Democracy Spraffa

756319 - Appendix 5 Luing, 25/05/2023 Pre-Agenda Briefing of the Community Services Committee

Argyll and Bute Council · 8 June 2023
Back to Community Services Committee — 8 June 2023 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

1
EDUCATION
OPTIONS APPRAISAL
LUING PRIMARY SCHOOL 
Isle of Luing
Appendix 5

Page 2

1.    INTRODUCTION
1.1  No pupils have attended Luing Primary School since August 2020.On
8th December 2020, the Community Services Committee agreed Luing
Primary should be mothballed on a temporary basis until June 2022
and the school premises should be retained during this time on a care
and maintenance basis. The Community Services Committee also
agreed that in the intervening period, the Education Service would
gather the necessary information, identify all reasonable options and
assess those options in order to consider the future of Luing Primary
School in accordance with the preliminary requirements of the Schools
(Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010, and present these findings to the
Committee in the form of an Options Appraisal at a future meeting of
the Committee. 
https://www.argyll-
bute.gov.uk/moderngov/ieListDocuments.aspx?CId=548&MId=13970&V
er=4 
The statutory process for the closure of a rural school is laid out in the
Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010 as amended by the
Children and Young People (Scotland) Act 2014. 
The Act, as amended, contains a presumption against closure of a
rural school and details specific requirements which the education
authority is required to follow if they are formulating a proposal to close
a rural school. This includes the introduction of a preliminary
consultation process. 
In addition, the Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015 sets out
a new right for community organisations to request the transfer of local
assets into local community ownership/management. Public bodies,
including councils, must consider such requests and respond to them
within a reasonable timescale. 
Before the Community Services Committee mothballed Luing Primary
School, there were no pupils enrolled.   
On 8th December 2020, the Community Services Committee agreed
that the Education Service would undertake the preliminary requirements
in relation to considering a rural school closure and look at an Options
Appraisal for Luing Primary School. This review will enable the Elected
Members to consider the various options put forward in relation to the
future of Luing Primary School.

Page 3

3 
The 2010 Act makes special arrangements in regard to rural schools
that is in effect a presumption against their closure.  There is a
requirement to have special regard to the rural schools factors prior to
formulating a proposal to close a rural school. In particular, it is
necessary to consider any reasonable alternatives before considering
closure. It is also necessary to consider the impact on the wider
community of a potential closure and the impact of any different travel
arrangements. These factors have been considered in this Options
Appraisal. 
2.  REASONS FOR THE PROPOSAL 
2.1  An authority that is contemplating formulating a rural school closure
proposal must satisfy the preliminary requirements set out in section
12A of the 2010 Act before starting to prepare its proposal paper. In
particular, it must identify the underlying reasons why the future of the
School is being considered, which are as follows: 
1. Luing Primary School has been mothballed for two years. The
school roll had been declining in the few years previously and not
predicted to rise in the near future. This continues to be the
situation. In the last year when the school was open, families with
children of primary school age expressed their desire for their
children to attend a bigger school. 
2. Along with several other rural councils, Argyll and Bute is facing
increasing challenges in recruiting staff. In June 2022 there were 15.49
vacancies for both Head Teachers and Teachers. Should Luing
Primary School re-open, staffing the school will be a significant
challenge in the current educational climate.   
3. Whilst the School is mothballed, the building is deteriorating with
limited budgets for maintenance.
The Council is therefore considering the future of Luing Primary
School. The various options are explored within this paper. 
3.  BACKGROUND
Argyll and Bute is an area of outstanding natural beauty sitting within
an ancient landscape with a strong cultural identity. Today, the culture
of Argyll and Bute is reflected in its traditional industries of fishing,
farming and crofting, sports such as shinty and in its world class

Page 4

4 
musicians and artists as well as its modern commercial industries such
as wind turbine production and fish farming. Tourism also lies at the
centre of the economy. 
Argyll and Bute is geographically the second largest authority in
Scotland. Education is delivered in a range of settings including
schools, partnerships and youth services. 
3.1  Argyll and Bute Corporate Plan
The Argyll and Bute Corporate Plan identifies Argyll and Bute as an
area of Scotland with outstanding places, people and potential for a
prosperous future for everyone. Our Council along with our Community
Planning Partners, is committed to ensuring that Argyll and Bute’s
Economic Success is built on a Growing Population. 
This strategic approach embraces the vision for our area, our
communities and our people as outlined in the Corporate Plan. Our key
service priorities support the delivery of our commitments in the plans,
helping to focus on local outcomes that will achieve meaningful
improvements for the area, our local communities and our citizens. 
Councils have a statutory responsibility in terms of the Local
Government in Scotland Act 2003 to achieve best value. Our
Community Services Asset Management Plan provides a review of the
property assets used to deliver services. It incorporates the School
Estate Management Plan which reflects the local implementation of
Building Better Schools: Investing in Scotland’s Future, the national
school estate strategy developed by the Scottish Government in
conjunction with local authorities. 
The aspirations, guiding principles and objectives contained within
Building Better Schools are reflected throughout Education and
Children’s Services Asset Management Plan (SAMP) for schools and
public buildings, both in the management of the existing assets and in
the design and construction of developments. 
3.2  Our Children Their Future
Councils, as an Education Authority, have a statutory duty in terms of
the Education (Scotland) Act 1980 to make adequate and efficient
provision of school education across their entire area for the current
school population and future pattern of demand. This is reflected in Our
Children, Their Future: Education Vision and Strategy. 
3.3  Luing and the Local Area - the Luing Primary School Setting

Page 5

5 
Luing Primary School is situated on the Island of Luing which lies
nineteen miles south of Oban. The island is 6 miles long and 1.5 miles
wide and has a population of around two hundred. It is mainly a
farming and fishing community and a number of residents commute
daily to Oban via the ferry at Cuan. The largest centre of population is
at Cullipool in the north west of the island. Slate quarrying was carried
out on Luing for many years, at one point employing 170 men, with
slate still being extracted from quarries at the north end of Cullipool
until 1965. Luing is also well known for its breed of Luing Cattle which
were developed as a commercial beef breed hardy enough to prosper
under adverse weather. There is a variety of wildlife on the island, such
as otters and hares with sightings of seals, porpoises and dolphins.
There are regular chances to see buzzards, peregrines and hen
harriers, as well as visiting eagles. 
3.4  The School within the Community
When the school was open, Luing Primary School was very active
within the community. It was a focus for social and educational events.
The school had positive links with a number of agencies that enriched
the education of the children. Whilst being mothballed, the school has
not been used for any activities. The island has an active community
and the Community Council indicate that they are trying to attract
families to the area. Recently the Community Council and local parent
and toddler groups have submitted requests to use the building. 
3.5  Population
Argyll and Bute has an average population density of just 0.13 persons
per hectare. This coupled with the changing demographic profile of the
area presents one of our greatest challenges. The table below refers
directly to the Luing area showing the changing population from census
2001 to census 2011: 
Table 1: Population Information
Luing Area Census Ref : Data from Scotland’s Census website
2001 2011
Total Resident
Population
142 Total Resident
Population
128
% under 16 22.54 % under 16 14.8
% 16 – 64 (pensionable
age)
54.23 % 16 – 64 (pensionable
age)
49.2
%  pensionable age
and over
23.24 %  pensionable age and
over
35.9

Page 6

6 
Data identifies that the population until 2011 was decreasing with a
reducing demographic of children of statutory school age and an
increase in those residents who are of a pensionable age. 
It is recognised that the census area and the catchment area of Luing
Primary School differ slightly. 
3.6  Development and House Building
The Local Development Plan (LDP2), sets out planning and
development proposals for the next 10 years from 2020, and a vision
for 20 years, is available.  The Argyll and Bute Local Development Plan
provides the local planning framework for the Council area, excluding
the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National Park area. There are no
allocations or development proposals for Luing within the current plan. 
Appendix 1 shows the Local Development Plans (2) for Luing.
(Toberonochy, Blackmill Bay and Cullipool)
Appendix 2 shows the Local Development Plans (2) for the Easdale
area (Easdale and Seil)
Appendix 3 provides the key for Local Development Plans. 
3.7  Luing Primary School
Luing Primary School is an attractive Victorian building, built in 1877, of
local granite in an exceptionally scenic setting. The school is co-
educational and non-denominational and has a catchment area
extending across the whole island.  The school has two classrooms, an
office, a store, kitchen and a playground. 
Appendix 4 shows the Luing Primary School Floor Plan. 
Luing Primary School is 5.95 miles from Easdale Primary School, with
a stretch of water in between. A local ferry provides a link with the
mainland and the crossing takes 4 minutes. The area is sparsely
populated.  Luing Primary School is situated on the side of a road that
leads towards Toberonochy. 
The Scottish Government’s Rural School List 2017 classifies Luing
Primary School as ‘very remote rural’.  This is defined as an area with a
population of less than 3,000 people, and with a drive time of over 60
minutes to a settlement of 10,000 or more. Luing is one of primary
schools associated with Oban High School. 
3.8  Easdale Primary School

Page 7

7 
Children who are in the catchment area for Luing Primary School while
it has been mothballed have been directed to Easdale Primary on the
Isle of Seil. There is one Primary 1 pupil who is in mainstream
education in the catchment area for Luing attending Easdale Primary
School. The pupil arrived on the island after the school was
mothballed. Easdale Primary is a mainstream, non-denominational
school catering for boys and girls of all stages P1-P7. It has a pre-five
unit catering for children who have reached their third birthday. The
catchment area of the school includes the Isle of Seil and Easdale
Island.
The school is close to the village of Ellenabiach on the Isle of Seil,
which is linked to the mainland by a bridge. 
The school building dates from 1877 and has been extensively
modernised. The accommodation comprises 3 class-teaching areas,
an activity area and pre five/general purpose area, a hall/dining room,
an office and staff room. The school grounds comprise of a tarred area
to the rear of the building with wet weather shelter and garden areas to
the side and front. 
Appendix 5 shows the Easdale Primary School Floor Plan. 
The Primary School building has facilities for pupils, visitors and special
access needs. The Scottish Government’s Rural School List 2017
classifies Easdale Primary School as ‘very remote rural’. Oban High
School is the associated Secondary School for Luing and Easdale. 
The Map below shows the adjoining catchment areas of Luing and
Easdale Primary Schools:

Page 8

8 
© Crown copyright and database right 2022. All rights reserved. Ordnance Survey Licence number 10002336 
3.9  Pupil Numbers
Pupil projections, and data for 2021 - 2022 are based on the 2018 pupil
census, a return prepared annually for the Scottish Government. Past
pupil numbers are historic data from past pupil censuses. Pupil
projections for future P1 intakes are from NHS data taken from children
registered with GP practices in the area. This data is anonymised. 
Table 2 shows the historic and current pupil registration numbers for
both Luing and Easdale Primary schools: 
Table 2 
School
name
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Luing
Primary
17 12 15 14 8 8 14 10 7 0 0
Easdale
Primary
29 28 33 26 28 21 14 14 16 17 20

Page 9

9 
Table 3 shows projected rolls for Luing Primary School and estimated
numbers of pupils in the Easdale Primary School catchment area
according to figures held by Argyll and Bute Council: 
Table 3:  Luing PS  Easdale PS  
Roll Roll
Capacity 49 92
2023 3 24
2024 4 25
2025 5 27
2026 6 25
2027 6 28
2028 6 27 
* Prediction based on information available to Argyll and Bute (2022). 
4.  COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 
4.1  Meetings
A Community Pre-Consultation ‘drop in’ engagement session was held
in Atlantic Island Centre, on 26th May 2022 from 9.30am-7.30pm.  This
was to seek the views of the community on the future of Luing School.
This meeting was attended by 33 people. There were also written
communication and emails from the local community received that
have also been accepted as part of the pre-consultation. An officer also
met with the Primary 1 pupil at Easdale Primary who is from the Luing
Primary School catchment area on 11th May to gain their view at the
time of the Pre-consultation. There is a record of this meeting available
and the pupil’s views are represented in Sections 4, 6, 7 and 8. 
4.2  Content of Meetings
Attendees at the meetings were given an overview of the information
that the Council would be using in this Options Appraisal, this included
previous pupil rolls, pupil projections, background information and
details of the pre-consultation process. 
The questions were as follows:
What has been the effect of mothballing Luing School on you, your
family and community? 
In your view what are the pros/cons of the following options:

Page 10

10 
• Continue with mothballing
• Re- open the school
• Close the school 
Attendees also noted questions regarding the future of the school, and
points of information that should be considered in the Options
Appraisal. A summary of comments from the Community meeting can
be found in Appendix 6. 
4.3  Feedback 
There was a range of viewpoints on the future of Luing Primary School:
• Community and Parents
The majority of the community felt on the day of the
consultation that they wanted the mothballing to continue for
a number of reasons. Two families wanted the school to be
re-opened; one family were happy with the provision for their
Early Years child at Easdale Primary. Subsequently, after the
consultation day, Luing Community Council indicated that it
would be their wish to open the school as soon as possible
as a school and used as such by both Luing and Seil Pre-
school and primary aged children. One family confirmed
during the consultation that they would be sending their child
to Luing Primary School, should it re-open. 
• Children/young people
The responsible Education Officer was granted permission to
speak to the Primary 1 child that would attend Luing PS in
2021-22 and it was his wish that the school should re-open.
The pupil said he was tired of travelling and wanted to be
able to walk or ride his bike to the school and he looked
forward to meeting teachers at the school. 
• Staff
Staff members were sad at the thought of the School being
closed but acknowledged that without a significant number of
pupils re-opening the school may not be viable. Members of
staff highlighted difficulties in providing staffing, securing
affordable family housing on the island and ensuring social
aspects of education are met due to low numbers. Some
members of staff stated that when the school was under a
shared headship with Easdale, this worked well. Some
indicated that they would like to see the school open again to

Page 11

11 
have education more locally for families and thought this
would help to attract families to the area. 
Feedback notes from the consultation day can be found in Appendix 6. 
General Comments: 
“Continue to mothball for a while longer, with possible uses for other purposes
eg playgroup. Gives the community time and can attract families to the area.” 
“A key point is that the Community Trust have been working hard to bring
more families to the area but this can take few years. We need the authority to
support us. This is a big thing for us.” 
“In a wee community like this – the school was at the centre – the community
were able to support the children – this is harder when the local school is not
on the island.” 
“If there is no school on the island, it is off putting to families considering
moving to the area.” 
“The council need to understand that this is a historical cycle on the Isle of
Luing, when I attended the school, there were 6 children, 7 children, when my
children went but then when my youngest son left there was around 30
children – the roll goes up and down and the school has remained open. This
is nothing new in the last 55 years. We would ask that it continues to remain
open as we believe the numbers will go up.” 
“It’s more than just a school.” 
“Easdale ELC has 10 children – which is better socially and for educational
purposes.” 
“There is a really good community at Easdale PS for the children. My child
likes going on the ferry.” 
5.0  THE PROPOSAL AND REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES TO THE
PROPOSAL AS CONSIDERED BY THE COMMUNITY
ENGAGEMENT
Luing Primary School has been mothballed for 2 years, the decision to
mothball the school was during a pandemic and had arisen through
parental choice of families choosing at the time to educate their
children in a bigger school. There were 5 primary aged children at
Luing Primary at the time. The school roll was very low and not
predicted to rise significantly in the future. This continues to be the
situation. At the Pre-Consultation meeting in May the majority of the
community felt that mothballing should continue. The Community

Page 12

12 
Council have since expressed their wish that the school should open
with immediate effect. 
Whilst the building is mothballed it continues to deteriorate. The
Community is very proactive and would like to use the building
constructively in the future. Along with several other rural councils,
Argyll and Bute is facing increasing challenges in recruiting staff. In
June 2022 there were 15.49 FTE vacancies for both Head Teachers
and Teachers. 
The Council is required to consider the future of Luing Primary School.
The following options are explored within this paper: 
a) Re-open Luing Primary School.
b) Continued Mothballing of Luing Primary with the pupils zoned to
Easdale Primary School.
c) Close Luing Primary School and realign its catchment area to
Easdale Primary School. 
6. OPTION A: RE-OPEN LUING PRIMARY SCHOOL 
6.1  Community Feedback
Of the 33 community members that attended the Options Appraisal
engagement event, the majority of which were in favour of mothballing
the school with a view to re-opening the school in order to attract
families to the area. There was a small minority who felt the small
number of children in the school would prove challenging to deliver a
meaningful education. Luing Community Council have subsequently
requested that the school is opened with immediate effect and continue
to work with under a shared Headship with Easdale Primary School, as
previously. 
“In a wee community like this – the school was at the centre – the
community were able to support the children – this is harder when the
school is not on the island.” 
“If there is no school on the island, it is off putting to families
considering moving to the area.” 
“When the ferry is involved, it does change everything – adds time to
the commute.”

Page 13

13 
“Smaller schools really support children of different ages, P1-P7
looking out for each other – all generations benefit from the school
opening.” 
“Housing is an issue on the island. Easdale PS love having Luing
children with them – it is brilliant as they get to be with their peers.
While it would be nice to have a school on your doorstep, being with
children of different ages is important.” 
“It would be lovely to see the school open however, children’s welfare
is not good if there are not many children there and they cannot reach
their milestones. It is important that they mix with children of their own
age and other ages.” 
“Financially, it is hard. The staffing, support for pupils and teaching
commitments need to be considered as all of this would be hard to
find.” 
6.2 Pupil Numbers
If the school were to reopen in August 2022, the maximum pupil
numbers from the catchment would be two. The families of these
children have expressed a desire for the school to open. 
If the school were to re-open sustainability may not be viable due to the
fact that pupil numbers over the next four years are not predicted to
rise significantly (see Table 4 below), and are well below the capacity
of the school building. 
If the school were to reopen teaching staff would require to be
recruited. 
If the school were to re-open, numbers would remain low and are well
below the capacity of the school building. The community feel however,
with their efforts to ensure affordable housing is available, the numbers
of pupils could increase. 
Table 4: Pupil Numbers
Luing
Primary
2022/2023 2023/2024 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028
Approved
Capacity
49 49 49 49 49 49
Roll
Projection
2 3 4 5 6 6

Page 14

14 
6.3 Financial Information
The total amount including employee; premises; supplies and services
and catering consideration to re-open the school is £165,3601 
The annual cost of mothballing Luing Primary School is £10,323.
Property Services have advised that if the decision is that the school is
to remain operational, the total estimated cost of remedial works
identified as being required in Years 1 to 3 and Years 1 to 10 and
excluding professional fees is as follows:   
Estimated Cost (Y1-Y3) Estimated Cost (Y1-Y10)
Total £119,432.10 (£120k) £151,053.10 (£155k) 
6.4  Assessment of Rural Factors 
The reasons why the future of Luing Primary School is being
considered are as stated at Section 2 of this Report. There is no
expectation for the pupil numbers at Luing Primary School to increase
significantly under present circumstances within the forthcoming years
without a change in the housing situation on the island. The Luing
Community Trust have informed through the pre-consultation process
that they are working to address the concerns about affordable family
housing on the island. This could take some time and affordable
housing does not always guarantee numbers of children of statutory
school age seeking local authority education. Luing Primary School is
currently mothballed and from August 2022 there are 2 current pupils in
the Luing catchment area looking to access mainstream schooling, and
currently attending Easdale Primary School. To reopen the school
would not necessarily increase the pupil numbers but the local
community feel that it would help to attract families to the area.   
The school has not been able to secure stable staffing in recent years.
There was no resident staff on Luing and winter closures were high risk
due to ferry cancellations. In the last ten years there were occasions
each year when the school closed due to inclement weather and no
teaching staff being available on the island. However, this issues was
not, and is not, unique to Luing. 
Luing ELC has been registered as ‘Inactive’ with the Care Inspectorate
since August 2018. 
1 Annual costs for running a comparative school for Luing Primary School.

Page 15

15 
The Isle of Luing has a Village Hall that is accessed and used on a
regular basis. 
6.4.1  Community Impact
The reopening of the school would enable the premises to be
used by the community. It would also be a possibility that the
school pupils would invite the community to specific events. The
presence of a school and the facilities/activities that may be
offered could make the area a more attractive place to live.
Reopening the school may therefore encourage families with
school age children to move to the island. This in turn may make
the community more sustainable. 
The local authority are currently making arrangements for the
local community to be able to use the building while it is
mothballed. This does not impact on the future of the school.   
The Community Council have expressed their wish that the
school open with immediate effect and the majority of local
community members who attended the Pre-consultation meeting
were in favour of the school re-opening. 
Respondents noted the negative impact of the school
mothballing on the community as: 
• The continued deterioration of the building.
• They were unaware as a community that the building could
be used by Community groups while it was mothballed and
as a result, it has not been used. Some community groups
have now requested use of the building and this is being
investigated. 
• A lack of focus for significant aspects of community life that
the school previously provided for all generations on the
island.
• Disappointment in not being consulted regarding the initial
mothballing de facto. However, the school was mothballed
due to families seeking to educate their children elsewhere
and there is no requirement for the local authority to lead a
consultation as mothballing is an informal, non-statutory
process. 
• Concerns about travel arrangements for pupils who attend
Easdale Primary School from Isle of Luing during the
mothballing period.

Page 16

16 
If the school were to reopen as an educational establishment
there would be an economic impact with respect to the
considerable expenditure needed to bring the building up to
standard.  There would also be costs relating to staffing, and
ongoing maintenance.  The reopening of the school and the
potential relocation of families to the island may have a positive
effect on the wider economy of the community. 
6.4.2  Travel Arrangements
The travel distance (sourced from Google maps) from Luing
Primary to Easdale Primary is 6 miles, including a ferry crossing
of 4 minutes which runs to a public timetable. The total travelling
time to Easdale Primary is approximately 45 minutes to 1 hour,
this could be slightly longer or shorter, depending on ferry times
and where children live on the Isle of Luing. The travel
arrangements, as arranged by Transport department would be:
pupils are picked up on a mini bus on the island, taken to the
ferry, the driver accompanies the children on the ferry, as an
escort and wait with them until the service bus arrives. The
driver ensures that the children safely board the bus at this
location. The service bus is met by a member of the school staff
at Easdale Primary School, who ensures pupils disembark
safely and are led into the school, the reverse of which happens
in the afternoon. At no time are the primary pupils left
unattended. 
Families and the community on Luing have been dissatisfied
with these arrangements, viewing them as being unsafe and
putting children at risk. One family who currently have the only
child of primary school age on the island have chosen to take
and pick up their child themselves, incurring costs and also
dedicating time during the working day. The travel arrangements
have been available since the school was mothballed. If Luing
Primary School was to reopen there could be a positive impact
on the health and wellbeing of pupils who are able to walk or
cycle to school. The Education Officer spoke to the Primary 1
child travelling from Luing to Easdale Primary in May 2022 and
he indicated as part of the pre-consultation process that he was
tired of travelling and would prefer to attend the local school. 
Staff would either travel to the school by car and ferry or if they
live locally could walk or cycle. There may be a positive
environmental impact as the use of vehicles to transport pupils
may decrease. Conversely, there could be increased car usage
by staff which may mean these travel arrangements have a

Page 17

17 
negative environmental impact. The respective positive and
negative impact may therefore balance, subject to recruitment of
staff and where they lived.   
6.5  Educational Benefits 
The principles of Curriculum for Excellence recognise the
professionalism of teachers and the importance of this in exercising the
freedom and responsibility associated with broader guidance. This
means that schools are able to design their curriculum to meet the
specific needs of their children and community. There are no specific
educational benefits from reopening the school as all schools
implement Curriculum for Excellence ensuring effective learning and
teaching which is matched to the needs of children. 
There are recognised benefits of children working with and socialising
with a peer group. Collaborative learning is an important aspect of the
curriculum and with very low projected pupil rolls is not a benefit that
would be achieved by reopening the school. 
With respect to outdoor learning community spaces could be used
either in the school grounds or in the immediate area of the island if the
school were to reopen.  Outdoor learning is provided by all schools. 
There would be issues with respect to the current condition and
suitability of the school buildings and facilities would need to be
brought up to standard in order to facilitate an appropriate learning and
teaching environment. 
6.6  Summary
Of the 33 people who attended the pre-consultation the majority were
in favour of mothballing in the sense that this would then facilitate the
reopening of Luing Primary as a school on a permanent basis.  If the
school reopened in August 2022, the pupil roll would be two and based
on current projections, increasing to 3 in 2023 as numbers of children
registered with Argyll and Bute demonstrate. 
Argyll and Bute Council have found recruitment of teachers and
promoted posts challenging in remote rural areas, particularly since the
pandemic and staffing remains an issue for many schools nationally.
Should Luing Primary School re-open, staffing the school will be a
significant challenge in the current educational climate.   
There are financial implications if the school is to be reopened.  The
total amount including employee; premises; supplies and services and

Page 18

18 
catering consideration to re-open the school is £165,3602, with the cost
to bring the property to an acceptable standard to re-open the school is
£119,432 over a three year period, £151,053 over a ten year period.   
The Isle of Luing has a Village Hall that is accessed and used on a
regular basis. The community will continue have access to the school
building while it is mothballed, as the authority are arranging currently. 
If the School was to be reopened, the premises would be able to be
used by the community, in addition to its use as an educational facility.
The reopening of the School may encourage families with school age
children to move to the community, which may make the community
more sustainable. 
The travel distance (sourced from Google maps) from Luing Primary to
Easdale Primary is 6 miles including a short ferry journey of 4 minutes.
Travel time to Easdale Primary is approximately 45 minutes to 1 hour,
this could be slightly longer or shorter, depending on ferry times and
where children live on the Isle of Luing. Adverse weather can be a
factor, however this is the same for other local schools and areas. The
travel arrangements have been available to access since the school
was mothballed. Parents of the Primary 1 child attending Easdale
Primary during the mothballing period have chosen not to access the
travel arrangements due to their belief that the arrangements put their
child at risk and have made their own arrangements, at a personal
cost. Should the school reopen, there may be a positive environmental
impact as the use of vehicles to transport pupils may decrease.
Conversely, there could be increased car usage by staff which may
mean these travel arrangements have a negative environmental
impact. The positive and negative impact may balance depending on
the recruitment of staff and their location. 
There are no specific educational benefits from reopening the school
as all schools implement Curriculum for Excellence ensuring effective
learning and teaching which is matched to the needs of children. 
When considering the above alongside projected low pupil numbers,
the challenges in recruiting teaching staff and the considerable
expenditure needed to bring the building up to standard balanced
against strong feeling within the community and their specific request
to keep the school open, this is not considered the most reasonable                                                 
2 Annual costs for running a comparative school for Luing.

Page 19

19 
option to address the underlying reasons why the future of Luing
Primary School is being explored. 
7.  OPTION B: CONTINUED MOTHBALLING OF LUING PRIMARY
SCHOOL WITH PUPILS ZONED TO EASDALE PRIMARY SCHOOL
The Statutory Guidance for the 2010 Act, in relation to mothballing,
states “the maximum length of its duration is likely to depend on the
location of the school and the desirability of maintaining capacity to re-
open a school there, but it is unlikely that it should exceed 3 years in
areas that are not very remote.” Luing Primary School has been
mothballed for 2 years. 
7.1  Community Feedback 
There was significant concern raised at the Pre-consultation meeting
regarding what was viewed as the lack of consultation in the
mothballing of Luing Primary School. The mothballing of a school is a
temporary closure. It does not require a statutory consultation to be
carried out as it is an informal non-statutory measure. 
At the Pre-consultation meeting there was a majority that wanted the
continued mothballing of Luing Primary, in the sense that this would
allow for preparation for the community and local authority to assess
what the long term future would be for the school. The majority of
residents viewed the mothballing to this being short term and would
enable planning for the school to re-open. Luing Community Trust
stated that they were working hard to secure affordable housing on the
island and they felt that this would help to increase numbers of children
accessing local mainstream education. There was also a view that
post-pandemic, there would be opportunities for the island to attract
more families to the area. 
“Continue to mothball for a while longer, with possible uses for other
purposes eg playgroup. Gives the community time and can attract
families to the area.” 
“The building needs to be used sooner rather than later as it will
deteriorate and I am sure others would like to use it.” 
“Folk have changed the way they work from home. People are still
reeling from COVID, these two years should not count. Beginning to

Page 20

20 
think about the future. Folk are adjusting and need to look at and
assess. I think we will get another influx on Luing.” 
“Keep it mothballed for the time being until we are ready for it as a
school, but ensure that the community can use it safely ie toddlers
group and others as appropriate in the meantime.” 
There was a significant view at the community meeting that mothballing
the school over a long period is wasteful due to deterioration of the
property and should not be prolonged: 
7.2 Pupil Numbers
Pupil numbers are not projected to increase significantly over the next
4 years, as per Table 4 above.   
7.3  Financial Information
The current annual cost (2021/22) to the Council of the mothballed
Luing Primary School is £10,323. This includes electricity, heating oil,
and ground maintenance but does not include building maintenance
and repair costs. Neither does it take account of the cost to bring the
property to an acceptable standard to re-open the school which is
£119,432 over a three year period, £151,053 over a ten year period. 
The current annual transport cost of taking pupils to Easdale Primary
school is approximately £18,427. 
7.4  Assessment of Rural Factors 
The reasons why the future of Luing Primary School is being
considered are as stated at Section 2 of this Report. There is no
expectation for the pupil numbers at Luing Primary School to increase
significantly without a change in the housing situation on the island.
The Community Trust have informed through the Pre-consultation
process that they are working to address the concerns about affordable
family housing on the island. Luing Primary School is currently
mothballed and from August 2022 there are 2 current pupils in the
Luing catchment area looking to access mainstream schooling. To
mothball the school it would not necessarily increase the pupil numbers
but the local community feel that it would give them more time to attract
families to the area in the short term.   
7.4.1  Community Impact
If pupils are to continue their education in Easdale Primary
School the members of the community who attended the
consultation day majority indicated that they would remain

Page 21

21 
concerned.  If the mothballing of Luing was to continue the
building would deteriorate further. There are already concerns
about the condition of the building and there would be expenses
to be met by the authority to bring it up to standard for use by
the community.  There is a risk that the building would
eventually become unavailable, if not brought up to standard
and used in the meantime by the community. This could have a
detrimental effect on the sustainability of the Luing community. 
7.4.2  Travel Arrangements
There is no change to the travel arrangements that are currently
in place nor to the environmental impact from these.  The travel
distance (sourced from Google maps) from Luing Primary to
Easdale Primary is 6 miles via a ferry crossing of 4 minutes
which runs to public timetable. Travel time to Easdale Primary is
approximately 45 minutes to 1 hour depending on ferry times
and where children live on the Isle of Luing. The protocol for
travel arrangements is detailed in Section 6.4.2 but have not
been used by the existing family as they are viewed by them
and some members of the community as being unsafe and
putting children at risk. They also feel there is a lot of
expectation for young children. The travel arrangements have
been available since the school was mothballed. The existing
family have chosen to take and pick up their children
themselves, incurring personal costs and also dedicating time
during the working day. The child travelling from Luing to
Easdale Primary was in Primary One in May 2022 and indicated
when speaking to the Education Officer as part of the Pre-
consultation process that he was tired of travelling and would
prefer to attend the local school. 
Travel is an accepted aspect of living in the Luing community.
Children throughout Argyll and Bute make very similar journeys
on school transportation, ferries and service buses every day.
Continued mothballing of Luing Primary School would have no
effect on current staff travel. The small number of children has
minimal effect on staffing within Easdale Primary, the receiving
primary school. 
7.5  Educational Benefits 
The principles of Curriculum for Excellence recognise the
professionalism of teachers and the importance of this in exercising the
freedom and responsibility associated with broader guidance. This
means that schools are able to design their curriculum to meet the

Page 22

22 
specific needs of their children and community. There are no specific
educational benefits from reopening the school as all schools
implement Curriculum for Excellence ensuring effective learning and
teaching which is matched to the needs of children. 
There are recognised benefits of children working with and socialising
with a peer group. Collaborative learning is an important aspect of the
curriculum and with very low projected pupil rolls is not a benefit that
would be achieved by reopening the school. 
Both Luing and Easdale are remote rural schools. Each school is set
within a very remote rural area (Scottish Government classification). 
Outdoor learning is currently provided at Easdale Primary. 
The co-location of the nursery and the primary classes at Easdale
Primary enhances the transition process for the children moving from
Nursery into Primary one, through joint educational processes and
liaison between the two settings. Transition to secondary school is
enhanced through joint planning and educational experiences. 
7.6  Summary
The majority of people who attended the consultation were in favour of
continuing the mothballing of Luing Primary School; only for the short
term to provide time for the community and Council to see what the
future holds for the population of the Isle of Luing. The majority of
attendees felt that after the next period of mothballing there would be a
possibility of the school being able to re-open. There was a significant
view at the community meetings that mothballing the school over a
long period was wasteful due to deterioration of the property and
potentially affected sustainability of the community. Pupil numbers are
not predicted to rise significantly in terms of pre-school children living
within the catchment area. 
The current annual cost (2021/22) to the Council of the mothballed
Luing Primary School is £10,323. This includes electricity, heating oil,
and ground maintenance but does not include building maintenance
and repair costs. Neither does it take account of the cost to bring the
property to an acceptable standard to re-open the school which is
£119,432 over three years and £151,053 over ten years.  The current
annual transport cost for taking pupils to Easdale Primary School is
approximately £18,427.

Page 23

23 
The travel distance (sourced from Google maps) from Luing Primary to
Easdale Primary is 6 miles including a brief ferry crossing of a four
minutes. Travel time to Easdale Primary is approximately 45 minutes to
1 hour, this could be slightly longer or shorter, depending on ferry times
and where children live on the Isle of Luing.  Adverse weather can be a
factor, however this is the same for other local schools and areas. The
travel arrangements have been available to access since the school
was mothballed, but families and many members of the community are
dissatisfied with the travel arrangements offered by the Council and
have chosen to make their own arrangements at a cost financially and
commitment of time. Should the school reopen, there may be a positive
environmental impact as the use of vehicles to transport pupils may
decrease. Conversely, there could be increased car usage by staff
which may mean these travel arrangements have a negative
environmental impact. The positive and negative impact may balance. 
There are no specific educational benefits from continuing the
mothballing of Luing Primary school. 
On the basis that pupil numbers are not expected to increase
significantly in the forthcoming years, and the building’s mothballing
was a temporary measure; the long term possibilities remain unknown.
Although a significant portion of stakeholders in the pre-consultation
exercise requested a continuation of the mothballing of Luing Primary
School, this is not considered the most reasonable option to address
the underlying reasons why the future of Luing Primary School is being
explored for the reasons as set out above.   
8.  OPTION C: CLOSE LUING PRIMARY SCHOOL AND REALIGN THE
CATCHMENT AREA FOR EASDALE PRIMARY SCHOOL TO
INCLUDE THE CURRENT LUING CATCHMENT AREA 
8.1  Community Feedback
The majority of people who attended the Options Appraisal meeting
were in favour of reopening Luing Primary as a school. The Community
Council have indicated that it would be their wish that the school opens
with immediate effect. Some recognised the challenges there were in
small numbers of children at the school. The Education Officer leading
the Pre-consultation sought permission and spoke to the Primary 1
pupil who currently attends Easdale PS. The pupil has no experience
of Luing Primary and while he likes his teacher and friends, he
expressed his wish to attend Luing Primary. The following comments
were made by stakeholders in relation to the option to close Luing
Primary School:

Page 24

24 
“The school is vital to the future of the island. My substantial
experience in education makes me very concerned. Previously the
school was under threat, we fought this and the roll has declined.
However, there needs to be enough children to attend. There are
potential pupils currently. We will campaign against closure as strongly
as we did 10 years ago.” 
“Absolutely not – once it’s gone it’s gone and cancels any future of
Luing children being educated on their island.” 
“My child has friends whose family would love to move over here but
housing is hard. It would be wonderful to have them here.” 
“The school was an important part of previous children’s lives here and
it was an important part of our small community which supported it and
enjoyed seeing the children there.” 
There were a few comments regarding parents being satisfied with the
education offered at Easdale Primary and ELC: 
“Easdale ELC has 10 children – which is better socially and for
educational purposes.” 
“There is a really good community at Easdale PS for the children. My
child likes going on the ferry.” 
There were also concerns raised regarding the cost of opening a
school for small numbers of pupils and also the quality of what may be
available to the children subsequently: 
“…….were the school used for education in future, there is the social
question that, in the fullness of time, the very few children who might
be schooled on the island will be deprived of contact with what would
be their peers, were they in a larger school community, perhaps to the
detriment of their development as members of society.”
Many community members commented on the school premises and
potential for this to be used by the community: 
“There must be other ways of using the school building – previously
used as a café and for choirs to use.” 
“Could the school be used as a Pre-school facility for early learning?” 
“Could the building be used to link with UHI and Argyll College for
learning? Adult learning? A study space in classes? This happens in

Page 25

25 
Mull, Campbeltown and on Islay. Folk studying on the island could use
this facility – you have less distractions than at home.” 
8.2  Pupil Numbers 
Table 4: Pupil Numbers and Occupancy
Luing
Primary
2022/2023 2023/2024 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028
Approved
Capacity
49 49 49 49 49 49
Roll
Projection
2 3 4 5 6 6
Occupancy 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 12% 
If Luing Primary School were to be permanently closed, it is further
intended that the catchment area for Easdale Primary School would be
extended to subsume Luing’s current catchment area. The current
occupancy rate for Easdale Primary School is 78.5%.   
8.3  Financial Information
Currently there are no primary school age children using the Education
Transport offered but one primary child is entitled to this; the family
have chosen to not access this for reasons outlined in Section 7.4.2. 
An existing West Coast Motors bus means that there would be no
additional annual transport costs should Luing Primary School be
permanently discontinued. Families accessing Early Years provision at
Easdale Primary School from the Isle of Luing are reimbursed £1,482
annually. If Luing Primary School were to be closed it would generate
savings of £10,323 - the current annual cost of mothballing (2021/22)
to the Council. This includes electricity, heating oil, ground
maintenance, building maintenance and repair costs. The cost to bring
the school building to an acceptable standard to re-open the school
which is £119,432 over three years and £151,053 over ten years.   
8.4  Assessment of Rural Factors 
The reasons why the future of Luing Primary School is being
considered are as stated at Section 2 of this Report. There is no
expectation for the pupil numbers at Luing Primary School to increase
significantly without a change in the housing situation on the island
over forthcoming years. The Community Trust have informed through
the Pre-consultation process that they are working to address the
concerns about affordable family housing on the island. Luing Primary

Page 26

26 
School is currently mothballed and from August 2022 there will be 2
pupils in the Luing catchment area looking to access mainstream
schooling. If the school were to close many of the local community
members who engaged with the pre-consultation process felt that it will
discourage families from moving to the island and this then could have
a significant impact on the future of the island overall. 
8.4.1  Community Impact
The there was a significant view from community members at
the preliminary consultation in May 2022 that did not support the
closure of the school. Within Luing there is a village hall that the
community use. All people who attended the consultation
strongly stated the school building should be retained in a good
state of repair. It was widely accepted by the community that
school closure will have an adverse effect on a community and
its longer term sustainability. 
8.4.2  Travel Arrangements
The travel distance (sourced from Google maps) from Luing
Primary to Easdale Primary is 6 miles, including a ferry
crossing of 4 minutes which runs to public timetable. Travel
time to Easdale Primary is approximately 45 minutes to 1 hour,
this could be slightly longer or shorter, depending on ferry
times, and where children live on the Isle of Luing. The protocol
for travel arrangements has already been described in Section
6.4.2 but has not been used by the existing family as the
arrangements are viewed by them and some members of the
community as being unsafe and putting children at risk. They
also feel there is a lot of expectation for young children. The
travel arrangements have been available since the school was
mothballed. The existing family has chosen to take and pick up
their child themselves, incurring personal financial costs and
also dedicating time during the working day. The child travelling
from Luing to Easdale Primary was in Primary One in May
2022 and indicated as he spoke to the Education Officer as
part of the pre-consultation process that he was tired of
travelling and would prefer to attend the local school. 
Travel is an accepted aspect of living in the Luing community.
Children throughout Argyll and Bute make very similar journeys
on school transportation, ferries and service buses every day.
Closure of Luing Primary School would have no effect on
current staff travel. The small number of children has minimal

Page 27

27 
effect on staffing within Easdale Primary, the receiving primary
school. 
This option would have no effect on the current travel
arrangements in place for staff and pupils. However, the family
with the current pupil attending Easdale Primary has expressed
concern about the sustainability of the current situation and is
dissatisfied. The community have also made their views known
in terms of their concerns about what is available. The closure
of Luing Primary School, in relation to travel would have a
neutral effect on the environment.  There is currently no
additional annual transport cost for pupils to travel to Easdale
Primary School and the use of the existing mini-bus, ferry and
West Coast Motors service bus would not incur additional costs
in the immediate future. 
8.5  Educational Benefits 
The principles of Curriculum for Excellence recognise the
professionalism of teachers and the importance of this in exercising the
freedom and responsibility associated with broader guidance. This
means that schools are able to design their curriculum to meet the
specific needs of their children and community. There are no specific
educational benefits as all schools implement Curriculum for
Excellence ensuring effective learning and teaching which is matched
to the needs of children. 
Both Luing and Easdale are remote rural schools. Each school is set
within a very remote rural area (Scottish Government classification). 
Outdoor learning is currently provided at Easdale Primary. The pupils
would then be transitioning to Oban High School with an established
friendship group. 
In Easdale Primary School children are taught in classes composed of
children from more than one year group. Children benefit from being
part of a social context in which they can build relationships with
different groups and individuals, develop social skills, meet challenges
and exercise responsibilities as members of a social group. They are
able to interact and socialise with groups of children of their own
gender, take part in team activities and move with their peers to
secondary school. 
8.6  Summary
The majority of people who attended the consultation were not in
favour of closing Luing Primary as a school, and realigning the

Page 28

28 
catchment area of Easdale Primary School due to the remote nature of
the school’s location. They also commented on the potential for the
school premises to be used as a community asset. 
Current capacity for Easdale Primary School is 78.5%. There are
currently two pupils in the Luing catchment area, there is no additional
annual cost to transport pupils to Easdale Primary school and use of
the existing mini bus, ferry and West Coast Motors service bus would
not incur additional costs. 
The travel distance (sourced from Google maps) from Luing Primary to
Easdale Primary is 6 miles, including a ferry crossing of 4 minutes
which runs to public timetable. Travel time to Easdale Primary is
approximately 45 minutes to 1 hour, this could be slightly longer or
shorter, depending on ferry times, and where children live on the Isle of
Luing. The protocol for travel arrangements has already been
described in Section 6.4.2 but has not been used by the existing family
as the arrangements are viewed by them and some members of the
community as being unsafe and putting children at risk. They also feel
there is a lot of expectation for young children. The travel
arrangements have been available since the school was mothballed.
The existing family has chosen to take and pick up their child
themselves, incurring personal financial costs and also dedicating time
during the working day. The family with the current pupil attending
Easdale Primary has expressed concern about the sustainability of the
current situation and is dissatisfied.  The child travelling from Luing to
Easdale Primary was in Primary One in May 2022 and indicated as he
spoke to the Education Officer as part of the pre-consultation process
that he was tired of travelling and would prefer to attend the local
school. 
The closure of Luing Primary School would have a neutral effect on the
environment in terms of travelling arrangements. Easdale Primary
currently accommodates pupils from Luing School and pupil numbers
are not projected to increase significantly. Easdale Primary has
capacity to continue to accommodate the projected pupil numbers. 
In Easdale Primary School, children benefit from a positive learning
environment with learning and teaching which is well matched to the
needs of the young people who attend the school. In addition there are
more opportunities for personal and social development in this setting.

Page 29

29 
In summary of all the aspects outlined above, this has been identified
as the most reasonable option for further consideration of the future of
Luing Primary School.       
11.  OVERVIEW OF OPTIONS
Option Option Description Outcome
A Re-open Luing Primary School with the
existing catchment area
A requested option, as
identified by the
community.
B Continued Mothballing of Luing Primary
School with the pupils zoned to Easdale 
Primary School
A requested option, as
identified by the
community.
C Close Luing Primary School and realign
the catchment area of Easdale Primary
School to include the current catchment
area for Luing Primary School.
The most reasonable
option to address the
underlying reasons for
considering the future of
Luing Primary 
DETAILED ANALYSIS OF REASONABLE OPTION C: CLOSE LUING
PRIMARY SCHOOL AND REALIGN THE CATCHMENT AREA FOR
EASDALE PRIMARY SCHOOL TO INCLUDE THE CURRENT LUING
CATCHMENT AREA  
12.1 Pupil Projections  
Luing
Primary
2022/2023 2023/2024 2024/2025 2025/2026 2026/2027 2027/2028
Approved
Capacity
49 49 49 49 49 49
Roll
Projection
2 3 4 5 6 6 
12.2  Educational Benefits
This statement focusses on Easdale Primary School, which is the
school Luing pupils have been attending since December 2020. 
12.2.1  Learning and Teaching 
The curriculum includes a broad range of experiences
which are planned for children and young people through

Page 30

30 
their education, to help every child and young person to
develop knowledge, skills and attributes for success in
learning, life and work. 
In Easdale Primary School, children are encouraged to
be eager and active participants who are engaged,
resilient and highly motivated during their learning.
Children know that their views are sought, valued and
acted upon. The learning environment encourages high
level of achievement, providing a wide range of
opportunities for children to achieve their full potential
within the four contexts of learning. 
In Easdale Primary School children may be taught in
classes composed of children from more than one year
group. Children benefit from being part of a social context
in which they can build relationships with different groups
and individuals, develop social skills, meet challenges
and exercise responsibilities as members of a social
group. They are able to interact and socialise with groups
of children of varying sizes and composition, take part in
team activities and move with their peers to secondary
school. 
There is a continual challenge for all schools to deliver a
school improvement agenda and deliver effectively the
principles and outcomes of curriculum for excellence. The
National Improvement Framework priorities include
raising attainment for all, and closing the gap between the
most and least disadvantaged children.   
The principles of Curriculum for Excellence recognise the
professionalism of teachers and the importance of this in
exercising the freedom and responsibility associated with
broader guidance. This means that schools are able to
design their curriculum to meet the specific needs of their
children and community. At Easdale Primary School, staff
are challenged and supported through a range of
continuous professional development and review
opportunities gained by working and learning with a range
of colleagues. Easdale Primary School is part of the
Oban, Lorne and the Isles (OLI) Schools Cluster, which
means that staff can be supported together, moderation
and tracking of pupil progress is enabled and staff work

Page 31

31 
across stage appropriate groups. Colleagues within
Easdale Primary School are able to support and
challenge each other on a daily basis. The whole staff are
able to bring a range of talents and skills to benefit
outcomes for learners. 
Easdale Primary School encourages nurturing and
positivity. One aspect of this work is a successful Buddy
System. Children from different stages work and learn
together. This vertical support is particularly evident on
numerous occasions when groups of children are
together in a social context. This system develops and
benefits both the ‘buddy’ and the ‘buddied’. To implement
this system there needs to be children across a range of
stages in the school. 
Both Easdale and Luing are very remote rural schools.
Each school is set within a remote rural area (Scottish
Government classification).   
The co-location of the nursery and the primary classes at
Easdale Primary School enhances the transition process
for the children moving from Nursery in to Primary one,
through joint educational processes and liaison between
the two settings. 
12.2.2  Outcomes
Through the GIRFEC practice model, meeting the needs
of every child continues to be a priority and teachers
carefully plan and assess to ensure each child has the
opportunity to reach their potential.  Careful tracking and
monitoring procedures are in place to evidence pupil
progress. This includes professional dialogue with
teachers, learning discussions with children, classroom
observations, assessment and looking at pupil work.
Planning for Progress meetings are being further
strengthened. These discussions between home and
school improve parental engagement whilst focussing on
next steps for learning. Where appropriate, intervention is
put in place, while working effectively with other agencies
and parents to ensure the needs of each child are met. 
In the primary classes, standards of attainment have
been maintained over the last three years. Most children

Page 32

32 
are achieving national expectations in reading, writing,
listening, talking and numeracy. Easdale continues to
develop within the PATHS program supporting positive
behaviours and relationship within the school.  A larger
staff, parent body and partner group by nature increases
the breadth of talent and interest that may be available to
share within a school setting. This applies both in terms
of the wider curriculum and within aspects of the
curriculum that may be enhanced by staff individual
expertise e.g. PE, language, science, expressive arts
teaching. 
12.2.3  Experiences - Broadening the Range of Opportunities 
Children are offered a range of active, planned
experiences which help them develop the knowledge and
understanding, skills, capabilities and attributes which
they need for their mental, emotional, social and physical
wellbeing both now and in the future.   
12.2.4  Environment for Learning
Easdale Primary School is a suitably-equipped and well
supported school, situated on the Isle of Seil. The entire
building is well maintained and along with the surrounding
scenery provides attractive accommodation for the
primary school.  The building has facilities for pupils and
visitors with special access needs. 
12.3  Assessment of Rural Factors 
The reasons why the future of Luing Primary School is being reviewed
are stated at Section 2 of this report. There is currently no expectation
for the pupil numbers to increase significantly at the School. Luing
Primary School is mothballed with two pupils accessing education at
Easdale Primary from August 2022. Having considered all the
alternatives above, the option to close Luing Primary School and
realign the catchment area for Easdale Primary School to subsume the
former Luing Primary School catchment area is considered the most
reasonable means to address the reasons identified at Section 2 of this
report. 
12.3.1  Community Impact
The majority of the community who attended the
consultation day in May 2022 did not support the closure
of the school. There was a strong feeling that the
sustainability of the Isle of Luing would be threatened

Page 33

33 
without a school of its own. There was also the benefits of
island life that are enhanced by having a school on the
island that community members valued and children have
previously enjoyed.  All people who attended the pre-
consultation meeting strongly stated the school building
should be also used by the community and not allowed to
fall in to further disrepair, as that would adversely impact
on the community’s access to the premises. The
difficulties in affordable housing on the island are a factor
and the Community Trust are working to address these
for the long term future.  There is a history of school rolls
fluctuating over a long period of time on the island. 
12.3.2  Travel Arrangements
The travel distance (sourced from Google maps) from
Luing Primary to Easdale Primary is 6 miles, including a
ferry crossing of 4 minutes which runs to public timetable.
Travel time to Easdale Primary is approximately 45
minutes to 1 hour, this could be slightly longer or shorter,
depending on ferry times, and where children live on the
Isle of Luing. The protocol for travel arrangements has
already been described in Section 6.4.2 but has not been
used by the existing family as the arrangements are
viewed by them and some members of the community as
being unsafe and putting children at risk. They also feel
there is a lot of expectation for young children. The travel
arrangements have been available since the school was
mothballed. The existing family has chosen to take and
pick up their child themselves, incurring personal financial
costs and also dedicating time during the working day.
The child travelling from Luing to Easdale Primary was in
Primary One in May 2022 and indicated as he spoke to
the Education Officer as part of the pre-consultation
process that he was tired of travelling and would prefer to
attend the local school. 
Travel is an accepted aspect of living in the Luing
community. Children throughout Argyll and Bute make
very similar journeys on school transportation, ferries and
service buses every day. Closure of Luing Primary
School would have no effect on current staff travel. The
small number of children has minimal effect on staffing
within Easdale Primary, the receiving primary school.

Page 34

34 
This option would have no effect on the current travel
arrangements in place for staff and pupils. However, the
family with the current pupil attending Easdale Primary
has expressed concern about the sustainability of the
current situation and is dissatisfied. The community have
also made their views known in terms of their concerns
about what is available. The closure of Luing Primary
School, in relation to travel would have a neutral effect on
the environment.  There is currently no additional annual
transport cost for pupils to travel to Easdale Primary
School and the use of the existing mini-bus, ferry and
West Coast Motors service bus would not incur additional
costs in the immediate future. 
12.4  Financial Impact 
The main elements included within a school budget are Teacher
employment costs (ie basic salary costs plus related employer’s
National Insurance and Superannuation contributions plus any relevant
individual allowances); Local Government employee costs and an
allocation for discretionary expenditure incurred by the school (i.e.
educational equipment, materials, staff travel, etc.).  Teacher staffing
budgets are calculated on an annual basis and within the Primary
sector are determined, taking cognisance of the SNCT class size
maxima, by the number of classes required to provide for the specific
number and age of the pupils in each school.  When a school ceases
to be operational the Teacher staffing budget is adjusted (at the
appropriate time), per entitlement information from Education HR, with
the staffing budget resulting in a nil value.  As a result of the authority’s
policy for no Teacher redundancies it is presumed that the staff are
deployed elsewhere within the authority and therefore their salary costs
still exist with an increase to the receiving school’s budget, unless the
member of staff is filling a vacancy.  This is also in line with the national
priority of maintaining teacher numbers.  This methodology also applies
to the school’s discretionary budget which again is formula based.  The
budget of the receiving school, in terms of any pupils being transferred,
will have increased.  The figures outlined below take account of the fact
that the staffing and discretionary budgets have been adjusted to nil. 
The annual running costs during mothballing of Luing Primary School
are a total of £10,323.

Page 35

35 
Annual savings generated through closing Luing Primary School would
be £10,323. 
The costs/savings outlined above assumes all revenue expenditure
would cease. This includes non-domestic rates, utility costs,
insurances, etc.  If the school was to be formally closed, this would
allow the council to take steps towards selling the school to a third
party or local community. 
12.5  Environmental Impact
From August 2022, two pupils will travel to Easdale Primary. However
this option would have a neutral environmental impact on the current
position and would have no impact on the current travel arrangements
for staff and pupils. Eventually all pupils will attend Easdale Primary
School. Travel is an accepted aspect of rural life. 
13.  CONCLUSION
Three alternative options have been reviewed in considering the future
of Luing Primary School.  For each option, information was collated
and consideration was given to:
• Community feedback;
• Pupil numbers; 
• Financial Information;
• Assessment of rural factors, including community impact, economic
impact and travel arrangements, and
• Educational Benefits.
An authority that is contemplating a rural school closure proposal must
satisfy the preliminary requirements set out in Section 12A of the 2010
Act before formulating a proposal. 
After consideration of the preliminary requirements, as set out in the
Act, and the options, and having regard to the specific reasons
identified at Section 2 of this report, closing Luing Primary School and
realigning the catchment area of Easdale Primary School to include the
current catchment area for Luing Primary School is the most reasonable
option in order to address the reasons for the possible proposal. 
It is recommended that the Community Services Committee:
a. Note the outcome of this consideration of the preliminary
requirements; and,
b. Agree that officers now formulate a draft proposal that will come
back to the June 2023 meeting of the Committee for approval by
members which would subsequently trigger the formal

Page 36

36 
consultation process under the Schools (Consultation)
(Scotland) Act 2010. 
Appendix 1 Local Develop Plans for Luing Area

Page 37

37

Page 38

38

Page 39

39 
Appendix 2 Local Development Plans for Easdale Area

Page 40

40 
Appendix 3

Page 41

41

Page 42

42 
Appendix 4  Luing Floor plan 
Appendix 5

Page 43

43 
Appendix 5   Easdale Primary

Page 44

44 
Appendix 6 
Luing – Community Consultation Day    26th May 2022
How has the mothballing of the school affected you, your family and the
community? 
x18 Keep mothballed for the time being until we are ready for it as a school,
but ensure that the community can use it safely ie toddlers group and others
as appropriate in the meantime. 
x12 The building needs to be used sooner rather than later as it will
deteriorate and I am sure others would like to use it. 
x11 Continue to mothball for a while longer, with possible uses for other
purposes eg playgroup. Gives the community time and can attract families to
the area.
x11 Talk of the school being used by the community – we need to know how
to go about that – obviously there has not been a lot of opportunity for this
during the pandemic, but in the last six months, it could perhaps have been
used.
x9 Feel need to continue with mothballing at current time – it is what is right
for now, re-assess in 2-3 years time if things are looking more prosperous.
x9 negatively – can’t attract families here to work (and no accommodation) –
need the school.
x7 If the school is not viable, people will not come to the island.
x7 Do want it to be mothballed if it inhibits closing – need a bit more time to
see what is happening. 
x6 Extend mothballing – give us a chance to recover from COVID – everyone
really pulled together and stuck together and we are adjusting to everything. 
x13 We were not told as a Community Council about the school being able to
be used by the community or details about the mothballing
x10 Why did the community not know they could use the school while it was
being mothballed? 
x8 Didn’t know the school could be used whilst mothballed.
x6 Sad to see the school closed – this has a negative impact on the
community – moral, future thinking etc. 
x5 Holly Tea was a massive community event as was the school sports day
and Burns celebrations.
x3 Lack of community involved in children of Luing’s education – no
involvement in Easdale School, sadly.

Page 45

45 
x3 Folk have changed the way they work from home. People are still reeling
from COVID, these two years should not count. Beginning to think about the
future. Folk are adjusting and need to look at and assess. I think we will get
another influx on Luing.  
x2 There was no consultation for mothballing.
x2 Achaleven PS – an example of a school that mothballed and communities
change and needs of the population being met. 
I was part of the group that helped to protect the school previously – I feel it is
my duty as a resident to continue to do this. We need to continue to mothball
the school. 
There is a lack of awareness of what has happened. 
Church are also concerned about this and the groups that support activities
for all ages. 
Mothballing and transport arrangements 
x16 Current transportation for the children at the moment is not safe – no
seatbelts on the buses, it is a public service. Unattended? Council not taking
into account or taking concerns seriously. 
x15 Transport arrangements for young children needs looking at. I would not
want a member of my family to be travelling such a long way,
unaccompanied. 
x14 Transport arrangements not acceptable – why is the mini bus not being
used? 
x12 Feel transport – safety and use of mini bus – reinstated would be sought
after. 
x11 Current transport situation – need door to door service – the previous
school minibus should take them. 
x3 There are 3 stages for transporting young children to the school currently.
There is the mini-bus – to ferry – to service bus. 
x3 Thinking about transport – policy? This needs looking at – for young
children – it is a lot to expect.
The bus times for transporting children are ‘peak’ times. Also, the time it takes
out of the day for children and families to transport children. 
These are obstacles for children – what if they are not in school? 
What happens if bad weather happens and children are stranded?
One parent contacted the Officer leading the Pre-consultation and raised the
following issues in relation to travel for his child. He wanted to ensure that the
consultation recognised his dissatisfaction:

Page 46

46 
• The travel costs he has incurred in fuel, wear and tear on his car, costs
in ferry travel as he is extremely unhappy that the arrangements in
place for his child to travel puts his child at risk on a number of levels;
• The time taken as a family to transport his child;
• Travel times – the waiting time involved for the ferry;
• The arrangements suggested are unsafe, there are also no seatbelts
on the buses the children are travelling in;
• Members of the public are allowed to sit with unaccompanied children
that could be as young as 4 years, 6 months; 
• The cancellation of ferries; 
• The sustainability of the arrangements for them as a family and being
able to ensure their child attends school. 
Views on re-opening the school (with current catchment) 
x17 A key point is that the Community Trust have been working hard to bring
more families to the area but this can take  few years. We need the authority
to support us. This is a big thing for us.
x16 It’s more than just a school. 
x16 Smaller schools really support children of different ages P1-P7 looking
out for each other – all generations benefit from the school opening. 
x14 If no there is no school on the island, it is off putting to families
considering moving to the area.
x12 As a former pupil, I understand the population fluctuates – housing is an
issue – the Community Trust are pursuing this and it could create affordable
housing which could support the school. 
x12 In a wee community like this – the school was at the centre – the
community were able to support the children – this is harder when the school
is not on the island. 
x10 When the ferry is involved, it does change everything – adds time to the
commute. 
x10 As a community we want to support the local parents. 
x10 The prospect of a school gives hope to families moving to the island –
there will be education locally for their children.
x7 A lot of families on Seil and Kilmelford would move back to Luing but
housing that is affordable is a massive issue. 
x6 Escort offered for two days? Unsafe. 
x6 If you want to get more children on the island, it is not made very easy.

Page 47

47 
x5 A community needs to thrive – we need facilities to attract families. 
x4 school is an integral part of the community.
x3 If no school is available, transport is not suitable – children on their own?
Bus? 
x3 If they have a joint HT, there would be collaboration between both schools
– there could be advantages.
x2 There are 2 issues – main one is that it is important to have a school on
the island. Second, is that it may be that a village primary in which the
numbers are low does not suit every child.
x2 Things can fluctuate and numbers can go up and down. A permanent
closure would not be good – can we illustrate that there is potential for
numbers to go up? Even with small numbers, it will attract more families to the
area. 
x2 Upset at lack of consultation over mothballing 2020 and sudden short
notice about this latest Pre-consultation. 
As parents, we move here 1 year ago and I felt I had no option but to send my
child to Easdale PS. I am not willing to put my child on a public service bus.
The council need to understand that this is a historical cycle on the Isle of
Luing, when I attended the school, there were 6 children, 7 children when my
children went but then when my youngest son left there was around 30
children – the roll goes up and down and the school has remained open. This
is nothing new in the last 55 years. We would ask that it continues to remain
open as we believe the numbers will go up. 
We are going through a difficult patch – we need to be very careful about
preserving the community – if we do not have a school we will not attract
families to the area. 
Can understand why parents are not keen to send children to a school with
low numbers in terms of education, but it only takes 1-2 families to move into
the area for numbers to go up.
I believe there are 25 new residents on Luing.
A lot of young families on the island. This is really hard.
The school was an important part of previous children’s lives here and it was
an important part of our small community which supported it and seeing the
children there. 
Views on closing the school
x15 The school is vital to the future of the island. My substantial experience in
education makes me very concerned. Previously the school was under threat,

Page 48

48 
we fought this and the roll has declined. However, there needs to be enough
children to attend. There are potential pupils currently. We will campaign
against closure as strongly as we did 10 years ago.
x9 Absolutely not – once it’s gone it’s gone and cancels any future of Luing
children being educated on their island.
x8 Would be a shame for children not to have school on the island. Special
community and school should be safe guarded. 
x8 Having a school on Luing attracts more families and enterprises to the
area, which is what we need. The proposals would be to campaign as before
when the school was under threat, which I am sure people will do. 
x7 I would like my child to be educated with more numbers.
x3 A great pity if the school were to close. 
x2 My child has friends whose family would love to move over here but
housing is hard. It would be wonderful to have them here. 
Easdale ELC has 10 children – which is better socially and for educational
purposes.
There is a really good community at Easdale PS for the children. My child
likes going on the ferry.
I was part of the group that helped to protect the school previously – I feel it is
my duty as a resident to continue to do this. We need to continue to mothball
the school. 
If the school closed, it would be the death nell for the community.
Need to bring some life to the area. Vibrancy. It would be tragic if it were to
close. 
The islands part of A & B make up and identity.
The future of the building 
x5 Empty buildings are bad – use it for outwards bound activities with the High
School. 
x5 Could the school not now be our nursery?
x3 Could the building be used to link with UHI and Argyll College for learning?
Adult learning? A study space in classes? This happens in Mull, Campbeltown
and on Islay. Folk studying on the island could use this facility – you have less
distractions than at home.
x4 Used as a Pre-school facility for early learning?
There must be other ways of using the school building – previously used as a
café and for choirs to use.

Page 49

49 
Opportunity for others to use for other things – client groups would be
interested. 
Need to use the school for evening classes or ‘back up’ school if something
happens to Easdale PS in the winter.
General comments 
x8 Communication? Why has it taken so long from the decision in terms of the
process, Dec 2020 until now? 
x8 Planning system does not always support affordable housing.
x2 Cost of living here is high. Transporting children from Luing to Easdale, if
you chose to do that yourself is an added cost. There are 6 houses being built
currently. 
Fibre broadband to all houses planned end of 2023
Feeling that we are at a ‘Pre-consultation’ which will inform decisions about
the future of the school very quickly – and it is about closure or opening the
school formally. 
Communication prior to this meeting today did not provide us with an
understanding of what was happening. 
The community knows what the potential is. 
Living on an island, it is already remote. 
It is a lifestyle choice.
Peoples working habits will change post COVID. People do move. 
Our community Trust are looking into affordable housing and jobs and
business. Lots happening within the island, to generate jobs. Opportunities for
ACA and A&B owned housing. 
“Housing is an issue on the island. Easdale PS love having Luing children
with them – it is brilliant as they get to be with their peers. While it would be
nice to have a school on your doorstep, being with children of different ages is
important.”
“It would be lovely to see the school open however, children’s welfare is not
good if there are not many children there and they cannot reach their
milestones. It is important that they mix with children of their own age and
other ages.” 
“Financially, it is hard. The staffing, support for pupils and teaching
commitments need to be considered as all of this would be hard to find.”
The school at the heart of the community
x12 Luing PS was at the heart of the community and the whole community
supported the children – local community raised amazing amounts of cash

Page 50

50 
and it gave the community a chance to get together – Christmas and
Halloween parties – everyone was together.