Democracy Spraffa

Item 8-Appendix 3

West Dunbartonshire Council · 5 March 2025
Back to West Dunbartonshire Council — 5 March 2025 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Some pages contain no extractable text. They may be blank, graphics or scanned pages. OCR has not been applied.

Page 1

Assessment No 1210 Owner Laura Evans
Resource Health Social Care
Partnership(HSCP)
Service/Establishment Joint
Name Julie Slavin Job title Chief Finance Officer
Head Officer Julie Slavin
Members
Julie Slavin – Chief Financial Officer
Terry Wall – HSCP Accountant
Yvonne Sloan – HSCP Accountant
Cheryl Taylor – Self Direct Support Manager
Sheryl Harvey -  HSCP Accountant
Jacqueline Carson – Integrated Operations Manager(IOM) Care at Home and Reablement services
Theresa Connor – IOM Adult  and hospital discharge services
Anne Kane – IOM Mental Health Services
Bernadette Smith – IOM Residential Care
Julie Campbell - IOM Mental Health Services
Sylvia Chatfield – Head of Service Learning Disability, Addictions and Mental health
Fiona Taylor  - Head of Health and Community Care 
Ailsa King – Equalities Lead and Health Improvement Officer
Gillian Gall – Head of HSCP Human Resources
Gemma Cowie – IOM for Learning Disability services
Policy Title Charging Policy Changes 2025/2026
The aim,
objective,
purpose and
intended
outcome of
policy
Consider if the following changes should be implemented or not.
 Add in different thresholds based on age
 Increase taper from 50% to 75%
 Charge Independ Living Fund (ILF) service users for social care
Service/Partner
s/Stakeholders/
service users
involved in the
Development
and/or
implementation
of policy.
Internal Stakeholders
Julie Slavin – Chief Financial Officer
Terry Wall – HSCP Accountant
Yvonne Sloan – HSCP Accountant
Cheryl Taylor – Self Direct Support Manager
Sheryl Harvey -  HSCP Accountant
Jacqueline Carson – Integrated Operations Manager(IOM) Care at Home and Reablement services
Theresa Connor – IOM Adult  and hospital discharge services
Anne Kane – IOM Mental Health Services
Bernadette Smith – IOM Residential Care
Julie Campbell - IOM Mental Health Services
Sylvia Chatfield – Head of Service Learning Disability, Addictions and Mental health
APPENDIX 3

Page 2

Fiona Taylor  - Head of Health and Community Care 
Ailsa King – Equalities Lead and Health Improvement Officer
Gillian Gall – Head of HSCP Human Resources
Gemma Cowie – IOM for Learning Disability services
Three public consultations took place held on the 21, 29 and 30 October across Clydebank and Dumbarton.  The session held on the 21 was open to partner
organisations and HSCP operational services only and the sessions on the 29 and 30 were open to members of the public, partner organisations and HSCP
operational services.
The two public consultations were promoted via Twitter and Facebook, and partner organisations and operational managers within HSCP were asked to share with
their service users.
The partner organisations and HSCP operational services invited to the three sessions were;
Carers of West Dunbartonshire;
Improving Lives;
Shop Mobility;
Glasgow Disability Alliance;
HSCP Adult Day services
Mental Health Network Greater Glasgow and Clyde;
Golden Hands of Friendship;
Kinship Carers;
HSCP Learning Disability service;
Adult Social Work team;
HSCP Self-Directed Support Team;
HSCP Mental Health services; and
HSCP Addiction services.
On the 21 October, ten service users and/or carers attended with representatives from Carers of West Dunbartonshire.  HSCP staff facilitated this session.
On the 29 October, six members of the public attended, with members from Improving Lives, Mental Health network and West Dunbartonshire Councilors
representative their constituents attended.  HSCP staff facilitated this session.
On the 30 October, seven members of the public attended, with members from Kinship Carers, Shop Mobility and Glasgow Disability Alliance.  HSCP staff
facilitated this session.
A survey was created to capture the views of those who could not attend the face to face public consultation.  The survey was sent out via West Dunbartonshire
Council Facebook page, HSCP Twitter page, partner organisations and HSCP operational managers.  This survey closed on Monday 6 January 2025.

Page 3

Does the proposals involve the procurement of any
Goods or services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our
procurement services to discuss your requirements. No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
All citizens of West Dunbartonshire who could be prospective users of a HSCP service, current users of a HSCP service will be affected by this policy.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Meeting held on the 14/03/2024 with the following group:
Julie Slavin – Chief Financial Officer
Terry Wall – HSCP Accountant
Yvonne Sloan – HSCP Accountant
Cheryl Taylor – Self Direct Support Manager
Sheryl Harvey -  HSCP Accountant
Jacqueline Carson – Integrated Operations Manager(IOM) Care at Home and Reablement services
Theresa Connor – IOM Adult  and hospital discharge services
Anne Kane – IOM Mental Health Services
Bernadette Smith – IOM Residential Care
Julie Campbell - IOM Mental Health Services
Sylvia Chatfield – Head of Service Learning Disability, Addictions and Mental health
Fiona Taylor  - Head of Health and Community Care 
Ailsa King – Equalities Lead and Health Improvement Officer
Gillian Gall – Head of HSCP Human Resources
Gemma Cowie – IOM for Learning Disability services
Three public consultations took place held on the 21, 29 and 30 October across Clydebank and Dumbarton.  The session held on the 21 was open to partner organisations and
HSCP operational services only and the sessions on the 29 and 30 were open to members of the public, partner organisations and HSCP operational services.
The two public consultations were promoted via Twitter and Facebook, and partner organisations and operational managers within HSCP were asked to share with their service
users.
The partner organisations and HSCP operational services invited to the three sessions were;

Page 4

Carers of West Dunbartonshire;
Improving Lives;
Shop Mobility;
Glasgow Disability Alliance;
HSCP Adult Day services
Mental Health Network Greater Glasgow and Clyde;
Golden Hands of Friendship;
Kinship Carers;
HSCP Learning Disability service;
Adult Social Work team;
HSCP Self-Directed Support Team;
HSCP Mental Health services; and
HSCP Addiction services.
On the 21 October, ten service users and/or carers attended with representatives from Carers of West Dunbartonshire.  HSCP staff facilitated this session.
On the 29 October, six members of the public attended, with members from Improving Lives, Mental Health network and West Dunbartonshire Councilors representative their
constituents attended.  HSCP staff facilitated this session.
On the 30 October, seven members of the public attended, with members from Kinship Carers, Shop Mobility and Glasgow Disability Alliance.  HSCP staff facilitated this session.
A survey was created to capture the views of those who could not attend the face to face public consultation.  The survey was sent out via West Dunbartonshire Council Facebook
page, HSCP Twitter page, partner organisations and HSCP operational managers.  This survey closed on Monday 6 January 2025.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
Relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups.

Page 5

Protected
Characteristic
Needs Evidence Impact
Age There is a clear relationship between long-term
health conditions or disability and increasing
age. In 2020, the Scottish Health Survey found
that the prevalence of any long-term condition
increased with age, from 32% among those
aged 16-44, to 68% among those aged 75 and
over.
The ageing population nationally and within
West Dunbartonshire mean that there will be
expected increase in demand on a HSCP
services.
The Adult Strategic Needs
assessment
http://www.wdhscp
.org.uk/media/2521
/sna-aop-june- 2022.pdf
https://www.gov.scot/binaries/c
ontent/documents/govscot/pub
lications/research-and-
analysis/2022/06/national-care
-service-adult-social-care-
scotland-equality-evidence-
review/documents/adult-social-
care-scotland-equality-
evidence-review/adult-social-
care-scotland-equality-
evidence-
review/govscot%3Adocument/
adult-social-care-scotland-
equality-evidence-review.pdf
Service Users Negative
 Adding in different threshold for those who are at retirement age and
those who are not, means those who haven’t reached retirement age
have a lesser threshold to meet and have a higher chance they will
need to pay a charge. The Equalities act states age as a protected
characteristic meaning that no one should be discriminated based on
their age. COSLA state HSCPs should consider this if there will be
different thresholds based on age.
 A service user may cancel the service if they cannot afford it.
Service Users – Positive
 The revised Area Resource Group process, requires every service
user to have a completed My Life Assessment and financial
assessment. These documents allow a discussion with the service
user if they wish for their benefits to be maximized and a referral to
be made. The process allows practitioners to think that non critical
services such as social support, day service, are services which
service users can use their benefits to pay for.
HSCP negative impact
If HSCP implemented different thresholds for those who are retired or not,
there is a risk of reputational damage, as the thresholds were removed in
2022 because of the equality impact on age.
Disability In 2019 29% of West Dunbartonshire adults had
a limiting long-term physical or mental health
Condition. Learning disability rates are above
the Scottish Average. Individuals with learning
disabilities have some of the poorest health
outcomes of any group in
Scotland. A large proportion of the current
service users would be classified as having a
disability
The adult Strategic needs
assessment  -
http://www.wdhscp.org.uk/med
ia/2521/sna-aop-june-2022.pdf
Service user – positive
 Those who receive Independent Living fund are typically a service
user of the Learning and physical disability service. Currently those
receiving ILF are not required to pay any charges for a HSCP service
as they already contribute towards their services via their ILF. On the
1st April 2024, the ILF fund was open to everyone. This means there
will be a higher amount of people who will have access to this fund
and be eligible for a free service.
Service User negative impact
ILF service user pay the ILF fund an amount for services they receive. If ILF
service users were to be charged, this mean they would need to pay the
maximum HSCP charge minus the charge they pay ILF, which would equal
the charge ILF service users would be charged by HSCP.
HSCP negative impact
In 2022, HSCP decided not to pay ILF service users, if ILF service users
were to be charged there is a risk of reputational damage to HSCP.
Gender
reassign
There is no national data about gender
reassignment and people who access social
The adult Strategic needs
assessment 
Positive and negative impact - included in cross cutting section.

Page 6

care. However, given the prevalence of social
care needs in the population and across the life
course, it is likely that some trans people will
require social care support.	
http://www.wdhscp.org.uk/med
ia/2521/sna-aop-june-2022.pdf
Marriage and
Civil
Partnership
Those who are married or in a civil partnership
may be a service user of the HSCP Care at
Home service.
Evidence of relationship status
can be found on the My Life
Assessment
Service user – Negative
If a service user has a partner who lives in the same household, then their
finances need to be reviewed collectively even if only one person receives
social care support. If the threshold is split based on age, then the partnership
threshold will be different based on the age of the service charge. For
example, if you are a couple and are below the retirement age then the
threshold is lower.
Service user positive impact
If one of couple are of retirement age, then the higher threshold will be used.
Positive and negative impact - included in cross cutting section.
Pregnancy
and Maternity
There is no national data about pregnancy and
maternity and social care. However, there is a
substantial cohort of women of child-bearing age
who are receiving social care, and many of this
group are likely to experience pregnancy and
maternity. There are 22,710 women aged 18-64
receiving social care in Scotland. Within the
general population, there are around 50 live
births per 1,000 women of childbearing age79 in
Scotland.
Evidence of status can be
found on the My Life
Assessment
Positive and negative impact - included in cross cutting section. 
Race Research by the ALLIANCE and Self-Directed
Support Scotland (SDSS), which explored
people's experience of Self-directed Support and
social care in Scotland, highlighted barriers to
support for Black and minority ethnic people,
including: access to information and advice; and
cultural awareness and understanding. This was
particularly the case for Black and minority
ethnic women, and the report suggests that this
could be associated with women having less
fluency in English in home communities.
https://www.gov.scot/publ
ications/race-equality-
framework-scotland-2016
-2030/documents/
Evidence of race can be found
on the My Life Assessment
Positive and negative impact - included in cross cutting section.
Religion and
Belief
There is no national data on religion or belief for
people who access social care, although NRS
analysis of population data suggests that
Scotland is becoming more ethnically and
religiously diverse.
Evidence of religion/belief can
be found on the My Life
Assessment
Positive and negative impact - included in cross cutting section.
Sex Life expectancy is lower than the Scottish
average for both men and Women within WDC.
Evidence of sex can be found
on the My Life Assessment
Positive and negative impact - included in cross cutting section.

Page 7

Research by the ALLIANCE and Self-Directed
Support Scotland (SDSS), which explored
people's experience of Self-directed Support and
social care in Scotland found some variation in
men and women’s experiences. For participants
in this study, women had generally received less
information about Self-directed Support options
and budgets than men, and were less content
with the quality of information that they received
The adult Strategic needs
assessment  -
http://www.wdhscp.org.uk/med
ia/2521/sna-aop-june-2022.pdf
Sexual
Orientation
LGBTQI+ identities are associated with poorer
health and wellbeing.
The adult Strategic needs
assessment  -
http://www.wdhscp.org.uk/med
ia/2521/sna-aop-june-2022.pdf
Positive and negative impact - included in cross cutting section.
Human
Rights
Right to equality
Fairness Respect Equality Dignity Autonomy
The right for respect for private and family life,
dignity and autonomy protected by the HRA
(Article 8 of the European Convention on Human
Rights) and by Article 19 of the Convention on
the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
Human Rights Act Positive and negative impact - included in cross cutting section.
Health The longstanding impacts of poverty, poor
employment and multiple deprivation have led to
a less healthy population in West
Dunbartonshire.
The adult Strategic needs
assessment  -
http://www.wdhscp.org.uk/med
ia/2521/sna-aop-june-2022.pdf
Positive and negative impact - included in cross cutting section.
Social and
Economic
Impact
Overall, substantially higher proportions of
people in the most deprived areas in Scotland
receive home care support; 26% of people
receiving home care lived in the most deprived
areas, compared to 13.9% in the least deprived.
However, this varies by age; 36.2% of those
aged 16-64 receiving home care lived in the
most deprived areas, compared to 7.5% in the
least deprived, while there was little difference in
the age 85 and over age group
The adult Strategic needs
assessment  -
http://www.wdhscp.org.uk/med
ia/2521/sna-aop-june-2022.pdf
Positive and negative impact - included in cross cutting section. 
Cross Cutting Impacts on all protected characteristics and
external impacts.
The adult Strategic needs
assessment  -
http://www.wdhscp.org.uk/med
ia/2521/sna-aop-june-2022.pdf
Service User - Positive impact
 Personal care is a free service within Scotland. Personal care will
continue to be provided and be free to all ages and to service users
who are eligible for the service.
 Removing the maximum charge, means service users who can afford
to pay for services will do so.

Page 8

 The revised ARG process, requires every service user to have a
completed My Life Assessment and financial assessment. These
documents allow a discussion with the service user if they wish for
their benefits to be maximized and a referral to be made. The
process allows practitioners to think that non critical services such as
social support, day service, are services which service users can use
their benefits to pay for.
 Those who receive Independent Living fund are typically a service
user of the Learning and physical disability service. Currently those
receiving ILF are not required to pay any charges for a HSCP service
as they already contribute towards their services via their ILF. On the
1st April 2024, the ILF fund was open to everyone. This means there
will be a higher amount of people who will have access to this fund
and be eligible for a free service.
Service user – Negative Impact
 If a service user has a partner who lives in the same household, then
their finances need to be reviewed collectively even if only one
person receives social care support. If the threshold is split based on
age, then the partnership threshold will be different based on age.
For example, if you are a couple and are below the retirement age
then the threshold is lower.
 Adding in different threshold for those who are at retirement age and
those who are not, means those who haven’t reached retirement age
have a lesser threshold to meet and have a higher chance they will
need to pay a charge. The Equalities act states age as a protected
characteristic meaning that no one should be discriminated based on
their age. COSLA state HSCPs should consider this if there will be
different thresholds based on age.
 Currently service users pay 50p for every £1 of means tested
services. By increasing the taper to 75% this means service users
would pay 75p for every £1. This means service users will be paying
for the same service they receive now. This could lead to cancelling
the service and not meeting their required outcomes.
 A service user may cancel the service if they cannot afford it.
 ILF service user pay the ILF fund an amount for services they
receive. If ILF service users were to be charged, this mean they
would need to pay the maximum HSCP charge minus the charge
they pay ILF, which would equal the charge ILF service users would
be charged by HSCP.

Page 9

Issue Description Action Description Actioner Name Due Date
Ownership of supporting
service users with benefit
forms.
Consider who should be
helping service users
complete benefit forms.
Currently a social worker
should refer to Working4u or
help the service user
complete the form
Julie Slavin TBC
Under-utilisation of
Attendance Allowance.
Currently in WDC.
Promote the under-
utilisation of Attendance
Allowance. Currently 15% of
eligible citizens receive
attendance allowance,
meaning 85% should be,
but aren’t.
Julie Slavin TBC
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be
Implemented, please provide justification for this.
The charges are for non-critical services, service users who use these services are eligible for attendance allowance, and can use these benefits to pay for these services.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
HSCP positive impact
 Other Local Authorities will be increasing their taper, therefore WDC
HSCP would be implementing a similar change.
HSCP negative impact
 If HSCP implemented different thresholds for those who are retired or
not, there is a risk of reputational damage, as the thresholds were
removed in 2022 because of the equality impact on age.
 In 2022, HSCP decided not to pay ILF service users, if ILF service
users were to be charged there is a risk of reputational damage to
HSCP.

Page 10

Yes – the charging policy is reviewed on a yearly basis.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Implement the following changes:
 Add in different thresholds based on age
 Increase taper from 50% to 75%
 Charge ILF service users for social care
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the
Reviewing the feedback from consultation and feedback from staff.

Page 11

No embedded text on this page.