Democracy Spraffa

Item 10 Appendix 1 - Block Building Insurance

West Dunbartonshire Council · 29 October 2025
Back to West Dunbartonshire Council — 29 October 2025 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

Assessment No 1339 Owner mlynn2                                 
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Regeneration
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Michelle Lynn Asset Manager
Members Laurence Slavin Chief Officer Resources
Peter Barry , Chief Officer Housing
Michelle Lynn, Asset Manager
Alan Young, Housing Asset & Investment Manager
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title Review of Block Buildings Insurance Scheme
The aim, objective, purpose and intended out come of policy
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of the policy:
The aim of the policy is to review and manage the Council’s continued provision of the
Right to Buy Block Buildings Insurance Scheme and to plan for its orderly withdrawal
by 31 March 2028. The objective is to ensure that the Council meets its financial and
administrative responsibilities while providing sufficient time and support for affected
homeowners to make alternative insurance arrangements. The intended outcome is a
planned and fair exit from the scheme, ensuring homeowners are informed, supported,
and able to maintain appropriate buildings insurance through the private market, while
the Council focuses on delivering its core statutory functions and achieving best value.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Internal officers and relevant Chief Officers.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Current Participants in the Block Buildings Insurance Scheme
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Finance and Procurement Services – to review the current policy and assess financial implications.
Legal Services – to ensure compliance with contractual and statutory requirements.
Housing and Communities Team - in relation to implementation of the recommendations.
Appendix 1

Page 2

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Older homeowners (many
Right to Buy participants)
may require extra support
understanding changes,
accessing information, and
arranging private insurance.
Demographic data shows a
significant proportion of Right
to Buy owners are aged 60+.
Feedback from housing
services suggests older
owners often contact the
Council for assistance with
administrative or financial
matters.
Potential negative
impact on older people if
communication is not
accessible or if they
struggle to source
affordable insurance.
Mitigation: Provide clear,
accessible
communication (letters,
large print, phone
helpline, in-person
advice). Allow a long
lead in period before
withdrawal.
Disability                    People with physical or
cognitive impairments may
need accessible information
and additional support to
arrange insurance.
Local data - around 24% of
residents report a long-term
health condition or disability
(WDC Equality Profile).
Potential negative
impact. Mitigation: Offer
information in accessible
formats (Easy Read,
Braille, large print).
Provide direct assistance
via Housing and Citizens
Advice partners. Ensure
reasonable adjustments
in communication.  Allow
a long lead in period
before withdrawal.
Gender Reassign               No specific needs identified
related to the insurance
scheme.
No evidence of differential
impact based on gender
reassignment.
Neutral impact. Standard
equality considerations
apply in all
communication.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Joint property owners may
need both names on
correspondence or
insurance policies.
Homeownership data indicates
some homes are jointly owned.
Low negative impact.
Mitigation: Provide
flexible timelines and
signpost to financial
advice if affordability of
new insurance becomes
an issue.Allow a long
lead in period before
withdrawal.
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Pregnant women or new
parents may experience
financial pressures.
Socioeconomic data suggests
households with young
children may face cost-of-living
challenges.
Low negative impact.
Mitigation: Provide
flexible timelines and
signpost to financial
advice if affordability of
new insurance becomes
an issue.  Allow a long
lead in period before
withdrawal.

Page 3

Race                          Some homeowners may
have limited English
proficiency and require
translated materials.
WDC Census 2022:
approximately 3% of residents
identify as belonging to ethnic
minority backgrounds.
Potential negative
impact. Mitigation:
Provide translated letters
and interpreter access
for non-English
speakers. Ensure plain
language in all
communications.  Allow
a long lead in period
before withdrawal. 
Religion and Belief           No direct link between
religion and access to
insurance, though sensitivity
in communication is
required.
No evidence of differential
impact.
Neutral impact. Maintain
inclusive communication
standards.
Sex                           Women, particularly older
women living alone, may
face barriers in navigating
insurance processes or
financial matters.
may face barriers in navigating
insurance processes or
financial matters.
Local data shows women are
more likely to be older lone
homeowners.
Potential minor negative
impact. Mitigation:
Provide targeted support
for vulnerable
homeowners, e.g. drop-
in advice, CAB referrals. 
Allow a long lead in
period before
withdrawal.
Sexual Orientation  No specific needs identified. No evidence of differential
impact.
Neutral impact. Ensure
inclusive communication
(e.g. gender-neutral
language).
Human Rights                  Homeowners have a right to
clear information, fair
treatment, and protection of
property.
ECHR Articles 8 & 1 Protocol 1
(respect for home and
possessions).
Positive impact if
transition is managed
transparently and fairly.
Risk mitigated through
open consultation and
support.  Allow a long
lead in period before
withdrawal.
Health                      Poor mental or physical
health may make dealing
with policy changes
stressful.
Local health data indicates
higher rates of long-term
illness and mental health
issues than national average.
Potential negative
impact. Mitigation: Clear,
step-by-step
communication;
signposting to wellbeing
and advice services. 
Allow a long lead in
period before
withdrawal.
Social & Economic
Impact     
Low-income homeowners
may face affordability issues
obtaining private insurance.
Right to Buy owners often on
fixed incomes or pensions.
Local deprivation indicators
show some areas of high
financial vulnerability.
Potential negative
impact. Mitigation:
Provide early notice,
financial advice, and
referrals to independent
support (CAB, Money
Advice). Explore group
or brokered insurance
guidance.  Allow a long
lead in period before
withdrawal.

Page 4

Cross Cutting          Multiple vulnerabilities (e.g.
age + disability + low
income). Digital exclusion.
Data on digital access and
poverty in WDC.
Potential negative
impact. Mitigation: Non-
digital communication
channels, personalised
support, community
engagement.  Allow a
long lead in period
before withdrawal.

Page 5

Actions

Page 6

Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
While the withdrawal may negatively impact some groups—particularly older, disabled, and low-income
homeowners—the policy will proceed as the scheme is no longer financially or operationally sustainable,
nor a statutory requirement. A long lead-in period to 2028 and an exit strategy (by October 2027) will
ensure affected owners receive clear communication, accessible information, and support from advice
services to minimise adverse impacts.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Yes. The Housing and Finance teams will track engagement with affected homeowners, identify any
emerging equality issues, and adjust support measures as needed. A final exit strategy will be presented
to Council by October 2027 before the scheme ends in March 2028.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1139: The recommendation to withdraw from the Block Buildings Insurance Scheme has
been reached following review of financial, operational, and equality impacts. While some
negative effects are anticipated for older, disabled, and low-income homeowners, these can be
mitigated through early communication, accessible support, and partnership working with advice
agencies. The policy ensures best value for the Council while maintaining fairness and
compliance with equality duties. The responsible officer has reviewed and approved this EIA
prior to submission.