Democracy Spraffa

Item 6-Appendix 9

West Dunbartonshire Council · 5 March 2025
Back to West Dunbartonshire Council — 5 March 2025 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Some pages contain no extractable text. They may be blank, graphics or scanned pages. OCR has not been applied.

Page 1

Assessment No 1118 Owner Amanda Graham                                  
Resource Transformation Service Budget CCF
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Amanda Graham Chief Officer
Members Amanda Graham, Chief Officer
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title CCF 01 Reduce Highland Games Spend 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
In March 2024, a saving option was approved which removed the £14,000 grant for
future years and directed the Games committee towards WDCVS for assistance with
applying for external funding or to seek sponsorship for the event.
Given recent service reductions to deliver savings and the requirement to ensuring
overtime spend is essential, it would be extremely challenging to provide staffing and
meet the other costs of the event. 
The Games Committee opted not to stage the event in 2024, and an opportunity exists
to remove all funding and generate a saving for the Council of circa £15,000 from
budgets. The Games Committee would have the option to proceed with the event
independently and meet all costs.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
WDLT
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Residents, visitors, local businesses.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
WDLT
APPENDIX 9

Page 2

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Health                        N/A N/A N/A
Age                           N/A N/A N/A
Disability                    N/A N/A N/A
Gender Reassign               N/A N/A N/A
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
N/A N/A N/A
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
N/A N/A N/A
Race                          N/A N/A N/A
Religion and Belief           N/A N/A N/A
Sex                           N/A N/A N/A
Sexual Orientation            N/A N/A N/A
Human Rights                  Universal Declaration of
Human Rights Article 27
says everyone has the right
to freely participate in the
cultural life of the
community, to share
scientific advances and its
benefits, and to get credit
for their own work. This
article firmly incorporates
cultural rights as human
rights for all.
UNCRC considerations. in
terms of provision,
protection and participation.
The organisers did not hold the
games in 23/24.
Unlikely to have a
significant impact, if
games continued. 
More likely to have an
impact if the committee
decide not to continue
with games.
Other cultural
participation
opportunities are
available in West
Dunbartonshire.
Cross Cutting                 Important to look at how
factors may crosscut and to
consider any cumulative
impacts.
The Council stages free events
including family fun days,
which take place in parks
including Moss o’Balloch, the
Pipe Band Championships in
Dumbarton and the annual
fireworks display.
Other cultural
participation
opportunities are
available in West
Dunbartonshire, with
those provided by the
Council being free of
charge.
Social & Economic
Impact     
Need to consider Fairer
Scotland Duty
requirements.
The organisers did not hold the
games in 23/24. No major
economic negative impact was
noted.
Potentially may impact
on the local economy if
the committee decided
not to proceed with the
event as a result of the
withdrawal of grant,
though it is unlikely that
the impact would be
major.

Page 3

Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Other cultural events occur in West Dunbartonshire. The Council stages free events including family fun
days, which take place in parks including Moss o’Balloch, the Pipe Band Championships in Dumbarton
and the annual fireworks display.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
No
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1118: We have considered the potential socio-economic impact in line with the Fairer
Scotland Duty and have concluded there is likely to be minimal impact for example on
businesses, even if the Loch Lomond Highland Games committee decide not to continue with the
games. We have also considered impacts from a Human Rights perspective, including UNCRC,
and do not believe that there would be any significant impact on fulfilment of rights by reducing
this non-core funding. 
If the games did not proceed a local opportunity for cultural participation would no longer be
available. Other cultural participation opportunities are available in West Dunbartonshire, with
those provided by the Council being free of charge.

Page 4

Assessment No 1123 Owner Amanda Graham                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget CCF
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Lauren Crooks Manager
Members Citizen, Culture and Facilities
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title CCF 02 Reduce or Close Clydebank Town Hall
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
Clydebank Town Hall is currently open as standard Tuesday to Friday with flexible
opening out with this for events which generate an income. In light of the high property
costs of the building the opening hours could be revised further. 
A further review of usage and bookings would be undertaken to ascertain the most
appropriate days for opening and closure.
Option 1 – Clydebank Town Hall opening reduced to three days a week (£15k saving)
Building would continue to open on additional days as required to support pre-booked
events as the cost is mitigated by the income generated. Access for elected members
and support staff would be maintained on three week days.
Option 2 - Clydebank Town Hall operates four days with reduced hours daily (£8k
saving)
Reduced hours would be introduced on each day, for example the building could
open, 9am to 1pm each day, or from 1pm to 5pm. Clydebank Town Hall would
continue to open as required to support pre-booked events as the cost would be
mitigated by the income generated.
Engagement would take place with current building users to identify the most suitable
opening days/times and to publicise any change of opening. Elected members and
support staff would continue to have access to the building three/four/five days a week
with reduced hours with dates for committee and Council business protected.
Option 3 - Clydebank Town Hall closure (£315k saving TBC)
Under this option, the building would be closed and added to the commercial portfolio
to market for sale. Elected member and member support accommodation would be
created within alternative premises in the area. All current bookings up to end March
2026 would be honoured.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
CCF
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes

Page 5

Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Employees whose normal place of work is in Clydebank Town Hall
Elected members
Residents and visitors
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
There will be engagement with current building users to identify the most suitable opening days/times and
to publicise any change of opening.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Accessible community
spaces
contribute to community
cohesion.
Physical spaces may be even
more important to older
people, however other age
groups also value physical
spaces.
For all options the
building will remain
open. Reduction in
hours has a potential
impact on this group
because it reduces the
availability of a local
cultural space. It should
be noted that cultural
offer is also available in
the adjacent Clydebank
Library. Identifying a
sustainable path in
terms of opening hours
for the Town Hall would
have a positive impact.
Cross Cutting                 Accessible community
spaces
contribute to community
cohesion. Any changes to
opening hours needs
to be clearly communicated
to members of the public.
Clydebank Town Hall provides
a unique facility within the
Clydebank area in terms of
size.
Sharing spaces and social
contact can help foster good
relations and support
community cohesions.
Any option adopted
needs to take these
factors into
consideration. For all
options the building will
remain open. Reduction
in hours has a potential
impact on user groups
because it reduces the
availability of a local
cultural space. It should
be noted that cultural
activities are also offered
in the adjacent
Clydebank Library.
Identifying a sustainable
path in terms of opening
hours for the Town Hall
would have a positive
impact.

Page 6

Disability                    We have an anticipatory
duty to make sure that such
services as the Council
provides are accessible to
disable people.
Accessible spaces are 
important. Feedback from
Deaf/BSL
users for example has noted a
preference for this venue for
engagement.
For all options the
building will remain
open. Reduction in
hours has a potential
impact on this group
because it reduces the
availability of a local
cultural space. It should
be noted that cultural
offer is also available in
the adjacent Clydebank
Library. Identifying a
sustainable path in
terms of opening hours
for the Town Hall would
have a positive impact.
Social & Economic
Impact     
We need to consider the
impact of major decisions in
line with the October 2021
Statutory Guidance on the
Fairer Scotland Duty.
A reduction in opening hours
could reduce income to the
area and may impact on visitor
numbers.
Negative.
Sex                           We need to be aware of
and consider any differential
impact in terms of sex.
Option 3 would result in the
loss of up to four jobs as well
as impacting on casual staff.
Staff would be supported
through the Council’s policies
including Switch.
Any reduction in posts
would more likely affect
women due to workforce
gender profile
Gender Reassign              
Health                       
Human Rights                  Under UN rights everyone
has the right freely to
participate in the cultural life
of the community, to enjoy
the arts and to share in
scientific advancement and
its benefits.
As a matter of good practice
we should consider impacts
on Children and Young
people.
In terms of young people, there
are a number of dance shows
as well as a couple of junior
theatre groups.
Arts and Heritage also host
school visits.
Under options 1 and 2
the building will remain
open. Reduction in
hours has a potential
impact on this group
because it reduces the
availability of a local
cultural space. It should
be noted that cultural
offer is also available in
the adjacent Clydebank
Library. Identifying a
sustainable path in
terms of opening hours
for the Town Hall would
have a positive impact.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Men and women of age,
without any limitation due to
race, nationality or religion,
have the right to marry and
to found a family.
On average there are 20 plus
ceremonies a year.
A reduction in hours at
this venue reduces
space in the area for
marriage ceremonies
and celebrations.
However identifying a
sustainable path in
terms of opening hours
for the Town
Hall would have a
positive impact.
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race

Page 7

Religion and Belief          
Sexual Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Option 3 would result in the loss of up to four jobs as well as impacting on casual staff. Staff would be
supported through the Council’s policies including Switch.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Yes
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1123: For options 1 and 2 the building will remain open, thus minimizing impacts, which
may be negative in terms of cultural participation especially for local people. Similar cultural
offer is available in the adjacent Clydebank Library. Identifying a sustainable path in terms of
opening hours for the Town Hall would have a positive impact.
Option 3 would result in the loss of up to four jobs as well as impacting on casual staff. Staff
would be supported through the Council’s policies including Switch.
Any reduction in posts would more likely affect women due to workforce gender profile.

Page 8

Assessment No 1113 Owner Amanda Graham                             
Resource Transformation Service Budget CCF
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Amanda Graham Chief Officer
Members Stephen Daly - Citizen and Library Service Manager
Lorraine Phimister
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title CCF 03 Reduce Staffed Citizen Services Provision at Church Street
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
The front desk at Church Street is the only office location where residents can access
services face to face.  There are two savings options being considered which would
impact face to face provision.  
Under Option 1, the service would be removed, and residents would be directed to
use the phone lines currently provided in reception to call the contact centre or, in the
case of emergencies, contact the services direct. This would generate a saving of
circa £30,000 per annum. 
Under Option 2, face to face support would continue to be provided on a part time
basis for example 10 am to 1pm daily, with residents able to use telephones in
reception out with these times.  This would generate savings of circa £15,000 per
annum. 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Citizen Services
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Members of the public, service users and potential service users
Staff may receive more telephone and other queries if face to face is removed
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?

Page 9

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Gender Reassign               It is important that services
are accessible to trans
people.
See info. under sexual
orientation.
Potentially negative.
Race                          Services must adhere to the
public sector equality duty
(PSED).
The council does not have a
system in place to ensure that
Language Line can be
accessed for callers on the
telephone, in contrast we have
used language Line at Physical
public counters.
People from most BME groups
are more likely to be income
deprived than people from
most white ethnic groups.
Potential negative for all
groups and especially
negative for BME groups
who are more likely to
have communication
needs relating to
language that would
currently be much better
address via initial face to
face contact.
Sex                           Services must adhere to the
public sector equality duty
(PSED).
Currently more female
employees staff this
workstation than male
employees.
On average women are more
likely to be income deprived
than men, e.g. women make
up 90% of single parents.
Women and children are more
likely to experience domestic
abuse and gender based
violence, and for example may
have been cut off from money
and bank accounts.
This has the potential to
disproportionally impact
female employees. This
could potentially have a
negative impact on
females who require
assistance and have no
other means to contact
the Council.
Cross Cutting                 We need to take into
account how factors
combine to impact groups
and individuals.
We need to take into
account potential impacts
on services across the
Council and partner
organisations such as
WDHSCP which provide
services from Church Street
At the time of the original EIA
in 2022, there was no clear
evidence of impact of similar
change caused by closing of
Clydebank Town Centre Office
as this was done during the
period of the Covid lockdown.
However, during budget focus
groups in October 2023,
participants note that the
Clydebank Town Centre Office
was valuable, to be able to visit
and an accessible and
effective way of raising and
sorting issues. 
The Scottish Women's Budget
Group notes that women and
girls have a disproportionate
reliance on local government
services because they do most
of the unpaid care work and
Overall impact would be
negative.
Interplay of factors such
as sex, race and
disability can magnify
likelihood of
consequences.

Page 10

therefore rely on local services
to support themselves and
their families. Decisions made
about locally run public
services will therefore have a
greater impact on women, with
disabled women, carers,
women from ethnic minority
communities, single parents
and low paid women likely to
feel the biggest impacts.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Cross cuts with sex, in
terms of women and
children.
Cross cuts with sex, in terms of
women and children.
Cross cuts with sex, in
terms of women and
children.
Religion and Belief           Though race and ethnicity
are not the same as religion
and belief, there is some
cross over in the of
experience of communities.
Though race and ethnicity are
not the same as religion and
belief, there is some cross over
in the of experience of
communities.
Potentially negative for
some groups.
Sexual Orientation            Services must adhere to the
public sector equality duty
(PSED).
Research demonstrates that
LGBT+ people, especially
young people, are at particular
risk of experiencing
homelessness, and LGBTIQ+
people who are homeless have
specific needs that differ to the
rest of the homeless
population. (2019 and 2018
reports from Stonewall etc.)
There is evidence that LBG
people are more likely to suffer
social exclusion and may not
have access to social networks
in a way that others have.
This could potentially
have a negative impact
on LGBT+ groups who
require assistance and
have no other means to
contact the Council.
Human Rights                  The council is a duty bearer
in terms of the European
Convention of Human
Rights/Human rights Act
e.g. and Article 14, non-
discrimination.
It is important to consider
how children and young
people might be affected in
terms of Equality and
Human rights, and
Children's rights.
Human rights crosscut with
those under equalities, for
examples disability provisions,
and comments under gender-
based violence, women and
children.
Ensuring accessible
services is required to
protect human rights,
including children's
rights.
Health                        Health and wellbeing is a
Council focus area as noted
in our Strategic Plan 22-27.
People will often need to
contact the Council at times of
great stress.
Lack of a face to face
contact could increase
stress for some people.
Social & Economic
Impact     
We need to have regard to
the Fairer Scotland Duty in
terms of strategic decisions
including on how services
are delivered.
Having no face to face option
for initial contact would mean
that those who could not use
phone of digital method,
because of lack of resources
This could potentially
have a negative impact
on those on low incomes
who require assistance
and have no other

Page 11

The Council views tackling
poverty and deprivation as
a major concern, and
mitigating these effects as
much as possible.
and funds could be
discriminated against.
means to contact the
Council.
Disability                    The council has a legal duty
to ensure that services are
accessible to all disabled
people, this duty is
proactive /anticipatory, and
also requires that we make
reasonable adjustments as
necessary. This would
include consideration of a
range of factors including
opening hours.
Some disabled people will not
be able to use phones or have
difficultly doing so, e.g. hearing
loss is the most common form
of sensory impairment.  Lack
of face to face contact may
provide extra difficulties for
some people.
Disabled people, and
households with any disabled
person are more likely to be
income deprived.
Negative impact as
some service users may
be unable to use a
telephone and require
face to face assistance.
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
There would be a need and opportunity to put in place a robust system for calls and call backs, for
interpreting, using services such as Language Line for people who are not sufficiently fluent or cannot
speak English and using Contact Scotland BSL to enable Deaf users to access services.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Monitor the success of other contact methods for example using the telephone contact centre of out of
hours of services.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1113: The assessment details likely negative impacts in terms of race, disability and age,
health, human rights including children's rights, sexual orientation, pregnancy and maternity,
gender reassignment and socio-economic impact.  This in terms of reduction of service; issues
would be amplified with closure. 
Some challenges described may be mitigated with effective signposting and service delivery
continuing via the emergency repairs line for those unable to report online.  The lack of any face
to face option for the council if this was removed, could theoretically breach the Equality Act in
combination with other factors if services were in practice less accessible to disabled people. In
terms of accessibility needs to include consideration of a range of factors including opening
hours.

Page 12

4bgh
Assessment No 1115 Owner Amanda Graham                                   
Resource Transformation Service Budget CCF
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Amanda Graham Chief Officer
Members Stephen Daly - Citizen Services
Lorraine Phimister
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title CCF 09 Reduce Contact Centre
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
Currently Citizen Services operates the Customer Contact Centre, Housing Repairs
Contact Centre and provides a front of house service at 16 Church Street. 
The Council recognises that for many people, their digital skills, literacy or deprivation
can prevent them from accessing the internet and for this reason it is important to
maintain alternative means of contacting the Council. It is recognised that for a
number of people the option to call rather than access services online is a preference
rather than a necessity. 
Currently the contact centre employs twelve (11.18FTE) staff. 
Option 1
Under this option, this number would be reduced by 1 FTE. Work would continue to
promote alternative methods of contacting or reporting issues to the Council including
via email and via the website. This would generate a saving of circa £30k per annum
(inclusive of oncosts)
Option 2
Under this option, this number would be reduced by 2 FTE. Work would continue to
promote alternative methods of contacting or reporting issues to the Council including
via email and via the website. This would generate a saving of circa £60k per annum
(inclusive of oncosts)
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Citizen Services
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?

Page 13

West Dunbartonshire Council Citizens, Businesses and Visitors.
The Contact Centre acts as a first point of engagement for a significant number of Council services.
Reducing staffing would still retain telephone services for those without internet access or for those
requiring urgent assistance. Each member of staff within the centre answers an average of 300 calls per
week. 
Reduction in staff in turn would reduce the calls answered by this amount and increase wait times,
currently there is a 3-minute response time target. This is an average derived from all calls throughout the
year and there are times when we are currently not meeting this target due to call volume.
A reduction by one member of staff would increase the average call answer time to 6 minutes meaning at
peak times the call wait could be upwards of 30 minutes.
A reduction by two members of staff would increase the average call answer time to 10 minutes meaning
at peak times the call wait could be upwards of 45 minutes.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Citizen Services
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Cross cuts with sex. Cross cuts with sex. Cross cuts with sex.
Age                           The Council must not
discriminate in the way it
provided services.
Older people are more likely to
be disabled.
Negative for some older
people who rely entirely
on telephone services.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Sexual Orientation           
Disability                    The council has a legal duty
to make its services
accessible to disabled
people, this is both
proactively ('Anticipatory')
and also requires
Reasonable Adjustments.
Waiting time increases may
have more effect on those
living with certain impairments
or conditions.
Negative for some
disabled people who rely
entirely on telephone
services.
Race                          The Council must not
discriminate in the way it
provides services.
Service users with no or little
English would potentially face
additional barriers due to
increased waiting time. There
is no system in place for
language Line use in this
Contact method although there
is an opportunity to build this
in.
Potentially more
negative for speakers of
languages other than
English.
Religion and Belief          
Sex                           We need to take into
account differential impacts.
Research shows that women
are overall more reliant on
pubic services.
Because of staff
composition reduction
on posts will affect
women more than men.

Page 14

Women make up 90% of single
parents.
Currently all contact centre
employees are women apart
from one man.
Women are more likely to be in
poverty than men e.g. women
make up 90% of single
parents.
Human Rights                  United Nations Convention
on the Rights of the Child -
'provision' is a relevant
consideration
Cross cuts with sex and age
(children and young people).
Some potential
disadvantage in terms of
level of provision.
Health                        Health and wellbeing is a
focus area in the Council's
Strategic Plan.
Accessing help and advice in
good time can help reduce
stress.
Could have negative
impact of services users
due to stress of not
being able to speak to
someone or having to
wait longer. Could
increase stress of
contact centre
employees.
Social & Economic
Impact     
The Council has a focus on
reducing poverty.
Cross cuts with sex in this
instance.
Negative see 'sex'
above.
Cross Cutting                 It is important that the
Council takes account of
how factors might interact.
The Scottish Women's Budget
Group notes that women and
girls have a disproportionate
reliance on local government
services because they do most
of the unpaid care work and 
therefore rely on local services
to support themselves and
their families. Decisions made
about locally run public
services will therefore have a
greater impact on women, with
disabled women, carers,
women from ethnic minority
communities, single parents
and low paid women likely to
feel the biggest impacts.
Increased waiting time
may have negative
effect on both services
users and staff overall.
Gender Reassign              
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
There would be a need and opportunity to improve online processes and communication across Council
services to help reduce the number of calls from residents who can self-manage, therefore potentially
reducing call wait times for those who require additional support.   
There would be a need and opportunity to put in place a robust system for calls and call backs via
Language Line and using Contact BSL as required. 
If replying to voice messages being left, systems in place would need to provide a reliable and timely
callback/contact
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?

Page 15

Yes
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1115: Waiting times are likely to increase. Details potential negative impacts for service
users who are older people, disabled people and some members of some BME groups, women
and children. There would be a need and opportunity to put in place a robust system for calls and
call backs via Language Line and using Contact BSL as required. As the vast majority of staff are
female reductions are likely to affect women more than men.

Page 16

Assessment No 1122 Owner Amanda Graham                                   
Resource Transformation Service Budget CCF
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Amanda Graham Chief Officer
Members Amanda Graham, Chief Officer for Citizen, Culture and Facilities 
Ricardo Rea
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title CCF10 Remove Community Budgeting Fund
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
The Communities Team budget includes a controllable Payments to Other Bodies that
is distributed to community groups through Participatory Budgeting (PB). In West
Dunbartonshire this model of grant giving is known as Community Budgeting (CB). 
The Community Choices 1% Framework Agreement between COSLA and the
Scottish Government commits to enabling local citizens to decide how 1% of local
authority annual budget should be spent to be taken. The CB allocation contributes to
the Council’s annual return.
A budget of £27,000 was available for groups to bid for in 2024. Community Budgeting
is small grants and only delivered every two years to avoid groups becoming reliant. It
did not take place in 2023/24 and is not scheduled to take place in 2025/26.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Elected members, senior management and Communities Team management.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
The staff members, other council service areas and the service users/communities that the team support.
The Communities Team supports the empowerment / youth empowerment agenda in a variety of ways
including through the Community Budgeting (CB) process. 
This is a democratic process where local citizens can vote to decide what groups / projects should be
awarded grant funding. The Council has been successfully delivering CB over 6 phases now since 2016
allowing local people to direct almost £1m in support to valuable community organisations. The fund is
well established, and the local democratic process has continuously improved through meaningful
participation from local people ensuring those involved improve their confidence, skills and social
networks.

Page 17

This process responds to the Community Choices Framework agreement between CoSLA and the
Scottish Government that commits that local authorities will target 1% of their annual budgets through
participatory processes. 
The money was directed by local people to support the continuation or start-up of community projects and
organisation. These are often projects that support life skills, confidence building, isolation, addictions,
health and well-being, poverty of opportunity and food and fuel poverty.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Elected member, senior officers and the Communities management team.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Council Equality Outcome
on increasing participation
of younger people.
Previous rounds of CB have
supported groups that provide
sport, craft and cultural
activities for young people
giving many an opportunity to
participate in a safe and
welcoming environment. 
This fund has supported a
range of organisations that
deliver community-based
services for people of all ages.
Many groups are focused on
supporting young people to
provide opportunities to
engage in positive activities. 
Each phase of community
budgeting has allowed the
process to improve and the
community to further benefit
from the funding. Each project
provides an evaluation report
ensuring that the funding is
reaching the most vulnerable
in our communities.
Potentially some
negative impact for
some groups with a
focus on older or young
people
Cross Cutting                 West Dunbartonshire
benefits from a wealth of
community organisations
delivering valuable services
to support people in our
most disadvantaged
communities. These groups
rely on the voluntary
commitment of local people
aiming to make a difference
in their communities. The
groups that have been
supported through this fund
Empowering communities and
increasing local democracy is
a preventative approach to
increase individual and
community resilience that in
turn reduces the burden on
public services. By supporting
community organisations to
expand their offer to those
most in need across the
authority supports the
ambitions set out in the Local
Outcome Improvement Plan
The impact reductions
are more likely to fall on
more disadvantaged
communities to varying
degrees. 
Removal will have an
impact on the council's
commitment to the
Community Choices 1%
Framework Agreement
between COSLA and the
Scottish Government.

Page 18

in the past include: food
banks, addiction support
services, disability groups,
faith groups, groups that
support young people into
sporting activities,
diversionary activities,
creative clubs, Information
Technology clubs,
development trusts and
isolation support groups.
This does not cover all the
groups supported but
provides confirmation that
this fund has a very wide
reach and impact. The fund
supports priority groups
across the authority and
seeks to support others to
address poverty of
opportunity.
and Strategic Plan of
addressing inequalities. Many
community groups operate in
areas suffering from multiple
deprivation and represent
many different equality groups. 
Community groups provide
important benefits that include
opportunities for people to
meet, socialise, improve their
confidence, their health and
tackle social isolation.
The reduction will be
reflected in the return to
the Scottish Government
or will be made-up
elsewhere in the
organisation.  
No group is completely
reliant on this funding.
The Council would
continue to promote
wider participatory
budgeting.
Disability                    Council Equality Outcome
increasing participation of
disabled people.
Disability groups have been
supported in the past and
include National Autistic
Society, West Dunbartonshire
Dyslexia Support,
Shopmobility, West
Dunbartonshire Epilepsy
Support Group, The Big
Disability Group and Get up
and Go Youth Club.
Collectively these groups
support hundreds of people on
a regular occurrence across
the authority. 
A number of disability groups
have applied repeatedly and
been successful in securing
money through the community
budgeting process. 
Disabled people and those
living in a household with a
disabled person are more likely
to be income deprived.
Potentially some
negative impact for
some groups with a
focus on disabled people
Social & Economic
Impact     
Tackling poverty especially
child poverty is priority for
the Council and this fund
has supported foodbanks
on every occasion. 
Some groups funded in the
past have a focus on reducing
effects of socio-economic
inequality.
Removal may result in
reduced ability to tackle
the effects of economic
and financial inequality
for some groups.
Sex                          
Gender Reassign              
Health                        Empowered and active
communities improve
people's physical and
mental health. It supports
communities to come
together and to make
connections which for some
Groups that offer drama,
martial arts, creative arts and
addiction support can all make
a difference to someone's
health and / mental health.
These have been funded in the
past.
Some of the activities
provided by groups
because of this funding
may cease or have to be
funded from elsewhere.

Page 19

can be the only opportunity
to engage with others.
Community budgeting
supports this coming
together of people by
supporting a wide range of
organisations to continue to
hold events and promote
activity.
Collectively these groups
support hundreds of people on
a regular occurrence across
the authority. The impact on
the Council/HSCP could be
significant if these groups were
not supported to continue their
work.
Human Rights                 
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                          Council Equality Outcome
increasing participation of
BME groups.
At the Scotland level it is
recognised that BME are under
presented in terms of
participation.
May have potentially
negative consequences
for BME groups though it
should be noted that
direct funding to groups
with a BME focus/user
base from fund this been
very limited.
Religion and Belief          
Sexual Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Removing the funding will likely have a negative impact on some, though groups funded in the past do not
completely rely on these funds, which are available only every two years. Groups are able to apply for
community grants and community wellbeing funding, youth transition, via the Council. Some of the
organisations who have benefited from Community Budgeting have also been supported by this funding.
The Council would continue to promote wider participatory budgeting.
WDCVS is also a source of information about funding for groups.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Yes
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1122:  Removing the funding may have some negative impact on some groups funded in the
past, some of which have supported disabled, younger and older and people and thus their service
users. Groups funded in the past do not completely rely on these funds, and these funds were only
available every two years.
Groups are able to apply for community grants and community wellbeing funding via the
Council. WDCVS is a source of information about funding for groups. There is also funding
available for through other routes for example the Scottish Governments Communities Mental
Health and Wellbeing Fund. The Council would continue to promote wider participatory
budgeting as a way of communities more directly influencing Council spend.

Page 20

Assessment No 1120 Owner Amanda Graham                                
Resource Transformation Service Budget CCF
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Amanda Graham Chief
Members Amanda Graham, Chief Officer, Citizen, Culture and Facilities
Ricardo Rea
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title CCF 11 Remove Community Engagement Budget
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
The Communities Team budget includes a controllable element referred to as the
Community Engagement budget. The total available in 2024 was £22,000. Over the
years the funding has been committed to a range of projects to support the community
empowerment agenda. This option would see the budget removed. Money has been
used by organisations to help them engage with people and communities about their
services or related issues.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Communities Team management.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
The staff members, other council service areas and the service users/communities that the team support.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Elected member, senior officers and the Communities management team.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact

Page 21

Religion and Belief          
Age                           Council Equality Outcome
increasing participation.
Participation amongst younger
age groups, 18- 34 is
significantly lower than other
age groups in WD. 
Work has been underway to
find different channels of
engagement with young
people and organisations
related to them. For example,
recent conversations with
young people on the Council's
budget priorities.
This may have a
potentially negative
impact on the support
that the team can
provide for participation
of young people.
Disability                    Council Equality Outcome
increasing participation.
Disabled people and those
living in a household with a
disabled person are more likely
to be less able to participate
fully in community life.
This may have a
potentially negative
impact on the support
that the team can
provide for participation
of disabled people.
Other avenues for
participation do exist for
example through West
Dunbartonshire Equality
Forum.
Gender Reassign              
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                          Council Equality Outcome
increasing participation of
BME groups.
BME groups are more likely to
have barriers to participate
fully in community life.
This may have a
potentially negative
impact on the support
that the team can
provide for participation
of BME groups. 
Other avenues for
participation do exist for
example through West
Dunbartonshire Equality
Forum.
Sex                          
Sexual Orientation           
Human Rights                  UNCRC considerations in
terms of participation and
young people.
Cross cuts with 'Age'.
See information on other
engagement work with
younger people and
organisations related to them.
Potentially negative in
terms of provision and
participation of young
people.
Other work is underway
to increase participation
of younger people.
Health                        The WDC Strategic Plan
2022-27, identifies health
and wellbeing as a priority.
Empowered and active
communities improve people's
physical and mental health. It
supports communities to come
together and to make
Removal of the
Community Engagement
budget will reduce the
number of groups or

Page 22

connections which for some
can be the only opportunity to
engage with others.
events that can be
supported.
Social & Economic
Impact     
Tackling poverty especially
child poverty is priority for
the Council.
Participation amongst people
from more deprived socio-
economic positions is relatively
low in WD compared to less
deprived groups.
Any reduction in the
Community Engagement
budget will reduce the
number of groups or
events that can be
supported. This in turn
will impact the
individuals and
communities the group
supports. It will have an
impact on the methods
of engagement used by
the team and would
reduce the team’s
capacity to reach those
that have never engaged
before including
communities that are
most deprived.
Cross Cutting                 West Dunbartonshire
benefits from a wealth of
community organisations
delivering valuable services
to support people in our
most disadvantaged
communities. These groups
rely on the voluntary
commitment of local people
aiming to make a difference
in their communities.
Empowering communities and
increasing local democracy is
a preventative approach to
increase individual and
community resilience that in
turn reduces the burden on
public services. By supporting
community organisations to
expand their offer to those
most in need across the
authority supports the
ambitions set out in the Local
Outcome Improvement Plan
and Strategic Plan of
addressing inequalities. Many
community groups operate in
areas suffering from multiple
deprivation and represent
many different equality groups. 
Community groups provide
important benefits that include
opportunities for people to
meet, socialise, improve their
confidence, their health and
tackle social isolation.
Removal of the
Community Engagement
budget will reduce the
number of groups or
events that can be
supported. This in turn
will impact the
individuals and
communities the group
supports. It will have an
impact on the methods
of engagement used by
the Council.
Other engagement
opportunities are
available in West
Dunbartonshire which
may mitigate the loss of
funding. The Council will
continue to engage
residents in key decision
making consultations
such as the Council
Budget setting, Rent
setting as well as
regeneration proposals.
In addition, the Citizens
Panel offers the
community to express
their views on topics
such as living in West
Dunbartonshire.

Page 23

Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
It is important The Council will continue to support communities; however removal of Community
Engagement budget will reduce the number of groups or events that can be supported.  
Other engagement work is ongoing in West Dunbartonshire for examples through the West
Dunbartonshire Equality Forum, job fairs supported, and events such as the recent anti-poverty event. The
Council will continue to have a focus on engaging with underrepresented groups including younger people
and people from BME groups.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1120: Some potential negative impacts for more deprived communities and certain equality
groups, removing a resource that could help advance our equality outcome on increasing
participation of underrepresented groups. 
The Council will still be able to sign post groups to other potential sources of funding for
example information via WDCVS. Other networking and opportunities will continue to exist for
example West Dunbartonshire Equality forum, and evident such as Job Fairs and the recent anti-
poverty event which engaged a range of groups. The Council will continue to have a focus on
engaging with underrepresented groups including younger people and people from BME groups
in line with our Equality Outcomes.

Page 24

Assessment No 1201 Owner Lauren Crooks                                  
Resource Transformation Service Budget CCF
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Lauren Crooks Manager
Members Amanda Graham
Ricardo Rea
Lauren Crooks
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title CCF 18 Reduction in Arts and Heritage
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
Option 1
The team would reduce by 25% (1.5 FTE), and consideration would require to
be given to which area of work would no longer be supported. As provision of
archives is statutory, and due to the requirement for support in capital
projects and exhibitions, reductions would require to be taken from other
areas. It is likely that this would result in reduced support for learning
programmes with schools, family history, and the on-site support for heritage
centres, enquiries, maintenance of collections and research undertaken on
behalf of other Council services and exhibitions. Budgets in these areas would
also reduce accordingly and this is reflected in the total saving below.
Option 2
The team would reduce by 50% (3.0 FTE), Given statutory requirement around
archives, the reduction would see all engagement and learning activity cease,
including the Finding Your Place Programme, participation in the Creative
Scotland Visual Arts and Crafts Makers Awards (VACMA) Award Scheme;
initiatives over school holiday periods and during Winter in West
Dunbartonshire. This would also result in only part-time staffing provision
across venues including Glencairn and there would be no staffing during
periods of leave.  Reduced access to and participation with collections could
lead to the service losing its accreditation status resulting in inability to seek
external funding, seek item loans and work in partnership within the cultural
sector. Budgets in these areas would also reduce accordingly and is reflected
in the total saving below.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
CCF
Libraries

Page 25

Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Arts & heritage team
Young people
Residents
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Need to assess impact on
different age groups.
Need recognise cross
cutting impacts for
children and young
people and UNCRC
considerations.
Option 1: It is likely that this
would result in reduced
support for learning
programmes with schools
Option 2: all engagement
and learning activity cease,
including the Finding Your
Place Programme,
participation in the Creative
Scotland Visual Arts and
Crafts Makers Awards
(VACMA) Award Scheme;
initiatives over school
holiday periods and during
Negative especially in
terms of provision of
children and young
people.

Page 26

Winter in West
Dunbartonshire.
Disability                    Need to assess any
potential impacts on
disabled people and
households with disabled
members.
Household with disabled
members are more likely to
be in relative poverty and
have less disposable income
compared to non disabled
households. They are more
likely to be reliant on ‘no
direct cost' activities.
Potentially more
negative on disabled
people due to
economic position.
Gender Reassign              
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                          Need to assess potential
impacts for different
ethnic groups.
Most BME and Gypsy
Travellers are more likely to
be in relative poverty than
most white ethnicities. 
They are more likely to be
more reliant on 'no direct
cost' activities.
Potentially more on
most BME groups
people due to
economic position,
Potentially more
negative on
Gypsy/Travellers for
the same reason.
Religion and
Belief          
Sex                           Need to assess any
differential impact.
Gender split in workforce is
five female, two male.
Evidence indicates that in
the UK women are more
reliant on public services
than men. Women are
more likely to be care givers
and are also 90% of single
parents.
Women are more likely to
be in relative poverty than
men.  
If there was reduction
in post it is possible
that women might be
affected more
because of gender
composition.
Reductions in services
that affect children
are also more likely to
affect women.
Sexual
Orientation           
Human Rights                  UNCRC considerations
cross cut with 'Age' in
this case 'Provision' is
relevant in the context of
Article 31 (leisure, play
Option 1: It is likely that this
would result in reduced
support for heritage
learning programmes with
schools.
Negative in terms of
heritage provision for
children and young
people within schools.
Access to heritage and

Page 27

and culture) which
states:
"Every child has the right
to relax, play and 
take part in a wide range
of cultural and 
artistic activities.' 
Option 2: would cease such
provision.
culture is still available
in museum spaces.
Health                       
Social &
Economic
Impact     
Fairer Scotland Duty: due
regard to strategic
proposals to disinvest in
services is needed when
making decisions.
Option 2: Reduced access to
and participation with
collections could lead to the
service losing its
accreditation status
resulting in inability to seek
external funding, seek item
loans and work in
partnership within the
cultural sector. Budgets in
these areas would also
reduce accordingly and is
reflected in the total saving.
All engagement and
learning activity cease,
including the Finding Your
Place Programme,
participation in the Creative
Scotland Visual Arts and
Crafts Makers Awards
(VACMA) Award Scheme;
initiatives over school
holiday periods and during
Winter in West
Dunbartonshire.
Negative in terms of
social impact/cultural
participation. 
This may especially
impact people and
children from more
deprived
circumstances
Reduction in fund
raising ability.
Cross Cutting                 Important to consider
how proposals cross cut,
cumulative impacts and
intersectional effects e.g.
when people an
communities are part of
more than one
disadvantaged group.
Need to consider Scottish
Consumer duty where
relevant and not covered
by the rest of the content
of the EIA.
Likely impact on Libraries
service as Arts and Heritage
could not maintain staffing
in venues such as Clydebank
Museum (within library)
and Glencairn.
In this case consumer duty
considerations do not span
outside the areas already
addressed in the
assessment.
Cross cutting negative
on people belonging
to more than one
negatively affected
group.

Page 28

No embedded text on this page.

Page 29

Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
While the implementation of this policy will reduce the arts & heritage offer for residents, it will
not remove it completely. Young people and residents more generally will continue to have
opportunity to access heritage resources through visits to museums and local history spaces.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
No
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Inroduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1201: In terms of service provision both options 1 and 2 are likely more negative for men,
women, most BME groups, children including disabled children, disabled people and in terms of
'provision' when considering Children's rights. In terms of employees any reductions in
workforce due to gender make up would more likely affect women. Negative impacts are cross
cutting including with socio economic impacts on more deprived groups and families.
Option 2 would have greater negative impacts than option 1.

Page 30

Assessment No 1153 Owner Julie McGrogan                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laura Mason Chief Education Officer
Members Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer
Julie McGrogan - Senior Education Officer
Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer
Claire Cusick - Senior Education Officer
Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title EDU02 -Reduce School Clothing Grant to Statutory Level
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
In 2024/25 the Council pays £150 clothing grant to all eligible pupils, irrespective of
school sector they attend.
This proposal would reduce the school clothing grant to the statutory level of £120 for
primary aged pupils, and £150 for secondary aged pupils.
Reducing the level of funds provided to the families that need it most will have an
impact on the health and wellbeing of our most vulnerable families, and will have an
indirect impact on school attendance.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Consultation with other Council services who currently assist in the provision of this
service.  
Consultation with HR, HTs/HOC’s, TU’s to advise of possible changes.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Children attending schools, as this will affect their family’s ability to fund suitable clothing for school and
school uniform. 
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Consultation with other Council department who currently provide this service.  
Consultation with HR, HTs and TU’s to advise of possible impact on families.

Page 31

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                          
Cross Cutting                 The Council has a focus on
reducing child poverty.
We should have a focus on
intersectionality.
Cost of the school day is a
consideration.
The impacts above may
combine.
Disability                    Priority group in terms of
child poverty.
Households with one or more
disabled person are more likely
to be income deprived.
Negative.
Social & Economic
Impact     
The Council needs to
consider the interplay
between social and
economic factors.
Historically the School Clothing
Grant has been increased
locally as a direct response to
need.
Negative Impact.
A reduction in household
income by reducing the
School Clothing Grant
will impact the poorest in
our communities.
Sex                           Women/single parents;
Priority group in terms of
child poverty.
Women are more likely to
income deprived than men.
Around 90% of single. parents
are women.
Negative.
Gender Reassign              
Health                        Health and wellbeing are a
priority for the Council as
noted in our Strategic Plan
22-27.
Household income has a direct
correlation to health and
wellbeing.
Negative Impact.
There is a direct
correlation between
household income and
health - reducing the
School Clothing Grant
may impact negatively
on health and wellbeing.
Human Rights                  The right to clothing is
recognized as a human
right.
Article 25 of UDHR.
The Council has a focus of
reducing child poverty
UNCRC in terms of
'provision'
Article 27 (adequate
standard of living) 
Reducing clothing grant may
interfere with fulfillment of
these rights
Negative.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity

Page 32

Race                          BME families are a Priority
group in terms of child
poverty.
People from BME groups are
more likely to be income
deprived than those from white
groups.
Negative.
Religion and Belief          
Sexual Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The council has a duty to balance the budget.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
We will monitor impact by consulting Head Teachers. Monitoring will be carried out on a termly basis.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1153: The proposed reduction keeps us in line with our statutory obligation.  However, there
will be negative impacts compared to the current situation which will be more pronounced for
some groups that are more likely to be materially deprived.

Page 33

Assessment No 1154 Owner Julie McGrogan                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laura Mason Chief Education Officer
Members Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer
Julie McGrogan - Senior Education Officer
Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer
Claire Cusick - Senior Education Officer
Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title EDU03 – Reduce Education Maintenance Allowance to Statutory Level
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
Education Maintenance Allowance (EMA) gives financial support to eligible 16 - 19-
year-olds who want to continue learning. The statutory amount for EMA is a weekly
payment of £30, paid by WDC every two weeks in arrears. 
Presently, West Dunbartonshire Council also pay an additional £10 per week where a
young person has 100% attendance which effectively makes the payments £40 per
week should a young person have 100% attendance. 
WDC also recognise Young Carers and pay a further £10 per week for all registered
Young Carers. There are 64 pupils who are young carers and are eligible to apply for
EMA for session 23/24.
This savings proposal presents two options. This proposal was presented as a
savings option in 2024, with no option being taken.
Option 1
This option would reduce the amount we provide to the statutory level of £30 per
week, removing the additionality we provide. This option would generate a saving of
£89k.
Option 2
This option would remove the additional payment to young carers. This option would
generate an additional saving of £25k.
Option 3
This option combines options 1 and 2. This would generate a saving of £114k.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Consultation with other Council services who currently assist in the provision of this
service.  
Consultation with HR, HTs/HOC’s, TU’s to advise of possible changes.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas

Page 34

Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
All young people presently in receipt of the Education Maintenance Allowance who achieve 100%
attendance.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Consultation with other Council departments who are currently involved in the provision of this service.  
Consultation with HR, HTs/HOC’s and TU’s to advise of possible changes. 
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           EMA is provided to 16-19
year olds in education. The
top-up to the EMA is given
to a small sub-set who
achieve 100% attendance.
Reducing the amount paid will
impact negatively on those in
receipt, but whilst many
achieve 100% for a number of
weeks in the session, few
achieve 100% attendance for
the whole session.
Negative.
Cross Cutting                
Disability                    Priority group in terms of
child poverty.
Households with one or more
disabled person are more likely
to be income deprived.
Negative.
Social & Economic
Impact     
The Council needs to
consider the interplay
between social and
economic factors.
Historically the EMA has been
increased locally as a direct
response to need. The
additional amount provided
presently is where a young
person achieves 100%
attendance, so there may be
an adverse impact on
attendance.
Negative.
A reduction in household
income by reducing the
EMA will impact the
poorest in our
communities.
Sex                           Women/single parents;
Priority group in terms of
child poverty.
Women are more likely to
income deprived than men.
Around 90% of single parents
are women.
Negative
Gender Reassign              
Health                        Health and wellbeing are a
priority for the Council as
noted in our Strategic Plan
22-27.
Household income has a direct
correlation to health.
Negative.
There is a direct
correlation between
household income and
health - reducing the

Page 35

EMA will impact
negatively on health.
Human Rights                  Article 28 of UNCRC
declared that children and
young people have a right
to education no matter who
they are.
Payment of an EMA is
incentive to stay on in
education beyond the statutory
leaving age. Reducing this
incentive will impact negatively
on young people from more
income deprived households.
Negative
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                          BME families are a Priority
group in terms of child
poverty.
People from BME groups are
more likely to be income
deprived than those from white
groups.
Negative.
Religion and Belief          
Sexual Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The top-up to the EMA is given to a small sub-set who achieve 100% attendance. Reducing the amount
paid will impact negatively on those in receipt, but whilst many achieve 100% for a number of weeks in the
session, few achieve 100% attendance for the whole session.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
We will monitor impact by consulting Head Teachers/Young People.
Monitoring will be carried out on a termly basis.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1154: Whilst the change in policy will see a reduction in the amount given to those in receipt
of an EMA, they will still receive the statutory amount.  There may be a negative financial impact
of potentially £200 per year per young person.   Families from BME groups, families with
disabled people, and single parent families are more likely to be income deprived and experience
poverty/child poverty. There may be an adverse impact on attendance which will be monitored.

Page 36

Assessment No 1217 Owner Julie McGrogan                          
Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Julie McGrogan Senior Education Officer
Members Laura Mason - Chief Education Officer
Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer
Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer
Claire Cusick - Senior Education Officer
Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title EDU04 – Remove P6 Swimming Lessons
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
Currently in West Dunbartonshire, £14,000 funding is allocated to provide free
swimming lessons to children in primary 6 during term time. This savings proposal
would remove the provision of free-swimming lessons.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Consultation with West Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust who currently assist in the
provision of this service as it may have an impact on Leisure Trust staffing.  
Consultation with stakeholders, HTs, TU’s to advise of possible changes.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Children attending schools will no longer receive free swimming lessons and would need to gain this life
skill elsewhere. WD Leisure would need to consider the need for a programme of swimming lessons and
ascertain costs and uptake of such a programme. As such, it is likely to be those most in need and at risk
that would be affected by this change.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Consultation with WD Leisure who currently provide this service.  
Consultation with stakeholders, HR, HTs and TU’s to advise of possible impact on staff and families.

Page 37

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                          
Disability                    Priority group in terms of
child poverty.
Households with one or more
disabled person are more likely
to be income deprived and
face challenges engaging with
any swimming programme not
organised /arranged by the
schools.
Negative.
Gender Reassign              
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                          BME families are a Priority
group in terms of child
poverty.
People from BME groups are
more likely to be income
deprived than those from white
groups, and as such face
challenges engaging with any
swimming programme not
organised / arranged by the
schools.
Negative.
Religion and Belief          
Sex                           Women/single parents;
Priority group in terms of
child poverty.
Women are more likely to
income deprived than men.
Around 90% of single parents
are women.
If swimming lessons not
organised / arranged by
schools; single parents may
struggle to engage.
Negative.
Sexual Orientation           
Human Rights                  Whilst learning how to swim
is not a human right,
knowing how to swim can
contribute to article 2
protecting the right to life.
UNCRC considerations i.e.
Provision
Protection
Participation
Article 2 of Human Rights Act.
Provision and protection in
terms of UNCRC.
Negative.
Health                        Health and wellbeing are a
priority for the Council as
noted in our Strategic Plan
22-27.
Swimming is an activity that
promotes health and wellbeing.
Reducing the number of
children able to swim would
impact on their health and
Negative.

Page 38

wellbeing, and without this life
skill would present a risk to life.
Social & Economic
Impact     
The Council needs to
consider the interplay
between social and
economic factors.
School swimming lessons
were introduced to ensure that
all of our young people gain
this important life skill -
especially important bearing in
mind the number of waterways
in the local authority, and the
dangers they present. Lower
income families would struggle
to engage with swimming
lessons if they are not provided
for them through school.
Negative.
Cross Cutting                 Drive for water safety Cross cuts with elements
above.
Potentially negative.
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The council has a statutory duty to balance the budget. Mitigation: Water safety is a discussion at various
stages of school and in a number of curriculum areas. This works together with ensuring children are able
to swim.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
We will monitor impact by consulting Head Teachers. Monitoring will be carried out on a termly basis.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1217: Potentially negative impacts for disabled, BME and income deprived Children. The
provision of free-swimming lessons for all of our children ensures that they acquire a basic
lifesaving skill. The abundance of rivers, canals and lochs in our geographical area present a
significant risk to those without this skill, The relatively small amount saved by this proposal
does not outweigh the risk presented by removing the service.  
Mitigation: Water safety is a discussion at various stages of school and in a number of curriculum
areas. This works together with ensuring children are able to swim.

Page 39

Assessment No 1155 Owner Julie McGrogan                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laura Mason Chief Education Officer
Members Laura Mason - Chief Education Officer
Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer
Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer
Julie McGrogan - Senior Education Officer
Claire Cusick - Senior Education Officer
Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title EDU06 – Reduce Secondary School Management Time
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
In our secondary schools, the number of Depute Head Teachers (DHTs) is based on
school roll. Due to the volume of management tasks associated with a secondary
school, at the last restructure it was agreed the minimum allocation of DHTs would be
3, irrespective of roll. Presently, for every 250 young people on the school roll beyond
750, an additional DHT is provided. This proposal would increase the qualifying
number to 300, reducing our secondary school DHT headcount by 3, resulting in a
saving of £81,447. As school rolls presently stand, schools directly affected by this
proposal would be Our Lady & St. Patrick’s High School, Clydebank High School and
Vale of Leven Academy.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
There has not been consultation yet however there will be with Head Teachers, WDC
Parent Forum members, pupils, TU’s,  Staffing, Finance Officers and  Education
central staff. A range of teaching and promoted teaching staff will be affected.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
All children and young people of secondary school age in West Dunbartonshire Council. A range of
teaching and promoted teaching staff.
There will be an impact on teacher numbers as the three substantive deputes will be replacing three Class
Teachers and therefore numbers of teachers will drop.

Page 40

There will be less Senior staff without a teaching commitment available to support young people and families who
are already experiencing the compounded impacts of increased additional support needs, poverty and deprivation and
social challenges.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
There has not been consultation yet however there will be with Head Teacher’s, WDC Parent
Forum members, pupils, TU’s, Staffing, Finance Officers and Education central staff.

Page 41

Assessment No 1048 Owner Alison Bowers                          
Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laura Mason Chief Education Officer
Members Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer
Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer
Claire Cusick - Senior Education Officer
Julie McGrogan - Senior Education Officer
Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title EDU11 - Shared Head at Two ELCs
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
Saving of Principal Officer post within WDC.
Greater opportunities for transition for children from under 3s to 3-5 provision under
one Principal Officer with shared vision, values and aims.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Senior Education Officers, Principal Educational Psychologist and Finance.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
The Principal Officers currently in post, staff, families and children.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Further consultation will be required with Trade Unions, Principal Officers impacted, staff teams and
families.

Page 42

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Children aged from 3 at
Clydebank ELC under this
proposal would now access
their entitlement at
Whitecrook ELC.
Proposal outlines this. This could provide a
positive impact as these
children would now have
access to an Excellence
and Equity Lead who is
employed to support
close the attainment
gap, which could support
an increase in
attainment.
Cross Cutting                
Disability                   
Social & Economic
Impact     
1.By moving the 3 yr old
provision from Clydebank
ELC to Whitecrook ELC
there would be capacity
within Clydebank ELC to
increase capacity for
eligible 2s.
2. One of the existing
Principal Officers would no
longer be required in post.
1.Both settings are in an area
of deprivation and there would
be an opportunity to support
more vulnerable families.
2. Proposal outlines a
reduction in post.
1.Increased attainment
for children and support
for families to allow them
to access employment
through having ELC
provision for their
children.
2. Displaced Principal
Officer could be
supported through
SWITCH policy.
Sex                           1. Displaced offer would be
female.
2. ELC staff, of whom all
are female, within
Whitecrook ELC, would be
able to increase their
skillset through having the
opportunity to work with
under 3s.
1. Current position is that 2
female Principal Officers are in
posts.
2. There is no under 3s
provision at Whitecrook ELC,
however, staff there would
have the opportunity to
increase their skillset through
working at Clydebank ELC with
under 3s.
1.Displaced offer is
female therefore a
negative impact in terms
of sex.
2. Could provide those
staff with greater career
progression
opportunities within ELC
by working with greater
age ranges.
Gender Reassign              
Health                       
Human Rights                  Children accessing ELC at
both settings could be
provided with a higher
quality provision - 
UNCRC Article 3 Best
Interests of the Child and
Article 28 Right to an
Education.
Excellence and Equity Lead at
Whitecrook would now also
support Clydebank ELC
children.
Under single leadership of both
settings there would be 
collective vision, values and
aims, improving transition
experiences for children.
Positive impact to
children's transition
experiences, attainment.
Opportunity to provide
more provision in future
to Eligible 2s.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity

Page 43

Race                         
Religion and Belief          
Sexual Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
This proposal would provide a saving for WDC and although it would impact on a Principal Officer there
are significant benefits to service users.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Feedback on change will allow for monitoring and review regularly.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1048: There are significant potential benefits to service users, that is young children and
their families. Through this revised operating model, there will be more cohesive transition under
the new arrangements. Displaced officer is female therefore a negative impact in terms of sex.
The Switch process would be in place to aid the officer.

Page 44

Assessment No 1219 Owner Julie McGrogan                          
Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laura Mason Chief Education Officer
Members Laura Mason - Chief Education Officer
Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer
Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer
Julie McGrogan - Senior Education Officer
Claire Cusick - Senior Education Officer
Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title EDU 12 -Review Mainstream Transport 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
To undertake a statutory consultation on the proposal to alter arrangements
for mainstream school transport, bringing it more in line with the safe walking
distance to schools of 2 miles for primary and 3 miles for secondary schools. 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Consultation with affected stakeholders - children and young people, parents
and carers, staff, Parent Councils, local elected members, Strathclyde
Partnership for Transport (SPT) and the Archdiocese of Glasgow of the Roman
Catholic Church.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?

Page 45

Children and young people who will attend our schools but reside between 1 and 2 miles from
their catchment primary school, or between 2 and 3 miles from their catchment secondary
school. This proposed change in policy may also impact on parents and carers due to possible 
increased travel and school attendance costs and challenges. 
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
West Dunbartonshire Council was required to undertake a statutory consultation under the
terms of the schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010 on the proposal to discontinue
arrangements for the provision of transport for pupils attending catchment schools. Children
and young people, parents and carers, staff, Trade Unions, Parent Councils of affected schools,
Strathclyde Partnership for Transport (SPT), and the Archdiocese of Glasgow of the Roman
Catholic Church were all consulted as part of this process. Education Scotland provide an
independent view and assessment of the process in their own report.

Page 46

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                          
Disability                   
Gender Reassign              
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                          .
Religion and
Belief          
We are required to
provide access to
denominational and non-
denominational schools
for children and young
people living in our
catchment areas.
The introduction of this
change in policy would
adversely affect choice of
school, due to some non-
denominational schools
being easier to access than
denominational schools.
Negative
Sex                           Women/single parents;
Priority group in terms of
child poverty
Around 90% of single
parents are women. They
would be disproportionately
affected by the introduction
of this policy, as they would
need to provide suitable
clothing and footwear for
walking longer distances to
school. A greater number of
single parent households
would also have to manage
the challenge of potentially
getting children to multiple
locations (ie one child at
nursery, and one at primary
school) each day.
Negative
Sexual
Orientation           
Human Rights                 
Health

Page 47

Social &
Economic
Impact     
Low-income households. Introducing this policy
change would adversely
affect low-income
households. Households
would need to provide
suitable clothing and
footwear for walking longer
distances to school.
Negative
Cross Cutting                
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The proposal removes the specific provision of transpoirt managed collaboratively by the
Council and Strathclyde Partnership for Transport and replacing it with the provision available to
the general public, enabling children and young people to use their free Under 22 Travel Pass.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
The proposed change to policy will not be implemented, but instead an alternative pursued
whereby some young people make use of their under 22 years Travel Pass instead of being
provided with a local authority bus pass. Officers will work with partners to ensure uptake of the
Under 22 years Travel Pass scheme, ensuring that no young person is without a pass to get to
and from school. Head Teachers and Central Education Officers will report back to Educational
Services committee the progress with implementing this change, but the policy will stay the
same.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1219: The Under 22 years free travel schemes offers an alternative provision for travelling to
school and reduces the financial burden on the Council. Introducing the proposed change to the
school transport policy would adversely affect low-income households, single parent households
and may indirectly affect parental choice of denominational or non-denominational school. If
introduced individual needs assessments will be considered to ensure equitable access to school
for all.

Page 48

Assessment No 1050 Owner Alison Bowers                          
Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laura Mason Chief Education Officer
Members Claire Cusick - Senior Education Officer
Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer
Julie McGrogan - Senior Education Officer
Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer
Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title EDU14  Align 1140 Hour Funding for 3 year olds with Statutory Guidance
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
Children accessing their funded 1140 hours entitlement will do so in line with ELC
Statutory Guidance. There will be a financial saving to WDC by changing the
entitlement start date.
The saving will be made through a reduction in cross boundary fees. These are the
fees we make to nurseries in other authorities who accommodate WDC children. The
children would not start until the term after their third birthday rather than the month
after meaning we would save some fees we would normally pay to other authorities as
children will start later.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
ELC Providers in West Dunbartonshire Council, ELC Central team and families and
children using the provision.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
All ELC providers, ELC staff and children and families using ELC services.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Consultation has been had with finance and legal, and West Partnership local authorities, many of whom
have already implemented this change.

Page 49

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Some children aged 3 years
old will now start ELC later
than current children do.
At present WDC guidance
entitles start date to be a
month after 3rd birthday.
Potentially less time at
nursery for these
children. However, all
children aged between
start of August term and
end of February have
access to a deferred
year resulting in more
time than previously.
Cross Cutting                
Disability                    The Council has a focus on
reducing child poverty.
Families that have a
disabled member are a
priority group.
Families that have disabled
members are more likely to be
in relative poverty.
Exceptions to the
revised policy can be
considered for those
deemed to be in need
due to family challenges,
child protection issues
etc.
Social & Economic
Impact     
1. Families accessing ELC
provision to allow them to
work will have to pay for
their children under 3 years
old for longer.
2. Funded providers will not
receive funding from month
after and this will change to
term after.
3. Eligible 2 children
1. Currently can access in
WDC from the month after
rather than the term after.
2. Funded providers will
receive monies from families
and can also receive funding
from WDC for longer due to
change in deferment
entitlement.
3. There is a policy for eligible
2 children who are from
families of low income where
they access their 1140 early,
those children would not be
impacted by this saving and
would continue to access their
entitlement.
1.Changes in deferment
entitlement will allow
them to access free
funding for longer should
they wish.
2. Funding from families
and deferment changes
should balance out any
changes to funding start
date.
3. Eligible 2 children will
not see their funding
interrupted when they
turn 3 and will continue
to access provision.
Sex                           The Council has a focus on
reducing child poverty.
Single parents are a priority
groups.
Women are 90% of single
parents. Women are more
likely to be in relative poverty
than men
More women are more
likely to be affected
directly than men. Those
children in the Eligible 2
cohort would not be
impacted by this
alignment and would
continue to receive
entitlement when they
turn 3. Additionally,
where required 3 yr old
children could start in
advance of this policy if
it was felt there was a
need.
Gender Reassign

Page 50

Health                       
Human Rights                  UNCRC - Article 3 & 28 -
Best Interests of the child
and right to an education.
Some children aged from 3 will
start nursery later than current
3 year olds do.
Access to a deferred
year will be available to
those families who wish
to access it.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                          The Council has a focus on
reducing child poverty. BME
groups are a priority.
People overall from BME
groups are more likely to be in
relative poverty than people
from white ethnic groups
overall
Census 2022 figures show
4059 0-4 year olds in the
population. 6% of these
children are from BME groups,
this is a higher proportion of
the overall BME groups which
is 3.2%
All ethnicities are likely
be affected, however
people from BME groups
are more likely to be
impacted
proportionately. If
required, there would be
an option to support
earlier entry than
proposed, if required, for
those families in
exceptional
circumstances where
there is a need.
Religion and Belief          
Sexual Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
If required, there would be an option to support earlier entry than proposed, if required, for those families
in exceptional circumstances where there is a need.
The council has a duty to balance the budget.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Feedback will be gathered on impact from providers, children and families.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1050: This amendment will align WDC with statutory guidance and along with many other
Local Authorities. The potential negative impacts to children through the change to current policy
can be overcome by the entitled to a deferred year. Those children who meet the criteria for
Eligible 2 year old funding would not be impacted and would continue to receive funding from
when they turn 3. This will produce a saving for WDC.

Page 51

Assessment No 1161 Owner Julie McGrogan                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laura Mason Chief Education Officer
Members Claire Cusick       Senior Education Officer
Ellen Moran         Principal Educational Psychologist
Julie McGrogan   Senior Education Officer
Andrew Brown     Senior Education Officer
Alison Bowers     Senior Education Officer
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title EDU15 -Reduce Music School Instructors  
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
It is proposed that a saving of £30k could be achieved by reducing the number
of IMS staff thus reducing the number of children engaged in one to one and
group tuition from IMS tutors. 
The Council currently employs 10.6 instrumental music tutors. Tutors provide
336 hours per week of one-to-one and group learning to 1,014 children and
young people.
The proposed charging option is being considered to offset the additional cost
to the Council of £700 000, to run the service, on top of Scottish Government
funding.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
There has not been consultation yet as this savings option has not yet been
agreed.  If it goes ahead a period of consultation will be required to include
but not confined to, Instrumental Music Tutors, Education Officers, Senior
Education Officers, Education Support staff, Trade Unions, Finance Officers
and HR Advisors.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes

Page 52

Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Primary and secondary pupils entitled to instrumental music tuition; and cultural and
community experiences delivered through music. Children living in poverty whose families
cannot afford to pay for music tuition.
Front line school staff who will not be provided with central support; Staff who will be made
redundant with limited redeployment opportunities as a result of the organisation’s downsizing.
Stakeholders who will have limited access to Education service provision.
It is recognised that the impact of the small reduction in staffing in EDU15 will also impact on
this saving though it is not a significant contributory factor.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
There has not been consultation yet as this savings option has not yet been agreed.  If it goes
ahead a period of consultation will be required to include but not confined to, Instrumental
Music Tutors, Education Officers, Senior Education Officers, Education Support staff, Trade
Unions, Finance Officers and HR Advisors.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Tacking child poverty
including reducing the
cost of the school day.
This proposal is more likely
to impact primary aged
children as music tuition will
still be offered to pupils
undertaking SQA
qualifications.
Negative
Cross Cutting                
Disability                   
Social &
Economic
Impact     
Reduction will
disadvantage lower
income families who
would need to pay
themselves
Lower income families are
less likely to prioritise spend
on music tuition. 
Negative
Sex                          
Gender Reassign              
Health

Page 53

Human Rights                  Need to consider the
UNCRC Articles 28, 29,
31.
There would be a reduction
in all schools’ abilities to
meet children's entitlement
to instrumental music
tuition and creative learning
Negative impact
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and
Belief          
Sexual
Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
There would be a very significant reduction in all schools’ abilities to meet children's entitlement
to instrumental music tuition and creative learning. 
In every school, there would be a reduction in young people achieving Scottish Qualification in
Music Performance (1014 Children and Young People)
Parents will be dissatisfied through reduced provision of Instrumental Music Education.
The council has a duty to balance the budget.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
We will monitor impact of any changes through feedback from the teams involved, central
monitoring and data analysis.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Don't Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1161: Reducing IMS will adversely affect children in our schools, and their rights. The
negative impacts identified will not be removed, however some can be minimised in the short
term by targeted use of existing and alternative resources and funding streams in some
establishments.  However, it needs to be noted that almost all of these alternatives rely on the
additional funding of the Strategic Equity Fund which will cease in 2026.

Page 54

Assessment No 1158 Owner Julie McGrogan                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laura Mason Chief Education Officer
Members Laura Mason - Chief Education Officer
Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer
Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer
Julie McGrogan - Senior Education Officer
Claire Cusick - Senior Education Officer
Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title EDU20 – Remove Secondary Schools Registration
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
Presently, our secondary schools use 10 minutes at the start of each day for
registration, before young people attend their lessons. Year groups are divided into
registration groups of approximately 30 young people. It would be possible instead to
run ‘period by period’ registration, and remove the 10-minute slot each day, and the
associated need to staff this provision with teaching staff.
This time is largely used for administrative purposes, that could be undertaken through
different means. 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
There has not been consultation yet however there will be with Head Teachers, WDC
Parent Forum members, pupils, TU’s, Staffing, Finance Officers and Education central
staff. A range of teaching and promoted teaching staff will be affected.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
All young people of secondary school age in West Dunbartonshire Council. A range of teaching and
promoted teaching staff.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
There has not been consultation yet however there will be with Head Teacher’s, WDC Parent
Forum members, pupils, TU’s, Staffing, Finance Officers and Education central staff.

Page 55

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                          
Cross Cutting                 The Council needs to
be aware of how
factors can interact.
Factors can and do combine to
amplify the effects of income
deprivation.
Some groups and
combinations of groups
may be more affected by
reduced budgets.
Disability                    The Council had a
duty to make its services
accessible to disabled
people, including pupils.
This is an anticipatory duty.
We must seek to mitigate
any negative impacts.
Pupils with a disability can often
benefit from time to settle and be
prepared for lessons during the
registration period, limiting time
missed from period 1.
Reduction may
negatively impact on
disabled pupils.
Social & Economic
Impact     
The council is committed to
examining how these
factors interact.
The removal of registration will
reduce time children have with
a significant adult, which the
science of Trauma informed
practice tells us is key to
forming positive relationships
and wellbeing.
Reduction may
negatively impact on
pupils with a range of
social and emotional
needs.
Sex                          
Gender Reassign              
Health                        Health and wellbeing is a
key priority in the Strategic
Plan 2022-27.
Registration class offers the
opportunity to carry out a
wellbeing check which
contributes to our commitment
within the mental health
wellbeing strategy.
Reduction may
negatively impact on
pupils requiring
additional welbeing
checks in terms of health
and wellbeing needs.
Human Rights                  The proposal will
negatively impact on
all children and young
people including those with
Protected Characteristics as
noted above.
1. There will be less staff
available in schools to support
children and young people in
overcoming the barriers their
range of needs brings, when
accessing education. 
2. There will be less staff
available to provide additional
support to multi-agency
planning to meet the needs of
those most at risk or in need of
support. 
3. There will be less
resources available to support
staff who are faced with the
challenges of children and
young people who are
dysregulated or require
alternative areas to learn away
from the classroom.
The negative impacts
identified will not be
removed, however some
can be minimised in the
short term by targeted
use of existing and
alternative resources
and funding streams in
some establishments.
However, it needs to
be noted that almost
all of these alternatives
rely on the additional
funding of the Strategic
Equity Fund which will
cease in 2026.

Page 56

4. There will be less
opportunity for the personal
and professional
development of our employees
and our service due to
increased class contact of
Management teams.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                          BME families are a priority
group in terms of reducing
child poverty.
People from BME groups are
more likely to be income
deprived.
Reduction may
negatively impact on
more on BME pupils
their families.
Religion and Belief          
Sexual Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The negative impacts identified will not be removed, however some can be minimised in the short term by
targeted use of existing and alternative resources and funding streams in some establishments. However,
it needs to be noted that almost all of these alternatives rely on the additional funding of the Strategic
Equity Fund which will cease in 2026.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
We will monitor impact of any changes on the rights of the child as a result of the reduced devolved school
management funding via school visits, monitoring of Standards and Quality reports, ongoing consultation
and interrogation of data.
Monitoring will be carried out on a termly basis. HR monitoring of range and demographic of staff
potentially affected.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1158: This proposal was developed to support budget saving exercise. A reduction to the
staffing compliment in any school would see a direct impact on the provision of courses on offer.
Late coming is already an issue that schools work hard to combat. Without registration, late
coming would impact further into teaching time, which would have a direct impact on attendance,
and an indirect impact on attainment and positive destinations. Registration is often referred to as
‘first line pastoral care’ – without this provision, many young people will see a reduction in the
people they feel they can turn to for help and support. Some of the impact could be minimized by
personalized support funded through external Strategic Equity Fund but this funding ceases in
2026.

Page 57

Assessment No 1159 Owner Julie McGrogan                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laura Mason Chief Education Officer
Members Laura Mason - Chief Education Officer
Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer
Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer
Julie McGrogan - Senior Education Officer
Claire Cusick - Senior Education Officer
Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title EDU21 -  Review Secondary School Common Senior Phase Timetable
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
This proposal would see the introduction of a common Senior Phase timetable across
all of our mainstream secondary schools, resulting in improving the consistency of the
offer of courses, and introducing a minimum class size. Where schools were unable to
meet this minimum class size, pupils could attend another school to study the course
they wish.
Due to the timescale to develop a model for a common timetable and consult on the
proposal, implementation would not be until school session 2026/27 where a part year
saving would be realised.
Presently, we have 3 curriculum models running across 5 schools. This proposal
would introduce a common model across all 5 schools, aligning the offer to young
people and establishing a minimum class size of 12 for any course. This approach is
presently on offer in a number of our neighbouring authorities, most notably East
Renfrewshire Council, who have been running this successfully for a number of years.
A common timetable would result in requiring fewer teachers to deliver it, as class
sizes would be optimised. Not taking the full saving could result in increasing the offer
of courses, providing a wider variety of options for our young people.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
There has not been consultation yet however there will be with Head Teachers, WDC
Parent Forum members, pupils, TU’s, Staffing, Finance Officers and Education central
staff. A range of teaching and promoted teaching staff will be affected.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes

Page 58

Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
All young people of secondary school age in West Dunbartonshire Council. A range of teaching and
promoted teaching staff.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
There has not been consultation yet however there will be with Head Teacher’s, WDC Parent
Forum members, pupils, TU’s, Staffing, Finance Officers and Education central staff.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                          
Cross Cutting                
Disability                    The Council had a duty to
make its services
accessible to disabled
people, including pupils.
This is an anticipatory duty.
We must seek to mitigate
any negative impacts.
Families including families with
children that have one or more
disabled people in them are
more likely to be income
deprived.
Reduction may
negatively impact on
disabled pupils and
their families.
Social & Economic
Impact     
The council is committed to
examining how these
factors interact.
The numbers of children with
additional support needs and
the complexity of their needs
has increased.
Some children are adversely
impacted by poverty. The
nature of support required for
children has intensified and
requires more continuous and
long-term interventions.
The most effective supports
are based on those supported
by significant relationships with
a key adult.
Negative Impact.
Sex                          
Gender Reassign              
Health                       
Human Rights                  The proposal will
negatively impact on all
children and young people
including those with
Protected Characteristics as
noted above.
Consideration of UNCRC
Articles 28 and 29.
1. There will be less staff
available in schools to support
children and young
people in overcoming the
barriers their range of needs
brings, when accessing
education. 
2. There will be less staff
available to provide additional
support to multi-agency
planning to meet the needs of
those most at risk or in need of
support. 
The negative impacts
identified will not be
removed, however some
can be minimised in the
short term by targeted
use of existing and
alternative resources
and funding streams in
some establishments.
However, it needs to be
noted that almost all of
these alternatives rely
on the additional funding

Page 59

3. There will be less resources
available to support staff who
are faced with the challenges
of children and young people
who are disregulated or require
alternative areas to learn away
from the classroom. 
4. There will be less
opportunity for the personal
and professional development
of our employees and our
service due to increased class
contact of Management teams.
of the Strategic Equity
Fund which will cease in
2026.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                          BME families are a priority
group in terms of reducing
child poverty and equity of
educational experience.
People from BME groups are
more likely to be income
deprived.
Reduction may
negatively impact on
more on BME pupils
their families.
Religion and Belief           We are required to provide
access to denominational
and non-denominational
schools for children and
young people living in our
catchment areas.
The introduction of this change
in policy would adversely affect
choice of school, due to some
non-denominational schools
being easier to access than
denominational schools.
Negative.
Sexual Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Reducing the number of teachers employed in our secondary schools will have a direct impact on the
breadth of courses offered in each establishment. There is a risk that schools would encourage young
people to study school-based courses in their own school, as it has a direct impact on their staffing.
Having to travel to another school would be a barrier for some young people choosing a subject and would
introduce a cost to the council for transportation. This could directly impact attainment and positive
destinations.  
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
We will monitor impact of any changes on the rights of the child as a result of the reduced devolved school
management funding via school visits, monitoring of Standards and Quality reports, ongoing consultation
and interrogation of data, stakeholder feedback.
Monitoring will be carried out on a termly basis. HR monitoring of range and demographic of staff
potentially affected.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1159: This proposal was developed as part of the budget exercise. Reducing the number of
teachers employed in our secondary schools will adversely affect children in our schools, and
their rights. The negative impacts identified will not be removed, however some can be
minimised in the short term by targeted use of existing and alternative resources and funding

Page 60

streams in some establishments.  However, it needs to be noted that almost all of these
alternatives rely on the additional funding of the Strategic Equity Fund which will cease in 2026.
Assessment No 1160 Owner Julie McGrogan                              
Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laura Mason Chief Education Officer
Members Laura Mason - Chief Education Officer
Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer
Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer
Julie McGrogan - Senior Education Officer
Claire Cusick - Senior Education Officer
Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title EDU22 - Secondary School Staffing
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
This proposal would see a reduction in the number of secondary school
teachers, based on the number of young people enrolled in the school, but
attending college or partner providers for part of their school week.
In session 2024/25, we have approximately 600 young people attending
college or partner providers for part of their school week (either 2 afternoons
per week, or 4 afternoons per week for college - a small number of young
people have different attendance patterns with partner providers). The
number of young people attending partner providers can fluctuate each year,
based on course uptake. Staffing is determined by school roll, but it is not
reduced to account for the number of young people being educated
elsewhere. This proposal would seek to reduce staffing accordingly. Based on
current rolls with college and other partner providers, this would equate to
7.8 FTE, spread across 5 secondary schools.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
There has not been consultation yet however there will be with Head
Teachers, WDC Parent Forum members, pupils, TU’s, Staffing, Finance Officers
and Education central staff. A range of teaching and promoted teaching staff
will be affected.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
Yes

Page 61

SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
All young people of secondary school age in West Dunbartonshire Council. A range of teaching
and promoted teaching staff.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
There has not been consultation yet however there will be with Head Teacher’s, WDC Parent
Forum members, pupils, TU’s, Staffing, Finance Officers and Education central staff.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                          
Cross Cutting                 The Council needs to
be aware of how
factors can interact.
Factors can and do combine
to amplify the effects of
income deprivation.
Some groups and
combinations of
groups may be more
affected by reduced
budgets.
Disability                    The Council had a duty to
make its services
accessible to disabled
people, including pupils.
This is an anticipatory
duty.
We must seek to mitigate
any negative impacts.
Families including
families with
children that have
one or more
disabled people in
them are more likely
to be income
deprived.
Reduction may
negatively impact on
disabled pupils and
their families.
Social &
Economic
Impact     
The council is
committed to
examining how
these factors
interact.
The number of
children with
additional support
needs and the
complexity of their
Negative Impact.

Page 62

needs has increased.
Some children are
adversely impacted
by poverty. The
nature of support
required for children
has intensified and
requires more
continuous and long
term interventions.
The most effective
supports are based
on those supported
by significant
relationships with a
key adult.
Sex                          
Gender Reassign              
Health                       
Human Rights                  The proposal will
negatively impact on
all children and
young people
including those with
Protected
Characteristics as
noted above.
1. There will be less
staff available in
schools to support
children and young
people in
overcoming the
barriers their range
of needs brings,
when accessing
education. 2. There
will be less staff
available to provide
additional support
to multi-agency
planning to meet the
needs of those most
at risk or in need of
support. 3. There
will be less
resources available
to support staff who
are faced with the
challenges of
children and young
people who are
disregulated
or require
alternative areas to
learn away from the
The negative
impacts identified
will not be removed,
however some can
be minimised in the
short term by
targeted use of
existing and
alternative
resources and
funding streams in
some
establishments.
However, it needs to
be noted that almost
all of these
alternatives rely on
the additional
funding of the
Strategic Equity
Fund which will
cease in 2026.

Page 63

classroom. 4. There
will be less
opportunity for the
personal and
professional
development of our
employees and our
service due to
increased class
contact of
Management teams.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                          BME families are a
priority group in
terms of reducing
child poverty.
People from BME groups
are more likely to be
income deprived.
Reduction may
negatively impact on
more on BME pupils
their families.
Religion and
Belief          
We are required to
provide access to
denominational and non-
denominational schools
for children and young
people living in our
catchment areas.
The introduction of this
change would adversely
affect subject choices in our
schools. This could
potentially have an impact
on belief as offers will need
to be available in
denominational and non-
denominational schools.
Negative.
Sexual
Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Reducing the number of teachers employed in our secondary schools will have a direct impact
on the breadth of courses offered. The number of young people attending partner providers
fluctuates each year. If there were fewer young people attending partner providers, we would
require the staffing to be in our schools to teach the young people. There is a risk that this
would narrow the curriculum offer.  Fewer young people studying courses with partners would
directly impact attainment and positive destinations.   
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
We will monitor impact of any changes on the rights of the child as a result of the reduced
devolved school management funding via school visits, monitoring of Standards and Quality
reports, ongoing consultation and interrogation of data, stakeholder feedback.

Page 64

Monitoring will be carried out on a termly basis. HR monitoring of range and demographic of
staff potentially affected.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1160: This proposal was developed to support the budget exercise. Reducing Secondary
School Staffing will adversely affect children in our schools, and their rights. The negative
impacts identified will not be removed, however some can be minimised in the short term by
targeted use of existing and alternative resources and funding streams in some establishments. 
However, it needs to be noted that almost all of these alternatives rely on the additional funding
of the Strategic Equity Fund which will cease in 2026.

Page 65

Assessment No 1152 Owner Julie McGrogan                             
Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laura Mason Chief Education Officer
Members Laura Mason - Chief Education Officer
Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer
Julie McGrogan - Senior Education Officer
Claire Cusick - Senior Education Officer
Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title EDU 23 Education Senior Phase Transport 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
This proposal presents three options to reduce our expenditure on Senior
Phase transport. Presently, we transport around 600 Senior Phase pupils per
week to attend classes in other schools and colleges. The majority of these are
by bus to West College Scotland in Clydebank, but a number are via taxi to
neighbouring schools or other colleges in Glasgow/Paisley. A number of young
people also attend college in Glasgow via Scotrail. Transport is provided to
ensure that the young person arrives at the venue in time for class, but the
return journey could be removed, requiring the young person to make their
own way home via public transport using their U22 Travel Pass. 
Option 1
Remove all return journeys, requiring all young people to travel home via
public transport. This would save circa £37,000.
Option 2
Remove consortium return journeys only, requiring young people attending
another school to travel home via public transport. This would save circa
£22,000.
Option 3
Remove West College Scotland Clydebank return journeys only, requiring
young people attending West College Scotland Clydebank Campus to travel
home via public transport. This would save circa £15,000.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Consultation with affected stakeholders - children and young people, parents
and carers, staff, Parent Councils, local elected members, Strathclyde

Page 66

Partnership for Transport (SPT) and the Archdiocese of Glasgow of the Roman
Catholic Church.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
600 Senior Phase pupils per week who attend classes in other schools and colleges through the
Senior Phase offer.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
West Dunbartonshire Council was required to undertake a statutory consultation under the
terms of the schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010 on the proposal to discontinue
arrangements for the provision of transport for pupils attending catchment schools. Children
and young people, parents and carers, staff, Trade Unions, Parent Councils of affected schools,
Strathclyde Partnership for Transport (SPT), and the Archdiocese of Glasgow of the Roman
Catholic Church were all consulted as part of this process. Education Scotland provide an
independent view and assessment of the process in their own report. 
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                          
Cross Cutting                
Disability                    An evaluation of
individual needs of all
young people to ensure
any young person with a
This policy may affect
negatively young people
with a disability with
appropriate alternative
This may have a
negative impact for
young disabled people
attending college

Page 67

disability has an
appropriate resource
provision for transport
support and resource
required to support. 
and/or school if
suitable public
transport is not
available or
accessible.
Social &
Economic
Impact     
Low income households. Introducing this policy
change would adversely
affect low income
households. Households
would need to provide
suitable clothing and
footwear for young people
travelling from college or
school independent of
corporate provision.
Negative.
Sex                          
Gender Reassign              
Health                        An evaluation of
individual needs of all
young people to ensure
any young person with a
health need has an
appropriate resource
provision for transport.
This policy may affect
negatively young people
with a health need with
appropriate alternative
support and resource
required to support. 
Negative – potential
for decreased
attendance at college
and school and
increased risk of
young people
reporting with
stress/mental health
issues due to
demands for
independent travel.
Human Rights                 
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and
Belief          
Sexual
Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.

Page 68

If implemented young people could use their under 22 travel pass to make their journey home
using public transport.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Impact will be monitored by secondary school Pastoral Care staff and Senior Phase Officers and
reported via Education Committee and Education Improvement Board.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1152: This proposal was developed to support the budget exercise. Introducing the
proposed change to the school transport policy could adversely affect attendance at senior
phase offer in college and school.

Page 69

Assessment No 1162 Owner Julie McGrogan                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laura Mason Chief Education Officer
Members Claire Cusick    Senior Education Officer
Ellen Moran      Principal Educational Psychologist
Julie McGrogan   Senior Education Officer
Andrew Brown     Senior Education Officer
Alison Bowers    Senior Education Officer
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title EDU24 - Charging for Instrumental Music Service
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
It is proposed that exploration of cost benefit from charging for IMS be explored as a
draft savings option. This option has been devised to generate income for the Council
to offset the cost of running the Music Service.
Of the 1,014 pupils currently accessing this service, 22% are living in families in
receipt of out of work benefits and would not be charged for this service. Assuming
that 10% of those who would be eligible and willing to pay for tuition choose to do so,
the following three charging options are proposed:
Option 1: £30/hour x 40 weeks
Option 2: £15/hour x 40 weeks
Option 3: £5/hour   x 40 weeks
These charging options do not cover the full-service costs.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
There has not been consultation yet as this savings option has not yet been agreed.  If
it goes ahead a period of consultation will be required to include but not confined to,
Instrumental Music Tutors, Education Officers, Senior Education Officers, Education
Support staff, Trade Unions, Finance Officers and HR Advisors.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Primary and secondary pupils entitled to instrumental music tuition; and cultural and community
experiences delivered through music. Children living in poverty whose families cannot afford to pay for
music tuition.

Page 70

Front line school staff who will not be provided with central support; Staff who will be made redundant with
limited redeployment opportunities as a result of the organisation’s downsizing.
Stakeholders who will have limited access to Education service provision.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
There has not been consultation yet as this savings option has not yet been agreed.  If it goes ahead a
period of consultation will be required to include but not confined to, Instrumental Music Tutors, Education
Officers, Senior Education Officers, Education Support staff, Trade Unions, Finance Officers and HR
Advisors.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                          
Cross Cutting                 It is important to consider
how factors might crosscut
to amplify negative or
positive impacts.
Likely that factors for groups
above will crosscut to amplify
negative impacts.
Negative, cross cutting
with sex, ethnic and
disability for example,
and other who are more
likely to be on lower
incomes and/or be in
relative poverty.
Disability                    Families with disabled
members are a priority
group in terms of tacking
child poverty including
reducing the cost of the
school day.
The Council is required to
make reasonable
adjustments for disabled
pupils to access its
services.
Households with one or more
disabled member are more
likely to be in relative poverty
than families with no disabled
members.
Likely more negative for
disabled children or
families with a disabled
member.
Social & Economic
Impact     
Council focus on reducing
child poverty.
Cost of the school day policy
not implemented with children
living in poverty further
disadvantaged as parents may
be unable to afford cost of
paying for music tuition.
Likely negative for those
on lower incomes.
Sex                           Single parent families re a
priority group in terms of
tacking child poverty
including reducing the cost
of the school day.
Women who make up 90% of
single parents are more likely
to be in relative poverty than
men.
More likely more
negative for single
parent families.
Gender Reassign              
Health                        Health and wellbeing is a
focus on the Councils 22-27
Strategic plan.
There is a range of evidence
on the positive effect of playing
musical instruments on
physical and mental health for
example Published in 2016,
Instruments of Knowledge:
Music and the Brain (Stoklosa,
2016) suggests that playing
If uptake of music in
reduced those not being
able to access these
opportunities will miss
out on the health and
wellbeing benefits

Page 71

instruments enhances
problem-solving, creativity, and
memory.
Human Rights                  Need to consider UNCRC
Articles 29 and 31.
There would be a very
significant reduction in all
schools’ abilities to meet
Children's entitlement to
instrumental music tuition and
creative learning.
Negative in terms of
provision for children
and young people.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                          BME families are a priority
group in terms of tacking
child poverty including
reducing the cost of the
school day.
Most BME groups are more
likely to be in relative poverty
than most white groups.
Likely more negative for
disabled children and
families from BME
groups.
Religion and Belief          
Sexual Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
There would be a significant reduction in all schools’ abilities to meet Children's entitlement to instrumental
music tuition and creative learning. 
In every school, there would be a reduction in the number of young people achieving Scottish Qualification
in Music Performance (1014 Children and Young People)
Parents will be dissatisfied through reduced provision of Instrumental Music Education.
Cost of the school day policy not implemented with children living in poverty further disadvantaged as
parents unable to afford cost of paying for music tuition.
The council has a duty to balance the budget.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
We will monitor impact of any changes through feedback from the teams involved, central monitoring and
data analysis.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Don't Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1162: This proposal was developed to support the budget exercise and to generate income to
offset the cost of the service. Charging for IMS will adversely affect children in our schools, and
their rights. More Negative impacts are more likely to fall on those who are disabled, from BME
groups and single parent families all of whom are more likely to be in relative poverty.  The
negative impacts identified will not be removed, however some can be minimised in the short
term by targeted use of existing and alternative resources and funding streams in some
establishments.  However, it needs to be noted that almost all of these alternatives rely on the
additional funding of the Strategic Equity Fund which will cease in 2026.

Page 72

Assessment No 1040 Owner Stephen Brooks                                
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and N
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Stephen Brooks Working4U Manager
Members Peter Barry 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title HE01  Reduce Modern Apprenticeship Investment
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
Assess the changes and impact on apprenticeship investment emerging as a
result of a reduction in funding by 10% each year for three years. West
Dunbartonshire Council has invested £1million in the Apprenticeship
Investment Fund. The Fund was set up to support access to apprenticeships
over a four-year period.  The Investment Fund is used solely to meet the wage
costs for participants and assist WDC Service Departments to address their
workforce development challenges. Using the Apprenticeship Investment
Fund as a solid foundation for delivering training and qualifications for
Modern apprenticeships and other national training programmes. The Team
at Working4U engages with National Training Funds Managers (SDS) to secure
additional funding that meets the training costs for participants. This includes
additional funds to meet the costs of college courses and qualifications:
reinforcing quality assurance; and ensuring that all participants secure the
relevant accredited qualifications. The fund allows us to support 29 new
apprentices each year.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Senior Council staff and elected members have been involved in the
development of the assessment.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes

Page 73

Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
The proposed change will lead to a reduction in the number of school leavers in West
Dunbartonshire securing good quality employment. Emphasis is placed on recruiting young
people who, without this route, might not secure employment and training.  In addition, the
reduction will mean fewer people are supported to achieve in-work qualifications required to
progress in the workplace.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Senior staff and Elected Members at West Dunbartonshire Council have been involved in the
consultation process.
The Apprenticeship Pathway is being continually developed and delivered by the Youth
Employability and Literacies Team at Working4U. The Team is responsible for the
development/design and delivery of youth employability service provision the delivery of
contracted ‘National Training Programmes’. The Working4U service manager has provided the
information for the assessment.
Further consultation will take place with Council services that use the Modern Apprenticeship
and Foundation Apprenticeship scheme when more details about the level of investment are
available. This will include a range of council departments (for example: Education, Housing, and
Building Services) and HSCP service providers.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Young people are more
likely than older
established workers to
experience disadvantage
in the labour market. 
Several factors
contribute to the higher
unemployment rates
among young people in
West Dunbartonshire. 
• Structural Changes in
the Economy: Shifts in
the economy, such as
automation and
The No One Left Behind
data toolkit provides
statistics from a range of
Government sources
(NOMIS, SIMD) that
demonstrate West
Dunbartonshire has a
comparatively higher
benefit claimant count and
a higher proportion of the
population with no
qualifications. West
Dunbartonshire has a higher
than average proportion of
Reduction in the
apprenticeship
investment fund will
lead to fewer
opportunities for
young people to
secure good quality
employment. Our
recruitment approach
is designed to increase
access to
opportunities for
groups of people
affected by inequality.

Page 74

digitalisation, can
displace jobs in sectors
where young people
typically find first-time
employment, such as in
retail or entry-level office
jobs. 
• Economic Factors:
Economic downturns or
recessions have a
significant impact on
employment, and young
workers are often the
first to lose their jobs due
to their lack of
experience and job
security. 
• Education and Skill
Mismatch: Sometimes
the skills and education
young people possess do
not match the job
market's requirements.
For instance, they might
lack the vocational
training needed for some
roles. 
• Lack of Experience:
Being less experienced
makes it challenging for
young individuals to face
the competition in the
job market. Companies
often prefer hiring those
with work experience. 
• Apprenticeships and
Internships: The limited
number of paid
apprenticeships and
internships can be
another factor. These are
important stepping
stones to secure a job,
but they are often
difficult to secure
because they are either
scarce and/or highly
competitive.
workless households and a
higher than average rate of
child poverty (27.6%
compared to Scotland
average 24.5%).
As such any reduction
in the investment will
reduce pathways to
opportunity for
people from groups
with protected
characteristics.

Page 75

Cross Cutting                 Important to consider
cross cutting
impacts/intersectionality
People can and do have
multiple vulnerabilities,
being members of more
than one priority group.
Negative impacts may
be multiple for people
in the circumstances
above.
Disability                    Council Equality
Outcome on increasing
employment diversity.
At national level statistics
from SDS indicate
popularity of FA among
disabled people, e.g. they
are overrepresented
compared to population.
Reduction in Modern
and Foundation
apprentices, negative
for disabled young
people especially. The
apprenticeship
pathway has been a
good route for
disabled people into
apprenticeships. This
year 14% of new
recruits disclosed a
disability.
Social &
Economic
Impact     
We need to have due
regard to the Fairer
Scotland Duty when
making strategic financial
decisions. 
May negatively affect the
future job and career
prospects of young people
in WD, and skills in the area.
Potentially negatively
impact the economy
in West
Dunbartonshire, and
the lives of young
people.
Sex                           Council equality outcome
on increasing
employment diversity.
Council Equality
Outcome on reducing
gender segregation.
Modern and Foundation
apprenticeships in social
care very popular with
females.
FAs in construction very
popular with Males.
Potential negative
effect for both males
and females in terms
of traditional choices
and for those make
non traditional ones.
The apprenticeship
pathway has provided
a good route for
young women to
apprenticeships. This
year, for example,
almost 40% of
apprenticeships were
taken up by young
women.
Gender Reassign              
Health                       
Human Rights                  Consideration of UNCRC The apprenticeship
investment fund supports
elements of human rights in
terms of UNCRC that is
Article 6: namely 'right to
develop'.
Reduced provision
may negatively affect
the fulfilment of rights
as fewer places will be
available for
apprenticeships.

Page 76

Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                          Council Equality
Outcome on increasing
employment diversity.
At national level statistics
from SDS indicate
popularity of Modern and
Foundation apprenticeships
among BME people, e.g.
they are over represented
compared to population.
Reduction in Modern
and Foundation
apprentices, negative
for BME young people
especially.
Religion and
Belief          
Race and Religion or
belief are different
elements however they
cross cut with ethnicity
because the relative
portions.
Cross cuts with race to a
certain extent.
Cross cuts with race to
a certain extent.
Sexual
Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The Council has a budget deficit and is seeking and assessing options that will contribute to
reducing the gap. Assessment of the Apprenticeship Investment Fund is a necessary part of that
process.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Working4U provides support to encourage young people to engage with training and
employment. We maintain a monitoring framework that charts progress towards our aims. We
will provide information on the impact of changes through our reporting procedures.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Don't Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1040: This proposal has been developed to support the budget setting exercise. The equality
impact assessment provides an overview of the impact of reducing the Apprenticeship
Investment Fund. This will reduce access to good quality employment opportunities for young
people, including disabled, and BME young people. It would reduce our potential to support in-
work progression among low paid workers and reduce the capacity to provide access to
qualifications that will support young people to establish themselves in the labour market. 
This is based on evidence that demonstrates that West Dunbartonshire compares unfavourably
with the Scottish averages for employment, economic activity and child poverty levels. The
apprenticeship pathway is designed to address these issues and will be negatively affected if the
funds are reduced.

Page 77

Assessment No 1032 Owner Stephen Brooks                                
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and N
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Stephen Brooks Working4U Manager
Members Peter Barry Chief Officer Housing and Employability
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title HE02 Reduce W4U 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
Reduce W4U workforce based on options below:
Option 1 - Reduction of 4.5 FTE - saving £206,000.
Option 2 - Reduction of 9 FTE - saving £412,500.
Option 3 - Reduction of 14 FTE - saving £619,125.
Option 4 - Reduction of 18 FTE - saving £825,500.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Elected Members, Senior WDC Staff, senior W4U staff
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Staff, service users.
Working 4U seeks to address the underlying causes of poverty, as well as the symptoms, by
specifically tackling unemployment, providing opportunities to increase levels of education,
skills, confidence and personal development as well support to claim in and out of work benefits
and manage debt.

Page 78

The specialist components of Working 4U’s services are:  Learning and Development that
supports disadvantaged or vulnerable groups and individuals of all ages to engage in learning.
This covers a range of activity, such as youth work, family and adult learning, including adult
literacy and English for Speakers of Other languages (ESOL) and community development and
capacity building. Working 4U’s focus is on youth work and family and adult learning. 
Employability encompasses all the things that enable people to improve their quality of life by
increasing their chances of getting a job, staying in a job, and progressing further in work. The
focus of our work is placed on supporting those that are facing the most intense levels of
disadvantage, including families most likely to be affected by child poverty, young people, older
workers, long-term unemployed and people from equalities groups.  
Benefit /debt Information and Advice National standards state that all debt counselling, income
maximisation support, money advice and welfare benefit advice services service providers must
be committed to providing equity of access to services for all. We provide a service that is open
to all; however, given the socio/economic circumstances we prioritise people who are most
vulnerable to disadvantage. 
In our service delivery we will place emphasis on supporting people facing difficult life
transitions, including, for example:
• Those with life limiting conditions;
• People affected by mental health issues;
• Those affected by drug and alcohol misuse;
• Those affected by housing and homelessness;
• Newly unemployed and retired.
In addition,  we place emphasis on supporting families with children who are more susceptible
to poverty and disadvantage, including families with children: 
• where the mother is under 25 years of age; 
• larger families;
• minority ethnic households; 
• lone parent families;
• families with children under 1 year old.
• Families and children with experience of the care system; 
• Children with caring responsibilities; and 
• Those living in areas of high material deprivation.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Consultation has been carried out in the context of the budget review. This has included
consultation among Elected Members, senior Council staff and managers at Working4U.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact

Page 79

Age                           Child poverty is
focus for the
Council.
High child poverty in
WDC.
18-30 year olds are
experiencing
particular economic
strain.
Reduced service provision may
result in negative impacts for
children and young people.
Cross Cutting                 Working4U seeks to
improve the quality
of lives for people
from disadvantaged
backgrounds who
are most likely to be
affected by
inequality, poverty
and disadvantage
which is driven by
structural or
institutional factors.
These factors
include: 
• Income from
social security and
benefits in kind,
influenced by: 
o design and
generosity of
welfare benefits;
o benefit sanctions
and recovery of
advance payments;
o hardship
payments and third-
party debts;
o barriers to
accessing financial
support (including
child maintenance).
• Income from
employment,
influenced by the
availability of jobs,
hours and the level
of earnings, and
barriers to taking up
that work, such as
childcare
responsibilities; plus
qualifications and
The key drivers of
poverty identified in
the legislation
include income
levels and the cost
of living. Income is
determined, to an
extent, by levels of
economic activity
and employment.
While there are
many sources of
labour market
information,
examples provided
by NOMIS (Office for
National Statistics
Labour Market
Profile - Nomis -
Official Census and
Labour Market
Statistics
(nomisweb.co.uk))
will illustrate West
Dunbartonshire’s
comparative labour
market profile to
suggest the need for
targeted
employability
support.
Employment and
Economic Activity: 
West
Dunbartonshire has
a comparatively
higher rate of
economic inactivity
with 26.2% of the
16-64 years age
group in
employment. The
Working4U has a budget of
£1.64m.  There are four options for
consideration. All options focus on
staff costs.
Option 1:  Reduction by £206,000
will affect approximately 4.5
members of staff all of whom will,
by necessity of our funding
sources, come from our
Employability Team, Community
Learning and Development team or
our welfare benefits/debt team or
a combination of all.
This will have an impact on their
ability to meet growing demand for
their services and will create
further challenges for the teams.
This is particularly the case for
benefit/advice/debt team who are
experiencing higher levels of
demand from increasing numbers
of people with a growing
complexity of concerns related to
the cost-of-living crisis.  
A reduction of staff in Welfare
Rights will lead to lower level of
benefit maximisation and debt
management activity (including
housing and council tax arrears).
This will lead to continuing levels of
disadvantage and greater demand
on crisis support services.  
A reduction in Community Learning
will result in a decrease in adult
literacy support, ESOL and
community-based learning. While a
reduction in the Employability
Team will reduce our capability to
deliver apprenticeship and in-work
progression support. 
These services will remain,

Page 80

skills, which can
influence both
contemporary and
future child
poverty. 
• Costs of living,
including housing,
food and fuel costs,
the poverty
premium, the costs
of the school day,
and the extra,
unavoidable costs
of disability or living
in a rural area. 
We provide
support because:
• People don’t
always claim the
benefits they are
entitled to;
• The benefits
system is difficult to
understand;
• Navigating the
process without
assistance can lead
to errors;
• Appeals without
help can lead to
wrong decisions;
• Understanding
welfare reform is
difficult.
• People face
physical and
psychological
barriers to
employment and
learning
opportunities
because of personal
circumstances and
professional
support will help
people to overcome
these barriers.
• Its difficult to
maintain jobsearch
comparative figure
for Scotland is 23.8%
and Great Britain’s
figure is 21.6%. 
At 19%, West
Dunbartonshire has
a higher proportion
of workless
households than
both Scotland
(18.1%) and Great
Britain (13.6%). Of
those in
employment, there
is a higher
proportion in West
Dunbartonshire
reliant on part-time
work (35.5%). This is
higher than the
figure for Scotland
(33.2%) and Great
Britain (32.1%).
A review of the
NOMIS statistics
reveals that the job
density in West
Dunbartonshire is
estimated at 0.61;
this is much lower
than the figure for
Glasgow (1.04);
Scotland (0.80) and
Great Britain (0.84).
In effect, although
there are
comparatively
higher numbers of
people out of work,
there are also
comparatively fewer
opportunities
available in West
Dunbartonshire. 
Addressing
unemployment and
underemployment is
consistent with
addressing the
however, their support for
equalities groups will be reduced
and fewer people will receive
support to overcome barriers to
opportunity. 
Option 2: Reduction of £412,500
affecting 9 FTE posts being met by
the Council. 
This will require a full consultation
with a requirement for voluntary
severance. It will also, most likely,
result in additional staff leaving the
Council possibly through
compulsory redundancy beyond
voluntary severance arrangements.
This will further reduce our direct
service delivery of Adult Learning
and Welfare Rights.  We will also
have reduced staff capacity to
deliver apprenticeship
programmes and access to
training. 
The capacity to respond to funding
opportunities and associated
delivery will also be compromised.
This could lead to the loss of
opportunities and external
investment in West
Dunbartonshire. Recent examples
of the type of opportunity that
could be missed in the future:
• ESOL funding (funding to support
New Scots);
• GP Practice funding – supporting
access to welfare rights in GP
Practices;
• Child Poverty accelerator funds –
testing new ideas to address
poverty;
• Cash first and energy hardship
funds – funds to reduce the
reliance on food banks and assist
people to cope with the rise in
cost-of-living .
• Connecting Scotland – providing
target groups with IT equipment.
• Improving the Cancer Journey –
funds to support families affected
by cancer.

Page 81

momentum and
participating in
learning without
professional, expert
support. 
income drivers of
poverty and will
therefore feature
extensively in our
approach to
addressing child
poverty.
Benefits
The number of
people in receipt of
out of work benefits
is a contributory
factor to the level of
child poverty. In
West
Dunbartonshire
4.5% of the
population in the
16-64 years group is
in receipt of out of
work benefits. This
is higher than the
average in Scotland
(3.2%) and Great
Britain (3.8%) and
represents 2,525
people.
18.4% of households
in West
Dunbartonshire are
in receipt of the
main benefits. This
compares
unfavourably with
the figure for
Scotland (13%) and
Great Britain (11%).
In effect,
comparatively more
people in West
Dunbartonshire rely
on benefits for their
income. Maximising
their entitlement
will feature strongly
in our approach to
maximising income
Option 3: £619,000 reduction will
result in a reduction of
approximately 14 fte posts.
(leaving 4 ftes to deliver welfare
rights, adult learning and
apprenticeship support). This will
require the actions outlined in the
previous 2 options. As a result
there would be very little direct
delivery of adult learning services
(1-2 ftes delivering ESOL, literacy
and numeracy) and welfare
rights/benefits service (1-2 ftes). 
The capacity to respond to external
opportunities in these areas of
work will be lost and the increasing
demand for learning and welfare
benefits services will not be met.
Support for access to community-
based learning and welfare
benefits will not be available for
significant numbers of people who
are facing disadvantage and:
• Are not in work and not seeking
work;
• Are economically inactive, retired
requiring support to maximise
benefits or overcome social
isolation (through participation in
learning);
• Have additional learning support
needs.
This will require a full consultation
with a requirement for voluntary
severance. It will also result in
additional staff leaving the Council
possibly through compulsory
redundancy. 
Option 4: £825,000 reduction will
result in a reduction of
approximately 18 fte posts.
(leaving 4 ftes to deliver welfare
rights, adult learning and
apprenticeship support). This will
require the actions outlined in the
previous 2 options. As a result,
there would be very little direct
delivery of adult learning services
(1-2 ftes delivering ESOL, literacy

Page 82

and numeracy) and welfare
rights/benefits service (1-2 ftes). 
The capacity to respond to external
opportunities in these areas of
work will be lost and the increasing
demand for learning and welfare
benefits services will not be met.
Support for access to community-
based learning and welfare
benefits will not be available for
significant numbers of people who
are facing disadvantage and:
• Are not in work and not seeking
work;
• Are economically inactive, retired
requiring support to maximise
benefits or overcome social
isolation (through participation in
learning);
• Have additional learning support
needs.
This will require a full consultation
with a requirement for voluntary
severance. It will also result in
additional staff leaving the Council
possibly through compulsory
redundancy. 
Disability                    Our child poverty
report notes
disabled people as
priority group.
Six family types are
most likely to be
affected by
disadvantage and
child poverty.  This
included families
where members are
affected by
equalities issues and
considered to have
protected
characteristics.
Disabled people and
those living in a
household with a
disabled person are
more likely to be
income deprived.
Reduced provision may affect
efforts to reduce poverty for this
group.
Social &
Economic
Impact     
Reducing child
poverty is a focus
for the council.
Groups noted above
may be especially
vulnerable, as well
Reduced provision may result in
reduced ability to tackle economic
and financial inequality.

Page 83

as other with low
incomes.
Sex                           Our child poverty
report notes
women as priority
group.
Six family types are
most likely to be
affected by
disadvantage and
child poverty.  This
included families
where members are
affected by
equalities issues and
considered to have
protected
characteristics. This
group includes
single person
households.
Women comprise
90% of single
parents who are
more likely to be
income deprived.
Reduced provision may affect
women disproportionately
compared to men.
Gender Reassign              
Health                       
Human Rights                  Human Rights Act;
For example, Article
8 family life.
UNCRC. Article 6
development, in
this case 'Provision'
is relevant.
The work of W4U
supports elements
of human rights and
UNCRC rights.
Reduced provision may negatively
affect the fulfilment of UNCRC
rights.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Child poverty is
focus for the
Council. Pregnant
mothers are a
target group for
support through
child poverty focus.
Cross cuts with sex.
Six family types are
most likely to be
affected by
disadvantage and
child poverty.  This
included families
where members are
affected by
equalities issues and
considered to have
protected
characteristics.
Families with young
Reduced provision may affect
efforts to reduce poverty for this
group.
Cross cuts with Sex.

Page 84

mothers, children
under 1 year old are
included in the
focus. 
Cross cuts with sex.
Race                          Our child poverty
report notes people
from BME groups as
a priority group.
Six family types are
most likely to be
affected by
disadvantage and
child poverty.  This
included families
where members are
affected by
equalities issues and
considered to have
protected
characteristics
People from BME
groups more likely
to me more income
deprived.
Reduced provision may affect
efforts to reduce poverty for this
group.
Religion and
Belief          
Sexual
Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The options have been developed as a contribution to the discussions about budget reductions
within Working4U in order to assist the Council to manage its budget deficit.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Working4U has a monitoring framework for reporting output and impacts of its activities. This
includes key performance indicators illustrating the statistics for the number of people
supported and the outcome of that support. This will provide information that will determine
how funding resources are deployed.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1032: This proposal has been developed to support the budget setting process. Likely
negative impacts especially for women, disabled people, young people including UNCRC rights,
people from BME groups.

Page 85

Any further cuts will require a reduction in Teams that have already sustained cuts in the
previous year and will have a substantial impact on service provision affecting the most
vulnerable households in West Dunbartonshire. 
Each subsequent option intensifies the negative impact with additional unintended
consequences associated with the options.
All options have a negative effect on our ability to address the drivers of poverty and support
disadvantaged individual and households to escape from poverty.

Page 86

Assessment No 1064 Owner John Kerr                                 
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Housing and Employment
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer John Kerr Housing Development and
Homelessness Manager 
Members Joanne Sutherland
Shari Law
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title HE03 Reduce Temporary Accommodation Furniture Budget 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
Under this option, plans to retire 18 temporary accommodation homes in
2025/26 would be delayed until 2026/27. If the plans had progressed in
2025/26, £1,000 per home would have been required to pay for white goods
for 18 new temporary accommodation units. The cessation of the rotation of
the temporary accommodation homes would reduce planned expenditure by
£18k in 2025/26.  This would not be recurring as the planned activity would be
reprofiled into 2026/27.  
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
None
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
N/A
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?

Page 87

Housing Development & Homeless management team
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The proposal would be contrary to a service commitment made by the Council in terms of the
rotation of the units, however as the proposed cessation is for a solitary year it would mean the
proposed activity would take a year longer than anticipated.
There is a risk that costs will increase during the cessation period, RPI is currently 3.6% if this
was assumed not to change costs would increase in 2026/27 this is reflected in rounding down
the estimated saving to £17k.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Yes
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
Screening 1064: The proposal has no relevance any of the four areas (1- Duty to eliminate
discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F), 2-Human Rights,
3- Health Impacts or 4- Social Economic Impacts, therefore no Equality Impact Assessment is
required.

Page 88

Assessment No 1166 Owner Nicola Pettigrew                       
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service HE Budget
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Nicola Pettigrew Housing Operations Manager
Members Nicola Pettigrew, Housing Operations Manager
Peter Barry, Chief Officer, Housing and Employability
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title HE04 – Reduce CCTV Service
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
General Services Saving option for consideration
Option 1 – CCTV reduction
• Delete 1 x post of CCTV Development Officer.          
Fund existing CCTV Operative (post in establishment - no current budget
provision).          
Financial difference between posts would be saving to General Fund.
Option 2 – 25% Reduction
• Delete 1 x Development Officer and 1 CCTV Operator 
Option 3 - 50% Reduction
• Delete 1 x Development Officer and 3 x CCTV Operators 
Option 4 – 75% Reduction
• Delete 1 x CCTV Supervisor and 4 X CCTV Operators
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
This is a saving option which has been requested to be provided for all General
Services functions that are not statutory requirements.  These options have been
identified by the Housing Operations Manager in discussion with the Chief Officer,
Housing and Employability.  There have been discussions undertaken with Police
Scotland with regards to increasing their contributions towards the operation of the
CCTV service, however no additional funding has been secured to date but will be
subject to ongoing discussions.  Police Scotland have confirmed that there is a
national review of funding provision to all Scottish Local Authorities underway.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes

Page 89

Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
Option 1 - Existing female post holder - CCTV Development Officer.  Removal of this post will result in the
only female post holder being removed from the team, leaving a male only workforce within the CCTV
Service.  Current post holder would require to be placed on Switch or considered for VS/ER options. 
Cease undertaking existing post holder duties (support day-to-day operations, responding to repair issues,
providing technical expertise, engagement with a range of partners to find technical solutions to CCTV
issues, completion of FOI/SARs, responding to member enquiries, producing statistical returns and
providing onsite support with engineers as required).  Wider impact to CCTV team as will no longer
receive the support, technical expertise and knowledge provided by the post holder. 
Options 2 - will impact on all team members due to deletion of 2 posts, which are currently held by 1
female and 1 male.  Will result in restructure of service provision with reduced monitoring provision
remaining.   This option would leave 3 CCTV Operatives, 1 Supervisor and 1 Team Leader.  There would
be live CCTV monitoring 7 days per week between 12pm and midnight only.  However, it must be
recognised there would be increased periods of no live monitoring during periods of staff absence, holiday
or vacancy.
Option 3 - will impact on all team members due to deletion of 4 posts, which are currently held by 1 female
and 3 males.  Will result in restructure of service provision with limited monitoring provision remaining.  
There would be no real time CCTV monitoring provision throughout WDC as insufficient staffing to operate
24/7 shift patterns.
Option 4 - will impact on all team members due to deletion of 5 CCTV team posts, which are currently held
by all males.  Will result in restructure of service provision with no monitoring provision remaining.   There
would no real time CCTV monitoring provision throughout WDC as insufficient staffing to operate 24/7 shift
patterns.
Internal and external services and partners who utilise CCTV will all be impacted if any these options are
taken - WDC internal services of Housing, ASB, Education, Greenspace, Assets, Roads, Communities. 
External partners of Police Scotland, SFRS, WDTRO, TRAs and Community Council reps.  
All will be impacted with loss of any posts within CCTV due to loss of expertise/knowledge, delays in
responses to operational technical issues and reduction in service provision, impact will increase through
the different options due to level of staff posts lost.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
No one has been involved in consultation as these are P&C budget saving options, which will be subject to
review by Chief Officer/CEO Budget Working Group, if decision made to take these options forward to a
future Council saving committee for approval/rejection, consultation and update would be carried out with
the post holders within the CCTV Team.  This would be followed by wider update and consultation with
Trade Union officials, as it has been outlined in the budget options there are associated risks with the
removal of any these posts.  
There are risks associated with the removal of the CCTV Development Officer post, namely loss of
support functions to CCTV team with the day-to-day operations of the CCTV network, supporting and
responding to repair issues, providing technical expertise and engagement with a range of partners to find
technical solutions to CCTV issues.  The post also completes a range of supporting functions to the team
including completion of FOI/SARs, responding to member enquiries, producing statistical returns and
providing onsite support with engineers as required.  Overall monitoring of the CCTV maintenance,
production of KPI statistics, research and completion of member enquiries research and onsite
engagement with contractors and engineers to resolve CCTV issues.  This will result in a reduction on the
performance of these key functions be carried out timeously.  
Options 2-4 - Removal of CCTV Operatives, CCTV Supervisor posts will also pose risk as any deletion of
posts will result in reduced service provision and periods of no live monitoring of CCTV.  This will create a
WDC community risk for all residents, WDC services and our Partners, for example Police Scotland, due
to loss of opportunity on prevention and detection of crime/ASB.

Page 90

In 23/24 CCTV service highlighted and reported 1232 incidents via our CCTV monitoring, which were
raised with police for action.
The CCTV Team were also requested by Police Scotland to carry our specific CCTV enquiries 576 times
23/24 and provided 449 evidence packages for court purposes.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           All age groups could be
negatively impacted with
this saving as CCTV
network operates
throughout WDC to support
prevention/detection of
crime and support residents
of all ages to feel safe in
their communities.
According to the 21/22 Scottish
Crime and Justice Survey
(SCJS) at the Scotland level
people aged 16-21 were more
likely to be victims of crime
than other age groups.
Those over 60 were less likely
to be victims of crime.
A Fairer Scotland for Older
People: Framework for Action. 
Older people want:
"Opportunities to remain
actively engaged with, and
involved in, their communities"
In 23/24 CCTV service
highlighted and reported 1232
incidents via our CCTV
monitoring, which were raised
with police for action.
The CCTV Team were also
requested by Police Scotland
to carry our specific CCTV
enquiries 576 times 23/24, and
provided 449 evidence
packages for court purposes.
If loss of any posts
resulted in a less
effective service, then
there could be negative
consequences for
younger people if they
are currently benefiting
from use of the system. 
However, should be
recognised that all age
groups can be
disadvantaged if CCTV
service is reduced, as
there is a direct impact
on prevention / detection
of crime/ASB, which
supports residents
feeling safe in their
communities.
Reduction in CCTV team
could pose a risk in
terms of missed
opportunities for the
prevention and detection
of crime and ASB
activity. 
This could result in
decreased levels of
satisfaction of residents
feeling safe in their
community.
Cross Cutting                 It is important that there is a
focus on prevention and
detection of criminal activity
and ASB within
communities.
This is supported with a
modern and efficient CCTV
network provision.
People can simultaneous be
members of more than one
disadvantaged or advantaged
group, which can multiply
negative or positive outcomes.
The Scottish Crime and Justice
Survey (SCJS) estimated that
40% of all crimes (as defined
by the SCJS) were reported to
the police in 2019-20.
Loss of CCTV posts
could pose a risk in
terms of missed
opportunities for the
prevention and detection
of crime and ASB
activity. 
This could result in
decreased levels of
satisfaction of residents

Page 91

In 23/24 CCTV service
highlighted and reported 1232
incidents via our CCTV
monitoring, which were raised
with police for action.
The CCTV Team were also
requested by Police Scotland
to carry our specific CCTV
enquiries 576 times 23/24, and
provided 449 evidence
packages for court purposes.
feeling safe in their
community.
Loss of CCTV posts to
help address timeously
any operating issues of
CCTV provision.  This
could pose a risk in
terms of missed
opportunities for the
prevention and detection
of crime and ASB
activity.  Resulting in
residents feeling unsafe
within their communities
and impacting on social
isolation.
Disability                    Evidence suggests disabled
people are more likely to be
socially isolated, and less
likely to be involved in
community life than non
disabled people. 
According to the 21/22 Scottish
Crime and Justice Survey
(SCJS) at the Scotland level
disabled people were less
likely to feel safe than non-
disabled people.
Disabled people were more
likely to victims of crime than
non disabled people.
In 23/24 CCTV service
highlighted and reported 1232
incidents via our CCTV
monitoring, which were raised
with police for action.
The CCTV Team were also
requested by Police Scotland
to carry our specific CCTV
enquiries 576 times 23/24, and
provided 449 evidence
packages for court purposes.
If loss of a posts resulted
in a less effective
service, then there could
be negative
consequences for
disabled people if they
are currently benefiting
from use of the system.
Loss of opportunity for
prevention and detection
of crime and ASB within
communities.  This could
result in increased levels
of social isolation for this
protected group due to
loss of opportunities.
This could also lead to
social isolation due to
feeling of being unsafe
in their communities.
Social & Economic
Impact     
It is important that there is a
focus on prevention and
detection of criminal activity
and ASB within
communities.
This is supported with a
modern and efficient CCTV
network provision.
According to SCJS 21/22 at
the Scotland level those living
in the most deprived 15%
SIMD areas were more likely
than those on other areas to
experience crime.
Involved, organised and
empowered communities have
greater economic and social
strength.   
In 23/24 CCTV service
highlighted and reported 1232
incidents via our CCTV
monitoring, which were raised
with police for action.
The CCTV Team were also
requested by Police Scotland
to carry our specific CCTV
enquiries 576 times 23/24 and
Loss of CCTV posts is
likely to result in delays
to operational CCTV
issues being dealt with
timeously.  This could
negatively impact on
wider community in
terms of loss of feeling
safe in their
communities.

Page 92

provided 449 evidence
packages for court purposes.
Sex                           We need to consider any
differential impacts between
sexes
At the Scotland level the SCJS
21/22 reported that women felt
less safe than men 63% v 90%
walking alone in the dark
Citizens Panel data from 2023
showed little difference
between women and men in
perceptions of how good an
area WD was to live into 
Engagement in community
activities varies across age
and gender.
In 23/24 CCTV service
highlighted and reported 1232
incidents via our CCTV
monitoring, which were raised
with police for action.
The CCTV Team were also
requested by Police Scotland
to carry our specific CCTV
enquiries 576 times 23/24, and
provided 449 evidence
packages for court purposes.
If loss of posts resulted
in a less effective
service, then there could
be negative
consequences for
Women if they are
currently benefiting from
use of the system. 
Loss of any CCTV posts
to help address
timeously any operating
issues of CCTV
provision.  This could
pose a risk in terms of
missed opportunities for
the prevention and
detection of crime and
ASB activity.  Resulting
in residents feeling
unsafe within their
communities and
impacting on social
isolation.
Gender Reassign               Those undergoing or who
have undergone gender
reassignment can be
particularly excluded from
social and in civil society. 
Therefore, loss of CCTV
posts could create isolation
for this protected group due
to few opportunities to
engage re CCTV provision
and development.
Evidence suggest that trans
people can be more socially
isolated and more at risk of
discrimination.
In 23/24 CCTV service
highlighted and reported 1232
incidents via our CCTV
monitoring, which were raised
with police for action.
The CCTV Team were also
requested by Police Scotland
to carry our specific CCTV
enquiries 576 times 23/24, and
provided 449 evidence
packages for court purposes.
If loss of posts resulted
in a less effective
service, then there could
be negative
consequences for Trans
people if they are
currently benefiting from
use of the system
Loss of CCTV posts
could impact on ability to
help address timeously
any faults or operating
issues of CCTV
provision.  This could
pose a risk in terms of
missed opportunities for
the prevention and
detection of crime and
ASB activity, creating
increased social
isolation for this group
due to feelings of lack of
safety in communities.
Health                        It is important that there is a
focus on prevention and
detection of criminal activity
and ASB within
communities.  This is
directly supported with an
efficient and modern CCTV
network provision.
Our physical and social
environment is the framework
in which our lives take place
and, depending on
circumstances, it can provide
us with opportunities or limit
our potential (Scottish National
Performance Framework).
If loss of CCTV posts
resulted in a less
effective service, then
there could be negative
consequences for the
mental health of
members of the
community for example

Page 93

In 23/24 CCTV service
highlighted and reported 1232
incidents via our CCTV
monitoring, which were raised
with police for action.
The CCTV Team were also
requested by Police Scotland
to carry our specific CCTV
enquiries 576 times 23/24, and
provided 449 evidence
packages for court purposes.
in terms of feeling safe,
timeous responses to
any operating issues of
CCTV.
Human Rights                  It is important that there is a
focus on prevention and
detection of criminal activity
and ASB within
communities.  
This is supported by a
modern and efficient CCTV
network provision.
Relevant under core civil
rights, such as the right to
respect for private and
family life (Article 8 of the
Convention), the right to
freedom of expression
(Article 10)
It is important that potential
impact for children and
young people is considered.
In practice Human Rights and
Children's Rights cross cut
often with equality
considerations and the others
addressed in our assessments.
In 23/24 CCTV service
highlighted and reported 1232
incidents via our CCTV
monitoring, which were raised
with police for action.
The CCTV Team were also
requested by Police Scotland
to carry our specific CCTV
enquiries 576 times 23/24, and
provided 449 evidence
packages for court purposes.
If loss of CCTV posts
resulted in a less
effective service, then
there could be negative
consequences in terms
of being able to support
peoples human rights.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
This area crosscuts with
consideration under sex
This area crosscuts with sex
In 23/24 CCTV service
highlighted and reported 1232
incidents via our CCTV
monitoring, which were raised
with police for action.
The CCTV Team were also
requested by Police Scotland
to carry our specific CCTV
enquiries 576 times 23/24 and
provided 449 evidence
packages for court purposes.
This area crosscuts with
sex
Race                          All protected groups could
be impacted with this saving
People from BME groups are
more likely to experience hate
incidents than people from
white ethnic groups
Evidence from Scottish Social
Attitudes surveys and other
sources suggests that people
who have contact with people
from other groups are less
If loss of CCTV posts
resulted in a less
effective service, then
there could be negative
consequences for BME
people if they are
currently benefiting from
use of the system.
Loss of CCTV posts to

Page 94

likely to hold negative views on
those groups.
In 23/24 CCTV service
highlighted and reported 1232
incidents via our CCTV
monitoring, which were raised
with police for action.
The CCTV Team were also
requested by Police Scotland
to carry our specific CCTV
enquiries 576 times 23/24, and
provided 449 evidence
packages for court purposes.
help address timeously
to operating issues of
CCTV provision.  This
could pose a risk in
terms of missed
opportunities for the
prevention and detection
of crime and ASB
activity. 
This could result in
group feeling unsafe in
their communities and
increasing social
isolation.
Religion and Belief           We need to consider any
differential impact in terms
of religion and belief
Whilst Race and religion are
distinct categories there is
some cross over in terms of
visibility, or perceived religion
of certain people. We also
need to consider and impact of
dealing with sectarian
incidents.
In 23/24 CCTV service
highlighted and reported 1232
incidents via our CCTV
monitoring, which were raised
with police for action.
The CCTV Team were also
requested by Police Scotland
to carry our specific CCTV
enquiries 576 times 23/24 and
provided 449 evidence
packages for court purposes.
Loss of CCTV posts to
help address timeously
to operating issues and
faults for CCTV
provision.  This could
pose a risk in terms of
missed opportunities for
the prevention and
detection of crime and
ASB activity.
Sexual Orientation            We need to consider any
differential impacts between
sexual orientations
LGB people are more likely to
suffer harassment linked to
sexual orientation than
heterosexual/straight people.
In 23/24 CCTV service
highlighted and reported 1232
incidents via our CCTV
monitoring, which were raised
with police for action.
The CCTV Team were also
requested by Police Scotland
to carry our specific CCTV
enquiries 576 times 23/24, and
provided 449 evidence
packages for court purposes.
Loss of any CCTV posts
to help address
timeously any operating
issues of CCTV
provision.  This could
pose a risk in terms of
missed opportunities for
the prevention and
detection of crime and
ASB activity.  Resulting
in residents feeling
unsafe within their
communities and
impacting on social
isolation.
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
It is recognised that if any these saving options are accepted by members that there will be a negative
impact on the delivery and future development of the CCTV network provision.  It is also recognised that
there would likely be a negative impact for the protected groups detailed above, as there will be less
opportunities to engage re CCTV developments and delays in responding to repairs for CCTV as they

Page 95

arise.  There would also be a restructure of service required if option 2-4 taken with limited live CCTV
monitoring, which will negatively impact on our ability to support the proactive prevention and detection of
crime and ASB to keep our tenants and residents safe in our communities.  This could likely also result in
tenants and residents feeling dissatisfaction with the management of their neighborhoods, with potential
links to increased feelings of social isolation due to safety concerns in their communities.
It is also recognised that there would also be a negative impact for internal WDC services and external
partners, for example Police Scotland and SFRS, who rely on CCTV provision in the prevention and
detection of crime and ASB activity for all groups.
As outlined previously, there are risks associated with the removal of any the CCTV roles, namely loss of
support functions to CCTV team with the day-to-day operations of the CCTV network, supporting and
responding to repair issues, providing technical expertise and engagement with a range of partners to find
technical solutions to CCTV issues, loss of supporting functions to allow operation of CCTV team,
reduction in live monitoring of CCTV which would result in loss of evidence and opportunity to detect and
prevent crime and ASB.  
Removal of any CCTV posts poses a significant risk in increased levels of ASB and crime within
communities.  This impact would reduce effective monitoring provision and negatively impact on
prevention and detection of crime and ASB due to extended periods, delayed responses and engaging
with partners and external providers to find solutions to technical and operational issues.  
There is also an associated risk with any reduction to the CCTV team as we have recently secured a once
in a generation level capital investment delivering a comprehensive upgrade programme, which included
Capital investment secured to deliver the CCTV Project consisted of £681,172 of UKSP investment and
£750,000 HRA investment.   As part of the UKSP investment there will be an ongoing requirement to
provide regular updates on how this money has positively impacted in our communities and achieved
positive outcomes.  This will be cross cutting across all protected groups. Therefore, is essential that we
retain sufficient staffing levels to monitor and operate our new enhanced CCTV provision network, removal
of any CCTV posts would pose a risk to deliver of these objectives.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Yes.  There will require to be ongoing quarterly updates to the UK Government to update on the positive
outcomes achieved from the upgrading of the CCTV network which is being delivered via the UKSP funds
secured of £681,172.  Removal of this post will present a challenge in providing the required statistical and
reporting returns required in a timeous manner.  As outlined above the removal of any CCTV posts will
also present delays in timeous onsite responses to technical issues that occur, which could negatively
impact on prevention and detection of crime.
There are also KPI returns that are provided as part of the Housing and Employability Delivery Plan
around CCTV, namely under Our Communities, Objective 1. Our neighbourhoods are safe, resilient and
inclusive, specific returns on (a) Number of incidents directed to Police by Public Space CCTV team, (b) %
of Public Space CCTV cameras that are operational, a 3rd KPI would also be impacted due to loss of
opportunity to detect/prevent ASB and gather evidence via operational CCTV (c) % of anti-social
behaviour cases resolved.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Don't Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1166: Removal of any the CCTV posts across option 1-4 would have anticipated negative
impact people with the protected characteristics noted in section 2 of the impact assessment for
example women, younger people, trans people, but all persons in our communities would be
impacted due to reduction in CCTV live coverage.  If decision taken to delete any the CCTV
posts, further support and discussions will be required to be undertaken with all existing post
holders to explore options.   Further discussions will also be required to be undertaken with wider
CCTV team, internal and external services/partners in terms of potential restructuring of service.

Page 96

Assessment No 1149 Owner Arun Menon                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget P and T
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Arun Menon Business Support Manager
Members Arun Menon, Business Support Manager
Richard Butler, Section Head CAS
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title PT12 Reduce Corporate Admin Support
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
This option, to reduce service by 5%, will see an equivalent of 3 FTE reduction within
the service area.  In financial teams this equates to £91,200 reduction. This figure
factors a 18% HRA recharge through Central Support Allocation which cannot be
reduced as it will not impact the General Fund.     
There are a range of associated impacts on service delivery for services that CAS
support which have been relayed to all Chief Officer ahead of a decision.  Whilst
savings here are reflected as FTE, no staff member with a permanent contact is likely
to be impacted.  These savings will be delivered from a mix of VER/VS and deletion of
temporary increased hours and/or fixed term posts.  That said, this will significant
impact the capacity within CAS which is why for transparency it was considered
necessary to reflect the savings as FTE hours deleted. 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Business Support Management
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
Services that receive support from CAS and any staff who are employed on fixed term contracts and/or
have a temporarily increase in their hours.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
PMRG have been made aware of the impact should the savings be approved

Page 97

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                          
Cross Cutting                
Disability                   
Social & Economic
Impact     
Sex                           We need to consider any
differential impact for
example because of
composition of the affected
workforce in terms of sex.
Due to workforce composition,
changes are likely to affect
women more than men. 
Women in Scotland are more
likely to be income deprived
than men.
In practice this means
that some staff will stop
working extra hours
currently in place,
meaning some reduction
in income above their
contractual amounts.
Gender Reassign              
Health                       
Human Rights                 
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and Belief          
Sexual Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
N/A
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing base
is?
No
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1149:  Due to workforce composition, changes are likely to affect women more than men. In
practice this means that some staff would stop working extra hours currently in place, meaning
some reduction in income above their contractual amounts.

Page 98

Assessment No 1059 Owner Lorraine Mair                                  
Resource Transformation Service Budget P and T
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Alison McBride People & Change Manager
Members Alison McBride, People & Change Manager
Victoria Rogers, Chief Office, People & Technology
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title P&T14  People and Change Team Restructure
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
As part of a wider service review of P&T, specifically to ensure compliance with
Standard Operating Model (SOM) and deliver savings towards the Council budget
gap, the proposal is to restructure the P&C team and reduce number of posts/people.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Strategic HR team
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
Impact will be the reduction of 1FTE management role in HR and 0.6FTE specialist H&S role.  The
remaining teams will be impacted in that there is reduced opportunity for progression.  The agreement of
the SOM is already in place.  This proposal ensures compliance for the P&T HR and OD teams. 
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
All those directly impacted by the proposal have been consulted and advised.
All P&T teams, have been advised of the proposed restructure changes.  
Trades Unions have been advised.
Elected Members will be asked to note the savings/management adjustment
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.

Page 99

Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           The role of managers is
required for the smooth
running of all services.  This
will continue, but will be
more efficient and therefore
effective, in line with SOM. 
The workforce has an
age diverse workforce but
44% are over 50.  People
tend to progress as they
get older which means
that the more specialist
and managerial posts are
often occupied by those
over 50
Reduction in posts at this
level may adversely affect
those in the upper age
bracket.
Cross Cutting                 N/A N/A N/A
Disability                    N/A N/A N/A
Social & Economic
Impact     
N/A N/A N/A
Sex                           We need to have regard to
any differential impact.
Gender Reassign               N/A N/A N/A
Health                        Employee Wellbeing is of
paramount concern and
WDC aim to ensure that all
relevant supports are in
place to help employees
and managers who need
support and to help them
maintain good health. 
The commitment to
supporting employees
remains of paramount
importance.  Any
employees and managers
affected by the changes
required will be supported
through all appropriate
channels
Implementation of this
change may be a time of
anxiety for those affected
e.g. change of line manager. 
Each individual will be
supported by the remaining
managers to make the
transition to the new
structure as smooth and
comfortable as possible
Human Rights                  N/A N/A N/A
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
N/A N/A N/A
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
N/A N/A N/A
Race                          N/A N/A N/A
Religion and Belief           N/A N/A N/A
Sexual Orientation            N/A N/A N/A
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Impact will be a reduction in management roles already envisaged when the FOM was first agreed in
2014/15. This was followed by variation and agreement of SOM, against which all Chief Officers were
asked to model any restructures.  This restructure will ensure that the service is SOM compliant, role
modelling the difficult decisions that must be made to achieve this.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Compliance with SOM will continue to be monitored and assessed following implementation of this
proposal
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation

Page 100

EIA 1059: Re-aligning the team ensures SOM compliance and secures a lighter but still focused,
delivery model. Current strategy and programmes in place to 2027 so will be unaffected in short
term. Future impact will be a reduction in resource and consequential impact on ability to respond
to service demand. 
Impact will be the reduction of 1 FTE management role in HR and 0.6FTE specialist H&S role.
Reduction in posts at this level may adversely affect older post holders.

Page 101

Assessment No 1058 Owner Lorraine Mair                                  
Resource Transformation Service Budget P and T
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Alison McBride People & Change Manager
Members Alison McBride, People & Change Manager
Victoria Rogers, Chief Office, People & Technology
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title P&T15 Reduce Organisational Development
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
As part of a wider service review of P&T, specifically to ensure compliance with SOM
and deliver savings towards the Council budget gap, the proposal is to remove the
1FTE Organisational Development Lead post, re -aligning the team members under
one of the People & Change Partners within Strategic HR.
The agreement of the SOM is already in place.  This proposal ensures compliance for
the P&T HR and OD teams. 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Strategic HR team
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
The impact will be the removal of a specialist focussed L&D management role (Grade 9) and merging with
another specialist role (HR), who will take over line management of the small team, and the service they
provide, in addition to existing line management responsibilities.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
All those directly impacted by the proposal have been consulted and advised.
All P&T teams, have been advised of the proposed changes.  
Trades Unions have been advised.
Elected Members will be asked to note the savings/management adjustment
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.

Page 102

Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           The role of managers is
required for the smooth
running of all services.  This
will continue, but will be
more efficient and therefore
effective, in line with SOM
The workforce has an
age diverse workforce but 44%
are over 50
Reduction in managerial
posts results in less
progression
opportunities in that area
Cross Cutting                 N/A N/A N/A
Disability                    N/A N/A N/A
Social & Economic
Impact     
N/A N/A N/A
Sex                           Managers are appointed
based on skills and
expertise, not sex.
The wider workforce of WDC is
predominantly female at 74%. 
However, the management
split is less with 58% female.
Implementation of this
change will reduce the
number of female
managers in the service.
Gender Reassign               N/A N/A N/A
Health                        Employee Wellbeing is of
paramount concern and
WDC aim to ensure that all
relevant supports are in
place to help employees
and managers who need
support and to help them
maintain good health. 
The commitment to supporting
employees remains of
paramount importance.  Any
managers affected by the
changes required will be
supported through all
appropriate channels.
Implementation of this
change may be a time of
anxiety for those
affected e.g. change of
line manager, move into
a different team.  Each
individual will be
supported by the
remaining managers to
make the transition to
the new structure as
smooth and comfortable
as possible.
Human Rights                  N/A N/A N/A
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
N/A N/A N/A
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
N/A N/A N/A
Race                          N/A N/A N/A
Religion and Belief           N/A N/A N/A
Sexual Orientation            N/A N/A N/A
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Impact will be a reduction in management roles already envisaged when the FOM was first agreed in
2014/15. This was followed by variation and agreement of SOM, against which all Chief Officers were
asked to model any restructures.  This restructure will ensure that the service is SOM compliant, role
modelling the difficult decisions that must be made to achieve this.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Compliance with SOM will continue to be monitored and assessed following implementation of this
proposal
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?

Page 103

Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1058: The agreement of the SOM is already in place.  This proposal ensures compliance for
the P&T HR and OD teams.  
Current strategy and programmes are in place to 2027, and to ensure continued support of this,
there is no proposed reduction in the team below (2FTE). There will be a reduction in leadership
resource, leading to less development and bespoke work/support. While current programmes will
be maintained, the ability to add and create more will be diminished. There is a risk in terms of
reduced development/support work however there are moves nationally to progress a more joined
up training offering covering digital (365 hub) and leadership (SG) which could potentially
mitigate to some degree. 
Implementation of this change will reduce the number of female managers in the service.
Reduction in managerial posts results in less progression opportunities in that area.

Page 104

Assessment No 1183 Owner Arun Menon                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget P and T
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Arun Menon Business Support Manager
Members Arun Menon and Victoria Rogers
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title PT18  Outsourcing Print Room
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
The Corporate Administrative Support (CAS) team currently manages in-house
printing, processing large volumes of envelopes and pages annually. Despite a
gradual reduction in volumes, the demand remains significant, with over 1.4 million
pages and 633,988 envelopes processed between 2020-2025.  This option will see
the entire print room function outsourced will the reduction in staffing and other related
costs.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Chief Officers, Strategic HR
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Staffing
In-house print room costs are primarily made up of staffing (2.5 FTE) alongside equipment and
consumables. In addition, there are costs associated with equipment, materials and consumables which
can be reduced should this option be approved.  Upon developing an options appraisal, the annualised
cost of outsourcing based on the above volumes is approximately £112,170 compared to an internal cost
of £177,253 delivering a saving of between 25% to 35% subject to all associated costs including staffing
being removed.
Businesses/suppliers
The Council already have a similar model for the annual Council Tax notices that are sent to all council
residents following March council.  This involves an output file of the required materials being sent to an
external printer who produce the notices, envelops and posts in line with the required SLA.  To produce
this option, high level discussions were undertaken with CFH (current external print providers) to ascertain

Page 105

the cost of a similar service based on the above volumes.  This was necessary to assure that the costs of
outsourcing do not exceed existing costs.   
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Chief Officers, Strategic HR
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                          
Disability                   
Gender Reassign              
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and Belief          
Sex                           Need to consider any staff
impacts
2 of the proposed FTE holder
of the 2.5 total are male
Because of gender
balance of the employee
group, men are more
likely to be affected.
Sexual Orientation           
Human Rights                 
Health                       
Social & Economic
Impact     
Need to have regard to the
Fairer Scotland Duty for
significant procurements
Consumer Duty with regard
to small business if affected
The Council has a target of
12% procurement spent on
local enterprises,
performance for 23/24 was
11.35% this needs to be
balanced against the need
to balance the Council
budget.
Will affect local spend on
businesses
Local or regional printing
firms that currently
provide services to the
council may experience
increased demand. 
Reduction in spend with
current suppliers of
printing supplies.
Cross Cutting                 It is good practice to
consider intersectionality
Effects of proposals, positive
or negative, may be multiplied
being the member of more
than one affected group.
Being for example from
a BME group, being a
woman and either being
disabled or having a
disabled person in their
household could be a
multiple factor.

Page 106

Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The council has a duty to balance the budget.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
No
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1183: Staffing would be reduced by 2.5 FTE, because relevant workforce gender
composition, men are more likely to be affected. Some potential impact for business providing
services and potentially negative for businesses currently supply resources to us to enable our
printing.

Page 107

Assessment No 1176 Owner James Gallacher                             
Resource Transformation Service Budget P and T
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer James Gallacher ICT Manager
Members James Gallacher, ICT Manager
Victoria Rogers, Chief Officer People & Technology
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy, function or financial
decision)
Policy Title PT20  Reduction in ICT Team
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
To reduce the ICT service by either £84k or £168k equivalent to 2 or 4 FTE
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or
implementation of policy.
Consultation with P&T Chief Officer, Strategic HR, ICT Management team and Trade Unions
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your
requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good
relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes

Page 108

Who will be affected by this policy?
ICT employees 
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Consultation with P&T Chief Officer, Strategic HR, ICT Management team and Trade Unions
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list
evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           The council must meet public
sector equality duty.
The age group are 55 to 60, and
60 to 65 group. These groups
more likely to be affected, though
other may be as well.
Potential to have negative
on older groups because of
workforce demographics
however the council is
providing early retirement
or switch policy to support
employees.
Cross Cutting                 We should consider
cumulative and cross cutting
impacts.
Longer wait times will impact all
employees and external service
users.
Likely negative in terms of
productively.
Disability                    The Council has a duty to
ensure that services are
accessible to disabled people
and that reasonable
adjustments are made for
disabled staff when required.
It is important that reasonable
adjustments are not only made,
but also made in good time.
Longer wait times will impact all
employees and external service
users.
Disabled people are more likely to
experience financial hardship.
Potentially negative for
disabled employees if this
impacts reasonable
adjustments.
Potential to have negative
impact however the council
is providing early
retirement or switch policy
to support employees.
Social & Economic
Impact     
The council has duty of care
toward all its workers, and in
terms of the Public Sector
Equality Duty.
Employees affected by this policy
may be impacted financially. 
This has the potential to
have a negative impact. 
Any potential reduction in
staffing requirements could
be managed through
SWITCH redeployment
programme. Additional
support will be available to

Page 109

any employees impacted
by the savings options to
ensure their health and
wellbeing.
Sex                           Important to gauge any
differential impact in terms of
sex.
Sex mix of further affected group
is equal.
Likely to be neutral in
terms of sex.
Gender Reassign              
Health                        Health and wellbeing are a
priority for the Council as
noted in our Strategic Plan 22-
27.
Worries surrounding job security
may be heightened for employees.
This has the potential to
negatively impact
employees, any potential
reduction in staffing
requirements will be
managed through SWITCH
redeployment programme.
Additional support will be
available to any employees
impacted by the savings
options to ensure their
health and wellbeing.
Human Rights                 
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and Belief          
Sexual Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification
for this.
The ICT service has been reduced over the years, mainly focusing on management posts and the deletion of three
broader analyst roles as part of 23/24 savings exercise. This further reduction would present serious challenges for
the service and the wider organisational support. Any employees impacted are being offered early retirement options
plus wellbeing and switch policy support.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?

Page 110

ICT will continue to monitor and review support requirements, capacity and workloads.  ICT will continue to report
via service management and WDC strategic plan KPI - Volume of ICT Incidents closed in half day or less.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1176:  A reduction in support areas will mean longer waiting times for support, project assistance and
incident/request resolution in corporate, education and partner areas. External service users may also be affected. 
Dependent on the option taken there may be additional impact and risk including increase in Cyber risk and
downtime for system patching. 
There is positive impact with the recommendation as the Council has a duty to address savings targets for 25/26 and
this recommendation will deliver savings.

Page 111

Assessment No 1229 Owner mlynn2                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget Resource
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer Resources
Members Laurence Slavin - Chief Officer Resources
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function
or financial decision)
Policy Title RES01 - Review of External Funding -WDCVS
The aim, objective, purpose and intended out come of policy
A reduction or removal in voluntary grant funding provided to West Dunbartonshire
Community & Y sorServices (WDCVS) who administer Voluntary Grant funding on
behalf of the Council. This funding total of £75,000 covers social transport at £50,000,
and play schemes and running costs at £25,000. 
Consideration will be given to either fully remove or reduce this funding in 2025/26 or
on a phased basis over a number of years.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Senior Council staff and the Budget Working Group have been consulted on the
development of the option.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Community Groups who apply to West Dunbartonshire Community & Volunteering Services for grant
funding.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
WDCVS have been notified of the potential reduction in funding subject to Council approval.

Page 112

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Relevant as funding is
provided across a wide
range of community groups
and age ranges.
Funding is provided to cover
social transport, play schemes
and running costs. Also
funding for people with
asbestos related diseases.
Reduction in funding will
negatively affect the
amount that WDCVS
can provide to
Community groups who
apply to them for
financial support. These
groups are wide ranging
and the funding also
helps support play
schemes and running
costs.
Disability                    Relevant as funding is
provided across a wide
range of community groups 
who support  a wide range
of groups requiring support
potentially including
disability groups.
The service may provide
support to community groups
with a specific focus on
disabilities through the funding
levels provided.
Reduction in funding will
negatively affect the
amount that WDCVS
can provide to
Community groups who
apply to them for
financial support. These
groups are wide ranging
and the funding to help
support social
transportation.
Gender Reassign              
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and Belief          
Sex                          
Sexual Orientation           
Human Rights                 
Health                       
Social & Economic
Impact     
The Council must have due
regard to the Fairer
Scotland Duty in terms of
Social Economic impacts
and the statutory guidance.
The service acts to provide
funding for social transport,
play schemes and running
costs
Reduction in funding will
negatively affect the
amount that WDCVS
can provide to
Community groups who
apply to them for
financial support. These
groups are wide ranging.
Cross Cutting                 It is important that the
Council considers how
impacts may interact.
People who are members of
more than one disadvantaged
group are more likely to be
impacted.
Negative affects may be
cumulative.

Page 113

Actions

Page 114

Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The Council has a substantial budget deficit and is seeking and assessing options that will contribute to
reducing the gap. Assessment of grant support to external service providers is a necessary part of that
process.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
No
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1229 details potential impacts which, summarised is that a reduction in funding may
negatively affect community groups that support a wide range of users with either health or
disability issues.  Reduced funding to voluntary groups could have an impact on the groups and
the services they provide to the community.  Provision of this funding is not a statutory
requirement and therefore it has to be put forward as a saving option for member consideration
whilst setting out the implications of taking the option. Non statutory funding is still covered by
the duty to impact assess  relevant proposals under the Public Sector Equality Duty in Scotland.

Page 115

Assessment No 1234 Owner mlynn2                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget Resource
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer Resources
Members Laurence Slavin - Chief Officer Resources
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function
or financial decision)
Policy Title RES01 - Review of External Funding - Y Sort It
The aim, objective, purpose and intended out come of policy
The aim is to assess the impact on services by either fully removing or reducing the
grant funding provided to Y Sort It.
Y Sort It, engage with young people in a variety of ways, including the provision of
issue based workshops, personal development, group work, support to achieve
accreditation, and assist the development of healthy lifestyles and facilitate
participation in community projects. Funding provided is £87,820. 
In addition education specific funding of £76,000 is provided - Care connections and
community mentoring supports for children and young people who are care
experienced. Supports out of school learning and mentoring. 
Consideration will be given to either fully remove or reduce this funding in 2025/26 or
on a phased basis over a number of years
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Senior Council staff and the Budget Working Group have been consulted on the
development of the option.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Y Sort-It delivers a young person led service, providing opportunities for young people and inspiring
them to reach their full potential. This is a youth friendly social space for young people facilitating
access to youth group activities and learning opportunities. This includes a weekly programme of
support groups, group work sessions in the Y Sort-It Youth Centre and other relevant outreach
locations. The service will be open access and available to any young person aged 5–25 years and a
resident within West Dunbartonshire. However, to meet the varying needs of young people living in
West Dunbartonshire consideration will be given to those people who are harder to reach, to ensure

Page 116

that they have equal opportunity of access. This will include specific provision for those that are the
following: • LGBT Youth; • Those at risk or vulnerable to anti-social behaviour or organised crime; •
Young Carers / Young Adult Carers; • Looked after Care Experienced young people; • Those at risk
or vulnerable to substance misuse
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Y Sort It have been notified of the potential reduction in funding subject to Council approval.

Page 117

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           While the majority
of children and
young people in
West
Dunbartonshire are:
happy in their
homes; enjoy
friendship; and are
actively engaged in
sport, culture and
recreation; progress
at school; have good
health and self esteem; and
are
civically engaged,
there are others who
are less well
connected. However,
this is not the case
for all young people
in West
Dunbartonshire
where some young
people living are
facing challenges
because of their
circumstances and
experience of
poverty and
disadvantage. Youth
Engagement
services, that
includes input from
Y-Sort-it will
contribute towards
addressing those
challenges within
West
Dunbartonshire
communities, with
specific emphasis
placed on
supporting those
that may be more
vulnerable to
disadvantage. In
order to do so there
is a need to engage
with young people
and develop services
that meet their
needs. This includes the
need for support
In 2020, 15,484 of
the population
(88,340) were
children between
the age of 0 and 15
years. 12,433
children were
attending school: •
6,658 pupils in the
32 primary schools
in West
Dunbartonshire. •
5,548 pupils in the
five secondary
schools in West
Dunbartonshire. •
227 pupils in the
additional support
needs schools in
West
Dunbartonshire. Of
these 3,549 are
considered to be
living in households
affected by poverty.
This represents
23.4% of the
population in the 0-
16 year’s age group.
This is 3%age points
higher than the
average in Scotland.
In 2021, there was
334 ‘looked after’
children. In addition,
statistics provided
by Skills
Development
Scotland show that
the proportion of
school leavers in a
positive destination
in West
Dunbartonshire
(91%) is lower than
the equivalent
proportion for our
neighbours in the
Greater Glasgow and
Clyde NHS (GGandC
NHS) area (95.8%) and
Scotland (95.5%). Similarly
the participation
Y Sort-It engages
with young people in
a variety of ways.
This includes the
provision of issue
based workshops,
personal
development, group
work, support to
achieve
accreditation, and
assist the
development of
healthy lifestyles
and facilitate
participation in
community projects.
Y-sortit receives funding
to deliver
services that
complement existing
services provided by
West
Dunbartonshire
Council
(Working4U) youth
teams. Y-sortit
receives funding
from other sources
and has reserve
funds which are
reported in the
organisations annual
accounts.
Nevertheless, the
options for removing or
reducing
grant funds will have
a negative effect on
their ability to
deliver services.

Page 118

to remain active and
healthy; enjoying
economic
opportunity and
security and being
connected,
respected and able
to contribute to their
communities.
rate in West
Dunbartonshire
(90.8%) compares
unfavourably with
the GGC NHS area
(92.4%) and
Scotland (92.2%).
Furthermore, 7.2%
of the population in
the 16- 25 years age
group are claiming
out of work benefits.
This compares
unfavourably with
Scotland, where the
figure is 4.6% and
Great Britain with a
figure 4.8%.
Disability                    Relevant as funding is
provided across a wide
range of community groups 
who support  a wide range
of groups requiring support
potentially including
disability groups.
The service may provide
support to community groups
with a specific focus on
disabilities through the funding
levels provided.
Reduction in funding will
negatively affect the
amount that Y Sort It can
provide to individuals
who look to them to
provide a service. 
Gender Reassign               Creation of places
where LGBTQ+
groups can safely
socialise and be
open about their
sexual orientation
and gender identity.
LGBT young people
in particular are at a
higher risk of
increased
homelessness and
domestic abuse
Stonewall Scotland's
report highlighted
that LGBT people are
vulnerable to and at
increased risk of
homelessness,
highlighting that
almost one in five
LGBT people (18%)
have experienced
homelessness at
some point in their
lives. A Report by
Scottish Alliance for
Children's Rights
notes LGBT children
and young people
may be significantly
disadvantaged in accessing
adequate
play, leisure and
culture
opportunities. This
is cross cutting with
sexual orientation.
Removal of funding
for an organisation
that provides
support to young
LGBT people may
have an adverse
impact on their
wellbeing
particularly if no
other supports are
available. How
support for LGBT
young people is
delivered would
need to be assessed
to ensure it still
delivers maximum
positive impact.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and Belief          
Sex                          
Sexual Orientation            Creation of places
where LGBTQ+
Stonewall Scotland's
report highlighted
Removal of funding
for an organisation

Page 119

groups can safely
socialise and be
open about their
sexual orientation
and gender identity.
LGBT young people
in particular are at a
higher risk of
increased
homelessness and
domestic abuse. This
is cross cutting with
gender
reassignment.
that LGBT people are
vulnerable to and at
increased risk of
homelessness,
highlighting that
almost one in five
LGBT people (18%)
have experienced
homelessness at
some point in their
lives. A Report by
Scottish Alliance for
Children's Rights
notes LGBT children
and young people
may be significantly
disadvantaged in
accessing adequate
play, leisure and
culture
opportunities. This
is cross cutting with
gender
reassignment.
that provides
support to young
LGBT people may
have an adverse
impact on their
wellbeing
particularly if no
other supports are
available. How
support for LGBT
young people is
delivered would
need to be assessed
to ensure it still
delivers maximum
positive impact. This
is cross cutting with
gender
reassignment
Human Rights                  Need to consider
Article 8 of
European
convention on Human
Rights
(ECHR), I.E. Family
and Private Life
Good practice to
consider impact on
Children and Young
people including in
terms of the UNCRC.
ECHR and UNCRC
Cross cuts with
considerations
under 'age'.
Reducing funding
may negatively
affect fulfillment of
UNCRC rights.
Health                        There are an
estimated 800,000
unpaid carers in
Scotland this
includes 30,000
young carers under
the age of 18.
Research
undertaken by
Carers Trust reports
that 45% of young
carers and young
adult carers aged 14-
25 surveyed stated
that they have or
have had mental
health problems.
Mental health and
wellbeing LGBTQ+
children and young
people experience
particularly high
rates of poor mental
health. More than
one in five LGB
Scottish Health
Survey (2012/13)
http://www.gov.sco
t/Publications/2016
/09/2408 Carers
Trust Scotland
(2015) Time to be
Heard for Young
Adult Carers.
Scottish Government
(2015) Scotland's
Carers
https://www.stone
wall.org.uk/experien
ces-lgbtq-children and-young-
people
https://www.gov.sc
ot/binaries/content
/documents/govscot
/publications/statist
ics/2019/11/scottis
h-schools adolescent-lifestyle
substance-use survey-salsus
national-overview
2018/documents/su
Removal of funding
for an organisation
that provides
support to young
people including
young carers and
young LGBT people
may have an adverse
impact on their
wellbeing
particularly if no
other supports are
available. How
support for carers is
delivered would
need to be assessed
to ensure it still
delivers maximum
positive impact.

Page 120

young people and
more than two in
five trans young
people have
attempted to take
their own life. One in
three non-binary
young people and
nearly half of
disabled LGBT
young people have
tried to take their
own life. Health is
cross cutting with
other areas such as
sexual orientation
and gender
reassignment.
mmary-findings west
dunbartonshire
council/summary findings-west
dunbartonshire
council/govscot%3A
document/summary
-findings-west dunbartonshire
council.pdf
Social & Economic
Impact     
West
Dunbartonshire has
one of the highest
proportion of young
carers by local
authority area.
Higher proportions
of young people
have caring
responsibilities in
areas of higher
deprivation and
lower income.
Research tells us
that young carers
are more common in
families with
unemployed parents
or low incomes. This
is cross cutting with
other areas such as
LGBT and
homelessness
Scotland's 2011
Census data.
Removal of funding
for an organisation
that provides
support to young
people may have an
adverse impact on
their economic
wellbeing
particularly if no
other supports are
available.
Cross Cutting                 There is a need to
recognise that young
people who access
youth services often
have compounded
barriers or
obstacles
Scottish Health
Survey (2012/13)
http://www.gov.sco
t/Publications/2016
/09/2408 Carers
Trust Scotland
(2015) Time to be
Heard for Young
Adult Carers Scottish
Government (2015)
Scotland's Carers.
Understanding the
impact on young people
in this
respect should be
understood in
reference to the
intersectionality of
challenges they face.

Page 121

Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
As above
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
We will monitor impact by consulting Head Teachers/Young People. Monitoring will be
carried out on a termly basis.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1234:  This proposal has the potential to have a negative impacts for some groups
particularly those attending schools in areas of high socio economic deprivation.
However some can be minimised in the short term by targeted use of existing and
alternative resources and the knowledge and skills already developed in some
establishments to support the range of pupil needs. However, it must be noted that
individual establishments and the central education service budgets have been subject to
significant pressures over time and leave very little scope for spend beyond the essential
to operate a service.
There is additional funding/support provided by WDC which includes; £39,000 of transition
funding from Cost-of-Living Fund which expires in 2026/27.
Benefit from concessionary rental at Bonhill Community Centre since 2021 (£1 if asked).  Market
rate would be £15,000.  Discussions ongoing regarding rental with a further two years rent free
proposed and stepped rental thereafter.  
£189,000 of HSCP funding to provide advocacy and support for Young Carers

Page 122

Assessment No 1230 Owner mlynn2                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget CCF
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer Resources
Members Laurence Slavin - Chief Officer Resources
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function
or financial decision)
Policy Title RES01 - Review of External Funding - Antonine Sports Centre
The aim, objective, purpose and intended out come of policy
Under this proposal, the current grant of £74,516 provided to the Antonine by the
Council would either be fully removed or reduced in 2025/26 or on a phased basis
over a number of years.  
The current Council grant pr
ovides approximately 17% of the organisations income. 
The Council provides grant support to a number of strategic partner organisations in
West Dunbartonshire.
The Antonine Sports Centre is an independent charity which has offered access to
sports and community facilities in Duntocher for over 30 years.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Senior Council staff and the Budget Working Group have been consulted on the
development of the option.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Current service users and staff. Members of the public especially those who live in the surrounding areas
including Faifley who might want to use facilities in future. Antonine Sports Centre (ASC) is the closet such
facility for people living in Duntocher and Faifley

Page 123

Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Antonine Sports Centre (ASC) have been notified about potential impact.

Page 124

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           The Council has an equality
outcome in relation to
increasing involvement of
younger people in
Community Empowerment
The Equality Act requires
that services do not
discriminate.
The organization has stated 
focus on:
Older people and 
Children and Young people
Dependent on effect of
any reductions and
profile of service users.
Expected to be a
negative impact.
Disability                    The Equality Act requires
that services are accessible
to disabled people.
The Council has an equality
outcome in relation to
increasing involvement of
disabled people in
Community Empowerment
The organization has a stated
focus on: Disabled people.
Disabled people are more
likely to be income deprived
than non-disabled people.
Dependent on effect of
any reductions and
profile of service users.
Expected to be a
negative impact.
Gender Reassign              
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                          The Council has an equality
outcome in relation to
increasing involvement of
BME people in Community
Empowerment
The Equality Act requires
that services do not
discriminate.
Most BME groups are more
likely than most white groups
to be income deprived.
Overall BME groups are less
likely to have access to a car
Dependent on effect of
any reductions and
profile of service users.
Religion and Belief          
Sex                           The Equality Act requires
that services do not
discriminate.
Women are more likely to be
income deprived than men.
Women are less likely to
access to a car than men.
Dependent on effect of
any reductions and
profile of service users.
Sexual Orientation           
Human Rights                 
Health                        Health and wellbeing is a
focus area of our 22-27
Strategic Plan
The organization has stated 
focus on:
People with health problems
Potential negative
impacts if services
provision was reduced
or costs increased for
users

Page 125

Social & Economic
Impact     
The Council must have
regard to the Fairer
Scotland Duty
Overall Duntocher has lower
than average child poverty and
early mortality, but there are
SIMD some more deprived
areas immediately to the North
west and further to the east of
the ASC
Failey which suffer from
significant deprivation is close
by.
Negative impacts if
workforce was reduced
Potential negative
impact on more deprived
communities if they
currently use the Centre
and services are
reduced or costs
increased
Cross Cutting                 The Council's Community
empowerment strategy
encourages Communities to
get involved in their local
areas, and links with our
Equality Outocmes for 21-
25
It is important that the
Council takes into account
how combine to affect
different groups and
individuals
Evidence suggests that BME,
Disabled people, women and
younger people have been
particularly affected by COVID
and Cost of Living impacts.
Dependent on effect of
any reductions and
profile of service users.
Expected to be a
negative impact.

Page 126

Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The Council has a substantial budget deficit and is seeking and assessing options that will contribute to
reducing the gap. Assessment of grant support to external service providers is a necessary part of that
process. WDC currently provide additional support in concessionary rental for Antonine Sports Centre and
Glenhead Community Centre.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1230 details potential impacts of funding reductions, currently Council funding makes up
approximately 17% of the ASC's income; Impacts are dependent on effect of any reductions and
profile of service users, but these may be negative for older and younger people and disabled
people and possibility women.
Additional funding / support includes; Benefit from concessionary rental leases at two properties.
Antonine Sports Centre concessionary rental of £5 per annum.  Market rate would be £80,000 
Glenhead Community Centre concessionary rental of £1 per annum. Market rate would be
£24,000.

Page 127

EI
Assessment No 1231 Owner mlynn2                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget CCF
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer Resources
Members Laurence Slavin - Chief Officer Resources
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function
or financial decision)
Policy Title RES01 - Review of External Funding - Shopmobility
The aim, objective, purpose and intended out come of policy
The Council provides grant support to a number of strategic partner organisations in
West Dunbartonshire.
Shopmobility delivers a mobility scooter, manual and powered wheelchair service to
residents from its base in Clydebank Shopping Centre.
Under this proposal, the current grant of £47,760 provided to Shopmobility by the
Council would either be fully removed or reduced in 2025/26 or on a phased basis
over a number of years
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
We would work with the group and provide them with practical support, engage with
CVS, and look at any other available funding streams.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
The staff members, other council service areas and the service users/communities that the team support.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Elected member, senior officers and the Communities management team.

Page 128

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Council Equality Outcome
on increasing participation
of younger people.
Participation amongst younger
age groups, 16- 34 is
significantly lower than other
age groups in WD. 
Work has been underway to
find different channels of
engagement with young
people and organisations
related to them. For example
recent conversations with
young people on the Council's
budget priorities. 
Some groups affected are
extensively used by older
people.  
Evidence suggest that older
people are more at risk than
some other age groups of
social isolation.
Older people are more likely to
be disabled. 
This may have a
potentially negative
impact on the support
that groups can provide
for  young and older
people.
Disability                    Council Equality Outcome
increasing participation of
disabled people.
Some groups affected are
disabled people and those
living in a household with a
disabled person are more likely
to be less able to participate
fully in community life.
This may have a
potentially negative
impact on this group.
Gender Reassign              
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                          Council Equality Outcome
on increasing participation
of BME groups.
BME groups are more likely to
have barriers to participate
fully in community life.
This may have a
potentially negative
impact on this group
Religion and Belief          
Sex                          
Sexual Orientation           
Human Rights                  UNCRC considerations in
terms of 'participation' and
young people.
Cross cuts with 'Age'.
See information on other
engagement work with
younger people and
organisations related to them.
This may have a
potentially negative
impact on this group

Page 129

Health                       
Social & Economic
Impact     
The Council must have due
regard to the Fairer
Scotland Duty, in terms of
Social Economic impacts,
and the Statutory Guidance
Organisations affected by the
proposals may currently
employs staff members and
volunteers.
This may have a
potentially negative
impact on this group
Cross Cutting                 It is important that the
council takes account of
how factors interact to affect
people and groups affected
by this saving.
Evidence suggests that BME,
Disabled people, women and
younger people have been
particularly affected by the
proposals. 
Factors such as sex,
disability and age may
interact in this
circumstance to multiple
effects of any service
reductions.

Page 130

Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The Council is required to have a balanced budget. Provision of this funding is not a statutory requirement
and therefore it has to be put forward as a saving option for member consideration.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1231 details potential impacts: Reduction of funding may negatively affect services users of
Clyde Shopmobility, more likely to be older and disabled and staff and volunteers of the
organisation.  There may also be a negative economic effect in terms of money spent in
Clydebank area in particular and in West Dunbartonshire more generally. There could also be
negative effects in terms of reduced capacity to provide services that counter social isolation.
Completely stopping funding is likely to produce more negative effects than partially reducing
funding.

Page 131

Assessment No 1232 Owner mlynn2                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget Resource
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer Resources
Members Laurence Slavin - Chief Officer Resources
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function
or financial decision)
Policy Title RES01 - Review of External Funding - Clydebank Asbestos Group
The aim, objective, purpose and intended out come of policy
The Council provides £21,560 of funding to Clydebank Asbestos Group to support
people affected by an asbestos-related disease and their families. The proposal is to
reduce or fully remove funding in 2025/26 or on a phased basis over a number of
years.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Senior Council staff and the Budget Working Group have been consulted on the
development of the option.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Service users of Clydebank Asbestos Group
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Clydebank Asbestos Group  have been notified of the potential reduction in funding subject to Council
approval.

Page 132

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Relevant as funding is
provided across a wide
range of community groups
and age ranges.
Funding is provided to for
people with asbestos related
diseases.
Reduction in funding will
negatively affect the
amount that the group
can provide.
Disability                   
Gender Reassign              
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and Belief          
Sex                          
Sexual Orientation           
Human Rights                 
Health                        Clydebank Asbestos Group 
support people affected by
an asbestos-related disease
and their families.
The service acts to provide
funding to Clydebank Asbestos
Group (£21,560).
Reduction in funding will
negatively affect the
amount that Clydebank
Asbestos Group have to
support people affected
by an asbestos-related
disease and their
families.
Social & Economic
Impact     
Cross Cutting                 It is important that the
Council considers how
impacts may interact.
People who are members of
more than one disadvantaged
group are more likely to be
impacted.
Negative affects may be
cumulative.

Page 133

Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Provision of this funding is not a statutory requirement and therefore it has to be put forward as a saving
option for member consideration
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1232 details potential impacts which, summarised is that a reduction in funding may
negatively affect community groups that support a wide range of users with either health or
disability issues.  Reduced funding to voluntary groups could have an impact on the groups and
the services they provide to the community.  Provision of this funding is not a statutory
requirement and therefore it has to be put forward as a saving option for member consideration
whilst setting out the implications of taking the option. Non statutory funding is still covered by
the duty to impact assess  relevant proposals under the Public Sector Equality Duty in Scotland.

Page 134

Assessment No 1242 Owner kconnelly2                             
Resource Transformation Service Budget Resource
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer Resources
Members Laurence Slavin Chief Officer
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function
or financial decision)
Policy Title RES01: Review of External Funding - Womans Aid
The aim, objective, purpose and intended out come of policy
The removal of funding of £250,000 to Woman's Aid (Clydebank and Dumbarton) or a
reduction phased over two/three years. This funding supports running costs related to
the provision of support and information to women, children and young people
experiencing domestic abuse. 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Key partners within West Dunbartonshire Council, HSCP and Police Scotland,  public,
private and third sectors that deliver services to women, children and young people
with lived experience of gender based violence and those accessing/using these
services
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Citizens who seek support from Woman's Aid. 
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Woman's Aid (Clydebank and Dumbarton) have been notified of the potential reduction in funding subject
to Council approval.

Page 135

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Younger women
experiencing domestic
abuse, force marraive, or
coercive control require
specialist interventions,
while older women may
face long-term abuse with
fewer options for support.
Woman's Aid supports women
of all ages, with tailored
services for young people and
older survivors. Many younger
women face financial
dependence and social
isolation, making it harder to
escape abuse.
A medium negative
impact, as younger and
older women may
struggle to access
appropriate support
elsewhere, increasing
their risk of remaining in
abusive situations.
Disability                   
• Needs: Disabled
women are at greater risk of
domestic abuse and often
face additional barriers to
accessing support, such as
physical accessibility,
communication needs, and
reliance on carers who may
also be perpetrators.
Women with disabilities
experience domestic abuse at
higher rates than non-disabled
women. Woman's Aid provides
trauma-informed support and
accessible services to meet
their needs.
A high negative impact,
as disabled women may
lose vital, accessible
support, potentially
leading to increased
vulnerability, social
isolation, and worsening
mental health.
Gender Reassign               Trans women may
experience unique
challenges when seeking
domestic abuse support,
including discrimination,
lack of inclusive services,
and safety concerns.
Research suggests that trans
women experience high levels
of domestic abuse but face
significant barriers to
accessing services. Woman's
Aid provides an inclusive and
supportive environment.
A medium negative
impact, as the removal
of funding may limit
access to safe and
supportive services for
trans women
experiencing abuse.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Women in abusive
marriages or partnerships
require legal and emotional
support to leave safely,
especially when children
are involved.
Woman's Aid offers advocacy
and legal support to women
leaving abusive relationships,
including assistance with
housing, child custody, and
financial independence.
A low negative impact,
though some women
may struggle to access
legal aid and advocacy
without these services.
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Pregnant women
experiencing domestic
abuse are at high risk of
harm, including increased
physical violence and
stress-related pregnancy
complications.
Domestic abuse often begins
or escalates during pregnancy.
Woman's Aid provides
specialised support to ensure
the safety and well-being of
pregnant women and new
mothers.
A high negative impact,
as cuts to funding could
leave pregnant women
without crucial support,
increasing risks to
maternal and infant
health.
Race                          BAME (Black, Asian, and
Minority Ethnic) women
may face language barriers,
immigration concerns, and
cultural stigmas that make it
harder to report abuse or
seek support.
Research indicates that BAME
women are less likely to seek
support due to fear of
discrimination or lack of
culturally appropriate services.
Woman's Aid provides
confidential, culturally sensitive
support.
A medium negative
impact, as a funding cut
may reduce access to
specialist services for
BAME women,
increasing isolation and
risk of harm.
Religion and Belief           Some women require faith-
sensitive support to ensure
their religious and cultural
Woman's Aid supports women
from diverse religious
backgrounds, offering a non-
A low negative impact,
as other generic
services may not offer

Page 136

beliefs are respected while
accessing services.
judgmental environment that
accommodates their needs.
the same level of
religious and cultural
sensitivity.
Sex                           Woman's Aid primarily
supports women
experiencing gender-based
violence, offering crisis
intervention, advocacy, and
safe accommodation. The
service is vital for those
fleeing abusive
relationships and seeking
safety.
Domestic abuse in West
Dunbartonshire is significantly
higher than the national
average, with women being
disproportionately affected.
Women’s Aid Clydebank
and Dumbarton provides
refuge accommodation and
specialist support to hundreds
of women and children
annually.
A high negative impact,
as reducing or removing
funding could leave
women without safe
housing, emotional
support, and legal
advocacy, increasing
risks of harm,
homelessness, and
mental health issues.
Sexual Orientation            LGBTQ+ women facing
domestic abuse may
struggle to access inclusive
services or fear
discrimination from
mainstream providers.
LGBTQ+ women are at risk of
domestic abuse at similar rates
to heterosexual women, but
they often face additional
barriers in seeking help.
Woman's Aid offers an
inclusive and safe space.
A medium negative
impact, as fewer
specialist services for
LGBTQ+ survivors could
reduce access to
appropriate support.
Human Rights                  UNHRC: Convention on the
Elimination of All Forms of
Discrimination against
Women adopted general
recommendation 19, which
defines gender-based
violence to be violence that
is directed against a woman
because she is a woman or
that affects women
disproportionately and
declares it to be "a form of
discrimination against
women that seriously
inhibits women’s ability to
enjoy rights and freedoms
on a basis of equality with
men.
Gender-based violence (GBV)
is a serious violation of human
rights and a life-threatening
health and protection issue.
Scotland’s  National Action
Plan for Human Rights
explicitly recognises that taking
action to address violence
against women and girls is
needed to ensure we realise
the human rights of everyone
in Scotland.
A high negative impact
as women may struggle
to access legal
procession and
increasing risks of
continued abuse.
Health                        Women experiencing
domestic abuse require
mental health support to
recover from trauma. 
Survivors may require
immediate medical
assistance for physical
injuries. 
Domestic abuse survivors
often experience PTSD,
anxiety and depression. 
Woman's aid provides trauma-
informed support.
A high negative impact
as reduced support
could lead to worsening
mental health increased
-self harm and suicide 
risk.
Social & Economic
Impact     
Support to help survivors
gain financial
independence.  Domestic
abuse has significant
economic costs, including
healthcare, social work, and
justice services expenses. 
Woman's aid services help
reduce reliance on benefits.
Woman's aid provides financial
advice, benefits, guidance, and
employability.  Studies show
that domestic abuse costs the
UK economy billions annually
due to healthcare, policing,
and lost productivity.
A high negative impact
as women may remain
financial trapped in
abusive relationships.
Cross Cutting                 Increased pressure on other
local services, including
social work, NHS, and
homeless services.
Woman's Aid reduces demand
on crisis services by offering
early intervention and
prevention.
A high negative impact
as other local services
become overwhelmed,
increasing waiting times

Page 137

and reducing overall
effectiveness.

Page 138

Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Reduced funding to voluntary groups could have an impact on the groups and the services they provide to
the community.  Provision of this funding is not a statutory requirement and therefore it has to be put
forward as a saving option for member consideration whilst setting out the implications of taking the
option.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
No
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1242 -  details potential impacts which, summarised is that a reduction in funding may
negatively affect community groups that support a wide range of users with either health or
disability issues.  Reduced funding to voluntary groups could have an impact on the groups and
the services they provide to the community.  Provision of this funding is not a statutory
requirement and therefore it has to be put forward as a saving option for member consideration
whilst setting out the implications of taking the option. Non statutory funding is still covered by
the duty to impact assess  relevant proposals under the Public Sector Equality Duty in Scotland.

Page 139

Assessment No 1236 Owner mlynn2                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget Resource
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer Resources
Members Laurence Slavin - Chief Officer Resources
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function
or financial decision)
Policy Title RES01 - Review of External Funding - Lomond & Clyde Care and Repair
The aim, objective, purpose and intended out come of policy
A reduction in funding or fully removal of £41,000 funding in 2025/26 or on a phased
basis over a number of years to Lomond and Clyde Care and Repair who provide
support to private homeowners to help them apply for grant funding via the Council for
medical adaptations or essential repairs.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Senior Council staff and the Budget Working Group have been consulted on the
development of the option.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Community Groups who apply to West Dunbartonshire Community & Volunteering Services for grant
funding.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
WDCVS have been notified of the potential reduction in funding subject to Council approval.

Page 140

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Elderly, adult and
young WD residents
who my need
support from this
service area.
Knowledge of past
applications for
grant support from
both age groups.
Negative impact.
Reduced provision may
affect users in  this
group.
Disability                    The majority of
applications come
from those with a
medical disability.
Knowledge of past
applications the
large majority are
for medical
adaptations
Negative impact.
Reduced provision may
affect users in this
group.
Gender Reassign              
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and Belief          
Sex                          
Sexual Orientation           
Human Rights                 
Health                        Those needing this
support have
underlying health
circumstances
mostly related to
mobility.
Knowledge of past
applications.
Negative impact.
Reduced provision may
affect users in this
group.
Social & Economic
Impact     
Social needs in
relation to providing
adapted facilities to
support health and
wellbeing
Knowledge of past
applications.
Applications are
subject to means
testing to meet low
income eligibility.
Negative impact.
Reduced provision may
affect users in this
group.
Cross Cutting

Page 141

Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Council has budget targets to meet and funding will still be provided to support these equality
groups. This savings option focuses on the funding provided to Lomond and Clyde Care
& Repair to support these groups with their grant applications.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
No
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1236: This savings option focuses on the funding provided to Lomond and Clyde Care
&Repair to support these groups with their grant applications. Potential negative impacts for
disabled. Additional funding/support  currently includes £164,210 of HSCP funding to provide
repairs service and keypads for carer entry to HSCP clients.

Page 142

Assessment No 1238 Owner kconnelly2                             
Resource Transformation Service Budget Resource
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Michelle Lynn Assets Manager
Members Laurence Slavin - Chief Officer Resources
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function
or financial decision)
Policy Title RES01: Review of External Funding - CAB
The aim, objective, purpose and intended out come of policy
The aim is to assess the impact on services by contributing to reduction of Council
budget deficit by reducing service either by fully removing or reduce funding for WD
Citizens Advice Bureau which receives £221,583 each year from West Dunbartonshire
Council to deliver services that complement existing services provided by West
Dunbartonshire Council. 
Consideration will be given to either fully remove or reduce this funding in 2025/26 or
on a phased basis over a number of years.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Senior Council staff and elected members have been involved in the development of
the assessment.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
West Dunbartonshire CAB delivers a proactive, accessible, independent, customer-focused advice service
for residents of West Dunbartonshire. This includes the provision of Welfare Rights, Money Advice and
Debt Advice and support for the submission of benefits applications and appeals, where appropriate. 
The service provided is not restricted to those elements in and may also include assistance to clients in
other areas of expertise where there is a benefit to them. This includes, for example, employment, housing
or consumer rights, whilst taking into account the need to minimise duplication in advice provision in West
Dunbartonshire.
The service is open to anyone seeking support and is provided locally, in communities and within locations
that effectively meet the needs of residents in West Dunbartonshire. West Dunbartonshire CAB adopts a
flexible and collaborative service which includes out-of-hours, home visits and outreach provision as
appropriate.

Page 143

Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Senior staff and Elected Members at West Dunbartonshire Council have been involved in the consultation
process.

Page 144

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                          
Disability                    Our child poverty report
notes disabled people as a
priority group.
Disabled people and those
living in a household with a
disabled person are more likely
to be income deprived.
Reduced provision may
affect efforts to reduce
poverty for this group.
Gender Reassign              
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                          Our child poverty report
notes people from BME
groups as a priority group.
People from BME groups more
likely to me more income
deprived.
Reduced provision may
affect efforts to reduce
poverty for this group.
Religion and Belief          
Sex                           Our child poverty report
notes women/lone parents
groups as a priority group.
Women are more likely to be
income deprived than men.
90% of single parents are
female.
Reduced provision may
affect efforts to reduce
poverty for this group.
Sexual Orientation           
Human Rights                  Human Rights Act; For
example Article 8 family life.
United Nations Convention
on the Rights of the Child
(Best practice).
The work of WD CAB 
supports elements of human
rights e.g. Article 8.
Advice is provided to families
with children and young
people.
Reduced provision may
negatively affect the
fulfilment of rights.
Health                       
Social & Economic
Impact     
Reducing child poverty is a
focus for the council.
Groups noted above may be
especially vulnerable, as well
as other with low incomes.
Reduced provision may
result in reduced ability
to tackle economic and
financial inequality.
Cross Cutting                 WDCAB users from
disadvantaged backgrounds
who are most likely to be
affected by inequality,
poverty and disadvantage
which is driven by structural
or institutional factors.
These factors include lack
of information about: 
• Income from social
security and benefits in
kind, influenced by: 
o design and generosity of
welfare benefits;
The key drivers of poverty
identified in the legislation
include income levels and the
cost of living. Income is
determined, to an extent, by
levels of economic activity and
employment.
While there are many sources
of labour market information,
examples provided by NOMIS
(Office for National Statistics
Labour Market Profile - Nomis
- Official Census and Labour
Market Statistics
The options focus on a
reduction in the level of
grant provided by the
Council. This will have a
negative impact on the
services and impact of
those services to
residents of West
Dunbartonshire. Note:
WDCAB receives
funding from other
sources as such,
WDCAB is not totally
reliant on the Council for

Page 145

o benefit sanctions and
recovery of advance
payments; 
o hardship payments and
third-party debts;
o barriers to accessing
financial support (including
child maintenance). 
• Costs of living, including
housing, food and fuel
costs, the poverty premium,
the costs of the school day,
and the extra, unavoidable
costs of disability.
• People are unaware of
their employment rights
WDCAB provide support
because:
• People don’t always claim
the benefits they are
entitled to;
• The benefits system is
difficult to understand;
• Navigating the process
without assistance can lead
to errors;
• Appeals without help can
lead to wrong decisions;
• Understanding welfare
reform is difficult.
(nomisweb.co.uk)) will illustrate
West Dunbartonshire’s
comparative labour market
profile to suggest the need for
targeted employability support.
Benefits:
The number of people in
receipt of out of work benefits
is a contributory factor to the
level of child poverty. In West
Dunbartonshire 4.5% of the
population in the 16-64 years
group is in receipt of out of
work benefits. This is higher
than the average in Scotland
(3.2%) and Great Britain
(3.8%) and represents 2,525
people.
18.4% of households in West
Dunbartonshire are in receipt
of the main benefits. This
compares unfavourably with
the figure for Scotland (13%)
and Great Britain (11%).
In effect, comparatively more
people in West Dunbartonshire
rely on benefits for their
income. Maximising their
entitlement will feature strongly
in our approach to maximising
income.
funding.
WDCAB has a number
of key performance
indicators reflecting the
activities that are
delivered through the
use of the funds
provided by the Council.
The activities are
directed towards the
most economically 
disadvantaged people in
West Dunbartonshire.
These indictors will be
reduced in proportion to
reduction of funds.
These indicators include:
• Number of people
receiving support (
• Value of income
generated 
• Total value of reduced
liability to debt 
• Number establishing a
debt strategy 
• Number advised with
housing issues 
• Number provided with
consumer rights issues
• Number provided with
employment rights
issues 
issues 
• Number supported with
advice on energy issues 
All options will lead to a
proportionate reduction
in the number of people
from disadvantaged
communities and
families receiving
support.

Page 146

Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The Council has a substantial budget deficit and is seeking and assessing options that will contribute to
reducing the gap. Assessment of grant support to external service providers is a necessary part of that
process.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Working4U maintains a set of performance indicators for all funded projects that are reported to the
Council and COSLA (Improvement Service). The statistics will reflect  changing funding levels.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1238: The equality impact assessment provides an overview of the differing negative
impacts of either fully removing or reducing funding.

Page 147

Assessment No 1233 Owner mlynn2                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget Resource
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer Resources
Members Laurence Slavin - Chief Officer Resources
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function
or financial decision)
Policy Title RES01 - Review of External Funding - Community Wellbeing Fund
The aim, objective, purpose and intended out come of policy
A reduction in or removal of funding in 2025/26 or on a phased basis over a number of
years in the Community Wellbeing Fund which is a recurring budget of £20k to support
community groups with up to £2,000 for hall and facility hire.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Senior Council staff and the Budget Working Group have been consulted on the
development of the option.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Community Groups who apply to West Dunbartonshire Community & Volunteering Services for grant
funding.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Chief Officers and budget working group.

Page 148

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Relevant as funding is
provided across a wide
range of community groups
and age ranges.
Funding is provided to cover
hall and facility cover.
Reduction in funding will
negatively affect the
amount of Community
groups who apply for
this type of financial
support. These groups
are wide ranging and the
funding also helps
support hall and facility
hire.
Disability                    Relevant as funding is
provided across a wide
range of community groups 
who support  a wide range
of groups requiring support
potentially including
disability groups.
The service may provide
support to community groups
with a specific focus on
disabilities through the funding
levels provided.
Reduction in funding will
negatively affect the
amount of Community
groups who apply for
financial support.
Gender Reassign              
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and Belief          
Sex                          
Sexual Orientation           
Human Rights                 
Health                       
Social & Economic
Impact     
Cross Cutting                 It is important that the
Council considers how
impacts may interact.
People who are members of
more than one disadvantaged
group are more likely to be
impacted.
Negative effects may be
cumulative.

Page 149

Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group,but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Provision of this funding is not a statutory requirement and therefore it has to be put forward as a saving
option
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Intoduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1233 details potential impacts which, summarised is that a reduction in funding may
negatively affect community groups that support a wide range of users with either health or
disability issues.  Reduced funding to community groups could have an impact on the groups and
the services they provide to the community.  Provision of this funding is not a statutory
requirement and therefore it has to be put forward as a saving option for member consideration
whilst setting out the implications of taking the option. Non statutory funding is still covered by
the duty to impact assess  relevant proposals under the Public Sector Equality Duty in Scotland.

Page 150

Assessment No 1173 Owner Arun Menon                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget Resource
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Arun Menon Business Support Manager
Members Arun Menon, Business Support Manager
Ryan Chalmers, Section Head – Revenues and Benefits
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RES05 Review Council Tax and Benefits Service
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
This option will see an equivalent of 0.5 FTE reduction within the service area. This
equates to a cumulative £14,000 reduction.  There are currently no vacancies in the
CT team so any reductions in establishment would trigger a potential compulsory
redundancy situation if SWITCH process was not successful.  Whilst no work has
started on this but should option be taken, service would have to review positions
within team.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Business Support Management
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
Reduction in team may result in an increased backlog and delays in resident’s discounts and/or
exemptions being applied and in registration of new taxpayer accounts.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Chief Officers, Strategic HR

Page 151

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                          
Cross Cutting                
Disability                   
Social & Economic
Impact     
Sex                           We need to consider any
differential impact for
example because of
composition of the affected
workforce in terms of sex.
Due to workforce composition,
changes are likely to affect
women more than men. 
Women in Scotland are more
likely to be income deprived
than men.
In practice this means
that the staff in print
room will need to be
redeployed, failing which
face compulsory
redundancy.
Gender Reassign              
Health                       
Human Rights                 
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and Belief          
Sexual Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The council has a duty to balance the budget.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
No
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1173:  Upon developing an options appraisal, the annualised cost of outsourcing delivers a
saving of between 25% to 35% subject to all associated costs including staffing being removed. 
Due to workforce composition, changes are likely to negatively affect women more than men.
Any reductions in establishment would trigger a potential compulsory redundancy situation if
SWITCH process was not successful.

Page 152

Assessment No 1172 Owner Arun Menon                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget Resource
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Arun Menon Business Support Manager
Members Arun Menon, Business Support Manager
Ryan Chalmers, Section Head – Revenues and Benefits
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RES06 Reduce Corporate Debt Team 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
This option, amended to reduce service by 25%, will see an equivalent of 3 FTE
reduction within the service area.  In financial teams this equates to a cumulative
£67,000 reduction by Year 2 (2026/27).  At the time of preparation (Dec’24) there is
only 1 FTE vacant post in CD.  Therefore, any reductions in establishment would
trigger a potential compulsory redundancy situation if SWITCH process was not
successful.  Whilst no work has started on this, but should option be taken, service
would have to review positions within team. 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Business Support Management
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
The council as a whole will be impacted.  The CD section is responsible for rent, council tax, sundry and
non-domestic rates debt collections which are key income streams for the Council and completing court
actions for recoveries of these debts.  It is difficult to fully cost the reduction on the debt service due to the
preventative work being carried out and also the payments received following work by the service are
received using different internal and external payment systems which are posted direct into the relevant
systems; therefore it is not possible to fully calculate the income collected by the service.  However, there
are some areas of collection that can be provided that relate solely to work completed by the section in
requesting deductions towards debts. 
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
PMRG have been made aware of the impact should the savings be approved

Page 153

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                          
Cross Cutting                
Disability                   
Social & Economic
Impact     
Sex                           We need to consider any
differential impact for
example because of
composition of the affected
workforce in terms of sex.
Due to workforce composition,
changes are likely to affect
women more than men. 
Women in Scotland are more
likely to be income deprived
than men.
In practice this means
that some staff will stop
working extra hours
currently in place,
meaning some reduction
in income above their
contractual amounts.
Gender Reassign              
Health                       
Human Rights                 
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and Belief          
Sexual Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The council has a duty to balance the budget.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
No
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1172: This saving will help the Council balance the budget and to find more efficient ways
of working. Due to workforce composition, changes are likely to affect women more than men.
Therefore, any reductions in establishment would trigger a potential compulsory redundancy
situation if SWITCH process was not successful.

Page 154

Assessment No 1205 Owner Michelle Lynn                                
Resource Transformation Service Budget Resource
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer Resources 
Members Michelle Lynn Asset Manager 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RES 08  Reduce Caretakers 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
There are currently three caretakers covering Lomond Trade Centre, Leven
Valley Enterprise Centre, Artizan Centre and Clyde Street Business Centre,
Clydebank.
The team provides a caretaking provision at each location which includes
caretaking and general janitorial duties, fire alarm testing, cleaning duties at
three of the four locations (none at the Artizan) and reporting any arising
maintenance issues.
The full-time caretaker covers Leven Valley Enterprise Centre and Artizan
Shopping Centre, splitting his day between the locations and working
between both as required over a 37 hour week. During holiday periods and
sickness absence an external contractor provides cleaning/cover on an hourly
basis. This is charged at £24.50 plus VAT per hour.
Various delivery models were looked at to achieve a saving. Potentially it
could be one FTE or it could be 3 workers splitting the 37 hours. 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
WDC Staff Members/Chief Officers
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No

Page 155

Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
All Council services, Elected Members and partner organisations including the Scottish
Government.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Michelle Lynn, Assets Manager- conducted this high level efficiency option ;
Laurence Slavin, Chief Officer - Resources - interrogated this high level efficiency option;
Performance and Monitoring Review Group, West Dunbartonshire Council - where informed of
this high level efficiency option; 
Martin Rooney, Leader of the Council - was informed of this high level efficiency option; and
David McBride, Deputy Leader of the Council - was informed of this high level efficiency option.
If this high level efficiency option is to be taken forward to the next stage; staff, Trade Unions
and Elected Members will be consulted. 
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                          
Disability                  
Gender Reassign              
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and
Belief          
Sex                           Gender make-up of the
employee group needs to
be taken into account.
All of the relevant employee
group are male.
Potential
displacement would
affect male staff
because of gender
make-up of the
employee group.

Page 156

Sexual
Orientation           
Human Rights                 
Health                       
Social &
Economic
Impact     
Cross Cutting                 Important to consider
any cross-cutting factors
These can be removed from
the establishment without
material impact on service
delivery or other staff's
workload.
Neutral in all respects
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The council has a duty to balance the budget.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Yes
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1205;  This is an efficiency proposal. Potential displacement would affect a male member of
staff because of gender make-up of the employee group, depending on how the saving might be
achieved.

Page 157

Assessment No 1221 Owner Michelle Lynn                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget Resource
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laurence  Slavin Chief Officer-Resources
Members Adrian Gray - Finance Business Partner
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RES12 Review Elderly Welfare Grant 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
Remove the historic £15 per resident payment made annually through the
elderly grant fund to registered groups and individuals.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Finance team within WDC & ASU
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Anyone currently receiving the payment from the Elderly Welfare Grant Fund.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
This is part of the range of savings proposals being considered to bridge the challenging financial
gap the council faces over the next three years.  Once approved by Council, it will be
communicated to all residents.

Page 158

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           No requirement to
provide this funding. The
Council budget needs to
have regards to Best
Value Considerations on
how money is spent and
its impact.
The policy only provides £15
per annum for each
resident over the specified
age. This is tiny proportion
of this group’s yearly
income.
Older age groups are less
likely to be in relative
poverty than people under
30.
Positive - the removal
of the grant would
remove current
inequality for those
under the specified
age. It is
acknowledged that
those under the
specified age may or
may not be just as
vulnerable at those
over the specified age
but are not eligible for
the payment.
Negative - Loss of £15
per eligible resident if
the option to remove
is pursued.
Disability                   
Gender Reassign              
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and
Belief          
Sex                          
Sexual
Orientation           
Human Rights                 
Health                       
Social &
Economic
Impact     
We need to have regards
to the Fairer Scotland
Duty.
£15 is only a very small
proportion of the annual
income for those over the
Neutral.

Page 159

specified age and would
have a negligible effect.
Cross Cutting                
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Council has a statutory duty to balance the budget.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Yes.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1221: The removal of the grant would remove a current inequality where those under the
specified age may or may not be just as vulnerable as those over that age but are not eligible for
the payment. Older people are less likely to be in relative poverty than people under 30. It is
noted that £15 is only a very small proportion of the annual income for those over the specified
age and would have a negligible effect.

Page 160

Assessment No 1174 Owner Arun Menon                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget Resource
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Arun Menon Business Support Manager
Members Arun Menon, Business Support Manager
Ryan Chalmers, Section Head – Revenues and Benefits
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RES14 Reduce Housing Benefit and Council Tax Team
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
This option, amended to reduce service by 10%, will see an equivalent of 0.5 FTE
reduction within the service area.  In financial teams this equates to a cumulative
£16,000 reduction.  There are currently no vacancies in the HB teams so any
reductions in establishment would trigger a potential compulsory redundancy situation
if SWITCH process was not successful.  Whilst no work has started on this, but should
option be taken, service would have to review positions within team.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Business Support Management
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
The residents of West Dunbartonshire who depend on Housing Benefits (HB) and Council Tax Reductions
(CTR) are likely to be affected.  Reducing the staffing with the HB and CTR team by 10% would have a
significant impact on the welfare supports being delivered to residents resulting in potential hardship and
reductions in rent and council tax collection.  Estimated to increase average processing times for new
claims from 12 days to 18 days and an increase from 4 days to 6 days for changes of circumstances. 
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
PMRG have been made aware of the impact should the savings be approved
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.

Page 161

Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                          
Cross Cutting                
Disability                   
Social & Economic
Impact     
Sex                           We need to consider any
differential impact for
example because of
composition of the affected
workforce in terms of sex.
Due to workforce composition,
changes are likely to affect
women more than men. 
Women in Scotland are more
likely to be income deprived
than men.
In practice this means
that some staff will stop
working extra hours
currently in place,
meaning some reduction
in income above their
contractual amounts.
Gender Reassign              
Health                       
Human Rights                 
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and Belief          
Sexual Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The council has a duty to balance the budget.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
No
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1174:  The Council has a duty to balance the budget and find more efficient ways of
working. Due to workforce composition, changes are likely to negatively affect women more than
men. Any reductions in establishment would trigger a potential compulsory redundancy situation
if SWITCH process was not successful.

Page 162

Assessment No 1202 Owner mlynn2                                 
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget SD and P
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer Resources
Members Laurence Slavin, Chief Officer Resources
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function
or financial decision)
Policy Title RES16 Reduce Community Council Funding
The aim, objective, purpose and intended out come of policy
Summary of Savings Proposal
The Council’s general fund provides £14,000 of funding to Community Councils as a
flat rate £750 administration grant plus a per capita allowance. 
The Council is required by statute to support community councils. In the past the
Council has reduced officer support provided to them and part of the justification was
the provision of the grant to pay for admin support/necessary ICT etc. If the grant is
fully removed it will increase pressure for greater officer support which is likely to cost
more.  Furthermore funding for Community Councils cannot be fully removed without a
special meeting of the Council to consider the matter and a two thirds majority vote.
However the grant can be reduced.   
There are four options to consider either fully remove or reduce funding  by 25%, 50%
or 75%.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Relevant Chief Officers and elected members
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Community Councils
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?

Page 163

Elected member, senior officers and the Communities team.

Page 164

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Council Equality Outcome
increasing participation of
younger people.
Participation amongst younger
age groups, 16- 34 is
significantly lower than other
age groups in WD. 
Work has been underway to
find different channels of
engagement with young
people and organisations
related to them. For example
recent conversations with
young people on the Council's
budget priorities.
This may have a
potentially negative
impact on the support/
facility of Community
councils to provide and
encourage  participation
of  young people in local
democracy
Disability                    Council Equality Outcome
increasing participation of
disabled people.
Disabled people and those
living in a household with a
disabled person are more likely
to be less able to participate
fully in community life.
This may have a
potentially negative
impact on the support
that Community
Councils can provide for
participation of  disabled
people.
Gender Reassign              
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                          Council Equality Outcome
on increasing participation
of BME groups.
BME groups are more likely to
have barriers to participate
fully in community life.
This may have a
potentially negative
impact on the support
that Community
Councils can provide for
participation of  BME
groups. 
Other avenues for
participation do exist for
example through West
Dunbartonshire Equality
Forum.
Religion and Belief          
Sex                          
Sexual Orientation           
Human Rights                 
Health                       
Social & Economic
Impact

Page 165

Cross Cutting                 West Dunbartonshire
benefits from a wealth of
community organisations
delivering valuable services
to support people in our
most disadvantaged
communities. These groups
rely on the voluntary
commitment of local people
aiming to make a difference
in their communities. 
Community Councils are
subject to the Public Sector
Equality Duty.
Empowering communities and
increasing local democracy is
a preventative approach to
increase individual and
community resilience that in
turn reduces the burden on
public services. By supporting
community organisations to
expand their offer to those
most in need across the
authority supports the
ambitions set out in the Local
Outcome Improvement Plan
and Strategic Plan of
addressing inequalities. Many
community groups operate in
areas suffering from multiple
deprivation and represent
many different equality groups. 
Community groups provide
important benefits that include
opportunities for people to
meet, socialise, improve their
confidence, their health and
tackle social isolation.
Removal of the
Community Council
funding will possibly
reduce groups or events
that can be supported.
This in turn will impact
the individuals and
communities the group
supports. It will have an
impact on the methods
of engagement used by
the Council.
Other engagement
opportunities are
available in West
Dunbartonshire which
may mitigate the loss of
funding.

Page 166

Actions
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The Council needs to have an overall balanced budget.
The Council will continue to support groups that are impacted by the removal of this funding. The Council
provides a range of engagement, participation and networking opportunities that groups can take part in
including the West Dunbartonshire Equality Forum.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases?
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1202: Some potential negative in terms of impacts participation and voice for more deprived
communities and certain equality groups, younger people, disabled people, BME groups by
removing a funding resource. This could be mitigated by other support mechanisms.   
The Council will still be able to sign post groups to other potential sources of funding for
example information via WDCVS. Other networking and opportunities will continue to exist for
example West Dunbartonshire Equality forum, and evident such as Job Fairs and the recent anti
poverty event which engaged a range of groups. The Council will continue to have a focus on
engaging with under represented groups including younger people and people from BME groups
in line with our Equality Outcomes.

Page 167

Assessment No 1204 Owner Michelle Lynn                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget Resource
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer Resources 
Members Michelle Lynn Asset Manager 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RES 19 Reduce Asset Management Team 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
Asset Management provide strategic and operational management of the
Council’s operational portfolio including full asset life cycle management for
146 properties. This saving would reduce the team from 13 FTE to 11.7FTE
and generate £55,200
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
WDC Staff Members/Chief Officers
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
All Council services, Elected Members and partner organisations including the Scottish
Government.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Michelle Lynn, Assets Manager- conducted this high level efficiency option ;
Laurence Slavin, Chief Officer - Resources - interrogated this high level efficiency option;
Performance and Monitoring Review Group, West Dunbartonshire Council - where informed of
this high level efficiency option;

Page 168

Martin Rooney, Leader of the Council - was informed of this high level efficiency option; and
David McBride, Deputy Leader of the Council - was informed of this high level efficiency option.
If this high level efficiency option is to be taken forward to the next stage; staff, Trade Unions
and Elected Members will be consulted. 
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                          
Disability                   
Gender Reassign              
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and
Belief          
Sex                           Need to consider gender
balance of affected
group.
70% male 30% female 
The intention is to achieve
reduction through natural
wastage.
May affect men more
than women if there
are any staff
displaced.
Sexual
Orientation           
Human Rights                 
Health                       
Social &
Economic
Impact

Page 169

Cross Cutting                 Important to consider
any cross cutting factors.
These can be removed from
the establishment without
material impact on service
delivery or other staff's
workload.
Neutral in all respects
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The council has a duty to balance the budget.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Yes
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1204: The intention is to achieve reduction through natural wastage however may affect
men more than women if there are any staff displaced.

Page 170

Assessment No 1185 Owner Gail Macfarlane                           
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and N
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Gail Macfarlane chief Officer - Roads &
Neighbourhood
Members Grounds Service
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title R&N02 Remove Public Toilets Provision 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
This saving option proposes to close the four automated toilets located
throughout the authority.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Grounds service
Legal Service
Procurement Service
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
Residents, businesses, visitors to area that utilise the automated toilet facilities. Homeless
people are more likely to be reliant on public toilets.

Page 171

There were 31,000 uses of the 4 toilets in the last year.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Grounds Manager
Procurement Manager
Economic Development Manager
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group
to consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Need to examine potential
differential impacts in terms
of age different age groups
Older people are more
likely to have impairments
than younger people
Older individuals and
parents with young
children may face
difficulties accessing
alternative facilities.
Children themselves may
have difficult
Potentially negative
for older groups
Negative for children
Disability                    We need to have due regard
to the Public Sector Equality
Duty, and we need to ensure
that such services as the
Council provides are
accessible to disabled people.
UN Convention on the Rights
of Persons with Disabilities
(https://tinyurl.com/3fkr6xty)
Enabling disabled people to
live independently in the
community is relevant here.
Disabled people may find
it more challenging to
access alternative facilities
in practice.
Residents or visitors who
have longstanding illness
or disability and who
have significant difficulty
with day to day activities
will wish access to toilet
facilities and to be made
aware where those are
sited.
These conditions often
include problems with
mobility or stamina and
require access to adapted
toilets. Conditions such as
Potentially negative
for some disabled
people

Page 172

irritable bowel syndrome,
ulcerative colitis, and
Crohn’s disease cause
many people to reduce
their outdoor activities
and stay at home because
of concerns about toilet
facilities.  
Gender
Reassign              
Cross cuts with sex. By their nature automated
toilets are gender neutral.
Potentially negative
for some trans
people.
Marriage &
Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and
Belief          
Sex                           We need to look at
differential impacts.
Women typically require
public toilets more
frequently and urgently
than men due to factors
such as menstruation,
pregnancy and
menopause.
At any one time, about a
quarter of all women
of childbearing age will be
menstruating and require
access to toilets.
Lack of public toilets
disproportionately affects
women in care-giving
roles, whether that is
children, elderly parents
or people with disabilities.
Women may feel
uncomfortable about
entering certain premises
alone.
Several research studies
have identified that
Potentially more
negative for women.

Page 173

females use toilets more
frequently than males
owing to particular
physical needs,(Stanwell-
Smith et al, 2010; Greed,
2016; Camenga et al,
2019; Heller, 2019).
Camenga et al (2019)
identified that women
spend a longer duration of
time in toilets.
Sexual
Orientation           
Human Rights                  United Nations Convention
on the Rights of the Child
(UNCRC) in terms of provision
for Children and young
people.
Human Rights Act, Article 8
should be taken into account
as 'Family life' is broadly
interpreted.
Cross cuts with age and
sex and disability. 
Potentially more
negative for children
and young people
and disabled people
and women.
Health                        When consider health
impacts we need to ensure
that we think about possible
cross cutting elements.
Cross cuts with disability
and other areas.
Potentially negative
in terms of health.
Social &
Economic
Impact     
Fairer Scotland Duty (FSD)
Consumer Duty (CD)
FSD and CD effectively
cross cuts in terms of
small businesses.
There may be some
effect on local
business in terms of
increased costs
though this is
difficult to quantify,
and there may be
increased footfall in
business.
Cross Cutting                 It is important to consider
how elements may interact
and cumulative impacts over
time and geographical areas
and protected
groups/assessment areas.
The factors above
interact.
"Customer-use-only" signs
can act as a barrier in
private premises.
Homeless people are likely
to be more reliant on
public toilets.
Potential impacts
will be multiplied for
groups and
individuals who
share are in multiple
positions of
disadvantage or
need.

Page 174

Women, care givers and
other may plan journeys
to take into account
availability of toilets.
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The Council is required to reach a balanced budget and although the automated toilets are used
by residents and visitors there are alternative toilet facilities within our town centres that can be
utilised.  This may require the council to implement a visitor scheme with local businesses.  
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Feedback will be monitored from town centre users
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1185: The council is required to reach a balanced budget and although toilets are utilised
there is a significant cost to lese the units and the contract concludes in May 2026.  
There may be negative consequences for women, disabled people and older people as well as
children and young people if demand cannot be meet, in terms of health and ability to get out
and about without concerns about being able access toilets.
There are alternative toilet facilities within town centres and the council will investigate
partnership schemes with local businesses in mitigation.

Page 175

Assessment No 1187 Owner Gail Macfarlane                           
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and N
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer - Roads &
Neighbourhood
Members Roads Manager
Road Safety Coordinator
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RN17 Reduce School Crossing Patrollers 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
School Crossing Patrols reduce or cease
Option 1 – Prioritised Locations
17 crossing patrollers would be retained with 13 crossing patrollers removed.
Sites for crossing patrollers would be prioritised based on location and traffic
conditions. Total reduction of 3.0FTE.
Option 2 – No Crossing Patrollers
The Council would not provide crossing patrollers but would continue to work
with parents and pupils to promote road safety. Total reduction 7.1FTE.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
National Benchmarking carried out.
Resident Feedback/complaints
The Roads Service have been involved in the development of this proposal.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No

Page 176

Who will be affected by this policy?
All groups are affected but parents and pupils to a greater degree
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
‘Development of an Active & Sustainable Travel Strategy and Action Plan for West
Dunbartonshire Council Consultation survey 2021
A question was asked on the withdrawal of school crossing patrols from junctions where
pedestrian crossings exist those opposed to the proposal highlighted concerns over safety those
supportive of the proposal noted the importance of proper road safety education
There was a general view that work was required on driver education to support this proposal
Nearly all respondents (of 85) supported the improvement and promotion of safe routes to
schools and local destinations and investment in prioritised safe walking routes was the most
popular suggestion in the consultation.
Last year we reduced school cross patrollers from mechanically controlled crossings. There was
low level of complaints initially (in August 2024) which have not been repeated.’
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific
group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Accessible and
safe routes to
school.
School age children that are walking to school
either with or without parents will tend to use the
identified safe route to school with crossing
patrollers.
Negative: All
groups
affected but
children and
young
families to a
greater
degree.  
Disability                    Accessible and
safe routes to
school.
Disabled people are less likely to have access to
cars.
All groups affected but people with disabilities may
be affected to a greater degree.  
School age children that are walking to school
either with or without parents will tend to use the
identified safe route to school with crossing
patrollers.
Negatively
on disabled
younger
people,
potentially
other
disabled
people

Page 177

Gender
Reassign              
Marriage &
Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Cross cuts with
sex
Young families walking to school or early learning
facilities.
Highly represented in affected group due to
potential users of crossing points with crossing
patrollers.
Negative
Race                          Need to assess
differential
impacts in
terms of
transport use.
Most BME groups have less access to cars than
most White ethnic groups.
(UK Gov. data published 2023)
Negative
Religion and
Belief          
Sex                           Need to assess
differential
impacts
between males
and females. 
Women are more likely to be involved in taking
children to and from school.
Women less likely to have access to cars than men.
Single parents are a priority group in terms of child
poverty.
Women more likely to be looking after children.
Reduction of FTE up 7.1 depending on options (30
locations) staffing is by both males and females.
More
negative for
women in
terms of
service
provision.
Impact of
staffing
would likely
be equality
in terms of
males and
females.
Sexual
Orientation           
Human
Rights                 
Need to
consider
UNCRC In terms
of Provision
and protection
and in this case
best interests
of the child
Relevant
UNCRC articles
Article 6 
UNCRC considerations crosscut with equality
considerations noted.
May impact
more on
younger
children
especially
those from
families with
lower
disposable
income 
Some groups
of children

Page 178

Life, survival
and 
development 
Article 3 
Best interests
of the child
may be more
affected
than others.
Health                        Health and
Wellbeing is a
priority for
WDC.
Children
travelling
actively to
school.
Sustrans Scotland have identified that children are
healthier if they travel to school by walking, cycling
or scooting.
May increase
car use.
There may
be negative
effect on
active travel.
Social &
Economic
Impact     
Children in
more deprived
areas.
Sustrans Scotland analysis highlights that children
on foot and bike are more than 3 times more likely
to be involved in an accident in the 20% most
deprived areas compared to the 20% least
deprived.
May be more
impact more
on groups
with lower
disposable
income.
Cross
Cutting                
Need to look at
cross cutting
elements.
Removal of patrollers may be a disincentive to
keep using active travel.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/
S2214367X20301782  Section 4.5 and 6 especially
Mix of
negative
impacts
noted above
may interact.
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Need to balance budgets is a legitimate aim. We have assessed likely impacts so that decision
makers can give due regard to equalities and the other elements we assess, and weight these
against other considerations, when making decisions. 
Roll out of any proposals would take into account health and safety and safe routes to school.
Patrollers are based along safe routes to schools. These routes have been identified and are
monitored by Education and Roads within the School Safety Plans. Any locations highlighted by
parents, pupils or schools will be assessed for physical measures. Children will continue to
receive education on road safety, including the safe crossing of roads and awareness of vehicle
movement. 
Lining, signing and ped crossings don’t currently have any budget available so would require this
before any interventions.

Page 179

Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Yes.  School travel plans are monitored and updated to reflect travel patterns and issues
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1187: This is an assessment of the likely impacts of this savings proposal.  Possibly negative
impacts for some groups including women, some BME groups with have less access to cars and
are more likely to walk to school, and children of these families. Active travel particularly
walking and cycling, by all groups may be discouraged for all groups which does not support
healthier lifestyles. UNCRC considerations crosscut with equality and health elements noted.  It
is possible that traffic may become heavier round affected schools.
Option 2 would likely have more potential negative impact than option 1.
Roll out of any proposals would take into account health and safety and safe routes to school.
The Council's road safety team liaise with the pupils to promote safe walking behaviour and to
support the delivery of road safety initiatives. 
There is a possibility of engineering works being carried out if the Roads Service identify
locations on safe routes to school that fulfil the criteria for controlled crossing points with an
available budget.  Officers will also continue to work with the school community to identify
suitable locations for lining or signing interventions to improve driver behaviour and raise aware
ness of the fact that they are in the proximity of a school.

Page 180

Assessment No 1190 Owner Gail Macfarlane                           
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and N
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer - Roads &
Neighbourhood
Members Roads and Grounds Service
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title R&N 18 Reduce Footway Gritting
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
The savings option is a review into footway gritting.  2 options have been
considered as follows:
Option 1 Reduce footway gritting by 50%
This will reduce footway gritting to main roads and prioritising areas round
schools and main shopping areas.
Option 2 Cease all footway gritting
In this option there will be no footway gritting carried on.  Gritting activities
would be limited within the Winter Plan to carriageways only.
In all options residents and businesses will be encouraged to use grit bins that
are sited throughout the local authority area.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Roads and Grounds Service
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes

Page 181

Who will be affected by this policy?
All users of the adopted footways 
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Roads and Grounds Services
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group
to consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Older residents may be
more vulnerable to
slips, trips and falls and
may be more reliant
on being able to walk
to shops etc. School
age children will use
public footways to
access school.
Older residents are more likely to
be vulnerable to injury if they fall
on ice and are more likely to be
reliant on walking and public
transport to access amenities. 
They may become fearful of
leaving their homes if footways
are icy and untreated.  It is
known that a high number of
children walk to school.
Older women more likely to have
hip fractures than older men. 
Negative
Disability                    Need to take into
account access to
public transport e.g.
bus stops.
Disabled people are more likely
to be reliant on public transport
and less likely to have access to a
car.
Some disabled will be more
prone to falls and injury.
Negative
Gender
Reassign              
Marriage &
Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Need to take into
account safety
concerns.
Pregnant women are more
vulnerable to injury if they fall on
ice. They may become fearful of
leaving their homes if footways
are icy and untreated.  
Negative

Page 182

Race                          Need to take into
account access to
public transport e.g.
bus stops.
Most BME groups have less
access to cars than most white
ethnic groups, and are more
reliant on public transport.
Negative
Religion and
Belief          
Sex                           Need to take into
account access to
public transport e.g.
bus stops.
Women are more likely to be
care givers than men.
Women have less access to cars
than men and are more reliant on
public transport.
More negative for
women
Sexual
Orientation           
Human Rights                  UNCRC in terms of
'provision' 
Cross cuts with impacts on care
givers most of whom are women.
May affect children
more and especially
those from lower
income more
deprived families. 
Health                        The Council Strategic
Plan 22-27 views
health and wellbeing
as important
Women account for more than
two-thirds of hip fractures and
the survey found older women
are significantly more likely to say
falling was a concern, compared
to older men (45% vs 26%,
respectively). Moreover, it was
older people living on their own
who were most worried about
falling.
https://www.ageuk.org.uk/latest-
press/articles/2019/may/falls-in-
later-life-a-huge-concern-for-
older-people/
Negative in terms of
physical and mental
health.
Social &
Economic
Impact     
Need to have due
regard to the Fairer
Scotland Duty. In areas
that are income
deprived there may be
not be access to a
private car and
residents may be
reliant on walking and
use of public transport. 
In addition, if residents
and visitors fearful of
untreated footways
Ownership of a private car is
lower in areas of deprivation and
therefore residents are reliant on
walking and access to public
transport.  There will be grit bins
sited in town centres to support
access. 
Negative

Page 183

they may not visit
town centres to shop
etc.
Cross Cutting                 Need to have due
regard to the Scottish
Consumer Duty. 
There may be a
reduction in footfall to
town centre
businesses etc if
footways are
untreated and areas
are not considered
safely accessible.
Visitors and residents may feel
vulnerable in accessing the town
centres and other destinations if
they feel there is a risk of slips,
trips or falls.
Negative
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Need to provide services efficiently and within budgets.
The Winter Plan will be updated to reflect that treatment will either be reduced to priority
routes or ceased to carriageway only.  A communications exercise will be undertaken about
taking sensible precautions in winter weather such as appropriate footwear.  There will also be
grit bins sited in appropriate locations.
The gritting of footways is non statutory
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
The Roads Service review the Winter Plan annually and will monitor actions undertake.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1190: In this proposal should footway gritting be reduced or ceased the location of grit bins
will be assessed to ensure theses are located in areas of most requirement.  In addition,
information sharing will be carried out to support communities how best to travel in winter
weather. Potentially more negative impacts for older people, disabled people, some BME
groups and women. Some potential negative impacts in socio-economic terms.

Page 184

Assessment No 1110 Owner Gail MacFarlane                                 
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and N
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer - Roads &
Neighbourhood
Members Ian Bain, Grounds Manager
Ricardo Rea, Performance and Strategy Team
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RN 19 Close or Transfer Bowling Clubs Amenities
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
Closure of Goldenhill and Whitecrook Bowling Clubs.
Additionally transfer maintenance of grounds and buildings to Committees at
other clubs or close and market for sale or lease.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Grounds Services
West Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust
Assets Team
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Playing and non playing members (social members) of Bowling clubs.
Seasonal operatives.

Page 185

The membership of the bowling clubs may be affected by the proposed option being
implemented should the committees not be able or willing to take on responsibility for
maintenance of buildings and grounds.  Should the bowling club be closed and marketed for
sale/lease this will reduce social and leisure opportunities for members.
There are circa 50 members between Goldenhill and Whitecrook, membership at the veteran
clubs is circa 30 people.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Discussions at Budget consultation.
It was noted that there were mainly social members of the Balloch & District Veterans Bowling
Club. Noted that members felt that the club helped combat social isolation. 
When discussing mitigation, in terms of tacking isolation Golden Friendship for example was
only a service operating in the Clydebank end of the area
A more general comment made by other community groups was that training and better
support on assets transfers from the Council would be a plus
Budget Survey consultation
Respondents to the 25/26 budget conversation survey rated Bowling greens and golf course as
5th of the 5 priorities under 'environment'. 
A member of one club attended face to face discussion on budget priorities and noted that the
clubs benefited members who are generally older and some of whom are disabled. They noted
that significant numbers were 'social' rather than playing members. They did not feel that
combining clubs was practical because of for instance transportation. 
Information and discussions would suggest that clubs are heavily used by members but are not
visited/used by other members of the community often.
WDLT, Greenspace, Club members.
Who will be affected by this policy?
Playing and non playing members (social members) of Bowling clubs.
Seasonal operatives.
The membership of the bowling clubs may be affected by the proposed option being
implemented should the committees not be able or willing to take on responsibility for
maintenance of buildings and grounds.  Should the bowling club be closed and marketed for
sale/lease this will reduce social and leisure opportunities for members.
There are circa 50 members between Goldenhill and Whitecrook, membership at the veteran
clubs is circa 30 people.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Discussions at Budget consultation.

Page 186

It was noted that there were mainly social members of the Balloch & District Veterans Bowling
Club. Noted that members felt that the club helped combat social isolation. 
When discussing mitigation, in terms of tacking isolation Golden Friendship for example was
only a service operating in the Clydebank end of the area
A more general comment made by other community groups was that training and better
support on assets transfers from the Council would be a plus
Budget Survey consultation
Respondents to the 25/26 budget conversation survey rated Bowling greens and golf course as
5th of the 5 priorities under 'environment'. 
A member of one club attended face to face discussion on budget priorities and noted that the
clubs benefited members who are generally older and some of whom are disabled. They noted
that significant numbers were 'social' rather than playing members. They did not feel that
combining clubs was practical because of for instance transportation. 
Information and discussions would suggest that clubs are heavily used by members but are not
visited/used by other members of the community often.
WDLT, Greenspace, Club members.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Disability                    We have an anticipatory
duty in terms of
accessibility for disabled
people for such services
as we provide.
Older people are more likely
to have some form of
impairment.
Negative in terms of
local access.
Gender Reassign              
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Age                           Older members of the
community are members
of the clubs.
The majority of the current
membership is older
residents and attendance at
the clubs provide social and
health benefits.
Negative in terms of
local access.

Page 187

Race                         
Religion and
Belief          
Sex                           Need to assess any
differential impact.
The majority of current
members are male.
Majority of seasonal
operative are male.
Likely negative impact
will affect more men
than women in terms
of services users.
Reduction in FTE
would affect men.
Sexual
Orientation           
Human Rights                 
Health                        Desirability of reducing
loneliness and isolation is
noted in the Councils 22-
27 Strategic Plan.
The members benefit from
physical and mental health
benefits attending the club.
Bowling provides health
benefits.
Negative.
Social &
Economic
Impact     
Need to consider social
and economic impacts.
We should also consider
the Scottish Consumer
Duty.
Bowling clubs would
meet the definition of a
not for profit enterprise
(within the 
meaning of section
252(1F) of the Town and
Country Planning 
(Scotland) Act 1997) or a
small business.
The club provides
opportunity for social
engagement for members.
Social interaction is a
benefit to members.
Seasonal operatives may be
local residents and reduces
employment opportunities.
Negative for members
in terms of accessing
social interaction at a
very local level in
terms of choice.
Any Consumer Duty
considerations would
in this case overlap
with the areas
covered in this
assessment.
Cross Cutting                 Important to look at
interactions.
Older age, disability and sex
with more direct impact on
males are cross cutting
factors.
Bowling clubs would still be
available, but some would
have to travel further.
More negative in
combination for the
groups noted.

Page 188

Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The Council is required to reach a balanced budget.
The Service will work with members to direct them to alternative activities for health and social
benefits.
Some members are 'social' rather than playing members, mitigation should take this into
account.
Mitigation would also be informed by discussion with those affected.
Bowling clubs would still be available, but some would have to travel further, however there
would still be provision in the Clydebank area and provision on the Dumbarton/Vale area.
Membership numbers are small and either mergers or neighbouring bowling clubs would be
able to accommodate the number of current members.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
No
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1110: The members of the bowling clubs would be affected by either of the proposed
options being implemented.  Therefore, there are some potential negative impacts especially for
older people and men who are more likely to use these facilities, in terms of health and social
interaction.  Bowling clubs would still be available, but some would have to travel further,
however there would still be provision in the Clydebank area and provision on the
Dumbarton/Vale area.  The current number of members at affected clubs could be
accommodated at alternative bowling facilities.
Seasonal operatives are likely to be male and may be local residents and this reduces
employment opportunities.

Page 189

Assessment No 1131 Owner Gail MacFarlane                                   
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and N
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Gail MacFarlane Chief Officer - Roads &
Neighbourhood
Members Grounds Manager
Assets Coordinator
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RN 20 Close or Reduce Dalmuir Golf Club 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
The aim of the policy is to review the council owned golf club and either
reduce to a 12-hole course or close and market for disposal.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Grounds Services
West Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust
Assets Team
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
The membership and attractiveness to day visitors of the golf club may be affected if the golf
course is reduced from an 18-hole to a 12-hole course.  Should the golf club be closed and
marketed for disposal this will reduce social and leisure opportunities for members.

Page 190

Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
The Grounds Service, Assets Team, members of the bowling clubs and WDLT.  
Membership continues to fall, current levels are now 180 members. Budget Survey consultation
Respondents to the 25/26 budget conversation survey rated Bowling greens and golf course as
5th of the 5 priorities under 'environment'. 
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Need to consider age
structure of users.
The majority of member are
from older age groups. 
Would therefore tend
to impact on older
people.
Cross Cutting                 Seasonal grounds
operatives’ requirement
will be reduced.
Seasonal operatives may be
local residents and reduces
employment opportunities.
Negative.
Disability                   
Social &
Economic
Impact     
Social interaction is a
benefit to members.
The club provides
opportunity for social
engagement for members.
Negative.
Sex                           Affects male members of
the community to a
greater degree.
The majority of current
members are male.
Seasonal operatives more
likely to be male.
Negative.
Gender Reassign              
Health                        Golfing provides health
benefits.
The members benefit from
physical and mental health
benefits attending the club.
Negative.
Human Rights                 
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and
Belief

Page 191

Sexual
Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The Council is required to reach a balanced budget.
The Service will work with members to direct them to alternative activities from health and
social benefits.  There are a number of alternative golf clubs in traveling distance of the golf
club.  The membership continues to fall 
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
No
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1131: Efficiency proposal. There are some potential negative impacts especially for older
men who are more likely to use these facilities.  Seasonal operatives who are more likely to be
male and may be local residents and reduces employment opportunities. There are a number of
alternative clubs in traveling distance of the golf club.  The membership continues to fall and
there is availability within the local area to accommodate the level of current members.

Page 192

Assessment No 1134 Owner Gail MacFarlane                                   
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and N
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer - Roads &
Neighbourhood
Members Grounds Manager
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RN21 Cease Care of Gardens Scheme
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
Proposal to cease providing the care of gardens service.  A charge was
introduced last year for all users.  This will affect older people and those that
are in receipt of a disability allowance who pay a charge to receive the service. 
The proposals are designed to reduce the funding gap, the introduction of a
charged service has continued to operate at a subsidy that is unsustainable.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Grounds Service
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
This will affect older people and those that receive a disability payment who are eligible for
access to the scheme.

Page 193

Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Grounds Service
HSCP
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Older members of the
community over state
pension age that have
been eligible to receive
the service at the
subsidised charge.
Those on a fixed pension
may find it more difficult to
meet the cost of a gardener
reflecting the increase in
the cost of living and may
struggle to find an
alternative.
However older people are
less likely to be in relative
poverty than people under
30.
Negative.
Cross Cutting                 Seasonal Workforce
reduction reduces
employment
opportunities locally.
Seasonal workers are
employed by the Council to
carry out care of gardens
duties and are often local
residents.
Negative.
Disability                    Members of the
community with
disabilities are more
likely to be income
deprived than non-
disabled people.
The removal of the
subsidised service for
disabled people who on
average may be more
income deprived may find it
more difficult to meet the
cost of an external
gardening service.
Negative.
Social &
Economic
Impact     
Those that are income
deprived will potentially
find it more challenging
to find and pay for
alternative options if
service ceases. 
Those that are on a lower
income and in receipt of a
disability payment or
eligible due to age may find
it a challenge to find and
afford alternative gardeners
Negative.

Page 194

and therefore the area may
not be as well maintained.
Sex                           Women are more likely
to be income deprived.
Due to gender pay gap and
are potentially more likely
to be single parents and/or
carers.
Seasonal workers are
employed by the Council to
carry out care of gardens
duties and are often local
residents, and usually male.
Negative.
Gender Reassign              
Health                       
Human Rights                 
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and
Belief          
Sexual
Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The service has continued to be delivered at a significant subsidy and is not a statutory function.
If the service ceases all users will be required to access an alternative which may provide
employment opportunity for local workforce.
If the care of gardens service ceases all users will be required to find alternative delivery options
which will potentially be at a cost and is dependent on businesses having availability.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
If the service ceases monitoring will be through feedback from colleagues in the community.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1134:  The proposals are designed to reduce the funding gap, the introduction of a charged
service has continued to operate at a subsidy that is unsustainable.
Some potential negative impact, particularly on some older people, disabled people and people

Page 195

on lower incomes. 
The users will be informed on decisions taken and where possible advised of alternatives.
There will be engagement to ensure users are made aware that alternative delivery modes are
required with a requirement to arrange garden maintenance independently.

Page 196

Assessment No 1132 Owner Gail MacFarlane                                  
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and N
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Gail MacFarlane Chief Officer - Roads &
Neighbourhood
Members Grounds Service
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RN22 Reduce Street Cleaning
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
The proposal is the reduction in street sweeping and litter collection.  This will
reduce the street cleaning and litter collection frequencies.  The resources
available will target locations that have increased visitor numbers such as
parks and town centres with outlying areas and housing estates having a
reduced service.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Grounds Service
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Communities, residents and businesses.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?

Page 197

Grounds Service.
Feedback from Citizen's Panel and Recycling surveys to the public in 2022 and 2023 respectively
showed support for increasing the number of litter bins in public areas.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                          
Cross Cutting                 Cross cutting impacts
should be considered 
Note areas in the
assessment evidence.
The areas above
crosscuts in terms of
appearance of the
area
Disability                    It is important that
routes are accessible.
Officer assessment that
accessibility will be
maintained.
Neutral.
Social &
Economic
Impact     
The cleanliness and
maintenance of both
urban and rural areas
adversely impacts the
perception of an area.
Areas with a lower level of
maintenance and street
cleanliness align with areas
of higher deprivation and
can impact on investment
opportunities and local
pride.
There may be a
potential negative
impact on the physical
appearance of the
area.
Sex                           Employees affected are
predominately male.
It is important that
routes are accessible for
those using prams.
This will have an increased
impact on men and their
employment opportunities.
Officer assessment that
accessibility will be
maintained.
There may be a
potential negative
impact on male
employees.
Neutral in terms of
accessibility.
Gender Reassign              
Health                        Health and Wellbeing is a
priority in the WDC 2022-
27 Strategic Plan.
Physical environment can
influence physical and
mental health.  If there is an
increase in litter and
general untidiness this can
impact on mental health.
There may be a
potential minimal
negative impact on
the health of our
residents based on
the physical
appearance of the
area.

Page 198

Human Rights                 
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and
Belief          
Sexual
Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The council has a requirement to reach a balanced budget.
The provision fulfils the council's statutory obligations in relation to street cleaning and
additional bins will be installed at key locations.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Yes, through performance indicators
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1132:  The proposals considered are of activities that are delivered in excess of the statutory
level.  Areas not maintained or a lower level of street cleanliness align with areas of higher
deprivation and can impact on investment opportunities.  Accessibility of public areas will be
maintained. Following a successful pilot of larger bins these may be provided at appropriate
locations, this is an idea supported by surveys of the public in West Dunbartonshire.
If grounds and/or seasonal operatives are reduced this adversely affects employment
opportunities, and male workers because of gender balance of our workforce.

Page 199

Assessment No 1130 Owner Gail MacFarlane                                   
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and N
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer - Roads &
Neighbourhood
Members Roads Manager
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RN23 Reduce Street Lighting
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
The proposal is to turn off street lighting for a period of time potentially
between 1am and 6am
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Roads Service
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Residents, businesses and visitors.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Roads Manager, Police Scotland, communities.
Background information and evidence

Page 200

A number of cities in Europe already either fully or partially switch off street lighting at night
including a number of towns in France.  
There are also full or partial switch offs in council areas such as Surrey, West Sussex and
Southampton, Essex County Council. Somerset reduced lighting 2011.
Streetlighting Hours have been reduced –in Comhairle nan Eilean Siar (cne-siar.gov.uk), Western
Isles
Evidence from studies by UCL and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine,
assessing data from 62 local authorities, suggests that removing or reducing residential
streetlights at night, saves energy costs and reduces carbon emissions. It also found that there
was no resultant increase in car collisions or crime.
Further, a study by the universities of York and Newcastle showed that it also has benefits for
nocturnal wildlife. This assists the Council meet its strategy priority of "Tackling the climate and
ecological emergency".
A College of Policing review of evidence https://www.college.police.uk/research/crime-
reduction-toolkit/street-lighting
Suggested that improving lighting during the day may reduce time and ASB, but doing so at
might does not do so; there is nothing in the review that would contradict the other evidence
noted here.
We have benchmarked by looking at related EIAs and information
Balancing our budget for 2025/26 - West Berkshire Council 
https://www.westberks.gov.uk/media/60381/Equity-Impact-Assessment-for-Budget-Proposal-
2025-26-Turn-off-streetlights-in-residential-roads-between-midnight-and-
5am/pdf/4._BP_2526_Residential_Streetlighting_EqIA_v3.pdf?m=1730803371587
Essex
https://www.essexhighways.org/roads-and-pavements/street-lighting/part-night-lighting
evidence from Essex County Council suggests that this does not lead to an increase in crime.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific
group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Older
members of
the community
may feel more
Older members may
feel more vulnerable
and feel at the risk of
crime if the street
Negative, in terms of perception of impact.
This may negatively impact younger people
or older people who partake in
employment or leisure activities during

Page 201

at risk if
streetlights are
off.  
Younger
people and
people of
working age
are potentially
likely to be
active during
these time
periods as a
result of
returning from
work or leisure
activities.
lighting is off in the
vicinity of their homes.
A higher proportion of
younger than older
people work in the
nighttime economy.
these times, or who work in the nighttime
economy.
Cross
Cutting                
The perception
of safety of
communities
may be
considered
significant.
It is important
that the
Council engage
with people in
West
Dunbartonshir
e if proposals
are advanced.
The Council is
committed to
tackling
climate change
including
through carbon
emissions
reductions.
If streets are in
darkness communities
may feel at risk from
crime, either within
their homes or when
traveling. 
Potentially Negative, in terms of perception
of impact
However evidence strongly suggests this is
likely to be neutral in terms of actual crime
or ASB
(https://jech.bmj.com/content/69/11/1118
)
Disability                    We need to
have regard to
the needs of
disabled
people. 
Members of the
community that are
disabled may feel more
vulnerable, abled
members of the
community may feel
more anxious if the
streetlights are off.
Negative, in terms of perception of impact.

Page 202

Social &
Economic
Impact     
Perception of
safety when
required to
commute or
travel during
hours when
street lighting
is off.
Those on lower
incomes may be more
likely to be in
employment that
requires a shift pattern
that means they may
be commuting during
periods when street
lighting is off.
Potentially negative, in terms of perception
of impact however research suggests
neutral impacts in terms of crime and road
safety.
Sex                           Need to take
into account
Women's
safety and
feelings of
safety.
Women may be more
concerned about
safety.
At the UK level, in 2022,
almost 4.9 million (56%)
night-time workers
were male and almost
3.9 million were female
(44%). In 2012, 58% of
night-time workers
were male and 42%
female.
Negative, in terms of perception of impact.
Gender
Reassign              
Health                        The Councils
strategic Plan
notes the
importance of
health and well
being
Periods when street
lighting is not on may
impact on mental
health and may cause
concern and worry.
Reduced sleep
disturbance when the
light shines direct into
windows of properties.
Potentially negative, in terms of perception
of impact
Potentially positive in terms of less sleep
disturbance.
Human
Rights                 
Marriage &
Civil
Partnershi
p 
Pregnancy
&
Maternity        
Race                          We need to
consider
potential
impacts with
In 2022, workers born
outside of the UK made
up 23.1% of night-time
workers compared with
Potentially negative in terms of perception
of safety

Page 203

regard to
ethnicity
17.8% of daytime
workers. Between 2012
and 2022, the number
of night-time workers
born in the UK fell from
7.4 million to 6.8
million, while the
number born outside of
the UK rose by 32.6%,
from 1.5 million to 2
million.
https://www.ons.gov.u
k
BME people may be
more concerned about
safety at night.
Religion
and Belief          
Sexual
Orientatio
n           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The hours that the street lighting is proposed to be switched off are when there is a reduced
movement of members of the community.
There will be concerns about personal safety, and this may lead to a reduction in road safety for
pedestrians and other road users. In mitigation, the Communications and information around
changes would be vital including appropriate dialogue with communities.
A good example on web info is here https://www.essexhighways.org/roads-and-
pavements/street-lighting/part-night-lighting
The Council could consider measures such as extending 20mph zones in residential areas which
should reduce traffic speeds.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Monitoring will be carried out through liaison with stakeholders and communities.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation

Page 204

EIA 1130: This is an efficiency measure considered, in line with potential impacts.  There may be
some negative impacts in terms of perceptions of safety by some groups.  However, research
has not found evidence of harmful effects of part-night lighting on road collisions or crime in
England and Wales. The hours of switch would be monitored to minimise impact on
communities.
There is an environmental benefit to reduced street lighting as there will be a reduction in light
pollution and carbon footprint.  This would support the council’s journey to net zero, nature
recovery and encourage nocturnal wildlife.

Page 205

Assessment No 1193 Owner Gail Macfarlane                           
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and N
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer - Roads &
Neighbourhood
Members Grounds Service
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title R&N 24 Reduce Park Maintenance 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
The proposal is the reduction in maintenance within parks including grass
cutting, play areas and litter collection, as a cost saving measure.
The proposal considered is as follows:
Reduce frequency and extent of grass cutting in the 4 main parks:
Balloch
Christie
Levengrove
Dalmuir
Reduced emptying litter bins with a focus on high use pedestrian areas. 
Additional bins would be installed at key locations to minimise littering.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Grounds Service
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes

Page 206

Who will be affected by this policy?
Communities, residents and businesses.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Grounds Service. 
Respondents to the 25/26 budget conversation survey rated grounds maintenance 3rd of the 5
priorities under 'environment'. Common comments are concerns about appearance of the area,
access to areas especially for play for children, and to a lesser extent safety.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Families with younger
children. 
Families with younger
children tend to use parks
to a greater extent that
others due to presence of
play equipment.
Play equipment will be
accessible and maintained.
Older people are more likely
to have an impairment that
effects mobility.
This may have a
perceived negative
impact as a result in
reduced maintenance
however additional
bins will be provided
and the parks will
continue to be
maintained. 
Disability                    The Council had a duty to
make its services
accessible to disabled
people.
We must seek to mitigate
any negative impacts.
Areas with more accessible
green space are associated
with better mental and
physical health.
It is important that shared
areas are accessible to all.
A reduction in grass
cutting/maintenance
may have a negative
impact on accessibility
for people with
disabilities, on some
areas off of paths if
grass cutting is
reduced.
Gender Reassign              
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race

Page 207

Religion and
Belief          
Sex                           The Council needs to
consider impacts of staff
and service users.  The
workforce affected is
predominately male.
If numbers of seasonal
operatives and/or grounds
operatives reduced this
adversely affects
employment opportunities.
This may have a
negative impact if
reduction to
maintenance results in
reduction of
employees.
Sexual
Orientation           
Human Rights                  UNCRC in terms of
'provision' should be
considered.
Cross cuts with age/children
and young people.
Play equipment would
continue to be defect
repaired and kept safe.
Neutral
Health                        Health and Wellbeing is a
priority in the Strategic
Plan.
Physical environment can
influence physical and
mental health.
Available research does not
suggest that there is any
increase of risk from Ticks
between longer grass and
shorter grass, and that
longer grass may tend to
reduce the abundance of
some allergenic plants.
Mowing urban lawns less
intensely increases
biodiversity, saves money
and reduces pests - Source:
British Ecological Society.
Impact of mowing
frequency on arthropod
abundance and diversity in
urban habitats: A meta-
analysis - ScienceDirect
Lawn mowing frequency in
suburban areas has no
detectable effect on
Borrelia ( is a genus of
bacteria of the spirochete
phylum) some of which
cause Lyme's Disease
Source| PLOS ONE'
This may have a
perceived negative
impact as a result in
reduced maintenance
however additional
bins will be provided
and the parks will
continue to be
maintained.

Page 208

Social &
Economic
Impact     
The cleanliness and
maintenance of both
urban and rural areas
adversely impacts the
perception of an area.  A
higher percentage of
those residents on a
lower income may live in
properties with limited or
no access to a garden
area.
Areas with a lower level of
maintenance of grassed
areas align with areas of
higher deprivation and can
impact on investment
opportunities and local
pride.
This may have a
perceived negative
impact as a result in
reduced maintenance
however additional
bins will be provided
and the parks will
continue to be
maintained. 
Cross Cutting                 Need to assess cross
cutting elements. 
As level of reductions
increased, there would be
increased impact on the
traditional appearance of
parks.
Areas would have less
labour-intensive planting.
May be perceived
negatively in terms of
appearance.
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The council has a requirement to reach a balanced budget.
The provision fulfils the council's statutory obligations as there is no statutory requirement to
maintain grassed areas.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Yes, through performance indicators
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1193: These proposals seek to reduce costs. The likely impacts are potentially negative in
terms of off path access for older people and disabled people, women and children. This is
sometimes linked to concerns about safety. A range of published research does not indicate
increased risks from longer grass to human or animal health. Neutral impact in terms of access
to play equipment. 
Some residents have voiced concern in the past about increased littering of reduced grass
cutting areas; Council surveys have identified a desire for more public litter bins and these can
be provided. There may be concerns about the appearance of areas being less traditional in the
past. If previously traditional flowered areas are no longer plants and maintained in the way
they were alternative planting such as wildflowers will be put in place.

Page 209

Assessment No 1141 Owner Gail MacFarlane                                   
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and N
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Gail MacFarlane Chief Officer
Members Ricardo Rea, Greenspace Manager
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RN 28: Remove Open Space Maintenance on Non Council Land
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
Cessation of any grass cutting/grounds maintenance of open space not owned
by the Council.
The Grounds currently maintain areas of open space within residential areas
that are not owned by the council.  These are areas of open space where
historically there has been a level of maintenance undertaken however is the
responsibility of the homeowners or has never been transferred from the
Developer to the Council or had a factor appointed.  These arrangements may
have been in place for a number of years. The saving does not propose to
cease grass cutting within play parks or areas of high amenity.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Greenspace Service
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
Communities, residents and businesses

Page 210

Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Grounds Service
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Need to consider
common perceived
issues with less grass
cutting.
Older people are more likely
to have impairments than
younger people,
considerations crosscut
with disability.
There have been concerns
raised in the past about
access to less cut areas for
children to play.
Under clear if this is an
actual result and if areas
that would not be cut are
currently used for play.
A reduction in grass
cutting/maintenance
may have a negative
impact more on older
people.
Cross Cutting                 Any reduction in grass
cutting reduces resource
requirement
Need to consider
common perceived
issues with less grass
cutting.
If numbers of seasonal
operatives and/or grounds
operatives reduced this
adversely affects
employment opportunities.
Negative
Disability                    The Council had a duty to
make its services
accessible to disabled
people.
We must seek to mitigate
any negative impacts.
Areas with more accessible
green space are associated
with better mental and
physical health.
It is important that shared
areas are accessible to all.
A reduction in grass
cutting/maintenance
may have a negative
impact on accessibility
for people with
disabilities.

Page 211

Social &
Economic
Impact     
The maintenance of both
urban and rural areas
adversely impacts the
perception of an area.
Areas with a lower level of
maintenance of grassed
areas align with areas of
higher deprivation and can
impact on investment
opportunities and local
pride.
Negative
Sex                           The Council needs to
consider impacts of staff
and service users.
If numbers of seasonal
operatives and/or grounds
operatives reduced this
adversely affects
employment opportunities.
Negative 
Gender Reassign              
Health                        Health and Wellbeing is a
priority in the WDC 2022-
27 Strategic Plan 
Need to consider
common perceived
issues with less grass
cutting.
Physical environment can
influence physical and
mental health.
Available research does not
suggest that there is any
increase of risk from Ticks
between longer grass and
shorter grass, and that
longer grass may tend to
reduce the abundance of
some allergenic plants.
Mowing urban lawns less
intensely increases
biodiversity, saves money
and reduces pests - Source:
British Ecological Society
Impact of mowing
frequency on arthropod
abundance and diversity in
urban habitats: A meta-
analysis - ScienceDirect
Lawn mowing frequency in
suburban areas has no
detectable effect on
Borrelia ( is a genus of
bacteria of the spirochete
phylum) some of which
cause Lyme's Disease
Source| PLOS ONE.
This may have a
potential negative
impact as a result in a
reduction to use open
as a result of reduced
maintenance. 
Human Rights                  United nations Rights of
the Child considerations.
Cross cuts with 'age' for
children.
The saving does not
propose to cease grass

Page 212

cutting within play
parks or areas of high
amenity.  It is unlikely
there would be any
significant impact.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and
Belief          
Sexual
Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The council has a requirement to reach a balanced budget.
The provision fulfils the council's statutory obligations in relation to street cleaning and
additional bins will be installed at key locations.
There is no statutory requirement to maintain grassed areas.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Yes, through performance indicators
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1141: It is unlikely that there would be any significant negative impact for any protected
group.  Where an area that is not Council owned is causing a significant obstruction for access,
then the Council will address these on an individual basis. Given past and ongoing interest in
grass cutting, there may be an increase in concern and negative feedback about the appearance
of areas. Concerns have also be raised in the past about potential health implications of longer
versus shorter grass but available research does not indicate negative impacts.
In terms of staffing reduction, given the demographic of operatives this is more likely to affect a
male rather than female person.

Page 213

Assessment No 1211 Owner Gail Macfarlane                           
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and N
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer - Roads &
Neighbourhood
Members Grounds Manager
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RN29 Remove Event Support by Grounds Service 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
In line with the Councils policy on reducing overtime costs, to cease grounds
support for events if external partners or common good fund are unable to
fund.
We support the pipe band championships and fireworks event and do set up,
clear up, litter collection etc.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Grounds Manager
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Those that hold events 
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?

Page 214

Event Organisers
Grounds Service
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                          
Disability                   
Gender Reassign              
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and
Belief          
Sex                          
Sexual
Orientation           
Human Rights                 
Health                       
Social &
Economic
Impact     
Need to consider the
Fairer Scotland Duty.
Need to consider the
Scottish Consumer Duty,
that is is there any harm
to individuals and/or
small business from
removing the service.
These considerations
cross cut.
Measures undertaken to
review benefit of events to
area, attendee numbers,
feedback from visitors and
organisers.
Events held within the local
authority are well attended. 
They provide economic
benefit with increased
footfall.
Event may not be
financially sustainable
should the costs be
incurred by external
partners and
unavailable from the
common good fund.
Cross Cutting

Page 215

Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The grounds support is provided through unfunded overtime which is a burden for the service.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Yes, feedback from event organisers will continue to be monitored.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1211: There may be negative impacts on businesses; event may not be financially
sustainable should the costs be incurred by external partners and are unavailable from the
common good fund. The service will no longer be provided the overtime resource without
funding being available.

Page 216

Assessment No 1208 Owner Gail Macfarlane                           
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and N
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer - Roads &
Neighbourhood
Members Roads Manager
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RN30  Reduce Road Network and Capital Management
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
To review and implement a new charging scheme for road construction
consents which includes all applicants both internal and external, to better
reflect the true cost of providing the service.
In addition option 2 includes the reduction of 1FTE which will impact on the
service's ability to monitor capital projects, delivery of traffic projects, review
of transport assessments and responding to queries from members of the
public.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Roads Manager
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
External and Internal applicants requiring a roads construction consent as part of a development
application.

Page 217

Reduction of resource capacity to support financial monitoring of capital projects, technical
support for responses to traffic signals, traffic management and processing of planning
application responses.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Roads Service
Housing Service
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                          
Disability                   
Gender Reassign              
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and
Belief          
Sex                           Need to assess any
differential impact
There will be an FTE
reduction. However, due to
the way work is distributed
it is unclear which particular
employee would be
affected.
Impossible to
determine at the
moment.
Sexual
Orientation           
Human Rights                 
Health                       
Social &
Economic
Impact     
Fairer Scotland Duty
Scottish Consumer Duty
These considerations
overlap in this case.
There will be an
additional cost for
The cost to deliver a project
is significant and the Roads
Construction Consent cost
increase is small compared
to the total cost of a
project.
Unlikely to have a
significant impact on
housing developers or
businesses and being
a small part of their
overall costs.  It would

Page 218

internal and external for
a roads construction
consent but unlikely to
impact on economic
investment as small in
comparison to a
development cost.
however be significant
for the Council.
Cross Cutting                
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The impact in charge for roads construction consent is anticipated to be small in relation to
financial impact on a project and therefore not materially impact on economic growth or
delivery of housing projects.  
The reduction in capital monitoring, 
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Income received, time taken to address traffic signal defects and planning application response
times are all monitored.  
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1208: Introducing a new charging scheme for road construction consents which includes all
applicants both internal and external, better reflects true cost of providing the service. This is
unlikely to have a significant impact on housing developers or businesses, being a small part of
their overall costs.  It would however be significant for the Council. There would be a reduction
of FTE which could fall on an employee if the occupier of a post was displaced.

Page 219

Assessment No 1209 Owner Gail Macfarlane                           
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and N
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer - Roads &
Neighbourhood
Members Roads Manager
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RN31 Reduce Winter Plan
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
The proposal reduces the number of carriageways gritting routes from 6 to 5. 
This will reduce the coverage of roads that are treated as a primary route by
30%, the removed roads will be residential and be included in the secondary
routes.  These are treated when primary routes are complete, and resources
allow.
There will be a reduction in workforce reducing capacity to undertake
carriageway resurfacing projects inhouse therefore a reprogramming will be
required to move to projects that are able to be undertaken by the inhouse
team.  
There will also be a reduction in resilience.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Roads Manager
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes

Page 220

Who will be affected by this policy?
Residents, visitors and all other users of the road network.  
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Roads Manager
Grounds Manager

Page 221

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Considerations about
crossing carriageways
and using vehicles on
carriageways.
Older residents may be
more vulnerable to slips,
trips and falls and may be
more reliant on being able
to walk to shops etc. 
School age children will use
public footways to access
school.
Potentially negative
for older and younger
groups.
Negative in terms of
some carriageways in
winter being more
difficult to cross.
Neutral in terms of
access to public
transport.
Disability                    Considerations about
crossing carriageways
and using vehicles on
carriageways.
Need to consider
accessibility.
Disabled people are more
reliant on public transport.
Some disabled will be more
prone to falls and injury if
they do so.
Negative in terms of
some carriageways in
winter being more
difficult to cross.
Neutral in terms of
access to public
transport.
Gender Reassign              
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Need to take into
account safety concerns
in terms of crossing
carriageways.
Pregnant women are more
vulnerable to injury if they
fall on ice. They may
become fearful of leaving
their homes if footways are
icy and untreated.  
Negative in terms of
some carriageways in
winter being more
difficult to cross.
Neutral in terms of
access to public
transport.
Race                          Need to consider
accessibility.
Need to take into
account access to public
transport e.g. bus stops.
Some BME groups are more
reliant on public transport.
Most BME groups have less
access to cars than most
white ethnic groups and are
Negative in terms of
some carriageways in
winter being more
difficult to cross.
Neutral in terms of

Page 222

more reliant on public
transport.
access to public
transport.
Religion and
Belief          
Sex                           Need to consider gender
balance of affected
workforce.
Need to take into
account access to public
transport e.g. bus stops.
The workforce is
predominately male so
would impact on
employment more heavily
on men.
Women are more reliant on
public transport, and more
likely to be care givers.
More negative for
males in terms of
employment.
Negative in terms of
some carriageways in
winter being more
difficult to cross.
Neutral in terms of
access to public
transport.
Sexual
Orientation           
Human Rights                 
Health                        May be risk of incidents
both for road users and
pedestrians that use
treated carriageway. 
Slips, trips and falls are a
risk in icy conditions. 
Vehicle incidents can impact
on health on carriageways.
Negative in terms of
some carriageways at
in winter being more
difficult to cross.
Neutral in terms of
access to public
transport.
Social &
Economic
Impact     
May impact on access to
main road network if
residential roads not
gritted therefore could
reduce access to work,
school etc on icy days.
Feedback from residents
complaints shows people
feel uncomfortable driving
on untreated residential
roads when icy, noted that
a number of these journeys
are morning commute
when the temperature will
not have risen or the
secondary routes
commenced.
More deprived groups
may be more affected.
Cross Cutting                 Important to consider
how issues might
crosscut in terms of
accessibility.
No evidence that public
transport routes would be
negatively affect.
Negative in terms of
some carriageways in
winter being more
difficult to cross.
Neutral in terms of

Page 223

access to public
transport.
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The council is required to reach a balanced budget and as the workforce size is determined by
winter gritting requirements this proposal reduces number of operatives required by 3 FTE and
delivers a saving.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Council will require to approve winter plan setting out the proposed treatment changes and this
will be reviewed annually
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1209: This is a cost saving proposal. No evidence that access to public transport routes
would be negatively affected. Some potential negative affect at some times, especially for
women, some BME groups disabled people and younger and older people in terms of cross
carriageways. These considerations crosscut with socio-economic ones, as more deprived
groups may be more affected, because of modes of transport, for example less access to cars.
Given that the vast majority of operatives are male, there would be an impact on men of
reducing staffing rather than women.

Page 224

Assessment No 1192 Owner Gail Macfarlane                           
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and N
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Gail MacFarlane Chief Officer - Roads &
Neighbourhood
Members Grounds and Waste Manager
Roads Manager
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RN32 Reduce Weed Killing
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
Ceasing carrying out weed killing.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Grounds Service
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
Residents, Visitors and Businesses within West Dunbartonshire.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Grounds and Roads Services.
Negative feedback from residents, visitors and business from reduction in weed killing in24/25.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact

Page 225

Age                           Need to consider how age
cross cuts
Older people are more likely to
have ambulatory impairments
and visual impairments.
Negative
Disability                    It is important that
accessibility is maintained.
Officers’ assessment is that a
reduction may hinder
accessibility. Should weed
growth damage footways,
block gullies causing flooding
and collect detritus.
Negative for some
disabled people
Gender Reassign              
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and Belief          
Sex                           Important to consider how
gendered roles may
interact.
Women are more likely to be
care givers and more likely to
use prams, etc.
Potentially more
negative for women in
terms of accessibility
Sexual Orientation           
Human Rights                 
Health                       
Social & Economic
Impact     
The cleanliness of a place
is viewed as important for
visitors and businesses.
Cross cuts with
consideration of the
Scottish Consumer Duty.
The area will appear less
cared for and maintained.  This
could impact on investment
opportunities.
Negative
Cross Cutting                 An opportunity to assess
how element may interact.
Need to ensure that
footways are safe and
accessible.
The reduction in use of
pesticide is of benefit to
biodiversity. 
There could be some
increased risk of localized
flooding if gullies are blocked
by weeds.
The area will appear less well
cared for.
There would be no weed killing
in public realm areas such as
Clydebank Town Hall.
Potential negative
impact on appearance.
Positive impact in terms
of biodiversity.
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The council is required to reach a balanced budget. 
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
The street cleanliness is monitored and reported.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce

Page 226

Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1192: There may be an impact on accessibility with damage to footways through weed
growth, potential flooding and detritus, this may be more marked for disabled people and women.
There will be no weed killing of public realm areas. There will be a negative impact in terms of
the appearance to residents and visitors.

Page 227

Assessment No 1191 Owner Gail Macfarlane                           
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and N
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer - Roads &
Neighbourhood
Members Waste and Grounds Manager
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RN33 Reduce Waste Services 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
The Council operates two civic amenity sites at Dalmoak, Renton and Ferry
Road, Old Kilpatrick.
The saving option proposes to reduce the number of civic waste amenity sites
from two to one.  This will reduce the workforce required to operate the two
sites.
There are currently two civic waste sites that operate 7 days a week.  There
are peak periods when the sites operate over capacity requiring short periods
of closure to allow skips to be emptied, at other times the sites operate within
capacity and the operatives plan the emptying of skips when possible, for
these periods.  The proposal to move to one site will increase usage and
therefore as mitigation the service plan to increase size of site with additional
skips where possible.  Operationally a booking system will be implemented to
manage the number of vehicles attending and traffic management.  It will also
allow skip emptying to built in to days activity which will reduce frustration of
users at the site.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Waste Service
Internal Service Users
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas

Page 228

Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Users of the civic waste amenity site, both internal and external, and communities/stakeholders
affected by any increase in fly tipping
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Waste Services and stakeholders
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Need to consider impacts
across age groups.
Older people are more likely
to have impairments,
crosscuts with disability.
Emerging national and
international evidence
suggests that people over
55 recycle more than young
adults. A recycling survey
carried out in West
Dunbartonshire in 2022
provided similar results. 
It may be the case
that older people,
because of recycling
more, will encounter
this change more than
younger people.
It may also be the
case that the change
may create a
disincentive for young
people especially to
recycle.
Disability                    We need to ensure that
services are accessible to
disable people.
Physical accessibility sites
will not be impacted.
An online booking system
will be implemented, but
bookings via phone will
possible if needed.
Accessible information will
be provided.
Neutral in terms of
disability.
Gender Reassign

Page 229

Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and
Belief          
Sex                           The operational
workforce is
predominately male.
5 FTE reduction. All of
current staff compliment is
male.
Negative impact
would fall on males
due gender balance of
workforce.
Sexual
Orientation           
Human Rights                 
Health                       
Social &
Economic
Impact     
Use of site to dispose of
waste, both residual and
recycling.
Risk of increased fly tipping,
both resource implications
to clear.
Negative
Cross Cutting                 Reduction in number of
operating sites will result
in a reduction of required
workforce.
Council services need to
be accessible.
The workforce are
potentially local residents,
and this impacts
employment opportunities.
Some residents may require
to travel further to a site
depending on the location
of their home – this may
adversely them affect them
because of cost of fuel and
time.
Negative
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The Council is required to reach a balanced budget.
The reduction in number of sites will be shared through a communications strategy to ensure
users are aware.  There will also be the implementation of a booking system to manage
congestion and traffic issues. Waste disposal information will be communicated to discourage
fly tipping.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Use of site will be monitored
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce

Page 230

Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1191: This proposal is designed to increase efficiency and reduce cost. 
Some residents may require to travel further to a site depending on the location of their home –
this may adversely them affect them because of cost of fuel and time, and may  affect more
deprived groups more, for example women, some BME groups and disabled people.
An online booking system would be put in place, with an option to book via the call centre if a
resident could not use the online system.
Potential impacts are risk of increased fly tipping, and the resource implications to clear.
Considerate waste disposal will be communicated to discourage fly tipping. The reduction in
number of sites will be shared through a communications strategy to ensure users are aware
and a booking system will be implemented.  
Due to gender balance of the relevant workforce men would be displaced from posts rather
than women.

Page 231

Assessment No 1196 Owner Gail MacFarlane                           
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and N
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Gail MacFarlane Chief Officer - Roads &
Neighbourhood
Members Grounds Service
Housing Service
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title R&N35 Reduce Grass Cutting
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
The proposal is the reduction in grass cutting of open spaces by 50% and
reduce grass cutting in cemeteries by 20%
The proposal considered is as follows 
Reduce grass cutting of open space, but with prioritising of areas of high
amenity such as parks, football pitches etc.  
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Grounds Service
Housing Service
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Communities, residents and businesses

Page 232

Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Respondents to the 25/26 budget conversation survey rated grounds maintenance 3rd of the 5
priorities under 'environment'. Common comments are concerns about appearance of the area,
access to areas especially for play for children, and to a lesser extent safety.
Grounds Service
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Need to consider
common perceived
issues with less grass
cutting.
Older people are more likely
to have impairments than
younger people,
considerations crosscut
with disability
A reduction in grass
cutting/maintenance
may have a negative
impact more on older
people if access is
affected.
The saving does not
propose to cease grass
cutting within play
parks or areas of high
amenity. It is unlikely
there would be any
significant impact.  
Disability                    The Council had a duty to
make its services
accessible to disabled
people.
We must seek to mitigate
any negative impacts.
Areas with more accessible
green space are associated
with better mental and
physical health.
It is important that shared
areas are accessible to all.
A reduction in grass
cutting/maintenance
may have a negative
impact on accessibility
for people with
disabilities.
Gender Reassign              
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and
Belief

Page 233

Sex                           The Council needs to
consider impacts of staff
and service users.
If numbers of seasonal
operatives and/or grounds
operatives reduced this
adversely affects
employment opportunities.
Negative 
Sexual
Orientation           
Human Rights                 
Health                        Health and Wellbeing is a
priority in the WDC 2022-
27 Strategic Plan.
Need to consider
common raised concerns
with less grass cutting.
Physical environment can
influence physical and
mental health.
The range of available
research does not suggest
that there is any increase of
risk from Ticks between
longer grass and shorter
grass, and that longer grass
may tend to reduce the
abundance of some
allergenic plants.
Mowing urban lawns less
intensely increases
biodiversity, saves money
and reduces pests - British
Ecological Society
Impact of mowing
frequency on arthropod
abundance and diversity in
urban habitats: A meta-
analysis - ScienceDirect
Lawn mowing frequency in
suburban areas has no
detectable effect on
Borrelia spp. vector Ixodes
scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) |
PLOS ONE
This may have a
potential negative
impact as a result in a
reduction to use open
as a result of reduced
maintenance. 
Social &
Economic
Impact     
The maintenance of both
urban and rural areas
adversely impacts the
perception of an area.
Areas with a lower level of
maintenance of grassed
areas align with areas of
higher deprivation and can
impact on investment
opportunities and local
pride.
Potentially negative in
terms of perception of
the area.

Page 234

Cross Cutting                 Any reduction in grass
cutting reduces resource
requirement.
If numbers of seasonal
operatives and/or grounds
operatives reduced this
adversely affects
employment opportunities.
Negative
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The council has a requirement to reach a balanced budget.
The provision fulfils the council's statutory obligations in relation to street cleaning and
additional bins will be installed at key locations.
There is no statutory requirement to maintain grassed areas.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Yes, through performance indicators
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1196:  Areas with grassed areas not maintained or a lower level of street cleanliness align
with areas of higher deprivation and can impact on investment opportunities however where
appropriate areas of biodiversity will be introduced which supports the council's transition to
net zero.  
In addition, additional litter bins will be installed if identified as required.
Given past and ongoing interest in grass cutting, there may be an increase in concern and
negative feedback about the appearance of areas. Concerns have also be raised in the past
about potential health implications of longer versus shorter grass but available research does
not indicate negative impacts.
If grounds and/or seasonal operatives are reduced this adversely affects employment
opportunities

Page 235

Assessment No 1102 Owner George Hawthorn                             
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget Regen’
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer George Hawthorn Manager of Democratic and
Registration Services
Members Alan Douglas, Chief Officer - Regulatory and Regeneration
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RR 04  Remove Members’ Secretary 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
To achieve a saving by not filling a vacant post within the Members' Services
team.  
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
None
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
Elected members serving in West Dunbartonshire and in particular those with disabilities.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Members will be consulted on all savings options prior to this decision being taken.

Page 236

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                          
Cross Cutting                
Disability                    Reasonable adjustments
and anticipatory duties:
The law states that
associations (which
includes political parties)
and local councils are
required to make
‘reasonable adjustments’
to ensure that disabled
people are not treated
unfairly as a result of
their disability and can
“access existing rights,
benefits, facilities or
services in the same way
as everyone else”. These
reasonable adjustments
cover policies and
practices, premises and
venues as well as
additional aids (e.g.
assistance animals) and
services. This includes,
for example, investing in
portable audio induction
loops for those with
hearing impairments or
allocating extra speaking
time to people with
speech impairments.
Furthermore, councils
and associations are
required to anticipate the
needs of disabled people
and to make reasonable
Some elected members
have asked for additional
support because of
impairments they have.
Negative.  A reduced
number of staff may
make it more difficult
to provide the
additional support
needed to those
members with
disabilities.  This will
need to be monitored
but the team has
managed to cope in
recent months
without a full
establishment due to
turnover.
If support cannot be
provided by the team
it must be provided by
someone else from
the Council or on
behalf on the Council.

Page 237

adjustments without
disabled people having to
request those changes be
made.
Social &
Economic
Impact     
Sex                          
Gender Reassign              
Health                       
Human Rights                 
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and
Belief          
Sexual
Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
It is possible that the reduction in number of staff will affect the team's ability to provide
additional support to those elected members with disabilities.  However, the team has managed
to cope with a reduction in numbers due to turnover in recent months which suggests that the
impact may be minimal.
If support cannot be provided by the team at any point it must be provided by someone else
from the Council or on behalf on the Council.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
The team will monitor the impact of the reduction in consultation with elected members,
especially those with disabilities who require additional support.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1102: It is possible that the reduction in number of staff will affect the team's ability to
provide additional support to those elected members with disabilities.  If support cannot be
provided by the team at any it must be provided by someone else from the Council or on behalf
of the Council, and in reasonable time.

Page 238

However, the team has managed to cope with a reduction in numbers due to turnover in recent
months which suggests that the impact may be minimal.  This will be monitored closely once
implemented.

Page 239

Assessment No 1121 Owner Michael McDougall                      
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and R
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Michael McDougall Manager of Legal Services
Members Annemarie Clelland, Service Coordinator
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RR 17 Reduce Trading Standards 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
It is proposed that one full time equivalent post will be removed from the
Trading Standards service. 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Legal Services
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
The Trading Standards service work to promote a fair marketplace and protect public safety. A
reduction in the Service will impact on consumers and businesses within West Dunbartonshire. 
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
The Chief Officer of Regulatory and Regeneration, the Manager of Legal Services, and the
Service Coordinator have been involved in this process.

Page 240

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Trading Standards' work
includes investigating
scams. The elderly are
particularly vulnerable to
scams. This particularly
relevant as 8.2% of West
Dunbartonshire's
population is 75 years
and above. The use of
call blockers and no cold
caller zones can help
reduce the risk of the
elderly being scammed.
Further, the use of call
blockers and no cold
caller zones can help
older people to live
independently.
Trading Standard's work
also involves tobacco and
vaping enforcement.
Smoking and vaping are
detrimental to the health
of the population and
especially younger
people.  Enforcement of
the age restrictions for
the sale of tobacco and
vaping products plays a
key role in making sure
that tobacco and vaping
products are not
available to young
people. 
17.4% of West
Dunbartonshire's
residents are aged 0 to
15 years old. Product
Scams - Analysis of data
from Action Fraud shows
that fraud is increasing with
recorded cases increasing
from 36,105 in 2019 to
57,430 in 2022. Further
analysis of those cases
indicates that there are 157
elderly fraud victims a day.
Further data reveals that
pensioners lost £460 million
in 2022 (this is up 10% from
£417 million in 2021). 
Elderly victims are 2.4 times
more likely to die or go into
a care home than those
who are not scammed.
Tobacco/vaping - The
Scottish Government's
Tobacco and Vaping
Framework identifies the
following relevant evidence:
The recent Health
Behaviour in School-Aged
Children 2022 (Scotland)
reports that 3% of 11-year-
olds, 10% of 13-year-olds
and 25% of 15-year-olds
said they had used an e-
cigarette in the past 30
days. The report also found
that there have been
increases in current e-
cigarette use since 2018 for
13-year-old girls (2% to
13%) and larger increases
for 15-year-olds (girls 6% to
30% and boys 8% to 20%). 
Negative. A reduction
in the Trading
Standards service may
have a negative
impact on the
Service's ability to
investigate scams,
product safety issues
and to carry out
enforcement work in
relation to premises
selling tobacco and
vaping products. A
reduction in this work
will have a particular
impact on the young
and elderly given that
they are at particular
risk of harm due to
their potential
vulnerability.

Page 241

safety is particularly
relevant to this age group
given the risk relating to
toys and feeding
implements that do not
conform to recognised
safety standards. Trading
Standards enforce these
standards proactively
and reactively. 
The World Health
Organization (WHO) states
that even though many of
the long-term health effects
of vapes use are still
unknown, there is growing
evidence to demonstrate
that these products are not
harmless to health and
should be "strictly
regulated."
On a local level, the Trading
Standards service is in
possession of intelligence
that local shops are selling
vapes to young people. 
Product safety - Trading
Standards are aware of
issues relating to product
safety where phthalates
(cancer causing chemicals)
are found in babies
dummies and bottle tops,
choking hazard from small
‘cottage’ style businesses
modifying and making
clothing and baby
accessories but not
submitting these products
for appropriate testing.
Cross Cutting                 Businesses or persons
who are engaged in the
supply and sale of
counterfeit goods, illicit
tobacco, or unsafe
products and so on are
recognised to often be
engaged in are often
engaged in practices such
as modern slavery and
human trafficking. These
practices cause
considerable harm to
society and the
individuals being
exploited. 
Modern slavery and human
trafficking - the link
between these activities
and activities relating to
Trading Standards is
recognised by Interpol and
has been reported in the
media. 
Negative - A reduction
in the Trading
Standards service may
have a negative
impact on the
Service's ability to
investigate complaints
relating to illegal
activity.

Page 242

Disability                    Persons with disability
are at a higher risk of
being victims of scams.
For example, call
blockers may assist in
lowering their chances of
being a victim of a scam.
Action Fraud and the
National Fraud Intelligence
Bureau recognises that
disabled persons are more
susceptible to certain fraud
types. 
Negative. A reduction
in the Trading
Standards service may
have a negative
impact on the
Service's ability to
investigate scams
which may increase
their activity in the
area. Persons with
disabilities may be
disproportionately
affected due to their
increased risk of being
taken in by a scam. 
Social &
Economic
Impact     
Trading Standards have
responsibility for
enforcing weights and
measures legislation.
Persons on low income
who often shop in
independent
convenience stores are
adversely impacted by
retailers who sell short
weight items or short
measures, i.e. they are
being "short changed".
Trading Standards'
inspections help address
these issues. 
A key function of Trading
Standards is to ensure
that there is a fair
marketplace. This means
that regulations are
applied to all businesses
to make sure that all
businesses are on an
equal footing. The
absence of regulations
being enforced may
embolden rogue traders.
This may have a
determinant impact on
legitimate businesses.  
Weights and measures -
Trading Standards work has
identified businesses that
are engaged in selling short
weight items. Further a
recent inspection program
of licensed premises
identified an 88% failure
rate. 
Fair marketplace - by way of
example Trading Standards
routinely receive complaints
from businesses of other
businesses selling illicit
tobacco.  This selling of
illicit tobacco harms the
legitimate businesses. 
Negative - A reduction
in the Trading
Standards service may
have a negative
impact on the
Service's ability to
proactively inspect
businesses and in
responding to
complaints. Further, it
may facilitate the
growth of rogue
businesses if it is felt
that Trading
Standards' presence is
diminished.

Page 243

Sex                           Need to consider
differential impacts in
terms of sex on staffing
Unclear whether reduction
in post would be more likely
to affect male or female
Unclear in terms of
differential impact
Gender Reassign              
Health                        Trading Standards have
responsibility for
enforcing product safety.
Unsafe products are
often sub-standard,
causing health problems
and injuries, even
proving fatal. 
Products sold must conform
with the relevant
regulations.  This is to
protect the consumer and
public from harm. Unsafe
goods can be harmful in
many different ways, from
being choking hazards to a
fire risk. 
The National Audit Office
reported in 2021 that 3,000
house fires were caused by
faulty appliances each year
in the UK. 
The Trading Standards
service can report locally of
examples where unsafe
goods have been sold that
are choking risks or are
contaminated by cancer
causing chemicals. 
Negative - A reduction
in the Trading
Standards service may
have a negative
impact on the
Service's ability to
proactively address
product safety issues.
Human Rights                 
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and
Belief          
Sexual
Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Need to balance budgets requires all areas to be examined.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?

Page 244

The Trading Standards service has various performance indicators that it has to complete for
certain tasks, for example, tobacco and vaping products. These metrics will be measured moving
forward. It is an area that is under public scrutiny and feedback from press, and Scottish
Government on high profile issues such vaping. 
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Pilot
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA1121; The Trading Standards service engages in a wide range of activities. Many of these
activities involve work that will protecting people from harm.
A reduction in the Service's staffing will mean that proactive work will by and large cease with
officers’ time being consumed dealing with reactive work relating to matters that are statutory
requirements.  
Older people and younger people and disabled people may be disproportionately affected by
this change. This requires to be balanced with the wider needs of the Council. If the reduction in
staffing is made, then the Service will have to consider how best to meet the needs of those
groups moving forward.

Page 245

Assessment No 1200 Owner Alan Douglas                               
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and R
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Alan Douglas Chief Officer: Regulatory and
Regeneration
Members Chief Officer: Regulatory and Regeneration
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RR18 – Reduce Records Management
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
To relocate Records Management to the Citizen and Regulatory Team of Legal
Services with the removal of the Records Manager post.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
None - internal.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
N/A
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
RR management team
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
N/A
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
No
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation

Page 246

Screening 1200: The proposal has been screened. An Equality impact Assessment is not needed
as the proposal is not relevant to any of the areas we assess: No employee will be displaced and
there will be no effect on staff or services users.

Page 247

Assessment No 1098 Owner George Hawthorn                              
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and R
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer George Hawthorn Manager of Democratic and
Registration Services
Members Alan Douglas, Chief officer - Regulatory and Regeneration
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RR19 Close of Clydebank Registration Office
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
To reduce the deficit in 2025/26 budget by closing Clydebank Registration
Office to achieve a reduction of a 0.5 FTE registration post. 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
The Senior Registrar has been consulted on this proposal.
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
People living in the Clydebank area. Low-income families in the Clydebank area.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
The senior registrar has been consulted on the proposal.
The Clydebank Registration Office was closed during the whole of the COVID pandemic period
and during that time the registration service did not receive any complaints about the service
being provided centrally from Dumbarton.

Page 248

The recent Budget consultation asked respondents to rank the priority they gave to various
things.  Under the category of 'Our Council' and how it provides services sections the two
highest priority scores were:
'Maintain the number and location of public buildings including offices, depots, libraries and
community facilities'
and 
'Maintaining current opening hours and service provision for services and buildings'
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Elderly persons may need
to register the death of
their spouse or partners. 
Young couples may have
to register the birth of
their newborn child.
Birth and death registration
can now be registered
remotely by telephone, 
therefore there is no
requirement for anyone
with access to a telephone
to travel to a registration
office.
During the period 20 July to
29 October 2024 only 9
persons attended the
Clydebank registration with
a birth or death registration
enquiry.
Both Scotland data through
the SHS and Local Data
through the Councils
telephone survey would
suggest lower internet use
by older people.
Older people are more likely
to have impairments, one of
the most common being
some degree of hearing
loss.
There would be very
little impact on this
equality group as
most persons will
have access to a
telephone and do not
need to travel to
register a birth or
death or even request
a certificate in person.
Cross Cutting                 Need to consider how
changes may impact on
people who share more
Consideration of the
evidence included shows
how factors may interact for
Potential cumulative
negative impacts for
some.

Page 249

than one affected
protected characteristic.
Services need to be
accessible to BSL users.
some people e.g. sex,
ethnicity, age and disability. Mitigation can be
maximised to make
services as accessible
as possible.
Disability                    The Council has a legal
duty to ensure that its
services are accessible to
disabled people.
Disabled person wishing
to register a birth or
death in Clydebank.
Birth and death registration
can now be registered
remotely by telephone,
therefore there is no
requirement for anyone
with access to a telephone
to travel to a registration
office.
During the period 20 July to
29 October 2024 only 9
persons attended the
Clydebank registration with
a birth or death registration
enquiry.  There is no
statistics held on file to
confirm what percentage of
persons registering birth or
death have a disability but
given the reduced number
of people attending the
Clydebank office it is likely
that the numbers are
extremely low.
Both Scotland data through
the SHS and Local Data
through the Councils
telephone survey would
suggest lower internet use
by disabled people.
There would be very
little impact as
disabled persons are
no longer required to
travel to any
registration office to
register births or
deaths providing they
have access to a
telephone.
Social &
Economic
Impact     
Persons on low income
may have to travel out
with Clydebank to
register birth and deaths.
No statistics are held on the
percentage of persons
registering births or deaths
who have low incomes.  
During the period 20 July to
29 October 2024 only 9
persons attended the
Clydebank registration with
a birth or death registration
enquiry therefore it is likely
that the numbers on
Negative - persons on
low incomes without
access to a telephone
may need to travel to
Dumbarton or their
nearest registration
office to register a
birth or death which
could mean incurring
some additional travel
costs.

Page 250

persons with low incomes
would be very low.
Sex                           Need to consider
differential factors
around sex, in terms of
finances, transport and
caring responsibilities.
Women are more likely to
be in relative poverty than
men, have more caring
responsibilities and are
more reliant on public
transport.
Potentially more
negative for women
than men noting the
factors under
'evidence' e.g.
transport.
Gender Reassign              
Health                       
Human Rights                 
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Cross cuts with sex Cross cuts with sex Cross cuts with sex
Race                          Persons whose first
language is not English
may have difficulty trying
to register a birth or
death over the
telephone, but they may
also experience similar
difficulties while trying to
register in person.
The registration service has
access to language line and
translation services to assist
persons of different
race/nationality who have
difficulty speaking and
understanding English.
There is also the option of
using MS Teams with the
family and the interpreter
and also language line.
There would be no
additional impacts as
remote registration
and the language line
service are available
and in use.
Religion and
Belief          
Sexual
Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
While it is clear that will be some negative impacts on some equality groups, there are many
mitigations in place to reduce the impact:  remote registration, language line, translation service
and the online certificate service.  It should also be noted that on average a person will only
require to register a life event on three or four occasions throughout their whole lifetime.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
The registration service will monitor feedback via a customer survey and review on an annual
basis.
The survey will include diversity monitoring.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?

Page 251

Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1098: This is a cost saving proposal.  All services with the expectation of Marriages and Civil
partnerships can be carried out remotely. There would likely be some potential negative impacts
on some equality groups, that is women, disabled people, some BME groups if they had to travel
to the remaining office if a could not register online for any reason. Whilst the the average
person will need to register a life event on three or four occasions throughout their lifetime, we
recognize that these are significant and can be stressful. 
There are a number of mitigations in place to reduce the impact, to ensure that services are
accessible as possible by other means.  Dumbarton Registry Office would remain open. 
The Clydebank Registration Office was closed during the whole of the COVID pandemic period
and during that time the registration service did not receive any complaints about the service
being provided centrally from Dumbarton.

Page 252

Assessment No 1106 Owner Sharon Jump                                  
Resource Transformation Service Budget CCF
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Sharon Jump Facilities Manager
Members Sharon Jump – Facilities Manager
Margaret Lamont – Facilities Officer
Jennifer McAdam – Facilities Officer
Michelle McCorrisken – Facilities Officer
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title CCF04 – Review Facilities Management Operating Model  
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
The FM Service Redesign will respond to evolving service needs, feedback
received including as part of staff survey responses and Scottish Government
policy changes.  The revised model will provide additional support for
frontline employees, introduce development and progression opportunities
and ultimately deliver a more resilient, efficient and sustainable service. 
The changes deliver:
• introduce first tier Cluster Manager role (Cleaning & Janitorial) provision to
deliver SOM compliance and enhance frontline support 
• revised cluster model based on geographical areas across the authority
• opportunity to implement new processes via technology supported via
Digital Champions
• opportunity to review ways of working, roles and service delivery to provide
more resilient, effective and efficient service
In summary, the process will incorporate:
• review of current operating model and effectiveness
• review of all frontline role profiles
• creation of new Cluster Manager role (Cleaning & Janitorial, grade to be
determined)
• review of catering management (Cooks and Catering Managers)
• consideration  given to creating a Senior Facilities Operative roles (grade to
be determined)
• creation of Universal Facilities Operative role to allow for contingency across
the service
This would facilitate consistency of approach across the whole service in
terms of management supports.
The structure will:

Page 253

• increase support and supervisory presence with the number of cluster
managers across the service
• enable team leaders to line manage cluster managers and be Standard
Operating Model (SOM) compliant. 
• increase capacity ensuring service standards are maintained and processes
followed
• increase resilience and capacity to respond to the increased face to face
contact time required to support employee wellbeing, mental health, and Be
the Best conversations
• enable the team to better work in line with the Scottish Government Fair
Work framework in terms of improving engagement with employees to
ensure the ‘employee voice’ is heard.
• provide for better employee engagement which is linked to lower rates of
turnover, improved sickness absence levels and increased morale and job
satisfaction.  
• create a more robust team which will be able to provide cover throughout
the entire FM Service
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
FM Staff, HR, TUs, Education
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
Staff
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Staff, HR, TU

Page 254

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this
policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on
particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Given the composition of
the workforce, and that
the role of supervisors is
required to ensure the
smooth running of the
service we need to
ensure this will continue
but will be more efficient
and therefore effective. 
The Council needs to
consider requests for
flexible working.
The workforce is
predominantly
female, resident
in West
Dunbartonshire.
A significant
number of the
workforce are
aged 50 plus.
Older people are
more likely to
have impairment
than older
people thus
crosscuts with
disability
Service Users – no impact
• Service provided to schools and
children, particularly schools
meals and cleaning will not
change. 
Employees – potentially negative.
Staff may not be able or willing to
change if new work pattern is
required. Role specification may
change to reflect current need
and legislation, 
The structure redesign may
involve work pattern/ work
hours/ reduced hours or
increased hours, less travel time/
reduced travel expenses. This
may impact on income. It could
also result in the person being
worse off financially. 
Employees would be supported
through existing policies including
Switch and VS/ER may be an
option for FM staff 
• Those with caring
responsibilities / may not be able
to move if new work pattern
introduced.
Positive – employees
• There will be an increase in
contracted hours for employees,
this could benefit the workforce
as they have access to more
hours, than they did before this
re-design.
• Cross skilling and up skilling/
opportunities   
Less travel for some.
Positive- Service Users

Page 255

• Service will be more resilient
and effective ensuring provision
is maintained.
Cross Cutting                 Training needs analysis
has been carried out.
The Council needs to
consider requests for
flexible working.
Interacting factors need
to be taken into account.
The introduction
of new cluster
managers will
mean a change
in operational
supervision
Training and
supervision will
be required to
embed this. 
Positive;
 Knowledge transfer through
training.
 Service strengthened and
more resilient, staff team
better supported.
 Opportunities for progression.
Disability                    Ensure reasonable
adjustments are in place
for any staff who require
them.
The process of
restructuring itself needs
to accessible and make
adjustments if required.
Older people are
more likely to
have impairment
than older
people thus
cross cuts with
disability
There are more
disabled women
than men in the
UK, the only
exception is
among children
under the age of
15. (DWP data
for 20-23)
Households with
a disabled
member are
more likely to be
in relative
poverty than
those with no
disabled
members.
No anticipated Impact
Reasonable adjustments will
continue to be made as required.
Social &
Economic
Impact     
Sex                           We need to take into
account differential
impacts.
The Council needs to
Profile of
workforce. 
More woman
will be affected
than men. 
Potentially positive as
opportunities for progression.
Potentially Negative;
The workforce is predominantly

Page 256

consider requests for
flexible working.
Women are
more likely to be
in poverty than
men e.g. women
make up 90% of
single parents.
Woman are
more likely to be
care givers.
Women are
more reliant on
child care than
men in terms of
accessing
employment.
Failure to allow
flexibility for
someone to care
for a child, or
perhaps a
disabled relative
such as a parent,
can potentially
be indirect sex
discrimination
contrary to the
Equality Act, on
the basis that
lack of flexibility
tends to put
female workers
at a
disadvantage as
being more
usually primary
carers. A male
worker who is a
primary carer
may now also be
able to claim
under s.19A
(above “Same
disadvantage”
indirect
discrimination).
female. There could be an impact
if the worker cannot move to the
new work pattern/ role/
geographical area allocated.
There could be a reduced income
to the household.
Those with caring
responsibilities/may not be able
to move to the new work model.
However, support through
Council policies including
redeployment via Switch 
Gender Reassign               Assess for any
differential impact
No evidence that
proposals would
No anticipated impact

Page 257

have any affect
this group.
Health                        Employee Wellbeing is of
paramount concern and
WDC aim to ensure that
all relevant supports are
in place to help
employees and managers
who need
support and to help them
maintain good health.  
Staff - The
commitment to
supporting
employees
remains of
paramount
importance.  Any
employees and
managers
affected by the
changes
required will be
supported
through all
appropriate
channels
Implementation of this change
may be a time of anxiety for
those affected e.g. change of line
manager, new areas to supervise. 
Each individual will be supported
to make the transition to the new
structure as smooth and
comfortable as possible.
Employees will be reminded of
supports available as part of the
consultation process and
throughout 
Human Rights                  We need to ensure that
services are provided in a
way that is in line with
the Human Rights
Act/ECHR
The redesign
should support
staff children's
rights in terms of
provision. See
above under
disability.
Positive in terms of maintaining
and improving provision.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Assess for any
differential impact
No evidence that
proposals would
have any affect
this group
No anticipated impact
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Some staff of child-
bearing age working
within FM, who are likely
to experience pregnancy
and maternity.
WDC pregnancy
and maternity
Policy applies to
all staff.  
No anticipated Impact. 
Race                          Assess for any
differential impact.
No evidence that
proposals would
have any affect
this group
No anticipated impact
Religion and
Belief          
Working shifts could
impact on attending
religious services.
NRS analysis of
population data
suggests that
Scotland is
becoming more
ethnically and
religiously
diverse.
Employees – Positive 
Employees can request
adjustments to their work pattern
if suitable to the service.

Page 258

Sexual
Orientation

Page 259

Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The service is currently not able to fully deliver, and resilience is a significant concern. A new
model is required to address these challenges and create a sustainable service. Potentially
positive and negative impacts. In mitigation as flexible an approach as possible will be in place in
terms of shift allocation.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Employees will have the opportunity to feedback as part of the consultation process and
working groups. In addition, service delivery will be monitored through delivery planning and
performance monitoring. Employee surveys will be repeated in future to seek feedback once
implemented.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1106: Details some potential positive impacts service users. There are a mix of potential
positive and negative impacts for staff. As the vast majority of staff are female this means that
this group would be more likely affected. A significant proportion of the workforce is over fifty
and this crosscuts with considerations around sex.  If some workers are not able to fit with the
new shift patterns they could see some financial loss. The shift patterns may however offer
more flexibility for some.

Page 260

Assessment No 1218 Owner Julie McGrogan
Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Julie McGrogan Senior Education Officer
Members Laura Mason - Chief Education Officer
Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer
Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer
Claire Cusick - Senior Education Officer
Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title EDU16 Reduce Secondary School Clerical Staff 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
In line with council modernisation strategy, the provision is being reduced to also align
staffing ratios across the five mainstream secondaries.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Consultation with HTs, HR, TUs and staff regarding continuation of the service for the
duration of the pilot project. 
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
Clerical Assistants based in secondary schools.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Head Teachers, Business Managers, Clerical Assistants, TU’s, Education Officers, HR advisors, Staffing
and Finance Officers
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact

Page 261

Age                          
Disability                   
Gender Reassign              
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and Belief          
Sex                           Women/single parents;
Priority group in terms of
child poverty
Clerical Assistants in our
secondary schools are
primarily female. Women are
more likely to be income
deprived than men.
Around 90% of single parents
are women.
Negative
Sexual Orientation           
Human Rights                 
Health                       
Social & Economic
Impact     
Cross Cutting                
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Council has a statutory duty to provide a balanced budget. Any potential reduction in staffing requirements
could be managed through the SWITCH redeployment programme.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
HR monitoring of the demographic of staff potentially affected.
Feedback is expected from Head Teachers, Parents and carers, TU’s, Education Officers, HR advisors,
Staffing and Finance Officers
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1218: Reducing the provision of clerical support hours in secondary schools will bring
updated working practices and processes to secondary schools, reducing unnecessary duplication
across establishments. Any potential reduction in staffing requirements could be managed
through natural turnover of staff, and/or SWITCH redeployment programme.

Page 262

Assessment No 1049 Owner Alison Bowers                          
Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laura Mason Chief Education Officer
Members Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer
Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer
Claire Cusick - Senior Education Officer
Julie McGrogan - Senior Education Officer
Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title EDU19 – Reduce Education Support Staff (ELC)
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
Saving for council through the reduction of the ELC central team by 0.5fte of one of
the Education Support Officer posts.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
ELC Central Team service
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
ELC Central Team, specifically Education Support Officers and ELC settings.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Senior Education Officers, Principal Educational Psychologist and Finance.
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                          
Cross Cutting

Page 263

Disability                   
Social & Economic
Impact     
Sex                           Need to evaluate differential
impacts by sex.
One of the officers has
secured a post elsewhere so
no member of staff with be
displaced.
Neutral
Gender Reassign              
Health                       
Human Rights                  UNCRC Article 28 -
Children's right to an
education. The quality of
children's education could
reduce due to reduced
support from central team.
This could have an impact on
the time and quality of support
that could be provided to ELC
settings.
Potentially negative
impact in terms of
'provision'. Remaining
central team will look to
adopt more innovative
approaches to reduce
impact. Also aim to
upskill managers within
settings to ensure quality
of provision for children
and their education is
not impacted.
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                         
Religion and Belief          
Sexual Orientation           
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
EIA 1037 - EDU 19 - This proposal will reduce the ELC central team Education Support Officer posts from
2 fte to 1.5 fte generating a saving but potentially bringing about increased workload for the remaining ELC
central team. This could have an impact on the time and quality of support that could be provided to ELC
settings.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
ELC Central team will monitor impact on service provision.
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1049: This could have an impact on the time and quality of support that could be provided to
ELC settings. Neutral in terms of staffing for existing employees. Impact would be for remaining
team when new post would be for 0.5 FTE rather than 1 FTE. The existing team will adopt more
innovative and autonomous approaches to manage revised workload.

Page 264

Assessment No 1182 Owner Arun Menon                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget P and T
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Arun Menon Business Support Manager
Members Arun Menon and Victoria Rogers
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title PT05 – Review of Printing
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
In the last financial year (2023/24), expenditure on external printing services totalled
£86,600. As part of the ongoing commitment to financial prudence and operational
efficiency, a reduction in this budget is proposed. This proposal could save up to
£10,000 per annum across general fund, which will aid with the significant financial
gap the council faces.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Chief Officers, Strategic HR
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
The proposed reduction in expenditure on external printing services is unlikely to have a direct, significant
impact on individual service users. However, certain stakeholder groups may be indirectly affected:
Internal Council Services - Reduced printing budgets may require departments to adjust operational
practices, potentially shifting to greater reliance on digital communication methods. This could affect teams
that depend on printed materials for service delivery.
Service Users - Service users with limited access to digital platforms or who rely on printed
communications—such as older people, individuals with disabilities, or those experiencing digital
exclusion—may be impacted if alternative accessible formats are not provided.
Mitigation measures, such as ensuring digital and printed communications remain inclusive and accessible
to all service users where required, should be considered to minimise potential adverse impacts.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Chief Officers, Strategic HR

Page 265

Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Council communication
need to be accessible
across age groups
Older people are more likely to
less digitally 
Negative if there was
significant impact on
availability to produce
alternative formats, that
could not be mitigated
through for example
digital means or
ensuring that sufficient
capacity is available to
meet specific
requirements.
Disability                    The Council has an
anticipatory legal duty to
ensure that its services are
accessible to disabled
people Council
communications need to be
accessible to disabled
people
Some disabled people are
more reliant on printed media
than non disabled people
Negative if there was
significant impact on
availability to produce
alternative formats, that
could not be mitigated
through for example
digital means or
ensuring that sufficient
capacity is available to
meet specific
requirements.
Gender Reassign              
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Race                          Council communications
need to be accessible
Some members of some ethnic
groups are more likely than
others to need information in
languages other than English
Negative if there was
significant impact on
availability to produce
alternative formats, that
could not be mitigated
through for example
digital means or
ensuring that sufficient
capacity is available to
meet specific
requirements.
Religion and Belief          
Sex                          
Sexual Orientation           
Human Rights                 
Health                       
Social & Economic
Impact     
We should have regard to
the Fairer Scotland Duty
It is good practice to also
Potential less money spent
with local businesses
Local or regional printing
firms that currently
provide services to the
council may experience

Page 266

consider the Scottish
Consumer duty, though this
will not come into full force
until 1st April 2025 
The Council has a target of
12% procurement spent on
local enterprises,
performance for 23/24 was
11.35% this needs to be
balanced against the need
to balance the Council
budget.
reduced demand, which
could have economic
implications for these
businesses.
Cross Cutting                 It is good practice to
consider intersectionality
Effects of proposals, positive
or negative, may be multiplied
being the member of more
than one affected group.
Being for example from
a BME group, being a
woman and either being
disabled or having a
disabled person in the
household could be a
multiple factor.
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
The council has a duty to balance the budget. The Council has an anticipatory legal duty to ensure that its
services are accessible to disabled people part of this relies on communications be accessible to disabled
people.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
No
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1182: Potential negative impacts are more like to affect service users with limited access to
digital platforms or who rely on printed communications—such as older people, individuals with
disabilities, members of some ethnic groups or those experiencing digital exclusion—may be
impacted if alternative accessible formats are not provided.

Page 267

Assessment No 1216 Owner Alison McBride
Resource Transformation Service Budget P and T
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Alison McBride People & Change Manager
Members Alison McBride, People & Change Manager
Victoria Rogers, Chief Officer, People & Technology
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title PT13 Right Size Employer Benefit Saving
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
The Council has implemented Vivup, an employee health and wellbeing solution that
delivers a single employee benefits platform which enables employees to more easily
access the benefits available to them.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Strategic HR team
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
Yes
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
All employees can benefit from this if they choose to.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Consultation has been undertaken via the TU convener meetings
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups.
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           VivUp is an online platform,
requiring basic digital skills
to access. All employees,
The WDC workforce has a
completely age diverse
VivUp delivers a single
employee benefits
platform which enables

Page 268

regardless of age have
access to a range of
supports for digital skills
development.
workforce with a spectrum of
digital skills ability and interest.
employees to more
easily access the
benefits available to
them.  
The platform enables
employees to order
goods with payment
through the means of
salary sacrifice or
deduction. Repayments
are on a 12, 24, 36
month basis directly
through the employee’s
salary.  This creates an
opportunity to generate
savings for employees
and the Council through
reductions in National
Insurance and Pension
Contributions
Disability                    Employees with disabilities
will already have
adjustments in place to
enable equality of access to
systems and supports. 
The WDC workforce contains
colleagues with a range of
different impairments including
hearing loss, visual impairment
and dyslexia.  Adjustments are
in place for each individual.
Whilst the the benefits of
Vivup for each employee
will vary depending on
how they choose to use
it, impact on disabled
people should be
neutral.
Gender Reassign               N/A N/A N/A
Marriage & Civil
Partnership 
N/A N/A N/A
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
Employees on maternity
leave will continue to benefit
from access to VivUp.
VivUp is an externally hosted
site, easily accessed via a
range of digital devices such
as smartphones and laptops.
Employees will be able
to access employee
benefits through VivUp
during maternity leave.
Race                          N/A N/A N/A
Religion and Belief           N/A N/A N/A
Sex                           N/A N/A N/A
Sexual Orientation            N/A N/A N/A
Human Rights                  N/A N/A N/A
Health                        Employee Wellbeing is of
paramount concern and
WDC aim to ensure that
all relevant supports are in
place to help employees
who need support and to
help them maintain good
health. 
The main aim of VivUp is to
enable employees to more
easily access the benefits
available to them.  
The platform enables
employees to order goods with
payment through the means of
salary sacrifice or deduction.
Repayments are on a 12,24,36
month basis directly through
the employee’s salary.  This
creates an opportunity to
generate savings for
employees and the Council
through reductions in National
The opportunity to pay
direct from salary, while
also saving on NI and
Pension contributions
can impact on financial
wellbeing as well as
overall health and
mental health.

Page 269

Insurance and Pension
Contributions
Social & Economic
Impact     
Maintaining and supporting
the health and wellbeing of
our workforce is very
important. The majority of
our employees live and
work in the local area.
VivUp aims to support health
and wellbeing, providing easy
access to benefits and support
in times of need. It can help
people to maintain
good financial, physical and
mental health, which has a
positive impact on keeping
people in work.
VivUp provides easier
access for employees
and in doing so also
aims to increase uptake
of all benefits available,
resulting in better health
and wellbeing impacts
for more employees.
Cross Cutting                 All employees need support
from time to time, and WDC
provides a wide range of
employee benefits and
supports that some
employees are either not
aware of or are not
accessing. 
With improved access to the
benefits and supports through
VivUp, the aim is that more
employees will be able to take
advantage of what is available
to them
WDC are committed to
ensuring that all
employees are
supported and have
access to benefits that
will impact positively on
their wellbeing -
financial, health and
mental health
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
No negative impact
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Yes, use of VivUp will be monitored and reported as part of Employee Wellbeing updates
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
EIA 1216: Introducing VivUp is a management adjustment as the decision to go ahead has been
taken and it will have been implemented with additional employee opportunities continuing to be
added.  We will ensure that the system is accessible, and that where needed, any adjustments are
made for disabled colleagues.
The platform enables employees to order goods with payment through the means of salary
sacrifice or deduction. Repayments are on a 12/24/36 month basis directly through the
employee’s salary.  This create an opportunity to generate savings for employees and the Council
through reductions in National Insurance and Pension Contributions.
The platform is being rolled out incrementally and it is expected that savings will increase,
however a conservative estimate of £50,000 has been assumed for 2024/25 (employee
opportunities implemented from August so savings reduced by 1/3) and future years initially. 
This figure will be updated when data on actual employee uptake is available.

Page 270

Assessment No 1207 Owner Michelle Lynn                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget Resource
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer Resources 
Members Michelle Lynn Asset Manager 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RES02 Right Size NDR Budgets 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
April 2023 marked the date of the next Non-Domestic Rates (NDR)
revaluation, and the first to reflect the reforms introduced by the
independent Barclay Review of Non-Domestic Rates. These reforms were to
ensure that property values more closely align with prevailing property
market conditions in Scotland.
Where a property occupied by a public body is subject to a successful
proposal or appeal, the financial benefit from the reduction in rateable value
will result in a downward re-determination of revenue allocations at a
subsequent fiscal event. WDC have begun the process of appeals with our
local assessors to ensure that values are accurate. 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
WDC Staff Members/Chief Officers
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?

Page 271

All Council services, Elected Members and partner organisations including the Scottish
Government.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Michelle Lynn, Assets Manager- conducted this high level efficiency option ;
Laurence Slavin, Chief Officer - Resources - interrogated this high level efficiency option;
Performance and Monitoring Review Group, West Dunbartonshire Council - where informed of
this high level efficiency option; 
Martin Rooney, Leader of the Council - was informed of this high level efficiency option; and
David McBride, Deputy Leader of the Council - was informed of this high level efficiency option.
If this high level efficiency option is to be taken forward to the next stage; staff, Trade Unions
and Elected Members will be consulted.

Page 272

Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
No employees will be displaced as a result of this savings proposal.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Yes
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
Screening 1207: Concludes that the proposal is not relevant to any of the areas we assess, and
therefore does not require an impact assessment.

Page 273

Assessment No 1184 Owner Gail MacFarlane                           
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and N
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer - Roads &
Neighbourhood
Members Grounds and Waste Manager
Roads Manager
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RN14 Review of Footway Gritting Operational Methods
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
The proposal is to cease using footway tractors to undertake footway gritting
but to undertake by hand gritting.  This allows the squads to target areas that
require additional grit due to wet spots etc.  The completion of the footway
gritting routes may take longer due to the treatment being more labour
intensive.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Roads Service
Grounds Service
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
N/A
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?

Page 274

RN management team
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
Screening 1184: The proposal has been screened, since there is no impact on staffing or the
services delivered to the public, no EIA is required.

Page 275

Assessment No 1213 Owner Alan Douglas                               
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and R
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Alan Douglas Chief Officer: Regulatory and
Regeneration
Members Alan Douglas
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function
or financial decision)
Policy Title RR10 Combine Dog Warden and Pest Control Posts 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
Not to replace a dedicated dog warden on retirement but rather to assign the duties to
the two existing Pest Control officers and restrict the current extensive Dog Warden
duties to closer to the statutory role around control of stray and dangerous dogs.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
None
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
RR management Team
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
N/A
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
No
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation

Page 276

Screening 1213:  The proposal has no relevance any of the four areas (1- Duty to eliminate
discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F), 2-Human Rights,
3- Health Impacts or 4- Social Economic Impacts, therefore no Equality Impact Assessment is
required.

Page 277

Assessment No 1151 Owner Alan Douglas                               
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and R
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Alan Douglas Chief Officer: Regulatory and
Regeneration
Members Alan Douglas - Chief Officer: Regulatory and Regeneration
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RR11 Lead Planner Replaced by Basic Grade Officer
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
To generate a saving through the removal of a Lead Planner post and its replacement
with a basic grade planner with a focus on major projects if the latest round of
recruitment to the Lead Planner post is unsuccessful.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
None
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
R&R management team
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
No
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce

Page 278

Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
Screening 1151: The proposal would not affect employees or services users. The proposal has no
relevance any of the four areas (1- Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F), 2-Human Rights, 3- Health Impacts or 4- Social
Economic Impacts, therefore no Equality Impact Assessment is required.

Page 279

Assessment No 1198 Owner Alan Douglas                               
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and R
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Alan Douglas Chief Officer- Regulatory and
Regeneration
Members Chief Officer: Regulatory and Regeneration
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RR12 Antonine Wall
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
Halt future funding of the Antonine Wall project.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Planning Service
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes
Who will be affected by this policy?
A study by SCARF (Scottish Archaeological Research Framework) into the Antonine Wall Project
(Frontiers of the Roman Empire World Heritage Site: The Antonine Wall
(https://scarf.scot/thematic/theantoninewall/) refers in turn to the Contemporary Values of the
Antonine Wall including its locality and relationship to some of the most deprived communities
in Scotland and references the project's potential as a catalyst for community change and
regeneration, including within deprived communities.  The inhabitants of such communities
appear likely to be adversely affected if the project is cut short. 
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?

Page 280

No third party. 
EIA 500 detailed potential benefits, some of which have been delivered in stage 1 of the project.

Page 281

Assessment No 1199 Owner Alan Douglas                               
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and R
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Alab Douglas Chief Officer- Regulatory and
Regeneration
Members Alan Douglas
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RR13 Review Environmental Health
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
The deletion of a post with the reallocation of the workload / cessation of elements of
workload.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
None - internal
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
N/A
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
RR management Team
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
N/A
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
No
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation

Page 282

Screening 1199: The proposal has been screened. An Equality impact Assessment is not needed
as the proposal is not relevant to any of the areas we assess: No employee will be displaced and
there will be no effect on staff or services users.

Page 283

Assessment No 1164 Owner Alan Douglas                               
Resource Regeneration, Environment and
Growth
Service Budget R and R
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Alan Douglas Chief Officer: Regulatory and
Regeneration
Members Alan Douglas
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy, policy,
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RR20  Development Planning and Placemaking
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy
Deletion of 1x 1 FTE Policy Planning Officer (vacant post) within the Development
Planning and Place team and the relocation of the Placemaking Co-ordinator to the
Team to support the Development Planning team and retain a Placemaking function
with the associated benefits to complex and large-scale applications and functions and
the prospect of additional income from pre-application advice.
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development
and/or implementation of policy.
Manager of Planning, Building Standards and Environmental Health
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to
discuss your requirements.
No
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or
foster good relations (F)
No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No
Who will be affected by this policy?
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?

Page 284

Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please
provide justification for this.
N/A
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
No
Q7 What is your recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation
Screening 1164: No impact assessment is required as the proposed change has no relevance to
any of the areas we assess. No currently occupied post will be deleted. The Placemaking Co-
Ordinator post will be filled at the same grade but with a change in emphasis within a Job Profile
that already contains some work of the nature envisaged.