Democracy Spraffa

Item 10 - Financial Update (Revised Version)

West Dunbartonshire Council · 17 December 2025
Back to West Dunbartonshire Council — 17 December 2025 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL 
Report by Chief Officer - Resources 
Council: 17 December 2025 
Subject:  Financial Update 
1. PURPOSE 
1.1 To provide an update on the financial challenges facing the Council, the
estimated 2026/27 – 2030/31 revenue budget gaps and present the first
tranche of saving options for members consideration to help the Council
deliver a balanced 2026/27 budget.   
1.2 This update has been prepared using three different scenarios, best case,
worst case and mid-range. Relatively small variations in assumptions can
lead to fairly significant changes in the outcome. Throughout the report the
primary focus is on the mid-range, however, where appropriate reference is
made to best case and worst-case assumptions. 
2. RECOMMENDATIONS 
2.1 Members are asked to: 
I. approve £0.168m per annum to enhance the Council’s cyber security
protection as set out in paragraph 4.10 
II. note the Council’s estimated 2026/27 revenue budget gap has
increased from £8.882m as at October 2025 to £9.243m 
III. approve the £0.199m, rising to £0.322m by 2027/28, of saving options
requiring political consideration to contribute toward agreeing a
balanced 2026/27 budget and assist with future projected budget gaps 
IV. note the £1.371m of management adjustments which will contribute to
agreeing a balanced 2026/27 budget and assist with future projected
budget gaps. 
3. BACKGROUND 
3.1 On 5 March 2025, the Council agreed a balanced 2025/26 revenue budget, a
revised capital budget and revenue estimates for 2026/27-2029/30. That
budget report also highlighted estimated future year budget gaps based on a
range of assumptions including future Scottish Government funding, inflation
and future interest rates.  The consequences of the decisions taken by
Council on 5 March to agree a balanced 2025/26 budget reduced the
cumulative estimated future budget gap and further reports to Council on 18
June 2025 and 29 October 2025 provided further updates on the financial
challenges faced by the Council and updated the estimated budget gaps as
ITEM 10
(Revised Version)
Page 115

Page 2

set out in Exhibit 1. 
Exhibit 1 – Future Year Estimated Budget Gaps 29 October 2025 Council Report 
Budget Gap 2026/27
£000
2027/28
£000
2028/29
£000
2029/30
£000
2030/31
£000
Best Case 7,905 16,870 31,939 41,058 49,691
Mid-Range 8,882 18,824 34,870 44,966 54,376
Worst Case 13,360 29,070 49,984 65,055 79,752 
4.  MAIN ISSUES 
4.1 I have revisited the key assumptions and cost pressures detailed in the 29
October 2025 Council report. This is summarised in the paragraphs below. 
Scottish Government Finance Settlement 
4.2 In my 29 October 2025 report I retained my assumption regarding the
Council’s financial settlement of: 
 Best Case - Flat Cash 
 Mid-Range – Flat Cash
 Worst Case - 1.0% reduction 
4.3 The Scottish Government have advised of an intention to provide 3-year
revenue and 5-year capital grant figures although there is no clarity yet over
the level of detail that will be provided. This is a welcome development and
should help increase certainty over future budget assumption and estimates. 
However, the UK Autumn Budget was delayed until 26 November 2025 which
considered tax and spending UK wide. As a consequence of this delay the
Scottish Government announced the Scottish Budget will be presented on 13
January 2026 with the Council getting sight of their individual settlements
soon after. These timescales will be problematic as officers require sufficient
time to examine the detailed impact of the settlement to inform the Council’s
consideration of the 2027/28 budget at its meeting on 4 March 2026. 
There has been no material changes since October which have resulted in a
change to the assumptions set out in paragraph 4.2. 
Extended Producer Responsibility 
4.4 Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) is an environmental policy approach
that holds producers accountable for the entire lifecycle of their products,
including the post-consumer phase. Under EPR, manufacturers are required
to take responsibility for the collection, recycling, and safe disposal of their
products once they are no longer in use. The key idea behind EPR is to shift
the financial and/or physical responsibility for waste management from
taxpayers to producers. This creates an incentive for companies to design
Page 116

Page 3

products that are easier to recycle, more durable, and have less
environmental impact. 
4.5 From 2025, some organisations and businesses have to pay a fee for the
packaging they supply to or import into the UK market.   The income
generated is distributed by the UK Government to councils to cover net costs
of collecting, managing, recycling and disposing of household packaging
waste. In 2025/26 all councils received a basic payment based on: 
 publicly available and existing data, Office of National Statistics data  
 data about tonnages, operations and unit costs gathered from a
representative sample of councils across the UK. 
From 2026/27 the basic payment and any adjustments will be based on
data councils submit to the Scheme Administrator. 
4.6 The Council’s indicative 2025/26 allocation was £1.487m (as reported to
Council on 5 March 2025). This was increased by £0.186m during 2025/26 to
provide a total of £1.673m in 2025/26. 
4.7 As part of the 2025/26 budget setting 50% of the initial indicative 2025/26
funding was allocated to costs specifically relating to waste service
improvement and a 2025/26 base budget adjustment for the other 50%
(£0.743m) was processed to ensure there was a committed budget to absorb
future associated costs. During 2025/26 that committed budget was allocated
to a range of emerging cost increases relating to waste service improvements
including vehicle hire, skip hire, bin replacements, relevant staff costs, and
fleet maintenance, and more generally to fund a range of recycling initiatives. 
4.8 The Council have been notified their 2026/27 allocation is £2.398m an
increase of £0.911m on the original allocation of £1.487m (which is what is
currently built into the budget). 
The Chief Officer Roads and Neighbourhoods and Chief Officer Resources
have conducted a review of emerging costs within the provision of recycling
services and identified £0.405m of new 2026/27 pressures which break down
as follows: 
 £0.240m increase in cost of the Council’s recycling contract
 £0.060m increase in cost of civic waste site management costs to
prioritise recycling 
 £0.045m increase in the cost of fuel to undertake waste collections
(total pressure apportioned between recycling costs and residual
waste - £0.045m related to the recycling costs)
 £0.030m increase in cost of the Council’s co-mingled recycling contract
 £0.016m increase in 2025/26 recurring hire costs due to inflation
 £0.014m increase in 2025/26 recurring staff costs due to pay awards. 
4.9 In addition, the service requires £0.250m of one-off expenditure in 2026/27 to
part fund the purchase of food waste vehicles which is expenditure consistent
Page 117

Page 4

with the intention of EPR to reduce environmental impact.  This £0.250m has
been added as a recurring cost pressure as it is likely there will be additional
costs in future years relating to recycling. Finally, £0.250m will be used for the
existing costs summarised in Exhibit 2 which are specifically focused on
waste service improvements. 
Exhibit 2: Existing costs relating to waste service improvement activity  
£,000
Maintenance charge for recycling vehicles and equipment 95
Recycling materials and bins 80
Depot costs for recycling vehicles 50
Printing / advertising costs 25
Total 250 
Increase Council Cyber Security Protection 
4.10 The Council continues to invest in Cyber security year on year; however, the
Cyber threat is growing, and the general opinion from industry experts is that
councils should consider it a case of ‘when’ not ‘if’ a cyber-attack occurs. A
successful attack on the Council would severely impact our ability to deliver
key services to the citizens of West Dunbartonshire.
Learning taken from cyber-attacks on public sector bodies such as Scottish
Environment Protection Agency and Redcar and Hackney Councils in 2020
and more recent attacks on Scottish local authorities in Dumfries and
Galloway, the Western Isles, Edinburgh City, West Lothian and an attack on
Glasgow City Council which resulted in payments and pensions services
being offline for citizens and partner councils. In addition, in recent months
there have been high profile and extremely damaging attacks on large retail
organisations such as Marks and Spencer, the Co-Op group.
Therefore, it is recommended Council approve additional investment of
£168,272 per annum to provide for enhanced cyber security protection for our
employees, data, and critical services that citizens rely on day to day.
If approved the contract shall be for a period of three years, The product will
be procured through the BT SWAN 2.0 Value Added Services Framework.
Tendering Committee approval was granted for the purchase of Value-Added
Services through this Framework to a value of £690,000 including VAT at the
Tendering Committee held on 15 November 2023. 
Base Budget Adjustments 
4.11 There are no changes to the Council’s base budget since the 29 October
report to Council. 
Cost Pressures   
Page 118

Page 5

4.12 Generally, services work on the basis of having to contain any cost pressures
within current resources, however, there are cost pressures which are
unavoidable and need to be factored into future budget processes.  In
addition to the new cost pressures relating to waste delivery (refer to
paragraph 4.8) there are three new cost pressures in excess of £0.100m. 
4.13 Cost Pressure 1 – Review of Commercial Rental Income 
A full review of the Council’s property portfolio has been carried out due to a
number of strategic asset disposals being implemented to reduce long-term
liabilities and align with best value principles.  While these disposals were
necessary, they have resulted in the permanent loss of rental streams that
previously supported the Council’s revenue position.  Compounding this, the
Scottish commercial property market remains highly competitive and volatile.
To secure occupancy and prevent prolonged vacancies, the Council has had
to agree revised rental levels and, in some cases, offer rent-free periods as
essential incentives. These measures are a direct response to market
conditions and the need to maintain tenant engagement in an environment
where councils across Scotland are struggling to retain and attract tenants. 
Achievable rents are currently under sustained downward pressure, and the
scope to recover lost income in the short term is extremely limited and not
considered a temporary fluctuation but a structural shift in the rental
landscape. The cumulative impact of these factors impacts on the overall
rental income the Council can generate with current projections requiring
budgeted income to reduce by £0.250m. 
4.14 Cost Pressure 2 – Unfunded Pension Costs 
A £3.455m budget is set aside for the payment of unfunded pension costs to
the Strathclyde Pension Fund. This primarily relates to costs associated with
pension increases and compensation payments to pensioners who are in
receipt of compensatory added years through redundancy/efficiency taken in
previous years.  A £0.200m cost pressure for 2025/26 was added in October
2024 to provide for a £0.100m increase in 2024/25 and an anticipated
£0.100m in 2025/26. However, the 2025/26 reprofiled payment has
highlighted an increase from 2024/25 of £0.200m resulting in a 2025/26
overspend of £0.100m.  If compensatory added years continues to increase
at this level an additional £0.100m is required in the budget going forward. 
This will continue to be reviewed to monitor future budget pressures in line
with approved redundancies / severance which are increasing the
compensatory added years payments required for the unfunded pension
scheme. 
4.15 Cost Pressure 3 – Adjustment to Benefit from Reduction in Strathclyde
Pension Fund Contribution. 
Following the last triennial valuation of the Strathclyde Pension Fund there
was an announcement that employers’ contributions would be reduced from
19.3% to 6.5% for two financial years (2024/25 and 2025/26). Initial estimates
of the overall saving for the Council were £21.328m which Council agreed to
Page 119

Page 6

smooth over 4 years at £5.332m a year.  This estimate was based on all
employees and did not take into consideration those employees who had
opted out the pension fund as it was not possible to extract this information
from the system.  Furthermore, the HSCP share of the saving was a proxy
based on the proportion of the staff cost budget rather than actual member
data. Therefore, there was always going to be a difference between the
estimated overall benefit and the actual benefit. Until the actual contribution
was confirmed we couldn’t calculate the difference between the estimate and
the actual.  This has now been done based on 2024/25 actuals and is
summarised in Exhibit 3. 
Exhibit 3 – Summary of Pension Contribution Benefit 
2024/25
(£,000)
2025/26
(£,000)
2026/27
(£,000)
2027/28
(£,000)
Brought Forward 0 4,361 9,058 3,726
Saving 9,693 10,030 0 0
Utilised in Year (5,332) (5,332) (5,332) (3,726)
Carried Forward 4,361 9,058 3,726 0 
4.16 Exhibit 3 shows that the amount that can be applied to the budget gap in
2027/28 (year 4 of the agreed smoothing period) has reduced by £1.606m
from £5.332m to £3.726m. 
4.17 Other Cost Pressures under £100k 
In addition to the larger cost pressures detailed above there are four which
are under £100k in value.   
 £55k due to a reduction in cremation income which is considered to be
irrecoverable at the current time
 £20k to reflect the national review of Chief Executive pay
 £15k for the temporary provision of system support in connection with
the replacement of the Council's Finance Ledger System, reducing to
£7k in 2027/28 then no longer required
 £9k to right size the COSLA membership fees budget and reflect the
increases agreed for a three-year period 2026/27 – 2028/29 
Sales, Fees and Charges 
4.18 The Council’s financial planning assumes a 5% annual increase in sales, fees
and charges (SFC).  This assumption is built into the 2026/27 and future
budget gaps. When agreeing the budget on 4 March 2026 the Council may
wish to consider an option to increase fees and charges by a different
percentage and may also consider fees for specific areas as part of saving
options where a different approach to the annual 5% may be considered. 
Revised Mid-Range Estimated Budget Gap 
4.19 Exhibit 4 sets out the revised cumulative estimated budget gap in the mid-
range in 2026/27 – 2030/31.  It illustrates that, prior to any measures to
Page 120

Page 7

balance the budget, the Council is faced with a budget gap of £9.243m in
2026/27 rising cumulatively to £54.738m in 2030/31. 
Exhibit 4 – Revised Mid-Range Estimated Budget Gaps (Cumulative) 
Para 2026/27
(£000)
2027/28
(£000)
2028/29
(£000)
2029/30
(£000)
2030/31
(£000)
Budget Gap  
29 October 2025
3.1 8,882  18,824 34,870 44,966 54,376
EPR Funding  4.8 (911) (911) (911) (911) (911)
EPR Recurring Cost
Pressures
4.8 405 405 405 405 405
EPR One Off Capital
Funded from
Revenue in 26/27
and future recurring
pressures
4.9 250 250 250 250 250
Cyber Security
(subject to Council
approval)
4.10 168 168 168 168 168
Commercial rental
income
4.13 250 250 250 250 250
Unfunded pension
costs
4.14 100 100 100 100 100
Pension contribution
benefit
4.16 0 1,606 0 0 0
Other cost pressures
under £0.100m
4.17 99 95 92 96 100
Revised Estimated
Budget Gap 
9,243 20,787 35,224 45,324 54,738 
Measures to Balance the Budget 
4.20 Between May and December 2025 officers have been developing a range of
saving options to help address the budget gap.  They are categorised as
either: 
 Political options – options which require elected member approval
 Management adjustments – options which can be implemented as part
of normal business, have no frontline service impact and the only staff
impact can be managed through existing vacancies 
4.21 A first tranche of saving options has been finalised. The political options are
presented to Council for approval and the management adjustments are
presented for noting.  The savings options identified to date propose a
potential reduction to the Council’s establishment of 1.5 FTE assuming they
are all accepted by Council.  They are summarised in Exhibit 5. 
Page 121

Page 8

Exhibit 5 – December 2025 Saving Options (Cumulative)  
2026/27 2027/28 2028/29
(and future years)
Category No Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE
Political 5 199 0.5 322 0.5 315 0.5
Mgt Adjustments 6 1,371 1.0 1,371 1.0 1,371 1.0
Total 11 1,570 1.5 1,693 1.5 1,686 1.5 
4.22 A more detailed breakdown of these saving options is provided in appendix 1
and 2 with appendices 3 and 4 providing the detail of each saving option
including the risk/impact associated with them. 
4.23 The Chief Executive is authorised to progress voluntary severance and early
retirement offers, where appropriate, to support the 2026/27 budget savings
exercise.   Where appropriate targeted discussions will commence in service
areas following the Council decision. 
4.24 Exhibit 6 sets out the revised 2026/27-2030/31 cumulative budget gap after
taking account of the proposed measures to balance the budget. This
reduces the estimated 2026/27 budget gap to £7.504m however this would be
on the basis all attached measures to balance the budget are approved and
that the key assumptions made when estimating the 2026/27 budget gap are
accurate. 
Exhibit 6 Updated Mid-Range Estimated Budget Gaps (Cumulative) after Measures
to Balance the Budget 
Para 2026/27
(£000)
2027/28
(£000)
2028/29
(£000)
2029/30
(£000)
2030/31
(£000)
Revised
Estimated Budget
Gap before
Measures to
Balance Budget 
4.19 9,243 20,787 35,224 45,324 54,738
Political Saving
Options
4.21 (199) (322) (322) (322) (322)
Management
Adjustments
4.21 (1,371) (1,371) (1,371) (1,371) (1,371)
Revised
Estimated Budget
Gap After
Measures to
Balance Budget 
7,673 19,094 33,531 43,631 53,045 
4.25 It is clear from Exhibit 6 that further work is required to develop options to
bridge the remaining estimated budget gap and officers will bring forward a
second tranche of saving options as part of the budget report to be
considered by Council when setting the 2026/27 budget. 
Page 122

Page 9

Other Issues 
4.26 Health and Social Care Partnership 
The Council, at the budget meeting on 5 March 2025, agreed an HSCP
requisition of £93.442m. There is a working assumption that the future
allocation to the HSCP is on the basis of ‘flat cash’ plus the appropriate share
of the Health & Social Care funding commitments made by the Scottish
Government. However, this is only an assumption and the HSCP requisition
will be a matter for Council to consider as part of the budget process. 
4.27 Council Tax 
The estimated budget gap makes no assumption over future Council Tax
increases as setting Council Tax is subject to a political decision when
agreeing the budget in March 2026. However, by means of illustration a 10%
Council Tax increase would generate an additional £4.540m and increase the
weekly bill for a Band D taxpayer by £3.00 (assuming they are liable for the
full Council Tax charge). 
4.28 Council Tax Reform 
The Scottish Government are progressing a programme of Council Tax
reform as the current system, is widely considered outdated. Reform
proposals being considered include updating property valuations to reflect
current market values; introducing new Council Tax bands; implementing
mitigation measures such as transitional relief, deferral schemes, and
expanding the Council Tax Reduction (CTR) scheme.  The public
consultation, launched on 27 October 2025, will run for 14 weeks until 30
January 2026. It includes an online questionnaire, town hall events across
Scotland, and targeted key stakeholder and expert consultation.  Responses
will be analysed and presented to COSLA Leaders for approval of any
substantive changes proposed by the Scottish Government however scrutiny
will not be complete before the pre-election period commences. 
5. PEOPLE IMPLICATIONS 
5.1 The potential staffing implications are shown within the savings options
appended to this report and will be subject to consultation processes where
appropriate and managed in accordance with the Council’s Switch Policy
(Organisational Change). 
6. FINANCIAL AND PROCUREMENT IMPLICATIONS 
6.1 The report sets out the estimated revenue budget gaps in 2026/27-2030/31.
The financial implications arising from the ongoing budget process are
detailed in the report and appendices. There are no direct procurement
implications arising from this report. 
7. RISK ANALYSIS 
Page 123

Page 10

7.1 None directly from this report but any proposals to address the estimated
budget gap will need to consider risk. 
8. EQUALITIES IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) 
8.1 All individual savings options have been screened and where relevant, impact
assessed. Individual EIAs are appended to the report at Appendix 5.   
9. CONSULTATION 
9.1 The views of all Chief Officers have been requested on this report and
feedback incorporated herein. 
10. STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT 
10.1 Proper budgetary control and sound financial practice are cornerstones of
good governance and support Council and officers to pursue the strategic
priorities of the Council’s Strategic Plan. 
10.2 The General Services revenue budget contributes to all categories by
providing funding in specific areas to help the Council achieve and develop
these priorities. 
Laurence Slavin
Chief Officer - Resources
Date:   17 December 2025 
Person to Contact: Laurence Slavin, Chief Officer - Resources
E-mail: laurence.slavin@west-dunbarton.gov.uk 
Appendices: 
Appendix 1 – Summary of Political Saving Options
Appendix 2 – Summary of Management Adjustments
Appendix 3 – Detailed Political Saving Options
Appendix 4 – Detailed Management Adjustments
Appendix 5 – Equality Impact Assessments for All Saving Options
Background Papers: Budget Report to Council - 5 March 2025
Financial Update Report to Council – 18 June 2025
Financial Update Report to Council – 29 October 2025     
Page 124

Page 11

Appendix 1 – Summary of Political Saving Options 
2026/27 2027/28 2028/29
Ref: CO Saving Option Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE
2627 EDU01 GH ASN School Transport 53 0 53 0 53 0
2627 HE01 PB Cessation of Rotation of Temporary
Accommodation 
10 0 10 0 10 0
2627 PT05 VR ICT SOM Compliance 31 0.5 31 0.5 31 0.5
2627 RN02 GM CCTV upgrade at Depots 80 0 192 0 192 0
2627 RN03 GM Gully Motor Purchase 25 0 36 0 29 0  
TOTAL 199 0.5 322 0.5 315 0.5 
Page 125

Page 12

Appendix 2 – Summary of Management Adjustments 
2026/27 2027/28 2028/29
Ref: CO Saving Option Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE Saving
(£,000)
FTE
2627 EDU02 GH School Fridges 6 0 6 0 6 0
2627 PT04 VR CAS Team Leader  49 1 49 1 49 1
2627 RES06 LS Council Tax Debt & His Majesty’s
Revenue and Customs Pilot
100 0 100 0 100 0
2627 RES07 LS Review of NDR budgets across the
asset portfolio 
930 0 930 0 930 0
2627 RES09 LS Review Portable Appliance Testing
Costs
36 0 36 0 36 0
2627 RES11 LS Council Tax Income  250 0 250 0 250 0  
TOTAL 1,371 1 1,371 1 1,371 1
Page 126

Page 13

Appendix 3 – Detailed Political Saving Options 
2026/27 SAVING OPTION 
Chief Officer: Gillian Hamilton Saving Ref: 2627 EDU01
Saving Title ASN School Transport
Summary of Savings Proposal 
Children with additional support needs are transported to the Lomond Base in
Balloch Campus and the Rainbow Base in Faifley Campus using private taxi
contracts. The cost of using taxi services has increased significantly in recent years. 
It is proposed the Council purchases three minibuses and recruits four drivers to
transport children who are able to share larger vehicles to these locations.   This has
been successful for other schools, with the purchase of five minibuses and
recruitment of six drivers for use by children attending Renton Leven Base and
Riverside School. This would generate a revenue saving of £53k net of driver salary,
loan charges and ongoing maintenance costs. Where the needs of individual
children prevents them from sharing a larger vehicle, local taxi provision would still
be utilised through the existing ASN transport budget.
Is there a Capital Requirement?  Yes - capital investment of £128k required to
purchase the minibuses with loan charges of £3,300 per annum for 7 years.
Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
Service Risk: Bringing the service in-house could increase the risk to service
provision, as resilience would not be catered for by the marketplace.
Strategic Risk: N/A
People Risk: There are no direct FTE or people risks with this proposal.
Reputational Risk: Any change could be disruptive for children and families. This
will be mitigated by ensuring clear and timely communication with those and the
retention of budget for private transport for those children whose needs require it.
Saving (Cumulative)
2026/27 2027/28 2028/29
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
53 0 53 0 53 0
FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies:  N/A
Equality Impact Assessment Completed:  Yes EIA No: 1359
Page 127

Page 14

2026/27 SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer Peter Barry Saving Ref: 2627 HE01
Saving Title Cease Rotation of Temporary Accommodation 
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council currently provides basic furnishings to approximately 250 temporary
accommodation units, with a budget of £1,000 per home. The service rotates
temporary accommodation, with the aim of ensuring that by 2027/28, no home is
used for that purpose for a period greater than three years. As part of this, plans
were made to relocate 10 temporary accommodation homes in 2026/27. 
Under this option, the rotation work would cease, reducing planned expenditure by
an estimated £10k in 2026/27 and future years if planned activity in future years is
also ceased. Operational reasons may require some units to be retired during the
course of 2026/27; however, this would be treated as a cost pressure within the
wider homelessness budget. 
Is there a capital requirement? No
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
Service Risk:  A similar saving option was accepted in 2025/26, with 17 planned
retirals ceased, this will potentially result in 27 properties being used as temporary
accommodation.
People Risk: There are no people risks identified with this option.
Strategic Risk Register: The proposed saving option does not impact on any of the
Council’s identified strategic risks.
Reputational Risk: The proposal may be viewed negatively by neighbouring
tenants and residents through the continued use of a nearby home as temporary
accommodation. This will be mitigated by management of temporary
accommodation with concerns resolved timeously.
Saving (Cumulative)
2026/27 2027/28 2028/29
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
10 0 10 0 10 0
FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies:  N/A
Equality Impact Assessment Completed:  Yes  EIA No: 1307
Page 128

Page 15

2026/27 SAVING OPTION 
Chief Officer: Victoria Rogers Saving Ref: 2627 PT05
Saving Title ICT Standard Operating Model Compliance
Summary of Savings Proposal 
A review of People & Technology was undertaken to ensure compliance with the
Council’s Standard Operating Model. This identified an opportunity to remove 0.5
FTE G8 1st Line Supervisor, with the line management of the existing G6 role
currently managed by this postholder to be realigned under ICT G10
Applications/Device Section Lead.
Is there a Capital Requirement?  No
Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
Service Risk: The proposed removal of a 0.5 FTE Grade 8 Device Management role
presents no risk to service delivery as there is no reduction in the overall capacity of
the Device Support Team. This change will positively impact the service by
eliminating role overlap and clarifying the remit of device management. It will
streamline the allocation and monitoring of device support across council service
areas and partners, enhancing the support service.
Strategic Risk Register: No impact risk on any existing strategic risk.
People Risk: There will be a reduction in resource of 0.5 x G8 FTE (17.5 hours).
Reputational Risk: N/A.
Saving (Cumulative)
2026/27 2027/28 2028/29
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
31  0.5 31 0.5 31 0.5
FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies:  NIL
Note that the FTE Impact is an estimate – if the saving option is approved then the
Chief Officer will assess the most effective way of delivering the saving target.  
Equality Impact Assessment Completed:  Yes EIA No: 1313 
Page 129

Page 16

2026/27 SAVING OPTION
Chief Officer: Gail Macfarlane Saving Ref: 2627 RN02
Saving Title CCTV upgrade at Depots
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council have a security system in place to prevent theft or damage on site. This
security costs £270k annually, split between General Services (£195k) and Housing
Revenue Account (£85k).  There are additional security costs incurred at wider
authority buildings  
Under this proposal, the security would be upgraded and improved CCTV
infrastructure would be installed at depots.  
Is there a Capital Requirement?   Yes
The saving requires an upgrade of CCTV infrastructure, with indicative costs of £50k
across two depots. This will be funded through the year one saving and does not
require a capital budget to be made available.
Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
Service Risk: The depots will have real-time CCTV surveillance, monitored through
sensors located at key positions. Operationally, teams will need to ensure alarm is
set and gates are locked.
Strategic Risk Register: N/A
People Risk:  N/A
Reputational Risk: The CCTV system has been designed to avoid theft/damage.
Insurance have been consulted.
Saving (Cumulative)
2026/27 2027/28 2028/29
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
80 0 192 0 192 0
FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies:  N/A
Equality Impact Assessment Completed:  Yes EIA No: 1360 
Page 130

Page 17

2026/27 SAVING OPTION 
Chief Officer: Gail Macfarlane Saving Ref: 2627 RN03
Saving Title Gully Motor Purchase
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council hires a gully motor vehicle to undertake routine gully cleaning routes
and ad hoc cleaning of hotspots as the Council’s vehicle is beyond its lifespan and
cannot be repaired. The annual cost of hiring a vehicle is £44k.
Under this proposal, the Council would invest in a new gully motor at an anticipated
cost of £275k. Due to lead in time to procure the motor, if agreement is given in
December 2025, the vehicle will likely be available for us from Summer 2026.
Is there a Capital Requirement?  Yes
Market testing suggests a purchase cost of £275k, with a borrowing costs of £8k
over 10 years.  This would net against the total revenue saving of £44k per annum
Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
Service Risk: N/A
Strategic Risk Register: N/A
People Risk:  N/A 
Reputational Risk: N/A
Saving (Cumulative)
2026/27 2027/28 2028/29
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
25 0 36 0 36 0 
FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies:  N/A
Note that the FTE Impact is an estimate – if the saving option is approved then the
Chief Officer will assess the most effective way of delivering the saving target.  
Equality Impact Assessment Completed:  Yes EIA No: 1356 
Page 131

Page 18

Appendix 4 – Detailed Management Adjustments 
2026/27 MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT 
Chief Officer: Gillian Hamilton Saving Ref: 2627 EDU02
Saving Title School Milk Fridges
Summary of Savings Proposal 
Fridges used in primary schools to keep pupils’ milk chilled are currently rented at a
cost of £6,480 per year. 
In some schools, the existing refrigeration in the school kitchen would have sufficient
space to hold the milk, and so it is proposed that all rentals cease with additional
equipment purchased if required.
Is there a Capital Requirement?  No. The capital investment of approximately £6k
required for any purchased fridges can be met from each establishment’s existing
capital items budget. 
Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
Service Risk: None
Strategic Risk: None
People Risk: None
Reputational Risk: None
Saving (Cumulative)
2026/27 2027/28 2028/29
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
6 0 6 0 6 0
FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies:  0
Note that the FTE Impact is an estimate – if the saving option is approved then the
Chief Officer will assess the most effective way of delivering the saving target.  
Equality Impact Assessment Completed:   EIA No:  1358 
Page 132

Page 19

2026/27 MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT
Chief Officer: Victoria Rogers Saving Ref: 2627 PT04
Saving Title Delete CAS Team Leader post
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Corporate Administration Support (CAS) team provides essential administrative
services across all council service areas, excluding schools and the Health and
Social Care Partnership. The CAS model centralised administrative functions to drive
efficiency and consistency.  As part of planned workforce changes, one Team
Leader retired in August 2025. It is proposed this post is not replaced and is formally
deleted in 2026/27. This approach delivers partial in-year savings in 2025/26 with
full-year savings realised from 2026/27.
Is there a Capital Requirement?  No
Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
Service Risk: The deletion of one Team Leader post will not result in a direct
reduction in the range of tasks delivered by CAS. A modest impact on timeliness and
oversight may arise due to an increased span of control across the remaining Team
Leaders.  To mitigate this, internal workflows will be reviewed, and digital tools such
as Automation and streamlined reporting will be further leveraged. This retains
operational front line capacity and minimises disruption to core support services.
Strategic Risk Register: No potential impact on areas of strategic risks.
People Risk: This proposal reflects an age retirement in August 2025. Therefore no
requirement for redeployment or redundancy.  
Reputational Risk: While the Team Leader role contributes to quality control,
service liaison and staff support, the functions will not cease and there is confidence
that with appropriate adjustment and monitoring, the service can continue to meet
expectations.
Saving (Cumulative)
2026/27 2027/28 2028/29
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
49 1 49 1 49 1 
FTE Impact delivered via vacancies: 1
Equality Impact Assessment Completed:  Yes EIA No: 1300 
Page 133

Page 20

2026/27 MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT 
Chief Officer: Laurence Slavin Saving Ref: 2627 RES06
Saving Title Council Tax Debt & HMRC Pilot
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Council is one of twelve local authorities in Scotland participating in the Council
Tax Data Sharing Pilot with His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC),
supported by the Scottish Government.  The pilot allows local authorities to share
information on unpaid Council Tax accounts, with HMRC then providing access to
taxpayer employment records — a data set previously unavailable to councils. The
access will enable the Council to initiate earnings arrestment recovery actions more
efficiently, particularly for current taxpayers with unpaid arrears and individuals who
have moved out of the area but remain liable for historical debt. National modelling
by the Scottish Government anticipates £20 million in additional recoveries across
Scotland if this pilot is implemented nationally.  Based on West Dunbartonshire’s
population and Council Tax arrears profile, an assumption of £100,000 per annum in
additional Council Tax income could be achieved.  
Is there a Capital Requirement?  No
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
Service Risk: The pilot will be delivered using existing resources and established
procedures and is not expected to reduce or remove any existing service functions.
However, as this exercise adds to workload, there is a modest risk other reactive
tasks may be slightly delayed during periods of peak demand. 
People Risk: There is no direct FTE reduction associated with this saving. 
Strategic Risk Register: N/A
Reputational Risk:  Minimal - use of employment data to recover tax from
individuals with a confirmed ability to pay is consistent with fair and ethical debt
recovery.  
Saving (Cumulative)
2026/27 2027/28 2028/29
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
100 0 100 0 100 0
FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A
Equality Impact Assessment Completed:  Yes EIA No: 1366
Page 134

Page 21

2026/27 MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT 
Chief Officer: Laurence Slavin Saving Ref: 2627 RES07
Saving Title Review of National Domestic Rate Budgets 
Summary of Savings Proposal 
A comprehensive review of Non-Domestic Rates (NDR) budgets across the
Council’s entire asset portfolio has been undertaken. This involved analysis of
rateable values for all operational and non-operational properties, verification of
budget allocations against current liability, and assessment of opportunities to
appeal or revalue properties where current rates may not accurately reflect use,
occupation status, or condition. Significant progress has been made in identifying
properties where savings can be achieved through reclassification, appeals, and
rationalisation of the asset base with initial findings confirming savings of
approximately £100k. The review has been expanded to include additional
properties and more complex appeals, with early indications suggesting that total
recurring savings could reach approximately £930k.
This is a substantial and ongoing piece of work that requires collaboration across
Asset Management, Finance, and services, alongside liaison with external valuation
and rating specialists.  
Is there a Capital Requirement?  No
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
Service Risk:  N/A
People Risk:  N/A
Strategic Risk Register: The work aligns closely with the Council’s strategic
objective to optimise use of assets and manage financial pressures. 
Reputational Risk: Minimal -  unsuccessful appeals or delays in delivering
projected savings could create scrutiny during financial reporting.
Saving (Cumulative)
2026/27 2027/28 2028/29
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
930 0 930 0 930 0
FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies:  N/A
Equality Impact Assessment Completed:  Yes EIA No: 1362
Page 135

Page 22

2026/27 MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT 
Chief Officer: Laurence Slavin Saving Ref: 2627 RES09
Saving Title Portable Appliance Testing
Summary of Savings Proposal 
Currently, each Council service is responsible for arranging its own Portable
Appliance Testing (PAT), typically delivered through a range of external
contractors.  A recent review by the Asset Management team assessed the
total cost of PAT across all Council services, comparing the cumulative
external spend with the projected cost of delivering the service in-house. 
The analysis indicates that a centralised, in-house PAT service could offer a
more cost-effective and efficient solution. Consolidation of testing using a
single delivery model means the Council can achieve better value for money,
improve compliance tracking, and reduce administrative overheads.
Estimated Financial Impact
 Total External PAT Cost: £86.5k per annum
(Based on average cost of £2.50 per test across circa 10,000 appliances)
 Projected In-House PAT Cost: £49.5k per annum
(Includes salaries for 1 Grade 7 FTE and equipment/training costs)
 Estimated Annual Saving: £36k per annum 
Is there a Capital Requirement?  No
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
Service Risk:  Transitioning PAT delivery in-house introduces potential risks
to service continuity and compliance. If internal capacity is insufficient or staff
availability is disrupted (e.g. due to sickness or turnover), there may be
delays in testing schedules. This could lead to non-compliance with health
and safety regulations, particularly in high-risk environments such as schools
or care facilities. Mitigation would require robust scheduling, contingency
planning, and clear service level agreements.
People Risk:  Delivering PAT in-house places additional responsibilities on
Asset Management staff. There is a risk of overloading existing roles or
requiring new staff with specialist training. 
Strategic Risk Register: Links to the strategic risks:
o Health, Safety, and Statutory Compliance: PAT testing is a fundamental
control in ensuring electrical safety across the Council’s estate.  Any failure in
delivery could result in non-compliance with statutory obligations, potential
safety incidents, and financial or legal exposure.
o Workforce Capacity and Resilience: The success of the in-house model relies
Page 136

Page 23

on sufficient trained staff and effective resource management. Sustained
capacity pressures or skills gaps could impact service resilience over time. 
Reputational Risk: Any failure to deliver PAT effectively, resulting in
missed tests, safety incidents, or regulatory breaches, could damage the
Council’s reputation. This is particularly sensitive in public-facing services
where safety is paramount.
Saving (Cumulative)
2026/27 2027/28 2028/29
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
36 0 36 0 36 0
FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies:  N/A
Equality Impact Assessment Completed:  Yes EIA No: 1363 
Page 137

Page 24

2026/27 MANAGEMENT ADJUSTMENT 
Chief Officer: Laurence Slavin Saving Ref: 2627 RES11
Saving Title Council Tax Income 
Summary of Savings Proposal 
The Revenues and Benefits service proposes a comprehensive re-evaluation of the
Council’s budgeted Council Tax income figure. This will be achieved through a
targeted review of all income-affecting variables, including:
 Discounts
 Exemptions
 Council tax reductions (CTR) claims and change of circumstances
 Assumptions on new properties being added to council tax register 
The Council Tax team will complete reviews on all applicable discounts and
exemptions to ensure continued entitlement. Where entitlement no longer applies,
backdated bills will be issued to recover underpaid Council Tax.
The Housing Benefit and Council Tax Reduction section will carry out an
assessment on CTR claims, ensuring accuracy using various sources which include
data from Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), Pension Service and His
Majesty’s Revenues and Customs.  The section will work alongside DWP to ensure
residents in receipt of Universal Credit have a financial assessment carried out to
maximise CTR and with the Pension Service to ensure pensioners are claiming both
pension credit and CTR given recent reports which indicate thousands of pensioners
across the country are not fully receiving what they are entitled to.
The Council Tax section will engage with the Dunbartonshire and Argyll and Bute
Joint Valuation Board to monitor and project new housing developments that are
expected to be added to the council tax roll in the near future to assist with
assumptions on chargeable properties  
Is there a Capital Requirement?  No
Impact and Risk Associated with Proposed Savings
Service Risk: The proposal will be delivered using existing resources and through
business-as-usual activities.  However, a more proactive and investigative workload
may lead to modest delays in other reactive areas, such as change of circumstance
processing or general correspondence.  These will be monitored and prioritised
accordingly.
People Risk: There is no proposed reduction in FTE.  However, this proposal
increases expectations on existing staff to carry out detailed reviews and engage in
additional financial assessment work. Risks to delivery will be mitigated through
Page 138

Page 25

performance monitoring and adjustment of non-statutory workload where necessary.
Strategic Risk Register: There would be no impact on strategic risks.
Reputational Risk:  While this approach is focused on increasing the Council’s
income through legitimate reassessment, it may generate complaints or appeals
from residents whose discount, exemption, or CTR award is amended or removed.
These risks will be managed through clear communications, appropriate
engagement with affected taxpayers, and adherence to statutory appeal procedures.
Saving (Cumulative)
2026/27 2027/28 2028/29
£000 FTE £000 FTE £000 FTE
250 0 250 0 250 0 
FTE impact delivered through existing vacancies: N/A
Equality Impact Assessment Completed:  No EIA No: 1361 
Page 139

Page 26

Appendix 5 – Equality Impact Assessments
Assessment
No
1359 Owner Andrew Brown                          
Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed 
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Gillian Hamilton  Chief Education Officer 
Members Gillian Hamilton - Chief Education Officer
Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer
Julie McGrogan - Senior Education Officer
Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer
Claire Cusick - Senior Education Officer
Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist
Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy
policy function or financial decision)
Policy Title Savings Option EDU01 - ASN School Transport 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy 
Currently, children with Additional Support Needs are transported to
the Lomond Base in Balloch Campus and the Rainbow Base in
Faifley Campus using private taxi contracts. The cost of using taxi
services has increased significantly in recent years. 
In order to minimise this cost, it is proposed the Council invests in
three mini buses and recruits four drivers to transport children who
are able to share vehicles to these locations. 
This approach has been successful for other schools in the area,
with the purchase of five buses and recruitment of six drivers last
year for use by children attending Renton Leven Base and
Riverside School. This would generate a revenue saving of £53k
after costs of driver salary, loan charges related to vehicle purchase
and ongoing maintenance costs. 
Where the needs of individual children prevent them from sharing a
vehicle, local taxi provision would still be utilised through the ASN
transport budget of £468k. 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy. 
Head Teachers and service users, Internal Transport, Fleet
Management, Drivers Services, Finance Officers, Procurement
Officers and Education central staff. 
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services?
Yes 
Page 140

Page 27

If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements.
Yes 
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas 
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal
opportunities (A) or foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) Yes
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes 
Who will be affected by this policy?
Children with Additional Support Needs who are transported to and from school by
the local authority will be affected by this change, however we will still be meeting
our obligation to transport them to and from school as this proposal only materially
changes the mode of transport being provided. 
This change will also have a direct impact on the income of local taxi providers, as
there will be a reduction in the business opportunities presented to them by the
Council. 
There will be employment opportunities presented by this option for drivers and
vehicle escorts to be employed by the Council.  
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Consultation with Head Teachers, children and families following the introduction of
minibuses during the previous session. Discussion with local taxi providers and
Internal Transport. Lessons have been learned through this process and
incorporated into future roll out of minibuses. Work is presently ongoing with
Internal Transport to revise the Service Level Agreement for the provision of this
service, ensuring all aspects are clearly documented and communicated with
stakeholders. 
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in relation to
this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether there is any negative
impact on particular groups. 
Specific
group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Council focus on
tackling child poverty. 
Young parents are
also a focus.
Cross cuts with the
consideration below. 
Neutral - change in
the mode of ASN
transport provision
would not impact
upon age. 
Page 141

Page 28

Disability                    The Council has a
duty to make its
services accessible to
disabled people,
including pupils. This
is an anticipatory
duty. 
We must seek to
mitigate any negative
impacts.
Families with one
disabled member are
more likely to live in
relative poverty.
Neutral - change in
provision would
continue to meet
accessibility
requirements of
service users.
Gender
Reassign              
N/A  
Marriage &
Civil
Partnership  
N/A  
Pregnancy &
Maternity        
N/A  
Race                          BME families are a
focus a group for
reducing child
poverty.
Most BME groups more
likely to be in relative
poverty and higher child
poverty than White
ethnic groups.
Neutral - change in
the mode of ASN
transport provision
would not impact
upon race.
Religion and
Belief           
Every young person
is entitled to the
provision of
denominational or
non-denominational
education
Provision of transport
would ensure children
can access  education.
Neutral - change in
the mode of ASN
transport provision
would not impact
upon religion and
belief.
Sex                           Single parent families
are a focus a group
for reducing child
poverty.
Women are more likely
to be income deprived.
Nationally
approximately 90% of
single parents are
women.
Neutral - change in
provision would
need to meet
requirements of
service users.
Sexual
Orientation           
N/A  
Human
Rights                 
UNCRC especially in
terms of the domain
of 'provision'. 
Children have a right to
access education. ASN
Transport provision
ensures access to that
right. 
Neutral - change in
the mode of ASN
transport provision
would not impact
upon this human
right.
Health                        Transporting children
to and from school
can have an impact
on their health, and
Provision of transport
can alleviate concerns
for families getting their
child to school, however
Positive - reducing
the number of
vehicles
transporting
Page 142

Page 29

the health and
wellbeing of their
families.
removes the benefits
associated with more
active modes of travel. 
children to school
would have a
positive impact on
the environment,
depending on
vehicle type used. 
Social &
Economic
Impact      
Council focus on
reducing child
poverty. 
Fairer Scotland Duty 
Scottish Consumer
Duty 
Fairer Scotland Duty:
There will be a
reduction in the number
of business
opportunities for local
taxi providers, however
the Council will still be
spending approximately
£468k in this market in
ASN transportation. 
We have screened for
relevance to the
Scottish Consumer
Duty. We have
concluded that we have
had due regard to
needs of the duty in the
approach, including in
the impact assessment,
and that there are no
additional elements we
need to assess.
Neutral - change in
provision would
have reduce
business
opportunities for
local taxi providers
but provide
employment
opportunities for
drivers and vehicle
escorts. The
change in provision
would have no
wider impact on
social and
economic factors.
Cross Cutting                 Important to look at
cross cutting impacts. 
Membership of more
than one disadvantaged
group will multiply
affects.
Impacts should be
considered in the
round. 
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be
implemented, please provide justification for this.
Overall, impact is regarded as neutral.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
We will monitor impact by consulting with Head Teachers, Internal Transport, Taxi
Providers, and the children and families involved.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the
recommendation
EIA 1359: The EIA notes neutral impacts for protected groups of service users.
There will be negative impacts on business opportunities for local taxi providers, but
positive impacts on council employment. Fewer vehicles used in total will reduce 
Page 143

Page 30

omissions, which is likely to be positive in terms of health. 
Assessment
No
1307 Owner Claire McKay                                 
Resource Regeneration, Environment
and Growth
Service HE Budget 
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer John Kerr Housing Development and
Homelessness Manager 
Members Joanne Sutherland - Homeless and Housing Options Co-ordinator
Shari Law - Team Leader 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title HE01 Cessation Temporary Accommodation Rotation Budget Saving 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy 
Under this option the plan to rotate and retire 10 temporary
accommodation units returning them back into mainstream use.  Some
of which have been used between 4 and 10 years in 2026/27 would
then be postponed until 2026/27.  To carry out the rotation would cost
£1,000 per property therefore but delaying these would save £10,000. 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy. 
None. 
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services?
No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements.
No 
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas 
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities
(A) or foster good relations (F)
No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No 
Page 144

Page 31

Who will be affected by this policy?
N/a
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Housing and Homelessness team 
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented,
please provide justification for this.
N/a
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
No
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the
recommendation
Screening 1307: The proposal has been screened. An impact assessment is not
required as there is no impact on service level, service users or staff. 
Assessment
No
1335 Owner James Gallacher                        
Resource Transformation Service Budget P and T 
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer James  Gallacher ICT Manager 
Members James Gallacher, ICT Manager
Victoria Rogers, Chief Officer, People & Technology
Ric Rea, Performance & Strategy Officer 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title PT05 SOM Savings Options - ICT Restructure 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy 
As part of a wider service review of People & Technology, specifically to
ensure compliance with SOM and deliver savings towards the Council
budget gap, the proposal is to remove 0.5 FTE G8 1st Line Supervisor. 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy. 
P&T Management, Chief Officer People and Technology 
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services?
No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements.
No 
Page 145

Page 32

SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas 
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities
(A) or foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes 
Who will be affected by this policy?
ICT employees 
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Consultation with P&T Chief Officer, Strategic HR, ICT Management team and Trade
Unions 
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether
there is any negative impact on particular groups. 
Specific group
to consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           The council must meet
public sector equality
duty.
People from older age
groups that is over 50,
are less likely to gain
employment than younger
if they are out of
employment.
Potential to have
negative on older
groups because of
workforce
demographics
however the council
is providing early
retirement or switch
policy to support
employees.
Disability                    The Council has a duty
to ensure that services
are accessible to
disabled people and
that reasonable
adjustments are made
for disabled staff when
required. 
It is important that
reasonable
adjustments are not
only made but also
Disabled people are more
likely to experience
financial hardship, as are
households with any
disabled member.
Potential to have
negative impact for
disabled workers.
however, the council
is providing early
retirement or switch
policy to support
employees. 
Page 146

Page 33

made in good time.
Gender
Reassign                 
Marriage &
Civil
Partnership     
Pregnancy &
Maternity         
Race                            
Religion and
Belief           
Sex                           Important to gauge any
differential impact in
terms of sex
The change will affect
one member staff directly.
Given that only one
member of staff will
be affected, there
would be a
differential impact in
terms of sex.
Sexual
Orientation           
Human Rights                    
Health                        Health and wellbeing
are a priority for the
Council as noted in our
Strategic Plan 22-27.
Worries surrounding job
security may be
heightened for
employees.
This has the
potential to
negatively impact
employees. Any
potential reduction in
staffing
requirements will be
managed through 
SWITCH
redeployment
programme.
Additional support
through SWITCHCH
is available to any
employees impacted
by the savings
options to ensure
their health and
wellbeing.
Social &
Economic
Impact      
The council has duty of
care toward all its
workers, and in terms
of the Public Sector
Equality Duty.
Employees affected by
this policy may be
impacted financially. 
Any potential
reduction in staffing
requirements could
be managed through
SWITCH
redeployment
programme.
Additional support
Page 147

Page 34

will be available to
any employees
impacted by the
savings options to
ensure their health
and wellbeing.
Cross Cutting                   
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented,
please provide justification for this.
There will be a differential impact in terms of sex, affecting a female member of staff.
The SWITCH process is in place to support and assist this member of staff. It is not
anticipated that there will be any negative consequences for service delivery, including in
regard to equality or the other areas we assess. 
To ensure compliance with SOM and reduce the ICT service with a 0.5 FTE (Grade 8)
resource. 
This is a positive more for the service in terms of device support as it adds clarify to
device management roles and responsibilities.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
ICT will continue to monitor and review support requirements, capacity and workloads. 
ICT will continue to report via service management and also WDC strategic plan KPI -
Volume of ICT Incidents closed in half day or less.
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the
recommendation
EIA 1335: Given that only one member of staff will be affected, there would be a
differential impact in terms of sex, in this case for a woman. The SWITCH process is in
place to support and assist this member of staff. It is anticipated that there would be
minimal impact on consequences for service delivery, including in regard to equality or
the other areas we assess. 
Assessment
No
1360 Owner Gail Macfarlane                          
Resource Regeneration, Environment
and Growth
Service Budget R and N 
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer - Roads &
Neighbourhood 
Members Grounds and Waste Manager, Procurement Team, Legal Team 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RN 02: Dec 2025 CCTV at Depots 
Page 148

Page 35

The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy 
The purpose of the saving option is to transition to the use of CCTV at
the depots. 
The proposal is to upgrade CCTV at the depots to include real time
monitoring and should any entry points be tripped with unauthorised
access this would be reported to Police to attend. 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy. 
Greenspace service, legal, procurement 
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services?
No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements.
Yes 
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas 
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities
(A) or foster good relations (F)
No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No 
Who will be affected by this policy?
CCTV team and external contractor
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Greenspace service, procurement team, legal team 
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether
there is any negative impact on particular groups. 
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented,
please provide justification for this. 
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
CCTV management will be monitored
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the
recommendation 
Page 149

Page 36

Screening 1360: The proposal to accelerate has been screened and is not relevant to
any of the impact areas, therefore no impact assessment is required. Eventual
procurement will be impact assessed having regard to the Fair Scotland Duty in line with
the Councils usual approach as this is a major procurement. 
Assessment
No
1356 Owner Gail Macfarlane                        
Resource Regeneration, Environment
and Growth
Service Budget R and N 
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Gail Macfarlane Chief Officer - Roads &
Neighbourhood 
Members Fleet Coordinator, Roads & Transport Manager, Road Network
Coordinator 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RN 03: Dec 2025 Purchase gully motor 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy 
The purpose of the saving option is to purchase a gully motor to
undertake gully cleaning. The gully motor is now out of service due to
age and maintenance requirements. The service has hired a vehicle to
undertake the statutory activity. The purchase of the vehicle will mitigate
the hire costs for the service. 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy. 
Fleet Service, roads service, procurement 
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services?
Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements.
Yes 
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas 
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities
(A) or foster good relations (F)
No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No 
Page 150

Page 37

Who will be affected by this policy?
Service users within the council - roads operatives
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Fleet Service, roads service, procurement team 
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether
there is any negative impact on particular groups. 
Specific group
to consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                             
Disability                      
Gender
Reassign                 
Marriage &
Civil
Partnership     
Pregnancy &
Maternity         
Race                            
Religion and
Belief           
Sex                             
Sexual
Orientation           
Human Rights                    
Health                          
Social &
Economic
Impact         
Cross Cutting                   
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Gully motor use will be monitored to maximise use 
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the
recommendation
Screening 1356: The proposal to accelerate has been screened and is not relevant to 
Page 151

Page 38

any of the impact areas, therefore no impact assessment is required. Eventual
procurement of vehicles will be impact assessed having regard to the Fair Scotland Duty
in line with the Councils usual approach as this is a major procurement. 
Assessment No 1358 Owner Andrew Brown                               
Resource Transformation Service Budget Ed 
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Gillian Hamilton  Chief Education Officer 
Members Gillian Hamilton - Chief Education Officer
Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer
Julie McGrogan - Senior Education Officer
Andrew Brown - Senior Education Officer
Claire Cusick - Senior Education Officer
Ellen Moran - Principal Educational Psychologist
Alison Bowers - Senior Education Officer 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title Savings Option EDU02 - Rental of School Milk Fridges 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy 
Fridges used in primary schools to keep pupils’ milk chilled are currently
rented at a cost of £6,480 per year. 
In some schools, the existing refrigeration in the school kitchen would
have sufficient space to hold the milk, and so it is proposed that all
rentals cease with additional equipment purchased if required. 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy. 
Head Teachers of Primary Schools and Central Education staff. 
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services?
No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements. 
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas 
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities
(A) or foster good relations (F)
No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No 
Page 152

Page 39

Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No 
Who will be affected by this policy?
N/A
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
N/A 
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether
there is any negative impact on particular groups. 
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                              
Disability                       
Gender Reassign                 
Marriage & Civil
Partnership     
Pregnancy &
Maternity         
Race                             
Religion and Belief             
Sex                              
Sexual Orientation              
Human Rights                    
Health                           
Social & Economic
Impact         
Cross Cutting                   
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be
implemented, please provide justification for this.
N/A
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
N/A
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the
recommendation 
Page 153

Page 40

Screening 1358: There is no impact on individuals or groups by this proposed
change. Purchasing fridges removes ongoing rental costs. 
Assessment
No
1300 Owner Arun Menon                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget P and T 
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Arun Menon Business Support
Manager 
Members Arun Menon, Business Support Manager
Richard Butler, Section Head CAS 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title PT 04 Delete 1 FTE CAS Team Leader post 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy 
This option will see CAS establishment reduced by 1 FTE in the Team
Leader category.  Each TL will assume responsibility for a larger cohort
of staff (from 10 FTE to approximately 11.5 FTE), which may extend
response times in some cases.   
The deletion of one Team Leader post is not expected to result in a
direct reduction in the range of tasks delivered by CAS. 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy. 
Business Support Management 
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services?
No
If yes please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements.
No 
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas 
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities
(A) or foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No 
Who will be affected by this policy?
Services that receive support from CAS but any impact will be minimised. 
Page 154

Page 41

Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
PMRG have been made aware of the impact should the savings be approved 
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether
there is any negative impact on particular groups. 
Specific group to consider Needs Evidence Impact
Age                              
Disability                       
Gender Reassign                  
Marriage & Civil Partnership    
Pregnancy & Maternity            
Race                             
Religion and Belief              
Sex                            Need to assess
any differential
impacts
The sex split is 2
Male and 6 Female
Team Leaders at
present and will be 2
Male and 5 Female if
a post is deleted. 
The slight shift in
gender balance is
due purely to a
female post holder
retiring. 
Most of the CAS
Teams are female.
No significant
differential.
impacts in terms
of sex.
Sexual Orientation               
Human Rights                     
Health                           
Social & Economic Impact        
Cross Cutting                     
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented,
please provide justification for this.
N/A
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? 
Page 155

Page 42

No
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the
recommendation
EIA 1300: No differential impacts were noted in terms of protected groups. There will be
an impact on timeliness and oversight may arise due to an increased span of control
across the remaining Team Leaders.  Each TL will assume responsibility for a larger
cohort of staff (from 10 FTE to approximately 11.5 FTE), which may extend response
times in some cases.   
To mitigate this, internal workflows will be reviewed, and digital tools such as Automation
and streamlined reporting will be further leveraged to support oversight and performance
tracking.  This approach retains operational capacity at the front line and minimises
disruption to core support services. 
Assessment
No
1366 Owner Arun Menon                              
Resource Transformation Service Budget Resource 
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Arun Menon Business Support
Manager 
Members Arun Menon, Business Support Manager
Ryan Chalmers, Section Head – Revenues and Benefits 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title 2627 RES06 Council Tax Debt & His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Pilot 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy 
West Dunbartonshire Council is participating in a national pilot with
HMRC, supported by the Scottish Government, allowing councils to
access taxpayer employment records for individuals with unpaid
Council Tax. This data sharing will improve the efficiency of recovery
actions, including earnings arrestment’s, for current and former
residents with outstanding arrears.  The pilot is focused on those that
can pay but choose not to pay and don't engage with the Council or our
debt partners. 
Scottish Government modelling suggests up to £20 million in additional
recoveries if implemented nationally. Based on local population and
arrears profiles, West Dunbartonshire could conservatively realise
around £100,000 per year. Actual income will depend on the volume of
matches and recoveries, which will be evaluated during the pilot’s first
year (2025/26). These findings will inform a full business case for 
Page 156

Page 43

resourcing and sustainable income assumptions from 2026/27 onwards. 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy. 
Business Support Management 
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services?
Yes
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements.
No 
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas 
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities
(A) or foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) Yes
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes 
Who will be affected by this policy?
The policy will affect West Dunbartonshire council tax payers with outstanding arrears
who are currently or recently employed, particularly those whose earnings can be
identified via HMRC data, enabling potential earnings arrestment. It may also affect
former residents with historical debts. Other residents may experience minor delays in
routine council tax enquiries due to temporary staff reallocation.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Chief Officer Resources and Revenues and Benefits Team Management. 
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether
there is any negative impact on particular groups. 
Specific
group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Younger working-
age adults
(especially 25–44)
are more likely to
be in employment
and have
traceable
earnings. Older
people (65+) are
Scottish Household Survey –
employment rates highest in
25–49 age group; high CTR
take-up among pensioners.
More effective
recovery from
working-age
debtors who can
afford to pay. 
Low/No negative
impact on older
people as they 
Page 157

Page 44

less likely to be in
employment and
more likely to
receive Single
Person Discount
or Council Tax
Reduction.
are unlikely to be
subject to
earnings
arrestment.
Disability                    Disabled people
may have
fluctuating or low
earned income,
be in receipt of
benefits exempt
from attachment,
or find debt
recovery
correspondence
distressing.
Approximately 28% of West
Dunbartonshire adults report
limiting long-term conditions
(Scottish Census 2022); higher
CTR and exemption uptake
among disabled households.
No or minimal
negative impact –
earnings
arrestment only
applies where
PAYE income
exists and is
above protected
thresholds.
Existing
vulnerability
procedures and
signposting to
advice agencies
remain in place.
Possible minor
positive via fairer
burden-sharing.
Gender
Reassign                 
Marriage &
Civil
Partnership 
Pregnancy
& Maternity        
Financial
pressure may
increase during
maternity leave or
pregnancy.
Pregnancy and
maternity is a
priority group in
terms of tackling
child poverty.
West Dunbartonshire Child
Poverty Strategy 
No or minimal
negative impact –
earnings
arrestment only
applies where
PAYE income
exists and is
above protected
thresholds.
Existing
vulnerability
procedures and
signposting to
advice agencies
remain in place. 
Race                          Minority ethnic
households may
face language or
digital barriers
West Dunbartonshire has small
but growing BME population
(approx. 4%); English as
additional language in some
Potential minor
negative if letters
are not fully
understood, but
Page 158

Page 45

when responding
to debt
correspondence.
households. standard
translation and
interpreter
services are
available on
request. Overall
impact low.
Religion
and Belief             
Sex                           Female lone
parents are a
priority group in
terms of tackling
child poverty. 
Domestic abuse
survivors may
have council tax
arrears linked to
coercive control.
In West Dunbartonshire
approximately 28% of families
are lone parent families.
Nationally about 92% of of lone
parent families have a female
lead.  Scottish Census 2022 &
local CTR data. 
Women slightly more likely to
be single parents receiving
CTR; men slightly more likely
to be in full-time PAYE
employment. 
West Dunbartonshire has high
levels of domestic abuse.
Men are more
likely to be the
subject of
arrestments. 
Potential negative
impact if domestic
abuse has
affected the
persons finances. 
Existing
vulnerability
procedures and
signposting to
advice agencies
remain in place.
Sexual
Orientation           
Human
Rights                 
Article 8 of the
ECHR, (Private
life etc.) is
relevant here.
Cross cuts with
GDPR
considerations. 
Process need to
be in place to
ensure that data
is securely
transferred, that it
is accurate and
determinations
are fair and
overseen by
people.
A data protection impact
assessment has been carried
out.  The results were
satisfactory.
The Councils
approach will
follow relevant
guidance to
ensure fairness
and Data
Protection.
Health                        There are links
between debt and
poor mental
health. 
Analysis of polling from
research company YouGov
suggests around 665,148 of
people in Scotland have seen
Implementation
does provide an
opportunity to
offer benefit
Page 159

Page 46

their mental health and
wellbeing affected by debt.
https://www.cas.org.uk/news-
and-events/over-660000-
people-say-debt-has-impacted-
their-mental-health. 
Evidence is also noted from
research by 'Mind'
https://www.mind.org.uk/media-
a/4348/still-in-the-red.pdf.
checks and
support. Existing
vulnerability
procedures and
signposting to
advice agencies
remain in place.
Social &
Economic
Impact      
People on low
earned income or
zero-hour
contracts may still
be affected if
earnings exceed
the protected
minimum. 
The West
Dunbartonshire
child poverty
strategy identifies,
larger families
and families with
younger children
more likely to be
affected by
poverty.
High deprivation in parts of
West Dunbartonshire (SIMD
2020); earnings arrestment
protected rate is relatively low.
Minor negative
risk for low-paid
workers, mitigated
by statutory
protected
earnings rate and
existing debt
advice/repayment
options. Potential
positive in that
recovery is
targeted at those
with confirmed
ability to pay
rather than
blanket measures.
Cross
Cutting                
We need to
consider cross
cutting impacts. 
Need to ensure
clear
communications.
Workloads of the Council's
W4U team and local Citizens
Advice or other advice
agencies may increase.
Potential
increased
workloads for
some Council
workers and other
agencies. 
Implementation
does provide an
opportunity to
offer benefit
checks and
support.   
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be
implemented, please provide justification for this.
The proposed pilot is both proportionate and aligned to statutory duties, ensuring
the Council maintains an accurate and sustainable tax base. 
Page 160

Page 47

There may be negative impacts for lower income and/or more indebted groups.
W4U can provide support in terms of benefits checks. 
The Council will follow its Communicating Effectively Guidance. Providing
Accessible Services training is available to all staff. 
The policy change will allow us to enforcement wage arrestments however in the
first instance, a letter will be issued to the taxpayer to advise of the data match and
to contact us to discuss their debt and financial position.  This will allow us to
discuss factors impacting their ability to pay, such as debt, personal situations,
health issues etc, fully reviewing their income and expenditure with a view to
agreeing a suitable repayment arrangement to avoid the wage arrestment being
applied.  There will also be the option to provide further breathing space to
taxpayers to work with us, provide financial and personal support before enforcing
the action. 
The pilot supports fairer burden-sharing by targeting recovery at those who can
afford to pay, while continuing to protect unemployed, benefit-dependent, and
vulnerable residents. On balance, the financial and equity benefits outweigh the
minimal risks identified. 
The policy will enhance fairness, accuracy and financial resilience across the
system, with no discriminatory effects identified. For these reasons, the
recommendation is to proceed with implementation, supported by appropriate
mitigation measures and ongoing monitoring to ensure equity across all groups.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Uptake of Council Tax Debt recovery via this pilot will be monitored
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the
recommendation
EIA 1366:  The equality impact assessment has identified no significant adverse
impact on any protected characteristic or socio-economically disadvantaged group.
Where risks exist for example potential distress from debt letters or slight delays in
routine enquiries, these are, temporary, and can be fully mitigated by existing
statutory protections, vulnerability procedures, debt-advice signposting, and
translation and support services. 
The Council Tax Debt & HMRC Data-Sharing Pilot introduces no new charges, no
changes to discounts or exemptions, and no reduction in service provision. Data
sharing will be carefully controlled. 
It enables the Council to use an existing, lawful recovery method, earnings
arrestment more effectively by identifying debtors who are in current employment
and confirming that this recovery route can be used. 
Page 161

Page 48

Assessment
No
1362 Owner Michelle Lynn                                
Resource Transformation Service Budget Resource 
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer Resources 
Members Michelle Lynn Asset Manager 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RES07: Review Non-Domestic Rates budget to realign to reflect in year
appeals 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy 
April 2023 marked the date of the next Non-Domestic Rates (NDR)
revaluation, and the first to reflect the reforms introduced by the
independent Barclay Review of Non-Domestic Rates. These reforms
were to ensure that property values more closely align with prevailing
property market conditions in Scotland. 
Where a property occupied by a public body is subject to a successful
proposal or appeal, the financial benefit from the reduction in rateable
value will result in a downward re-determination of revenue allocations
at a subsequent fiscal event. WDC have begun the process of appeals
with our local assessors to ensure that values are accurate. 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy. 
WDC Staff Members/Chief Officers 
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services?
No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements.
No 
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas 
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities
(A) or foster good relations (F)
No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No 
Who will be affected by this policy?
All Council services, Elected Members and partner organisations including the Scottish 
Page 162

Page 49

Government.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Michelle Lynn, Assets Manager- conducted this high level efficiency option ;
Laurence Slavin, Chief Officer - Resources - interrogated this high level efficiency option;
Performance and Monitoring Review Group, West Dunbartonshire Council - where
informed of this high level efficiency option 
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether
there is any negative impact on particular groups. 
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                              
Disability          
Gender Reassign                 
Marriage & Civil
Partnership     
Pregnancy & Maternity           
Race                             
Religion and Belief              
Sex                            
Sexual Orientation              
Human Rights                     
Health                       
Social & Economic
Impact         
Cross Cutting                 
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be
implemented, please provide justification for this. 
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? 
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the
recommendation
Screening 1362: Concludes that the proposal is not relevant to any of the areas we 
Page 163

Page 50

assess and therefore does not require an impact assessment. 
Assessment
No
1363 Owner Michelle Lynn                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget Resource 
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Laurence Slavin Chief Officer Resources 
Members Michelle Lynn Asset Manager 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title RES09: Portable Appliance Testing 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy 
Currently, each Council service is responsible for arranging its own
Portable Appliance Testing (PAT), typically delivered through a range of
external contractors. 
A recent review by the Asset Management team assessed the total cost
of PAT across all Council services, comparing the cumulative external
spend with the projected cost of delivering the service in-house. 
The analysis indicates that a centralised, in-house PAT service could
offer a more cost-effective and efficient solution. Consolidation of
testing using a single delivery model means the Council can achieve
better value for money, improve compliance tracking, and reduce
administrative overheads. 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy. 
WDC Staff Members/Chief Officers 
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services?
No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements.
No 
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas 
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities
(A) or foster good relations (F)
No
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No
Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) No 
Page 164

Page 51

Who will be affected by this policy?
All Council services, Elected Members and partner organisations including the Scottish
Government.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Michelle Lynn, Assets Manager- conducted this high level efficiency option ;
Laurence Slavin, Chief Officer - Resources - interrogated this high level efficiency option; 
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether
there is any negative impact on particular groups. 
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                              
Disability                       
Gender Reassign                 
Marriage & Civil
Partnership     
Pregnancy & Maternity           
Race                             
Religion and Belief              
Sex                              
Sexual Orientation              
Human Rights                     
Health                           
Social & Economic
Impact         
Cross Cutting                     
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be implemented,
please provide justification for this. 
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis? 
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the
recommendation 
Page 165

Page 52

Screening 1363: Concludes that the proposal is not relevant to any of the areas we
assess and therefore does not require an impact assessment. 
Assessment
No
1361 Owner Arun Menon                                 
Resource Transformation Service Budget Resource 
FirstName Surname Job Title
Head Officer Arun Menon Business Support
Manager 
Members Arun Menon, Business Support Manager
Ryan Chalmers, Section Head – Revenues and Benefits 
(Please note: the word 'policy' is used as shorthand for strategy policy
function or financial decision)
Policy Title 2627 RES11 Council Tax Income 
The aim, objective, purpose and intended outcome of policy 
The Revenues and Benefits service will undertake a full review of the
Council’s budgeted Council Tax income. This includes validating all
discounts, exemptions and Council Tax Reduction (CTR) awards,
ensuring entitlements remain accurate and issuing backdated bills
where required. The service will use verified data from national
agencies to improve the accuracy of CTR assessments and support
residents, particularly Universal Credit claimants and pensioners, to
maximise their entitlement. In parallel, the Council Tax team will work
with the Dunbartonshire and Argyll and Bute Joint Valuation Board to
monitor forthcoming housing developments and refine projections of
new chargeable properties. This combined approach aims to ensure the
Council Tax base is robust, accurate and fully reflects income due. 
Service/Partners/Stakeholders/service users involved in the
development and/or implementation of policy. 
Business Support Management 
Does the proposals involve the procurement of any goods or
services?
No
If yes, please confirm that you have contacted our procurement
services to discuss your requirements.
No 
SCREENING
You must indicate if there is any relevance to the four areas 
Duty to eliminate discrimination (E), advance equal opportunities
(A) or foster good relations (F)
Yes
Relevance to Human Rights (HR) No 
Page 166

Page 53

Relevance to Health Impacts (H) No
Relevance to Social Economic Impacts (SE) Yes 
Who will be affected by this policy?
The proposal will primarily affect households whose Council Tax discounts, exemptions
or Council Tax Reduction (CTR) awards are subject to review. This may include low-
income residents, Universal Credit claimants, and pensioners whose entitlement
requires reassessment. Some taxpayers may experience changes to their bill where
eligibility has altered or been removed. 
Internal staff within Revenues and Benefits will also be impacted through an increased
requirement for detailed case reviews and cross-agency verification.
Who will be/has been involved in the consultation process?
Chief Officer Resources and Revenues and Benefits Team Management. 
Please outline any particular need/barriers which equality groups may have in
relation to this policy list evidence you are using to support this and whether
there is any negative impact on particular groups. 
Specific group to
consider
Needs Evidence Impact
Age                           Older residents may
require clearer
communication and
additional support to
understand changes to
discounts, exemptions
or CTR awards,
particularly if they are
not digitally confident. 
Younger working-age
residents, especially
those on low incomes or
receiving Universal
Credit, may need
support to ensure timely
reporting of changes in
circumstances and
access to accurate
financial assessments. 
Both younger and older
adults may need
assistance navigating
appeals processes if
Reports from the
Department for Work and
Pensions and the
Pension Service
highlighting that many
pensioners are under-
claiming pension credit
and Council tax reduction
(CTR). 
Local CTR and Council
Tax caseload data
showing high levels of
working-age UC
claimants who frequently
experience changes in
circumstances. 
The proposal does not
create age-related
eligibility criteria; rather, it
applies consistently
across all age groups. 
Children have the highest
If eligibility is
altered or
removed
impacts on
more
financially
vulnerable age
groups are
likely to be
greater. 
Page 167

Page 54

their award is amended. poverty rates. Pensioners
and working-age adults
have the lowest rates.
(https://www.jrf.org.uk/uk-
poverty-2025-the-
essential-guide-to-
understanding-poverty-in-
the-uk)
Disability                    The Council has a
anticipatory legal duty to
make its services
accessibility to disabled
people. 
Some disabled
residents may require
accessible
communication formats
(e.g., large print, plain
English, alternative
formats, or telephone
support) to understand
changes to their Council
Tax or CTR entitlement. 
Individuals with
cognitive, mental health,
or learning disabilities
may need additional
support to navigate
reviews, supply
evidence, or understand
backdated adjustments. 
Residents with long-
term health conditions
or fluctuating conditions
may require flexible
timescales for
responding to requests
for information.
National research and
DWP guidance highlight
that disabled residents
can experience
challenges understanding
complex benefit changes
without tailored
communication. 
The policy does not
amend eligibility criteria
linked to disability;
reviews are applied
uniformly across all
households.
If eligibility is
altered or
removed,
impacts on
more
financially
groups
vulnerable
groups
including
disabled
people are
likely to be
greater.
Gender Reassign                 
Marriage & Civil
Partnership     
Pregnancy &
Maternity         
Race                          BME groups are a
priority area for tackling
child poverty.
People from some BME
groups such as
Bangladeshi, Pakistani
If eligibility is
altered or
removed,
Page 168

Page 55

and African are more
likely to be in relative
poverty compared to
White ethnic groups.
impacts on
more
financially
vulnerable
ethnic groups
including are
likely to be
greater.
Religion and Belief             
Sex                           Women are
disproportionately
represented among
lower-income
households and single-
parent families, meaning
they may need
additional support
understanding Council
Tax reduction
reassessments or
dealing with potential
backdated charges. 
Single parents are
priority group in terms of
reducing child poverty.
National data indicating
women form the majority
of single-parent
households. 
The policy is applied
equally to all households
regardless of sex, and
entitlement criteria are
not sex-based.
If eligibility is
altered or
removed,
impacts on
more
financially
vulnerable
groups
including
women are
likely to be
greater.
Sexual Orientation              
Human Rights                    
Health                          
Social & Economic
Impact      
Residents on low
incomes may need
clear, timely and easy-
to-understand
communication about
any changes to
discounts, exemptions
or CTR awards, as
financial pressures can
limit their ability to
absorb unexpected
charges.
Local Council Tax
Reduction caseload data
shows a significant
proportion of recipients
are in low-income
households, including
those on Universal
Credit. 
The policy does not
introduce socio-economic
eligibility criteria and
applies the same review
process to all
households.
If eligibility is
altered or
removed
impacts on
more
financially
vulnerable
groups
including are
likely to be
greater.
Cross Cutting                 We need to consider
cross cutting impacts. 
Need to ensure clear
Workloads of the
Council's W4U team and
local Citizens Advice or
other advice agencies
Potential
increased
workloads for
some Council
Page 169

Page 56

communications. may increase. workers and
other agencies. 
Implementation
does provide
an opportunity
to offer benefit
checks and
support.   
Policy has a negative impact on an equality group, but is still to be
implemented, please provide justification for this.
The proposed Council Tax income review is both proportionate and aligned to
statutory duties, ensuring the Council maintains an accurate and sustainable tax
base. 
There may be negative impacts for lower income and/or more indebted groups.
W4U can provide support in terms of benefits checks. 
The Council will follow it's Communicating Effectively Guidance. Providing
Accessible Services training is available to all staff. 
The policy will enhance fairness, accuracy and financial resilience across the
system, with no discriminatory effects identified. For these reasons, the
recommendation is to proceed with implementation, supported by appropriate
mitigation measures and ongoing monitoring to ensure equity across all groups.
Will the impact of the policy be monitored and reported on an ongoing basis?
Uptake of Council Tax reduction will be monitored
Q7 What is you recommendation for this policy?
Introduce
Please provide a meaningful summary of how you have reached the
recommendation
EIA 1361:  The review process may create some communications challenges for
particular groups—especially low-income households, older residents, disabled
people and those facing language or digital barriers—these impacts can be
effectively mitigated through accessible communication, targeted support and
adherence to established appeal processes. 
More financially vulnerable groups such as women, BME groups, Disabled people,
single parents and large families might be negatively affected financially if eligibility
is reduced or removed. 
The implementation of the review will include helping residents maximise their
entitlement to Council Tax Reduction and related benefits. 
Page 170