Democracy Spraffa

Item 14-Appendix 1

West Dunbartonshire Council · 27 March 2024
Back to West Dunbartonshire Council — 27 March 2024 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

OFFICIAL
OFFICIAL
Glasgow City Region – City Deal
Cabinet 
Report by Director of Regional Economic Growth
Contact: Kevin Rush (0141 287 4613) 
Regional Spatial Planning Arrangements
Purpose of Report:
The purpose of this paper is to propose a revised governance structure for the oversight of
the development of a Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) for the Glasgow City Region (GCR)
following the recommendation of the Clydeplan Joint Committee in June 2023 to transfer
responsibility to the GCR Cabinet.
Recommendations:
Cabinet is asked to:
- Note the report;
- Agree to the establishment of a new Planning Sub-Committee with approval of a
Regional Spatial Strategy resting with the individual Member Authorities; and
- Agree this approach through their own democratic structures at the earliest opportunity.
Item
APPENDIX 1

Page 2

OFFICIAL 
OFFICIAL
Introduction
1. The purpose of this paper is to propose a revised governance structure for the oversight of
the development of a Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) for the Glasgow City Region (GCR)
following the recommendation of the Clydeplan Joint Committee in June 2023 to transfer
responsibility to the GCR Cabinet. 
2. The proposal requires endorsement from the GCR Cabinet and the 8 constituent Member
Authorities prior to implementation.
Background and the growth of City Regions 
3. Increasingly the role of city regions, through the establishment of City Deals and Regional
Economic Partnerships, are emerging as the key mechanism for the delivery on a number of
important agendas including: economic development, City Deals, climate change,
environmental improvement and strategic planning. 
4. In this context the new duty to prepare a Regional Spatial Strategy is key in planning for the
future development of the Glasgow City Region. 
5. Since 1996 the eight Glasgow City Region local authorities have worked together to develop
a series of regional spatial plans, the most recent being the Clydeplan Strategic
Development Plan (“SDP”), which was approved by Scottish Ministers in July 2017. 
6. The previous SDP set out a Vision and Spatial Development Strategy from now until 2036,
suggesting where new development should be located and a policy framework that helps
deliver sustainable economic growth through the creation of high quality development which
seeks to reduce inequalities and enhances the quality of life in Glasgow City Region. The
SDP also set the strategy and policy context for the individual local authority Local
Development Plans. 
7. This is no longer extant since the introduction of NPF4, and has been replaced by the
requirement to prepare an RSS. 
8. Since 2022, the City Region has seen a very significant increase in responsibility and budget
devolved to it from both UK and Scottish Governments. This includes a number of
programmes which have clear spatial planning elements to them. New programmes now
managed through the GCR PMO and overseen by Cabinet include:
Date of Award Programme Amount   
February 2022 Innovation Accelerator £33m
August 2022 UK Shared Prosperity Fund £74m
June 2023 Clyde Mission £26.5m
June 2023 Investment Zone £160m
November 2023 5G Innovation Region £3.2m 
9. Given this, a new Head of Place has been appointed to oversee the spatial planning
elements of the GCR Programme, including Clyde Mission, the development of a Clyde
Masterplan and the Investment Zone. Ross Nimmo, currently Head of Planning and
Development at Glasgow Airport, will take up this post on 4th March 2024.

Page 3

OFFICIAL 
OFFICIAL
10. There are clear synergies between this exciting new body of work and the development of a
Regional Spatial Strategy, and the opportunity to merge teams and governance could
generate significant opportunities and efficiencies for the Region. 
Governance Review 
11. The Clydeplan Joint Committee has previously agreed that work should be undertaken to
explore the future governance arrangements for the performance of the functions undertaken
by the Joint Committee particularly in relation to the new duty on local authorities in relation
to strategic planning as part of the Planning (Scotland) Act 2019, namely to prepare a
Regional Spatial Strategy. 
12. Unlike the current Strategic Development Plan the Regional Spatial Strategy will not form
part of the statutory Development Plan which will now comprise the National Planning
Framework and the Local Development Plan. 
13. Given these changes it was acknowledged that the role and remit for which the Glasgow and
Clyde Valley Strategic Development Planning Authority Joint Committee was originally
established will significantly change and therefore the future role of the Committee required
to be reviewed. 
14. Following the vote at its June 2023 meeting on a report on future arrangements, the Joint
Committee agreed to recommend the following option:
(a) That the contents of the report be noted;
(b) That the cessation of strategic development plans be noted; and
(c) That the preferred option for considering regional spatial strategy planning issues
going forward be that existing Clydeplan staff resource be reviewed in light of the
new requirements for RSS preparation. Staff would be consulted on a possible TUPE
transfer to Glasgow City Council. If transferred, the team would be integrated into the
existing city region structures (overseen by the Regional Director) who would take
responsibility for preparing an RSS and reporting this through to the GCR Cabinet
for approval. This would move the duty to prepare an RSS directly into the city region
governance structures.   
15. It should be noted that the individual Member Authorities need to take their own decisions
on how they wish to proceed with the development of Regional Spatial Strategies and the
Joint Committee’s recommendation. 
16. Since the June 2023 recommendation, two Councils have expressed views on the future
arrangements: 
- In September 2023, Renfrewshire Council approved the following motion:
“This Council notes the decision of the GCVSDPA (Clydeplan) Joint
Committee to recommend passing responsibility for the new Regional Spatial
Strategy to the Glasgow City Region Cabinet, however this Council considers
it premature to do so at this juncture as no guidance has been issued to date
as to the development of the RSS or the governance agreed between the
constituent authorities. 
The staff of the GCVSDPA (who are Renfrewshire Council employees) are
greatly valued for their skills and knowledge in this rapidly changing planning

Page 4

OFFICIAL 
OFFICIAL
environment and should be fully supported and involved in any proposed
changes. 
The Joint Committee has successfully operated as a directly accountable
governance structure to all 8 local authorities regarding regional planning.
This council believes that the same principle should apply regarding the
development of the new Regional Spatial Strategies (RSS). For it to be equally
successful it must be founded in democratically accountable governance
structures which encourages neighbouring authorities to collaborate and
agree on any strategies that may have an influence on their own local planning
policies. 
Council therefore agrees that the Joint Committee should continue until
alternative suitable democratically accountable governance structures are
identified, agreed and approved by all constituent authorities for its
replacement with responsibility for delivering the new Regional Spatial
Strategy” 
- In December 2023, North Lanarkshire Council voted to formally withdraw from the existing
Joint Committee and will serve its two year notice from 31st March 2024. 
17. It is therefore clear that a sustainable future arrangement needs to be found which satisfies
the desire for democratically accountable governance, generates efficiencies, develops a
mutually agreed Regional Spatial Strategy and delivers on the new programmes devolved to
regional level.
Proposed way forward 
18. Recognising that consensus will always be sought, the proposal is based on three
fundamental principles: 
- A collaborative approach to regional spatial planning with all members being equal;
- Integration with wider regional activity to maximise impact; and, fundamentally
- The need for local democratic accountability with no local authority being bound by any
decision they cannot support
Ensuring local democratic accountability for the new Regional Spatial Strategy 
19. To secure local democratic accountability for the new Regional Spatial Strategy it is
proposed that a Glasgow City Region Spatial Planning Committee is established as a sub-
committee of the Glasgow City Region Cabinet, which is a Joint Committee established
under the Local Government (Scotland) Act 1973. Membership will consist of Planning
Conveners or equivalent from each of the local authorities. The Chair will be decided by its
membership. This Committee will oversee the development of a Regional Spatial Strategy for
the Glasgow City Region for approval by the 8 Member Authorities. The Directors /Heads of
Service with responsibility for Planning of each council will attend meetings in support of
members. 
20. This is the model used for the Education Collaborative which has been in operation since
2017.

Page 5

OFFICIAL 
OFFICIAL
21. The Spatial Planning Committee would not have decision making powers and would only
make recommendations on the Regional Spatial Strategy for consideration by the 8 Member
Authorities to ensure local democratic accountability. 
22. Ideally, all 8 Member Authorities would participate in an agreed Regional Spatial Strategy,
but this would be a matter for each Council to decide and it is within the gift of any of the
members to choose not to support the final strategy. 
23. The Cabinet would receive and note the Regional Spatial Strategy but only after approval by
all participating Member Authorities through their local democratic structures. This is similar
to the approach undertaken for recent regional initiatives such as the Shared Prosperity Fund
Investment Plan and no RSS could be presented to Cabinet without prior approval from its
constituent members. 
24. All efforts will be managed to agree consensus amongst the 8 members but a Regional
Spatial Strategy is not a statutory document and therefore, no local authority could be bound
to adopt an RSS without approval through their own democratic structures. The individual
authorities retain the right not to support or be bound by anything contained within the RSS. 
25. This approach was discussed at the Clydeplan Joint Committee meeting on 22nd January
2024 and there was widespread support for the approach, subject to necessary approvals
being sought. 
Process for agreeing new RSS  
Staffing 
26. The Spatial Planning Committee would replace the existing Clydeplan Joint Committee and it
is anticipated that staff and budgets would transfer into the existing City Region structures,
ensuring a more streamlined approach to audit, finance etc. with no requirement for separate
arrangements. Following appropriate consultation, the current Clydeplan and Green Network
Partnership team would transfer to Glasgow City Council under TUPE regulations (Transfer
of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006) and be based within the City
Region PMO section where appropriate management arrangements will be put in place and
resilience and support will be available. The new Head of Place would oversee the transfer
and be responsible for developing the Regional Spatial Strategy for consideration by
members. 
27. If this approach was agreed, a paper would need to be taken through all 8 Member
Authorities agreeing to the windup of Clydeplan, the establishment of a new Spatial Planning
Committee and formalising the requirement for the agreement of all members before an RSS
could be presented to Cabinet. 
Draft RSS considered by Spatial
Planning Committee and
recommended for approval
Consideration by Member
Authorities
Approval by all Participating
Authorities Noting by GCR Cabinet

Page 6

OFFICIAL 
OFFICIAL
28. This process would run over the next few months subject to all authorities reaching
agreement and due trade union/staff consultation. It is likely that revised governance
arrangements may take longer to embed but staffing transfers could progress more quickly. 
Budget 
29. The transfer of responsibility and staff to the GCR PMO is likely to generate efficiencies for
the Member Authorities, with no requirement for separate office accommodation or IT costs.
In addition, the GCR PMO has been effective in generating external funding from both
Scottish and UK Governments in recent years for spatial planning related activity, including
Clyde Mission and Investment Zone, and it is expected that this will reduce the burden on
Member Authorities in future years.
Recommendation 
30. Cabinet is asked to: 
- Note the report;
- Agree to the establishment of a new Planning Sub-Committee with approval of a Regional
Spatial Strategy resting with the individual Member Authorities; and
- Agree this approach through their own democratic structures at the earliest opportunity.