Democracy Spraffa

Item 9 - Review of Capital Programme

West Dunbartonshire Council · 21 December 2022
Back to West Dunbartonshire Council — 21 December 2022 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Some pages contain no extractable text. They may be blank, graphics or scanned pages. OCR has not been applied.

Page 1

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL
Report by Chief Officer - Resources
Council: 21 December 2022
Subject: Review of West Dunbartonshire Council’s Capital Programme
1. PURPOSE
1.1 To provide Council with the outcome of a review of the Council’s Capital
Programme and present recommendations to reduce the capital programme in
light of concerns about affordability.
2. RECOMMENDATIONS
2.1 Council is asked to:
a) Note the factors having a significant impact on the affordability and delivery
of the Council’s capital programme.
b) Approve the removal of  the 34 projects listed at paragraph 4.15 of the
report from the Council’s capital plan
c) Approve reduced budget allocations to the 14 projects listed at paragraph
4.17 of the report.
d) Note these amendments will remove a total of £34.615m of capital
expenditure from the Council’s long term capital programme and generate
an estimated £0.337m in revenue savings in 2023/24, rising to £0.515m in
2024/25 and £0.577m in 2025/26.
e) Note that future bids for new capital projects will be subject to an
assessment carried out by the Council’s Strategic Asset Management
Group and recommendations for new projects will be submitted to Council
for approval on an annual basis as part of the budget setting process.
However, in exceptional circumstances, recommendations for new capital
projects will be submitted to Council, for approval outside of that annual
cycle.
3. BACKGROUND
3.1 On 9 March 2022, the Council agreed an updated ten year capital programme
and a balanced 2023/24 revenue budget. The Capital Plan contains a range of
specific projects allocated to services and also a number of recurring projects for
areas where there is an acknowledgement that there needs to be a degree of
capital spend each year (for example building upgrades, roads maintenance,
vehicle replacement etc).
3.2 The capital plan profiles the capital expenditure over a ten year window.  Exhibit 1
summarises that profiled expenditure over the period 2022/23 to 2020/31.  Note
that a number of the projects will also have incurred capital expenditure prior to
2022/23 however Exhibit 1 is focusing on the level of capital expenditure in the
ITEM 9

Page 2

current and future years. It can be seen that the current plan includes
£275.6million of expenditure over the period 2022/23 to 2030/31.
Exhibit 1 – Summary of Planned Capital Expenditure as at March 2022 Budget Meeting (costs are in £000)
Service No 22/23 23/24 24/25 25/26 26/27 27/28 28/29 29/30 30/31 Total
22/23-
30/31
RECURRING 14 17,576 14,043 13,550 14,079 13,101 13,103 13,103 13,103 13,103 124,761
CCF 5 3,305 1,251 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,556
SPD 12 3,187 2,290 4,000 1,952 0 0 0 0 0 11,429
HSCP 4 497 711 434 280 280 154 154 154 0 2,664
R&N 41 5,506 8,658 7,665 3,130 100 0 0 0 0 25,059
EDU 11 4,036 21,805 7,860 1,560 120 120 60 0 0 35,561
RES 8 76 2 4 0 30 0 0 0 0 112
H&E 3 125 35 35 35 35 35 35 0 0 335
R&R 32 17,048 27,585 13,510 9,000 3,383 0 0 0 0 70,526
P&T 5 150 146 46 47 48 49 50 51 0 587
Total 135 51,506 76,526 47,104 30,083 17,097 13,461 13,402 13,308 13,103 275,590
3.3 The Council receives a general capital grant from the Scottish Government each
year (approx. £6m). Any spend above this level, not funded from other grants, is
funded through borrowing. Capital spend funded from borrowing results in loan
charges until the borrowing is fully repaid. Exhibit 2 summarises how the capital
expenditure in each of the years between 2022/23 and 2030/31 is currently
projected to be financed.
Exhibit 2 – Financing the Capital Programme 2022/23-2030/31
Service 22/23 23/24 24/25 25/26 26/27 27/28 28/29 29/30 30/31 Total
22/23-
30/31
Borrowing 34,172 48,948 32,725 16,554 7,541 6,813 6,754 6,660 6,455 166,622
Ring Fenced
Capital Grant
8,223 20,218 7,701 5,951 2,908 0 0 0 0 45,001
General Capital
Grant
5,982 6,648 6,648 6,648 6,648 6,648 6,648 6,648 6,648 59,166
Matched Funding 3,087 712 30 930 0 0 0 0 0 4,759
Other 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42
Total 51,506 76,526 47,104 30,083 17,097 13,461 13,402 13,308 13,103 275,590
3.4 Exhibit 2 shows that the Council’s current capital programme will require £166.6m
of prudential borrowing over the period 2022/23 to 2030/31 based on current
projections for the cost of specific projects. That represents 60% of the total
planned capital programme expenditure.
4. MAIN ISSUES
Affordability of the Capital Programme
4.1 The current financial crisis is having a significant impact on both the affordability
and delivery of the capital programme. The paragraphs below set out some of the
key issues.
4.2 Cost Inflation
Rising prices across all sectors of the economy are having an impact on the price
of products, materials and contractors. Contractors, sub-contractors and suppliers

Page 3

are factoring in allowances to cover future cost increases, particularly for projects
with a longer construction period. The majority of capital projects are likely to be
affected by this and it is a reasonable assumption that any capital projects costed
in the last 12-18 months, are likely to end up costing materially more than the
current estimates in the Council’s capital programme.
4.3 Availability of Products and Materials
The impact of various socio-economic factors and worldwide events are causing
substantial supply chain issues, leading to significant delays and lack of
availability of products and materials required to undertake capital work. This
affects availability across all services including roads materials, buildings
construction, ICT and fleet. In some cases, a lead time of 18 to 24 months has
been quoted in respect of new plant and vehicles.
4.4 Cost of Funding the Capital Programme
As demonstrated in Exhibits 1 and 2,  the capital programme, approved in March
2022, allocated a total capital budget of £276m over the period 2022/23 to
2030/31. The capital programme is funded by a mix of borrowing and grant
funding from the UK and Scottish Governments, and other external sources.
Around £6m is currently received on an annual basis through the General Capital
Grant from the Scottish Government. Other grant funding normally involves a
bidding process and therefore the Council faces growing competition from other
local authorities. However, the majority, around 60% of the total capital spend, is
funded from borrowing. The affordability of capital spend is therefore impacted by
changes in interest rates.
4.5 It is well publicised that interest rates have increased materially in recent months,
over and above what were already high projections, and this has had a significant
impact on the affordability of the current Capital Programme. Interest rates
continue to be volatile and therefore it is difficult to predict the future trend with a
degree of certainty, but current PWLB borrowing rates sit at around 4.5% whereas
in March 2022, when the new capital programme was agreed, on average, long-
term borrowing of up to 10 years could be obtained at an interest rate of around
2.3%.
By means of illustration the payback for a capital project costing £10m at 2.3%
interest rate per annum repaid over 40 years would have been £14.7m. However
PWLB interest rates at the time of writing this paper are approximately 4.5%
which increases the payback to £19.2m, an increase of £4.5m, which is a 31%
increase on the original payback.
4.6 It is also reasonable to make an assumption that a £10m project could actually
now cost in the region of £15m due to the cost inflation issues highlighted in
paragraphs 4.1 and 4.2. A £15m project borrowed at a current interest rate of
4.5% per annum repaid over 40 years would result in a total payback of £22.4m
So after accounting for cost inflation coupled with interest rate rises, the result is
that the cost of the original £10m project will have increased by 52% as
demonstrated by Exhibit 3.

Page 4

Exhibit 3 – Illustrative Impact of Rising Interest Rates and Cost Inflation
Original
Build
Cost
Total Interest
Payable over
40 Years
(@2.3%)
Total
Original
Payback
Revised
Build
Cost
Total Interest
Payable over 40
years (@4.5%)
Total
Revised
Payback
Increase
in
Payback
Increa
se (%)
£10m £4.715m £14.715m £15m £7.403m £22.403m £7.688m 52%
Impact of Capital Spend on Future Revenue Budgets
4.7 The repayment of borrowing used to fund capital creates a future revenue budget
commitment over the entirety of the anticipated lifespan of the new asset.
Additional borrowing to fund more expensive capital projects will increase the
Council’s overall debt position and will accrue substantial interest charges. These
pressures are not unique to West Dunbartonshire Council and are being faced by
all councils with a number of them also reviewing their current capital
programmes due to concerns about affordability. 
4.8 The Council has a statutory obligation to balance its budgets. The revenue budget
is already under significant pressure from rising energy prices, rising fuel prices
and staff pay awards. As a result of the higher interest rates, any new capital
spend will add further pressure to the loans charges element of that budget.
However, it is important that Members also recognise that, along with a
substantial increase in the current cost of financing a capital project, once the
asset is complete it may bring additional future revenue budget commitments
through the need to fund future operating costs, including maintenance. 
4.9 Decisions on capital spend will need to focus on obtaining best value for money
for the Council, including prioritisation to ensure the continued delivery of
essential services, a focus on mitigation of key areas of risk and consideration of
available external funding, new income generation opportunities and budget
efficiency savings that can be achieved.
Approach to Review of the Capital Programme
4.10 The review of the Council’s capital programme focused on:
1. Non-recurring projects which are considered non-essential.
2. Annual recurring projects where the value remains static year on year.
3. Budgets held for spend relating to other organisations.
And considered factors such as:
• legal and health and safety obligations
• impact on service delivery
• impact on the value and life of the assets
• potential for increases in repair costs if ageing assets are not replaced
• the extent to which projects are already well advanced or supported by
external funding.
4.11 The capital programme was reviewed, on a line by line basis, by a sub group of
the Strategic Asset Management group, chaired by the Chief Officer Resources,

Page 5

with initial proposals and questions posed to all Chief Officers on the projects in
the programme allocated to their services.  Responses to those questions and
feedback on the initial proposals were further considered by the sub group which
has informed the recommendations set out in this report. 
4.12 For each line in the capital programme there is a recommended action to either:
• Remove – cancel the project
• Reduce – reduce the allocated budget over the life of the programme
• Reprofile – no change to the overall allocated capital budget however a
need to reprofile the anticipated spend as it affects the revenue impact of
the borrowing
• Keep – retain the project with no changes
4.13 For each recommended action a brief rationale has also been provided.
Summary of Recommended Actions
4.14 Of the 123 projects currently in the capital programme (note this is 12 less than
quoted in Exhibit 1 as Exhibit 1 was the capital programme as at March 2022
whereas the review was conducted on the updated capital programme as at
period 7 2022/23 where 12 of the programmes had been removed as completed:
• 34 to be removed entirely totalling £12.911m
• 14 to have their allocated capital budget reduced totalling £21.704m
• 18 that need their capital expenditure reprofiled
• 57 that should be kept
The net effect of these changes would remove a total of £34.615m from the
capital programme over the period 2022/23 to 2030/31.
4.15 The Finance team have reviewed the revenue implications of making the
recommended changes summarised in paragraph 4.14.  Based on current loan
charge rates, if all the recommendations are accepted, there would be a reduction
in loan charge payments (funded from revenue) of:
• £0.337m in 2023/24
• £0.515m in 2024/25
• £0.577m in 2025/26
In addition there would be an avoidance in in future loans principal repayments
(funded through capital receipts) of:
• £0.903m in 2023/24
• £1.109m in 2024/25
• £1.348m in 2025/26
Note that further work is required to reprofile the 18 projects where reprofiling has
been recommended. This is likely to increase the estimated revenue savings but
not by a material amount.

Page 6

4.16 Exhibit 4a summarises the 34 projects that are recommended to be removed and
the rationale for their removal.  
Exhibit 4a – Rationale for Projects Recommended for Removal
Service Project Rationale
R&R Energy Projects
quick wins
Costs for projects of this nature should either be aligned with
the next three years of projects which Building Services
have for Building Upgrades or via Central Repairs budget or
the services own budget if a quick win is to reduce utility
costs.
R&R Upgrade obsolete
heating controls
(BEMS) 
Costs for projects of this nature should either be aligned with
the next three years of projects which Building Services
have for Building Upgrades or via Central Repairs budget or
the services own budget if an outcome is a reduction in
utility costs.
R&R Water Meter
Downsize
Costs for projects of this nature should either be aligned with
the next three years of projects which Building Services
have for Building Upgrades or via Central Repairs budget or
the services own budget if an outcome is a reduction in
utility costs.
R&R Zero Carbon Costs for projects of this nature should either be aligned with
the next three years of projects and beyond, which Building
Services have for Building Upgrades.  This will prevent
disruption to service users within buildings as currently
programmes are not aligned and therefore there is a risk
that building upgrades work could be completed and then
works to achieve net zero commenced and vice versa.
R&R Viresco Studio
and Arts Centre
Project cancelled and Scottish Government funding
withdrawn 
R&R Lighting upgrades
to LED in schools
and Corporate
buildings
This should be funded from building upgrades recurring
budget after applying the existing prioritisation process.
Currently programmes are ongoing outwith the building
upgrades prioritisation process which has been approved by
Council.  
R&R Water Automatic
Meter Readers 
Costs for projects of this nature should either be aligned with
the next three years of projects which Building Services
have for Building Upgrades or via Central Repairs budget or
the services own budget if an outcome is a reduction in
utility costs.
R&R Replace Obsolete
oil fired Boiler at
HUB CEC.
This site is due for building upgrades work in line with the
prioritisation process in 2023/24 and this should be added to
the building upgrades project which has already accounted
for the cost of this within the budget allocation.

Page 7

R&R Electricity
Automatic Meter
Readers
Costs for projects of this nature should either be aligned with
the next three years of projects which Building Services
have for Building Upgrades or via Central Repairs budget or
the services own budget if an outcome is a reduction in
utility costs.
CCF Telephone
System Upgrade
This was taken forward following criticism of the service in
2021/22 and would have enabled calls to be recorded for
quality improvement and also introduced call positioning.
The team will consult ICT to ascertain if there is any
alternative funding other than capital. 
SDP New Sports
Changing Facility
Dumbarton West
(Old OLSP)
Very minor spend to date against this project as yet and
project has not progressed for an extended period of time.
The spend to date has only been in relation to surveys for
feasibility of the site and ground conditions together with
planning application.   The site has no current bookings and
it is not known whether there is a demand for this and the
booking previously taken when it was a school has moved to
the new school location. There is potential for the site to be
sold to developers whhc would generate a capital receipt.  
SDP Purchase of 3
Welfare Units
No spend to date and building services have confirmed that,
if and when these are required, they can be hired
SDP Holm Park &
Yoker Athletic FC
Project is complete.
SDP New
Westbridgend
Community
Centre 
This project has been subject to previous council reports
and commitments made to progress it however there has
been no spend against it as at December 2022 and in the
current economic climate it needs to be considered against
other priorities and whether it delivers value for money. The
Council have engaged with the community group to submit
an application for funding of up to £1m from the
Regeneration Capital Grant Fund and it is anticipated there
is a good possibility they will be successful. This will not be
known until around September 2023. 
SDP Changing Places
Toilet Provision
This was a Council commitment when agreeing the 2022/23
but there is no spend too date against it although it is at
design stage. Since that budget decision two changing place
toilets have been installed in non WDC sites (Clydebank
Shopping Centre and the Big Disability Building) and further
ones could be added in Concorde and Alexandria
Community Centre when they are refurbished in 2023/24
and 2024/25 as part of the Building Upgrades programme..
SDP Alexandria
Community
Centre Sports
Hall re-flooring
This is not considered a high priority project at the current
time and there is no spend to date against it – there may be
scope to incorporate these works into Building Upgrades
prioritisation works and either commence in 2023/24 or
2024/25.

Page 8

HSCP Replacement of
CareFirst
Whilst there has been concern that the CareFirst supplier
(OLM) will no longer support the current version of Carefirst
as they have developed a new cloud based replacement
they have confirmed that their senior management team
have not made any formal decisions around the general
support for CareFirst.  They have confirmed that they no
longer provide bug fixes or enhancements for CareFirst
unless there is a statutory need for them to do so. Given that
support is still being provided and given the uncertainty
about the future of social care provision due to the potential
for a National Care Service it is not advisable to invest
material capital sums in a system which may or may not be
needed in the short to medium future.
R&N Infrastructure -
Flooding
This recurring budget line is used to fund smaller
infrastructure projects as and when they arise. In essence it
is a 'general pot'. Going forward these infrastructure projects
should be subject to a specific capital bid to ensure they are
considered equally against all other capital bids
R&N Footways/Cycle
Path Upgrades
This can be absorbed within the existing recurring roads
annual budget.
R&N Spaces for
People
Project has been completed and budget is not required. Was
carried forward in error.
R&N A813 Road
Improvement
Phase 2
Chief Officer to consider the impact of removing this  phase
2 budget  and, if appropriate, bring forward a future capital
bid for revised works.
R&N A811 Lomond
Bridge
Project is complete and no budget beyond 2022/23 - remove
from capital programme
R&N Elevated
Platforms
(Building
Services)
No spend to date and building services have confirmed that
if and when these are required they can be hired.
R&N Protective
overcoating to 4
bridges over
River Leven
Renton Bridge has been completed but other bridge works
not yet procured.  Remove this now and future bids can be
submitted and assessed as required.
R&N Mandatory
20mph
Residential
communities
This was a capital bid that has taken a long time to deliver
as linked to Scottish Government and transport bill.  It can
be reduced and phased over a number of years or removed
at current time. Recommendation is to remove at current
time and consider need to reintroduce it at a later date if and
when there is greater clarity from the Scottish Government
over what is required 
R&N Footway
Resurfacing
(RAMP)
There is no spend to date against this just now as it is taking
a long time to procure a contractor in the current market.
This budget should be removed and the costs absorbed
from within the recurring roads budget
R&N Water Safety This budget was a political decision taken in early 2022 - the
budget has not been spend as at November 2022. 
R&N Street sign
renewal
This should be funded from the recurring roads budget

Page 9

R&N Christmas lights No costs assigned for this as of yet and Christmas light
provision is subject to review
R&N Roads
improvements 
Council commitment when agreeing 2022/23 budget. No
spend to date. 
R&N Pavement
improvements 
Council commitment when agreeing 2022/23 budget. No
spend to date. 
H&E Invest in "Your
Community
Initiative"
This is externally funded but won't extend beyond 2022/23
so can be removed from the capital programme however
has no savings impact
H&E Integrated
Housing
Management
System
This budget was to cover costs of capitalised consultancy
however there is now less of a need for consultancy so
budget no longer required
H&E Dennystoun
Forge Site
Improvements
Budget is the funding included within the Council's Capital
Block Grant to support the provision of service to Gypsy
Travelling community.  Funding in 2022/23 is earmarked for
proposed improvements to the Dennystoun Forge site in
terms of traffic calming measures and play provision.  Future
years spend is undetermined and therefore can be removed. 
4.17 Exhibit 4b summarises the capital budget implications of removing the 34 projects
over the life of the capital programme and the revenue savings over the three
year period 2023/24 to 2025/26. Where there is a 0 for a revenue saving it either
means the associated revenue saving is beyond 2025/26 or is simply due to it
being a small amount which has rounded to 0. 
Exhibit 4b – Capital and Revenue Implications of Removed Projects  
Service Project  Capital Budget
Removed 22/23
– 30/31 (£000)
2023/24
Revenue
(£000)
2024/25
Revenue
(£000)
2025/26
Revenue
(£000)
R&R Energy Projects quick
wins
31 1 1 1
R&R Upgrade obsolete heating
controls (BEMS) 
131 5 4 4
R&R Water Meter Downsize 3 0 0 0
R&R Zero Carbon 242 10 8 6
R&R Viresco Studio and Arts
Centre
0 0 0 0
R&R Lighting upgrades to LED
in schools and Corporate
buildings
50 2 2 2
R&R Water Automatic Meter
Readers 
20 1 1 0
R&R Replace Obsolete oil fired
Boiler at HUB CEC.
110 4 4 4
R&R Electricity Automatic
Meter Readers
10 0 0 0

Page 10

CCF Telephone System
Upgrade
11 0 0 0
SDP New Sports Changing
Facility Dumbarton West
(Old OLSP)
340 0 14 13
SDP Purchase of 3 Welfare
Units
78 3 3 3
SDP Holm Park & Yoker
Athletic FC
86 3 3 3
SDP New Westbridgend
Community Centre 
2,290 44 89 85
SDP Changing Places Toilet
Provision
150 6 5 5
SDP Alexandria Community
Centre Sports Hall re-
flooring
40 2 1 1
HSCP Replacement of CareFirst 1,400 11 20 27
R&N Infrastructure - Flooding 800 0 4 8
R&N Footways/Cycle Path
Upgrades
800 4 8 12
R&N SpACES for People 390 16 15 14
R&N A813 Road Improvement
Phase 2
2,325 0 0 0
R&N A811 Lomond Bridge 84 3 3 3
R&N Elevated Platforms
(Building Services)
45 2 1 1
R&N Protective overcoating to
pa4 bridges over River
Leven
279 0 0 11
R&N Mandatory 20mph
Residential communities
489 9 19 18
R&N Footway Resurfacing
(RAMP)
350 14 13 13
R&N Water Safety 30 1 1 1
R&N Street sign renewal 100 4 4 4
R&N Christmas lights 0 0 0 0
R&N Roads improvements 1,000 40 50 50
R&N Pavement improvements 1,000 40 50 50
H&E Invest in "Your Community
Initiative"
0 0 0 0
H&E Integrated Housing
Management System
77 1 1 1
H&E Dennystoun Forge Site
Improvements
150 0 1 3
TOTAL 12,911 227 304 314

Page 11

4.18 Exhibit 5a summarises the 14 projects proposed for a reduction, the rationale for
the reduction and the proposed reduction.   
Exhibit 5a – Rationale for Projects Recommended for Reduction
Service Project  Rationale and Proposed Reduction
CCF Heritage
Capital Fund 
Chief Officer has confirmed that £1.7million can be released.
This would remove funding for Dalmuir Library/Gallery project,
reduce the scope of works to the roof and stonework at Town
Hall; reduce the Town Hall renovation project; and reduce the
scope of works at Bruce Street Baths. Alexandria Library is
complete and the Council is contracted to complete work in the
basement of Clydebank Library. Proposal is to reduce the
budget by £1.7 million.
R&N Allotment
Development
This budget is used to work towards Scottish Government
targets for allotments however the Council has historically
struggled to find suitable plots which has resulted in ongoing
reprofiling.  Proposal is to reduce the budget by 50% at the
current time and reassess this when reviewing the capital
programme again in advance of agreeing the 2024/25 budget.
R&N A813 Road
Improvement
Phase 1
There has been substantial prior year spend against this project
however the £0.625m budgeted for 2025/26 is for a different
area of road so it can be cancelled without there being any
recharge to revenue. Chief Officer to consider the impact of
removing this £0.625m and, if appropriate, bring forward a future
capital bid for revised works.
EDU Audio Visual
Equipment
There is a requirement to replace and renew these teaching
resources which was delayed due to COVID. Fully removing this
budget would remove the Council’s capacity to replace an
ageing electronic teaching board provision. Therefore proposal is
to half the capital budget allocation between 2023/24 and
2030/31 and ask the service to bring forward a specific phased
replacement programme for AV equipment with a consideration
of how much can be funded from school budgets (likely to be
reduced) and how much from the Council's capital programme. 
RES Agresso
upgrade
This is a critical system for the Council. The £25k spend in
2022/23 is mandatory as we require new functionality to continue
to provide services however the £30k in 2026/27 is speculative
with an assumption we will need further investment. Proposal is
to remove the 2026/27 budget and reconsider if it is necessary
nearer the time.
R&R Regeneration/
Local
Economic
Development 
Capital budget is required for existing regeneration projects
however levels of future investment in regeneration projects
need to be further considered with a robust case by case cost
benefit analysis carried out.  Proposal is to retain  budgets in
2023/24 to 2025/26 but reduce by 50% from 2026/27 onwards.  
P&T ICT Security
& DR
There has been underspends in prior years against this recurring
budget line which suggests there is some scope to reduce the
overall allocation however IT costs are generally increasing so
any reduction in this budget line will need to be relatively minor. 
Furthermore this supports a planned five year refresh for key

Page 12

hardware which the Council already tries to extend to six or
seven years wherever possible. Proposal is to reduce annual
allocation  by 10%
SDP Building
Upgrades
This is a recurring and needs led budget and any reduction in
allocated budget will require a review of the planned programme
of works. A 10% reduction in 2023/24 will mean works to
Parkhall Library, Clydebank East Community Centre, Goldenhill
Pavilion, Glenhead Community Centre will not go ahead at the
current time but can be reconsidered as part of the longer term
programme of works.  Any further reduction beyond 10% would
impact on planned works to schools and early learning centres. 
Proposal is to reduce annual allocation by 10%.
HSCP Aids &
Adaptations
for HSCP
clients and
telecare
This is a recurring and demand led budget which historically has
spend fluctuating between 79% and 100% of budget which
suggests there is scope to reduce the commitment but not by an
excessive amount. COVID has resulted in a backlog of social
work assessments and this, added to the deterioration in the
health and mobility of people affected by COVID restrictions
means there is a possibility of an increase in pressure on this
budget. Therefore spend against it should be closely monitored
to determine if the reduced budget is sufficient over the medium
to long term.   Proposal is to reduce annual allocation  by 15%
R&N Infrastructure
- Roads
Historically spend against this recurring budget has averaged
84% which suggests there is scope to reduce the commitment
by around 15%. Recommended reduction of 20% slightly
exceeds that which may require a change in strategy to move
away from resurfacing and focus on more localised structural
patching.  This may result in an increase in complaints and
insurance claims so this will need to be closely monitored to
assess whether a 20% reduction is excessive. Proposal is to
reduce annual allocation  by 20%
P&T ICT
Modernisation
Historically spend against this recurring budget has averaged
76% which suggests there is scope to reduce the commitment
by around 20%. Proposal is to reduce annual allocation  by 20%
RES Payment Card
Industry Data
Security
Standard
(PCIDSS)
Removing this and not completing the project would mean the
Council  are not compliant with payment security standards
which gives rise to a risk of a fine and reputational risk if
payments not taken securely. However latest estimate is a
reduced capital cost so budget reduced to reflect that. Proposal
is to reduce by £10k.
R&N Public non-
adopted paths
and roads
This recurring budget is mostly used for grounds and upgrades
to paths in parks, cemeteries.  Reducing the budget by 50% will
leave some annual budget for these types of work of a lesser
amount but larger projects over a pre-determined threshold
should be submitted as a specific capital bid to enable them to
be considered by the capital prioritisation process. Proposal is to
reduce annual allocated by 50%
R&N Vehicle
Replacement
There is considerable reprofiling against this recurring budget
line due to lead times on vehicles. Work is currently underway to
determine the funding required to transition to an electric fleet

Page 13

which ultimately will be added to the capital budget and replace
the current recurring budgeted amounts. Recommendation to
reduce recurring budget at current time will require a
reprogramming of current vehicle requirements and that review
should consider possible reductions in workforce.  Proposal is to
reduce by estimated £2m unspent in 2022/23 and reduce the
annual allocation from 2023/24 onwards by 20%
4.18 Exhibit 5b summarises the capital budget implications of reducing the 14 projects
over the life of the capital programme and the revenue savings over the three
year period 2023/24 to 2025/26. Where there is a 0 for a revenue saving it either
means the associated revenue saving is beyond 2025/26 or is simply due to it
being a small amount which has rounded to 0.
Exhibit 5b – Capital and Revenue Implications of Reduced Projects
Service Project Capital
Budget
Removed
22/23 – 30/31
(£000)
2023/24
Revenue
(£000)
2024/25
Revenue
(£000)
2025/26
Revenue
(£000)
CCF Heritage Capital Fund 1,700 22 67 64
R&N Allotment Development 178 7 0 0
R&N A813 Road Improvement
Phase 1
625 0 0 0
EDU AV Equipment - Education 240 1 2 3
RES Agresso upgrade 30 0 0 0
R&R Regeneration/Local
Economic Development
2,500 0 0 0
P&T ICT Security & DR 440 0 3 5
SDP Building Upgrades 2,472 0 12 23
HSCP Aids & Adaptations for
HSCP clients and telecare
1,071 0 5 10
R&N Infrastructure - Roads 5,084 0 25 49
P&T ICT Modernisation 1,474 0 9 15
RES Payment Card Industry
Data Security Standard
(PCIDSS)
10 0 0 0
R&N Public non-adopted paths
and roads
1,800 0 9 18
R&N Vehicle Replacement 4,080 80 79 76
TOTAL 21,704 110 211 263
4.17 Appendix 1 details the 18 capital projects that need their capital expenditure
reprofiled and Appendix 2 lists the 57 that are recommended to be kept in the
capital programme without any amendments.

Page 14

Future additions to the capital programme
4.18 Future bids for additions to the Council’s capital programme will be subject to a
robust assessment/risk prioritisation process which will be carried out by the
Council’s Strategic Asset Management Group and will include input and a
recommendation by the Chief Officer Resources and Chief Officer Supply,
Distribution and Property. 
4.19 Services submitting a request for a new capital project will be asked to complete a
bid form which will include a range of information including financial implications
and the project’s link to the Council’s corporate objectives and strategic plan.
Consideration will be given to factors such as any legal/statutory requirements,
service delivery, and financial benefit. 
4.20 Whilst services will be asked to score their bids against these types of categories
the scores will be subject to review by the Strategic Asset Management Group to
ensure scores are applied consistently across all projects.
4.21 Recommendations in relation to potential new capital projects will normally be
submitted to Council as part of the annual budget setting process. Only in
exceptional circumstances will a capital project request be submitted to Council
for consideration outwith this annual budgeting cycle.
5. PEOPLE IMPLICATIONS
5.1 None as a direct consequence of this report
6. FINANCIAL AND PROCUREMENT IMPLICATIONS
6.1 Sets out the options to reduce the capital budget expenditure and associated
revenue impact.
7. RISK ANALYSIS
7.1 Reductions in the capital programme, and in particular some of the recurring
service budgets, may have a detrimental impact on service delivery and may
create an increase in complaints.
8. EQUALITIES IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
8.1 None of the proposes amendments to the capital programme are considered to
require a formal EIA.
9. CONSULTATION
9.1 The views of all Chief Officers have been requested on this report and feedback
incorporated herein.
10. STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT
10.1 Proper budgetary control and sound financial practice are cornerstones of good

Page 15

governance and support Council and officers to pursue the strategic priorities of
the Council’s Strategic Plan.
10.2 The capital budget contributes to all categories by providing funding in specific
areas to help the Council achieve and develop these priorities.  
Laurence Slavin
Chief Officer - Resources
Date:   21 December 2022
Person to Contact: Laurence Slavin, Chief Officer - Resources
E-mail: laurence.slavin@west-dunbarton.gov.uk
Appendices
Appendix 1 – Capital projects requiring capital expenditure reprofiled
Appendix 2 – Capital projects to be retained with no changes
Background Papers
Budget Report to Council - 9 March 2022
Financial Update Report to Council – 22 June 2022

Page 16

Appendix 1 – Capital projects requiring capital expenditure reprofiled
Service Project Rationale
R&R Installation of Solar
PV at Clydebank
Leisure Centre
This budget should be kept as it is a spend to save
project which is anticipated will deliver revenue
savings. It does however need reprofiled to ensure
loan charge estimates are as accurate as possible
R&R Replace existing main
hall Air Handling unit
at Clydebank Town
Hall
This has slipped for a couple of years and we need
to reprofile the expenditure to ensure loan charge
estimates are as accurate as possible
R&R Leisure Energy
projects 
This is a budget for capital works in a leisure centre,
in particular to replace an air handling unit which is
required and the project is very near going for
tender.  The expenditure needs reprofiled.
R&R Regeneration Fund  The budget is fully allocated across four projects
with only a small contingency amount of £55k
retained.  However costs need reprofiled to better
reflect anticipated timing of spend ensure revenue
implications are more accurately calculated
R&R Place Based
Investment
These capital funds will be required for costs
relating to Titan Boulevard and the Alexandria
masterplan. However costs need reprofiled to better
reflect anticipated timing of spend ensure revenue
implications are more accurately calculated
R&R Clydebank Can on the
Canal
Majority of this is externally funded (WDC
contribution is £30k) - expenditure needs reprofiled
into 2023/24 as not all to be spent in 2022/23
however as predominantly externally funded there
is no impact on revenue costs
R&R Levelling Up Fund Levelling Up is externally grant funded but costing
need reprofiled
R&N Pothole Rapid Repair
Service
This is a bid for a JCB pothole patcher which has a
long lead in time.  No costs allocated yet but likely
to exceed £100k. Purchase can be considered as
part of wider roads review
R&N Flood Risk
Management
This capital budget is still required to complete the
planned works however there has been material
reprofiling already and the whole budget needs
reprofiled so we can more accurately calculate the
estimated revenue impact of this capital spend
R&N Gruggies Burn Flood
Prevention
Council have submitted a bid for £20m of funding
from Scottish Government.   Design underway and
will be complete this financial year which will
determine phasing. If project costs more than the
funding requested the Council will require to fund
overspend.  If delivered within the external funding
and it is fully received we may not require WDC
funding at all.  Can be reviewed when there is 
certainty from Scottish Government.
APPENDIX 1

Page 17

R&N Waste Transfer
Station
Feasibility has been completed.  If paused/stopped
the Council won't be ready for landfill ban in 2025
and service provider bids will be much higher.
Currently preparing a bid for external funding.  May
need reprofiling.
R&N Electric Vehicle
Charging Points
Electric Vehicle strategy and expansion plan is
underway in city region.  There is an expectation
that up to £0.300 million of external funding will be
made available in 2023/24. Advisable to pause this
project until there is greater clarity over that. 
R&N Cemetery Extension,
North Dalnotter
This was a five year use extension. Number of lairs
are required to meet anticipated number however
budget needs to be reprofiled to better match
expected timing of expenditure
R&N Traffic Signal
Upgrades
There were a number of signal failures at Kilbowie
roundabout due to age of signals and the Council
received complaints regarding the issue. This is
also a safety concern. There has been no spend
against this line as at November 2022 so it may
need to be reprofiled
R&N Vehicle Replacement
Strategy
These vehicles are necessary to deliver roads and
neighbourhood service however lead in time for the
vehicles is between 18 months and two years.
Budget needs reprofiled
EDU Choices Programme - This budget is largely spent so no benefit in
removing this - however 2022/23 needs reprofiled
RES Cost of Living The Cost of Living Capital Fund was launched on
31 October 2022 and a Council decision taken to
cap it at £0.250m per annum over a four year
period. Spend needs to be reprofiled to reflect that
decision.
RES Cash Receipting
system
enhancements
This is an enabler for the PCIDSS project and
should be amalgamated with that line - this
expenditure is now expected in 2023/24

Page 18

Appendix 2 – Capital projects to be retained with no changes
Servi
ce
Project Capital
Budget
2022/23
-
2030/31
(£000)
Rationale for Keeping
R&R Legal Case
Management
System
33 This budget should be kept as it is a spend to
save project which is anticipated will deliver
revenue savings. 
R&R Solicitor
Project
40 This is appropriate capitalisation of a solicitor
post so should be retained as a capital cost at
the current time - however this will be subject
to a wider review of capitalised staff costs in
2023/24 
R&R Replace failed
heating
controls
7 This is a small spend with the majority already
spent.
R&R District Heating
Network
Expansion
11,220 District Heating Network Expansion is a long
term project and the Council is fully committed
to it with capital  costs required to part fund
connections to, for example, Golden Jubilee,
West College Scotland, Dumbarton Road flats
and Health Centre
R&R Exxon City
Deal
31,369 Exxon City Deal is predominantly externally
funded and there is also Council contribution. If
we ceased this now we would need to pay
back considerable amounts of incurred costs. 
R&R Level UP
Funding
68 Levelling Up is externally grant funded
R&R Re -imagine
Antonine Wall 
30 This is linked to matched funding from other
councils and Historic Environment Scotland 
R&R Town Centre
Fund
142 Projects funded by Scottish Government.
CCF Transformation
of
Infrastructure
Libraries and
Museums
191 This work is being considered as part of a
saving option being developed by the relevant
Chief Officer. It is likely this capital budget will
be reduced as a consequence of that saving
option however no reductions being proposed
as part of this review to avoid any double
counting.
CCF Strathleven
Place
1,590 This project is linked to the Glencairn House
and depot rationalisation and will free up the
current museum store and office space in
Poplar Road. The project formed part of the
rationale for the Glencairn project.
Opportunities exist to attract external funding.
APPENDIX 2

Page 19

SDP Depot
Rationalisation
8,417 The options appraisal business case for the
depot rationalisation project is currently being
developed with a view to bringing it to a future
meeting of the IRED Committee in the first half
of 2023. Whilst this is still in progress early
indications are that the existing budget
provision of £8.4m will be materially insufficient
meaning that continuance of the project in its
current guise is no longer financially viable. An
alternative option might be to invest capital
monies in the existing assets to ensure they
are fit for purpose. With that in mind it is
recommended to keep this budget in the
capital programme at the current time to
ensure we have money set aside for that
upgrade work in the event that that is the
preferred option.
SDP New Sports
Changing
Facility at  Glen
Lussett 
134 Unit is now in productions, demolition work is
complete and awaiting date for installation. Too
far progressed to cancel.
SDP Children and
Families Team
(Dumbarton
/Vale of Leven)
TBC Scoping of this work is ongoing and there is no
budget allocated to it yet. Once there is greater
clarity over the scope of works and associated
cost a decision will be required as to whether
funding will be made available for it.
HSCP Community
Alarm upgrade
924 British Telecom will no longer support
analogue telephone lines from 2025 and no
longer install them from Summer 2023. The
current community alarms are analogue based
and require to be replaced for HSCP to provide
this service. The current value approved last
year will require to be refined when the
Scottish Digital Office make their final
approvals on providers.  Estimates of cost vary
across other local authority areas and the
financial risk has been raised with the Scottish
Government by the HSCP and requests for
additional funding have been made.    
HSCP Replace
Elderly Care
Homes and
Day Care
Centres
320 Budget mostly spent
HSCP Criminal
Justice
Adaptations
73 Funded from HSCP revenue
RES Valuation Joint
Board -
Requisition of
ICT Equipment
9 This is an approved budget for the DAB VJB
and is minor

Page 20

R&N Cycling,
Walking and
Safer Streets
683 This is fully funded by the Scottish Government
so no benefit in ceasing or reducing the project
R&N Street lighting
and associated
electrical
infrastructure
813 This recurring budget is used to upgrade street
lighting as required as part of the column
replacement programme.  If the budget was
removed the team would submit annual bids
for capital funding reflecting programme and
locations that require upgrades.  This would
just create a resource issue to assess multiple
capital bids of a relatively minor value.
R&N Environmental
Improvement
Fund
13 Budget is almost fully spent - no benefit in
removing this now
R&N Kilmaronock
Cemetery
Extension
13 Budget is almost fully spent - no benefit in
removing this now
R&N Posties Park
Sports Hub
844 This budget is already overspent and there
would be no value in cancelling the project now
R&N Sports
Facilities
Upgrades -
Argyll Park
6 Budget is almost fully spent - no benefit in
removing this now
R&N Vale of Leven
Cemetery
Extension
553 Budget required to provide sufficient burial
space for forecast need
R&N Playparks 22 Externally funded
R&N Auld Street
Clydebank -
Bond
42 Externally funded
R&N Clydebank
Charrette,
A814
498 Project almost complete
R&N Bus, cycling
and walking
infrastructure
improvements
& Park and
Rides
1,627 Externally funded
R&N Purchase of
gritters
400 Gritters are ordered and are due early 2023
having been delayed for two years due to
external influences. This is a spend to save as
currently leasing vehicles. 
R&N Turnberry
Homes - traffic
calming/
management 
5 Only small amount left in budget and matched
funding is expected

Page 21

R&N Electrical
Charging
Points - Rapid
Charge
50 Only small amount left in budget and matched
funding is expected
R&N River Leven
Flood
Prevention
Scheme 
620 This budget is required as the Council
contribution to this work.  This work is being
progressed.
R&N Bus rapid
development
fund
214 Externally funded
R&N Replacement
of compactors
at Dalmoak 
160 This is essential equipment to maintain a
service which generates income 
R&N Depot
Improvement
Works
62 This budget is to address a health & safety
issue required to  advance the depot project
R&N Roads Plant 80 This is a spend to save as the Council
currently hire this equipment at the moment
which has a revenue implication.  We do street
lighting repairs inhouse so equipment is
required.
R&N East End Park
Resurfacing
200 The pitch is currently close to the end of life
and without investment it will need to be
closed. We currently spend around £10k a
year on maintenance and this would be
removed if the pitch was in good condition - the
facility also generates income which would be
lost if it was closed. 
R&N Balloch
Mountain Bike
Track
210 £10k for design and £200k for Council
contribution toward estimated £800k total build
with an assumption that further £600k will be
funded by external parties.  Linked to Nike
championships coming to Glasgow. Once
deign is completed there will be greater clarity
over anticipated cost and we can engage with
partners to determine if the build will go ahead.
R&N Play Area
Upgrade
Programme
500 This is to upgrade 82 play areas.  Proposal
was to supplement the Scottish Government
funding with £500k of Council funding to
programme the upgrading of all play parks to
become accessible.  If we don't add to SG it
will take longer to upgrade.  There is a
programme that will come to Council setting
out the order for upgrading.  Keep budget in
programme for now and reconsider once
Council paper bas been considered
R&N Flood
prevention
500 This budget is Council funding to progress
various flood prevention works that are
required. It should be kept in the programme

Page 22

but amalgamated with other flood prevention
budget lines.
R&N Large Bins for
High Traffic
Areas (pilot)
25 This is linked to in development savings
proposals relating to waste collection. Larger
bins are likely to be required to support those
options. 
R&N Community
Sports Fund
66 This budget has been spent - kept in for the
purposes of this review but the whole project
will be stripped from the capital programme
when it is presented to Council as part of the
2023/24 budget pack
R&N Knowes Nature
reserve
228 Externally funded
R&N Additional
Pavement
Requirements
5 Budget is almost fully spent - no benefit in
removing this now
EDU Digital
Inclusion
41 Project almost complete
EDU Schools Estate
Improvement
Plan - next
Phase Faifley
29,355 This is a committed project being progressed
with the framework provider (Hub West
Scotland) and the specification is subject to
review. Current capital cost escalation strongly
suggest the whole budget will be required 
EDU Schools Estate
Improvement
Plan 
4,487 The schools estate improvements are long
established commitments which are well
communicated to service users including some
statutory consultations
EDU Free School
Meals
10 Required to meet Scottish Government
standards and budget largely spent
EDU Schools Estate
Refurbishment
Plan 
4 Work will be commencing shortly and only very
small budget remaining
EDU Early Years
Early Learning
and Childcare
Funding
795 Required to meet standards and funded via
Scottish Government
EDU Dalmonach CE
Centre
26 This is mostly spent and the project is
complete - just needs final account closed to
see if any remaining that can be removed.
RES Direct Project
Support
16,910 Keep level as it is as part of this review
however revisit this budget in 2023/24 once the
capital programme has been reduced and
implement a phased plan to reduce this capital
commitment over a three year period
RES Electronic
Insurance
System -
claim/incident
management
7 This project has prior year spend against it
which is well in excess of the amount of budget
left to completion. Ceasing the project now
would require this prior year spend to be
charged to revenue with no benefit

Page 23

system
RES IFRS 16
Database
5 The Council is required to have this in place by
31/3/23 as per accounting standards. The cost
of not having a system/database far exceeds
the purchase price due to a manual
workaround being labour intensive option with
material risk of error. 
P&T Development
of Workforce
Management
System
337 This is all staffing cost and required for a viable
Workforce Mgt System. If the system is not
developed, it will create a lot of additional
manual work for analysing and maintaining
WMS related data which will be
disproportionate to the spend here.  If this is
removed from capital programme it will need to
be funded from revenue.
P&T Internet of
Things Asset
Tracking
17 Budget mostly spent
P&T 365
Implementation
273 Budget mostly spent and 365 implementation
is required. There will be a future capital bid for
further phases of the project

Page 24

No embedded text on this page.