Democracy Spraffa

SUPPLEMENTARY DOCUMENT PACK (Council 22 06 22) Bookmarked

West Dunbartonshire Council · 22 June 2022
Back to West Dunbartonshire Council — 22 June 2022 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Supplementary
Agenda
West Dunbartonshire Council
Date: Wednesday, 22 June 2022
Time: 10:00
Format: Hybrid Meeting
Contact:   Christine McCaffary, Senior Democratic Services Officer
Email: christine.mccaffary@west-dunbarton.gov.uk
Dear Member
ITEMS TO FOLLOW
I refer to the agenda for the above meeting that was issued on 9 June and now
enclose copies of Items 8, 10, 11 and 12, which were not available for issue at that
time.
Yours faithfully
JOYCE WHITE
Chief Executive
Page 69

Page 2

Note referred to:
8 FINANCIAL UPDATE 71 - 84
Submit report by the Chief Officer – Resources providing an update on the
financial challenges facing the Council, the estimated 2023/24 and 2024/25
revenue budget gaps, available general COVID funds, and the approach to be
adopted to identify saving options to enable the Council to deliver a balanced
2023/24 budget.
10 TOWARDS 2030 85 – 94
Submit report by the Chief Executive setting out the progress of the Council over
the last decade, and highlighting the key challenges moving forward towards
2030.
11 LEVELLING UP FUND ROUND 2 – PROPOSED BID 95 - 104
Submit report by the Chief Officer –Roads and Neighbourhood (Shared Service)
seeking approval to submit a bid to the UK Levelling Up Fund (LUF) by the
Round 2 deadline of 6 July 2022.
12 WEST BRIDGEND HALL – MOTION FROM COUNCIL 105 - 110
9 MARCH 2022
Submit report by the Chief Officer – Supply, Distribution and Property providing
an update on the progress of the West Bridgend Hall project and indicative costs.
Distribution:-
Provost Douglas McAllister Councillor Michelle McGinty
Councillor James Bollan  Councillor June McKay
Councillor Karen Conaghan Councillor John Millar
Councillor Ian Dickson  Councillor Lawrence O’Neill
Councillor Diane Docherty  Councillor Lauren Oxley
Councillor Craig Edward  Councillor Chris Pollock
Councillor Gurpreet Johal  Councillor Martin Rooney
Councillor Daniel Lennie Councillor Gordon Scanlan
Councillor David McBride Councillor Hazel Sorrell
Councillor Jonathan McColl Councillor Clare Steel
Councillor James McElhill  Councillor Sophie Traynor
Chief Executive
Chief Officers
Date of issue: 16 June 2022
Page 70

Page 3

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL
Report by Chief Officer - Resources
Council: 22 June 2022
Subject: Financial Update
1. PURPOSE
1.1 To provide an update on the financial challenges facing the Council, the
estimated 2023/24 and 2024/25 revenue budget gaps, available general
COVID funds,  and the approach to be adopted to identify saving options to
enable the Council to deliver a balanced 2023/24 budget.   This is the first
financial update of 2022/23 and rolls forward previous estimates as well as
updating some assumptions. The assumptions will continue to be updated and
refined as the year progresses.
1.2 This update has been prepared using three different scenarios, best case,
worst case and mid-range. Relatively small variations in assumptions can lead
to fairly significant changes in the outcome. Throughout the report the primary
focus is on the mid-range however, where appropriate reference is made to
best case and worst case assumptions.
1.3 To highlight some key items that Council need to be sighted on which may
impact on the estimated budget gap and the possible options for closing it.
2. RECOMMENDATIONS
2.1 Members are asked to:
a) Note the updated position regarding projections for the estimated
revenue budget gaps in 2023/24 and 2024/25.
b) Note the current positon in relation to the Council’s revenue reserves
(based on the unaudited 2021/22 accounts).
c) Note the current position in relation to the availability of COVID funds.
3. BACKGROUND
3.1 On 9 March 2022, the Council agreed a balanced 2022/23 revenue and
capital budget and estimates for 2023/24-2024/25.  That budget report also
highlighted estimated future year budget gaps based on a range of
assumptions including future Scottish Government funding, inflation, Council
tax increases and future interest rates. The consequences of the decisions
taken by Council on 9 March to agree a balanced 2022/23 budget increased
the cumulative estimated future budget gap in the best case, mid-range and
worst case scenarios as set out in Exhibit 1.
Item 8
Page 71

Page 4

Exhibit 1 – Future Year Estimated Budget Gaps
9 March 2022 Budget Post Budget Setting
Budget Gap 2023/24
£000
2024/25
£000
2023/24
£000
2024/25
£000
Best Case 11,738 14,553 11,712 14,521
Mid-Range 13,787 18,654 13,761 18,622
Worst Case 16,586 24,255 16,560 24,223
3.2 Appendix 1 provides further detail on how the mid-range estimated budget
gap was affected by the decisions made when setting the 2022/23 budget on
9 March 2022. 
4. MAIN ISSUES
4.1 Since the budget was agreed on 9 March 2022 I have revisited the key
assumptions detailed in the 9 March Budget Paper. This is summarised in the
paragraphs below.
4.2 Scottish Government Finance Settlement  and Resource Spending Review
On 9 March 2022 I reported assumptions in respect of future years Scottish
Government funding of a prudent estimate of a reduction in funding of:
• 0.5% in the best case scenario
• 1.0% in the mid-range scenario
• 1.5% in the worst case.
4.3 On the 31 May 2022 the Scottish Government published its Resource Spending
Review providing insight into strategic priorities and highlighting the scale of ongoing
challenges for councils and the wider public sector.
4.4 The Resource Spending Review is high level at this time and based on ‘Level 2’
funding positions over the next four years.  ‘Level 2’ does not provide councils with
their specific allocations which would provide for more detailed financial planning
however it is sufficient to provide an overview of Scottish Government intentions.
4.5 Analysis of these priorities confirms the Scottish Government has chosen to prioritise
Health & Social Care and Social Security spending relative to councils.  Taken
together these two priority areas account for 90% of the increase in the day-to-day
spending budget from 2022/23 to 2026/27.  Exhibit 2 shows the spending allocations
by portfolio, in real terms over this period relative to other ‘Level 2’ allocations
4.6 Exhibit 2 - Spending Allocations by portfolio, in real terms, based on 2022/23 = 100
Page 72

Page 5

4.7 The Resource Spending Review states that Council funding will remain as ‘flat
cash’ (at current 2022/23 levels) until 2025/26 with a £100m added in
2026/27. However Exhibit 2 shows that the real term impact (taking inflation
into account) for the next four years is a continuing erosion of core funding for
councils with a 7% reduction between 2022/23 and 2026/27.  A “flat-cash”
settlement ignores the impact on Local Government of the material increases
in inflation and energy costs and requires councils to absorb the full cost of
any pay awards.
On the basis of the ‘flat cash’ announcement I have changed my funding
assumptions to:
• Best Case - Flat Cash
• Mid-Range – Flat Cash
• Worst Case - 1.0% reduction.
This reduces the estimated mid-range budget gap in 2022/23 by £1.927m.
4.8 In 2022/23 there was an additional £120m funding distribution at Stage 2 of
the Budget Bill (announced 27 January 2022) of which the Council’s share
was £2.186m. The advice from the Scottish Government at that time was that
this funding was non-recurring and for this reason that funding was not built
into my projections reported to Council on 9 March 2022. A letter to all Council
Leaders from the Cabinet Sectary for Finance and Economy dated 31 May
2022 confirms that
“Reflecting the fact that Local Authorities are key partners in the delivery of the
priorities set out by the spending review, the spending review baselines the
£120 million added during the 2022-23 Budget Bill process”
On that basis the £2.186m funding is now recurring and the estimated budget
Page 73

Page 6

gap has been adjusted accordingly.
4.9 Council Tax Increases
The budget gaps referred to in paragraph 3.1 include an assumption of a 3%
increase in Council Tax as historically this has always been built into the
Council’s long term financial strategy.  However setting the Council Tax is
subject to a political decision when agreeing the budget as it is a measure
available to help close the budget gap.  As such I have adjusted the budget
gap to remove this assumption and will report on future budget gaps on this
basis going forward.  This adds an estimated £1.110m to the budget gap in
each scenario (£0.370m per 1%).
4.10 Non-Pay Inflation
Inflation is included in future year budget estimates where it is considered
necessary to ensure budgets are adjusted to reflect expected increases in
costs.  The assumption in the budget report on 9 March 2022 was that, in
2023/24, the same level of 2022/23 non-pay inflation was built into the best
case and mid-range scenarios with an additional £0.500m general inflation
built into the worst case scenario in future years.  Exhibit 3 shows how RPI
has increased over the past 12 months
Exhibit 3 – Increase in RPI  since May 2021
4.11 In their last economic outlook (published March 2022) the Office of Budget
Responsibility stated
‘We forecast RPI inflation to reach 10.5 per cent in April 2022, and peak at
almost 11 per cent in the last quarter of 2022 then to fall back over the next
two years’
Based on the projections I am of the opinion it would be prudent to change my
assumptions relating to non-pay inflation.  My revised assumptions are to
apply the same level of non-pay inflation that was applied in the budget report
on 9 March 2022 but to apply an additional general inflation of £0.250m in the
best case scenario, £0.500m in the mid-range and £0.750m in the worst case
scenario.
4.12 It may be that the inflation could rise to a peak and then fall again and this
Page 74

Page 7

would alter future year estimates however this is very difficult to predict and
the estimates will be kept under review.  
4.13 Bank Interest Rates
Link (the Council’s Treasury Advisors) have recently published their latest
interest rate forecast and are forecasting that the Monetary Policy Committee
will increase the bank rate at a much faster pace throughout 2022 to try and
keep inflation in check. Their current forecast is a 0.25% increase in June (to
1.25%) with further 0.25% increases in each subsequent quarter with the rate
peaking at 2% by the end of quarter 1 in 2023. 
A sizeable proportion of the Council debt is short term borrowing which, by
nature, requires to be re-borrowed regularly and is therefore subject to
fluctuations in interest rates. An increasing bank base rate is likely to have an
impact on future PWLB rates which is likely to be the source of funding for
future capital investment, as well as transferring some short term borrowing
into longer term borrowing. 
Re-borrowing of current shorter term debt and borrowing to fund the capital
programme will be impacted by increased interest rates resulting in an
increase in the cost of borrowing which will need to be absorbed by the
revenue budget.   
The current short term PWLB rates of interest range between 1% and 1.3%
depending on the length of loan which compares with assumptions built into
the Council budget of 0.85% in 2023/24 and 2024/25.
I have revised these assumptions to rates of 1.4% in 2023/24 and 1.8% in
2024/25 in the best case and mid-range scenario with the worst case scenario
being 0.2% higher in each year.  This creates cost pressures of:
• Best Case - £0.787m in 2023/24, £1.674m in 2024/25
• Mid-Range - £0.787m in 2023/24, £1.674m in 2024/25
• Worst Case - £1.288m in 2023/24, £2.026m in 2024/25
4.14 Increasing Utility Costs
The energy price cap has increased from 1 April 2022, driven by a record rise
in global gas prices over the last six months, with wholesale prices
quadrupling in the last year.  This has been exacerbated by the recent
Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Gas
The Scottish Fuel Procurement framework’s purchasing strategy is to buy
circa 90% of customer gas consumption over a 2½ year period and leave the
remaining 10% to float on the day-ahead market, prior to consumption. This
strategy means most gas consumption for 2022/2023 has been purchased
and is protected, However, even with a low proportion left to purchase on the
day ahead markets, the record-breaking prices during these extraordinary
Page 75

Page 8

times have had a significant impact on outturn prices for 2022/23. Current
estimates are that the Council’s (gas costs will increase from £0.846m in
2021/22 to £2.068m in 2022/23 (an increase of 145%).  
Electricity
Whilst not as stark as the estimated increase in gas costs there are also
material increases in electricity unit prices with current estimates being that
the Council’s electricity  costs will increase from £3.13m in 2021/22 to
£4.069m in 2022/23 (an increase of 30%).
These 2022/23 increases will need to be absorbed within the existing 2022/23
budget agreed on 9 March 2022 however it is important that we reflect on
these increases when estimating future year cost pressures.    In 2023/24 I
have used the current estimated 2022/23 cost as a new baseline and
assumed utility inflation will revert back to be more in line with CPI so have
applied increases of 5.7%, 6.2% and 6.7% in the best case, mid-range and
worst case scenarios respectively.  However as utility prices are currently very
volatile this is an area that will kept under regular review.
On the basis of this I have created a further cost pressure in 2023/24 of
£1.737m and in 2024/25 of £1.746m (cumulatively)  
Other Cost Pressures
4.15 Generally services work on the basis of having to contain any cost pressures
within current resources, however, there are cost pressures which are
unavoidable and need to be factored into future budget processes. Historically
these have been brought forward on an annual basis as ‘burdens’ when the
Council sets its budget. However as this report is updating the estimated
future budget gaps I have decided that any new cost pressure should be
highlighted now rather than later as part of the budget process.
4.16 Since the Council meeting on 9 March 2022 the following changes have been
made to the cost pressures in in the mid-range scenario in 2023/24 and
beyond.
Service Cost Pressure 2023/24
(£,000)
2024/25
(£,000)
Finance Additional cost for software to meet
required Payment Card Industry standards
for taking card payments by telephone.
15 15
ICT Estimated increase in ICT license costs due
to increase in users and anticipated
reduction in public sector discount.
200 200
ICT Estimated increase in cost of hosting cloud
services which will shortly be subject to
tendering.
100 200
Roads In the second half of 2021 there were well
documented upward pressures on building
212 212
Page 76

Page 9

material costs and these pressures have
been greatly exacerbated since the
invasion of Ukraine. Material prices for
bitumen in particular are up 30%.
Total 527 627
Pay Award Update
4.17 There is a mid-range assumption built into the base budget of a 2% pay award
in 2022/23 (1.5% best case and 2.5% worst case) however that pay award
has still to be agreed. If the pay award is greater than the 2% assumption then
this will create a further pressure on the revenue budget in 2023/24 and future
years.  
4.18 In March 2022, COSLA Leaders agreed to make an undifferentiated offer of a
2% uplift to all bargaining groups on the basis of parity for all which has been
both a key concern and agreed position for the past number of years.  All
Unions have rejected this initial offer and negotiations are ongoing.  
4.19 The COSLA remuneration advisory group, made up of advisors from the
Society of Local Authority Chief Executives (SOLACE), The Directors of
Finance and the Society of Personnel and Development Scotland (SPDS) has
noted the constraints on Local Government funding, with two thirds of
Councils having budgeted for a pay increase of 2% or less.  The 2% increase
is deemed to be affordable, hence why that is the assumption that has been
built into the budget.
4.20 On 30 May 2022 the COSLA Spokesperson for Resources wrote to the First
Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Finance and the Economy on behalf of all
32 Scottish Council Leaders to seek an urgent meeting to discuss the ongoing
impact of the rising cost of living on local government employees and to
further discuss what support the Scottish Government can provide to ensure a
revised pay offer can be made which provides parity across the public sector.
In a reply to COSLA’s Resources Spokesperson dated 9 June the Cabinet
Secretary indicating that she believes it would not be appropriate to meet, as
the Scottish Government has never had a seat in local government pay
negotiations and any intervention now would undermine that long-held
position.
4.21 The latest Office for National Statistics (ONS) data shows average weekly
earnings, excluding bonuses, rising by 4% (annually), for the three months to
February 2022.  Within the ‘overall’ average, total pay growth for the private
sector was 6.2% in the three months to February 2022, while for the public
sector it was 1.9%.  
4.22 Every 1% increase in pay over and above the budgeted 2% would add an
additional pressure of circa £1.5m. However I have not amended my
assumption of a 2% award in the mid-range at the current time.  I have
however changed my best case assumption to be 2% and worst case to be
4%.
Page 77

Page 10

Revised Mid-Range Estimated Budget Gap
4.23 Exhibit 4a sets out the revised cumulative estimated budget gap in the mid-
range in 2023/24 and 204/25 and Exhibit 4b summarises the total cumulative
budget gaps in all three scenarios. 
4.24 Exhibit 4a – Revised Mid-Range Estimated Budget Gaps (Cumulative)
Para
Ref
2023/24
£000
2024/25
£000
Budget Gap Post 9 March 2022 Budget 3.1 13,761 18,622
Change to future funding assumption 4.7 (1,927) (3,854)
Baselining £120m Funding 4.8 (2,186) (2,186)
Remove 3% Council Tax Assumption 4.9 1,110 2,220
Increase to non-pay inflation 4.11 500 1,000
Impact of Bank Interest Rate 4.13 787 1,674
Increased Utility Costs 4.14 1,737 1,746
Other Cost Pressures 4.15 527 627
Revised Budget Gap 14,309 19,849
Exhibit 4b – Estimated Budget Gaps (Cumulative) – Scenario Analysis
Budget Gap 2023/24
£000
2024/25
£000
Best Case 13,636 18,709
Mid-Range 14,309 19,849
Worst Case 22,164 34,724
Summary of General Fund Reserves
4.25 A key aspect of the Council’s financial position is a consideration of the
relevant reserve balances.  The Council’s Reserves Policy states that the core
“Prudential” Reserve be maintained at a level of 2% of net expenditure
(excluding requisitions). This equates to £3.123m for 2022/23.  Exhibit 5
summarises the Council’s reserve position as at 31 March 2022 (based on the
unaudited accounts). 
4.26 Exhibit 5 – General Fund Reserves at 31 March 2022 (unaudited accounts)
£,000 £,000
Prudential Reserve 3,123
Free Reserves 372
Total Unearmarked Reserves 3,495
Change Fund 1,257
General ‘Free’ COVID Funds (ref para 4.32) 1,244
Committed General COVID Funds for 2022/23
Budget (ref para 4.32)
2,058
COVID Specific Funds 3,378
Budget Commitments 1,219
Young Person’s Guarantee 1,018
Legal/HR Commitments 210
Page 78

Page 11

Historic Abuse Cases 150
Scottish Welfare Fund 129
Other (under 100k) 861
Total Earmarked Reserves 11,524
Total Reserves 15,019
4.27 Exhibit 5 shows that, subject to post audit adjustments, the Council only has
£0.372m in free reserves over and above the prudential target. The remaining
reserves are earmarked for specific purposes which means there is limited
scope to fund any transformation programmes from existing reserves. 
2023/24 Budget Process
4.28 Given the scale of the financial challenge facing the Council in 2023/24 and
future years, it is important that immediate progress is made to identify saving
options with momentum on this maintained between now and setting the
budget in March 2023. The Senior Leadership Team (SLT) held a finance
workshop on 26 April 2022 to commence the process with a follow up meeting
held on 31 May to further discuss emerging options.  To support this process
the SLT has established monthly meetings to develop and progress saving
options which will be presented to members for their consideration at an
appropriate time.
COVID Funding Update
4.29 During 2021/22 officers continued to monitor the financial impact of COVID on
the Council’s revenue positon and reported on this through budget control
reports taken to Committees and full Council. £4.488m of general COVID
funding was made available in 2021/22 which was added to the £1.972m
which had been carried forward from 2020/21. 
4.30 During 2021/22 the Council exercised the Loans Fund Principal Repayment
Holiday and Use of Capital Receipts financial flexibilities approved by the UK
Government and Scottish Government to help councils respond to the
financial pressures faced by local authorities as a result of the COVID
pandemic.  This will be formally reported to Council in August 2022 when the
Council’s draft 2021/22 financial statements are presented.
4.31 The Loans Fund Principal Repayment Holiday allows the Council to take a
loans fund payment holiday in 2021/22 on the condition the amount not repaid
in year would by fully paid over a 20 year period. The in year principal
payment would have been £1.673m which the Council would have paid using
in year capital receipts. £0.362m of this was used to fund a shortfall in capital
receipts during 2021/22 which left a balance of £1.311m of capital receipts. 
Exercising the Use of Capital Receipts financial flexibility means this £1.311m
can be used to fund COVID cost pressures. Exhibit 6 summarises the current
positon in relation to COVID funds.
4.32 Exhibit 6 – General COVID Funds as at 31 March 2022
£,000 £,000
Page 79

Page 12

2020/21 COVID Funding Carried Forward 1,972
2021/22 COVID Funding 4,488
Financial Flexibilities 1,311
Total Available COVID Funding in 2021/22 7,771
2021/22 COVID Spend (4,469)
Total Estimated COVID Funding to Carry
Forward into 2022/23
3,302
Estimated 2022/23 COVID Expenditure 2,058
Available General COVID Funding 1,244
4.33 In February 2022 the Scottish Government announced an £80m Local
Authority COVID Economic Recovery (LACER) Fund. The Council’s share of
this is £1.458m. The fund provided via the General Revenue Grant and
Scottish Government expectations are that it will be fully utilised during
2022/23.  The Scottish Government proposed the following principles of spend
to guide how the fund should be used by local authorities:
• Interventions that support local economic recovery and contribute to
businesses being able to move from surviving the period of trading
restrictions towards recovery, growth, adaptation and building
resilience.
• Projects that can rebuild consumer confidence and stimulate demand
and economic activity in their specific contexts.
• To support the low-income households that are disproportionately
impacted by the pandemic and the current cost of living crisis, to
become more economically active.
4.34 This funding has not been included in the general COVID funding table above
as the proposed principles means there are restrictions on use. Exhibit 7 sets
out the expenditure agreed at the Council budget meeting on 9 March 2022
which is to be funded by LACER.
4.35 Exhibit 7 – Expenditure to be funded by LACER
£,000
Four year modern apprenticeship scheme (£250k per annum) 250
Cost of Living Crisis Fund 400
Double School Clothing Grant 774
COVID Compliance Officers 101
Total 1,525*
*£1.458m of this will be funded by the LACER fund with the balance of
£0.067m funded from general COVID funding – this has been included in the
table at Exhibit 6.
4.36 There is still to be a decision made on the use of the £0.400m cost of living
crisis fund highlighted in Exhibit 7.
Other Issues
4.37 This section sets out other areas which impact on the Council’s revenue
budget which members may wish to consider when considering options to
Page 80

Page 13

balance the budget. No decisions on these items are required at the current
time, they are simply provided for information. 
4.38 Health and Social Care Partnership
The Council, at the budget meeting on 9 March 2022, agreed an HSCP
requisition of £81.4m (subsequently increased to £81.8m to reflect the final
confirmation by the Scottish Government of the allocation of funding
commitment). There is a working assumption that the future allocation to the
HSCP is on the basis of ‘flat cash’ plus the appropriate share of the Health &
Social Care funding commitments. However this is only an assumption and
the HSCP requisition will be a matter for Council to consider as part of the
budget process.   The Council should also seek ongoing engagement with the
HSCP on how the funds available to both the Council and the HSCP are best
targeted at delivering outcomes for the people of West Dunbartonshire. 
4.39 Residential Care Costs
At the 9 March 2022 Budget Setting Council meeting the Council agreed to a
budget assumption to amend the split of incurred costs for residential care
from a 50%/50% split between the HSCP and Education to a 77% HSCP/23%
Education split.  The motion asked officers to carry out an evaluation and
make a recommendation to a future Council on the division of this budget.
That evaluation is ongoing and it is hoped to bring a report back to Council in
August to present its conclusions. If the report concludes a split materially
different from the assumed 77%/23% split then this will affect the future
budget gap.  
4.40 West Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust (WDLT)
The Council provides a management fee to WDLT which is subject to
approval as part of the annual budget setting process. The 2022/23 fee was
£4.16m. Since the Trust was founded, the Council has underwritten uplifts in
employee costs and increases in utility costs.  The Trust is bound under the
terms of its agreement to honour Council terms and conditions for employees
and also any nationally agreed pay increases for the local government
workforce. However, the SLA states the Trust will be responsible for all
revenue expenditure relating to the operation of the properties and delivery of
the services unless it is detailed in this Services Specification as being the
responsibility of the Council. Therefore there is scope to increase the
management fee and/or no longer meet the payment of utility charges.
4.41 Capital Programme
The Council receives a general capital grant from the Scottish Government
each year (approximately £6m). Any spend above this level, not funded from
other grants is funded through borrowing. Capital expenditure funded from
borrowing results in revenue loan charges ongoing until the borrowing is fully
repaid. Therefore, any reduction in the capital programme will result in
revenue savings over a longer period of time (depending on the type of spend,
Page 81

Page 14

this could be over 5 years or 60 years).
4.42 The Council’s current capital programme (as agreed by Council on 9 March
2022) has total expenditure of £453.8m of which £178.2m relates to prior
years (including 2021/22) and is already spent. This leaves £275.6m of
planned capital expenditure over the nine year period 2022/23 and 2030/31.
Given the current rates of inflation it is likely that this projected planned
expenditure will increase. 
4.43 Based on current assumptions about levels of future capital grant funding,
matched funding and capital receipts this will require to be funded by at least
£166.7m of prudential borrowing. As per paragraph 4.13 rises in interest rates
are impacting the affordability of capital programmes due to the cost of
borrowing.
Officers will review the current capital programme to identify options for
reducing future capital expenditure, and the subsequent impact on the
revenue budget, and bring forward a report to members at a later date.  This
review will consider factors such as:
• legal and health and safety obligations
• impact on service delivery
• affordability
• impact on the value and life of the assets
• potential for increased repair costs if ageing assets are not replaced.
4.44 Council Tax
As per paragraph 4.9 the estimated budget gap makes no assumptions over
future Council Tax increases.  This will be a matter for Council to decide
however, by means of illustration, a 3% increase would generate
approximately £1.110m in revenue.
4.45 Service Concession Financial Flexibility
The Resource Spending Review agreed to the service concession financial
flexibility to model debt over the life of the asset rather than the life of the
contract. The letter from the Cabinet Secretary to Council Leaders says
I am willing to accede to the request to recognise principal debt repayments
over the asset life and for this approach to be applied retrospectively. I will
also agree that this may apply to the grant funded element of the principal
debt repayments. . This flexibility will only apply to existing service
concessions and each local authority will be responsible for fully evaluating
any change in method and making appropriate financial provision. The
decision for making any change must be taken by the Council, that is, it may
not be delegated. 
It is too early to say what the implications of this are for the Council. I will
engage with our Treasury Advisors on this and update Members soon as
possible.
Page 82

Page 15

5. PEOPLE IMPLICATIONS
5.1 None directly from this report but there is a strong link between HR and
budgets.
6. FINANCIAL AND PROCUREMENT IMPLICATIONS
6.1 Sets out the estimated revenue budget gaps in 2023/24 and 2024/25. There
are no direct procurement implications arising from this report.
7. RISK ANALYSIS
7.1 None directly from this report but any proposals to address the estimated
budget gap will need to consider risk.
8. EQUALITIES IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
8.1 None directly from this report but any proposals to address the estimated
budget gap will need to consider equality issues.
9. CONSULTATION
9.1 The views of all Chief Officers have been requested on this report and
feedback incorporated herein.
10. STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT
10.1 Proper budgetary control and sound financial practice are cornerstones of
good governance and support Council and officers to pursue the 5 strategic
priorities of the Council’s Strategic Plan.
10.2 The General Services revenue budget contributes to all categories by
providing funding in specific areas to help the Council achieve and develop
these priorities.  
Laurence Slavin
Chief Officer - Resources
Date:   22 June 2022
Person to Contact: Laurence Slavin, Chief Officer - Resources
E-mail: laurence.slavin@west-dunbarton.gov.uk
Appendices
Appendix 1 – Impact of 2022/23 budget decisions on estimated future budget
gaps
Background Papers
Budget Report to Council - 9 March 2022
Page 83

Page 16

Appendix 1 – Impact of 2022/23 budget decisions on estimated future
budget gaps
2023/24 2024/25
9 March Budget Report Estimated Mid-Range Gap 13,787 18,654
9 March 2023 Council Decisions
Review of HSCP/Education Residential Care Costs -1,365 -1,365
Additional Committee Resource 30 30
Apprentice Programme 250 250
Additional Environmental Health Resource 101 101
Double School Clothing Grant 774 774
HSCP Funding 61 61
Recurring Savings Options Taken -63 -63
Freezing Taxi License Fee  9 9
Loans Fund Cost of New Capital Projects 175 173
Updated Estimated Mid-Range Budget Gap 13,759 18,624
Rounding Adjustment 2 -2
Estimates Book Budget Gap 13,761 18,622
Page 84

Page 17

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL
Report by Chief Executive 
Council:  22 June 2022
___________________________________________________________________
Subject: Towards 2030
1. Purpose
1.1 This report sets out the progress of the Council over the last decade, and
highlights the key challenges moving forward towards 2030.
2. Recommendations
2.1 It is recommended Council:
- notes this paper and considers the journey so far as well as key issues
pertaining to the future.
3. Background
Our Council
3.1 The Council has undergone a journey of transformation over the last decade
underpinned by investment in people and assets and significant regeneration
to progress towards West Dunbartonshire as the best place in Scotland to
live, work, learn, visit and invest.
3.2 In 2011 the Council was praised by the Accounts Commission for "significant
progress" and “effective and improved leadership of councillors and officers,
sharing a commitment to making improvements”, marking a dramatic recovery
from 2006 when the authority had received the spending watchdog's most
severe sanction. Progress has been consist since with ongoing external
recognition, highlights include:
Annual report 2017/18 – Audit Scotland
The Best Value Assurance Report (BVAR) published in June stated that West
Dunbartonshire Council had made significant improvements in how it works
over the last ten years. The Council demonstrates a focus on delivering Best
Value and there was evidence of continuous improvement in its services. In
August 2018, the Council agreed a Best Value Assurance Improvement Plan
to address all the recommendations included in the BVAR with progress
reported in the Annual Audit Report.
Item 10
Page 85

Page 18

Annual report 2020/21 – Audit Scotland
Audit Scotland’s annual audit of the Council in 2020/21 highlighted that the
Council continued to make good progress in demonstrating evidence of
improvement in its services and has a clear focus on delivering Best Value
with effective systems in place to monitor and report its performance and drive
continuous improvement. A critical element in this is the strategic planning
process with a strategic plan developed every five years setting out the
priorities for the Council and annual delivery plans in place across every
service area to monitor progress against local and national performance
targets.
Regeneration
A number of regeneration projects have been completed in recent years,
transforming neighbourhoods, educational facilities, care homes,
infrastructure and leisure. These included the redevelopment of Clydebank
waterfront; developing West Dunbartonshire Energy Centre and district
heating system to use green energy to heat homes; the construction of our
award-winning offices in Dumbarton as part of our ongoing commitment to
regenerating our town centres; and the delivery of hundreds of new energy
efficient Council homes.
Recognition
There has been national recognition for achievements including a COSLA
award, becoming the first Council to receive the Nurturing Schools Award, our
new Dumbarton offices being named Regeneration Project of the Year and
been awarded Heat Pump of the Year as well as being listed in the Top 10 of
flexible employers in Scotland.
3.3 Covid Response
Throughout 2021/22 COVID continued to provide unprecedented challenges
for delivery of Council services which included managing the impact of
changes to national restrictions, especially as a result of rising infection rates
due to the emergence of the Omicron variant. The Council’s Strategic
Resilience Group (SRG) and the Operational Resilience Group (ORG) met to
discuss the challenges the pandemic presented with regular updates reported
to Council to ensure elected members were fully updated on the impact
across all services. These included:
Page 86

Page 19

Service Impact and Action Taken
Education  Continued to respond and adapt to the regularly updated
Scottish Government ‘Reducing Risks in Schools Guidance’
issuing Education Leaders with the relevant advice and support
to maintain the necessary protective measures for operational
delivery of the service.
 Continued to work with colleagues in Environmental Health and
Corporate Health and Safety to ensure enhanced and rigorous
COVID Safe Protocols and COVID Risk Assessments in place.
 Delivered the schools and ELC’s Asymptomatic Testing
Programme to support twice weekly lateral flow testing for staff
and secondary school pupils to minimise the spread of COVID.
 Significant operational challenges faced by the service through
the numbers of positive COVID cases among staff and children
and young people. Staff showed great commitment and effort to
ensuring there has been minimal disruption to the learning for
children and young people.
 Created agile and flexible working plans to offset the impact of
staff or child/young person absence which provided continuous
service across all schools and ELC’s. This was supported by
remote/blended learning.
 Continued to enhance the digital technologies inclusion
provision to support remote/blended learning.
 Re-established programme of transition experiences for
children and young people entering P1 or S1.
 Provided financial and food support to families requiring most
support.
 Closely monitored CO2 levels across the learning estate.
 Provided free summer 2021 Activity Programme.
Citizen,
Culture and
Facilities
 Providing enhanced cleaning in Council premises including
schools and nurseries.
 Processing £1m of Self-Isolation Support Grants.
 Recruited additional staff to ensure capacity to engage with
citizens on issues being experienced with housing repairs due
to the impact of COVID.
Supply,
Distribution &
Property
 With restrictions in place during the pandemic, internal works
such as housing repairs could not be undertaken, except for
emergencies.  This resulted in a significant backlog or
work.  Restrictions were lifted 26 April and an action plan was
put in place to address outstanding repairs and improve
performance where possible. However, continuous high levels
of COVID related absence, together with the national skills
Page 87

Page 20

shortage in trades, impacted on the ability of building services
to deal with the backlog as well as newly reported repairs.
 Monitored and reported progress regularly to the Chief
Executive and elected members.
 Maintained communication with tenants through appropriate
forums including tenant groups, housing news, social media,
and text messaging.
People &
Technology
 All teams continued to deliver full service to support the
organisation and maintain essential service delivery during
pandemic.
 Delivered a managed ‘Return to Office’ programme designed to
deliver a safe, gradual return with appropriate restrictions
maintained to protect our employees.
 Implemented enhanced ICT security measures to better
support employees and Members working in hybrid
environment and to protect the organisation.
 Actively supported the recruitment and associated contracts
and payment of over 80 COVID recovery posts and over 50
Vaccination support team posts
Housing &
Employability
 Established a number of community based facilities to allow the
Communities Team to engage with the community.
 Increased focus on homelessness prevention working with
landlords and introducing a Tenant Support Fund.
 Maintained communication with tenants through appropriate
forums including tenant groups, housing news, social media,
and text messaging.
 Over the course of the pandemic delivered 316 new homes.
 Working 4U established remote community hubs from which
they delivered one-to-one and group support services and
established and managed a crisis support service which has
also informed future priorities
 Implemented revised working practices to deliver services
across Housing Operations during the pandemic in line with
restrictions.
 Allocated over 900 houses despite pandemic restrictions.
 Neighbourhood team and caretaking service continued to
operate in communities during the pandemic
Page 88

Page 21

Regulatory &
Regeneration
 Visited and provided advice to businesses to ensure they are
aware of applicable health protection guidance and that they
continue to operate in a safe manner.
 Changed to deliver services remotely including registration of
deaths.
 Delivered a range of sector specific Scottish Government
COVID grants across our business community.
Resources  Continued to update their estimates of the cost of COVID to
ensure Scottish Government funding was allocated
appropriately.
 Supported local communities by processing COVID hardship
payments, free school meal payments.
 Adapted interventions to meet emerging needs including
allocation of funds to foodbank support, Scottish Welfare fund
top ups and additional support for people facing housing rent
and council tax pressures.
4. Main Issues
4.1 Over the past year, West Dunbartonshire has had to address the twin tasks of
managing the Covid-19 pandemic and beginning the recovery in our
communities, services and economy. We continue to adapt and evolve our
approach to ensure we deliver to the public at a time when public bodies have
been under more pressure than ever experienced. This has meant learning
new ways of delivering services, as well as refocusing our resources to
ensure that we address the key issues. At the same time, we have also been
ensuring we have the capacity and skills to fully respond to what our citizens
need.
The Council and the Community Planning Partnership have a pivotal role in
supporting and working with communities and now must lead recovery work
with and alongside our local communities, focusing on getting the services
people need in place as pressures and stresses escalate and impact the day
to day lives of individuals and communities.
A report from the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has warned that the
Scottish Government will face "tough decisions" between "axing, taxing or
hoping for extra funding" in its multi-year resource spending review. 
Significant pressure will be all around us as we move towards 2030 and
deliver for our communities. Some difficult choices will be required to be made
Page 89

Page 22

as the economic impact of events including the pandemic and Brexit continue
to take hold and the cost of living continues to rise.
COSLA has written to the Scottish Government seeking funding for a more
generous pay deal for local government workers - with Council leaders
backing a call for a "significant pay increase" for Council workers facing
soaring inflation, to be "funded by the Scottish Government". Council leaders
supported urgent calls for the First Minister and Finance Secretary to demand
"the additional funding necessary to make such an enhanced pay offer", and
for a meeting between the Scottish Government, COSLA and trade unions, "to
press the case for sustainable long term funding for Local Government."
As we move forwards the priorities are around:
 Developing our Strategic Plan for 2022-27
 Balancing the finances - both revenue and reviewing capital
investment plans
 Responding to the soaring cost of living and poverty
 Building the wealth of our communities
 Further developing partnership working with communities, public
sector agencies and the third sector
Facing the challenges together is key and both Council and partners must
focus on:
 Boosting our economy, creating good jobs and investment
opportunities
 Addressing the cost of living crisis, tackling fuel poverty
 Education of our workforce and our people
 Sustainability and delivering on net zero
 Caring for our people
 Looking after our environment
We must create prosperity and jobs, good homes and continue our efforts to
position West Dunbartonshire as a destination of choice to live, work, learn,
visit and invest.  . 
Through our passion, imagination, commitment, integrity and demonstrating
our values of ACHIEVE (Ambition, Confidence, Honesty, Innovation,
Efficiency, Vibrancy and Excellence) we must focus on critical areas outlined
below. Although by no means an exhaustive list, this demonstrates the
complexity and challenges we will face as one of the 32 Council areas across
Scotland.
• Delivering within tight budgets, financial constraints and with increasing cost
pressures.
• Regeneration of sites and job creation
Page 90

Page 23

• Raising attainment
• Accessing external funding
• Developing our town centre plans and 20 minute neighbourhoods
• Responding to the  Climate Emergency and delivering on the Scottish
Government’s net zero 2045 ambition
• Effectively running our new District Heating facility and addressing fuel
poverty in our communities
• Continuing to develop our new housing investment and housing services
• Providing opportunities for active and sustainable travel.
5. People Implications
5.1 A high proportion of the working population are employed in Public Sector
Scotland (about 48%) and currently the Council has around 6500 with
approximately 60-70% living within West Dunbartonshire. The dependency on
employment within the Council is critical to support our communities and the
prospect of a lack of funding to incentivise and support workforce investment
is a potential significant challenge. 
6. Financial and Procurement Implications
6.1 The Council, like all councils, faces significant financial challenges and is
required to operate within tight fiscal constraints for the foreseeable future due
to the continuing difficult national economic outlook and increased demand for
services. With so many external influences impacting on the economy,
forecasting remains very difficult. The COVID-19 pandemic has elicited a
fiscal response from the UK and Scottish Governments which is without
precedent in modern times with both governments releasing large sums of
funding to support the economy, households and frontline services in the
COVID-19 response to help protect jobs, businesses and livelihoods. 
6.2 Approximately 76% of the Council’s budget is supported by Aggregated
External Finance (AEF) from the Scottish Government. This includes general
revenue grant, specific grants and Non-Domestic Rate income. The remaining
24% is made up from Council Tax and other Council sources of finance e.g.
fees and charges. Consequently the Council has limited access to levers to
influence income levels.
6.3 In addition the Scottish Government currently produces single year financial
settlements for Local Government making it extremely challenging for the
Council to accurately estimate future funding levels. However on the 31 May
2022 the Scottish Government published its Resource Spending Review
providing insight into strategic priorities for the period up until 2026/27. Whilst
it does not provide councils with their specific allocations it is sufficient to
provide an overview of Scottish Government intentions. The Resource
Spending Review states that Council funding will remain as ‘flat cash’ (at
Page 91

Page 24

current 2022/23 levels) until 2025/26 with a £100m added in 2026/27. This
equates to a real term reduction (taking inflation into account) over the next
four years of 7% which represents a continuing erosion of core funding for
local government. A “flat-cash” settlement ignores the impact on Local
Government of the material increases in inflation and energy costs and
requires councils to absorb the full cost of any pay awards.
6.4 The further we look toward 2030 the greater the uncertainty about the
financial challenges the Council will face. In addition to the extent to which
COVID-19 will continue to affect the national economy there are a number of
further key issues which are likely to impact on the Council’s revenue budget.
These include:
 the impact of population change/demographic shifts on funding levels
 future decisions of the Scottish Government regarding funding provided
for Local Government and protection of other parts of the national
budget
 potential use of available tax raising powers
 continuance of Health and Social Care integration within a context of
increasing demand
 pension costs influenced by the impact of auto-enrolment
 costs associated with sustainability including waste disposal and
recycling, energy and fuel costs
 the impact of the Feeley review of the delivery of Adult Social Care.
7. Risk Analysis
7.1 The new Strategic Plan will detail the priorities for the Council over the next
five years and will be underpinned by performance indicators monitored and
reported on annually through the annual report. This framework will
demonstrate that the Council has robust processes in place to plan, manage
and improve performance. Failure to produce a strategic plan for the 5 year
term of the Council would be a significant risk.
7.2 Due to the ongoing reductions in funding, and uncertainty over future funding
levels, there is an inherent risk of there being insufficient financial resource to
meet current and future service requirements and provide much needed
support to the communities and businesses of West Dunbartonshire.  The
Council must continue to develop longer term financial planning, and maintain
robust budget preparation and monitoring processes, as well as continuing to
focus on transformational change to deliver services more efficiently and
effectively. 
Page 92

Page 25

8. Equalities Impact Assessment (EIA)
8.1 There are no direct issues relating to this report as it is for noting. An EIA will
be completed during the development of the new Strategic Plan 2022-27 
9. Consultation
9.1 This report has been compiled in consultation with some of the Chief Officers
and the newly appointed Chief Executive. 
10. Strategic Assessment
10.1 A new strategic plan is being developed for 2022-27 and will set out the
strategic priorities for the Council for the coming five years.
Page 93

Page 26

Name Joyce White OBE
Designation Chief Executive, West Dunbartonshire Council
Date:  10th June 2022
Person to Contact: Peter Hessett, Chief Officer – Regulatory &
Regeneration, Church Street Offices, Dumbarton
Telephone (01389) 737800
e-mail: peter.hessett@west-dunbarton.gov.uk
Laurence Slavin, Chief Officer - Resources,
Church Street Offices, Dumbarton   
Telephone (01389) 737191 
e-mail: laurence.slavin@west-dunbarton.gov.uk
Victoria Rogers, Chief Officer – People and Technology,
Church Street Offices, Dumbarton
Telephone 07795 266028
e-mail: victoria.rogers@west-dunbarton.gov.uk
Appendices: N/A
Background Papers: N/A
Wards Affected: N/A
Page 94

Page 27

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL
Report by: Chief Officer - Roads & Neighbourhood (Shared Service)
Council: 22 June 2022
Subject: Levelling Up Fund Round 2 - Proposed Bid
1. Purpose
1.1 This report seeks Council approval to submit a bid to the UK Levelling Up
Fund by the round 2 deadline of 6th July 2022.
2. Recommendations
2.1 It is recommended that Council:
i) Approves the proposed bid submission comprising the
Clydebank Transportation Hub and the Carless Access Road
(Scottish Marine Technology Park);
ii) Notes that should Carless Access Road not be able to proceed
further due to the assessment of the state aid position the
Kilbowie Roundabout project will be developed for submission:
and
iii) Authorises the commencement of the procurement processes
relating to the projects included in the bid.
3. Background
3.1 The first round of the Levelling Up Fund was announced at the 2020
Spending Review with an aim to support communities in realising this
vision. By focusing on capital investment in local infrastructure and
building on and consolidating prior programmes such as the Local Growth
Fund and the Towns Fund, the first round of the Levelling Up Fund
supported £1.7 billion of projects in over 100 local areas across all corners
of the UK, delivering over £170 million of funding in Scotland.
3.2 The Levelling Up Fund is a capital fund to address systemic weaknesses
in the economies of the UK’s towns and cities. Bids are invited by 6th July
2022 for round 2 of Levelling Up Funding which focuses on local transport
projects that make a genuine difference to local areas; town centre and
high street regeneration; and support for maintaining and expanding the
UK’s world-leading portfolio of cultural and heritage assets. The Fund is
jointly managed by HM Treasury (HMT) and UK Government
departments.
Item 11
Page 95

Page 28

3.3 The Levelling Up Fund Round 2 Guidance was published in March, and
further clarifications issued by Government during the following weeks. As
such, Councils had limited time to work up bids, less time than would
normally be taken to develop projects of this nature.
4. Main Issues
4.1 Levelling Up Funding will focus on projects requiring up to £20m. One
successful bid per MP area is allowed over the duration of the LUF
programme to 2024/25.  Funding re-submissions to subsequent rounds
are acceptable following an unsuccessful bid. Having one MP aligned
with our local authority boundary, the Council can only receive a
maximum of one award of up to £20M. Exceptionally, there is also
scope for larger high value transport projects. Bids above £20m and
below £50m will be accepted for transport projects only, such as road
schemes. They will be subject to a more detailed business case process
and will need to score highly overall. Bids in excess of £20 million must
be 90% Transportation based projects. Again as above, having one
MP, the maximum number of awards that the Council could receive
would be one. In both cases securing the support of the local MP is
advised but not essential.
4.2 West Dunbartonshire Council were successful, as part of round 1, in
securing funds for a project requiring up to £20m with the Dumbarton
Town Regeneration project. Therefore it is proposed to submit a bid for
a large scale Transportation Project as part of round 2.
4.3 The Levelling Up Funding Bids can be submitted as a package of two or
three projects, as long as their component elements are aligned and
represent a coherent set of interventions.
4.4 The second round of the Levelling Up Funding is open to projects that
can demonstrate spend from the Fund during the 2022-23 financial
year. All funding provided from the Fund is to be spent by 31 March
2025, and by 2025-26 on an exceptional basis, therefore favouring
shovel ready projects that are at an advanced stage of development or
can be developed in the timescale.
4.5 Should the submission be unsuccessful it may be resubmitted for
consideration for Levelling Up Fund 3.
4.6 There is a three-stage approach to the competitive Levelling Up
Funding assessment and decision making:
▪ Stage 1 Gateway: This stage is pass/fail. It requires confirmation
of some Levelling Up Funding expenditure in 2022-23.
Page 96

Page 29

▪ Stage 2 Assessment and Shortlisting: Bids will be assessed
against four equally weighted criteria. A short-list will be
developed from the highest scoring bids and those who score at
least average or above on strategic fit, value for money and
deliverability:
o Characteristics of the place – each local authority is
categorised 1-3 based on the funding assessment metrics,
with West Dunbartonshire Council in Category 1.
o Deliverability - will be gauged by the availability of
supplementary finance, management and commercial
cases, with bids which demonstrate investment (or start
delivery) in financial year 2022-23.
o Strategic fit with local and Fund priorities –should be
addressed in the submission strategic case and should
include stakeholder support.
o Value for money – an economic case is required to
explain project benefits and how it represents value for
money.
▪ Stage 3 Decision Making: Following bid assessment and
moderation, Ministers will make funding decisions. This is expected
in Autumn 2022.
5. Options Appraisal
5.1 With a short turnaround between being provided with the details of the
Funds at the end of March and the 6th July deadline, officers produced a
range of prospective bids that could potentially meet Levelling Up Funding
eligibility criteria and assessed which would be at a sufficiently advanced
stage to submit a bid in round 2. This process entailed drawing up a long
list of 9 prospective bids and agreeing a scoring mechanism that reflected
Levelling Up Funding criteria as well as Council’s corporate priorities. With
input from senior officers across all relevant Services, projects were then
ranked 1st to 9th, with Clydebank Transport Hub ranked number 1 and
Carless Access Road, Scottish Marine Technology Park, ranked number
2. 
It has been identified that there may a risk to delivery of the Carless
Access Road in relation to state aid and the detail of this is contained
within section 11.2 of the report.  Should legal advice assess that the
Carless Access Road can not be progressed due to the state aid position
it is proposed to include the third ranked project which is Kilbowie
Roundabout Improvements.
The prospective projects considered are outlined on the table below:
Page 97

Page 30

Rank Prospective Project Comments
1 Clydebank Transport
Hub
Strong support from SPT, forms
part of Clydebank Master Plan
with initial designs and costing
already completed. Links well
with LUF2 themes
2 Carless Access Road
(Scottish Marine
Technology Park)
Supports regeneration and local
development plan 2 and links
with LUF2 themes
3 Kilbowie Roundabout
Improvements
Would improve connectivity, bus
priority, reduce congestion and
emissions. Limited design
information at current stage. 
Links well to LUF2 themes
4 A813 Road, Cycle and
Footway Improvements
Currently phase 1 funding
available from Sustrans.
Requires land purchase. Does
not have economic benefit
assessment
5 A813 Ladyton Junction
Improvement
Linked to above project but only
at concept stage
6 A811 Walking and
Cycle Improvements
Several issues with purchasing
of adjacent land and final design
and economic benefits still to be
concluded
7 Alexandria Gyratory Supported by Alexandria
masterplan. Would need
significant design work and
further consultation
8 A812 Improvements Would be difficult to deliver
within timescales
9 Levengrove Park
Bridge
No existing business case.
Doesn’t align to criteria
6. Clydebank Transport Hub
6.1 Clydebank Rail and Bus Stations are located adjacent to each other on
Chalmers Street, immediately south of Clydebank Town Centre. Both
stations are located within a constrained road network which is expected to
exceed its operational capacity in the coming years, with the public transport
and active travel networks providing the only real options to support the
regeneration and inclusive economic growth that is expected to take place
within Clydebank and the wider Dunbartonshire area.
6.2 From an infrastructure point of view, the existing rail station facilities are non-
compliant by the current standards (“Design Standards for Accessible
Stations1”). The rail station facilities are not fit for purpose as they do not
facilitate adequate access and egress for mobility impaired users.
Page 98

Page 31

6.3 In terms of passenger demand, the existing facilities are currently catering for
400k rail passengers and 2 million bus passengers per year. There are a
number of major regeneration development proposals in the vicinity of the
rail and bus stations as well as in the wider Clydebank area. These are all
expected to contribute to increased bus and rail demand, with an increase to
700k rail passengers and 2.5 million bus passengers by 2029.
6.4 The Transport Hub will incorporate Clydebank Central Station, the bus
station and infrastructure for active travel to encourage walking and cycling.
The main objective being enhanced bus facilities, improved footways and
public realm space. It will compliment and integrate with the railway station
improvements providing better disabled access to both platforms.  
6.5 The Improved Transport Hub supports the long term regeneration vision for
Clydebank by establishing the North – South link between Queens Quay
Titian Boulevard – Hume Street and potential enhancement of Abbotsford
Road to the Forth and Clyde canal / National Cycle route and the shopping
centre.  The scheme offers enhanced access and egress for all mobilities to
Sylvania Way and Alexander Street.
6.6 The strategic need for a new transport hub in Clydebank has been identified
through a full review of the existing, and emerging, national, regional and
local policy and an in depth look at the previous studies which have been
carried out in the Clydebank Area which relate to transport network in
Clydebank. It supports the long-term vision of Clydebank and the delivery of
regional and local policy aspirations for the town and wider area of West
Dunbartonshire
6.7 The proposed Clydebank Transport Hub will support regeneration within
Clydebank, helping to create a sense of place / identity and reducing the
sense of severance with the railway line and the A814 Glasgow / Dumbarton
Road, while also improving accessibility and personal security. In terms of
environmental benefits, the proposed transport hub is expected to remove a
total of almost one million car km from the road network over the 25-year
assessment period as a result of new users switching from car to more
sustainable modes. This will reduce carbon and greenhouse gas emission
and will therefore improve the air quality in Clydebank as well as the primary
destination for trips from Clydebank (Glasgow) and will therefore aid in
combatting the current ‘Climate Emergency’.
6.8 The development of the transport hub will also support the realisation of the
benefits from the wider housing and employment developments at sites such
as Queens Quay and the Playdrome Site by ensuring the station provides a
gateway experience and integrates these areas with the town centre. In
addition bus services will be extended to facilitate Queens Quay.
6.9 The project aligns with the key objectives of the Levelling Up Fund 2,
namely:
Page 99

Page 32

• Promote economic growth by building, enhancing, managing and
maintaining transport services, infrastructure and networks to maximise
their efficiency.
• Promote social inclusion by connecting remote and disadvantaged
communities and increasing the accessibility of the transport network.
6.10 The Local Delivery Plan 2 which outlines the Development Strategy for
Clydebank Town Centre was approved by Council on 19th December 2018
lists the creation of a transport interchange at Chalmers Street to support
development and improve accessibility of key sites in the town centre and
Queens Quay as a key priority.
7. Carless Access Road
7.1 The project will provide improved road infrastructure, connectivity and
accessibility into the currently derelict site of the former Careless Oil
Terminal and support the future development of the Scottish Marine
Technology Park (SMTP) by the Malin Group.
7.2 North Clyde Riverbank, including the infrastructure required to deliver the
proposed Scottish Marine Technology Park (SMTP) and connectivity projects
along the Riverbank, was ranked number 2. SMTP is currently the most
transformational proposed regeneration project in West Dunbartonshire. An
economic impact assessment undertaken by Stantec for the Malin Group
(owners of the site) concludes that the development would create 986 jobs, if
fully realised, and add £125.4 million annually to West Dunbartonshire’s
economy.
7.3 The redevelopment of the site benefits from a strong local policy support and
West Dunbartonshire Local Development Plan 2 which includes a Carless
development strategy and a number of site specific policies:-
• To remediate the Carless site to enable redevelopment for business
and industrial uses, appropriate commercial uses and, where
appropriate and justified, housing and day-to-day convenience retail
uses;
• To provide a secondary access point to the site where residential
development is proposed on site H2(33) Carless and to upgrade the
existing access to serve the business and industrial and mixed-use
areas of the site;
• To use development of the site to enhance the Green Network;
• To protect the Forth and Clyde Canal and its setting; and
• To ensure no adverse effect on the integrity of the Special Protection
Area (SPA) or on the objectives of designation and the overall
integrity of the Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI).
7.4 The long-term development strategy for Carless requires a flexible approach
to delivery of the site; enabling the remediation, infrastructure provision and
new development to meet market conditions and overcome the challenges
presented by site conditions.
Page 100

Page 33

7.5 A residential development will only be supported when a new access from
Dumbarton Road has been provided to serve the residential development.
As part of the bid project a new access into the site will be included and open
up the site for further redevelopment potential.
7.6 It is fully aligned with the Clyde Mission Agenda (2019), the Scottish
Government's Programme for Scotland 2020-2021 and aspirations for a
more circular economy per the Scottish Government’s Economic Strategy
(2015). By enabling local employment opportunities for residents of Dalmuir
and Mountblow, the SMTP will also contribute towards the creation of a 20-
minute neighbourhood, an ambition of the Programme for Scotland 2020-
2021
7.7 As well as providing redevelopment of 17.7 ha of vacant land on the banks of
the River Clyde the development is expected to bring 750 net additional jobs
to the area including high paid, high-skilled jobs associated with marine
technology and providing a positive effect in the local economy.
7.8 The project aligns with the following objective of the LUF2:
• Promote economic growth by building, enhancing, managing and
maintaining transport services, infrastructure and networks to maximise
their efficiency.
7.9 A review of baseline economic conditions identified several challenges which
the proposed development can help to address, namely:
• A decreasing population and a relatively low working age (16-64
years) population compared to the national average;
• A high proportion of deprivation, both in overall rank and across
individual domains;
• A high economic activity rate and a high unemployment rate indicative
of a high proportion of those looking for work;
• Lower median full time gross annual pay in West Dunbartonshire
compared to the wider Glasgow City Region (GCR) and Scotland; and
• A high out-commuting profile to Glasgow City and Argyll and Bute.
8. Kilbowie Roundabout Improvements
8.1 The Kilbowie Roundabout is a key transport interchange on the A82 linking
Clydebank with both local and further connections.  The roundabout is
signalised and the traffic signals are close to the end of their design life.
There is an opportunity to redesign the roundabout to improve the public
realm and sustainable transport and active travel facilities.
The project aims to:
• Improve access to key destinations in West Dunbartonshire
• Reduce congestion
Page 101

Page 34

• Improve connectivity to jobs, education and leisure
• Prioritise bus movement
• Support active travel
• Improve air quality
• Encourage economic investment
9. People Implications
9.1 Existing staff resources across several Services will be required to
develop and submit the application for funding. Should the Levelling Up
Funding application be successful, additional development resources will
be required to deliver the project in the required timescale. Development
costs can be capitalised and will be costed for the lifetime of the project
and included in the Levelling Up Funding application.
10. Financial and Procurement Implications
10.1 Levelling Up Funding requires at least a 10% funding contribution from
the applicant. With the combined total cost of the Clydebank Transport
Hub and Carless Access Road bid estimated at £25m, the Council has
had positive discussions with both SPT and Marlin Group (Owner of the
Carless Development Site) in relation to funding to deliver the projects
and confirmation of a funding contribution from both is expected to be
confirmed in the coming weeks. The Procurement timescales, though
challenging are considered achievable within the programme timeframe,
and approval is sought to commence procurement processes to deliver
the projects should the bid be successful.
11. Risk Analysis
11.1 For Levelling Up Funding the principal risk would be the failure to deliver
the programme of projects by end 2024/25, leading to consequent
withdrawal of Levelling Up Funding and leaving the Council with financial
exposure. Delivery of the programme relies on several factors, including
but not limited to:
• Reaching a suitable design solution for both projects that provides
the desired outcomes whilst remaining on time and on budget; and
• Delivery timescales for the Clydebank Transport hub. The initial
design and preferred options are completed but will need further
consultation with Network rail in regards to mobility access into the
station.
11.2 It is recognised that the Carless Access Road project will need to
address the requirements of the UK Government’s new Subsidy Regime
which was introduced through the Subsidy Control Act 2022 which was
enacted on 28th April 2022.  Projects where there may be significant
benefit to one or more identifiable parties will need to demonstrate either
Page 102

Page 35

that they do not constitute a subsidy or if they do, that the subsidy is of a
type permitted by the Law.  The new legislative regime is substantially
different from the preceding State Aid rules  under which block
exemptions from the general State Aid principles were available for
certain types of infrastructure – e.g. ports and airports.
It is proposed to take specialist legal advice on the matter as the 
consequences of not addressing the subsidy regime correctly may include
refusal of the grant application or a requirement for the recipient to repay the
whole sums provided.  There is funding available to obtain such advice
within the project development funding.
As noted above, if the advice indicates that the Carless Access Road is likely
to constitute a non-permitted subsidy, or there is insufficient time within the
window for submission of Levelling Up Fund bids to resolve any significant
concerns, it is proposed that the bid be submitted with the Kilbowie
Roundabout Improvements project as the second project in place of the
Carless Access Road.
11.3 Risk will be mitigated by availability of a suitable level of resource to
progress the project components, taking a project management approach
to design and delivery and early agreement with the key stakeholders
12. Equalities Impact Assessment (EIA)
12.1 Screening and impact assessments will be carried out on specific projects
elements as they are further developed.
13. Consultation
13.1 The Clydebank Transport Hub and redevelopment of the former Carless Oil
Terminal have been subject to previous consultation through the
development of the Clydebank Master Plan and Local Development Plan
(LDP2), with the latter approved by the Council’s Planning Committee on
19th September 2018. In addition planning consent has already been sought
and granted for the Scottish Marine Technology Park (DC19/0469).
13.2 An Options Appraisal exercise of the Clydebank Transport Hub was carried
out in conjunction with Strathclyde Partnership for Transport and WSP
Consultants along with an outline business case with the findings presented
to Elected Members on 16th January 2019 with support provided for the
preferred design option.
13.3 In arriving at the recommended bid engagement is being undertaken with
Martin Docherty-Hughes MP.
13.4 Officers across Legal, Finance, Cultural Services, Planning, Regeneration,
Housing, Sustainability and Roads and Transportation have had an input to
the scoring process for the selection of Levelling Up Funding bid.
Page 103

Page 36

14. Strategic Assessment
14.1 At its meeting on 25 October 2017, the Council agreed that its five
main strategic priorities for 2017 – 2022. The projects included in the
Levelling Up Funding supports West Dunbartonshire in developing a
strong local economy and improved employment opportunities as
well as supporting individuals, families and carers living
independently and with dignity.
• Delivering a key regeneration objective with associated job creation
and business development objectives.
• Supporting businesses to develop their workforce, products and
services.
Gail Macfarlane
Chief Officer – Roads and Neighbourhood Services
14 June 2022
Person to Contact: Liam Greene.
Liam.greene@west-dunbarton.gov.uk
Appendices: None.
Background Papers: None.
Wards Affected: Ward 4 – Kilpatrick,
Ward 5 – Clydebank Central,
Ward 6 – Clydebank Waterfront.
Page 104

Page 37

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL 
Report by Chief Officer: Supply, Distribution and Property
Council 22 June 2022 
Subject: West Bridgend Hall
1. Purpose
1.1 To update Council on progress with West Bridgend Hall project following the
request for further information on the request for costs.
2. Recommendations
2.1 It is recommended that Council:
2.1.1 notes the contents of the report.
3. Background
3.1 At Council on 9 March 2022 Councillor Dickson moved the following:
Motion Council notes the officer's recommendation 'F' regarding
Westbridgend Community Centre, but is concerned about the
unprecedented increase in the budget ask to provide this centre, which will
then be transferred out of the Council. While we agree at this time to
earmark the required funds, we believe that the next Council should
determine the way forward for this project and as such a report will come to
June Council detailing the reasons for this increase in budget and allowing
the new Council to decide the best way forward. In the meantime officers
should continue to work with the local community and assist them in
seeking external funding.
3.2 A decision was taken at Council on 22 February 2017 to fund the demolition of
West Bridgend Community Centre with a view that a Community Asset
Transfer application with a detailed business plan would be submitted by a
community group for future use.  Budget allocation at this time was £675k.
3.3 At the time of the budget setting in Feb 2017, the budget of £675k was based
on a previous new build hall.  The budget was assigned, it is believed, on a
sq.m basis but did not provide financially for a number of actions which can be
found in Appendix 1.  In addition, the budget did not account for furniture,
fixtures and equipment which will be required to deliver the group’s ambitions
within their business case.
Item 12
Page 105

Page 38

3.4 The allocation of budget was contained within the  budget at Council and a
number of other projects were also included: Dalmonach Community Centre
and 3 Sports Pavilions. Funding allocated to these projects appear to have
also been based on costs of previous projects delivered.
3.5 As time progressed it was apparent that the budget set at the time was
inadequate and this was reported via budgetary control reports.
3.6 Discussions with the group had been ongoing with the Strategic Lead for that
area since 2017.  An application was submitted by West Bridgend
Community Hall Development Association including a detailed business case
on 4 February 2018.  The newly constituted group achieved charitable status
in July 2018.  The application contained a detailed business case to sustain
a suitable new build community facility to be built on the site of the former
West Bridgend Community Centre
3.7 Key target groups for future use of the new build include children and
families, young people, people with disabilities, older people, people who
have become isolated through a variety of issues.  The group proposed to
open the centre as a community hub.  It is proposed that the community hub
will include a community café space, after school and evening clubs for
children and people of a variety of ages, parent and toddler groups, elderly
lunch clubs, arts and fitness clubs as well as bigger events such as
weddings, and family celebrations.  They envisage that this will bring a
positive impact on the lives of all residents in the area.  
4. Main Issues
4.1 The Infrastructure, Regeneration and Economic Development Committee
approved a report on 16 May 2019, proposing that a detailed design phase for
a new community hall on the site of the former West Bridgend Community Hall
be progressed, planning permission submitted and thereafter progress to
tender to appoint a contractor to undertake the build.   The report at the time
confirmed the project could be delivered within budget £675k.
4.2 Following demolition of the old Community Centre work began with the group
to look at designs which would meet their aspirations / requirements within
their business case.
4.3 In October 2019 a dedicated architect was appointed to ensure a consistent
approach following a request by elected members as there had been a
number of changes with the architectural staff.  
4.4 Initial designs were presented to WDC Place and Design Panel in December
2019 and feedback was provided in February 2020.  Following feedback and
pre application information, further design amendments and additional
surveys were required to meet the planning requirements.  The location of the
old hall was on the flood risk plan and any new build therefore required to be
relocated.
Page 106

Page 39

4.5 From February 2020, a value engineering process has been ongoing to
minimise the potential additional costs with the intention to deliver an
economic build, but still delivering the community group’s aspirations /
business plan. The exercise has taken some considerable time due to the
discussions with services and the community group to review and propose
alternative options.  COVID also caused significant delays in the completion of
this exercise.
4.6 Based on the proposed design and the requirements listed above, it is
currently estimated that an additional £1.7m is required to deliver the project
over 2 financial years 2022/23 and 2023/24. Taking into account the budget
already provided, this would requires estimated overall funding of £2.3m to be
allocated to this project.
However it is important to stress that the total estimated budget of £2.3m is
based on prices and assumptions when the revised cost was added to the
Council’s capital programme approved by Council on 9 March 2022.   The
construction industry is experiencing unprecedented increases in costs due to
a combination of supply chain pressures and shortages, scarcities in the
construction workforce, increased fuel costs and the impact of increasing
energy costs on inflation. As such there is a genuine risk that the £2.3m
estimate will increase before any build is commenced. 
4.7 The project has not yet been capable of qualifying for any capital funding to
date but may be able to in the future and apply for some match funding and
this is constantly reviewed.  
4.8 The Regeneration Capital Grant Fund (RCGF) is a Scottish Government
managed fund delivered in partnership with COSLA that supports place-based
regeneration projects.  The project currently does not meet the RCGF delivery
timescales for grant funding in 2023/24, however, this will be reviewed in
conjunction with the group for funding 2024/25 in November 2022.
4.9 We will be working with the group and West Dunbartonshire CVS in relation to
potential funding from “the Big Lottery” and again, the group will be supported
by council officers with any application.  The outcome may not be known for
some time, potentially up to 12 months.  This may require advance transfer of
land to ensure match funding is confirmed.  
4.10 A detailed analysis has been carried out by teams including quantity
surveyors, who have referenced other buildings of a similar typology and
advised that the budget cost following the value engineering is comparable
across these other buildings - various public and community builds.  
4.11 The value re-engineering considered alternative, less costly materials
however these do not meet the specifications set out by planning.
4.12 A new build community centre similar to Milton hall at much reduced cost in
line with original budget, was considered.  However, this will not meet the
Page 107

Page 40

aspirations of the community, provide the facility required to fulfil / deliver the
business case and in turn the community asset transfer would not proceed.
4.13 The revised estimated costs are reflective of the community group’s business
case / aspirations and include a catering kitchen to service the needs and
functions of the hall, the works, fees, surveys, items listed in Appendix 1 and
the specifications of materials as required by planning.
4.14 At the time of the original budget setting in 2017, a review of other facilities in
the area which serve the community were looked at in order to facilitate
decant of groups and allow the demolition to take place.  Groups were
decanted to Brucehill Activity Centre and Concorde Community Centre.
4.15 Brucehill Activity Centre is now not available for use as it has been turned into
a bespoke centre for a local gymnastics club and precludes any other activity
taking place.  Following this change residents were required to travel to
Alexandria Community Centre to continue with their activities. 
4.16 Whilst the Concorde Community Centre is available for use for residents
within this area, previous consultations have indicated that the community
group users felt this facility was too far to travel on foot or by public transport. 
4.17 There is therefore no longer a community facility west of Dumbarton High
Street / Centre.
4.18  The trustees of the group were appointed on a 5 year fixed term, which can be
extended, with the appointments varying from July 2018 to January 2019.  At
this stage the trustees have not provided confirmation on whether they
intended to extend their appointments.
5. People Implications
5.1 There are no people implications arising from this report.
6. Financial and Procurement Implications
6.1 It is estimated an additional £1.7m is required to deliver the project over the
two financial years 2022/23 and 2023/24 taking the total estimated budget to
£2.3m. However this estimate is subject to the impact of inflationary
pressures on construction projects as set out in paragraph 4.6.
6.2  There are no procurement implication arising from this report.
7. Risk Analysis
7.1 There is a risk that should additional budget not become available the
aspirations set by Council in 2017 for a new build facility may not be met.
7.2 There is a risk that should the Trustees not extend their current term and new
Trustees not found then Westbridgend Community Hall Development
Association could cease to exist and the asset would then come back to the
Page 108

Page 41

Council ownership and the Council would incur additional revenue liabilities as
a result.
8. Equalities Impact Assessment (EIA)
8.1 An equalities screening has been carried out for this report and there are no
equality issues identified.
9. Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)
9.1 A Strategic Environmental Assessment is not required for the purposes of
this report
10. Consultation
10.1 Consultation was undertaken with various officers across a number of
services including Resources, Education Services, Corporate Health &
Safety and Corporate Asset Management. 
11. Strategic Assessment
11.1 The provision of a new build hall will contributing to the Council’s
strategic priority for a strong local economy and improved job
opportunities and also assist us in delivering the strategic priority of
efficient and effective frontline services that improve the everyday lives of
residents.
Angela Wilson 
Chief Officer, Supply, Distribution and Property
Date: 24 May 2022
Person to Contact: Michelle Lynn, Assets Co-ordinator
Email: michelle.lynn@west-dunbarton.gov.uk
Appendices: Appendix 1
Background Papers: Council – 9 March 2022.  General Services Budget
2022/23 and Council Tax Setting.  
Wards Affected: Ward 3
Page 109

Page 42

ACTION  ASSOCIATED INDICATIVE COST
M&E engineer fees £17,000
Structural engineer fees £48,000
Landscape architect (Planning requirement) £7,500
Flood Risk Assements (Planning
requirement)
£1,900
Ground Investigation Surveys   £8,900
Topographical Surveys (SEPA requirement
due to building requiring to be relcated from
original site)
£1,500
Drainage Surveys (SEPA requirement due to
building requiring to be relcated from original
site)
£4,000
Site investigations and survey works £1,500
Contaminated Land Remediation Strategy
(Planning Requirement) 
Costs as yet unknown. 
Abnormal Ground Conditions £310,000
CDM Advisor fees £5,700
Inflationary Costs  £100,000
Covid/Brexit related cost increase 
market still voilatile and currently difficult to
establish what these costs will be once we
tender but contingencies in building
construction costs include the current
position.
£251,000
Requirement for renewables technology (due
to revisions to the building technical
standards)
contingency has been made
building construction costs
(below) but final detail still being
value engineered with
mechanical and electrical
contractor.
Increased costs for external materials due to
high visibility of the site (Planning
requirement).
£617,000   (elements included in
the building construction costs
below)
Building Construction costs £1,416,891
Page 110