Supplementary Document Pack (1) (Bookmarked) 04.03.26
West Dunbartonshire Council · 4 March 2026
Back to West Dunbartonshire Council — 4 March 2026 and its agenda
Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.
Page 1
Supplementary Agenda West Dunbartonshire Council Date: Wednesday, 4 March 2026 ___________________________________________________________________ Time: 16:00 ___________________________________________________________________ Format: Hybrid meeting ________________________________________________________________ Contact: Carol-Ann Burns Email: carol-ann.burns@west-dunbarton.gov.uk committee.admin@west-dunbarton.gov.uk Dear Member ITEM TO FOLLOW I refer to the agenda for the above meeting that was issued on 19 February 2026 and now enclose a copy of the undernoted report which was not available for issue at that time. Yours faithfully PETER HESSETT Chief Executive Note referred to:- 6/ Page 67
Page 2
6 GENERAL SERVICES BUDGET SETTING 2026/27, AND 2027/28 TO 2030/31 BUDGET ESTIMATES 69 – 465 Submit report by the Chief Officer – Resources:- (a) summarising the key issues relating to the revenue budget estimates and setting of Council Tax for 2026/27 and the Council’s capital plan, and providing budget estimates for 2027/28 to 2030/31; and (b) seeking approval of the General Services revenue and capital budgets for 2026/27 through approval of options to close the 2026/27 revenue budget gap. Distribution:- Provost Karen Murray Conaghan Councillor June McKay Councillor James Bollan Councillor John Millar Councillor Kevin Crawford Councillor Lawrence O’Neill Councillor Ian Dickson Councillor Lauren Oxley Councillor Diane Docherty Councillor Chris Pollock Councillor Fiona Hennebry Councillor Martin Rooney Councillor Gurpreet Singh Johal Councillor William Rooney Councillor Daniel Lennie Councillor Gordon Scanlan Councillor David McBride Councillor Hazel Sorrell Councillor Jonathan McColl Councillor Clare Steel Councillor Michelle McGinty Councillor Sophie Traynor Chief Executive Chief Officers Date of issue: 25 February 2026 Page 68
Page 3
WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL Report by Chief Officer - Resources Council: 4 March 2026 Subject: General Services Budget Setting 2026/27 and 2027/28 – 2030/31 Budget Estimates 1. PURPOSE 1.1 This report summarises the key issues relating to the revenue budget estimates and setting of Council Tax for 2026/27 and the Council’s capital plan. It also provides budget estimates for 2027/28 to 2030/31. 1.2 To seek Members approval of the General Services revenue and capital budgets for 2026/27 through approval of options to close the 2026/27 revenue budget gap. 2. RECOMMENDATIONS 2.1 Members are asked to: a) Approve options set out in Appendix 2 to be used to set the General Services revenue budget for 2026/27 and assist with future projected budget gaps. b) Note the management adjustments set out in Appendix 3 to be used to set the General Services revenue budget for 2026/27 and assist with future projected budget gaps. c) Agree the 2026/27 Health and Social Care Partnership Requisition including consideration of the issues highlighted in section 4.9 of this report. d) Agree the 2026/27 West Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust management fee including consideration of the issues highlighted in section 4.10 of this report. e) Agree the 2026/27 Council Tax rate. f) Note the planned use of earmarked reserves of £1.648m in 2026/27. g) Approve the proposed 2026/27 capital plan set out in Appendix 4. 3. BACKGROUND 3.1 A report to Council on 17 December 2025 reported an estimated 2026/27 mid- range budget gap of £9.243m and provided a range of options for Member consideration to close that gap. As a result of decisions made by Council on 17 ITEM 6 Page 69
Page 4
December 2025, the 2026/27, and future year mid-range budget gaps were reduced as set out in Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1: Mid-Range Budget Gap After 17/12/25 Council Meeting 2026/27 £000 2027/28 £000 2028/29 £000 2029/30 £000 2030/31 £000 17 Dec 2025 Council Report 9,243 20,787 35,224 45,324 54,738 Saving Options Agreed 17 Dec 2025 (189) (312) (312) (312) (312) Management Adjustments Reported 17 Dec 2025 (1,371) (1,371) (1,371) (1,371) (1,371) Updated Cumulative Budget Gap 7,683 19,104 33,541 43,641 53,055 3.2 This position has been updated to reflect changes since 17 December 2025. The revised position is set out in the remainder of this report. 4. MAIN ISSUES 4.1 Scottish Government Settlement to Councils 2026/27 4.1.1 The Scottish Budget was announced by the Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Local Government on 13 January 2026. The Local Government Finance Circular 1/2026 was published on the same day. This Circular detailed the provisional revenue and capital funding allocations for 2026/27. The provisional total funding allocations form the basis for the annual consultation between the Scottish Government and COSLA ahead of the Local Government Finance (Scotland) Order 2026 being presented to the Scottish Parliament which at the time of writing is currently scheduled for the end of February 2026. 4.1.2 The Circular outlines that the Scottish Government will work in partnership with local government to implement the budget and the joint priorities in return for the full funding package worth £15.7 billion which includes: • £773.8 million of funding baselined as General Revenue Grant as part of the Verity House Agreement commitment to review ring-fenced funding • £253.9 million of additional General Revenue Grant to support local priorities • £3 million to support Free School Meals • £160 million for adult social care workers in commissioned services • £11 million to improve pay for early learning and childcare workers in commissioned services • £11 million to support development of people working in children’s social work • £7 million to support provision of Free Personal and Nursing care • £40 million to improve active travel infrastructure • £11.4 million resource and £15.5 million capital to improve inter-island connectivity. Page 70
Page 5
4.1.3 As per paragraph 4.1.2 the Scottish Government has announced £253.9m of additional General Revenue Grant for 2026/27. COSLA’s analysis, however, identifies £234.9m of additional resource—£19m less than the Scottish Government figure. The difference relates to how the uplift required for the Real Living Wage in the care sectors has been calculated. Funding has historically been calculated by applying the uplift to the National Living Wage rate. For 2026/27, the Scottish Government has changed its approach and applied the uplift only to the National Living Wage rather than the Real Living Wage. Their position, when the settlement was announced, was that the voluntary Real Living Wage increases are an employer duty. This change resulted in a Scotland wide underfunding of £19m across social care. Since the settlement was announced the Scottish Government have made additional funding available to cover this shortfall. The distribution of this funding is still to be confirmed although the estimated total for the Council is £0.325m with this split between the Health and Social Care Partnership (£0.321m) and general fund (for Early Years) (£0.004m). Also included in the £253.9m additional general revenue grant money is the agreed Scottish Government contribution to the 2026/27 pay award (0.5% equating to £41m) and the 2026/27 Teacher Pay award (£18m). Accordingly, the additional general revenue grant money amounted to £194.9m. 2026/27 Scottish Government Funding for West Dunbartonshire Council 4.1.4 Officers have analysed the Scottish Government settlement to confirm the Council’s total 2026/27 funding before adjusting for changes in funding which have associated commitments. This is summarised in Exhibit 2. Exhibit 2 – Summary of Movement from Original 2025/26 Settlement to Final 2026/27 Settlement £,000 2025/26 Grant Settlement 1/25 (February 2025) 255,563 School Milk 16 No one left behind 68 Prisoner early release 25 Nature Restoration Fund 58 Employers’ National insurance 2,580 Resettlement 78 Holiday activities 20 Single use vape 4 Rapid Rehousing Transition Plan (RRTP) top up 26 Teacher Pay Award 2025/26 491 Revenue Pay Award 2025/26 1,427 Teacher induction scheme 173 Scottish Welfare Fund 131 Teacher Pay 2026/27 1,025 Electoral Registration Officers 20 Children's social care Real Living Wage – Health & Social Care Partnership (HSCP) 155 Children's social care Real Living Wage - Education 32 Page 71
Page 6
SRA kinship 39 Discretionary Housing Payment 262 Children's Services Real Living Wage - HSCP 168 Children's Services Real Living Wage - Education 31 Scottish Assessors 12 HSCP Carers Service and Respite Care – Real Living Wage 2,870 Early Learning Childcare 208 Pupil Equity Funding 9 School Clothing 7 Revenue Pay Award 2026/27 724 Uncommitted Funding 1,007 2026/27 Grant Settlement 2/26 (February 2026) 267,229 4.2 Future Years Scottish Government Funding 4.2.1 Alongside the announcement of the Scottish budget on 13 January 2026, the Scottish Government also released its three-year spending review. This document outlines multi-year spending plans for various Scottish Government portfolios spanning from 2026/27 to 2028/29. This is summarised in Exhibit 3. Exhibit 3 – Summary of Scottish Government Portfolio Three Year Spending Plans as per January 2026 Spending Review Portfolio 2026/27 £m 2027/28 £m 2028/29 £m Change over three-year period £m % Change over two-year period] Local Government 14,783 14,772 14,773 -10 -0.07% Finance (excluding Local Government) 421 363 365 -56 -13.30% Health and Social Care 21,952 22,786 23,896 1,944 8.86% Social Justice 8,024.3 8,485.7 8,875.7 851 10.61% Education & Skills 3,556.1 3,594.5 3,592.1 36 1.01% Justice & Home Affairs 4061 3,890.8 3,680.4 -381 -9.37% Transport 3,952.4 4,053.2 4,335.1 383 9.68% Deputy First Minister, Economy and Gaelic 1,362.3 1,342.9 1,264.2 -98 -7.20% Housing 1,205.3 1,272.7 1,370.0 165 13.66% Rural Affairs, Land Reform & Islands 1,111.4 1,116.9 1,128.7 17 1.56% Climate Action and Energy 435.8 434.8 433.4 -2 -0.55% Constitution, External Affairs & Culture 397.5 445.9 437.8 40 10.14% Page 72
Page 7
Crown Office & Procurator Fiscal Service 248.6 246.8 245.3 -3 -1.33% Scottish Parliament and Audit Scotland 166 163 168 2 1.20% Total Scotland 61,677 62,968 64,565 2,888 4.68% 4.2.2 Exhibit 3 illustrates that Local Government funding, in cash terms, is expected to decrease slightly over the three-year period which will require councils to absorb the financial pressures brought about by inflationary increases. It is expected detailed estimates at Local Authority level will be available in the Spring at which point assumptions about future years funding can be further reviewed. In the meantime, a flat cash settlement has been assumed in future years. 4.3 Council Tax 4.3.1 The Council Tax income budget for 2025/26 was set at £45.426m. This is the starting position for 2026/27. 4.3.2 As the setting of Council Tax is subject to a political decision no assumptions were made in year about any increase in 2026/27 or future years. However, a modest growth in the Council Tax base is assumed over the next five years as summarised in Exhibit 4. Exhibit 4: Estimated Council Tax Income 2026/27-2030/31 2026/27 £000 2027/28 £000 2028/29 £000 2029/30 £000 2030/31 £000 Council Tax Income (before any increase) 45,426 45,426 45,426 45,426 45,426 Estimated Council Tax Base Growth 213 428 643 858 1,071 Total Council Tax Income 45,639 45,854 46,069 46,284 46,497 4.4 Total Funding 4.4.1 Exhibit 5 summarises the total estimated funding over the next five years within the mid-range scenario. Exhibit 5: Estimated funding 2026/27-2030/31 Para 2026/27 £000 2027/28 £000 2028/29 £000 2029/30 £000 2030/31 £000 General Funding 4.1.4 267,229 267,229 267,229 267,229 267,229 Council Tax Income 4.3.2 45,639 45,854 46,069 46,284 46,497 Extended Producer Responsibility Reported to Council Dec 2025 2,397 2,397 2,397 2,397 2,397 Page 73
Page 8
Released Strathclyde Pension Fund Gain Reported to Council Dec 2025 5,332 3,726 0 0 0 One off use of Smoothing Fund in 2025/26 Agreed by Council in Mar 2025 (20) 0 0 0 0 Total Funding 320,577 319,206 315,695 315,910 316,123 4.5 Base Budget 4.5.1 The base budget for 2026/27 starts off as the 2025/26 revenue budget of £313.604m and is then adjusted for the changes set out in the following paragraphs. The base budgets for the subsequent years follow the same logic so the base increases each year to reflect the assumptions built into the prior year. 4.5.2 There are elements of Scottish Government funding that are provided as part of the settlement with the expectation they are used to deliver the service/policy intended. The base budget needs to be adjusted to reflect the additional costs of delivering on these funding commitments and the budget increase is limited to the funding. These commitments, or changes to previous commitments, are set out in Exhibit 6. There are funds yet to be distributed including Scottish Disability Allowance (£3.3m), Free Personal Nursing Care (£7m) and Care Leaver Payments (£3.952m), Real Living Wage (£20m). The HSCP’s share of these will be added to the requisition once distributed. Exhibit 6: Funding Commitments 2026/27 £000 2027/28 £000 2028/29 £000 2029/30 £000 2030/31 £000 HSCP Carers Services, Respite Care and Health & Social Care Uplift (including share of Real Living Wage) 2,870 2,870 2,870 2,870 2,870 Scottish Disability Assistance - undistributed (70) (70) (70) (70) (70) Children’s Services 165 165 165 165 165 HSCP Total 2,965 2,965 2,965 2,965 2,965 COUNCIL Teachers’ Pay 362 362 362 362 362 Discretionary Housing 223 223 223 223 223 2026/27 Pay Award 485 485 485 485 485 Page 74
Page 9
Scottish Assessors Barclay Implementation 11 11 11 11 11 Pupil Equity Funding 9 9 9 9 9 COUNCIL Total 1,090 1,090 1,090 1,090 1,090 4.5.3 There are base budget adjustments required to either reflect decisions taken in previous budgets which have an impact on the 2026/27 budget or decisions already reported to Council during 2025/26. These are: New Base Budget Adjustments since December Council Meeting • The 2024/25 management fee paid to West Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust was reduced by £0.500m to take account of the temporary reduction in the Strathclyde Pension employer’s contribution rate from 19.3% to 6.5%. The rate will increase back to 17.5% in 2026/27 which requires the management fee to be increased by £0.465m. The reason the required increase is less than the £0.500m reduction is primarily because the rate is increasing to 17.5% rather than 19.3%. • As part of the 2022/23 budget the Council agreed to invest £0.250m per annum for four years in the modern apprentice scheme. 2025/26 was the final year of this commitment. • As part of the 2023/24 budget the Council agreed to invest £0.120m per annum to provide food subsidy to foodbanks for a three-year period. 2025/26 was the final year of this commitment. • Finance have reviewed the future loan charges revenue budget projections to reflect the decisions taken by Council in December 2025 to reduce the capital programme and account for reprofiling of the capital programme reported over the course of 2025/26. The combined impact of this is to reduce forecast expenditure in 2025/26 by £0.300m. • Finance have reviewed a range of sundry and service budget lines to update expenditure estimates for areas such as utilities, non-domestic rates relief, travel and subsistence. The combined impact of this is to reduce forecast expenditure in 2025/26 by £0.527m. Base Budget Adjustments Already Reported to Previous Council Meetings • June and October 2025 Council - £4.239m adjustment to the service concession arrangement with adjustments profiled within the base budget in future years. • June 2025 Council - £0.250m adjustment to reduce estimated allocation to the Housing Revenue Account for Central Support Allocation costs. • June 2025 Council - £0.580m adjustment for staff costs which were generating income as they were allocated to HRA capital budgets which is no longer appropriate. • June 2025 Council - £0.350m adjustment to remove a double count allocation of Free School Meals income between services and a central budget line. Page 75
Page 10
• June 2025 Council - £0.480m adjustment reflecting a more cost-effective way to provide school/college transportation through the procurement of minibuses and employing drivers. 4.5.4 The revised 2026/27 base budget is shown in Exhibit 7. Exhibit 7: Revised Base Budget Para 2026/27 £000 Base Budget 4.5.1 313,604 HSCP Funding Commitments 4.5.2 2,965 Council Funding Commitments 4.5.2 1,090 Adjust for Leisure Trust Pension Costs 4.5.3 465 Profiling of March 2022 Council Growth Items 4.5.3 (250) Profiling of March 2023 Council Growth Items 4.5.3 (120) Review of loan charges 4.5.3 (300) Review of Sundry and Service Budgets 4.5.3 (621) Service Concession Adjustment 4.5.3 (4,329) Adjustment to HRA Central Support Allocation costs 4.5.3 250 Adjustment to capital Central Support Allocation 4.5.3 580 Free School Meals 4.5.3 350 Alternative delivery of school transportation 4.5.3 (480) Revised Base Budget 313,204 4.5.5 The base budget for future years, before any 2026/27 budget decisions, is shown in Exhibit 15 after taking into account unavoidable cost pressures, employee cost changes and non-pay inflation. 4.6 Employee Costs 4.6.1 In terms of 2026/27 employee budgets, the expectation would be that the budget would reflect the 2025/26 budget plus any increase due to pay awards, incremental progression, and a small built-in assumption of savings being generated through turnover. 4.6.2 The 2026/27 pay award has been agreed as 3.5% and this has been built into estimates as has an increase in the Council’s national insurance contribution. 4.6.3 Exhibit 8 summarises the estimated changes to the employee budgets in each of the next five years for Council services including an assumption of £0.680m for incremental increases in 2026/27 rising to £0.711m per annum in future years. Exhibit 8: Estimated Employee Costs 2026/27-2030/31 2026/27 £000 2027/28 £000 2028/29 £000 2029/30 £000 2030/31 £000 Pay award 5,445 5,608 5,776 5,949 6,127 National Insurance Increase 117 121 124 128 132 Page 76
Page 11
Increments 680 711 711 711 711 Total Employee Increases 6,242 6,440 6,611 6,788 6,970 4.7 Non-Pay Inflation 4.7.1 Inflation has been included in the 2026/27 budget estimates and future year estimates where it is considered necessary to ensure budgets are adjusted to reflect expected increases in costs. An additional £0.500m annual general inflation has been built into the mid-range scenario (£0.250m in best case and £0.750m in worst case). 4.7.2 The additional budget requirement, in each year, for non-pay inflation estimated over the next five years is summarised in Exhibit 9. Exhibit 9: Non-Pay Inflation - 2026/27-2030/31 2026/27 £000 2027/28 £000 2028/29 £000 2029/30 £000 2030/31 £000 General Provision 500 500 500 500 500 Utilities – Gas 143 149 155 155 155 Utilities – Electricity 143 151 158 158 158 Utilities – Street Lighting 32 33 34 34 34 Water rates 42 44 47 50 50 Non-Domestic Rates 22 22 22 22 22 ICT 32 32 32 32 32 Landfill Tax 12 12 12 12 12 Audit Fee 20 20 20 20 20 PPP Unitary Payment 281 287 293 299 305 Residential Care Costs 94 98 102 100 100 Total 1,321 1,348 1,375 1,382 1,388 4.8 Cost Pressures 4.8.1 Services operate on the basis of having to contain any cost pressures within current resources wherever possible, however that is not always achievable and it is necessary to ensure budgets are adjusted where necessary for unavoidable cost increases. 4.8.2 Cost pressures have been reported to Council over the course of 2025/26 as they have materialised. However, there are three new cost pressures since the Finance Update reported to Council on 17 December 2025, which exceed £0.100m. 4.8.3 Cost Pressure 1 – Dunbartonshire and Argyll and Bute Valuation Joint Board (VJB) Contribution (£0.216m) Over the ten-year period 2016/17 – 2025/26 the total contribution made to the VJB by the three constituent authorities (West Dunbartonshire Council, East Dunbartonshire Council and Argyll and Bute Council) has been on a flat cash basis with the only exception being a small increase in 2025/26. This means the Page 77
Page 12
VJB has been absorbing all inflationary increases and pay awards from a combination of delivering savings and using reserves. Exhibit 10 demonstrates how the VJB reserves have been depleted from a balance of £0.902m in 2021/22 to £0.015m in 2025/26. This is £0.085m under their prudential target of £0.100m Exhibit 10 - Dunbartonshire and Argyll and Bute Valuation Joint Board Reserves The VJB’s financial position has been subject to ongoing discussions during 2025 between the Assessor and the S95 Officers of the three constituent authorities and there is an acceptance that the contribution from each authority needs to be uplifted to ensure the VJB remains financially viable. The Council’s share of the uplifted 2026/27 requisition is £1.108m which compares to the current budget of £0.880m. This is an increase of £0.228m which is partially funded by an increase in Scottish Government funding of £0.012m leaving a cost pressure to the Council of £0.216m for 2026/27. For the purposes of future budget planning an assumption has been made of a 2% per annum increase in the Council’s contribution. 4.8.4 Cost Pressure 2 – Sales, Fees and Charges (£0.154m) Finance have conducted a review of Council wide sales, fees and charges income which has highlighted a need to right size the income budget by reducing anticipated income by £0.154m. This is due to decreased levels of uptake over multiple years rather than due to any specific decrease in 2025/26. 4.8.5 Cost Pressure 3 - Gruggies Burn (£0.419m from 2028/29) In December 2025 Council agreed to progress the delivery of the full Gruggies Burn Flood Prevention scheme. This has no effect on the 2026/27 budget but, based on current project timings, the loans fund impact will create a cost pressure of £0.419m from 2028/29 onwards. 4.8.6 In addition to the cost pressures exceeding £0.100m the following less material cost pressures have been added to the budget: • Education – a review identified five budget lines needing increased totalling £0.252m with this partially offset by £0.159m of budget lines which could be reduced. This creating a net cost pressure of £0.093m. Page 78
Page 13
• Resources – total of £0.071m required to move estate surveyor salaries from the capital budget to the revenue budget, provide sufficient budget for security costs in relation to the Ardlui outdoor centre, and for the license for Call Secure which is required to ensure payment card industry compliance for cash receipting. • Citizens, Culture and Facilities – a review identified four budget lines needing increased totalling £0.097m with this partially offset by £0.068m of budget lines which could be reduced. This creating a net cost pressure of £0.029m. • Regulatory and Regeneration - £0.026m for the implementation of the IDOX document management system for Planning and Building Standards. 4.8.7 The full list of estimated cost pressures for Council services is noted in Exhibit 11. Exhibit 11: Cost Pressures - 2026/27-2030/31 2026/27 £000 2027/28 £000 2028/29 £000 2029/30 £000 2030/31 £000 SEEMIS Fees 2 2 2 2 2 Apprenticeship Levy 4 4 4 4 4 Loan Charges 3,070 180 500 500 500 2027/28 Local Government Elections 0 200 (200) 0 0 Housing Benefit Admin Subsidy 10 10 10 10 10 Software Licences 68 68 68 68 68 Intromission Provision 200 200 200 200 0 NDR Revaluation 900 190 0 0 0 Unfunded Pension Costs 200 100 100 100 100 Riverside Additional Support Needs 279 77 0 0 0 Reliance on Capital Receipts 500 500 500 500 500 General Provision 0 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Early Years Rate 45 0 0 0 0 Additional Support Needs Job Evaluation 305 0 0 0 0 Asset Valuation 50 0 0 0 0 Commercial Rental Income 500 0 0 0 0 Crematorium Income 165 0 0 0 0 Transport Costs 117 0 0 0 0 Commercial Waste Income 40 0 0 0 0 Local Delivery Plan 30 (30) 0 0 0 Diesel 60 0 0 0 0 Financial Ledger 85 22 3 3 4 Grass Cutting 250 0 0 0 0 ICT 56 0 50 0 0 Salt and Grit 60 0 0 0 0 Page 79
Page 14
General Materials Inflation 30 0 0 0 0 Additional Support Needs Swimming 10 0 0 0 0 Recycling Contract 240 0 0 0 0 Co-mingled Recycling Contract 30 0 0 0 0 Civic Waste Site Costs 60 0 0 0 0 Fuel Costs 45 0 0 0 0 Recycling Costs 30 0 0 0 0 Food Waste Vehicles 250 0 0 0 0 Provision for temporary system support 15 (8) (7) (1) 0 COSLA membership increase 9 4 4 4 4 Chief Exec pay award plus oncosts 20 0 0 0 0 Cybersecurity 168 0 0 0 0 Gruggies Burn 0 0 419 0 0 Website Costs 9 0 0 0 0 Shortfall in ASN income 66 0 0 0 0 Security/call-outs at Schools 21 0 0 0 0 Bus Contracts 126 0 0 0 0 School Lets Income 19 0 0 0 0 Metered Water Charges 24 0 0 0 0 Sales Fees and Charges 154 0 0 0 0 Building Cleaning - income 60 0 0 0 0 Catering 24 0 0 0 0 Call Secure 21 0 0 0 0 Estate Surveyors 40 40 40 40 0 Ardlui Security 10 0 0 0 0 VJB Requisition 216 4 4 4 4 Document Management System 26 0 0 0 0 Totals 8,719 2,563 2,697 2,434 2,196 4.9 West Dunbartonshire Health and Social Care Partnership (HSCP) 4.9.1 On 5 March 2025 the Council agreed a 2025/26 HSCP requisition of £93.442m. Exhibit 12 sets out the adjustments made to the 2025/26 HSCP requisition during 2025/26 and the indicative 2026/27 requisition after taking account of the impact of the 2026/27 settlement. Exhibit 12: In year adjustments to HSCP 2025/26 requisition and indicative 2026/27 requisition £,000 Original 2025/26 Requisition 93,442 Adjustments in year Budget Adjustments (8) Kinship 39 Page 80
Page 15
Pay – Children’s Services 155 Revised 2024/25 HSCP Requisition 93,628 Pay – Children’s Services 168 Carers Services, Respite Care and Health & Social Care Uplift (including share of real living wage) 2,870 Scottish Disability Assistance - Undistributed (70) 2026/27 HSCP Requisition 96,596 4.9.2 There is an ongoing assumption that the Council’s allocation to the HSCP will be on the basis of ‘flat cash’ plus the appropriate share of the Health & Social Care funding commitments detailed in the Local Government Finance Circular (adjusting for any one-off funding not recurring). However, the Council is able to provide the HSCP with a cash increase. There are three issues for Council to consider in relation to the 2026/27 requisition. 1. 2025/26 Pay Award 2. 2026/27 Pay Award 3. Any share of the £1.007m of the Council’s uncommitted settlement funding Each of these are detailed below. There has been no assumption made in this report about any political decision in relation to these three areas. Consequently, the budget gap presented in this report assumes no increase to the flat cash assumption. 4.9.3 2025/26 Pay Award £1.427m has been made available by the Scottish Government to the Council to partially fund the 2025/26 pay award. This allocation is based on the total local government workforce including Council employed social care staff delivering delegated services through the HSCP. However, councils have autonomy to allocate funding based on local needs and priorities. Therefore, Council, when agreeing the 2026/27 budget, needs to decide whether a share of the funding for the 2025/26 pay award is passed through to the HSCP. The HSCP makes up 33% of the overall Council staff costs (excluding Teachers) so if the full share was to be passed on this would amount to £0.475m and the budget gap for 2026/27 will increase by the amount passed on. 4.9.4 2026/27 Pay Award As stated in para 4.1.3 the Scottish Government has included 2026/27 pay award money within the £253/234.9m uncommitted figure. While the exact amount is not specified it has been assumed £0.724m is to partially fund the 2026/27 pay award. Therefore, Council, also needs to decide whether a share of the funding for the 2026/27 pay award is passed through to the HSCP. If the full share was to be passed on this would amount to £0.238m and the budget gap for 2026/27 will increase by the amount passed on. 4.9.5 Share of £1.007m Uncommitted Funding Page 81
Page 16
The process used by the Scottish Government to determine the allocation of revenue funding is based on a series of Gross Aggregate Expenditure (GAE) indicators such as number of school children, length of roads etc. Each indicator determines an allocation of cash to the Council however that does not place any restriction on what the Council can spend that allocation on. It is the totality of these indicators that determines the Council’s settlement. Some of those indicators relate to social care. 4.9.6 In 2026/27 there was a material change to the distribution of funding relating to Adult Social Care GAE indicators as the data previously underpinning the distribution methodology was approximately 20 years old. This created material changes to the allocations to councils. For West Dunbartonshire, the impact of these indicators in isolation increased the distribution by £3.022m, offset by other downward movements within Social Work resulting in an overall increase of £2.547m. However, the increase of Social Work indicators by £2.547m and other Council service GAE indicators by £1.146m cannot be considered in isolation as these are not reflected in the committed funding in the settlement and do not take account of the wider complexity of the settlement. Using the indicators alone may result in some councils being allocated a disproportionally higher or lower share of the available funding due to their circumstances. To avoid this and ensure a fair and stable distribution of funding available, the distribution formula is adjusted to reflect the ‘Main Funding Floor.’ 4.9.7 The Main Funding Floor sets a minimum grant floor to ensure all councils receive at least a minimum guaranteed increase in revenue support for each year when there is an overall increase in revenue funding or a maximum guaranteed decrease in those years where overall revenue funding decreases. In essence it ensures no council experiences excessively large variances in revenue support from one year to the next. Historically the Council has benefited from the floor, for example in 2025/26 the Council, gained £3.358m, however in 2026/27 the Council has contributed £2.548m to the floor, a movement of £5.906m which is taken from the Council’s funding to provide the final revenue support grant. The 2026/27 position is not entirely due to the material change in the adult social care distribution as it is a consequence of all settlement distributions. 4.9.8 As per paragraph 4.1.4 the overall increase in the Council’s uncommitted funding is £1.007m. This is the net consequence of all whole settlement including the changes in the GAE indicators, the contribution to the floor, funding made available for the 2026/27 pay award and other directed funding. Page 82
Page 17
4.9.9 The Council can choose to pass through a share of the uncommitted funding of £1.007m to the HSCP as part of the 2026/27 requisition. An indicative split based on the forecast 2025/26 expenditure as at period 7 in 2025/26 is set out below. 2025/26 Forecast Expenditure (£m) % Split Split of Uncommitted (£m) General Fund 230.346 71.14% 0.716 HSCP Requisition 93.442 28.86% 0.291 Total 323.788 100.00% 1.007 4.9.10 Exhibit 13 sets out the options for Council to consider in relation to the HSCP requisition. Exhibit 13 – HSCP Requisition Options Option 1 Flat Cash £,000 Option 2 Fund 25/26 Pay Award £,000 Option 3 Fund 25/26 and 26/27 Pay Award £,000 Option 4 Fund 25/26 and 26/27 Pay Award and Funding Share £,000 Indicative 2026/27 HSCP Requisition 96,596 96,596 96,596 96,596 2025/26 Pay Award 0 475 475 475 2026/27 Pay Award 0 0 238 238 Uncommitted Funding Share 0 0 0 291 Revised HSCP Requisition 96,596 97,071 97,309 97,600 Increase to Council Budget Gap 0 475 713 1,004 4.9.11 While Exhibit 13 sets out four possible options the Council can agree any requisition to the HSCP at either flat cash or higher. Council is asked to consider the totality of the HSCP requisition. 4.10 West Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust Management Fee 4.10.1 On 5 March 2025, the Council agreed a 2025/26 West Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust (WDLT) management fee of £4,597,492. 4.10.2 As per paragraph 4.5.3 the 2026/27 management fee needs to be increased by £464,750 to reflect the Strathclyde Pension employer’s contribution rate increasing to 17.5% in 2026/27. 4.10.3 The Service Level Agreement with the Trust does not require the Council to meet employee uplifts. The 2026/27 pay award will add £0.234m to their expenditure Page 83
Page 18
budget. When agreeing the 2026/27 budget Council needs to decide if funding will be provided for the 2026/27 pay award. Exhibit 14 sets out the options for Council to consider. Note that any decision on the Leisure Trust management fee also needs to consider saving option CCF10 which is included in Appendix 2. Exhibit 14 – West Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust Management Fee Option 1 Flat Cash Option 2 Fund 2026/27 Pay Award Base Mgt Fee 4,645,492 4,645,492 Adjust for Increase in Pension Rate 464,750 464,750 Updated Base Mgt Fee 5,110,242 5,110,242 2026/27 Pay Award 0 233,934 Revised Mgt Fee 5,110,242 5,344,176 Increase to Council Budget Gap 0 233,934 4.11 Budget Gap Prior to Measures to Balance Budget 4.11.1 The estimated budget gap prior to factoring in any potential options towards balancing the budget is summarised in Exhibit 15. Exhibit 15: Estimated Budget Gap Prior to Measures to Balance Budget Para 2026/27 £000 2027/28 £000 2028/29 £000 2029/30 £000 2030/31 £000 4.5.4 Revised Base Budget 313,204 325,867 336,514 346,702 356,136 4.6.4 Employee Cost Changes 6,242 6,440 6,611 6,788 6,970 4.7.2 Non-Pay Inflation 1,321 1,348 1,375 1,382 1,389 4.8.7 Cost Pressures 8,719 2,563 2,697 2,434 2,195 Total Expenditure 329,486 336,218 347,197 357,306 366,690 4.4.1 Total Funding 320,577 319,186 315,675 315,889 316,318 Budget Gap Cumulative 8,909 17,032 31,522 41,417 50,372 4.12.2 Exhibit 15 shows a 2026/27 budget gap prior to measures to balance the budget of £8.909m (assuming HSCP and WDLT requisitions as flat cash). 4.13 Measures to Balance the Budget – Previously Agreed 4.13.1 There are a number of measures to balance the budget which have already been agreed by Council. These are summarised in Exhibit 16. Exhibit 16: Previously Agreed Measures to Balance Budget 2026/27 £000 2027/28 £000 2028/29 £000 2029/30 £000 2030/31 £000 Management Adjustments (Mar 2024) 50 0 0 0 0 Savings Options (Dec 2024) 5 5 0 0 0 Page 84
Page 19
Management Adjustments (Dec 2024) 127 0 0 0 0 Savings Options (Mar 2025) 1,362 33 0 0 0 Management Adjustments (Mar 2025) 147 0 0 0 0 Savings Options (Dec 2025) 189 123 0 0 0 Management Adjustments (Dec 2025) 1,371 0 0 0 0 Assumed 5% increase in sales, fees and charges 448.5 471 495 520 546 Total Previously Agreed Savings 3,699 632 495 520 546 4.13.2 Exhibit 17 sets out the estimated budget gap after previously agreed measures. This shows that there is a further £5.210m of measures required to balance the 2026/27 budget. Exhibit 17: Budget Gap After Application of Previously Agreed Measures 2026/27 £000 2027/28 £000 2028/29 £000 2029/30 £000 2030/31 £000 Cumulative Budget Gap Before Previously Agreed Measures 8,909 17,032 31,522 41,417 50,372 Previously Agreed Measures (3,699) (632) (495) (520) (546) Cumulative Budget Gap After Previously Agreed Measures 5,210 16,401 31,027 40,897 49,826 4.13.3 Note that this residual gap of £5.210m assumes the: • HSCP requisition is not increased above flat cash (section 4.9 provides options ranging from flat cash to a £1.004m increase in 2026/27) • WDLT management fee is not increased above flat cash (section 4.10 provides options from flat cash plus increase in pension costs to a £0.234m increase in 2026/27) Depending on the decisions taken with regard to these two issues the budget gap could increase to as high as £6.448m. 4.14 Measures to Balance the Budget – For Council Approval 4.14.1 There are a range of options to assist Members to balance the 2026/27 budget. These options are set out in the following paragraphs. Page 85
Page 20
Council Tax 4.14.2 The setting of Council Tax should happen on the same day as the Council sets its revenue budget as once all proposals are considered, Council Tax is the balancing figure. The estimated budget gap makes no assumption over future Council Tax increases as setting the Council Tax is a matter for Council to decide. Each 1% increase in Council Tax will generate an estimated £0.454m in revenue and increase the weekly Band D bill by £0.30. Closing a budget gap of £5.210m (paragraph 4.13.2) would require a 11.5% Council Tax increase. If the budget gap increases to £6.448m (paragraph 4.13.3) an increase of 14.2% would be required. Exhibit 18 sets out the impact that increases of 7.5%, 10%. 12.5% and 15% would have on the budget gap and on the weekly bill for a Band D taxpayer (assuming they are liable for the full Council Tax charge). Exhibit 18: Impact of Council Tax Increases on Revenue and Band D Weekly Bill CT Increase 7.5% 10% 12.5% 15% Band D Weekly Bill Increase (£) 2.25 3.00 3.75 4.50 Net Revenue Benefit (£000) 3,405 4,540 5,675 6,810 4.14.3 Saving Options – As an alternative to fully closing the budget gap with a Council Tax increase officers have identified a range of saving options for member consideration. A number of the saving options submitted for member consideration have multiple options contained within them. Members are advised that many of the options have a full time equivalent employee impact. Efforts will be made to redeploy using the SWITCH Policy or to explore options including voluntary release. The total value of the ‘higher value’ saving options is a recurring saving of £3.152m in 2026/27 rising to £5.241m in 2027/28 and £5.847m in future years. These options are summarised in Appendix 1 with full details of each option set out in Appendix 2. 4.14.4 Management Adjustments – Officers have also identified management adjustments which do not result in either potential redundancies or changes to policy and can be implemented without political approval. The total value of these management adjustments is a recurring saving of £0.705m in 2026/27 increasing to £0.775m in future years. These options are summarised in Appendix 1 with full details of each option set out in Appendix 3. 4.14.5 Sales, Fees and Charges - The Council’s financial planning currently assumes a 5% annual increase in sales, fees and charges which will generate an estimated £0.295m increase in 2026/27. This assumption is already built into the 2026/27 budget gap. The Council may wish to consider an option to increase fees and charges by a higher percentage. Each further 1% increase in the Council’s fees and charges would generate approximately £0.060m in income. Page 86
Page 21
4.14.6 Use of Reserves (Prudential Target) - On 20 December 2022, the Council raised the Prudential target from 2% to 3% of net expenditure (after requisitions). This was done to strengthen financial protection amid significant financial uncertainty. Although interest rates are projected to fall, easing some risk, there is ongoing uncertainty about future pay awards and the implications of the Spending Review which indicates local government will face further real-term funding cuts in future years. Additionally, the Council has had to use reserves in recent years due to overspending and, while there are inflationary assumptions built into future budgets, these are estimates and ongoing geopolitical issues could result in further inflationary cost pressures. 4.14.7 The specific amount needed for this reserve changes with each approved budget. As per Exhibit 19 it is estimated at £6.615m for 2026/27. Note that Exhibit 19 makes assumptions over what Council will agree as the various 2026/27 requisitions and on the levels of saving options and management adjustments that will be taken. 4.14.8 Exhibit 19: Estimated 2026/27 Prudential Target £,000 Indicative 2026/27 Expenditure Budget (before any saving options) 326,426 Less Estimated HSCP Requisition (97,600) Less Estimated West Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust Requisition (5,344) Less Strathclyde Passenger Transport Requisition (1,611) Less Estimated Valuation Joint Board Requisition (1,108) Less Estimated Management Adjustments and Savings (2,000) Net Expenditure 218,763 3% of Net Expenditure (Prudential Target) 6,563 4.14.9 Based on 2025/26 period 7 projections the forecast unallocated reserves balance as at 1 April 2026 will be £6.185m which is £0.378m under the estimated 2026/27 3% prudential target. 4.14.10 Exhibit 20 illustrates the level of reserves that could be released to help balance the 2026/27 budget if the Prudential Target was reduced to 2.5%. It illustrates that maintaining the 3% target will require a recovery plan to rebuild the reserves and that reducing the target to 2.5% would release £0.716m. Exhibit 20: Options to Reduce Prudential Target Option 2026/27 Target £000 Forecast Balance 1/4/2026 £000 Amount Able to Release £000 1. Maintain 3% 6,563 6,185 (378) 2. Reduce to 2.5% 5,469 6,185 716 Page 87
Page 22
4.14.11 4.15 4.15.1 It is the S95 Officer’s view that any reduction in the Council’s Prudential Target should not exceed 0.5% which would leave a policy of maintaining a Prudential reserve of 2.5% of net expenditure (excluding requisitions). Planned Use of Earmarked Reserves During 2025/26 changes to revenue budgetary control reports has enhanced the transparency over the use of earmarked reserves. To further enhance this transparency, Exhibit 21 provides Council with the current forecast to drawdown £1.648m of earmarked reserves in 2026/27 to support non-recurring service expenditure. The projected use is consistent with intended purposes of each reserve. Incorporating the use of earmarked reserves to fund designated areas of expenditure reduces the level of available reserves and Finance will continue to monitor this and report to Council via existing budgetary control processes. Exhibit 21: 2026/27 Forecast Use of Earmarked Reserves Earmarked Reserve Use of Money 2026/27 Forecast Use of Reserves £'000 Revenues and Benefits Non-Domestic Rates system software developments 13 Business Support To support the creation, sustainability, and growth of local businesses 62 Organisational Development & Change Training Defined training needs 9 Equal Pay / Holiday Pay Associated legal costs 20 Modern Apprentice Contribution to modern apprenticeship programme. 110 Community Renewal Fund Premises costs at Levengrove training centre 9 Employability Development and delivery of key employability initiatives to support vulnerable groups 201 Cost of Living Cost of living initiatives agreed by Council 324 Voluntary Redundancy & Early Retirement Reserve Estimated cost of releases due to 2026/27 budget decisions. 500 Smoothing Fund Estimated use of fund to support delivery of saving options 400 Total Forecast Use of Earmarked Reserves 1,648 4.16 Capital Plan Update 4.16.1 An update of the Council’s 10-year capital plan was approved by Council on 5 March 2025. As part of the capital reporting process implemented 1 April 2024 Page 88
Page 23
the plan has been reviewed throughout the year with updates reported to Council and Committee for approval. 4.16.2 Presentation of Recurring Budgets The presentation of the recurring budgets in the Capital Plan (Appendix 5) has been amended to provide further transparency over the intended use of approved recurring budgets. Previous iterations of the Capital Plan have presented recurring budget lines as single projects with a total annual budget for capital activity intended to be delivered by the entire budget. These lines have now been broken down to show the specific capital activity the recurring budget has been allocated to (in a ‘sub parent project’) with any residual unallocated budget shown in the ‘parent’ project. By means of illustration, Exhibit 21 shows the presentation of recurring budget line P&T1 (ICT Modernisation) as previously reported and how it will be reported going forward. Exhibit 21 only shows the capital plan up until 2028/29 rather than the full 10 years to help make the changes easier to see. However, the full details are included in Appendix 4. Exhibit 21: Changes to Presentation of Recurring Budgets Previous Presentation Service Project Spend to 31 March 2025 £000 Updated Budget 2025/26 after P10 BCR £000 Budget 2026/27 £000 Budget 2027/28 £000 Budget 2028/29 £000 P&T 1 ICT Modernisation 0 578 459 806 436 New Presentation Service Project Spend to 31 March 2025 £,000 Updated Budget 2025/26 after P10 BCR £,000 Budget 2026/27 £,000 Budget 2027/28 £,000 Budget 2028/29 £,000 P&T 1 ICT Modernisation (unallocated) 0 0 0 122 0 P&T 1a PCs for Education 0 126 0 0 119 P&T 1b Laptops for Education 0 162 136 99 33 P&T 1c Chromebooks for Education 0 0 0 307 0 P&T 1d PCs for Corporate Employees 0 0 0 17 0 P&T 1e Laptops for Corporate Employees 0 167 200 97 161 P&T 1f Mobile Phones 0 0 0 15 0 P&T 1g Public PC Replacement 0 0 0 26 0 P&T 1h Resources 0 123 123 123 123 4.16.3 In the event that a recurring ‘sub parent project’ is cancelled or reduced, the capital budget allocated to it will be released back into the ‘parent’ unallocated Page 89
Page 24
line. For example, in the illustration above if the 2028/29 budget of £0.161m for P&T 1e is not required that budget would reduce to £0 and the ‘parent’ P&T1 (Unallocated) budget would increase to £0.161m. 4.16.4 A further change to the presentation of the capital plan in Appendix 4 is that the detailed allocations are shown for years 1-5 with years 6-10 consolidated into one column. This is purely to make the appendix easier to read. Finance will maintain the more detailed breakdown across all 10 years, which is available on request. 4.16.5 There are two appendices to this report in relation to the capital plan. • Appendix 4 shows the anticipated spend on projects (revised capital plan) • Appendix 5 shows the current resources available 4.16.6 In terms of affordability of the proposed plan, it is the view of the Council’s Senior Management Team that, while the plan is affordable in 2026/27 assuming a balanced revenue budget is agreed, it does create significant pressures on the revenue budget due to the cost of borrowing. Furthermore, it will have revenue implications for future years and these will require to be planned for through long- term financial strategies and budget planning processes. This may require the capital programme to be subject to further review in future if it is deemed to be placing an excessive pressure on the revenue budget. 5. PEOPLE IMPLICATIONS 5.1 The potential staffing implications are shown within the savings options appended to this report and will be subject to consultation processes where appropriate and managed in accordance with the Council’s SWITCH Policy (and Organisational Change Procedure). Efforts will be made to redeploy using the SWITCH Policy or to explore voluntary release and if required, use of the redundancy selection policy, including appropriate and equality proofed selection criteria, as agreed with the trade unions and approved by Corporate Services Committee in August 2023. 6. FINANCIAL AND PROCUREMENT IMPLICATIONS 6.1 The financial implications arising from the budget process are detailed in the report and appendices. There are no specific procurement implications arising from this report. 7. RISK ANALYSIS 7.1 Some of the capital plan projects have an assumption of match-funding and grant funding from Scottish Government and other agencies. There is a risk that some or all of these are not received. The business cases for these projects will require to be updated as funding becomes clearer, and Members may be required to consider the financial affordability of continuing with the projects. The risk and impact of the saving options are detailed in the appendices. Page 90
Page 25
8. EQUALITIES IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) 8.1 A screening was carried out for the budget report as a whole and determined that an Equality Impact Assessment is not applicable for this report. However, all individual savings options have been screened and where relevant, impact assessed. The Equality Impact Assessments are appended to this report (Appendix 6). 9. CONSULTATION 9.1 The views of all Chief Officers have been requested on this report and feedback reflected herein. Discussions on the issues herein have been undertaken with the Trade Unions and a summary copy of the saving options was provided to Trade Unions, political group leaders and communicated to the workforce in the week commencing 23 February 2026. 10. STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT 10.1 Proper budgetary control and sound financial practice are cornerstones of good governance and support Council and officers to pursue the four strategic priorities of the Council’s Strategic Plan. 10.2 The General Services revenue budget contributes to all outcomes by providing funding in specific areas to help the Council achieve and develop these priorities. Laurence Slavin Chief Officer - Resources Date: 25 February 2026 Person to Contact: Laurence Slavin, Chief Officer - Resources, Church Street Offices, Dumbarton E-mail: laurence.slavin@west-dunbarton.gov.uk Appendices: Appendix 1 – Summarised Saving Options and Management Adjustments Appendix 2 – Detailed Saving Options Appendix 3 – Detailed Management Adjustments Appendix 4 – Capital Plan – 2026/27 – Proposed Spend Appendix 5 – Capital Plan – 2026/27 – Proposed Resources Appendix 6 – Equality Impact Assessments Background Papers: Budget Report to Council - 5 March 2025 Financial Update Report to Council – 18 June 2025 Financial Update Report to Council – 29 October 2025 Financial Update Report to Council – 17 December 2025 Page 91
Page 26
Appendix 1 – Summarised Saving Options and Management Adjustments 2026/27 BUDGET - SAVING OPTIONS 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 Ref: CO Saving Option Saving (£,000) FTE Saving (£,000) FTE Saving (£,000) FTE 2627 CCF02 AG Review of Clydebank Town Hall 15 0 15 0 15 0 2627 CCF03 AG Review of Contact Centre 15 1 30 1 30 1 2627 CCF08 AG Full Cost school meals 361 0 761 0 761 0 2627 CCF09 AG Reduce Performance and Strategy Team 25 1 60 1 60 1 2627 CCF10 AG WDLT Management Fee 253 0 253 0 253 0 2627 CCF11 AG Removal of events 5 0 28 0 28 0 2627 EDU04 GH Swimming Lessons 14 0 14 0 14 0 2627 EDU05 GH Early Start Clubs 67 0 102 0 102 0 2627 EDU08 GH Charging for Instrumental Music Tuition 0 0 67 0 100 0 2627 EDU09 GH Closure of Out of School Care 29 2 29 2 29 2 2627 EDU11 GH Mainstream School Transport 0 0 80 0 120 0 2627 EDU12 GH Instrumental Music Service 23 0.4 23 0.4 23 0.4 2627 EDU13 GH Secondary School Common Senior Phase Timetable 0 0 236 5 354 5 2627 EDU14 GH Secondary School Staffing 0 0 368 7.8 552 7.8 2627 EDU15 GH Senior Phase Transport 44 0 67 0 67 0 2627 EDU17 GH Reduce Day and Residential School Budget 150 0 200 0 200 0 2627 EDU19 GH Reduction in Management Funding for ELC provision 46 0 69 0 69 0 2627 EDU20 GH Reduction in Temporary Teaching Posts 228 5 345 5 345 5 2627 EDU23 GH Roll related Clerical Hour Allocation 60 2 90 3 90 3 2627 HE01 PB Homelessness Budget – Cessation of Rotation of Temporary Accommodation 10 0 10 0 10 0 2627 HE02 PB CCTV Team 27 2 54 2 54 2 Page 92
Page 27
2627 PT01 VR Review leadership support and explore transfer to CAS 0 0 49 1 49 1 2627 PT10 VR Charges for Disclosure Scotland Passed to Employees / Applicants 26 0 26 0 26 0 2627 PT11 VR Reduction in Corporate Training Budget 15 0 15 0 15 0 2627 RES01 LS Review External Funding 645 0 645 0 645 0 2627 RES04 LS Review of Office Accommodation 25 0 50 0 50 0 2627 RES14 LS Review Elderly Welfare Grant 110 0 120 0 120 0 2627 RES15 LS Review Community Council Funding 14 0 14 0 14 0 2627 RES18 LS National Fraud Initiative Single Person Discount Review 16 0 20 0 20 0 2627 RES19 LS Close Municipal Buildings 16 0 65 0 65 0 2627 RES20 LS Review of depot rental charges 75 0 75 0 75 0 2627 RES21 LS Council Tax on Long Term Empty and Second Homes 225 0 225 0 225 0 2627 RN01 GM Closure of Bowling Clubs 40 0.5 66 0.5 81 0.5 2627 RN04 GM Street Lighting 18 0 126 0 126 0 2627 RN05 GM Working 4U 245 12 490 12 490 12 2627 RN06 GM Crematorium Weekend Operations 5 0 5 0 5 0 2627 RN07 GM Reduction in Street Cleaning 27.5 2 55 2 55 2 2627 RN08 GM Introduction of Parking Charging 0 0 0 0 216 0 2627 RN09 GM Reduce number of Apprentices 115 5 115 5 115 5 2627 RN10 GM Cease supply and installation of Christmas Trees 15 0 15 0 15 0 2627 RN11 GM Street Sweeping and Litter Collection of Trunk Road 50 0 50 0 50 0 2627 RN14 GM Purchase of vehicles to replace hire cars 20 0 37 0 37 0 2626 RN15 GM Cease supply of dog waste bags 25 0 25 0 25 0 2627 RR01 AD Communities Team 42 1 42 1 42 1 2627 RR08 AD Assistance to Business 10 0 10 0 10 0 TOTAL 3,151.5 33.9 5,241 48.7 5847 48.7 Page 93
Page 28
2026/27 BUDGET - MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENTS 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 Ref: CO Saving Option Saving (£,000) FTE Saving (£,000) FTE Saving (£,000) FTE 2627 CCF12 AG Facilities Management Operating Model 250 TBC 250 TBC 250 TBC 2627 CCF13 AG Deletion of vacant Facilities Management support post 40 1 50 1 50 1 2627 EDU18 GH Right size Free School Meal, Alternative Holiday Payments and School Clothing Grant budgets 128 0 128 0 128 0 2627 EDU24 GH ELC Education Support Officer Post 18 0.5 28 0.5 28 0.5 2627 PT06 VR 365 Licence Savings 60 0 60 0 60 0 2627 PT07 VR Reduce ICT Support 32 1 32 1 32 1 2627 RN12 GM Separation of Garden/Food Waste 50 0 100 0 100 0 2627 RR02 AD Secondment to Clydebank Neighbourhood Board 42 0 42 0 42 0 2627 RR03 AD Capacity Funding - Plan For Neighbourhoods 34 0 34 0 34 0 2627 RR06 AD Planning, Environmental Health and Building Standards 15.5 0 15.5 0 15.5 0 2627 RR07 AD Business Gateway 10 0 10 0 10 0 2627 RR09 AD Merger of Manager Roles – Legal and Democratic Services 25 0 25 0 25 0 TOTAL 704.5 2.5 774.5 2.5 774.5 2.5 Page 94
Page 29
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer Amanda Graham Saving Ref: 2627 CCF02 Saving Title Review of Clydebank Town Hall Summary of Savings Proposal Clydebank Town Hall (CTH) is currently open as standard Tuesday to Friday with flexible opening outwith this for events which generate income. In light of property costs, operations could be revised further with a review of usage undertaken to ascertain the most appropriate opening hours. Option 1 – CTH open three days a week (£15k saving) Access for public, elected members and support staff would be maintained on three week days. Building would continue to open on additional days to support pre-booked events as the cost is mitigated by the income generated. Option 2 - CTH open four days with reduced hours daily (£8k saving) Reduced opening hours would be introduced, for example, 9am to 1pm each day, or 1pm to 5pm. Building would open to support pre-booked events as the cost is mitigated by income generated. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: Under Option 1 and 2, the building would be opened for pre-booked events. The museum and gallery in the Town Hall would be impacted by reduced hours. Members Services would require to adjust operations to account for revised opening. Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: Under Option 1 and 2, consideration would be given to staff contracts, place and hours of work with consultation required. Staff may be in detriment. Reputational Risk: The options carry reputational risk around perceived reduction in provision. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 1 15 0 15 0 15 0 2 8 0 8 0 8 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A *May reduce depending on any ongoing rate liability Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1344 APPENDIX 2 Page 95
Page 30
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Amanda Graham Saving Ref: 2627 CCF03 Saving Title Review of Contact Centre Summary of Savings Proposal Currently Citizen Services operates the Customer Contact Centre, Housing Repairs Contact Centre and provides a front of house service at 16 Church Street. The Council recognises that for many people, their digital skills, literacy or deprivation can prevent them from accessing the internet and for this reason it is important to maintain alternative means of contacting the Council. It is recognised that for a number of people the option to call rather than access services online is a preference rather than a necessity. Currently the contact centre employs 9 FTE staff. Under this option, this number would be reduced by 1 FTE. Work would continue to promote alternative methods of contacting or reporting issues to the Council including via email and via the website. This would generate a saving of circa £30k per annum. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: The contact centre acts as a first point of engagement for a significant number of Council services. Reducing staffing would still retain telephone services for those without internet access or for those requiring urgent assistance. Each member of staff within the centre answers an average of 300 calls per week. Reduction in staff in turn would reduce the calls answered by this amount and increase wait times, currently there is a 3 minute response time target. This is an average derived from all calls throughout the year and there are times when we are currently not meeting this target due to call volume. A reduction by one member of staff would increase the average call answer time to 6 minutes meaning at peak times the call wait would be upwards of 30 minutes. Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: This option would impact on the headcount of staff. Employees would be supported through Council policies including Switch. Reputational Risk: There is a risk that people’s call behaviour does not change in spite of highlighting the digital first approach and wait times within the contact centre increase. It should also be noted that service changes which are delivering financial efficiencies for the Council can also add to the call volume and increase wait times. Saving (Cumulative) 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE Page 96
Page 31
15 1 30 1 30 1 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: 0 Note that the FTE Impact is an estimate – if the saving option is approved then the Chief Officer will assess the most effective way of delivering the saving target. Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1343 Page 97
Page 32
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Amanda Graham Saving Ref: 2627 CCF08 Saving Title Full cost school meals Summary of Savings Proposal Delivering a catering service across all education services in West Dunbartonshire including early learning, primary, secondary and additional support needs settings cost the Council £5.1m gross in 2024/25 inclusive of staffing, operational and food costs. Net expenditure was £4.2m, with income of £0.919m from paid for meals across the school estate, credited to Education. Currently free school meals are provided to all pupils in early years, P1 to P5 pupils in primary, all pupils in ASN and pupils at every age group entitled to free school meals by means of entitlement in every setting. In 2024/25 the revenue support grant received by WDC contained a figure of £3.96m (including summer holiday provision of £0.58m) for delivering school meals (paid and free). The Council currently provides a further £800k subsidy to deliver the service. The current cost to pupils of a school meal is £3.19. To fully recover the cost of delivery, the charge for each paid for school meal would need to increase by £2.54 to £5.73 per meal (based on 2024/25 prices). Option 1 Recover all expenditure not covered by grant or income - increase cost of paid for school meals to at least £5.73 per lunch (89% increase on the 2024/25 price) Option 2 Recover 50% of expenditure not covered by grant or income - increase cost of paid for school meals to at least £4.39 per lunch (44% increase on the 2024/25 price) Option 3 Recover 25% of expenditure not covered by grant or income - increase cost of paid for school meals to at least £3.71 per lunch (22% increase on the 2024/25 price) Option 4 Deliver only free school meals which are externally funded and remove the provision of paid for school meals across all settings. As almost 80% of meals are free and many costs are not variable the cessation of paid for meals would save £0.285m. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: Increases in school meal prices to this level is likely to have a significant impact on demand for those meals that are not free. There is a significant risk that people would not pay the costs. Strategic Risk Register: N/A Page 98
Page 33
People Risk: It is likely increasing costs charged for school meals will impact on uptake and therefore there is a risk that demand for school meals significantly decreases. With less demand for the service, there would be less staff required therefore there is a risk to employee numbers. Reputational Risk: School meals deliver healthy, nutritionally balanced food and there is a correlation between nutrition, diet, behaviour, attainment and health outcomes. There is a reputational risk from increasing costs to a level which many are likely to deem unaffordable particularly in the current financial environment with increasing cost pressures on families. Option 4, removing provision of paid for service would set us apart from all other councils and also presents a reputational risk in terms of equity of provision and highlighting/stigmatising FSM by means of entitlement particularly in secondary school settings. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 1 361 0* 761 0 761 0 2 161 0 361 0 361 0 3 61 0 161 0 161 0 4 101 0 246 0 246 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: 0* - *subject to comments above regarding staffing impact Note that the FTE Impact is an estimate – if the saving option is approved then the Chief Officer will assess the most effective way of delivering the saving target. Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1346 Page 99
Page 34
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Amanda Graham Saving Ref: 2627 CCF09 Saving Title Reduction in Performance and Strategy Team Summary of Service Responsibilities The Performance and Strategy team leads on performance management and strategic planning across the Council with responsibility for co-ordinating the preparation of the Council’s Strategic Plan and individual service delivery plans twice yearly. In addition the team delivers the Council’s Public Performance Reporting requirements, supporting continuous improvement and co-ordinating the Local Government Benchmarking Framework (LGBF) return. Further responsibility includes strategic consultation and community engagement; equality mainstreaming; and data analysis. While this is a non-statutory service, the team supports the Council to meet statutory duties. This includes performance monitoring and gathering to demonstrate the organisation meets its statutory duty to provide best value, and leading on equality mainstreaming to ensure that it meets the statutory duty to ensure that equality and diversity are embedded into all functions and activities as required by the Equality Act 2010. Performance monitoring and reporting is required by Audit Scotland and is also a pre-requisite for some external funders. In addition, the team ensures the Council meets its requirement to contribute to LGBF. Planning for the West Dunbartonshire Strategic Plan 2027-2032 will begin in 2026 with a focus on carrying out a comprehensive strategic assessment followed by consultation and identification of performance indicators over the following year. Planning for the West Dunbartonshire Local Outcome Improvement Plan (LOIP) 2027-2037 undertaken by Communities will begin in 2026 and will require support from the Performance & Strategy Team in relation to consultation and data analysis. Under this option, a 25% reduction in the team is proposed. The service operates on a business partner model with the team of four core employees responsible for a particular area of service and a further specialism. The support provided to help the Council meet its statutory obligations would require to be maintained and therefore the removal of a Business Partner would reduce the guidance and support currently provided to services, with no support provided for operational performance information, continuous improvement or delivery planning. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: This presents a risk to all Council services as services would be required to develop, monitor and report against delivery plan performance independently. Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: The option would impact on up to 1 FTE employee who would be supported through Switch. Page 100
Page 35
Reputational Risk: Potential for reputational risk if services do not have capacity to effectively develop, monitor and report against delivery plan performance. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 25 1 60 1 60 1 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: 0 Note that the FTE Impact is an estimate – if the saving option is approved then the Chief Officer will assess the most effective way of delivering the saving target. Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1457 Page 101
Page 36
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Amanda Graham Saving Ref: CCF10 Saving Title Reduction in WDLT Management Fee Summary of Savings Proposal The Council pays a management fee to West Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust (WDLT) for delivery of a range of leisure and sport services, including management of sport and leisure facilities, community facilities, sports development, Active Schools, outdoor recreation facilities and events. The proposed fee paid by the Council to WDLT for 2025/26 was £4,597,492. This was based on flat cash with a number of adjustments to incorporate costs for the 25/26 pay award, uplift for utility costs and also funding the impact of increased National Insurance payments. The fee calculation is summarised in the table below: Base Management Fee 2024/25 £3,932,592 Adjust for Interest payable on 3G Pitches (£ 65,000) Updated Base Mgt Fee £3,867,592 Pay Award (Estimated cost) £274,000 Utility Cost (DHN) £253,900 National Insurance costs £202,000 Management Fee 2025/26 £4,597,492 This fee was further adjusted to reflect the fact the three pitches were not delivered in year and therefore the £65,000 deducted for loan interest was reinstated; the final pay award cost was £257,000. This resulted in a final Management Fee of £4,645,492. The 2026/27 management fee needs to be increased by £464,750 to reflect the Strathclyde Pension employer’s contribution rate increasing to 17.5% in the coming financial year. The revised loan interest fee payable on pitches will be £42,000. Based on flat cash the assumed Management Fee for 2026/27 would be £5,068,242. Under this option, the management fee would be reduced by a set percentage, which for illustration purposes would equate to: • 1% reduction – £50,682 • 3% reduction – £152,047 • 5% reduction – £ 253,412 Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: The Council has a Service Level Agreement with the Trust around delivery of service. There is a risk that in delivering savings WDLT reduces services, Page 102
Page 37
facilities or staffing. While it would be for the Trust to decide how to deliver with a reduced management fee, the Trust does have the ability to generate additional income and use to support activities or to consider its reserves to mitigate against a service impact. Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: It would be for the Trust to consider how to operate and deliver with a reduced management fee Reputational Risk: The Council has a statutory duty to ensure ‘adequate’ provision of recreation and sport facilities. If a reduction in management fee leads to a reduction in leisure services, this carries reputational risk. The reduction has been kept to a minimum level to mitigate against this. In addition it is for the Trust to decide how to deliver with a reduced fee, with options to consider the level of reserves it holds or raise additional income to meet the gap. A public consultation is currently underway to seek feedback on the range of services delivered by WDLT as part of a comprehensive review. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 Options £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 1% 50 0 50 0 50 0 3% 151 0 151 0 151 0 5% 253 0 253 0 253 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: 0 Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1404 Page 103
Page 38
Chief Officer: Amanda Graham Saving Ref: 2627 CCF11 Saving Title Removal of events Summary of Savings Proposal The Council stages two events in West Dunbartonshire each year, a firework display at Levengrove Park, Dumbarton in November and the Scottish Pipe Band Championships at the same venue in July. The cost of both events is offset by funding from the Dumbarton Common Good Fund with the fireworks receiving £15k and the pipe band event £50k. Due to oversubscription to the fund, for 2026 the two events will receive 59% of the amount applied for - £13,100 for fireworks and £34,500 for pipe bands. This will leave an unbudgeted cost pressure of £22,400 for both events to proceed. The total events budget is £28,000 which would be a saving should the events cease. It should be noted the Pipe Band would require to continue until the contract could be exited. Option 1: Cease the firework display saving £5k revenue (and £13,100 release back to Common Good) Option 2: Cease the Scottish Pipe Band Championships saving £23k revenue (and £34,500 release back to Common Good) Option 3: Cease both the firework display and Scottish Pipe Band Championships saving £28k revenue from 27/28 (and £47,600 release back to Common Good) Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: N/A Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: N/A Reputational Risk: Both events are free and well received by the public and therefore there is a reputational risk if they were to cease. In addition the Pipe Band Championships has been shown to generate economic benefit through increased visitor number and spend in local hotel, restaurants and shops. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 1 5 0 5 0 5 0 2 0 0 23 0 23 0 3 5* 0 28 0 28 0 *Based on firework ceasing from 2026 and Pipe Band ceasing from 2027 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: 0 Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1373/1376 Page 104
Page 39
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Gillian Hamilton Saving Ref: 202627 EDU04 Saving Title Swimming Lessons Summary of Savings Proposal Currently in West Dunbartonshire, £14,320 funding is allocated to West Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust (WDLT) to fund a free eight-week course of swimming lessons to children in Primary 6 or 7 during term time. This option would remove that provision. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: Increasing risk of disadvantage and inequity as many children are not supported to learn to swim by their parents. Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: This could potentially impact on the 12 WDLT employees who currently deliver approximately 128 hours of lessons over an eight week period. Reputational Risk: Removing lessons could be perceived as contradictory, given that the Council has conducted high-profile local and national campaigns, as well as a multi-agency education programme since 2021.The national campaigns promoting water safety at Loch Lomond were initiated following the deaths of 4 people in one weekend in the summer of 2021; and the tragic death in the summer of 2020 of a primary-aged child from West Dunbartonshire. Records for 2022 report 2 adults drownings in West Dunbartonshire and one in both 2023 and 2024. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 14 0 14 0 14 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1448 Page 105
Page 40
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Gillian Hamilton Saving Ref: 2627 EDU05 Saving Title Early Start Clubs Summary of Savings Proposal The Council currently offers Early Start Clubs in all primary schools to ensure no pupil starts the day without a meal. The cost per day for a child to attend is currently £2.10, with pupils in receipt of free school meals exempt from that charge. The number of pupils attending clubs across the authority is approximately 350, and as such the cost to run the service exceeds the income it generates. In 2025/26 estimated staffing costs are £246,000 and estimated income is £144,000. This means it costs the Council £102,000 to deliver. Under this proposal provision of Early Start Clubs would cease at the beginning of session 2026/27, generating a saving of £102,000. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: Ceasing the service may lead to some children not receiving breakfast resulting in an increase in children starting the day without a meal. Strategic Risk: SR02 Challenges in implementing broad-ranging school improvement to raise attainment and achievement People Risk: Currently Learning Assistants are contracted for the additional time required to operate the club. Ceasing provision would reduce their required hours. Reputational Risk: Ceasing Early Start clubs in such an area of deprivation would lead to criticism of the Council. We receive additional funding in 2025/26 to increase the capacity of our clubs from Scottish Government’s ‘Bright Start Breakfasts’ initiative, so it would be problematic to make any saving during session 2025/26 Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 67 0 102 0 102 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: 0 Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1436 Page 106
Page 41
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Gillian Hamilton Saving Ref: EDU08 Saving Title Charging for Instrumental Music Service tuition Summary of Savings Proposal Provision of the Instrumental Music Service (IMS) tuition is currently offered free to children and young people in our schools, with 1,014 pupils currently participating. The service is primarily funded by the Council, at a cost of £464,334, with an additional £205,000 of Scottish Government funding. To ensure the sustainability of IMS, and limit any potential reductions to the service, it is proposed that a charging structure for one to one and small group music tuition is introduced. Families in receipt of out of work benefits would be exempt from fees (this accounts for 22% of participants). Under this proposal, there are three options: Option 1: Introduce a charge of £25/hour x 40 weeks Option 2: Introduce a charge of £15/hour x 40 weeks Option 3: Introduced a charge of £5/hour x 40 weeks None of the proposed options will cover the full cost of service delivery and the charges would be introduced in August 2027 to provide implementation time including to minimise the service disruption to young people. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: In 2020/21, the Scottish Government abolished all charges for instrumental music education to ensure equitable access for all children, regardless of background. Local introduction of charging departs from this national policy intent of free access to music education and could be challenged. There is no statutory obligation on the Council to provide free instrumental music tuition, however there is a statutory obligation to deliver an education service in line with Curriculum for Excellence which entitles children and young people to receive a comprehensive and equitable education, tailored to meet their individual needs and aspirations. Reduction in service uptake may result in potentially talented students missing out on opportunities to develop their skills due to financial constraints and a possible reduction in the number of students gaining SQA music practical qualifications. Income projections are based on the assumption that eligible families will take up the offer of paid tuition, however these may not be realised. Strategic Risk Register: SR002 Implementing broad ranging school improvement People Risk: There are no staffing implications. Page 107
Page 42
Reputational Risk: Community perception that the Council is prioritising revenue over the educational and cultural development of young people. Charging for music tuition will disproportionately affect low-income families, limiting access to music education for those who cannot afford it, which is likely to lead to criticism of the Council. As the introduction of charging contradicts national policy commitments, it may be challenged. Saving (Cumulative) 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 1 - £25 per hour (assuming 10% uptake, 100 children) 0 0 67 0 100 0 2 - £15 per hour (assuming 10% uptake, 100 children) 0 0 40 0 60 0 3 - £5 per hour (assuming 10% uptake, 100 children) 0 0 13 0 20 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: 0 Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1162 Page 108
Page 43
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Gillian Hamilton Saving Ref: 2627EDU09 Saving Title Closure of out of school care at St Eunan’s and Linnvale Primaries Summary of Savings Proposal Currently out of school care (OSC) services are provided at St Eunan’s Primary School and Linnvale Primary School. In 2025/26 approximately 71 places across each week are being purchased by families at £17.57 per session. Based on these numbers, it is anticipated the income generated in 2025/26 will be approximately £47,404, while staffing costs for the same period are estimated to be £75,500. This means the Council will have to subsidise the cost of the service by £28,400. The council does not have a statutory duty to provide out of school care. Under this proposal, three options are being considered: Option 1 – Retain out of school care provision with an increased session cost of £22.50. Based on the attendance levels for session 2025/26 and the expected increase to staffing costs for session 2026/27 this could reduce the subsidy cost to Council to approximately £25,000. Option 2 – Retain out of school care provision, with an increased session cost to ensure breakeven, based on current utilisation. To break even, the cost per session would require to increase to £28.10 in 2026/27. Option 3 – Close out of school care provision at both Linnvale and St Eunan’s. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: There is no statutory duty to provide OSC. An increase to charges per session may make the cost prohibitive for some families and lead to a reduction in uptake, which would decrease utilisation of the service. Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: If the provision at both primary schools closes, then two Senior Early Learning and Childcare Officers and three Early Learning and Childcare Officers ( amounting to 2FTE) could be displaced. Reputational Risk: Working families at St Eunan’s and Linnvale Primaries rely on this provision to support them to work. An increase in cost for the provision could make it prohibitive for them and impact on their employment. Saving (Cumulative) Page 109
Page 44
Option 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 1 14 0 14 0 14 0 2 29 0 29 0 29 0 3 29 2 29 2 29 2 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: 0 Note that the FTE Impact is an estimate – if the saving option is approved then the Chief Officer will assess the most effective way of delivering the saving target. Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1347 Page 110
Page 45
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Gillian Hamilton Saving Ref: 2627 EDU11 Saving Title Mainstream School Transport Summary of Savings Proposal The Council currently provides transport to schools for: ● Primary pupils who live more than 1 mile away from school ● Secondary pupils who live more than 2 miles away from school. This exceeds the statutory requirement to provide transport to all pupils up to the age of 8 who live more than 2 miles from school, and all pupils over the age of 8 who live more than 3 miles from school. This proposal presents two options to reduce our expenditure on mainstream school transport. A statutory consultation would need to take place before implementing either of these options. Option 1 Maintain a provision of transport to schools for: ● Primary pupils who live more than 2 miles away from school ● Secondary pupils who live more than 3 miles away from school. Option 2 Bring our transport provision in line with the statutory requirement to transport for: • All pupils up to the age of 8 who live more than 2 miles from school • All pupils over the age of 8 who live more than 3 miles from school. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: Reducing the provision by either options could have an adverse impact on school attendance, particularly in inclement weather, and may lead to an increase in road traffic at the start and end of the school day, as parents opt to drive children. Undertaking a statutory consultation would be additional work for a small team, which will have a direct impact on other work. Strategic Risk: SR 002 ‘Challenges in implementing broad-ranging school improvement to raise attainment and achievement’ will be directly affected by this savings option. People Risk: There are no direct FTE or people risks with this proposal, however there are indirect people risks to local transport providers who would see a reduction in business. Reputational Risk: A statutory consultation brings risks of reputational damage to the council. When option A was previously proposed, this gathered significant local attention and negative publicity. Page 111
Page 46
Saving (Cumulative) Costs would still be incurred for routes that were not deemed as ‘safe routes’. 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 1 0 0 67 0 100 0 2 0 0 80 0 120 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A Equality Impact Assessment Completed: EIA No: 1156 Page 112
Page 47
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Gillian Hamilton Saving Ref: 2627 EDU12 Saving Title Reduction in staff: Instrumental Music Service Summary of Savings Proposal The Instrumental Music Service supports attainment, achievement, and positively impacts school and community life. It supports young people working to gain SQA awards in music performance and also provides performance opportunities for our children and young people playing at events throughout the west of Scotland. The Council employs 10.6 instrumental music tutors who provide 336 hours per week of one-to-one and group learning to 1,014 children and young people. In 2020/21, the Scottish Government abolished all charges for instrumental music education to ensure all children, irrespective of background, have access to music education. While the Scottish Government provide some funding to support the abolishment of charges it does not cover the full-service cost as set out below Service Cost: £669k Scottish Government Funding: £205k Cost to West Dunbartonshire Council: £464k Under this option, a reduction in staffing in the service is proposed, generating a saving of £30,000. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: A reduction in staffing would reduce the number of young people gaining SQA music practical qualifications. In addition, the quality of Education service could reduce as less young people experience the benefits of music education. Strategic Risk Register:SR002 Implementing broad ranging school improvement People Risk: This saving is to be achieved by termination of a fixed-term contract. Reputational RiskA reduced service could result in an unfair advantage for families who can afford private music tuition and disadvantage our most deprived pupils. There is national agreement that all children and young people should have access to instrumental music tuition, regardless of their financial circumstances. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 23 0.4 23 0.4 23 0.4 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: 0.4 Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1161 Page 113
Page 48
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Gillian Hamilton Saving Ref: 2627 EDU13 Saving Title Secondary School Common Senior Phase Timetable Summary of Savings Proposal There are currently three different curriculum models running across five secondary schools. This proposal would introduce a common model across all five schools, aligning the offer to young people and establishing a minimum class size of 12 for any course. Where schools are unable to meet the minimum class size, pupils could attend another school to study the course. A common timetable would result in requiring fewer teachers to deliver it, as class sizes would be optimised. Not taking the full saving could result in increasing the offer of courses, providing a wider variety of options for our young people. Due to the timescale to develop a model for a common timetable and consult on the proposal, implementation would not be until school session 2027/28 where a part year saving would be realised. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: This will impact WDC’s ability to retain teacher numbers at 2023 levels as expected by Scottish Government. Reducing the number of teachers employed in our secondary schools will have a direct impact on the breadth of courses offered in each establishment. Having to travel to another school could be a barrier for some young people choosing a subject and would introduce a cost to the council for transportation. This could directly impact attainment and positive destinations. However it is worth noting that this approach has been successful for many years in a number of our neighbouring authorities. Strategic Risk: SR 002 ‘Challenges in implementing broad-ranging school improvement to raise attainment and achievement’ will be directly affected by this savings option, as young people may elect to stay in school and study a subject other than their first choice, rather than journey to another school. People Risk: WDC is tasked by Scottish Government to maintain teacher numbers. This would have a direct impact on 5 FTE. Reputational Risk: It is likely this change could receive a negative response from parents/carers/staff due to perceived benefits of their existing model. Teachers may object to optimisation of class sizes due to increased pressure. Any reduction in teacher numbers carries reputational risk, as we are tasked by Scottish Government to maintain teacher numbers at 2023 levels. Saving (Cumulative) Page 114
Page 49
2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 0 0 236 5 354 5 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: 0 Note that the FTE Impact is an estimate – if the saving option is approved then the Chief Officer will assess the most effective way of delivering the saving target. Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1159 Page 115
Page 50
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Gillian Hamilton Saving Ref: 2627 EDU14 Saving Title Secondary School Staffing Summary of Savings Proposal Staffing in schools is determined by school roll, but it is not reduced to account for the number of young people being educated elsewhere. There are approximately 600 young people attending college or partner providers for part of their school week (either 2 afternoons per week, or 4 afternoons per week for college). This proposal would seek to reduce staffing to account for this, and based on current rolls with college and other partner providers, this would equate to 7.8 FTE, spread across 5 secondary schools. Due to the timescales to develop and implement course offers in our schools and with partners, the earliest a saving could be realised would be for session 2027/28, which would be a part year saving. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: This will impact WDC’s ability to retain teacher numbers at 2023 levels as expected by Scottish Government. Reducing the number of teachers employed in our secondary schools will have a direct impact on the breadth of courses offered. The number of young people attending partner providers fluctuates each year. If there were fewer young people attending partner providers, we would require the staffing to be in our schools to teach the young people. Fewer young people studying courses with partners would directly impact attainment and positive destinations. Strategic Risk: SR 002 ‘Challenges in implementing broad-ranging school improvement to raise attainment and achievement’ will be directly affected by this savings option. People Risk: WDC is tasked by Scottish Government to maintain teacher numbers. This would have a direct impact on 7.8 FTE. Reputational Risk: This is likely to generate a negative response from parents/carers/staff as it could lead to a reduction in provision of courses in the Senior Phase on offer in each school. Any reduction in teacher numbers carries reputational risk, as we are tasked by Scottish Government to maintain teacher numbers at 2023 levels. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 Page 116
Page 51
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 0 0 368 7.8 552 7.8 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: 0 Note that the FTE Impact is an estimate – if the saving option is approved then the Chief Officer will assess the most effective way of delivering the saving target. Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1160 Page 117
Page 52
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Gillian Hamilton Saving Ref: 2627 EDU15 Saving Title Senior Phase Transport Summary of Savings Proposal Presently, we transport around 600 Senior Phase pupils per week to attend classes in other schools and colleges. The majority of these are by bus to West College Scotland in Clydebank, but a number are via taxi to neighbouring schools or other colleges in the Glasgow/Paisley area. Young people also attend college in Glasgow via Scotrail. Transport is provided to ensure that the young person arrives at the venue in time for class. This proposal presents four options to reduce our expenditure on Senior Phase transport by reducing our operating costs. Option 1 – £67k Saving Move Senior Phase transport that presently uses taxis to Internal Transport provision following the additional minibus/driver capacity introduced in 2025. Option 2 – £37k Saving Remove all return journeys, requiring all young people to travel home via public transport. Option 3 – £22k Saving Remove consortium return journeys only, meaning young people attending another school would travel home via public transport. Option 4 – £15k Saving Remove West College Scotland Clydebank return journeys only, meaning young people attending West College Scotland Clydebank Campus would travel home via public transport. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service risk: Option 1 does not present a service risk. Options 2-4, where young people would have to make their own way home may have an impact on uptake of college and consortium courses. This could have an indirect impact on attainment and positive destinations of our young people. Strategic Risk: N/A for Option 1. For Options 2-4, SR 002 ‘Challenges in implementing broad-ranging school improvement to raise attainment and achievement’ will be indirectly affected. People Risk: N/A Reputational Risk: There is a reputational risk associated with removing business from local taxi providers. In addition, local bus capacity or provision may not align Page 118
Page 53
with the volume of young people looking to make use of it which may present a challenge for First Glasgow and other local bus operators. A small number of young people may require transport at the end of the day in order to get to part time employment on time. Some courses/locations would still receive transport both ways due to complex routes between them and West Dunbartonshire, and removing transport from some could be seen as inequitable. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 1 44 0 67 0 67 0 2 24 0 37 0 37 0 3 14 0 22 0 22 0 4 10 0 15 0 15 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1429 Page 119
Page 54
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Gillian Hamilton Saving Ref: 2627 EDU17 Saving Title Reduce Day and Residential School Budget Summary of Savings Proposal The Council operates under a presumption to mainstream model, with our ambition to divert more support locally to keep children and young people educated in their communities and with their families. This approach, which supports our inclusive practices, will be extended over the next three years. In line with this approach, the Council has invested in 91 addition specialist setting places and four enhanced mainstream support settings across the school estate, providing 115 additional places. The Council has supported an average of 69 children or young people in day placements and 30 in residential each year for the past three years. The budget for these out of authority placements is £5,684,000. This option proposes a reduction in the budget currently allocated for out of authority day and residential placements, incrementally over three years. This is equivalent to an average reduction of five day places or three residential places. No children currently placed with partner providers outwith West Dunbartonshire will be impacted by this proposal. This will result in decreased payments to out of authority partners. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: There will be an increased number of children and young people with complex needs requiring ‘in-house’ support. This option will mean additional demands on Central Support Resources including Educational Psychologists, Children’s Services Officers and schools. Schools which are already challenged in meeting the range of needs across the service will be subject to increased expectations and demand, risking staff grievance. This could lead to an increased risk of Additional Support Needs Tribunals for Scotland (ASNTS) which has significant resource implications across the service. The risks should be considered in conjunction with other savings proposals. Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: N/A Reputational Risk: There is a risk that this is challenged by parents and carers, children and young people or their advocates, who disagree the support offered is Page 120
Page 55
appropriate. This could lead to increased risk of the Council being referred to the Additional Support Needs Tribunals for Scotland (ASNTS). Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 150 0 200 0 200 0 Equality Impact Assessment Completed: EIA No: 1433 Page 121
Page 56
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Gillian Hamilton Saving Ref: 2627 EDU19 Saving Title Reduction in Management Funding for ELC provision Summary of Savings Proposal Currently all primary school settings with an early learning and childcare (ELC) provision are allocated specific funding to support them to fund 0.2FTE supply teacher cover. This enables a Senior Leader to undertake management aspects of the facility. Six settings which are provided with this management funding also have a full time Principal Teacher for Early Years in place, whose remit is to oversee and support the management of the ELC provision. In those settings, a total of 1.2FTE of support (1FTE Principal Teacher and 0.2FTE supply teacher cover) is available. Under this proposal settings which have an allocated Principal Teacher for Early Years would no longer receive the additional management funding to purchase supply cover, making a saving of £68,916. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: There is a risk that Principal Teacher management time could be reduced if they are required to provide cover for other staff. Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: N/A Reputational Risk: A reduction in this funding could impact on the quality of the provision. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 46 0 69 0 69 0 Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No:1383 Page 122
Page 57
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Gillian Hamilton Saving Ref: 2627 EDU20 Saving Title Reduction in Temporary Teaching Posts Summary of Savings Proposal Each year, in order to cover a wide variety of circumstances, we deploy within our available budget a number of temporary teaching posts to alleviate pressure points within the system. This also ensures we meet conditions placed upon us by Scottish Government. Our pupil roll is declining in West Dunbartonshire and it is proposed the temporary teaching posts are reduced by five to reflect this. This would make our numbers align more closely with our pupil/teacher ratio. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: This will impact the Council’s ability to retain teacher numbers at 2023 levels as expected by Scottish Government. Reducing the number of teachers employed in our primary schools will reduce flexibility to staff according to identified pressure points or need. Reducing the number of teachers employed in our secondary schools will have a direct impact on the breadth of courses offered. Strategic Risk: SR 002 ‘Challenges in implementing broad-ranging school improvement to raise attainment and achievement’ will be directly affected by this savings option. People Risk: The Council is tasked by Scottish Government to maintain teacher numbers. This would have a direct impact on 5 FTE, potentially leaving us open to challenge and withholding of funding. Reputational Risk: It is likely this option will receive a negative response from parents/carers/staff as there may be an increased workload for remaining teachers, and a potential reduction in provision of Senior Phase courses on offer in each school. Any reduction in teacher numbers carries reputational risk, as we are tasked by the Scottish Government to maintain teacher numbers at 2023 levels. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 228 5 345 5 345 5 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: 0 Note that the FTE Impact is an estimate – if the saving option is approved then the Chief Officer will assess the most effective way of delivering the saving target. Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1430 Page 123
Page 58
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Gillian Hamiton Saving Ref: 2627 EDU23 Saving Title Roll related Clerical Hour Allocation Summary of Savings Proposal Given school rolls have declined in many schools, an audit of clerical hours compared with pupil rolls is proposed to ensure provision properly reflects need. The aim of the audit is to identify locations where clerical allocation can be reduced or requires to be increased. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: A review of clerical functions in primary and secondary schools undertaken between 2023-2025 has already delivered reductions and a further reduction in front line staff will impact on quality of service to children, parents and families as limited scope for fast paced people centred response. Strategic Risk: N/A People Risk: It is anticipated that staffing reductions will impact on individual staff being asked to change work location. Concern that further reduction will impact on headteachers to provide services out with remit and role (reception duties and admin, care and welfare of children, families and members of local community). This is a compound reduction at a time when learning assistant provision being reduced which often provided flexibility for front line service response (reception duties / care and welfare of children) Reputational Risk : There is a potential for negative perception by trade unions and also parents/carers who may not receive support at school reception as quickly as they currently do. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 60 2 90 3 90 3 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: 0 Note that the FTE Impact is an estimate – if the saving option is approved then the Chief Officer will assess the most effective way of delivering the saving target Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1450 Page 124
Page 59
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer Peter Barry Saving Ref: 2627 HE01 Saving Title Cease Rotation of Temporary Accommodation Summary of Savings Proposal The Council currently provides basic furnishings to approximately 250 temporary accommodation units, with a budget of £1,000 per home. The service rotates temporary accommodation, with the aim of ensuring that by 2027/28, no home is used for that purpose for a period greater than three years. As part of this, plans were made to relocate 10 temporary accommodation homes in 2026/27. Under this option, the rotation work would cease, reducing planned expenditure by an estimated £10k in 2026/27 and future years if planned activity in future years is also ceased. Operational reasons may require some units to be retired during the course of 2026/27; however, this would be treated as a cost pressure within the wider homelessness budget. Is there a capital requirement? No Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: This proposal is contrary to a service commitment made to the Council in terms of the rotation of the units, however that service commitment was made in advance of the budget pressures faced by the Council today. As a similar saving option was accepted in 2025/26, with 17 planned retirals ceased, this will potentially result in 27 properties being used as temporary accommodation above the planned 5-year period. People Risk: N/A Strategic Risk Register: The proposed saving option does not impact on any of the Council’s identified strategic risks. Reputational Risk: The proposal may be viewed negatively by neighbouring tenants and residents through the continued use of a nearby home as temporary accommodation. This will be mitigated by ongoing excellent management of temporary accommodation with concerns resolved timeously. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 10 0 10 0 10 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1307 Page 125
Page 60
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Peter Barry Saving Ref: 2627 HE02 Saving Title Reduce CCTV Team Summary of Savings Proposal The CCTV service provides monitoring and surveillance to prevent and detect anti- social and criminal behaviour, promoting safety and wellbeing within communities as well as supporting decriminalised parking enforcement by identifying areas with increased illegal parking. There are four operatives in this team with three employees on Grade 3 and one supervisor employee on Grade 5. The team require a minimum of four CCTV operatives to allow efficient operation of the rota seven days per week 8am-4am to provide live monitoring provision to proactively prevent crime and anti-social behaviour in our communities. Our CCTV network has recently been upgraded following successful funding application capital investment of £680k of UK Shared Prosperity Fund (UKSPF), matched by £750k from Housing Revenue Account (HRA). This led to the installation of 407 new CCTV cameras across West Dunbartonshire. From January 2025 to January 2026 there were 1863 incident logs recorded including large scale disturbances, violence/assaults, theft, support for vulnerable persons, anti-social behaviour, domestic abuse, drugs, vandalism, fires, road traffic and public nuisance. Incidents recorded do not take account of the proactive monitoring of cameras to detect and support prevention of anti-social behaviour or criminal activity to safeguard our communities. Under this proposal there are two options: Option 1 – Delete one CCTV Operative Option 2 – Delete two CCTV Operatives. Both options will have significant impact on the Council’s ability to identify and prevent acts of anti-social behaviour and criminal activity, along with reduced opportunity to proactively target areas for decriminalised parking enforcement and Penalty Charge Notices. Is there a Capital Requirement? There is no new capital requirement. A 5-year contract in place with BT for the ongoing maintenance of the new modernised CCTV network, which equates to £134,000 per year. These costs would continue regardless of whether there is live CCTV monitoring or not. Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: The CCTV team supports decriminalised parking enforcement. Any reduction to the team may impact upon the Council’s ability to generate income in this way. There is a risk of increased crime or anti-social behaviour due to reduced ability to prevent and detect crime in communities. Also reduced capacity to provide Page 126
Page 61
evidence for court proceedings. There is an increased risk of missed opportunity to detect and prevent anti-social behaviour/criminal incidents as CCTV monitoring supports the Council’s Anti-Social Behaviour Team and Police Scotland. Both options would result in increased periods of no live monitoring due to lack of resilience within team during planned or unplanned staff leave. Strategic Risk Register: No potential impact on areas of Strategic Risk. People Risk: Loss of between 1-2 FTE. Reputational Risk: Given the level of capital investment from UK Government and HRA, a reduction in CCTV operation poses a reputational risk as any periods of unmanned CCTV increases the risk of missing real time opportunity to prevent and capture anti-social behaviour or criminal activities. Residents may react negatively to a perceived loss of safety. In addition, the Council may be criticised if illegal parking is not identified quickly. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 25% - Option 1 14 1 27 1 27 1 50% - Option 2 27 2 54 2 54 2 It should be noted that any savings are only partial as the posts are part funded by HRA. The 2026/27 savings would be for half year to take account of required staffing/TU consultation periods if any options taken. FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: 0 Note that the FTE Impact is an estimate – if the saving option is approved then the Chief Officer will assess the most effective way of delivering the saving target. Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1351 Page 127
Page 62
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Victoria Rogers Saving Ref: 2627 PT01 Saving Title Review leadership support and explore transfer to CAS Summary of Savings Proposal The Leadership Support Team provides administrative and personal assistant support to the Chief Executive and Chief Officers of the Council. There are synergies between the work of the Leadership Support Supervisor and that of Corporate Administrative Support Team Leaders. Additionally, the introduction of AI-enabled transcribing of meetings and other digital solutions is likely to reduce demand in Leadership Support Team, enabling the streamlining of work. It is proposed that the team transfers to be managed by Corporate Administrative Support, reducing the number of Supervisor/Team Leader posts required. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: There is a risk capacity within Corporate Administrative Support cannot absorb work of managing additional employees meaning quality of service delivered to Chief Officers and Chief Executive may be impacted. To mitigate this, a review of tasks will be undertaken to identify where digital solutions may reduce demand on team such as transcribing of meetings through M365. Strategic Risk Register: There would be no impact on strategic risks. People Risk: Deletion of Supervisor or Team Leader post would create a redundancy if redeployment could not be achieved. Deleting a post at Supervisor level would reduce the impact on lower grade employees and help the manage any impact on service delivered to Chief Officers and Chief Executive. Reputational Risk: The risk is assessed as low. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 0 0 49 1 49 1 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: Could potentially avoid compulsory redundancy through use of planned age retirement. Note that the FTE Impact is an estimate – if the saving option is approved then the Chief Officer will assess the most effective way of delivering the saving target. Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1444 Page 128
Page 63
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Victoria Rogers Saving Ref: 2627 PT10 Saving Title Charges for Disclosure Scotland Summary of Savings Proposal Updates to the Disclosure Scotland Act 2020 last year is resulting in increased charges for PVG applications A PVG membership is now required for al regulated roles meaning an increase to the number of posts now caught by this requirement. In addition, a new 2025 fee and category structure has been introduced. New Categories & Costs: 1. Level 1 Disclosure - £25: Aimed at individuals applying for jobs where a basic criminal record check is required. 2. Level 2 Disclosure - £25: For roles that require a more detailed background check, including specific checks for roles such as solicitors and financial responsibility. 3. Level 2 with Barred List Check - £25: For specific activities such as adoption. 4. PVG Scheme Membership - £59: Remains the membership scheme for roles working with children or protected adults. It is a legal requirement to join the scheme for individuals undertaking a regulated role. With PVG scheme existing membership this is £18. There are also general administrative fees such as Registration Fee for accredited bodies (£125) and counter-signatory fees. The average annual cost of PVG applications over the last three years is around £29,000 albeit this is based on previous years’ before the increase to regulated roles. Under this proposal, two options are presented for consideration. The first option proposes passing the costs to all applicants/employees, whilst the second proposes passing the costs only to those above Grade 5 and equivalent Teacher (SNCT) grades. All options have been modelled on the outturn for 2023/24 noting that average annual costs are £29,000 over the last 3 years (against a budget of £30,000). Option 1 – saving £26k per annum: Charges for PVG membership would be the responsibility of applicants. Option 2 – saving of £16k per annum: Charges for PVG Membership for roles above Grade 5 would be responsibility of applicants. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: It could make it harder for services to recruit into roles, some of which are already hard to fill. Prospective employees may opt not to consider a position if they are required to pay the Disclosure Scotland charges. This is specifically true for areas where these proposals impact lower grade roles (option 1). It is worthy of note that many local authorities already pass these costs onto the applicants or pay the cost and recover through pay over a specified period. Should members decide Page 129
Page 64
not to pass the cost to employees, consideration must be given to budget strain as increasing numbers of regulated roles are identified across the organisation. Strategic Risk: There would be an impact on SR007, complexities in ensuring an appropriately resourced and resilient workforce People Risk: Due consideration of this cost saving option should be given to the employment groups affected by this proposal which may impact ability to fill roles, mainly educational establishments. This may deter entrants to lower paid children’s services roles (although this could be mitigated through phased recovery); and cause a reduction in volunteering opportunities and the number of volunteers, as the council currently pays for PVG membership. Reputational Risk: Passing the costs to individuals may have an adverse impact on the Council’s reputation. Saving 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 1 26 0 26 0 26 0 2 16 0 16 0 16 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1392 Page 130
Page 65
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Victoria Rogers Saving Ref: PT11 Saving Title Reduction in Corporate Training Budget Summary of Savings Proposal The Council's corporate training budget is £55,000. It funds workforce development activities such as i-learn modules, leadership programmes (Modern Leaders, Inspiring Leaders), and digital tools. In addition, it supports specific needs including retraining displaced employees and service-driven requests identified through workforce planning. Under this option, the corporate training budget would reduce by £15,000 to £40,000 which would reduce the level of support available. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: Support available to displaced employees would reduce as would support to meet specific learning needs which may impact on service delivery. In particular this would impact on ICT and Digital as they need to upskill ahead of the wider workforce to ensure best use of new tools available. There will be less budget to support the redeployment of displaced employees through the SWITCH Policy which may lead to increased costs in relation to unavoidable/statutory redundancy and/or access to unreduced pension benefits. Strategic Risk Register: There would be an impact on SR007 Complexities in ensuring an appropriately resourced and resilient workforce. People Risk: There is no direct impact on FTE but indirectly, opportunities for redeployment may be reduced. Reputational Risk: Provision of a training budget is not statutory however there are service delivery roles within the Council that employees have been successfully redeployed into that require Scottish Vocational Qualifications. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 15 0 15 0 15 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: 0 Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1369 Page 131
Page 66
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Laurence Slavin Saving Ref: 2627 RES01 Saving Title Review of External Funding Summary of Savings Proposal The Council’s general fund provides funding to a range of external groups/organisations to help pay for a range of services/activity. There is scope to either fully remove or reduce this funding in 2026/27 or on a phased basis over a number of years. The table below sets out the groups currently in receipt of funding and a summary of what the funding is provided for. Group Reason for Funding 2025/26 (£) West Dunbartonshire Community & Volunteering Services Voluntary Grant funding for social transport (£50k), play schemes and running costs (£25k). 75,000 YSortIt Engage with young people including the provision of issue based workshops, personal development, group work, support to achieve accreditation, and assist the development of healthy lifestyles and facilitate participation in community projects. 87,820 YSortIt Education Specific - Care connections and community mentoring supports for children and young people who are care experienced. Supports out of school learning and mentoring 76,000 Antonine Sports Centre Provide access to sports and community facilities in Duntocher 74,516 Clyde Shopmobility Deliver a mobility scooter, manual and powered wheelchair service to residents from its base in Clydebank Shopping Centre 47,760 Clydebank Asbestos Group Support running costs related to the provision of support, advice and information for victims of asbestos and their families 21,560 Lomond and Clyde Care & Repair Support to private homeowners to help them apply for grant funding via the Council for medical adaptations or essential repairs. 41,000 WD Citizen’s Advice Bureau Support for debt and benefit advice and consumer rights. 221,583 Total 645,239 Note that the funding detailed above excludes any funding made available on a time restricted basis from the Cost-of-Living fund and groups funded by the Dumbarton Common Good. Page 132
Page 67
Some indicative options for consideration are set out in the table below however other options can also be considered. Note the indicative options assume all groups are considered for reductions and treated equally. It would also be possible to apply different percentage savings to groups on an individual basis. Under this proposal, there are three options: Option 1: Fully remove all funding in 2026/27 Option 2: Phase out funding over two years Option 3: Phase out funding over three years Is there a Capital Requirement? No Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: N/A People Risk: N/A Strategic Risk Register: N/A Reputational Risk: There would be a reputational risk to the Council as reduction in funding to any of these groups would have a detrimental impact on the support service they provide to communities across West Dunbartonshire. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 1 – Remove in Year 1 645 0 645 0 645 0 2 – Phase 2 Years 323 0 645 0 645 0 3 – Phase 3 years 215 0 430 0 645 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1411, 1412, 1413, 1414, 1415, 1416, 1417, 1419 Page 133
Page 68
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Laurence Slavin Saving Ref: 2627 RES04 Saving Title Review of Office Accommodation Summary of Savings Proposal This proposal is to review office accommodation across three locations, Aurora House Carleith Primary School Campus, and Clydebank Library. Aurora has 73 desks on the ground and first floor allocated to Health & Social Care Partnership and Citizen, Culture and Facilities (CCF) staff. This property is leased to the Council from Clydebank Property Company. Clydebank Library has under utilised space on the 1st floor and plans have previously been drafted for a potential relocation of CCF staff. Carleith Primary School Campus has an area of office accommodation primarily used by psychological services, early years and education management team. The review will consider the allocation of staff across these sites to determine whether there is a more cost effective allocation model which still enables services to be delivered with the Council making a saving on the lease cost of Aurora House. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: Low - Minimal impact on service delivery across the locations as services are remaining in the geographical area. People Risk: Moderate - Relocations will impact multiple staff groups, potentially altering work locations, travel requirements, and access to team facilities. There is a risk of reduced morale or resistance to change, particularly if staff perceive new arrangements as less convenient or if workspace capacity is limited. Strategic Risk Register: Low - This proposal links to the Strategic Risk Register, given alignment with the Council’s wider Workforce and Accommodation Strategy and contribution to long-term financial sustainability through asset rationalisation. Reputational Risk: Low - Reputational impact is expected to be low if relocations are well-managed and service continuity maintained. However, any perceived reduction in workspace quality, accessibility, or employee welfare could draw internal criticism. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 25 0 50 0 50 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1408 Page 134
Page 69
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Laurence Slavin Saving Ref: 2627 RES14 Saving Title Elderly Welfare Grant Summary of Savings Proposal The Council currently offers a £15 per year Elderly Welfare Grant to all West Dunbartonshire residents over the age of 67. The budget for this grant is £110,000. Individuals have the option to have the grant paid to themselves or allocated to a group they are involved with for use for a social event. Last year £61,485 was paid to individuals and groups. Administration of this fund involves manual intervention for a range of services. Officers must verify applications, pay £15 to each applicant, and manage discrepancies including failed bank transfers. The Council relies on individuals to update personal records. When information is not kept up to date it can lead to a significant additional workload. In addition to the £110,000 saving, a further £10,000 could be saved from year two on costs associated with issuing remittance advice to each individual. This £10,000 saving would not be realised in year one as the Council would require notifying in writing those currently in receipt of the grant that it is no longer available. There are two options for this proposal. Option 1 – Cease payment of these grants with a percentage of the saving redirected to an external body to support charities who focus on supporting the elderly. For the purposes of this template a 50% redirection has been costed however there would be flexibility to consider a different percentage. Option 2 – Cease payment of these grants with none of the saving redirected. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: N/A People Risk: N/A Strategic Risk Register: N/A Reputational Risk: General risk of criticism for removing grants to elderly citizens. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 1 55 0 60 0 60 0 2 110 0 120 0 120 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1418 2026/27 SAVING OPTION Page 135
Page 70
Chief Officer: Laurence Slavin Saving Ref: 2627 RES15 Saving Title Review of Community Council Funding Summary of Savings Proposal The Council’s general fund provides £14,000 of funding to Community Councils as a flat rate £750 administration grant plus a per capita allowance. The Council is required by statute to support community councils. In the past the Council has reduced officer support provided to them and part of the justification was the provision of the grant to pay for admin support/necessary ICT etc. This proposal has four options as follows: Option 1: Reduce funding to Community Councils by 25% Option 2: Reduce funding to Community Councils by 50% Option 3: Reduce funding to Community Councils by 75% Option 4: Remove funding to Community Councils (this option would require to be considered at a special meeting of the Council with a two thirds majority vote). Is there a Capital Requirement? No Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: If the grant is fully removed it will increase pressure for greater officer support which is likely to cost more than the saving made. People Risk: N/A Strategic Risk Register: N/A Reputational Risk: There is a reputational risk as an expectation exists that local authorities will support community councils financially. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 1 3.5 0 3.5 0 3.5 0 2 7 0 7 0 7 0 3 10.5 0 10.5 0 10.5 0 4 14 0 14 0 14 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1202 2026/27 SAVING OPTION Page 136
Page 71
Chief Officer: Laurence Slavin Saving Ref: 2627 RES18 Saving Title National Fraud Initiative Single Person Discount Review Summary of Savings Proposal People living on their own can be eligible for a 25% single person discount (SPD) on their annual council tax bill. The National Fraud Initiative (NFI) matches SPD recipients to the electoral register and other datasets to identify where other adult residents have not been declared on applications, have subsequently turned 18 or have moved in. The information provided to the Council by the NFI must be fully investigated to ensure there is no acceptable reason for the mismatch. If no reason is identified, contact is made with the taxpayer in receipt of the SPD to discuss the matter. If appropriate, amended council tax notices are issued for payment with non-payment resulting in the normal recovery processes to be followed. This results in additional council tax income of an estimated £50k per year, however also generates significant additional work. It is therefore proposed an additional Grade 3 post is recruited to complete the NFI SPD Review for council tax. It is estimated this would generate net income for the Council of £20,000 per annum. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: The review will be delivered using an additional staff member so it is not expected to reduce any existing service functions. However, as it adds investigative and recovery workload, there is a modest risk other reactive tasks may be slightly delayed during periods of peak demand. People Risk: N/A Strategic Risk Register: N/A Reputational Risk: While the review aims to ensure fairness and accuracy in the award of discounts, some residents may perceive the removal of the SPD as punitive or dispute the findings. To mitigate this, all decisions will be supported by robust evidence and clear communication. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 16 0 20 0 20 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1396 2026/27 SAVING OPTION Page 137
Page 72
Chief Officer: Laurence Slavin Saving Ref: 2627 RES19 Saving Title Review use of Municipal Building Summary of Savings Proposal The Council’s Municipal Building is open five days per week between the hours of 8am and 6pm, with weekend access provided as required for wedding ceremonies. It is proposed to review the current and future use of the Municipal Building as part of the wider office accommodation and asset rationalisation programme. This will assess occupancy levels, service delivery requirements, and operational costs, and identify the most efficient and sustainable way to utilise the property. The review will explore the potential for lease of the building, supported by a detailed marketing exercise to attract potential parties. Active marketing of the building for shared or partnership use with any appropriate bodies will be undertaken. The review will balance operational needs, heritage considerations, and financial implications, with a target to identify measurable efficiencies and/or income generation opportunities. Outcomes from this review will be presented once feasibility work and engagement with potential parties are complete. As part of the review, the Council will undertake targeted market testing to gauge external interest in the building. Any progression toward alternative use would only be pursued where genuine, demonstrable interest is identified, ensuring that decisions are evidence-based and aligned with best value principles. The year one saving has been reduced to allow time for the property to be actively marketed for lease. The Council will continue to lease the building from the Common Good until such time as an alternative tenant can be identified. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: The review may lead to changes in how the Municipal Building is used or accessed, including potential reduction in opening days, relocation of existing functions, or full disposal. Any such change could temporarily affect public access, service availability, and event scheduling. People Risk: Staff based within the Municipal Building could be affected depending on the outcome of the review. Strategic Risk Register: Moderate - This proposal should be linked to the Strategic Risk Register, as it forms part of the Council’s wider asset rationalisation and financial sustainability programme. Reputational Risk: Reputational impact is expected to be low if relocations are well- managed and service continuity is maintained. Saving (Cumulative) Page 138
Page 73
2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 16 0 65 0 65 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1409 Page 139
Page 74
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Laurence Slavin Saving Ref: 2627 RES20 Saving Title Review use of depot rental charges Summary of Savings Proposal Internal recharges for several depot facilities have remained static for a number of years, despite changes in occupancy levels, service delivery models, and associated property costs such as maintenance, utilities, and insurance. In addition, a number of strategic sites in the Clydebank area, used by various services for storage, fleet operations, and support functions have never previously been subject to internal rental or recharge, resulting in under recovery of property costs within the asset management budget. To ensure rental charges accurately reflect current market values, usage patterns, and operational cost recovery principles, a detailed review of internal property recharges and rental arrangements for depot sites and strategic operational locations across the Council’s asset portfolio has been undertaken. This exercise has identified revised and new rental charges for a range of locations. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: Introduction of revised and new internal recharges will not directly reduce service delivery but may create budgetary pressures for individual services as costs are realigned to reflect fair market value. People Risk: There is a potential for indirect impact if services subsequently review depot-based operations or staffing structures as part of their efficiency planning. Strategic Risk Register: Low to Moderate - This proposal supports the Council’s broader Asset Rationalisation and Financial Sustainability objectives by ensuring all operational property costs are accurately attributed and recovered. Reputational Risk: Reputational risk is minimal, however, if service impacts or depot rationalisations occur in later phases, there is potential for perceived internal inequity or challenge from affected departments. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 75 0 75 0 75 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1410 Page 140
Page 75
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Laurence Slavin Saving Ref: 2627 RES21 Saving Title Council Tax on Long Term Empty and Second Homes Summary of Savings Proposal As per the terms of Local Government Finance (Unoccupied Properties, etc.) (Scotland) Act 2012 and Council Tax (Variation for Unoccupied Dwellings) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2023, owners of long-term empty homes and second homes in West Dunbartonshire currently pay 200% Council Tax rate. This generates generated additional Council Tax (CT) income of approximately £300,000 per year. The aim of the increased charge for empty homes and holidays homes is to incentivise owners to bring their homes back into use or return them to a main residence. This has reduced the number of empty homes in the area by more than half over the past 11 years, while holiday homes have reduced marginally. In 2024/25, the total collection rate on the increased charges was 75.6% including all debt recovered via Corporate Debt and/or the Council’s Debt Partners. The Council Tax (Variation for Unoccupied Dwellings) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2026 removed the upper limit on Council Tax rates for these homes, which creates an opportunity to introduce a further increase. There are five options to be considered with the associated saving based on a 75% collection rate Option 1: Increase the charge from 200% to 225% - increased CT of £56,250 Option 2: Increase the charge from 200% to 250% - increased CT of £112,500 Option 3: Increase the charge from 200% to 275% - increased CT of £168,750 Option 4: Increase the charge from 200% to 300% - increased CT of £225,000 There is scope to introduced increased charges from the start of 2026/27, mid-year in 2026/27 or from the start of 2027/28. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: There is a risk that the potential increase in Council Tax income will be less than stated however this will be a result of second home becoming someone’s sole or main residence which will bring benefits to the communities or long-term empty properties being brought back into use. People Risk: N/A Strategic Risk Register: N/A Page 141
Page 76
Reputational Risk: Any change may lead to complaints from taxpayers who feel the further increase to be unfair given they already pay double the Council Tax charge than others in the same Council Tax band who are in receipt of the same level of services from the Council. The increase could also lead to the owners’ financial hardship therefore impacting their ability to bring an empty property back into use. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 1 – Increase to 225% 56 0 56 0 56 0 2 – Increase to 250% 113 0 113 0 113 0 3 – Increase to 275% 169 0 169 0 169 0 4 - Increase to 300% 225 0 225 0 225 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1426 Page 142
Page 77
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Gail Macfarlane Saving Ref: 2627 RN01 Saving Title Closure of Bowling Clubs Summary of Savings Proposal The Council currently maintain the buildings and grounds of six bowling clubs at Whitecrook, Goldenhill, Christie Park Veterans, Bonhill Veterans, Balloch Veterans and Renton Veterans. Membership across the six sites remains low. In 2024/25, the utility bill cost for all sites – which includes electricity, gas and water– was circa £33,000. At Whitecrook and Goldenhill (before its closure due to significant vandalism last year) members receive the concessionary rate of £28.45 per season generating a total income of £1,384 per year. This is significantly less than the £44,000 the Council pays for buildings and ground maintenance across both sites. The veteran club members do not pay membership fees but receive maintenance of buildings and grounds. Currently grass cutting costs £24,000 per year across the six sites with additional costs for building maintenance. This option proposes to retain Whitecrook and merge the veteran bowling clubs to Christie Park. The Council has a dedicated resource to support the merger, and will continue to maintain the greens, building and associated amenities at the two retained clubs. Maintenance of the other sites would cease and these would be considered for disposal. The potential saving/income generation is estimated to be approximately £81,000. This will not be delivered from year 1 and the saving profile is set out in the table below. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: There is a service risk of continuing at all six sites, as the cost significantly outweighs income and when repairs are required (as is the situation at Goldenhill due to vandalism), there is no budget to undertake the work. Goldenhill Bowling Club is now closed and has not reopened for summer season 25/26 following vandalism and damage caused. There is no budget available to undertake necessary repair works (expected to be in the region of £48k). In addition, in 2025/26 quotes were received for £19,943 for a roof renewal at Renton Veterans Bowling Club, but there is no budget available to undertake these works. Strategic Risk Register: N/A Page 143
Page 78
People Risk: The FTE impact is employment of seasonal operative at 0.5FTE Reputational Risk: The membership of all bowling clubs are low and tend to be older members of the community. Members are likely to be critical of the Council in terms of the social aspect, and merging may introduce accessibility issues for members in relation to attending. This has been mitigated by the proposal to retain a club facility within both Dumbarton and Clydebank areas. It is anticipated that there is alternative capacity in private clubs in the Alexandria area to accommodate membership of the affected bowling clubs there. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 40 0.5 66 0.5 81 0.5 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: will be delivered through a reduction in seasonal operative and 0.5FTE operational reduction Note that the FTE Impact is an estimate – if the saving option is approved then the Chief Officer will assess the most effective way of delivering the saving target. Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1398 Page 144
Page 79
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Gail Macfarlane Saving Ref: 2627 RN04 Saving Title Street Lighting Summary of Savings Proposal Based on current estimates the annual electricity cost of one-hour operation of street lights in 2026/27 will be £48,676. This option proposes a change to street light programming. There is an environmental benefit to reduced street lighting as there will be a reduction in light pollution and carbon footprint. This would support the council’s journey to net zero, nature recovery and encourage nocturnal wildlife. There are two options to consider: Option 1: Lights programmed to be off for two hours between the hours of 2.30am and 4.30am. Option 2: Lights programmed to be off for three hours between or between 2.30am and 5.30am. Is there a Capital Requirement? Yes. Capital investment of circa £300k is required to install timers on columns. It is anticipated the project would require a nine-month lead in to procure consultant to undertake design, facilitate procurement and installation of timers and to undertake a communications activity. The revenue implication per year including capital repayment and loan is £18,600 per annum for 25 years. Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: Whilst turning off of street lights has been implemented in other areas, this has tended to be within more rural and less built up areas. Due to the nature of our network there would be very little benefit in only implementing this in rural areas alone and the proposal would be for a blanket turning off of all lights during these hours. Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: N/A Reputational Risk: There is no legal requirement on local authorities in the UK to provide street lighting, but the Council does have a duty to ensure that lighting units are kept in a safe condition. There is a perception that reduced lighting levels will lead to an increase in crime. Whilst there is little actual evidence to support this communities may feel less safe if street lights are switched off. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE Page 145
Page 80
1 6 0 77 0 77 0 2 18 0 126 0 126 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A . Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1380 Page 146
Page 81
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Gail MacFarlane Saving Ref: RN05 Saving Title Working4U Service Reduction Summary of Savings Proposal The Council provides Working4U with £1.24m with an additional £4million provided through external funding. All external funding is ringfenced for specific eligible activity. This includes funding from: • Macmillan Cancer • No One Left Behind (Scottish Government) • Skills Development Scotland (National Programmes) • UK Shared Prosperity funding (UK Government) As well as managing the service and securing and managing the external funds, Working4U is responsible for facilitating partnerships and associated strategy/planning development, monitoring and reporting. This includes: • Local Employability Partnership (Three-year employability plan) • No One Left Behind/Family Prosperity Network (Local Annual Child Poverty Report) • Community Learning and Development Partnership (Three Year Community Learning and Development (CLD) Plan) • Welfare/Benefits Partnership These requirements have emerged either as a strategic policy priority; a condition of the external funding or legislative/statutory requirements and/or service quality compliance. Working4U has 77 employees (70 Full Time Equivalent (FTE)). Of these: • 28 (26 FTE) are Council funded • 49 (44 FTE) are external grant funded (primarily employability service staff). Of the Council funded posts, 14 FTE must be retained to ensure continued delivery of the work outlined above as this cannot be met by external funding. This includes the compliance requirements set out by the external funders. This means 12 FTE of the Council funded workforce can be considered under this option. This will impact activities including Welfare Support, Debt Management, Adult Learning and Employability as these cannot be delivered utilising external funding. Therefore, even if additional external funding is received, these services will still be reduced as a result of this saving. There are four options to consider: Option 1 – Reduction of 3 FTE – saving £122,500 Option 2 – Reduction of 6FTE – saving £245,000 Option 3 – Reduction of 9 FTE – saving £367,000 Option 4 – Reduction of 12 FTE – saving £490,000 Page 147
Page 82
The FTE reduction may reduce. The final FTE will depend on the level of external funding received by the Council. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: Each option will reduce the number of employees available to deliver Working4U services with adult and community-based learning, welfare rights, debt advice and support to get residents into employment and apprenticeships impacted. It would also reduce the capacity to apply for ad-hoc external funding or offer support for businesses. Third sector support would cease. There is a risk that while the Council remains responsible for creating/delivering the Community Learning and Development Plan and associated partnership, and the Local Child Poverty Report and associated partnership, we have to rely wholly on external funds to provide/deliver the services. These options must be considered alongside the reduction in external funding from UKSPF, which will cease in 2026/27 with revenue funding reduced from £1.2m to £400,000 (best case scenario) as it transitions to the UK Growth Fund. There are currently 20 posts funded by UKSPF and this will mean a reduction to the workforce of approximately 12FTE. The combined impact of reductions in external funding and council reductions will require full scale consideration of the structure, priorities and service provision. People Risk: Up to 12 FTE employees impacted. There are currently no vacancies so will require a reduction of workforce. The FTE impact is indicative as should alternative external funding be secured this impact will reduce. Strategic Risk: N/A Reputational Risk: A reduction in service provision and in turn the support offered carries a significant reputational risk. The reductions will be noticeable by service users and those in crisis who will face longer waiting times for support. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 Option £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 1 61 3 122 3 122 3 2 122.5 6 245 6 245 6 3 184 9 368 9 368 9 4 245 12 490 12 490 12 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: 0 Note that the FTE Impact is an estimate – if the saving option is approved then the Chief Officer will assess the most effective way of delivering the saving target. In addition if alternative external funding is secured this will reduce FTE impact as employees will transition to new funds as eligibility allows. Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1401 Page 148
Page 83
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Gail Macfarlane Saving Ref: 2627 RN06 Saving Title Crematorium Weekend Operations Summary of Savings Proposal Currently cremations are offered Monday to Friday and Saturday morning. In addition, the Book of Remembrance is open for viewing seven days per week, including three hours on a Saturday and five hours on a Sunday. The cost to provide staffing for Saturday and Sunday operation is approximately £25,000 overtime, which exceeds the £5k budget allocated. In 2024 and 2025, there were adequate available weekday slots to accommodate cremations held on a Saturday. It is therefore proposed that cremations and viewings of the Book of Remembrance are offered Monday to Friday only, with the crematoriums closed to the public at weekends. Overtime would still be utilised to cover essential activities including crematorium cooldown after cremations taking place later in the day. This would generate a £5,000 saving in the reduction of overtime budget, and £20,000 cost avoidance. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: There is a risk if service continues to be delivered with a reliance on overtime payments. While there are adequate available weekday slots for demand, residents may wish to hold their loved ones ceremony at the weekend, and may choose to go elsewhere. This would be a loss in income of circa £1k/cremation. Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: Potential concern from employees who have frequently been offered overtime at Saturday cremations. Overtime will continue to be required for essential tasks as outlined above. Reputational Risk: There is a risk that residents or visitors react negatively to the removal of access to the book of remembrance at weekends. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 5 0 5 0 5 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A Note that the FTE Impact is an estimate – if the saving option is approved then the Chief Officer will assess the most effective way of delivering the saving target. Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1399 Page 149
Page 84
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Gail Macfarlane Saving Ref: 2627 RN07 Saving Title Reduction in Street Cleaning Summary of Savings Proposal The Council’s Greenspace service currently carries out mechanical street cleaning, litter picking, emptying of street bins and graffiti removal in addition to grounds activities. Under this option, it is proposed that the street cleaning function is reduced by 2FTE. The reduction will mean a reduction in litter collection and bin emptying with operatives prioritising town centre locations. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: This group of employees also deliver flood prevention works and filling of grit bins during the winter period so any reduction will also have an impact on the service’s ability to react to inclement weather events. Strategic Risk Register: SR009 Challenges in delivering effective services in relation to Roads and Neighbourhoods. People Risk: 2FTE operatives from the Grounds Service. There are currently no vacancies so will require a reduction of workforce. Reputational Risk: The statutory level of street cleaning would continue to be met through all options. Residents may be critical as the area will not be as clean due to litter collection and bin emptying not carried out as regularly. Cleaning would be undertaken on priority basis so some outlying areas will have a reduced frequency of cleaning. Those areas will see litter lying for longer periods of time and this may lead to an increase in reports of vermin. In addition, these areas may be impacted by flooding as the lack of mechanical sweeping may lead to choked gulleys. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 27.5 2 55 2 55 2 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: 0 Note that the FTE Impact is an estimate – if the saving option is approved then the Chief Officer will assess the most effective way of delivering the saving target. Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1379 Page 150
Page 85
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Gail Macfarlane Saving Ref: 2627 RN08 Saving Title Introduction of Parking Charging Summary of Savings Proposal Currently motorists are not charged to park within West Dunbartonshire towns and villages. Good parking management is a recognised tool to encourage turnover and improve access to town centre businesses and amenities. This option proposes implementing charges or parking within town centre car parks in Dumbarton, Clydebank, Alexandria and Balloch following the promotion of traffic regulation orders. Motorists would pay to park between the hours of 9am and 6pm on Monday-Saturday with the following proposed tariff: 0 - 2 hour £1 2 – 3 hour £2 3 – 4 hour £3 Over 4 hours £5 Arrangements would be put in place to ensure blue badge holders continue to park without charge. The introduction of charging within council owned public car parks requires the promotion of a Traffic Regulation Order (TRO). This must be advertised so stakeholders are given the opportunity to make representation for consideration. It is likely that the TRO process will take in the region of 18 months. Is there a Capital Requirement? Yes, there is a requirement to procure parking charging infrastructure and signage. Costs for instalment of pay machines estimated at £150k capital. Capital will be spent in year 2028/29 and costs £18,725/year Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: There will be a requirement to write and TROs, manage correspondence, monitor the ticket machines, replace tickets and arrange repairs. There is currently limited capacity or resource available to undertake these activities. There is a resource requirement from Legal to progress TROs and to manage objection process. Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: Enforcement is reliant on the capacity of Enforcement Officers therefore may require the recruitment of additional officers. This would be funded through income received from parking. Resource required to write and promote TROs, to be funded through enforcement income if available. Reputational Risk: It is not a statutory function to provide free parking. Good parking management encourages turnover and improves access to town centre amenities and facilities for users as discourages long stay parking. This may have negative feedback from employees and residents who currently use Council car parks free of charge. The impact of this would be partially offset by maximising the Page 151
Page 86
use of Council owned electric pool vehicles. There are good public transport links to the town centre and the use of these will be promoted to encourage sustainable commuting. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 0 0 0 0 216 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1397 Page 152
Page 87
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Gail Macfarlane Saving Ref: 2627 RN09 Saving Title Reduce number of Apprentices Summary of Savings Proposal The Council’s Roads and Greenspace teams currently offer 11 apprenticeships across both services, with one in Roads and the remainder in Greenspace. The cost per each employee is circa £23k and these posts have been typically difficult to fill, with five currently vacant. Under this option, these five vacant apprenticeships would be deleted, removing the Roads apprentice opportunity, and bringing Greenspace opportunities to six. No apprentices in post will be impacted and as deleted posts are currently vacant there will be no service reduction. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: N/A Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: A reduction in five posts but no existing employees as these posts are currently vacant. Reputational Risk: Although there is a reduction in opportunity to commence an apprenticeship with the council these posts have been difficult to recruit to and the current apprentices will not be impacted. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 115 5 115 5 115 5 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: 5 Note that the FTE Impact is an estimate – if the saving option is approved then the Chief Officer will assess the most effective way of delivering the saving target. Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1377 Page 153
Page 88
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Gail Macfarlane Saving Ref: 2627 RN10 Saving Title Cease supply and installation of Christmas Trees Summary of Savings Proposal The Service provide and install a Christmas tree within Dumbarton, Clydebank and Balloch and decorate with lights at a cost of £15,000. This proposal is to cease the supply and installation of three trees and associated lighting. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: N/A Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: N/A Reputational Risk: There is likely to be a negative perception from residents of the towns impacted and criticism of the Council, particularly as it may impact upon footfall. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 15 0 15 0 15 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1378 Page 154
Page 89
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Gail Macfarlane Saving Ref: 2627 RN11 Saving Title Street Sweeping and Litter Collection of Trunk Road Summary of Savings Proposal The Greenspace Team undertake street cleaning and litter collection of the A82 trunk road which is owned and maintained by Transport Scotland. The current cost to undertake is £150,000 per annum. While there is a statutory obligation to undertake these activities, there is no set level of maintenance required. It is therefore proposed the Council makes a saving by reducing the frequency of litter collection and street cleaning of the trunk road. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: There is a risk of flooding if debris and detritus is not cleared frequently. Flooding instances are the responsibility of Transport Scotland and they may challenge a reduction in service. Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: N/A Reputational Risk: The trunk road is the main approach to and journey through and into West Dunbartonshire. Increased litter levels with these items lying for longer is likely to generate criticism and impact of the perception of the area’s cleanliness.. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 50 0 50 0 50 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1400 Page 155
Page 90
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Gail Macfarlane Saving Ref: 2627 RN14 Saving Title Purchase of vehicles to replace hire cars Summary of Savings Proposal The Council has for the past five years hired a number of vehicles for use in the delivery of essential work in Roads, Grounds and Caretaking. The annual cost for these hires is £74k. This option proposes the Council reduces its outgoings by purchasing the required vehicles at a cost of £300,000, bringing the annual cost for the vehicles down to £37k. Is there a Capital Requirement? Yes, the cost of procuring 10 vehicles is £300k Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: This will not impact upon service delivery as the vehicles will continue to be available. Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: N/A Reputational Risk: No reputational risk. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 20 0 37 0 37 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1381 Page 156
Page 91
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Gail Macfarlane Saving Ref: 2627 RN15 Saving Title Cease supply of Dog Waste Bags Summary of Savings Proposal The Council provides dog waste bags to residents free of charge, with residents able to collect these from libraries, council buildings and police stations. The Service currently distributes five million dog waste bags per year at a cost of £25,000. This proposal is to cease the supply of free dog waste bags. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: There may be an impact on service capacity should operational workforce be required to increase street cleaning to address dog fouling. Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: N/A Reputational Risk: There is likely to be a negative perception from residents who are critical of the Council as they have historically been able to access these free of charge. There may be a perception that there will be higher levels of dog fouling in hotspot areas. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 25 0 25 0 25 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1460 Page 157
Page 92
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Regulatory & Regeneration Saving Ref: 2627 RR01 Saving Title Communities Team The Communities Team deliver community development work that is shaped by West Dunbartonshire Council’s Community Learning and Development Three Year Plan. The team has 4.75 FTE employees made up of a Communities Team Leader (Grade 8), a Project Development Officer (Grade 6) and three Community Workers (Grade 5). The Community Workers engage at a grass-roots level with communities and support the development of community activity/participation. Activity and project ideas are developed to a certain stage, before being passed to the Project Development Officer to support. Under this proposal, the Communities team would reduce to 3.75 FTE, with the deletion of one of the three Community Worker posts. Additionally, under RR02 (Management Adjustment) some of the work and resources of the communities Team would be directed towards the support of Regeneration activity while under RR03 the part of the time of two officers would be expressly directed towards community engagement surrounding the Clydebank Neighbourhood Board. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: This would have an impact on the volume of community engagement the team would be able to deliver and would impact on annual reporting through the Community Learning and Development Plan. The team would direct its focus more on community planning, with less opportunity to support organic community activity and participation. This is contrary to the Community Wealth Building agenda. Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: 1FTE would be lost. Reputational Risk: There is a possibility that the reduction in community activity will be criticised if we fail to meet nationally set targets. Reduction in community activity is likely to be criticised by community activists and others in civic society. Saving (Each Year) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 42 1 42 1 42 1 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A Note that the FTE Impact is an estimate – if the saving option is approved then the Chief Officer will assess the most effective way of delivering the saving target. Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1454 Page 158
Page 93
2026/27 SAVING OPTION Chief Officer: Alan Douglas Saving Ref: 2627 RR08 Saving Title: Assistance to Businesses Summary of Savings Proposal Business Support in Economic Development have two main funds for supporting businesses. One of these is tied to the UK Shared Prosperity Fund and therefore the Council has little scope to reduce funds. The other fund of circa £70k funds the business start-up grant (£500) and Business Development grant (50% of eligible costs up to maximum of £3k). These funds are typically fully committed. Under this option, a £10k reduction is proposed, maintaining £60k to support businesses. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: There is a possibility that remaining funds are insufficient to meet demand, particularly when combined with reduction to UK Shared Prosperity Funding. Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: N/A Reputational Risk: Given the anticipated impact of the reduction in shared prosperity funding, it may be that the Council could be seen as unsupportive to local business needs. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/27 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 10 0 10 0 10 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1453 Page 159
Page 94
2026/27 MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT Chief Officer: Amanda Graham Saving Ref: CCF12 Saving Title Facilities Management Operating Model Summary of Savings Proposal The Facilities Management service has circa 600 staff and provides a range of services across educational and operational premises including access, a building cleaning service and nutritionally balanced breakfasts, lunches and snacks for pupils. During 2025/26 a new operating model was proposed for Facilities Management to deliver a more effective, efficient and resilient service and is set to be implemented in March 2026 following extensive consultation with employees. A £250,000 saving will be generated from implementation of the model. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: Service operations have not been reviewed in over 10 years and in this time there have been significant changes in the landscape. There is an issue with resilience currently and absence levels have been significant historically. There is a risk that staff do not buy in impacting on implementation or that absence continues at current levels impacting on service delivery. This has been mitigated against by significant and ongoing consultation and engagement both with employees and TU colleagues. Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: This proposal offers opportunity for service improvement and efficiencies, however may result in a reduction of some posts. It is anticipated this will be achieved by voluntary means. Reputational Risk: Given circa 600 employees are employed within the service there is a risk of reputational impact. Employee feedback received through a staff survey, back to the floor and working groups has been incorporated into the new delivery model. There has also been early and ongoing TU engagement throughout. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 250 TBC 250 TBC 250 TBC FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: TBC Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1374 APPENDIX 3 Page 160
Page 95
2026/27 MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT Chief Officer: Amanda Graham Saving Ref: CCF13 Saving Title Vacant Facilities Management support post Summary of Savings Proposal A vacancy has arisen within the Facilities Management team. In the short term the work is being undertaken on a temporary basis to support implementation of the service redesign however with a new structure being introduced to provide further support for the frontline, the Business Support Officer vacancy would be deleted during 2026/27 to realise a saving. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: Services are being delivered in a different way which will minimise the risk of service impact. Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: Deletion of one vacant post. Reputational Risk: N/A Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 40 1 50 1 50 1 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: 1 Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1375 Page 161
Page 96
2026/27 MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT Chief Officer: Gillian Hamilton Saving Ref: 2627 EDU18 Saving Title Right size Free School Meal, Alternative Holiday Payments and School Clothing Grant budgets Summary of Savings Proposal At present children and young people are eligible for Free School Meals (FSM) where their household income is below a set threshold. In addition, Scottish Government provide FSM to all P1-P5 pupils. During school holidays, an alternative to the school lunch is provided in the form of payment to parents. The budget in 2025/26 is £563k and the total estimated cost is £535k, representing a £28k underspend (in 2024/25, expenditure was £568k). Similarly, dependent on circumstances, families are eligible for a school clothing grant of £120 per primary child per year and £150 per secondary child per year. Currently 3,679 families receive this grant. The budget in 2025/26 is £605k and the total estimated cost is £502k, representing a £103k underspend. Falling school rolls have had an impact on eligibility numbers for free school meals, alternative to meals holiday payments and school clothing grants. As a consequence, current projections show a favourable variance against all three of these areas and there is scope to reduce these expenditure budgets. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: There is risk that the budgets would need increased in time to reflect changing demand from eligible families. Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: N/A Reputational Risk: There is a risk that this is perceived as a reduction impacting upon children. This can be mitigated by ensuring we meet demand from all eligible families. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 128 0 128 0 128 0 Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1449 Page 162
Page 97
2026/27 – MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT Chief Officer: Gillian Hamilton Saving Ref: 2627 EDU24 Saving Title Early Learning and Childcare Education Support Officer Summary of Savings/Management Adjustment Proposal Currently within the Early Learning and Childcare central team there are four Link Officer posts (3.5FTE), one of which is vacant. Link Officers provide improvement and quality support to the Council’s 29 Early Learning settings and 12 partner settings. Two Link Officers are employed on Scottish Negotiating Committee for Teachers (SNCT) terms and conditions, as an Education Officer (0.6FTE) and Principal Teacher (1FTE). They are both employed on a term-time basis. One Link Officer is an Education Support Officer (ESO) (1FTE) and employed under Administrative, Professional, Technical & Clerical (APT & C) terms and conditions on a 52-week basis on a temporary contract. The vacant post is 0.5FTE on a 52-week contract. The 1FTE ESO post splits the work of an Education Support Officer (0.5FTE) and cover for the Education Officer post (0.5FTE), due to the Education Officer’s flexible working arrangement. Both Education Support Officer posts are employed on a 52-week basis to support in the running of our ELC service outwith term time. This option proposes deletion of the 0.5FTE Education Support Officer post, creating a saving of £28K. The remaining Education Support Officer post which is vacant would be filled on a 52-week basis and the temporary filled post would no longer exist. This would reduce the ELC Link Officers to 3FTE and these staff would be required to adopt more innovative and automative approaches to manage the revised workload. Is there a capital requirement? No Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk - With the further reduction of 0.5fte of the ELC central team, the remaining ELC central team would be required to provide support to more ELC settings and the current strategic remit aspects would require to be delegated to remaining team members. This would have an impact on the time and quality of support that could be provided to settings. People Risk – None (as post is currently vacant) Page 163
Page 98
Reputational Risk – With reduced central support there is a risk that settings will not perform as well at inspection and could fall below the requirements of ‘good’ for the National Standard. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 18 0.5 28 0.5 28 0.5 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: 0.5 Equality Impact Assessment Completed: EIA No: 1382 Page 164
Page 99
2026/27 MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT Chief Officer: Victoria Rogers Saving Ref: 2627 PT06 Saving Title 365 Licence Savings Summary of Savings Proposal The council has made a significant investment in the Microsoft 365 technology platform to support modern, collaborative, and secure working practices. The current licensing model enables employees to access a suite of productivity and security tools, including Outlook, Word, Excel, SharePoint, OneDrive, Microsoft Teams, and the enterprise mobility and security suite. The Council’s corporate Microsoft Enterprise Agreement (EA) expired on 31 December 2025 and as part of the renewal planning process, a detailed review of existing licence usage has been undertaken. This review has identified an opportunity to optimise the deployment of Microsoft 365 E3 licences and reduce licence volumes by 500. The associated saving on our renewal is estimated to be £72,000. A small part of this amount will be used towards 2025/26 savings already agreed by council in March 2025 (PT20). The remainder, amounting to £60,000, is a 2026/27 management adjustment. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: There is no risk to service areas with the reduction of licences. All council employees and partnerships have been allocated a E3 licence which provides secure access to Office 365, SharePoint and One Drive. The licences that are reduced are surplus to requirements and will not impact service delivery across the organisation. Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: N/A Reputational Risk: N/A. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 000 FTE 000 FTE 000 FTE 60 0 60 0 60 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: NIL Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1318 Page 165
Page 100
2026/27 MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT Chief Officer: Victoria Rogers Saving Ref: 26/27 PT07 Saving Title: Reduce ICT Support Summary of Savings Proposal Information, Communications and Technology (ICT) provides centralised services across the Council and partnerships, including Health and Social Care Partnership, West Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust and Valuation Joint Board. The service includes delivery and support of network infrastructure to provide access to critical business systems such as finance, social care, housing, and desktop office applications such as MS Teams, email and office 365 suite. In addition, ICT delivers and supports technology across all educational establishments The team are currently migrating council employees to MS365 & SharePoint/One Drive, and implementing Artificial Intelligence solutions such as Copilot and Transcribe. In addition, a new Telephony replacement project is being rolled out across the Council estate. Recent focus has been on strengthening the organisation’s cyber security posture and raising employee awareness to cyber risk, plus supporting service projects such as Faifley Campus and the Council’s new financial system. ICT currently employs 51.5 FTE, including 6.6 FTE employees funded by capital. Under this option 1FTE G3 Device Support, currently vacant, will be deleted from the structure. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: Any reduction in this area has the potential to cause delays to resolution of device incidents and requests impacting all Council employees requiring ICT support, extending waiting times for all users. It is likely to reduce Tech Bar support to corporate employees in Church Street office. Strategic Risk Register: Impact linked to SR004. People Risk: As this is option refers to a post which is currently vacant, there is no people risk. If the proposal is accepted, full-year savings will be realised from 2026/27 following the formal deletion of the post. Reputational Risk: There is a risk that further reduction to the ICT service would impact on device support, which could directly impact upon frontline services causing reputational damage. Saving (Cumulative) 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 32 1 32 1 32 1 FTE Impact delivered via vacancies: 1 Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1364 Page 166
Page 101
2026/27 MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT Chief Officer: Gail Macfarlane Saving Ref: 2627 RN12 Saving Title Separation of Garden/Food Waste Summary of Savings Proposal Currently garden and food waste is collected and treated together as a comingled material. The cost to process and treat comingled waste is significantly higher per tonne than the cost to treat garden and food waste separately. In addition, the waste requires to be transported to a processing site at a further distance than separate waste. This option proposes to separate collection and disposal of food and garden waste, which will have financial benefits, as well as environmental benefits including reducing the Council’s carbon footprint. Is there a Capital Requirement? Yes, the purchase of food waste vehicles for collection and food waste caddies for residents to use for disposal. Both will be funded through extended producer responsibility budget. Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: The separation of waste aligns to the national and local ambitions to increase recycling. Strategic Risk Register: SR011 Inability to reduce carbon footprint in line with targets. People Risk: N/A Reputational Risk: If this change leads to further disruption to residents’ collections following the introduction of the recycling prioritisation schedules, the Council will be heavily criticised. A number of local authorities have implemented separation of garden and food waste and it aligns to the Household Charter ambitions. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 50 0 100 0 100 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1368 Page 167
Page 102
2026/27 MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT Chief Officer: Regulatory & Regeneration Saving Ref: 2627 RR02 Saving Title Secondment to Clydebank Neighbourhood Board The Clydebank Neighbourhood Board, established as part of the UK Government’s Pride in Place/Plan for Neighbourhoods programme, is responsible for developing Clydebank’s 10‑year Regeneration Plan and overseeing delivery of regeneration projects to ensure they reflect community needs. The board includes local community representatives, local organisations, elected members and a chairperson. The Board needs a full-time Project Officer to support delivery of the overall project. Consideration of the role’s profile outlined by other local authorities identified similarities to the Council’s Regeneration Officer role. At its meeting in January 2026 the Board agreed the principle of secondment to Clydebank Neighbourhood Board of a Grade 8 from the Regeneration team to be the Programme Manager for the programme of interventions. The grade of the new post will need to be determined through the Job Evaluation process. It is proposed a Communities Worker (Grade 5) from Communities Team would be seconded to the Regeneration Team to assist with the community engagement work which is currently undertaken by Regeneration Officers. This officer would be paid for by capital funds, as the Regeneration team are, meaning there would be a revenue saving in the Communities team and a saving to capital (the difference between a Grade 8 and Grade 5 officer). If this role is developed during the period of secondment, a job evaluation exercise would be required however this is not currently envisaged. Is there a Capital Requirement? There will be impact on capital through a reduced commitment from a Grade 8 to Grade 5. Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: There are two other proposals impacting the Communities Team. 2627 RR01 and 26/27 RR03. This option and 2627 RR03 propose dedicating employees to community engagement in particular service areas, however alongside the reduction proposed in 2627 RR01 there would be a net reduction in the team’s overall capacity, and less scope to address general community engagement work. This would impact on annual reporting through the Community Learning and Development Plan. The team would direct its focus to community planning, with less opportunity to support organic community activity and participation. This is contrary to the Community Wealth Building agenda. If taken alongside 2627 RR01 and RR03 the reduction in such work would be significant however in part offset as noted above. Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: N/A Saving (Each Year) Page 168
Page 103
2026/27 2027/27 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 42 0 42 0 42 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1455 Page 169
Page 104
2026/27 MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT Chief Officer: Regulatory & Regeneration Saving Ref: 2627 RR03 Saving Title Capacity Funding - Plan For Neighbourhoods The Clydebank Neighbourhood Board, established as part of the UK Government’s Pride in Place/Plan for Neighbourhoods programme, is responsible for developing Clydebank’s 10‑year Regeneration Plan and overseeing delivery of regeneration projects to ensure they reflect community needs. The board includes local community representatives, local organisations, elected members and a chairperson. At its meeting on 30 January 2026 the Board agreed in principle, subject to Council approval, utilising capacity funding of the Pride in Place annual budget. The proposal would see the partial funding of two posts within the Communities Team to support Community Development work on behalf of the Clydebank Neighbourhood Board rather than the programme of work being delivered by consultants. The proposal would see the fund meeting 50% of a Grade 5 Community Worker and 25% of a Grade 6 Project Development Officer to support a programme of work. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: There are two other proposals impacting the Communities Team. 2627 RR01 relates to a reduction of one FTE on a permanent basis while 2627 RR02 relates to a member of the Communities Team’s time dedicated to community engagement associated with regeneration. This option and 2627 RR02 propose dedicating employees to community engagement in particular service areas, however alongside the reduction proposed in 2627 RR01 there would be a net reduction in the team’s overall capacity, and less scope to address general community engagement work. This would impact on annual reporting through the Community Learning and Development Plan. The team would direct its focus to community planning, with less opportunity to support organic community activity and participation. This is contrary to the Community Wealth Building agenda. If taken alongside 2627 RR01 and RR02 the reduction in such work would be significant however in part offset as noted above. Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: N/A Reputational Risk: N/A. Saving (Each Year) 2026/27 2027/27 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 34 0 34 0 34 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No:1456 Page 170
Page 105
2026/27 MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT Chief Officer: Alan Douglas Saving Ref: 2627 RR06 Saving Title: Planning, Environmental Health and Building Standards Summary of Savings Proposal Planning, Environmental Health and Building Standards have identified the following potential savings and income generation options which have limited financial impact on service users. £ Reduction of Place and Design Panel budget 5,000 Review Planning Preapplication Service and Associated Fee 4,500 Introduce Charges for Stopping Up Orders 2,000 Review Charges for Street Naming and Numbering 500 Review EH Pest Control Fees 1,000 Statutory Local Review Body Fees 1,500 Recover admin costs associated with Dangerous Buildings 1,000 Total 15,500 Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: There is always a risk on income generation activities that the required numbers of applications do not arise, however estimates are conservative for the achievable sums to mitigate this risk. Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: N/A Reputational Risk: There is likely to be some concern around fee increases however these are modest increases and are justified in the current financial climate. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/27 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 15.5 0 15.5 0 15.5 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: Screening 1451 Page 171
Page 106
2026/27 MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT Chief Officer: Alan Douglas Saving Ref: 2627 RR07 Saving Title: Business Gateway Summary of Savings Proposal The Business Gateway service is currently situated in the Titan Enterprise building at Queens Quay, Clydebank. This proposal would see the relocation of services to Council offices at Church Street, Dumbarton. The main physical impact would be the requirement for ready access to meeting rooms and a degree of branding in place as a requirement for the funding we receive to operate the service. An additional saving can be achieved by reduction of the current Publicity and Promotions budget based on the ability to utilise online promotion more effectively. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: There is a possibility that the service may have difficulty accommodating their meetings in the busy office space at Church Street. Other nearby offices and facilities would provide sufficient overspill, and occasional sessions to Clydebank and The Vale could be accommodated within other Council properties with some planning. Strategic Risk Register: N/A People Risk: N/A Reputational Risk: The change would involve another service being withdrawn from Clydebank which may draw negative comment given the long established nature of the facility in Clydebank, and the recent closure of other facilities in the area e.g. Registration Services. Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/27 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 10 0 10 0 10 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1452 Page 172
Page 107
2026/27 MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT Chief Officer: Alan Douglas Saving Ref: RR09 Saving Title Merger of Manager Roles – Legal and Democratic Services Summary of Savings Proposal The proposal would see the merger of two service manager roles under a new single post of Manager of Legal and Democratic Services with some teams relocated to other senior managers and/or Chief Officer areas to facilitate compliance with the Council’s Strategic Operating Model and provide synergies in service delivery. Details of these structural changes were reported to Recruitment and Individual Performance Committee in February. The gross saving of this option is £75,000 however £50,000 is required as a contribution toward the 2024/25 Strategic Operating Model saving option (PT08). This leaves a balance of £25,000 to be taken as a management adjustment in 2026/27. Is there a Capital Requirement? No Risk Associated with Proposed Savings Service Risk: The merger of two key roles always brings a risk of creating single points of failure and of being too large a role to successfully fill. Any potential risk to service delivery is reduced through the recruitment of an experienced individual to undertake the new role and by having a full complement of direct reports. Strategic Risk Register: The new post will impact on a number of strategic risks through the oversight of the legal and administrative establishment of the Council. The proposed postholder is suitably qualified to address these risks with their teams and the assistance of the Chief Officer: Regulatory and Regeneration while the new arrangements bed in People Risk: N/A Reputational Risk: N/A Saving (Cumulative) 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 £000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE 25 0 25 0 25 0 FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: Equality Impact Assessment Completed: Yes EIA No: 1441 Page 173
Page 108
WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL Appendix 4 GENERAL SERVICES CAPITAL PLAN UPDATE 2025/26 TO 2035/36 - SPEND Project No Recurring/ Non- recurring Spend to 31 March 2025 Updated Budget 2025/26 after P10 BCR Budget 2026/27 Budget 2027/28 Budget 2028/29 Budget 2029/30 Budget 2030/31 Budget 2031/32 to 2035/36 Budget 2025/26 to 2035/36 Project Life £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 Service Project RES 1 Valuation Joint Board - Requisition of ICT Equipment NR 17 4 3 6 13 30 RES 2 Agresso Development NR 86 6 6 92 RES 4 Community Success Capital Fund NR 0 21 129 150 150 RES 5 Community Sports Success NR 10 9 231 240 250 RES 6 Strathleven Place (formerly part of Glencairn House project) NR 0 0 1,590 1,590 1,590 RES 7 New Sports Changing Facility Dumbarton West (Old OLSP site) NR 9 0 340 340 349 RES 8 Building Upgrades and H&S - lifecycle & reactive building upgrades (unallocated) R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13,905 13,905 13,905 RES 8a Building Upgrades - Whitecrook PS Cunard CSW 233 368 601 601 RES 8b Building Upgrades - Clydebank Library - Internal Refurbishment Works 350 350 350 RES 8c Building Upgrades - Fire Risk Works 150 350 350 350 350 350 1,900 1,900 RES 8d Building Upgrades - Health & Safety - For Works Arising 5 150 150 150 150 150 755 755 RES 8e Building Upgrades - ASN Adaptations 40 25 25 25 25 25 165 165 RES 8f Building Upgrades - Signalling/Monitoring for Alarms 60 40 40 40 40 40 260 260 RES 8g Building Upgrades - St Eunan's PS - installation of outdoor poly tunnel 11 11 11 RES 8h Building Upgrades - Whitecrook PS - New All Weather Pitch 122 122 122 RES 8i Building Upgrades - Knoxland Primary School - condition survey works 214 187 401 401 RES 8j Building Upgrades - lifecycle & reactive building upgrades - Linnvale PS - condition survey works 157 157 157 RES 8k Building Upgrades - Hartfield Clinic – creation of drop in clinic 26 26 26 RES 8l Building Upgrades - 45 Kilbowie Road (Labour office) - New door 93 93 93 RES 8m Building Upgrades - Roof Repair required at 10a Elm Road, Broadmeadow Industrial Estate, Dumbarton 54 54 54 RES 8n Building Upgrades - lifecycle & reactive building upgrades - 167-169 Main St, Alexandria (Boots) roof repair 128 128 128 RES 8o Building Upgrades - Christie Park PS - New All Weather Pitch 186 186 186 RES 8p Building Upgrades - Kilbowie PS - New All Weather Pitch 11 11 11 RES 8q Building Upgrades - Craigellachie Children's Home - Office redesign and painting 118 118 118 RES 8r Gavinburn ELCC roof 283 283 283 RES 8s Museum fit-out of Clydebank Museum 46 46 46 RES 8t St Michaels PS Boiler Replacement 98 98 98 RES 8u Carleith PS Playground resurfacing 5 5 5 RES 8v Levengrove Park Pavilion Café Heat Pump 1 1 1 RES 8w Building Upgrades - Conditions Survey 65 65 65 RES 8x Building Upgrades - Flourishing Faifley (The Knowe) - new roof 80 80 80 RES 8y Building Upgrades - Balloch Castle - Upgrade Windows & all required surveys 392 392 392 RES 8z Building Upgrades - Argle Park bothy refurb 157 157 157 RES 8aa Building Upgrades - Vale Cemetary Bothy 53 53 53 RES 8ab Building Upgrades - Christie Park Workshop 34 34 34 RES 8ac Building Upgrades - Christie Park Primary School 315 315 315 RES 8ad Building Upgrades - Our Lady of Loretto Primary School 315 315 315 RES 8ae Building Upgrades - Carleith Primary School 315 315 315 RES 8af Building Upgrades - St Mary’s Primary School, Alexandria 331 331 331 RES 8ag Building Upgrades - St Mary’s Primary School,Duntocher 331 331 331 RES 8ah Building Upgrades - Lennox Primary School & ELCC 331 331 331 RES 8ai Building Upgrades - Bonhill Primary School 331 331 331 RES 8aj Building Upgrades - St Stephen’s Primary School 331 331 331 Page 174
Page 109
Project No Recurring/ Non- recurring Spend to 31 March 2025 Updated Budget 2025/26 after P10 BCR Budget 2026/27 Budget 2027/28 Budget 2028/29 Budget 2029/30 Budget 2030/31 Budget 2031/32 to 2035/36 Budget 2025/26 to 2035/36 Project Life £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 RES 8ak Building Upgrades - Goldenhill Primary School 331 331 331 RES 8al Building Upgrades - St Michael’s Primary School 230 117 347 347 RES 8am Building Upgrades - Our Holy Redeemer Primary School - condition survey 348 348 348 RES 8an Building Upgrades - St Martin’s Primary School 348 348 348 RES 8ao Building Upgrades - Bellsmyre Campus 348 348 348 RES 8ap Building Upgrades - Kilpatrick Primary School & Kilpatrick ASN Secondary School 348 348 348 RES 8aq Building Upgrades - Our Lady & St Patrick’s High School 348 348 348 RES 8ar Building Upgrades - Braehead Primary 348 348 348 RES 8as Building Upgrades - Levenvale Primary School 11 354 365 365 RES 8at Building Upgrades - Gavinburn Primary School & ELCC 365 365 365 RES 8au Building Upgrades - Kilbowie ELCC 365 365 365 RES 8av Building Upgrades - Ferryfield ELCC 365 365 365 RES 8aw Building Upgrades - Ladyton ELCC 365 365 365 RES 8ax Building Upgrades - Lennox ELCC 365 365 365 RES 8ay Building Upgrades - Brucehill ELCC 37 346 383 383 RES 8az Building Upgrades - Auchnacraig ELCC 383 383 383 RES 8ba Building Upgrades - Whitecrook ELCC 383 383 383 RES 8bb Building Upgrades - Dalmonach ELCC 383 383 383 RES 8bc Building Upgrades - Gartocharn ELCC 383 383 383 Page 175
Page 110
Project No Recurring/ Non- recurring Spend to 31 March 2025 Updated Budget 2025/26 after P10 BCR Budget 2026/27 Budget 2027/28 Budget 2028/29 Budget 2029/30 Budget 2030/31 Budget 2031/32 to 2035/36 Budget 2025/26 to 2035/36 Project Life £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 RES 8bd Building Upgrades - Dalmuir ELCC 338 338 338 RES 9 Direct Project Support R 0 1,586 1,586 1,586 1,586 1,586 1,586 7,930 17,446 17,446 RES 10 Depot Rationalisation NR 2,335 500 5,665 0 0 0 0 0 6,165 8,500 RES 11 Finance Ledger System NR 34 212 554 766 800 RES 12 Community Sports Facility at Millburn NR 20 100 380 500 500 RES 13 Holm Park Community Football Academy Accesibility Project NR 75 75 75 RES 14 4G Football pitch at Faifley Knowles NR 150 150 150 RES 15 Design, Creation, Installation of Digital Content for Glencairn House NR 187 187 187 Total Resources 2,491 5,156 13,049 4,753 4,367 4,367 4,367 21,835 57,893 60,385 RR 4 Regeneration/Local Economic Development (unallocated) R 0 0 0 0 0 0 475 2,375 2,850 2,850 RR 4a Dumbarton Town Centre & Waterfront 0 0 Dumbarton Visitor Gateway/Arc of Attractions 18 100 100 50 268 268 Dumbarton Castle Floodlighting 80 80 80 Dumbarton Town Centre Heritage and Place Fund contribution 75 500 500 1,075 1,075 Dumbarton Waterfront Walkway - consultancy & delivery 35 250 550 835 835 Dumbarton High Street and Town Centre revitalisation 222 137 200 559 559 Artizan Centre further phases 85 175 260 260 RR 4b Alexandria (Mitchell Way redevelopment) 0 0 Alexandria - Alexander Street fees 4 101 105 105 Alexandria - Mitchell Way & Main Street improvements 76 800 876 876 Alexandria - Mitchell Way - gas pipe relocation 88 88 88 Alexandria - Masterplan project development 10 10 10 Tourism/Heritage Strategy Capital Projects 200 200 200 RR 4c Clydebank Town Centre & Waterfront 0 0 District Heating Network Expansion 15 15 15 45 45 Clydebank Development Framework 25 25 25 RR 4d Strategic Disposal - key sites 0 0 Long term commitment to CLO 50 50 50 50 50 250 250 RR 4e Balloch 0 0 Balloch Pierhead Action Plan 25 311 83 419 419 RR 5 Regeneration Fund NR 7,107 50 1,074 1,820 880 3,824 10,931 RR 6 Place Based Investment NR 1,401 150 625 775 2,176 RR 7 Level Up Funding NR 11,851 4,379 5,870 10,249 22,100 RR 8 Level Up Capacity Funding NR 160 160 160 320 RR 10 Clyde Mission Catalyst Fund NR 673 625 702 1,327 2,000 RR 13a Pride in Place - Holm Park Improvement NR 240 240 240 RR 13b Pride in Place - Western Titans BMX Club track improvements NR 60 60 60 RR 13c Pride in Place - Playpark - christie park NR 300 300 300 RR 13d Pride in Place - Playpark - Dumbarton common NR 300 300 300 RR 13e Pride in Place - Community capital grants NR 600 600 600 Total Regulatory and Regeneration 21,191 5,462 11,471 3,320 2,202 475 475 2,375 25,780 45,471 0 RN 1 Infrastructure - Roads (unallocated) R 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,544 12,720 15,264 15,264 RN 1a Footways - schemes developed following condition surveys 544 544 544 544 2,176 2,176 RN 1b Drainage - various locations following assessment/investigation 150 150 150 150 150 750 750 RN 1c Structures - various locations following assessment/inspection 150 150 150 150 150 750 750 RN 1d Carriageways - schemes developed following condition surveys 1,700 1,700 1,700 5,100 5,100 RN 1e Infrastructure - Roads - Capital Lighting Installations 9 9 9 RN 1f Infrastructure - Roads - CONSULTANCY WORK 19 19 19 RN 1g A814 DUMBARTON ROAD (Agamemnon St - Sportsman Barber), CLYDEBANK 255 255 255 RN 1h SURVEY INITIATION & IMAGERY COLLECTION OF C/WAYS & F/WAYS 9 9 9 RN 1i Hillbank Street Carriageway Resurfacing 70 70 70 Page 176
Page 111
Project No Recurring/ Non- recurring Spend to 31 March 2025 Updated Budget 2025/26 after P10 BCR Budget 2026/27 Budget 2027/28 Budget 2028/29 Budget 2029/30 Budget 2030/31 Budget 2031/32 to 2035/36 Budget 2025/26 to 2035/36 Project Life £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 RN 1j Baird Crescent Carriageway Resurfacing 65 65 65 RN 1k Campbell Avenue Carriageway Resurfacing 125 125 125 RN 1l Granger Road Carriageway Resurfacing 45 45 45 RN 1m Ladyton Ring Road Carriageway Resurfacing 140 140 140 RN 1n Nairn Street Dalmuir Carriageway Resurfacing 20 20 20 RN 1o Drumry Road Carriageway Resurfacing 71 71 71 RN 1p A814 Glasgow Road (Argyll Road to North Elgin Street) Carriageway Resurfacing 370 370 370 RN 1q A8014 Kilbowie Road Carriageway Resurfacing 210 210 210 RN 1r Montrose Street carriageway Resurfacing 70 70 70 RN 1s William Street Carriageway Resurfacing 25 25 25 RN 1t Lawmuir Crescent Carriageway Resurfacing 26 26 26 RN 1u Shakepeare Avenue Carriageway Resurfacing 105 105 105 RN 1v Mildam Road Carriageway Resurfacing 15 15 15 RN 1w Auchinleck Road Carriageway Resurfacing 40 40 40 RN 1x Purchase of New Winter Maintenance Equipment 11 11 11 RN 1y INFRASTRUCTURE 25/26 DUMBARTON ROAD, CLYDEBANK IMPROVEMENT WORKS 50 50 50 RN 1z Langlands Terrace Footway Resurfacing 70 70 70 RN 1aa Barrwoodhill Footway Resurfacing 70 70 70 RN 1ab Argyle Place Footway Resurfacing 70 70 70 RN 1ac St Andrews Brae Footway Resurfacing 70 70 70 RN 1ad Mildam Road Footway Resurfacing 70 70 70 RN 1ae Footway Patching (various locations) 108 108 108 RN 1af Footway & Carriageway (IDesign & Management) 150 150 150 RN 1ag PROV Douglas Road, Dumbarton 10 10 10 RN 1ah PROV Smollet Road, Alexandria 15 15 15 RN 1ai PROV Inchconnachan Avenue / Boturich Drive Balloch 30 30 30 RN 1aj PROV Tulliechewan, Balloch 90 90 90 RN 1ak PROV Mallard Road, Faifley 30 30 30 RN 1al PROV West Thomson Street, Clydebank 40 40 40 RN 1am PROV ErskineFerry Road, Old Kilpatrick 30 30 30 RN 1an PROV Langlands Terrace, Dumbarton 50 50 50 RN 1ao PROV Glasgow Road / Dock Street, Clydebank 420 420 420 RN 1ap PROV Faifley Road, Clydebank 155 155 155 RN 1aq PROV Clyde Street Clydebank 100 100 100 RN 1ar PROV Stark Avenue, Duntocher 30 30 30 RN 1as PROV John Street - Renton 20 20 20 RN 1at PROV Strathleven Drive, Bonhill 80 80 80 RN 1au PROV Talbot Road, Balloch 20 20 20 RN 1av PROV A82 Great Western Road 150 150 150 RN 1aw PROV Sandbank Crescent, Alexandria 20 20 20 RN 1ax Carriageway Resurfacing (following assessment) 200 200 200 RN 1ay Structural Patching (following assessment) 200 200 200 RN 1az PROV Leven Street, Renton 10 10 10 RN 2 Flood Risk Management (unallocated) R 0 0 0 0 0 0 180 900 1,080 1,080 RN 2a Gruggies Burn Design 585 585 585 RN 2b Cycle 2 flood risk actions 200 200 195 180 775 775 RN 2c Clydebank and Dumbarton surface water management 100 100 100 RN 3 Street lighting and associated electrical infrastructure (unallocated) R 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 500 1,100 1,100 RN 4 Flood Prevention NR 257 193 193 450 RN 5 Vehicle Replacement (unallocated) R 0 75 0 0 1,027 1,027 1,027 5,135 8,291 8,291 RN 5a Resources 43 43 43 RN 5b Empowerment 0 0 Page 177
Page 112
Project No Recurring/ Non- recurring Spend to 31 March 2025 Updated Budget 2025/26 after P10 BCR Budget 2026/27 Budget 2027/28 Budget 2028/29 Budget 2029/30 Budget 2030/31 Budget 2031/32 to 2035/36 Budget 2025/26 to 2035/36 Project Life £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 RN 5c Community Connections 40 40 40 RN 5d HSCP 150 44 194 194 RN 5e Estate Management 48 48 48 RN 5f Facilities 48 48 48 RN 5g Land Services 300 300 300 RN 5h Education 528 528 528 RN 5i Housing 1,590 192 320 2,102 2,102 RN 5j Greenspace 50 50 50 RN 5k Property maintenance 60 60 60 RN 5l Roads Service 300 300 300 RN 5m Libraries 95 125 220 220 RN 5n Transport 130 130 130 RN 5o Criminal Justice 60 60 60 RN 5p Courier Service 40 40 40 RN 5q G/work 45 45 45 RN 5r ISMS 45 45 45 RN 5s Leisure Trust 55 55 55 RN 5t Contracts Section 215 215 215 RN 5u Pool Vehicles 80 80 80 RN 5v Waste 1,285 500 720 2,505 2,505 RN 6 Auld Street Clydebank - Bond NR 214 42 42 256 RN 7 Clydebank Charrette, A814 NR 4,251 52 52 4,303 RN 9 A813 Road Improvement Phase 1 NR 1,379 201 201 1,579 RN 10 Traffic Signal Updates NR 286 14 14 300 RN 11 Gruggies Burn Flood Prevention NR 987 882 6,340 6,820 29,672 43,714 44,700 RN 12 River Leven Flood Prevention Scheme NR 181 200 200 381 RN 13 Public non-adopted paths and roads (unallocated) R 0 0 0 0 0 169 169 845 1,183 1,183 RN 13a Balloch park surfacing improvements 80 80 80 RN 13b Vale of leven cemetery paths 120 120 120 RN 13c Dumbarton cemetery paths 150 75 225 225 RN 13d Old Dalnottar Cemetery 60 30 90 90 RN 13e Parks, cemeteries and open space non adopted paths, identified following annual review 191 109 64 169 533 533 RN 14 Cemetery Extension, North Dalnotter NR 14 250 250 264 RN 16 Allotment Development NR 312 122 58 180 492 RN 18 Play Area Upgrade Programme (unallocated) R 0 0 0 0 100 100 100 500 800 800 RN 18a Dalmuir Park 90 90 90 RN 18b Balloch Park 90 90 90 RN 18c Braes Avenue 70 70 70 RN 18d Pappert 70 70 70 RN 18e Roshead 56 56 56 RN 18f Central Alexandria 42 42 42 RN 18g Tullichewan 20 20 20 RN 18h Christie Park 10 10 10 RN 18i Dalmonach Park 25 25 25 RN 18j Ladyton 10 10 10 RN 18k Dillichip Park 10 10 10 RN 18l Dumbarton Common 10 10 10 RN 18m Bowling 25 25 25 RN 18n Old Kilpatrick 15 15 15 RN 18o Goldenhill Park 10 10 10 RN 18p Rosshead 60 60 60 RN 18q Kirkoswald Drive 50 50 50 RN 18r Whitecrook Park 50 50 50 Page 178
Page 113
Project No Recurring/ Non- recurring Spend to 31 March 2025 Updated Budget 2025/26 after P10 BCR Budget 2026/27 Budget 2027/28 Budget 2028/29 Budget 2029/30 Budget 2030/31 Budget 2031/32 to 2035/36 Budget 2025/26 to 2035/36 Project Life £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 RN 18s Langfaulds Crescent, Clydebank 25 25 25 RN 18t Onslow Road 25 25 25 RN 18u Whylie Park, Renton 25 25 25 RN 18v St Helena Crescent 25 25 25 RN 20 Balloch Mountain Bike Track NR 7 15 428 443 450 RN 21 Pappert 2G Pitch NR 8 242 242 251 RN 23 Creation of 2 new all weather pitches at Argyll Park and Mountblow playing fields NR 47 50 1,354 1,404 1,451 RN 24 Exxon City Deal NR 11,370 20,585 10,970 4,018 35,573 46,942 RN 25 Active Travel NR 942 942 942 RN 26 Strathclyde Partnership for Transport - Bus, cycling and walking infrastructure improvements & Park and Rides NR 278 278 278 RN 27 Transport Scotland Implementation 20MPH Speed Limits NR 458 458 458 RN 28 Review of schools speed Limits NR 75 75 75 RN 29 Roads Lining and Signing NR 150 150 150 RN 30 Plant and Machinery Replacement (unallocated) R 516 100 100 100 100 100 500 1,516 1,516 RN 31 Bus Infrastructure Fund NR 50 50 50 RN 32 People and Places - Transport Scotland NR 35 35 35 RN 33 Shared Prosperity Funding - Open Places NR 396 396 396 RN 34 Nature Restoration Fund NR 185 185 185 RN 35 Road Safety Improvement Fund NR 185 185 185 RN 36 Food Waste Vehicles NR 500 500 500 RN 37 CCTV Upgrade at Depots NR 50 50 50 RN 38 Gully Motor Purchase NR 275 275 275 Total Roads and Neighbourhood 19,312 35,184 24,861 15,091 33,907 4,220 4,220 21,100 138,583 157,895 EDUC 1 AV Equipment - Education NR 356 96 100 100 100 107 503 859 EDUC 3 Schools Estate Improvement Plan - next Phase - Faifley Campus NR 24,767 8,994 2,754 818 818 818 818 4,090 19,110 43,877 EDUC 4 Schools Estate Improvement Plan NR 19,921 1,181 802 1,983 21,904 EDUC 5 Free School Meals Expansion NR 23 51 1,191 1,242 1,265 Total Education 45,067 10,322 4,847 918 918 925 818 4,090 22,838 67,905 HSCP 1 Special Needs - Aids & Adaptations for HSCP clients (unallocated) R 0 0 0 0 0 0 765 3,590 4,355 4,355 HSCP 1a Resources 281 229 228 227 225 1,190 1,190 HSCP 1b Stairlift 74 60 59 58 57 308 308 HSCP 1c Equipment 413 342 346 350 355 1,806 1,806 HSCP 1d Ceiling Track 10 8 8 8 8 42 42 HSCP 1e Physical Disabilities Aids and Adaptations 157 126 124 122 120 649 649 HSCP 2 ICT Modernisation HSCP (unallocated) R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 437 437 437 HSCP 2a Life Lens 1 13 14 14 HSCP 2b Magic Notes 15 48 63 63 HSCP 2c Staffing 43 45 46 48 49 50 281 281 HSCP 2d ICT Device 5 5 5 5 5 5 30 30 HSCP 3e HSCP Website 30 0 30 30 HSCP 3f Digital Inclusion (Prevention, Early Intervention, DCE) 10 10 10 10 10 10 60 60 HSCP 2e Digital Telecare (AICO project, tec hub, new technology) 13 49 10 72 72 HSCP 2f HSCP Systems/Applications (new applications, scripts, automation, data utilisation) 10 25 49 27 26 25 162 162 HSCP 3 Community Alarm upgrade NR 0 272 75 4 0 0 42 42 435 435 Total HSCP 0 1,321 999 928 865 855 897 4,069 9,934 9,934 P&T 1 ICT Modernisation (unallocated) R 0 0 0 122 0 0 0 992 1,114 1,114 P&T 1a PCs for Education 126 0 119 0 100 406 751 751 P&T 1b Laptops for Education 162 136 99 33 138 100 241 909 909 Page 179
Page 114
Project No Recurring/ Non- recurring Spend to 31 March 2025 Updated Budget 2025/26 after P10 BCR Budget 2026/27 Budget 2027/28 Budget 2028/29 Budget 2029/30 Budget 2030/31 Budget 2031/32 to 2035/36 Budget 2025/26 to 2035/36 Project Life £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 P&T 1c Chromebooks for Education 307 307 307 P&T 1d PC's for Corporate Employees 17 64 81 81 P&T 1e Laptops for Corporate Employees 167 200 97 161 175 100 217 1,117 1,117 P&T 1f Mobile Phones 15 13 11 39 39 P&T 1g Public PC Replacement 26 26 26 P&T 1h Resources 123 123 123 123 123 123 369 1,107 1,107 P&T 2 ICT Security & DR (unallocated) R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 774 774 774 P&T 2a Future of SWAN Contract 50 50 50 P&T 2b SWAN 2.0 Implementation 250 250 250 P&T 2c Replace Ageing Infrastructure Hardware 75 94 94 94 94 94 282 827 827 P&T 2d Security Compliance remediation 60 70 70 70 70 70 210 620 620 P&T 2e Security Resourcing - Security partner 30 23 23 23 23 23 69 214 214 P&T 2f Internal ICT resource recharges 84 90 90 90 90 90 270 804 804 P&T 2g Education Software Licence Refresh 30 30 30 P&T 2h Wi-Fi Technology licensing 80 90 90 90 90 90 270 800 800 P&T 2i Telephony system replacement 60 60 60 P&T 2j Security Patching Improvements 18 20 20 20 20 20 60 178 178 P&T 3 365 Implementation NR 757 226 226 983 P&T 4 Development of Workforce Management System NR 2 108 110 110 P&T 5 Data Strategy NR 27 27 27 Total P&T 757 1,570 954 1,193 823 823 823 4,235 10,421 11,178 Overall Total 88,818 59,015 56,181 26,203 43,082 11,665 11,600 57,704 265,449 352,768 Page 180
Page 115
WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL Appendix 5 GENERAL SERVICES CAPITAL PLAN UPDATE 2025/26 TO 2035/36 - RESOURCES Budget 2025/26 Budget 2026/27 Budget 2027/28 Budget 2028/29 Budget 2029/30 Budget 2030/31 Budget 2031/32 to 2035/36 Total £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 Resources Carried Forward 5,521 1,618 0 0 0 0 0 7,139 Turnberry Homes 6 0 6 Auld Street Bond 42 0 42 Digital Inclusion 36 0 36 Internet of things Asset Tracking 1 1 Clyde Mission 625 789 1,414 Levelling Up Funding 4,379 573 4,952 Placed Based Investment 150 256 406 Electric Vehicle Infrastructure 39 39 Roads SG Income - 20mph 23 23 Whitecrook Tennis Court 15 15 Inspiring School Age Childcare Spaces Fund 205 205 General Services Capital Grant 12,804 6,806 5,618 5,618 5,618 5,618 28,090 70,172 General Services Capital Grant 13,186 7,188 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 30,000 74,374 Less PSHG to HEEDS (382) (382) (382) (382) (382) (382) (1,910) (4,202) Ring-fenced Government Grant funding 14,945 7,088 396 396 396 396 1,980 25,597 Scottish Government Active Travel (CWSS) 693 693 Play Parks Grant Funding 376 166 542 Level Up Funding 0 6,526 6,526 Shared Prosperity Funding 0 396 396 396 396 396 1,980 3,960 Exxon City Deal - grant allocation applied to city deal project 13,876 13,876 Match-funding/other grants & contributions 1,812 3,007 912 818 818 818 4,090 12,275 Scottish Government Learning Estate Investment Programme - Faifley Campus 732 1,098 912 818 818 818 4,090 9,286 Place Based Investment Programme 150 219 0 0 0 0 369 Strathclyde Partnership for Transport 0 Transport Scotland Implementation 20MPH Speed Limits 458 458 People and Place Local Authority Direct Award 35 35 Bus Infrastructure Fund 50 50 Road Safety Improvement Fund 185 185 Others 0 Balloch Park Mountain Bike track 15 190 205 Inspiring Change Grant - Strathleven Foundation 187 187 Pride in Place Impact Fund 0 1,500 1,500 Page 181
Page 116
WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL Appendix 5 GENERAL SERVICES CAPITAL PLAN UPDATE 2025/26 TO 2035/36 - RESOURCES Budget 2025/26 Budget 2026/27 Budget 2027/28 Budget 2028/29 Budget 2029/30 Budget 2030/31 Budget 2031/32 to 2035/36 Total £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 Prudential Borrowing 23,933 37,262 19,177 36,150 4,733 4,668 23,044 148,967 0 Funded from Revenue 0 400 100 100 100 100 500 1,300 Plant and Machinery Replacement 0 100 100 100 100 100 500 1,000 EPR Funding for Food waste vehicles CFCR 0 250 250 Upgrade of Depots CCTV R&N - CFCR 0 50 50 Total - all 59,015 56,181 26,203 43,082 11,665 11,600 57,704 265,449 Resources held on Balance Sheet 5,521 1,618 7,139 General Capital Grant 12,804 6,806 5,618 5,618 5,618 5,618 28,090 70,172 Ring Fenced Capital Grant 14,945 7,088 396 396 396 396 1,980 25,597 Match-funding 1,812 3,007 912 818 818 818 4,090 12,275 Required Prudential Borrowing 23,933 37,262 19,177 36,150 4,733 4,668 23,044 148,967 Revenue contributions 0 400 100 100 100 100 500 1,300 0 TOTAL RESOURCES IDENTIFIED 59,015 56,181 26,203 43,082 11,665 11,600 57,704 265,449 Page 182
Page 117
Appendix 6 - 2026/27 BUDGET – SAVINGS OPTIONS EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENTS Assessment No 1344 Owner rrea Resource Transformation Service Budget CCF FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Amanda Graham Chief Officer Members Citizen, Culture and Facilities Sharon Jump Ricardo Rea (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title CCF 02 Review Clydebank Town Hall The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy Clydebank Town Hall is currently open as standard Tuesday to Friday (four days) with flexible opening out with this for events which generate an income. To further reduce property costs, the opening hours could be revised further to three days of operation or to four days but with reduced/part-time hours. A further review of usage and bookings would be undertaken to ascertain the most appropriate days for opening and closure. Option 1 – Clydebank Town Hall opening reduced to three days a week (£15k saving) Building would continue to open on additional days as required to support pre-booked events as the cost is mitigated by the income generated. Access for elected members and support staff would be maintained on three week days. Option 2 - Clydebank Town Hall operates four days with reduced hours daily (£8k saving) Reduced hours would be introduced on each day, for example the building could open, 9am to 1pm each day, or from 1pm to 5pm. Clydebank Town Hall would continue to open as required to support pre-booked events as the cost would be mitigated by the income generated. Engagement would take place with current building users to identify the most suitable opening days/times and to publicise any change of opening. Elected members and support staff would continue to have access to the building three/four days a week with reduced hours with dates for committee and Council business protected. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Page 183
Page 118
CCF Democratic Services Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Employees whose normal place of work is Town Hall Elected members Residents, visitors, service users/bookers Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? There will be engagement with services to identify the most suitable opening days/times and to publicise any changes to opening/operating. Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Accessible community spaces contribute to community cohesion. Physical spaces may be seen as more important to older people; however other age groups also value physical spaces. This has been feedback during udget conversations in West Dunbartonshire. Reduction in hours has a potential impact on this group because it reduces the availability of a local cultural space. It should be noted that cultural offer is also Page 184
Page 119
available in the adjacent Clydebank Library. Identifying a sustainable path in terms of opening hours for the Town Hall would have a positive impact. Cumulative and intersectional impacts Accessible community spaces contribute to community cohesion. Any changes to opening hours needs to be clearly communicated to members of the public. Clydebank Town Hall provides a unique facility within the Clydebank area in terms of size. Sharing spaces and social contact can help foster good relations and support community cohesions. Any option adopted needs to take these factors into consideration. Reduction in hours has a potential impact on user groups because it reduces the availability of a local cultural space. It should be noted that cultural activities are also offered in the adjacent Clydebank Library. Identifying a sustainable path in terms of opening hours for the Town Hall would have a positive impact. Disability We have an anticipatory duty to make sure that such services as the Council provides are accessible to disable people. Accessible spaces are important. Feedback from Deaf/BSL users for example has noted a preference for this venue for engagement. Reduction in hours has a potential impact on this group because it reduces the availability of a local cultural space. It should be noted that cultural offer is also available in the adjacent Clydebank Library. Identifying a sustainable path in terms of opening hours for the Town Page 185
Page 120
Hall would have a positive impact. Social & Economic Impact We need to consider the impact of major decisions in line with the October 2021 Statutory Guidance on the Fairer Scotland Duty. A reduction in opening hours could reduce income to the area and may impact on visitor numbers. Negative. Sex We need to be aware of and consider any differential impact in terms of sex. **Option 3 would result in the loss of up to four jobs as well as impacting on casual staff. Staff would be supported through the Council’s policies including Switch. Any reduction in posts would more likely affect women due to workforce gender profile Gender Reassign Health Human Rights Under UN rights everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits. As a matter of good practice we should consider impacts on Children and Young people. In terms of young people, there are a number of dance shows as well as a couple of junior theatre groups. Arts and Heritage also host school visits. Under options 1 and 2 the building will remain open. Reduction in hours has a potential impact on this group because it reduces the availability of a local cultural space. It should be noted that cultural offer is also available in the adjacent Clydebank Library. Identifying a sustainable path in terms of opening hours for the Town Hall would have a positive impact. Marriage & Civil Partnership Men and women of age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to On average there are 20 plus ceremonies a year. A reduction in hours at this venue reduces space in the area for marriage ceremonies and Page 186
Page 121
marry and to found a family. celebrations. However, identifying a sustainable path in terms of opening hours for the Town Hall would have a positive impact. Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. Due to the ongoing financial challenge, the Council is required to implement savings to deliver a balanced budget. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1344: For all options the building will remain open, thus minimising impacts, which may be negative in terms of cultural participation especially for local people, especially older people and disabled people and women. A similar cultural offer is available in the adjacent Clydebank Library. Identifying a sustainable path in terms of opening hours for the Town Hall would have a positive impact. Page 187
Page 122
Assessment No 1343 Owner rrea Resource Transformation Service Budget CCF FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Amanda Graham Chief Officer Members Stephen Daly - Citizen Services Lorraine Phimister Ricardo Rea (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title CCF 03 Review of Contact Centre The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy Currently Citizen Services operates the Customer Contact Centre and Housing Repairs Contact Centre as well as a range of other services. The Council recognises that for many people, their digital skills, literacy or deprivation can prevent them from accessing the internet and for this reason it is important to maintain alternative means of contacting the Council. However for a number of people the option to call the Council rather than access services online is a preference rather than a necessity. Currently the contact centre employs 9FTE staff. Under this option, this number would be reduced by 1 FTE. Work would continue to promote alternative methods of contacting or reporting issues to the Council including via email and via the website. This would generate a saving of circa £30k per annum (inclusive of oncosts) Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Citizen Services Other Council services Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Page 188
Page 123
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? West Dunbartonshire Council Citizens, Businesses and Visitors The contact centre acts as a first point of engagement for a large number of Council services and each member of staff within the centre answers an average of 300 calls per week. Reduction in staff in turn would reduce the calls answered by this amount and increase wait times, currently there is a 3 minute response time target. This is an average derived from all calls throughout the year and there are times when we are currently not meeting this target due to call volume. A reduction by one member of staff would increase the average call answer time to 6 minutes meaning at peak times the call wait would be upwards of 30 minutes. Reducing staffing would still retain telephone services for those without internet access or for those requiring urgent assistance. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Citizen Services Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age The Council must not discriminate in the way it provided services. Older people are more likely to be disabled. Negative for some older people who rely entirely on telephone services. Cumulative and intersectional impacts It is important that the Council takes account of how factors might interact. The Scottish Women's Budget Group notes that women and girls have a disproportionate reliance on local government services because they do most Increased waiting time may have negative effect on both services users and staff overall. Page 189
Page 124
of the unpaid care work
and
therefore rely on local
services to support
themselves
and their families.
Decisions made about
locally run
public services will
therefore have a greater
impact on
women, with disabled
women, carers, women
from
ethnic minority
communities, single
parents and low
paid women likely to
feel the biggest impacts.
Disability The council has a
legal duty to make its
services accessible to
disabled people, this
is both proactively
('Anticipatory') and
also requires
Reasonable
Adjustments.
Waiting time increases
may have more effect
on those living with
certain impairments or
conditions.
Negative for some
disabled people
who rely entirely on
telephone services.
Social &
Economic
Impact
The Council has a
focus on reducing
poverty.
Scottish Consumer
Duty
Cross cuts with sex in
this instance.
Negative see 'sex'
above as a cross
cutting impact,
Along with
disabaility and
Ethnicty.
Removing the
ability to telephone
could cause harm
to consumers
Sex We need to take into
account differential
impacts.
Research shows that
women are overall more
reliant on pubic
services.
Women make up 90%
of single parents.
Currently all contact
centre employees are
Because of staff
composition
reduction on posts
will affect women
more than men.
Page 190Page 125
women apart from one man. Women are more likely to be in poverty than men e.g. women make up 90% of single parents. Gender Reassign Health Health and wellbeing is focus area in the Council's Strategic Plan. Accessing help and advice in good time helps reduce stress. Could have negative impact of services users due to stress of not being able to speak to someone. Could increase stress of contact centre employees. Human Rights United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child - 'provision' is a relevant consideration Cross cuts with sex and age (children and young people). Provisions for families, including those containing CYP would be at a slower level. Some potential disadvantage in terms of level of provision. Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Cross cuts with sex. Cross cuts with sex. Cross cuts with sex. Race The Council must not discriminate in the way it provides services. Service users with no or little English would potentially face additional barriers due to increased waiting time. There is no system in place for language Line use in this Contact method although there is an opportunity to build this in. Potentially more negative for speakers of languages other than English. Religion and Belief Page 191
Page 126
Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The Council continues to face a significant financial challenge and savings require to be implemented in order to balance the budget. There would be a need and opportunity to enhance and further promote online processes and communication with services across Council services to help in reducing the number of calls from residents who can self-manage reducing call wait times for those who require additional support. There would be a need and opportunity to put in place a robust system for calls and call backs via Language Line and using Contact BSL as required. If relying on messages being left, systems in place would need to provide a reliable and timely callback/contact Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Yes Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1343: Waiting times are likely to increase. Details potential negative impacts for service users who are older people, disabled people and some members of some BME groups, women and children. There would be a need and opportunity to put in place a robust system for calls and call backs via Language Line and using Contact BSL as required. As the vast majority of staff are female reductions are likely to affect women more than men. Page 192
Page 127
Assessment No 1346 Owner rrea Resource Transformation Service Budget CCF FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Amanda Graham Chief Officer Members Ricardo Rea W4U Amanda Graham Sharon Jump (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title CCF 08 School Meals cost recovery The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy Option 1 Recover all expenditure not covered by grant or income - increase cost of paid for school meals to at least £5.73 per lunch (89% increase on the 2024/25 price) Option 2 Recover 50% of expenditure not covered by grant or income - increase cost of paid for school meals to at least £4.39 per lunch (44% increase on the 2024/25 price) Option 3 Recover 25% of expenditure not covered by grant or income - increase cost of paid for school meals to at least £3.71 per lunch (22% increase on the 2024/25 price) Option 4 Deliver only free school meals which are externally funded and remove the provision of paid for school meals across all settings. As almost 80% of meals are free and many costs are not variable the cessation of paid for meals would save £0.285m. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Education W4U Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Page 193
Page 128
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Pupils and families Employees Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Engagement would take place with education Page 194
Page 129
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Young parents, especially young single parents are a focus in reducing poverty Children, and people under 30 are more likely to be in poverty than older age groups Increases in cost of the school day would have a negative effect on members of under 30 age groups particularly if they are entitled to free school meals and not claiming, or are in poverty but do not meet threshold for entitlement to free school meals. Cumulative and intersection al impacts Cumulative impacts of the other proposals that may affect the cost of the school day should be taken into account If option 4 is taken this may decrease social interaction between some pupils; the Council carried out research in 2022 in high schools, with pupils being asked why they took free school meals the most commonly sighted reason (44%) was 'to eat with friends', with 'get free school meal' at 21% Taking option 4 would reduce choice Increases in costs of meals would affect Option 4, removing provision of paid for service would set us apart from all other councils and also Page 195
Page 130
larger families who do not get free meals more. presents a reputationa l risk in terms of equity of provision It would also reduce choice to children and young people and families Removing provision may decrease interact between children which is valued by children Disability Families with a disabled member are a priority group for tackling child poverty Relative Poverty levels are higher in families with a disabled member across Scotland, than where there is no disabled member. National evidence shows a strong link between poverty and additional support needs Increases in cost of the school day would have a negative effect on families with disabled members particularly if they are entitled to free school meals and not claiming, or are in poverty but not entitled to free Page 196
Page 131
school meals. Social & Economic Impact Th Council has a focus on reducing child poverty. The Council has a focus on reducing the cost of the school day The Council's Child Poverty Report highlights the importance of tackling Food Insecurity. Fairer Scotland Duty Consumer Duty An analysis by the Child Poverty Action Group carried out for 2024 found there are 25,000 children in Scotland who are in poverty but do not qualify for school meals. Using 2024 population estimates and assuming roughly the same level of school age children as Scotland, this may mean there are around 400 children in West Dunbartonshire is this situation. The Child Poverty Rate for WD after Housing costs is 25.2% compared to the Scotland figure of 20.7% for 23/24. We do not figures for WD, but https://www.schoolfoodmatters.org/ research suggested that those who do not take school meals in England spent between £15 and £25 per week. Food Foundation notes https://foodfoundation.org.uk/publication/kid s-food-guarantee-update-packed-lunches- may-2024 looking at the price of health packed lunches across 5 supermarkets in England (May 2024 prices) that 'The weekly cost varied across the retailers from £8.56 to £11.72. In comparison, a Free School Meal allowance is approximately £12.50 per week. Therefore, for children paying for a school lunch, a healthy packed lunch is not always significantly cheaper than buying lunch from the school canteen depending on which retailer and what the school canteen offers.' It also noted that in each retailer unhealth lunches were always cheaper and usually significantly so. Increases in cost to school meals would especially effect those not entitled to school meals but not in poverty the most. Removal of meals would reduce choice also for this group. Sex Lone parents are a priority group in terms of reducing child poverty. The majority of lone parents are women. Single people are more likely to be in relative poverty. Relative poverty rates have been historically highest for single mothers but have gradually declined to be comparable Service users Women in poverty including single parents Page 197
Page 132
with other single household types. In the most recent period, poverty rates were highest for single childless men (33%, 90,000). If an option is taken to cease paid for school meals will this affect Council staff as less of them may be required. may be more adversely affect, both by increases in prices or stopping providing paid for meals. Employees If there are staff reductions these will mainly affect women. Gender Reassign Potential impacts on Trans people need to be assessed A BMJ study from 2023 (https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/13/2/e06 8099) noted that Trans people are more likely to live in more deprived areas. ONS data and BMJ analysis suggest that there are higher proportion of Trans people in younger age groups that is 16 to 30. Census results from 2022 show 227 identify as Trans Impacts compared to other groups difficult to assess due to lack of evidence in relevant areas such as relative poverty. Health The Council's Strategic Plan recognised the importance of Health and Wellbeing Children living in poverty often lack access to adequate nutrition, healthcare, and safe living conditions, leading to higher rates of illness and developmental issues. (Increasing the demands on the healthcare system). Whole school approaches to improving health are likely to be more effective, school meals along with exercise are important components. School meals are nutritionally balance and provide a choice to children and families. The Council carried out a school meals Increased cost or removal of paid for school meals would reduce choice and remove a source of balanced nutrition for those groups Page 198
Page 133
survey with High School students in 2022. One question was when pupils first ate during the day (excluding sweets). 27% of those who were not entitled to FSM said that lunch time was the first time they ate, this compares to 38% who were entitled to FSM. The figure was 25% for those who weren’t sure if they were entitled to FSM. This suggests that for many who could be affected by either increased costs or removal of paid school meals, change could be significant. Researchers in the School of Food Science and Nutrition at the University of Leeds study (2016) on England found that just 1.6 per cent of primary children’s packed lunches met the nutritional standards set for their classmates eating in the school canteen. noted in this assessme nt. This could result in poorer diet overall for those affect and have a knock on effect on health. Human Rights We need to consider the UNCRC in terms of provision UNCRC Cross cuts with considerations noted in Social and Economic Impact, and across protected characteristics There is possible Highlighting/stigmatising FSM by means of entitlement particularly in secondary school settings. Stigmatisin g of FSM could reduce uptake, and result in higher costs to more financially vulnerable families. Families who do not qualify for FSM but are non the less in relative poverty, would experience poorer provision and extra costs. Page 199
Page 134
Marriage & Civil Partnership Consideratio ns cross cut with sex so need to be examined In 2021-24, the relative poverty rate after housing costs was highest for divorced adults 28%, and single adults 29%. Single people with children are more likely to be in poverty than couples so any of the options could have a more negative affect Pregnancy & Maternity Cross cuts with sex Pregnancy/Maternity may mean reduced income for some women meaning greater financial pressure May be more adversely affected, both by increases in prices or stopping providing paid for meals. Race BME groups are a priority in terms of tacking child poverty Poverty levels Increases in costs of meals would affect larger families who do not get free emails more, this would more likely affect BME families due on average larger sizes Negative impact on BME families not getting free meals. Religion and Belief There can be cross cutting consideration s between religion and belief and Race. The Council's school meals provision provides choice of healthy food that supports dietary requirements linked to religion or belief. It may be more difficult for some groups to as easily or cheaply source suitable food during the school day, if paid school meals are removed. Page 200
Page 135
Sexual Orientation Need to take into account LGB poverty levels when considering impacts At the Scotland level, the poverty rate has been consistently higher for LGB+ adults compared to straight / heterosexual adults. Increases in cost of the school day would have a negative affect on families with LGB adult members especially if they are entitled to free school meals and not claiming, or are in poverty but not entitled to free school meals Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. In light of the current financial context, the Council is required to implement savings to balance the budget. Any increase in cost would be accompanied by efforts to increase uptake of FSM and raise awareness of benefit maximisation as would removal of paid for meals. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1346: Either increasing school meals charges or removing paid for school meals are likely to have negative financial impact for a range of equality groups particularly, women, families with a disabled member, BME families, younger families, well as children and young people in relative poverty. An analysis by the Child Poverty Action Group showed 25,000 children in Scotland are in poverty but do not qualify for free school meals. This would equate to around Page 201
Page 136
400 children in West Dunbartonshire. Increasing charges may limit choice and access to affordable healthy food. Increasing charges or stopping paid for school meals may also limit choices to affordable and healthy meals for those with dietary requirements based on religion, belief or medical requirements. Impacts are more likely to multiplied when people are members of more than one vulnerable group. There are potential negative impacts in terms of children’s health, and when considering provision for children and young people in terms of the United Nations Convention of the Rights of the Child. Removing paid for school meals would also reduce opportunities for interaction among children. There may also be increased stigmatising of those taking school meals as these would then only be FSM; this might mitigate against uptake of FSM. Page 202
Page 137
Assessment No: EIA 1457 Lead Officer Amanda Graham Who else has been involved in developing this EIA CCF HR Lauren Crooks Title Savings Option CCF09 – Review of Performance & Strategy Team Description: (Provide an overview of the aims and objectives of this policy) The Performance and Strategy team leads on performance management and strategic planning across the Council with responsibility for co-ordinating the preparation of the Council’s Strategic Plan and individual service delivery plans twice yearly. In addition, the team delivers the Council’s Public Performance Reporting requirements, production of annual report, supporting continuous improvement and co-ordinating the Local Government Benchmarking Framework (LGBF) return; management of Council performance management system including training, and data analysis supporting SIMD and census data. Further responsibility includes strategic consultation and community engagement including Citizens Panel and budget consultation; West Dunbartonshire equality mainstreaming including leading on statutory Equality Outcomes Plan and BSL plan, support with equality impact assessments and equality training. The team also leads the WD Equality forum (community forum) and the Equality and Diversity Working group (officer and elected member group). The team consists of four employee (3.6 FTE (from 1st April)) and under this option, the team would reduce by one post. Who have you engaged/consulted with as part of your proposal? CCF, Performance and Strategy Other senior officers Who will be affected by this proposal? Employees, all Council services due to reduction in support and equality groups Does the proposal involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements and viewed the guidance No Relevance screening: If the proposal/policy is relevant to any of the six areas then an Equality Impact Assessment must be carried out. You must indicate if there is any relevance to the six areas Page 203
Page 138
The three needs of the general duty are to make sure that public authorities have due regard to the need to: Eliminate discrimination (E) or Advance equal opportunities (A) or Foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Human Rights Act/European Convention on Human Rights Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) or Fairer Scotland Duty (FSD) Yes Relevance to Scottish Consumer Duty (SCD) No Consider any needs and policy drivers e.g. Council or national strategies and plans /and any barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy. List evidence you are using to support this assessment. A review of tasks and membership of groups has supported the evaluation of the impact on services and protected groups if the team was reduced, including: The views of colleagues with relevant expertise or experience who are in direct contact with service users, formal and informal groups, representing the interests of people with particular protected characteristics (e.g. West Dunbartonshire Equality Forum, WD Equality & Diversity Working Group) Consideration of impact on people with particular protected characteristics who have a disproportionately low level of access to services, participation in public life or other activities. Equalities training to help tackle prejudice and promote understanding between people with different protected characteristics? Accessible information and materials - ensuring information is provided in suitable formats for protected groups i.e. BSL. Consider the impact of your policy on people and how they will be able to access goods, services and information with no barriers and state the potential impact. Specific group to consider What Key Drivers and Evidence has been used to inform this assessment. (i.e. national statistics - Scot Govt; or local statistics - workforce data, Citizens Panel) For each group, state the potential Impact – Positive/Negative/Neutral Page 204
Page 139
Age All age groups could be negatively impacted with this saving as the services operates to engage with residents of all ages to ensure representation. A Fairer Scotland for Older People: Framework for Action. Older people want: "Opportunities to remain actively engaged with, and involved in, their communities”. This has the potential to have a negative impact as all age groups can be disadvantaged if the service is reduced, as there is a direct impact on engaging with communities. The team leads on the Council’s equality mainstreaming work and a reduction in the team would result in less resources being applied to support services to reduce inequalities in service delivery. This could result in decreased levels of satisfaction of resident’s opportunity to influence council services and decisions. Disability Evidence suggests disabled people are more likely to be socially isolated, and less likely to be involved in community life than non- disabled people. Disabled people and those living in a household with a disabled person are more likely to be income deprived. There could be negative consequences for disabled people who have less opportunities to be actively involved or to have their views considered. Loss of opportunity for working with equality groups. This could result in increased levels of social isolation for this protected group due to loss of opportunities to engage with the Council and influence council decisions. Loss of opportunity to ensure accessible information is provided to support people with disabilities as identified through the Equality Outcome plan and BSL plan. The team leads on the Council’s equality mainstreaming work and a reduction in the team would result in less resources being Page 205
Page 140
applied to support services to reduce inequalities in service delivery. Gender Reassign Those undergoing or who have undergone gender reassignment can be particularly excluded from social and in civil society. Evidence suggest that trans people can be more socially isolated and more at risk of discrimination. Loss of a post would result in a less effective service, there could be negative consequences for Trans people through loss of opportunities to engage with the Council and influence council decisions, creating increased social isolation for this group. The team leads on the Council’s equality mainstreaming work and a reduction in the team would result in less resources being applied to support services to reduce inequalities in service delivery. Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy and Maternity Race All protected groups could be impacted with this saving, people from BME groups are more likely to experience hate incidents than people from white ethnic groups. Evidence from Scottish Social Attitudes surveys and other sources suggests that people who have contact with people from other groups are less likely to hold negative views on those groups. Loss of a post would result in a less effective service, there could be negative consequences for BME people to be actively involved or to have their views considered. The team leads on the Council’s equality mainstreaming work and a reduction in the team would result in less resources being applied to support services to reduce inequalities in service delivery. This could result in group feeling unsafe in their communities and increasing social isolation. Religion and Belief We need to consider any differential impact in terms of religion and belief. Whilst Loss of a post would result in a less effective service, there could be negative Page 206
Page 141
Race and religion are distinct categories there is some cross over in terms of visibility, or perceived religion of certain people. We also need to consider and impact of dealing with sectarian incidents. consequences for this group to be actively involved or to have their views considered. The team leads on the Council’s equality mainstreaming work and a reduction in the team would result in less resources being applied to support services to reduce inequalities in service delivery. Sex We need to consider any differential impacts between sexes. The P&S team is predominantly female employees. Our child poverty report notes women/lone parents groups as a priority group. Women are more likely to be income deprived than men. 90% of single parents are female. Potentially negative as females could be impacted. Loss of a post would result in a less effective service, there could be negative consequences in terms of being able to support this group to be actively involved or to have their views considered. The team leads on the Council’s equality mainstreaming work and a reduction in the team would result in less resources being applied to support services to reduce inequalities in service delivery. Sexual Orientation We need to consider any differential impacts between sexual orientations LGB people are more likely to suffer harassment linked to sexual orientation than heterosexual/straight people. Loss of a post would result in a less effective service, there could be negative consequences in terms of being able to support this group to be actively involved or to have their views considered. The team leads on the Council’s equality mainstreaming work and a reduction in the team would result in less resources being applied to support services to reduce inequalities in service delivery. This could mean this group feel unsafe within their communities and experience social isolation. Page 207
Page 142
Human Rights In practice Human Rights and Children's Rights cross cut often with equality considerations. Loss of a post would result in a less effective service, there could be negative consequences in terms of being able to support people’s human rights. Health Cross cuts with other areas in relation to both physical and mental health. Loss of a post would result in a less effective service, there could be negative consequences in terms of being able to support protected groups to engage and influence Council decisions and service design. Social & Economic Impacts & Fairer Scotland Duty (FSD) The team supports the Council to uphold its equality and Fairer Scotland Duty. Reduction in posts will reduce available support. Potentially negative, if loss of posts resulted in a less effective service, then there could be negative consequences in terms of being able to support the Council with their equality duties. This section must be completed if any potential impact on children and young people up to the age of 18 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) The team supports the Council to uphold its equality duty. Reduction in posts will reduce available support. Potentially negative, if loss of posts resulted in a less effective service, then there could be negative consequences in terms of being able to support the Council with their equality duties. This section must be completed in reference to the Scottish Consumer Duty Scottish Consumer Duty (SCD) N/A Consider cumulative impact of the proposal Cumulative/ intersectional considerations Potential cross cutting impacts due to reduction in team resource. People can simultaneous be members of more than one disadvantaged or advantaged group, which can multiply negative or positive outcomes. Potentially negative, loss of posts could pose a risk in terms of missed opportunities to support equality groups to be actively involved or to have their views considered. The team leads on the Council’s equality mainstreaming work and a reduction in the team would result in less resources being applied to support services to Page 208
Page 143
reduce inequalities in service delivery. State how the impact of the proposal/policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis including how actions will be delivered to mitigate any negative impacts or secure positive impacts. If the saving is taken the service would require to be reviewed to identify which areas of delivery would cease. Other Council services would have to identify officers to take a lead on areas previously supported by the P&S team. Summary of overall impact(s) of the proposal. A 25% reduction in resource would result in the reduction of service delivery with some areas of work requiring to be ceased, considering elements of the service which are statutory. There would also be a restructure of service required if this option was taken. It is recognised that if this saving option is accepted by members that there will be a negative impact on the delivery and future development of the Council’s strategic and equality plans. It is also recognised that there would likely be a negative impact for the protected groups detailed above, as there will be less opportunities to engage with council on delivery of services with a high potential to silence voices of minoritised groups and weaken the inclusion infrastructure. This could likely also result in tenants and residents feeling dissatisfaction with their ability to engage with and influence council decisions. It is also recognised that there would also be a negative impact for internal WDC services and external partners, for example services would need to identify an officer to undertake the work previously supported by the P&S team and external partners would have less opportunity to represent their group in council decisions. Name of the senior manager who has approved this assessment Amanda Graham Page 209
Page 144
Assessment No 1404 Owner ajgraham Resource Transformation Service Budget CCF FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Amanda Graham Chief Officer - CCF Members Amanda Graham, Chief Officer - CCF (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title CCF_10 WDLT Management Fee The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy The Council currently provides an annual management fee to WDLT for the strategic and operational management of its Sport and Leisure Facilities, Community Facilities, Sports Development, Active Schools, Outdoor Recreation facilities and for event delivery. Based on flat cash the assumed Management Fee for 2026/27 would be £5,068,242. Under this option, the management fee would be reduced by a set percentage, which for illustration purposes would equate to: • 1% reduction – £50,682 • 3% reduction – £152,047 • 5% reduction – £ 253,412 Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. CCF, WDLT Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. Yes SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Page 210
Page 145
WDLT and potentially staff and services users, dependent on how the WDLT opts to take forward the management fee reduction. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? WDLT Page 211
Page 146
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age The Council and WDLT, as it provides services for WDC, needs to comply with Public Sector Equality Duty (PSED). In determining options for addressing any funding gaps WDLT should consider relevant evidence for the areas listed below. Funding options will be assessed by WDLT in terms of how gaps will be addressed and any potential impact on services, for each protected group and for each of the areas below. Cumulative and intersectional impacts The Council and WDLT require to take into consideration the cumulative effects of its decisions. WDC needs to be aware of how the factors above interact for communities and individuals. The factors above do interact. In terms of equality groups and factors above. EIAs carried out on WDLT services can be used to inform future EIAs. Funding options to be assessed by WDLT in terms of how how gaps will be addressed and any potential impact on services. Disability As above, and it is noted that the WDLT and the Council have a duty to continue to make services accessible to disabled people. As above, and it is noted that, Disabled people are more likely to be income deprived than non disabled people. As above. Social & Economic Impact WDC needs to take into account the Fairer Scotland Duty when making Strategic decisions to address any funding shortfall. WDLT will have to assess budgets and options to address any funding shortfall. Funding options to be assessed by WDLT in terms of how how gaps will be addressed and any potential impact on services. Sex As above. As above and it is noted that women are more likely to be income deprived than men. As above. Page 212
Page 147
Gender Reassign As above. As above. As above. Health The Council Strategic Plan has a focus on Health and Wellbeing. Our Communities Resilient and thriving, specifically objective 'Our residents’ health and wellbeing remains a priority' A Service Level Agreement is in place between the Council and WDLT. Funding options to be assessed by WDLT in terms of how gaps will be addressed and any potential impact on services. Human Rights The Council is a duty bearer in terms of the European Convention on Human Rights, this extends to WDLT as they provide public services on Council's behalf. United Nation Convention on Rights of the Child also requires to be considered. Human Rights considerations cross cut with equalities UNCRC rights cross cut with Human Rights and Equality Act considerations. Funding options to be assessed by WDLT in terms of how gaps will be addressed and any potential impact on services. Marriage & Civil Partnership As above. As above. As above. Pregnancy & Maternity As above. As above. As above. Race As above. As above and it is noted that members of most BME groups are more likely to be income deprived than most white ethnic groups. As above. Religion and Belief As above. As above. As above. Sexual Orientation As above. As above. As above. Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. In light of the ongoing financial challenge the Council is required to make savings to deliver a balanced budget Page 213
Page 148
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? The Council has arrangements in place to engage with and monitor the services provided by WDLT Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1404 - The option would see the management fee to the leisure trust reduce however it would be for the WDLT to decide how to manage this reduction in funding. Potential impacts are not clear but potential negative impacts are possible, both in terms of staff and service users. Larger reductions would hold more potential for negative impacts. The Council has a service level agreement with the Trust for the delivery of core services. Any change by the Trust which impacted on this would require to be negotiated and agreed with the Council. Equality considerations, Human Rights considerations, and as matter of good practice United Nation Convention on the Rights of the Child considerations will inform any changes. Page 214
Page 149
Assessment No 1373 Owner rrea Resource Transformation Service Budget CCF FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Amanda Graham Chief Officer Members Amanda Graham, Chief Officer Ricardo Rea, Performance and Strategy Officer (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title CCF 11 Remove all funding to support Pipe Bands The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy The Council stages the Scottish Pipe Band Championships in Dumbarton each year. The event is free to attend. Under this option the event would cease saving £23k revenue (and £34,500 released back to Common Good Fund). Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. WDLT Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Residents, visitors, local businesses. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? WDLT Page 215
Page 150
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Cumulative and intersectional impacts Important to look at how factors may cross cuts and to consider any cumulative impacts. The Council stages free events including family fun days, which take place in parks including Moss o’Balloch, the Pipe Band Championships in Dumbarton and the annual fireworks display. Other cultural participation opportunities are available in West Dunbartonshire, with those provided by the Council being free of charge. Disability Social & Economic Impact Need to consider Fairer Scotland Duty requirements. The organisers did not hold the games in 23/24. No major economic negative impact was noted. Potentially may impact on the local economy if the committee decided not to proceed with the event as a result of the withdrawal of grant, though its is unlikely that the impact would be major. Sex Gender Reassign Health Human Rights Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 27 says everyone has the right to freely participate in the cultural life of the community, to share scientific advances and its benefits, and The organisers did not hold the games in 23/24. Unlikely to have a significant impact, if games continued. More likely to have an impact if the committee decide not to continue with games. Page 216
Page 151
to get credit for their own work. This article firmly incorporates cultural rights as human rights for all. UNCRC considerations. in terms of provision, protection and participation. Other cultural participation opportunities are available in West Dunbartonshire. Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. Due to the ongoing financial challenge, the Council is required to make savings to deliver a balanced budget. Other cultural events occur in West Dunbartonshire. The Council stages free events including family fun days, which take place in parks including Moss o’Balloch and the annual fireworks display (noting this is subject of a potential saving option). Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1373: We have considered the potential socio economic impact in line with the Fairer Scotland Duty and have concluded there is likely to be minimal impact. We have also considered impacts from a Human Rights perspective, including UNCRC, and do not believe that there would be any significant impact on fulfilment of rights by reducing this non core funding. Other cultural participation opportunities are available in West Dunbartonshire. Page 217
Page 152
Assessment No 1376 Owner rrea Resource Transformation Service Budget CCF FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Amanda Graham Chief Officer Members Amanda Graham, Chief Officer (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title CCF 11 Remove fireworks display provision The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy Remove all Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. WDLT Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Residents, visitors, local businesses. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? WDLT Page 218
Page 153
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Cumulative and intersectional impacts Important to look at how factors may cross cuts and to consider any cumulative impacts. The Council stages other free events including family fun days, which take place in parks including Moss o’Balloch, the Pipe Band Championships in Dumbarton. Other cultural participation opportunities are available in West Dunbartonshire, with those provided by the Council being free of charge. Disability Social & Economic Impact Need to consider Fairer Scotland Duty requirements. No evidence of any major economic impact. Neutral. Sex Gender Reassign Health Human Rights Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 27 says everyone has the right to freely participate in the cultural life of the community, to share scientific advances and its benefits, and to get credit for their own work. This article firmly incorporates cultural rights as human rights for all. UNCRC considerations. in terms of provision, No evidence that there would significant cultural impact. Other cultural participation opportunities are available in West Dunbartonshire. Page 219
Page 154
protection and participation. Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. Other cultural events occur in West Dunbartonshire. The Council stages free events including family fun days, which take place in parks including Moss o’Balloch. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1376: We have considered the potential socio economic impact in line with the Fairer Scotland Duty and have concluded there is likely to be minimal impact. We have also considered impacts from a Human Rights perspective, including UNCRC, and do not believe that there would be any significant impact on fulfilment of rights by reducing this non core funding. Other cultural participation opportunities are available in West Dunbartonshire. Due to the significant financial challenge facing the Council, savings require to be implemented. The Council does offer other free events. Removal of this event would result in a cost saving for the Council. Page 220
Page 155
Assessment No 1448 Owner jmcgrogan Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Julie McGrogan Senior Education Officer Members Gillian Hamilton - Chief Education Officer Julie McGrogan - Senior Education Officer Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer Claire Cusick - Senior Education Officer Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title Savings Option EDU04 - Swimming Lessons The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy Currently in West Dunbartonshire, £14,320 funding is allocated to West Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust (WDLT) to fund a free eight- week course of swimming lessons to children in Primary 6 or 7 during term time. This option would remove that provision. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Education officers Consultation with West Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust who currently assist in the provision of this service. Consultation with stakeholders, HTs, TUs to advise of possible changes. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Page 221
Page 156
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Children attending schools will no longer receive free swimming lessons, and would need to gain this life skill elsewhere. WD Leisure would need to consider the need for a programme of swimming lessons, beyond its current offer and ascertain the costs, capacity to deliver and uptake of such a programme. As such, it is likely to be those most in need and at risk that would be affected by this change and reduction in provision. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Consultation with WD Leisure who currently provide this service. Consultation with stakeholders, HR, HTs and TUs to advise of possible impact on families. Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Cumulative and intersectional impacts Drive for water safety Cross cuts with elements above. Potentially negative. Disability Priority group in terms of child poverty. Households with one or more disabled person are more likely to be income deprived and face challenges engaging with any swimming programme not organised /arranged by schools. Negative. Social & Economic Impact The Council needs to consider the interplay between social and economic factors. School swimming lessons were introduced to ensure that all of our young people gain this important life skill - especially important bearing in mind the number of waterways in Negative. Page 222
Page 157
the local authority, and the dangers they present. Lower income families would struggle to engage with swimming lessons if they are not provided for them free of charge through school. Sex Women/single parents; Priority group in terms of child poverty. Women are more likely to be income deprived than men. Around 90% of single parents are women. If swimming lessons not organised / arranged by schools, single parents may struggle to engage. Negative. Gender Reassign Health Health and wellbeing are a priority for the Council as noted in our Strategic Plan 22- 27. Swimming is an activity that promotes health and wellbeing. Reducing the number of children able to swim would impact on their health and wellbeing, and without this life skill would present a risk to life. Negative. Human Rights Whilst learning how to swim is not a human right, knowing how to swim can contribute to article 2 protecting the right to life. UNCRC considerations i.e. Provision Protection Participation Article 2 of Human Rights Act. Provision and protection in terms of UNCRC. Negative. Page 223
Page 158
Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race BME families are a Priority group in terms of child poverty. People from BME groups are more likely to be income deprived than those from white groups, and as such face challenges engaging with any swimming programme not organised / arranged by the schools. Negative. Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The council has a statutory duty to balance the budget. Mitigation: Water safety is a discussion at various stages of school and in a number of curriculum areas. This works together with ensuring children are able to swim. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? We will monitor impact by consulting Head Teachers. Monitoring will be carried out on a termly basis. Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1448: Potentially negative impacts for disabled, BME and income deprived Children. The provision of free swimming lessons for all of our children ensures that they acquire a basic life saving skill. The abundance of rivers, canals and lochs in our geographical area present a significant risk to those without this skill. The relatively small amount saved by this proposal does not outweigh the risk presented by removing the service. Page 224
Page 159
Mitigation: Water safety is a discussion at various stages of school and in a number of curriculum areas. This works together with ensuring children are able to swim. Page 225
Page 160
Assessment No 1436 Strategic Team EDU Lead Officer Gillian Hamilton Who else has been involved in developing this EIA Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer Julie McGrogan - Senior Education Officer Claire Cusick - Senior Education Officer Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist Title Savings Option EDU05 - Early Start Clubs Description: (Provide a brief overview of the aims and objectives of this policy) The Council currently offers Early Start Clubs in all primary schools to ensure no pupil starts the day without a meal. The cost per day for a child to attend is currently £2.10, with pupils in receipt of free school meals exempt from that charge. The number of pupils attending clubs across the authority is approximately 350, and as such the cost to run the service exceeds the income it generates. In 2025/26 estimated staffing costs are £246,000 and estimated income is £144,000. This means it costs the Council £102,000 to deliver. This option proposes to cease provision of Early Start Clubs at the beginning of the 2026/27 session, generating a saving of £102,000. Who have you engaged and consulted with as part of your Consultation with other Council services who currently assist in the provision of this service. Consultation with stakeholders, HR, HTs & TU’s to advise of possible changes. Who will be affected by this proposal? Children and families who make use of 'Early Start' clubs in our schools in the morning. Staff who work in our Early Start clubs. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements and viewed the guidance No Relevance screening: If the proposal/policy is relevant to any of the six areas then an Equality Impact Assessment must be carried out. You must indicate if there is any relevance to the six areas Page 226
Page 161
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Human Rights Act/European Convention on Human Rights Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) or Fairer Scotland Duty (FSD) Yes Relevance to Scottish Consumer Duty (SCD) No Consider any needs and policy drivers e.g. Council or national strategies and plans /and any barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy. List evidence you are using to support this assessment. Consider the impact of your policy on people and how they will be able to access goods, services and information with no barriers and state the potential impact. Specific group to consider What Key Drivers and Evidence has been used to inform this assessment. (i.e. national statistics - Scot Govt; or local statistics - workforce data, Citizens Panel) For each group, state the potential Impact – Positive/Negative/Neut ral Age Younger parents (18-30) are more likely to be in relative poverty than older parents. Negative Disability Families including families with children that have one or more disabled people in them are more likely to be income deprived. Reduction may negatively impact on disabled pupils and their families. Gender Reassign A BMJ Study published in 2023 notes Trans and non-binary adults were younger, more likely to be from Asian, black, mixed or other ethnic groups and more likely to live in more deprived parts of the country. (Demographic characteristics, long-term health conditions and healthcare experiences of 6333 trans and non-binary adults in England: nationally representative evidence from the 2021 GP Patient Survey | BMJ Open) In 2022 Scotland’s Census found that 19,970 Negative impact Page 227
Page 162
people were trans or had a trans history. This is 0.44% of people aged 16 and over. For West Dunbartonshire the figure was 0.31% equating to 227 people. Marriage & Civil Partnershi p Single people are more likely to be in relative poverty Single parent households are more likely to be in relative poverty. 90% of single parent households are headed by women. Negative impact Pregnanc y & Maternity The vast majority of Learning Assistants who staff our Early Start clubs are female. Ceasing the provision of Early Start clubs will adversely affect employment opportunities. Negative impact. Race People from BME groups are more likely to be income deprived. Reduction may negatively impact on more on BME pupils their families. Religion and Belief There can be cross cutting considerations between religion and belief and Ethnicity Relative poverty rates higher for Muslims (https://data.gov.scot/poverty/#Religion) For example from Census data 90% of those who say they are Pakistani or Bangladeshi also say they are Muslim and these two ethnic groups are more likely to be income deprived Most White ethnic groups Negative Impact Sex The vast majority of Learning Assistants who staff our Early Start clubs are female. Ceasing the provision of Early Start clubs will adversely affect employment opportunities. Negative impact. Sexual Orientatio n Relative poverty rates higher for LGB+ adults (https://data.gov.scot/poverty/#Sexual_orientat ion) Negative impact This section must be completed if there are potential Human Rights impacts, this includes but is not limited to Human Rights Act 1998 considerations Page 228
Page 163
Human Rights Many of the children attending the Early Start Club have had nothing to eat at home before coming to school and are provided with breakfast at the club. Although access to food is not defined as a right in the Human Rights act 1998, it has a direct impact on the health and wellbeing, and the performance of children and young people in school, which is defined in Protocol 1, Article 2 'right to an effective education Negative impact. This section must be completed if there are potential Human Rights impacts, this includes but is not limited to Human Rights Act 1998 considerations Health Early Start clubs provide breakfast for those who are eligible for free school meals. Ceasing the provision of Early Start clubs will negatively impact the health of some of our most vulnerable children. Negative impact. This section must be completed if any there are any potential socio- economic impacts including but not limited to those covered by the Fairer Scotland Duty Social & Economic Impact The numbers of children with additional support needs and the complexity of their needs has increased. Some children are adversely impacted by poverty. The nature of support required for children has intensified and requires more continuous and long term interventions. The most effective supports are based on those supported by significant relationships with a key adult. Negative impact. Page 229
Page 164
An analysis by the Child Poverty Action Group carried out for 2024 found there are 25,000 children in Scotland who are in poverty but do not qualify for school meals. Using 2024 population estimates and assuming roughly the same level of school age children as Scotland, this may mean there are around 400 children in West Dunbartonshire is this situation. This section must be completed if any potential impact on children and young people up to the age of 18 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child Article 24 (health and health services) Every child has the right to the best possible health. Governments must provide good quality health care, clean water, nutritious food, and a clean environment and education on health and well- being so that children can stay healthy. Article 27 (adequate standard of living) Every child has the right to a standard of living that is good enough to meet their physical and social needs and support their development. Governments must help families who cannot afford to provide this. Negative impact. This section must be completed in reference to the Scottish Consumer Duty Scottish Consumer Duty The assessment meets the need to have due regard under the Duty to possible harm to consumers. Negative impact Page 230
Page 165
Consider cumulative impact of the proposal Cumulative and intersectional impacts Factors can and do combine to amplify the effects of income deprivation. Some groups and combinations of groups may be unable to access alternative provision based on cost. State how the impact of the proposal/policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis including how actions will be delivered to mitigate any negative impacts or secure positive impacts. Summary of overall impact(s) of the proposal. EIA 1436: This proposal was developed to support the budget exercise. Ceasing the provision of 'Early Start' clubs will impact children and Learning Assistant staff in our schools. The loss of the 'Early Start' club will mean many children in our communities will go without breakfast, and our predominantly female Learning Assistant workforce will face a reduction in available hours and income. An analysis by the Child Poverty Action Group carried out for 2024 found there are 25,000 children in Scotland who are in poverty but do not qualify for school meals. Using 2024 population estimates and assuming roughly the same level of school age children as Scotland, this may mean there are around 400 children in West Dunbartonshire is this situation, this group would be affected negatively. Name of the senior manager who has approved this assessment Gillian Hamilton Page 231
Page 166
Assessment No 1162 Owner fkelly Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Gillian Hamilton Chief Education Officer Members Claire Cusick Senior Education Officer Ellen Moran Principal Educational Psychologist Julie McGrogan Senior Education Officer Andrew Brown Senior Education Officer Alison Bowers Senior Education Officer (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title EDU08 - Charging for Instrumental Music Service The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy It is proposed that the cost benefit from charging for IMS be explored as a draft savings option. This option has been devised to generate income for the Council to offset the cost of running the Music Service. Of the 1,014 pupils currently accessing this service, 22% are living in families in receipt of out of work benefits and would not be charged for this service. Assuming that 10% of those who would be eligible and willing to pay for tuition choose to do so, the following three charging options are proposed: Option 1: £30/hour x 40 weeks Option 2: £15/hour x 40 weeks Option 3: £5/hour x 40 weeks These charging options do not cover the full service costs. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. There has not been consultation yet as this savings option has not yet been agreed. If it goes ahead a period of consultation will be required to include but not confined to, Instrumental Music Tutors, Education Officers, Senior Education Officers, Education Support staff, Trade Unions, Finance Officers and HR Advisors. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. Yes SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Page 232
Page 167
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? All primary and secondary pupils entitled to instrumental music tuition; and cultural and community experiences delivered through music. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? There has not been consultation yet as this savings option has not yet been agreed. If it goes ahead a period of consultation will be required to include but not confined to, Instrumental Music Tutors, Education Officers, Senior Education Officers, Education Support staff, Trade Unions, Finance Officers and HR Advisors. Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Cumulative and intersectional impacts It is important to consider how factors might cross cut to amplify negative or positive impacts Likely that factors for groups above will cross cut to amplify negative impacts. Negative, cross cutting with sex, ethnic and disability for example, and and other who are more likely to be on lower incomes and/or be in relative poverty. Disability Families with disabled members are a priority group in terms of tacking child poverty including reducing the cost of the school day. The Council is required to make Households with one or more disabled member are more likely to be in relative poverty than families with no disabled members. Likely more negative for disabled children or families with a disabled member. Page 233
Page 168
reasonable adjustments for disabled pupils to access its services Social & Economic Impact Council focus on reducing child poverty. Cost of the school day policy not implemented with children living in poverty further disadvantaged as parents may be unable to afford cost of paying for music tuition. Likely negative for those on lower incomes. Sex Single parents families re a priority group in terms of tacking child poverty including reducing the cost of the school day. Women who make up 90% of single parents are more likely to be in relative poverty than men. More likely more negative for single parent families. Gender Reassign Health Health and well being is a focus on the Councils 22-27 Strategic plan. There is a range of evidence on the positive effect of playing musical instruments on physical and mental health for example Published in 2016, Instruments of Knowledge: Music and the Brain (Stoklosa, 2016) suggest that playing instruments enhances problem- solving, creativity, and memory. If uptake of music in reduced those not being able to access these opportunities will miss out on the health and wellbeing benefits. Human Rights Need to consider UNCRC Articles 29 and 31 There would be a very significant reduction in all schools’ abilities to meet Children's entitlement to instrumental music tuition and creative learning . Negative in terms of provision for children and young people. Marriage & Civil Partnership Page 234
Page 169
Pregnancy & Maternity Race BME families are a priority group in terms of tacking child poverty including reducing the cost of the school day. Most BME groups are more likely to be in relative poverty than most white groups. Likely more negative for disabled children and families from BME groups. Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The Council is facing a significant financial challenge and is legally obligated to balance its budget. This is a proposal put forward as part of work to ensure a balanced budget can be set. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? We will monitor impact of any changes through feedback from the teams involved, central monitoring and data analysis. Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1162: Charging for IMS will adversely affect children in our schools, and their rights. More Negative impacts are more likely to fall on those who are disabled, from BME groups and single parent families all of whom are more likely to be in relative poverty. The negative impacts identified will not be removed, however some can be minimised in the short term by targeted use of existing and alternative resources and funding streams in some establishments. However, it needs to be noted that almost all of these alternatives rely on the additional funding of the Strategic Equity Fund which will cease in 2026. Page 235
Page 170
Assessment No 1347 Owner alison.bowers Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Gillian Hamilton Chief Education Officer Members Gillian Hamilton - Chief Education Officer Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer Julie McGrogan - Senior Education Officer Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer Claire Cusick - Senior Education Officer Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title Savings Option EDU09 - Closure of Out of School Care Service at St Eunan’s Primary School and Linnvale Primary School The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy The OSC services have reduced over time to the current offer of school term time, evenings only. In session 24/25 approximately 87 places were used, however, in session 25/26 this has reduced to approximately 71. There are 3 options within this proposal, 1 is to make an increase to cover some more of the costs, 2 is to make a further increase to cover all of the costs and the last option is to cease the provision. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. HT/HOC’s, WDC Parent Forum members, pupils, HR, TU’s, Finance Officers and Education central staff. Also work with alternative OSC providers in the local area to provide alternative placements for children and families impacted by the closure. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. Yes SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Page 236
Page 171
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? If closure is chosen it would affect the children and families accessing the evening Out of School Care service at St. Eunan’s and Linnvale Primary Schools and Out of School Care workers employed part time - 5 in total The other options would impact families as the cost for both options would increase and may make it prohibitive for some. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Consultation with families would be crucial to the process of closure of the children currently attending Linnvale and St. Eunan’s Out of School Care (OSC). Consultation with HT/HOC's, HR, TUs and staff regarding alternative employment for staff impacted by the closure. For the options of a price increase these families would also require to be notified. Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Council focus on tackling child poverty. Young parents are also a focus. Cross cuts with the consideration below. Potential that users may turn to other mainly older families members for more child care Potentially negative. Cumulative and intersectional impacts Important to look at cross cutting impacts. Membership of more than one disadvantaged group will multiply affects. Impacts should be considered in the round. Disability The Council has a duty to make its services accessible to disabled people, Families with one disabled member are more likely to live in relative poverty. Reduction may negatively impact on disabled pupils and their families. Page 237
Page 172
including pupils. This is an anticipatory duty. We must seek to mitigate any negative impacts. Social & Economic Impact Council focus on reducing child poverty. At the Scotland level, use of OSC is strongly linked to parental employment, and the most common reason parents give for using OSC is that it allows them to work. An analysis by the Child Poverty Action Group carried out for 2024 found there are 25,000 children in Scotland who are in poverty but do not qualify for school meals. Using 2024 population estimates and assuming roughly the same level of school age children as Scotland, this may mean there are around 400 children in West Dunbartonshire is this situation. In terms of Linnvale Primary the 2 SIMD data zones in the immediate area are in the 3rd Decile of deprived data zones that I the top 30% in terms of deprivation, they rank 2091 and 1911 of 6976 data zones in Scotland for deprivation, with number 1 being the most deprived. They are directly bounded by 2 Negative impacts if other affordable provision is not available. Page 238
Page 173
areas in the first decile and 1 area in the second decile. St Eunan's itself sits in data zone that is in the top 10% deprived of zones, close to areas that are in the second and fifth decile We do not have information of why usage may have declined for example if increased cost have been factor. Sex Single parent families are a focus a group for reducing child poverty. Women are more likely to be income deprived. 90% of single parents are women. Women are more likely to be providing unpaid care. If the service was to become less affordable or be withdrawn this would have a negative affect on such carers. Potentially negative for families and children, including unpaid carers. Potentially more negative for women in terms of staffing due to workforce demographics. Gender Reassign Health Human Rights UNCRC especially in terms of the domain of 'provision'. It is important that there are available and affordable provision in the areas. Positive Impacts: Benefit to the OSC financially may mean future financial business security Reduction in staff costs. Reduction in running costs of the services. Negative Impacts: Children attending the services are Page 239
Page 174
pupils at both schools. Children will be picked up at their school to join a new OSC group of children at another location. OSC closure will result in redeployment through Switch for staff. Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race BME families are a focus a group for reducing child poverty. Most BME groups more likely to be in relative poverty and higher child poverty than White ethnic groups. Potentially negative. Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The OSC services have reduced over time and there is a smaller number of users. There are 3 options to be explored and the decision has to be made over which option would be the most financially viable yet also minimise the negative impact to all involved. As above there would be an impact on those working and using the service, however, the council is required to balance their budget and make best use of the finances that they have. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases? We will monitor impact by consulting children and families involved. We will also monitor the uptake of the service should the options to increase prices be implemented as an alternative to closure. Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Page 240
Page 175
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1347: The EIA notes potential negative impacts for some protected groups of service users. There are some potential negative impacts for employees. In terms of service users those who are more likely to be in relative poverty or lower paid work, that is women who make up 90% of single parent families, younger families, families from BME groups, families with a disabled member are more likely to be negatively affected. This holds true for all three options. It is likely that option 1 would have less negative impact than options 2 and 3. All options could have a socio economic impact in the local community as some parents would no longer be able to work in local employment without affordable childcare, and in terms of option 3 closure, there might not be sufficient capacity in the private sector to provide childcare in the area, with a previous provider no longer operating. We do not have information of why usage OSC may have declined for example if increased cost have been factor. Option 3 of OSC closure will result in redeployment through Switch for staff. This will affect women more than men because of workforce gender balance. Page 241
Page 176
Assessment No 1219 Owner abrown Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Gillian Hamilton Chief Education Officer Members Gillian Hamilton - Chief Education Officer Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer Julie McGrogan - Senior Education Officer Claire Cusick - Senior Education Officer Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title Savings Option EDU11 – Statutory Consultation to alter arrangement for school transport The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy To undertake a statutory consultation on the proposal to alter arrangements for mainstream school transport, bringing it more in line with the safe walking distance to schools of 2 miles for primary and 3 miles for secondary schools. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Consultation with affected stakeholders - children and young people, parents and carers, staff, Parent Councils, local elected members, Strathclyde Partnership for Transport (SPT) and the Archdiocese of Glasgow of the Roman Catholic Church. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. Yes SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Page 242
Page 177
Children and young people who will attend our schools, but reside between 1 and 2 miles from their catchment primary school, or between 2 and 3 miles from their catchment secondary school. This proposed change in policy will also impact on parents and carers due to an increased financial pressure on households, and on school attendance. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? West Dunbartonshire Council was required to undertake a statutory consultation under the terms of the Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Act 2010 on the proposal to discontinue arrangements for the provision of transport for pupils attending catchment schools. Children and young people, parents and carers, staff, Trade Unions, Parent Councils of affected schools, Strathclyde Partnership for Transport (SPT), and the Archdiocese of Glasgow of the Roman Catholic Church will all be consulted as part of this process. Education Scotland provide an independent view and assessment of the process in their own report. Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Cumulative and intersectional impacts Disability Social & Economic Impact Low income households. Introducing this policy change would adversely affect low income households. Households would need to provide suitable clothing and footwear for walking longer distances to school. Negative Sex Women/single parents; Priority group in terms of child poverty Around 90% of single parents are women. They would be disproportionately affected by the introduction of this policy, as they would Negative Page 243
Page 178
need to provide suitable clothing and footwear for walking longer distances to school. A greater number of single parent households would also have to manage the challenge of potentially getting children to multiple locations (ie one child at nursery, and one at primary school) each day. Gender Reassign Health Human Rights Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race . Religion and Belief We are required to provide access to denominational and non-denominational schools for children and young people living in our catchment areas. The introduction of this change in policy would adversely affect choice of school, due to some non-denominational schools being easier to access than denominational schools. Negative Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The response to a previous statutory consultation in 2023 was negative, and highlighted impacts on equality groups as noted above. Changes were made to the policy in 2023 to make best use of the Under 22 Travel Pass instead of a local authority provided bus pass. The proposed changes would still impact equality groups negatively, but bring us in line with our statutory obligations. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Page 244
Page 179
The impact of the proposed changes will be monitored by schools on an ongoing basis, but the proposed changes bring us into line with our statutory obligations. Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1219: Introducing the proposed change to the school transport policy would adversely affect low income households, single parent households and may indirectly affect parental choice of denominational or non-denominational school. If introduced individual needs assessments will be considered to ensure equitable access to school for all. Page 245
Page 180
Assessment No 1161 Owner fkelly Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Gillian Hamilton Chief Education Officer Members Claire Cusick Senior Education Officer Ellen Moran Principal Educational Psychologist Julie McGrogan Senior Education Officer Andrew Brown Senior Education Officer Alison Bowers Senior Education Officer (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title EDU12 - Reduction in staff: Instrumental Music Service (IMS) The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy It is proposed that a saving of £30k could be achieved by reducing the number of IMS staff thus reducing the number of children engaged in one to one and group tuition from IMS tutors. The Council currently employs 10.6 instrumental music tutors. Tutors provide 336 hours per week of one-to-one and group learning to 1,014 children and young people. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. There has not been consultation yet as this savings option has not yet been agreed. If it goes ahead a period of consultation will be required to include but not confined to, Instrumental Music Tutors, Education Officers, Senior Education Officers, Education Support staff, Trade Unions, Finance Officers and HR Advisors. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. Yes SCREENING Page 246
Page 181
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Primary and secondary pupils entitled to instrumental music tuition; and cultural and community experiences delivered through music. Children living in poverty whose families cannot afford to pay for music tuition. Front line school staff who will not be provided with central support; Staff who will be made redundant with limited redeployment opportunities as a result of the organisation’s downsizing. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? There has not been consultation yet as this savings option has not yet been agreed. If it goes ahead a period of consultation will be required to include but not confined to, Instrumental Music Tutors, Education Officers, Senior Education Officers, Education Support staff, Trade Unions, Finance Officers and HR Advisors. Page 247
Page 182
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Tacking child poverty including reducing the cost of the school day. This proposal is more likely to impact primary aged children as music tuition will still be offered to pupils undertaking SQA qualifications. Negative Cumulative and intersectional impacts Disability Social & Economic Impact Reduction will disadvantage lower income families who would need to pay themselves Lower income families are less likely to prioritise spend on music tuition. Negative Sex Gender Reassign Health Human Rights Need to consider the UNCRC Articles 28, 29, 31. There would be a very significant reduction in all schools’ abilities to meet children's entitlement to instrumental music tuition and creative learning. Negative impact Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Page 248
Page 183
Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The Council has a legal duty to balance its budget and is facing significant financial challenges. This proposal has been brought forward as part of work to balance the budget. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? We will monitor impact of any changes through feedback from the teams involved, central monitoring and data analysis. Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1161: Reducing IMS will adversely affect children in our schools, and their rights. The negative impacts identified will not be removed, however some can be minimised in the short term by targeted use of existing and alternative resources and funding streams in some establishments. Almost all of these alternatives rely on the additional funding of the Strategic Equity Fund which will cease in 2026. Page 249
Page 184
Assessment No 1159 Owner fkelly Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Gillian Hamilton Chief Education Officer Members Gillian Hamilton - Chief Education Officer Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer Julie McGrogan - Senior Education Officer Claire Cusick - Senior Education Officer Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title EDU13 - Secondary School Common Senior Phase Timetable The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy Presently, we have 3 curriculum models running across 5 schools. This proposal would introduce a common model across all 5 schools, aligning the offer to young people and establishing a minimum class size of 12 for any course. This approach is presently on offer in a number of our neighbouring authorities, most notably East Renfrewshire Council, who have been running this successfully for a number of years. A common timetable would result in requiring fewer teachers to deliver it, as class sizes would be optimised. Not taking the full saving could result in increasing the offer of courses, providing a wider variety of options for our young people. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. There has not been consultation yet however there will be with Head Teachers, WDC Parent Forum members, pupils, TU’s, Staffing, Finance Officers and Education central staff. A range of teaching and promoted teaching staff will be affected. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. Yes SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Page 250
Page 185
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? All young people of secondary school age in West Dunbartonshire Council. A range of teaching and promoted teaching staff. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? There has not been consultation yet however there will be with Head Teacher’s, WDC Parent Forum members, pupils, TU’s, Staffing, Finance Officers and Education central staff. Page 251
Page 186
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Cumulative and intersectional impacts The Council needs to be aware of how factors can interact. Factors can and do combine to amplify the effects of income deprivation. Some groups and combinations of groups may be more affected by reduced budgets. Disability The Council had a duty to make its services accessible to disabled people, including pupils. This is an anticipatory duty. We must seek to mitigate any negative impacts. Families including families with children that have one or more disabled people in them are more likely to be income deprived. Reduction may negatively impact on disabled pupils and their families. Pupils with disabilities may be less able to attend other schools to access the classes they wish to pursue. Social & Economic Impact The council is committed to examining how these factors interact. The numbers of children with additional support needs and the complexity of their needs has increased. Some children are adversely impacted by poverty. The nature of support required for children has intensified and requires more continuous and long term interventions. The most effective supports are based on those supported by significant Negative Impact. Page 252
Page 187
relationships with a key adult. Sex Gender Reassign Health Human Rights The proposal will negatively impact on all children and young people including those with Protected Characteristics as noted above. Consideration of UNCRC Articles 28 and 29. 1. There will be less staff available in schools to support children and young people in overcoming the barriers their range of needs brings, when accessing education. 2. There will be less staff available to provide additional support to multi-agency planning to meet the needs of those most at risk or in need of support. 3. There will be less resources available to support staff who are faced with the challenges of children and young people who are disregulated or require alternative areas to learn away from the classroom. 4. There will be less opportunity for the personal and professional development of our employees and our service due to increased class contact of Management teams. The negative impacts identified will not be removed, however some can be minimised in the short term by targeted use of existing and alternative resources and funding streams in some establishments. However, it needs to be noted that almost all of these alternatives rely on the additional funding of the Strategic Equity Fund which will cease in 2026. Marriage & Civil Partnership Page 253
Page 188
Pregnancy & Maternity Race BME families are a priority group in terms of reducing child poverty and equity of educational experience. People from BME groups are more likely to be income deprived. Reduction may negatively impact on more on BME pupils their families. If considered in combination with other budget proposals, ie reductions to school transport, pupils from BME groups may be disadvantaged as they cannot afford to travel to attend alternative schools. Religion and Belief We are required to provide access to denominational and non-denominational schools for children and young people living in our catchment areas. The introduction of this change in policy would adversely affect choice of school, due to some non-denominational schools being easier to access than denominational schools. Negative. Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. This has been proposed as part of work to support the Council meet its legal obligation to set a balanced budget in a challenging financial period. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases? We will monitor impact of any changes on the rights of the child as a result of the reduced devolved school management funding via school visits, monitoring of Standards and Quality reports, ongoing consultation and interrogation of data, stakeholder feedback. Monitoring will be carried out on a termly basis. HR monitoring of range and demographic of staff potentially affected. Page 254
Page 189
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1159: This proposal was developed as part of the budget exercise. Reducing the number of teachers employed in our secondary schools will adversely affect children in our schools, and their rights. The negative impacts identified will not be removed, however some can be minimised in the short term by targeted use of existing and alternative resources and funding streams in some establishments. However, it needs to be noted that almost all of these alternatives rely on the additional funding of the Strategic Equity Fund which will cease in 2026. Page 255
Page 190
Assessment No 1160 Owner fkelly Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Gillian Hamilton Chief Education Officer Members Gillian Hamilton - Chief Education Officer Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer Julie McGrogan - Senior Education Officer Claire Cusick - Senior Education Officer Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title EDU14 - Secondary School Staffing The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy This proposal would see a reduction in the number of secondary school teachers, based on the number of young people enrolled in the school, but attending college or partner providers for part of their school week. In session 2024/25, we have approximately 600 young people attending college or partner providers for part of their school week (either 2 afternoons per week, or 4 afternoons per week for college - a small number of young people have different attendance patterns with partner providers). The number of young people attending partner providers can fluctuate each year, based on course uptake. Staffing is determined by school roll, but it is not reduced to account for the number of young people being educated elsewhere. This proposal would seek to reduce staffing accordingly. Based on current rolls with college and other partner providers, this would equate to 7.8 FTE, spread across 5 secondary schools. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. There has not been consultation yet however there will be with Head Teachers, WDC Parent Forum members, pupils, TU’s, Staffing, Finance Officers and Education central staff. A range of teaching and promoted teaching staff will be affected. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. Yes SCREENING Page 256
Page 191
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? All young people of secondary school age in West Dunbartonshire Council. A range of teaching and promoted teaching staff. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? There has not been consultation yet however there will be with Head Teacher’s, WDC Parent Forum members, pupils, TU’s, Staffing, Finance Officers and Education central staff. Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Cumulative and intersectional impacts The Council needs to be aware of how factors can interact. Factors can and do combine to amplify the effects of income deprivation. Some groups and combinations of groups may be more affected by reduced budgets. Disability The Council had a duty to make its services accessible to disabled people, including pupils. This is an anticipatory duty. We must seek to mitigate any negative impacts. Families including families with children that have one or more disabled people in them are more likely to be income deprived. Reduction may negatively impact on disabled pupils and their families. Page 257
Page 192
Social & Economic Impact The council is committed to examining how these factors interact. The numbers of children with additional support needs and the complexity of their needs has increased. Some children are adversely impacted by poverty. The nature of support required for children has intensified and requires more continuous and long term interventions. The most effective supports are based on those supported by significant relationships with a key adult. Negative Impact. Sex Gender Reassign Health Human Rights The proposal will negatively impact on all children and young people including those with Protected Characteristics as noted above. 1. There will be less staff available in schools to support children and young people in overcoming the barriers their range of needs brings, when accessing education. 2. There will be less staff available to provide additional support to multi-agency planning to meet the needs of those most at risk or in need of support. 3. There will be less resources available to support staff who are faced with the challenges of The negative impacts identified will not be removed, however some can be minimised in the short term by targeted use of existing and alternative resources and funding streams in some establishments. However, it needs to be noted that almost all of these alternatives rely on the additional funding of the Strategic Equity Page 258
Page 193
children and young people who are disregulated or require alternative areas to learn away from the classroom. 4. There will be less opportunity for the personal and professional development of our employees and our service due to increased class contact of Management teams Fund which will cease in 2026. Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race BME families are a priority group in terms of reducing child poverty. People from BME groups are more likely to be income deprived. Reduction may negatively impact on more on BME pupils their families. Religion and Belief We are required to provide access to denominational and non-denominational schools for children and young people living in our catchment areas. The introduction of this change in policy would adversely affect choice of school, due to some non-denominational schools being easier to access than denominational schools. Negative. Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The Council is facing a significant financial challenge, and this proposal has been put forward as work to set a balanced budget as per legal obligations. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Page 259
Page 194
We will monitor impact of any changes on the rights of the child as a result of the reduced devolved school management funding via school visits, monitoring of Standards and Quality reports, ongoing consultation and interrogation of data, stakeholder feedback. Monitoring will be carried out on a termly basis. HR monitoring of range and demographic of staff potentially affected. Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1160: This proposal was developed to support the budget exercise. Reducing Secondary School Staffing will adversely affect children in our schools, and their rights. The negative impacts identified will not be removed, however some can be minimised in the short term by targeted use of existing and alternative resources and funding streams in some establishments. However, it needs to be noted that almost all of these alternatives rely on the additional funding of the Strategic Equity Fund which will cease in 2026. Page 260
Page 195
Assessment No 1429 Owner andbrown Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Gillian Hamilton Chief Education Officer Members Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer Julie McGrogan - Senior Education Officer Claire Cusick - Senior Education Officer Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title Savings Option EDU15 Senior Phase Transport The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy Presently, we transport around 600 Senior Phase pupils per week to attend classes in other schools and colleges. The majority of these are by bus to West College Scotland in Clydebank, but a number are via taxi to neighbouring schools or other colleges in the Glasgow/Paisley area. Young people also attend college in Glasgow via Scotrail. Transport is provided to ensure that the young person arrives at the venue in time for class. This proposal presents four options to reduce our expenditure on Senior Phase transport by reducing our operating costs. Option 1 – saving of circa £67k Move Senior Phase transport that presently uses taxis to Internal Transport provision following the additional minibus/driver capacity introduced in 2025. Option 2 – saving of circa £37k Remove all return journeys, requiring all young people to travel home via public transport. Option 3 – saving of circa £22k Remove consortium return journeys only, meaning young people attending another school would travel home via public transport. Option 4 – saving of circa £15k Remove West College Scotland Clydebank return journeys only, meaning young people attending West College Scotland Clydebank Campus would travel home via public transport. Page 261
Page 196
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Consultation with affected stakeholders - children and young people, parents and carers, staff, local transport providers and Strathclyde Partnership for Transport (SPT). Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. Yes SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Children and young people who will attend our schools but attend another school or one of our partner providers for one or more of their courses. This proposed change in policy will also impact on parents and carers due to an increased financial pressure on households, and on school attendance. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Young people, school staff, partner provider staff, Strathclyde Partnership for Transport, local taxi providers and Internal Transport will be consulted in relation to this proposal. Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Cumulative and Page 262
Page 197
intersectional impacts Disability Families including families with children that have one or more disabled people in them are more likely to be income deprived Reduction may negatively impact on disabled pupils and their families. Social & Economic Impact Low income households. Introducing this policy change would adversely affect low income households. Households would need to provide suitable clothing and footwear for walking distances between pick up and drop off points. Negative Sex Women/single parents; Priority group in terms of child poverty Around 90% of single parents are women. They would be disproportionately affected by the introduction of this policy, as they would need to provide suitable clothing and footwear for walking distances to drop off or pick up points. Negative Gender Reassign Health Human Rights Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race . Religion and Belief We are required to provide access to denominational and non-denominational schools for children The introduction of this change in policy would adversely affect choice of school, due to some non-denominational Negative Page 263
Page 198
and young people living in our catchment areas. schools being easier to access than denominational schools. Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. Introducing this would see a change in the provision of transport for young people. Although there are some negative impacts noted above, some of these could be mitigated by the choice of provider of the alternative. This would reduce the impact on some equality groups but would not remove all negative impacts. Implementing this proposal would adversely affect attendance, which would affect UNCRC article 12 right to education. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? The impact of introducing this change and the associated impact on course choice will be monitored by central officers and Head Teachers. Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1429: Introducing the proposed change to the school transport policy would adversely affect low income households, single parent households and may indirectly affect parental choice of denominational or non-denominational school. It is recommended that the change proposed in the consultation is not introduced, but that savings are made in another way that does not affect equality groups. Page 264
Page 199
Assessment No 1446 Strategic Team EDU017 Budget Lead Officer Gillian Hamilton Who else has been involved in developing this EIA Claire Cusick Senior Education Officer Julie McGrogan Senior Education Officer Andrew Brown Senior Education Officer Alison Bowers Senior Education Officer Ellen Moran Principal Educational Psychologist Title Budget Option EDU17 Reduce Day and Residential School Budget Description: (Provide a brief overview of the aims and objectives of this policy) Reduce Day and Residential School Budget as a cost cutting measure The Context in which the proposals sit are the aims or requirements of GIRFEC, the Attainment Challenge UNCRC, Equality Act Who have you engaged and consulted with as part of your There has not been wider consultation yet however there will be with Head Teachers , WDC Parent Forum members, TU’s, Staffing, Finance Officers and Education central staff. Internal discussions have taken place with Council finance and Human Resources Colleagues. Officer knowledge and work in the areas of Monitoring of Day and Residential budget trends, monitoring of ASN trajectory of needs, School visit feedback, meetings with HT’s, Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) Data, budgetary allocations has been used to inform the assessment. Who will be affected by this proposal? It is difficult to identify accurately how many children will be affected because it is dependent on children's needs at any given time. However, analysis of trends in recent years would indicate that it could be approximately 99 per year. Children and young people with significant or profound needs who could require specialist support to meet their needs. Families and carers of children and young people. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements and viewed the guidance No Page 265
Page 200
Relevance screening: If the proposal/policy is relevant to any of the six areas then an Equality Impact Assessment must be carried out. You must indicate if there is any relevance to the six areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Human Rights Act/European Convention on Human Rights Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) or Fairer Scotland Duty (FSD) Yes Relevance to Scottish Consumer Duty (SCD) Yes Consider any needs and policy drivers e.g. Council or national strategies and plans /and any barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy. List evidence you are using to support this assessment. Consider the impact of your policy on people and how they will be able to access goods, services and information with no barriers and state the potential impact. Specific group to consider What Key Drivers and Evidence has been used to inform this assessment. (i.e. national statistics - Scot Govt; or local statistics - workforce data, Citizens Panel) For each group, state the potential Impact – Positive/Negative/Neutral Age Crosscuts with UNCRC considerations for Children and Young People. Crosscuts with impacts noted under UNCRC Disability This proposal will limit options of providing the most appropriate support for our most severe and complex learners by reducing the availability of partner provider places. This is concluded from discussions with Educational Psychologists, Finance and central education staff Service users Potentially more negative of disabled people and people and people with more complex needs Staff There will be an increased requirement on WDC staff available in schools to support Page 266
Page 201
between September 25 and January 2026 2024 Pupil Census Data shows that West Dunbartonshire had the fourth highest proportion of pupils with additional support needs in Scotland at 45.7%. this compares to the Scotland figure of 40.5% Pupil census data for 2024 shows 615 out 15760 WDC pupils that is 3.9% being assessed as disabled. The Scotland figure was 2.8%. children and young people in overcoming the barriers their range of needs brings, when accessing education. There will be a reduced range of availability to provide additional support via partners to those most at risk or in need of support. There will be less resources available to support staff who are faced with the challenges of children and young people who are dis-regulated or require alternative provisions to learn. There will be an increased demand for the personal and professional development of our employees and our service due to increased range of severe and complex needs of pupils which will need to be met. Reduction may negatively impact on disabled pupils and their families. Gender Reassign Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sex Sexual Orientation This section must be completed if there are potential Human Rights impacts, this includes but is not limited to Human Rights Act 1998 considerations Page 267
Page 202
Human Rights Protocol 1, Article 2: Right to education of the European Convention on Human Rights: A person has a right not to be denied access to the existing educational system. Article 14 non-discrimination is not free standing; it only works to protect people from different treatment in exercising their other Convention rights. Reductions that effect service provision must do so in a non- discriminatory manner in terms of effects on different groups, unless this can be justified objectively: this crosscuts with Equality Act provisions. This section must be completed if there are potential Human Rights impacts, this includes but is not limited to Human Rights Act 1998 considerations Health Those in relative poverty rely more on Public services than those who are not. The links between financial stress and negative effects on mental health are well established For pupils who have healthcare needs and require significant support, the reduction in partner provider provision will negatively impact options for supporting them. This section must be completed if any there are any potential socio- economic impacts including but not limited to those covered by the Fairer Scotland Duty Social & Economic Impact Those in relative poverty rely more on Public services than those who are not. The Council has focus on reducing child poverty including the cost of the school day. Children and families as consumers of Council service will be negatively impacted. Partner organisations may be negatively affected This section must be completed if any potential impact on children and young people up to the age of 18 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child United Nations Rights of The Child • Article 3 Best Interests of the Child • Article 12 Respect for Views of the Child • Article 28 The right to an education Negative impact in terms of provision of services to children and young people in terms of providing the best and most appropriate support to meet their needs. This section must be completed in reference to the Scottish Consumer Duty Page 268
Page 203
Scottish Consumer Duty Crosscuts with the other areas assessed Effects on consumers that is service users and Small and Medium Enterprises e.g. Partner organisations need to be taken into account. Children and families as consumers of Council service will be negatively impacted. Partner organisations may be negatively affected Consider cumulative impact of the proposal Cumulative and intersectional impacts Examination by Council Officers from Education, Finance and HR have identified a range of impacts to the Council. children and families, and partner organisations. This proposal impacts all children and young people including all of those with protected characteristics. Negative impacts would be multiplied where children are members of more than one disadvantaged group. Any effect on extra-curricular activities needs to be taken into account. It is important that decision makers take account of how budget proposals may interact. Will have a negative impact on income of partner providers Will result in increased demand for WDC specialist setting placements Increased demand on existing staffing to support needs/challenges of increased number of pupils remaining in WDC provisions Will increase challenge in meeting the needs of our most severe and complex learners and require ongoing professional learning and monitoring. Increased demand on staff to attend multi-agency planning meetings Increased demands of staff to undertake professional learning to develop knowledge and skills in meeting the range of learner needs Less availability of staff to provide the range of interventions to support children and young people in small group sessions, due to the increased demand to meet the needs of an increased number of pupils with severe Page 269
Page 204
or complex needs. Less availability of staff to provide responsive and reactive 1-1 support for the increasing range of social and emotional challenges our children and young people face State how the impact of the proposal/policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis including how actions will be delivered to mitigate any negative impacts or secure positive impacts. Through a range of evaluative processes including reviewing child’s plans, school visits, dialogue with staff and partners and budgetary monitoring. Summary of overall impact(s) of the proposal. EIA 1446 details a range of potential impacts in section 2 of the record: There are general potential negative impacts in terms of provision to children and young people with reference to the UNCRC. There are potential negative impacts for all Equality Act Groups, which would magnified by membership of more than one disadvantaged group. These impacts crosscut with Socio Economic position of services users, with more negative consequences for people from more deprived circumstances. The impacts crosscut with the Scottish Consumer Duty in terms of impacts on services users and any small partners organisations. There are negative impacts for WDC staff. The negative impacts identified will not be removed, however some can be minimised by targeted use of existing and alternative resources and funding streams. However, it needs to be noted that all of these alternatives rely on the additional funding which is already stretched. This change is being proposed as the council needs to produce a balanced budget. Name of the senior manager who has approved this assessment Gillian Hamilton Page 270
Page 205
Assessment No 1383 Owner alison.bowers Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Gillian Hamilton Chief Education Officer Members Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer Claire Cusick - Senior Education Officer Julie McGrogan - Senior Education Officer Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title EDU19 - Reduction in management funding for ELC provision The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy Currently all primary school settings that have an early learning and childcare provision are provided with some specific funding from the ELC budget to support with the management of their ELC provision. 6 settings are provided with this management funding but additionally have a full time Principal Teacher for Early Years with a remit of overseeing and supporting in the management of the ELC provision. Under this proposal those settings who have an allocated Principal Teacher for Early Years would no longer receive the additional management funding. This would result in a reduction of monies available to purchase 0.2fte to facilitate management cover for these settings. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. ELC Central Team service Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Page 271
Page 206
Who will be affected by this policy? Service users of 6 Education settings. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Chief Education Officer, Senior Education Officers, Principal Educational Psychologist and Finance. Page 272
Page 207
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Cumulative and intersectional impacts Disability Social & Economic Impact Impact on services which are already undergoing financial and staffing change could impact on the quality of provision offered to children in low income households. Less funding will be made available to managers to assist them in managing the service and maintaining high quality for all service users. Negative. Sex Women are more reliant on pubic services in general Women make up 90% of single parent household heads Potentially more negative for women as services if their families are negatively affected Gender Reassign Health Human Rights UNCRC Article 28 - Children's right to an education. The quality of children's education could reduce due to reduced finances for resources. This could have an impact on the quality of provision within these ELC settings. Potentially negative impact in terms of outcomes for children. Marriage & Civil Partnership Page 273
Page 208
Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The Council is facing a significant financial challenge and has a duty to set a balanced budget. This proposal is being brought forward as part of the budget process. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? ELC Central team will monitor impact on service provision. Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1383: Negative impact on services which are already undergoing financial and staffing change could impact on the quality of provision offered to children in low income households. Page 274
Page 209
Assessment No 1430 Owner andbrown Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Gillian Hamilton Chief Education Officer Members Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer Julie McGrogan - Senior Education Officer Claire Cusick - Senior Education Officer Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title Savings Option EDU20 - Reduction in Temporary Teaching Posts The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy Each year, in order to cover a wide variety of circumstances, we deploy within our available budget a number of temporary teaching posts to alleviate pressure points within the system. This also ensures we meet conditions placed upon us by Scottish Government. Our pupil roll is declining in West Dunbartonshire, and it is proposed the temporary teaching posts are reduced by five to reflect this. This would make our numbers align more closely with our pupil/teacher ratio. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. There has not been consultation yet however there will be with Head Teachers, TUs, Staffing, Finance Officers and Education central staff. A range of teaching staff will be affected. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. Yes SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Page 275
Page 210
All young people of secondary school age in West Dunbartonshire Council. A range of teaching and promoted teaching staff. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? There has not been consultation yet however there will be with Head Teacher’s, WDC Parent Forum members, pupils, TU’s, Staffing, Finance Officers and Education central staff. Page 276
Page 211
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Cumulative and intersectional impacts The Council needs to be aware of how factors can interact. Factors can and do combine to amplify the effects of income deprivation. Some groups and combinations of groups may be more affected by reduced budgets. Disability The Council had a duty to make its services accessible to disabled people, including pupils. This is an anticipatory duty. We must seek to mitigate any negative impacts. Families including families with children that have one or more disabled people in them are more likely to be income deprived. Reduction may negatively impact on disabled pupils and their families. Social & Economic Impact The council is committed to examining how these factors interact. The numbers of children with additional support needs and the complexity of their needs has increased. Some children are adversely impacted by poverty. The nature of support required for children has intensified and requires more continuous and long term interventions. The most effective supports are based on those supported by significant relationships with a key adult. Negative Impact. Sex Page 277
Page 212
Gender Reassign Health Human Rights The proposal will negatively impact on all children and young people including those with Protected Characteristics as noted above. 1. There will be less staff available in schools to support children and young people in overcoming the barriers their range of needs brings, when accessing education. 2. There will be less staff available to provide additional support to multi-agency planning to meet the needs of those most at risk or in need of support. 3. There will be less resources available to support staff who are faced with the challenges of children and young people who are disregulated or require alternative areas to learn away from the classroom. 4. There will be less opportunity for the personal and professional development of our employees and our service due to increased class contact of Management teams The negative impacts identified will not be removed, however some can be minimised in the short term by targeted use of existing and alternative resources and funding streams in some establishments. However, it needs to be noted that almost all of these alternatives rely on the additional funding of the Strategic Equity Fund which will cease in 2026. Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Page 278
Page 213
Race BME families are a priority group in terms of reducing child poverty. People from BME groups are more likely to be income deprived. Reduction may negatively impact on more on BME pupils their families. Religion and Belief We are required to provide access to denominational and non-denominational schools for children and young people living in our catchment areas. The introduction of this change in policy would adversely affect choice of school, due to some non-denominational schools being easier to access than denominational schools. Negative. Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. Council is required to deliver a balanced budget. Reducing the number of teachers employed in our schools will have a direct impact on the support offered to our young people and the breadth of courses offered. There is a risk that this would narrow the curriculum offer. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? We will monitor impact of any changes on the rights of the child as a result of the reduced devolved school management funding via school visits, monitoring of Standards and Quality reports, ongoing consultation and interrogation of data, stakeholder feedback. Monitoring will be carried out on a termly basis. HR monitoring of range and demographic of staff potentially affected. Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1430: This proposal was developed to support the budget exercise. Reducing School Staffing risks adversely children in our schools, and their rights. The negative impacts identified will not be removed. Page 279
Page 214
Assessment No 1450 Owner jmgrogan Resource Transformation Service Education, Learning & Attainment FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Julie McGrogan Senior Education Officer Members Gillian Hamilton - Chief Officer - Education, Julie McGrogan- Senior Education Officer, Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer, Claire Cusick - Senior Education Officer, Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer, Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist, Kirsty Connor - Staffing Officer (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title Roll related Clerical Hour Allocation (Saving Option EDU23) The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy Given school rolls have declined in many schools, an audit of clerical hours compared with pupil rolls is proposed to ensure provision properly reflects need. The aim of the audit is to identify locations where clerical allocation can be reduced or requires to be increased. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Education officers, staffing team and HR. Consultation with Trade Unions has been undertaken on previous reviews and will be undertaken as part of the review process. Representatives with experience of admin in school offices have also been involved in discussions during the development of the proposal as have Head Teachers. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Page 280
Page 215
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Employees Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Officers, Employees, TUs Page 281
Page 216
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Cumulative and intersectional impacts Disability Social & Economic Impact Sex We need to consider any differential impact for example because of composition of the affected workforce in terms of sex. Due to workforce composition, changes are likely to affect women more than men. Women in Scotland are more likely to be income deprived than men. Due to composition of workforce, women will be more disproportionately impacted by any change which impacts roles. Gender Reassign Health Human Rights Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Page 282
Page 217
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. Council is required to set a balanced budget Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation This proposal was developed to support the budget exercise. Due to workforce composition, changes are likely to affect women more than men. Consultation would be undertaken with employees and TUs if implemented. Page 283
Page 218
Assessment No 1307 Owner cmckay Resource Regeneration, Environment and Growth Service HE Budget FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer John Kerr Housing Development and Homelessness Manager Members Joanne Sutherland - Homeless and Housing Options Co-ordinator Shari Law - Team Leader (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title HE01 Cessation Temporary Accommodation Rotation Budget Saving The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy Under this option the plan to rotate and retire 10 temporary accommodation units returning them back into mainstream use, some of which have been used between 4 and 10 years would be postponed for 2026/27. To carry out the rotation would cost £1,000 per property therefore but delaying these would save £10,000. This would not be recurring as the planned activity would be reprofiled into 2027/28. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. None. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No Page 284
Page 219
Who will be affected by this policy? Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Page 285
Page 220
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation Screening 1307: The proposal has been screened. An impact assessment is not required as there is no impact on service level, service users or staff. Page 286
Page 221
Assessment No 1351 Owner smclelland Resource Regeneration, Environment and Growth Service HE Budget FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Nicola Pettigrew Housing Operations Manager Members Nicola Pettigrew, Housing Operations Manager Peter Barry, Chief Officer, Housing (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title HE02 - Reduce CCTV Team The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy General Services Saving option for consideration - Option 1 Delete 1 x post of CCTV Operative Option 2 Delete 2 x CCTV Operative Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Housing Operations Manager Chief Officer, Housing Police Scotland with regards to increasing their contributions towards the operation of the CCTV service, however no additional funding has been secured to date but will be subject to ongoing discussions. Police Scotland have confirmed that there is a national review of funding provision to all Scottish Local Authorities underway. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Page 287
Page 222
Who will be affected by this policy? CCTV operatives Internal and external services and partners who utilise CCTV: Housing, ASB, Education, Greenspace, Assets, Roads, Communities, Police Scotland, SFRS, WDTRO, TRAs and Community Council reps. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? If decision made to progress, consultation and update would be carried out with the post holder/s in the (CCTV) team and Trade Unions. Page 288
Page 223
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age All age groups could be negatively impacted with this saving as CCTV network operates throughout WDC to support prevention/detection of crime and support residents of all ages to feel safe in their communities. According to the 21/22 Scottish Crime and Justice Survey (SCJS) at the Scotland level people aged 16-21 were more likely to be victims of crime than other age groups. Those over 60 were less likely to be victims of crime. A Fairer Scotland for Older People: Framework for Action. Older people want: "Opportunities to remain actively engaged with, and involved in, their communities" . In 23/24 CCTV service highlighted and reported 1232 incidents via our CCTV monitoring, which were raised with police for action. The CCTV Team were also requested by Police Scotland to carry our specific CCTV enquiries 576 times 23/24, and provided 449 evidence packages for court purposes. If loss of a post resulted in a less effective service then there could be negative consequences for younger people if they are currently benefiting from use of the system. However, should be recognised that all age groups can be disadvantaged if CCTV service is reduced, as there is a direct impact on prevention / detection of crime/ASB, which supports residents feeling safe in their communities. This could result in decreased levels of satisfaction of residents feeling safe in their community. Cumulative and It is important that there is a focus on prevention and People can simultaneous be members of more than Loss of CCTV Worker/s would pose a risk in Page 289
Page 224
intersectional impacts detection of criminal activity and ASB within communities. This is supported with a modern and efficient CCTV network provision. one disadvantaged or advantaged group, which can multiply negative or positive outcomes. The Scottish Crime and Justice Survey (SCJS) estimated that 40% of all crimes (as defined by the SCJS) were reported to the police in 2019-20. In 23/24 CCTV service highlighted and reported 1232 incidents via our CCTV monitoring, which were raised with police for action. The CCTV Team were also requested by Police Scotland to carry our specific CCTV enquiries 576 times 23/24, and provided 449 evidence packages for court purposes. terms of missed opportunities for the prevention and detection of crime and ASB activity. This could result in decreased levels of satisfaction of residents feeling safe in their community. Loss of a CCTV Worker/s to help address timeously any operating issues of CCTV provision. This could pose a risk in terms of missed opportunities for the prevention and detection of crime and ASB activity. Resulting in residents feeling unsafe within their communities and impacting on social isolation. Disability Evidence suggests disabled people are more likely to be socially isolated, and less likely to be involved in community life than non disabled people. According to the 21/22 Scottish Crime and Justice Survey (SCJS) at the Scotland level disabled people were less likely to feel safe than non-disabled people. Disabled people were more likely to victims of crime than non disabled people. In 23/24 CCTV service highlighted and reported 1232 incidents via our CCTV monitoring, which Loss of opportunity for prevention and detection of crime and ASB within communities. This could result in increased levels of social isolation for this protected group due to loss of opportunities to engage with CCTV worker/s on CCTV development. This could also lead to social isolation due to feeling of Page 290
Page 225
were raised with police for action. The CCTV Team were also requested by Police Scotland to carry our specific CCTV enquiries 576 times 23/24, and provided 449 evidence packages for court purposes. being unsafe in their communities. Social & Economic Impact It is important that there is a focus on prevention and detection of criminal activity and ASB within communities. This is supported with a modern and efficient CCTV network provision. According to SCJS 21/22 at the Scotland level those living in the most deprived 15% SIMD areas were more likely than those on other areas to experience crime. Involved, organised and empowered communities have greater economic and social strength. In 23/24 CCTV service highlighted and reported 1232 incidents via our CCTV monitoring, which were raised with police for action. The CCTV Team were also requested by Police Scotland to carry our specific CCTV enquiries 576 times 23/24, and provided 449 evidence packages for court purposes. Loss of the post/s is likely to result in delays to operational CCTV issues being dealt with timeously. This could negatively impact on wider community in terms of loss of feeling safe in their communities. The loss of post/s could also impact on timeous responses to fix any operational issues with CCTV, which could result in increased crime/ASB, loss opportunity to prevent/detect behaviours. Sex We need to consider any differential impacts between sexes. At the Scotland level the SCJS 21/22 reported that women felt less safe than men 63% v 90% walking alone in the dark. Citizens Panel data Missed opportunities for the prevention and detection of crime and ASB activity. Resulting in residents feeling unsafe within their Page 291
Page 226
from 2023 showed little difference between women and men in perceptions of how good an area WD was to live into Engagement in community activities varies across age and gender. In 23/24 CCTV service highlighted and reported 1232 incidents via our CCTV monitoring, which were raised with police for action. The CCTV Team were also requested by Police Scotland to carry our specific CCTV enquiries 576 times 23/24, and provided 449 evidence packages for court purposes. As only one post is affect directly there would be a differential impact in terms of sex. communities and impacting on social isolation. Gender Reassign Those undergoing or who have undergone gender reassignment can be particularly excluded from social and in civil society. Evidence suggest that trans people can be more socially isolated and more at risk of discrimination. In 23/24 CCTV service highlighted and reported 1232 incidents via our CCTV monitoring, which were raised with police for action. The CCTV Team were also requested by Police Scotland to carry our specific CCTV enquiries 576 times Missed opportunities for the prevention and detection of crime and ASB activity, creating increased social isolation for this group due to feelings of lack of safety in communities. Page 292
Page 227
23/24, and provided 449 evidence packages for court purposes. Health It is important that there is a focus on prevention and detection of criminal activity and ASB within communities. This is directly supported with an efficient and modern CCTV network provision. Being Article 10) and the right to education (Article 2 of Protocol No. 1). to participate, being represented and feeling able to make an impact on where you live can have an effect on both mental and physical health. Our physical and social environment is the framework in which our lives take place and, depending on circumstances, it can provide us with opportunities or limit our potential (Scottish National Performance Framework). In 23/24 CCTV service highlighted and reported 1232 incidents via our CCTV monitoring, which were raised with police for action. The CCTV Team were also requested by Police Scotland to carry our specific CCTV enquiries 576 times 23/24, and provided 449 evidence packages for court purposes. A less effective service could lead to negative consequences for the mental health of members of the community for example in terms of feeling safe, timeous responses to any operating issues of CCTV. Human Rights It is important that there is a focus on prevention and detection of criminal activity and ASB within communities. This is supported by a modern and efficient CCTV network provision. Relevant under core civil rights, such as the right to respect for private and family life (Article 8 of the Convention), the right to freedom of expression (Article 10) Its is important that In practice Human Rights and Children's Rights cross cut often with equality considerations and the others addressed in our assessments. In 23/24 CCTV service highlighted and reported 1232 incidents via our CCTV monitoring, which were raised with police for action. The CCTV Team were also requested by Police Scotland to carry our specific CCTV A less effective service could result in negative consequences in terms of being able to support peoples human rights. Page 293
Page 228
potential impact for children and young people is considered. enquiries 576 times 23/24, and provided 449 evidence packages for court purposes. Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity This area cross cuts with consideration under sex This area cross cuts with sex In 23/24 CCTV service highlighted and reported 1232 incidents via our CCTV monitoring, which were raised with police for action. The CCTV Team were also requested by Police Scotland to carry our specific CCTV enquiries 576 times 23/24, and provided 449 evidence packages for court purposes. This area cross cuts with sex. Race All protected groups could be impacted with this saving. People from BME groups are more likely to experience hate incidents than people from white ethnic groups. Evidence from Scottish Social Attitudes surveys and other sources suggests that people who have contact with people from other groups are less likely to hold negative views on those groups. In 23/24 CCTV service highlighted and reported 1232 incidents via our CCTV monitoring, which were raised with police for action. Missed opportunities for the prevention and detection of crime and ASB activity. This could result in group feeling unsafe in their communities and increasing social isolation. Page 294
Page 229
The CCTV Team were also requested by Police Scotland to carry our specific CCTV enquiries 576 times 23/24, and provided 449 evidence packages for court purposes. Religion and Belief We need to consider any differential impact in terms of religion and belief. Whilst Race and religion are distinct categories there is some cross over in terms of visibility, or perceived religion of certain people. We also need to consider and impact of dealing with sectarian incidents. In 23/24 CCTV service highlighted and reported 1232 incidents via our CCTV monitoring, which were raised with police for action. The CCTV Team were also requested by Police Scotland to carry our specific CCTV enquiries 576 times 23/24, and provided 449 evidence packages for court purposes. Missed opportunities for the prevention and detection of crime and ASB activity as above. Sexual Orientation We need to consider any differential impacts between sexual orientations. LGB people are more likely to suffer harassment linked to sexual orientation than heterosexual/straight people. In 23/24 CCTV service highlighted and reported 1232 incidents via our CCTV monitoring, which were raised with police for action. The CCTV Team were Missed opportunities for the prevention and detection of crime and ASB activity. Resulting in residents feeling unsafe within their communities and impacting on social isolation. Page 295
Page 230
also requested by Police Scotland to carry our specific CCTV enquiries 576 times 23/24, and provided 449 evidence packages for court purposes. Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. It is recognised that there would likely be a negative impact for the protected groups detailed above, with tenants and residents feeling dissatisfaction with the management of their neighbourhoods, with potential links to increased feelings of social isolation due to safety concerns in their communities. The Council continues to be facing significant financial challenges and has a legal obligation to balance its budget. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Yes. There will require to be ongoing quarterly updates to the UK Government to update on the positive outcomes achieved from the upgrading of the CCTV network which is being delivered via the UKSP funds secured of £681,172. There are also KPI returns that are provided as part of the Housing Delivery Plan around CCTV, namely under, Objective 1. Our neighbourhoods are safe, resilient and inclusive, specific returns on (a) Number of incidents directed to Police by Public Space CCTV team, (b) % of Public Space CCTV cameras that are operational, a 3rd KPI could also be impacted due to loss of opportunity to detect/prevent ASB and gather evidence via operational CCTV (c) % of anti-social behaviour cases resolved. Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation Removal of this post would have anticipated negative impact people with the protected characteristics noted in section 2 of the impact assessment for example women, younger people, trans people. If decision is taken to remove the post, there would be a differential impact in terms of sex as there is only one person in the post; further support and discussions will be required to be undertaken with existing post holder to explore options Further discussions will also be required to be undertaken with wider CCTV team, internal and external services/partners in terms of what duties will no longer be provided. Page 296
Page 231
Assessment No 1444 Strategic Team PT Budget Lead Officer Arun Menon Who else has been involved in developing this EIA Arun Menon, Business Support Manager Richard Butler, Section Head Corporate Administration Support Title PT01 Move Management of Leadership Support to CAS Description: (Provide a brief overview of the aims and objectives of this policy) This option, would reduce the requirement for a Grade 6 post to manage Leadership Support by 1 FTE. This would impact on the capacity of Team Leaders in CAS given the increase in line management responsibility, a review of tasks undertaken by Leadership Support could identify opportuntites for digital solutions that may help to mitigate this change in capacity given the introduction of M365. Who have you engaged and consulted with as part of your P&T Management Who will be affected by this proposal? The proposal realigns the Leadership Support Team with CAS, as their duties closely overlap with CAS Team Leaders. Tasks can be transferred to reduce the number of supervisory roles required, and the use of M365 meeting transcription will streamline work further. The change supports the Strategic Operating Model by freeing capacity within Democratic Services for wider structural changes, enabling additional teams and posts to be reviewed and potentially redesigned or removed. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements and viewed the guidance No Relevance screening: If the proposal/policy is relevant to any of the six areas then an Equality Impact Assessment must be carried out. You must indicate if there is any relevance to the six areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Human Rights Act/European Convention on Human Rights No Page 297
Page 232
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) or Fairer Scotland Duty (FSD) Yes Relevance to Scottish Consumer Duty (SCD) No Page 298
Page 233
Consider any needs and policy drivers e.g. Council or national strategies and plans /and any barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy. List evidence you are using to support this assessment. Consider the impact of your policy on people and how they will be able to access goods, services and information with no barriers and state the potential impact. Specific group to consider What Key Drivers and Evidence has been used to inform this assessment. (i.e. national statistics - Scot Govt; or local statistics - workforce data, Citizens Panel) For each group, state the potential Impact – Positive/Negative/Neutral Age No evidence of relevance neutral Disability Disabled people are more likely to experience discrimination in the workplace. Council policies provide a framework for employees to be supported and for reasonable adjustments to be made and recorded as part of a disability passport. Gender Reassign No evidence of relevance neutral Marriage & Civil Partnership No evidence of relevance neutral Pregnancy & Maternity No evidence of relevance or impacts neutral Race No evidence of relevance neutral Religion and Belief No evidence of relevance neutral Sex The change will affect one member staff directly. Given that only one member of staff will be affected, there would be a differential impact in terms of sex. Sexual Orientation No evidence of relevance neutral This section must be completed if there are potential Human Rights impacts, this includes but is not limited to Human Rights Act 1998 considerations Page 299
Page 234
Human Rights No evidence of relevance neutral This section must be completed if there are potential Human Rights impacts, this includes but is not limited to Human Rights Act 1998 considerations Health Worries surrounding job security may be heightened for employees This has the potential to negatively impact employees, Any potential reduction in staffing requirements will be managed through SWITCH redeployment programme. Additional support will be available to any employees impacted by the savings options to ensure their health and wellbeing. This section must be completed if any there are any potential socio- economic impacts including but not limited to those covered by the Fairer Scotland Duty Social & Economic Impact Employees affected by this policy may be impacted financially. Any potential reduction in staffing requirements could be managed through SWITCH redeployment programme. Additional support will be available to any employees impacted by the savings options to ensure their health and wellbeing. This section must be completed if any potential impact on children and young people up to the age of 18 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child This section must be completed in reference to the Scottish Consumer Duty Scottish Consumer Duty Consider cumulative impact of the proposal Page 300
Page 235
Cumulative and intersectional impacts No evidence of relevance or impacts neutral State how the impact of the proposal/policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis including how actions will be delivered to mitigate any negative impacts or secure positive impacts. Summary of overall impact(s) of the proposal. EIA 1444: Given that only one member of staff will be affected, there would be a differential impact in terms of sex. Employees are supported through the switch process. Name of the senior manager who has approved this assessment Victoria Rogers Page 301
Page 236
Assessment No 1392 Owner amenon Resource Transformation Service Budget P and T FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Arun Menon Business Support Manager Members Arun Menon and Victoria Rogers (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title PT10 - Savings opportunity by passing charges for Disclosure Scotland checks to employees The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy The Disclosure Scotland Act 2020 has resulted in increased charges for PVG applications, due to the new regulated role resulting in an increase in the number of posts within the Council and our associated Committees which now fall within this requirement, as well as the new fee structure introduced. At least one of the options introduces full cost recovery of Disclosure Scotland fees. New Categories: 1. Level 1 Disclosure: Aimed at individuals applying for jobs where a basic criminal record check is required. 2. Level 2 Disclosure: For roles that require a more detailed background check, including specific checks for roles such as solicitors and financial responsibility. 3. Level 2 with Barred List Check: For specific activities such as adoption. 4. PVG Scheme Membership: Remains the membership scheme for roles working with children or protected adults. It is a legal requirement to join the scheme for individuals undertaking a regulated role. 5. There are also general administrative fees such as Countersigntory fees. Two options are being considered by officers and included within this paper. The first option proposes passing the costs to all applicants, whilst the second proposes passing the costs only to those above Grade 5 and equivalent Teacher grades. All options have been modelled on the outturn for 2023/24. So, whilst the exact numbers are unknown, the approach adopted will give elected members a sense of cost. Page 302
Page 237
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Chief Officers, Strategic HR Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Employees and prospective employees/applicants. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Chief Officers, Strategic HR Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age The council has duty of care toward all its workers, and in terms of the Public Sector Equality Duty Younger people, (under 30) are more likely to be income deprived than older people The Council's age profile confirms that the highest percentage of employees remain clustered in the age groups 50-59. Payment for checks may be less affordable for younger people. Page 303
Page 238
Cumulative and intersectional impacts It is good practice to consider intersectionality. Effects of proposals, positive or negative, may be multiplied being a member of more than one affected group. Being for example from a BME group, being a woman and either being disabled or having a disabled person in the household could be a multiplying factor. Disability The Council must make reasonable adjustments for members of staff. Disabled people are more likely to unemployed than non disabled people; a potential barrier is created by shifting expense onto job applicants. The Council's disability profile confirms 1.38% of employees have declared a disability. Disabled people are more likely to be in relative poverty compared to non disabled people. Payment for checks may be less affordable for disabled people. Social & Economic Impact The council has duty of care toward all its workers, and in terms of the Public Sector Equality Duty. Unemployed job candidates There is a potential for a negative effect in terms of jobseekers generally and since people from BME backgrounds, younger people, and disabled people are more likely to be unemployed these groups may be potentially adversely effected, because of a reduced ability to pay for disclosure checks. Reduction in anticipated income for some employees may result in disposable income being reduced and This policy will have a financial impact on staff given they will need to bear the cost of the Disclosure Scotland checks. Page 304
Page 239
having a reduced amount to spend in the economy Sex The council needs to consider differential impacts. Women are more likely to be income deprived and/or in relative poverty than men. Workforce profile concludes 71% female and 29% male. The gender split is not readily available for this group of applicants but it is safe to assume this proposal is likely to impact females greater than males given the role profiles impacted by the policy. Passing of the charges to applicants, be it current or the increased rates, is likely effect more women than men based on the roles and services in scope. Gender Reassign Health The council has duty of care toward all of its workers, and in terms of the Public Sector Equality Duty. Reduction in anticipated income for some employees may contribute towards poor health outcomes. Unlikely to have a significant impact on health. Human Rights Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race The council needs to consider differential impacts. People from most BME groups are more likely to unemployed than non BME people; a potential barrier is created by shifting expense onto job applicants. Most BME groups people are more likely to be in relative poverty compared to non BME groups. Payment for checks may be less affordable for people from some BME groups. Page 305
Page 240
Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The council has a duty to balance the budget. This policy may have a negative impact on employees given the socio economic impact assessed above, however it is recommended for implementation due to the significant financial challenge the Council which means covering the cost is no longer sustainable. In mitigation, fees for new employees could be taken from new employees first or later pay. This is an approach which has been adopted by some other Local Authorities including East Dunbartonshire Council. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? No Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1392: While there are potential impacts on certain groups, particularly disabled people, women and BME people, and the introduction of this policy could make it difficult for the Council to recruit, there are mitigations which have been considered to minimise the impact. In mitigation for both options fees for new employees could be taken from new employees first pay or later pay. Restricting to grade 5 and above may reduce negative impacts. The Public Sector Finance Manual sets out that fees should be set at full cost recovery. Page 306
Page 241
Assessment No 1369 Owner lhastings Resource Transformation Service Budget P and T FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Victoria Rogers Chief Officer - People and Technology Members Louise Hastings, Strategic People and Change Manager Victoria Rogers, Chief Officer People and Technology (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title PT11 Reduce Corporate Training Budget The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy Unallocated budget apart from £5k per year would be removed. Reducing the training budget will mean that we cover corporate requirements only in terms of I-learn system, hosting, subscriptions and management pathways. This will mean reduced ability to support redeployment through SWITCH of displaced employees. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Victoria Rogers, Chief Officer People and Technology Louise Hastings, Strategic People and Change Manager Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No Who will be affected by this policy? All employees Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Page 307
Page 242
Victoria Rogers, Chief Officer People and Technology Louise Hastings, Strategic People and Change Manager Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age The Council has an ageing workforce and and Council employees typically have a long length of service. 49% of employees have 10+ years service. Older employees are more likely to have some impairments, such as hearing loss or sight loss. Negative, employees may not be able to access the same level of support in relation to training or gaining new qualifications. Older employees could be impacted due to workforce demographics. Cumulative and intersectional impacts Disability The Council has a duty to ensure that disabled members of staff can access training and development. Current iLearns are not fully accessible to people with a range of impairments including vision loss or hearing loss. Removal of face to face training, will affect all staff, however the interactivity and flexibility of such training in terms of delivery does provided advantages over our iLearn modules for disabled people especially. We can put adjustments in place to enable employees to access the Learning material. This could include support from a colleague to work through content so it could be accessed through. Where possible we will utilise text to speak as a tool also. Page 308
Page 243
Social & Economic Impact Employees in front line delivery roles make up a significant portion of the workforce and can be impacted by organisational change. Approx 59% of workforce are G5 or below. Negative: Employees in lower graded posts may not be easily able to access training/funds to re- qualify in different roles without the support of the corporate training budget. Sex The workforce is predominately female. 74% of workforce is female. As a result of the workforce demographic, a bigger proportion of female employees may have less access to training/funds to re- qualify in different roles without the support of the corporate training budget. Gender Reassign Health Human Rights Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Page 309
Page 244
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The Council is facing a significant financial challenge and has a legal obligation to balance its budget. Support would still be provided to employees within corporate offering and through partnership with PACE (UK Govt.) if appropriate. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Yes, redeployment is reported to committee annually. Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1369: There could be potentially more negative impact on female workers as a greater number of our workers are female. Older workers who are redeployed for health reasons may also be affected. In terms of disabled workers we would mitigate impacts by continuing to provide adjustments. Support would continue to be provided to employees within corporate offering and through partnership with PACE (UK Govt.) if appropriate. Page 310
Page 245
Assessment No 1411 Owner mlynn2 Resource Transformation Service Budget Resource FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer Resources Members Laurence Slavin - Chief Officer Resources (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title RES01 - Review of External Funding -WDCVS The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy A reduction or removal in voluntary grant funding provided to West Dunbartonshire Community & Volunteering Services (WDCVS) who administer Voluntary Grant funding on behalf of the Council. This funding total of £75,000 covers social transport at £50,000 and play schemes and running costs at £25,000. Consideration will be given to either fully remove or reduce this funding in 2026/27 or on a phased basis over a number of years. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Senior Council staff and the Budget Working Group have been consulted on the development of the option. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Community Groups who apply to West Dunbartonshire Community & Volunteering Services for grant funding. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Page 311
Page 246
WDCVS have been notified of the potential reduction in funding subject to Council approval. Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Relevant as funding is provided across a wide range of community groups and age ranges. Funding is provided to cover social transport, play schemes and running costs. Also funding for people with asbestos related diseases. Reduction in funding will negatively affect the amount that WDCVS can provide to Community groups who apply to them for financial support. These groups are wide ranging and the funding also helps support play schemes and running costs. Cumulative and intersectional impacts It is important that the Council considers how impacts may interact. People who are members of more than one disadvantaged group are more likely to be impacted. Negative affects may be cumulative. Disability Relevant as funding is provided across a wide range of community groups who support a wide range of groups requiring support potentially including disability groups. The service may provide support to community groups with a specific focus on disabilities through the funding levels provided. Reduction in funding will negatively affect the amount that WDCVS can provide to Community groups who apply to them for financial support. These groups are wide ranging and the funding to help Page 312
Page 247
support social transportation. Social & Economic Impact The Council must have due regard to the Fairer Scotland Duty in terms of Social Economic impacts and the statutory guidance. The service acts to provide funding for social transport, play schemes and running costs Reduction in funding will negatively affect the amount that WDCVS can provide to Community groups who apply to them for financial support. These groups are wide ranging. Sex See under ‘disability’ and cumulative and cross cutting impacts See under ‘disability’ and cumulative and cross cutting impacts See under ‘disability’ and cumulative and cross cutting impacts Gender Reassign Health See under ‘disability’ and cumulative and cross cutting impacts WDCVS Administers the annual Health and Well being Fund, with representation from the Council and HSCP See under ‘disability’ and cumulative and cross cutting impacts See under ‘disability’ and cumulative and cross cutting impacts Human Rights United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child Cross cuts with age provides both services and participation opportunities to Children and young people Cross cuts with age Potentially less 'provision' of services and 'participation' opportunities. Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race See under ‘disability’ and cumulative and cross cutting impacts See under ‘disability’ and cumulative and cross cutting impacts See under ‘disability’ and cumulative and cross cutting impacts Page 313
Page 248
Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The Council has a substantial budget deficit and is seeking and assessing options that will contribute to reducing the gap. Assessment of grant support to external service providers is a necessary part of that process. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? No Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1411: The recommendation has been reached by considering the role of WDCVS in administering voluntary grant funding on the Council’s behalf and the absence of detailed demographic or usage data, which limits the ability to fully quantify the impacts. The £75,000 funding supports social transport (£50,000) and play schemes and running costs (£25,000). Any reduction or removal of this funding is likely to negatively affect a wide range of community groups, including those supporting people with health conditions, women, disabilities, children, BME groups, and families who rely on accessible activities and transport. WDCVS work has a role in fostering good relations in the area. As with other external funding proposals, larger or immediate reductions would be expected to produce greater negative impacts on community organisations’ capacity, with potential knock-on effects for participation, inclusion, and access to community services. Although this funding is non-statutory, it must still be impact assessed under the Public Sector Equality Duty in Scotland. Given the lack of new usage information, this assessment draws on the nature of the services funded and learning from previous years to identify the likely areas of disproportionate impact. Page 314
Page 249
Assessment No 1412 Owner mlynn2 Resource Transformation Service Budget Resource FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer Resources Members Laurence Slavin - Chief Officer Resources (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title RES01 - Review of External Funding - Y Sort It The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy The aim is to assess the impact on services by either fully removing or reducing the grant funding provided to Y Sort It. Y Sort It, engage with young people in a variety of ways, including the provision of issue based workshops, personal development, group work, support to achieve accreditation, and assist the development of healthy lifestyles and facilitate participation in community projects. Funding provided is £87,820. In addition, education specific funding of £76,000 is provided - Care connections and community mentoring supports for children and young people who are care experienced. Supports out of school learning and mentoring. Consideration will be given to either fully remove or reduce this funding in 2026/27 or on a phased basis over a number of years. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Senior Council staff and the Budget Working Group have been consulted on the development of the option. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Page 315
Page 250
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Y Sort-It delivers a young person led service, providing opportunities for young people and inspiring them to reach their full potential. This is a youth friendly social space for young people facilitating access to youth group activities and learning opportunities. This includes a weekly programme of support groups, group work sessions in the Y Sort-It Youth Centre and other relevant outreach locations. The service will be open access and available to any young person aged 5–25 years and a resident within West Dunbartonshire. However, to meet the varying needs of young people living in West Dunbartonshire consideration will be given to those people who are harder to reach, to ensure that they have equal opportunity of access. This will include specific provision for those that are the following: • LGBT Youth; • Those at risk or vulnerable to anti-social behaviour or organised crime; • Young Carers / Young Adult Carers; • Looked after Care Experienced young people; • Those at risk or vulnerable to substance misuse Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Y Sort It have been notified of the potential reduction in funding subject to Council approval. Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age While the majority of children and young people in West Dunbartonshire are: happy in their homes; enjoy friendship; and are actively engaged in sport, culture and recreation; progress at school; have good health and self esteem; and are civically engaged, there are others who In 2020, 15,484 of the population (88,340) were children between the age of 0 and 15 years. 12,433 children were attending school: • 6,658 pupils in the 32 primary schools in West Dunbartonshire. • 5,548 pupils in the five secondary schools in West Dunbartonshire. • Y Sort-It engages with young people in a variety of ways. This includes the provision of issue based workshops, personal development, group work, support to achieve accreditation, and assist the development of healthy lifestyles Page 316
Page 251
are less well connected. However, this is not the case for all young people in West Dunbartonshire where some young people living are facing challenges because of their circumstances and experience of poverty and disadvantage. Youth Engagement services, that includes input from Y-Sort-it will contribute towards addressing those challenges within West Dunbartonshire communities, with specific emphasis placed on supporting those that may be more vulnerable to disadvantage. In order to do so there is a need to engage with young people and develop services that meet their needs. This includes the need for support to remain active and healthy; enjoying economic opportunity and security and being connected, respected and able to contribute to their communities. 227 pupils in the additional support needs schools in West Dunbartonshire. Of these 3,549 are considered to be living in households affected by poverty. This represents 23.4% of the population in the 0- 16 year’s age group. This is 3%age points higher than the average in Scotland. In 2021, there was 334 ‘looked after’ children. In addition, statistics provided by Skills Development Scotland show that the proportion of school leavers in a positive destination in West Dunbartonshire (91%) is lower than the equivalent proportion for our neighbours in the Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS (GGandC NHS) area (95.8%) and Scotland (95.5%). Similarly the participation rate in West Dunbartonshire (90.8%) compares unfavourably with the GGC NHS area (92.4%) and Scotland (92.2%). Furthermore, 7.2% of the population in the 16- 25 years age group are claiming out of work benefits. and facilitate participation in community projects. Y-sort it receives funding to deliver services that complement existing services provided by West Dunbartonshire Council (Working4U) youth teams. Y-sortit receives funding from other sources and has reserve funds which are reported in the organisations annual accounts. Nevertheless, the options for removing or reducing grant funds will have a negative effect on their ability to deliver services. Page 317
Page 252
This compares unfavourably with Scotland, where the figure is 4.6% and Great Britain with a figure 4.8%. Cumulative and intersectional impacts There is a need to recognise that young people who access youth services often have compounded barriers or obstacles Scottish Health Survey (2012/13) http://www.gov.sco t/Publications/2016 /09/2408 Carers Trust Scotland (2015) Time to be Heard for Young Adult Carers Scottish Government (2015) Scotland's Carers. Understanding the impact on young people in this respect should be understood in reference to the intersectionality of challenges they face. Disability Relevant as funding is provided across a wide range of community groups who support a wide range of groups requiring support potentially including disability groups. The service may provide support to community groups with a specific focus on disabilities through the funding levels provided. Reduction in funding will negatively affect the amount that Y Sort It can provide to individuals who look to them to provide a service. Social & Economic Impact West Dunbartonshire has one of the highest proportion of young carers by local authority area. Higher proportions of young people have caring responsibilities in areas of higher deprivation and lower income. Research tells us that young carers are more common in families with unemployed parents or low incomes. This is cross cutting with other areas such as LGBT and homelessness Scotland's 2011 Census data. Removal of funding for an organisation that provides support to young people may have an adverse impact on their economic wellbeing particularly if no other supports are available. Page 318
Page 253
Sex Need to assess economic and social impacts varying by sex Women head 90% of single parent families in Scotland. Single parent families are more likely to be in relative poverty. Any reductions in services may have more of an impact on women as heads of single parent households especially. Gender Reassign Creation of places where LGBTQ+ groups can safely socialise and be open about their sexual orientation and gender identity. LGBT young people in particular are at a higher risk of increased homelessness and domestic abuse Stonewall Scotland's report highlighted that LGBT people are vulnerable to and at increased risk of homelessness, highlighting that almost one in five LGBT people (18%) have experienced homelessness at some point in their lives. A Report by Scottish Alliance for Children's Rights notes LGBT children and young people may be significantly disadvantaged in accessing adequate play, leisure and culture opportunities. This is cross cutting with sexual orientation. Removal of funding for an organisation that provides support to young LGBT people may have an adverse impact on their wellbeing particularly if no other supports are available. How support for LGBT young people is delivered would need to be assessed to ensure it still delivers maximum positive impact. Health There are an estimated 800,000 unpaid carers in Scotland this includes 30,000 young carers under the age of 18. Research undertaken by Carers Trust reports that 45% of young carers and young adult carers aged 14- 25 surveyed stated that they have or have had mental health problems. Scottish Health Survey (2012/13) http://www.gov.sco t/Publications/2016 /09/2408 Carers Trust Scotland (2015) Time to be Heard for Young Adult Carers. Scottish Government (2015) Scotland's Carers https://www.stone wall.org.uk/experien ces-lgbtq-children and- young-people https://www.gov.sc Removal of funding for an organisation that provides support to young people including young carers and young LGBT people may have an adverse impact on their wellbeing particularly if no other supports are available. How support for carers is Page 319
Page 254
Mental health and wellbeing LGBTQ+ children and young people experience particularly high rates of poor mental health. More than one in five LGB young people and more than two in five trans young people have attempted to take their own life. One in three non-binary young people and nearly half of disabled LGBT young people have tried to take their own life. Health is cross cutting with other areas such as sexual orientation and gender reassignment. ot/binaries/content /documents/govscot /publications/statist ics/2019/11/scottis h-schools adolescent- lifestyle substance-use survey-salsus national- overview 2018/documents/su mmary-findings west dunbartonshire council/summary findings-west dunbartonshire council/govscot%3A document/summary -findings-west dunbartonshire council.pdf delivered would need to be assessed to ensure it still delivers maximum positive impact. Human Rights Need to consider Article 8 of European convention on Human Rights (ECHR), I.E. Family and Private Life Good practice to consider impact on Children and Young people including in terms of the UNCRC. ECHR and UNCRC Cross cuts with considerations under 'age'. YSI provides both services and participation opportunities to Children and young people Reducing funding may negatively affect fulfilment of UNCRC rights. For example 'provision' and 'participation' Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Creation of places where LGBTQ+ Stonewall Scotland's report highlighted Removal of funding for an organisation Page 320
Page 255
groups can safely socialise and be open about their sexual orientation and gender identity. LGBT young people in particular are at a higher risk of increased homelessness and domestic abuse. This is cross cutting with gender reassignment. that LGBT people are vulnerable to and at increased risk of homelessness, highlighting that almost one in five LGBT people (18%) have experienced homelessness at some point in their lives. A Report by Scottish Alliance for Children's Rights notes LGBT children and young people may be significantly disadvantaged in accessing adequate play, leisure and culture opportunities. This is cross cutting with gender reassignment. that provides support to young LGBT people may have an adverse impact on their wellbeing particularly if no other supports are available. How support for LGBT young people is delivered would need to be assessed to ensure it still delivers maximum positive impact. This is cross cutting with gender reassignment Page 321
Page 256
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The Council has a substantial budget deficit and is seeking and assessing options that will contribute to reducing the gap. Assessment of grant support to external service providers is a necessary part of that process. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? We will monitor impact by consulting Head Teachers/Young People. Monitoring will be carried out on a termly basis. Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1412: The recommendation has been reached by considering the services provided by Y Sort It and the lack of detailed demographic or usage data, which limits the ability to fully quantify impacts. Y Sort It delivers a wide range of support to children and young people, including issue-based workshops, personal development, accreditations, mentoring, and support for care-experienced young people, funded by £87,820 from the Council and £76,000 of education-specific funding. Any reduction or removal of this support is therefore likely to have negative impacts on young people, particularly those in areas of high socio-economic deprivation and those who are care-experienced, who may be more reliant on these targeted services. As with other external funding proposals, larger or immediate reductions would be expected to create greater negative effects and could place additional pressure on individual schools and central education services, which already operate under constrained budgets. Some impacts could be mitigated in the short term through targeted use of existing skills and resources, but overall capacity is limited. The assessment also reflects the broader context of other support currently provided by the Council, including: £39,000 of transition funding from the Cost-of- Living Fund (ending 2026/27), concessionary rental arrangements at Bonhill Community Centre, and £189,000 of HSCP funding for advocacy and support to young carers. Although the funding is not statutory, the Public Sector Equality Duty requires potential impacts on protected groups to be assessed, and in the absence of new usage data this EIA draws on the nature of the service and previous assessments. Page 322
Page 257
Assessment No 1413 Owner mlynn2 Resource Transformation Service Budget CCF FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer Resources Members Laurence Slavin - Chief Officer Resources (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title RES01 - Review of External Funding - Antonine Sports Centre The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy Under this proposal, the current grant of £74,516 provided to the Antonine by the Council would either be fully removed or reduced in 2026/27 or on a phased basis over a number of years. The current Council grant provides approximately 17% of the organisations income. The Council provides grant support to a number of strategic partner organisations in West Dunbartonshire. The Antonine Sports Centre is an independent charity which has offered access to sports and community facilities in Duntocher for over 30 years. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Senior Council staff and the Budget Working Group have been consulted on the development of the option. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Page 323
Page 258
Current service users and staff. Members of the public especially those who live in the surrounding areas including Faifley who might want to use facilities in future. Antonine Sports Centre (ASC) is the closet such facility for people living in Duntocher and Faifley Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Antonine Sports Centre (ASC) have been notified about potential impact. Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age The Council has an equality outcome in relation to increasing involvement of younger people in Community Empowerment The Equality Act requires that services do not discriminate. The organization has stated focus on: Older people and Children and Young people Dependent on effect of any reductions and profile of service users. Expected to be a negative impact. Cumulative and intersectional impacts The Council's Community empowerment strategy encourages Communities to get involved in their local areas, and links with our Equality Outcomes for 21-25 It is important that the Council takes into account how combine to affect different groups and individuals Evidence suggests that BME, Disabled people, women and younger people have been particularly affected by COVID and Cost of Living impacts. Dependent on effect of any reductions and profile of service users. Expected to be a negative impact. Disability The Equality Act requires that services are accessible to The organization has a stated focus on: Disabled people. Dependent on effect of any reductions and Page 324
Page 259
disabled people. The Council has an equality outcome in relation to increasing involvement of disabled people in Community Empowerment Disabled people are more likely to be income deprived than non-disabled people. profile of service users. Expected to be a negative impact. Social & Economic Impact The Council must have regard to the Fairer Scotland Duty Overall Duntocher has lower than average child poverty and early mortality, but there are SIMD some more deprived areas immediately to the North west and further to the east of the ASC Failey which suffer from significant deprivation is close by. Negative impacts if workforce was reduced Potential negative impact on more deprived communities if they currently use the Centre and services are reduced or costs increased Sex Important to assess impacts for men and women. Women make up 90% of the heads of single parent families. Single parent families are more likely to be in relative poverty Women are less likely to access to a car than men. Potential negative impacts if services provision was reduced or costs increased for users. Dependent on effect of any reductions and profile of service users. Gender Reassign Health Health and wellbeing is a focus area of our 22-27 Strategic Plan The organization has stated focus on: People with health problems Potential negative impacts if services provision was reduced or costs increased for users Human Rights United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child Cross cuts with age YSI provides both services and participation opportunities to Cross cuts with age Potentially less 'provision' of services and Page 325
Page 260
Children and young people 'participation' opportunities. Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race The Council has an equality outcome in relation to increasing involvement of BME people in Community Empowerment The Equality Act requires that services do not discriminate. Most BME groups are more likely than most white groups to be income deprived. Overall BME groups are less likely to have access to a car Dependent on effect of any reductions and profile of service users. Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The Council has a substantial budget deficit and is seeking and assessing options that will contribute to reducing the gap. Assessment of grant support to external service providers is a necessary part of that process. WDC currently provide additional support in concessionary rental for Antonine Sports Centre and Glenhead Community Centre. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Intrduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1413 details potential impacts on how the recommendation has been reached by considering the role of the Antonine Sports Centre as a long-established community facility and the absence of detailed usage or demographic data to quantify the full impact. The Council’s grant represents around 17% of the organisation’s income, and any reduction or removal of the £74,516 support is likely to affect its capacity to deliver accessible sports and community activities in Duntocher. Page 326
Page 261
While the lack of demographic data limits detailed analysis, the nature of the service suggests potential impacts across a range of protected groups, particularly older people, disabled people, young people, and those who rely on local, affordable facilities to participate in physical activity and social programmes. As with other external funding proposals, larger or immediate cuts would be expected to create greater negative effects, including reduced access to sport, reduced community cohesion, and possible consequences for health and wellbeing. Although this funding is non-statutory, the implications must still be assessed under the Public Sector Equality Duty, and in the absence of new data this assessment draws on the established role of the Centre and the learning from previous EIAs. Page 327
Page 262
Assessment No 1414 Owner mlynn2 Resource Transformation Service Budget CCF FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer Resources Members Laurence Slavin - Chief Officer Resources (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title RES01 - Review of External Funding - Shopmobility The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy The Council provides grant support to a number of strategic partner organisations in West Dunbartonshire. Shopmobility delivers a mobility scooter, manual and powered wheelchair service to residents from its base in Clydebank Shopping Centre. Under this proposal, the current grant of £47,760 provided to Shopmobility by the Council would either be fully removed or reduced in 2026/27 or on a phased basis over a number of years Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. We would work with the group and provide them with practical support, engage with CVS, and look at any other available funding streams. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Page 328
Page 263
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? The staff members, other council service areas and the service users/communities that the team support. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Elected member, senior officers and the Communities management team. Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Council Equality Outcome on increasing participation of younger people. Participation amongst younger age groups, 16- 34 is significantly lower than other age groups in WD. Work has been underway to find different channels of engagement with young people and organisations related to them. For example, recent conversations with young people on the Council's budget priorities. Some groups affected are extensively used by older people. Evidence suggest that older people are more at risk than some other age groups of social isolation. This may have a potentially negative impact on the support that groups can provide for young and older people. Page 329
Page 264
Older people are more likely to be disabled. Cumulative and intersectional impacts It is important that the council takes account of how factors interact to affect people and groups affected by this saving. Evidence suggests that BME, Disabled people, women and younger people have been particularly affected by the proposals. Factors such as sex, disability and age may interact in this circumstance to multiple effects of any service reductions. Disability Council Equality Outcome increasing participation of disabled people. Some groups affected are disabled people and those living in a household with a disabled person are more likely to be less able to participate fully in community life. This may have a potentially negative impact on this group. Social & Economic Impact The Council must have due regard to the Fairer Scotland Duty, in terms of Social Economic impacts, and the Statutory Guidance Organisations affected by the proposals may currently employs staff members and volunteers. This may have a potentially negative impact on this group Sex Important to take population structure into account. Women in West Dunbartonshire live significantly longer than men. More women than men may be affected. Gender Reassign Health The Council has a focus on health and well being The service provides social interaction opportunities for service users. Potential negative impacts Human Rights UNCRC considerations in terms of 'participation' and young people. Cross cuts with 'Age'. See information on other engagement work with younger people and organisations related to them. This may have a potentially negative impact on this group Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Page 330
Page 265
Race Council Equality Outcome on increasing participation of BME groups. BME groups are more likely to have barriers to participate fully in community life. This may have a potentially negative impact on this group Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The Council is required to have a balanced budget. Provision of this funding is not a statutory requirement and therefore it has to be put forward as a saving option for member consideration. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1414 details potential impacts: The recommendation has been reached by considering the function of the service and the lack of detailed demographic or usage data from Shopmobility, which limits the ability to fully quantify impacts. However, based on the nature of the support provided mobility scooters and manual or powered wheelchairs any reduction or removal of the £47,760 grant is likely to disproportionately affect older and disabled people and women who rely on the service to access Clydebank Shopping Centre and the surrounding area. As with other external funding proposals, larger or immediate reductions would be expected to create greater negative effects, including reduced mobility support, increased barriers to independent access, and potential impacts on social participation. There may also be secondary economic effects linked to reduced footfall in the local area. Although the funding is non-statutory, the assessment is required under the Public Sector Equality Duty, and in the absence of new usage data this EIA reflects the nature of the service and learnings from previous assessments. Page 331
Page 266
Assessment No 1415 Owner mlynn2 Resource Transformation Service Budget Resource FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer Resources Members Laurence Slavin - Chief Officer Resources (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title RES01 - Review of External Funding - Clydebank Asbestos Group The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy The Council provides £21,560 of funding to Clydebank Asbestos Group to support people affected by an asbestos-related disease and their families. The proposal is to reduce or fully remove funding in 2026/27 or on a phased basis over a number of years. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Senior Council staff and the Budget Working Group have been consulted on the development of the option. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Service users of Clydebank Asbestos Group Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Page 332
Page 267
Clydebank Asbestos Group have been notified of the potential reduction in funding subject to Council approval. Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Relevant as funding is provided across a wide range of community groups and age ranges. Funding is provided to for people with asbestos related diseases. Older people are more likely to be disabled Reduction in funding will negatively affect the amount that the group can provide. Cumulative and intersectional impacts It is important that the Council considers how impacts may interact. People who are members of more than one disadvantaged group are more likely to be impacted. Negative affects may be cumulative. Disability Meeting the needs of disabled people needs to be considered Asbestos related disease will often be considering as disabling under the Equality Act Reduction in funding will negatively affect the amount that the group can provide. Social & Economic Impact Economic impacts need to be considered The service provides advice and support on compensation; this may be reduced. Reduction in funding will negatively affect the amount that Clydebank Asbestos Group have to support people affected by an asbestos- related disease and their families. Sex Gender Reassign Health Clydebank Asbestos Group support people affected by an asbestos-related The service acts to provide funding to Clydebank Asbestos Group (£21,560). Reduction in funding will negatively affect the amount that Clydebank Page 333
Page 268
disease and their families. Asbestos Group have to support people affected by an asbestos- related disease and their families. Human Rights Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. Provision of this funding is not a statutory requirement and therefore it has to be put forward as a saving option for member consideration Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1415: Provision of this funding is not a statutory requirement and therefore it has to be put forward as a saving option for member consideration whilst setting out the implications of taking the option. Non statutory funding is still covered by the duty to impact assess relevant proposals under the Public Sector Equality Duty in Scotland. The recommendation has been reached by considering the nature of the service and the lack of detailed demographic or usage data from Clydebank Asbestos Group. This limits the ability to quantify the full impact; however, given the organisation supports individuals with asbestos related diseases and their families, any reduction or removal of the £21,560 funding is likely to have negative consequences for people with serious health conditions, many of whom may also fall within older age groups or disability related protected characteristics. The service provides advice and support on compensation, this may be reduced. Page 334
Page 269
As with other external funding proposals, larger or faster reductions would be expected to produce greater negative impacts on service users and the organisation’s capacity to provide specialist support. Although the funding is non statutory, the Public Sector Equality Duty still requires the implications to be assessed. In the absence of new usage data and reflecting last year’s approach, this assessment draws on the nature of the service and available guidance to identify the likely areas of impact. Page 335
Page 270
Assessment No 1416 Owner mlynn2 Resource Transformation Service Budget Resource FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer Resources Members Laurence Slavin - Chief Officer Resources (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title RES01 - Review of External Funding - Lomond & Clyde Care and Repair The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy A reduction in funding or fully removal of £41,000 funding in 2026/27 or on a phased basis over a number of years to Lomond and Clyde Care and Repair who provide support to private homeowners to help them apply for grant funding via the Council for medical adaptations or essential repairs. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Senior Council staff and the Budget Working Group have been consulted on the development of the option. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. Yes SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Community Groups who apply to Lomond and Clyde Care and Repair Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Page 336
Page 271
Officers have been notified of the potential reduction in funding subject to Council approval. Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Elderly, adult and young WD residents who my need support from this service area. Knowledge of past applications for grant support from both age groups. Negative impact. Reduced provision may affect users in this group. Cumulative and intersectional impacts Disability The majority of applications come from those with a medical disability. Knowledge of past applications the large majority are for medical adaptations Negative impact. Reduced provision may affect users in this group. Social & Economic Impact Social needs in relation to providing adapted facilities to support health and wellbeing Knowledge of past applications. Applications are subject to means testing to meet low income eligibility. Negative impact. Reduced provision may affect users in this group. Sex Gender Reassign Health Those needing this support have underlying health circumstances mostly related to mobility. Knowledge of past applications. Negative impact. Reduced provision may affect users in this group. Human Rights Marriage & Civil Partnership Page 337
Page 272
Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. Council is required to set a balanced budget. This savings option focuses on the funding provided to Lomond and Clyde Care & Repair to support these groups with their grant applications. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? We will take feedback on impacts from Care and repair Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1416: The recommendation has been reached by considering the nature of the service and the absence of detailed usage or demographic data from Lomond and Clyde Care and Repair. This makes it difficult to assess the full scale of impact. However, based on the purpose of the funding, supporting mainly older and disabled homeowners to access grant funding for medical adaptations and essential repair, it is likely that any reduction or removal of the £41,000 will have a negative and disproportionate impact on these groups. As with other external funding proposals, larger or faster reductions would be expected to have greater negative effects. The service works alongside £164,210 of HSCP funding for repairs and keypad installations, meaning reductions may increase barriers for vulnerable individuals in securing essential home adaptations, and longer waits for a service. While no issues were raised in previous EIAs and no new data is available, impacts have been considered using the nature of the service and existing system guidance. Page 338
Page 273
Assessment No 1417 Owner mlynn2 Resource Transformation Service Budget Resource FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Michelle Lynn Assets Manager Members Laurence Slavin - Chief Officer Resources (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title RES01: Review of External Funding - CAB The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy The aim is to assess the impact on services by contributing to reduction of Council budget deficit by reducing service either by fully removing or reduce funding for WD Citizens Advice Bureau which receives £221,583 each year from West Dunbartonshire Council to deliver services that complement existing services provided by West Dunbartonshire Council. Consideration will be given to either fully remove or reduce this funding in 2026/27 or on a phased basis over a number of years. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Senior Council staff and elected members have been involved in the development of the assessment. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. Yes SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Page 339
Page 274
West Dunbartonshire CAB delivers a proactive, accessible, independent, customer- focused advice service for residents of West Dunbartonshire. This includes the provision of Welfare Rights, Money Advice and Debt Advice and support for the submission of benefits applications and appeals, where appropriate. The service provided is not restricted to those elements in and may also include assistance to clients in other areas of expertise where there is a benefit to them. This includes, for example, employment, housing or consumer rights, whilst taking into account the need to minimise duplication in advice provision in West Dunbartonshire. The service is open to anyone seeking support and is provided locally, in communities and within locations that effectively meet the needs of residents in West Dunbartonshire. West Dunbartonshire CAB adopts a flexible and collaborative service which includes out-of-hours, home visits and outreach provision as appropriate. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Senior staff and Elected Members at West Dunbartonshire Council have been involved in the consultation process. Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Important to assess impacts on different age groups Working-age adults and pensioners are less likely to be in poverty compared to children: Older people are more likely to be disabled. Younger age groups are more likely to be more negative affected if services are reduced. Cumulative and intersectio nal impacts WDCAB users from disadvantag ed background s who are most likely to be affected by inequality, poverty and disadvantag The key drivers of poverty identified in the legislation include income levels and the cost of living. Income is determined, to an extent, by levels of economic activity and employment. While there are many sources of labour market information, examples provided by NOMIS (Office for National Statistics Labour Market Profile - Nomis - Official Census and Labour Market Statistics (nomisweb.co.uk)) will illustrate West Dunbartonshire’s comparative labour The options focus on a reduction in the level of grant provided by the Council. This will have a negative impact on the services and impact of Page 340
Page 275
e which is driven by structural or institutional factors. These factors include lack of information about: • Income from social security and benefits in kind, influenced by: o design and generosity of welfare benefits; o benefit sanctions and recovery of advance payments; o hardship payments and third- party debts; o barriers to accessing financial support (including child maintenanc e). • Costs of living, including housing, food and fuel costs, the poverty premium, the costs of market profile to suggest the need for targeted employability support. Benefits: The number of people in receipt of out of work benefits is a contributory factor to the level of child poverty. In West Dunbartonshire 4.5% of the population in the 16-64 years group is in receipt of out of work benefits. This is higher than the average in Scotland (3.2%) and Great Britain (3.8%) and represents 2,525 people. 18.4% of households in West Dunbartonshire are in receipt of the main benefits. This compares unfavourably with the figure for Scotland (13%) and Great Britain (11%). In effect, comparatively more people in West Dunbartonshire rely on benefits for their income. Maximising their entitlement will feature strongly in our approach to maximising income. those services to residents of West Dunbartonshi re. Note: WDCAB receives funding from other sources as such, WDCAB is not totally reliant on the Council for funding. Impacts on people who are members of more than one disadvantage d group are likely to be multiplied. WDCAB has a number of key performance indicators reflecting the activities that are delivered through the use of the funds provided by the Council. The activities are directed towards the most economically disadvantage d people in West Dunbartonshi re. These Page 341
Page 276
the school day, and the extra, unavoidable costs of disability. • People are unaware of their employment rights WDCAB provide support because: • People don’t always claim the benefits they are entitled to; • The benefits system is difficult to understand; • Navigating the process without assistance can lead to errors; • Appeals without help can lead to wrong decisions; • Understandi ng welfare reform is difficult. indictors will be reduced in proportion to reduction of funds. These indicators include: • Number of people receiving support ( • Value of income generated • Total value of reduced liability to debt • Number establishing a debt strategy • Number advised with housing issues • Number provided with consumer rights issues • Number provided with employment rights issues issues • Number supported with advice on energy issues All options will lead to a proportionate reduction in the number of people from disadvantage d communities Page 342
Page 277
and families receiving support. Disability Our child poverty report notes disabled people as a priority group. Disabled people and those living in a household with a disabled person are more likely to be in relative poverty. Reduced provision may affect efforts to reduce poverty for this group. Social & Economic Impact Reducing child poverty is a focus for the council. Groups noted above may be especially vulnerable, as well as other with low incomes. Reduced provision may result in reduced ability to tackle economic and financial inequality. Sex Our child poverty report notes women/lone parents groups as a priority group. Women are more likely to be income deprived than men. 90% of single parents are female. Reduced provision may affect efforts to reduce poverty for this group. Gender Reassign Cross cuts with sex A BMJ Study published in 2023 notes Trans and non-binary adults were younger, more likely to be from Asian, black, mixed or other ethnic groups and more likely to live in more deprived parts of the country. (Demographic characteristics, long-term health conditions and healthcare experiences of 6333 trans and non-binary adults in England: nationally representative evidence from the 2021 GP Patient Survey | BMJ Open) In 2022 Scotland’s Census found that 19,970 people were trans or had a trans history. This is 0.44% of people aged 16 and over. For West Dunbartonshire the figure was 0.31% equating to 227 people. Potentially more negative on groups who are in relative poverty Health The Council has a focus Those in relative poverty rely more on public services than those who are not. Potentially more Page 343
Page 278
of health and wellbeing The links between financial stress and negative effects on mental health are well established negative on groups who are in relative poverty Human Rights Human Rights Act; For example, Article 8 family life. United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (Best practice). The work of WD CAB supports elements of human rights e.g. Article 8. Advice is provided to families with children and young people. Reduced provision may negatively affect the fulfilment of rights. Marriage & Civil Partnership Cross cuts with sex Single people are more likely to be in relative poverty Single parent households are more likely to be in relative poverty. 90% of single parent households are headed by women. Cross cuts with sex Pregnancy & Maternity Cross cuts with sex Cross cuts with sex Cross cuts with sex Race Our child poverty report notes people from BME groups as a priority group. People from BME groups more likely to me more income deprived. Relative poverty rates higher for ethnic minorities (https://data.gov.scot/poverty/#Ethnicity) Most BME groups are more likely to be in relative poverty and higher child poverty than White ethnic groups. Reduced provision may affect efforts to reduce poverty for this group. Religion and Belief There can be cross cutting consideratio ns between religion and belief and Race. Relative poverty rates higher for Muslims (https://data.gov.scot/poverty/#Religion) For example from Census data 90% of those who say they are Pakistani or Bangladeshi also say they are Muslim and these two ethnic groups are more likely to be income deprived Most White ethnic groups. Potentially more negative on groups who are in relative poverty Sexual Orientation Important to examine evidence on factors such Relative poverty rates higher for LGB+ adults (https://data.gov.scot/poverty/#Sexual_orie Potentially more negative on groups who Page 344
Page 279
as economic position ntation) are in relative poverty Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The Council has a substantial budget deficit and is seeking and assessing options that will contribute to reducing the gap. Assessment of grant support to external service providers is a necessary part of that process. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Working4U maintains a set of performance indicators for all funded projects that are reported to the Council and COSLA (Improvement Service). The statistics will reflect changing funding levels. Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1417: The equality impact assessment provides an overview of the differing negative impacts of either fully removing or reducing funding. Impacts on people who are members of more than one disadvantaged group are likely to be multiplied. Groups most likely to be most negatively affected are women, children and younger adults, and disabled people, LGBT people, single people. These impact crosscuts with health and social and economic impacts. Any other reductions in advice capacity across West Dunbartonshire, and reductions in capacity over time will magnify negative impacts. Page 345
Page 280
Assessment No 1408 Owner mlynn2 Resource Regeneration, Environment and Growth Service Budget SD and P FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer Resources Members Michelle Lynn Assets Manager (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title RES 04: Review of Office Accommodation The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy This proposal has reviewed office accommodation across 3 locations, Aurora House Carleith Primary School Campus, and Clydebank Library. Aurora currently has 73 desks on the ground and first floor allocated to HSCP and CC&F staff. This property is leased to the Council from Clydebank Property Company. It is difficult to confirm the current workstyle allocation within this building as post COVID a number of service areas have not updated locations. Clydebank Library currently has underutilised space on the 1st floor and plans have previously been drafted for a potential relocation of CC&F staff. Carleith Primary School Campus is split into three facilities, Primary School, Early Learning Centre, and office accommodation. The office accommodation is primarily used by psychological services, early years and education management team. In the current workstyle allocation, believed to be up to date for this location, is a 15 staffing (12 flexible and 3 remote) which equates to a 6 desk allocation. It is proposed to relocate staff from Aurora to allow the site to be available for rental, thus reducing the Council’s liability for this site. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. No staff members will be displaced as a result of this proposal. Once further detailed plans and opportunities arise for additional income an Equality Impact Assessment will be produced for that purpose. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No Page 346
Page 281
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No Who will be affected by this policy? WDC staff members Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Chief Officers and Service Managers Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age N/A N/A N/A Cumulative and intersectional impacts N/A N/A N/A Disability N/A N/A N/A Social & Economic Impact N/A N/A N/A Sex N/A N/A N/A Gender Reassign N/A N/A N/A Health N/A N/A N/A Human Rights N/A N/A N/A Page 347
Page 282
Marriage & Civil Partnership N/A N/A N/A Pregnancy & Maternity N/A N/A N/A Race N/A N/A N/A Religion and Belief N/A N/A N/A Sexual Orientation N/A N/A N/A Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. Proposal does not have a negative impact with any group. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Yes, continued monitoring of staff accommodation is monitored via SAMG and service managers meetings. Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation Screening 1408 concludes that the proposal is not relevant and therefore does not require an impact assessment, as it builds on successful existing arrangements and does not introduce significant changes. Should opportunities arise for additional income an Equality Impact Assessment will be produced for that purpose. Page 348
Page 283
Assessment No 1418 Owner mlynn2 Resource Transformation Service Budget Resource FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer-Resources Members Adrian Gray - Finance Business Partner (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title RES14 Savings Option - Remove Elderly Welfare Grant Fund The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy Remove the historic £15 per resident payment made annually through the elderly grant fund to registered groups and individuals. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Officers from the Finance team within WDC & ASU Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Anyone currently receiving the payment from the Elderly Welfare Grant Fund. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? This is part of the range of savings proposals being considered to bridge the challenging financial gap the council faces over the next three years. Once approved by Council, it will be communicated to all residents. Page 349
Page 284
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age No requirement to provide this funding. The Council budget needs to have regards to Best Value Considerations on how money is spent and its impact. The policy provides £15 per annum for each resident over the specified age. This is tiny proportion of this groups yearly income. Older age groups are less likely to be in relative poverty than people under 30. Positive - the removal of the grant would remove current inequality for those under the specified age. It is acknowledged that those under the specified age may or may not be just as vulnerable at those over the specified age but are not eligible for the payment. Negative - Loss of £15 per eligible resident if the option to remove is pursued. Cumulative and intersectional impacts Disability Social & Economic Impact We need to have regards to the Fairer Scotland Duty. £15 is only a very small proportion of the annual income for those over the specified age and would have a negligible effect. Neutral. Sex Gender Reassign Health Human Rights Page 350
Page 285
Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. There is very little potential for any significant negative impact. The saving produced year on year to the Council is considerable. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Yes. Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1418: Older people are less likely to be in relative poverty than people under 30. It is noted that £15 is a very small proportion of the annual income for those over the specified age and would have a negligible effect. The removal of the grant would remove a current inequality where those under the specified age may or may not be just as vulnerable as those over that age but are not eligible for the payment. Page 351
Page 286
Assessment No 1202 Owner mlynn2 Resource Regeneration, Environment and Growth Service Budget SD and P FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer Resources Members Laurence Slavin, Chief Officer Resources (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title RES15 Review of Community Council Funding The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy Summary of Savings Proposal The Council’s general fund provides £14,000 of funding to Community Councils as a flat rate £750 administration grant plus a per capita allowance. The Council is required by statute to support community councils. In the past the Council has reduced officer support provided to them and part of the justification was the provision of the grant to pay for admin support/necessary ICT etc. If the grant is fully removed, it will increase pressure for greater officer support which is likely to cost more. Furthermore, funding for Community Councils cannot be fully removed without a special meeting of the Council to consider the matter and a two thirds majority vote. However, the grant can be reduced. There are four options to consider either fully remove or reduce funding by 25%, 50% or 75%. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Relevant Chief Officers and elected members Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Page 352
Page 287
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Community Councils Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Elected member, senior officers and the Communities team. Page 353
Page 288
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Council Equality Outcome increasing participation of younger people. Participation amongst younger age groups, 16- 34 is significantly lower than other age groups in WD. Work has been underway to find different channels of engagement with young people and organisations related to them. For example, recent conversations with young people on the Council's budget priorities. This may have a potentially negative impact on the support/ facility of Community councils to provide and encourage participation of young people in local democracy Cumulative and intersectional impacts West Dunbartonshire benefits from a wealth of community organisations delivering valuable services to support people in our most disadvantaged communities. These groups rely on the voluntary commitment of local people aiming to make a difference in their communities. Community Councils are subject to the Public Sector Equality Duty. Empowering communities and increasing local democracy is a preventative approach to increase individual and community resilience that in turn reduces the burden on public services. By supporting community organisations to expand their offer to those most in need across the authority supports the ambitions set out in the Local Outcome Improvement Plan and Strategic Plan of addressing inequalities. Many community groups Removal of the Community Council funding will possibly reduce groups or events that can be supported. This in turn will impact the individuals and communities the group supports. It will have an impact on the methods of engagement used by the Council. Other engagement opportunities are available in West Dunbartonshire which may mitigate the loss of funding. Page 354
Page 289
operate in areas suffering from multiple deprivation and represent many different equality groups. Community groups provide important benefits that include opportunities for people to meet, socialise, improve their confidence, their health and tackle social isolation. Disability Council Equality Outcome increasing participation of disabled people. Disabled people and those living in a household with a disabled person are more likely to be less able to participate fully in community life. This may have a potentially negative impact on the support that Community Councils can provide for participation of disabled people. Social & Economic Impact Ensure any reduction in Community Council funding is implemented fairly, recognising the role Community Councils play in supporting local participation, particularly in areas experiencing socio-economic disadvantage The Council currently provides £14,000 in flat-rate and per-capita grants to Community Councils. Options under consideration include reducing or fully removing this funding. Removal would increase demand for officer support, which may cost more and undermine statutory support obligations Reducing or removing funding may limit Community Councils’ ability to operate effectively, affecting their capacity to represent local communities. This could reduce community participation, especially in areas with fewer resources. Sex Gender Reassign Health Ensure any reduction in funding does not undermine Community Councils’ ability to support local wellbeing activities, Community Councils use their grant to cover essential admin, communication and engagement costs, enabling them to Reduced funding may weaken Community Councils’ ability to support community connection and Page 355
Page 290
community cohesion, or signposting that contributes to positive health outcomes. organise local initiatives, meetings and community-led activity. Loss or reduction of funding may limit their ability to support community networks, which play a role in mental wellbeing and social connection. local wellbeing activity, which could increase isolation and negatively affect mental and social health— especially in areas with fewer alternative support networks. Human Rights Ensure any reduction in Community Council funding does not restrict residents’ ability to participate in local democratic processes, safeguarding their rights to involvement, representation and accessible decision-making. Community Councils form part of the statutory framework that enables residents to participate in local democratic processes. The Council is legally required to support them, and any change to funding must still allow these democratic structures to function. Funding removal requires a formal Council decision and vote, demonstrating the protected status of these participatory bodies Reduced funding could limit Community Councils’ ability to meet, communicate, and represent residents, weakening access to information and participation in public life, key Human Rights considerations. Communities with fewer resources may experience a greater reduction in their ability to engage in local decision-making. However, if Community Councils retain basic operational capacity, Human Rights impacts may be minimal. Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Council Equality Outcome on increasing participation of BME groups. BME groups are more likely to have barriers to participate fully in community life. This may have a potentially negative impact on the support that Community Page 356
Page 291
Councils can provide for participation of BME groups. Other avenues for participation do exist for example through West Dunbartonshire Equality Forum. Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The Council needs to have an overall balanced budget. The Council will continue to support groups that are impacted by the removal of this funding. The Council provides a range of engagement, participation and networking opportunities that groups can take part in including the West Dunbartonshire Equality Forum. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1202: Some potential negative in terms of impacts participation and voice for more deprived communities and certain equality groups, younger people, disabled people, BME groups by removing a funding resource. This could be mitigated by other support mechanisms. The Council will still be able to sign post groups to other potential sources of funding for example information via WDCVS. Other networking and opportunities will continue to exist for example West Dunbartonshire Equality forum, and evident such as Job Fairs and the recent anti-poverty event which engaged a range of groups. The Council will continue to have a focus on engaging with underrepresented groups including younger people and people from BME groups in line with our Equality Outcomes. Page 357
Page 292
Assessment No 1396 Owner amenon Resource Transformation Service Budget Resource FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Arun Menon Business Support Manager Members Arun Menon, Business Support Manager Ryan Chalmers, Section Head – Revenues and Benefits (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title 2627 RES18 National Fraud Initiative Single Person Discount Review The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy This proposal is a spend-to-save initiative to fund an additional Grade 3 post (£26k including on-costs) within the Council Tax Team. The role will provide the capacity needed to complete the National Fraud Initiative (NFI) review of Single Person Discounts (SPD). The SPD gives a 25% council tax reduction to people living alone or with adults who are disregarded. The NFI identifies potential incorrect claims by matching SPD records against the electoral register and other datasets to highlight undeclared adults living at a property. Each identified case must be investigated using internal systems to confirm whether discrepancies can be explained (e.g., outdated electoral register entries or historical bank accounts). If no valid reason is found, the taxpayer will be contacted and the SPD will be removed from the appropriate date. Revised bills will be issued, and standard recovery procedures will apply if payments are not made. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Business Support Management Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No Page 358
Page 293
SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Council Tax payers currently receiving a Single Person Discount (SPD) - WDC residents may be affected if the National Fraud Initiative review identifies mismatches suggesting an additional adult lives in the property. Some may have their SPD removed following investigation. Residents contacted for clarification - Individuals flagged by the NFI will be asked to confirm their household circumstances, which may require them to provide information and could cause concern or additional administrative burden. The Council Tax Team - Staff will have increased investigative and customer- contact responsibilities, which is why additional resource is needed. The Council (financially) - Accurate SPD reviews help ensure council tax revenue is correct, reducing fraud/error and supporting wider council services. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Chief Officer Resources and Revenues and Benefits Team Management. Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Younger working-age adults (especially 25– 44) are more likely to be in employment and have traceable earnings. Older people (65+) are less likely to be in employment and more likely to receive Scottish Household Survey – employment rates highest in 25–49 age group; high CTR take-up among pensioners. More effective recovery from working-age debtors who can afford to pay. Low/No negative impact on older people as they are unlikely to be Page 359
Page 294
Single Person Discount or Council Tax Reduction. subject to earnings arrestment. Cumulative and intersectional impacts We need to consider cross cutting impacts. Need to ensure clear communications. Workloads of the Council's W4U team and local Citizens Advice or other advice agencies may increase. Potential increased workloads for some Council workers and other agencies. Implementation does provide an opportunity to offer benefit checks and support. Disability Council services and communications need to be accessible to disabled people Disabled people have a range of communications needs which may cross cut with others. The Council will follow its communicating Effectively Guidance. Although Deaf people would not see themselves as disabled they are protected by the provisions of the Equality Act in terms of accessible including information in BSL if needed. Potential minor negative if letters are not fully understood. However Council communications standards will be followed to ensure appropriate communication formats. Social & Economic Impact Ensure the SPD review is carried out fairly, with due regard to socio-economic disadvantage, and that communication and support processes minimise any disproportionate impact on low-income households NFI data-matching identifies possible incorrect SPD claims using sources such as the electoral register. Flagged cases require investigation, and where no valid explanation is found, the SPD is removed and revised bills issued. This affects SPD recipients, residents contacted for clarification, and the Council Tax team managing increased investigative workload Some residents may face financial strain or stress if their SPD is removed, particularly low-income single-adult households. Those contacted for verification may experience inconvenience or worry. The Council Tax team will face increased workload. However, accurate SPD Page 360
Page 295
reviews support fairness, reduce fraud/error, and protect council revenues for essential services. Sex Gender Reassign Health Human Rights Article 8 of the ECHR, (Private life etc.) is relevant here. Cross cuts with GDPR considerations. Process need to be in place to ensure that data is securely transferred, that it is accurate and determinations are fair and overseen by people. A data protection impact assessment has been carried out. The results were satisfactory. The Councils approach will follow relevant guidance to ensure fairness and Data Protection. Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Minority ethnic households may face language or digital barriers when responding to change in household correspondence. West Dunbartonshire has small but growing BME population (approx. 4%); English as additional language in some households. Potential minor negative if letters are not fully understood, but translation and interpreter services are available. Overall impact low. Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. Page 361
Page 296
The proposed review is both proportionate and aligned to statutory duties, ensuring the Council maintains an accurate and sustainable tax base. The Council will follow its Communicating Effectively Guidance. Providing Accessible Services training is available to all services and staff. The policy will enhance fairness, accuracy and financial resilience across the system, with no discriminatory effects identified. For these reasons, the recommendation is to proceed with implementation, supported by appropriate mitigation measures and ongoing monitoring to ensure equity across all groups. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Uptake of SPD via this review will be monitored Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1396: The equality impact assessment has identified no significant negative impact on any protected characteristic or socio-economically disadvantaged group. Where risks exist for example potential distress from letters notifying of their SPD being removed, these will be handled in a sensitive and practical manner by Council Tax and Corporate Debt Team staff and can be fully mitigated by existing statutory protections, vulnerability procedures, debt-advice signposting, and translation and support services. Page 362
Page 297
Assessment No 1409 Owner mlynn2 Resource Regeneration, Environment and Growth Service Budget SD and P FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer Resources Members Michelle Lynn Asset Manager (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title RES 19 : Close Municipal Buildings The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy It is proposed to undertake a comprehensive review of the current and future use of the Municipal Buildings as part of the wider office accommodation and asset rationalisation programme. This review will assess occupancy levels, service delivery requirements, and operational costs, and identify the most efficient and sustainable way to utilise or release the property. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Should opportunities arise for additional income a further EIA will be produced for that purpose. Page 363
Page 298
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No Who will be affected by this policy? WDC staff members, service users who visit registration services. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Chief Officers and Service Managers Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age N/A N/A N/A Cumulative and intersectional impacts N/A N/A N/A Disability N/A N/A N/A Social & Economic Impact N/A N/A N/A Sex N/A N/A N/A Gender Reassign N/A N/A N/A Health N/A N/A N/A Human Rights N/A N/A N/A Page 364
Page 299
Marriage & Civil Partnership N/A N/A N/A Pregnancy & Maternity N/A N/A N/A Race N/A N/A N/A Religion and Belief N/A N/A N/A Sexual Orientation N/A N/A N/A Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. Proposal does not have a negative impact with any group. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Yes continued monitoring of staff accommodation is monitored via SAMG and service managers meetings. Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation Screening 1409: Concludes that the proposal is not relevant and therefore does not require an impact assessment, as it builds on successful existing arrangements and does not introduce significant changes. Service users who visit registration services at the Municipal builds will instead be able to use the relocated service nearby at Church Street. Page 365
Page 300
Assessment No 1410 Owner mlynn2 Resource Transformation Service Budget Resource FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer Resources Members Michelle Lynn Asset Manager Laurence Slavin, Chief Officer (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title RES 20: Review of depot rental charges The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy A detailed review has been undertaken of internal property recharges and rental arrangements for depot sites and strategic operational locations across the Council’s asset portfolio. This work forms part of the wider programme to ensure that all rentals being charged accurately reflect current market values, usage patterns, and operational cost recovery principles. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. No staff members will be displaced as a result of this proposal. Should opportunities arise for additional income an EIA will be produced for those proposals. Assets team. Page 366
Page 301
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Tenants of commercial properties Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Assets Team. Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Cumulative and intersectional impacts We need to take into account any equality and other linked implications of proposals. We evaluate impacts based on evidence an take account of how factors interact. We will examine potential impacts of any proposed changes to ensure consideration on potential impacts and how these interact. Disability Social & Economic Impact We need to take into account the Fairer Scotland Duty when considering Strategic We evaluate impacts based on evidence. We will examine potential impacts of any proposed changes to ensure Page 367
Page 302
financial decisions and follow the statutory guidance relating to this. consideration on potential impacts. Sex Gender Reassign Health Human Rights Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The Council requires to deliver a balanced budget. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1410: Increasing charges may have equality and socio-economic impacts. We are therefore committed to impact assessing any and all future proposals that would increase these. Page 368
Page 303
Assessment No 1426 Owner rchalmers Resource Regeneration, Environment and Growth Service Budget R and R FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Ryan Chalmers Section Head Members Laurence Slavin, Chief Officer Resources Arun Menon, Business Support Manager (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title 2627 RES21: Council Tax on Long Term Empty and Second Home Properties The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy The savings option proposes increasing Council Tax charges on long term empty and second homes, now that the previous 200% cap has been removed. By raising the premium above 200%, the Council can generate additional income while continuing to incentivise owners to bring unused properties back into occupation Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Revenues and Benefits Page 369
Page 304
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Any owner of a property which is classed as a second home for council tax purposes or an owner of a long term empty property. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Institute of Revenues, Ratings and Valuation. Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Cumulative and intersectional impacts Disability Social & Economic Impact The Council needs to have due regard to the Fairer Scotland Duty when making strategic decisions. The increased levy will have a financial impact affected rate payers. Financial impact on those rate payers impacted. Potential benefit to local housing market economy. Sex Page 370
Page 305
Gender Reassign Health Human Rights Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. Council is required to deliver a balanced budget. Increased costs to second home or long term empty property owners however aim is to have those properties become someone's sole and/or main residence or bring long term empty properties back into use. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Yes Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1426: By raising the premium above 200%, the Council can generate additional income while continuing to incentivise owners to bring unused properties back into occupation. There will be an increased financial burden on some owners. Page 371
Page 306
Assessment No 1398 Owner GMacfarlane2 Resource Regeneration, Environment and Growth Service Budget R and N FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer - Roads & Neighbourhood Members Ian Bain, Waste & Grounds Manager Michelle Lynn, Assets Manager Ricardo Rea, Performance and Strategy Team (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title RN01 March 2026: Savings Options Bowling Clubs The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy This option proposes to retain Whitecrook and merge the veteran bowling clubs to Christie Park. The Council has a dedicated resource to support the merger, and will continue to maintain the greens, building and associated amenities at the two retained clubs. Maintenance of the other sites would cease, and these would be considered for disposal. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Page 372
Page 307
Grounds Services West Dunbartonshire Leisure Trust Assets Team Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Playing and non playing members (social members) of Bowling clubs. Seasonal operatives. The membership of the bowling clubs may be affected by the proposed option being implemented should the location of the 2 retained sites not be accessible or utilised by the users of the sites no longer being managed. Should the bowling clubs be marketed for sale/lease this will reduce social and leisure opportunities for members. The Communities Team will be able to support members through the merger process. There are circa 30 members at Whitecrook, membership at the veteran clubs is circa 30 people. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Discussions at Budget consultation. It was noted that there were mainly social members of the Balloch & District Veterans Bowling Club. Noted that members felt that the club helped combat social isolation. A more general comment made by other community groups was that training and better support on assets transfers from the Council would be a plus Budget Survey consultation Respondents to the 25/26 budget conversation survey rated Bowling greens and Page 373
Page 308
golf course as 5th of the 5 priorities under 'environment'. A member of one club attended face to face discussion on budget priorities and noted that the clubs benefited members who are generally older and some of whom are disabled. They noted that significant numbers were 'social' rather than playing members. They did not feel that combining clubs was practical because of for instance transportation. Information and discussions would suggest that clubs are heavily used by members but are not visited/used by other members of the community often. WDLT, Greenspace, Club members. Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Older members of the community are members of the clubs. The current membership are in majority older residents and attendance at the clubs provide social and health benefits. Negative in terms of local access Bowling clubs would still be available, but some would have to travel further. Cumulative and intersectional impacts Important to look at interactions. Older age, disability and sex with more direct impact on males are cross cutting factors. Bowling clubs would still be available, but some would have to travel further. More negative in combination for the groups noted. Bowling clubs would still be available, but some would have to travel further, however there would still be provision in the Clydebank area and provision on the Dumbarton/Vale area. Page 374
Page 309
Disability We have an anticipatory duty in terms of accessibility for disabled people for such services as we provide. Older people are more likely to have some form of impairment. Negative in terms of local access Bowling clubs would still be available, but some would have to travel further. Social & Economic Impact Need to consider social and economic impacts. We should also consider the Scottish Consumer Duty. Bowling clubs would meet the definition of a not for profit enterprise (within the meaning of section 252(1F) of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997) or a small business. The club provides opportunity for social engagement for members. Social interaction is a benefit to members. Seasonal operatives may be local residents and reduces employment opportunities. Negative for members in terms of accessing social interaction at a very local level in terms of choice. Any Consumer Duty considerations would in this case overlap with the areas covered in this assessment. Sex Need to assess any differential impact. The majority of current members are male. Majority of seasonal operative are male. Likely negative impact will affect more men than women in terms of services users. Reduction in FTE would affect men. Gender Reassign Health Desirability of reducing loneliness and isolation is noted in the Councils 22-27 Strategic Plan. The members benefit from physical and mental health benefits attending the club. Bowling provides health benefits. Negative. Human Rights Marriage & Civil Partnership Page 375
Page 310
Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The Council is required to reach a balanced budget. The Service will work with members to direct them to alternative activities for health and social benefits. Some members are 'social' rather than playing members, mitigation should take this into account. Mitigation would also be informed by discussion with those affected. Bowling clubs would still be available, but some would have to travel further, however there would still be provision in the Clydebank area and provision on the Dumbarton/Vale area. Membership numbers are small and either mergers or neighbouring bowling clubs would be able to accommodate the number of current members. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing bases? No Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1398: The members of the bowling clubs would be affected by the proposed option being implemented. Therefore, there are some potential negative impacts especially for older people and men who are more likely to use these facilities, in terms of health and social interaction. Bowling clubs would still be available, but some would have to travel further, however there would still be provision in the Clydebank area and provision on the Dumbarton/Vale area. The current number of members at affected clubs could be accommodated at alternative bowling facilities. Seasonal operatives are likely to be male and may be local rresidents,and this reduces employment opportunities. Page 376
Page 311
Assessment No 1380 Owner GMacfarlane2 Resource Regeneration, Environment and Growth Service Budget R and N FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer - Roads & Neighbourhood Members Roads Manager (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title RN04 Saving Option Street Lighting The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy The proposal is to turn off street lighting for a period of time potentially between either 2.30-4.30 or 2.30-5.30. These are times with reduced activity in the community. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Roads Service Page 377
Page 312
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Residents, businesses and visitors. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Roads Manager, Police Scotland, communities. Background information and evidence A number of cities in Europe already either fully or partially switch off street lighting at night including a number of towns in France. There are also full or partial switch offs in council areas such as Surrey, West Sussex and Southampton, Essex County Council. Somerset reduced lighting 2011. Streetlighting Hours have been reduced –in Comhairle nan Eilean Siar (cne- siar.gov.uk), Western Isles Evidence from studies by UCL and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, assessing data from 62 local authorities, suggests that removing or reducing residential street lights at night, saves energy costs and reduces carbon emissions. It also found that there was no resultant increase in car collisions or crime. Further, a study by the universities of York and Newcastle showed that it also has benefits for nocturnal wildlife. This assists the Council meet its strategy priority of "Tackling the climate and ecological emergency". A College of Policing review of evidence https://www.college.police.uk/research/crime-reduction-toolkit/street-lighting Suggested that improving lighting during the day may reduce time and ASB, but doing so at might does not do so; there is nothing in the review that would contradict the other evidence noted here. Page 378
Page 313
We have benchmarked by looking at related EIAs and information Balancing our budget for 2025/26 - West Berkshire Council https://www.westberks.gov.uk/media/60381/Equity-Impact-Assessment-for-Budget- Proposal-2025-26-Turn-off-streetlights-in-residential-roads-between-midnight-and- 5am/pdf/4._BP_2526_Residential_Streetlighting_EqIA_v3.pdf?m=1730803371587 Essex https://www.essexhighways.org/roads-and-pavements/street-lighting/part-night- lighting evidence from Essex County Council suggests that this does not lead to an increase in crime. Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Older members of the community may feel more at risk if street lights are off. Younger people and people of working age are potentially likely to be active during these time periods as a result of returning from work or leisure activities. Older members may feel more vulnerable and feel at the risk of crime if the street lighting is off in the vicinity of their homes. A higher proportion of younger than older people work in the night time economy. Negative, in terms of perception of impact. This may negatively impact younger people or older people who partake in employment or leisure activities during these times, or who work in the night time economy. Cumulative and The perception of safety of If streets are in darkness communities may feel at risk from Potentially Negative, in terms of perception of Page 379
Page 314
intersection al impacts communities may be considered significant. It is important that the Council engage with people in West Dunbartonshi re if proposals are advanced. The Council is committed to tackling climate change including through carbon emissions reductions. crime, either within their homes or when traveling. impact However evidence strongly suggests this is likely to be neutral in terms of actual crime or ASB (https://jech.bmj.co m/ content/ 69/11/1118) Disability We need to have regard to the needs of disabled people. Members of the community that are disabled may feel more vulnerable, abled members of the community may feel more anxious if the street lights are off. Negative, in terms of perception of impact. Social & Economic Impact Perception of safety when required to commute or travel during hours when street lighting is off. There may be consideration of the night time economy and perception of safety for Those on lower incomes may be more likely to be in employment that requires a shift pattern that means they may be commuting during periods when street lighting is off. Potentially negative, in terms of perception of impact however research suggests neutral impacts in terms of crime and road safety. Page 380
Page 315
staff or customers Sex Need to take into account Women's safety and feelings of safety. Women may be more concerned about safety. At the UK level In 2022, almost 4.9 million (56%) night-time workers were male and almost 3.9 million were female (44%). In 2012, 58% of night-time workers were male and 42% female. Negative, in terms of perception of impact. Gender Reassign Health The Councils strategic Plan notes the importance of health and well being Periods when street lighting is not on may impact on mental health and may cause concern and worry. Reduced sleep disturbance when the light shines direct into windows of properties. Potentially negative, in terms of perception of impact Potentially positive in terms of less sleep disturbance. Human Rights Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race We need to consider potential impacts with regard to ethnicity In 2022, workers born outside of the UK made up 23.1% of night- time workers compared with 17.8% of daytime workers. Between 2012 and 2022, the number of night-time workers born in the UK fell from 7.4 million to 6.8 million, while the number born outside of the UK rose by 32.6%, from 1.5 million to 2 million. https://www.ons.gov.uk/businessind ustry andtrade/business/activitysizeand location/articles/thenighttimeecono myuk /2022#place-of-birth Potentially negative in terms of perception of safety Page 381
Page 316
BME people may be more concerned about safety at night Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The hours that the street lighting is proposed to be switched off are when there is a reduced movement of members of the community. This is proposed for either 2.30- 4.30 or 2.30-5.30 There will be concerns about personal safety, and this may lead to a reduction in road safety for pedestrians and other road users. In mitigation, the Communications and information around changes would be vital including appropriate dialogue with communities. A good example on web info is here https://www.essexhighways.org/roads-and- pavements/street-lighting/part-night-lighting The Council could consider measures such as extending 20mph zones in residential areas which should reduce traffic speeds. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Monitoring will be carried out through liaison with stakeholders and communities. Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1380: This saving option proposes light switch off either between 2.30-4.30 or 2.20-5.30. There may be some negative impacts in terms of perceptions of safety by some groups, namely women, older people and younger people. However, research has not found evidence of harmful effects of part-night lighting on road collisions or crime in England and Wales. The hours of switch would be monitored to minimise impact on communities. There is an environmental benefit to reduced street lighting as there will be a reduction in light pollution and carbon footprint. This would support the council’s journey to net zero, nature recovery and encourage nocturnal wildlife. Page 382
Page 317
Assessment No 1401 Owner GMacfarlane2 Resource Regeneration, Environment and Growth Service Budget R and N FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Stephen Brooks Working4U Manager Members Gail Macfarlane, Chief Officer - R&N (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title RN05 March 26 Reduce W4U workforce The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy Reduce W4U workforce based on options below: Option 1 - Reduction of 3 FTE - saving £123,000. Option 2 - Reduction of 6 FTE - saving £245,000. Option 3 - Reduction of 9 FTE - saving £368,000. Option 4 - Reduction of 12 FTE - saving£490,000. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Elected Members, Senior WDC Staff, senior W4U staff Page 383
Page 318
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Staff, service users. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Consultation has been carried out in the context of the budget review. This has included consultation among Elected Members, senior Council staff and managers at Working4U. Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Child poverty is focus for the Council. Mothers younger than 25 are a focus group for reducing poverty. WDC has an aging High child poverty in WDC. 18-30 year olds are experiencing particular economic strain. Reduced service provision may result in negative impacts for children and young people and for younger parents. Page 384
Page 319
population and a lower than average healthy life expectancy lower than Scottish average therefore older residents require greater welfare support. Cumulative and intersection al impacts Working4U seeks to improve the quality of lives for people from disadvantage d backgrounds who are most likely to be affected by inequality, poverty and disadvantage which is driven by structural or institutional factors. These factors include: • Income from social security and benefits in kind, influenced by: o design and generosity of welfare benefits; o benefit sanctions and recovery of The key drivers of poverty identified in the legislation include income levels and the cost of living. Income is determined, to an extent, by levels of economic activity and employment. While there are many sources of labour market information, examples provided by NOMIS (Office for National Statistics Labour Market Profile - Nomis - Official Census and Labour Market Statistics (nomisweb.co.uk)) will illustrate West Dunbartonshire’s comparative labour market profile to suggest the need for targeted employability support. Employment and Economic Activity: West Dunbartonshire has a comparatively higher rate of economic inactivity with 26.2% of the 16-64 years age group in employment. The comparative figure for Scotland is 23.8% and Great Britain’s figure is 21.6%. At 19%, West Dunbartonshire has a higher proportion of workless households than both Scotland (18.1%) and Great Britain (13.6%). Of those in employment, there is a higher proportion in West Dunbartonshire reliant on part-time work (35.5%). This is higher than the figure for Scotland (33.2%) and Great Britain (32.1%). Page 385
Page 320
advance payments; o hardship payments and third-party debts; o barriers to accessing financial support (including child maintenance) . • Income from employment, influenced by the availability of jobs, hours and the level of earnings, and barriers to taking up that work, such as childcare responsibilitie s; plus qualifications and skills, which can influence both contemporary and future child poverty. • Costs of living, including housing, food and fuel costs, the poverty premium, the costs of the school day, and the extra, unavoidable costs of disability or living in a A review of the NOMIS statistics reveals that the job density in West Dunbartonshire is estimated at 0.61; this is much lower than the figure for Glasgow (1.04); Scotland (0.80) and Great Britain (0.84). In effect, although there are comparatively higher numbers of people out of work, there are also comparatively fewer opportunities available in West Dunbartonshire. Addressing unemployment and underemployment is consistent with addressing the income drivers of poverty and will therefore feature extensively in our approach to addressing child poverty. Benefits The number of people in receipt of out of work benefits is a contributory factor to the level of child poverty. In West Dunbartonshire 4.5% of the population in the 16-64 years group is in receipt of out of work benefits. This is higher than the average in Scotland (3.2%) and Great Britain (3.8%) and represents 2,525 people. 18.4% of households in West Dunbartonshire are in receipt of the main benefits. This compares unfavourably with the figure for Scotland (13%) and Great Britain (11%) . In effect, comparatively more people in West Dunbartonshire rely on benefits for their income. Maximising their entitlement will feature strongly in our approach to maximising income Page 386
Page 321
rural area. We provide support because: • People don’t always claim the benefits they are entitled to; • The benefits system is difficult to understand; • Navigating the process without assistance can lead to errors; • Appeals without help can lead to wrong decisions; • Understandin g welfare reform is difficult. • People face physical and psychological barriers to employment and learning opportunities because of personal circumstance s and professional support will help people to overcome these barriers. • Its difficult to maintain jobsearch momentum Page 387
Page 322
and participating in learning without professional, expert support. Disability Our child poverty report notes disabled people as priority group. 33.4% of WDC residents live with a long term health condition Health loss is 15% higher in WDC than Scottish rate Six family types are most likely to be affected by disadvantage and child poverty. This included families where members are affected by equalities issues and considered to have protected characteristics. Disabled people and those living in a household with a disabled person are more likely to be income deprived. Economic Inactive: Long-term Sick/Disabled Rate (%) 2023 WD- 33.4 Glasgow City Region - 31.3 Scotland -31.6 UK -27.5. Source - NOMIS - Annual Population Survey Reduced provision may affect efforts to reduce poverty for this group. Social & Economic Impact Reducing child poverty is a focus for the council. All multi member wards have areas oh 30% of residents have experience of multiple deprivation, higher unemploymen t, lower education attainment and limited opportunity compared to Groups noted above may be especially vulnerable, as well as other with low incomes. social economic source - NOMIS Reduced provision may result in reduced ability to tackle economic and financial inequality. Page 388
Page 323
more affluent areas Sex Our child poverty report notes women as priority group. Six family types are most likely to be affected by disadvantage and child poverty. This included families where members are affected by equalities issues and considered to have protected characteristics. This goup includes single person households. Women comprise 90% of single parents who are more likely to be income deprived. Reduced provision may affect women disproportionate ly compared to men. Gender Reassign Need to examine how this cross cuts with other areas. A BMJ Study published in 2023 notes Trans and non-binary adults were younger, more likely to be from Asian, black, mixed or other ethnic groups and more likely to live in more deprived parts of the country. (Demographic characteristics, long- term health conditions and healthcare experiences of 6333 trans and non-binary adults in England: nationally representative evidence from the 2021 GP Patient Survey | BMJ Open) In 2022 Scotland’s Census found that 19,970 people were trans or had a trans history. This is 0.44% of people aged 16 and over. For West Dunbartonshire the figure was 0.31% equating to 227 people. Potentially more negative on groups who are in relative poverty Health health - sna-aop-june-2022.pdf Labour Market-Number of Incapacity Based Benefits (per 1,000 16 - 64 population) Feb-24 WD 69.0 Glasgow region 57.5 Scotland 46.2 source -DWP Stat Xplore. WDC residents living with long term health conditions is 33.4% Health loss is 15% higher than Scottish rate. Reduced provision may affect those with long term health issues disproportionall y Human Rights Human Rights Act; For example The work of W4U supports elements of human rights and UNCRC rights. Reduced provision may negatively affect Page 389
Page 324
Article 8 family life. UNCRC. Article 6 development, in this case 'Provision' is relevant the fulfilment of UNCRC rights. Marriage & Civil Partnership Need to examine how this cross cuts with other areas. Single people are more likely to be in relative poverty Single parent households are more likely to be in relative poverty. 90% of single parent households are headed by women. Cross cuts with sex Pregnancy & Maternity Child poverty is focus for the Council. Pregnant mothers is a target group for support through child poverty focus. Cross cuts with sex. Six family types are most likely to be affected by disadvantage and child poverty. This included families where members are affected by equalities issues and considered to have protected characteristics. Families with young mothers, children under 1 year old are included in the focus. Cross cuts with sex Reduced provision may affect efforts to reduce poverty for this group. Cross cuts with Sex. Race Our child poverty report notes people from BME groups as a priority group. higher levels of BME population live in areas of higher deprivation and inequality has widened in last decade. Language barriers exist which reduce Six family types are most likely to be affected by disadvantage and child poverty. This included families where members are affected by equalities issues and considered to have protected characteristics People from BME groups more likely to me more income deprived. The Coalition for Racial Equality and Rights 2024 Reduced provision may affect efforts to reduce poverty for this group. Page 390
Page 325
ability to access support services. Religion and Belief Need to examine how this cross cuts with other areas Relative poverty rates higher for ethnic minorities (https://data.gov.scot/poverty/#Ethnici ty) Most BME groups are more likely to be in relative poverty and higher child poverty than White ethnic groups. Potentially more negative on groups who are in relative poverty. Sexual Orientation https://www.gov.scot/publications/sex ual-orientation-scotland-2017- summary-evidence-base Unemployment levels of LGBQ residents is 3x higher than other residents. 27% live in areas of highest deprivation compared to 19% of heterosexual adults. Reduced provision may impact this group disproportionall y Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The options have been developed as a contribution to the discussions about budget reductions within Working4U in order to assist the Council to manage its budget deficit. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Working4U has a monitoring framework for reporting output and impacts of its activities. This includes key performance indicators illustrating the statistics for the number of people supported and the outcome of that support. This will provide information that will determine how funding resources are deployed. Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation Likely negative impacts especially for women, disabled people, children and young people including UNCRC rights, people from BME groups. All the proposed options have a negative effect on our ability to address poverty and support disadvantaged individual and households to escape from poverty. The Council continues to face significant financial challenges and cannot sustain the level of service currently being offered. Page 391
Page 326
Assessment No 1399 Owner GMacfarlane2 Resource Regeneration, Environment and Growth Service Budget R and N FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Gail MacFarlane Chief Officer Members Gail Macfarlane Ricardo Rea Ian Bain (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title RN06 No longer offer Saturday cremations The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy Efficiency Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Greenspace Manager Burial Services Page 392
Page 327
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No Who will be affected by this policy? Potentially, members of the public who may require or wish a Saturday cremation and visitors wishing to view the Book of Remembrance Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Burial Service Greenspace Manager Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Cumulative and intersectional impacts Disability Social & Economic Impact Sex Gender Reassign Page 393
Page 328
Health Human Rights Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights has been engaged in relation to issues around burials and cremations. A review of relevant case law does not suggest that Article 8 would be infringed by removing Saturday cremations, and that the change is proportionate given the legitimate aims of the Council in this case Reference: 'Guide on Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life, home and correspondence' Neutral Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The Council will continue to support families of the bereaved as much as they are able to provide a suitable option. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? The cremation service is monitored and the number of funerals are reported Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1399: Removing the option of a Saturday cremation, may make it more difficult for residents and non residents to access a suitable booking as quickly as they wanted to do this in West Dunbartonshire. In mitigation, the service will continue to support users of the service to deliver acceptable solutions. Page 394
Page 329
Assessment No 1379 Owner GMacfarlane2 Resource Regeneration, Environment and Growth Service Budget R and N FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Gail MacFarlane Chief Officer - Roads & Neighbourhood Members Grounds Service (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title RN07 Savings Option Reduction in street cleaning The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy The proposal is the reduction in street sweeping and litter collection. This will reduce the street cleaning and litter collection frequencies. The resources available will target locations that have increased visitor numbers such as town centres with outlying areas and housing estates have a reduced service. The operatives also undertake response to weather conditions and filling of grit bins in the winter period, and this can impact on our ability to respond. Page 395
Page 330
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Grounds Service Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Communities, residents and businesses. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Grounds Service. Feedback from Citizen's Panel and Recycling surveys to the public in 2022 and 2023 respectively showed support for increasing the number of litter bins in public areas. Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Cumulative and intersectional impacts Cross cutting impacts should be considered Note areas in the assessment above. The areas above cross cuts in terms of appearance of the area Page 396
Page 331
Disability It is important that routes are accessible. Officer assessment that accessibility will be maintained. Neutral. Social & Economic Impact The cleanliness and maintenance of both urban and rural areas adversely impacts the perception of an area. Areas with a lower level of maintenance and street cleanliness align with areas of higher deprivation and can impact on investment opportunities and local pride. There may be a potential negative impact on the physical appearance of the area. Sex Employees affected are predominately male. It is important that routes are accessible for those using prams. This will have an increased impact on men and their employment opportunities. Officer assessment that accessibility will be maintained. There may be a potential negative impact on male employees. Neutral in terms of accessibility. Gender Reassign Health Health and Wellbeing is a priority in the WDC 2022-27 Strategic Plan. Physical environment can influence physical and mental health. If there is an increase in litter and general untidiness this can impact on mental health. There may be a potential minimal negative impact on the health of our residents based on the physical appearance of the area.. Human Rights Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. Page 397
Page 332
The council has a requirement to reach a balanced budget. The provision fulfils the council's statutory obligations in relation to street cleaning and additional bins will be installed at key locations. Following a successful pilot of larger bins these may be provided at appropriate locations, this is an idea supported by surveys of the public in West Dunbartonshire. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Yes, through performance indicators Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1379: The proposals considered are of activities that are delivered in excess of the statutory level. Areas not maintained or a lower level of street cleanliness align with areas of higher deprivation and can impact on investment opportunities. Accessibility of public areas will be maintained. Following a successful pilot of larger bins these may be provided at appropriate locations, this is an idea supported by surveys of the public in West Dunbartonshire. If grounds and/or seasonal operatives are reduced this adversely affects employment opportunities, and male workers because of gender balance of our workforce. Assessment No 1397 Owner GMacfarlane2 Resource Regeneration, Environment and Growth Service Budget R and N FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Gail Macfarlane chief Officer - Roads & Neighbourhood Members Roads Manager Asset Manager Economic Development Manager (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title RN08 Introduction of Parking Charging (March option) The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy To introduce the implementation of parking charging to improve access to town centre facilities by encouraging turnover and improving parking management. Page 398
Page 333
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Roads Manager Asset Manager Regeneration Team Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. Yes SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? residents, visitors, business owners, those working and living within the town centre Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? The council would be required to promote traffic regulation orders to implement charging scheme. There is a statutory consultation period required, and statutory consultees such as Police Scotland and other stakeholders will have opportunity to respond. Wider consultation is also undertaken with residents able to raise objections, concerns, queries. Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age The Council has focus on reducing child poverty Older people are more likely to have ambulatory impairments Cross cuts with considerations under UNCRC and health Positive for both older people and children especially younger children in terms of accessibility Page 399
Page 334
Younger adults are more likely to be in relative poverty than older people Younger families if they have no alternative than using High Street parking may be more negatively affected Cumulative and intersectio nal impacts Cross cuts with parking enforcement measures, which have recently come into place The range of negative and positive impacts noted may combine for different groups e.g. those more likely to be income deprived if they have no alternative but to park in the charged zone. Similarly benefits may multiple for some e.g. Positive in terms of encouraging active travel Positive in terms of reducing noise and air pollution Disability The Council has an anticipatory duty in terms of disability access Council has a commitment to keeping pavements clear blue badge holders do not need to pay to park if displaying their badge. There will also be enforcement undertaken in car parks so that will reduce misuse of disabled spaces. Positive in terms of less misuse of disabled spaces. Blue Badge holder who display do not need to pay. Social & Economic Impact Fairer Scotland Duty Consumer Scotland Duty; The assessment covers the need to have due regard to the Duty Parking cars in some areas will now attract a charge Evidence on the impact of parking on high streets is mixed with both positive noted, such as earlier parking allow people to access businesses, and negative impact such as reduced footfall and is influence by a variety of factors. It is also note that High Street usage and economy across the UK has been in decline for a number of other reasons. https://www.britishparking.co.uk/ write/Documents/Re- thinking_Car_Parking.pdf Impact may be more negative in terms of expenditure for people with less disposable income if they have no alternative but to use a car. There may be some negative and positive impacts on local businesses, evidence being mixed. Page 400
Page 335
Sex Economic circumstanc es need to be considered, as due gender roles that affect how people move about Single adult households are more likely to be in relative poverty. 90% of single parent households are headed by women. Women are more likely to have caring roles. this may mean using push chairs or wheelchairs. Women because of caring roles may need to make more multi stop journeys than men. Women are more heavily reliant on the public sector May be negative in terms of expenditure for women May be positive in terms of getting about as part of caring role, e.g. push chair/wheelchair users Gender Reassign Economic circumstanc es need to be considered A BMJ Study published in 2023 notes Trans and non-binary adults were younger, more likely to be from Asian, black, mixed or other ethnic groups and more likely to live in more deprived parts of the country. (Demographic characteristics, long-term health conditions and healthcare experiences of 6333 trans and non-binary adults in England: nationally representative evidence from the 2021 GP Patient Survey | BMJ Open) In 2022 Scotland’s Census found that 19,970 people were trans or had a trans history. This is 0.44% of people aged 16 and over. For West Dunbartonshire the figure was 0.31% equating to 227 people. Maybe more negative from an affordability point of view Health A West Dunbartonsh ire Local Transport Plan objective is to facilitate Reduced car use for example for short journeys encourages active travel and reduces air and noise pollution Positive Page 401
Page 336
access to services and opportunities , promote physical and mental well- being, prevent ill health and reduce inequality Human Rights UNCRC in terms of 'protection' In concert with parking enforcement charging may benefit children especially younger children, making walking safer and easier Positive Marriage & Civil Partnership Economic circumstanc es need to be considered Single adult households are more likely to be in relative poverty. Possibly more negative for single people Pregnancy & Maternity Cross cuts with sex Cross cuts with sex Cross cuts with sex Race Economic circumstanc es need to be considered Most BME groups more likely to be in relative poverty than most white ethnic groups Most BME groups have larger family sizes than most White ethnic groups Impact may be more negative in terms of expenditure for people from BME groups especially Religion and Belief There can be cross cutting consideratio ns between religion and belief and Race Relative poverty rates higher for Muslims (https://data.gov.scot/poverty /#Religion) For example from Census data 90% of those who say they are Pakistani or Bangladeshi also say they are Muslim and these two ethnic groups are more likely to be income deprived Most White ethnic groups Potentially more negative on groups who are in relative poverty Sexual Orientation Important to examine evidence on factors such as economic position Relative poverty rates higher for LGB+ adults (https://data.gov.scot/poverty/#S exual_orientation) Potentially more negative on groups who are in relative poverty Page 402
Page 337
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Regular monitoring will be undertaken and reported to Committee. This will include usage of car parks. Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1397: The introduction of car parking charges can support the management of available car parking spaces to encourage turnover and support access to town centre amenities. In concert with parking enforcement more active travel could be made. Those with lower disposable incomes, noted in the assessment may be less able to pay the charges. Blue badge holders do not need to pay to park if displaying their badge. There will also be enforcement undertaken in car parks so that will reduce misuse of disabled spaces. Assessment No 1377 Owner GMacfarlane2 Resource Regeneration, Environment and Growth Service Budget R and N FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer Members Ian Bain Liam Greene (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title RN09 Saving Option Reduce Number of Apprentices The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy The proposal is to reduce the number of apprentice positions by 5 in the current structure by 5, 4 in Grounds and 1 in Roads. Current apprentices will continue to be supported throughout the remaining phases of their apprenticeship. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Page 403
Page 338
Neighbourhood services Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? There will no impact to current employees but will reduce opportunity for future apprentice applications Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Gail Macfarlane - Chief Officer Ian Bain - Greenspace and Waste Manager Jenna McCrum - Waste Strategy Project Lead Michelle McKenzie - Procurement Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Apprentices tend to be younger members of the community Roles have been unfilled Negative as the number of available roles will be reduced however these roles have been advertised previously and remain unfilled Page 404
Page 339
Cumulative and intersectional impacts Disability Social & Economic Impact Need to have due regard to the Fairer Scotland Duty Possibilities for community benefits are examined during procurement processes, these will be required of the successful contractor based on the value of the contract works but are determined later in the process based on the capabilities of the individual contractor. Likely to be neutral in terms of significant impacts. Sex The workforce are predominately male This will have an increased impact on men and their employment opportunities as these roles tend to be applied for more by men There may be a potential negative impact on male employees Reduction would also affect any women wanting to apply. Gender Reassign Health Human Rights Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Page 405
Page 340
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? No Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1377; The posts are vacant and although the service undertook recruitment, we were unable to fill the posts. This will have an increased impact on men and their employment opportunities as these roles tend to be applied for more by men. Reduction would also affect any women wanting to apply. Assessment No 1378 Owner GMacfarlane2 Resource Regeneration, Environment and Growth Service Budget R and N FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer Members Ian Bain Liam Greene (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title RN10 Saving Option Cease Supply and Installation of Christmas Trees The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy The proposal is to cease supplying and installing Christmas trees in 3 town centre locations Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Neighbourhood services Page 406
Page 341
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Residents, businesses, visitors Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Gail Macfarlane - Chief Officer Ian Bain - Greenspace and Waste Manager Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Cumulative and intersectional impacts Disability Social & Economic Impact May impact on town centre activity during the festive period Footfall is expected to rise during the festive period; it is unlikely town centre visitors will not visit due to absence of a tree Likely to be neutral in terms of significant impacts. Page 407
Page 342
Sex Gender Reassign Health Human Rights Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. N/A Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? No, but footfall is monitored in town Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1378; The removal of Christmas trees may slightly affect footfall though not significantly during the festive period. Should any business or community wish to install a tree the Service will provide guidance and advice on requirements. Page 408
Page 343
Assessment No 1400 Owner GMacfarlane2 Resource Regeneration, Environment and Growth Service Budget R and N FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Gail MacFarlane Chief Officer - Roads & Neighbourhood Members Grounds Service (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title R&N11 Savings Option Reduction in street cleaning and litter collection on A82 The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy The proposal is the reduction in street sweeping and litter collection on the A82. This will reduce the street cleaning and litter collection frequencies. The saving will be delivered through reduction in overtime and reduced external cost of street sweeper Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Grounds Service Page 409
Page 344
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Communities, residents and businesses. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Grounds Service. Transport Scotland Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Cumulative and intersectional impacts Disability Social & Economic Impact The cleanliness and maintenance of both urban and rural areas adversely impacts the perception of an area. Areas with a lower level of maintenance and street cleanliness align with areas of higher deprivation and can impact on investment There may be a potential negative impact on the physical appearance of the area. Page 410
Page 345
opportunities and local pride. Sex Gender Reassign Health Health and Wellbeing is a priority in the WDC 2022-27 Strategic Plan. Physical environment can influence physical and mental health. If there is an increase in litter and general untidiness this can impact on mental health. There may be a potential minimal negative impact on the health of our residents based on the physical appearance of the area. Human Rights Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The council has a requirement to reach a balanced budget. The provision fulfils the council's statutory obligations in relation to street cleaning and litter collection. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Yes through performance indicators Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1400: The proposals considered are of activities that do not have a set level and frequency of cleaning. The proposal is a reduction from 6 times a year to 4 Page 411
Page 346
times a year frequency of litter collection and sweeping. Areas not maintained or a lower level of street cleanliness align with areas of higher deprivation and can impact on investment opportunities. Assessment No 1381 Owner GMacfarlane2 Resource Regeneration, Environment and Growth Service Budget R and N FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer - Roads & Neighbourhood Members Working4You and Fleet Manager, Fleet Coordinator (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title R&N14 Saving Option Reduction in Hire Cars The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy The purpose of the saving option is to reduce the reliance on the use of hire cars by the council and to prioritise the procurement of fleet vehicles where vehicles are required. 10 vehicles will be purchased. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Fleet Service, procurement, service users Page 412
Page 347
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. Yes SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No Who will be affected by this policy? Service users within the council Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Fleet Service, procurement team, service users Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Cumulative and intersectional impacts Disability Social & Economic Impact Screened for relevance Spend of this nature and scale is unlikely to impact inequalities. Standard procurement approach will be in place in terms of any potential community benefits No impact in terms of reducing socio- economic inequality Sex Page 413
Page 348
Gender Reassign Health Human Rights Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Fleet use will be monitored to maximise use of vehicles Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation Screening 1381: The proposal has been screened and is not relevant to any of the impact areas, therefore no impact assessment is required. Spend of this nature and scale is unlikely to impact socio-economic inequalities. Page 414
Page 349
Assessment No 1460 Strategic Team RN Budget Lead Officer Gail Macfarlane Who else has been involved in developing this EIA Ian Bain Title RN15 Saving Option Cease Supply of Dog Waste Bags Description: (Provide a brief overview of the aims and objectives of this policy) The proposal is to cease supplying dog waste bags to residents. Who have you engaged and consulted with as part of your Neighbourhood services Who will be affected by this proposal? Residents Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No Page 415
Page 350
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements and viewed the guidance No Relevance screening: If the proposal/policy is relevant to any of the six areas then an Equality Impact Assessment must be carried out. You must indicate if there is any relevance to the six areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Human Rights Act/European Convention on Human Rights No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) or Fairer Scotland Duty (FSD) No Relevance to Scottish Consumer Duty (SCD) No Page 416
Page 351
Consider any needs and policy drivers e.g. Council or national strategies and plans /and any barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy. List evidence you are using to support this assessment. Consider the impact of your policy on people and how they will be able to access goods, services and information with no barriers and state the potential impact. Specific group to consider What Key Drivers and Evidence has been used to inform this assessment. (i.e. national statistics - Scot Govt; or local statistics - workforce data, Citizens Panel) For each group, state the potential Impact – Positive/Negative/Neutral Age Disability Gender Reassign Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sex Sexual Orientation This section must be completed if there are potential Human Rights impacts, this includes but is not limited to Human Rights Act 1998 considerations Human Rights This section must be completed if there are potential Human Rights impacts, this includes but is not limited to Human Rights Act 1998 considerations Page 417
Page 352
Health This section must be completed if any there are any potential socio- economic impacts including but not limited to those covered by the Fairer Scotland Duty Social & Economic Impact . This section must be completed if any potential impact on children and young people up to the age of 18 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child This section must be completed in reference to the Scottish Consumer Duty Scottish Consumer Duty Consider cumulative impact of the proposal Cumulative and intersectional impacts Page 418
Page 353
State how the impact of the proposal/policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis including how actions will be delivered to mitigate any negative impacts or secure positive impacts. Summary of overall impact(s) of the proposal. EIA 1460 screening; The ceasing of the provision of dog waste bags may increase the level of dog fouling but waste bags are readily available from a number of shops at a low cost in the local area. Name of the senior manager who has approved this assessment Gail Macfarlane Page 419
Page 354
Assessment No 1454 Owner ADouglas Resource Regeneration, Environment and Growth Service Budget R and R FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Alan Douglas Chief Officer: Regulatory and Regeneration Members Alan Douglas (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title 2627 RR01 Communities Team The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy To reduce the Communities Team by 1xFTE Community Worker. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Former Manager of Economic Development. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Service users/communities that the team support. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Chief Officer Citizens, Culture and Communities, former Manager of Economic Development. Page 420
Page 355
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Council Equality Outcome on increasing participation of younger people Anecdotal backed by national studies regarding the importance of youth engagement and the isolation of older people in communities. Potentially some negative impact for some groups with a focus on older or young people. Note also work will continue with younger people through the youth learning team. Cumulative and intersectional impacts Disability Council Equality Outcome increasing participation of disabled people. Disabled people and those living in a household with a disabled person are more likely to be less able to participate fully in community life. Potentially some negative impact for some groups with a focus on disabled people Social & Economic Impact Tackling poverty especially child poverty is priority for the Council. Some groups which the Communities Team work with have a focus on reducing effects of socio- economic inequality. The reduction in resource may result in reduced ability to tackle the effects of economic and financial inequality. for some groups. Sex Gender Reassign Health Human Rights Page 421
Page 356
Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Council Equality Outcome increasing participation of BME groups. BME groups are more likely to have barriers to participate fully in community life. This proposal may have a potentially negative impact on the support that the team can provide for participation of BME groups. Other avenues for participation do exist for example through West Dunbartonshire Equality Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The requirement to make savings to sustain core Council services requires measured reductions in services across the Council. A core team will be retained and along with other savings proposals, there will be a partial focusing of services on particular areas of demand. No disproportionate impact on any protected characteristic or other monitored characteristic is anticipated for staff. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? The impact will not be formally measured however the Communities Team will continue to be involved with communities and will report back to management any concerns and impacts. Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation The requirement to make savings to sustain core Council services requires measured reductions in services across the Council. A core team will be retained and along with other savings proposals, there will be a partial focusing of services on particular areas of demand. Page 422
Page 357
Assessment No 1453 Owner ADouglas Resource Regeneration, Environment and Growth Service Budget R and R FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Alan Douglas Chief Officer: Regulatory and Regeneration Members Alan Douglas (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title 2627 RR08 Assistance to Businesses The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy To reduce the sums available for Business Development Grants by £10k (approximately 14%). Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Business Support - Economic Development Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Persons in need of finance seeking to establish or expand a small business in West Dunbartonshire. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Business Development Section and the Chief Officer: Regulatory and Regeneration have discussed the proposal. Page 423
Page 358
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Cumulative and intersectio nal impacts Disability Social & Economic Impact More socioeconomic ally deprived entrepreneurs can find it difficult to access mainstream business funding due to the increasing automation of decision making based of financial track record by lending institutions. The reduction of the availability of Local Authority Business Development grants which may be less dependent on such data could limit scope for business expansion / support. Scottish National Investment Bank: Fairer Scotland Duty assessment (https://www.gov.scot/publications/sc ottish-national-investment-bank- fairer-scotland-duty- assessment/pages/4/) Potentially lower available funds for more socioeconomic ally deprived business owners. Sex Page 424
Page 359
Gender Reassign Health Human Rights Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The relatively modest reduction still addresses the Council's requirement to make savings. While there may be a reduced ability to access this particular fund the Business Development service will continue to offer support to businesses based on clear business need and the robustness of the business case and a fund of £160k will remain available. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? No. There is no real means to actively monitor the impact. Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation The benefit to the local authority in identifying savings is considered to outweigh the disadvantages and avoid reductions in services more directly impacting the citizens of West Dunbartonshire. Page 425
Page 360
2026/27 BUDGET – MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENTS Assessment No 1374 Owner rrea Resource Transformation Service Budget CCF FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Sharon Jump Facilities Manager Members Sharon Jump – Facilities Manager Margaret Lamont – Facilities Officer Jennifer McAdam – Facilities Officer Michelle McCorrisken – Facilities Officer (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title CCF12 FM Service Operating Model The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy The FM Service Redesign will respond to evolving service needs, feedback received including as part of staff survey responses and Scottish Government policy changes. The revised model will provide additional support for frontline employees, introduce development and progression opportunities and ultimately deliver a more resilient, efficient and sustainable service. The changes deliver: • introduce first tier Cluster Manager role (Cleaning & Janitorial) provision to deliver SOM compliance and enhance frontline support and clear career progression • revised cluster model based on geographical areas across the authority • opportunity to implement new processes via technology supported via Digital Champions • opportunity to review ways of working, roles and service delivery to provide more resilient, effective and efficient service In summary, the process will incorporate: • review of current operating model and effectiveness • review of all frontline role profiles • creation of new Cluster Manager role (Cleaning & Janitorial, grade to be determined) • review of catering management (Cooks and Catering Managers) • consideration given to creating a Senior Facilities Operative roles (grade to be determined) • creation of Universal Facilities Operative role to allow for contingency across the service Page 426
Page 361
This would facilitate consistency of approach across the whole service in terms of management supports The structure will: • increase support and supervisory presence with the number of cluster managers across the service • enable team leaders to line manage cluster managers and be Standard Operating Model (SOM) compliant. • increase capacity ensuring service standards are maintained and processes followed • increase resilience and capacity to respond to the increased face to face contact time required to support employee wellbeing, mental health, and Be the Best conversations • enable the team to better work in line with the Scottish Government Fair Work framework in terms of improving engagement with employees to ensure the ‘employee voice’ is heard. • provide for better employee engagement which is linked to lower rates of turnover, improved sickness absence levels and increased morale and job satisfaction. • create a more robust team which will be able to provide cover throughout the entire FM Service Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. FM Staff, HR, TUs, Education Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No Who will be affected by this policy? Employees Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Page 427
Page 362
Staff, HR, TU Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Given the composition of the workforce, and that the role of supervisors is required to ensure the smooth running of the service we need to ensure this will continue but will be more efficient and therefore effective. The Council needs to consider requests for flexible working The workforce is predominantly female, resident in West Dunbartonshire. A significant number of the workforce are aged 50 plus Older people are more likely to have impairment than older people thus cross cuts with disability Service Users – no impact • Service provided to schools and children, particularly schools meals and cleaning will not change. Employees – potentially negative Staff may not be able or willing to change if new work pattern is required. Role specification may change to reflect current need and legislation, The structure redesign may involve work pattern/ work hours/ reduced hours or increased hours, less travel time/ reduced travel expenses. This may impact on income. It could also result in the person being worse off financially. Employees would be supported through existing policies including Switch and VS/ER Page 428
Page 363
may be an option for FM staff • Those with caring responsibilities / may not be able to move if new work pattern introduced. Positive – employees • There will be an increase in contracted hours for employees, this could benefit the workforce as they have access to more hours, than they did before this re-design. • Cross skilling and up skilling/ opportunities Less travel for some . Positive- Service Users • Service will be more resilient and effective ensuring provision is maintained Cumulative and intersectional impacts Training needs analysis has been carried out. The Council needs to consider requests for flexible working Interacting factors need to be taken into account The introduction of new cluster managers will mean a change in operational supervision Training and supervision will be required to embed this Positive; Knowledge transfer through training Service strengthened and more resilient, staff team better supported. Opportunities for progression Disability Ensure reasonable adjustments are in place for any staff who require them Older people are more likely to have impairment than older people thus cross cuts with disability No anticipated Impact Reasonable adjustments will continue to be made Page 429
Page 364
The process of restructuring itself needs to accessible and make adjustments if required There are more disabled women than men in the UK, the only exception is among children under the age of 15. (DWP data for 20-23) Households with a disabled member are more likely to be in relative poverty than those with no disabled members as required. Social & Economic Impact Sex We need to take into account differential impacts The Council needs to consider requests for flexible working Profile of workforce. More women will be affected than men. Women are more likely to be in poverty than men e.g. women make up 90% of single parents. Woman are more likely to be care givers. Women are more reliant on child care than men in terms of accessing employment. Failure to allow flexibility for someone to care for a child, or perhaps a disabled relative such as a parent, can potentially be indirect sex discrimination contrary to the Equality Act, on the basis that lack of flexibility tends to put female workers at a disadvantage as being more usually primary carers. A male worker Potentially positive as opportunities for progression. Potentially Negative; The workforce is predominantly female. There could be an impact if the worker cannot move to the new work pattern/ role/ geographical area allocated. There could be a reduced income to the household. Those with caring responsibilities/may not be able to move to the new work model. However, support through Council policies including redeployment via Switch Page 430
Page 365
who is a primary carer may now also be able to claim under s.19A (above “Same disadvantage” indirect discrimination). Gender Reassign Assess for any differential impact No evidence that proposals would have any affect this group No anticipated impact Health Employee Wellbeing is of paramount concern and WDC aim to ensure that all relevant supports are in place to help employees and managers who need support and to help them maintain good health. Staff - The commitment to supporting employees remains of paramount importance. Any employees and managers affected by the changes required will be supported through all appropriate channels Implementation of this change may be a time of anxiety for those affected e.g. change of line manager, new areas to supervise. Each individual will be supported to make the transition to the new structure as smooth and comfortable as possible. Employees will be reminded of supports available as part of the consultation process and throughout Human Rights We need to ensure that services are provided in a way that is in line with the Human Rights Act/ECHR The redesign should support staff children's rights in terms of provision. See above under disability. Positive in terms of maintaining and improving provision. Marriage & Civil Partnership Assess for any differential impact No evidence that proposals would have any affect this group No anticipated impact Pregnancy & Maternity Some staff of child- bearing age working within FM, who are likely to experience pregnancy and maternity WDC pregnancy and maternity Policy applies to all staff. No anticipated Impact. Race Assess for any differential impact No evidence that proposals would have any affect this group No anticipated impact Page 431
Page 366
Religion and Belief Working shifts could impact on attending religious services NRS analysis of population data suggests that Scotland is becoming more ethnically and religiously diverse Employees – Positive Employees can request adjustments to their work pattern if suitable to the service. Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The service is currently not able to fully deliver, and resilience is a significant concern. A new model is required to address these challenges and create a sustainable service. The proposed model also addresses the key challenges identified within the service, takes into account employee feedback and aligns with the Council’s People First strategy in terms of fair working practices, career progression and workforce planning. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Employees had the opportunity to feedback as part of the consultation process and working groups. In addition, service delivery will be monitored through delivery planning and performance monitoring. Employee surveys will be repeated in future to seek feedback once implemented. Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1374: Details some potential positive impacts service users. There are a mix of potential positive and negative impacts for staff. As the vast majority of staff are female this means that this group would be more likely affected. A significant proportion of the workforce is over fifty and this cross cuts with considerations around sex. If some workers are not able to fit with the new shift patterns they could see some financial loss. The shift patterns may however offer more flexibility for some. Page 432
Page 367
Assessment No 1375 Owner rrea Resource Transformation Service Budget CCF FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Amanda Graham Chief Officer - CCF Members Amanda Graham, Chief Officer - CCF (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title CCF 13 Vacant post deletion The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy The Facilities Management (FM) Service was restructured earlier this year creating additional support for frontline employees. There is a vacancy (G6 post) which is outwith the core management team and a number of the duties had previously been subsumed into the newly created posts. The option will see the G6 vacancy removed from the structure. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. FM employees Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No Who will be affected by this policy? Vacant post being deleted Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? FM Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Page 433
Page 368
Age Cumulative and intersectional impacts Disability Social & Economic Impact Sex Gender Reassign Health Human Rights Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation Screening 1375: The saving would be achieved via a vacancy therefore the screening has not identified an assessment as being required. Page 434
Page 369
Assessment No 1449 Owner ndocherty Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Gillian Hamilton Chief Education Officer Members Gillian Hamilton Claire Cusick (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title 2627 EDU18 Right size Free School Meal, Alternative Holiday Payments and School Clothing Grant budgets The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy At present children and young people are eligible for Free School Meals (FSM) where their household income is below a set threshold. In addition, Scottish Government provide FSM to all P1- P5 pupils. During school holidays, an alternative to the school lunch is provided in the form of payment to parents. The budget in 2025/26 is £563k and the total estimated cost is £535k, representing a £28k underspend (in 2024/25, expenditure was £568k). Similarly, dependent on circumstances, families are eligible for a school clothing grant of £120 per primary child per year and £150 per secondary child per year. Currently 3,679 families receive this grant. The budget in 2025/26 is £605k and the total estimated cost is £502k, representing a £103k underspend. Falling school rolls have had an impact on eligibility numbers for free school meals, alternative to meals holiday payments and school clothing grants. As a consequence, current projections show a favourable variance against all three of these areas and there is scope to reduce these expenditure budgets. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Education Management Team Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Page 435
Page 370
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No Who will be affected by this policy? Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA screening 1449: This option relates to right sizing of budget to match expenditure. A screen did not reveal any relevance to the areas we assess; therefore no Equality Impact Assessment is required. Page 436
Page 371
Assessment No 1382 Owner alison.bowers Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Gillian Hamilton Chief Education Officer Members Gillian Hamilton - Chief Education Officer Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer Julie McGrogan - Senior Education Officer Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer Claire Cusick - Senior Education Officer Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title Management Adjustment - EDU 24 - ELC Central Support Officer Post The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy Summary of Savings/Management Adjustment Proposal Currently within the ELC central team there are 4 Link Officers. These Link Officers provide improvement and quality support to our 29 WDC ELC settings and 12 Partner settings. 2 of these Link Officers are employed with Teacher’s terms and conditions, one of them is an Education Officer and the other is a Principal Teacher. They are both employed on a term time basis. The other 2 Link Officers are Education Support Officers and are employed under Administrative, Professional, Technical & Clerical (APT & C) terms and conditions. One of the Education Support Officers is currently employed on a temporary basis, and the other Education Support Officer has resigned from their post and left at the start of December 2025. The temporary post comprises of the 0.5fte Education Support Officer post and 0.5fte to cover for the Education Officer post as the Education Officer has a temporary flexible working arrangement of 0.6fte. They are both employed on a 52 week basis to support in the running of our ELC service out with term time. These ELC central staff have responsibility for supporting all our settings across the WDC ELC estate and have strategic lead roles for specific aspects of ELC service delivery. A previous management adjustment was taken in session 24/25 where one of the Education Support Officer posts was reduced from 1fte Term Time to 0.5fte Term Time. Page 437
Page 372
As one of the Education Support Officers has recently resigned from post this proposal would involve deleting the remaining 0.5 fte of the Education Support Officer (Term Time) post, creating a saving of £28K. The remaining Education Support Officer post which has become vacant would be filled on a 52 week basis and the temporary filled post would no longer exist. This would reduce the ELC Link Officers to 3fte and these staff would be required to adopt more innovative and automative approaches to manage the revised workload. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Chief Education Officer, ELC Central Team. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. Yes SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? This will impact on the support available to ELC services within WDC. Staff and indirectly parents and children. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Consultation with CEO, SEOs, ELC Central Team, HT/HOC's, HR, TUs Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Page 438
Page 373
Cumulative and intersectional impacts Important to look at cross cutting impacts. Membership of more than one disadvantaged group will multiply affects. Impacts should be considered in the round. Disability Social & Economic Impact Council focus on raising attainment may be impacted as quality in settings could be reduced due to reduced support. ELC Central Team will be less able to provide support to ELC settings with a reduces resource, potentially impacting on attainment and outcomes for children and families. Negative impacts on service users. Sex Removal of post could have more of an impact on women in the workforce. Predominantly ELC has a high percentage of females in the workforce. Potentially more negative for women in terms of staffing due to workforce demographics. Gender Reassign Health Human Rights UNCRC Article 28 - Children's right to an education. The quality of children's education could reduce due to reduced support from central team. This could have an impact on the time and quality of support that could be provided to ELC settings. Potentially negative impact in terms of 'provision'. Remaining central team will look to adopt more innovative approaches to reduce impact. Also aim to upskill managers within settings to ensure quality of provision for children and their education is not impacted. Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Page 439
Page 374
Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The Council is operating in a financial challenging environment. This proposal is being brought forward as part of work to set a balanced budget as per legal obligations. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? We will monitor impact by consulting with staff and settings impacted. Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1382: The EIA notes potential negative impacts for female service users. Provision may be less good for children, which is area that we need to consider in terms of equality and UNCRC. There are some potential negative impacts for employees, with women more likely to be affected by reductions. Remaining employees will be required to find more innovative ways of working to ensure that this reduction does not negatively impact service users. Page 440
Page 375
Assessment No 1318 Owner JGALLACHER Resource Transformation Service People and Technology FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer James Gallacher ICT Manager Members James Gallacher, Ricardo Rea (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title PT06 Savings Option - Reduce Microsoft 365 licences The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy To reduce the volume of Microsoft 365 E3 licences and delivery savings. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. ICT, CO People & Technology, Policy and Strategy Team Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. Yes SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No Who will be affected by this policy? WDC Corporate Employees. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? ICT, OD, Comms. Education, Policy and Strategy Team potential to add SMT and elected members. Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Page 441
Page 376
Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Cumulative and intersectional impacts Disability Systems need to accessible to council employees included those with visual impairments and learning difficulties such as Dyslexia There will still be a license for each user. Likely neutral impact Social & Economic Impact The Council has a duty to obtain Best Value. The Council must keep in mind the Fairer Scotland Duty when making strategic financial decisions. Reduces the costs associated with technology. Positive impact for Council finances. No likely effect outside of this. Sex Gender Reassign Health Human Rights Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Page 442
Page 377
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? 365 licence requirements are continuously monitored to maximise usage of licences and to deliver savings where possible. Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1318: The proposal is relevant to equality in relation to disability, as our systems need to be accessible for our users. It is likely that the proposal will have a neutral impact as sufficient licenses will be in place for all users. Page 443
Page 378
Assessment No 1364 Owner JGALLACHER Resource Transformation Service Budget P and T FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer James Gallacher ICT Manager Members James Gallacher, ICT Manager Victoria Rogers, Chief Officer People & Technology (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title PT07 Reduction in ICT Support The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy To reduce the ICT service by 1 FTE Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Consultation with P&T Chief Officer, Strategic HR and ICT Management team Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? ICT employees Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Consultation with P&T Chief Officer, Strategic HR, ICT Management team and Trade Unions Page 444
Page 379
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age The council must meet public sector equality duty. The age group are 55 to 60, and 60 to 65 group. These groups more likely to be affected, though other may be as well. Workforce Potential to have negative on older groups because of workforce demographics however the council is providing early retirement or switch policy to support employees. Cumulative and intersectional impacts We should consider cumulative and cross cutting impacts. Longer wait times will impact all employees and external service users. Likely negative in terms of productivity. Disability The Council has a duty to ensure that services are accessible to disabled people and that reasonable adjustments are made for disabled staff when required. It is important that reasonable adjustments are not only made, but also made in good time. Longer wait times will impact all employees and external service users. Disabled people are more likely to experience financial hardship. Service provision Potentially negative for disabled employees if this impacts reasonable adjustments Workforce Potential to have negative impact however the council is providing early retirement or switch policy to support employees. Social & Economic Impact The council has duty of care toward all its workers, and in terms of the Public Sector Equality Duty Employees affected by this policy may be impacted financially. This has the potential to have a negative impact. Any potential reduction in staffing requirements could be managed through SWITCH redeployment Page 445
Page 380
programme. Additional support will be available to any employees impacted by the savings options to ensure their health and wellbeing. Sex Important to gauge any differential impact in terms of sex Sex mix of further affected group is equal. Likely to be neutral in terms of sex. Gender Reassign Health Health and wellbeing are a priority for the Council as noted in our Strategic Plan 22- 27. Worries surrounding job security may be heightened for employees This has the potential to negatively impact employees, Any potential reduction in staffing requirements will be managed through SWITCH redeployment programme. Additional support will be available to any employees impacted by the savings options to ensure their health and wellbeing. Human Rights Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Page 446
Page 381
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. The Council is facing a financial challenge and this proposal is being brought forward to support work to balance its budget. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? ICT will continue to monitor and review support requirements, capacity and workloads. ICT will continue to report via service management and also WDC strategic plan KPI - Volume of ICT Incidents closed in half day or less. Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1364: It may take longer to carry out adjustments for disabled staff as reduction in support areas will mean longer waiting times for support, reduced ICT Tech Bar support and incident/request resolution in corporate and partner areas. External service users would also be affected. In terms of staff because of affected workforce demographics older age groups and disabled people are more likely to be impacted negatively by a reduction in head count. Page 447
Page 382
Assessment No 1368 Owner GMacfarlane2 Resource Regeneration, Environment and Growth Service Budget R and N FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer Members Jenna McCrum - Waste Strategy Project Lead Ian Bain - Greenspace and Waste Manager Gail Macfarlane - Chief Officer Laura Adams - Procurement (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title RN12 Saving Option Separating Garden and Food Waste - Management Adjustment The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy The proposal is to separate garden and food waste for collection and processing. The cost of comingled waste is significantly higher for processing than the treatment of garden waste and food waste separately. There is a requirement to procure food caddies and food waste vehicles. The procurement of food waste vehicles is underway but to address any lead in times it may be required to undertake a short-term hire. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Waste services Neighbourhood services Procurement Residents Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? Yes If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. Yes SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Page 448
Page 383
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes Who will be affected by this policy? Effects are not expected on individuals by this policy, additional bin will be provided and communications strategy undertaken. Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Gail Macfarlane - Chief Officer Ian Bain - Greenspace and Waste Manager Jenna McCrum - Waste Strategy Project Lead Michelle McKenzie - Procurement Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Cumulative and intersectional impacts Scottish Consumer Duty Discussions with some consumers e.g. BSL users have noted confusion over current arrangements. The proposed arrangements could address some of these issues. Could be positive for consumers of Council services Disability Social & Economic Impact Need to have due regard to the Fairer Scotland Duty Possibilities for community benefits are examined during procurement processes, these will be required of the successful contractor based on the value of the contract works but are determined later in the process based on the capabilities of the individual contractor. Likely to be neutral in terms of significant impacts. Sex Gender Reassign Page 449
Page 384
Health Human Rights Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. N/A Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Yes, monitored through waste strategy Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation EIA 1368; The waste strategy sets out this action to separate food and garden waste. Will deliver financial savings as treatment is at reduced cost when not comingled material. There could be a positive impact for some residents in having a simpler system, and clear communication is needed especially for some equality groups such as British Sign Language users. Residents will be informed through communications strategy when implemented. Page 450
Page 385
Assessment No 1455 Strategic Team RR Budget Lead Officer Alan Douglas Who else has been involved in developing this EIA Alan Douglas Title 2627 RR02 Secondment to Clydebank Neighbourhood Board Description: (Provide a brief overview of the aims and objectives of this policy) Secondment to Clydebank Neighbourhood Board of a Grade 8 from the Regeneration team to be the Programme Manager for the programme of interventions. The post will be back-filled by secondment of a Community Worker to the Regeneration Team to aid with community engagement on future regeneration proposals. It is anticipated that whilst the resource will be drawn from the Communities Team and therefore apparently reduce capacity, the net impact is likely to be positive or neutral as it permits a focus on community response to key regeneration activities which can otherwise appear to be formulated without community input. Who have you engaged and consulted with as part of your Former Manager of Economic Development . Who will be affected by this proposal? Clydebank Neighbourhood Board. Citizens and groups consulted on future regeneration proposals. Citizens and groups who the Communities Team interact with. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements and viewed the guidance No Relevance screening: If the proposal/policy is relevant to any of the six areas then an Equality Impact Assessment must be carried out. You must indicate if there is any relevance to the six areas Page 451
Page 386
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Human Rights Act/European Convention on Human Rights No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) or Fairer Scotland Duty (FSD) Yes Relevance to Scottish Consumer Duty (SCD) No Consider any needs and policy drivers e.g. Council or national strategies and plans /and any barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy. List evidence you are using to support this assessment. Consider the impact of your policy on people and how they will be able to access goods, services and information with no barriers and state the potential impact. Specific group to consider What Key Drivers and Evidence has been used to inform this assessment. (i.e. national statistics - Scot Govt; or local statistics - workforce data, Citizens Panel) For each group, state the potential Impact – Positive/Negative/Neutral Age Anecdotal backed by national studies regarding the importance of youth engagement and the isolation of older people in communities. It is anticipated that while this proposal will reduce the capacity to undertake wider community engagement it will permit enhanced scrutiny and participation in key regeneration activity. Direct engagement with young people will also continue through the youth learning team Disability Disabled people and those living in a household with a disabled person are more likely to be less able to participate fully in community life. It is anticipated that while this proposal will reduce the capacity to undertake wider community engagement it will permit enhanced scrutiny and participation in key regeneration activity. Page 452
Page 387
Gender Reassign No anticipated impact. No anticipated impact. Marriage & Civil Partnership No anticipated impact. No anticipated impact. Pregnancy & Maternity No anticipated impact. No anticipated impact. Race BME groups are more likely to have barriers to participate fully in community life. It is anticipated that while this proposal will reduce the capacity to undertake wider community engagement it will permit enhanced scrutiny and participation in key regeneration activity. Religion and Belief No anticipated impact. No anticipated impact. Sex No anticipated impact. No anticipated impact. Sexual Orientation No anticipated impact. No anticipated impact. This section must be completed if there are potential Human Rights impacts, this includes but is not limited to Human Rights Act 1998 considerations Human Rights No anticipated impact. No anticipated impact. This section must be completed if there are potential Human Rights impacts, this includes but is not limited to Human Rights Act 1998 considerations Health No anticipated impact. No anticipated impact. This section must be completed if any there are any potential socio- economic impacts including but not limited to those covered by the Fairer Scotland Duty Social & Economic Impact Some groups which the Communities Team work with have a focus on reducing effects of socio-economic inequality. It is anticipated that while this proposal will reduce the capacity to undertake wider community engagement it will permit enhanced scrutiny and participation in key regeneration activity. It is Page 453
Page 388
believed that successful regeneration and economic development activity contributes significantly to increased economic activity and so assists those suffering socio-economic disadvantage. This section must be completed if any potential impact on children and young people up to the age of 18 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child No anticipated impact. No anticipated impact. This section must be completed in reference to the Scottish Consumer Duty Scottish Consumer Duty No anticipated impact. No anticipated impact. Consider cumulative impact of the proposal Cumulative and intersectional impacts No anticipated impact. No anticipated impact. State how the impact of the proposal/policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis including how actions will be delivered to mitigate any negative impacts or secure positive impacts. Summary of overall impact(s) of the proposal. The requirement to make savings to sustain core Council services requires measured reductions in services across the Council. A core team will be retained and along with other savings proposals, there will be a partial focusing of services on particular areas of demand which are anticipated to be positive. Name of the senior manager who has approved this assessment Alan Douglas Page 454
Page 389
Assessment No 1456 Strategic Team RR Budget Lead Officer Alan Douglas Who else has been involved in developing this EIA Alan Douglas Title 2627 RR03 Capacity Funding - Plan For Neighbourhoods Description: (Provide a brief overview of the aims and objectives of this policy) The proposal would see the partial funding of two posts (50% of a Community Worker and 25% of a Project Development Officer) within the Communities Team to support Community Development work on behalf of the Clydebank Neighbourhood Board rather than the programme of work being delivered by consultants. The proposal would see the fund meeting 50% of a Grade 5 Community Worker and 25% of a Grade 6 Project Development Officer to support the Pride In Place programme of work being developed by the Clydebank Neighbourhood Board. Who have you engaged and consulted with as part of your Former Manager of Economic Development. Chair of Clydebank Neighbourhood Board. Who will be affected by this proposal? Clydebank Neighbourhood Board. Citizens and groups consulted on future Clydebank Neighbourhood Board initiatives proposals. Citizens and groups who the Communities Team interact with. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements and viewed the guidance No Relevance screening: If the proposal/policy is relevant to any of the six areas then an Equality Impact Assessment must be carried out. You must indicate if there is any relevance to the six areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) Yes Page 455
Page 390
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Human Rights Act/European Convention on Human Rights No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) or Fairer Scotland Duty (FSD) Yes Relevance to Scottish Consumer Duty (SCD) No Consider any needs and policy drivers e.g. Council or national strategies and plans /and any barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy. List evidence you are using to support this assessment. Consider the impact of your policy on people and how they will be able to access goods, services and information with no barriers and state the potential impact. Specific group to consider What Key Drivers and Evidence has been used to inform this assessment. (i.e. national statistics - Scot Govt; or local statistics - workforce data, Citizens Panel) For each group, state the potential Impact – Positive/Negative/Neutral Age Anecdotal backed by national studies regarding the importance of youth engagement and the isolation of older people in communities. It is anticipated that while this proposal will reduce the capacity to undertake wider community engagement it will permit enhanced scrutiny and participation in key decisions about Clydebank. Direct engagement with young people will also continue through the youth learning team Disability Disabled people and those living in a household with a disabled person are more likely to be less able to participate fully in community life. It is anticipated that while this proposal will reduce the capacity to undertake wider community engagement it will permit enhanced scrutiny and participation in key decisions about Clydebank. Gender Reassign No anticipated impact. No anticipated impact. Marriage & Civil Partnership No anticipated impact. No anticipated impact. Page 456
Page 391
Pregnancy & Maternity No anticipated impact. No anticipated impact. Race BME groups are more likely to have barriers to participate fully in community life. It is anticipated that while this proposal will reduce the capacity to undertake wider community engagement it will permit enhanced scrutiny and participation in key decisions about Clydebank. Religion and Belief No anticipated impact. No anticipated impact. Sex No anticipated impact. No anticipated impact. Sexual Orientation No anticipated impact. No anticipated impact. This section must be completed if there are potential Human Rights impacts, this includes but is not limited to Human Rights Act 1998 considerations Human Rights No anticipated impact. No anticipated impact. This section must be completed if there are potential Human Rights impacts, this includes but is not limited to Human Rights Act 1998 considerations Health No anticipated impact. No anticipated impact. This section must be completed if any there are any potential socio- economic impacts including but not limited to those covered by the Fairer Scotland Duty Social & Economic Impact Some groups which the Communities Team work with have a focus on reducing effects of socio-economic inequality. It is anticipated that this proposal will direct capacity in community engagement towards enhanced scrutiny and participation in proposals developed by the Neighbourhood Board in in Clydebank. It is believed that successful regeneration and economic development activity from Board proposals contributes significantly to Page 457
Page 392
increased economic activity and so assists those suffering socio-economic disadvantage. This section must be completed if any potential impact on children and young people up to the age of 18 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child No anticipated impact. No anticipated impact. This section must be completed in reference to the Scottish Consumer Duty Scottish Consumer Duty No anticipated impact. No anticipated impact. Consider cumulative impact of the proposal Cumulative and intersectional impacts No anticipated impact. No anticipated impact. State how the impact of the proposal/policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis including how actions will be delivered to mitigate any negative impacts or secure positive impacts. Summary of overall impact(s) of the proposal. The requirement to make savings to sustain core Council services requires measured reductions in services across the Council. It is believed this proposal does not reduce the overall Communities activity, but rather focusses specific resource in the Clydebank Area, reflecting the need to address the increased activity arising from the Clydebank Neighbourhood Board activity. A core team will be retained and along with other savings proposals, there will be a partial focusing of services on particular areas of demand which are anticipated to be positive. Name of the senior manager who has approved this assessment Alan Douglas Page 458
Page 393
Assessment No 1451 Owner ADouglas Resource Regeneration, Environment and Growth Service Budget R and R FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Alan Douglas Chief Officer: Regulatory and Regeneration Members Alan Douglas (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title 2627 RR06 Planning, Environmental Health and Building Standards - Miscellaneous Savings The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy To implement a number of small savings and income generation options associated with the Planning, Environmental Health and Building Standards functions of the Council. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Planning, Environmental Health and Building Standards Service Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No Who will be affected by this policy? Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Page 459
Page 394
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation A screen did not reveal any relevance to the areas we assess; therefore, no Equality Impact Assessment is required. Page 460
Page 395
Assessment No 1452 Owner ADouglas Resource Regeneration, Environment and Growth Service Budget R and R FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Alan Douglas Chief Officer: Regulatory and Regeneration Members Alan Douglas (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title 2627 RR07 Business Gateway The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy The relocation of the Business Gateway Service to Church Street, Dumbarton Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Business Development - Economic Development. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No Who will be affected by this policy? Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Page 461
Page 396
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact Age Cumulative and intersectional impacts Disability Social & Economic Impact Sex Gender Reassign Health Human Rights Marriage & Civil Partnership Pregnancy & Maternity Race Religion and Belief Sexual Orientation Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Introduce Page 462
Page 397
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation The proposal involves the relocation of the Business Gateway from a location in Clydebank to the Council's Church Street, Dumbarton office. Dumbarton is more centrally located within the authority, however, if required within certain circumstances, it would be possible to host sessions in Clydebank and the Vale. No diminution or change to means of service is anticipated. Page 463
Page 398
Assessment No 1441 Owner ADouglas Resource Regeneration, Environment and Growth Service Budget R and R FirstName Surname Job Title Head Officer Alan Douglas Chief Officer: Regulatory and Regeneration Members Alan Douglas (Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy function or financial decision) Policy Title RR09 Legal and Democratic Services Merger The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy To merge the Legal Services Manager and Democratic & Registration Services Manager roles into one Legal and Democratic Services role with some further re-allocation of responsibilities to other services. There is no service interruption, cessation or amendment or change to policy. Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the development and/or implementation of policy. Chief Officers - Resources, People and Technology and Citizen, Culture and Facilities. Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or services? No If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement services to discuss your requirements. No SCREENING You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F) No Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No Who will be affected by this policy? Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process? Page 464
Page 399
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative impact on particular groups. Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented, please provide justification for this. Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy? Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the recommendation Screening 1441: A screen did not reveal any relevance to the areas we assess, therefore no Equality Impact Assessment is required. Page 465