0.3 10 0.3 10 0.3
*Factors time taken to progress consultation and process
Page 43

Page 44

Appendix 3 
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer Amanda Graham  Saving Ref: CCF20
Saving Title  Review of Contact Centre
Summary of Savings Proposal 
Currently Citizen Services operates the Customer Contact Centre, Housing Repairs
Contact Centre and provides a front of house service at 16 Church Street. 
The Council recognises that for many people, their digital skills, literacy or
deprivation can prevent them from accessing the internet and for this reason it is
important to maintain alternative means of contacting the Council. It is recognised
that for a number of people the option to call rather than access services online is a
preference rather than a necessity. 
Currently the contact centre employs 12 members of staff. Under this option, the
contact centre provision would continue with nine members of staff, with work
undertaken to promote alternative methods of contacting or reporting issues to the
Council including via email and via the website. This would generate a saving of
circa £90,000 per annum. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
A public awareness campaign would be required to further promote the digital first
approach and encourage residents who are able to self-serve and submit enquiries
via the website. Telephone services would continue for those without internet access
or for those requiring urgent assistance. There is a risk that people’s behaviour does
not change and wait times within the contact centre could rise as a result,
particularly at peak times. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2024/25
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
90 3 90 3 90 3 
Page 44

Page 45

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer: Amanda Graham/Angela Wilson Saving Ref: CCF21
Saving Title Review grants to strategic partners -
Shopmobility
Summary of Savings Proposal
The Council provides grant support to a number of strategic partner organisations
in West Dunbartonshire.
Shopmobility delivers a mobility scooter, manual and powered wheelchair service
to residents from its base in Clydebank Shopping Centre.
Under this proposal, the current grant of £47,670 provided to Shopmobility by the
Council would reduce by between 25% and 90%
Option Reduction Remaining Grant
1 – 25% reduction 11,917.50 35,752.50
2 – 50% reduction 23,835 23,835
3 – 75% reduction 35,752.50 11,917.50
4 – 90% reduction 42,903 4767
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
In addition to the provision of scooters and wheelchairs, Shopmobility delivers a
range of support to residents with physical impairments to increase
independence, reduce isolation and ensure equality. This includes provision of
trained sighted to accompany those who are visually impaired to support them
with tasks such as shopping or to attend events and facilitating a number of
groups for walking, yoga, knitting and photography. 
Membership of Shopmobility costs £20 a year and the organisation relies on the
Council funding to sustain its services. Any reduction in funding carries a political
and reputational risk. Reducing funding could impact on the future sustainability of
the group. The impact could potentially be reduced if alternative funding streams
could be identified through the likes of CVS or the HSCP.
Saving
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
1 12 0 12 0 12 0
2 24 0 24 0 24 0
3 36 0 36 0 36 0
4 43 0 43 0 43 0
Page 45

Page 46

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer: Amanda Graham/Angela Wilson  Saving Ref: CCF22
Saving Title  Reduce funding of Antonine
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council provides grant support to a number of strategic partner
organisations in West Dunbartonshire. 
The Antonine Sports Centre is an independent charity which has offered access
to sports and community facilities in Duntocher for over 30 years. 
Under this proposal, the current grant of £49,156 provided to the Antonine by the
Council would reduce by between 25% and 90% 
Option Reduction  Remaining Grant
1 – 25% reduction 12,289 36,867
2 – 50% reduction 24,578 24,578
3 – 75% reduction 36,867 12,289
4 – 90% reduction 44,240 4,915 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
The Antonine provides and supports access to sports and physical activity in the
community of Duntocher and surrounding areas which members drawn from
across the Clydebank area. The Council made a commitment in 2017 to support
the Antonine with funding for the next 10 years to protect and enhance the
facility. 
Any reduction in funding carries a political and reputational risk. This could
potentially be mitigated by investigation other potential funding streams for the
organisation through CVS. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
1 12 0 12 0 12 0
2 25 0 25 0 25 0
3 37 0 37 0 37 0
4 44 0 44 0 44 0 
Page 46

Page 47

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION - SAVING OPTION 
Chief Officer: Laura Mason  Saving Ref: EDU03  
Saving Title  Learning Assistants 
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council currently employs 28 Learning Assistants across 29 Early Learning and
Childcare Centres. Learning Assistant posts are contracted at 0.78FTE, meaning the current
central allocation for these posts is 21.84FTE.   
Under this option, the Council will continue to provide Learning Assistants for 19.5 FTE (25
posts) in Early Learning and Childcare Centres. This would generate a saving of £32,107 in
2023/24. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
Every child and young person will continue to be offered appropriate support from adults to
allow them to grow and develop and reach their full potential in the Council’s Early Learning
and Childcare Centres. When children and young people experience consistent, positive
relationships from key adults, they are more likely to grow up resilient in their wider world. As
such, children will continue to be supported through the key adult approach at our ELCCs. 
The nature of support required for children and young people has intensified and requires
more continuous and long term interventions. 
A reduction in Learning Assistant support impacts on abilities to meet children’s changed
needs effectively; reducing life chances and positive outcomes. 
This proposal will impact those in one of the lowest paid groups of workers in the Council, with
three posts removed or reduction in hours for each Learning Assistant. 
The first year saving (2023/2024) would be a part-year saving and the saving detailed is
based on the 8 month period August – March. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
32 2.34 49 2.34 49 2.34 
Page 47

Page 48

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer: Laura Mason Saving Ref: EDU07
Saving Title School Clothing Grant
Summary of Savings Proposal
The Council currently pays a school clothing grant of £300 per child per year, which
is more than double the statutory amount. This amount was increased from £150
offered in 2022/23 because the Council were able to fund it using Local Authority
Covid Economic Recovery (LACER) funding. LACER funding has now been fully
utilised and will not be available to fund this policy in future years.
Under this proposal, there are two options to be considered.
Option 1
Under this option, families of eligible children would continue to receive grant funding
to support them with the cost of providing school uniform. From 2023/24 onwards,
this payment will be £150, as was paid in previous years.  The Scottish Government
fully fund the £150 payment for secondary school pupils, with the amount allocated
for primary pupils sitting at £120. The Council will subsidise this payment to increase
it to £150 per primary school pupil.  This is favourable compared to other local
authorities, with most providing £120 for primary school children. This option would
generate £774,000 of savings. 
Option 2
Under this option, all families of eligible children would continue to receive grant
funding to support them with the cost of providing school uniform. From 2023/24
onwards, a school clothing grant payment in line with the Scottish Government
funding provision of £120 for primary school and £150 for secondary school would
be made to eligible families. This option would generate a saving of £839,000.
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
This proposal means that families who are eligible will continue to receive support in
line with what is offered in other local authority areas. 
The proposal will impact recipients of the increased grant in 2022/23.
Saving (Cumulative)
Option 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
1 774 0 774 0 774 0
2 839 0 839 0 839 0
Page 48

Page 49

Appendix 3 
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION - SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer: Laura Mason  Saving Ref: EDU09 
Saving Title  Clerical Review in Primary Schools 
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council currently offers 2,250 hours of clerical support in primary schools
costing £1.461m.  This equates to 64.3 FTE posts. 
Under this proposal, a review of clerical operations within primary schools would be
undertaken to identify duplication and ensure the service is working efficiently. 
It is proposed that a saving of £119,420 could be achieved by introducing modern
technological solutions, creating a local learning community administrative support
function, reviewing front-line personnel required in school offices and introducing
modern working practices including flexible working to enhance the work-life balance
of employees. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
Pupils, staff and parents would continue to have access to services delivered by
school offices. It is accepted that a reduction in staffing may impact on capacity to
deliver a personal service. 
A risk analysis assessing the impact of any changes to roles will be undertaken and
current employees will be supported to ensure they are ready for change, with
service assessments and action plans completed. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
0 0 120 5 120 5 
Page 49

Page 50

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION - SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer Laura Mason  Saving Ref: EDU11  
Saving Title  Bring Education Maintenance Allowance (EMA) in line
with statutory level 
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council currently pays Education Maintenance Allowance (EMA) of £30 per
week to eligible 16 – 19 year olds who want to continue learning. The Council also
pays an additional £5 per week to those who have 100% attendance.  
This is more than the statutory EMA payment requirement of £30 per week, paid
every two weeks in arrears. 
This proposal would bring the Council’s EMA payment in line with the statutory level
of £30 per week. 
This proposal would bring the Council  in line with other local authorities, and save
approximately £50,000 per annum  
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
Eligible young people will continue to receive financial support while learning. 
This proposed change could impact upon attendance of young people staying on at
school. 
The Council will engage with impacted families timeously before any changes to
payments. 
Savings are based on probable outturn as the additional payment is based on the
young person achieving 100% attendance, which varies each year. In 2021/22 the
additional cost to the council was £54,000. The 2022/23 budget is £47,000. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
47 0 47 0 47 0 
Page 50

Page 51

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION - SAVING OPTION 
Chief Officer Laura Mason  Saving Ref: EDU12
Saving Title  Breakfast Clubs in Primary Schools
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council currently provides breakfast clubs in all primary schools every morning. 
The Breakfast Club operates between 8.00 am – 9.00 am. 
Under this proposal, breakfast club provision would cease, generating a saving of
£142,000 (including on costs) in the first year. The first year saving (2023/2024)
would be a part-year saving and the saving detailed is based on the 8 month period
August – March. The savings for future years would equate to £212,867 (including
on costs).
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
Children and young people will continue to be provided with healthy and nutritious
food options during their school day, both through school meals and in school
cafeterias. 
It is recognised that providing a healthy start to the day has associated benefits of
improved concentration, behaviour and attendance. 
Parents who utilise the service as childcare will be require to consider alternative
options. 
This proposal will impact 69 employees (working the equivalent of 9 FTE posts) who
are predominantly female. The impact on 67 of those employees will be loss of
hours to the individual, while two employees will lose their only post with the Council.
The average weekly hours required to cover breakfast clubs in the post is between 3
– 5 hours per week.  Employees will be supported through the SWITCH policy to try
to find posts with similar hours. 
This proposal will impact employees in other departments including facilities
management.
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
142 9 213 9 213 9 
Page 51

Page 52

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer: Laura Mason Saving Ref: EDU13 
Saving Title P4 Swimming Lessons
Summary of Savings Proposal
The Council currently provides free swimming lessons to all primary 4 pupils during
term time, costing £14,000. 
Under this proposal, children will continue to be educated in all aspects of water
safety. Free swimming lessons offered to Primary 4 children during term time will
cease.  
The Council offered free swimming to all children in West Dunbartonshire over the
Summer and October week holidays. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
The Council works proactively with Police Scotland, Scottish Fire & Rescue Service,
Scottish Ambulance and the RNLI to develop water safety learning materials. These
are used to educate children about the risks of swimming in open water.
There is a risk of disadvantage and inequity for children not supported to learn to
swim by their parents/carers. 
The removal of free lessons could result in reputational risk to the Council given
local and national attention on promoting water safety within schools.
Saving
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
14 0 14 0 14 0
Page 52

Page 53

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION - SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer: Laura Mason  Saving Ref: EDU15  
Saving Title  Reduce Greenspace Budget
Summary of Savings Proposal 
Education Services currently pays £313,883 per annum for grounds maintenance, which
includes grass and hedge cutting, weed killing, shrub maintenance and sports pitch
maintenance within the schools estate. The level of maintenance is specific to each premise,
with an additional £10,000 provided for six schools who have synthetic pitches.   
Under this proposal, the service would continue to invest in grounds maintenance with a
budget of £213,883 per year. 
To achieve this saving, two options are being considered under this proposal. 
Option 1 
Under this option, there would be no change to sports pitch maintenance, and grass cuts
would be undertaken on a four-weekly basis.   
Option 2
Under this option, additional biodiversity areas would be created by identifying large areas of
grass to plant small trees on.  This would reduce the requirement for grass cutting in these
areas. The trees would be funded from Greenspace’s Nature Restoration Fund. 
The saving generated will result in a staff reduction of 4FTE which will either be delivered
through employing less seasonal staff or an increased reduction in the permanent workforce 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
Increased biodiversity areas help the Council reduce its carbon footprint, as well as encourage
a more diverse range of birds and insects, and providing additional learning opportunities for
school pupils.   
There may be a perception by residents that areas are not well maintained. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
100 4 100 4 100 4 
Page 53

Page 54

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION - SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer Laura Mason Saving Ref EDU16 
Saving Title School 4 Day Week
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council currently provides education over five days between Monday-Friday.
Primary schools are open to pupils from 9am-3pm with one hour break split between
morning and lunch. There is local flexibility in the timing of breaks and lunch in each
establishment.
Secondary schools run an asymmetric week:
Monday & Tuesday, 8:50am until 3:50pm (7 periods)
Wednesday - Friday, 8:50am until 3:00pm (6 periods)
Each day includes 1 hour 10 minutes for registration, interval and lunch.
Under this proposal schools would continue to meet their statutory provision of
learning and teaching time across a four day week. 
Primary schools would open Monday - Thursday, 8:30am until 3:45pm, providing
pupils with the same amount of teaching time across four days, instead of five. 
Secondary schools will run an eight period day, Monday - Thursday, 8:20am until
4:10pm.
Various start and finish times in all schools could be explored to provide the same
hours of learning. Models that vary the length of day by season could also be
explored (shorter days in winter/heating season could result in a larger saving). 
It is expected that local authorities introduce changes to facilitate a reduction in
teacher class contact time from the current 22.5 hours to 21 hours for the start of
session 2024/25. Change to the school day could potentially be introduced at the
same time.
It is proposed that a programme of extra-curricular activities for the 5th day is
developed to ensure provision for vulnerable and at risk children. As secondary
school buildings are required to be open through the Council’s contract with BAM,
these could be utilised as venues for delivering the programme. It is proposed that
approximately £1million of the savings generated by this change are reinvested to
facilitate delivery of this programme, with the potential for partnership providers to be
involved. 
Five models of provision for the 5th day are being explored, including creating local
learning communities in each catchment area with a range of activities offered;
targeted support offered to the six family groups identified by the Scottish
Government as requiring wrap-around provision; working with community partners to
Page 54

Page 55

Appendix 3
deliver programmes for children and families to participate in; providing funding to
libraries and culture/active schools/sports development/swimming
development/music/drama to plan and deliver a range of community based
programmes; and engaging with national partners with possibility of matched funding
to deliver activities. It is possible to blend the models listed above and these will be
explored in more detail should this savings option be progressed. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
This proposal would result in the Council seeing a significant reduction in
transportation costs, and in energy usage, with savings generated for Facilities
Management as well as Education. 
All pupils will continue to receive the same teaching time as they do currently and
schools would continue to meet their statutory provision of learning and teaching
across a four day week. 
The five-day model has been in place for a significant period of time and therefore
the change may not be well-received as it may impact upon childcare arrangements
for parents.   
Consideration must be given to supports in place for vulnerable children whose
attendance at school provides a much-needed routine. 
Saving 
Option 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
1 0 0 1,338 0 2,008 0
2 1,338 0 2,008 0 2,008 0 
Page 55

Page 56

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION - SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer: Laura Mason  Saving Ref: EDU17  
Saving Title  Review Senior Early Learning and Childcare
Officers (SELCO) role and delete 6 Early
Learning and Childcare Officers (ELCO) posts 
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council currently has six experienced Senior Early Learning and Childcare Officers
(SELCO) at seven ELCCs. SELCOs are allocated to centres with at least 80 children and are
currently not committed to a key worker group. This means they are not currently counted in
ratio of adults to children required by the Care Inspectorate registration of settings. The Council
also has 250 Early Learning and Childcare Officers (ELCO) across the 29 ELCCs. 
Under this proposal, all six SELCO posts will be retained which will require a review of their
role, in order to commit the post holders to a key worker group. Employees at each ELC would
have continued support from the SELCO and leadership team. The Senior position will remain
as part of the route to promotion in our ELC leadership structure. 
In order to achieve this saving 6 ELCO posts will be deleted. The 6 ELCO post holders will be
offered ELCO vacancies as they arise. Vacant ELCO posts will be held for and offered to the 6
post holders impacted by this saving.   
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
The first year saving (2023/2024) would be a part-year saving and the saving detailed is based
on the 8 month period August - March. 
ELCCs have a regular turnover of ELCO positions. Vacancies which arise can be utilised for
the six ELCO posts to be deleted. 
A consultation with employees impacted by this decision will be undertaken, with the SWITCH
Policy highlighted as an option for ELCO being replaced by SELCO. 
Saving: 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
119 6 179 6 179 6 
Page 56

Page 57

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Chief Officer: Peter Barry  Saving Ref: HE01 
Saving Title  Reduce anti-social behaviour service 
Summary of Savings Proposal 
Currently the Council’s anti-social behaviour team consists of eight officers and one
team leader who operate on varying shift patterns to ensure a comprehensive
service provision from 9am until 2am seven days a week. 
The team undertake duties including investigating complaints, identifying disruptive
behaviour, supporting the prosecution of perpetrators and providing mediation where
neighbours are in dispute. Officers act as professional witnesses in court, conduct
proactive patrols, issue enforcement actions or issue Fixed Penalty Notices for fly
tipping, dog fouling or littering.
.
As part of this option, there are three proposals to be considered. 
Option 1  
Under this option, the ASB service would continue to operate with a team of seven,
with two posts removed. The team would assist only with complaints involving
Council tenants. Issues with other residents would be referred to police. 
Option 2 
Under this option, a reduced anti-social behaviour service would operate with a team
of two. The provision would operate Monday to Friday during office hours only with
evening and weekend service and proactive patrols ceasing. It will be a telephone
service only, with no proactive interventions possible. 
Option 3 
Under this option, we would reduce the current budget required under General
Service and increase Housing Revenue Account (HRA) contribution to fund the
service based on a shift in complainer/perpetrator tenure using the service. The
service would continue to operate as it currently does with no negative impact on our
communities or employees as outlined in option 1 and 2.   
Implications and Risks 
Option One 
Backshift/weekend service provision will be vulnerable to interruption with a reduced
workforce for cover purposes.  This is because of shift patterns and the health and
safety requirement for two officers to always be in attendance when responding to
ASB complaints 
A reduction in workforce could also lead to increased levels of anti-social behaviour,
low level disputes escalating without mediation and a loss of opportunity for
evidence gathering. Communities will feel unsupported because there will be delays
Page 57

Page 58

Appendix 3
in responding to their enquiries. In addition, there is a risk of increased failed
tenancies where long term ASB cases go unresolved, which will have a wider impact
on services including homelessness, HSCP, social work and education. 
This option proposes restricting the service to Council tenants only.  There is a
reputational risk to the Council if the service offer to Council tenants and other
residents differ. It meant that no service will be provided for complaints that do not
involve a council tenant either as victim or perpetrator.
Option Two
This option will see the loss of 7 ASB posts and end evening, night and weekend
provision of the ASB Service, leaving a phone service only with no physical
response and only within normal office hours Monday-Friday
This option would effectively cease the proactive community based ASB service and
extremely limit use of any enforcement actions
The service would be left with 2 ASB Officers dayshift who could not deal with the
volume of enquiries received or allow investigation of cases, gathering of evidence
or effective progression of actions to address ASB behaviour.  The daytime ASB
Officers would also be unable to deliver effective responses on our unique No Home
for Domestic Abuse service.
Data analysis for the past 2 years indicates 67% of calls are received out of normal
office hours.
Option Three
The current funding split between General Fund and HRA has become increasingly
complex in recent years but broadly equates to 66% General Fund and 34% HRA.  
Analysis has identified that the existing financial funding split for the service was no
longer reflective of current demand, therefore this option proposes to amend the
existing funding split to 65% HRA and 35% General Services.  This change is
designed to protect the key elements of the ASB service whilst at the same time
offering up a substantial saving for the general fund.  This change would ensure the
ASB Service continued to operate as it currently does with no detrimental or
significant negative impact on our communities or employees as outlined in option 1
and 2.
Saving
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
1 89 2 89 2 89 2
2 272 7 272 7 272 7
3 127 0 127 0 127 0
Page 58

Page 59

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer Peter Barry Saving Ref: HE02
Saving Title Apprenticeship Pathway Modern apprenticeship
scheme 
Summary of Savings Proposal
In March 2022 the Council agreed to invest £250k per year over four years to fund
the salary costs for young people to take up apprenticeships within West
Dunbartonshire Council and beyond. In year 1, Covid recovery (LACER) funding
was used to meet the commitment however there is no specific funding in place for
years 2-4 which means it will need to be funded from the general services budget.
Under this option, there are two proposals to be considered.
Option 1: 
Under this option, the Council will continue to invest in apprenticeships with a fund of
£200,000 available each year. This would generate a yearly saving of £50,000.
Option 2: 
Under this option, the modern apprenticeship programme will cease at the end of
2022/23, generating a saving of £250,000 per year. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
While Option 1 will mean a reduction in available opportunities, the Council will be
able to maintain the critical elements of the apprenticeship pathway and outcomes.
The impact will be a reduction of outputs by approximately 25%, with approximately
300 people still supported to secure employment or improved position in the
workplace. 
Under Option 2, the Council’s support for young people - in particular those making
the transition to the workplace through modern and foundation apprenticeships - will
be significantly reduced. Work to support the development of key skills for essential
industries including social care workers will end and there may be a requirement to
reduce the number of staff in the team carrying out this work.   In addition the
Council will not have the resources to capitalise on any future opportunities, such as
the Government-funded Kickstart programme and programmes such as Developing
Scotland’s Young Workforce.
Saving
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
1 50 0 50 0 50 0
2 250 0 250 0 250 0
Page 59

Page 60

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Chief Officer  Peter Barry  Saving Ref: HE04
Saving Title  Review Communities Team 
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council’s Communities Team provides a range of services to support the
development and wellbeing of communities including community councils and other
community groups, CCTV, Participatory Budgeting and community involvement.
The team leads and co-ordinates the implementation of the Council and CPWD
Community Empowerment Strategy and the UK Shared Prosperity Fund community
proposals. 
Under this proposal, there are two options to consider. 
Option 1
Under this option, the Communities Team would be reduced by 50%, with a
workforce of 11.5 operating a streamlined service. 11.5 posts would be deleted from
the organisation. This would generate potential savings of £447,000 per annum. 
Option 2
Under this option, the Communities Team would be restructured, and amalgamated
with the Working4U Youth Learning and Community Planning support role. This
would general potential savings of £383,000 per annum, with a reduction in
workforce of 13 across both services 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
Option 1 
The proposed 50% budget reduction for the Communities team would severely
impact their ability to operate effectively and meet strategic and operational priorities
developed in response to the Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015.
Resulting in a loss of progress and impact in areas such as building community
resilience, anti-poverty, and community safety, including reduced capacity to
develop community groups including councils, hindered anti-poverty efforts, reduced
monitoring services and inability to develop the public space CCTV network in line
with UKSPF external funding. This would remove the long-term ambition of self-
sufficiency for the CCTV service and increase reliance on council budgets. 
Option 2
Combining the Communities team and Working4U Youth Learning Team would
create an efficient operating model which continues to meet key strategic priorities.
It also enables the continuation of the community planning function within the
Council and the development of services in line with the three year Community
Learning and Development Plan, Community Empowerment Strategy and Public
Space CCTV. The proposed restructure will reduce overall costs of the service but
strengthen ability to lever external funding.  
Page 60

Page 61

Appendix 3 
Please note that: 
Option 1 relates to the Communities Team only. 
Option 2 affects two teams Communities and Working4U Youth Team, and also the
community planning function which is currently provided through an arrangement
with Argyle and Bute Council. The headcount is lower than FTE for Option 2 due to
two staff and their budget returning to Education and the FTE being the difference
between the combined teams total and the proposed restructure staffing total of
FTE. 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
1 447 11.5 447 11.5 447 11.5
2 383 13 383 13 383 13 
Page 61

Page 62

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer Peter Barry Saving Ref: HE07
Saving Title Review Working4U service
Summary of Savings Proposal
The Council’s Working4U is a non-statutory service which offers some of the most
vulnerable residents in West Dunbartonshire a range of financial, employability and
learning support. 
The service employs approximately 98.5 FTE of which 49.5 FTE are funded through
either Scottish Government employability grants or European Social Funds
(ESF).  ESF funding (18 posts) ends in June 2023. 
The Council directly funds 49 FTE of theWorking4U posts from the general revenue
budget at a cost of £2.3m.
Under this proposal, there are three options for consideration which reduce some of
the element funded by the Council. The percentage reductions for each option
represent the total reduction in W4U, i.e. the % of the total resource of 98.5 FTE.
The options do not affect the externally funded element of W4U and means that we
would retain between 73.5 FTE and 94 FTE staff depending on which option for
savings is selected. However, externally funded posts are dependent on Scottish
Government funding for employability services, which is currently under review, and
in addition there is some uncertainty around the impact of the transition from ESF to
UK Shared Prosperity Fund.
Option 1 Reduce Working 4U by 5%. 
In addition to the 49.5 FTE externally funded staff our Working4U service would
continue to support residents with approximately 44.5 FTE employees delivering
practical debt and benefit advice and community learning support. This would
reduce the service by 4.5 x FTE.
Option 2 Reduce Working 4U by 13% 
In addition to the 49.5 FTE externally funded staff our Working4U service would
continue to support residents, on a reduced scale, with 36 FTE employees delivering
practical debt and benefit advice and community-based learning. This would reduce
the service by 13 x FTE.
Option 3 Reduce Working 4U by 25% 
In addition to the 49.5 FTE externally funded staff our Working4U service would
continue with approximately 24 FTE employees delivering practical debt and benefit
advice and community-based learning. This would reduce the service by 25 x FTE.
The savings would come from teams supported by Council core budgets, which are
the Debt and Money Advice Team and the Community Learning Team. 
Page 62

Page 63

Appendix 3
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
Option 1 the Working4U service will continue to operate and provide a range of
practical financial and employability support to residents throughout West
Dunbartonshire , although, the reduction in funding will reduce the capacity to meet
the demand for welfare rights and community learning services.
Option 2 will impact welfare rights, debt and adult learning teams, reducing their
capacity to meet current and future demands for services.  In addition, benefit
maximisation and debt management support will reduce alongside support for
residents to secure, retain and progress in employment.   
Option 3: will reduce the provision to a minimal service limiting the opportunity to
tackle inequality. The ability to maximise income from benefits for citizens could be
substantially reduced; and there will be limited resources to support residents to
manage their debt. There is a risk the Council’s will not meet its commitment to
supporting literacy/numeracy/ESOL work/ youth representation and outreach work
through community learning activities.
Saving
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
1 183 4.5 183 4.5 183 4.5
2 572 13 572 13 572 13
3 1,145 25 1,145 25 1,145 25
Page 63

Page 64

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer Peter Barry Saving Ref: HE08
Saving Title Review Citizen Advice Bureau Funding
Summary of Savings Proposal
The Council’s Working4U service currently manages a budget of £594,118 which is
paid to external bodies for the provision of services. West Dunbartonshire Citizens
Advice Bureau (WDCAB) receives £349,137 of this. 
As part of this proposal, there are four option. Under each, WDCAB would continue
to receive financial support from the Council for provision of services.  
Option 1
Under this option, WDCAB would continue to receive £261,583 per year in Council
funding. This would generate a saving for the Council of £87,284.
Option 2
Under this option, WDCAB would continue to receive £175,569 per year in Council
funding. This would generate a saving for the Council of £174,569.  
Option 3
Under this option, WDCAB would continue to receive £87,284 per year in Council
funding. This would generate a saving for the Council of £261,583.
Option 4
Under this option, WDCAB would continue to receive £34,914 per year in Council
funding. This would generate a saving for the Council of £314,223.
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
Under all options, West Dunbartonshire Citizens Advice Bureau (WDCAB) will
continue to receive a level of Council funding to support their provision of debt
support, benefit advice and consumer rights. This is in addition to the funding it
receives from other sources. 
WDCAB has recently changed its delivery model from static premises to a pro-active
community-based, outreach approach. As such, the organisation has reduced its
overhead costs and is better prepared for a reduction in grants.
It is recognised that a change in the level of grant funding is likely to lead to a
reduction in services with greater emphasis on the use of ICT, telephone and online
services.  
Page 64

Page 65

Appendix 3
Saving
2023/24 2024/25 2024/25
Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
1 87 0 87 0 87 0
2 174 0 174 0 174 0
3 261 0 261 0 261 0
4 314 0 314 0 314 0
Page 65

Page 66

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer Peter Barry  Saving Ref: HE10
Saving Title  Review YSortit Funding
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council’s Working4U service currently manages a budget of £594,118 which is
paid to external bodies for the provision of services. Youth charity Ysortit currently
receives £156,124 of this for the provision of services. 
Under this proposal, there are four options to be considered. 
Option 1
Under this option, Ysortit will continue to receive £117,093 in Council funding. This
will generate a saving of £39,031. 
Option 2
Under this option, Ysortit will continue to receive £78,062 in Council funding. This will
generate a saving of £78,062. 
Option 3
Under this option, Ysortit will continue to receive £39,031 in Council funding. This will
generate a saving of £117,093. 
Option 4
Under this option, Ysortit will continue to receive £15,612 in Council funding. This will
generate a saving of £140,512. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
Under all options, Ysortit will continue to receive a level of Council funding to support
their provision of youth services. This is in addition to the funding it receives from
other sources which include a grant of £116,000 from the Council’s Education
Service and £30,000 from West Dunbartonshire Health and Social Care Partnership.  
In addition, Ysortit has reported in its latest annual accounts that the organisation
has reserve funds of £982,619; of which £103,536 are restricted. It is stated in their
statutory accounts that this is equivalent to a year’s running cost. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
1 39 0 39 0 39 0
2 78 0 78 0 78 0
3 117 0 117 0 117 0
4 141 0 141 0 141 0 
Page 66

Page 67

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Chief Officer: Peter Barry  Saving Ref: HE11
Saving Title  Review Tenant Liaison Officer (TLO) service 
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council currently employs four tenant liaison officers to provide neighbourhood and
workplace mediation, respond to low-level neighbour disputes and work in partnership with
other agencies to support vulnerable households to sustain tenancies. 
Under this option, the Council would continue to provide two tenant liaison officers to
support tenants, with a review of the service undertaken to ensure it is working efficiently
without duplication. 
This will generate a saving of £99,000 per year. 
Implications and Risks 
The tenant liaison service will continue to be available to support tenants in communities
throughout West Dunbartonshire. A reduction in workforce will lead to a reduced capacity to
provide specialist housing support or early engagement with vulnerable individuals. 
A reduction in provision may result in increased incidents of unacceptable and challenging
behaviours from some of our most vulnerable households.  This has the potential to impact
upon those individuals, their families and other residents in the community. 
A review will be undertaken to ensure the service is working efficiently and the impacts of a
reduced workforce are minimised. 
A range of additional supports are also available through the Council’s Housing and
Working4U services for tenants who currently engage with the tenant liaison officer service. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
99 2 99 2 99 2 
Page 67

Page 68

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Chief Officer Peter Barry  Saving Ref: HE12   
Saving Title  Mitchell Way Office Accommodation Rent 
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Homeless and Housing Options Service centralised public access provision
following the pandemic, and as a result no longer provide services from the Mitchell
Way office in Alexandria. 
The office is still used by Police Scotland and the Housing Operations Service Area
for staff location and has a limited public access provision.  This option would see
the current rental charge passed to the Housing Revenue Account as the staff
utilising the office are all HRA funded posts. 
There is also an opportunity for Assets to examine the current relationship with
Police Scotland who currently have sole use of the first floor at the building for a £1
annual charge. 
This option will ensure the Council still receives the targeted rental income, but an
opportunity exists for this to be maximised. This could represent a saving of £41,500
per year. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
A new rental charge requires to be assessed internally for 2023/24 and an
appropriate proportionate allocation to be set for those still using the building as a
staff office base. Any new proposed rent should be seen to be appropriate and
correlates with service provision. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
41.5 0 41.5 0 41.5 0 
Page 68

Page 69

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Chief Officer  Peter Barry  Saving Ref: HE13
Saving Title  Reduce the level of  funding available to Community
Councils 
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act of 2015 empowers Community
Councils with legal powers and responsibilities, such as the ability to request
information and assets from public bodies and to be consulted on certain decisions
that affect their community. 
At present, the budget allocated to Community Councils is £25,000, which is
distributed as a flat rate £500 administration grant plus a per capita allowance minus
insurance costs. 
This option reduces the budget to £14,000 by increasing the administration grant to
£750 and reducing the per capita allowance by 75%. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
The impact and risks associated with this option would include: reduced community
engagement; limited ability to advocate for community needs; decreased ability to
organise community events; difficulty in maintaining and improving community
infrastructure; and loss of local decision making. This can lead to decisions being
made without adequate input from the community which may not reflect the needs
and wants of local residents. 
Savings 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
11 0 11 0 11 0 
Page 69

Page 70

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Chief Officer: Victoria Rogers  Saving Ref: PT05
Saving Title  Reduce pay preservation 
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council currently protects eligible employee’s salary under pay preservation for
24 months, subject to criteria being satisfied.  Under this proposal the current level of
pay preservation will be reduced to either three months or six months.   
Data for the five year period (01/012018 to 13/01/2023) indicated that: 
 Reducing pay preservation to 6 months could have reduced costs by circa
£128,000 for the 5 year period or £25,700 per annum. 
 Reducing pay preservation to 3 months could have reduced cost by circa
£165,000 for the 5 year period or £33,000 per annum. 
It is difficult to forecast the cost reduction for the Council in future years as it
depends on the number of employees eligible for pay preservation.  The data
assessment also indicated that, in that 5 year timeframe, the breakdown of impacted
employees was 67% females and 33% males.  This is disproportionately more
advantageous to men as the overall demographic is 73% female and 27% male so
one should expect the protected numbers to mirror that. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
A reduction of this nature will need to consider: 
Legal requirements to ensure the change is compliant with relevant laws and
regulations, such as those related to employee rights and severance pay. 
Operational impact to consider any potential adverse impact on staff morale,
productivity and turnover and thereby service delivery.  However our offering in this
area is beyond that offered by many other councils and while others have removed
this entirely, the proposal seeks to retain a sustainable element. 
This option requires consultation with the Joint Trade Unions and employees and so
it is assumed this is unlikely to be implemented until 2024/25. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
1 0 0 26 0 26 0
2 0 0 33 0 33 0 
Page 70

Page 71

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Chief Officer: Victoria Rogers  Saving Ref: PT06
Saving Title  Reduction in ICT Management 
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council currently provides Information & Computer Technology hardware,
software and support to all employees/members and some third party organisations
which plays an integral role in the organisation’s infrastructure and security posture. 
There are currently 53.1 FTE in ICT. 
This option would remove one full-time ICT Business Partner role saving £50,000
per year. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
Removal of this strategic role would increase workload for the ICT management
team and impact service delivery with reduced capacity to attend meetings, delay
delivery of strategic tasks including annual application savings exercise and ICT
customer satisfaction survey. Reduced availability for service area and partner
liaison meetings including scoping and resourcing of new systems/upgrades. Noting
this post is currently vacant. 
Saving   
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
50 1 50 1 50 1 
Page 71

Page 72

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Chief Officer: Victoria Rogers  Saving Ref: PT07
Saving Title  Reduction in ICT Support
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council currently provides Information & Computer Technology hardware,
software and support to all employees/members and some third party organisations
which plays an integral role in the organisation’s infrastructure and security posture. 
There are currently 53.1 FTE in ICT. 
This option would remove three part-time roles (1.7FTE) thus reducing the available
ICT support and saving £82,000 per year. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
Reduction in support areas will mean longer waiting times for system upgrades, file
restores and longer waiting times for incident/request resolution in both corporate,
education and partner areas. 
Saving   
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
82 2.7 82 2.7 82 2.7 
Page 72

Page 73

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Chief Officer: Resources Saving Ref: RES01 
Saving Title Restructure Audit & Fraud Provision
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council currently has an Audit & Fraud team consisting of nine employees.  The
audit team has one FTE vacancy and a further 14 vacant hours relating to an
existing post (0.4FTE). Under this proposal these will be deleted from the structure
from 1 April 2023, generating a saving of £58k. 
There are two further opportunities to generate savings: 
A full time Grade 8 audit officer is retiring in June 2023.  It is intended to replace the
post with a 0.6 FTE Grade 8 Internal Auditor post generating an in year saving of
£17k for 2023/24 and a full year saving in future years of £23k. 
There is a further Grade 8 officer in the Fraud team who has expressed an interest
in voluntary redundancy from 31 March 2024.  This presents an opportunity to
review the structure of the team to ensure it remains efficient and effective.   
The current structure consists of one FTE Grade 8 Section Lead and 2 FTE Grade 6
Counter Fraud Officers.  The proposal would be to: 
1. Delete the grade 8 post
2. Create a Grade 7 Senior Counter Fraud Officer and retain one Grade 6
Counter Fraud Officer. 
3. Delete the remaining Grade 6 Counter Fraud Officer. 
This would generate annual saving of £50k from 2024/25 onwards. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
The vacant 1xFTE post does not carry a case load and therefore does not directly
influence the work of the team. There will be a small impact on the audit plan in
relation to the 0.4xFTE vacant hours (reduction of 40 days). This is not considered to
have a detrimental impact on the overall audit plan resources which sufficiently
cover the risk-based audit work required to provide assurance on the Council’s
System of Internal Control. The Section Lead – Corporate Fraud post does not carry
a case load and therefore does not directly influence the work of the team.  It is
proposed that a Grade 7 Senior Counter Fraud Officer post is created to continue to
ensure the quality of the work of the team, attend any national events that are
required and provide oversight to the National Fraud Initiative.   
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
75 1.8 131 2.8 131 2.8 
Page 73

Page 74

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer Laurence Slavin  Saving Ref: RES03 
Saving Title  Remove Elderly Welfare Grant 
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council currently offers £15 per year in Elderly Welfare Grants to all West
Dunbartonshire residents over the age of 67. The budget for this grant is £110,000
annually. Individuals have the option to have funding paid to themselves or allocated
to a group they are involved with for use for a social event. Last year approximately
£90,000k was paid to individuals and groups. 
Under this proposal, the Council would stop payments of these grants.
Administration of this fund involves significant manual exercises for a range of
services including Central Admin Support and Finance. Employees must verify
applications, pay £15 to each resident over 67 and manage discrepancies including
failed bank transfers. The Council relies on individuals and their families to update
personal records for any changes and when information is not kept up to date it can
lead to a significant additional workload. 
In addition to a saving of £110,000, a further £10,000 could be saved from year two
on stationary and postage costs associated with issuing remittance advice to each
individual. This £10,000 saving would not be benefited in year one as the Council
would require to notify in writing those currently in receipt of the grant that it is no
longer available. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
An Equality Impact Assessment carried out in previous years has age-related
equality concerns in relation to this award. Removing this grant would remove these
concerns. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
110 0 120 0 120 0 
Page 74

Page 75

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Chief Officer Laurence Slavin  Saving Ref: RES04
Saving Title Remove Voluntary Grant Funding
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council currently supports various community groups via West Dunbartonshire
Community & Volunteering Services (WDCVS) who administer Voluntary Grant
funding on behalf of the Council of up to £150,000 per annum. This funding covers
social transport (£100,000), community chest, play schemes and running costs
(£50,000).  An annual report is brought to Corporate Services Committee on the
allocation of the grant funding. In 2020/21 only £29,711 of this money was paid out,
due to the impacts of COVID restrictions.   
WDCVS have confirmed that, based on their 2021/22 year-end report, the
community chest spend increased to £44,100 and the social transport spend
increased to £63,600, reflective of a cautious approach to the ongoing COVID
experience amongst some vulnerable groups. WDCVS also report that 2022/23
spend levels are seeing a return to full spend in Community Chest and a stable
spend position with regards to the Social Transport fund. 
In addition to the above funding, the Council also provides £21,560 of funding to
Clydebank Asbestos Group and £17,297 to Tullochan Trust. 
Under this proposal: 
 The £150,000 of Voluntary Grant Funding would be removed. 
 Clydebank Asbestos Group funding would reduce by 25% from £21,560 to
£16,170 (reduction of £5,390)
 Funding for Tullochan Trust would continue at £17,297 however it would be
provided through an alternative funding stream provided by the Scottish
Government for employability called No One Left Behind. 
In total this would generate a saving of £172,687. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
Reduced funding to voluntary groups could have an impact on the groups and the
services they provide to the community. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
173 0 173 0 173 0 
Page 75

Page 76

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer: Laurence Slavin  Saving Ref: RES05
Saving Title  Remove Provost Hospitality Fund
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council currently has £37,000 in the Provost Hospitality Fund which is used for
hospitality (food and refreshments) at events hosted by the Provost. The fund is also
used to buy flowers for anniversaries for couples within the community. 
Under this proposal, the hospitality fund would be removed to generate a saving of
£37,000. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
Residents would no longer receive gifts for lifetime events. No hospitality would be
available for hosting events. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
37 0 37 0 37 0 
Page 76

Page 77

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer: Laurence Slavin Saving Ref: RES10
Saving Title Insurance Management
Summary of Savings Proposal
The Council currently employs an Insurance Team Leader who is responsible for all
insurance contracts and annual reviews within the Council and is also responsible
for contracts within WD Leisure Trust, Clydebank Property Company, and District
Heating Network
Under this option, the Council would remove the Insurance Team Leader post from
the structure. Consideration would be given to sharing services with another local
authority or expanding the role of another existing Team Leader within Finance. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
The Insurance Section has three other team members at lower grades, some of
which are relatively new to the team. Any changes to the job role of the existing
team may result in job re-evaluation which could lead to an increase in salary costs
and reduce the overall saving.
If a shared service was to be considered, the saving would be less, the loss of
knowledge in the wider insurance market would be less, and a suitable Council who
is willing to agree a shared service would require to be identified.
Saving
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
50 1 50 1 50 1
Page 77

Page 78

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer: Laurence Slavin  Saving Ref: RES11  
Saving Title  Invoicing Automation
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council currently issues debtor and creditor invoices to residents and business
for services received by the Council manually in Agresso via the Central Admin
Support (CAS) team. 
Under this proposal, invoices would be issued via an automated system. 
Automation would deliver efficiencies in a number of services including Commercial
Waste, Greenspace, Bereavement Services, Roads, Sold Property and Education -
Lets and Early Years. The main potential for efficiency of creditor invoices is within
Building Services process. 
Successful delivery of this saving proposal will require engagement/consultation with
residents/businesses. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
This proposal will see a reduction in staff within CAS. The process would still require
support by the team but less FTE would be required as they would only be dealing
with exceptions. 
There will also be an impact on service users who would no longer be dealing with
people directly involved in the service and queries would need to be raised with the
Council’s Contact Centre. 
Saving (Cumulative) 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
25 1 25 1 50 2 
Page 78

Page 79

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer Laurence Slavin Saving Ref: RES21
Saving Title Automation Project
Summary of Savings Proposal
The Council currently uses Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and was one of the
first local authorities to deploy the technology in 2020. The Council has invested
£69,000 per annum on UiPath (RPA solution) with a further investment of £132,000
in three posts currently allocated to the Automation team (one FTE Grade nine and
two FTE Grade six posts). 
A number of automated processes have been introduced including the issuing of
payslips via email, tasks required for new employees and the calculation of sickness
absence.  In addition, a number of automated processes are under development or
consideration including the processing of refunds, invoice processing in Building
Services and annual leave calculations.
Under this option, the automation project would continue to progress, with UiPath
automation solution retained along with a Grade nine employee. Of the two Grade
six posts, one is currently vacant. In order to minimise disruption to the programme
and ensure knowledge sharing, it is proposed to delete one grade six post in
2023/24 and the other in 2024/25. 
This would generate a saving of £37,500 in 2023/24 increasing to £75,000 in year
two.
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
Under this proposal, work would continue to develop automation with the associated
benefits to services managing workload.  As the Grade nine post would be the sole
member of the team, development of further automation throughout the organisation
could potentially slow. 
Saving (Cumulative)
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
37.5 1 75 2 75 2
Page 79

Page 80

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Chief Officer: Resources  Saving Ref: RES22
Saving Title  Reduce Accountancy Provision
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council has a Grade 8 Accountant temporarily seconded from Resources to the
Housing Maintenance Trading Account (HMTA) to work on projects relating to the
Housing Revenue Account (HRA). The cost of this secondment is currently not
charged to the HRA as it is a temporary arrangement.  This would see the
secondment made permanent with the postholder supporting Accountancy for 30%
of the role, and HMTA for 70%. This would provide a saving of £39,000 to general
services as the 0.7FTE would be charged to HRA.  
In addition the accountancy team has a Grade 8 Accountant post which is currently
vacant due to a recent resignation. The intention is to delete this post from the
establishment saving £55,000 with a 0.5FTE Finance Assistant (Grade 5) recruited
at a cost of £18,000. In order to support the service until 30 June 2023 to cover year
end tasks, temporary provision would be provided at a cost of £3,000. The full
annual saving for this proposal will be £37k however the 2023/24 saving will be £34k
due to the temporary provision until 30 June 2023. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
In order to deliver this saving changes are required within the Accountancy team.
While there will be less capacity within the team, a review will be undertaken to
establish tasks that can stop or reduce in frequency.  This will include Chief Officers
receiving full budgetary control reports every two months rather than monthly. 
It is not envisaged that this reduction will impact the current on the Accountancy
team’s ability to deliver statutory requirements and there should be no material
impact on the quality of information provided to Elected Members at Committees. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
73 1 76 1 76 1 
Page 80

Page 81

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer: Gail Macfarlane  Saving Ref: RN01 
Saving Title  School Crossing Patrollers 
The Council currently provides school crossing patrollers at 43 locations, a number
of which have a signalised crossing.  The controllers are in place for the start and
finish of the school day. 
There is no statutory obligation to provide a school crossing service and in addition,
the Council has experienced difficulties recruiting for school crossing vacancies and
currently has 6 vacant posts. 
Under this proposal, there are three options to consider. 
Option 1
Under this proposal, the Council would not provide crossing patrollers. The Council
would continue to work with parents and pupils to promote road safety. 
Option 2 
Under this option, 31 crossing patrollers would be in place across the Council area,
with crossing patrollers located at controlled pedestrian crossings withdrawn.
National best practice guidance states that school crossing patrollers should not be
deployed at junctions where pedestrian crossings already exist because this
duplication can be confusing for motorists. This saving would be achieved through
not filling nine vacant posts with three posts affected. 
Option 3
Under this option, 17 crossing patrollers would be in place across the Council area,
with six vacant FTE posts removed. Sites for crossing patrollers would be prioritised
based on location and traffic conditions. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
Patrollers are based along safe routes to schools. These routes have been identified
and are monitored by the Council’s Road Safety Officers. Any locations highlighted
by parents, pupils or schools will be assessed for physical measures. Children will
continue to receive education on road safety, including the safe crossing of roads
and awareness of vehicle movement. 
Saving 
Option 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
1 95 9.43 190 9.43 190 9.43
2 22.5 2.6 45 2.6 45 2.6
3 52 6 102 6 102 6 
Page 81

Page 82

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer: Gail Macfarlane  Saving Ref: RN04 
Saving Title  Care of Gardens
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council currently offers free garden maintenance to any resident who is in
receipt of a disability benefit. As part of this scheme they receive two hedge cuts and
seven grass cuts per year. Any resident pensioner in receipt of state benefit can also
request the service for a fee of £70 per annum. 
Currently 1,300 households use the service, with 200 of them paying the annual fee
of £70. As such, the scheme generates an income of approximately £14,000. The
cost to deliver the service is subsidised, with the true cost in the region of £338 per
household, or approximately £440,000 per year. 
As part of this option, there are four proposals to be considered: 
Option 1 
Under this option, the existing £70 annual fee would be payable by all households
joining the scheme. It is estimated that approximately 200 households would not
apply for the scheme if a charge was introduced, reducing the cost of running the
service by £67,600. Together with achieving a potential income of £77,000 through
the introduction of a fee, this option could deliver a saving of £130,600. 
Option 2 
Under this option, all households joining the scheme would pay an annual fee of
£100 per property. It is estimated that approximately 400 households would not re-
apply for the scheme if this option was taken.  This would reduce the cost of running
the service by £135,200 and together with achieving a potential income of £76,000
through the introduction of a fee, this option could deliver a total saving of £211,200. 
Option 3
This option would see the scheme available to those in receipt of disability benefits
only, with a £100 annual fee payable to access the service. This would reduce
potential users to 1,100 and it is estimated that approximately 300 households would
not re-apply for the scheme. Therefore the cost of running the service would be
reduced by £169,000 and with a potential income of £66,000 generated by the
introduction of a fee, this option could achieve a saving of £235,000. 
Option 4 
Under this option, the Council would not provide a garden maintenance service. This
would generate a saving of £440,000. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
Page 82

Page 83

Appendix 3
The service is delivered through the recruitment of seasonal operatives.  The
reduction in numbers or no requirement to appoint seasonal operatives will have an
impact on 25 seasonal roles. 
Saving   
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
1 130 4 130 4 130 4
2 211 8 211 8 211 8
3 235 10 235 10 235 10
4 440 16 440 16 440 16 
Page 83

Page 84

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer: Gail Macfarlane Saving Ref: RN06
Saving Title Weekend Litter Collection
Summary of Savings Proposal
Currently, the Council undertakes litter collection at weekends at key destinations
such as parks and town centres, as well as supporting locations with increased
visitor numbers and events. Six operatives are employed on an 18 hour contract
over four days (Friday to Monday). This contract was introduced to reduce the
requirement for overtime. 
Under this option, there are three proposals to consider:
Option 1
Under this option, four operatives will undertake weekend litter collection, focusing
on town centres and parks only.
Option 2
Under this option, two operatives will undertake weekend litter collection, focusing
on hot spots in town centres only.
Option 3
Under this option, the weekend litter collection service would cease to operate.
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
There is potential for litter build up over the weekend, with bin emptying and litter
collection not commencing until Monday. Teams will ensure bins are fully emptied
each Friday to minimise this risk. 
Under each option, there will be a workforce reduction and associated impact.
Saving
Option 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
1 47 1.6 47 1.6  47 1.6
2 114 3.2 114 3.2  114 3.2
3 140 4.8 140 4.8  140 4.8
Page 84

Page 85

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Chief Officer: Gail Macfarlane  Saving Ref: RN08  
Saving Title  Garden Waste Collection Charge
Summary of Savings Proposal 
Currently, the Council collects garden and food waste in the same bin.   
Under this proposal, garden waste and food waste will be collected separately. Food
waste uplift will continue to be offered free of charge. Residents who wish to have
their garden waste uplifted will buy a permit, costing in the region of £30 per year. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
This proposal has a capital implication due to the requirement for every household to
have a food bin. There is potential for this to be funded by Zero Waste Scotland or
another external partner as it will lead to improved recycling and waste treatment. 
In line with national guidance and best practice it is anticipated that garden and food
waste will no longer be permitted to be comingled as this contaminates the garden
waste and reduces recycling opportunities.  It also increases the cost to treat as it is
then treated as residual waste. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
64 0 127 0 127 0 
Page 85

Page 86

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer: Gail Macfarlane Saving Ref: RN09 
Saving Title Review of Grounds Service / Street Cleaning
Summary of Savings Proposal
The Council currently undertakes general open space grass cutting every three
weeks, with high amenity areas such as parks and sports facilities cut on a weekly
basis. The Greenspace team also undertakes bin clearing and litter collection twice
per week, with mechanical street sweeping in town centres weekly 
Under this proposal, ground maintenance would be reviewed to identify duplication
and ensure the service is working efficiently. The number of biodiversity areas would
be increased, helping the Council to reduce its carbon footprint as well as encouraging
a more diverse range of birds and insects. Grass cutting would be undertaken every
four weeks in open spaces, and fortnightly in high amenity areas. 
Option 1 - Under this option, no seasonal workforce operatives would be recruited
and the cutting of high amenity areas would be undertaken by permanent workforce.
There would be no cutting of open space areas.  This would save £460,000. 
Option 2 - Under this option, 15 seasonal employees would be taken on (rather than
30 in previous years) with a reduction in the permanent workforce by 12.  The full
year saving would be £560,000.
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
Grass cutting would be impacted as seasonal operatives carry out the majority of
grass cutting within the summer months. A prioritisation exercise will be carried out
to programme the grass cutting effectively. 
Grounds maintenance standards could drop across the Council and there may be a
perception by local residents and visitors the area has become a less well
maintained and clean Council. 
A reduced workforce could potentially lead to increased response times to attend to
complaints or unplanned maintenance. 
The ability to service litter bins and dog waste bins in parks and open spaces would
be curtailed, potentially reducing the frequency of emptying bins, as well as reduced
capacity to undertake new bin requests. 
Legal and regulatory risk associated with not being able to clear snow and/or spread
grit around schools and other key public footways.  The Winter Plan would be
updated to reflect reduction in service.
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
1 460 18 460 18 460 18
2 400 22 560 22 560 22 
Page 86

Page 87

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer: Gail Macfarlane Saving Ref: RN10
Saving Title Three-Weekly Bin Collection
Summary of Savings Proposal
Currently the Council collects residual waste from households on a two-weekly
frequency, with recyclable waste collected on alternate weeks.  
Under this this proposal, a three-weekly residual waste collection would be
implemented to increase recycling levels, reduce residual waste levels and
contribute to a reduction in the Council’s carbon footprint. Residents would receive a
residual collection on a three-week cycle, with an alternative collection of recycling
and garden/food waste.
Treating residual waste costs more than the treatment of recyclable material. Zero
Waste Scotland are supporting the Council to develop a business case for the new
model with potential savings of £150,000.
The saving will be realised through a reduction in vehicles and operatives, as well as
a route optimisation review which is already underway as the first phase of
facilitating this change.
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
Waste is a key contributor to the organisation’s carbon output figures. The
introduction of a three-weekly residual bin collection would improve the Council’s
recycling figures, contributing to the climate change agenda 
The circular economy looks to reuse, resource and recycle as much material as
possible.  A three- weekly collection will support this aim.
As the landfill tax ban is due to be introduced in 2025 this will support the council to
deliver a compliant service.  
A communications strategy will be key to ensuring residents understand the wider
benefits of the change to three-weekly collections, both on a local and national level.
It will also be necessary to ensure a smooth transition to new collection days and
systems for households and stricter criteria for the type of waste within specific bins.
Saving
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
50 0 150 2 150 2
Page 87

Page 88

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Chief Officer Gail Macfarlane Saving Ref: RN12
Saving Title Reduction in Footway Gritting
Summary of Savings Proposal 
Currently, as part of the Council’s Winter Maintenance Programme, footway gritting
is undertaken during adverse weather on priority routes. This includes treatment of
main routes at schools, hospitals, sheltered housing complexes, day care centres,
public buildings, transport hubs and urban shopping areas. Priority treatment also
takes place in main pedestrian routes in major residential developments. 
Priority treatment is undertaken during the hours of 8am - 3.30pm Monday to Friday,
with an average annual cost of providing the service of £128,000. 
Under this option, there are three proposals to consider. 
Option 1 – Reduce service by 20%
Under this option, the footway gritting service would focus on areas of higher footfall
only, including routes to schools, shopping areas, main streets and key public
transport hubs. Residents would be encouraged to use grit bins on residential
streets. 
Option 2 – Reduce service by 50%
Under this option, teams would continue to treat footways on main roads, main
shopping areas and around schools. Grit bins would be re-stocked regularly to assist
residents. 
Option 3 – Cease all footway gritting
Under this option, the provision of footway gritting would cease. The Council would
consider whether additional grit bin provision is necessary to assist residents. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
Untreated sections of the network could lead to increased claims from residents and
a reputational risk to the Council. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
1 26 0 26 0 26 0
2 64 0 64 0 64 0
3 128 0 128 0 128 0 
Page 88

Page 89

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Chief Officer Gail Macfarlane Saving Ref: RN15
Saving Title Provision of Christmas Lights
Summary of Savings Proposal 
Currently, the Council provides decorative Christmas lighting at a cost of £25,000
per year for installation and energy usage. 
Under this option, the Council would cease provision and installation of Christmas
lights, with support given to communities and traders associations to take on
providing decorative lighting at Christmas. Similar initiatives have been successful in
neighbouring authorities, including in Helensburgh and Oban.   
It is expected that some WDC assistance would be required at switch on events to
ensure events go as planned. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
Upgrades to the electrical system would be required to simplify installation for local
groups and ensure no interference in the Council’s network. 
It is expected that some assistance from the Council would be required during
Switch-On events to ensure they run smoothly. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
25 0 25 0 25 0 
Page 89

Page 90

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer: Gail Macfarlane Saving Ref: RN16
Saving Title Roads Review of Activities to Support Education
The Roads Services is a statutory service but it also provides additional non-
statutory services to schools covering Cycling Proficiency, Road Safety, School
Travel Plans and Safe Routes to School. 
This option would remove these non statutory items however note that schools have
a requirement to develop a School Travel Plan and update it on a regular basis.  
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
Any risk and impact of this option would, be reduced by the Roads Service providing
schools with professional information and advice to support road safety activities. A
road safety pack could be made available by Roads Services & Education, on the
Council website to help support parents to reinforce road safety issues. 
Saving
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
34 2 68 2 68 2
Page 90

Page 91

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer: Gail Macfarlane  Saving Ref: RN17
Saving Title  Environmental Trust Grant Reduction 
A grant is provided annually to the Environmental Trust in the region of £177k.  The
Trust provide project management to the Council on a range of Environmental
improvement projects, submit funding bids to external bodies and support the
maintenance of infrastructure such as play parks and paths. 
The proposal is to reduce the funding allocated to the Trust as follows: 
Option 1 - Reduction of grant by £43.5k (25%) 
This would reduce the number of projects that could be project managed by the
Trust and their ability to apply for external funding. 
Option 2 - Reduction of grant by £87k (50%) 
This would remove the ability to fund project management of environmental projects,
apply for funding to external bodies. 
Both options retain the funding of maintenance works.  
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
The grant funds the project management of environmental projects and the ability to
apply for external funding.  The risk is that the reduction in grant means that the
Trust is no longer able to deliver and manage projects within the Council area. 
Although it is not proposed to reduce the funding for maintenance if the Trust is no
longer operational there may be the requirement to reconsider how maintenance is
carried out. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
Option 1 43.5 0 43.5 0 43.5 0
Option 2 87 0 87 0 87 0 
Page 91

Page 92

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Chief Officer: Alan Douglas  Saving Ref: RR12 
Saving Title  Economic Development – Business Support Savings 
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Business Support service, sitting within the Economic Development, is partly funded
by General Services Revenue and partly by securing income from Revenue Block grant
to deliver Business Gateway Advisory services (£228k) and a range of business grants,
to fund external membership fees and provide funding to external organisations.  The
Service will receive a £500k share of the Shared Prosperity Fund between 2022/23 –
2024/25 for delivery of additional services to the business community. 
Currently the Business Support staffing is ten with a FTE of 8.46. 
Also sitting within Economic Development is the Energy Compliance Team and two
departures from that team has created an  opportunity to relocate officers in the
compliance side of the Team to Supply, Distribution and Property (cost neutral).  This
change has allowed the first steps towards a service redesign that will realise full year
capital savings of £73k. 
There are two options as set out below. 
Option 1 
a) Terminate the Business Gateway Workshops and Expert Help support contract
from 1 October 2023 saving £24.7k in 2023/24 rising to £49.3k in subsequent
years.
b) Reduce ‘Other Funding’ Budget by £11k to reduce it to the core funding needed
of £17k
c) Reduce the Scheme allocation from £110k to £70k, saving £40k saving,  due to
the potential funding available to provide business support grants and expert help
through the UK Shared Prosperity Fund, of which £500,000 is allocated to
Business Support to deliver 4 programmes of work during 2023/24 and 2024/25
d) Implement a Service Redesign reducing the total number in Business Support by
1.5 FTE, generating a saving of £52.4k 
Option 2 (additional to option 1) 
Reduce Grade 8 Officers from 4.5 FTE to 3 FTE (in addition to reducing the 1.5 FTE
in Option 1).  This would generate an additional full year saving of approximately
£81k (depending on roles) however only a half year saving (£40.5k) will be taken in
2023/24 due to time required to implement required changes.  Note this option may
restrict the Council’s ability to provide assistance to business through the Shared
Prosperity Fund and meet performance targets. 
For the sake of clarity note that:
Page 92

Page 93

Appendix 3 
 Option 1 can be taken in isolation to deliver £128k of savings in year 1 rising to
£153k in future years
 Option 2 can only be taken in addition to option 1 which increases the maximum
saving from this option to £169k of savings in year 1 rising to £234k in future
years
 Option 2 cannot be taken in isolation. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
Any reduction in the Business Support budgets will impact on the Council’s ability to
support local businesses and support organisations at a time of extreme economic
hardship. Reducing support at this time may draw enhanced attention as the perception
of withdrawal of support at such a time may be disproportionate to the actual reduction. 
The Service will receive £500k share of the Shared Prosperity Fund between 2022/23 –
2024/25 for delivery of additional services to the business community. Option 2 may
impact on the Council’s ability to deliver on targets that may be set for match funding
from the Shared Prosperity Fund.  There may be benefit in delaying taking Option 2 until
the extent of the demands and relative benefits of the Shared Prosperity Fund can be
fully considered. 
Saving (CUMULATIVE) 
As per note above option 2 is an add on to option 1 meaning the maximum saving that
can be delivered is £169k rising to £234k. 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
1 128 1.5 153 1.5 153 1.5
2 169 3 234 3 234 3 
Page 93

Page 94

Appendix 3 
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVINGS OPTIONS
Chief Officer:  Angela Wilson  Saving Ref: SDP01
Saving Title  Review non-regulated procurements
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council’s Corporate Procurement Unit currently has a workforce equivalent of
15.5 FTE, across 20 posts, four of which are currently vacant. The team includes
P2P (Pecos) support, procurement officers, senior procurement officers, business
partners and procurement manager.   
Under this option, the non-regulated procurement work currently undertaken by the
team will be reviewed to ensure efficiency and identify any duplication. As part of
this, individual services will undertake non regulated procurement for works under
£2million. In addition, work to analyse services’ procurement spend, measurement
of sustainability in contracts, keeping of contract and supplier scorecards,
measurement of spend on small, medium-sized enterprises or third sector bodies
and measurement of suppliers with Fair Work and Real Living Wage practices will
cease. 
These efficiencies will generate a saving of up to £109,962 per year. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
The amended work of the team will reduce employee costs, while still delivering
the core support function. This will result in a reduction of 2.3 FTE. 
If services undertake some procurement activities independently, there may be a
lack of a central control point. There is a risk that employees do not follow
regulations or procedures and procurement may not achieve best value. A
reduction in workforce could also cause capacity issues within the team to support
volume of queries. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2024/25
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
110 2.3 110 2.3 110 2.3 
Page 94

Page 95

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVINGS OPTIONS
Chief Officer:  Angela Wilson  Saving Ref: SDP02  
Saving Title  Review of non-complex procurements
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council’s Corporate Procurement Unit currently has a workforce equivalent of
15.5 FTE, across 20 posts, four of which are currently vacant. The team includes
P2P (Pecos) support, procurement officers, senior procurement officers, business
partners and procurement manager.   
Under this option, the non-complex procurement work (ie where there is low risk to
Council / service users / suppliers) currently undertaken by the team will be reviewed to
ensure efficiency. This will mean non-complex procurements can be undertaken
by services independently. In addition, work to analyse services’ procurement
spend, measurement of sustainability in contracts, keeping of contract and supplier
scorecards, measurement of spend on small, medium-sized enterprises or third
sector bodies and measurement of suppliers with Fair Work and Real Living Wage
practices will cease. 
This option will generate savings of up to £148,471 per year. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Saving 
The amended work of the team will reduce employee costs, while still delivering
the core support function. This will result in a reduction of 3.1 FTE. 
If services undertake certain procurement activities independently, there may be a
lack of a central control point. There is a risk that employees do not follow
regulations or procedures and procurement may not achieve best value. A
reduction in workforce could also cause capacity issues within the team to support
volume of queries. Requests for reports, briefs and Freedom of Information would
require input from all services.   
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
148 3.1 148 3.1 148 3.1 
Page 95

Page 96

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVINGS OPTIONS
Chief Officer:  Angela Wilson Saving Ref: SDP03
Saving Title Review Purchase to Pay Support
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council’s Corporate Procurement Unit currently has a workforce equivalent of
15.5 FTE, across 20 posts, four of which are currently vacant. The team includes
P2P (Pecos) support, procurement officers, senior procurement officers, business
partners and procurement manager.  
Under this option, work would be undertaken to review and improve pecos (p2p)
admin procedures to ensure efficiency and reduce the need for CPU support. This
option will allow services to fully undertake p2p activities. Work to analyse
services’ procurement spend, measurement of spend on small, medium-sized
enterprises or third sector bodies and measurement of suppliers with Fair Work
and Real Living Wage practices will cease.
This option will generate savings of up to £99,481 per year.
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
This option will reduce employee costs, while still delivering the core support
function. This will result in a reduction of 2.7 FTE.
If services undertake some procurement activities independently, there may be a
lack of a central control point. There is a risk that employees do not follow
regulations or procedures and procurement.
Saving
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
99 2.7 99 2.7 99 2.7
Page 96

Page 97

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer Angela Wilson Saving Ref: SDP11
Saving Title Consultancy Services/Capital Investment Team -
Review of service provision
Summary of Savings Proposal
Consultancy Services and the Capital Investment Team sits within Corporate
Asset Management and is the design, construction and project management
service which administers and manages capital programmed construction works
of all size and types. Given the planned reduction of capital projects and the
current review of the capital programme the support from Consultancy Services
and the Capital Investment Team should be reviewed with the review also
considering how costs are recharged against the appropriate budget.
Within Consultancy Services there are 24 employees of varying grades. The team
comprises of a programme leader, a senior architectural officer, an electrical
engineer, a senior clerk of works, architectural officers, architectural assistants,
quantity surveying officers, clerks of works.
Within the Capital Investment Team there are 6 posts of varying grades. The
team comprises of capital project managers, client business partners, scoping
officer and support co-ordinator.
The revised recharging model across GS / HRA capital has been agreed with
Finance and the proposal is to remove 4 posts within Consultancy Services and 2
posts from the Capital Investment Team.
A further review of both teams will be undertaken in 23/24 in line with the wider
review of the charging model across the council.
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
It is envisaged that the reduction in staffing could continue to support current
project levels without the need for additional external consultancy.
The potential risks are reduced responsiveness and flexibility with any potential
ad-hoc requests for technical assistance require to be assessed in terms of team
capacity.
Saving
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE H/Count £000 FTE H/Count £000 FTE H/Count
212 6 6 286 6 6 286 6 6
Page 97

Page 98

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Chief Officer Angela Wilson  Saving Ref: SDP13 
Saving Title  Review Asset Management resource
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council’s Asset Management team is currently made up of a workforce of 25
equating to 22.14 FTE. 
An initial review of service has been undertaken to try and deliver savings whilst
streamlining processes.  The initial review also looked at the support Asset
Management receive from CAS and other services across the authority.  The
initial review has looked at processes involving monitoring physical assets and
digital system holding asset information together with monitoring and instructing
repairs to BAM schools.  There are no further vacancies within the team. 
Under this option, the Asset Management team would continue to operate with 22
employees, equating to 19.14 FTE.  This will generate a capital saving rather than
a revenue saving. This option is in line with the capital programme reduction
agreed at council in December.    
CAPITAL SAVING  23/24 - £96,036                                
24/25 - £97,957                                
25/26 - £99,916         
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
Impact
From initial review impact would be minimal and can be integrated into existing
staffing resources within Asset Management and wider services across the
authority. 
Risk Associated
If support from other service areas across the authority change and
implementation of process changes are not delivered in financial year then the
risk is other key services being delivered by Asset Management would require to
be reprioritised. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
0 3 0 3 0 3 
Page 98

Page 99

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Chief Officer Angela Wilson  Saving Ref: SDP14 
Saving Title  Review use of Municipal Buildings
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council’s Municipal Buildings are currently open five days per week between
the hours of 9am and 5pm, Monday to Friday. The building is opened at
weekends for wedding ceremonies as and when required. 
It is proposed to review current capacity, service delivery and operating hours for
the Municipal Buildings in conjunction with other office accommodation and
consider options for generating income – for example leasing floor space to
interested partners. 
The target is to achieve efficiencies / income of £37k 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
This option allows the Council to maximise opportunities to maximise occupancy
levels, rationalise use of its operational estate and potentially generate income to
deliver efficiencies. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
37 0 37 0 37 0 
Page 99

Page 100

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Chief Officer Angela Wilson  Saving Ref: SDP15 
Saving Title  Early Closure of Clydebank Town Centre Office
Summary of Savings Proposal 
An initial review of the operation of Clydebank Town Centre Office has indicated
that an early closure of the building could take place prior to the intended closure
(at expiry of lease in 2025). 
This is also possible due to the recent closure of the Municipal Bank. Employees
based in CTCO can be relocated to accommodation within Aurora House / Titan,
Dalmuir and Clydebank library. Under this option the following savings can be
made per year: 
£63,103 Service Area Running Costs
£44,522 Staffing Costs (this is in relation to FM staff/Asset staff, based on two
grade 3 posts – employees can be redeployed elsewhere).  
Should we be able to rent out the building until the lease expires we would
be able to achieve an additional saving on rental of £64,950 per annum 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
This option will maximise opportunities to rationalise use of our operational estate
to deliver savings on property running costs and, where applicable, staffing costs.   
Saving
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
108 0.8 108 0.8 108 0.8 
Page 100

Page 101

Appendix 3
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer Angela Wilson Saving Ref: SDP16
Saving Title Christmas Office Closure
Summary of Savings Proposal
This proposal is to close the majority of Council office accommodation and depots
over the Christmas period whilst keeping open sufficient office capacity to
accommodate key statutory functions and essential service requirements
identified by Chief Officers.
There are two options to consider (3 day closure and 6 day closure). The exact
closure days will vary year on year based on when weekends and bank holidays
fall but, by means of illustration,  the days over the next three financial years for
each option are set out below:
Option Period of Closure 23/24 24/25 25/26 Saving (£)
1 3 Days 27 Dec
28 Dec
29 Dec
27 Dec
30 Dec
31 Dec
29 Dec
30 Dec
31 Dec
£3,500
2 6 Days 27 Dec
28 Dec
29 Dec
03 Jan
04 Jan
05 Jan
23 Dec
24 Dec
27 Dec
30 Dec
31 Dec
03 Jan
22 Dec
23 Dec
24 Dec
29 Dec
30 Dec
31 Dec
£7,000
Staff would be required to take the above dates as part of their annual leave
entitlement with the exception of those staff who carry out functions that are
required by statute or are essential during this period.
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
There would be no detrimental impact on the delivery of statutory functions or
essential services as a result of this proposal.
Saving
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
1 3.5 0 3.5 0 3.5 0
2 7 0 7 0 7 0
Page 101

Page 102

Appendix 4 
2023/24 BUDGET - MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT
Chief Officer Amanda Graham  Saving Ref: CCF14  
Saving Title  Common Good Funding for library resources 
Summary of Savings Proposal 
In recent years, significant savings have been taken from the libraries service as part
of a service wide review. The savings were generated in the main from a restructure
of the service to fully integrate with Citizen Services and reduce post numbers and a
reduction in library opening hours. 
The Common Good Fund is available to support initiatives which are for the benefit
of the people of Dumbarton. An opportunity exists to make an application to the fund
to help support the purchase of resources including physical (books, audio books,
magazines, newspapers, DVDs) and digital (eBook, eAudio, eMagazine,
eNewspaper) for Dumbarton Library. The total fund for library resources across all
libraries and the mobile library service is £100,000, and it is proposed to seek
funding of £10,000 to fund the provision for Dumbarton Library. This would generate
a saving of circa £10,000 from the Council revenue budget 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
This is a change in how the resources are funded moving from revenue budget to
funding from the Common Good Fund. 
Currently the Common Good Fund has a favourable balance and opportunity exists
to further utilise this for the benefit of residents.  There is a small risk that income to
the Common Good Fund reduces in future and the position has to be reconsidered
at that time. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
10 0 10 0 10 0 
Page 102

Page 103

Appendix 4 
2023/24 BUDGET – MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT
Chief Officer: Laura Mason  Saving Ref: EDU04 
Saving Title  Outreach Support Service Reviewed and Revised
Alternative Model
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Outreach Support Service provides targeted support for the area’s most
vulnerable children and families.  Our family demographics demonstrate an
increased need for early family help in line with Scottish Government and local
policies. The Council provides early signposting for families to a wide range of
supports and partners including access to health, mental health support, wellbeing,
financial support and benefits. This service provides family supports which are
different to that of any other education resource. 
Under this proposal, the Outreach Support Service for children and families will be
reviewed to become part of the Whole Family Wellbeing pilot project, and funded for
an agreed period through the Whole Family Wellbeing Fund(WFWF). The alternative
funding for the continuation of the outreach service will continue to 2023/24.   
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
This service is currently managed by Education. Under this proposal the cost of the
service would be deleted from Education thus providing a saving. The revised
outreach model would be funded from the WFWF until April 2024. Following that,
funding would be determined by availability and viability of the pilot and if not
available through WFWF or any successor the Council would require to determine
whether to mainstream funding. The future pilot model will ensure continuity and
mitigate risks to families. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
212 0 0 0 0 0 
Page 103

Page 104

Appendix 4 
2023/24 BUDGET – MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT
Chief Officer: Victoria Rogers  Saving Ref: PT04
Saving Title  Reduction to service provision in People & Change
team
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council currently provides Human Resources support to all employees and
managers across services via the People and Change team. 
The People and Change Team have a residual budget of £29k as a consequence of
previous changes to the team structure. For example: 
 not replacing like for like when the Health and Safety manager left (created
two lead roles at lower grade)
 replacing Health and Safety Officer with a graduate. 
This residual budget was to be used to recruit a Human Resources graduate to build
resilience, create additional resource (due to increasing HR caseload + 33%) and
ensure succession planning. 
However, given the budget gap, this budget can be offered resulting in no HR
graduate. There is no staff impact as recruitment had not commenced. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
Reduced resource within the People and Change team will impact succession
planning and end plans to recruit a Human Resources graduate. Service delivery will
be impacted as HR may need to withdraw from some meetings and Organisational
Development will be unable to support bespoke requests. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
29 0 29 0 29 0 
Page 104

Page 105

Appendix 4 
2023/24 BUDGET – MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT
Chief Officer: Laurence Slavin  Saving Ref: RES09 
Saving Title  Increase in turnover savings target
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council’s budget currently assumes an annual turnover savings target of 4%
which equates to £2.698m in 2022/23. This is generally achieved through either: 
 newly employed officers starting at the bottom of a grade having replaced
someone at a higher spinal point in the grade
 there being a period of time between an office leaving and their replacement
being recruited. 
Officers have reviewed the turnover savings generated to date and projected the
estimated outturn for the year which amounts to £3.410m. This exceeds the annual
target by £0.712m.  This assumes a continued level of turnover for the rest of the
2022/23 financial year. 
On this basis the turnover savings target for 2023/24, and beyond, has been
increased by £0.712m.  This will be closely monitored during 2023/24 to assess
progress toward meeting the target and, if appropriate active management of
recruitment will be implemented should it appear that the target is not going to be
met. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
The option has no impact on staff in terms of posts however material delays in filling
vacancies will increase the workload on existing staff. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
712 0 712 0 712 0 
Page 105

Page 106

Appendix 4 
2023/24 BUDGET – MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT
Chief Officer: Laurence Slavin  Saving Ref: RES23
Saving Title  Income From Building Insurance Recharges
Summary of Savings Proposal 
Budget realignment 
The annual cost of building insurance for General Services properties (including
commercial properties) is budgeted within Sundry Services.  However, a contribution
is made towards this cost by the tenants of commercial properties, who are charged
for their share of the insurance cost. 
This contribution has been previously omitted from the income budgeted within
Sundry Services totalling approximately £0.080m.  This £0.080m will be added to the
miscellaneous income budget within Sundry Services. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
The associated cost of commercial building insurance is recharged to occupied
properties.  The anticipated income of £0.080m assumes those properties will
remain occupied for the foreseeable future.  However, the cost of insurance will
remain with the council for any properties which are vacant or become vacant and
so this income is variable year on year. 
Saving
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
80 0 80 0 80 0 
Page 106

Page 107

Appendix 4 
2023/24 BUDGET PREPARATION – SAVING OPTION 
Chief Officer: Laurence Slavin  Saving Ref: RES24
Saving Title  Right size the Strathclyde Passenger Transport (SPT)
and Valuation Joint Board (VJB) Budgets
Summary of Savings Proposal 
Budget realignment 
VJB - The Dunbartonshire and Argyll and Bute Valuation Joint Board (DABVJB) is
funded by contributions from the three constituent authorities (West Dunbartonshire,
East Dunbartonshire and Argyll and Bute).  Whilst, in recent years, the total funding
assumed is retained on a flat cash basis, the split per authority changes year on
year to reflect changes in the gross aggregate expenditure (GAE).  The 2023/24
West Dunbartonshire Council  contribution based on the 2022/23 GAE allocation will
be £0.732m which is a reduction of £0.033m from what is currently budgeted
(£0.765m). 
SPT - The Council has received notification of the 2023/24 SPT requisition which
totals £1.588m.  Whilst this reflects an increase on the 2022/23 allocation of
£0.020m, a review of the Council’s budget has confirmed that the budgeted figure
was too high in previous years and can be reduced by £0.044m to align it to the
2023/24 requisition level. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
None 
Saving
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
77 0 77 0 77 0 
Page 107

Page 108

Appendix 4 
2023/24 BUDGET – MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT
Chief Officer: Alan Douglas  Saving Ref: RR05
Saving Title  Remove one Section Head (Principal Solicitor) Posts
and redistribute all duties between the existing two.
Summary of Savings Proposal 
With the retirement of the Section Head Contracts and Property in mid-June 2022
the possibility has arisen to redefine the roles of the remaining two Section Heads
and remove one post from the organisation. 
A previous iteration of this saving option had envisaged the possibility of backfilling
the post with a basic grade solicitor which would have limited the available saving to
£16,000 per annum (the difference between the Section Head (Grade 10) and the
Solicitor post (Grade 8). 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
A reconfiguration of the existing three teams’ workloads would be required to ensure
professional management oversight for all disciplines. 
Following a review of workload it is considered that the previously envisaged
backfilling of the post with one basic grade solicitor could be avoided. 
With the Council’s regeneration agenda, housing challenges and the reliance on
Capital Receipts to balance budgets this represents a substantial risk to the Council
and it is likely that for some considerable time to come, the Manager of Legal
Services would need to be involved in some level of case-work. As this post is
currently vacant, attracting a candidate with relevant skills will be vital.   
A review of attendance at and oversight of agendas for some committees may be
required and it is likely that attendance at Project Boards will be limited to those
where legal input is an essential pre-requisite. 
It is possible that some areas may require to be outsourced and there may be
additional costs to client services on occasion. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
70 0 70 0 70 0 
Page 108

Page 109

Appendix 4 
2023/24 BUDGET – MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT
Chief Officer Alan Douglas  Saving Ref: RR14 
Saving Title  Remove vacant Trading Standards Authorised Officer
Post 
Summary of Savings Proposal 
In the meeting of Council in December 2022 a savings option to revert one currently
vacant Trading Standards Officer Post to an Authorised Officer post was accepted
by Council.  Following the call for further savings and consideration of how Trading
Standards might operate alongside other regulatory teams within Regulatory and
Regeneration Services, it is proposed that the Authorised Officer post be removed
from the establishment, generating a further saving of £42k. 
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings 
The proposal will involve re-prioritisation of work and the permanent cessation of
some optional services which the Trading Standards Service previously provided.  A
full options appraisal will be undertaken to determine what the future service will
omit.  Certain, currently postponed , intelligence led work will require cross team
working in order to recommence, however as a number of teams within Regulatory
and Regeneration have dedicated officers used to working in regulatory roles, it is
believed that cross-team working will allow sufficient resource to allow these to
recommence, albeit at a reduced pace. 
Saving 
2023/24 2024/25 2025/26
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
42 0 42 0 42 0 
Page 109

Page 110

Capital Projects Forecast Outturn and Rephasing 2022/23 Appendix 5
Budget 2022/23 Forecast
2022/23
Rephasing
2022/23
(Over) /
Under
Spend
£000 £000 £000 £000
Capital Financing
Resources Carried Forward - non cash 790 722 69 0
General Services Capital Grant 5,233 5,574 (341) 0
Ring Fenced Government Grant Funding 10,982 2,036 8,947 0
Match-funding/other grants & contributions 5,064 4,577 487 0
Anticipated Capital Receipts 4,119 10 4,109 0
Prudential Borrowing 30,960 18,177 12,783 0
CFCR 73 73 0 0
TOTAL 57,221 31,168 26,053 0
Expenditure
REGULATORY and REGENERATION
Regeneration/Local Economic Development 775 775 0 0
Legal Case Management System 33 0 33 0
Solicitor Project 33 33 0 0
Energy Projects quick wins 30 10 20 0
Installation of Solar PV at Clydebank Leisure Centre 55 5 50 0
Replace existing main hall Air Handling unit at Clydebank
Town Hall
83 5 78 0
Replace failed heating controls/valves & recommision 7 7 0 0
Upgrade obsolete heating controls (BEMS) across Council
estate
20 20 0
Leisure Energy projects - air handling units, upgrade lighting,
circulating pumps, and draught proofing
216 2 214 0
Zero Carbon 15 15 0 0
Regeneration Fund 2,223 50 2,173 0
Town Centre Fund 142 143 (1) 0
Placed Based Investment 1,317 1,112 205 0
Clydebank Can on the Canal 747 90 657 0
Level Up Fudning 68 68 0 0
District Heating Network Expansion 3,720 0 3,720 0
Exxon City Deal 986 1,304 (318) 0
Level Up Funding 7,465 698 6,767 0
Re -imagine Antonine Wall   10 10 0 0
CCCF
Transformation of Infrastructure Libraries and Museums 91 91 0 0
Heritage Capital Fund 662 662 0 0
Stathleven Place 1,590 0 1,590 0
SUPPLY and DISTRIBUTION
Building Upgrades and H&S - lifecycle & reactive building
upgrades
1,912 1,912 0 0
Depot Rationalisation 1,715 750 965 0
New Sports Changing Facility Dumbarton West (Old OLSP
site) 
0 0 0 0
New Sports Changing Facility at Lusset Glen in Old Kilpatrick 134 134 0 0
Holm Park & Yoker Athletic FC 86 86 0 0
New Westbridgend Community Centre 1,090 28 1,062 0
HOUSING & EMPLOYABILITY
Invest in "Your Community Initiative" 80 80 0 0
Integrated Housing Management System 3 3 0 0
Dennystoun Forge Site Improvements 50 50 0 0
RESOURCES
Valuation Joint Board - Requisition of ICT Equipment 3 3 0 0
Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCIDSS) 20 20 0 0
Agresso development 25 25 0 0
Cash Receipting system enhancements 35 0 35 0
Electronic Insurance System - claim/incident management
system
7 8 0 (1)
Cost of Living 1,000 250 750 0
IFRS 16 Database 5 5 0 0
ENVIRONMENT & NEIGHBOURHOOD
Infrastructure - Flooding 149 149 0 0
Infrastructure - Roads 3,444 3,444 0 0
Vehicle Replacement 817 600 217 0
Flood Risk Management 1,257 0 1,257 0
Page 110

Page 111

Budget 2022/23 Forecast
2022/23
Rephasing
2022/23
(Over) /
Under
Spend
£000 £000 £000 £000
Cycling, Walking and Safer Streets 683 566 117 0
Footways/Cycle Path Upgrades 107 107 0 0
Street lighting and associated electrical infrastructure 13 17 (4) 0
Public non-adopted paths and roads 405 405 0 0
Allotment Development 179 100 79 0
Community Sports Fund 66 0 66 0
Environmental Improvement Fund 13 13 0 0
Kilmaronock Cemetery Extension 13 13 0 0
Levengrove Park - Restoration & Regeneration 102 110 0 (8)
Posties Park Sports Hub - New sports hub to include Gym &
running track
844 1,708 0 (864)
Sports Facilities Upgrades 6 7 (1) 0
Vale of Leven Cemetery Extension 553 150 403 0
Playparks 122 201 (79) 0
Knowes Nature reserve 228 228 0 0
Additional Pavement Requirements 5 5 0 0
Auld Street Clydebank - Bond 42 0 42 0
A813 Road Improvement Phase 1 693 693 0 0
Clydebank Charrette, A814 498 498 0 0
Protective overcoating to 4 over bridges River Leven 117 117 0 0
Strathclyde Partnership for Transport - Bus, cycling and
walking infrastructure improvements & Park and Rides
1,627 1,075 552 0
Purchase of gritters 400 400 0 0
Turnberry Homes - traffic calming/ management at Turnberry
housing development off Castle Road
5 5 0 0
Electrical Charging Points - Rapid Charge 50 50 0 0
River Leven Flood Prevention Scheme 620 500 120 0
Flood Prevention 500 500 0 0
Gruggies Burn Flood Prevention 1,524 124 1,400 0
Bus rapid development fund 214 0 214 0
Waste Transfer Station 180 45 135 0
Replacement of compactors at Dalmoak civic amenity site 80 80 0 0
Depot Improvement Works 55 55 0 0
Large Bins for High Traffic Areas (pilot) 25 25 0 0
Roads Plant 40 40 0 0
East End Park Resurfacing 30 30 0 0
Cemetery Extension, North Dalnotter 0 0 0 0
Balloch Mountain Bike Track 10 10 0 0
Traffic Signal Upgrades 300 300 0 0
Vehicle Replacement Strategy 1,000 0 1,000 0
Electric Vehicle Charging Points 50 50 0 0
EDUCATION
AV Equipment - Education 442 441 1 0
Digital Inclusion 41 41 0 0
Schools Estate Improvement Plan - next Phase Faifley 2,797 800 1,997 0
Schools Estate Improvement Plan 1,246 1,005 241 0
Free School Meals 505 505 0 0
Choices Programme - to assist young people who require
additional support
113 0 113 0
Schools Estate Refurbishment Plan 4 3 1 0
Early Years Early Learning and Childcare Funding 795 795 0 0
Dalmonach CE Centre 26 26 0 0
HSCP
Special Needs - Aids & Adaptations for HSCP clients 1,053 969 84 0
Replace Elderly Care Homes and Day Care Centres 43 61 (18) 0
Criminal Justice Adaptations 73 73 0 0
Community Alarm upgrade 154 40 114 0
PEOPLE ANDTECHNOLOGY
ICT Modernisation 1,400 886 514 0
ICT Modernisation HSCP 21 14 7 0
ICT Security & DR 1,297 950 347 0
Internet of Things Asset Tracking 17 17 0 0
365 Implementation 173 120 53 0
Development of Workforce Management System 0 46 (46) 0
Direct Project Support 3,502 3,502 0 0
Page 111

Page 112

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL Appendix 6
GENERAL SERVICES CAPITAL PLAN UPDATE 2022/23 TO 2031/32 - SPEND
Project Lead Chief Officer Updated
Budget
2022/23
Forecast
Outturn
2022/23
Budget
2023/24
Budget
2024/25
Budget
2025/26
Budget
2026/27
Budget
2027/28
Budget
2028/29
Budget
2029/30
Budget
2030/31
Budget
2031/32
Budget
2022/23 to
2031/32
£000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000
RECURRING
Special Needs - Aids & Adaptations for HSCP clients Beth Culshaw 1,053 969 804 744 767 767 767 767 767 767 767 7,886
Building Upgrades and H&S - lifecycle & reactive building
upgrades
Angela Wilson 1,912 1,912 2,781 2,781 2,781 2,781 2,781 2,781 2,781 2,781 2,781 26,941
ICT Modernisation Victoria Rogers 1,400 886 1,410 676 821 678 681 681 681 681 681 7,876
ICT Modernisation HSCP 21 14 22 11 12 12 11 11 11 11 10 125
ICT Security & DR Victoria Rogers 1,297 950 1,076 504 792 387 387 387 387 387 387 5,644
Infrastructure - Flooding Gail McFarlane 149 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 149
Infrastructure - Roads Gail McFarlane 3,444 3,444 2,528 2,544 2,544 2,544 2,544 2,544 2,544 2,544 2,544 26,324
Vehicle Replacement Gail McFarlane 817 600 1,257 1,040 1,040 1,040 1,040 1,040 1,040 1,040 1,040 10,177
Flood Risk Management Gail McFarlane 1,257 0 350 500 500 200 200 200 179 178 178 2,485
Cycling, Walking and Safer Streets Gail McFarlane 683 566 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 683
Footways/Cycle Path Upgrades Gail McFarlane 107 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 107
Street lighting and associated electrical infrastructure Gail McFarlane 13 17 96 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 913
Public non-adopted paths and roads Gail McFarlane 405 405 225 225 225 225 225 225 225 225 225 2,430
Regeneration/Local Economic Development Alan Douglas 775 775 1,876 1,000 1,000 500 500 500 500 500 500 7,651
Direct Project Support Laurence Slavin 3,502 3,502 1,586 1,586 1,586 1,586 1,586 1,586 1,586 1,586 1,586 17,776
RESOURCES
Valuation Joint Board - Requisition of ICT Equipment David Thomson 3 3 2 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 15
Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCIDSS) Laurence Slavin 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20
Agresso development Laurence Slavin 25 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25
Cash Receipting system enhancements Laurence Slavin 35 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35
Electronic Insurance System - claim/incident management system Laurence Slavin 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8
Cost of Living Laurence Slavin 1,000 250 250 250 250 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,000
IFRS 16 Database Laurence Slavin 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
REGULATORY and REGENERATION
Legal Case Management System Alan Douglas 33 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33
Solicitor Project Alan Douglas 33 33 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40
Energy Projects quick wins Alan Douglas 30 10 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30
Installation of Solar PV at Clydebank Leisure Centre Alan Douglas 55 5 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58
Replace existing main hall Air Handling unit at Clydebank Town
Hall
Alan Douglas 83 5 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 87
Replace failed heating controls/valves & recommision Alan Douglas 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
Upgrade obsolete heating controls (BEMS) across Council estate Alan Douglas 20 20 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28
Leisure Energy projects - air handling units, upgrade lighting,
circulating pumps, and draught proofing
Alan Douglas 216 2 225 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 227
Zero Carbon Alan Douglas 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15
Regeneration Fund Alan Douglas 2,223 50 3,848 1,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,898
Town Centre Fund Alan Douglas 142 143 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 143
Place Based Investment Alan Douglas 1,317 1,112 205 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,317
Clydebank Can on the Canal Alan Douglas 747 90 657 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 747
Level Up Fudning Alan Douglas 68 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68
District Heating Network Expansion Alan Douglas 3,720 0 7,365 3,095 760 0 0 0 0 0 0 11,220
Exxon City Deal Alan Douglas 986 1,304 11,806 12,820 4,277 1,162 0 0 0 0 0 31,369
Level Up Funding Alan Douglas 7,465 698 19,634 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20,332
Re -imagine Antonine Wall   Alan Douglas 10 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30
CCCF 0
Transformation of Infrastructure Libraries and Museums Amanda Graham 91 91 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 191
Heritage Capital Fund Amanda Graham 662 662 451 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,113
Strathleven Place (formerly part of Glencairn House project) Amanda Graham 1,590 0 1,590 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,590
SUPPLY and DISTRIBUTION
Depot Rationalisation Angela Wilson 1,715 750 1,715 4,000 1,952 0 0 0 0 0 0 8,417
New Sports Changing Facility Dumbarton West (Old OLSP site)  Angela Wilson 0 0 340 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 340
Page 112

Page 113

Project Lead Chief Officer Updated
Budget
2022/23
Forecast
Outturn
2022/23
Budget
2023/24
Budget
2024/25
Budget
2025/26
Budget
2026/27
Budget
2027/28
Budget
2028/29
Budget
2029/30
Budget
2030/31
Budget
2031/32
Budget
2022/23 to
2031/32
£000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000
New Sports Changing Facility at Lusset Glen in Old Kilpatrick Angela Wilson 134 134 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 134
Holm Park & Yoker Athletic FC C7 Angela Wilson 86 86 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 86
New Westbridgend Community Centre Angela Wilson 1,090 28 1,062 1,200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,290
HOUSING & EMPLOYABILITY
Invest in "Your Community Initiative" Peter Barry 80 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80
Integrated Housing Management System Peter Barry 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
Dennystoun Forge Site Improvements Peter Barry 50 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50
ENVIRONMENT & NEIGHBOURHOOD
Allotment Development Gail McFarlane 179 100 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 179
Community Sports Fund Gail McFarlane 66 0 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66
Environmental Improvement Fund Gail McFarlane 13 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13
Kilmaronock Cemetery Extension Gail McFarlane 13 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13
Levengrove Park - Restoration & Regeneration Gail McFarlane 102 110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 110
Posties Park Sports Hub - New sports hub to include Gym &
running track
Gail McFarlane 844 1,708 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,708
Sports Facilities Upgrades Gail McFarlane 6 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
Vale of Leven Cemetery Extension Gail McFarlane 553 150 403 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 553
Play Area Upgrade Programme Gail McFarlane 122 201 100 100 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 601
Knowes Nature reserve Gail McFarlane 228 228 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 228
Additional Pavement Requirements Gail McFarlane 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
Auld Street Clydebank - Bond Gail McFarlane 42 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42
A813 Road Improvement Phase 1 Gail McFarlane 693 693 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 693
Clydebank Charrette, A814 Gail McFarlane 498 498 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 498
Protective overcoating to 4 over bridges River Leven Gail McFarlane 117 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 117
Strathclyde Partnership for Transport - Bus, cycling and walking
infrastructure improvements & Park and Rides
Gail McFarlane 1,627 1,075 552 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,627
Purchase of gritters Gail McFarlane 400 400 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 400
Turnberry Homes - traffic calming/ management at Turnberry
housing development off Castle Road
Gail McFarlane 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
Electrical Charging Points - Rapid Charge Gail McFarlane 50 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50
Electrical Charging Points - Rapid Charge Gail McFarlane 620 500 120 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 620
Flood Prevention Gail McFarlane 500 500 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500
Gruggies Burn Flood Prevention Gail McFarlane 1,524 124 1,439 6,340 6,000 729 0 0 0 0 0 14,632
Bus rapid development fund Gail McFarlane 214 0 214 214
Waste Transfer Station Gail McFarlane 180 45 1,935 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,980
Replacement of compactors at Dalmoak civic amenity site Gail McFarlane 80 80 0 0 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 160
Depot Improvement Works Gail McFarlane 55 55 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62
Large Bins for High Traffic Areas (pilot) Gail McFarlane 25 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25
Roads Plant Gail McFarlane 40 40 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80
East End Park Resurfacing Gail McFarlane 30 30 170 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 200
Cemetery Extension, North Dalnotter Gail McFarlane 250 0 250
Balloch Mountain Bike Track Gail McFarlane 10 10 200 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 210
Traffic Signal Upgrades Gail McFarlane 300 300 0 300
Vehicle Replacement Strategy Gail McFarlane 1,000 0 1,000 1,000
Electric Vehicle Charging Points Gail McFarlane 50 50 0 50
EDUCATION
AV Equipment - Education Laura Mason 442 441 30 30 30 60 60 30 0 0 0 681
Digital Inclusion Laura Mason 41 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41
Schools Estate Improvement Plan - next Phase Faifley Laura Mason 2,797 800 3,500 26,500 2,538 1,700 581 0 0 0 0 35,619
Schools Estate Improvement Plan Laura Mason 1,246 1,005 3,986 742 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,733
Free School Meals Laura Mason 505 505 1,317 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,822
Choices Programme - to assist young people who require
additional support
Laura Mason 113 0 113 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 113
Schools Estate Refurbishment Plan Laura Mason 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
Early Years Early Learning and Childcare Funding Laura Mason 795 795 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 795
Dalmonach CE Centre Laura Mason 26 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26
HSCP
Replace Elderly Care Homes and Day Care Centres Beth Culshaw 43 61 259 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 320
Criminal Justice Adaptations Beth Culshaw 73 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73
Community Alarm upgrade Beth Culshaw 154 40 268 154 0 0 154 154 154 0 0 924
Page 113

Page 114

Project Lead Chief Officer Updated
Budget
2022/23
Forecast
Outturn
2022/23
Budget
2023/24
Budget
2024/25
Budget
2025/26
Budget
2026/27
Budget
2027/28
Budget
2028/29
Budget
2029/30
Budget
2030/31
Budget
2031/32
Budget
2022/23 to
2031/32
£000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000
PEOPLE ANDTECHNOLOGY
Internet of Things Asset Tracking Victoria Rogers 17 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
365 Implementation Victoria Rogers 173 120 153 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 273
Development of Workforce Management System Victoria Rogers 0 46 46 46 47 48 49 50 51 0 0 383
TOTAL CAPITAL 57,221 31,168 79,916 68,004 28,206 14,619 11,666 11,056 11,006 10,800 10,799 277,240
Page 114

Page 115

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL Appendix 7
GENERAL SERVICES CAPITAL PLAN UPDATE 2022/23 TO 2031/32 - SPEND
Revised
Budget
2022/23
Projected
Outturn
2022/23
Budget
2023/24
Budget
2024/25
Budget
2025/26
Budget
2026/27
Budget
2027/28
Budget
2028/29
Budget
2029/30
Budget
2030/31
Budget
2031/32 Total
£000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000
Resources Carried Forward 790 722 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 790
Turnberry Homes 5 6 (0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5
Auld Street Bond 42 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42
Town Centre Fund Grant 143 143 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 143
Digital Inclusion 41 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41
Can on the Canal 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30
Internet of things Asset Tracking 17 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17
Spaces for People 21 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21
Renew Playparks 22 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22
Knowes Nature Reserve 102 102 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 102
Flood Prevention 79 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 79
Level Up 168 120 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 168
District Heating 120 99 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120
General Services Capital Grant 5,233 5,574 8,662 6,490 6,490 6,490 6,490 6,490 6,490 6,490 6,490 66,156
General Services Capital Grant 5,574 6,061 13,375 6,872 6,872 6,872 6,872 6,872 6,872 6,872 6,872 74,412
Gruggies Burn Grant Awarded 0 0 (5,186) (5,186)
Less PSHG to HEEDS (382) (446) (382) (382) (382) (382) (382) (382) (382) (382) (382) (3,884)
Free School Meals (1,317) (1,317)
Pay Award 2,172 2,172
Stairlift transfer to HSCP 41 (41) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (41)
Ring-fenced Government Grant funding 10,982 2,036 14,396 10,925 7,943 1,140 147 117 117 117 117 37,055
Scottish Government
Cycling, Walking, Safer Streets 388 1 147 147 147 147 147 117 117 117 117 1,204
Level Up Funding 5,766 526 1,115 1,000 2,641
District Heating Network Expansion 2,500 0 5,000 2,500 0 7,500
Exxon City Deal - grant allocation applied to city deal project 1,012 192 8,134 7,278 7,796 993 0 0 0 0 0 24,393
Place Based Investment 1,317 1,317 1,317
Match-funding/other grants & contributions 5,064 4,577 2,949 235 392 450 450 0 0 0 0 7,978
Scottish Government
River Leven Flood Prevention 280 0 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 300
Regeneration Capital Grant Fund, funded by SG - Clydebank Can on the Canal 747 717 0 717
Sustrans 0
Footways/Cycle Path upgrades 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30
Connecting Clydebank (Clydebank Charrette A814) 0 270 493 763
Spaces for People 0 368 0 368
Strathclyde Partnership for Transport 0
Bus Infrastructure Improvements (10130) 0 200 200
A813 Road Improvement Phase 1 0 0 0 0 0 450 450 0 0 0 0 900
A814 Congestion Reduction Measures (10502) 0 300 300
A8014 Kilbowie Road Bus Route Improvement Works 0 330 330
Strathleven Active Travel Network 2 2 2
Heritage Lottery Fund 0
Levengrove Park 0 280 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 280
Others 0
Developer contributions re Dumbarton Walkway 0 682 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 682
Transport Scotland Electrical Charging Points (New Funding) 0 95 95
Renewal of play parks 79 79 157 235 392 863
Free School Meals 495 495 1,317 1,812
Nature Restoration Fund - Knowes Nature Reserve 126 126 126
Scottish Maritine Technology Park (SMTP) 200 200 200
National Acquisitions fund - Heritage -art work 11 11
0
Page 115

Page 116

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL Appendix 7
GENERAL SERVICES CAPITAL PLAN UPDATE 2022/23 TO 2031/32 - SPEND
Revised
Budget
2022/23
Projected
Outturn
2022/23
Budget
2023/24
Budget
2024/25
Budget
2025/26
Budget
2026/27
Budget
2027/28
Budget
2028/29
Budget
2029/30
Budget
2030/31
Budget
2031/32 Total
£000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000
Capital Receipts 4,119 10 (0) (453) (1,370) 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1,813)
Prudential Borrowing 30,960 18,177 53,840 50,807 14,751 6,539 4,579 4,449 4,399 4,193 4,192 165,926
Funded from Revenue 73 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73
Criminal Justice Adaptations 73 73 73
0
Total - all 57,221 31,168 79,916 68,004 28,206 14,619 11,666 11,056 11,006 10,800 10,799 276,165
0
Resources held on Balance Sheet 790 722 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 790
General Capital Grant 5,233 5,574 8,662 6,490 6,490 6,490 6,490 6,490 6,490 6,490 6,490 66,156
Ring Fenced Capital Grant 10,982 2,036 14,396 10,925 7,943 1,140 147 117 117 117 117 37,055
Match-funding 5,064 4,577 2,949 235 392 450 450 0 0 0 0 9,053
Capital Receipts 4,119 10 (0) (453) (1,370) 0 0 0 0 0 0 (1,813)
Required Prudential Borrowing 30,960 18,177 53,840 50,807 14,751 6,539 4,579 4,449 4,399 4,193 4,192 165,926
Revenue contributions 73 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 73
TOTAL RESOURCES IDENTIFIED 57,221 31,168 79,916 68,004 28,206 14,619 11,666 11,056 11,006 10,800 10,799 277,240
Page 116

Page 117

Appendix 8
Recurring Budgets
Aids & Adaptations The provision of Aids and Adaptations links some of our main strategic priorities of Early
Intervention, Access and Resilience – which ties into the Scottish Government’s 2020 Vision of
“supporting people to live longer, healthier lives at home or in a homely setting” for as long as is
reasonably possible and also to support WD residents (mainly older people and physical
disabilities) to be discharged home from hospital as soon as possible – a key Strategic Priority as
set out in the HSCP Strategic Plan
Building Upgrades and H&S This links to key objectives within the Regeneration Delivery Plan, Asset Management Service Plan
and Property Asset Management Plan.  Contained within Asset Management Plan Property.
ICT Modernisation ICT Asset management plan commits to delivering ICT assets that are fit for purpose in terms of
ease of use, meeting business requirements and innovative
ICT Modernisation HSCP ICT Asset management plan commits to delivering ICT assets that are fit for purpose in terms of
ease of use, meeting business requirements and innovative
ICT Security & DR ICT Asset Management Plan commits to delivering a secure and resilient but cost effective
infrastructure to support service delivery and minimise disruption
Infrastructure - Flooding AMP states that we will develop and produce a Flood Protection Study.
Infrastructure - Roads This links to the Roads Asset Management Plan - to provide an improved Roads
Infrastructurewhich supports the Council's strategic aims & objectives with respect to connectivity
and access to employment, education, health, leisure  and transport opportunities.
Vehicle Replacement The Asset Management Plan - Vehicle Fleet establishes the replacement intervals for light
commercial vehicles (10 Years) and heavy vehicles (7 years) from the date of first registration. The
capital budget for replacement vehicles is aligned to replacement dates of the vehicles.
Flood Risk Management SEPA licensing & delays incurred by 3rd party utilities resulted in slippage of programme &
therefore budget Linking to AMP Flood protection of River Leven & surrounding water  courses &
critical drainage infrastructure.
Cycling, Walking and Safer Streets AMP states that we will undertake footway/cycleway Capital improvements.
Footways/Cycle Path upgrades AMP states that we will undertake footway improvements as part of the Capital Programme.
Street Lighting and asssociated
electrical infrastructure
AMP states that we will continue with our ongoing programme of column and infrastructure
replacement.
Public non adopted paths and
roads
Upgrading paths is mentioned in the following sections of the Open Space Asset Management
Plan - Amenity Greenspace, Public parks, Green Corridors and Cemeteries.
Regeneration/Local Economic
Development
The LED budget contains numerous sub-projects.
Direct Project Support This is a general support budget that is not linked to a specific asset management plan
Legal Case Management System ICT Asset management plan commits to delivering ICT assets that are fit for purpose in terms of
ease of use, meeting business requirements and innovative
Solicitor Post Support for various capital projects.
Antonine Wall Heritage Lottery
Fund
This is a multi partner project and is a heritage site involving Historic Environment Scotland and
other Local Authorities. The aim is to carry out regeneration heritage projects and development. It
links in with Regeneration of West Dunbartonshire area.
Energy Projects quick wins This links to key objectives within the Regeneration Delivery Plan, Asset Management Service Plan
and Property Asset Management Plan. To continue to reduce energy consumption and deliver
savings through effective asset management.
Installation of Solar PV at
Clydebank Leisure Centre
This links to key objectives within the Regeneration Delivery Plan, Asset Management Service Plan
and Property Asset Management Plan. To continue to reduce energy consumption and deliver
savings through effective asset management.
Replace existing main hall Air
Handling unit at Clydebank Town
Hall
This links to key objectives within the Asset Management Service Plan and Property Asset
Management Plan. 
Replace failed heating
controls/valves & recommision
This links to key objectives within the Regeneration Delivery Plan, Asset Management Service Plan
and Property Asset Management Plan. To continue to reduce energy consumption and deliver
savings through effective asset management.
Upgrade obsolete heating controls
(BEMS) across Council estate
This links to key objectives within the Regeneration Delivery Plan, Asset Management Service Plan
and Property Asset Management Plan. To continue to reduce energy consumption and deliver
savings through effective asset management.
Leisure Energy projects This links to key objectives within the Regeneration Delivery Plan, Asset Management Service Plan
and Property Asset Management Plan. To continue to reduce energy consumption and deliver
savings through effective asset management.
Zero Carbon This links to key objectives within the Regeneration Delivery Plan, Asset Management Service Plan
and Property Asset Management Plan. To assist with meetin the demands for zero carbon
emmisions
Regeneration Fund This links in with plans to regenerate the West Dunbartonshire area and there are sub projects
within the plan to allow this to happen.
Town Centre Fund Funding received from Scottish Government which has been targeted to support regeneration of
Town Centres
Clydebank Can on the Canal This project will provide a new community-run activities centre in Clydebank Town Centre which
assists with the regeneration nof the local area.
Queens Quay District Heating
Network
This links to key objectives within the Regeneration Delivery Plan, Asset Management Service Plan
and Property Asset Management Plan. Corporate Asset Management Strategy.
Exxon City Deal This links to key objectives within the Regeneration Delivery Plan, Asset Management Service Plan
and Property Asset Management Plan. Corporate Asset Management Strategy.
Level Up Funding Funding received from Scottish Government which has been targeted to support regeneration of
the lcoal area
Transformation of Infrastructure
Libraries and Museums
Committee approved spend to invest in the improvement of the Libraries and Culture Service. This
fits in with efficient, effective, frontline services from the Strategic Plan.
Heritage Capital Fund Administration budget commitment
General Services Capital Plan Linkage of Capital Projects to Asset Management Plans
Chief Officer - Regulatory and Regeneration
Chief Officer - Communications, Culture, Communities and Facilities
Page 117

Page 118

Strathleven Place This links to key objectives within the Regeneration Delivery Plan, Asset Management Service Plan
and Property Asset Management Plan and Corporate Asset Management Strategy.
Depot Rationalisation This links to key objectives within the Regeneration Delivery Plan, Asset Management Service Plan
and Property Asset Management Plan. Contained within Asset Management Plan Property &
Corporate Asset Management Strategy.
New Sports Changing Facility (Old
OLSP site)
This links to key objectives within the Regeneration Delivery Plan, Asset Management Service Plan
and Property Asset Management Plan. Contained within Asset Management Plan Property &
Corporate Asset Management Strategy.
New Sports Changing Facility at
Lusset Glen in Old Kilpatrick
This links to key objectives within the Regeneration Delivery Plan, Asset Management Service Plan
and Property Asset Management Plan. Contained within Asset Management Plan Property &
Corporate Asset Management Strategy.
Holm Park & Yoker Athletic FC This links to key objectives within the Regeneration Delivery Plan, Asset Management Service Plan
and Property Asset Management Plan. Contained within Asset Management Plan Property &
Corporate Asset Management Strategy.
New West Bridgend Community
Centre
This links to key objectives within the Regeneration Delivery Plan, Asset Management Service Plan
and Property Asset Management Plan. Contained within Asset Management Plan Property &
Corporate Asset Management Strategy
Invest in "Your Community
Initiative"
The H+E Delivery Plan clearly sets out the challenge of the competing demands of delivering
joined-up services to local areas, against a backdrop of financial and resourcing challenges. The
Delivery Plan confirms that the Your Community Inititative, which includes Community Budgeting
and the Improvement Fund, is the council's approach to delivering services to local areas and
involving local communities.  The Communities Team continue to work to embed this approach
across relevant council services and CPWD to improve ways of delivering the required services,
while improving community participation and engagement.
Integrated Housing Management
System
ICT Asset management plan commits to delivering ICT assets that are fit for purpose in terms of
ease of use, meeting business requirements and innovative
Dennystoun Forge Site
Improvements
This project will support site improvements providing more and better accomodation for the
community.
Valuation Joint Board This is linked to the VJB capital plan
Payment Card Industry Data
Security Standard (PCIDSS)
Development work required for Legislative purposes and to provide adequate security for citizens
making payment to the Council
Development of Agresso Development work required to ensure our computer systems remain robust and fit for purpose
Cash Receipting system
enhancements
Development work required to ensure our computer systems remain robust and fit for purpose
Electronic Insurance System Although not linked to a specific AMP this system will improve the working processes within the
insurance team, streamlining reporting and claims handling processes being dealt with. It will
improve the digitalisation of the work within the team.
Cost of Living Required to assist with cost of living projects.
IFRS 16 Database To ensure compliance with new accounting standard for leasing
Allotment Development There is a section within the Open Space Asset Management Plan Action Plan on Allotments. This
states that in line with the Councils obligations under the Community Empowerment Act we will
provide three new allotment sites of at least 0.66 hectares.
Community Sports Fund This is a fund that allows sports clubs to apply for funding to improve existing and develop new
facilities. Within the Open Space Asset Management Plan it states that the provision of new 3G
pitches and new pavillions has improved the overall sports pitch asset, however there are some
facilities still classed as poor which require addressing.
Environmental Improvement Fund The Open Space Asset Management Plan states that we will select amenity Greenspace sites to
increase the proportion that is managed for biodiversity.The plan states that we will upgrade and
make green corridors more useable.
Kilmaronock Cemetery Extension The Open Space Asset Management Plan states that we will construct an extension to
Kilmaronock Cemetery.
Levengrove Park The Open Space Asset Management Plan states  that we will provide as a minimum provision in
our Urban Parks - car parking, toilet provision, nature area and play opportunities.
Posties Park Sports Hub Within the Open Space Asset Management Plan it states that the provision of new 3G pitches and
new pavillions has improved the overall sports pitch asset, however there are some facilities still
classed as poor which require addressing.
Sports Pitch/Facilities Upgrades Within the Open Space Asset Management Plan it states that the provision of new 3G pitches and
new pavillions has improved the overall sports pitch asset, however there are some facilities still
classed as poor which require addressing.  Contained within Asset Management Plan Property &
Corporate Asset Management Strategy
Vale of Leven Cemetery Extension The Open Space Asset Management Plan states that we will identify a new Cemetery site in the
Vale of Leven.
Play Parks This project links to the Open Space Asset Management Plan Action Plan where there is a section
on Playspace for children and teenagers
Knowes Nature reserve Funding has been received from Nature Restoration Fund to build nature resource for Faifley
community.
Additional Pavement Requirements AMP states that we will undertake footway improvements as part of the Capital Programme.
Auld Street Clydebank - Bond Works to be carried out from recovered Road Bond include C/way, F/Way resurfacing, roundal &
street lighting.
A813 Road Improvement Phase 1 A813 forms a strategic link from the settlements witing WDC both Carriageway and geometery
require upgrading to current specifications and is named in current AMP.
Clydebank Charrette, A814 This will enhance the A814 through Clydebanl and links to the current AMP
Protective overcoating to 4 over
bridges, River Leven
Slippage required due to a comprehensive works package which will be created from the Bridge
Principal inspections which have been undertaken. AMP states that we will continue with
programme of both Principal & General bridge inspections and implement Capital improvements
identified from these inspections.
Strathclyde Partnership for
Transport
These projects improve & support connectivity and equal access to Public transport & assist in
encouraging Modal shift, thus helping reducing emissions.
Purchase of Gritters Allows the Counci to continue to deliver savings through effective asset management.
Chief Officer - Resources
Chief Officer - Environment and Neighbourhood
Chief Officer - Housing and Communities
Chief Officer - Supply, Distribution and Property
Page 118

Page 119

Turnberry Homes Final tranche of these works to be completed in conjuction with Dumbarton East footway
improvements. As previously noted AMP states we will deliver capital footway improvements to
facilitate safe pedestrian routes and encourage active travel.
Electrical Vehicle Charging AMP states that we will continue to work with other service deprtments and organisations to install
Electric Vehicle Charging points.
River Leven Flood Prevention
Scheme
AMP states that we will develop and produce a Flood Protection Study of the River Leven.
Continued  participation in CaLL - Clyde & Loch Lomond Flood Prevention Management Group.
Flood Prevention Development of flood prevention plans
Gruggies Burn Flood Prevention
Scheme
Project design is ongoing as optioneering has produced alternative design solutions ongoing
discussions with Consultants, Contractors & SEPA have permitted us to appoint a Specialist
Contractor via Scape framework to produce a "Buildabilit"y statement. Ground investigation works
instructed under Scape framework. Specialist Consultant appointed via SLC Professional Services
Framework.  AMP - continuation of the developement of Gruggies Burn and subsequent
implementation of Gruggies Burn Flood Prevention Scheme.
Bus rapid development fund Funding has been awarded from Sustrans to assist with social distancing measures required as a
result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Waste Transfer Station The design, development and construction of a recycling and bulk waste transfer facility that will
ensure all recycling material can be sorted and disposed off appropriately to ensure compliance
with landfill ban in 2025.
Replacement of compactors at
Dalmoak civic amenity site
The purchase of 2 compactors for the Council civic amenity site at Dalmoak.
Depot Improvement Works Improvement of WDC Roads Depot to ensure fit for purpose
Large Bins for High Traffic Areas
(pilot)
Purchase of larger bins for high traffic areas to assess
Electric Vehicle Charging Points AMP states that we will continue to work with other service deprtments and organisations to install
Electric Vehicle Charging points.
Roads Plant The Asset Management Plan - Vehicle Fleet establishes the replacement intervals for light
commercial vehicles (10 Years) and heavy vehicles (7 years) from the date of first registration. The
capital budget for replacement vehicles is aligned to replacement dates of the vehicles.
East End Park Resurfacing AMP states that we will undertake footway improvements as part of the Capital Programme.
Cemetery Extension, North
Dalnotter
Links to the Asset Management Plan.
Balloch Mountain Bike Track AMP states that we will undertake footway improvements as part of the Capital Programme.
Traffic Signal Upgrades Upgarde required due to repeated failure of current signlas
Vehicle Replacement Strategy The Asset Management Plan - Vehicle Fleet establishes the replacement intervals for light
commercial vehicles (10 Years) and heavy vehicles (7 years) from the date of first registration. The
capital budget for replacement vehicles is aligned to replacement dates of the vehicles.
AV Equipment - Education The current Education audio visual estate numbers ~650 teaching boards. ~200 boards are
currenty aged 7+ years old and/or faulty. The project aims to create and maintain a 'fit for purpose'
learning enviroment to ensure compatability with emerging and futre technology by replacing
ageing and faulty audio visual teaching boards.
Digital Inclusion Increase the ratio of chrome book devices for most disadvantaged children and families and
support for families with remote access. Particular requirement during recent pandemic
Schools Estate Improvement Plan -
next Phase Faifley
This links to key objectives within the Regeneration Delivery Plan, Asset Management Service Plan
and Property Asset Management Plan. Contained within Asset Management Plan Property &
Corporate Asset Management Strategy
Schools Estate Improvement Plan This links to key objectives within the Regeneration Delivery Plan, Asset Management Service Plan
and Property Asset Management Plan. Contained within Asset Management Plan Property &
Corporate Asset Management Strategy
Free School Meals This links to key objectives within the Regeneration Delivery Plan, Asset Management Service Plan
and Property Asset Management Plan.
Choices Programme Current school Estate Management Plan is being revised to reflect the changing needs in
education delivery.  A revised action plan has been presented to committee.  This links to key
objectives within the Regeneration Delivery Plan, Asset Management Service Plan and Property
Asset Management Plan.  Contained within Asset Management Plan Property 2016-21 &
Corporate Asset Management Strategy 2016-21
Schools Estate Refurbishment Plan This links to key objectives within the Regeneration Delivery Plan, Asset Management Service Plan
and Property Asset Management Plan. Contained within Asset Management Plan Property &
Corporate Asset Management Strategy
Early Years Early Learning and
Childcare Funding
This is linked to the Early Year Strategy
Dalmonach CE Centre This links to key objectives contained within Asset Management Plan Property & Corporate Asset
Management Strategy.
Replace Elderly Care Homes and
Day Care Centres
This links to key objectives within the Regeneration Delivery Plan, Asset Management Service Plan
and Property Asset Management Plan.
Criminal Justice Adaptations Renovation of Unit 11 Levenside Business Court which is funded from revenue.
Community Alarm upgrade Development work required to ensure our computer systems remain robust and fit for purpose
Internet of Things Asset Tracking ICT Asset management plan commits to delivering ICT assets that are fit for purpose in terms of
ease of use, meeting business requirements and innovative
365 Implementation ICT Asset management plan commits to delivering ICT assets that are fit for purpose in terms of
ease of use, meeting business requirements and innovative
Development of Workforce
Management System
ICT Asset management plan commits to delivering ICT assets that are fit for purpose in terms of
ease of use, meeting business requirements and innovative
Chief Officer - People and Technology
Chief Officer - Education, Learning and Attainment
Chief Officer - Health and Social Care Partnership
Page 119

Page 120

1
Equality Impact Assessment record layout for information: Assessment Number 554
Owner: Annabel Travers
Resource: Regeneration Service/Establishment: Supply, Distribution and Property Service
First Name Surname Job Title
Head Officer: Annabel Travers Procurement Manager
Include job titles/organisation
Members: Annabel Travers, Procurement Manager, West Dunbartonshire Council;
Angela Wilson, Chief Officer - Supply, Distribution and Property Service, West Dunbartonshire Council
Please note: the word policy is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision
Policy Title: SDP_ 04 Corporate Procurement Unit (CPU) - Absorb Purchase to Pay Support in to Services
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
Service officers are responsible for requesting, approval and payment of supplies / services / works (Purchase to Pay [P2P]).  One of
the systems for delivery of these duties, is PECOS.  Currently, the PECOS administration is part of the CPU.   This team: processes
changes within PECOS; uploads e-Catalogues; resolves PECOS system issues; updates guidance on the intranet and escalates work
routes if the user still has issues despite the guidance.
The aim of absorbing the PECOS P2P support in to Services is to provide efficiencies to support the balance of the budget.  Potential
outcomes in reaching up to £99,481 of efficiencies per year. 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy
All Council Services, WD HSCP Services as well as Trade Unions.
Appendix 9
Page 120

Page 121

2
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? N
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services
to discuss your requirements
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A)
or foster good relations (F) Y
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Y
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Y
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Y
Who will be affected by this policy?
All Council services, Elected Members and partner organisations including the Scottish Government.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Annabel Travers, Procurement Manager, West Dunbartonshire Council - conducted this high level efficiency option regarding the CPU;
Angela Wilson, Chief Officer - Supply, Distribution and Property Services, West Dunbartonshire Council - interrogated this high level
efficiency option;
Performance and Monitoring Review Group, West Dunbartonshire Council - where informed of this high level efficiency option; 
Martin Rooney, Leader of the Council - was informed of this high level efficiency option; and
Michelle McGinty, Deputy Leader of the Council - was informed of this high level efficiency option.
Page 121

Page 122

3
If this high level efficiency option regarding the CPU is to be taken forward to the next stage; staff, Trade Unions and Elected Members
will be consulted. 
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are
using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups
Needs Evidence Impact
Age Worries surrounding job
security may be heighten
in older staff - reiterate
the commitment to no
compulsory
redundancies
Please see cross cutting
https://www.gov.scot/publications/scotlands-
labour-market-people-places-regions-statistics-
annual-population-survey-2019/
https://www.gov.scot/publications/older-people-
employment-scotland/
The age profile in the current structure:
1 x staff = <24 years old
1 x staff = 30 - 34 years old
1 x staff = 40 - 44 years old
1 x staff = 60 - 64 years old
There is 1 staff who is within the 60 - 64 years old
category
Negative - This could heightened
concerns of staff as evidence suggests
that those over 50 find it more difficult to
regain employment
Disability Please see cross cutting Neutral
Gender
Reassign
Please see cross cutting Neutral
Marriage &
Civil
Partnership
Please see cross cutting Neutral
Pregnancy
& Maternity
Full communication to
staff in 'maternity leave'
about this process 
Please see cross cutting
There is 1 staff who is currently on maternity
leave
Neutral - Return of work on June 2023
Page 122

Page 123

4 
Needs Evidence Impact
Race Please see cross cutting  Neutral
Religion &
Belief
Please see cross cutting  Neutral
Sex Worries surrounding job
security may be heighten
in women - reiterate the
commitment to no
compulsory
redundancies 
Please see cross cutting
There are 3 out of 4 staff who are women Negative - Detriment to female staff
compared to males because of make up
of workforce
Sexual
Orientation
Please see cross cutting  Neutral
Human
Rights
Please see cross cutting  Neutral
Health Please see cross cutting  Neutral
Social &
Economic
Impact
Worries surrounding job
security may be heighten
lower payed staff -
reiterate the commitment
to no compulsory
redundancies 
Please see cross cutting
HR21 records 
There are 3 out of 4 staff who are on the lowest
grade within this structure
Negative - Detriment to lowest grade staff
due to potential work being transferred
Cross
Cutting
Identify a "champion" to
assist with understanding
of this process for staff 
Reiterate the commitment
to no compulsory
redundancies to mitigate
against any heightened
concerns 
Neutral
Page 123

Page 124

5 
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this
There is the potential for three FTE  to be displaced.  A fair process would be undertaken in line with the Council's policies.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Yes
What is your recommendation for this policy?
Nothing is checked for this
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 554 details impact on staff.  
3 FTE out of  3.7 FTE staff will be potentially displaced from the structure. There are:
3 out of 4 staff are women and this would therefore affect women more;
3 out of 4 staff are on the lowest grade and therefore affect them due to transaction work being absorbed into other Services; and
1 out of 4 staff being 60 - 65 and this could heightened concerns about being displaced, as evidence suggests that those over 50 find it
more difficult to regain employment. 
Page 124

Page 125

1 
Equality Impact Assessment record layout for information: Assessment Number 555 
Owner: Annabel Travers 
Resource: Regeneration Service/Establishment: Supply, Distribution and Property Service 
First Name Surname Job Title
Head Officer: Annabel Travers Procurement Manager 
Include job titles/organisation
Members: Annabel Travers, Procurement Manager, West Dunbartonshire Council;
Angela Wilson, Chief Officer - Supply, Distribution and Property Service, West Dunbartonshire Council 
Please note: the word policy is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision
Policy Title: SDP-02    Corporate Procurement Unit (CPU) - Transfer Non Complex Procurements to Services 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
The remit of the category team within the CPU is to develop robust procurement and contract management activity that drive and enable
business transformation and that aligns with national, local and Council strategies and delivers best value for money. 
The aim of transferring non-complex procurements into other Services is to provide efficiencies to support the balance of the budget.  
Potential outcomes could be £148,471 of efficiencies per year. 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy
All Council Services, WD HSCP Services as well as Trade Unions. 
Page 125

Page 126

2 
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? N
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services
to discuss your requirements 
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A)
or foster good relations (F) Y
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Y
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Y
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Y 
Who will be affected by this policy? 
All Council services, Elected Members and partner organisations including the Scottish Government. 
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Annabel Travers, Procurement Manager, West Dunbartonshire Council - conducted this high level efficiency option regarding the CPU;
Angela Wilson, Chief Officer - Supply, Distribution and Property Services, West Dunbartonshire Council - interrogated this high level
efficiency option;
Performance and Monitoring Review Group, West Dunbartonshire Council - where informed of this high level efficiency option; 
Martin Rooney, Leader of the Council - was informed of this high level efficiency option; and
Michelle McGinty, Deputy Leader of the Council - was informed of this high level efficiency option. 
Page 126

Page 127

3 
If this high level efficiency option regarding the CPU is to be taken forward to the next stage; staff, Trade Unions and Elected Members
will be consulted.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are
using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age Worries surrounding job
security may be heighten
in older staff - reiterate
the commitment to no
compulsory
redundancies 
Please see cross cutting 
https://www.gov.scot/publications/scotlands-
labour-market-people-places-regions-statistics-
annual-population-survey-2019/ 
https://www.gov.scot/publications/older-people-
employment-scotland/ 
The age profile in the current structure:
1 x staff = <24 years old
1 x staff = 25 -29 years old
1 x staff = 30 - 34 years old
4 x staff = 35 - 39 years old
3 x staff = 40 - 44 years old
1 x staff = 45 - 49 years old
1 x staff = 50 - 54 years old 
There is 1 staff who is within the 50 - 54 years old
category 
Negative - This could heightened
concerns of staff about any displacement,
as evidence suggests that those over 50
find it more difficult to regain employment
Disability Worries surrounding job
security may be heighten
in disabled staff -
reiterate the commitment
to no compulsory
redundancies 
Please see cross cutting 
HR21 report 
Disabled people in employment - House of
Commons Library (parliament.uk) 
There is at least 1 staff who is disabled
Negative - This could heightened
concerns of staff about any displacement
Page 127

Page 128

4 
Needs Evidence Impact
Gender
Reassign
Please see cross cutting  Neutral
Marriage &
Civil
Partnership
Please see cross cutting  Neutral
Pregnancy
& Maternity
Please see cross cutting  Neutral
Race Please see cross cutting  Neutral
Religion &
Belief
Please see cross cutting  Neutral
Sex Worries surrounding job
security may be heighten
in women - reiterate the
commitment to no
compulsory
redundancies 
Please see cross cutting
There are 8 out of 12 staff who are women Negative - Detriment to female staff
compared to males because of make-up
of workforce
Sexual
Orientation
Please see cross cutting  Neutral
Human
Rights
Please see cross cutting  Neutral
Health Worries surrounding job
security may be heighten
in staff who have Health
conditions 
Please see cross cutting
Occupational Health reports 
Of the Health screening that was undertaken
before formally offering a new job, there are at
least 4 out of 12 staff for whom the Equality
Legislation is likely to apply
Negative - This could heightened
concerns of staff about any displacement  
Page 128

Page 129

5 
Needs Evidence Impact
Social &
Economic
Impact
Worries surrounding job
security may be heighten
in lower payed staff -
reiterate the commitment
to no compulsory
redundancies 
Please see cross cutting
HR21 records 
There are 4 out of 12 staff who are on the lowest
grade within this structure
Negative - This could heightened
concerns of staff about any displacement
Cross
Cutting
Identify a "champion" to
assist with understanding
of this process for staff 
Reiterate the commitment
to no compulsory
redundancies to mitigate
against any heightened
concerns 
Neutral
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this
There is the potential for 3.1 FTE  to be displaced.  A fair process would be undertaken in line with the Council's policies.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Yes
What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce  
Page 129

Page 130

6 
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 555 details impact on staff.  3.1 staff in a current structure of 12 FTE, will be potentially displaced from the structure. There are:
8 out of 12 staff are women and this could therefore affect women more;
4 out of 12 staff are on the lowest grade and therefore affect them due to operational work being  transferred to other Services;  
At least 1 out of 12 staff is disabled and this could heightened concerns about being displaced;
At least 4 out of 12 staff have health conditions and this could heightened concerns about being displaced; and
1 out of 12 staff being 50 - 55 and this could heightened concerns about being displaced, as evidence suggests that those over 50 find it
more difficult to regain employment. 
Page 130

Page 131

1 
Equality Impact Assessment record layout for information: Assessment Number 556 
Owner: Annabel Travers 
Resource: Regeneration Service/Establishment: Supply, Distribution and Property Service 
First Name Surname Job Title
Head Officer: Annabel Travers Procurement Manager 
Include job titles/organisation
Members: Annabel Travers, Procurement Manager, West Dunbartonshire Council;
Angela Wilson, Chief Officer - Supply, Distribution and Property Service, West Dunbartonshire Council 
Please note: the word policy is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision
Policy Title: SDP01  Corporate Procurement Unit (CPU) - Transfer Non Regulated Procurements to Services 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
The remit of the category team within the CPU is to develop robust procurement and contract management activity that drive and enable
business transformation and that aligns with national, local and Council strategies and delivers best value for money. 
The aim of transferring non regulated procurements into other Services is to provide efficiencies to support the balance of the budget.  
Potential outcomes could be £109,962 of efficiencies per year. 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy
All Council Services, WD HSCP Services as well as Trade Unions. 
Page 131

Page 132

2 
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? N
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services
to discuss your requirements 
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A)
or foster good relations (F) Y
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Y
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Y
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Y 
Who will be affected by this policy? 
All Council services, Elected Members and partner organisations including the Scottish Government. 
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Annabel Travers, Procurement Manager, West Dunbartonshire Council - conducted this high level efficiency option regarding the CPU;
Angela Wilson, Chief Officer - Supply, Distribution and Property Services, West Dunbartonshire Council - interrogated this high level
efficiency option;
Performance and Monitoring Review Group, West Dunbartonshire Council - where informed of this high level efficiency option; 
Martin Rooney, Leader of the Council - was informed of this high level efficiency option; and
Michelle McGinty, Deputy Leader of the Council - was informed of this high level efficiency option. 
Page 132

Page 133

3 
If this high level efficiency option regarding the CPU is to be taken forward to the next stage; staff, Trade Unions and Elected Members
will be consulted.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are
using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age Worries surrounding job
security may be heighten
in older staff - reiterate
the commitment to no
compulsory
redundancies 
Please see cross cutting 
https://www.gov.scot/publications/scotlands-
labour-market-people-places-regions-statistics-
annual-population-survey-2019/ 
https://www.gov.scot/publications/older-people-
employment-scotland/ 
The age profile in the current structure:
1 x staff = <24 years old
1 x staff = 25 -29 years old
1 x staff = 30 - 34 years old
4 x staff = 35 - 39 years old
3 x staff = 40 - 44 years old
1 x staff = 45 - 49 years old
1 x staff = 50 - 54 years old 
There is 1 staff who is within the 50 - 54 years old
category 
Negative - This could heightened
concerns of staff about any displacement,
as evidence suggests that those over 50
find it more difficult to regain employment
Disability Worries surrounding job
security may be heighten
in disabled staff -
reiterate the commitment
to no compulsory
redundancies 
Please see cross cutting 
HR21 report 
Disabled people in employment - House of
Commons Library (parliament.uk) 
There is at least 1 staff who is disabled
Negative - This could heightened
concerns of staff about any displacement
Page 133

Page 134

4 
Needs Evidence Impact
Gender
Reassign
Please see cross cutting  Neutral
Marriage &
Civil
Partnership
Please see cross cutting  Neutral
Pregnancy
& Maternity
Please see cross cutting  Neutral
Race Please see cross cutting  Neutral
Religion &
Belief
Please see cross cutting  Neutral
Sex Worries surrounding job
security may be heighten
in women - reiterate the
commitment to no
compulsory
redundancies 
Please see cross cutting
There are 8 out of 12 staff who are women Negative - Detriment to female staff
compared to males because of make up
of workforce
Sexual
Orientation
Please see cross cutting  Neutral
Human
Rights
Please see cross cutting  Neutral
Health Worries surrounding job
security may be heighten
in staff who have Health
conditions 
Please see cross cutting
Occupational Health reports 
Of the Health screening that was undertaken
before formally offering a new job, there are at
least 4 out of 12 staff for whom the Equality
Legislation is likely to apply
Negative - This could heightened
concerns of staff about any displacement  
Page 134

Page 135

5 
Needs Evidence Impact
Social &
Economic
Impact
Worries surrounding job
security may be heighten
in lower payed staff -
reiterate the commitment
to no compulsory
redundancies 
Please see cross cutting
HR21 records 
There are 4 out of 12 staff who are on the lowest
grade within this structure
Negative - Detriment to lowest grade staff
due to potential work being transferred
Cross
Cutting
Identify a "champion" to
assist with understanding
of this process for staff 
Reiterate the commitment
to no compulsory
redundancies to mitigate
against any heightened
concerns 
Neutral
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this
There is the potential for 2.6 FTE  to be displaced.  A fair process would be undertaken in line with the Council's policies.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Yes
What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce  
Page 135

Page 136

6 
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 555 details impact on staff.  3.1 staff in a current structure of 12 FTE, will be potentially displaced from the structure. There are:
8 out of 12 staff are women and this could therefore affect women more;
4 out of 12 staff are on the lowest grade and therefore affect them due to operational work being  transferred to other Services;  
At least 1 out of 12 staff is disabled and this could heightened concerns about being displaced;
At least 4 out of 12 staff have health conditions and this could heightened concerns about being displaced; and
1 out of 12 staff being 50 - 55 and this could heightened concerns about being displaced, as evidence suggests that those over 50 find it
more difficult to regain employment. 
Page 136

Page 137

AssessmentNo 561 Owner smclelland
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment HE Budget
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Nicola Pettigrew Manager
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Nicola Pettigrew Scott Mclelland
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function
or financial decision)
Policy Title HE01 - Reduction to ASB team
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
As part of current savings options (23/24) for above service the objective and
purpose of this EIA is to outline impact to residents, stakeholders and staff.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Staff tenants Residents Police Scotland local TRA groups Community Councils
Elected Members SFRS Safe and Stronger DIG ASB tasking Group Fire Reduction
Group ASBOF ASBLEF WDTRO Environmental Health Greenspace Housing West
Dunbartonshire Equality Forum
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Staff tenants Residents Police Scotland local TRA groups Community Councils Elected Members
SFRS Safe and Stronger DIG ASB tasking Group Fire Reduction Group ASBOF ASBLEF WDTRO
Environmental Health Greenspace Housing
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
There has been no consultation carried out as yet as no decision has been made however
consultation would include Staff , TUs and all stakeholders affected.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Older people are
often affected by
ASB or the
perception of. This
can be true of all age
A Fairer Scotland for
Older People:
Framework for
Action. Older people
want: "Opportunities
Face to face contact
with tenants
residents within this
age group will be
reduced. There will
Page 137

Page 138

group however more
so in the older
group/s. Physical
and meaningful
Engagement will be
accessed by all
groups and
delivered by ASB
staff. The reduction
to the service to two
officers will remove
a high degree of
services to the age
group
to remain actively
engaged with, and
involved in, their
communities" this
reduction with
remove significant
engagement at TRA,
face to face support
for ASB and remove
physical response to
this age group
be no public meeting
or engemange with
this age group under
ASB given this
reduction.
Cross Cutting
Participation across
all protected groups
is an opportunity to
build community
cohesion
People can
simultaneous be
members of more
than one
disadvantaged
group, which can
multiply negative
outcomes
Participation will be
challenged by this
reduction as
residents will see a
negative signal that
WDC don't care with
any reduction to ASB
services.
Disability
Evidence suggests
disabled people are
more likely to be
socially isolated, and
less likely to be
involved in
community life than
non disabled people.
There will be very
limited access to this
group with
reduction
This reduction will
remove response
and actions to this
group moving them
closer to social
isolation. due to
disability, are
remaining indoors
and more likely to be
isolated. Local
feedback suggests
some success during
lockdown, using
digital methods and
also phone calls, but
this will not be good
for everyone.
This reduction will
remove response
and actions to this
group moving them
closer to social
isolation.
Social & Economic
Impact
Increased income
(through training
opportunities,
increased benefit
take up, community
enterprise, social
investment etc.),
reduced expenditure
(debt advice,
community
transport, local food
production) and
through sharing and
redistributing
Involved, organised
and empowered
communities have
greater economic
and social strength.
ASB service feed into
this by working to
make our
communities safer.
The economic
impact of any
reduction to ASB
services is yet to be
fully realised in WDC
Communities. Our
work may need to
focus much more on
poverty and
economic recovery
and the cost of living
crisis to come, there
is an expectation
that levels of crime
Page 138

Page 139

recourses,
communities can be
impacted by
Community
Development and
Capacity Building.
and ASB will
increase.
Sex
ASB services
currently engage in
community activities
which varies across
age and gender.
Impact to
engagement due to
reduction of staff.
Women are more
likely to suffer
domestic abuse and
Gender based
violence than men
Women are often
more visible and
available to engage
with our Team due
to childcare and
other need to be out
of doors even when
formal/informal
groups are not
meeting. This
reduction will
remove platform to
engage.
Gender Reassign
Those under going
or who have
undergone gender
reassignment can be
particularly
excluded from social
and in civil society, it
is important that
people have an
opportunity to
participate in their
community and give
their opinion on
things that might
effect them.
Evidence suggest
that trans people can
be more socially
isolated and more at
risk of
discrimination. This
reduction will
further isolate this
group in terms of
response and
physical support.
Evidence suggest
that trans people can
be more socially
isolated and more at
risk of
discrimination. This
reduction will
further isolate this
group in terms of
response and
physical support.
Health
Being Article 10)
and the right to
education (Article 2
of Protocol No. 1).e
to participate, being
represented and
feeling able to make
an impact on where
you live can have an
effect on both
mental and physical
health.
Our physical and
social environment
is the framework in
which our lives take
place and,
depending on
circumstances, it can
provide us with
opportunities or
limit our potential
(Scottish National
Performance
Framework). this
reduction will
impact significantly
on responding to
ASB within our
communities and
place a signal that
Efforts to engage
people meaningfully
about ASB
community will be
challenged by this
reduction due to the
lack of physical
response.
Page 139

Page 140

WDC do not care
about social control
within its
communities. This is
in line with signal
crimes theory.
Human Rights
Relevant under core
civil rights, such as
the right to respect
for private and
family life (Article 8
of the Convention),
the right to freedom
of expression (Ar
Awareness of
Human Rights as
part of everyday life
is low, therefore its
relevance, nationally
there is increasing
focus from the
Scottish Government
on giving Human
Rights a more
central place
Although not
directly affecting HR,
Considering the
service from a
Human Rights
perspective can help
inform inclusive
practice however
due to reduction in
staffing this would
adversely impact on
your verbal guidance
and physical
response to cases.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
This area cross cuts
with sex, and sexual
orientation
This area cross cuts
with sex, and sexual
orientation
This area cross cuts
with sex, and sexual
orientation. Given
the reduction there
will be no support or
physical response to
this group. Given the
reduction there will
be no support or
physical response to
this group
Pregnancy &
Maternity
This area cross cuts
with sex, and sexual
orientation
This area cross cuts
with sex, and sexual
orientation
This area cross cuts
with sex, and sexual
orientation. Given
the reduction there
will be no support or
physical response to
this group
Race
The ASB team
Communities Team
core function is to
respond and address
any ASB concerns
for all protected
groups.
People from BME
groups are much
more likely to be the
subject of racist hate
incidents and crimes
Evidence from
Scottish Social
Attitudes surveys
and other sources
suggests that people
who have contact
with people from
other groups are less
likely to hold
negative views on
This reduction will
remove reporting
platforms and
response to any ASB
concerns with the
loss of physical
engagement.
Page 140

Page 141

those groups.
Religion and Belief
ASB services have
always respected
events and activities
and would seek to
avoid common times
of worship
Event timing and
venue can affect
people ability to take
part, with the
reduction to two
officers this now
might not be
achievable due to
demand and loss of
resources.
Event timing and
venue can affect
people ability to take
part, with the
reduction to two
officers this now
might not be
achievable due to
demand and loss of
resources. There is
also the aspect of
restricted to no
response with lower
staffing to this
group.
Sexual Orientation
Services need to be
accessible including ,
those aiming to
support
participation and
empowerment
Impact to
engagement due to
reduction of staff.
Whilst will ensure
that we will design
in engagement to be
inclusive, in both
genreral
engagement,
ahttps://www.equal
ity-network.org/wp-
ontent/uploads/201
3/02/Community-
Connections-1.-
Engaging-LGBT-
People.pdfnd where
specific . We will
face significant
reduction to physical
and verbal
engagement with
this group to the the
reduction of staff
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
There is high potential for some equality groups to be less frequently or meaningfully involved
with the ASB Team due to this reduction. Face to Face engagement with subject citizen's at door
step, in community meetings will be fewer to none. The service will only be able to offer telephony
support. Moving to a phone based service, it is vital to have measures in place to allow access, e.g.
an process to ensure that non English speakers can get through with Language Line support for
calls. Phone based services may present more of a barrier to BSL users, and this would need to be
mitigated. Part of these measures would be directed communication to people generally and
certain groups particularly about changes/access in to the service. As noted systems to mitigate
would need to be in place supported by staff training.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Yes. The policy will be monitored in line with decision on services.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Page 141

Page 142

Don't Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 561 -HE01 (1) and (2) details potential negative impacts of this proposed service reduction,
and necessary mitigation. The ASB team support all people across West Dunbartonshire which
include all protected groups. These groups and membership is made up of people from equalities
groups; most notably disabled people, older people and women. The suggested reduction's to
service will have a negative impact of a range of protected groups and remove physical response
and support to our most vulnerable residents in terms of ASB, case management and any pending
legal action to remove/control the behaviours of Anti- Social offender's . Option 1 - Reduce ASB
Service by 2 ASB backshift/weekend officers and no longer deal with non WDC tenure cases.
However, retain 6 ASB Officers and 1 Team Leader (4 ASB Officers backshift/weekend shifts, 2 ASB
Officers and Team Leader dayshift). This reduction would have significant impact on service
provision, but enable WDC to continue to provide day/backshift and weekend provision
(backshift/weekend 3pm-2am) for cases whereby there is WDC tenure involvement. However, the
reality of this option being implemented would mean that the ASB service would only deal with
calls if one of the parties involved were a WDC tenant. Option 2 - The reduction from 9 staff
members to 2 will have an significant negative impact on our communities and protected groups.
The impact to affected staff members will undoubtedly be catastrophic both from the employment
loss and financial lose in a time where disposable income is non existent. Further to this, the
knowledge and skill of the affected staff is irreplaceable and our partner agencies can't absorb
this/their skilled work, again this will affect all protected groups and our 90k+ Tenants/Residents
to who we serve if this reduction is adopted and implemented.
Page 142

Page 143

AssessmentNo 567 Owner sbrooks
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment HE Budget
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Stephen Brooks Working4U Manager
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Peter Barry Chief Officer Housing and Employability Ricardo Rea Performance and
Strategy Officer
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function
or financial decision)
Policy Title HE02ab Apprenticeship pathway, Modern Apprenticeship Scheme options
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Reduction of Council investment in the Apprenticeship Pathway: affecting Modern
Apprenticeships, foundation Apprenticeships, in-work progression. The
assessment reviews the comparative impact of reducing the Council’s annual
investment of £250,000 by 20% and reducing the investment to £0.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Working4U delivers the apprenticeship pathway activity. This has contributed to
West Dunbartonshire Council workforce development in a range of Council
services recruitment and training of Modern Apprenticeships. It also has an impact
on Education Services' and their access to the Foundation Apprenticeship scheme
that assists young people to make the transition from school to work. Other
stakeholders include HSCP services such as Care Services that are seeking to
upskill their workforce.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
The Apprenticeship Investment Fund is managed by Working4U and is used as the basis for the
Apprenticeship Pathway. This includes • Modern Apprenticeship Programme - Providing access to
a modern apprenticeship either within the Council or the wider economy; • Foundation
Apprenticeship Programme – support for young people at school to obtain sector specific training;
and • In-work progression (as an alternative approach to adult apprenticeships). Improving
people’s position in the workplace through access to training that could lead to an increase in pay.
Since 2018 the team has supported 407 people. This includes 290 people as Modern Apprentices
or in-work progression (in work training to improve salary or position in the workplace). In
addition in the past two years, the team has supported 118 people through Foundation
Page 143

Page 144

Apprenticeships, allowing school students to develop their understanding of careers and skill
requirements in civil engineering, social care, childcare and business skills. Those affected will be:
• young people in the 15-17 years age group being supported through the Foundation
apprenticeship scheme; • Young people in the 16-24 years age group being supported though the
Modern Apprenticeship programme; • Older workers seeking to improve their skill sets and secure
better jobs with improved terms and conditions (increased salary).
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
The equalities impact assessment has been produced as part of the process for assessing the
potential savings options being explored by the Council. The consultation has included elected
members and senior council officials. The Apprenticeship Pathway is being continually developed
and delivered by the Youth Employability and Literacies Team at Working4U. The Team is
responsible for the development/design and delivery of youth employability service provision the
delivery of contracted ‘National Training Programmes’. The Working4U service manager has
provided the information for the assessment. Further consultation will take place with Council
services that use the Modern Apprenticeship and Foundation Apprenticeship scheme when more
details about the level of investment are available. This will include a range of council departments
(Education, Housing, Building Services) and HSCP service providers.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
West
Dunbartonshire has
a population that has
a higher than
average number of
people with no
qualifications, a
lower employment
rate and the
participation rate for
school leavers is
comparatively lower
than the Scottish
average and the
average in the city
region. The
Apprenticeship
Investment Fund
provides access to
opportunities for
young people to
achieve their career
ambitions by
providing access to
good quality
employment with
associated
qualifications.
Apprentices learn
real-life industry
skills while they
work towards a
There are a number
of key statistics that
demonstrate the
need for investment
in employability
skills development
for young people
through
apprenticeships. •
NOMIS annual
population survey:
No Qualification
Rate of 14.3% in
West
Dunbartonshire.
Almost 4% higher
than the Scottish
Figure. • NOMIS
annual population
survey: Employment
rate (70.6%) almost
3% lower than the
figure for Scotland. •
Scottish Government
Initial School leaver
destination survey:
West
Dunbartonshire has
a figure of 91% for
school leavers
securing a positive
destination. This is
Using a scale from
no impact through,
slight (low impact),
moderate (between
no impact and
severe); serious (not
the worst case, but
extremely
challenging) and
severe (worst case
with significant
negative impact).
Given the scale of
challenges faced in
West
Dunbartonshire, a
20% reduction of
investment in
modern and
foundation
apprenticeships
(reducing the fund
by £50,000 each
year) will have a
negative but
moderate impact on
access to
opportunities for
young people.
Reducing the
contribution to the
improvement of
Page 144

Page 145

qualification that’s
accredited by the
Scottish
Qualifications
Agency.
approximately 4%
lower than the figure
for Scotland.
school leaver
destinations,
improving the
qualifications and
increasing the
employment rate.
Ending support for
the apprenticeship
pathway by reducing
the investment fund
to £0 will have a
severe impact. West
Dunbartonshire will
lose the ability to
influence key
indicators:
qualification levels
and employment
rate, that have an
impact on the
quality of life for
residents. It will
have a negative
effect on the
opportunities
available and will
reduce access to
good quality
employment.
Cross Cutting
Disability
The Council has
committed to
increasing
workforce diversity
in its Equality
Outcomes for 21-25
The work in this
area had a part to
play in supporting
these outcomes
It is possible that
reduction may
negatively impact on
the ability of the
Council to achieve its
equality outcomes
Social & Economic
Impact
West
Dunbartonshire has
a population that has
a higher than
average number of
people with no
qualifications than
the Scottish average
and the average in
the city region. The
Apprenticeship
Investment Fund
provides the
foundation for
providing additional
support that will
provide access to
There are a number
of key statistics that
demonstrate the
need for investment
in employability
skills development
for young people
through
apprenticeships. •
NOMIS annual
population survey:
No Qualification
Rate of 14.3% in
West
Dunbartonshire.
Almost 4% higher
than the Scottish
Using a scale from
no impact through,
slight (low impact),
moderate (between
no impact and
severe); serious (not
the worst case, but
extremely
challenging) and
severe (worst case
with significant
negative impact).
Given the scale of
challenges faced in
West
Dunbartonshire, a
20% reduction of
Page 145

Page 146

opportunities for
people to progress
within the
workplace. They will
achieve this by
securing the
relevant
qualifications
required for
advancement in
their chosen
professions. Those
supported with in-
work progression
learn the industry
skills and work
towards a
qualification within
their workplace
that’s accredited by
the Scottish
Qualifications
Agency. This
includes support to
achieve the required
(mandatory)
qualifications to
work in the care
sector.
Figure. • NOMIS
annual population
survey: Employment
rate (70.6%) almost
3% lower than the
figure for Scotland.
investment in
modern and
foundation
apprenticeships
(reducing the fund
by £50,000 each
year) will have a
negative but
moderate impact on
our ability to
continue with the in-
work progression
for those working in
the care sector.
Reducing the
contribution to
improving the
qualifications and
the development of a
skilled workforce.
Ending support for
the apprenticeship
pathway by reducing
the investment fund
to £0 will have a
severe impact. West
Dunbartonshire will
lose the ability to
influence key
indicators:
qualification levels
that have an impact
on the quality of life
for residents. It will
have a negative
effect on the
opportunities
available; reduce in
work progression
and affect residents
access to
opportunity.
Sex
The Council has
committed to
increasing
workforce diversity,
and reducing gender
segregation in
certain roles in its
Equality Outcomes
for 21-25
The work in this
area had a part to
play in supporting
these outcomes
It is possible that
reduction may
negatively impact on
the ability of the
Council to achieve its
equality outcomes
Gender Reassign
Health
Page 146

Page 147

Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
The Council has
committed to
increasing
workforce diversity
in its Equality
Outcomes for 21-25
The work in this
area had a part to
play in supporting
these outcomes
It is possible that
reduction may
negatively impact on
the ability of the
Council to achieve its
equality outcomes
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The comparison of options has been produced as a direct result of the need to identify potential
savings that will contribute to the Council budget deficit. There will be a negative impact in
applying both reductions: a 20% reduction equivalent to £50,000 reduction each year; or a full
reduction of £250,000 each year with investment in apprenticeships reduced to £0. We have used
a scale from no impact to severe impact to illustrate the impact and as a basis for decision making.
• no impact; • slight (low impact), • moderate (between no impact and severe); • serious (not the
worst case, but extremely challenging); and • severe (worst case with significant negative impact).
The reduction of the apprenticeship investment fund by 20% will be moderate. The team will be
able to continue to deliver support that will support young people to secure opportunities and
older people to achieve in-work progression. The Team, through contracting National Programmes
and prudent use of the annual apprenticeship investment, has levered a further £1.4m into West
Dunbartonshire. This has been used to ensure we have the appropriate expertise to deliver
apprenticeships, manage and deliver training and support and pay for ongoing training and college
costs for the apprentices. Maintaining the Apprenticeship Fund will allow the gains to be
consolidated and continue the leverage of funds to West Dunbartonshire, albeit on a lower scale.
The reduction of the Apprenticeship investment fund to £0 will be severe. The capability and
expertise to support young people into careers and older people’s in-work progression will be lost.
We will not be able to support any activity and as a result West Dunbartonshire workforce
development plans will be seriously affected. In addition the potential for levering in funds through
national programmes will be lost.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
This will depend on the decisions regarding the level of apprenticeship investment that the Council
makes. If the decision is to reduce the investment to £0 there will be no capacity to monitor the
impact.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Modify
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 567; This assessment details impacts of this proposals which forms part of a suite of
reductions to Working4U service provision. The option to reduce the apprenticeship investment
will have a substantial negative impact on the Council’s ability to provide support for young people
making the transition from school to work. It may also negative effect progress on the Councils
Equality Outcomes for 21-25. Of the options identified the preferred option would be to reduce the
investment fund by 20%, saving £50,000 each year. Although this also has a negative effect on the
Council’s ability to support young people, the effect is much less profound.
Page 147

Page 148

AssessmentNo 569 Owner LPENNYCOOK
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget Ed
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Kathy Morrison Senior Education Officer
(include job titles/organisation)
Members
Laura Mason - Chief Education Officer Julie McGrogan - Senior Education
Officer Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer Claire Cusick - Senior
Education Officer Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title EDU-03 Reduce Learning Assistants
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
This reduction represents three Learning Assistant posts, allocated in
addition to centrally allocated learning assistants at our Early Learning
and Childcare Centres (ELCC). Deletion of the additional posts would limit
capacity to provide additional support where required. A reduction in
hours of Learning Assistant at ELCC will impact targeted support provided
to children with additional support needs/learning requirements. There is
one vacant post and two posts contracted to June 2023 (the vacancy will
not be filled). Both posts are allocated for additional support for children
with significant needs.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
HT/HOC’s, HR, TU’s, Finance Officers and Education staff.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Decisions taken will impact on services to children and young people and on staff who
deliver these services. A reduction in hours of Learning Assistant at ELCC will impact
targeted support provided to children with additional support needs/learning
requirements.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
These are temporary posts which are allocated on a needs basis to our ELCC on a school
sessional basis. The posts are fixed term contracts which would not be renewed.
Consultation with HT/HOC's, HR, TUs, Finance and staff involved.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there
is any negative impact on particular groups.
Page 148

Page 149

Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Cross Cutting
Disability
The Council had a
duty to make its
services accessible
to disabled people,
including pupils.
This is an
anticipatory duty.
We must seek to
mitigate any
negative impacts.
ASN support is
provided to pupils
some of whom are
disabled in terms of
the Equality Act
2010.
Reduction may
negatively impact on
disabled pupils and
their families.
Social & Economic
Impact
The numbers of
children with
additional support
needs and the
complexity of their
needs has increased
at ELC. Some
children are
adversely impacted
by poverty. The
nature of support
required for children
has intensified and
requires more
continuous and long
term interventions.
The most effective
supports are based
on those supported
by significant
relationships with a
key adult.
Positive Impact
Reduction in staff
costs. Negative
Impact Learning
assistants are almost
all women who are
unqualified workers,
often working in two
jobs to support their
own children and
families. Therefore,
this reduction would
impact those who
are in one of the
lowest paid groups
of workers in the
Council. There will
be less staff available
to support children
with additional
support needs.
Sex Need to assess
differential impacts
There are more
female than male
learning assistants.
Women are more
likely to be
negatively impacted
by the reduction in
posts.
Gender Reassign
Health
Human Rights
UNCRC The numbers
of children with
additional support
needs and the
complexity of their
needs has increased
at ELC. Some
children are
adversely impacted
by poverty. The
nature of support
Negative Impact
Learning assistants
are almost all
women who are
unqualified workers,
often working in two
jobs to support their
own children and
families. Therefore,
this reduction would
impact those who
Page 149

Page 150

required for children
has intensified and
requires more
continuous and long
term interventions.
The most effective
supports are based
on those supported
by significant
relationships with a
key adult.
are in one of the
lowest paid groups
of workers in the
Council. There will
be less staff available
to support children
with additional
support needs.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented,
please provide justification for this.
As above.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
We will monitor impact by consulting staff involved. HR monitoring of the demographic of
staff potentially affected. Monitoring will be carried out on a termly basis.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the
recommendation
EIA 569 details impact: These are temporary posts which are allocated on a needs basis to
our ELCC on a school sessional basis. The posts are fixed term contracts which would not
be renewed. Research has been carried out in consultation with the following: GIRFEC
Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014 Recommendations UNCRC Best Start:
Strategic early learning and childcare plan for Scotland 2022-26 A key outcome of the Best
Start Plan is children’s development improves and the poverty related outcome gap
narrows.
Page 150

Page 151

AssessmentNo 578 Owner sbrooks
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment HE Budget
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Stephen Brooks Working4U Manager
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Peter Barry Chief Officer Housing and Employability
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function
or financial decision)
Policy Title HE07ab Assessment of impact reduction to W4U of 8% or 25%
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Consider the impact on services as a result of reduction in budget income by 8%
and by 25%
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Elected Members, Senior WDC Staff, senior W4U staff
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Staff, service users Working 4U seeks to address the underlying causes of poverty, as well as the
symptoms, by specifically tackling unemployment, providing opportunities to increase levels of
education, skills, confidence and personal development as well support to claim in and out of work
benefits and manage debt. The specialist components of Working 4U’s services are: Learning and
Development that supports disadvantaged or vulnerable groups and individuals of all ages to
engage in learning. This covers a range of activity, such as youth work, family and adult learning,
including adult literacy and English for Speakers of Other languages (ESOL) and community
development and capacity building. Working 4U’s focus is on youth work and family and adult
learning. Employability encompasses all the things that enable people to improve their quality of
life by increasing their chances of getting a job, staying in a job, and progressing further in work.
The focus of our work is placed on supporting those that are facing the most intense levels of
disadvantage, including families most likely to be affected by child poverty, young people, older
workers, long-term unemployed and people from equalities groups. Benefit /debt Information and
Advice National standards state that all debt counselling, income maximisation support, money
advice and welfare benefit advice services service providers must be committed to providing
equity of access to services for all. We provide a service that is open to all; however, given the
socio/economic circumstances we prioritise people who are most vulnerable to disadvantage. In
our service delivery we will place emphasis on supporting people facing difficult life transitions,
Page 151

Page 152

including, for example: • Those with life limiting conditions; • People affected by mental health
issues; • Those affected by drug and alcohol mis-use; • Those affected by housing and
homelessness • Newly unemployed and retired. In addition, we place emphasis on supporting
families with children who are more susceptible to poverty and disadvantage, including families
with children: • where the mother is under 25 years of age; • larger families; • minority ethnic
households; • lone parent families; • families with children under 1 year old. • Families and
children with experience of the care system; • Children with caring responsibilities; and • Those
living in areas of high material deprivation.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Consultation has been carried out in the context of the budget review. This has included
consultation among Elected Members, senior Council staff and managers at Working4U.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Needs Evidence Impact
Age Child poverty is
focus for the Council
High child poverty in
WDC 18-30 year
olds are
experiencing
particular economic
strain
Reduced may result
in negative impacts
for children and
young people
Cross Cutting
Working4U seeks to
improve the quality
of lives for people
from disadvantaged
backgrounds who
are most likely to be
affected by
inequality, poverty
and disadvantage
which is driven by
structural or
institutional factors.
These factors
include: • Income
from social security
and benefits in kind,
influenced by: o
design and
generosity of
welfare benefits; o
benefit sanctions
and recovery of
advance payments; o
hardship payments
and third-party
debts; o barriers to
accessing financial
support (including
child maintenance).
•Income from
employment,
influenced by the
The key drivers of
poverty identified in
the legislation
include income
levels and the cost of
living. Income is
determined, to an
extent, by levels of
economic activity
and employment.
While there are
many sources of
labour market
information,
examples provided
by NOMIS (Office for
National Statistics
Labour Market
Profile - Nomis -
Official Census and
Labour Market
Statistics
(nomisweb.co.uk))
will illustrate West
Dunbartonshire’s
comparative labour
market profile to
suggest the need for
targeted
employability
support.
Employment and
There are two
options for
consideration. Both
of these option focus
on staff costs. •
Option 1 Reducing
internal costs by 8%;
•Option 2 Reducing
internal costs by
25%. Option 1:
Reducing internal
staff costs by 8%
The value of staff
costs that are funded
through the
Council’s core
budget is
approximately
£2.29m. Reduction
of Working4U
service by 8% will
have a value of
£183,351. This will
affect approximately
4.5 members of staff
all of whom will, by
necessity of our
funding sources,
come from either
our Community
Learning and
Development team
Page 152

Page 153

availability of jobs,
hours and the level
of earnings, and
barriers to taking up
that work, such as
childcare
responsibilities; plus
qualifications and
skills, which can
influence both
contemporary and
future child poverty.
• Costs of living,
including housing,
food and fuel costs,
the poverty
premium, the costs
of the school day,
and the extra,
unavoidable costs of
disability or living in
a rural area. We
provide support
because: • People
don’t always claim
the benefits they are
entitled to; • The
benefits system is
difficult to
understand; •
Navigating the
process without
assistance can lead
to errors; • Appeals
without help can
lead to wrong
decisions; •
Understanding
welfare reform is
difficult. • People
face physical and
psychological
barriers to
employment and
learning
opportunities
because of personal
circumstances and
professional support
will help people to
overcome these
barriers. • Its
difficult to maintain
Economic Activity:
West
Dunbartonshire has
a comparatively
higher rate of
economic inactivity
with 26.2% of the
16-64 years age
group in
employment. The
comparative figure
for Scotland is
23.8% and Great
Britain’s figure is
21.6%. At 19%, West
Dunbartonshire has
a higher proportion
of workless
households than
both Scotland
(18.1%) and Great
Britain (13.6%). Of
those in
employment, there
is a higher
proportion in West
Dunbartonshire
reliant on part-time
work (35.5%). This
is higher than the
figure for Scotland
(33.2%) and Great
Britain (32.1%). A
review of the NOMIS
statistics reveals
that the job density
in West
Dunbartonshire is
estimated at 0.61;
this is much lower
than the figure for
Glasgow (1.04);
Scotland (0.80) and
Great Britain (0.84).
In effect, although
there are
comparatively
higher numbers of
people out of work,
there are also
comparatively fewer
opportunities
available in West
or our welfare
benefits/debt team
or a combination of
both. This will have
an impact on both
team’s ability to
meet growing
demand for their
services and will
create further
challenges for the
teams. This is
particularly the case
for
benefit/advice/debt
team who are
experiencing higher
levels of demand
from increasing
numbers of people
with a growing
complexity of
concerns related to
the cost of living
crisis. A reduction of
4.5 ftes in Welfare
Rights is equivalent
to a 20% reduction
of this team. Leading
to lower level of
benefit
maximisation and
debt management
activity (including
housing and council
tax arrears). This
will lead to
continuing levels of
disadvantage and
greater demand on
crisis support
services. The welfare
rights team has, on
average each year,
supported residents
to maximise benefit
income with a value
of £7.2m and
managed debt
£2.4m: 8% reduction
equivalent to 20% of
the team will lead to
a loss of £1.4m in
Page 153

Page 154

jobsearch
momentum and
participating in
learning without
professional, expert
support.
Dunbartonshire.
Addressing
unemployment and
underemployment is
consistent with
addressing the
income drivers of
poverty and will
therefore feature
extensively in our
approach to
addressing child
poverty. Benefits
The number of
people in receipt of
out of work benefits
is a contributory
factor to the level of
child poverty. In
West
Dunbartonshire
4.5% of the
population in the 16-
64 years group is in
receipt of out of
work benefits. This
is higher than the
average in Scotland
(3.2%) and Great
Britain (3.8%) and
represents 2,525
people. 18.4% of
households in West
Dunbartonshire are
in receipt of the
main benefits. This
compares
unfavourably with
the figure for
Scotland (13%) and
Great Britain (11%) .
In effect,
comparatively more
people in West
Dunbartonshire rely
on benefits for their
income. Maximising
their entitlement
will feature strongly
in our approach to
maximising income
annual income for
most disadvantaged
residents and
reduction in
managing debt of
approx. £480,000 A
reduction of 4.5 ftes
in Community
Learning will be the
equivalent of a 20%
reduction of the
team (youth/adult
literacies, youth
diversionary
activities, summer
programmes). The
result will be a
decrease in adult
literacy support and
youth diversionary
activities, school
holiday programmes
and youth
representation. This
savings option will
place more pressure
on schools, police
and other services to
address the absence
of these services.
The teams have
contributed to 993
people entering
education or
training; and 457
people gaining a
qualification. 20%
reduction will lead
to fewer people
securing access to
learning
opportunities (200
fewer); and 90 fewer
people securing a
qualification. Option
2: Reducing internal
staff costs by 25%
Reduction of
Working4U service
by 25% will
generate a potential
saving value of
£572,971. This will
Page 154

Page 155

affect 18.3 FTE. All
of whom will, by
necessity of our
funding sources,
come from either
our Community
Learning and
Development Team
or our Welfare
Benefits/Debt Team
or a combination of
both. The effect of
this level of saving
on both welfare
rights and
community learning
would be significant.
18.3fte is equivalent
to 75% of the staff in
each team. This
represents a
substantial
reduction in the
teams’ activity and
will have a
significant impact on
the lives of those
people that W4U
targets for support.
For example, this
would lead to a
reduction of income
generated for the
most disadvantage
in West
Dunbartonshire by
£5.4million each
year. The number
gaining
qualifications would
be reduced 342
people and the
number entering
education and/or
training would
reduce by 342
people. The table
below provides a
summary of the
comparative
reduction in
productivity
associated with 8%
Page 155

Page 156

and 25% reduction
in budget. Total
Value (£) of Income
Generated:
£7.2million (8%)
£1.4m (loss) (25%)
£5.4m (loss) Value
(£) of new debt
managed: £2.49m
(8%) £0.48m (loss)
(25%) £1.86m (loss)
Number entering
education or
training 993 (8%)
198 (fewer)
(25%)744 (fewer)
Number gaining a
full qualification 457
91 (fewer) (25%)
342 (fewer) *8%
reduction is
equivalent to 20% of
the staff
complement in
teams likely to be
affected **25% is
equivalent to 75% of
the staff
complement in
teams likely to be
affected Sharing the
reduction between
both teams will
reduce the impact.
However in both
cases it will have an
impact on the
services ability to
maintain the current
level of service
provision at a time
when demand from
the most
disadvantaged
people in West
Dunbartonshire is
intensifying.
Disability
Our child poverty
report notes
disabled people as
priority group
Disabled people and
those living in a
household with a
disabled person are
more likely to be
income deprived
Reduced provision
may affect efforts to
reduce poverty for
this group
Page 156

Page 157

Social & Economic
Impact
Reducing child
poverty is a focus for
the council
Groups noted above
may be especially
vulnerable, as well
as other with low
incomes
Reduced provision
may result in
reduced ability to
tackle economic and
financial inequality
Sex
Our child poverty
report notes women
people as priority
group
Women comprise
90% of single
parents who are
more likely to be
income deprived
Reduced provision
may affect women
disproportionately
compared to men
Gender Reassign
Health
Human Rights
Human Rights Act;
For example Article
8 family life UNCRC
(Best practice)
The work of W4U
supports elements of
human rights
Reduced provision
may negatively
affect the fulfillment
of rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity Cross cuts with sex Cross cuts with sex Cross cuts with Sex
Race
Our child poverty
report notes people
from BME groups as
a priority group
People from BME
groups more likely
to me more income
deprived
Reduced provision
may affect efforts to
reduce poverty for
this group
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The options have been generated as a contribution to the discussions about budget reductions
within Working4U in order to assist the Council to manage its budget deficit.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Working4U has a monitoring framework for reporting output and impacts of its activities. This
includes key performance indicators illustrating the statistics for the number of people supported
and the outcome of that support. This will provide information that will determine how funding
resources are deployed.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Modify
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
Assessment 578 provides information about the impact of a budget reduction of 8% and 25% for
Working4U. The information will be used as part of the option assessment. A 25% reduction will
have a substantial impact on service provision affecting the most vulnerable households in West
Dunbartonshire. While an 8% reduction has less of an impact it should be considered in light of
changes within other funding sources that Working4U currently has available. Reductions in
European Funding and No One Left Behind Funding, which have yet to be decided, will have a
further negative impact beyond the savings required by the Council. Reductions show potential
negative impacts for some groups in particular women, disabled people, children people from BME
Groups.
Page 157

Page 158

AssessmentNo 579 Owner sbrooks
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment HE Budget
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Stephen Brooks Working4U Manager
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Peter Barry
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function or
financial decision)
Policy Title HE08d Assessment of impact - WDCAB
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
The aim is to assess the impact on services by contributing to reduction of Council
budget deficit by reducing service costs in a range between 25% and 90%. WD CAB
currently receives £349,137 each year from West Dunbartonshire Council to deliver
services that complement existing services provided by West Dunbartonshire
Council
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Senior Council staff and elected members have been involved in the development of
the assessment.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
West Dunbartonshire CAB delivers a proactive, accessible, independent, customer-focused advice
service for residents of West Dunbartonshire. This includes the provision of Welfare Rights, Money
Advice and Debt Advice and support for the submission of benefits applications and appeals, where
appropriate. The service provided is not restricted to those elements in and may also include
assistance to clients in other areas of expertise where there is a benefit to them. This includes, for
example, employment, housing or consumer rights, whilst taking into account the need to minimise
duplication in advice provision in West Dunbartonshire. The service is open to anyone seeking
support and is provided locally, in communities and within locations that effectively meet the needs
of residents in West Dunbartonshire. West Dunbartonshire CAB adopts a flexible and collaborative
service which includes out-of-hours, home visits and outreach provision as appropriate.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Senior staff and Elected Members at West Dunbartonshire Council have been involved in the
consultation process.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
Page 158

Page 159

this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Cross Cutting
WDCAB from
disadvantaged
backgrounds who
are most likely to be
affected by
inequality, poverty
and disadvantage
which is driven by
structural or
institutional factors.
These factors
include lack of
information about: •
Income from social
security and benefits
in kind, influenced
by: o design and
generosity of
welfare benefits; o
benefit sanctions
and recovery of
advance payments; o
hardship payments
and third-party
debts; o barriers to
accessing financial
support (including
child maintenance).
• Costs of living,
including housing,
food and fuel costs,
the poverty
premium, the costs
of the school day,
and the extra,
unavoidable costs of
disability. • People
are unaware of their
employment rights
WDCAB provide
support because: •
People don’t always
claim the benefits
they are entitled to;
• The benefits
system is difficult to
understand; •
Navigating the
process without
The key drivers of
poverty identified in
the legislation
include income
levels and the cost of
living. Income is
determined, to an
extent, by levels of
economic activity
and employment.
While there are
many sources of
labour market
information,
examples provided
by NOMIS (Office for
National Statistics
Labour Market
Profile - Nomis -
Official Census and
Labour Market
Statistics
(nomisweb.co.uk))
will illustrate West
Dunbartonshire’s
comparative labour
market profile to
suggest the need for
targeted
employability
support.
Employment and
Economic Activity:
West
Dunbartonshire has
a comparatively
higher rate of
economic inactivity
with 26.2% of the
16-64 years age
group in
employment. The
comparative figure
for Scotland is
23.8% and Great
Britain’s figure is
21.6%. At 19%, West
Dunbartonshire has
a higher proportion
There are four
options for
consideration. These
options focus on a
reduction in the
level of grant
provided by the
Council and the
impact this will have
on the services and
impact of those
services to residents
of West
Dunbartonshire. WD
CAB receives
£349,137 each year
from West
Dunbartonshire
Council. • Option 1
Reducing grant by
25% (£87,284) –
remaining grant
£261,853. • Option 2
Reducing internal
costs by 50%
(£174,569) –
Remaining grant
£174,569. • Option 3
Reducing grant by
75% (£261,853)
Remaining Grant
£87,284. • Option 4
reducing the grant
by 90% (£314,223)
Remaining Grant
£34,914. Note:
WDCAB receives
funding from other
sources (£219,000
from Citizens Advice
Scotland). As such,
WDCAB is not totally
reliant on the
Council for funding.
WDCAB has a
number of key
performance
indicators reflecting
the activities that are
Page 159

Page 160

assistance can lead
to errors; • Appeals
without help can
lead to wrong
decisions; •
Understanding
welfare reform is
difficult.
of workless
households than
both Scotland
(18.1%) and Great
Britain (13.6%). Of
those in
employment, there
is a higher
proportion in West
Dunbartonshire
reliant on part-time
work (35.5%). This
is higher than the
figure for Scotland
(33.2%) and Great
Britain (32.1%). A
review of the NOMIS
statistics reveals
that the job density
in West
Dunbartonshire is
estimated at 0.61;
this is much lower
than the figure for
Glasgow (1.04);
Scotland (0.80) and
Great Britain (0.84).
In effect, although
there are
comparatively
higher numbers of
people out of work,
there are also
comparatively fewer
opportunities
available in West
Dunbartonshire.
Addressing
unemployment and
underemployment is
consistent with
addressing the
income drivers of
poverty and will
therefore feature
extensively in our
approach to
addressing child
poverty. Benefits
The number of
people in receipt of
out of work benefits
is a contributory
delivered through
the use of the funds
provided by the
Council. These
indictors will be
reduced in
proportion to
reduction of funds.
These indicators
include: • Number of
people receiving
support (4,300) •
Value of income
generated
(£750,000) • Total
value of reduced
liability to debt
(£425,000) •
Number establishing
a debt strategy (85)
•Number advised
with housing issues
(770 ) • Number
provided with
consumer rights
issues (250) •
Number provided
with employment
rights issues (800) •
Number supported
with advice on
energy issues (600)
Option 1 reducing
WD Council grant by
25% (£87,000
reduction). Taking
into account other
funding WDCAB
receives we estimate
a reduction in
performance
indicators to be: •
Number of people
receiving support
(4,300) reduced to
3,639. • Value of
income generated
(£750,000) reduced
to £634,000 • Total
value of reduced
liability to debt
(£425,000) reduced
to £359,000 •
Page 160

Page 161

factor to the level of
child poverty. In
West
Dunbartonshire
4.5% of the
population in the 16-
64 years group is in
receipt of out of
work benefits. This
is higher than the
average in Scotland
(3.2%) and Great
Britain (3.8%) and
represents 2,525
people. 18.4% of
households in West
Dunbartonshire are
in receipt of the
main benefits. This
compares
unfavourably with
the figure for
Scotland (13%) and
Great Britain (11%)..
In effect,
comparatively more
people in West
Dunbartonshire rely
on benefits for their
income. Maximising
their entitlement
will feature strongly
in our approach to
maximising income
Number establishing
a debt strategy (85)
reduced to 72 •
Number advised
with housing issues
(770 )reduced to
652 • Number
provided with
consumer rights
issues (250) reduced
to 212 • Number
provided with
employment rights
issues (800) reduced
to 677 • Number
supported with
advice on energy
issues (600) reduced
to 508 Option 2
reducing WD Council
grant by 50%
(£174,659
reduction). Taking
into account other
funding WDCAB
receives we estimate
a reduction in
performance
indicators to be: •
Number of people
receiving support
(4,300) reduced to
2,900. • Value of
income generated
(£750,000) reduced
to £519,000 • Total
value of reduced
liability to debt
(£425,000) reduced
to £290,000 •
Number establishing
a debt strategy (85)
reduced to 59 •
Number advised
with housing issues
(770 )reduced to
533 • Number
provided with
consumer rights
issues (250) reduced
to 173 • Number
provided with
employment rights
Page 161

Page 162

issues (800) reduced
to 554 • Number
supported with
advice on energy
issues (600) reduced
to 416 Option 3
reducing WD Council
grant by 75%
(£261,853
reduction). Taking
into account other
funding WDCAB
receives we estimate
a reduction in
performance
indicators to be: •
Number of people
receiving support
(4,300) reduced to
2,300. • Value of
income generated
(£750,000) reduced
to £400,000 • Total
value of reduced
liability to debt
(£425,000) reduced
to £230,000 •
Number establishing
a debt strategy (85)
reduced to 46 •
Number advised
with housing issues
(770 )reduced to
415 • Number
provided with
consumer rights
issues (250) reduced
to 135 • Number
provided with
employment rights
issues (800) reduced
to 431 • Number
supported with
advice on energy
issues (600) reduced
to 323 Option 3
reducing WD Council
grant by 75%
(£314,223
reduction). Taking
into account other
funding WDCAB
receives we estimate
Page 162

Page 163

a reduction in
performance
indicators to be: •
Number of people
receiving support
(4,300) reduced to
1,900. • Value of
income generated
(£750,000) reduced
to £335,000 • Total
value of reduced
liability to debt
(£425,000) reduced
to £190,000 •
Number establishing
a debt strategy (85)
reduced to 38 •
Number advised
with housing issues
(770 )reduced to
344 • Number
provided with
consumer rights
issues (250) reduced
to 112 • Number
provided with
employment rights
issues (800) reduced
to 358 • Number
supported with
advice on energy
issues (600) reduced
to 268 Note: The
figures provided are
estimates based on
WD Council funding
reduction while
other funds remain
in place. All options
will lead to a
reduction in the
number of people
from disadvantaged
communities and
families receiving
support. The 90%
reduction option
resulting in a 65%
reduction in the
support available
through CAB
services.
Disability Our child poverty Disabled people and Reduced provision
Page 163

Page 164

report notes
disabled people as a
priority group
those living in a
household with a
disabled person are
more likely to be
income deprived
may affect efforts to
reduce poverty for
this group
Social & Economic
Impact
Reducing child
poverty is a focus for
the council
Groups noted above
may be especially
vulnerable, as well
as other with low
incomes
Reduced provision
may result in
reduced ability to
tackle economic and
financial inequality
Sex
Our child poverty
report notes
women/lone
parents groups as a
priority group
Women are more
likely to be income
deprived than men.
90% of single
parents.
Reduced provision
may affect efforts to
reduce poverty for
this group
Gender Reassign
Health
Human Rights
Human Rights Act;
For example Article
8 family life UNCRC
(Best practice)
The work of WD CAB
supports elements of
human rights
Reduced provision
may negatively
affect the fulfilment
of rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Our child poverty
report notes people
from BME groups as
a priority group
People from BME
groups more likely
to me more income
deprived
Reduced provision
may affect efforts to
reduce poverty for
this group
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The Council has a substantial budget deficit and is seeking and assessing options that will contribute
to reducing the gap. Assessment of grant support to external service providers is a necessary part of
that process.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Working4U maintains a set of performance indicators for all funded projects that are reported to the
Council and COSLA (Improvement Service). The statistics will reflect changing funding levels.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Modify
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 579: The equality impact assessment provides an overview of the differing impacts of a range of
options from 25% to 90%. The choice of option will be based on the scale of budget gap and the
range of contributions from other sources.
Page 164

Page 165

AssessmentNo 580 Owner sbrooks
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment HE Budget
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Stephen Brooks Working4U Manager
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Peter Barry
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function
or financial decision)
Policy Title HE08e Assessment of impact - Y-sort-it
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
The aim is to assess the impact on services by contributing to reduction of Council
budget deficit by reducing service costs in a range between 25% and 90%. Y-sortit
currently receives £156,124 to deliver services that complement existing services
provided by West Dunbartonshire Council (Working4U) youth teams.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Senior staff at West Dunbartonshire Council and elected members.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Y Sort-It delivers a young person led service, providing opportunities for young people and inspiring
them to reach their full potential. This is a youth friendly social space for young people facilitating
access to youth group activities and learning opportunities. This includes a weekly programme of
support groups, group work sessions in the Y Sort-It Youth Centre and other relevant outreach
locations. The service will be open access and available to any young person aged 5–25 years and a
resident within West Dunbartonshire. However, to meet the varying needs of young people living in
West Dunbartonshire consideration will be given to those people who are harder to reach, to ensure
that they have equal opportunity of access. This will include specific provision for those that are the
following: • LGBT Youth; • Those at risk or vulnerable to anti-social behaviour or organised crime; •
Young Carers / Young Adult Carers; • Looked after Care Experienced young people; • Those at risk
or vulnerable to substance misuse.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Page 165

Page 166

Needs Evidence Impact
Age
While the majority
of children and
young people in
West
Dunbartonshire are:
happy in their
homes; enjoy
friendship; and are
actively engaged in
sport, culture and
recreation; progress
at school; have good
health and self-
esteem; and are
civically engaged,
there are others who
are less well
connected. However,
this is not the case
for all young people
in West
Dunbartonshire
where some young
people living are
facing challenges
because of their
circumstances and
experience of
poverty and
disadvantage. Youth
Engagement
services, that
includes input from
Y-Sort-it will
contribute towards
addressing those
challenges within
West
Dunbartonshire
communities, with
specific emphasis
placed on
supporting those
that may be more
vulnerable to
disadvantage. In
order to do so there
is a need to engage
with young people
and develop services
that meet their
needs. This includes
In 2020, 15,484 of
the population
(88,340) were
children between
the age of 0 and 15
years. 12,433
children were
attending school: •
6,658 pupils in the
32 primary schools
in West
Dunbartonshire. •
5,548 pupils in the
five secondary
schools in West
Dunbartonshire. •
227 pupils in the
three special need
schools in West
Dunbartonshire. Of
these 3,549 are
considered to be
living in households
affected by poverty.
This represents
23.4% of the
population in the 0-
16 year’s age group.
This is 3%age points
higher than the
average in Scotland.
In 2021, there was
334 ‘looked after’
children. In addition,
statistics provided
by Skills
Development
Scotland show that
the proportion of
school leavers in a
positive destination
in West
Dunbartonshire
(91%) is lower than
the equivalent
proportion for our
neighbours in the
Greater Glasgow and
Clyde NHS (GGandC
NHS) area (95.8%)
and Scotland
(95.5%). Similarly
Y-sortit receives
£156,124 to deliver
services that
complement existing
services provided by
West
Dunbartonshire
Council
(Working4U) youth
teams. Y-sortit
receives funding
from other sources
and has reserve
funds which are
reported in the
organisations annual
accounts.
Nevertheless, the
options for reducing
grant funds in a
range between 25%
and 90% will have a
negative effect on
their ability to
deliver services.
25% reduction has a
value of £39,000.
This will have a low
impact and will
require some
consideration of the
priorities that
organisation’s focus
and activities
delivered on behalf
of the Council. 50%
reduction has a
value of £76,062.
This will have a low
to medium impact
and will require
consideration of
priorities and the
reduction of
activities delivered
on behalf of the
Council. 75%
reduction has a
value of £117,000.
This will have a
medium to high
impact and will
Page 166

Page 167

the need for support
to remain active and
healthy; enjoying
economic
opportunity and
security and being
connected,
respected and able
to contribute to their
communities.
the participation
rate in West
Dunbartonshire
(90.8%) compares
unfavourably with
the GGandC NHS
area (92.4%) and
Scotland (92.2%).
Furthermore, 7.2%
of the population in
the 16- 25 years age
group are claiming
out of work benefits.
This compares
unfavourably with
Scotland, where the
figure is 4.6% and
Great Britain with a
figure 4.8%.
require
consideration of
priorities and a
significant reduction
in activity delivered
on behalf of the
Council. This will
include the
requirement for co-
ordination with
WDC and HSCP with
Working4U taking
on some of the
activities. 90%
reduction will have a
high impact and will
require a review of
activities, co-
ordination of
priorities and an
assessment to
identify which of the
activities could be
taken on by
Working4U and
youth alliance
partners.
Cross Cutting
There is a need to
recognise that young
people who access
youth services often
have compounded
barriers or
obstacles.
Scottish Health
Survey (2012/13)
http://www.gov.sco
t/Publications/2016
/09/2408 Carers
Trust Scotland
(2015) Time to be
Heard for Young
Adult Carers Scottish
Government (2015)
Scotland's Carers
Understanding the
impact on young
people in this
respect should be
understood in
reference to the
intersectionality of
challenges they face.
Disability
Social & Economic
Impact
West
Dunbartonshire has
one of the highest
proportion of young
carers by local
authority area.
Higher proportions
of young people
have caring
responsibilities in
areas of higher
deprivation and
lower income.
Research tells us
Scotland's 2011
Census data
Removal of funding
for an organisation
that provides
support to young
people may have an
adverse impact on
their economic
wellbeing
particularly if no
other supports are
available.
Page 167

Page 168

that young carers
are more common in
families with
unemployed parents
or low incomes. This
is cross cutting with
other areas such as
LGBT and
homelessness
Sex
Gender Reassign
Creation of places
where LGBTQ+
groups can safely
socialise and be
open about their
sexual orientation
and gender identity.
LGBT young people
in particular are at a
higher risk of
increased
homelessness and
domestic abuse.
Stonewall Scotland's
report highlighted
that LGBT people are
vulnerable to and at
increased risk of
homelessness,
highlighting that
almost one in five
LGBT people (18%)
have experienced
homelessness at
some point in their
lives. A Report by
Scottish Alliance for
Children's Rights
notes LGBT children
and young people
may be significantly
disadvantaged in
accessing adequate
play, leisure and
culture
opportunities. This
is cross cutting with
sexual orientation
Removal of funding
for an organisation
that provides
support to young
LGBT people may
have an adverse
impact on their
wellbeing
particularly if no
other supports are
available. How
support for LGBT
young people is
delivered would
need to be assessed
to ensure it still
delivers maximum
positive impact.
Health
There are an
estimated 800,000
unpaid carers in
Scotland this
includes 30,000
young carers under
the age of 18.
Research
undertaken by
Carers Trust reports
that 45% of young
carers and young
adult carers aged 14-
25 surveyed stated
that they have or
have had mental
health problems.
Mental health and
Scottish Health
Survey (2012/13)
http://www.gov.sco
t/Publications/2016
/09/2408 Carers
Trust Scotland
(2015) Time to be
Heard for Young
Adult Carers Scottish
Government (2015)
Scotland's Carers
https://www.stone
wall.org.uk/experien
ces-lgbtq-children-
and-young-people
https://www.gov.sc
ot/binaries/content
/documents/govscot
Removal of funding
for an organisation
that provides
support to young
people including
young carers and
young LGBT people
may have an adverse
impact on their
wellbeing
particularly if no
other supports are
available. How
support for carers is
delivered would
need to be assessed
to ensure it still
delivers maximum
Page 168

Page 169

wellbeing LGBTQ+
children and young
people experience
particularly high
rates of poor mental
health. More than
one in five LGB
young people and
more than two in
five trans young
people have
attempted to take
their own life. One in
three non-binary
young people and
nearly half of
disabled LGBT
young people have
tried to take their
own life. Health is
cross cutting with
other areas such as
sexual orientation
and gender
reassignment
/publications/statist
ics/2019/11/scottis
h-schools-
adolescent-lifestyle-
substance-use-
survey-salsus-
national-overview-
2018/documents/su
mmary-findings-
west-
dunbartonshire-
council/summary-
findings-west-
dunbartonshire-
council/govscot%3A
document/summary
-findings-west-
dunbartonshire-
council.pdf
positive impact.
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Creation of places
where LGBTQ+
groups can safely
socialise and be
open about their
sexual orientation
and gender identity.
LGBT young people
in particular are at a
higher risk of
increased
homelessness and
domestic abuse. This
is cross cutting with
gender
reassignment
Stonewall Scotland's
report highlighted
that LGBT people are
vulnerable to and at
increased risk of
homelessness,
highlighting that
almost one in five
LGBT people (18%)
have experienced
homelessness at
some point in their
lives. A Report by
Scottish Alliance for
Children's Rights
notes LGBT children
and young people
may be significantly
disadvantaged in
accessing adequate
play, leisure and
Removal of funding
for an organisation
that provides
support to young
LGBT people may
have an adverse
impact on their
wellbeing
particularly if no
other supports are
available. How
support for LGBT
young people is
delivered would
need to be assessed
to ensure it still
delivers maximum
positive impact. This
is cross cutting with
gender
reassignment
Page 169

Page 170

culture
opportunities. This
is cross cutting with
gender
reassignment
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The Council has a substantial budget deficit and is seeking and assessing options that will contribute
to reducing the gap. Assessment of grant support to external service providers is a necessary part of
that process.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Working4U will continue to deliver Youth services. The impact of the reduced input for Ysort it will
be monitored and reported on through the various lines of accountability for the Community
learning and Development plan
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Modify
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 580: The equality impact assessment provides an overview of the differing impacts of a range of
options from 25% to 90%. The choice of option will be based on the scale of budget gap and the
range of contributions to the budget gap from other sources.
Page 170

Page 171

AssessmentNo 588 Owner cenglish
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment HE Budget
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Clare English Communities Manager
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Clare English - Communities Manager Stephen Brooks - W4U Manager
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function
or financial decision)
Policy Title HE04bc Communities Team reduced by 50% or Restructure W4U YL CT and CPP
Support
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Reduction in costs related to Communities Team staffing. The assessment reviews
the comparative impact of reducing the Communities Team by 50% and
restructuring the team to merge with Working4U Youth learning and include the
CPP Support function.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Communities, Working4U and associated HR and Business Partners
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Communities Team – 21 Staff; W4U Youth Learning Team – 19 staff; dependant on savings option
selected. Communities across West Dunbartonshire.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
The equalities impact assessment has been produced as part of the process for assessing the
potential savings options being explored by the Council. The consultation has included elected
members and senior council officials
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
CLD services are
targeted at children,
young people and
adults who are
experiencing
27.4% of children
across West
Dunbartonshire are
living with poverty.
Children born into
50% reduction -
reduction in staff
therefore potential
negative impact on
older members of
Page 171

Page 172

disadvantage
accessing services
and often have
limited resources.
This includes lone
parents, disengaged
young people, and
people with limited
qualifications. pre-
pandemic WD had
higher levels of
youth
unemployment than
Scotland.
poverty are more
likely to experience
mental health
problems. The
evidence from the
pandemic economic
impacts to date
shows that young
people (aged 16-24
years) have been
disproportionately
affected. All Age UK
have noted that
there has not been
as big an upsurge in
the use of digital
technology among
older people since
2020 as is assumed
by some.
staff 50% reduction -
Community impact
negative, reduction
in support for age
focused groups and
interventions
Restructure Staff
impact - reduction in
staff therefore
potential negative
impact on older
members of staff
Restructure
Community impact -
limited or no impact
Cross Cutting
Intersectionality and
multiple
discrimination need
to be taken into
account. Need to
progress Councils
equality outcomes
and aspirations.
Need to support
Council BSL action
plan.
WD has higher than
Scottish and UK
levels of deprivation
and child poverty
which has multiple
negative outcomes
for people living in
poverty and with
limited access to
CLD services. Living
in poverty is a
significant
determinant of both
physical and mental
health. Many of the
groups who were
already struggling
with poverty have
borne the brunt of
the pandemic and
the cost of living
crisis and things will
get more
challenging.
50% reduction - staff
impact 50%
reduction -
Community impact
Restructure Staff
impact -Restructure
Community impact -
Positive impact
anticipated as a
holistic approach to
support service
users is fundamental
to the 3 Year Plan -
staff will continue to
access training and
support to
understand the
complex needs of
service users and
consultation with
service users will
continue to influence
service design. We
will ensure
appropriate training
and support for staff
The service will
ensure best
communications
practice informed by
the Council's
Communicating
Effectively Guidance.
Page 172

Page 173

Disability
We have legal duty
to ensure that
services are
accessible to
disabled people. This
duty is anticipatory.
CLD services are
open to all however
a particular risk
group are those with
disabilities or long
term health issues.
Risk of poverty is
much higher for
disabled people.
Older people are
more likely to be
disabled than
younger people, and
only 17% of people
who eventually have
impairment are born
with this. WDC is
committed to
ensuring BSL users
are supported to
access services, so
that they can
improve their
quality of life. The
Councils BSL Action
Plan is relevant in
terms of service
accessibility.
Disabled people
more likely to be in
poverty. WD has a
higher percentage of
disabled people than
Scotland on this
measure. 23% of
those who live in a
household with a
disabled household
member live in
poverty. Disabled
people are more
reliant on public
transport
50% reduction - staff
impact potential
negative impact on
staff with a disability
50% reduction -
Community impact
negative, reduction
in support for
disability focused
groups and
interventions
Restructure Staff
impact - potential
negative impact on
staff with a disability
Restructure
Community impact -
limited or no impact
Social & Economic
Impact
Many economically
disadvantaged
people in WD have
poorer health
outcomes, have
lower levels of
qualifications and
fewer qualifications
at all levels
compared to
Scotland, are more
likely to be digitally
excluded. Poverty
impacts peoples
ability to feed,
clothe, heat their
homes for
themselves and their
families.
OVID has had a
greater negative
impact on already
disadvantaged
groups. Cost of living
crisis is going to
have a major impact
on people already
living in poverty. It
will push more
people into poverty
as fuel costs, food
bills increase.
50% reduction -
negative staff impact
50% reduction -
Community impact,
negative - reduced
support to
Communities and
groups who require
or provide support
to residents facing
economic hardship,
this negative impact
is intensified with
the cost of living
crisis and goes
against the councils
anti poverty efforts
Restructure Staff
impact - negative
Page 173

Page 174

impact Restructure
Community impact ,
limited or no impact.
Work will continue
through the
Community
Empowerment
Strategy priority
projects and the
focus throughout on
the Cost of Living
Crisis - CLD services
are targeted at
individuals and
communities most in
need of social,
personal
development
activities so the
impact should be
positive for this
group. Youth
Empowerment and
participation
enables young
people to influence
decision making in
WD. CLD
practitioners are
always investigating
ways to remove
barriers to
participation
Sex
Women face
multiple
discrimination,
including disabled
women, women
from Black and
Ethnic Minority
(BME) communities,
refugee and asylum
seekers, lesbian,
bisexual and Trans
(LGBT+) women,
and older women. In
the preCOVID-19
labour market,
women were
unequal in pay,
participation and
progression due to
drivers including
The gap between
women’s and men’s
earning is bigger in
WD than for
Scotland. WD
domestic violence
rates are higher than
Scotland.
50% reduction - staff
impact reduction in
staff therefore
potential negative
impact on female
members of staff
50% reduction -
Community impact
negative, reduced
support to
discrimination
focused groups and
interventions
Restructure Staff
impact -reduction in
staff therefore
potential negative
impact on female
members of staff
Restructure
Page 174

Page 175

occupational
segregation, job
valuation,
discrimination, and
time available to
work. 38% of single
women with
children are living in
poverty. In 2019-20
4 out of 5 victims of
domestic abuse were
female. Males are 2.6
x more likely to die
by suicide in
Scotland than
females. Gender-
based violence is
experienced
unequally, with 17%
of women and 7% of
men having
experienced the use
of force from a
partner or ex-
partner at some
point in their lives.
Community impact -
no or limited impact
anticipated
continuation with 3
Year Plan links with
Child poverty plan
for WDC and actions
align with CP
indicators. Teams
adhere to Child
Protection policies
and reporting within
WDC. Staff are fully
trained on guidance
and remain up to
date with any
changes.
Gender Reassign
Services need to be
inclusive and
accessible. Services
ensure
confidentiality of
information for all
users. People who
identify as
LGBTQIA+ have
higher rates of
common mental
health problems and
lower wellbeing
than heterosexual
people.
LGBTQIA+ people
more likely to be
income deprived.
Going through a
gender
reassignment means
legally changing
almost every
recorded document
that has your birth
name and given
gender on it. This
can include things
like bank details.
50% reduction - staff
impact r no impact
50% reduction -
Community impact
negative, reduction
in support for
gender
reassignment
focused groups and
interventions
Restructure Staff
impact - no impact
Restructure
Community impact -
We will continue to
ensure that our
workers have
appropriate
knowledge and
expertise to support
service users.
limited or no impact
Health
In the most affluent
areas of Scotland,
men experience 23.8
more years of good
health and women
WD is an area of
substantial
deprivation and
health outcomes for
WD compared to
50% reduction - no
staff impact at this
point 50% reduction
- Community impact
negative, reduction
Page 175

Page 176

experience 22.6
more years
compared to the
most deprived areas.
The life expectancy
of people with
learning disabilities
is substantially
shorter than the
Scottish average.
Scotland are a
concern. Longer
term effects of
COVID 19 are
unknown. Poverty
has huge impacts on
health inequalities.
in support and
services for health
focused groups and
interventions,
reduced
partnershipp
working with CPP
colleagues, Public
Health, shaping
Places for Wellbeing
project and HSCP
Community
Empowerment
involvement.
Restructure Staff
impact - not st this
point Restructure
Community impact -
No Or limited impact
with continuation of
Positive impact
anticipated through
the CLD 3 year plan
outlines engagement
services to ensure
accessibility to
service users with
health and
disabilities including
engagement with
specialist services-
outreach activity to
those who require it.
WD residents have
reported that
participating in CLD
activity has
impacted positively
on their health and
wellbeing.
Human Rights
WDC needs to up
hold human rights.
The Council is a duty
bearer. UNCRC -
young peoples
rights.
Scottish Human
rights Commission
Human Rights
Report Card 2022
UNCRC - CLD staff
are part of the
working group for
WDC.
50% reduction - no
staff impact 50%
reduction -
Community impact
negative, reduction
in support and
interventions for all
groups Restructure
no Staff impact -
Restructure
Community impact -
No or limited impact
and continued
Page 176

Page 177

Positive impact for
people in West
Dunbartonshire
including adults,
young people and
children. The 3 year
plan will deliver CLD
services in WD
where anyone is able
to obtain the
information and
advice and support
they need, when
they need it and
obtain access in the
way they need it.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership N/A N/A N/A
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Poverty is both a
cause and a
consequence of teen
pregnancy. More
than 60% of young,
unmarried mothers
live in households
that qualify as being
in poverty.
Young lone parents
are more likely to be
income deprived.
vittana.org/teen
pregnancy- and
poverty
50% reduction - no
staff impact at this
point 50% reduction
- Community impact
negative, reduction
in support for
parenting or lone
parent focused
groups and
interventions
Restructure Staff
impact - no impact at
this time
Restructure
Community impact -
no impact at this
time.
Race
Risk of poverty is
much higher for
black minority
ethnic people
compared to white
people. WDC has
comprehensive
translation and
interpreter services
which service users
and providers can
access as required.
Those from minority
ethnic groups are
more likely to live in
deprived areas and
in poverty. People
from Black groups
are twice as likely to
be unemployed as
people from white
communities. Child
poverty is higher in
BME groups. There
is increasing ethnic
diversity in WD.
50% reduction - no
staff impact 50%
reduction -
Community impact
negative reduction
in support for ethnic
minority groups
groups and
interventions
Restructure Staff
impact - no impact
Restructure
Community impact -
limited or no impact
Religion and Belief
Services need to be
inclusive and
accessible. Services
ensure
There is increasing
religious diversity in
West
Dunbartonshire.
50% reduction - no
staff impact at this
point 50% reduction
- Community impact
Page 177

Page 178

confidentiality of
information for all
users.
negative, reduction
in support and
interventions for
religious groups
Restructure Staff
impact - no impact
Restructure
Community impact -
No Or limited
impact.We will
continue to ensure
that our workers
have appropriate
knowledge and
expertise and
cultural competence.
CLD teams have well
established links
with national
organisations who
have resources and
training on a range
of topics including
sectarianism, Nil by
Mouth etc.
Sexual Orientation
Services need to be
inclusive and
accessible. Services
ensure
confidentiality of
information for all
users
LGBTQIA+ people
are likely to earn
less than
heterosexual people
and are more likely
to live in deprived
areas.
50% reduction - staff
impact 50%
reduction -
Community impact
negative, reduction
in support and
interventions for
LGBTQIA+ groups
Restructure Staff
impact -Restructure
Community impact -
No or limited impact.
We will continue to
ensure that our
workers have
appropriate
knowledge and
expertise. There is
currently a
LGBTQIA+ group for
young people in WD
supported by the
Youth Learning
Team.
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Page 178

Page 179

The comparison of options has been produced as a direct result of the need to identify potential
savings that will contribute to the Council budget deficit. There will be a negative impact in
applying both reductions: a 50% reduction across the Communities team or a restructure for the
Communities Team with W4U Youth learning and incorporation of Community Planning support.
We have used a scale from no impact to severe impact to illustrate the impact and as a basis for
decision making. • no impact; • slight (low impact), • moderate (between no impact and severe); •
serious (not the worst case, but extremely challenging); and • severe (worst case with significant
negative impact). A 50% reduction would be severe, leaving the Communities team unable to
operate effectively and unable to meet key strategic and operational priorities. The Team is
currently under-resourced to address the significant challenges our communities face. This
budget reduction would stop: most progress; impact; and reach of the Council’s Community
Empowerment ambitions; outlined in the Community Empowerment Strategy and associated
action plan which have been developed in response to the Community Empowerment (Scotland)
Act 2015. The impact of this option would be particularly pronounced given the cost of living
crisis and the critical role community development will play in identifying and supporting local
groups and local solutions. Significantly, this will result in less resilient communities which in turn
will lead to greater demands on scarce council resources. Three main areas affected: • Community
resilience; • Anti-poverty; • Community safety The option to restructure the Communities team
and Working4U Youth Learning Team will be moderate, in relation to staff impact from resulting
job losses. The positive side being the creation of a combined and more efficient operating model,
ensures the new team continues to meet key strategic, operational and emerging priorities. It will
also enable the continuation of the community planning function (currently within the CCF
service area). The proposed restructure will have positive impacts that include reduce overall
costs of the service but strengthen ability to lever external funding. This would reduce the
pressure on council services and council budgets more widely and it a more strategic option than
simply reducing the budget of the team with all the negative impacts that brings. A restructure
would positively impact: • The Council’s Community Empowerment ambitions, ensuring that
Youth Empowerment and continuing engagement and participation is a key factor of the
Community Empowerment Strategy and associated action plan which have been developed in
response to the Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015. • UK Shared prosperity Projects
with the overarching aim of building pride in place and increasing life chances would benefit
greatly from a Youth perspective. Projects will support interventions to; Reduce Anti-Social
Behaviour; Reduce Unlawful Fire raising; Focus on our estate (social housing) work and wider
community input e.g. community clean up initiatives; Improve mental health and wellbeing;
Increase community engagement. • Supporting Communities throughout the cost of living crisis
and the critical role community development will play in identifying and supporting local groups
and local solutions. An immediate example being the Food Insecurity funding, group management
and the development of a Food Pantry Network, aligning with the council’s anti-poverty efforts. •
Community safety with a collaborative approach between the Youth Outreach team and the public
space CCTV team. A Communities and Police Scotland partnership would have additional
intelligence with regard to Youth hotspots and behaviours but more importantly reduce police
intervention and introduce young people to resources and services that can lead to positive life
outcomes such as education enrolment, increased work experience, employment, and wider
attainment. • Providing a focus for partnership working at neighbourhood level, through
Community Planning that targets specific local circumstances. This will focus on where partners'
collective efforts and resources can add the most value to their local communities, with particular
emphasis on reducing inequality
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
This will depend on the decisions regarding the savings option that the Council makes. If the
decision is to reduce the Communities Team by 50% there will be a significant negative impact on
Communities across West Dunbartonshire, this will be monitored through Community
consultation and reported annually. If the restructure option is taken there will be no requirement
to monitor the impact
Page 179

Page 180

Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 588 details potential impacts of the options: In summary, Option 1 will result in a 50%
reduction in staffing and a potential 70% reduction in services delivered. This will have a severe
equalities impact on West Dunbartonshire residents and their Communities. It will also have a
negative impact on staff within the Communities and Youth Learning teams who are ineligible for
voluntary severance or early retirement. Option 2 - The restructure of the Communities Team;
Youth Learning and Community Planning Support will result in a 27.5% reduction in staffing
across two teams, having a negative impact ( though less severe than Option 1) for those staff
ineligible for the early retirement or voluntary severance option. For West Dunbartonshire
residents and their Communities there will be no or limited impact. There will be a positive
equalities impact from the alignment continuation and development of services across both the
Communities and Youth Learning portfolios. The alignment in conjunction with the Community
Planning Support function will result in a more efficient operating model. There will be no or
limited impact on Service delivery and the capacity to apply for and deliver on externally funded
projects and ensure social return on investment. The recommended budget option is therefore
Option 2 - restructure of the Communities Team, Youth Learning and the community Planning
Support Function.
Page 180

Page 181

AssessmentNo 592 Owner smclelland
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment HE Budget
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Nicola Pettigrew Manager
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Nicola Pettigrew Tracy Crichton
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function
or financial decision)
Policy Title HE 11 - Reduction to Tenant Liaison Service (TLO)
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
As part of current savings options (23/24) for above service the objective and
purpose of this EIA is to outline impact to residents, stakeholders and staff. The TLO
service support all tenants across West Dunbartonshire which include all protected
groups.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Staff Tenants Residents Local TRA groups Elected Members Housing West
Dunbartonshire Equality Forum
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Staff tenants Residents Police Scotland local TRA groups Community Councils Elected Members
SFRS Safe and Stronger DIG ASB tasking Group Fire Reduction Group ASBOF ASBLEF WDTRO
Environmental Health Greenspace Housing
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
There has been no consultation carried out as yet as no decision has been made however
consultation would include Staff , TUs and all stakeholders affected.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Older people are
often affected by
challenging tenants
or the perception of.
This can be true of
A Fairer Scotland for
Older People:
Framework for
Action. Older people
want: "Opportunities
Face to face contact
with tenants
residents within this
age group will be
reduced.
Page 181

Page 182

all age group
however more so in
the older group/s.
Physical and
meaningful
Engagement will be
accessed by all
regarding
challenging tenants
and the proposed
reduction to the
service by two
officers will remove
a high degree of
service to the age
group delivered by
TLO
to remain actively
engaged with, and
involved in, their
communities" this
reduction could see
significant unwanted
engagement at TRA,
face to face support
for issues and
remove physical
response to this age
group
Cross Cutting
Participation across
all protected groups
is an opportunity to
build community
cohesion
People can
simultaneous be
members of more
than one
disadvantaged
group, which can
multiply negative
outcomes
Reduction in
capacity within the
service will mean
there is less
opportunity to
engage with
communities and
build on community
safety and cohesion.
Disability
Evidence suggests
disabled people are
more likely to be
socially isolated, and
less likely to be
involved in
community life than
non disabled people.
There will be very
limited access to this
group with
reduction as the
proposal to reduce
this service by two
officers will impact
significantly
This reduction will
remove response
and actions to this
group moving them
closer to social
isolation. due to
disability, are
remaining indoors
and more likely to be
isolated. Local
feedback suggests
some success during
lockdown, using
digital methods and
also phone calls, but
this will not be good
for everyone
without physical
response by TLO
service
This reduction will
remove response
and actions to this
group moving them
closer to social
isolation.
Social & Economic
Impact
WDC has a duty to
consider the Fairer
Scotland Duty.
Involved, organised
and empowered
communities have
greater economic
and social strength.
TLO service feed
into this by working
The economic
impact of any
reduction to TLO
services is yet to be
fully realised in WDC
Communities. Our
work may need to
Page 182

Page 183

to make our
communities safer.
focus much more on
poverty and
economic recovery
and the cost of living
crisis to come, there
is an expectation
that levels of
crime/ASB and
challenging
behaviours will
increase.
Sex
TLO services
currently engage in
community activities
which varies across
age and sex.
Impact to
engagement due to
reduction of staff.
Women are more
likely to suffer
domestic abuse and
Gender based
violence than men.
TLO and ASB service
jointly deliver NHDA
and the proposed
reduction will see
limited response to
this group.
Women are often
more visible and
available to engage
with our Team in a
face to face informal
environment. This
proposed reduction
will remove
engagement
platforms that would
normally ensure face
to face contact.
Gender Reassign
Those under going
or who have
undergone gender
reassignment can be
particularly
excluded from social
and civil society, it is
important that
people have an
opportunity to
participate in their
community and give
their opinion on
things that might
effect them. TLO
service helps
support this area via
our tenant referral
system
Evidence suggest
that trans people can
be more socially
isolated and more at
risk of
discrimination. This
reduction will
further isolate this
group in terms of
response and
physical support.
Evidence suggest
that trans people can
be more socially
isolated and more at
risk of
discrimination. This
reduction will
further isolate this
group in terms of
response and
physical support.
Health
The WDC strategic
plan has a focus on
health and wellbeing
Our physical and
social environment
is the framework in
which our lives take
place and,
depending on
circumstances, it can
provide us with
opportunities or
Reduction in
capacity may leave
less time to address
health and wellbeing
issues.
Page 183

Page 184

limit our potential
(Scottish National
Performance
Framework). this
reduction will
impact significantly
on responding to
challenging tenants
within our
communities.
Human Rights
Relevant under core
civil rights, such as
the right to respect
for private and
family life (Article 8
of the Convention).
There is evidence
there is low
awareness of human
rights. There is an
increased focus the
Scottish Government
on giving Human
Rights a more
central place
Although not
directly affecting HR,
Considering the
service from a
Human Rights
perspective can help
inform inclusive
practice however
due to reduction in
staffing this would
adversely impact on
our verbal guidance
and physical
response to all cases.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
This area cross cuts
with sex, and sexual
orientation
This area cross cuts
with sex, and sexual
orientation
This area cross cuts
with sex, and sexual
orientation. Given
the reduction there
will be no support or
physical response to
this group. Given the
reduction there will
be limited support to
this group
Pregnancy &
Maternity
This area cross cuts
with sex, and sexual
orientation
This area cross cuts
with sex, and sexual
orientation
This area cross cuts
with sex, and sexual
orientation. Given
the reduction there
will be no support or
physical response to
this group
Race
The TLO service
team core function is
to respond and
address challenging
tenants from a
housing
environment and for
all protected groups.
People from BME
groups are much
more likely to be the
subject of racist hate
incidents and crimes
Evidence from
Scottish Social
Attitudes surveys
and other sources
suggests that people
who have contact
with people from
This reduction will
remove reporting
platforms and
limited response
from TLO service to
concerns with the
reduction of physical
engagement.
Page 184

Page 185

other groups are less
likely to hold
negative views on
those groups.
Religion and Belief
TLO services have
always respected
events and activities
and would seek to
avoid common times
of worship
Event timing and
venue can affect
peoples ability to
take part, with the
reduction to two
officers this now
might not be
achievable due to
demand and loss of
resources.
Event timing and
venue can affect
peoples ability to
take part, with the
reduction to two
officers this now
might not be
achievable due to
demand and loss of
resources. There is
also the aspect of
restricted to no
response with lower
staffing to this
group.
Sexual Orientation
Services need to be
accessible including ,
those aiming to
support
participation and
empowerment
LGBT are more likely
to be socially
excluded and suffer
from hate crime.
Whilst we will
ensure that we will
design our
engagement to be
inclusive, we will
face significant
reduction to physical
and verbal
engagement with
this group with the
proposed reduction
of staff.
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
There is high potential for some equality groups to be less frequently or meaningfully involved with
the TLO service due to this reduction. Face to Face engagement with subject citizen's at door step, in
community meetings will be fewer to none. The service will be greatly reduced and may only be
able to offer nothing short of telephony support should these proposals be implemented. Moving to
a phone based service, it is vital to have measures in place to allow access, e.g. an process to ensure
that non English speakers can get through with Language Line support for calls. Phone based
services may present more of a barrier to BSL users, and this would need to be mitigated. Part of
these measures would be directed communication to people generally and certain groups
particularly about changes/access in to the service. As noted systems to mitigate would need to be
in place supported by staff training.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Yes. The policy will be monitored in line with decision on services.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Don't Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 592 -HE01 (A) details potential negative impacts of this proposed service reduction, and
necessary mitigation. The TLO service support all tenants across West Dunbartonshire which
Page 185

Page 186

include all protected groups. These groups and membership is made up of people from equalities
groups; most notably disabled people, older people and women. The suggested reductions to service
will have a negative impact of a range of protected groups and remove physical response and
support to our most socially challenged residents in terms of intense case management. Option A -
The reduction from 4 staff members to 2 will have an significant negative impact on our
communities and protected groups. The impact to affected staff members would be significant both
from the employment and financial loss in a time where disposable income is non existent. Further
to this, the knowledge and skill of the affected staff is irreplaceable and our partner agencies can't
absorb this/their skilled work, again this will affect all protected groups and our 90k+ to who we
serve.
Page 186

Page 187

AssessmentNo 612 Owner LPENNYCOOK
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget Ed
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Kathy Morrison Senior Education Officer
(include job titles/organisation)
Members
Laura Mason - Chief Education Officer Julie McGrogan - Senior Education
Officer Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer Claire Cusick - Senior
Education Officer Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title EDU_17 Senior Early Learning and Childcare Officers (SELCO) Posts
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
The deletion of 6 FTE Early Learning and Childcare Officer (ELCO)
positions at ELC with a Senior Early Learning and Childcare Officer
(SELCO) in post. The role of the SELCO would require to be reviewed - the
SELCO will be counted in the ELC ratio of adults to children i.e. in place of 6
FTE ELCO positions. 6.5 FTE is within ELC budget. Brucehill SELCO (0.5
FTE) retired in August 2022. The ELC does not meet the threshold of 80
children for this post which is currently a saving. Staff teams at ELCs
impacted would continue to be supported by the leadership team which
includes the Senior position. The Senior position would remain as part of
the route to promotion in our ELC leadership structure.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
Consultation with ELC leaders to ensure that they deploy staff
appropriately and provide support for SELCO to carry out tasks related to
remit. Consultation with HTs, HR, TUs and staff regarding alternative
employment for ELCOs impacted by the changing role of the SELCO.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Early Learning and Childcare Officers (ELCO's) impacted by the changing role of the Senior
Early Learning and Childcare Officer (SELCO).
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Consultation with ELC leaders to ensure that they deploy staff appropriately and provide
support for SELCO to carry out tasks related to remit. Consultation with HTs, HR, TUs and
staff regarding alternative employment for ELCOs impacted by the changing role of the
SELCO. Use the Switch policy to support staff.
Page 187

Page 188

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is
any negative impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Cross Cutting
The Council needs to
be aware of how
factors can interact
Disability
The Council had a
duty to make its
services accessible
to disabled people,
including pupils.
This is an
anticipatory duty.
We must seek to
mitigate any
negative impacts.
Families including
families with
children that have
one or more
disabled people in
them are more likely
to be income
deprived
Reduction may
negatively impact on
disabled pupils and
their families.
Social & Economic
Impact
The council is
committed to
examining how
these factors
interact.
The numbers of
children with
additional support
needs and the
complexity of their
needs has increased
at ELC. Some
children are
adversely impacted
by poverty. The
nature of support
required for children
has intensified and
requires more
continuous and long
term interventions.
The most effective
supports are based
on those supported
by significant
relationships with a
key adult.
Employment:
Positive Impact
Route to promotion
at ELC remains in
place. The SELCOs
time will be used
differently but this
will make best use of
the time of other
leaders. Negative
Impact 6 FTE ELCO
could be redeployed.
Service users:
Sex Need to assess
differential impacts.
There are more
female than male
learning assistants.
Single parent
households are more
likely to be income
deprived, 90% of
these are headed my
women
Employment:
Women are more
likely to be
negatively impacted
by the reduction in
posts. Service users:
Women who held
single households
more likely to be
negatively affected
Gender Reassign
Health
Human Rights UNCRC The numbers Research has been Positive Impact
Page 188

Page 189

of children with
additional support
needs and the
complexity of their
needs has increased
at ELC. Some
children are
adversely impacted
by poverty. The
nature of support
required for children
has intensified and
requires more
continuous and long
term interventions.
The most effective
supports are based
on those supported
by significant
relationships with a
key adult.
carried out in
consultation with
the following:
GIRFEC Children and
Young People
(Scotland) Act 2014
Recommendations
United Nations
Rights of The Child
Article 3 Best
Interests of the Child
Route to promotion
at ELC remains in
place. The SELCOs
time will be used
differently but this
will make best use of
the time of other
leaders. Negative
Impact 6 FTE ELCO
could be redeployed.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
BME families are a
priority group in
terms of reducing
child poverty.
Families and
children from BME
groups are more
likely to be income
deprived.
Reduction may
negatively impact on
more on BME pupils
their families.
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented,
please provide justification for this.
As above.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
We will monitor impact by consulting staff involved. HR monitoring of the demographic of
staff potentially affected. Monitoring will be carried out on a termly basis.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Don't Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the
recommendation
EIA 612: There may be a negative effect on some groups including disabled children and
their families. Women are more likely to be negatively affected by reductions due to the
gender balance of the staff team, though the promotion structure will remain in place, and
there may be alternative post in the structure. Staff teams at ELCs impacted would continue
to be supported by the leadership team which includes the Senior position. The Senior
position would remain as part of the route to promotion in our ELC leadership structure.
Page 189

Page 190

AssessmentNo 619 Owner smclelland
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment HE Budget
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Nicola Pettigrew Manager Housing Operations
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Scott Mclelland - ASB Coordinator
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function
or financial decision)
Policy Title HE01 - Reduction to ASB team Option 3
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Option 3 – Under this option, we would reduce the current budget required under
General Service and increase HRA contribution to fund the service based on a shift
in complainer/perpetrator tenure using the service. The service would continue to
operate as it currently does with no negative impact on our communities or
employees.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Housing Operations/WDTRO
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Cross Cutting
Disability
Social & Economic
Impact
Sex
Gender Reassign
Page 190

Page 191

Health
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 619, We are reducing cost of service from general funds and absorbing in HRA no impact on
service.
Page 191

Page 192

AssessmentNo 622 Owner andbrown
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget Ed
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Laura Mason Chief Education Officer
(include job titles/organisation)
Members
Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer Julie McGrogan - Senior Education
Officer Kathy Morrison - Senior Education Officer Claire Cusick - Senior
Education Officer Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title Savings Option EDU16 - 4 day week
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
This proposal would see our schools meet their statutory provision of learning
and teaching time across a 4 day week instead of the existing 5 days. This
would result in: • energy savings in the running of our buildings on the 5th day,
• a reduction of transportation costs, as children would only need transported
on 4 days instead of 5 • a reduction in the cleaning, facilities management and
catering costs.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
Consultation with other Council services who are currently involved in the
provision of this service as there may be an impact on staffing within other
departments. Consultation with HR, HTs, TU’s to advise of possible changes.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
All children and young people attending our primary and secondary schools and their families
Teachers Other Council departments who currently provide this service.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
All children, young people and families. Consultation with other Council department who
currently provide this service and any impact on staffing within other departments.
Consultation with HR, HTs and TU’s to advise of possible changes.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation
to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any
negative impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Page 192

Page 193

Cross Cutting
It is important to
consider how
elements may
interact.
Reducing the
number of days at
school would reduce
the burden of the
cost of the school
day on families, but
focus would need to
be given to ensure
identified groups
and families were
still benefitting from
FME and options of
activities on the 5th
day.
Positive / Neutral
Disability
The Council had a
duty to make its
services accessible
to disabled people,
including pupils.
This is an
anticipatory duty.
We must seek to
mitigate any
negative impacts.
Households with one
or more disabled
person are more
likely to be income
deprived.
Programme of
activities would
need to be provided
for the 5th day.
Neutral
Social & Economic
Impact
The Council needs to
consider the
interplay between
social and economic
factors.
This is cross cutting
with other areas that
may impact of the
socioeconomic
wellbeing of
families.
This may have a
negative impact . We
would need to
ensure families in
receipt of FME were
catered for with
activities on 5th day.
Adverse impact on
other families due to
potential childcare
costs
Sex
Women/single
parents; Priority
group in terms of
child poverty
Women are more
likely to income
deprived than men.
Around 90% of
single parents are
women.
Negative
Gender Reassign
Health
Health and
wellbeing are a
priority for the
Council as noted in
our Strategic Plan
22-27.
Reducing the
number of days at
school could impact
positively on the
wellbeing of staff
and pupils, provided
options to improve
wellbeing were
offered as part of the
programme of
activities for the 5th
Positive
Page 193

Page 194

day. Careful
exploration of times
of 4 days to ensure
this is not
detrimental.
Human Rights
UNCRC Article 3 Best
interests of the child
Every decision and
action taken relating
to a child must be in
their best interests.
Balance between
increasing the
amount of time on 4
days, with the
benefit of wider
activities on the 5th
day.
Neutral
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
BME families are a
Priority group in
terms of child
poverty.
People from BME
groups are more
likely to be income
deprived than those
from white groups.
Negative
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The council has a duty to present a balanced budget. Negative impacts noted above would be
mitigated through the development of 5th day activities.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
We will monitor impact by consulting Head Teachers/Pupils/Families. Monitoring will be
carried out on a termly basis.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 622: Some potential negative impacts noted in section 2 of the EIA in terms of disability,
health and cross cutting elements need to be addressed with the reinvestment of part of the
overall saving into alternative provision on the 5th day, ensuring that any negative impacts for
groups and individuals are overcome.
Page 194

Page 195

AssessmentNo 625 Owner rrea
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget CCF
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Amanda Graham Chief Officer CCF
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Amanda Graham CO Ricardo Rea Performance and Strategy officer
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title CCF21-Review grants to strategic partners - Shopmobility
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
The Council provides grant support to a number of strategic partner
organisations in West Dunbartonshire. Shopmobility delivers a mobility
scooter, manual and powered wheelchair service to residents from its
base in Clydebank Shopping Centre. Under this proposal, the current
grant of £47,670 provided to Shopmobility by the Council would reduce
by between 25% and 90% At the current level of grant funding the
Councils provided approximately 22% of the organisation's income
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
TBC
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Disabled people and their carers and families, Staff and volunteers of Clyde Shopmobility.
In addition to the provision of scooters and wheelchairs, Shopmobility delivers a range of
support to residents with physical impairments to increase independence, reduce
isolation and ensure equality. This includes provision of trained sighted to accompany
those who are visually impaired to support them with tasks such as shopping or to attend
events and facilitating a number of groups for walking, yoga, knitting and photography.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there
is any negative impact on particular groups.
Needs Evidence Impact
Age Social inclusion and
mobility in this
The service is
extensively used by
Negative Funding
reductions
Page 195

Page 196

context are relevant
in this context
older people
Evidence suggest
that older people are
more at risk than
some other age
groups of social
isolation Older
people are more
likely to be disabled.
negatively affect the
amount the services
that CSM can
provide
Cross Cutting
It is important that
the council takes
account of how
factors interact to
affect people and
groups
Evidence suggests
that BME, Disabled
people, women and
younger people have
been particularly
affected by COVID
and Cost of Living
impacts.
Factors such as sex,
disability and age
may interact in this
circumstance to
multiple effects of
any service
reductions.
Disability
The Council has an
Equality outcome on
increasing the
participation of
disabled people
The service is
extensively used by
disabled people.
Disabled people are
more likely to
experience poverty
compared to non-
disabled people
Evidence suggest
that disabled people
are more at risk than
non disabled people
of social isolation
Negative Funding
reductions
negatively affect the
amount the services
that CSM can
provide
Social & Economic
Impact
The Council must
have due regard to
the Fairer Scotland
Duty, in terms of
Social Economic
impacts, and the
Statutory Guidance
The service acts to
encourage shopping
in Clydebank,
especially the
shopping centre The
organization
currently employs 9
members of staff*
and has 'TBC'
number of
volunteers
Revenue of shops in
the Clyde shopping
center and
surrounding area
may be negatively
affected. This could
also occur more
widely in WD. There
may be a negative
financial affect on
service users if
provision is reduced.
Sex
The Council needs to
have regard to the
differential impact of
decisions on
relevant protected
groups
More female than
male service users
If there were service
reduction these may
tend to affect men
more than women
Gender Reassign
Health
The Council
recognizes health
and wellbeing as a
priority.
The service supports
social interaction
among groups at
risk of isolation.
Reductions in
service may
negatively impact on
this aspect
Page 196

Page 197

Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented,
please provide justification for this.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the
recommendation
EIA 625 details potential impacts: current Council funding makes up approximately 22%
of CSM income. Reduction of funding may negatively affect services users of Clyde
Shopmobility, more likely to be older and disabled and staff and volunteers of the
organisation. There may also be a negative economic effect in terms of money spent in
Clydebank area in particular and in West Dunbartonshire more generally. There could
also be negative effects in terms of reduced capacity to provide services that counter
social isolation.
Page 197

Page 198

AssessmentNo 626 Owner andbrown
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget Ed
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Laura Mason Chief Education Officer
(include job titles/organisation)
Members
Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer Julie McGrogan - Senior
Education Officer Kathy Morrison - Senior Education Officer Claire Cusick -
Senior Education Officer Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title Savings Option EDU11 - Education Maintenance Allowance
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Education Maintenance Allowance (EMA) gives financial support to eligible
16 – 19 year olds who want to continue learning. The statutory amount for
EMA is a weekly payment of £30, paid every two weeks in arrears.
Presently, West Dunbartonshire Council pay an additional £5 per week
where a young person has 100% attendance. This savings proposal would
reduce the amount we provide to the statutory level of £30 per week.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
Consultation with other Council services who currently assist in the
provision of this service. Consultation with HR, HTs/HOC’s, TU’s to advise
of possible changes.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
All young people presently in receipt of the Education Maintenance Allowance who achieve
100% attendance.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Consultation with other Council departments who are currently involved in the provision
of this service. Consultation with HR, HTs/HOC’s and TU’s to advise of possible changes.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is
any negative impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
EMA is provided to
16-19 year olds in
education. The top-
Reducing the
amount paid will
impact negatively on
Negative
Page 198

Page 199

up to the EMA is
given to a small sub-
set who achieve
100% attendance.
those in receipt, but
whilst many achieve
100% for a number
of weeks in the
session, few achieve
100% attendance for
the whole session.
Cross Cutting
Disability
Priority group in
terms of child
poverty
Households with one
or more disabled
person are more
likely to be income
deprived.
Negative
Social & Economic
Impact
The Council needs to
consider the
interplay between
social and economic
factors.
Historically the EMA
has been increased
locally as a direct
response to need.
The additional
amount provided
presently is where a
young person
achieves 100%
attendance, so there
may be an adverse
impact on
attendance.
Negative Impact A
reduction in
household income
by reducing the EMA
will impact the
poorest in our
communities.
Sex
Women/single
parents; Priority
group in terms of
child poverty
Women are more
likely to income
deprived than men.
Around 90% of
single parents are
women.
Negative
Gender Reassign
Health
Health and
wellbeing are a
priority for the
Council as noted in
our Strategic Plan
22-27.
Household income
has a direct
correlation to health.
Negative Impact
There is a direct
correlation between
household income
and health -
reducing the EMA
will impact
negatively on health.
Human Rights
Article 28 of UNCRC
declared that
children and young
people have a right
to education no
matter who they are.
Payment of an EMA
is incentive to stay
on in education
beyond the statutory
leaving age.
Reducing this
incentive will impact
negatively on young
people from more
income deprived
households.
Negative
Marriage & Civil
Page 199

Page 200

Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
BME families are a
Priority group in
terms of child
poverty.
People from BME
groups are more
likely to be income
deprived than those
from white groups.
Negative
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented,
please provide justification for this.
As above.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
We will monitor impact by consulting Head Teachers/Young People. Monitoring will be
carried out on a termly basis.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the
recommendation
EIA 626: Whilst the change in policy will see a reduction in the amount given to those in
receipt of an EMA, they will still receive the statutory amount; There be a negative financial
impact of potentially £200 per year per young person. Families from BME groups, families
with disabled people, and single parent families are more likely to be income deprived and
experience poverty/child poverty. There may be an adverse impact on attendance which
will be monitored.
Page 200

Page 201

AssessmentNo 627 Owner andbrown
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget Ed
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Laura Mason Chief Education Officer
(include job titles/organisation)
Members
Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer Julie McGrogan - Senior Education
Officer Kathy Morrison - Senior Education Officer Claire Cusick - Senior
Education Officer Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title Savings Option EDU07 - School Clothing Grant
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
When agreeing the 2022/23 revenue budget on 9 March 2022 the Council
agreed to double the school clothing grant to £300. This created a revenue
pressure of £0.774m. In 2022/23 this was funded through Local Authority
COVID Economic Recovery (LACER) funds as the Scottish government agreed
that these funds could be used ‘To support the low-income households that are
disproportionately impacted by the pandemic and the current cost of living
crisis, to become more economically active.’ However the LACER funding has
been fully utilised and is not available to fund this policy in future years.
Therefore it creates a cost pressure on the general fund in future years. Option
A This option would mean the doubling of the school grant would still apply in
2022/23 but, from 2023/24 onwards, it would revert back to £150 of which
£120 is funded by the Scottish Government for primary school children and the
full £150 is funded for secondary school children. It is noted that awarding
£150 for both primary and secondary is still a higher than the majority of other
local authorities as most only provide £120 for primary school children. This
option would generate £774k of savings. Option B This option would mean the
doubling of the school grant would still apply in 2022/23 but, from 2023/24
onwards, it would change to the Scottish Government funded provision of £120
for primary school children, and £150 for secondary children. This option
would generate a further saving of circa £65k meaning the entire saving would
be £839k.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
Consultation with other Council services who currently assist in the provision
of this service. Consultation with HR, HTs/HOC’s, TU’s to advise of possible
changes.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Page 201

Page 202

Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Children attending schools, as this will affect their families ability to fund suitable clothing for
school and school uniform.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Consultation with other Council department who currently provide this service. Consultation
with HR, HTs and TU’s to advise of possible impact on families.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation
to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any
negative impact on particular groups.
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Cross Cutting
The Council has a
focus on reducing
child poverty We
should have a focus
on intersectionality
Cost of the school
day is a
consideration
Disability
Priority group in
terms of child
poverty
Households with one
or more disabled
person are more
likely to be income
deprived.
Negative
Social & Economic
Impact
The Council needs to
consider the
interplay between
social and economic
factors.
Historically the
School Clothing
Grant has been
increased locally as a
direct response to
need.
Negative Impact A
reduction in
household income
by reducing the
School Clothing
Grant will impact the
poorest in our
communities.
Sex
Women/single
parents; Priority
group in terms of
child poverty
Women are more
likely to income
deprived than men.
Around 90% of
single parents are
women.
Negative
Gender Reassign
Health
Health and
wellbeing are a
priority for the
Council as noted in
our Strategic Plan
22-27.
Household income
has a direct
correlation to health
and wellbeing.
Negative Impact
There is a direct
correlation between
household income
and health -
reducing the School
Clothing Grant will
impact negatively on
health and
wellbeing.
Human Rights
The right to clothing
is recognized as a
human right
Article 25 of UDHR Negative
Marriage & Civil
Page 202

Page 203

Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
BME families are a
Priority group in
terms of child
poverty.
People from BME
groups are more
likely to be income
deprived than those
from white groups.
Negative
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
As above.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
We will monitor impact by consulting Head Teachers. Monitoring will be carried out on a
termly basis.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 627: Whilst both options will see a reduction in the amount given in School Clothing Grant,
which may have more effect on some groups than others, however both options keep us in line
with our statutory obligation.
Page 203

Page 204

AssessmentNo 628 Owner rrea
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget CCF
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Amanda Graham Chief Officer CCF
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Ricardo Rea Performance and Strategy Officer Amanda Graham, CO CCF
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title CCF22-Review of Grant Funding, Antonine Sports Centre
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Under this proposal, the current grant of £49,156 provided to the Antonine by
the Council would reduce by between 25% and 90% The current Council grant
provides approximately 17% of the organisations income The Council provides
grant support to a number of strategic partner organisations in West
Dunbartonshire. The Antonine Sports Centre is an independent charity which
has offered access to sports and community facilities in Duntocher for over 30
years.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
TBC
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Current service users and staff Members of the public especially those who live in the
surrounding areas including Faifley who might want to use facilities in future. Antonine Sports
Centre (ASC) is the closet such facility for people living in Duntocher and Faifley
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Antonine Sports Centre (ASC) will be consulted about potential impact, and this will be fed into
this impact assessment.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation
to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any
negative impact on particular groups.
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
The Council has an
equality outcome in
relation to
increasing
The organization has
stated focus on:
Older people and
Children and Young
Dependent on effect
of any reductions
and profile of service
users
Page 204

Page 205

involvement of
younger people in
Community
Empowerment The
Equality Act requires
that services do not
discriminate.
people
Cross Cutting
The Council's
Community
empowerment
strategy encourages
Communities to get
involved in their
local areas, and links
with our Equality
Outocmes for 21-25
It is important that
the Council takes
into account how
combine to affect
different groups and
individuals
Evidence suggests
that BME, Disabled
people, women and
younger people have
been particularly
affected by COVID
and Cost of Living
impacts.
Dependent on effect
of any reductions
and profile of service
users
Disability
The Equality Act
requires that
services are
accessible to
disabled people. The
Council has an
equality outcome in
relation to
increasing
involvement of
disabled people in
Community
Empowerment
The organization has
a stated focus on:
Disabled people.
Disabled people are
more likely to be
income deprived
than non-disabled
people.
Dependent on effect
of any reductions
and profile of service
users
Social & Economic
Impact
The Council must
have regard to the
Fairer Scotland Duty
The organisation has
12 employees.
Overall Duntocher
has lower than
average child
poverty and early
mortality, but there
are SIMD some more
deprived areas
immediately to the
North west and
further to the east of
the ASC Failey which
suffer from
significant
deprivation is close
by.
Negative impacts if
workforce was
reduced Potential
negative impact on
more deprived
communities if they
currently use the
Centre and services
are reduced or costs
increased
Sex The Equality Act Women are more Dependent on effect
Page 205

Page 206

requires that
services do not
discriminate.
likely to be income
deprived than men.
Women are less
likely to access to a
car than men.
of any reductions
and profile of service
users
Gender Reassign
Health
Health and
wellbeing is a focus
area of our 22-27
Strategic Plan
The organization has
stated focus on:
People with health
problems
Potential negative
impacts if services
provision was
reduced or costs
increased for users
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
The Council has an
equality outcome in
relation to
increasing
involvement of BME
people in
Community
Empowerment The
Equality Act requires
that services do not
discriminate.
Most BME groups
are more likely than
most white groups
to be income
deprived. Overall
BME groups are less
likely to have access
to a car
Dependent on effect
of any reductions
and profile of service
users
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 628 details potential impacts of funding reductions, currently Council funding makes up
approximately 17% of the ASC's income; Impacts are Dependent on effect of any reductions and
profile of service users, but these may be negative for older and younger people and disabled
people and possibility women.
Page 206

Page 207

AssessmentNo 629 Owner gmcnamara
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment Budget R and R
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Gillian McNamara Economic Development Manager
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Gillian McNamara Alan Douglas
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function or
financial decision)
Policy Title RR-12 Budget Savings 2023 - Economic Development Service
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
To consider two options to reduce revenue within the Business Support team of
economic development, involving reduction of discretionary budgets and staff
numbers.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Economic Development team Business Clients
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements. Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Employees within the Economic Development service - Business Support team. Local Businesses
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Discussions with trade unions and Business Support team employees. All Business Gateway services
are evaluated by service users. This informs the development of services.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Younger people may
lack the knowledge
and skills to set up
or run a business.
Business Gateway
will help them gain
these skills and
knowledge and can
Evidence suggests
that younger and
older entrepreneurs
face particular sets
of challenges
Reduction in
number of local
workshops and
expert help available
to support people of
all ages to start up
and run businesses.
Page 207

Page 208

link them with
specialist support,
e.g. Princes Trust for
Business. Young
Enterprise scheme.
In terms of older
members of this
equality group,
setting up a business
may help them to
overcome barriers
such as age
discrimination by
employers.
Cross Cutting
We need to ensure
that we take account
of how factors
interact
A reduction in
business support
provision during a
period where
businesses are
facing a number of
challenges including
rising inflation and
rising energy costs.
Feedback is sought
from all Business
Gateway users and
informs the
development of the
service. Evidence
suggests that BME,
Disabled people,
women and younger
people have been
particularly affected
by COVID and Cost
of Living impacts.
There will be a
reduction in capacity
overall, but help and
advice will remain
available to the
population of West
Dunbartonshire to
set up and run
businesses, thereby
positively impacting
on them personally
and on West
Dunbartonshire
generally.
Disability
We have a legal duty
to ensure services
are accessible to
disabled people The
Council has an
equality outcome on
increasing
participation
generally from this
group.
In terms of Disability
we can link those
with disability issues
to specialist advice
and support, e.g.
adaptation of
business premises.
Helping members of
this group to run a
business could
address barriers
they face, e.g. low
pay.
Help and advice will
continue to be
provided to those
with disability issues
to overcome
employment and
income related
barriers.
Social & Economic
Impact
We need to ensure
that strategic
decisions such as
services provision
Reduction of
Business Support
service provision
provided to local
The business
support
programmes
through the UK
Page 208

Page 209

take account of the
Fairer Scotland Duty
businesses.
Feedback is sought
from all Business
Gateway users and
informs the
development of the
service.
Shared Prosperity
Fund will help to
reduce the impact of
the reduced grant
support available to
local businesses.
Sex
We need to act in
line with the Public
Sector Equality Duty,
including having due
regard to any
differential impacts
Staff: Discussions
will be held with
trade unions and
employees who may
be affected. Service
users: Women are
more Likely to be
income deprived
than men. There is
substantial UK
evidence of
additional barriers
women face in
setting up
businesses
In terms of this
equality group
option 1 will affect
female members of
staff due to the
composition of the
team. Option 2 could
affect either female
or male employees
due to the make-up
of the team. Four
employees may
require to be
redeployed through
the Switch Policy.
Gender Reassign
Business Gateway is
not targeted
specifically on
people in this
equality group but is
available to all.
Evidence suggests
that Trans people
face particular
barriers in the UK in
terms of setting up
businesses
Help and advice will
remain available to
members of this
group to set up and
run businesses.
Health
As savings options
may involve
reduction of
employee numbers
this could have an
effect on employee's
mental health.
Discussions will take
place with trade
unions and
employees within
the Business
Support team.
Additional support
will be available to
any employees
impacted by the
savings options to
ensure their health
and wellbeing.
Human Rights
We are duty Bearer
in terms of the
Human Rights Act
Articles 8 (with
respect to work) and
Articles 14 (non
discrimination) are
relevant in this
situation
In terms of human
rights we have for
example provided
specific support to
the asylum seeker
population of West
Dunbartonshire.Fee
dback is sought from
all Business Gateway
users and informs
the development of
the service.
Help and advice will
remain available to
all
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Business Gateway is
not targeted
specifically on
people in this
equality group but is
available to all.
This cross cuts with
considerations
under 'sex'
Help and advice will
remain available to
members of this
group to set up and
run businesses.
Page 209

Page 210

Pregnancy &
Maternity
In terms of this
equality group,
helping members of
this group to run a
business could
address barriers
they face, e.g.
employment
discrimination.
This cross cuts with
considerations
under 'sex'
Help and advice will
remain available to
members of this
group to set up and
run businesses and
avoid employment
discrimination.
Race
The Council has an
equality outcome on
increasing
participation
generally from this
group.
Uk evidence
suggests that BME
entrepreneurs face
particular challenges
We can link users to
specialist support
and advice, e.g.
groups offering
support for Black
and Minority Ethnic
entrepreneurs. We
have also provided
support to asylum
seekers resident in
West
Dunbartonshire to
help start up and run
businesses.
Help and advice will
remain available to
members of this
group to set up and
run businesses and
overcome racial
discrimination, and
possible low-income
issues.
Religion and Belief
Business Gateway is
not targeted
specifically on
people in this
equality group but is
available to all.
Feedback is sought
from all Business
Gateway users and
informs the
development of the
service.
Help and advice will
remain available to
members of this
group to set up and
run businesses.
Sexual Orientation
Business Gateway is
not targeted
specifically on
people in this
equality group but is
available to all.
Evidence suggests
that LGB people face
particular barriers in
the UK in terms of
setting up
businesses
Help and advice will
remain available to
members of this
group to set up and
run businesses.
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Option 1 will have negative effects on female employees due to the composition of the team. If this
savings option is taken this will result in the redeployment of two female employees of the business
support team. Option 2 could affect male or female employees and if taken would result in a further
two employees being redeployed through the Switch Policy. Option 2 may also impact on the
Council’s ability to deliver on performance targets required for the UK Shared Prosperity Fund. The
proposed budget reductions for workshops, expert help and business grant support would have an
effect on service provision and would reduce the amount of support available to our local businesses
at a time where they continue to face a period of hardship and a number of economic challenges.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Page 210

Page 211

Yes It is important as with other services the Council provides that service development take
account equalities factors and are informed by robust EIAs
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 629: We have assessed the impact of Option 1 and Option 2 of the proposed Economic
Development savings options against the various equality groups and issues they may face. We
believe that Option 1 will have a direct impact on female employees and result in 2 female
employees requiring to be redeployed. Option 2 may affect male or female employees and may
require a further 2 employees to be redeployed through the Switch Policy. It has been highlighted
that Option 2 may have a negative effect on the Business Support team's ability to deliver the
business support programmes through the UK Shared Prosperity Fund. The proposed reduction in
the business support revenue budget will reduce the service provision available through Business
Support/Business Gateway team at a time when local businesses are struggling with a number of
on-going economic challenges such as rising energy costs and rising inflation.
Page 211

Page 212

AssessmentNo 630 Owner sdaly
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget CCF
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Amanda Graham Chief Officer
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Stephen Daly - Citizen and Library Service Manager
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title CCF-12 Citizen Services Provision at Church Street
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
The front desk at Church Street is the only office location where residents
can access services face to face. Under this option, the service would be
removed and residents would be directed to use the phone lines currently
provided in reception to call the contact centre or, in the case of
emergencies, contact the services direct. This would generate a saving of
circa £30,000 per annum.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
Citizen Services
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Members of the public both service users and potential service users Staff may receive
more telephone and other queries if face to face is removed
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there
is any negative impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
The Council must
not discriminate in
the way it provided
services
Older people are
more likely to be
disabled Most older
BME groups are
more likely to be
income deprived
compared to most
Negative
Page 212

Page 213

older white ethnic
groups
Cross Cutting
We need to take into
account how factors
combine to impact
groups and
individuals
No clear evidence of
impact of similar
change caused by
closing of CTCO, as
this was done during
covid lockdown.
Over impact would
be negative
Interplay of factors
such as sex, race and
disability can
magnify likely hold
of consequences
Disability
The council has a
legal duty to ensure
that services are
accessible to all
disabled people, this
duty is proactive
/anticipatory, and
also requires that we
make reasonable
adjustments as
necessary
Some disabled
people will not be
able to use phones
or have difficultly
doing so, e.g. hearing
loss is the most
common form of
sensory impairment.
Lack of face to face
contact may provide
extra difficulties for
some people.
Disabled people, and
households with any
disabled person are
more likely to be
income deprived
Negative
Social & Economic
Impact
We need to have
regard to the Fairer
Scotland Duty in
terms of strategic
decisions including
on how services are
delivered The
Council views
tackling poverty and
deprivation as a
major concern, and
mitigating these
effects as much as
possible
Having no face to
face option for initial
contact would mean
that those who could
not use phone of
digital method,
because of lack of
resources and funds
could be
discriminated
against
More negative for
those in financial
distress
Sex
Servcices must not
adhere to the public
sector equality duty
(PSED)
Women staff this
work station On
average women are
more income
deprived than men,
e.g. women make up
90% of single
parents. Women and
children are more
likely to experience
domestic abuse and
gender based
violence, and for
Staffing: Negative
Differential impact
in terms of sex,
women would likely
be affected
Page 213

Page 214

example may have
been cut off from
money and bank
accounts
Gender Reassign
Health
Health and well
being is council
focus area as noted
in our Strategic Plan
22-27
People will often
need to contact the
Council at times of
great stress.
Lack of a face to face
could increase stress
for some people
Human Rights
The council is a duty
bearer in terms of
the European
Convention of
Human
Rights/Human
rights Act e.g. and
Article 14, non-
discrimination It is
important to
consider how
children and young
people might be
affected.
Human rights
crosscut with those
under equalities, for
examples disability
provisions, and
comments under
gender based
violence, women and
children
Ensuring accessible
services is required
to protect human
rights, including
children's rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Servcices must not
adhere to the public
sector equality duty
(PSED)
The council does not
have a system in
place to ensure that
Language Line can
be accessed for
callers on the
telephone, in
contrast we have
used language Line
at Physical public
counters People
from most BME
groups are more
likely to be income
deprived than
people from most
white ethnic groups.
Potential negative
for all groups and
especially negative
for BME groups who
are more likely to
have Commnication
needs relating to
language that would
currently be much
better address via
initial face to face
contact
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented,
please provide justification for this.
Issues highlighted by proposal. Ensure Language Line is available to communicate with
Page 214

Page 215

phone callers.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Don't Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the
recommendation
EIA 630 details likely negative impacts in terms of race, disability and age, health, human
rights and socio-economic impact. Some challenges described can be mitigated with
effective signposting and service delivery continuing via the emergency repairs line for
those unable to report online, however the lack of any face to face option for the council if
this was removed, could theoretically breach the Equality Act in combination with other
factors if a service was inaccessible to disabled people.
Page 215

Page 216

AssessmentNo 631 Owner mrodger
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget CCF
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Amanda Graham Chief Officer Citizen, Culture and Facilities
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Citizen, Culture and Facilities
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function
or financial decision)
Policy Title CCF-16 Savings Option-reduce two posts from Citizen, Culture and Facilities and
performance areas
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Post one: This post will be a straight transfer to another department, with no
detriment to the employee. Post two: This post will be removed from the
structure. Minor duties will be shared within existing members of the team and/or
added to a currently vacant post with a new job description created and the
position advertised. The current holder of the post wishes to leave the Council.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
None
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Cross Cutting
Disability
Social & Economic
Impact
Sex
Gender Reassign
Health
Page 216

Page 217

Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
Screening 631: The proposal is not relevant for assessment, as changes are minor and staff the
reduction is voluntary, so no assessment is required.
Page 217

Page 218

AssessmentNo 632 Owner sdaly
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget CCF
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Amanda Graham Chief Officer
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Stephen Daly - Citizen and Library Manager
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title CCF-17 Revise Housing Repairs Contact Centre Provision
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
The option would see the contact centre replaced with a single emergency and
right to repair only manned phone line. All other reports would be via a
voicemail service, the website and email. This would result in the reduction of
four members of staff, generating a saving of circa £120,000 per annum. The
emergency controller would continue to operate out of hours, 365 days a year.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
Citizen Services Housing Repairs
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
West Dunbartonshire Council Housing Tenants West Dunbartonshire Council Property and
Assets customers Settlement Team
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Citizens services
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation
to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any
negative impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
The Council must
not discriminate in
the way it provided
services.
Older people are
more likely to be
disabled e.g., to be
hard of hearing,
those leaving
messages may
present an extra
challenge.
Negative for some
older people
Page 218

Page 219

Cross Cutting
It is important that
the Council takes
account of how
factors might
interact.
If relying on
messages being left,
systems in place
would need to
provide a reliable
and timely
callback/contact.
Increased waiting
time may have
negative effect on
both services users
and staff overall.
Disability
The council has a
legal duty to make
its services
accessible to
disabled people, this
is both proactively
('Anticipatory') and
also requires
Reasonable
Adjustments.
E.g. People who are
hard of hearing,
people who are Deaf.
Leaving a message
may present an
extra challenge for
some people.
Negative for some
disabled people May
also impact
negatively on BSL
users
Social & Economic
Impact
Sex
Gender Reassign
Health
Health and
wellbeing is a focus
area in the Council's
Strategic Plan
Accessing help and
advice in good time
helps reduce stress.
Could have negative
impact of services
users due to stress
of not being able to
speak to someone.
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
The Council must
not discriminate in
the way it provided
services
Service users with
no or little English
would potentially
face additional
barriers to accessing
services, a) It is
unclear how a
comprehesible
message could be
left, and b) we have
no system in place to
ensure that staff on
the emergency line
can access Language
Line
Negative for non
English speakers
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Page 219

Page 220

The availability of the emergency repair service would remain in place. The individuals
affected negatively could contact via the emergency service line and receive the service as they
do presently. There would be a need and opportunity to put in place a robust system for call
backs via Language Line and using Contact BSL as required.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 632 details potential negative impacts for some groups including older people, disabled
people and people who do not or cannot use English. In mitigation there is an opportunity to
improve systems for example building in a process for using Language Line for incoming calls
to the emergency line.
Page 220

Page 221

AssessmentNo 633 Owner sdaly
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget CCF
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Amanda Graham Chief Officer
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Stephen Daly - Citizen Services
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title CCF-20 Review of Contact Centre
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Currently the contact centre employs 12 members of staff. Under this option,
the contact centre provision would continue with nine members of staff, with
work undertaken to promote alternative methods of contacting or reporting
issues to the Council including via email and via the website. This would
generate a saving of circa £90,000 per annum.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
Citizen Services
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
West Dunbartonshire Council Housing Tenants West Dunbartonshire Council Property and
Assets customers
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Citizen Services
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation
to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any
negative impact on particular groups.
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
The Council must
not discriminate in
the way it provided
services
Older people are
more likely to be
disabled
Negative for some
older people
Cross Cutting
It is important that
the Council takes
account of how
factors might
If relying messages
being left, systems in
place would need to
provide a reliable
Increased waiting
time may have
negative effect on
both services users
Page 221

Page 222

interact and timely
callback/contact and staff overall
Disability
The council has a
legal duty to make
its services
accessible to
disabled people, this
is both proactively
('Anticipatory') and
also requires
Reasonable
Adjustments.
Waiting time
increases may have
more effect on those
living with certain
impairments or
conditions
Negative for some
disabled people
Social & Economic
Impact
The Council has a
focus on reducing
poverty
Cross cuts with sex
in this instance
Negative see 'sex'
above
Sex
We need to take into
account differential
impacts
All staff are women
apart from one man
Women are more
likely to be in
poverty than men
e.g. women make up
90% of single
parents
Because of staff
composition
reduction on posts
will affect women
more than men
Gender Reassign
Health
Health and
wellbeing is focus
area in the Council's
Strategic Plan
Accessing help and
advice in good time
helps reduce stress
Waiting times likely
to increase
Could have negative
impact of services
users due to stress
of not being able to
speak to someone.
Could increase
stress of workers
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
The Council must
not discriminate in
the way it provided
services
Service users with
no or little English
would potentially
face additional
anxiety due to
increased waiting
time,. There is no
system in place for
language Line use in
this Contact method,
there is an
opportunity to build
this in.
Potentially more
negative for
speakers of
languages other than
English
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Page 222

Page 223

Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The availability of the emergency repair service would remain in place. The individuals
affected negatively could contact via the emergency service line and receive the service as they
do presently. There would be a need and opportunity to put in place a robust system for calls
and call backs via Language Line and using Contact BSL as required.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Yes
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 633 details potential impacts for older people, disabled people and some members of
some BME groups. There would be a need and opportunity to put in place a robust system for
calls and call backs via Language Line and using Contact BSL as required. As the vast majority
of staff are female reductions are likely to affect women more than men.
Page 223

Page 224

AssessmentNo 634 Owner ajgraham
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget CCF
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Amanda Graham Chief Officer - CCF
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Amanda Graham
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title CCF 13_Review community facilities
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Under this option, community facility provision would be reviewed with up
to seven centres transferred to community ownership or closed. Those in
scope are: • Bonhill Community Centre (Ladyton) • Napier Hall • Bowling
Hall • Glenhead Community Centre • Skypoint Community Centre •
Clydebank East Community Centre • West Dunbartonshire Activity Centre
(Brucehill) This option would result in an overall generated of saving of over
£450,000 – part of the figure is from reduction in West Dunbartonshire
Leisure Trust staffing with a total saving for the Council of £257,700. There
is also a potential to achieve capital receipts from sales of the buildings,
totalling £2,415,000. A further £987,694 could be saved as a result of non-
capital condition survey works programmed not progressing.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
Amanda Graham in partnership with WDLT which operates the buildings on
the council's behalf as part of the SLA and in line with the management fee
transferred to the trust. Assets would have a lead role in any proposal to
transfer the properties or dispose of properties
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Staff, community groups and citizens
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Assets, WDLT, consultation was undertaken in 2018 as part of a review of the community
facilities at that point. In the event of community assets transfer a range of groups would be
involved with a view to identifying a suitable group to manage the facility
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is
any negative impact on particular groups.
Page 224

Page 225

Needs Evidence Impact
Age
The Council must
not discriminate in
the way it provides
services
Older people are
more likely to be
more reliant on
services provided in
their
neighbourhoods.
Children and parents
may be more likely
to use some sites.
If no alternative
provision was found
this could have a
negative impact on
some age groups.
Cross Cutting
Access to
community facilities
that support a range
of activities can have
a positive impact on
the socio
determinants of
health and wellbeing
as well as forging
community
cohesion.
Community facilities
can provide for the
health, welfare,
social, educational,
spiritual,
recreational, leisure
and cultural needs of
the community, and
play an important
role in the
development of
vibrant
neighbourhoods by
creating a sense of
place and providing
opportunities for
people to meet and
interact socially.
If no alternative
provision was found
this could have a
negative impact on
reducing the socio
determinants of
poor health and
increasing
community
cohesion.
Disability
The Council has a
legal duty to make
its services
accessible to
disabled people, this
is both proactively
and also requires
reasonable
adjustments.
Disabled people are
more likely to be
more reliant on
services provided in
their
neighbourhoods.
If no alternative
provision was found
this could have a
negative impact on
some disability
groups.
Social & Economic
Impact
The Council needs to
have regard to the
Fairer Scotland Duty
in terms of strategic
decision including
on how services are
delivered. The
Council views
tackling poverty and
deprivation as a
major concern and
mitigating the
impacts of these as
much as possible.
Any reduction in
facilities within
neighbourhoods
could limit access to
groups and activities
particularly for
those experiencing
deprivation
If no alternative
provision was found
this could have a
negative impact on
low-income groups.
Sex The Council needs
have due regard to
Women provide the
vast majority of child
Groups may need to
find alternative
Page 225

Page 226

the Public Sector
Equaity Duty
care. Toddlers group
for example may use
some facilities
venues locally
Gender Reassign
Health
The Council has
made a commitment
to improve health
and wellbeing
through the strategic
plan.
Community groups
utilising the centres
offer activity to
support the
wellbeing of
individuals
If no alternative
provision was found
this could have a
negative impact on
improving health
and wellbeing.
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented,
please provide justification for this.
The area currently, per head of the population, has access to a significant number of facilities
and in relation to the Council owned centres, these are not fully utilised. Opportunity exists
to rationalise the estate and maximise the use of community facilities. There are
opportunities for community asset transfer to retain the facilities under alternative
providers and also to engage and support groups to source alternative space to maintain
provision in their neighbourhood.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 634 highlights potential impact on grounds of age, race, disability or socio-economic.
The previous consultation in 2018 indicates an appetite for community asset transfer and
through this it would be possible to maintain access and provision for groups and
individuals. Where this was not possible, the Council would work with impacted groups to
secure alternative accommodation as it did during Covid, to mitigate impact.
Page 226

Page 227

AssessmentNo 636 Owner ajgraham
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget CCF
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Amanda Graham Chief Officer - CCF
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Amanda Graham
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title CCF_03 WDLT efficiencies
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
The Council currently provides an annual management fee to WDLT for the
strategic and operational management of its Sport and Leisure Facilities,
Community Facilities, Sports Development, Active Schools, Outdoor
Recreation facilities and for event delivery. In 2022/23 the fee was £4.16m.
Under this option, the management fee would be reduced, and/or the Council
would not meet the increase in utility charges for this year. The fee reduction
would be a set percentage, which for illustration purposes would equate to •
10% reduction - £416,107 • 7.5% reduction - £312,080 • 5% reduction -
£208,053 The Trust’s current utilities bill is £983,000 and it is projected this
could be up to £500,000 more in 23/24. The Council would not pay the
increase.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
CCF, WDLT
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
WDLT and potentially services users
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Discussion with WDLT
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation
to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any
negative impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
The Council and
WDLT, as it provides
services for us,
In determining
options for
addressing any
Funding options to
be assessed by
WDLT in terms of
Page 227

Page 228

needs to comply
with Public Sector
Equality Duty
funding gaps WDLT
should considered
relevant evidence
for the areas listed
below
how they might
impact services
Cross Cutting
We need to be aware
of how the factors
above interact for
communities and
individuals
The factors above do
interact. In terms of
equality groups and
factors above. EIAs
carried out on WDLT
services can be used
to inform future
EIAs
Funding options to
be assessed by
WDLT in terms of
how they might
interact to impact
services
Disability As above As above As above
Social & Economic
Impact
We need to take into
account the Fairer
Scotland Duty when
making Strategic
funding decisions.
WDLT will have to
look at economies or
other means to fill
the funding gap
Funding options to
be assessed by
WDLT in terms of
how they might
impact services
Sex As above As above As above
Gender Reassign As above As above As above
Health
The Council
Strategic Plan has
focus on Health and
Well Being.
The SLA in place
Funding options to
be assessed by
WDLT in terms of
how they might
impact services
Human Rights
The Council is a duty
bearer in terms of
the European
Convention on
Human Rights, this
extends to WDLT as
they provide public
services on our
behalf
Human Rights
considerations cross
cut with equalities
Funding options to
be assessed by
WDLT in terms of
how they might
impact services
Marriage & Civil
Partnership As above As above As above
Pregnancy &
Maternity As above As above As above
Race As above As above As above
Religion and Belief As above As above As above
Sexual Orientation As above As above As above
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Page 228

Page 229

Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 636 - The option would see the management fee to the leisure trust reduce however it
would then be for the Trust to decide how to manage this reduction in funding. The impact is
not yet clear however the Council has an SLA with the Trust for the delivery of core services.
Any change by the Trust which impacted on this would require to be negotiated and agreed
with the Council.
Page 229

Page 230

AssessmentNo 637 Owner ajgraham
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget CCF
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Amanda Graham Chief Officer - CCF
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Amanda Graham
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title CCF-09 Clydebank Town Hall opening hours
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
The Town Hall is currently open to the public five days a week. Post Covid,
plans are being developed to address the low visitor numbers but in light of the
high operational costs of the building there is opportunity to consider reducing
opening hours. Option 1 Under this option, the Town Hall would continue to
operate on four days. The building would open on additional days as required
to support pre-booked events. A review of usage and bookings would be
undertaken to ascertain the most appropriate days for opening and closure.
Access for elected members and support staff would be maintained on four
week days. Option 2 Under this option, the Town Hall would operate over three
days. The building would continue to open on additional days as required to
support pre-booked events as the cost would be mitigated by the income
generated. Access for elected members and support staff would be maintained
on three week days
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
CCF
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Staff, visitors
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Staff
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation
to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any
negative impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age Accessible Older people are less Identifying a
Page 230

Page 231

community spaces
contribute to
community cohesion
like to be digitally
included
sustainable path in
terms of opening
hours for the town
hall would be a
positive impact
Cross Cutting
Accessible
community spaces
contribute to
community cohesion
Any changes to
opening hours needs
to be clearly
communicated to
members of the
public
Sharing spaces and
social contact can
help foster good
relations and
support community
cohesions
Any option adopted
needs to take these
factor into
consideration
Disability
Accessible
community spaces
contribute to
community cohesion
Some disabled
people are less likely
to be digitally
included Accessible
spaces are therefore
very important Feed
back from Deaf/BSL
users for example
has noted a
preference for this
venue for
engagement
Identifying a
sustainable path in
terms of opening
hours for the town
hall would be a
positive impact
Social & Economic
Impact
We need to consider
the impact of major
decisions in line
with the October
2021 Statutory
Guidance on the
Fairer Scotland Duty
There is the
possibility that
extended opening
hours may provide
extra income
Any option adopted
needs to take these
factor into
consideration
Sex
Gender Reassign
Health
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Page 231

Page 232

Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 637: There may be some small/minor potential positive impacts in terms of disability and
age from the proposal detailed in the EIA between opening 4 days compared to 3 days but these
are hard to assess. It is important however that a sustainable arrangement is found.
Page 232

Page 233

AssessmentNo 640 Owner apriestman
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget Resource
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Andi Priestman Shared Service Manager - Audit &Fraud
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Andi Priestman - Shared Service Manager - Audit &Fraud Laurence Slavin -
Chief Officer - Resources
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RES_01 Savings exercise 2023/24 - Audit &Fraud Provision
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
The Audit &Fraud team has carried a vacant post since August 2019. The
team continues to achieve positive results despite this vacancy and
therefore this presents an opportunity to remove this post along with
vacant hours from the Audit &Fraud Structure. Due to more recent staff
changes being notified in 2023 around retirement and an expression of
interest to retire from the organisation at end of March 2024, there are
further opportunities to review existing posts within the current structure
and amend these to align with ongoing requirements to deliver a risk-based
audit and fraud plan. The work of the Audit &Fraud team is driven by an
annual plan which ensures that resources are focused on areas of higher
risk such as financial, legal/regulatory, reputational and operational risk.
The removal of the vacant hours/posts will not impact on the team's ability
to deliver the required level of assurance on the system of internal control
as higher risk areas will be prioritised. New risk-based audit methodology
has been implemented such that efficiencies will be achieved in the
planning, fieldwork and reporting stages of the team's work going forward.
The removal of the Grade 8 post within the fraud section will present career
progression opportunities for other team members.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
Shared Service Manager - Audit &Fraud Chief Officer - Resources
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
No direct implications on the team as they all undertake their own workload which is driven
by the areas of focus identified in the annual audit plan. A risk-based approach was
introduced in 2020/21 to ensure that resources are focused on areas of higher risk
Page 233

Page 234

including financial, legal/regulatory, reputational and operational risks to ensure that the
work of the team aligns with the Council's risk management strategy. The purpose,
authority, responsibilities and scope are set out in the Internal Audit Charter and the work
of the team conforms with the Public Sector Internal Audit Standards.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
The Lead Internal Auditor and the Section Lead - Corporate Fraud will be consulted on the
construction of the risk-based annual plan to ensure that resources are aligned to areas of
higher risk including financial, legal/regulatory, reputational and operational risks. This will
ensure that the work of the team aligns with the Council's risk management strategy and
can provide an overall audit opinion on the system of internal control.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is
any negative impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Cross Cutting
We have looked at
how factors may
interact, see sections
1 and 2 of this
assessment,
including for
protected
characteristics
There is no
differential impact
on staff due to the
nature of changes, or
in terms of services
The removal of the
Grade 8 post within
the fraud section will
present career
progression
opportunities for
other team
members.
Disability
Social & Economic
Impact
Sex
Gender Reassign
Health
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented,
please provide justification for this.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 640: There is no differential impact on staff due to the nature of changes, or in terms of
services. The removal of the Grade 8 post within the fraud section will present career
progression opportunities for other team members. There are no negative impacts
identified by this assessment.
Page 234

Page 235

AssessmentNo 640 Owner apriestman
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget Resource
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Andi Priestman Shared Service Manager - Audit &Fraud
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Andi Priestman - Shared Service Manager - Audit &Fraud Laurence Slavin -
Chief Officer - Resources
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RES_01 Savings exercise 2023/24 - Audit &Fraud Provision
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
The Audit &Fraud team has carried a vacant post since August 2019. The
team continues to achieve positive results despite this vacancy and
therefore this presents an opportunity to remove this post along with
vacant hours from the Audit &Fraud Structure. Due to more recent staff
changes being notified in 2023 around retirement and an expression of
interest to retire from the organisation at end of March 2024, there are
further opportunities to review existing posts within the current structure
and amend these to align with ongoing requirements to deliver a risk-based
audit and fraud plan. The work of the Audit &Fraud team is driven by an
annual plan which ensures that resources are focused on areas of higher
risk such as financial, legal/regulatory, reputational and operational risk.
The removal of the vacant hours/posts will not impact on the team's ability
to deliver the required level of assurance on the system of internal control
as higher risk areas will be prioritised. New risk-based audit methodology
has been implemented such that efficiencies will be achieved in the
planning, fieldwork and reporting stages of the team's work going forward.
The removal of the Grade 8 post within the fraud section will present career
progression opportunities for other team members.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
Shared Service Manager - Audit &Fraud Chief Officer - Resources
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
No direct implications on the team as they all undertake their own workload which is driven
by the areas of focus identified in the annual audit plan. A risk-based approach was
introduced in 2020/21 to ensure that resources are focused on areas of higher risk
Page 235

Page 236

including financial, legal/regulatory, reputational and operational risks to ensure that the
work of the team aligns with the Council's risk management strategy. The purpose,
authority, responsibilities and scope are set out in the Internal Audit Charter and the work
of the team conforms with the Public Sector Internal Audit Standards.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
The Lead Internal Auditor and the Section Lead - Corporate Fraud will be consulted on the
construction of the risk-based annual plan to ensure that resources are aligned to areas of
higher risk including financial, legal/regulatory, reputational and operational risks. This will
ensure that the work of the team aligns with the Council's risk management strategy and
can provide an overall audit opinion on the system of internal control.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is
any negative impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Cross Cutting
We have looked at
how factors may
interact, see sections
1 and 2 of this
assessment,
including for
protected
characteristics
There is no
differential impact
on staff due to the
nature of changes, or
in terms of services
The removal of the
Grade 8 post within
the fraud section will
present career
progression
opportunities for
other team
members.
Disability
Social & Economic
Impact
Sex
Gender Reassign
Health
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented,
please provide justification for this.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 640: There is no differential impact on staff due to the nature of changes, or in terms of
services. The removal of the Grade 8 post within the fraud section will present career
progression opportunities for other team members. There are no negative impacts
identified by this assessment.
Page 236

Page 237

AssessmentNo 641 Owner kshannon
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget Resource
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Karen Shannon Section Head/Finance Business Partner
(include job titles/organisation)
Members
Karen Shannon-Section Head Finance, Administration
&Control/Finance Business Partner Lauren Slavin-Chief Officer-
Resources
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy
policy function or financial decision)
Policy Title RES-10 Savings Option-Insurance Management
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Reduce insurance team by either a shared service with another
authority or shared team leader by expanding role of other Team
Leader within Finance. Review of service to be undertaken to review
what work will be done/stopped/ how service is delivered.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
Chief Officer Section Head/Finance Business Partner Finance Staff
within the Insurance Team
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
Team members Service departments within the wider Council
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Team members Service departments within the wider Council Wider finance staff
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether
there is any negative impact on particular groups.
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
The Council has a
duty of care towards
all of its workers,
and in terms of the
Public Sector
Equality Duty
Age profile of the
team
There is no specific
impact identified in
relation to age.
Cross Cutting
Page 237

Page 238

Disability
Social & Economic
Impact
Sex
The Council has a
duty of care towards
all of its workers,
and in terms of the
Public Sector
Equality Duty
Profile of the team
If there are
reductions, because
of workforce
composition this will
fall on women rather
than men. Negative.
Any potential
reduction in staffing
requirements could
be managed through
SWITCH
redeployment
programme.
Additional support
will be available to
any employees
impacted by the
savings options to
ensure their health
and wellbeing.
Gender Reassign
Health
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented,
please provide justification for this.
Council has a statutory duty to provide a balanced budget. Any potential reduction in
staffing requirements could be managed through SWITCH redeployment programme.
Additional support will be available to any employees impacted by the savings options
to ensure their health and wellbeing.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Yes
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the
recommendation
EIA 641 details the likely impact of the proposals. There is a negative impact on
females due to the composition of the team.
Page 238

Page 239

AssessmentNo 643 Owner ajgraham
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget CCF
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Amanda Graham Chief Officer - CCF
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Amanda Graham
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title CCF06 Generate income from buildings
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Space in Council buildings is not being fully utilised post-pandemic and
opportunity exists to maximise use of our assets by sub-letting. The proposal is
to generate additional income by letting space within the publically accessible
area of Church Street; Bruce Street Baths and Clydebank Leisure Centre
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
CCF, Assets, WDLT
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation
to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any
negative impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Cross Cutting
Disability
Social & Economic
Impact
Sex
Gender Reassign
Health
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Page 239

Page 240

Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 643 is a proposal to maximise additional income generation opportunities using Council
buildings. The recommendation to introduce this policy has been made on the basis that there is
an anticipated positive impact generated. The assessment has not identified any potential for
discrimination or adverse impact.
Page 240

Page 241

AssessmentNo 644 Owner kshannon
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget Resource
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer-Resources
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Adrian Gray - Finance Business Partner
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RES-03 Savings Option - Remove Elderly Welfare Grant Fund
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Remove the historic £15 per resident payment made annually through the
elderly grant fund to registered groups and individuals
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
Finance team within WDC &ASU
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Anyone currently receiving the payment from the Elderly Welfare Grant Fund
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
This is part of the range of savings proposals being considered to bridge the challenging
financial gap the council faces over the next three years. Once approved by Council, it will be
communicated to all residents.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation
to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any
negative impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
No requirement to
provide this funding.
The Council budget
needs to have
regards to Best
Value
Considerations on
how money is spent
and its impact
The policy only
provides £15 per
annum for each
resident over the
specified age
Positive - the
removal of the grant
would remove
current inequality
for those under the
specified age. It is
acknowledged that
those under the
specified age may or
may not be just as
Page 241

Page 242

vulnerable at those
over the specified
age but are not
eligible for the
payment. Negative -
Loss of £15 per
eligible resident if
the option to remove
is pursued.
Cross Cutting
Disability
Social & Economic
Impact
We need to have
regards to the Fairer
Scotland Duty
£15 is only a very
small proportion of
the annual income
for those over the
specified age and
would have a
negligable effect
Neutral
Sex
Gender Reassign
Health
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Council has a statutory duty to balance the budget
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Yes
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 644: The removal of the grant would remove a current inequality where those under the
specified age may or may not be just as vulnerable as those over that age but are not eligible
for the payment. It is noted that £15 is only a very small proportion of the annual income for
those over the specified age and would have a negligable effect.
Page 242

Page 243

AssessmentNo 645 Owner kshannon
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget Resource
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer-Resources
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Adrian Gray-Finance Business Partner Laurence Slavin-Chief Officer-Resources
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function or
financial decision)
Policy Title RES05 Savings Option-Remove Provost Hospitality Fund
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
To remove the Provost Hospitality Fund, which is used for hospitality (food and
refreshments) at events hosted by the Provost and is also used to buy flowers for
anniversaries for couples within the community.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Chief Officer Finance Business Partner Corporate Communications Team
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
Members of the community who attend an event hosted by the Provost or who would receive a
celebratory presentation on the event of an anniversary
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Finance Corporate Communications Team
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
No requirement to
provide, flowers etc
for anniversaries
Relevant to couples
married for a long
time
Will not have any
significant negative
effect
Cross Cutting
Disability
Social & Economic
Impact
Sex
Gender Reassign
Health
Page 243

Page 244

Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
The Council has a
long standing
commitment to
LGBT History month
The LGBT history
month is followed by
a short event.
Under the proposal
this event can still go
ahead with no
catering
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 645 has been screened and is not relevant, it does not disadvantage any member of the
community.
Page 244

Page 245

AssessmentNo 646 Owner dmain
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget CCF
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Amanda Graham Chief Officer
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Stephen Daly - Citizen Services David Main - Library Services
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title CCF 01 Budget options - Co-location of library services
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Under this option, some library branches would be co-located with other
Council venues, such as community centres or schools. Rather than close,
library provision would be retained for the benefit of the community, with
savings generated from repairs, maintenance and running costs at the
current library sites.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
Library Services
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
West Dunbartonshire Council residents/library users
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Library Services
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is
any negative impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
The Council must
not discriminate in
the way it provided
services.
Older people are
more likely to
experience mobility
issues and social
isolation.
A change in location
may introduce new
barriers to access
(such as roads to
cross, steps etc).
Such changes are
likely to negatively
impact older people.
Cross Cutting It is important that A separate proposed A change in location
Page 245

Page 246

the Council takes
account of how
factors might
interact.
reduction in library
opening hours
(CCF18) may further
reduce access to
library services.
and opening hours
may present new
barriers to access
(e.g. bus timetables
and stop locations).
Disability
The council has a
legal duty to make
its services
accessible to
disabled people, this
is both proactively
('Anticipatory') and
also requires
Reasonable
Adjustments.
People with mobility
issues may
experience barriers
to accessing Council
services located in
unsuitable buildings.
Any change in
library location may
introduce new
physical barriers to
access and these
would likely further
negatively impact
those with mobility
issues.
Social & Economic
Impact
The Council has a
focus on reducing
poverty.
Library services
seek to combat
many issues
associated with
poverty and the
cost-of-living,
including offering
free internet access,
free reading
material, free and
welcoming warm
spaces, free
community support
and free educational
activities.
A change in location
may reduce the
space available to
deliver library
services (such as
fewer PCs, space for
groups to meet etc).
These will most
likely further
negatively impact
those who are
already socially
excluded and
experiencing
hardship.
Sex
Gender Reassign
Health
Health and
wellbeing is focus
area in the Council's
Strategic Plan.
Reading is proven to
contribute to
positive mental
health. Libraries also
act as an information
and collection point
for some community
health services.
Change of locations
may limit the space
available for
community support
groups to meet,
health information
to be displayed etc.
Reductions to the
library offer may
contribute to
adverse mental
health issues for
some service users.
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
The Council must
not discriminate in
the way it provided
People who do not
speak English well
may experience
Any reduction to
local signposting to
sources of support
Page 246

Page 247

services. barriers to accessing
support.
will likely negatively
impact those who do
not speak English as
a first language.
Requiring users to
access services
online will likely
introduce new
barriers to this
group.
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented,
please provide justification for this.
The proposal would result in the Council owning less buildings with associated reduced
costs in utilities, rates, maintenance. The proposal would safeguard library provision in the
local area and maximise use of existing Council venues. Although potentially viewed as a
denigration of service, avoiding closure means residents can still access vital library and
community services. The proposal would not impact on the employee headcount.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Yes
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 646 details potential impacts for older people, disabled people and for those
experiencing social isolation and/or hardship from poverty. While the proposed change
may introduce new barriers to access, this proposal seeks to continue to offer library
services in the local area. Full consideration of any barriers to access will be undertaken at
the time of producing final designs, which will include mitigation measures wherever
possible.
Page 247

Page 248

AssessmentNo 648 Owner sbrooks
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment HE Budget
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Stephen Brooks Working4U Manager
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Peter Barry Chief Officer Housing and Employability
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function
or financial decision)
Policy Title HE07 Assessment of impact reduction to W4U of 5%, 13% or 25%
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Consider the impact on services as a result of reduction in budget and associated
loss of staff approximate (5%, 13% or 25% FTEs)
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Elected Members, Senior WDC Staff, senior W4U staff
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Staff, service users Working 4U seeks to address the underlying causes of poverty, as well as the
symptoms, by specifically tackling unemployment, providing opportunities to increase levels of
education, skills, confidence and personal development as well support to claim in and out of work
benefits and manage debt. The specialist components of Working 4U’s services are: Learning and
Development that supports disadvantaged or vulnerable groups and individuals of all ages to
engage in learning. This covers a range of activity, such as youth work, family and adult learning,
including adult literacy and English for Speakers of Other languages (ESOL) and community
development and capacity building. Working 4U’s focus is on youth work and family and adult
learning. Employability encompasses all the things that enable people to improve their quality of
life by increasing their chances of getting a job, staying in a job, and progressing further in work.
The focus of our work is placed on supporting those that are facing the most intense levels of
disadvantage, including families most likely to be affected by child poverty, young people, older
workers, long-term unemployed and people from equalities groups. Benefit /debt Information and
Advice National standards state that all debt counselling, income maximisation support, money
advice and welfare benefit advice services service providers must be committed to providing
equity of access to services for all. We provide a service that is open to all; however, given the
socio/economic circumstances we prioritise people who are most vulnerable to disadvantage. In
our service delivery we will place emphasis on supporting people facing difficult life transitions,
Page 248

Page 249

including, for example: • Those with life limiting conditions; • People affected by mental health
issues; • Those affected by drug and alcohol mis-use; • Those affected by housing and
homelessness • Newly unemployed and retired. In addition, we place emphasis on supporting
families with children who are more susceptible to poverty and disadvantage, including families
with children: • where the mother is under 25 years of age; • larger families; • minority ethnic
households; • lone parent families; • families with children under 1 year old. • Families and
children with experience of the care system; • Children with caring responsibilities; and • Those
living in areas of high material deprivation.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Consultation has been carried out in the context of the budget review. This has included
consultation among Elected Members, senior Council staff and managers at Working4U.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age Child poverty is
focus for the Council
High child poverty in
WDC 18-30 year
olds are
experiencing
particular economic
strain
Reduced provision
may result in
negative impacts for
children and young
people
Cross Cutting
Working4U seeks to
improve the quality
of lives for people
from disadvantaged
backgrounds who
are most likely to be
affected by
inequality, poverty
and disadvantage
which is driven by
structural or
institutional factors.
These factors
include: • Income
from social security
and benefits in kind,
influenced by: o
design and
generosity of
welfare benefits; o
benefit sanctions
and recovery of
advance payments; o
hardship payments
and third-party
debts; o barriers to
accessing financial
support (including
child maintenance).
• Income from
employment,
influenced by the
The key drivers of
poverty identified in
the legislation
include income
levels and the cost of
living. Income is
determined, to an
extent, by levels of
economic activity
and employment.
While there are
many sources of
labour market
information,
examples provided
by NOMIS (Office for
National Statistics
Labour Market
Profile - Nomis -
Official Census and
Labour Market
Statistics
(nomisweb.co.uk))
will illustrate West
Dunbartonshire’s
comparative labour
market profile to
suggest the need for
targeted
employability
support.
Employment and
There are three
options for
consideration. These
options complement
previous savings on
service provision
and focus on staff
costs. • Option 1
Reducing internal
staff costs by 8%
with estimated loss
of 4.5ftes
(approximately 5%
of Working4U total
staff); • Option 2
Reducing internal
costs by 25%
affecting
approximately
13ftes
(approximately 13%
of W4U staff); •
Option 3: Reducing
internal staff costs
by 50% affecting
approximately
25ftes (25% of
working4U staff).
The value of staff
costs that are funded
through the
Council’s core
Page 249

Page 250

availability of jobs,
hours and the level
of earnings, and
barriers to taking up
that work, such as
childcare
responsibilities; plus
qualifications and
skills, which can
influence both
contemporary and
future child poverty.
• Costs of living,
including housing,
food and fuel costs,
the poverty
premium, the costs
of the school day,
and the extra,
unavoidable costs of
disability or living in
a rural area. We
provide support
because: • People
don’t always claim
the benefits they are
entitled to; • The
benefits system is
difficult to
understand; •
Navigating the
process without
assistance can lead
to errors; • Appeals
without help can
lead to wrong
decisions; •
Understanding
welfare reform is
difficult. • People
face physical and
psychological
barriers to
employment and
learning
opportunities
because of personal
circumstances and
professional support
will help people to
overcome these
barriers. • Its
difficult to maintain
Economic Activity:
West
Dunbartonshire has
a comparatively
higher rate of
economic inactivity
with 26.2% of the
16-64 years age
group in
employment. The
comparative figure
for Scotland is
23.8% and Great
Britain’s figure is
21.6%. At 19%, West
Dunbartonshire has
a higher proportion
of workless
households than
both Scotland
(18.1%) and Great
Britain (13.6%). Of
those in
employment, there
is a higher
proportion in West
Dunbartonshire
reliant on part-time
work (35.5%). This
is higher than the
figure for Scotland
(33.2%) and Great
Britain (32.1%). A
review of the NOMIS
statistics reveals
that the job density
in West
Dunbartonshire is
estimated at 0.61;
this is much lower
than the figure for
Glasgow (1.04);
Scotland (0.80) and
Great Britain (0.84).
In effect, although
there are
comparatively
higher numbers of
people out of work,
there are also
comparatively fewer
opportunities
available in West
budget is
approximately
£2.29m. Reduction
of Working4U
service by 8% will
have a value of
£183,351. This will
affect approximately
4.5 members of staff
all of whom will, by
necessity of our
funding sources,
come from either
our Community
Learning and
Development team
or our welfare
benefits/debt team
or a combination of
both. This will have
an impact on both
team’s ability to
meet growing
demand for their
services and will
create further
challenges for the
teams. This is
particularly the case
for
benefit/advice/debt
team who are
experiencing higher
levels of demand
from increasing
numbers of people
with a growing
complexity of
concerns related to
the cost of living
crisis. A reduction of
4.5 ftes in
Community
Learning will be the
equivalent of a 20%
reduction of the
team (youth/adult
literacies, youth
diversionary
activities, summer
programmes). The
result will be a
decrease in adult
Page 250

Page 251

jobsearch
momentum and
participating in
learning without
professional, expert
support.
Dunbartonshire.
Addressing
unemployment and
underemployment is
consistent with
addressing the
income drivers of
poverty and will
therefore feature
extensively in our
approach to
addressing child
poverty. Benefits
The number of
people in receipt of
out of work benefits
is a contributory
factor to the level of
child poverty. In
West
Dunbartonshire
4.5% of the
population in the 16-
64 years group is in
receipt of out of
work benefits. This
is higher than the
average in Scotland
(3.2%) and Great
Britain (3.8%) and
represents 2,525
people. 18.4% of
households in West
Dunbartonshire are
in receipt of the
main benefits. This
compares
unfavourably with
the figure for
Scotland (13%) and
Great Britain (11%) .
In effect,
comparatively more
people in West
Dunbartonshire rely
on benefits for their
income. Maximising
their entitlement
will feature strongly
in our approach to
maximising income
literacy support and
youth diversionary
activities, school
holiday programmes
and youth
representation. This
savings option will
place more pressure
on schools, police
and other services to
address the absence
of these services.
The teams have
contributed to 993
people entering
education or
training; and 457
people gaining a
qualification. 20%
reduction will lead
to fewer people
securing access to
learning
opportunities (200
fewer); and 90 fewer
people securing a
qualification. Option
2: Reducing internal
staff costs by 25%
Reduction of
Working4U service
internal staff costs
will generate a
potential saving
value of £572,971.
This will affect 13
FTE. The majority of
whom will, by
necessity of our
funding sources,
come from either
our Community
Learning and
Development Team
or our Welfare
Benefits/Debt Team
or a combination of
both. The effect of
this level of saving
on both welfare
rights and
community learning
would be significant.
Page 251

Page 252

13fte is equivalent to
50% of the staff in
each team. This
represents a
substantial
reduction in the
teams’ activity and
will have a
significant impact on
the lives of those
people that W4U
targets for support.
For example, this
would lead to a
reduction of income
generated for the
most disadvantage
in West
Dunbartonshire by
£5.4million each
year. The number
gaining
qualifications would
be reduced 342
people and the
number entering
education and/or
training would
reduce by 342
people. Option 3:
Reduction of
Working4U service
internal staff costs
will generate a
potential saving
value of £1.14m.
This will affect 25
FTE. The effect of
this level of saving
on both welfare
rights and
community learning
would be substantial
and will leave them
unable to maintain
the service in a way
that meets growing
demand. 25fte is
equivalent to 50% of
the staff in both
teams. This
represents a
substantial
Page 252

Page 253

reduction in the
teams’ activity and
will have a
significant impact on
the lives of those
people that W4U
targets for support.
The result will be a
substantial loss in
the benefit income
generated for
disadvantaged
residents, fewer
people having access
to debt counselling
and potential
increase in
consumer debts and
council tax/rent
arrears. Fewer
people will have
access to learning
support and, as a
result, will miss out
on opportunities to
improve their lives
and the lives of their
families. Sharing the
reduction between
both teams will
reduce the impact.
However in both
cases it will have a
significant impact on
the teams ‘ability to
maintain the current
level of service
provision at a time
when demand from
the most
disadvantaged
people in West
Dunbartonshire is
intensifying.
Disability
Our child poverty
report notes
disabled people as
priority group
Disabled people and
those living in a
household with a
disabled person are
more likely to be
income deprived
Reduced provision
may affect efforts to
reduce poverty for
this group
Social & Economic
Impact
Reducing child
poverty is a focus for
the council
Groups noted above
may be especially
vulnerable, as well
Reduced provision
may result in
reduced ability to
Page 253

Page 254

as other with low
incomes
tackle economic and
financial inequality
Sex
Our child poverty
report notes women
people as priority
group
Women comprise
90% of single
parents who are
more likely to be
income deprived
Reduced provision
may affect women
disproportionately
compared to men
Gender Reassign
Health
Human Rights
Human Rights Act;
For example Article
8 family life UNCRC
(Best practice)
The work of W4U
supports elements of
human rights
Reduced provision
may negatively
affect the fulfillment
of rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity Cross cuts with sex Cross cuts with sex Cross cuts with Sex
Race
Our child poverty
report notes people
from BME groups as
a priority group
People from BME
groups more likely
to me more income
deprived
Reduced provision
may affect efforts to
reduce poverty for
this group
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The options have been generated as a contribution to the discussions about budget reductions
within Working4U in order to assist the Council to manage its budget deficit. The options will
result in a reduction in staff numbers of around in option 1: 4.ftes; option 2: 13 ftes; Option 3: 25
ftes.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Working4U has a monitoring framework for reporting output and impacts of its activities. This
includes key performance indicators illustrating the statistics for the number of people supported
and the outcome of that support. This will provide information that will determine how funding
resources are deployed.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Modify
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
Assessment 648 provides information about the impact of a budget reduction of 8% and 25% for
Working4U. The information will be used as part of the option assessment. A 25% reduction will
have a substantial impact on service provision affecting the most vulnerable households in West
Dunbartonshire. While an 8% reduction has less of an impact it should be considered in light of
changes within other funding sources that Working4U currently has available. Reductions in
European Funding and No One Left Behind Funding, which have yet to be decided, will have a
further negative impact beyond the savings required by the Council. Reductions show potential
negative impacts for some groups in particular women, disabled people, children people from BME
Groups.
Page 254

Page 255

AssessmentNo 653 Owner GMacfarlane2
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment Budget R and N
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer - Roads &Neighbourhood
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Roads Services
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function or
financial decision)
Policy Title R&N16 Roads review of activities to support education
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
The Review of roads support for education services
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or
implementation of policy.
Roads and Education Services
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities
(A) or foster good relations (F) No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Pupils engaged with through the activities provided at school by Roads officers in an education
environment.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Education services
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Reduce cycle and
walking Education
for school age
children
Roads officers
support education
services with safe
walking and cycling.
this will cease.
May reduce number
of pupils with
necessary road skills
to safely travel to
school
Cross Cutting
Disability
Social & Economic
Impact
Sex
Page 255

Page 256

Gender Reassign
Health
Reduced Support
and education of
safe cycling and
walking
Encouraging
children to walk and
cycle Supports a
healthy lifestyle
Less encouragement
for children to walk
to school
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please provide
justification for this.
Proposal has a negative effect on pupils in an education environment with a reduction in walking and
cycling training. Education services has responsibility for developing a safe routes to school plan and
outcomes from that plan will be developed and delivered in partnership with the roads service
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Liaison will be carried out with education services
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 653; Proposal may have a negative effect on pupils in an education environment with a reduction in
walking and cycling training. Education services has responsibility for developing a safe routes to school
plan and outcomes from that plan
Page 256

Page 257

AssessmentNo 654 Owner rrea
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget Resource
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Laurence Slavin Head of Finance
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Richard Butler Ryan Chalmers, Section Head revenues and Benefits
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function
or financial decision)
Policy Title RES -11 Invoicing Automation (Debtors and Creditors)
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
The Council currently issues debtor and creditor invoices to residents and
business for services received by the Council manually in Agresso via the Central
Admin Support (CAS) team. Under this proposal, invoices would be issued via an
automated system. Automation would deliver efficiencies in a number of services
including Commercial Waste, Greenspace, Bereavement Services, Roads, Sold
Property and Education - Lets and Early Years. The main potential for efficiency
of creditor invoices is within Building Services process.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Successful delivery of this saving proposal will require engagement/consultation
with residents/businesses.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
There will also be an impact on service users who would no longer be dealing with people
directly involved in the service and queries would need to be raised with the Council’s Contact
Centre.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Cross Cutting
Disability
Social & Economic
Page 257

Page 258

Impact
Sex
Gender Reassign
Health
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
Screening 654: This proposal has not been screened as service users will see no changes, and
there will no effect on staff.
Page 258

Page 259

AssessmentNo 655 Owner jokerr
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment HE Budget
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer John Kerr Housing Development and Homelessness Manager
(include job titles/organisation)
Members John Kerr Peter Barry Janice Rainey Michelle Lynn
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function or
financial decision)
Policy Title H&E12 Mitchell Way Office Rent Review
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Savings Option to review location of staff and the ongoing usage of Mitchell Way only
for staff funded from the HRA
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
All within team above
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities
(A) or foster good relations (F) No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Cross Cutting
Disability
Social & Economic
Impact
Sex
Gender Reassign
Health
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Page 259

Page 260

Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please provide
justification for this.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
Screening 655: The proposal was screened and is not relevant, so no EIA is required.
Page 260

Page 261

AssessmentNo 656 Owner dmain
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget CCF
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Amanda Graham Chief Officer
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Stephen Daly - Citizen Services David Main - Library Services
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy
policy function or financial decision)
Policy Title CCF 02 Budget options - Library closures
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Under this option, main branch libraries in Alexandria, Dumbarton
and Clydebank would be retained, with Balloch, Parkhall, Duntocher,
Faifley and Dalmuir libraries closed. If all five closures were
progressed, this would result in the deletion of 12 posts. This
proposal would generate a saving of circa £427,000 (£300,000 from
staffing and £127,000 from property running costs including energy
and maintenance).
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
Library Services
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
West Dunbartonshire Council residents/library users
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Library Services
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether
there is any negative impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
The Council must
not discriminate in
the way it provided
services
Older people are
more likely to
experience mobility
issues and social
isolation.
Library closures will
further reduce
opportunities for
social interaction by
those already
isolated.
Cross Cutting The Council has a Separate savings Despite a long-term
Page 261

Page 262

statutory duty to
provide an adequate
library service to
residents. It is
important that the
Council takes
account of how
various factors
might interact.
proposals may lead
to further reductions
in other available
community
provision (e.g.
community centres,
Working4U learning
programmes).
national trend of
declining physical
visitors to libraries,
West
Dunbartonshire
Libraries are seeing
continual growth
since the pandemic
as residents return
to libraries. Physical
use is increasing
quarter on quarter
towards pre-
pandemic levels;
digital use of
services remains at
an all-time high
following the forced
digital pivot during
lockdown. Numbers
of family Bookbug
sessions, adult craft
sessions, heritage
and author events
continue to
demonstrate the
demand for library
services in the area.
Library closures will
significantly reduce
the services and
resources available
to local communities
- with those most
affected usually
experiencing
multiple deprivation,
such as social
&digital exclusion
and poverty. Young
children, families on
low incomes as well
as the unemployed
and older residents
will likely
experience the most
significant negative
impacts. Requiring
users to travel
greater distances to
access support in
alternative venues
may present new
Page 262

Page 263

barriers for some
(e.g. bus timetables
and stop locations).
Disability
The council has a
legal duty to make
its services
accessible to
disabled people, this
is both proactively
('Anticipatory') and
also requires
Reasonable
Adjustments.
People with mobility
issues may
experience barriers
to accessing Council
services located in
unsuitable buildings.
Closure of libraries
will further reduce
the ability for some
residents to access
Council services in
person. Virtual
platforms will not be
suitable for all,
resulting in some
residents becoming
further isolated from
accessing support.
The Home Library
service will likely
see a significant rise
in demand which
may not be possible
to meet with current
resource.
Social & Economic
Impact
The Council has a
focus on reducing
poverty.
Library services
address many issues
associated with
poverty and the
cost-of-living,
including offering
free internet access,
free reading
material, free and
welcoming warm
spaces, free
community support
and free educational
activities.
Library closures will
further limit the
opportunity for
those experiencing
social isolation
and/or hardship to
access support. As
physical routes to
support are
removed, those who
are digitally
excluded will face
more obstacles in
accessing assistance.
Sex
The Council needs to
consider impacts of
staff and service
users
75% of staff are
female research
shows that women
have on average less
access to private
transport (CARS)
than men
Any reductions in
numbers of staff are
more likely to be
experienced by
women because of
workforce
composition
Gender Reassign
Health
Health and
wellbeing is focus
area in the Council's
Strategic Plan.
Reading is proven to
contribute to
positive mental
health. Libraries also
act as an information
and collection point
for some community
health services.
Library closures will
further limit the
space available for
community support
groups to meet and
for health
information to be
accessed. Reductions
to the library offer
Page 263

Page 264

may contribute to
adverse mental
health issues for
some service users.
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
The Council must
not discriminate in
the way it provided
services.
People who do not
speak English well
may experience
barriers to accessing
support.
The loss of local
signposting to
support will likely
negatively impact
those who do not
speak English as a
first language.
Requiring users to
access services
online will likely
introduce new
barriers to this
group.
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented,
please provide justification for this.
The proposal would safeguard library provision in Alexandria, Dumbarton and
Clydebank - the three main populated areas of West Dunbartonshire, while resulting
in the Council owning less buildings with significantly reduced associated costs in
utilities, rates, maintenance.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Yes
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the
recommendation
EIA 656 details negative potential impacts for older people, women, disabled people
and for those experiencing social isolation and/or hardship from poverty. While
physical visits to libraries have experienced a long-term national trend of slow
decline over the past decade, West Dunbartonshire Libraries continue to see a steady
increase in physical visitors since the pandemic as residents continue to return.
Online use of digital library resources remains extremely high and would likely to
continue to do so, however it is important to recognise this only represents use from
those who are digitally connected at present. Library closures will further widen the
digital exclusion gap with a significant reduction in community internet provision.
Retaining library provision in the main populated areas of Alexandria, Dumbarton
and Clydebank means residents can still access these vital community services in the
larger towns, while generating a significant saving to Council budgets.
Page 264

Page 265

AssessmentNo 659 Owner LPENNYCOOK
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget Ed
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Laura Mason Chief Education Officer
(include job titles/organisation)
Members
Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer Julie McGrogan - Senior Education
Officer Kathy Morrison - Senior Education Officer Claire Cusick - Senior
Education Officer Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title EDU-15 Reduce Education Greenspace Budget
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Education Services budget allocation for Grounds Maintenance in educational
premises is £313,883. Last year costs paid were £283k. Consider reducing this
budget by £100k. Current grounds maintenance provision includes: grass
cutting, hedge cutting, weed killing, shrub maintenance and sports pitch
maintenance. The level of maintenance differs within each premise. Education
Services budget allocation for Grounds Maintenance in educational premises
is £313,883. Consider reducing this budget by £100k. 2 options for
consideration: 1. Change the frequency of grass cuts from fortnightly to 4
weekly. There would be no changes to sports pitches. Grass within
educational premises is currently cut every fortnight (twice per month). The
frequency of cuts would reduce to one cut every 4 weeks; or 2. Identify large
areas of grass &plant small trees so the grass would not require to be cut.
These areas would now be an area of biodiversity. The trees would be funded
from Greenspace’s Nature Restoration Fund.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
Consultation with other Council services who currently provide this service as
there may be an impact on staffing within other departments. Consultation
with HR, HTs/HOC’s, TU’s to advise of possible changes to the learning
environment.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Children attending schools/ELCC’s as this will affect the outside learning environment. Other
Council department who currently provide this service as may result in a reduction to current
staffing if option 1 is approved.
Page 265

Page 266

Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Consultation with other Council department who currently provide this service and any
impact on staffing within other departments. Consultation with HR, HTs/HOC’s and TU’s to
advise of possible changes to the learning environment.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation
to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any
negative impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Cross Cutting
It is important to
consider how
elements may
interact.
It is important that
shared areas are
accessible to all.
Outside learning
spaces may be less
accessible due to
long grass.
Disability
The Council had a
duty to make its
services accessible
to disabled people,
including pupils.
This is an
anticipatory duty.
We must seek to
mitigate any
negative impacts.
Areas with more
accessible green
space are associated
with better mental
and physical health.
It is important that
shared areas are
accessible to all
A reduction in grass
cutting/maintenance
may have an impact
on accessibility for
pupils with
additional special
needs if grass is left
without being cut for
longer periods.
Social & Economic
Impact
The Council needs to
consider the
interplay between
social and economic
factors.
Outside greenspace
may be particularly
important to pupils
who cannot access
this where they live
Negative Impact If
there is a reduction
to grass cutting,
grass will be long
and more cut grass
will lie during
periods. This grass
may be carried in to
schools which will
be unsightly and a
possible health and
safety hazard. There
may be a perception
by staff, pupils and
residents that areas
are less well
maintained. There
will be a reduction of
4 FTE posts within
Greenspace if the
reduction in grass
cutting option is
approved. This could
result in
redeployment
through Switch for
staff.
Sex
Gender Reassign
Page 266

Page 267

Health
Health and
wellbeing are a
priority for the
Council as noted in
our Strategic Plan
22-27.
Redeployment of
staff.
Physical
environment can
influence physical
and mental health
Negative Impact If
there is a reduction
to grass cutting,
grass will be long
and more cut grass
will lie during
periods. This grass
may be carried in to
schools which will
be unsightly and a
possible health and
safety hazard. There
may be a perception
by staff, pupils and
residents that areas
are less well
maintained. Option 2
may provide
mitigation to the
above. If more trees
were planted, this
will provide a more
attractive and
natural environment
and also create areas
of biodiversity.
Human Rights
Human Rights
Act/ECHR Article 8
This includes a right
to participate in
essential economic,
social, cultural and
leisure activities.
UNCRC Article 3 Best
interests of the child
Every decision and
action taken relating
to a child must be in
their best interests.
Outside greenspace
may be particularly
important to pupils
who cannot access
this where they live.
Impacts have been
considered in the
round in this
assessment.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
As above.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Page 267

Page 268

We will monitor impact by consulting Head Teachers/Heads of Centres. HR monitoring of the
demographic of staff potentially affected (within another service area). Monitoring will be
carried out on a termly basis.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 659: 2 options have been considered in terms of impacts: 1. Some potential negative
impacts noted in section 2 of the EIA in terms of disability, health and cross cutting elements;
or 2. Identify large areas of grass &plant small trees so the grass would not require to be cut.
This may mitigate some of the negative impacts compared to option 1. There may be some
positive impacts.
Page 268

Page 269

AssessmentNo 660 Owner mlynn2
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment Budget SD and P
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Angela Wilson Chief Officer Supply Distribution &Property
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Michelle Lynn Assets Coordinator
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function or
financial decision)
Policy Title SDP14 Review the use of Municipal Buildings to identify alternative uses or
commercial opportunities
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Maximise opportunities to rationalise use of our operational Estate to deliver in
year savings on property running costs and where applicable increase revenue by
leases parts thereof. Additional revenue income will add to the relevant budget lines
for use by WDC
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
No staff members will be displaced as a result of this proposal. Should opportunities
arise for additional income a further EIA will be produced for that purpose.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
WDC staff members
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Chief Officers and Service Managers
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Needs Evidence Impact
Age N/A N/A N/A
Cross Cutting N/A N/A N/A
Disability N/A N/A N/A
Social & Economic
Impact N/A N/A N/A
Sex N/A N/A N/A
Page 269

Page 270

Gender Reassign N/A N/A N/A
Health N/A N/A N/A
Human Rights N/A N/A N/A
Marriage & Civil
Partnership N/A N/A N/A
Pregnancy &
Maternity N/A N/A N/A
Race N/A N/A N/A
Religion and Belief N/A N/A N/A
Sexual Orientation N/A N/A N/A
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Proposal does not have a negative impact with any group.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Yes continued monitoring of staff accommodation is monitored via SAMG and service managers
meetings.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
Screening 660 concludes that the proposal is not relevant and therefore does not require an impact
assessment, as it builds on successful existing arrangements and does not introduce significant
changes.
Page 270

Page 271

1 
Equality Impact Assessment record layout for information: Assessment Number 664 
Owner: Craig Jardine 
Resource: Regeneration Service/Establishment: SD&P 
First Name Surname Job Title
Head Officer: Angela Wilson Chief Officer Supply Distribution & Property 
Include job titles/organisation
Members: Craig Jardine Corporate Asset Manager 
Please note: the word policy is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision
Policy Title: SDP11 Reduce Consultancy Services and Capital Investment Team 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
Consultancy Services and the Capital Investment Team sits within Corporate Asset Management and is the design, construction and
project management service which administers and manages capital programmed construction works of all size and types. Given the
planned reduction of capital projects and the current review of the capital programme the support from Consultancy Services and the
Capital Investment Team should be reviewed with the review also considering how costs are recharged against the appropriate budget. 
Within Consultancy Services there are 24 employees of varying grades. The team comprises of a programme leader, a senior
architectural officer, an electrical engineer, a senior clerk of works, architectural officers, architectural assistants, quantity surveying
officers, clerks of works. 
Within the Capital Investment Team there are 6 posts of varying grades. The team comprises of capital project managers, client
business partners, scoping officer and support co-ordinator. 
Page 271

Page 272

2 
The revised recharging model across GS / HRA capital has been agreed with Finance and the proposal is to remove 4 posts within
Consultancy Services and 2 posts from the Capital Investment Team. 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy
WDC Staff Members/Chief Officers 
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Y
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services
to discuss your requirements 
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A)
or foster good relations (F) Y
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Y
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Y
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Y 
Who will be affected by this policy? 
All Council services, Elected Members and partner organisations including the Scottish Government. 
Page 272

Page 273

3 
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Stewart Paton, Programme Leader Consultancy Services and Craig Jardine, Corporate Asset Manager   - conducted this high level
efficiency option;
Angela Wilson, Chief Officer - Supply, Distribution and Property Services, West Dunbartonshire Council - interrogated this high level
efficiency option;
Performance and Monitoring Review Group, West Dunbartonshire Council - where informed of this high level efficiency option; 
Martin Rooney, Leader of the Council - was informed of this high level efficiency option; and
Michelle McGinty, Deputy Leader of the Council - was informed of this high level efficiency option. 
If this high level efficiency option is to be taken forward to the next stage; staff, Trade Unions and Elected Members will be consulted. 
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are
using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age Worries surrounding job
security may be heighten
in older staff - reiterate
the commitment to no
compulsory
redundancies 
Please see cross cutting
https://www.gov.scot/publications/scotlands-
labour-market-people-places-regions-statistics-
annual-population-survey-2019/ 
https://www.gov.scot/publications/older-people-
employment-scotland/ 
The age profile in the current structure:
0 staff = <24 years old       
0 staff = 25 -29 years old
2 staff = 30 - 34 years old
2 staff = 35 - 39 years old
4 staff = 40 - 44 years old
3 staff = 45 - 49 years old
5 staff = 50 - 54 years old
4 staff = 55 – 59 years old 
3 staff = 60  - 64 years old 
3 staff = 65 + years old 
4 vacant posts
Negative - This could heightened
concerns of staff about any displacement,
as evidence suggests that those over 50
find it more difficult to regain employment.
Any potential reduction in staffing
requirements could be managed through 
SWITCH redeployment programme.
Additional support will be available to any
employees impacted by the savings
options to ensure their health and
wellbeing.
Page 273

Page 274

4
Needs Evidence Impact
Disability Worries surrounding job
security may be heighten
in disabled staff -
reiterate the commitment
to no compulsory
redundancies
Please see cross cutting
HR21 report
Disabled people in employment - House of
Commons Library (parliament.uk)
There is at least 1 staff who is disabled
Negative - This could heightened
concerns of staff about any displacement.
Any potential reduction in staffing
requirements could be managed through 
SWITCH redeployment programme.
Additional support will be available to any
employees impacted by the savings
options to ensure their health and
wellbeing.
Gender
Reassign
Please see cross cutting Neutral
Marriage &
Civil
Partnership
Please see cross cutting Neutral
Pregnancy
& Maternity
Please see cross cutting Neutral
Race Please see cross cutting Neutral
Religion &
Belief
Please see cross cutting Neutral
Sex Worries surrounding job
security may be heighten
in women - reiterate the
commitment to no
compulsory
redundancies
Please see cross cutting
There are 11 out of 30 staff who are women Neutral
Sexual
Orientation
Please see cross cutting Neutral
Human
Rights
Please see cross cutting Neutral
Page 274

Page 275

5
Needs Evidence Impact
Health Worries surrounding job
security may be heighten
in staff who have Health
conditions
Please see cross cutting
Occupational Health Reports Negative - This could heightened
concerns of staff about any displacement.
Any potential reduction in staffing
requirements could be managed through 
SWITCH redeployment programme.
Additional support will be available to any
employees impacted by the savings
options to ensure their health and
wellbeing.
Social &
Economic
Impact
Please see cross cutting Neutral
Cross
Cutting
Identify a "champion" to
assist with understanding
of this process for staff
Reiterate the commitment
to no compulsory
redundancies to mitigate
against any heightened
concerns
Neutral
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this
There is the potential for 6 FTE  to be displaced.  A fair process would be undertaken in line with the Council's policies.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Yes
Page 275

Page 276

6 
What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 664 details impact on staff.  6 staff in a current structure of 22.14 FTE, will be potentially displaced. Employees affected will be
supported through the Council Wellbeing and Switch policy. 
Michelle Lynn Phone: 6992 Date Started: 14-Feb-2023
Page 276

Page 277

AssessmentNo 665 Owner andbrown
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget Ed
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Claire Cusick Senior Education Officer
(include job titles/organisation)
Members
Laura Mason - Chief Officer Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer Julie
McGrogan - Senior Education Officer Kathy Morrison - Senior Education Officer
Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title Savings Option EDU12 - Remove breakfast club provision in all primary schools
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Presently, all primary schools in West Dunbartonshire offer a breakfast club
provision. Uptake is split between children from families who benefit from the
service for the provision of breakfast, and children whose parents drop them
off early at school to facilitate shift work/travel to work. Breakfast clubs are
staffed in the main by Learning Assistants and Clerical Assistants who receive
payment for these additional hours. The Breakfast Club operates between 8.00
a.m. – 9.00 a.m. The overall operation of the Breakfast Club is the responsibility
of the Head teacher and the suggested timetable is: 8.00 a.m. – 8.15 a.m. setting
up /preparation time 8.15 a.m. – 8.50 a.m. Breakfast Club open 8.50 a.m. – 9.00
a.m. clearing up time. Under this proposal, breakfast club provision would
cease, generating a saving of £142,000 (including on costs) in the first year. The
first year saving (2023/2024) would be a part-year saving and the saving
detailed is based on the 8 month period August – March. The savings for future
years would equate to £212,867 (including on costs) This proposal will impact
the equivalent of 69 employees who are predominantly female. The average
weekly hours required to cover breakfast clubs in the post is between 3 – 5
hours per week.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
Consultation with other Council services who currently assist in the provision
of this service. Consultation with stakeholders, HR, HTs &TU’s to advise of
possible changes.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Families with primary school children who benefit from the service for the provision of
Page 277

Page 278

breakfast, and primary school children whose parents drop them off early at school to facilitate
shift work/travel to work. Employees who work within the breakfast clubs.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Consultation with other Council department who currently provide this service. Consultation
with HR, HTs and TU’s to advise of possible impact on families.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation
to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any
negative impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Cross Cutting
Disability
Priority group in
terms of child
poverty
Households with one
or more disabled
person are more
likely to be income
deprived. Loss of
breakfast clubs
could impact this
group negatively.
Negative
Social & Economic
Impact
The Council needs to
consider the
interplay between
social and economic
factors.
Breakfast clubs were
introduced locally as
a direct response to
need.
Negative Impact
Removing Breakfast
Clubs will impact the
poorest in our
communities.
Sex
Women/single
parents; Priority
group in terms of
child poverty
Women are more
likely to income
deprived than men.
Around 90% of
single parents are
women. Staff
working in breakfast
clubs are
predominantly
female. Loss of
breakfast clubs
could impact both
women and single
parents negatively.
Negative
Gender Reassign
Health
Health and
wellbeing are a
priority for the
Council as noted in
our Strategic Plan
22-27.
Ensuring children
eat a nutritious
breakfast is
important to their
health and
wellbeing.
Negative Impact
Human Rights
The right to food is
recognized as a
human right
Breakfast clubs were
introduced in WDC
school as a direct
response to the fact
that many children
were arriving at
school having had
Negative
Page 278

Page 279

nothing to eat that
day.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
BME families are a
Priority group in
terms of child
poverty.
People from BME
groups are more
likely to be income
deprived than those
from white groups.
Loss of breakfast
clubs could impact
this group
negatively.
Negative
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Council has a statutory duty to provide a balanced budget. It may be possible to cater for those
who require breakfast by other means.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
We will monitor impact by consulting Head Teachers. Monitoring will be carried out on a
termly basis.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 665: Whilst breakfast clubs are used by many for the provision of breakfast, for many
others it provides childcare facilities. It may be possible to cater for those who require
breakfast by other means.
Page 279

Page 280

AssessmentNo 666 Owner andbrown
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget Ed
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Julie McGrogan Senior Education Officer
(include job titles/organisation)
Members
Laura Mason - Chief Education Officer Andrew Brown - Senior Education
Officer Kathy Morrison - Senior Education Officer Claire Cusick - Senior
Education Officer Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title Savings Option EDU13 - Remove the provision of free swimming lessons for
children in primary 4
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Currently in West Dunbartonshire, £14,000 funding is allocated to provide
free swimming lessons to children in primary 4 during term time.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
Consultation with West Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust who currently assist
in the provision of this service. Consultation with stakeholders, HTs, TU’s to
advise of possible changes.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Children attending schools will no longer receive free swimming lessons, and would need to
gain this life skill elsewhere. WD Leisure would need to consider the need for a programme
of swimming lessons, and ascertain costs and uptake of such a programme. As such, it is
likely to be those most in need and at risk that would be affected by this change.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Consultation with WD Leisure who currently provide this service. Consultation with
stakeholders, HR, HTs and TU’s to advise of possible impact on families.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is
any negative impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Cross Cutting
Disability Priority group in
terms of child
Households with one
or more disabled Negative
Page 280

Page 281

poverty
person are more
likely to be income
deprived and face
challenges engaging
with any swimming
programme not
organised /arranged
by the schools.
Social & Economic
Impact
The Council needs to
consider the
interplay between
social and economic
factors.
School swimming
lessons were
introduced to ensure
that all of our young
people gain this
important life skill -
especially important
bearing in mind the
number of
waterways in the
local authority, and
the dangers they
present. Lower
income families
would struggle to
engage with
swimming lessons if
they are not
provided for them
through school.
Negative Impact
Sex
Women/single
parents; Priority
group in terms of
child poverty
Women are more
likely to income
deprived than men.
Around 90% of
single parents are
women. Were
swimming lessons
not organised /
arranged by schools,
single parents would
struggle to engage.
Negative
Gender Reassign
Health
Health and
wellbeing are a
priority for the
Council as noted in
our Strategic Plan
22-27.
Swimming is an
activity that
promotes health and
wellbeing. Reducing
the number of
children able to
swim would impact
on their health and
wellbeing, and
without this life skill
would present a risk
to life.
Negative Impact
Human Rights Whilst learning how Article 2 of Human Negative
Page 281

Page 282

to swim is not a
human right,
knowing how to
swim can contribute
to article 2
protecting the right
to life.
Rights Act
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
BME families are a
Priority group in
terms of child
poverty.
People from BME
groups are more
likely to be income
deprived than those
from white groups,
and as such face
challenges engaging
with any swimming
programme not
organised /
arranged by the
schools.
Negative
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented,
please provide justification for this.
The council has a statutory duty to balance the budget. Water safety is a discussion at
various stages of school and in a number of curriculum areas. This works together with
ensuring children are able to swim.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
We will monitor impact by consulting Head Teachers. Monitoring will be carried out on a
termly basis.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Don't Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 666: The provision of free swimming lessons for all of our children ensures that they
acquire a basic life saving skill. The abundance of rivers, canals and lochs in our our
geographical area present a significant risk to those without this skill - indeed, there have
been a number of recent fatalities. The relatively small amount saved by this proposal does
not outweigh the risk presented by removing the service.
Page 282

Page 283

AssessmentNo 667 Owner andbrown
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget Ed
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Julie McGrogan Senior Education Officer
(include job titles/organisation)
Members
Laura Mason - Chief Education Officer Andrew Brown - Senior Education
Officer Kathy Morrison - Senior Education Officer Claire Cusick - Senior
Education Officer Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title Savings Option EDU09 - Reduce the provision of clerical support hours in
primary schools
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
The Council currently offers 2,250 hours of clerical support in primary schools
costing £1.461m. This equates to 64.3 FTE posts. Under this proposal, a review
of clerical operations within primary schools would be undertaken to identify
duplication and ensure the service is working efficiently. It is proposed that a
saving of £119,420 could be achieved by introducing modern technological
solutions, creating a local learning community administrative support
function, reviewing front-line personnel required in school offices and
introducing modern working practices including flexible working to enhance
the work-life balance of employees. A review would take place in session
2023/24, with a saving equivalent to 5FTE being taken in 2024/25.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
Consultation with HTs, HR, TUs and staff regarding continuation of the service
for the duration of the pilot project.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Clerical Assistants based in primary schools.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Head Teachers, Business Managers, Clerical Assistants, TU’s, Education Officers, HR advisors,
Staffing and Finance Officers
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation
to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any
negative impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Page 283

Page 284

Age
Cross Cutting
Disability
Social & Economic
Impact
Sex
Women/single
parents; Priority
group in terms of
child poverty
Clerical Assistants in
our primary schools
are primarily female.
Women are more
likely to be income
deprived than men.
Around 90% of
single parents are
women.
Negative
Gender Reassign
Health
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race .
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Council has a statutory duty to provide a balanced budget. Any potential reduction in staffing
requirements could be managed through the SWITCH redeployment programme.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
HR monitoring of the demographic of staff potentially affected. Feedback is expected from
Head Teachers, Parents and carers, TU’s, Education Officers, HR advisors, Staffing and Finance
Officers
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 667: Reducing the provision of clerical support hours in primary schools will bring
updated working practices and processes to primary schools, reducing unnecessary
duplication across establishments. Any potential reduction in staffing requirements could be
managed through natural turnover of staff, and/or SWITCH redeployment programne.
Page 284

Page 285

AssessmentNo 668 Owner mlynn2
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment Budget SD and P
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Angela Wilson Chief Officer Supply Distribution &Property
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Michelle Lynn Assets Coordinator
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title
SDP13 Reduce the resource in the Asset Management team from 22.14
FTE to 19.14 FTE removing three posts. This generates a capital budget
saving rather than revenue.
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
The Council’s Asset Management team is currently made up of a
workforce of 25 equating to 22.14 FTE. An initial review of service has
been undertaken to try and deliver savings whilst streamlining processes.
The initial review also looked at the support Asset Management receive
from CAS and other services across the authority. The initial review has
looked at processes involving monitoring physical assets and digital
system holding asset information together with monitoring and
instructing repairs to BAM schools. There are no further vacancies within
the team. Under this option, the Asset Management team would continue
to operate with 22 employees, equating to 19.14 FTE. This will generate a
capital saving rather than a revenue saving. This option is in line with the
capital programme reduction agreed at council in December. CAPITAL
SAVING 23/24 - £96,036 24/25 - £97,957 25/26 - £99,916
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
WDC Staff Members/Chief Officers
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
All Council services, Elected Members and partner organisations including the Scottish
Government.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Michelle Lynn, Assets Coordinator - conducted this high level efficiency option ; Angela
Wilson, Chief Officer - Supply, Distribution and Property Services, West Dunbartonshire
Page 285

Page 286

Council - interrogated this high level efficiency option; Performance and Monitoring
Review Group, West Dunbartonshire Council - where informed of this high level efficiency
option; Martin Rooney, Leader of the Council - was informed of this high level efficiency
option; and Michelle McGinty, Deputy Leader of the Council - was informed of this high
level efficiency option. If this high level efficiency option is to be taken forward to the next
stage; staff, Trade Unions and Elected Members will be consulted.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there
is any negative impact on particular groups.
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Worries
surrounding job
security may be
heighten in older
staff - reiterate the
commitment to no
compulsory
redundancies Please
see cross cutting
https://www.gov.sc
ot/publications/scot
lands-labour-
market-people-
places-regions-
statistics-annual-
population-survey-
2019/
https://www.gov.sc
ot/publications/olde
r-people-
employment-
scotland/
Negative - This could
heightened concerns
of staff about any
displacement, as
evidence suggests
that those over 50
find it more difficult
to regain
employment. Any
potential reduction
in staffing
requirements could
be managed through
SWITCH
redeployment
programme.
Cross Cutting
Identify a
"champion" to assist
with understanding
of this process for
staff Reiterate the
commitment to no
compulsory
redundancies to
mitigate against any
heightened concerns
Neutral
Disability
Worries
surrounding job
security may be
heighten in disabled
staff - reiterate the
commitment to no
compulsory
redundancies Please
see cross cutting
HR21 report
Disabled people in
employment - House
of Commons Library
(parliament.uk)
There is at least 1
staff who is disabled
Negative - This could
heightened concerns
of staff about any
displacement. Any
potential reduction
in staffing
requirements could
be managed through
SWITCH
redeployment
programme.
Social & Economic
Impact
Please see cross
cutting. Neutral
Sex
Worries
surrounding job
security may be
heighten in women -
There are 2 out of 3
staff who are women
This may have a
negative impact as
women are more
likely to be affected
Page 286

Page 287

reiterate the
commitment to no
compulsory
redundancies Please
see cross cutting
by this policy. Any
potential reduction
in staffing
requirements could
be managed through
SWITCH
redeployment
programme.
Gender Reassign Please see cross
cutting Neutral
Health
Worries
surrounding job
security may be
heighten in staff who
have Health
conditions Please
see cross cutting
Occupational Health
Reports
Negative - This could
heightened concerns
of staff about any
displacement. Any
potential reduction
in staffing
requirements could
be managed through
SWITCH
redeployment
programme.
Additional support
will be available to
any employees
impacted by the
savings options to
ensure their health
and wellbeing.
Human Rights Please see cross
cutting. Neutral
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Please see cross
cutting. Neutral
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Please see cross
cutting. Neutral
Race Please see cross
cutting. Neutral
Religion and Belief Please see cross
cutting. Neutral
Sexual Orientation Please see cross
cutting. Neutral
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented,
please provide justification for this.
There is the potential for 3 FTE to be displaced. A fair process would be undertaken in line
with the Council's policies.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Yes
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the
recommendation
Page 287

Page 288

EIA 668 details impact on staff. Three staff in a current structure of 22.14 FTE, will be
potentially displaced from the structure. There are: 2 out of 3 staff are women and this
could therefore affect women more; 1 out of staff being 60 - 65 and this could heightened
concerns about being displaced, as evidence suggests that those over 50 find it more
difficult to regain employment.
Page 288

Page 289

AssessmentNo 669 Owner dmain
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget CCF
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Amanda Graham Chief Officer
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Stephen Daly - Citizen Services David Main - Library Services
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title CCF 19 Budget options - Review of school library provision
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Currently, there is four-day-a-week staffed library provision across most of
West Dunbartonshire’s five secondary schools, with one school operating
five days and another three days. The service has a workforce of 4.1 FTE
librarians. Under this proposal, the service would operate part-time and on
days when librarians were not present, the space could be utilised for
lessons with teaching staff, or could be supported by senior student
volunteers at lunchtimes.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
Library Services
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
West Dunbartonshire Council residents/school library users
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Library Services
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there
is any negative impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
The Council must
not discriminate in
the way it provided
services.
As people approach
secondary school
age, public library
use tends to drop
unless encouraged
and supported
during school.
Reducing the school
library provision
negatively impacts
young people
accessing services
and activities
specifically designed
Page 289

Page 290

to support their
educational and
personal
development.
Cross Cutting
It is important that
the Council takes
account of how
factors might
interact.
Other Council
proposals may
further impact
young people who
are experiencing
hardship.
Requiring users to
travel greater
distances to access
support may present
new barriers (e.g.
bus timetables, fares
and stop locations).
Disability
The council has a
legal duty to make
its services
accessible to
disabled people, this
is both proactively
('Anticipatory') and
also requires
Reasonable
Adjustments.
People with mobility
issues may
experience barriers
to accessing Council
services located in
unsuitable buildings.
Extra-curricular
wellbeing support is
provided by school
libraries, including
as a safe and trusted
space during the
school day to
explore independent
personal
development. This
option would reduce
the ability for young
people with
disabilities to access
the school library
space in times of
need.
Social & Economic
Impact
The Council has a
focus on reducing
poverty.
Library services
address many issues
associated with
poverty and the
cost-of-living,
including offering
free internet access
and free reading
material.
Reductions to school
libraries will likely
lead to increases in
social and digital
exclusion for pupils
experiencing
hardship.
Opportunities
designed to prevent
disrupted learning
will be reduced,
leading to a potential
decrease in
attainment.
Sex
The Council needs to
consider impacts of
staff and service
users.
All school library co-
ordinator positions
are currently held by
female staff.
Any reductions in
numbers of staff are
more likely to be
experienced by
women because of
workforce
composition.
Gender Reassign
The Council must
not discriminate in
the way it provided
services.
Young people of
secondary school
age are at a crucial
stage in their
Young people make
use of school library
services to explore
their own
Page 290

Page 291

personal
development and
require safe trusted
spaces in which to
explore their own
feelings in non-
judgmental settings
away from peers.
development in a
safe and non-
judgmental way.
Library items are
often ordered
discreetly for young
people to read
privately.
Health
Health and
wellbeing is focus
area in the Council's
Strategic Plan.
Reading is proven to
contribute to
positive mental
health.
Reducing the
opportunity for
young people to
access a school
library may
contribute to
adverse mental
health issues for
some service users.
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
The Council must
not discriminate in
the way it provided
services.
People who do not
speak English well
may experience
barriers to accessing
support.
School library
services seek to offer
tailored reading
material for
individuals - such as
graphic novels in
foreign languages.
Without this
resource, reading
material will more
likely be limited to
popular titles in
English only.
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
The Council must
not discriminate in
the way it provided
services.
Young people of
secondary school
age are at a crucial
stage in their
personal
development and
require safe trusted
spaces in which to
explore their own
feelings in non-
judgmental settings
away from peers.
Young people make
use of school library
services to explore
their own
development in a
safe and non-
judgmental way.
Library items are
often ordered
discreetly for young
people to read
privately.
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented,
please provide justification for this.
Page 291

Page 292

The school library service not only exists to issue books and other materials to pupils
across the five mainstream secondary schools, it also supports literacy, personal
development, critical thinking and provides space and support for study and projects. It is
integral to supporting the curriculum in schools. Reducing the school library offer to a
part-time only service enables these vital functions to continue while generating a saving
to the Council at a time of significant budget pressure.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Yes
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the
recommendation
EIA 669 details potential impacts for young people, especially those who are currently
socially and digitally excluded due to hardship from poverty. These should be balanced
against the likely impact of full service closure. With existing school library provision on a
part-time basis in four out of five secondary schools, reducing the school library provision
to part-time across the authority enables savings to be generated while retaining these
vital functions.
Page 292

Page 293

AssessmentNo 670 Owner dmain
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget CCF
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Amanda Graham Chief Officer, CCF
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Stephen Daly, Citizen Services David Main, Libraries
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy
policy function or financial decision)
Policy Title CCF 18 Budget options - Reduce Library Opening hours
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Library hours
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
Library service
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
West Dunbartonshire Council residents/library users
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Library Services
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether
there is any negative impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
The Council must
not discriminate in
the way it provided
services
Older people are
more likely to
experience mobility
issues and social
isolation.
Reductions to
library opening
hours will further
reduce opportunities
for social interaction
by those already
isolated.
Cross Cutting
It is important that
the Council takes
account of how
factors might
interact.
Separate proposals
(CCF01 &CCF02)
may further reduce
access to library
services.
Requiring users to
travel greater
distances to access
support may present
new barriers (e.g.
bus timetables, bus
Page 293

Page 294

fares and stop
locations).
Disability
The council has a
legal duty to make
its services
accessible to
disabled people, this
is both proactively
('Anticipatory') and
also requires
Reasonable
Adjustments.
People with mobility
issues may
experience barriers
to accessing Council
services located in
unsuitable buildings.
Reduced library
opening hours will
further reduce the
ability for some
residents to access
Council services in
person. Virtual
platforms will not be
suitable for all,
resulting in some
residents becoming
further isolated from
accessing support.
Social & Economic
Impact
The Council has a
focus on reducing
poverty.
Library services
address many issues
associated with
poverty and the
cost-of-living,
including offering
free internet access,
free reading
material, free and
welcoming warm
spaces, free
community support
and free educational
activities.
Reduced opening
hours will further
limit the opportunity
for those
experiencing social
isolation and/or
hardship to access
support. As physical
routes to support
are reduced, those
who are digitally
excluded will face
more obstacles in
accessing assistance.
Sex
The Council needs to
consider impacts of
staff and service
users.
75% of staff are
female. Research
shows that women
have on average less
access to private
transport (CARS)
than men.
Any reductions in
numbers of staff are
more likely to be
experienced by
women because of
workforce
composition.
Gender Reassign
Health
Health and
wellbeing is focus
area in the Council's
Strategic Plan.
Reading is proven to
contribute to
positive mental
health. Libraries also
act as an information
and collection point
for some community
health services.
Reduced opening
hours will further
limit the
opportunities
available for
community support
groups to meet and
for health
information to be
accessed. Reductions
to the library offer
may contribute to
adverse mental
health issues for
some service users.
Human Rights
Page 294

Page 295

Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
The Council must
not discriminate in
the way it provided
services.
People who do not
speak English well
may experience
barriers to accessing
support.
The reduction of
local signposting to
sources of support
will likely negatively
impact those who do
not speak English as
a first language.
Requiring users to
access services
online will likely
introduce new
barriers to this
group.
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented,
please provide justification for this.
Libraries support literacy and digital inclusion, providing access to books and other
reading materials alongside signposting to other Council services via the integration
of citizen services. They are used by a number of services including Working4U and
CL&Dto provide outreach and also provide a safe space for people who are vulnerable
and isolated. Reducing the opening hours of libraries retains these vital services while
generating savings for the Council.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Yes
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the
recommendation
EIA 670 details negative potential impacts for older people, women, disabled people
and for those experiencing social isolation and/or hardship from poverty. While
physical visits to libraries have experienced a long-term national trend of slow decline
over the past decade, West Dunbartonshire Libraries continue to see a steady increase
in physical visitors since the pandemic as residents continue to return. Online use of
digital library resources remains extremely high and would likely to continue to do so,
however it is important to recognise this only represents use from those who are
digitally connected at present. Further reductions to library opening hours will likely
further widen the digital exclusion gap with a significant reduction in community
internet provision. However, reducing library opening hours as opposed to closures
mean that residents can still access these vital services, while generating a required
saving for Council.
Page 295

Page 296

AssessmentNo 672 Owner cenglish
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment HE Budget
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Clare English Communities Manager
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Clare English - Communities Manager
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function or
financial decision)
Policy Title HE05 Reduce Community budgeting by 10%
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Community Budgeting is a part of West Dunbartonshire's response to Participatory
Budgeting. It is a method of allocating small grants to community groups and
organisations where the decision on which groups receive funding is made by local
people through voting. Community Budgeting contributes to the requirement of the
Council to direct 1% of its budget through a Participatory Budgeting process, it is
also an element of the Mainstreaming project within the Community Empowerment
delivery plan Previous phases of Community Budgeting voting took place in
community locations where people had the opportunity to gather and vote in
person for the projects they saw as of most value. This savings option will reduce
the £60,000 budget available by 10% to £54,000.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
The Communities Team, and Finance.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
This budget reduction would impact on the Council’s Community Empowerment ambitions which
have been developed in response to the Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015. The
Community budgeting process allows for increased levels of community participation and resources
are directed to communities where it is most needed. Community budgeting has a high social return
on investment. It also contributes to the requirement for the Council to direct 1% of its budgets
through a Participatory Budgeting process.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
The equalities impact assessment has been produced as part of the process for assessing the
potential savings options being explored by the Council. The consultation has included elected
members and senior council officials
Page 296

Page 297

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Equality outcome on
increasing
participation of
younger people.
There is a need for
community groups
in West
Dunbartonshire to
apply or source
funding to deliver
programmes.
Evidenced that less
than 5% of young
people participated
in the CB voting.
Volume of groups
applying across
Phase 4 = 42% and
Phase 5 = 28%.
Recovery from covid
for young people.
Digital Exclusion(see
EIA281)-WDC
Digital Policy-
Curriculum for
Excellence-
Empowerment
Strategy- Young
people’s National
outcomes:1-7-
Rights of the Child
Potential to have a
negative impact if
the Council
ambitions to direct
1% of eligible
budgets through a
participatory
budgeting process
are not realised.
Cross Cutting
The Council has
adopted an equality
outcome.
Participation in
Community
Budgeting in terms
of BME people,
disabled people and
younger people We
need to be aware of
intersectionaility.
People can
simultaneous be
members of more
than one
disadvantaged
group, which can
multiply negative
outcomes.
Potential to have a
negative impact if
the Council
ambitions to direct
1% of eligible
budgets through a
participatory
budgeting process
are not realised.
Disability
Equality outcome on
increasing
participation of
disabled people We
have a duty to make
services accessible
to disabled people
Evidence suggests
disabled people are
more likely to be
socially isolated, and
less likely to be
involved in
community life than
non disabled people.
In previous phases
of CB groups
supporting disability
issues were
successful in gaining
funding and were
represented at
voting events. In
2019 85% of homes
in WD had home
Potential to have a
negative impact if
the Council
ambitions to direct
1% of eligible
budgets through a
participatory
budgeting process
are not realised.
Page 297

Page 298

access to the
internet available.
This is only slightly
below the Scottish
average. However,
fewer older and
disabled people use
technology than the
general population.
Social & Economic
Impact
There is a need to
ensure that our
approach to
Community
Budgeting
empowers local
communities. It is a
democratic method
of distributing funds
to meet local needs.
Previous phases of
CB have supported
projects addressing
low income and
poverty in
communities. The
impact of theses has
been to increase
income (through
training
opportunities,
increased benefit
take up, community
enterprise, social
investment etc.),
reduced expenditure
(debt advice,
transport, local food
production) and
through sharing and
redistributing
resources,
communities can be
impacted by
Community
Budgeting.
Potential to have a
negative impact if
the Council
ambitions to direct
1% of eligible
budgets through a
participatory
budgeting process
are not realised.
Sex
Engagement in
community activities
varies across age
and gender.
There is no
significant
differences between
men and women
using on line
activity.
Potential to have a
negative impact if
the Council
ambitions to direct
1% of eligible
budgets through a
participatory
budgeting process
are not realised.
Gender Reassign
Those undergoing or
have undergone
gender
reassignment can be
particularlyexcluded
from social and civil
society, it is
important that
people have an
LGBT+ community
group
Facebook.com/Vale
pride2019, WDC
Youth Council
inaugural meet 2019
highlighted Youth
Empowerment
/LGBT as one of top
Potential to have a
negative impact if
the Council
ambitions to direct
1% of eligible
budgets through a
participatory
budgeting process
are not realised.
Page 298

Page 299

opportunity to
participate in things
that might effect
them.
4priorities for YP.
Health
Being able to
participate, being
represented and
feeling able to make
an impact on where
you live can have a
positive effect on
both mental and
physical health.
Our physical and
social environment
is the framework in
which our lives take
place and,
depending on
circumstances, it can
provide us with
opportunities or
limit our potential
(Scottish National
Performance
Framework). In
previous phases of
CB changes to the
physical
environment within
communities has
featured in several
successful bids.
There is evidence of
the positive impact
these changes made
to the communities
who implemented
these.
Potential to have a
negative impact if
the Council
ambitions to direct
1% of eligible
budgets through a
participatory
budgeting process
are not realised.
Human Rights
Relevant under core
civil rights, such as
the right to respect
for private and
family life (Article 8
of the Convention),
the right to freedom
of expression
(Article 10) and the
right to education
(Article 2 of Protocol
No. 1). The rights of
the Child. Article 21.
Awareness of
Human Rights as
part of everyday life
is low. Therefore its
relevance nationally
has received
increased focus from
the Scottish
Government on
giving Human Rights
a more central place
Potential to have a
negative impact if
the Council
ambitions to direct
1% of eligible
budgets through a
participatory
budgeting process
are not realised.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
This area cross cuts
with sex, and sexual
orientation
This area cross cuts
with sex, and sexual
orientation
Potential to have a
negative impact if
the Council
ambitions to direct
1% of eligible
budgets through a
participatory
budgeting process
are not realised.
Pregnancy & This area cross cuts Primary care Potential to have a
Page 299

Page 300

Maternity
with consideration
under sex Work
needs to take
account of the needs,
of pregnant women
similar to those
under 'sex'
responsibilities falls
predominately upon
women. Women's
available time is can
therefore be
restricted. However,
child care and other
care responsibilities
maintains a link to
community matters
through school etc.,
negative impact if
the Council
ambitions to direct
1% of eligible
budgets through a
participatory
budgeting process
are not realised.
Race
We have a duty to
make funding
available to all.
Equality outcome on
increasing
participation of BME
groups within our
local authority.
Evidence from
Scottish Social
Attitudes surveys
and other sources,
suggests that people
who have contact
with people from
other groups are less
likely to hold
negative views on
those groups.
Participating in CB
could help improve
understanding
across cultures.
Local Driver
Equality outcomes
adhered to. Groups
representing the
BME communities
have been
underrepresented at
previous CB phases.
Potential to have a
negative impact if
the Council
ambitions to direct
1% of eligible
budgets through a
participatory
budgeting process
are not realised.
Religion and Belief
Faith groups have
been represented
and successful in
previous phases of
CB. , due diligence is
taken to make sure
there is no chance of
a clash with
significant festivals
or times for worship.
If there were to be a
defined community
event during CB6,
due diligence will be
taken to allow all
religious beliefs
participation to suit
all.
Potential to have a
negative impact if
the Council
ambitions to direct
1% of eligible
budgets through a
participatory
budgeting process
are not realised.
Sexual Orientation
Need to support
inclusion in civil
society.
Evidence suggest
that LGBTQ+ people
can be more socially
isolated and more at
risk of
discrimination.
Evidence that
LGBTQ+ people are
more likely to be
Potential to have a
negative impact if
the Council
ambitions to direct
1% of eligible
budgets through a
participatory
budgeting process
are not realised.
Page 300

Page 301

income deprived.
Evidence suggests-
that there are still
barriers to engaging
with LGBTQ+ people
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Community budgeting activity will continue the activity will be in the main a digital experience, this
may exclude some residents from the protected categories. The severity of the negative impact will
also be dependent on the decisions regarding the savings option that the Council makes on the
future structure of the Communities Team HE04.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Yes,teh impact of the policy will be subject to the ongoing participatory budgeting processes, regular
meetings will be ongoing by the planning sub group through out the financial year. The element of
Coproduction also offers opportunity for scrutiny by officers and community and this will be built
into our practice. Monitoring during the application process will include identifying any funding
gaps from groups who represent equalities communities. Efforts will be made by staff and partners
to encourage and support participation from these communities and to support access to external
funding. If in addition the decision is also made to reduce the Communities Team by 50% there will
be a significant negative impact on Communities across West Dunbartonshire, including community
participation and resources being directed to communities where it is most needed, this would be
monitored through Community consultation and reported annually.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Pilot
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 672 details potential impacts of the option HE05and if taken in conjunction with HE04 Option 1:
which will result in a 50% reduction in staffing and a potential 70% reduction in services delivered
including Community budgeting as part of the Participatory Budgeting process. This will have a
severe equalities impact on West Dunbartonshire residents and their Communities. This budget
reduction would impact on the Council’s Community Empowerment ambitions which have been
developed in response to the Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015. The Community
budgeting process allows for increased levels of community participation and resources are directed
to communities where it is most needed. Community budgeting has a high social return on
investment.
Page 301

Page 302

AssessmentNo 673 Owner cenglish
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment HE Budget
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Clare English Communities Manager
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Clare English - Communities Manager
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function
or financial decision)
Policy Title HE13 Reduce the level of funding available to Community Councils
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
The Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act of 2015 has given Community
Councils new legal powers and responsibilities, such as the ability to request
information and assets from public bodies, and to be consulted on certain
decisions that affect their community. The act also requires public bodies to
consider the views of Community Councils when making decisions that may
impact the local community. Community Councils are also empowered to make
some decisions that affect their community. At present the total £25,000 budget
available is allocated to Community Councils as a flat rate £500 administration
grant plus a per capita allowance minus insurance costs, distributing the
remaining budget across active Community Councils, the distribution in 22/23
equates to £0.04 per resident. This option reduces the budget available to
Community Councils from £25,000 to £14,000 This is achieved by increasing the
administration grant from £500 to £750 and reducing the per capita allowance by
75%, £0.01 per head of population. There are also potential further year on year
savings as the per capita figure is set and the budget is based on all 17 Community
Council areas having an active council.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Communities, associated Business Partners
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
17 Community Council areas
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
The equalities impact assessment has been produced as part of the process for assessing the
potential savings options being explored by the Council. The consultation has included elected
Page 302

Page 303

members and senior council officials
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
CLD services are
targeted at children,
young people and
adults who are
experiencing
disadvantage
accessing services
and often have
limited resources.
This includes lone
parents, disengaged
young people, and
people with limited
qualifications. pre-
pandemic WD had
higher levels of
youth
unemployment than
Scotland.
27.4% of children
across West
Dunbartonshire are
living with poverty.
Children born into
poverty are more
likely to experience
mental health
problems. The
evidence from the
pandemic economic
impacts to date
shows that young
people (aged 16-24
years) have been
disproportionately
affected. All Age UK
have noted that
there has not been
as big an upsurge in
the use of digital
technology among
older people since
2020 as is assumed
by some.
Negative impact -
reduced influence
local decision-
making processes,
also impacting on
the opportunities
available to
equalities groups in
the area.
Cross Cutting
Intersectionality and
multiple
discrimination need
to be taken into
account. Need to
progress Councils
equality outcomes
and aspirations.
Need to support
Council BSL action
plan.
WD has higher than
Scottish and UK
levels of deprivation
and child poverty
which has multiple
negative outcomes
for people living in
poverty and with
limited access to
CLD services. Living
in poverty is a
significant
determinant of both
physical and mental
health. Many of the
groups who were
already struggling
with poverty have
borne the brunt of
the pandemic and
the cost of living
crisis and things will
get more
Negative impact -
reduced influence
local decision-
making processes,
also impacting on
the opportunities
available to
equalities groups in
the area.
Page 303

Page 304

challenging.
Disability
We have legal duty
to ensure that
services are
accessible to
disabled people. This
duty is anticipatory.
CLD services are
open to all however
a particular risk
group are those with
disabilities or long
term health issues.
Risk of poverty is
much higher for
disabled people.
Older people are
more likely to be
disabled than
younger people, and
only 17% of people
who eventually have
impairment are born
with this. WDC is
committed to
ensuring BSL users
are supported to
access services, so
that they can
improve their
quality of life. The
Councils BSL Action
Plan is relevant in
terms of service
accessibility.
Disabled people
more likely to be in
poverty. WD has a
higher percentage of
disabled people than
Scotland on this
measure. 23% of
those who live in a
household with a
disabled household
member live in
poverty. Disabled
people are more
reliant on public
transport
Negative impact -
reduced influence
local decision-
making processes,
also impacting on
the opportunities
available to
equalities groups in
the area.
Social & Economic
Impact
Many economically
disadvantaged
people in WD have
poorer health
outcomes, have
lower levels of
qualifications and
fewer qualifications
at all levels
compared to
Scotland, are more
likely to be digitally
excluded. Poverty
impacts peoples
ability to feed,
clothe, heat their
homes for
themselves and their
COVID has had a
greater negative
impact on already
disadvantaged
groups. Cost of living
crisis is going to
have a major impact
on people already
living in poverty. It
will push more
people into poverty
as fuel costs, food
bills increase.
Negative impact -
reduced influence
local decision-
making processes,
also impacting on
the opportunities
available to
equalities groups in
the area.
Page 304

Page 305

families.
Sex
Women face
multiple
discrimination,
including disabled
women, women
from Black and
Ethnic Minority
(BME) communities,
refugee and asylum
seekers, lesbian,
bisexual and Trans
(LGBT+) women,
and older women. In
the preCOVID-19
labour market,
women were
unequal in pay,
participation and
progression due to
drivers including
occupational
segregation, job
valuation,
discrimination, and
time available to
work. 38% of single
women with
children are living in
poverty. In 2019-20
4 out of 5 victims of
domestic abuse were
female. Males are 2.6
x more likely to die
by suicide in
Scotland than
females. Gender-
based violence is
experienced
unequally, with 17%
of women and 7% of
men having
experienced the use
of force from a
partner or ex-
partner at some
point in their lives.
The gap between
women’s and men’s
earning is bigger in
WD than for
Scotland. WD
domestic violence
rates are higher than
Scotland.
Negative impact -
reduced influence
local decision-
making processes,
also impacting on
the opportunities
available to
equalities groups in
the area.
Gender Reassign
Services need to be
inclusive and
accessible. Services
ensure
confidentiality of
information for all
LGBTQIA+ people
more likely to be
income deprived.
Going through a
gender
reassignment means
Negative impact -
reduced influence
local decision-
making processes,
also impacting on
the opportunities
Page 305

Page 306

users. People who
identify as
LGBTQIA+ have
higher rates of
common mental
health problems and
lower wellbeing
than heterosexual
people.
legally changing
almost every
recorded document
that has your birth
name and given
gender on it. This
can include things
like bank details.
available to
equalities groups in
the area.
Health
In the most affluent
areas of Scotland,
men experience 23.8
more years of good
health and women
experience 22.6
more years
compared to the
most deprived areas.
The life expectancy
of people with
learning disabilities
is substantially
shorter than the
Scottish average.
WD is an area of
substantial
deprivation and
health outcomes for
WD compared to
Scotland are a
concern. Longer
term effects of
COVID 19 are
unknown. Poverty
has huge impacts on
health inequalities.
Negative impact -
reduced influence
local decision-
making processes,
also impacting on
the opportunities
available to
equalities groups in
the area.
Human Rights
WDC needs to up
hold human rights.
The Council is a duty
bearer. UNCRC -
young peoples
rights.
Scottish Human
rights Commission
Human Rights
Report Card 2022
UNCRC - CLD staff
are part of the
working group for
WDC.
Negative impact -
reduced influence
local decision-
making processes,
also impacting on
the opportunities
available to
equalities groups in
the area.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership N/A N/A N/A
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Poverty is both a
cause and a
consequence of teen
pregnancy. More
than 60% of young,
unmarried mothers
live in households
that qualify as being
in poverty.
Young lone parents
are more likely to be
income deprived.
vittana.org/teen
pregnancy- and
poverty
Negative impact -
reduced influence
local decision-
making processes,
also impacting on
the opportunities
available to
equalities groups in
the area.
Race
Risk of poverty is
much higher for
black minority
ethnic people
compared to white
people. WDC has
comprehensive
translation and
interpreter services
Those from minority
ethnic groups are
more likely to live in
deprived areas and
in poverty. People
from Black groups
are twice as likely to
be unemployed as
people from white
Negative impact -
reduced influence
local decision-
making processes,
also impacting on
the opportunities
available to
equalities groups in
the area.
Page 306

Page 307

which service users
and providers can
access as required.
communities. Child
poverty is higher in
BME groups. There
is increasing ethnic
diversity in WD.
Religion and Belief
Services need to be
inclusive and
accessible. Services
ensure
confidentiality of
information for all
users.
There is increasing
religious diversity in
West
Dunbartonshire.
Negative impact -
reduced influence
local decision-
making processes,
also impacting on
the opportunities
available to
equalities groups in
the area.
Sexual Orientation
Services need to be
inclusive and
accessible. Services
ensure
confidentiality of
information for all
users
LGBTQIA+ people
are likely to earn
less than
heterosexual people
and are more likely
to live in deprived
areas.
Negative impact -
reduced influence
local decision-
making processes,
also impacting on
the opportunities
available to
equalities groups in
the area.
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The options has been produced as a direct result of the need to identify potential savings that will
contribute to the Council budget deficit. The impact of this option: Reduced community
engagement: Community Councils play a key role in engaging with local residents and
representing their views and concerns to local authorities. With reduced funding, their ability to
carry out that role may be impacted. Limited ability to advocate for community needs: Community
Councils use funding to carry out research and gather evidence to support their advocacy efforts
on behalf of the community in the form of locality place and neighbourhood plans. With reduced
funding, their ability to carry out that role may be impacted. Decreased ability to organise
community events: Community Councils often use funding to organise community events and
meetings. With reduced funding, their ability to carry out that role may be impacted. Loss of local
decision making: Community Councils play a key role in local decision making, and with reduced
funding, they may be unable to effectively participate in the process. This could lead to decisions
being made without adequate input from the community and potentially lead to decisions that do
not reflect the needs and wants of local residents. Overall, reducing funding for Community
Councils in West Dunbartonshire could impact negatively on community engagement and
representation, limited ability to advocate for community needs, decreased ability to organise
community events, difficulty in maintaining and improving community infrastructure, and loss of
local decision making. The option has not been progressed until elected member approval is
secured. The new scheme of Establishment also allows for an annual funding review, stating;
“West Dunbartonshire Council will provide a Community Council grant to assist with the operating
costs of the Community Council. The grant will consist of a flat rate and an additional per capita
allowance. The applicable amounts will be reviewed on an annual basis”. The reduction is also
bringing the West Dunbartonshire administration allowance in line with other local authorities
offering a minimum flat rate, to be determined periodically , which includes an additional
minimum 1p per head of population.
Page 307

Page 308

Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
This will depend on the decisions regarding the savings option that the Council makes. If the
decision is to reduce the Communities Team by 50% there will be a significant negative impact on
Communities across West Dunbartonshire, and the ability to fully monitor the impact of a reduced
budget to Community councils it would therefore be monitored through Community consultation
and reported annually.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 673 details potential impacts of the option HE13and if taken in conjunction with HE04 Option
1: which will result in a 50% reduction in staffing and a potential 70% reduction in services
delivered including support to Community Councils. This combination of options will have a
severe equalities impact on West Dunbartonshire residents and their Communities. Taking HE013
as a singular option a reduction in funding would mean that Community Councils are less able to
engage with equalities groups, reducing the opportunities for these groups to influence local
decision-making processes. This could have negative consequences for marginalised communities,
as their voices may be less heard and their needs less well understood. Additionally, Community
Councils play a crucial role in supporting local community initiatives and projects, which can have
particular relevance for equalities groups. A reduction in funding could mean that these projects
are less likely to go ahead or be successful, impacting on the opportunities available to equalities
groups in the area. In summary, a reduction in funding to Community Councils could have a
significant impact on equalities groups, reducing their ability to engage with decision-makers and
potentially limiting their opportunities for community participation and collaboration.
Page 308

Page 309

AssessmentNo 673 Owner cenglish
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment HE Budget
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Clare English Communities Manager
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Clare English - Communities Manager
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function
or financial decision)
Policy Title HE13 Reduce the level of funding available to Community Councils
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
The Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act of 2015 has given Community
Councils new legal powers and responsibilities, such as the ability to request
information and assets from public bodies, and to be consulted on certain
decisions that affect their community. The act also requires public bodies to
consider the views of Community Councils when making decisions that may
impact the local community. Community Councils are also empowered to make
some decisions that affect their community. At present the total £25,000 budget
available is allocated to Community Councils as a flat rate £500 administration
grant plus a per capita allowance minus insurance costs, distributing the
remaining budget across active Community Councils, the distribution in 22/23
equates to £0.04 per resident. This option reduces the budget available to
Community Councils from £25,000 to £14,000 This is achieved by increasing the
administration grant from £500 to £750 and reducing the per capita allowance by
75%, £0.01 per head of population. There are also potential further year on year
savings as the per capita figure is set and the budget is based on all 17 Community
Council areas having an active council.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Communities, associated Business Partners
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
17 Community Council areas
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
The equalities impact assessment has been produced as part of the process for assessing the
potential savings options being explored by the Council. The consultation has included elected
Page 309

Page 310

members and senior council officials
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
CLD services are
targeted at children,
young people and
adults who are
experiencing
disadvantage
accessing services
and often have
limited resources.
This includes lone
parents, disengaged
young people, and
people with limited
qualifications. pre-
pandemic WD had
higher levels of
youth
unemployment than
Scotland.
27.4% of children
across West
Dunbartonshire are
living with poverty.
Children born into
poverty are more
likely to experience
mental health
problems. The
evidence from the
pandemic economic
impacts to date
shows that young
people (aged 16-24
years) have been
disproportionately
affected. All Age UK
have noted that
there has not been
as big an upsurge in
the use of digital
technology among
older people since
2020 as is assumed
by some.
Negative impact -
reduced influence
local decision-
making processes,
also impacting on
the opportunities
available to
equalities groups in
the area.
Cross Cutting
Intersectionality and
multiple
discrimination need
to be taken into
account. Need to
progress Councils
equality outcomes
and aspirations.
Need to support
Council BSL action
plan.
WD has higher than
Scottish and UK
levels of deprivation
and child poverty
which has multiple
negative outcomes
for people living in
poverty and with
limited access to
CLD services. Living
in poverty is a
significant
determinant of both
physical and mental
health. Many of the
groups who were
already struggling
with poverty have
borne the brunt of
the pandemic and
the cost of living
crisis and things will
get more
Negative impact -
reduced influence
local decision-
making processes,
also impacting on
the opportunities
available to
equalities groups in
the area.
Page 310

Page 311

challenging.
Disability
We have legal duty
to ensure that
services are
accessible to
disabled people. This
duty is anticipatory.
CLD services are
open to all however
a particular risk
group are those with
disabilities or long
term health issues.
Risk of poverty is
much higher for
disabled people.
Older people are
more likely to be
disabled than
younger people, and
only 17% of people
who eventually have
impairment are born
with this. WDC is
committed to
ensuring BSL users
are supported to
access services, so
that they can
improve their
quality of life. The
Councils BSL Action
Plan is relevant in
terms of service
accessibility.
Disabled people
more likely to be in
poverty. WD has a
higher percentage of
disabled people than
Scotland on this
measure. 23% of
those who live in a
household with a
disabled household
member live in
poverty. Disabled
people are more
reliant on public
transport
Negative impact -
reduced influence
local decision-
making processes,
also impacting on
the opportunities
available to
equalities groups in
the area.
Social & Economic
Impact
Many economically
disadvantaged
people in WD have
poorer health
outcomes, have
lower levels of
qualifications and
fewer qualifications
at all levels
compared to
Scotland, are more
likely to be digitally
excluded. Poverty
impacts peoples
ability to feed,
clothe, heat their
homes for
themselves and their
COVID has had a
greater negative
impact on already
disadvantaged
groups. Cost of living
crisis is going to
have a major impact
on people already
living in poverty. It
will push more
people into poverty
as fuel costs, food
bills increase.
Negative impact -
reduced influence
local decision-
making processes,
also impacting on
the opportunities
available to
equalities groups in
the area.
Page 311

Page 312

families.
Sex
Women face
multiple
discrimination,
including disabled
women, women
from Black and
Ethnic Minority
(BME) communities,
refugee and asylum
seekers, lesbian,
bisexual and Trans
(LGBT+) women,
and older women. In
the preCOVID-19
labour market,
women were
unequal in pay,
participation and
progression due to
drivers including
occupational
segregation, job
valuation,
discrimination, and
time available to
work. 38% of single
women with
children are living in
poverty. In 2019-20
4 out of 5 victims of
domestic abuse were
female. Males are 2.6
x more likely to die
by suicide in
Scotland than
females. Gender-
based violence is
experienced
unequally, with 17%
of women and 7% of
men having
experienced the use
of force from a
partner or ex-
partner at some
point in their lives.
The gap between
women’s and men’s
earning is bigger in
WD than for
Scotland. WD
domestic violence
rates are higher than
Scotland.
Negative impact -
reduced influence
local decision-
making processes,
also impacting on
the opportunities
available to
equalities groups in
the area.
Gender Reassign
Services need to be
inclusive and
accessible. Services
ensure
confidentiality of
information for all
LGBTQIA+ people
more likely to be
income deprived.
Going through a
gender
reassignment means
Negative impact -
reduced influence
local decision-
making processes,
also impacting on
the opportunities
Page 312

Page 313

users. People who
identify as
LGBTQIA+ have
higher rates of
common mental
health problems and
lower wellbeing
than heterosexual
people.
legally changing
almost every
recorded document
that has your birth
name and given
gender on it. This
can include things
like bank details.
available to
equalities groups in
the area.
Health
In the most affluent
areas of Scotland,
men experience 23.8
more years of good
health and women
experience 22.6
more years
compared to the
most deprived areas.
The life expectancy
of people with
learning disabilities
is substantially
shorter than the
Scottish average.
WD is an area of
substantial
deprivation and
health outcomes for
WD compared to
Scotland are a
concern. Longer
term effects of
COVID 19 are
unknown. Poverty
has huge impacts on
health inequalities.
Negative impact -
reduced influence
local decision-
making processes,
also impacting on
the opportunities
available to
equalities groups in
the area.
Human Rights
WDC needs to up
hold human rights.
The Council is a duty
bearer. UNCRC -
young peoples
rights.
Scottish Human
rights Commission
Human Rights
Report Card 2022
UNCRC - CLD staff
are part of the
working group for
WDC.
Negative impact -
reduced influence
local decision-
making processes,
also impacting on
the opportunities
available to
equalities groups in
the area.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership N/A N/A N/A
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Poverty is both a
cause and a
consequence of teen
pregnancy. More
than 60% of young,
unmarried mothers
live in households
that qualify as being
in poverty.
Young lone parents
are more likely to be
income deprived.
vittana.org/teen
pregnancy- and
poverty
Negative impact -
reduced influence
local decision-
making processes,
also impacting on
the opportunities
available to
equalities groups in
the area.
Race
Risk of poverty is
much higher for
black minority
ethnic people
compared to white
people. WDC has
comprehensive
translation and
interpreter services
Those from minority
ethnic groups are
more likely to live in
deprived areas and
in poverty. People
from Black groups
are twice as likely to
be unemployed as
people from white
Negative impact -
reduced influence
local decision-
making processes,
also impacting on
the opportunities
available to
equalities groups in
the area.
Page 313

Page 314

which service users
and providers can
access as required.
communities. Child
poverty is higher in
BME groups. There
is increasing ethnic
diversity in WD.
Religion and Belief
Services need to be
inclusive and
accessible. Services
ensure
confidentiality of
information for all
users.
There is increasing
religious diversity in
West
Dunbartonshire.
Negative impact -
reduced influence
local decision-
making processes,
also impacting on
the opportunities
available to
equalities groups in
the area.
Sexual Orientation
Services need to be
inclusive and
accessible. Services
ensure
confidentiality of
information for all
users
LGBTQIA+ people
are likely to earn
less than
heterosexual people
and are more likely
to live in deprived
areas.
Negative impact -
reduced influence
local decision-
making processes,
also impacting on
the opportunities
available to
equalities groups in
the area.
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The options has been produced as a direct result of the need to identify potential savings that will
contribute to the Council budget deficit. The impact of this option: Reduced community
engagement: Community Councils play a key role in engaging with local residents and
representing their views and concerns to local authorities. With reduced funding, their ability to
carry out that role may be impacted. Limited ability to advocate for community needs: Community
Councils use funding to carry out research and gather evidence to support their advocacy efforts
on behalf of the community in the form of locality place and neighbourhood plans. With reduced
funding, their ability to carry out that role may be impacted. Decreased ability to organise
community events: Community Councils often use funding to organise community events and
meetings. With reduced funding, their ability to carry out that role may be impacted. Loss of local
decision making: Community Councils play a key role in local decision making, and with reduced
funding, they may be unable to effectively participate in the process. This could lead to decisions
being made without adequate input from the community and potentially lead to decisions that do
not reflect the needs and wants of local residents. Overall, reducing funding for Community
Councils in West Dunbartonshire could impact negatively on community engagement and
representation, limited ability to advocate for community needs, decreased ability to organise
community events, difficulty in maintaining and improving community infrastructure, and loss of
local decision making. The option has not been progressed until elected member approval is
secured. The new scheme of Establishment also allows for an annual funding review, stating;
“West Dunbartonshire Council will provide a Community Council grant to assist with the operating
costs of the Community Council. The grant will consist of a flat rate and an additional per capita
allowance. The applicable amounts will be reviewed on an annual basis”. The reduction is also
bringing the West Dunbartonshire administration allowance in line with other local authorities
offering a minimum flat rate, to be determined periodically , which includes an additional
minimum 1p per head of population.
Page 314

Page 315

Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
This will depend on the decisions regarding the savings option that the Council makes. If the
decision is to reduce the Communities Team by 50% there will be a significant negative impact on
Communities across West Dunbartonshire, and the ability to fully monitor the impact of a reduced
budget to Community councils it would therefore be monitored through Community consultation
and reported annually.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 673 details potential impacts of the option HE13and if taken in conjunction with HE04 Option
1: which will result in a 50% reduction in staffing and a potential 70% reduction in services
delivered including support to Community Councils. This combination of options will have a
severe equalities impact on West Dunbartonshire residents and their Communities. Taking HE013
as a singular option a reduction in funding would mean that Community Councils are less able to
engage with equalities groups, reducing the opportunities for these groups to influence local
decision-making processes. This could have negative consequences for marginalised communities,
as their voices may be less heard and their needs less well understood. Additionally, Community
Councils play a crucial role in supporting local community initiatives and projects, which can have
particular relevance for equalities groups. A reduction in funding could mean that these projects
are less likely to go ahead or be successful, impacting on the opportunities available to equalities
groups in the area. In summary, a reduction in funding to Community Councils could have a
significant impact on equalities groups, reducing their ability to engage with decision-makers and
potentially limiting their opportunities for community participation and collaboration.
Page 315

Page 316

AssessmentNo 674 Owner mlynn2
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment Budget SD and P
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Angela Wilson Chief Officer Supply Distribution &Property
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Michelle Lynn Assets Coordinator
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function
or financial decision)
Policy Title SDP15 Review possible early closure of Clydebank Town Centre Office with
employees based there relocated to alternative Council accommodation
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Maximise opportunities to rationalise use of our operational Estate to deliver in
year savings on property running costs and where applicable increase revenue by
leases parts thereof whilst still delivering key services within other
accommodation within the Clydebank area. Additional revenue income will add to
the relevant budget lines for use by WDC
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
WDC Staff Members/Chief Officers. Employees will be supported in moves to new
appropriate locations within accommodation in the area and no extra travel
arrangements required for staff for the purpose of this proposal are envisaged.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
WDC staff members
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Chief Officers and Service Managers
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Needs Evidence Impact
Age N/A N/A N/A
Cross Cutting N/A N/A N/A
Disability N/A N/A N/A
Social & Economic N/A N/A N/A
Page 316

Page 317

Impact
Sex N/A N/A N/A
Gender Reassign N/A N/A N/A
Health N/A N/A N/A
Human Rights N/A N/A N/A
Marriage & Civil
Partnership N/A N/A N/A
Pregnancy &
Maternity N/A N/A N/A
Race N/A N/A N/A
Religion and Belief N/A N/A N/A
Sexual Orientation N/A N/A N/A
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Proposal does not have a negative impact with any group.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Yes continued monitoring of staff accommodation is monitored via SAMG and service managers
meetings.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
Screening 661 concludes that the proposal is not relevant and therefore does not require an impact
assessment, as it builds on successful exists arrangements and does not introduce significant
changes.
Page 317

Page 318

AssessmentNo 675 Owner mlynn2
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment Budget SD and P
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Angela Wilson Chief Officer Supply Distribution &Property
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Michelle Lynn Assets Coordinator
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title SDP16 Two week Christmas closedown bar delivery of essential services
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
The purpose of this paper is to propose the closure of Council office
accommodation and depots on the days between the public holidays of
Christmas and New year whilst keeping open sufficient office capacity to
accommodate key statutory functions and essential service requirements
identified by Chief Officers. There are two options to consider (3 day closure and
6 day closure). The exact closure days will vary year on year based on when
weekends and bank holidays fall. Staff would be required to take the above dates
as part of their annual leave entitlement with the exception of those staff who
carry out functions that are required by statute or are essential during this
period.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
WDC Staff Members/Chief Officers. No extra travel arrangements required for
staff for the purpose of this proposal as accommodation will be available across
the authority for those required to carry out essential services.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
WDC staff members
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Chief Officers and Service Managers
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Page 318

Page 319

Age
The council has duty
of care toward all its
workers, and in
terms of the Public
Sector Equality Duty
The Council's age
profile confirms that
the highest
percentage of
employees remain
clustered in the age
groups 50-59.
There is no specific
impact in relation to
age
Cross Cutting N/A N/A N/A
Disability
The council has duty
of care toward all its
workers, and in
terms of the Public
Sector Equality Duty
The Council's
disability profile
confirms 1.38% of
employees have
declared a disability.
There is no specific
impact in relation to
disability
Social & Economic
Impact N/A N/A N/A
Sex
The council has duty
of care toward all its
workers, and in
terms of the Public
Sector Equality Duty
It is well
documented and
reported that males
typically earn more
than females with
greater opportunity
to access
enhancements
through overtime
and allowances.
Equal Pay Audit
2017. Workforce
profile concludes
71% female and
29% male. The pay
data for 21/22 used
identifies that more
males access
overtime than
females and that
females typically
work overtime
attract the rate at
plain time, which is
due to the majority
working in a part-
time role. It is well
understood that
females are main
caregivers and
benefit from
flexibility to support
the balance of
working and home
life.
There is no specific
impact in relation to
sex
Gender Reassign
The council has duty
of care toward all its
workers, and in
The Council's
transgender profile
confirms that 0.15%
There is no specific
impact in relation to
gender reassign
Page 319

Page 320

terms of the Public
Sector Equality Duty
have declared
transgener and
19.01% not
transgender and
80.71% unknown.
Health N/A N/A N/A
Human Rights N/A N/A N/A
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
The council has duty
of care toward all its
workers, and in
terms of the Public
Sector Equality Duty
No information
reported on marital
status/civil
partnership. It is
well documented
and reported that
males typically earn
more than females
with greater
opportunity to
access
enhancements
through overtime
and allowances.
There is no specific
impact in relation to
marriage &civil
partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Cross-Cutting with
Sex
Cross-Cutting with
Sex
There is no specific
impact in relation to
pregnancy and
maternity
Race
The council has duty
of care toward all its
workers, and in
terms of the Public
Sector Equality Duty
The Council's race
profile confirms
0.58% of the
workforce are
BAME.
There is no specific
impact in relation to
race
Religion and Belief
The council has duty
of care toward all its
workers, and in
terms of the Public
Sector Equality Duty
The Council's
religion and belief
provide confirms
that 1.45% are
Christian, 0.89%
other and 8.56%
none.
There is no specific
impact in relation to
religion and belief.
Sexual Orientation
The council has duty
of care toward all its
workers, and in
terms of the Public
Sector Equality Duty
The Council's sexual
orientation profile
concludes that
0.81% of the
workforce have
declared LGB and
18.26% as
heterosexual with
80.41 unknown
There is no specific
impact in relation to
sexual orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Proposal does not have a negative impact with any group. Provision will be provided for any
individual who has specific requirements over the proposal period and can discuss directly with
Page 320

Page 321

their line manager.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Yes continued monitoring of staff accommodation is monitored via SAMG and service managers
meetings.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
Screening 663 concludes that the proposal is not relevant and therefore does not require an
impact assessment, as it builds on successful exists arrangements and does not introduce
significant changes.
Page 321

Page 322

AssessmentNo 676 Owner amenon
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget Resource
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Arun Menon Business Support Manager
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Arun Menon Laurence Slavin
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy
policy function or financial decision)
Policy Title Reduce the size of the Council's Automation team
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Reduce the size of the Council's Automation team from three to two
in 2023/24 and by a further one in 2024/25. The post holders in the
automation team have a substantive post in place.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
Resources Management team and consultation with PMRG to convey
the impact of this option for any future developments and
manitainece of automations.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
Employees in the automation team
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Staff impacted and Strategic HR and TUs
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether
there is any negative impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Cross Cutting
Disability
Social & Economic
Impact
Sex
Gender Reassign
Health
Human Rights
Page 322

Page 323

Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be
implemented, please provide justification for this.
The Council has a duty to balance the budget. There is a neutral impact as both
employees impacted will return to their substantive posts.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
No
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the
recommendation
The council was an early adopter of Robotic Process Automation (RPA) and one of
the first councils to deploy the technology in 2020. The solution has seen an
investment in UiPath (RPA solution) and complemented by investment in an
automation team which comprises of 1 FTE Grade 9 post and 2 FTE Grade 6 posts.
The project in the last two years has seen the deployment of a range of automation
that have supported the relevant service areas to manage workload by avoiding the
need for adding additional resource and/or delays in processing times. Despite the
challenging financial gap, it was considered prudent not to give up the programme
and stop automation altogether as that would require additional staff to compensate
for the live automations that the bot completes at present. This alternative option is
to delete one FTE grade 6 post in 2023/24 with a final remaining grade 6 post
deleted in 2024/25. This will only retain an automation lead post which will not only
restrict the development and maintenance capabilities but also resilience should the
post holder be off. Whilst alternatives for addressing this resilience will be
considered, the specialist required to develop automation does not easily present an
option to wider the knowledge pool with ease.
Page 323

Page 324

AssessmentNo 677 Owner GMacfarlane2
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment Budget R and N
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer - Roads &Neighbourhood
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Grounds Service
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title R&N17 Reduction in grant to Environmental Trust
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
To reduce the level of financial grant provided to the Environmental
Trust who carry out project management, access external funding,
deliver environmental projects and carry out maintenance activities.
The proposed financial reduction is in the region of 25% or 50%. The
25% grant reduction will reduce project management and delivery of
environmental projects with an additional impact to access external
funding. If a 50% reduction there would no project management,
delivery and external funding as all funding will be allocated to
maintenance activities.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
Grounds and Finance Services. Further to implementation communities
and visitors will be affected by reducing the potential extension and
delivery of key desire routes for access by walking and cycling.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
The Environmental Trust and those that use and access the environmental projects
when delivered such as remote footpaths and wider active travel routes and some
playgrounds.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
The Grounds Service
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether
there is any negative impact on particular groups.
Page 324

Page 325

Needs Evidence Impact
Age
The Council has an
equality outcome in
relation to
increasing
involvement of
younger people in
Community
Empowerment. The
Equality Act requires
that services do not
discriminate. The
West
Dunbartonshire
Environment Trust
have delivered
playgrounds which
they maintain.
Playgrounds are
accessed by younger
members of our
community
This has a potential
to have a negative
impact as a
reduction in funding
may lead to a
reduction in
playgrounds or
other new
environmental
infrastructure for
use by children that
either live in the
local authority area
or are visiting.
Cross Cutting
We need to have due
regard to general
and specific public
sector equality
duties. The third
sector provides
many services and
supports to
vulnerable people
that the public and
private sector don't.
Evidence suggests
that BME, Disabled
people, women and
younger people have
been particularly
affected by COVID
and Cost of Living
impacts.
Factors such as sex,
disability and age
may interact in this
circumstance to
multiple effects of
any service
reductions.
Disability
The Council has an
Equality outcome on
increasing the
participation of
disabled people
The organization has
a stated focus on:
Disabled people.
A reduction in the
delivery of paths and
other environmental
projects will impact
on increasing good
quality connections
that encourage
active and healthy
activity
Social & Economic
Impact
Linkages to
transport, jobs,
education that do
not require a private
car and support
tourism and visitors
to the area
Active travel is free
and therefore
available to all
members of the
community,
reducing reliance on
the use of private
cars
There may be areas
that either do not
have routes
implemented or
improved and this
may impact on
accessibility and
economic
opportunities
Sex
Gender Reassign
Health
The ability to use
active travel
infrastructure
encourages outdoor
National guidance
encourages
sustainable
transport and
A reduction in the
delivery of paths and
other environmental
projects will impact
Page 325

Page 326

activity improving
health outcomes outdoor activity
on increasing good
quality connections
that encourage
active and healthy
activity
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented,
please provide justification for this.
The Council is required to reach a balanced budget and the activities that are carried out
through delivery of the grant that covers project management, delivery etc of
environmental projects are not statutory. The maintenance of the environmental
projects and play parks will continue to be maintained.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
The design and delivery of access routes will be monitored through the Active Travel
Strategy and Action Plans.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the
recommendation
The Council is required to reach a balanced budget and the grant reduction proposed
will reduce the opportunity to access external funding to design, project manage and
deliver environmental projects. These are not statutory activities and the maintenance
funded by the grant will continue. The user groups include all members of the
community and visitors to the area that may require to access amenities by walking and
cycling where a desire line currently has a gap in connection. There are alternative
access routes that should be used through the adopted road network though these may
be longer, less direct or require use of a private car.
Page 326

Page 327

AssessmentNo 678 Owner GMacfarlane2
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment Budget R and N
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer - Roads &Neighbourhood
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Waste Project Board
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function or
financial decision)
Policy Title R&N10 Improve recyling rates through a review of the programme of residual waste
collection
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
The intention is to implement a 3 weekly residual waste collection to increase levels of
recycling and support the route to net zero.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Waste Project Board members
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities
(A) or foster good relations (F) No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
All users of the waste collection service, frequency of residual waste collection will be impacted and the
day of collection may be impacted depending on the route review. All users will be advised following
and exercise in information raising. The collection of recycling waste will continue to be carried out
fortnightly. This will support users to improve their recycling rates and support the transition to net
zero.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Waste Service and the Waste Project Board
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Some members of
the community have
increased levels of
residual waste or
can find recycling
Those with young
children or with
particular health
issues may have
increased levels of
Should residual
waste frequency of
collection reduce the
use of the recycling
bins will require to
Page 327

Page 328

confusing. residual waste be maximised
Cross Cutting
Disability
Some members of
the community with
a disability may have
more need of
increased residual
waste
There may be
residual waste
implications from
health conditions
The residual waste
impact of specific
health
circumstances may
be difficult to be
accomodated within
the reduced
frequency of
collection
Social & Economic
Impact
Communities are
required to
understand what
waste can be
recycled, how and
where
There are elements
of waste that is
being placed in
residual waste
collection that could
be recycled if
communities are
educated and
supported to dispose
correctly
An educution and
communications
strategy is required
as there will be an
impact on the
quantity of waste
that can be disposed
of in the residual
bins and recycling
will require to
increase
Sex
Gender Reassign
Health
Any health waste
will require to be
disposed of
appropriately
There may be
increased levels of
residual waste
depending on
particular health
conditions
The availability of
residual waste
disposal may be
impacted with a
reduced frequency
in collection
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please provide
justification for this.
The council are required to reach a balanced budget. There will be a communications strategy and
education carried out to ensure residents are informed of collection days of each type of waste
collection. Appropriate use of recycling will be shared to support communities to dispose of their waste
appropriately.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Yes the waste service will monitor contamination levels within the recycling collection and the level of
residual waste collected is measured and reported upon.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
Page 328

Page 329

The Council has a requirement to reach a balanced budget and transition to net zero. This proposal is to
increase and improve recyling rates by supporting communities to dispose of waste appropriately by
recycling all materials that are able to be recycled and removing them from the residual collection.
There will be clear, multi-channel communication on changes to collection frequencies and uplift days.
Page 329

Page 330

AssessmentNo 681 Owner GMacfarlane2
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment Budget R and N
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer - Roads &Neighbourhood
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Roads Manager Road Safety Coordinator
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function
or financial decision)
Policy Title R&N1 Safety Options Crossing Patrollers - Reduce or Cease
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
School Crossing Patrols reduce or cease Option 1 Bring the service in line with
current national guidance by withdrawing patrols from 17 locations where there
are controlled pedestrian crossings in place. Best practice guidance states that
school crossing patrollers should not be deployed at crossing points where
controlled pedestrian crossings exist because this can be confusing for motorists.
The Council has experienced difficulties recruiting for school crossing patrollers
and the saving would be achieved through not filling vacant posts and budgeted
hours. Option B The Council has no statutory obligation to provide a school
crossing service and this option would see patrollers withdrawn from all crossings.
The Council would continue to work with parents and pupils to promote road
safety.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
National Benchmarking carried out. Relevant to both options a question was asked
on the withdrawal of school crossing patrols from junctions where pedestrian
crossings exist those opposed to the proposal highlighted concerns over safety
those supportive of the proposal noted the importance of proper road safety
education general view that work was required on driver education to support this
proposal The Roads Service have been involved in the development of this
proposal.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
All groups are affected but parents and pupils to a greater degree
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
National Benchmarking A question was asked on the withdrawal of school crossing patrols from
Page 330

Page 331

junctions where pedestrian crossings exist those opposed to the proposal highlighted concerns
over safety those supportive of the proposal noted the importance of proper road safety education
general view that work was required on driver education to support this proposal
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
All groups affected
but children and
young families to a
greater degree.
School age children
that are walking to
school either with or
without parents will
tend to use the
identified safe route
to school with
crossing patrollers
Negative
Cross Cutting
Disability
All groups affected
but people with
disabilities may be
affected to a greater
degree.
School age children
that are walking to
school either with or
without parents will
tend to use the
identified safe route
to school with
crossing patrollers
Negative
Social & Economic
Impact
Children in more
deprived areas
Sustrans Scotland
analysis highlights
that children on foot
and bike are more
than 3 times more
likely to be involved
in an accident in the
20% most deprived
areas compared to
the 20% least
deprived
Negative
Sex
Gender Reassign
Health Children travelling
actively to school
Sustrans Scotland
have identified that
children are
healthier if they
travel to school by
walking, cycling or
scooting.
Negative
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Highly represented
in affected group
due to potential
users of crossing
points with crossing
Young families
walking to school or
early learning
facilities
Negative
Page 331

Page 332

patrollers
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
A balanced budget is required. Role out of any proposals would take into account health and safety
and safe routes to school
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Yes. School travel plans are monitored and updated to reflect travel patterns and issues
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
The Council's road safety team liaise with the pupils to promote safe walking behaviour and to
support the delivery of road safety initiatives. Option1 Best practice guidance states that school
crossings patrollers should not be deployed where patrolled crossings exist as this duplication can
be confusing for motorists. The council has experienced difficulties recruiting for school crossing
vacancies and the saving would be achieved by not filling vacant posts. Option 2 Retention of
crossing patrollers at locations that are prioritised due to the location of the school with review of
the localised road conditions such as vehicle speed, visibility and road geometry. This propsal does
not provide crossing patrollers to all sites that do not have a formal crossing facility. Option 3 This
proposal would see the removal of all crossing patrollers from all locations. The council has no
statutory obligation to provide a school crossing service. The council would continue to work with
parents and pupils to promote road safety. There is a possibility of engineering works to be carried
out if the Roads Service identify locations on safe routes to school that fulfil the criteria for
controlled crossing points with an available budget. Officers will also continue to work with the
school community to identify suitable locations for lining or signing interventions to improve
driver behaviour and raise aware ness of the fact that they are in the proximity of a school.
Page 332

Page 333

AssessmentNo 684 Owner GMacfarlane2
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment Budget R and N
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer - Roads &Neighbourhood
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Grounds Manager
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function
or financial decision)
Policy Title R&N4 Savings Option Care of Gardens - Introduce charges or cease service
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
To introduce a charge for all users of the care of gardens scheme or to cease
providing the service. This will affect older people and disabled who currently
receive this service at no charge and those over 65 are able to pay a subsidised
charge to receive the service. The potential charging proposal is £70 for all users,
£100 for all users, £100 for those on disability payment only or to cease providing
the service for all.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Grounds Service
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements. Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
This will affect older people who are eligible for access to the scheme and those identified as with
disabilities who currently receive this service at no charge
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Grounds Service HSCP
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Older members of
the community over
state pension age
that have been
previously exempt
Those on a fixed
pension may find it
more difficult to
meet the charge
reflecting the
Negative
Page 333

Page 334

from charges and
eligible to receive
the service
increase in the cost
of living
Cross Cutting
Seasonal Workforce
reduction to reflect
any reduction in
number of
customers, reduces
employment
opportunities locally
Seasonal workers
are employed by the
Council to carry out
care of gardens
duties and are often
local residents
Negative
Disability
Members of the
community with
disabilities are more
likely to be income
deprived than non-
disabled people
The removal of the
free service for
disabled people who
on average may be
more income
deprived may find it
more difficult to
meet the charge.
Negative
Social & Economic
Impact
Those that are
income deprived will
potentially find it
more challenging to
either pay the
charge or if service
ceases find
alternative options
Those that are on a
lower income and in
receipt of a disability
payment or eligible
due to age may find
it a challenge to
either pay charge or
find alternative
gardeners and
therefore the area
may not be as well
maintained
Negative
Sex
Women are more
likely to be income
deprived
Due to gender pay
gap and are
potentially more
likely to be single
parents and/or
carers
Negative
Gender Reassign
Health
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The overall charge can be paid flexibly and at £70 or £100, the service remains heavily subsidised.
Should the service no longer be made available to those that are not in receipt of a disability
Page 334

Page 335

payment this may impact on those that have currently been in receipt of the service but are now no
longer eligible. if the service ceases all users will be required to access an alternative which may
provide employment opportunity for local workforce. If the care of gardens service ceases all users
will be required to find alternative delivery options which will potentially be at a cost and is
dependent on businesses having availability.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
The use of the service will be monitored and the number of customers will be reported annually. if
the service ceases monitoring will be through feedback from colleagues in the community
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
It is a legitimate aim of the council to provide sustainable services and the council is required to
reach a balanced budget. The proposals are designed to reduce the funding gap in a sustainable
fashion and the charge is equal for all. Whilst there is a negative impact on some groups that were
previously exempt from charging this is considered proportionate to sustain a subsidised service
that supports a desirable outcome in terms of general environment. The users will be informed on
decisions taken and supported as to whether the charge introduced is £70/£100 for all users or
whether the eligibility criteria is to be reviewed to limit to those on disability payments only. If the
service ceases users will be informed and where possible advised of alternatives. There will be
opportunity to pay in installments. If the service ceases there will be engagement to ensure users
are made aware that alternative delivery modes are required with a requirement to arrange garden
maintenance independently.
Page 335

Page 336

AssessmentNo 685 Owner amenon
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget P and T
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Arun Menon Business Support Manager
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Arun Menon and Victoria Rogers
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title Reduce pay preservation
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
The Council currently protects eligible employee’s salary under pay
preservation for 24 months, subject to criteria being satisfied. Under this
proposal the current level of pay preservation will be reduced to either three
months or six months. An assessment of the level of impact such a change
will have for the organisation and employees was undertaken. Data for the
five year period (1 January 2018 to 13 January 2023) was analysed and this
indicated that: • Reducing pay preservation to 6 months could have reduced
costs by circa £128,000 for the 5 year period or £25,700 p.a. • Reducing pay
preservation to 3 months could have reduced cost by circa £165,000 for the
5 year period or £33,000 p.a. It is difficult to forecast the cost reduction for
the Council in future years as it depends on the number of employees eligible
for pay preservation. The data assessment also indicated that, in that 5 year
timeframe, the breakdown of impacted employees was 67% females and
33% males. This is disproportionately more advantageous to men as the
overall demographic is 71% female and 29% male so one should expect the
protected numbers to mirror that.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
Chief Officers, Strategic HR
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
Based on historic data over last 5 years this policy would have a Female (67%) - Male (33%)
split. However it will be hard to predict what the likely split between females and males will
be going forward but can safely say it is likely to geared towards females staff groups given
they are the majority within the council.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Chief Officers, Strategic HR
Page 336

Page 337

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is
any negative impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
The council has duty
of care toward all its
workers, and in
terms of the Public
Sector Equality Duty
The Council's age
profile confirms that
the highest
percentage of
employees remain
clustered in the age
groups 50-59.
There is no specific
impact identified in
relation to age.
Cross Cutting
Disability
The council has duty
of care toward all its
workers, and in
terms of the Public
Sector Equality Duty
The Council's
disability profile
confirms 1.38% of
employees have
declared a disability.
There is no specific
impact identified in
relation to disability.
Social & Economic
Impact
The council has duty
of care toward all its
workers, and in
terms of the Public
Sector Equality Duty
Reduction in
anticipated income
for some employees
may result in
disposable income
being reduced and
having a reduced
amount to spend in
the economy
This policy may have
a financial impact on
staff where their pay
preservations is
reduced from 24
months to either 6
months or 3 months.
Sex
The council has duty
of care toward all its
workers, and in
terms of the Public
Sector Equality Duty
Workforce profile
concludes 71%
female and 29%
male
Based on last 5 years
data this policy is
disproportionately
more advantageous
to men as the overall
demographic is 71%
female and 29%
male so one should
expect the impacted
numbers to mirror
that. However it is
split as 67% female
and 33% male.
Gender Reassign
Health
The council has duty
of care toward all its
workers, and in
terms of the Public
Sector Equality Duty
Reduction in
anticipated income
for some employees
may contribute
towards poor health
outcomes.
This policy may
impact heath of staff
if they are adversely
impacted by being
put on pay
preservation and
rather than the
current 24 months
have only 6 months
or 3 months.
Human Rights
Page 337

Page 338

Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The council has a duty to balance the budget. Although this policy may have a negative impact
on employees given the socio economic impact assessed above. Based on last 5 years data
this policy is disproportionately more advantageous to men as the overall demographic is
71% female and 29% male so one should expect the impacted numbers to mirror that.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
No
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
It is difficult to forecast the cost reduction for the Council in future years as it depends on the
number of employees eligible for pay preservation. The data assessment also indicated that,
in that 5 year timeframe, the breakdown of impacted employees was 67% females and 33%
males. This is disproportionately more advantageous to men as the current overall
demographic is 71% female and 29% male so one should expect the protected numbers to
mirror that.
Page 338

Page 339

AssessmentNo 686 Owner GMacfarlane2
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment Budget R and N
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer - Roads &Neighbourhood
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Grounds Manager
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function or
financial decision)
Policy Title R&N6 Savings Option Weekend Litter Collection
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Removal or reduction of Litter Collection facility at weekends
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Grounds Service
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements. Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities
(A) or foster good relations (F) No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Communities, businesses and visitors to the area over the weekend period
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Grounds Service
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Cross Cutting
There are 6
postholders
employed to carry
out this function
The operatives
employed will no
longer be required
and this reduces
employment
opportunities
Negative
Disability
Social & Economic
Impact
Litter may by
dropped and left
affecting the look of
Litter detracts from
the appearance of a
location and the
Negative
Page 339

Page 340

the town
centre/park etc.
perception will be
that the area is not
cared for if litter
allowed to remain
Sex
Gender Reassign
Health
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please provide
justification for this.
The Council is required to reach a balanced budget. The siting of bins will be reviewed to ensure they
are located where visitors etc require to maximise compliance
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
The litter strategy will identify if the litter issue greater at weekend if no collection in place
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
This proposal would mean reduce or no litter collection at weekends, this will affect town centres,
parks and areas with high visitor numbers. Currently 6 operatives are employed from Friday to Monday
to clear litter and retain levels of cleanliness. The options being considered are a reduction tby 2 or 4
weekend litter collectors or removal of all 6 weekend litter collectors. If introduced additional litter
bins will be installed but these will not be emptied until Monday.
Page 340

Page 341

AssessmentNo 687 Owner GMacfarlane2
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment Budget R and N
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer - Roads &Neighbourhood
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Roads Service
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function or
financial decision)
Policy Title R&N15 Saving Option Christmas Lighting
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Cease council erecting festive lighting and supporting businesses and communities
to fund raise and self manage festive lighting displays.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Roads Service
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements. Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
Communities and town centre users
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Roads Service
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Cross Cutting
Disability
Social & Economic
Impact
Christmas lighting
can encourage
footfall within town
centres
Christmas light
switch ons and
associated events
can be well
supported by
visitors
Negative if there is
no appetite from
others to take on
this organising
Sex
Page 341

Page 342

Gender Reassign
Health
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The council has the responsibity to reach a balanced budget and communities and town centre
businesses users will be supported to take on the responsibility for christmas lighting.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Feedback from those that organise the christmas lighting in future years will be monitored
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
The council is required to reach a balanced budget and this proposal is related to a non statutory
activity carried out by the Roads Service. Town centre businesses and community groups will be
supported to take this activity on within future years.
Page 342

Page 343

AssessmentNo 688 Owner GMacfarlane2
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment Budget R and N
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer - Roads &Neighbourhood
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Waste Service, Grounds Service
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function or
financial decision)
Policy Title R&N8 Savings Option Garden Waste Charge Introduced
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
To introduce a fee to collect and dispose of garden waste
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Waste Service
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements. Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities
(A) or foster good relations (F) No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
All users of the garden waste collection
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Waste Service and Grounds Service
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
15-16 years ago
25% of pensioners
in Scotland were
living in poverty,
compared to 15%
now Single
pensioners over the
age of 75 more likely
to to live in poverty
Some small potential
negative effect
Cross Cutting
Disability Disabled people are Some small potential
Page 343

Page 344

more likely to be
living in poverty
than non disabled
people
negative effect
Social & Economic
Impact
May lead to
increased fly tipping
and/or
contamination of
other bins.
If unable or
unwilling to pay a
fee users may
dispose of garden
waste in an
alternative manner
Negative
Sex
Women are more
likely to be income
deprived than men.
39% of single
women with
children are living in
poverty.
Some small potential
negative effect
Gender Reassign
Health
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
people from non-
white minority
ethnic groups were
more likely to be in
relative poverty
after housing
Some small potential
negative effect
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please provide
justification for this.
The council is required to reach a balanced budget. The waste strategy and communications plan will
inform users on the appropriate bins for disposal and encourage compliance. It will support the councils
climate action plan.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Yes the number of residents purchasing a permit will be monitored and recordedd
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
The Council is required to reach a balanced budget. The separation of garden waste and food would will
support the appropriate disposal of waste reducing the carbon footprint of the council and reducing the
costs. Some very small potential negative effect on some groups however, the fee charged will be small
for the collection of the garden waste and a payment plan option will be available for those that require
to pay in instalments.
Page 344

Page 345

AssessmentNo 689 Owner GMacfarlane2
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment Budget R and N
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer - Roads &Neighbourhood
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Grounds Service
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function or
financial decision)
Policy Title R&N9 Savings Option Reduction in grass cutting, litter collection and street cleaning
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
The proposal is the reduction in grass cutting, street sweeping and litter collection
The proposal considered is as follows Reduce grass cutting of open space areas
prioritising areas of high amenity such as parks, football pitches etc. Reduced
emptying litter bins and routine and ad hoc sweeping with a focus on high use
pedestrian areas. Additional bins would be installed at key locations to minimise
littering.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Grounds Service
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements. Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Communities, residents and businesses
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Grounds Service
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Cross Cutting
Any reduction in
grass cutting, street
sweeping and litter
collection reduces
resource
If numbers of
seasonal operatives
and/or grounds
operatives reduced
this adversely affects
Negative
Page 345

Page 346

requirement employment
opportunities
Disability
The Council had a
duty to make its
services accessible
to disabled people.
We must seek to
mitigate any
negative impacts.
Areas with more
accessible green
space are associated
with better mental
and physical health.
It is important that
shared areas are
accessible to all
A reduction in grass
cutting/maintenance
may have a negative
impact on
accessibility for
people with
disabilities.
Social & Economic
Impact
The cleanliness and
maintenance of both
urban and rural
areas adversely
impacts the
perception of an
area
Areas with a lower
level of maintenance
of grassed areas and
street cleanliness
align with areas of
higher deprivation
and can impact on
investment
opportunities and
local pride
Negative
Sex
The Council needs to
consider impacts of
staff and service
users.
If numbers of
seasonal operatives
and/or grounds
operatives reduced
this adversely affects
employment
opportunities
Negative
Gender Reassign
Health
Health and
Wellbeing is a
priority in the WDC
2022-27 Strategic
Plan
Physical
environment can
influence physical
and mental health
This may have a
potenital negative
impact as a result in
a reduction to use
open as a result of
reduced
maintenance.
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please provide
justification for this.
The council has a requirement to reach a balanced budget. The provision fulfils the council's statutory
obligations in relation to street cleaning and additional bins will be installed at key locations. There is
Page 346

Page 347

no statutory requirement to maintain grassed areas.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Yes through performance indicators
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
The council has a requirement to reach a balance budget. The proposals considered are of activities
that are either non statutory or are delivered in excess of the statutory level. Areas with grassed areas
not maintained or a lower level of street cleanliness align with areas of higher deprivation and can
impact on investment opportunities however where appropriate areas of biodiversity will be
introduced which supports the council's transition to net zero. In addition additional litter bins will be
installed if identified as required. If grounds and/or seasonal operatives are reduced this adversely
affects employment opportunities
Page 347

Page 348

AssessmentNo 690 Owner GMacfarlane2
Resource
Regeneration,
Environment
and Growth
Service/Establishment Budget R and N
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer - Roads &Neighbourhood
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Roads and Grounds Service
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title R&N12 Reduction or removal of Footway Gritting
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
The savings option is a review into footway gritting. 3 options have been
considered as follows: Option 1 Reduce footway gritting by 20% This will
reduce footway gritting to prioritise routes to school, town centres,
transport hubs and other locations that are identified as priority pedestrian
routes and destinations Option 2 Reduce footway gritting by 50% This will
reduce footway gritting to main roads and prioritising areas round schools
and main shopping areas. Option 3 Cease all footway gritting In this option
there will be no footway gritting carried on. Gritting activities would be
limited within the Winter Plan to carriageways only. In all options residents
and businesses will be encouraged to use grit bins that are sited throughout
the local authority area.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
Roads and Grounds Service
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
All users of the adopted footways
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Roads and Grounds Services
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is
any negative impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age Older residents may Older residents are Negative
Page 348

Page 349

be more vulnerable
to slips, trips and
falls and may be
more reliant on
being able to walk to
shops etc. School age
children will use
public footways to
access school
more vulnerable to
injury if they fall on
ice and are more
likely to be reliant
on walking and
public transport to
access amenities.
They may become
fearful of leaving
their homes if
footways are icy and
untreated. It is
known that a high
number of children
walk to school.
Cross Cutting
There may be a
reduction in footfall
to town centre
businesses etc if
footways are
untreated and areas
are not considered
safely accessible
Visitors and
residents may feel
vulnerable in
accessing the town
centres and other
destinations if they
feel there is a risk of
slips, trips or falls.
Negative
Disability
Those that are
registered as
disabled may be
more likely to be
reliant on walking
and use of public
transport
Members of the
community that are
registered disabled
may be more
vulnerable to slips,
trips and falls and
potential injury.
Negative
Social & Economic
Impact
In areas that are
income deprived
there may be not be
access to a private
car and residents
may be reliant on
walking and use of
public transport. In
addition if residents
and visitors fearful
of untreated
footways they may
not visit town
centres to shop etc
Ownership of a
private car is lower
in areas of
deprivation and
therefore residents
are reliant on
walking and access
to public transport.
There will be grit
bins sited in town
centres to support
access.
Negative
Sex
Cross cuts with
pregnancy and
maternity
Cross cuts with
pregnancy and
maternity
Cross cuts with
pregnancy and
maternity
Gender Reassign
Health
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy & May be more Pregnant people are Negative
Page 349

Page 350

Maternity vulnerable to slips,
trips and falls
more vulnerable to
injury if they fall on
ice. They may
become fearful of
leaving their homes
if footways are icy
and untreated.
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented,
please provide justification for this.
The gritting of footways is non statutory and the Winter Plan will be updated to reflect that
treatment will either be reduced to priority routes or ceased to carriageway only. A
communications exercise will be undertaken about taking sensible precautions in winter
weather such as appropriate footwear. There will also be grit bins sited in appropriate
locations.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
The Roads Service review the Winter Plan annually and will monitor actions undertake.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
The council is required to reach a balanced budget and the gritting is footways is not
statutory. If a service is no longer sustainable the service is required to be reviewed to
determine how delivery should continue. In this proposal should footway gritting be
reduced or ceased the location of grit bins will be assessed to ensure theses are located in
areas of most requirement. In addition information sharing will be carried out to support
communities how best to travel in winter weather.
Page 350

Page 351

AssessmentNo 691 Owner JGALLACHER
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget P and T
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer James Gallacher ICT Manager
(include job titles/organisation)
Members James Gallacher, ICT Manager Victoria Rogers, People &Technology Chief Officer
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy function or
financial decision)
Policy Title PT06 Savings Options - Reduction in ICT Management.
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
Removal of one full-time ICT Business Partner role from the ICT management
structure. This post is a new post and currently vacant, therefore there is no impact to
employees.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Consulation with P&TChief Officer, Strategic HR, ICT Management team and Trade
Unions
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Cross Cutting
Disability
Social & Economic
Impact
Sex
Gender Reassign
Health
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Page 351

Page 352

Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please provide
justification for this.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
The council has a duty to balance the budget. This post is a new post and currently vacant, following
consideration of how these tasks can be carried out it has been determined that there is no longer a
need for this post.
Page 352

Page 353

AssessmentNo 694 Owner JGALLACHER
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Budget P and T
 
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer James Gallacher ICT Manager
(include job titles/organisation)
Members James Gallacher, ICT Manager Victoria Rogers, Chief Officer People
&Technology
 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title PT07 Savings Options - Reduction in ICT Support
 
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
To reduce the ICT support team by three part-time roles, equivalent to 1.7
FTE.
 
 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
Consulation with P&TChief Officer, Strategic HR, ICT Management team and
Trade Unions
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
ICT employees in the management and support teams.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Consulation with P&TChief Officer, Strategic HR, ICT Management team and Trade Unions
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation
to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any
negative impact on particular groups.
 
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
The council must
meet public sector
equality duty.
The age group are
55 to 60, and 60 to
65 group.
Potential to have
negative impact
however the council
is providing early
retirement or switch
policy to support
employees.
Cross Cutting
Disability The council must
meet public sector
Disabled people are
more likely to
Potential to have
negative impact
Page 353

Page 354

equality duty. experience financial
hardship.
however the council
is providing early
retirement or switch
policy to support
employees.
Social & Economic
Impact
The council has duty
of care toward all its
workers, and in
terms of the Public
Sector Equality Duty
Employees affected
by this policy may be
impacted financially.
This has the
potential to have a
negative impact. Any
potential reduction
in staffing
requirements could
be managed through
SWITCH
redeployment
programme.
Additional support
will be available to
any employees
impacted by the
savings options to
ensure their health
and wellbeing.
Sex
Gender Reassign
Health
Health and
wellbeing are a
priority for the
Council as noted in
our Strategic Plan
22-27.
Worries
surrounding job
security may be
heightened for
employees
This has the
potential to
negatively impact
employees, Any
potential reduction
in staffing
requirements will be
managed through
SWITCH
redeployment
programme.
Additional support
will be available to
any employees
impacted by the
savings options to
ensure their health
and wellbeing.
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Page 354

Page 355

Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Reduction in support is manageable as ICT are currently implementing and embracing new
technology to automate processes and reduce the requirement for manual tasks. In addition,
employees are being offered early retirement options plus wellbeing and switch policy
support.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
ICT will continue to monitor and review support requirements, capacity and workloads. ICT
will continue to report via service management and also WDC strategic plan KPI - Volume of
ICT Incidents closed in half day or less.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
The council has a duty to balance the budget. Following consideration of how these tasks can
be carried out it has been determined that a reduction in support areas is manageable but will
mean longer waiting times for system upgrades, file restores and longer waiting times for
incident/request resolution in both corporate, education and partner areas.
Page 355

Page 356

AssessmentNo 697 Owner Laurence.Slavin
Resource Transformation Service/Establishment Resources
First Name Surname Job title
Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer Resources
(include job titles/organisation)
Members Laurence Slavin - Chief Officer Resources
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for stategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RES04 - Remove Voluntary Grant Funding
The aim, objective,purpose and intended out come of policy
A reduction in voluntary grant funding provided to West Dunbartonshire
Community &Volunteering Services (WDCVS) who administer Voluntary
Grant funding on behalf of the Council of up to £150,000 per annum. This
funding covers social transport (£100,000), play schemes and running
costs (£50,000). In addition to the above funding, the Council also
provides £21,560 of funding to Clydebank Asbestos Group and the
proposal is to reduce this by 25% to £16,170 (reduction of £5,390)
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy.
Senior Council staff and the Budget Working Group have been consulted
on the development of the option
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Community Groups who apply to West Dunbartonshire Community &Volunteering
Services for grant funding and in particular, Clydebank Asbestos Group
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
WDCVS and Clydebank Asbestos Group have been notified of the potential reduction in
funding subject to elected member approval on 1 March 2023
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there
is any negative impact on particular groups.
Needs Evidence Impact
Age
Relevant as funding
is provided across a
wide range of
community groups
Funding is provided
to cover social
transport
(£100,000), play
Reduction in funding
will negatively affect
the amount that
WDCVS can provide
Page 356

Page 357

and age ranges
schemes and
running costs
(£50,000) and
funding for people
with asbestos
related diseases.
to Community
groups who apply to
them for financial
support. These
groups are wide
ranging and the
funding also helps
support play
schemes and
running costs
Cross Cutting
Disability
Relevant as funding
is provided across a
wide range of
community groups
who support a wide
range of groups
requiring support
potentially including
disability groups
The service may
provide support to
community groups
with a specific focus
on disabilities
through the funding
levels provided
Reduction in funding
will negatively affect
the amount that
WDCVS can provide
to Community
groups who apply to
them for financial
support. These
groups are wide
ranging and the
funding to help
support social
transportation.
Social & Economic
Impact
The Council must
have due regard to
the Fairer Scotland
Duty in terms of
Social Economic
impacts and the
statutory guidance
The service acts to
provide funding for
social transport
(£100,000), play
schemes and
running costs
(£50,000) and the
Clydebank Asbestos
Group (£21,560)
Reduction in funding
will negatively affect
the amount that
WDCVS can provide
to Community
groups who apply to
them for financial
support. These
groups are wide
ranging.
Sex
Gender Reassign
Health
Clydebank Asbestos
Group support
people affected by
an asbestos-related
disease and their
families
The service acts to
provide funding to
Clydebank Asbestos
Group (£21,560)
Reduction in funding
will negatively affect
the amount that
Clydebank Asbestos
Group have to
support people
affected by an
asbestos-related
disease and their
families
Human Rights
Marriage & Civil
Partnership
Pregnancy &
Maternity
Race
Page 357

Page 358

Religion and Belief
Sexual Orientation
Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented,
please provide justification for this.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the
recommendation
EIA 697 details potential impacts which, summarised is that a reduction in funding may
negatively affect community groups that support a wide range of users with either health
or disability issues. Reduced funding to voluntary groups could have an impact on the
groups and the services they provide to the community. Provision of this funding is not a
statutory requirement and therefore it has to be put forward as a saving option for
member consideration whilst setting out the implications of taking the option
Page 358

Page 359

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL
Report by the Chief Officer – Resources
Council: 1 March 2023
___________________________________________________________________
Subject: Dumbarton Common Good Budget Update 2023/24
1. Purpose
1.1 The purpose of this report is to provide Council with an update on the 2022/23
Dumbarton Common Good budget and seek approval for a revised 2023/24
budget and indicative budgets for 2024/25 and 2025/26.
2. Recommendations
2.1 Members are asked to:
i) Note the probable 2022/23 outturn as set out in Appendix 1.
ii) Approve the revised 2023/24 budget as set out in Appendix 1, including
the approval of additional budgets for the Pipe Band Championship of
£50,000, £10,000 for resources for Dumbarton Library and an increase
in grant of £13,706 for Alcoholics Anonymous.
iii) Note the indicative budgets to 2025/26 as set out in Appendix 1.
iv) Note the projected balances available for carry forward of £615,424 at
31 March 2023 and £584,446 at 31 March 2024 (based upon the
revised draft 2023/24 budget).
3. Background
3.1 At Council on 9 March 2022, Members approved the 2022/23 budget for the
Dumbarton Common Good and noted indicative budgets for the period to
2024/25.  The 2022/23 budget, as shown on Appendix1, has since been
updated to reflect the actual figures carried forward from 2021/22, as opposed
to the estimated figures which were included in the original 2022/23 budget.
At the same meeting on 9 March 2022, Council also agreed to increase the
charge to the Common Good for the central admin allocation by £10,000 and
this has also been reflected in the revised 2022/23 budget as shown on
Appendix 1.
3.2 The Prudential Reserve of the Common Good remains at £25,000.
4. Main Issues
4.1 Appendix 1 details the 2022/23 financial performance of the Common Good.
It highlights that the income expected in-year (£321,946) is likely to be more
than the anticipated expenditure (£287,835) for 2022/23, resulting in an in-
year surplus of £34,111. This means that £34,111 will be added to the
reserves brought forward from 2021/22 of £581,313, resulting in a total of
£615,424 being carried forward into 2023/24.
ITEM 6
Page 359

Page 360

4.2 Indicative budgets for 2023/24 to 2025/26 are also shown on Appendix 1.  The
figures indicate that in all 3 years, it is likely that spend will be greater than
income which means there will be the need to fund any shortfall from the
reserves brought forward. 
4.3 In terms of the adequacy of reserves, the prudential level of reserves is
considered to be adequate to deal with any unforeseen financial pressures on
the fund, based on previous experience and future expectations, specifically in
relation to income streams.  The current level of reserves remains significantly
above the prudential level and are therefore judged as being adequate. 
4.4 Proposed budgets going forward remain at a standstill level with the exception
of the following projects, for the following reasons: 
PROJECT REASON
Alcoholics Anonymous Increase required reflects additional inflationary
cost associated with utilities, as explained at 
paragraph 4.7 below.
▪ Increase in 2023/24 £13,706, standstill
thereafter with annual amount to be
reviewed in line with inflation.
Dumbarton Fireworks Grant increased in line with the identified 
inflationary pressure and will continue to do so until 
such time as it exceeds £20,000 as previously 
agreed by Members at the Corporate Services 
Committee on the 2 November 2022.
▪ Initial increase in grant 22/23 £2,730, 5%
annual increase thereafter.
Town Centre
Management
Budget is a declining fund; whatever is not used in
one year is carried forward into the next. Balance
has been re-profiled annually over the next 5 years.
Bellsmyre Schools Out Project is no longer operational.
▪ £6,000 reduction.  
4.5  At the meeting of the Corporate Services Committee on 2 November 2022,
Members were also asked to note the request from the Chief Officer for
Citizen, Culture and Facilities to fund an annual grant of £50,000 to be paid as
a contribution to the annual Pipe Band Championships commencing 2023/24.
Assuming approval is given, Appendix 1 shows that a budget of £50,000 has
been added in for the next 3 years.   
4.6 Furthermore, the Chief Officer for Citizen, Culture and Facilities has requested
approval for the inclusion of an annual budget of £10,000 towards the cost of
library resources for Dumbarton Library commencing 2023/24.  Assuming
approval is given, Appendix 1 shows this additional budget has been included
for the next 3 years. 
4.7 An annual grant has been awarded to Alcoholics Anonymous for the last 10+
years to fund property running costs, namely the rent and utilities at Poplar
Page 360

Page 361

Road, Dumbarton.  Having previously been awarded £11,700, the grant was
reduced to £8,000 in 2020/21 in line with the actual cost at that time. 
However recent increases in utility costs means an overspend of £13,706 is
anticipated in 2022/23 and the budget is no longer sufficient going forward. 
Assuming approval is given, Appendix 1 shows revised budgets for 2023/24 –
2025/26 of £21,706 which will be subject to review in line with inflationary
increases. 
5. Option Appraisal 
5.1 No option appraisal was required for this report. 
6. People Implications 
6.1 There are no people implications. 
7. Financial and Procurement Implications 
7.1 Other than the financial position note above, there are no financial or
procurement implications. 
8. Risk Analysis 
8.1 The Council must consider financial and reputational risks when considering
funding to external organisations.  The financial risk is that the Dumbarton
Common Good remains within budget, however with a robust budget being
agreed and ongoing monitoring and review will ensure that this is protected. 
There is a risk that the voluntary organisations awarded grants do not remain
financially sustainable and that grant payments made are not used for the
purposes intended.  Organisations funded by the Common Good must comply
with conditions of grant which includes providing financial accounts etc. to the
Council on a regular basis.  This allows officers to monitor spend as being in
line with expectations as well as the financial sustainability of the
organisations. 
9. Equalities Impact Assessment (EIA) 
9.1 No equalities impact assessment was required in relation to this report. 
10. Environmental Sustainability 
10.1 No assessment of environmental sustainability was required in relation to this
report. 
11. Consultation 
11.1 Legal and Financial Officers have been consulted in preparing this report. 
Page 361

Page 362

12. Strategic Assessment 
12.1 Good financial governance is essential to the delivery of each of the
Council’s Strategic Priorities. 
__________________
Laurence Slavin
Chief Officer – Resources
Date: 10 February 2023
__________________________________________________________________
Person to Contact: Janine Corr, Accountant 
Council Offices, Church Street, Dumbarton  
E-mail: janine.corr@west-dunbarton.gov.uk 
Appendices: Appendix 1 – Financial Analysis and Revised Budget 
Background Papers: Report to Council – 9 March 2022 – Dumbarton Common
Good Fund Budget 2022/23 
Report to Corporate Service Committee – 2 November 2022
– Various Grant Applications to Dumbarton Common Good.   
Wards Affected           2 and 3. 
Page 362

Page 363

DUMBARTON COMMON GOOD FUND Appendix 1
ESTIMATES 2023/24
2021/22
ACTUAL
OUTTURN 
2022/23
ORIGINAL
BUDGET 
CHANGES TO
2022/23 SINCE
MARCH 
2022/23
REVISED
BUDGET 
2022/23
PROBABLE
OUTTURN 
2022/23
(UNDER)/ 
OVER SPEND 
2023/24
INDICATIVE
BUDGET 
2024/25
INDICATIVE
BUDGET 
2025/26
INDICATIVE
BUDGET
£ £ £ £ £ £ £ £ £
CONTINUATION OF EXISTING PROJECTS:
5,805       Alcoholics Anonymous - Grant for Property 8,000 - 8,000 21,706        13,706 21,706 21,706 21,706
5,000       Alternatives 5,000 - 5,000 5,000 0 5,000 5,000 5,000
35,602     Bellsmyre Digital Project 35,601        - 35,601 35,602        1 35,602 35,602 35,602
36,000     Bellysyre Development Trust 36,000        - 36,000 36,000        0 36,000 36,000 36,000
15,000     Christmas Lights 15,000        - 15,000 15,000        0 15,000 15,000 15,000
10,000     Dumbarton Senior Citizens 10,000        - 10,000 10,000        0 10,000 10,000 10,000
- Dumbarton Fireworks 9,050 - 9,050 11,780        2,730 12,369 12,987 13,637
26,224     Town Centre Management - Capital & Revenue 142,547      22,777 165,324 22,777        (142,547) 22,777 22,777 22,777
2,630       Rockvale Rebound - Rent 2,630 - 2,630 2,630 0 2,630 2,630 2,630
50,000     Scottish Maritime Museum 50,000        - 50,000 50,000        0 50,000 50,000 50,000
- Small Grants 7,000 - 7,000 - (7,000) 7,000 7,000 7,000
40,000     West Dunbartonshire Citizen's Advice Bureau 40,000        - 40,000 40,000        0 40,000 40,000 40,000
14,000     Central Admin Allocation 14,000        10,000 24,000 24,000        0 24,000 24,000 24,000
10,840     Estates Dept - Management Fee 10,840        - 10,840 10,840        0 10,840 10,840 10,840
PROJECTS NO LONGER OPERATIONAL:
8,500       Bellsmyre Schools Out 6,000 - 6,000 2,500 (3,500) - - -
NEW PROJECTS:
- Pipe Band Chamionships - - - - 0 50,000 50,000 50,000
- Dumbarton library resources - - - - 0 10,000 10,000 10,000
259,602   TOTAL EXPENDITURE 391,668      32,777 424,445      287,835      (136,610) 352,924        353,542        354,191       
(360) Interest on Revenue Balance / Investments (1,100) 0 (1,100) (360) 740 (360) (360) (360)
(319,912) Rental Income (319,000) 0 (319,000) (321,585) (2,585) (321,585) (321,585) (321,585)
(320,272) TOTAL INCOME (320,100) 0 (320,100) (321,946) (1,846) (321,946) (321,946) (321,946)
(60,671) NET EXPENDITURE 71,568 32,777 104,345 (34,111) (138,456) 30,978 31,596 32,246
(520,643) BALANCE B/FWD (438,094) (143,219) (581,313) (581,313) 0 (615,424) (584,446) (552,850)
(581,313) BALANCE C/FWD (366,526) (110,442) (476,968) (615,424) (138,456) (584,446) (552,850) (520,604)
Page 363

Page 364

Page 364

Page 365

West Dunbartonshire Council
Report by the Chief Officer - Resources
Council: 1 March 2023
Subject: Capital Strategy 2023/24 to 2031/32
1. Purpose
1.1 The purpose of this report is to provide Members with West Dunbartonshire
Council’s (the Council) updated capital strategy for the period 2023/24 to
2031/32.
2. Recommendations
2.1 Members are requested to approve West Dunbartonshire Council’s
updated capital strategy for the period 2023/24 to 2031/32.
3. Background
3.1 In December 2017, the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and
Accountancy, (CIPFA), issued revised Prudential and Treasury
Management Codes. As from 2019/20, all local authorities are
required to prepare a Capital Strategy which is intended to provide:
• a high-level overview of how capital expenditure, capital financing and
treasury management activity contribute to the provision of services
• an overview of how the associated risk is managed
• the implications for future financial sustainability.
3.2 The Council’s first Capital Strategy was approved by Council in March
2019 and has been subject to an annual update since that date. 
4. Main Issues
Capital Strategy
4.1 The capital strategy is reviewed and updated annually. This updated
version covers the period 2023/24 to 2031/32 which is the same
period covered by the Council’s capital plan update which will be
reported to Council as part of the separate budget report to this
Council meeting.
4.2 The updated strategy reflects new accounting rules which will come
into effect on 1 April 2024 which require all leases (with a few
exceptions) to be accounted for on the Council Balance Sheet as
assets. Accounting for these on the Balance Sheet will result in
increases to the Council’s assets and long term liabilities. This will
ITEM 7
Page 365

Page 366

also result in an adjustment to Prudential and Treasury Management
indicators as it will increase the ‘level of debt’ identified by the Council;
the Capital Financing Requirement; Operational Boundary; and
Authorised Limit, by the value of the leases. Forecast and estimates of
the ratio of financing costs to Net Revenue Stream may also be
affected. This change affects all councils, however this Council has a
relatively low number of leased assets so the impact is not considered
to be significant. 
5. Option Appraisal 
5.1 No option appraisal was required for this report. 
6. People Implications 
6.1 There are no personnel issues. 
7. Financial and Procurement Implications 
7.1 There are no direct financial or procurement implications arising from
this report. 
8. Risk Analysis 
8.1 While the appended report provides the capital strategy of the Council
there are three main risks associated with long term capital planning. 
These risks are noted below along with assurances over existing
procedures to mitigate these risks. 
Risk Mitigation
Capital plans are not fully
aligned to Council strategic
objectives
Council has controls included within
the prioritisation and approval process
to mitigate this risk. 
Non-deliverability of capital
investment plans
Council has management and
monitoring controls, including regular
capital budget reporting, that will
assist in mitigating this risk.
Inflation may increase capital
expenditure levels, which
may affect the capital
financing and borrowing
requirement leading to an
increase in borrowing,
assuming no additional
capital receipts are available
Council has management and
monitoring controls, including regular
capital budget reporting, that will
assist in mitigating this risk. This
includes reconsidering the inclusion of
capital projects in the capital
programme due to concerns around
affordability. 
Page 366

Page 367

9. Equalities Impact Assessment 
9.1 An equalities impact screening has been carried out and has
determined that a detailed assessment was not required in relation to
this report. 
10. Environmental Sustainability 
10.1 No assessment of environmental sustainability was required in relation
to this report. 
11.  Consultation 
11.1 The views of Legal Services have been requested on this report and
have advised there are neither any issues nor concerns. 
12. Strategic Assessment 
12.1 Proper budgetary control and sound financial practice are
cornerstones of good governance and support Council and officers to
pursue the five strategic priorities of the Council’s Strategic Plan. 
12.2 The capital strategy contributes to the Financial Strategy via the
interdependency that exists between pro-active long term capital
planning and the formulation of long term financial plans. 
_______________________
Laurence Slavin
Chief Officer – Resources 
10 February 2023
______________________________________________________________________
Person to Contact:  Chief Officer - Resources
Council Offices, Church Street, Dumbarton
Email: laurence.slavin@west-dunbarton.gov.uk 
Appendix:   Capital Strategy 2023/24 to 2031/32 
Background Papers: Prudential Indicators 2022/23 to 2031/32 and Treasury 
Management Strategy 2022/23 to 2031/32 (Council 23 March 
2022)
EIA Screening 
Wards Affected:  No wards directly affected.
Page 367

Page 368

Capital Investment Strategy – 2023/24 to 2031/32 Page 1
West 
Dunbartonshire
Council
Capital 
Strategy
2023/24 to 2031/32
March 2023
Appendix
Page 368

Page 369

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 2 
Contents       
Page
Chapter One - Overview 
Introduction 3
Guiding principles 4
Linkage of capital plan to internal plans and strategies 4
External influences on capital planning 6  
Chapter Two – Long term capital planning 
Governance process  9
Prioritisation and approval 11
Management and monitoring of the capital plan 14
Funding of the capital investment plan 
Capital grants and capital contributions 14  
Capital receipts strategy 15  
Revenue and other forms of funding 15  
Borrowing 15
Alternative funding and delivery opportunities 16
Capacity to deliver 17
Skills and knowledge 18  
Chapter Three - Investments and Guarantees 
Approach, due diligence and risk appetite 20
Investment properties 20
Impact of capital planning on investment strategy 20
Summary of material investments and guarantees  21  
Chapter Four - Treasury Management and Prudential Indicators 
Governance process 22
Impact of capital investment on treasury management and prudential indicators 22  
Chapter Five - Section 95 Officer Statements 
Statements on delivery, affordability and risk 25  
Chapter Six – Action Plan  
Actions, timescales, outputs and outcomes 27 
Page 369

Page 370

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 3 
Chapter One - Overview 
Introduction
The Capital Strategy for West Dunbartonshire Council (the Council) provides an overview of
how capital expenditure plans reflect the Council’s capital investment ambition while
ensuring the links between capital investment, capital financing, treasury management,
asset management plans/strategies and the Council’s revenue budgeting cycle and long
term financial planning are maintained.   
The Capital Investment Strategy is a reporting requirement introduced by the 2017 edition
of the CIPFA Prudential Code. Local authorities produce many plans and strategies in the
course of their operations, however, it is recognised that within the context of capital
planning, there is a need to produce an overarching view that addresses the following key
considerations: 
• ensuring capital plans are aligned to the Council’s strategic priorities 
• ensuring capital plans are affordable, prudent and sustainable
• demonstrating the linkage to local strategic and local asset management planning
• ensuring financing decisions are taken in accordance with good professional practice
and a full understanding of the risks involved
• ensuring lifecycle revenue costs are understood
• demonstrating the Council has robust governance arrangements to support its
capital planning activities. 
The Strategy is the policy framework document that sets out the principles to be used to
guide the allocation of capital investment across the Council’s services and informs
decisions on capital spending priorities within both the General Fund 10 year capital plan
(2023/24 to 2031/32) and the Housing Revenue Account (HRA) 5 year capital plan
(2023/24 to 2027/28).  Included within this strategy document is a statement by the Section
95 Officer on the delivery, affordability and risks associated with this strategy. 
Background 
The Council is ambitious and has plans to deliver significant capital investment over the
next 10 year capital planning period across housing, schools, economic regeneration and
infrastructure. The Council works in partnership with other agencies in the delivery of this
investment, including the Scottish Government and Glasgow City Region City Deal. 
The Capital Investment Strategy takes account of the Council’s strategic priorities and
considers any new investment within the context of outcomes, affordability, sustainability or
spend to save. There is also recognition of the need to balance investment between
maintaining current assets and infrastructure against the ambitions for acquiring new
assets. The Council’s current capital programme is shaped and influenced by various
associated strategies and plans, as illustrated as follows:  
Page 370

Page 371

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 4 
The primary purpose of the Capital Investment Strategy is to provide an overarching view of
how various plans and strategies inform capital investment and to demonstrate this is both
affordable and sustainable. The associated plans and strategies each focus on specific
priority areas and, through appropriate governance structures, ultimately shape and
influence the investment plans delivered through the Capital Investment Programme.
Underpinning the Capital Investment Programme is the Treasury Management and
Investment Strategy and Loans Fund Policy. Both ultimately consider the delivery of the
capital programme within the context of affordability and risk and apply a measurement of
what this means against key prudential and treasury indicators. The aim being to
demonstrate affordability and sustainability over the long term. 
COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN  HSCP –
Strategic
Plan
CAPITAL INVESTMENT STRATEGY
Capital Investment
Programme 
Treasury Management
and Investment Strategy
Loans Fund Policy 
LHS & Strategic
Housing Investment
Plan
Asset
Management
Plans 
Local Outcome
Improvement
Plan (LOIP)
Capital Expenditure  
Capital Facing 
Borrowing 
Loans Fund 
Governance 
Risk 
Economic
Development
Strategy 
Page 371

Page 372

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 5
Plans and Strategies
West Dunbartonshire Council Strategic Plan 2022-2027
The vision for the Council is to: “Deliver services which build on the strength and resilience
of our neighbourhoods and supporting all residents to fulfil their individual potential, and that
of their communities”. The Council has 5 Strategic Priorities that link to the Community
Planning West Dunbartonshire’s Local Outcome Improvement Plan, with an overarching
priority of reducing inequalities for the people of West Dunbartonshire, as illustrated below:
Page 372

Page 373

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 6 
Health and Social Care Partnership Strategic Plan
The strategic plan has been created in partnership with the third and independent sector,
public health, community planning partners, local communities and people who use the
service. The vision and our desire is to ensure that our citizens have access to the right
care, at the right time and in the right place. It involves a range of activities, centred around
a continuous cycle of “analyse, plan, do and review” and is iterative and dynamic to support
collaborative system change across health and social care and all partners working in our
communities. The HSCP Strategic Plan has identified the following Strategic Priorities: 
• Early Intervention
• Access
• Resilience
• Assets
• Inequalities. 
Asset Management Plans
The Council has a number of asset management plans, each of which covers a 5 year
period.  The following diagram illustrates the linkage between the overarching Corporate
Asset Management Strategy and the underlying asset plans that are in place for each asset
category. 
Corporate
Asset
Management 
Strategy
2022-2027
Property
2022-2027
Roads
structures
and lighting
2018-2023
Open
spaces
2018-2023
Fleet and
Vehicle
Replaceme
nt Strategy 
2016-2021
Housing
2018-2023
ICT
2017-2022
Page 373

Page 374

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 7 
The overarching document is the Corporate Asset Management Strategy. The aim of the
Asset Management Strategy is to ensure that our assets are managed in a corporate,
coherent and prioritised fashion, as a mechanism to support the delivery of key services;
ensuring their efficiency and effectiveness in meeting the current and future needs of
communities within West Dunbartonshire.   
Strategic well-executed asset management is an essential component for the Council and is
fundamental to being able to demonstrate that the Council is delivering in the context of the
Best Value agenda. The Council therefore has a responsibility to ensure that: 
• assets are managed on a strategic basis so that they enhance and improve service
delivery
• the asset base is aligned to the organisations strategic priorities and objectives and
that they are managed in an active, effective and efficient manner. 
Sound and efficient management of our assets has a significant part to play in continuing to
improve and develop our services to the Community. Therefore, core services such as
Education, Health & Social Care Partnership, Housing, etc. must continue to articulate their
strategic direction in the short, medium and long term and support the translation of these
priorities and their implications in terms of asset requirements to enable the effective
development and delivery of Services. Effective Asset Management as well as improving
efficiency and effectiveness, can: 
• generate resources through income by selling surplus assets
• generate long term revenue efficiencies as those assets would no longer be a burden
on resources.   
The corporate Asset Management Strategy supplemented by individual asset management
plans.  These plans follow the guidance from the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and
Accounting (CIPFA) advising that local authorities should classify assets under 6
categories: 
• Property (including investment and disposals)
• Open Spaces
• Roads Structures & Lighting
• Housing
• Vehicle Fleet & Plant 
• Information and Communication Technology (ICT). 
The Council’s approach to the management of these categories require detailed asset
management plans which have been developed within the context of this strategic
framework and approved by the appropriate Committee for each category. 
Each of the asset management plans takes account of six key drivers which are promoted
by CIPFA as being critical to effective asset management.  These drivers in turn will
Page 374

Page 375

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 8 
influence the capital projects that are both in the current capital investment plan and are
proposed for future inclusion.  The key drivers are: 
• Condition
• Suitability
• Sufficiency
• Revenue Costs
• Accessibility
• Value. 
Local Housing Strategy 2022-27 and Strategic Housing Investment Plan 2023/24-
27/28
The key strategic outcomes for the Local Housing Strategy for West Dunbartonshire include
ensuring the supply of housing meets the needs and aspirations of local people that they
live in good quality homes which are located in strong, safe communities. The Strategic
Housing Investment Plan (SHIP) sets out the priorities for affordable housing investment in
West Dunbartonshire over the next five years; 
• Health and Educational benefits
• Contribute to Regeneration of West Dunbartonshire
• Sustainable Investment
• Meet Local Demand and Aspirations
• Maximise Return on Investment and achieve Value for Money. 
The SHIP will secure investment across the Council and provide sustainable, affordable,
accessible high quality homes which will contribute to the wider regeneration aims for the
area. 
In addressing projected demographic trends of an ageing population in West
Dunbartonshire new build homes will be designed for future needs of an aging population
with cognisance taken in the design stage for changing mobility needs. The SHIP supports
the Health and Social Care Partnership to meet specialist housing need through dedicated
supported accommodation projects. 
The Council also recognises that bringing former social housing stock back into social
ownership can increase the level of housing stock available as well as supporting
regeneration in the area. As such, a buy-back programme has been incorporated into the
SHIP. 
Making sustainable investment in housing is a key priority within the SHIP and this is
achieved by incorporating energy efficiency measures and renewable technologies within
the new build programme. The developments benefit from a range of sustainable measures
including solar photovoltaic panels, district heating schemes and design measures to
minimise space heating demand. This investment aligns to the Council’s Environmental,
Sustainability and Climate Change Strategy in supporting affordable warmth to households
across the Council.
Page 375

Page 376

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 9 
The regeneration of Council communities is a strategic priority within the Council Plan and
the SHIP. Through housing led regeneration and the provision of high quality homes,
desirable communities are created where people want to live and which in turn can also
attract private sector investment. 
Finally, it is recognised that new build housing also provides benefits to health, wellbeing
and can contribute positively to educational attainment. New energy efficient, high quality
homes can alleviate symptoms in a number of respiratory illnesses and young people can
benefit from improved cognitive development and less risk of behavioural issues when living
in warm, high quality housing. 
Other plans and strategies
In addition to the asset management plans outlined above there are a number of other
plans, strategies and approaches that influence the level and type of capital investment
undertaken by the Council. 
• West Dunbartonshire Strategic Plan
• Strategic service delivery plans
• Schools Estate Strategy
• Early Years Strategy
• Asset Disposal Strategy
• Regeneration charrettes. 
Capital Investment
Capital Investment is a highly regulated area of finance and is clearly defined both
externally and internally by CIPFA’s Code of Practice (underpinned by financial reporting
standards) and the Council’s Capital Guidance document which can be located in the
Treasury and Capital section of the Council’s intranet.  
In summary capital investment is defined as expenditure that can be directly attributed to
the acquisition, creation or enhancement of items of property, plant and equipment or the
acquisition of rights over certain longer term intangible benefits.  In contrast revenue
expenditure is incurred in providing a service on a day to day basis and the benefit is
immediately consumed by the Council. 
The value of the Council’s assets as at 31 March 2023 is detailed in the table below and
illustrates the diversity and scale of the asset base: 
Asset Classification  £000 
Operational land and buildings  374,595 
Commercial land and buildings  43,308 
Surplus assets  6,014 
Assets under construction  28,179 
Council dwellings  461,429
Page 376

Page 377

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 10 
Infrastructure assets 111,508 
Vehicles, plant and equipment  18,986
Community Assets 7,586 
Total Asset Value  1,051,605 
While this strategy focuses on the Council’s management of its own investment in assets, a
wider view of capital investment throughout the Council area (by other public organisations
and the private sector) will influence both the Council’s capital spend and the ability of the
Council to meet its strategic priorities: 
• Reducing inequalities for the people of West Dunbartonshire
• A strong local economy and improved job opportunities
• Supported individuals, families and carers living independently and with dignity
• Meaningful engagement with active, empowered and informed citizens who feel safe
and engaged
• Open, accountable and accessible local government
• Efficient and effective frontline services that improve the everyday lives of residents. 
The Capital Strategy sets out a number of guiding principles, however a balance is required
between guidance and prescription to allow a flexible approach to be taken and to enable
the Council to adapt and reflect in times of uncertainty.   
The management of both the General Fund and HRA capital plans are supported by the
Council’s financial regulations and financial code of practice. 
Guiding principles
Long term capital investment plans cannot be developed in isolation but instead are
informed by a number of key principles which are explored in more detail further in this
document: 
• Approach to borrowing - ensuring that the Council complies with the CIPFA Prudential
Code and that borrowing is prudent, affordable and sustainable in the long term;
• Approach to development and monitoring of long term capital investment plans - 
ensuring that all plans make a positive contribution to the overall Council strategic
priorities and that all plans are clearly linked to asset management planning and any
other relevant plans/strategies;
• Approach to treasury management - ensuring that there is a close relationship
between long term capital investment plans and overall treasury management; and
• Approach to financial planning - ensuring that the impact of long term capital
investment plans are clearly detailed within the Council’s Long Term Financial Plan
and annual budget reports. 
Page 377

Page 378

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 11 
Linkage of capital plan to internal plans and strategies
Any capital investment plans that are undertaken by the Council must link to one of the
Council’s key priorities and contribute to the documented aims and objectives. The capital
bids are determined by a number of internal plans and strategies (as described above). 
External influences on capital planning
The internal plans and strategies outlined in the previous section will determine the capital
strategy for both the management of the existing asset base and future capital investment
requirements; however external influences will impact on the Council’s ability to deliver the
aims and objectives.  The level to which the Council is able to mitigate against these
externalities will depend on both the risk and materiality of them. 
External influences can be considered under a PESTLE analysis and some of the main
externalities are explored in more detail below: 
Political 
Much of the activity undertaken by the Council is governed by statute and in turn this has
implications for capital investment required by the Council.  Examples of such statutory
implications are: 
• National housing policy
• School regeneration 
• Scottish housing standards
• Energy efficiency standards. 
Economic
Both the UK and the wider global economy have an impact on both the Council’s ability to
undertake capital borrowing and effectively manage its asset disposal strategy.   
• Capital borrowing considerations: 
o While the Council is able to borrow money from the money market or from the
Public Works Loans Board to fund capital investment it is essential that this is
done in as efficient a way as possible to ensure best value for both Council
tenants and Council tax payers 
o The Council takes a prudent approach to borrowing, paying particular regard to
the robustness of the management and monitoring of the capital investment plan,
loan charge forecasting models and the impact that any deviations will have on
the level of prudential borrowing required. 
• Asset disposal considerations: 
o Those properties which have been declared surplus are grouped into three
separate categories based on importance. In prioritised order, they are: 
Page 378

Page 379

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 12
▪ Strategic sites – sites that could bring significant economic impact
▪ Rationalisation programme – land and buildings that are to be disposed of as
part of any Council rationalisation programme
▪ Commercial and private – land and buildings with commercial and/or private
benefit to interested parties.
o The economic climate impacts on the Council’s ability to dispose of surplus sites
as developers may or may not be able to move forward with development plans.
The Council will fully consider the best way to market surplus assets/sites taking
all relevant factors into account.
Social
Changes in the social and demographic profile of West Dunbartonshire (e.g. changes in the
age profile of the population, household size, poverty levels, gender mix and life
expectancy) all have implications for service delivery on a day to day basis and ultimately
for the long term management of the Council’s assets.
Technological
Changes in technology such as new ways of working, advances in delivering heating and
lighting, etc. has the potential to impact on capital investment plans both in relation to the
cost of implementation and the frequency of updates required.
Legal
Increasing complex capital investment plans invariably result in complex legal negotiations. 
In addition legal and regulatory responsibilities of the Council have the potential to result in
capital investment requirements such as protecting vulnerable residents.
Environmental
Climate change has far reaching impacts on the Council for capital investment.  An example
of this is the requirement to tackle the resulting environmental impacts such as flood
management.
Page 379

Page 380

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 13
Chapter Two – Long term capital planning
Governance process
Capital investment within the Council is governed by a hierarchy of approval, scrutiny and
monitoring processes, as follows:
Council 
In accordance with the CIPFA Prudential Code all capital investment must be approved by
full Council prior to project commencement and any expenditure being incurred.  The
General Fund 10 year capital plan (2023/24 to 2031/32) and the HRA 5 year capital plan
(2023/24 to 2027/28) will be submitted to Council in March 2023 for approval and include
both recurring and one off projects with one off project budgets being approved in principle
subject to business case approval. The responsibilities of Council in relation to capital are
noted below:
• approval of capital plans
• approval and scrutiny of capital plan budget monitoring reports
• approval of budget virements
• oversight of specific capital projects if deemed appropriate.
Council
Committees
Performance and Monitoring Review
Group (PMRG)
Strategic Asset Management Group
(SAMG)
Project Boards
Stategic Leads and capital budget
holders
Capital and Treasury team
Page 380

Page 381

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 14 
Committees
Service Committees are responsible for scrutiny of capital budgets, approval of business
cases (if delegated authority from Council) and oversight of specific capital projects where
required.  The main Committees this applies to are: 
• Corporate Services Committee
• Educational Services Committee
• Housing and Communities Committee
• Infrastructure, Regeneration and Economic Development Committee. 
In addition the Health and Social Care Partnership is responsible for capital projects that
would previously have been classed as social work projects. 
Performance and Monitoring Review Group (PMRG)
The PMRG is led by the Chief Executive and membership includes all Chief Officers of the
Council.  This group is responsible for scrutiny of capital plans, budget monitoring reports
and any other issues that require discussion prior to reporting to Committee/Council. 
Strategic Asset Management Group (SAMG)
The SAMG was established in 2010 initially as a short life small working group to take a
more strategic focus in relation to asset management and the contribution that an effective
asset management strategy could make to the wider issues across the Council. 
Since that time the group has increased in both members and remit. Standing members
include the following: 
• Chief Officer -  Supply, Distribution & Property (Chair)
• Chief Officer - Regeneration
• Chief Officer - Resources
• Chief Officer - Environment & Neighbourhood
• Capital Programme Manager
• Manager of Legal Services
• Procurement Manager
• Service Manager ICT
• Corporate Assets Manager
• Finance Business Partner (Capital). 
With other Chief Officers and/or project sponsors of existing major capital projects (where
variance in delivery, budget, or risk is being reported) or proposed new capital projects
being required to attend on a case by case basis. 
The remit of the group is to: 
• ensure the most efficient use of the Council’s capital assets in pursuit of the Councils
strategic priorities
• review Asset Management plans prior to PMRG/Committee consideration
• ensure that capital spending is aligned to the Council’s strategic priorities
Page 381

Page 382

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 15
• make recommendations on the prioritisation of spending to maximise the impact on
those strategic priorities including recommendations on annual refresh of the capital
programme
• drive the rationalisation of the Councils operational properties, and decide on the
allocation of space to services as required by that process
• receive updates on the financial and physical progress of capital spending and
individual capital projects
• scrutinise the performance of the capital spending programme and of individual capital
projects and make recommendations to PMRG where necessary
• scrutinise delivery of the Asset Disposal Strategy and linked capital funding
expectations
• drive improvements in capital programme and capital project management.
Project Boards
Where appropriate major capital projects within similar themes are reported to individual
Project Boards. Each project board will have a project sponsor who is ultimately responsible
for the project objectives and outcomes. 
Chief Officers and capital budget holders
Once a capital project has been approved capital budget holders (and ultimately Chief
Officers) are responsible for the implementation of the project.  Depending on the scale and
nature of the project the budget holder may need to engage the services of other Council
departments such as planning, consultancy services, procurement, etc.
Capital and Treasury Team
The Capital and Treasury Team is responsible for preparing annual capital plan refresh
documentation, budget monitoring, determining capital finance requirements and assisting
with financial/business case analysis as and when required.  The team also undertake all
treasury management functions within the Council including the preparation of the annual
treasury management strategy and prudential indicator information thus ensuring the
linkage between capital investment and these core documents.
Prioritisation and approval
The Council has separate capital plans for both the General Fund and the HRA. The
General Fund plan covers a 10 year period with the next update in March 2023 being for
the period 2023/24 to 2031/32.  The HRA capital plan covers a shorter period of 5 years for
the period 2023/24 to 2027/28 (backed up by a 30 year HRA business plan).
Both the updated General Fund and the HRA capital plans will be submitted to Council in
March 2023 for approval and is just one part of the cyclical annual capital process.  The
prioritisation and approval process for each are slightly different due to the different nature
of the projects involved and the strategies/plans that underpin them.  It is important to
maintain a list of “shovel ready” projects to ensure sufficient flexibility in the process to take
advantage of any funding opportunities that may occur mid-year or fill any gaps where
programme reprofiling is required.
Page 382

Page 383

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 16
The management of capital investment planning follows a cyclical process as follows:
Existing capital projects are subject to an annual review to determine the likely profile of
capital spent taking into account the nature, complexity and risk of the project. This exercise
is carried out in conjunction with ongoing budget monitoring.
It is always difficult to make choices between competing priorities as funding requests will
normally be in excess of finance available.  As highlighted above the process involved is
slightly different for both General Fund and the HRA with the key differences detailed
below:
General Fund – due to the nature of the General Fund being multi-functional if a specific
scheme is to be recommended for approval there will be a requirement for a capital bid
template to be completed and submitted to the capital and treasury team. The following are
some of the details to be provided by prospective budget holders:
• confirmation that the project meets the definition of capital investment
• the project must be scored by the budget holder according to how well the project
meets a number of corporate priorities, financial and non-financial criteria
• anticipated budgetary requirements
• anticipated resources which may be either full or partial grant funding
• anticipated revenue impact of the project which may be either positive, neutral or
negative
• risk analysis.
Re-
profilling of
existing
capital
projects
Analysis
of new
capital
bids
Determine
funding
gapReview and
scrutiny of
draft capital
plan by
SAMG
Council
approval
Upating
of
capital
plan
Management
and monitoring
of capital plan
Page 383

Page 384

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 17 
It is intended to undertake a full review of the Council’s capital reporting in 2023/24 
HRA – Unlike the General Fund capital investment plans are not subject to a bidding
process but instead are primarily driven by stock condition survey results; ongoing housing
regulations; and new build investment plans. The proposed capital investment must be
affordable within the parameters of the HRA 30 year business plan. 
Overall - Once all potential capital investment has been identified an analysis of likely
capital resources (e.g. grants, receipts and contributions) is carried out to identify any
funding gap which in turn will: 
• determine the level of prudential borrowing and likely revenue impact re loan charges
that would be required if all potential capital investment was approved by Council
• flow through to both the treasury management strategy and prudential indicator
calculations
• inform the revenue budget process
• inform the long term finance strategy.   
The draft capital plan refresh for the General Fund (covering both investment plans and the
anticipated resources in place to finance those plans) is reviewed and scrutinised by the
SAMG prior to being submitted to Council for approval.  This group challenges the phasing
and deliverability of capital projects at each of its meetings. 
Documents are produced for council outlining recommendations for both updates to the
existing capital plan and inclusion of new capital projects. These documents form part of an
overall finance budget report covering both capital and revenue to ensure that the linkage
between both types of expenditure are maintained.   
In addition to approving the recommended capital plan refresh Council may add new
projects to the capital plan that have been identified outwith the bidding process reflecting
political priorities.  Where this is the case any revenue impact is included within the budget
papers thus maintaining the links. 
Capital projects are defined as either recurring or one off projects. Recurring projects relate
to ongoing investment requirements on the core asset base such as building upgrades and
roads infrastructure works. The funding for one off projects are approved in principle with a
detailed business case requiring to be approved by the relevant service Committee prior to
project commencement.  Any projects which are subject to unconfirmed external funding
are also approved in principle and should not commence until grant offer letters have been
received. 
Once the capital plan is updated for all approvals obtained at council, final confirmation of
available budget is communicated to budget holders to allow the management and
monitoring part of the capital cycle to commence. 
Page 384

Page 385

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 18 
Management and monitoring of the capital plan
The capital plan is monitored on a monthly basis via a combination of verbal updates for
small/low risk budgets and face to face meetings for material/high risk budgets.  Monitoring
is carried out for both investment expenditure and anticipated resources and is reported on
an exception basis using a red, amber, green status as detailed below: 
Red 
Projects are forecast to be overspent and/or material delay to completion
Amber
Projects are either at risk of being overspent and/or delay in completion
(although this is unquantifiable at present) or the project has any issues that
require to be reported at this time
Green
Projects are on target both in relation to overall budget and the forecast stages
in the project life cycle and no issues are anticipated at this time 
Monitoring reports follow the governance cycle and are reported in a hierarchy from the
SAMG and PMRG to Council and Service Committees with the Project Boards receiving
more detailed project updates.  An example of the monitoring reports prepared can be
found on the West Dunbartonshire Council's Committee Management Information System
(CMIS) under the relevant Council/Committee meeting. 
Funding of the capital investment plan 
Capital grants and capital contributions
Grants may be awarded to the council for the purpose of carrying out either a specific
project or a general aim, but in either case certain conditions will be imposed by the
establishment awarding the grant which will have to be adhered to. Failure to adhere to the
conditions may require the grant to being repaid. Grant finance can come from a number of
sources such as the Scottish Government, The Big Lottery Fund, Strathclyde Partnership
for Transport (SPT), etc.   
Capital contributions arise when funds are provided to the Council by way of a non-
refundable and unconditional gift.  The capital involved can vary in nature. Cash is an
obvious example, but a capital contribution may also be by way of property or services
provided. 
Capital receipts strategy
Capital receipts that are received are held in either the Capital Receipts Reserve or Capital
Fund and can only be used for “defraying any expenditure of the authority to which capital
is properly applicable, or in providing money for repayment of the principal of loans (but not
any payment of interest on loans)”. 
Page 385

Page 386

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 19 
As such it is generally considered that use of the Capital Fund is restricted to (a) funding
capital expenditure by the Council or (b) repayment of loans principal and premiums. 
The Council takes a balanced view in the application of capital receipts and the current
strategy is to apply capital receipts both to funding expenditure and to funding the
repayment of loans principal, in line with legislation and Scottish Government guidance.
The balance between these is considered on an annual basis when Council considers and
sets its revenue and capital budgets. 
Revenue funding
The situation may arise where the Council requires to either create or enhance an asset;
however the project is not part of the approved capital plan. In this case where no capital
resources have been previously allocated to the project a funding option that can be utilised
is known as Capital Funded From Current Revenue (CFCR). 
As the name suggests under CFCR revenue budgets are used to finance the capital
project. This allocation must be taken account of when estimating future revenue budget.   
Other forms of funding
In addition to the traditional sources of funding outlined above the Council will explore the
following where appropriate: 
• Leasing and Hire Purchase Agreements
A lease is a form of contract whereby the Council (lessee) pays an annual charge
which is comprised of capital and interest to the finance company (lessor) for the use
of an asset.  This is normally used for vehicles, plant, furniture and equipment. Up until
financial year 2024/25 these are not all required to be accounted for on the Council’s
balance sheet, however this changes from financial year 2024/25, where most leases
will be accounted for on the balance sheet. 
• Public Finance Initiatives - Public Private Partnerships (PPP), Non-Profit Distributing
(NPD) and hub financing models
Public Finance Initiatives, as a generic term and approach are normally used as a
method of financing new buildings and some of the types of buildings as reported by
HM Treasury range from new schools and leisure centres to hospitals. The Council
didn’t access any such funding from the original PFI scheme, but used a PPP scheme
to fund new schools with Scottish Government funding support). Since PPP was
terminated as an approach for new investment the Council has used the NPD
approach via the West hub to fund Our Lady and St. Patrick’s High School. It is likely
that the Scottish Government will replace the NPD approach with a new approach for
further schools regeneration funding. Under these financing approaches the Council
does not own the asset but the asset is constructed and financed by a private
contractor and the Council pays an annual charge for the use of the asset for a
specified period of time. At the end of the contract the asset ownership passes to the
Council. 
• Unconventional Finance
Page 386

Page 387

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 20 
If the Council has any fixed assets bought or constructed with financing that does not
take the form of simple borrowing, the future liability should be capitalised. 
Borrowing 
The current guidance for a Council’s level of borrowing is the CIPFA Prudential Code
(revised December 2021). The following extracts from the Code and the Local Government
Scotland Act 2003 summarise the Code’s approach to level of borrowing (self-regulating)
and the governance that should apply: 
• Prudential Code (Executive summary – E3): “The objectives of the Prudential Code
are to ensure, within a clear framework, that the capital expenditure plans of local
authorities are affordable, prudent and sustainable”; and 
• Local Government Act 2003 (Part 7 [Finance] – 35(1)): “It is the duty of a local
authority to determine and keep under review the maximum amount which it can
afford to allocate to capital expenditure”. 
A significant change to the Accounting Code of Practice was intended to be introduced for
2022/23.This change was in relation to assets the Council leases in. However, the
implementation has been changed and is now 2024/25. Information on how this affects the
capital strategy will be included in future reports. 
Under the prudential system, individual authorities are responsible for deciding the level of
their affordable borrowing, having regard to CIPFA’s Code, which has been given legislative
backing. The system is designed to encourage authorities that need, and can afford to
undertake capital investment, to do so. 
The Council’s Section 95 officer is responsible for determining and presenting possible
capital investment options to Elected Members and offering them professional advice.
However, it is the duty of Elected Members to balance the constraints of affordability with
the demands of services for capital investment, and in all but most exceptional cases it will
be for elected members to make the necessary judgement. 
The ability to borrow additional money in this way comes with increased responsibility and a
need for greater transparency in decision making such as what capital projects to borrow
for, how much to borrow and when, where to borrow from, how long to borrow over, and so
on. 
The risks associated with a significant capital plan and a significant level of borrowing can
be mitigated and indeed should be mitigated as “business as usual”.  All capital projects are
supported by the Council’s governance process and should have: 
• arequate project management and/or project boards
• suitable skills for the delivery of the project, tax planning, cash flow
• clear operational plan for the use of the asset
• clear assumptions on phasing of spend taking into account optimism bias
• clear business case analysis where appropriate
Page 387

Page 388

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 21 
• use of specific Committees
• security and due diligence on loans and purchases
• use of external advice where appropriate
• project contingencies
• full tender process
• Regular and transparent reporting to members. 
Alternative funding and delivery opportunities
The Council will consider alternative methods of supporting capital investment within West
Dunbartonshire using alternative funding and delivery opportunities where opportunities
arise which are financially viable and positively contribute to the Council’s strategic
priorities. 
Two such opportunities that the Council is currently engaged with is the partnership with
Clydeside Regeneration Limited (CRL) in relation to the redevelopment of the former John
Brown site at Queens Quay in Clydebank and the developments at the former Exxon Mobil
site which is part of the Glasgow City Deal £1.13bn project. 
Capacity to deliver
The capacity of the Council to deliver its long term capital investment plans depends upon
the following: 
• affordability of capital investment plans
• project officer capacity
• interdependencies with other projects
• skills and knowledge. 
The affordability of capital investment plans is covered both within the capital investment
cycle as detailed above and the treasury management and prudential indicators section of
the strategy covered in chapter 4. 
The ability to have “shovel ready” capital projects primarily relates to recurring capital
investment projects such as building upgrades.  Such investment plans are mostly driven by
the outcome of condition surveys which enable officers to plan capital investment needs in
advance of funding being available.  This combined with the long term planning horizon of
the capital investment plan mitigates the risk of lack of capacity in this area. 
Project officer capacity relates to the reliance of the project on the ability of the Council to
both access and co-ordinate technical and professional expertise which is primarily internal
to the Council and varies depending on the complexity and nature of the capital investment
required such as: 
• Project managers
• Planning and building control
• Environmental health
• Roads
Page 388

Page 389

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 22 
• Legal
• Financial
• Procurement
• Other stakeholders 
The long term planning approach to capital investment will ensure that project officer
resources are aligned appropriately to the needs of each project as required. 
While many capital investment projects are “stand alone” such that the delivery of them has
no material impact on the delivery of others (other than potentially competing for technical
and professional expertise), there are a number of capital investment projects where there
is a high level of interdependency and thus increased levels of risk associated with delivery.   
Where such interdependencies exist the Council will ensure that project officers and all
those involved in project development and implementation maintain regular communication
with any issues/concerns/decisions required being highlighted and discussed as
appropriate via the capital governance process as detailed above. 
Skills and knowledge
The Council will seek to draw upon internal skills and knowledge wherever possible;
however this may not be possible for a variety of reasons.   
• Project officer capacity issues may arise where the available resource in-house is
insufficient to meet project demand either due to staffing vacancies or a number of
projects requiring the same technical and professional expertise at the same time thus
creating a bottleneck.
• The expertise required is highly specialised and the Council does not have any
resource in-house with the knowledge base at the appropriate level. 
Where the Council is unable to utilise internal skills and knowledge (and it is considered
essential to the successful implementation of the capital investment project) external
expertise will be brought in on a contract by contract basis in accordance with procurement
rules.  The cost of such expertise will be included in the overall budget set aside for the
relevant project. External expertise is more likely to be contracted in where projects are
highly complex and/or of a specialist nature. 
Chapter Three – Investments and Guarantees 
Approach, due diligence and risk appetite
The approach to investments and guarantees will be to fully consider the following prior to
recommendation: 
• level of financial and economic benefit to the Council
• whether held on a cash or non-cash basis
• impact on wider service objectives
• impact on wider community
Page 389

Page 390

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 23 
• risk profile of investment. 
Investment properties
Linked to its approach to asset management planning and the increasing trend for
commercialism the Council will consider, where appropriate, the purchase or development
of land and property as an investment to both generate an ongoing income stream or to
realise an increase capital value in the future. 
Any such purchase or development will only be recommended to members for approval
following the development of a robust business case that clearly demonstrates financial and
economic benefit to the Council. 
Impact of capital planning on investment strategy
Long term capital planning has a material impact on the Council’s investment strategy
which forms part of the annual treasury management and prudential indicators strategy
report covered in chapter 4 of this document. 
The process for investment strategy covers a wide range of Council investments and will be
broadly managed in the following way: 
• Short term cash – Cash relating to day to day cash flow will be maintained on a
shorter term basis in cash type products with consideration to the liquidity
requirements outlined above. 
• Longer term cash – Cash relating to reserves, provisions and balances on the balance
sheet may be held for longer periods of time in cash type products or in longer term
bonds or funds depending on 
▪ cash flow requirements
▪ the underlying expectation for interest rates
▪ the economic background of these investments may be held longer term. 
• Service type investments – These types of investments will predominately be policy
driven and approved by Members.  Shareholdings, development opportunities, loans
to third parties, equity instruments and investment properties held for rental returns)
will be regularly reviewed to judge the investment performance. 
• Non-service type investments – Investments such as Joint venture delivery companies
such as Hub West Scotland and investments in regeneration partnerships and
development opportunities. 
In relation to cash investments it is important to determine the likely profile of capital spend
as the timing of such investment plays a crucial part in the ability of the Council to maximise
the investment return on surplus funds. 
Page 390

Page 391

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 24 
In relation to service and non-service type investments the investment strategy must be
future proofed in that all potential investments must be listed as a permitted investment. 
Summary of material investments and guarantees 
Material investments
The Council currently holds long term investments which generate annual investment
income as noted below: 
• Clydebank Property Company
Previously known as Clydebank Rebuilt this was a pathfinder urban regeneration
organisation, limited by guarantee and included a commercial letting company
(industrial units) and a registered charity (the Titan Trust). On 11 August 2014,
following the transfer of the Titan Crane to the Property Company, the Council bought
the commercial letting company with a view to continuing its regeneration objective. 
• Hub West Scotland 
This is a public private joint venture development organisation established in 2012.
They work with the public sector partners to plan, design, build, and fund and maintain
buildings in the most efficient and effective manner delivering better value for money
and ultimately improving public services. 
• District Heating Network West Dunbartonshire Energy District Heating Network on the
Queens Quay is Scotland’s first large-scale water source heat pump district heating
scheme. WDC has established an Energy Supply Company (ESCo) to manage the
operation of the network. The ESCo is a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) structure
and is 99% controlled by WDC. The company name is West Dunbartonshire Energy
Limited Liability Partnership ( WDE LLP).That said, WDE LLP (The ESCo) is a
separate legal entity from West Dunbartonshire Council. The WDE LLP Board is made
up of  three Elected Members, two expert advisors, and one community
representative. 
Guarantees
Loans for a capital purpose may be approved by Council subject to an appropriate business
case and due diligence including, as appropriate, guarantees to secure the repayment of
the loan. 
Business Loans Scotland
In December 2018, Business Loans Scotland was appointed as the Fund Manager, under
contract to the Scottish Growth Scheme to deliver a new £10 million debt fund, on behalf of
the Scottish Government. Business Loans Scotland is a company limited by guarantee, and
has as its Members all 32 Scottish Local Authorities. The company is governed by Articles
of Association and Members’ Agreement where WDC is a member. 
In all investments and/or guarantees entered into by the Council the risks associated with
the activity will be clearly weighed up against the long term benefits which may be both
Page 391

Page 392

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 25 
financial and non-financial in nature.  The Council will seek to protect its position at all times
via robust governance and legal processes. 
Chapter Four – Treasury Management and Prudential Indicators 
Governance process
The treasury management service is an important part of the overall financial management
of the Council’s affairs with the Council’s treasury activities are strictly regulated by statutory
requirements and a professional code of practice (the CIPFA code of practice on treasury
management – revised December 2021). 
Closely linked with treasury management is the prudential regime for capital investment. 
Whilst prudential indicators consider the affordability and impact of capital investment
decisions, the treasury service covers the effective funding of these decisions.   
Section 56 of the local government (Scotland) act 1973 Act permits local authorities in
Scotland to discharge their functions by Committees.  Exceptions include setting the
Council tax (s56 (6) (b)) and borrowing money (s56 (6) (d)), which requires the authority,
that is full Council, to discharge. 
As a result of Section 56, both the prudential indicators and the treasury management
strategy are required to be approved by full Council before the start of the financial year. 
The CIPFA Treasury Management Code of Practice requires greater elected member
scrutiny of the treasury polices with one of the key clauses being that a responsible body is
required to ensure effective scrutiny of the treasury management strategy and polices. 
Within West Dunbartonshire Council the Audit Committee provides further scrutiny after
Council has considered the policies. 
As a requirement of the Code the Council included the following documents within its
“Prudential Indicators 2021/22 to 2030/31 and Treasury Management Strategy 2022/23 to
2031/32” report which was approved by members in March 2022: 
• Treasury Management Policy Statement (the policy)
• Treasury Management clauses
• Treasury Management role of the Section 95 Officer. 
The Policy requires an annual strategy to be reported to Council outlining the expected
treasury activity for the forthcoming three years, however in line with the longer term capital
planning approaches, the current treasury management and prudential indicators are
provided (where appropriate) covering the period to 2031/32. An updated strategy that will
be submitted for approval in March 2023 will extend this period to 2032/33.   
Impact of capital investment on treasury management and prudential indicators
Page 392

Page 393

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 26 
There are clear links between the Capital Investment Plan to the Treasury Management
Strategy and Prudential Indicators. These are also subject to review and oversight by
members at Audit Committee and Council. 
Treasury management
The treasury management strategy covers: 
• the Council’s debt and investment projections
• limits to the Council’s borrowing activity
• Information on the economic climate and expected movement in interest rates
• the Council’s borrowing, debt and investment strategies
• treasury performance indicators
• specific limits on treasury activities
• policy on ethical investments. 
Any new borrowing increases the Council’s overall liabilities that will need to be repaid in
the future. This generates a greater financial risk to the Council’s two main Funds as the
value of borrowing increases as additional borrowing increases the level of interest and
principal repayment costs that it will incur each year. This is currently increasing due to
previous investment decisions of the Council linked to the Councils priorities as described
earlier in this document. The updated 2022/23 Treasury Management Strategy indicated
that the Council is likely to generate a borrowing liability of £809.033m and ongoing fixed
costs of approximately £25m per annum by 2023/2024 and increasing over time in line with
planned capital spend (split between General Fund and HRA). 
Following a review of the PWLB regime by the UK Government a new set of governance
arrangements were introduced to reduce the use of PWLB by Councils on what were seem
Capital
investment
plans
Treasury
management
Prudential
indicators
Page 393

Page 394

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 27 
as speculative commercial investments by some English Councils. Following this the PWLB
interest rates were reduced by 0.1% and remain at lower levels than market rates. The
current strategy is to borrow short term while converting a fixed percentage of short term
into longer term debt over a 20 year period, depending on market conditions.   
The Treasury Management and investment Strategy of the Council will take full cognisance
of the capital plan update and is reported to Members in accordance with the Treasury
Management Code of Practice.   
There are a number of risks associated with the funding of capital investment decisions
which are explored (including mitigation strategies) in more detail within the individual
strategy documents.  In summary these can be defined as: 
• Increasing borrowing liability
• Increasing revenue impact of capital investment (loan charges)
• Interest rate risk
• Counterparty risk;
• Security and liquidity in financial markets. 
Prudential indicators
The Council is required to approve the following prudential indicators to ensure the financial
risks of borrowing are recognised and considered appropriately: 
• Capital Expenditure
• Capital Financing Requirements
• Forecast and estimates of the ratio of financing costs to Net Revenue Stream. 
In addition to the above Council is also required to approve the policy for loans fund
advances. 
Prudential indicators are prepared taking both the audited financial accounts and the capital
plan update into consideration and therefore the risk that the indicators vary from forecast is
directly correlated to the extent to which the capital investment plans and the associated
resourcing of those plans is managed effectively. 
Chapter Five – Section 95 Officer Statement on delivery, affordability and risk 
Delivery 
The delivery of the individual projects in the capital plan are directly linked to the original
approval of the capital plan supported by the governance process outlined with projects
being support by budget holders and (where appropriate) project sponsors who are
responsible for the delivery of each approved project and the subsequent achievement of
the objectives of that project. 
The governance process enables the SAMG, PAMG and Elected Members to review and
challenge the delivery of projects and any changes to both the timing and value of the
Capital Plan.   
Page 394

Page 395

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 28
Affordability 
Affordability is critical in applying the capital strategy and approving projects for inclusion in
the capital plan. This is demonstrated by the interdependency of the annual capital plan
refresh or update; the revenue budget report and the annual Treasury Management
Strategy – which provide Elected Members with key information about the levels of debt
and estimates of affordability in short, medium and longer term.
All projects need to have a clear funding source.  If external funding such as an external
grant is to be used there needs to be a clear funding commitment in place prior to the
project commencing.
The affordability of each project needs to be clear, not only for the funding of the capital
spend but also to cover any ongoing costs of the operation and funding of that capital
spend. 
Where borrowing is to be used the affordability is of greater importance and the affordability
has to include the interest costs of that borrowing and the provision for the repayment of the
borrowing. This repayment is matched to a prudent asset life and any income streams
estimated to fund this asset must be sustainable.  The “rules” around the governance of this
borrowing is outlined in the Prudential Code.
At no stage should the asset value be lower than the value of outstanding debt unless there
is a clear plan to mitigate that shortfall or to sell that asset. 
Risks 
A number of key risks (as listed below) have been identified throughout this strategy along
with associated mitigating actions and members need to be aware of them:
• Economic risks - mitigated by capital borrowing and asset disposal considerations
• General capital investment plan risk - mitigated by the governance structure in place
to recommend, monitor and review the capital investment plans of the Council;
• Capacity to deliver - mitigated by both an assessment of the affordability of the
capital investment plans supported by the governance structure and clear
communication between all relevant parties
• Treasury management and Prudential risks - mitigated by the preparation and
monitoring of a clear treasury management (investment) strategy and calculation of
prudential indicators.
Ultimately all risks impact on the level/timing of borrowing required to be undertaken to
finance the capital investment plans of the Council. The current system of borrowing is a
self-regulatory system which means that responsibility for borrowing decisions, and the
level of borrowing incurred, by a Council is determined on a local level. Therefore Elected
Members have a key role. 
Page 395

Page 396

Capital Investment Strategy - 2022/23 to 2031/32 Page 29 
It is the duty of Elected Members to balance the constraints of affordability with the
demands of services for capital investment, and in all but most exceptional cases it will be
for Elected Members to make the necessary judgement. 
The Section 95 Officer’s professional view is that, as all borrowing decisions result in a long
term commitment to fund that borrowing, all decision-making should be as transparent as
possible to all elected members and the residents of West Dunbartonshire. 
The pace and level of change in the Council’s borrowing is significant, with material 
revenue cost implications.  Therefore all Elected Members need to be fully informed as to
all implications of its capital investment decisions, in particular those funded from borrowing. 
To assist Elected Members make an informed decision on investment plans the reporting
for approval of capital plans to Council each year provides information of future risk around
affordability with a projection of the percentage of revenue funding streams (General Fund
and HRA) that is being used to fund the borrowing required within the capital plans. 
Page 396

Page 397

Capital Investment Strategy – 2023/24 to 2031/32 Page 30 
Chapter Six – Action Plan 
Long term capital planning is not an exercise that can be carried out in isolation and as such is supported by a number of plans,
strategies and processes that are required to be refreshed on a regular basis.  The following action plan outlines key actions.
Action Timescale Lead Officer Output Outcomes Update on progress
Asset
management
planning 
Feb 2023
Oct 2023
May 2023
Feb 2023
Aug 2023
Aug 2023 
Property – Craig Jardine
Vehicles – Kenny Lang
ICT- James Gallacher
Housing – John Kerr
Roads – Liam Greene
Open Spaces – Ian Bain
Updated asset
management plans
Ensures that asset
management plans
remain relevant
Decision to reschedule
and align with new 5
year strategic priorities
from 2023
Asset
disposal
strategy 
May 2022
– May
2027
Michelle Lynn Updated asset
disposal strategy
Ensures the disposal of
surplus assets is
managed effectively and
linked to corporate and
service objectives.  
Updated plan went to
committee in May
2022 and due to be
reviewed May 2026
Annual
capital plan
refresh report
February /
March
annually
Laurence Slavin/ Carol
Alderson 
Alan Young
Updated capital
investment plans for
both the General
Fund the and the
HRA
Ensures long term capital
plans are robust and
clearly linked to corporate
and service objectives
Updated and being
reported to Council 1
March 2023
Annual
treasury
management
and
prudential
indicator
report
February /
March
annually
Laurence Slavin/ Carol
Alderson 
Updated strategy
documents for
treasury
management,
investment strategy
and prudential
indicators
Ensures the Council
complies with CIPFA
Codes and financial
impact of long term
capital plans clear and
understood
Updated and being
reported to Council 29
March 2023 
Page 397

Page 398

Page 398

Page 399

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL
Report by Chief Officer- Housing and
Employability 
Council: 1 March 2023
Subject: Housing Revenue Account (HRA) Estimates and Rent
Setting 2023/2024
1. Purpose
1.1 The purpose of this report is to seek Council approval of the updated HRA
capital programme; the HRA revenue budget for 2023/24 and to agree the level
of weekly rent increase for 2023/24 which is sufficient to fund the revenue
budget for 2023/24 and the associated capital investment programme.
2. Recommendations
2.1 It is recommended that Council:
i) Notes the outcome of the tenant consultation process detailed in Appendix
1;
ii) Notes the projected break even revenue position for 2022/23;
iii) Notes the progress made, per Appendix 2, in the HRA capital programme
for 2022/23;
iv) Agrees the updated five year capital programme of work set out in Appendix
3 to this report inclusive of the Council’s new house building programme
and the overall resources to fund the programme;
v) Agrees the revenue budget for 2023/24 as detailed in Appendix 4;
vi) Agrees the 4% weekly rent increase for 2023/24 at an average £3.38 on a
52 week basis (£3.73 on a 47 week basis), equating to 4% to meet the
planned revenue HRA budget as detailed in Appendix 4;
vii) Agrees to increase rents at the Gypsy Travellers site by the 4%; increasing
pitch rent by £3.08 to £80.09 on a 52 week basis (£3.41 to £88.61 per
week on a 47 week basis);
viii) Agrees to increase by the lock-up rents by 4%, increasing rent by £0.22 to
ITEM 8
Page 399

Page 400

£5.66 per week on a 52 week basis (£0.24 on a 47 week basis to £6.26); 
ix) Notes the increase in the prudential reserve target for 2023/24 (from 
£0.940m to £0.984m); and 
x) Agrees the recommended use of the projected reserves as at 31 March
2023 for the purposes identified at 4.3.4 of the report.
3. Background 
3.1 West Dunbartonshire Council (the Council) is the landlord for a stock of 10,441
homes located in communities across West Dunbartonshire.  In delivering this
role, good quality, affordable, safe, secure and warm housing is fundamental to
the health and well-being of individuals and families as well as the sustainability
of local communities and the success of the local economy. 
3.2 In June 2012 the Council took the decision to halt the partial stock transfer
process and retain the housing stock and to address the challenges of
improving homes and meeting housing need by: 
• Investing approximately £161 million to improve homes and meeting the
Scottish Housing Quality Standard; 
• Embarking on a programme of demolition and regeneration of
sites; and
• Progress on a council house building programme. 
3.3 In addition, through the Council’s Strategic Housing Investment Plan (SHIP),
supported by the Scottish Government’s Affordable Housing Programme, more
than 1,000 new social homes for rent will have been completed in West
Dunbartonshire by the Council and its RSL partners in the period to 2022,
including 496 new Council homes. 
3.4 In considering the structure of the budget consideration has been given to: 
• Increasing revenues and reducing costs by:
- Focused strategic asset management of our council housing stock;
- A housing led regeneration approach;
- improving estate management generally; and
- Improved void performance. 
• Financial Impact
- Ongoing implementation of various welfare reform changes
and the emerging impact of the pandemic; and 
• Financing the investment required to meet the Energy
Efficiency Standard for Social Housing (EESSH) and the
Page 400

Page 401

wider climate change and energy efficiency agenda. 
3.5 In preparing these estimates the following factors have been taken into account: 
• Inflation has been applied on relevant budget lines
• Provision has been made for a pay increase in line with
Scottish Government’s commitments on public sector pay
• A 4% turnover expectation has been applied to employee costs
• Debt interest rates have been assumed in line with current financial
borrowing costs 
3.6 For financial year 2022/2023, West Dunbartonshire’s average weekly rent (with
regards to lettable self-contained units) of £84.53 was fourth highest of
Scotland’s 26 housing authorities.. In comparison with the overall Scottish
average including Registered Social Landlords of £85.36, West
Dunbartonshire’s average weekly rent was £0.83 less than this average. 
4. Main Issues 
4.1 HRA Capital Investment 
4.1.1 At Council on 9 March 2022, a five year programme of HRA capital work to
2026/27 was reported and approved. Progress on 2022/23 work is shown
in Appendix 2. The overall value of projects requiring reprofiling from
2022/23 is projected to be £31.671m (48%). 
4.1.2 The HRA capital programme is derived from data from the current stock
condition survey and our annual stock assessment exercise. The main drivers
for the programme are for the Council to deliver on the key objectives of the
Council’s Better Homes Strategic Housing Asset Management Strategy and
health and safety responsibilities.  In addition to the core stock, the programme
includes the Council’s ambitious ongoing new house build programme ‘More
Homes West Dunbartonshire’. 
4.1.3 Due to the long term nature of the HRA Capital Investments, a 30 year financial
business planning model is used to determine if these investments are
affordable in the longer term taking account of expected inflation and debt
interest rates. 
4.1.4 This report outlines ambitious proposals for a major programme of investment in
housing led regeneration and renewal in West Dunbartonshire that will not only
significantly enhance the Council’s housing stock but will also contribute to the
wider transformation of West Dunbartonshire as a place, and will be central to
the economic and social recovery of West Dunbartonshire in the face of the
wider impacts of the pandemic. 
Page 401

Page 402

4.1.5 The Council’s new house build and housing supply programme ‘More
Homes West Dunbartonshire’ will see significant resources invested in the
creation and acquisition of new homes.  The Council’s commitment to
increasing the housing supply, as evidenced within the Local Housing
Strategy, is further reinforced through planned open market acquisitions
and is incorporated into the future programme. An expenditure budget of
£154.969m for the affordable housing supply programme is factored into
the five year capital plan, together with a projected minimum of £51.103m
of Scottish Government Grant Funding available through the Affordable
Housing Supply Programme. Therefore, for new builds, there is a net
capital cost to the HRA of £103.866m. The borrowing cost of financing new
builds is spread over 80 years and will be part of the figures contained in
4.1.7 table.
The Council will also continue to support applications under the Scottish
Government Mortgage to Rent Scheme (MTR). This Scheme is a means tested
Scottish Government run scheme, information can be found on the Councils
website, by contacting the Scottish Government directly or speaking to Citizens
Advice. The Council has supported 4 MTRs and gone through the process with
many others that have not progressed from the Scottish Government side.
4.1.6 The More Homes West Dunbartonshire programme aims to contribute towards
the manifesto commitment of the current Administration for 2500 new homes
over a 10 year period.  This increases the pace of development and the
associated challenges around land acquisition, ground conditions and inflation. 
Quarterly updates on progress including changes in programme will continue to
be reported to the Housing and Communities Committee.
4.1.7 The five year plan has now been rolled forward a year to 2027/28 and
recognises progress made and any re-profiling of projects and
anticipated funding that have been necessary. The result of this review is
shown as Appendix 3 and results in the expected level of loan charges
for all Capital projects to be as per below. Note that these costs reflect
the borrowing costs of both current projects and past projects where
some debt remains outstanding. 
Year Amount
2023/24 £15.476m
2024/25 £17.455m
2025/26 £19.697m
2026/27 £19.080m
2027/28 £20.439m
5 year total £92.147m
4.1.8 The investment will deliver an ongoing commitment to improving housing for
tenants and future tenants of Council homes  and will also support the
Page 402

Page 403

delivery of wider Strategic Plan and Local Housing Strategy priorities,
including:
• providing a pipeline of construction work with opportunities for job
creation, community benefits, training and benefits to the local supply
chain as a means of contributing to the wider pandemic economic
recovery plan and with the potential to lever in significant external
investment.
• contributing to the wider recovery plan from the pandemic, with the
investment programme providing a catalyst for engagement with local
communities in the development and delivery of these ambitious plans
through our strong tenant participation mechanisms.
• through our Better Homes approach ensuring that the design and
specification of improvements maximises opportunities to future proof
homes.  This includes the use of new technology where practical and
appropriate, to improve the health and wellbeing of tenants. Improving
the quality of housing and the places people live helps to improve the
quality of people’s lives, with positive benefits for both physical and
mental health and general wellbeing.
• contributing to the Council’s place making agenda, providing a
framework for improving the quality of the places where people live and
supporting tenants to be actively involved in shaping change, impacting
positively on the attractiveness of West Dunbartonshire as a place to
live and encouraging economic investment.
• improving the quality and appearance of neighbourhoods and
delivering a consistent and cost effective approach to the maintenance
and management of areas. As well as benefiting local tenants and
residents, this will bring positive benefits for a range of Council
services, such as open space maintenance, waste collection and
recycling. Improvements to the physical environment will encourage
more people to use outside spaces (this is particularly important in the
context of the pandemic) and encourage physical activity.
• contributing to the achievement of climate change ambitions and the
Council’s Climate Change Strategy and addressing fuel poverty
through the use of the highest standards of energy efficiency practices
in new build construction and retrofit technologies, along with future
proposed demonstration innovation projects which will be reported to
the Housing and Communities Committee.
4.1.9 It should be noted that the 30 year HRA business model has been prepared
on the basis that there will be fluctuations in inflation over the period of the
plan. These assumptions would need to be revised in the event of long-term
inflation forecasts being above target.  The planning assumption for long-
term inflation in the business model is 1.9% initially rising to 2.5% or
Page 403

Page 404

additional pressures on the revenue account becoming apparent. The other
key variable within the business model is the capital expenditure
requirements which can alter depending on circumstances and priorities.
The HRA business model has been updated this year with the revised
proposed capital plan as part of the normal annual review to recognise the
most up-to-date information and to consider affordability. 
4.1.10 In considering affordability, a key output from the HRA business model is the
percentage of rental stream that is required to fund debt charges. This is an
indicator of the amount of prudential borrowing that can be undertaken without
putting undue stress on the remainder of the revenue budget. When the decision
was taken to retain all the housing stock in West Dunbartonshire the investment
requirement needed to achieve the Scottish Housing Quality Standards, coupled
with the historic debt structure of HRA debt, suggested that the “debt
affordability” percentage in West Dunbartonshire should not exceed 50%.
Additionally each year of the 30 year plan must have a surplus or break even
revenue position. The most recent update based on the recommended 4% rent
increase for 2023/24 has an average percentage of 34.7% with a peak of 42.4%
in 2030/31. 
4.1.11 The annual debt affordability percentages under the most recent HRA business
model update as outlined above continues to be within acceptable range and the
model therefore remains robust and viable in terms of debt affordability. A rent
rise lower than 4% would leave the longer term viability of the HRA in a
vulnerable position. 
4.1.12The revenue estimates for 2023/24 are attached as Appendix 4 showing
an increase in net expenditure since 2022/23 of £2.083m. This is the
amount which needs to be recovered via the proposed rent increase and
equates to 4% based on expected housing stock and occupancy levels. 
Appendix 4 provides information on the breakdown of the budget and
provides explanations for the main year on year variances. 
4.2 Rent Increase 
4.2.1 The Council is required to consider the level of weekly rent increase for the
financial year 2023/24 and agree an appropriate rent rate which meets the
estimated costs of providing the Housing Service in 2023/24 as identified in
the Appendix 4. 
4.2.2 In determining the level of weekly rent increase, due cognisance must be
taken in terms of changing service demands, as well as the requirements
for investment as highlighted in the Housing Asset Management Strategy
and the need for robust financial planning and management to ensure
that the Council delivers on its investment commitments. In addition the
decision of the Council in June 2012 regarding its policy on stock
Page 404

Page 405

retention, which set out clearly the rent increase requirements to support
the Council’s investment needs, must be recognised. 
4.2.3 The required weekly percentage rent increase contained within the attached
HRA estimate is an average £3.38 on a 52 week basis (£3.73 on a 47 week
basis) which equates to 4%.  This is considerably below inflation and continues
a trend for West Dunbartonshire Council of below inflation rent rises. 
4.2.4 The recommended budget attached, sets a rent level that satisfies best
practice in maintaining a prudential balance, ensuring that all
reasonable contingencies are taken into account and is sufficient to
support the Council’s HRA investment programme. 
4.2.5  The consultation was launched at a meeting of the Joint Rent Group held
remotely on the 8 December 2022, the draft HRA spending plans for 2023/24
were presented to tenants. Discussions centred on keeping rent rise as low
as possible without having to reduce service. The tenants agreed to consult
on two options of 4% and 5%. 
4.2.6 A survey of tenants was undertaken regarding options for setting the rent
and tenants were asked to select from 2 options: 
Option 1 - 4% Increase 
• Maintaining all current services that tenants receive including direct
support
• Improving performance around voids to maximize tenant experience and
HRA income
• Delivering our Capital programme of housing investment
• Retaining a Tenant Priority  Budget of £800,000 for tenants to direct
spend to improve buildings and wider environment 
Option 2 – 5% Increase 
• As for option 1 plus delivering an additional £50m of capital investment in
our existing homes over the next five years based on our tenant priorities
• The preferred programme/s that tenants could choose from for this option
were:-
1. Programme A – Energy Efficiency Measures including new heating
systems 
2. Programme B – Kitchen and Bathroom Renewals 
3. Programme C – Window/Door Renewal Programmes  
4. Programme D – Environmental Works 
Page 405

Page 406

There were 1,173 respondents (12.3% of tenants) to the survey with the
majority opting for option 1, as follows:
• Option 1 52.9%
• Option 2 47.1%
Further information from the survey is provided in Appendix 1
4.2.7 It should also be highlighted that following the rent increase, to support tenants
through the cost of living crisis, there is also a provision of £0.565m direct
financial assistance for those experiencing hardship included in the estimates
for 2023/2024. This is made up as follows :-
Tenant Sustainability Fund £0.365m
Hardship Fund  £0.200m
4.2.8 It is recommended that Council increase rents at the Gypsy Travellers site and
lock ups by the same percentage as the housing rents at 4%.
4.3 Reserves
4.3.1 At 31 March 2022, the HRA reserve was £2.740m, consisting of:
Reserves £m
Service improvements /net zero projects 1.000
Welfare Reform Resilience Reserve 0.800
2022/23 prudential reserve 0.940
Total 2.740
4.3.2 The standing Council policy is that an HRA Prudential Reserve of 2% of
gross expenditure should be maintained. Based upon the recommended
budget for 2023/24, this equates to £0.984m for 2023/24 (previously
£0.940m). The increase in the prudential reserve is therefore £0.044m for
2023/24. It is prudent to recommend that the budget for 2023/24 retains
reserves at this level.
4.3.3 It is currently forecast (per the probable outturn identified in the Budgetary
Control report for Period 9 which was presented to Housing and
Communities Committee on 23 February 2023) that there will be a break
even position on the HRA revenue account therefore the funding for this
increase in prudential reserve will be achieved by reducing the service
improvement reserve by £0.044m. During 2022/2023 , £0.100m of the
service improvement reserve was also utilised to fund the caretakers pay
re- evaluation therefore the remaining balance is £0.856m.
Page 406

Page 407

4.3.4 Therefore by 31 March 2023 the above would result in the reserves being
as follows: 
Reserves £m
Service improvements /net zero projects 0.856
Welfare Reform Resilience Reserve 0.800
2023/24 prudential reserve 0.984
Total 2.640
4.3.5 In terms of the adequacy of reserves, the prudential level of reserves is viewed
as being at an adequate level to deal with any financial shocks to the budget,
based on previous experience and future expectations specifically in relation to
income streams. As can be seen, the level of reserve remains planned to meet
the prudential level and is therefore judged as being adequate.
4.3.6 The Council is currently focused on ensuring an effective and sustainable
response to the challenge of dampness and mould in our properties.  A revised
and strengthened protocol is being developed to ensure rapid and appropriate
service responses.  In light of the reserves outlined above, the Chief Officer
Housing and Employability is in dialogue with the Housing Convener to explore
further strengthening our response through the use of new technologies such
as sensors to monitor dampness and mould and facilitate earlier and
preventative interventions.   A paper will be taken to the Housing and
Communities Committee in May to outline proposals for members’ approval. 
5. People Implications 
5.1 There are no personnel issues. 
6. Financial and Procurement Implications 
6.1 The financial implications are as detailed within the report and appendices. 
6.2 All procurement activity carried out by the Council in excess of £50,000 is
subject to a contract strategy. The contract strategy for the HRA Capital
Programme will be developed by the Corporate Procurement Unit in
consultation with Housing officers.  The contract strategy will include, but is not
limited to; contract scope, service forward plan, the market, procurement model
and routes – including existing delivery vehicles, roles and responsibilities,
risks, issues and opportunities and on-going contract management.
Opportunities to maximise the positive social, economic and environmental
Page 407

Page 408

impact for the Council through the relevant procurement processes will be
developed in line with procurement policy. 
7. Risk Analysis 
7.1 The key driver for determining rents for Council properties is the HRA
investment plan.  Failure to set rents consistent with the delivery of this
plan will potentially result in insufficient funding being available to meet
the aspirations highlighted above. 
7.2 In producing the budget a number of assumptions have been made
in relation to performance around rent recovery, voids and the
impact of welfare reform. These issues will be closely monitored
during 2023/24 and members advised of any significant variations
that will impact materially on the sufficiency of the budget as
proposed. 
7.3 In terms of the capital programme, the main financial risks relate to: 
i) whether inflation increases costs, resulting in plans requiring to
be reviewed upwards;
ii) Longer-term affordability requires to be considered in
determining appropriate levels of capital funding. 
Ongoing budgetary control processes will monitor the above issues and any
issues will be reported to a future Council meeting for consideration. 
8. Equalities Impact Assessment (EIA) 
8.1 An EIA screening has been undertaken by officers and no issues
were identified. 
9. Consultation 
9.1 The Council has a statutory requirement to carry out a rent consultation
exercise. Details of the consultation can be seen in Appendix 1. 
9.2 A HRA budget scrutiny group (Joint Rent Group) is now well
established involving tenant representatives. This group meet with
Officers and the Convenor monthly and examines the HRA to ensure
increased transparency and demonstrate Value for Money to tenants. 
10. Strategic Assessment 
10.1 The proposals contained in this report directly address all of the Council’s
Page 408

Page 409

strategic priorities. The investment in, and provision of attractive
affordable housing will also indirectly support the objective of economic
growth and employability through supporting employment and improving
place attractiveness. 
10.2 Proper budgetary control and sound financial practice are cornerstones of
good governance and support Council and Officers to pursue the five
strategic priorities of the Council’s Strategic Plan. This report forms part of the
financial governance of the Council. 
Peter Barry
Chief Officer – Housing and Employability
Date: 1 March 2023 
Person to Contact: Janice Rainey - Business Unit Finance Partner,
16  Church Street, Dumbarton, G82 1QL,
telephone: 01389 737704,
e-mail:  janice.rainey@west-dunbarton.gov.uk 
John Kerr – Housing Development and Homelessness
manager john.kerr@west-dunbarton.gov.uk    
Alan Young - Housing Asset and Investment Manager,
Overburn Avenue, Dumbarton,
telephone: 01389 608950,
email: alan.young@west-dunbarton.gov.uk 
Appendices: Appendix 1: Consultation information
Appendix 2: HRA Capital Projects Forecast
Outturn and Slippage 2022/23
Appendix 3: HRA Capital programme Financial
Year 2023/28
Appendix 4: 2023/24 Housing Revenue Account
Draft Revenue Estimate 
Background Papers: EIA screening
Consultation Planning Sheet 
Wards Affected: All       
Page 409

Page 410

Appendix 1
Housing Services Consultation Recording Sheet   
Housing Service …Housing Development & Homelessness team 
Person responsible:  Janice Rainey and Jane Mack 
Consultation Start date:  8/12/22   End Date 19/1/23 
Consultation criteria Steps taken
1. The name of consultation /
participation exercise
Rent setting consultation 2023-24 
2. Its aims and objectives To gather tenant views on 2 proposed rent options for 2023/24.
Option1: 4% Increase (average weekly rent increase of
£3.38)
 Maintaining all current services that tenants receive
including direct support budgets,
 Improving performance around voids to maximize tenant
experience and HRA income,
 Delivering our Capital programme of housing investment,
 Retaining a Tenant Priority Budget of £800,000 for
tenants to direct spend to improve buildings and wider
environment and
 Continuing our New Build housing programme
Option 2: 5% Increase (average weekly rent increase of
£4.22)
 Maintaining all current services that tenants receive
including direct support budgets
 Improving performance around voids to maximize HRA
income,
 Delivering our Capital programme of housing investment,
 Retaining a Tenant Priority Budget of £800,000 for
tenants to direct spend to improve buildings and wider
environment
 Continuing our New Build housing programme and
Page 410

Page 411

2 
Consultation criteria Steps taken
 Delivering an additional £50m of capital investment in our
existing homes over the next 5 years based on tenant
priorities – the preferred programme/s that tenants could
choose from for this option were,
 Programme A – Energy Efficiency Measures including
new heating systems
 Programme B – Kitchen and Bathroom Renewals 
 Programme C – Window/Door Renewal Programmes 
 Programme D – Environmental Works
 Programme E - All Options Above 
3. Who did you invite/include?
(e.g. all tenants, tenant from the
interested tenants register,
RTOs, staff)
The consultation was open to all tenants and those residing in
homeless temporary accommodation.
The consultation was launched at a meeting of the Joint Rent
Group on 8/12/22. Copy of the presentation as well as
information on the options was also posted on the Council’s
website so that it was freely available. 
4. What methods did you use to
promote/invite stakeholders to
get involved? (e.g. letters,
posters, website)
Information on the rent options were sent out in a specific
mailing to all tenants with information detailing the rationale
behind the options and details on each option. This included a
free-post voting card that could be used to vote as well as
details of how to vote online, by phone, by text or email.
An article was included in the winter edition of the Housing
News.  Although it wasn’t able to specify the rent options at time
of production and printing, it did alert tenants to the consultation
process, that they would receive specific information by post
and that a range of ways to vote would be available to make
voting as easy as possible.  
The survey was also promoted regularly through the Council’s
webpages and social media as well as on our Tenant
Participation Facebook account. Email and text reminders were
also sent to tenants where possible.
WDC intranet was also used to reach WDC staff who are also
tenants to encourage them to vote.
Housing officers and Homeless support officers were also sent
a briefing and asked to encourage their tenants to vote. 
Page 411

Page 412

3 
Consultation criteria Steps taken
5. Who actually took part?
(Number of individuals and or
number of tenant organisations
represented)
1173 tenants voted for their preferred option in the survey giving
a response rate of 12.3%.
6. What method(s) did you use
to obtain their views? (e.g.
focus/working group, newsletter,
survey)
Why did you choose this
method(s)?
A quick and easy survey was used to gather tenants’ views. All
tenants were encouraged to vote for their preferred rent option
with a direct mailing to them and a range of voting methods
offered to make it as easy as possible – free-post voting card,
online survey, texting and email options. 
These methods were chosen to gather the views of as many
tenants as possible in a clear and most accessible way
possible. The survey results will be taken into account as part of
the Council committee decision -making process when setting
rents for 2023/24.
The information provided was presented in as clear and
understandable way as possible and made available online for
any tenant to refer to and paper copies made available on
request. 
We also used staff to promote the survey and to encourage
dialogue with tenants and to explain the options being
considered. The Tenant Participation Officer’s contact details
were also provided for tenants to ask any questions and a
number of tenants got in touch.
7. What good practice or
minimum standards can you
evidence as part of your
consultation? 
A six week consultation period was used to collect views. This
was shorter[PB1] than normal due to the later start of the
consultation.
Freepost voting cards, phoning, texting and email options were
made available to all tenants as well as the online survey so that
tenants could use a method they were most comfortable with
and at no cost. 
All financial information was presented as clearly and
understandable as possible as well as being available on-line
for public scrutiny. 
Page 412

Page 413

4 
Consultation criteria Steps taken
8. What was the outcome of the
consultation?
1173 tenants gave their views in the survey and Option 1 (4%
rent increase), was the preferred option getting 52.94% of the
votes. 
The results were close with, 
Option 1 52.94%   621
Option 2 47.13% 552 
Total                               1173
9533 tenants were contacted so the response rate equals
12.3%.
The survey results will be put forward as the proposed rent
increase going for Council approval. 
9. How did you feedback to
participants the outcome?
Once March Council meeting has concluded, the survey results
and final rent setting decision will be reported in the Spring
Housing News, on the Council webpages and through the TP
Facebook account.
All rent increases must be notified to tenants in writing with 28
days’ notice so all tenants will be advised of the rent increase
and how much the increase means for their own weekly and
annual rent charge. 
10. How did tenant involvement
influence your consultation?  The impact of the mini Budget in September and then the
reversal of many of the plans was that interest rates fluctuated
and so was very difficult to estimate costs and set budgets. This
delayed the consultation and meant that there was insufficient
time for discussion and pre consultation tenant involvement as
has been the case in recent years. 
This was a unique situation and both the Chief Officer Housing
and Employability and the Housing Convener have given
assurances to the WDTRO that this will not set a precedent. 
We have continued to increase tenants’ understanding and
opportunity to scrutinise the HRA through our Joint Rent Group
which includes tenant volunteers. Our Joint Rent Group have
also helped make the financial information being presented as
clear and understandable as possible and their input continues.  
Page 413

Page 414

5
Consultation criteria Steps taken
11. Are you able to demonstrate
this? Yes  - meeting notes and information on webpages
12. How have you demonstrated
to tenants that involvement
made a difference?
The preferred option from the consultation survey was for 4%
rent increase and that is being put forward as the rent proposal
to be considered by Councilors.  
13. Did you check with
participants that they were
happy with the opportunities
given to make their views known
and that they felt that we listened
and acted upon them?
The results of the consultation survey have been shared with
the tenant volunteers on the Joint Rent Group. There was a
slight increase in responses, 1173 up from 1089 last year, but
not as high as pre covid figure of 1344 in 2020. The response
rate still equates to 12.3% of tenants responding which is a
significant number and gives a credible insight into their
preference.
Tenant understanding of the HRA has continued to increase
through the Joint Rent Group and the Housing News will be
used to share this information with all tenants to help encourage
more involvement and reiterate the influence they can have on
this important issue.
14. What worked well, what
didn’t work well – or any other
comments you have.
Despite us starting nearer Christmas and the consultation
period being shorter than normal, the response rate was still
credible and when more face to face and community
engagement is possible it is hoped that numbers would increase
again.
We were also able to use text and email reminders via the QL
housing system and more tenants responded after these were
issued so was an effective way of engaging tenants. Facebook
reminders about the survey were also used and got good
reaches.395 freepost voting cards were also returned so this is
still a preferred way to vote for a third of tenants.  
The majority of the negative comments received about the
consultation were in relation to affordability of any rent increase
and outstanding repair issues and reflects that tenant
satisfaction with services affect tenants views on rent setting
and their willingness to get involved.
Page 414

Page 415

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL APPENDIX 2
HRA CAPITAL PROGRAMME
CAPITAL PROJECTS FORECAST OUTTURN AND REPROFILING REQUIRED 2022/23
Budget
Forecast
Outturn
Reprofiling
required
Over / 
(Under)
Recovery
RESOURCES £000 £000 £000 £000
New Build Grant 30,006 10,480 0 19,526
Prudential Borrowing 26,287 21,549 0 4,738
Buy Backs 0 417 0 (417)
Contribution towards Noise Insulation Project 96 0 0 96
CFCR 9,215 5,386 0 3,829
Total Resources 65,604 37,832 0 27,772
Budget
Forecast
Outturn
Reprofiling
required
(Over) /
Under
Spend
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE £000 £000 £000 £000
OTHER CAPITAL EXPENDITURE £2,039 £2,125 £283 (368)
Special Needs 474 474 0 0
Capitalised Minor Works 431 800 0 (369)
Better Homes Priority Budget 664 664 0 0
Community Safety 17 17 0 (0)
QL Development 185 94 91 0
Airport Noise Insulation Scheme 192 0 192 0
Redeployable CCTV Cameras 36 36 0 0
Gypsy Travellers Site Upgrades 40 40 0 0
MAJOR COMPONENT REPLACEMENTS £14,344 £12,727 £3,755 (2,139)
Targeted SHQS compliance works 0 0 0 0
Targeted EESSH compliance works 4,455 4,455 0 0
Building external component renewals 4,955 2,700 2,255 0
Doors/window component renewals 2,500 1,000 1,500 0
External stores/garages/bin stores 75 75 0 0
Secure entry component renewals 91 91 0 0
Statutory/regulatory compliance works 108 200 0 (92)
Heating improvement works 969 2,600 (1,631)
Energy improvements/energy efficiency works 54 54 0 0
Modern facilities and services 1,035 1,450 0 (415)
Non Traditional/Traditional Improvement Works 103 103 0 0
VOID CAPITAL £2,000 £3,500 £0 (1,500)
Void house strategy programme 2,000 3,500 0 (1,500)
CONTINGENCIES £181 £0 £0 181
Contingencies 181 0 0 181
STRUCTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL £2,872 £2,983 £287 (399)
Defective structures/component renewals 887 600 287 0
Environmental renewal 969 1,368 0 (399)
Asbestos management works 215 215 0 0
MSF Fire Risk Assessment Works 800 800 0 0
SUPPORT COSTS £2,504 £2,504 £0 0
Direct Project Support 2,504 2,504 0 0
AFFORDABLE SUPPLY PROGRAMME £41,664 £13,991 £27,346 326
New Builds 39,645 11,972 27,346 326
Buy Backs 2,019 2,019 0 0
TOTAL 65,604 37,831 31,671 (3,899)
Page 415

Page 416

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL
HRA CAPITAL PROGRAMME
FINANCIAL YEAR 2023-28 DRAFT 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Annual Budget
(excl Slippage) Annual Budget Annual Budget Annual
Budget Annual Budget
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE £000 £000 £000 £000 £000
OTHER CAPITAL EXPENDITURE 1,398 1,467 1,504 1,542 1,580
Special Needs Adaptations 600 630 646 662 678
Minor capital repairs 525 551 565 579 594
Better Homes Priority Budget 221 232 238 244 250
Housing Management System Development 20 21 22 22 23
Gypsy Travellers Site 32 33 34 35 36
MAJOR COMPONENT REPLACEMENTS 12,098 12,703 16,221 16,546 13,680
Targeted SHQS /EESSH compliance works 4,321 4,537 4,651 4,767          4,886
Building external component renewals,
roofs/chimneys/flashings/fascias/gutters etc 3,121 3,277 3,359 3,443          3,529
Doors/window component renewals 1,696 1,781 1,825 1,871          1,918
District Heating - - 3,200 3,200          -
External stores/garages/bin stores/drainage component renewals 45 47 49 50 51
Secure door entry component renewals 45 47 49 50 51
Statutory/regulatory compliance works (lifts/electrical/legionella/fire etc) 113 119 122 125 128
Heating improvement works (Boiler replacement programme) 1,200 1,260 1,292 1,324          1,357
Energy improvements/energy efficiency works 57 59 61 62 64
Kitchen and Bathroom replacement programme 1,500 1,575 1,614 1,655          1,696
VOID CAPITAL 3,000 2,625 2,691 2,758 2,827
Works to empty properties in order to allow them back into the letting pool 3,000 2,625 2,691 2,758          2,827
CONTINGENCIES 100 100 100 100 100
Budget provision for unforeseen expenditure 100 100 100 100 100
STRUCTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL 2,422 2,768 3,069 3,120 3,173
Defective structures/component renewals 678 712 730 748 767
Environmental renewal works, paths/fences/walls/parking areas 1,017 1,068 1,095 1,122          1,150
Asbestos management works 226 237 243 249 256
MultiStorey Flats Fire Risk Assessment Works 500 750 1,000 1,000          1,000
SUPPORT COSTS 2,629 2,734 2,803 2,873          2,945
Salaries/central support/offices 2,629 2,734 2,803 2,873          2,945
Affordable Housing Supply Programme 54,409 43,879 26,240 15,435 15,006
Queens Quay site b 87
Cbank East (88) 13,728 9,152 - -
Pappert 5,716 2,583 - - -
Queens Quay Site C 6,750 6,750 9,000 - -
Clydebank Gap Sites (prev Lilac Ave) 500 3,375 3,375 3,375          2,875
Bank Street 2,588 2,168 - - -
Clydebank Health Centre 4,572 5,658 - - -
Willox Park (Phase 1) 3,188 663 - - -
Willox Park (Potential Phase 2) - 5,625 1,875 - -
Mount Pleasant 6,300 - - - -
Silverton 2,250 - - - -
Fees, Staffing Costs, contingency 3,729 1,744 858 875 891
Gap sites 3,001 4,081
Future New build sites 9,000 9,000          9,000
Buy Backs 2,000 2,080 2,132 2,185          2,240
ANNUAL TOTAL EXPENDITURE 76,056 66,277 52,627 42,374 39,311
ANTICIPATED RESOURCES 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28
Annual Budget Annual Budget Annual Budget Annual
Budget Annual Budget
£000 £000 £000 £000 £000
New Build Grant 28,055 8,923 6,125 4,000 4,000
Prudential Borrowing/CFCR 48,001 57,354 46,502 38,374 35,311
TOTAL ANTICIPATED RESOURCES 76,056 66,277 52,627 42,374 39,311
APPENDIX 3
Page 416

Page 417

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL APPENDIX 4
DRAFT HRA ESTIMATES 2023/24
2022/23 Outturn  EXPENDITURE 2022/23
Estimate
2020/23 P9
Probable
Outturn 
2023/24
Estimate
Movement
year on year Comments on Movement >£50,000
£000 £000 £000 £000 £000
6,068 Employee Costs 6,690        6,932 7,669 979 Provision for anticipated employee pay award, increments and additional
staff requirements .
1,800 Property Costs 2,030        1,909 2,375 345 Utilities increase to reflect rising prices , remaining increase is due to
general inflation on rents and insurance
121 Transport Costs 112 139 142 31
358 Supplies, Services and Admin 395 330 389 (7)
2,485 Support Services 2,724        2,613 2,720 (4)
715 Other Expenditure 532 754 534 2
12,581 Repairs & Maintenance 12,942      13,784          16,257         3,315  Additional budgets required for EICR £1.8M and solar panel maintenance
£0.2m. The £0.4M one year reduction in 22/23  Tenant Priority Budget has
been re- instated. The remaining increase is the impact of inflation/pay
award on the cost of repairs 
1,048 Bad Debt Provision 971 840 879 (92) Reduced to reflect expected requirement
1,717 Void Loss (Council Tax/Lost Rents) 946 2,285 1,448 502  Increased to reflect higher void numbers. The budget is based on the
expectation that during 2023/24 the numbers of voids will reduce during the
year  from the current high levels  
13,175 CFCR 7,501        5,386 1,298 (6,203) Reduced in line with increased revenue spend. The CFCR depends on
excess of income over spend projection in year 
10,520 Loan Charges 12,175      12,309          15,476         3,301  Increased cost of borrowing in line with interest rate rises 
50,589 Total Expenditure 47,018      47,280          49,186         2,169
44,223 House Rents 45,215      45,388          47,274         2,059 4% rent increase plus additional income from newly tenanted new builds
206 Lockup Rents 210 206 214 5
1,268 Factoring/Insurance Charges 1,316        1,302 1,434 118 Annual fee increase applied
117 Other rents 115 116 117 2
7 Interest on Revenue Balance 55 30 30 (25)
4,842 Miscellaneous Income 107 237 117 9
50,664 Total Income 47,018      47,280          49,186         2,169
(76) Net Expenditure 0 0 0 0
Page 417