Democracy Spraffa

Item 6 app 3 - Tree felling within area covered by Brucehill Cliffs Tree Preservation Order

West Dunbartonshire Council · 8 June 2022
Back to Planning Committee — 8 June 2022 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

1 
Tree Replacement Proposals
Cardross Road, Dumbarton
Planning Application Reference – DC21/211/FUL 
Date: 
24th May 2022

Page 2

2 
Contents: 
1.0 Introduction/Summary
2.0 Tree Removal Assessment
3.0 Tree Replacement Proposals
4.0 Supporting Visual Representation of Proposals.
5.0 DWA Landscaping Proposal for Development

Page 3

3 
1.0 Introduction/Summary 
1.1 In response to the inadvertent tree felling within the TPO which took place on
the development site at Cardross Road, Dumbarton, on behalf of the
landowners, Slate Island Developments, we are presenting our replacement
proposal in order to give West Dunbartonshire Council reassurance that the
inadvertent removal of the trees will be mitigated by adopting a robust re-
planting proposal which will be incorporated and embedded within the overall
developments landscaping proposals. 
2.0 Tree removal Assessment 
2.1 Following the mistaken and inadvertent removal of the trees in question WDC
requested that the site landowners carry out an assessment to determine the
extent of the number of trees which had been inadvertently felled, their
appointed consultant, Julian A Morris (Professional Tree Services) carried out
the survey and on completion WDC undertook their own survey, the following
table of contents is a combined representation of both assessments and is
agreed by both the landowners and the council.

Page 4

4

Page 5

5 
2.2 BASED ON “TPO (WDC13, 2021) Brucehill Cliffs: Tree Removal Assessment”
(Additional comments by JMPTS on 24/5/22)
[WDC]
Count 
Location Tag
number
Species Grade Life stage [WDC] Comment [20/5/22] JMPTS comment [24/5/22]
1 Cliff glade 4088 Sycamore A Mature Felled, as recorded in consultant’s
Tree Removal Survey
Noted
2 Cliff glade 4089 Sycamore C Early
mature
Felled, as recorded in consultant’s
Tree Removal Survey
Noted
3 Cliff glade 4097 Norway
maple
A Mature Felled, as recorded in consultant’s
Tree Removal Survey
Noted
4 Cliff glade 4098 Lime A Mature Felled, as recorded in consultant’s
Tree Removal Survey
Noted
5 Cliff glade 4099 Norway
maple
B Mature Felled, as recorded in consultant’s
Tree Removal Survey
Noted
6 Along
boundary
with
convent
house
12 Silver birch C Semi
mature
One stem of 4 multi-stem tree has
been removed. Not recorded in
consultant’s Tree Removal Survey.
Tree has also been marked with
paint.
Recorded in DRA survey as 4
stemmed mixed broadleaf group #12
7 Along
boundary
with
convent
house
No tag, in
between 12
and 187
Silver birch   Young silver birch stem recently
removed, sap present. Not recorded
in consultant’s Tree Removal Survey.
By elimination, must be #186. Small
high stump noted in photo record.
8 Along
boundary
with
convent
house
187 Downy
birch
C Young Recorded as felled in consultant’s
Tree Removal Survey. Felled tree
confirmed in mapped location, no
tag found to confirm tree.
Agreed no tag could be found at Apr
2022

Page 6

6 
[WDC]
Count 
Location Tag
number
Species Grade Life stage [WDC] Comment [20/5/22] JMPTS comment [24/5/22]
9 Group 1
(189 to
202)
189 Goat
willow
B Early
mature
This tree is felled and unrecorded in
consultant’s Tree Removal Survey.
Photographic record shows #189 has
been felled.
10 Group 1
(189 to
202)
190 Goat
willow
B Early -
mature
Recorded as felled in consultant’s
Tree Removal Survey. Felled tree
confirmed in mapped location, no
tag found to confirm tree.
Agreed no tag could be found at Apr
2022
11 Group 1
(189 to
202)
191 Silver birch B Semi -
mature
Recorded as felled in consultant’s
Tree Removal Survey. Felled tree
confirmed in mapped location, no
tag found to confirm tree.
Agreed no tag could be found at Apr
2022
12 Group 1
(189 to
202)
192 Goat
willow
C Semi-
mature
192 is recorded as standing in the
report and 193 as down, however
193 is intact and is a Silver birch, as
are 194 and 195.
Agreed. Photo record shows #192
down, 193 standing.
13 Group 1
(189 to
202)
196 Silver birch C Young  Recorded as felled in consultant’s
Tree Removal Survey. Felled tree
confirmed in mapped location, no
tag found to confirm tree.
Agreed no tag could be found at Apr
2022
14 Group 1
(189 to
202)
197 Silver birch   This tree is felled and not recorded
on developer’s initial tree report or
tree removal survey but tagged on
site.
Agreed. Photo record shows #197
down.
15 Group 1
(189 to
202)
198 Silver birch B Early-
mature
Recorded as felled in consultant’s
Tree Removal Survey. Felled tree
confirmed in mapped location, no
tag found to confirm tree.
Presumed omitted from original
survey. Agreed no tag could be
found at Apr 2022
16 Group 1
(189 to
202)
199 Goat
willow
B Mature Recorded as felled in consultant’s
Tree Removal Survey. Felled tree
Agreed no tag could be found at Apr
2022

Page 7

7 
[WDC]
Count 
Location Tag
number
Species Grade Life stage [WDC] Comment [20/5/22] JMPTS comment [24/5/22]
confirmed in mapped location, no
tag found to confirm tree.
17 Group 1
(189 to
202)
200 Goat
willow
C Semi-
mature
As recorded in consultant’s Tree
Removal Survey, tagged tree
confirmed on site.
Agreed. Photo record shows #200
down.
18 Group 1
(189 to
202)
201 Goat
willow
B Semi-
mature
As recorded in consultant’s Tree
Removal Survey, tagged tree
confirmed on site.
Agreed. Photo record shows #201
down.
19 Group 1
(189 to
202)
202 Goat
willow  
Felled tree not recorded developer’s
initial tree report or tree removal
survey but tagged on site.
Presumed omitted from original
survey. No tag could be found at Apr
2022
20 At site
vehicle
entrance
206 Sycamore C Semi-
mature
Felled, this was the one tree within
the TPO that was to be granted
permission for removal as part of
application.
Noted.
21-33 Spread
throughout
Group 1
within TPO
WDC13
Unrecorded
smaller
tree
stumps
Mixed
species  
These are trees within the woodland
TPO area that were unrecorded in
the developer’s initial tree report or
tree removal survey, most likely due
to their smaller than 15cm diameter
size. Regardless, they have been
felled within a woodland TPO site
without permission and have been
included in the overall count. These
all occur within the Group 1 area.
Noted. No pre-removal records exist.

Page 8

8 
3.0 Tree Replacement Proposals by Julian A Morris – Professional Tree
Services 
3.1 No further operations to be carried out on site until the tree protection
recommended in the Arb Impact Assessment and Tree Protection Plan of
March 2022 (version 3) and the addendum of March 2022 are put in place and
checked by the project arboriculturist; 
3.2 The protective measures should be put in place without any vehicles entering
the protected areas; 
3.3 No tree work arisings should be removed from site or relocated within the site
at this time unless otherwise agreed with WDC.
3.4  In order to allow weeds to be supressed and return nutrients to the soil the
existing brash should be chipped from outside the protected areas. The ground
within the TPO has species such as wild garlic and bluebells growing and the
impact to these must be mitigated. It is proposed to use the excess brash
around new planting areas and mulching for landscaping features such as
ornamental trees or new hedge rows. No brash will be used on the woodland
floor and all surplus will be removed from site; however, this will not take place
until after the bird nesting season (31st August) but must be complete by the
end of October to avoid becoming a suitable hedgehog habitat. 
3.5 The young sycamore saplings that have grown since the large canopy removal
are already beyond the height that would be impacted by mulching; therefore,
it is our intention to remove these by hand as ‘positive woodland management’
which is permitted under the TPO. 
3.6 The heavy sections lying in the south corner are to be left in place as deadwood
habitat but made stable safe and in contact with the ground as much as
possible. It should be deliberately 'distressed' to accelerate habitat
development; Note that given the volume an agreement should be reached with
WDC in regards to what can be removed to ensure adequate open space
provision is still achieved throughout the development.
The heavy logs already piled on site and the scattered logs will be utilised within
the natural play area proposed within the development. In addition, any surplus
material will be offered to WDC Education Department’s Greenspace Support
for Schools and Nurseries initiative in order to provide logs which can be re-
purposed into seats for children or for use in Forest School and Outdoor
learning. 
.

Page 9

9 
3.7 A system of arboricultural supervision and monitoring to be agreed with WDC
and then implemented. It should meet with and where necessary exceed the
requirements of the planning conditions. 
3.8 Replanting (advising against like-for-like replacement of sycamore (Acer
pseudoplatanus) and norway maple (Acer platanoides), a native mix is to be
preferred and can be specified in due course, with the objective of improving
on habitat relative to what has been removed) and aftercare within the TPO
area to be undertaken in accordance with a plan to be agreed with WDC. It
should comprise a mixture of rootballed, guyed/staked specimens and smaller
bare root trees, at an overall replacement ratio of 5:1 to allow for losses, to
promote competition and companion shelter and to achieve a net overall
increase in tree cover. This should be thinned to 3:1 within 10 years; Refer
following proposed re-placement schedule for specific species/sizes; 
Species Abbreviation Planting
size
No.
Sessile Oak Qupe Heavy
Standard
5
Downy
Birch
Bepu(f) Feathers 10 
Bepu(s) Standards 5
Bird Cherry Prpa Standards 10
Rowan Soau(f) Feathers 10 
Soau(s) Standards 5
Hazel Coav Feathers 20
Scots Pine Pisy Feathers 10
All   75                 
3.9 Consideration to be given to extending the replanting into areas in the south
corner that did not and do not have tree cover.
3.10 Selection, planting and aftercare to be carried out in accordance with BS
8545:2014 “Trees: from nursery to independence in the landscape –
Recommendations” 
3.11 Planting design to be integrated with any additional planting that is being
undertaken along the cliff edge to provide continuity of habitat and green
network linkage with the Havoc Hole woodland corner; a thorny species
woodland edge mix along the cliff face area is proposed and these species will
be replicated throughout the TPO boundary.

Page 10

10 
3.12 Specimen planting to be undertaken any time after the tree protection barriers
are in place, and bare root planting within the dormant season 22-23;
Agreement to be reached with WDC in regards to programme and phasing of
works to ensure that any planting works is not abortive relative to construction. 
3.13 The stumps of shrubby Prunus laurocerasus that have been left at about 0.5m
high, to be reduced to as near ground level as practicable and treated with a
herbicide, as they will otherwise out-compete replacement native planting; 
No stumps to be removed, ground out or grubbed up. Whereas regenerative
growth from stumps is very likely this will not be structurally viable as it matures
and consideration should be given to its removal at the thinning stage or if it is
out-competing the new planting.  Note: Where stumps have been cut to 30-50
cm above ground these will be reduced to ground level by means of reducing
trip hazards for people working in and around the site.

Page 11

11 
4.0 Supporting Visual Representation of Proposals 
4.1 The following visual representations are to allow WDC to understand the
visual aspect of the finalised proposals specifically within the TPO area;

Page 12

12 
4.2 South West View Towards the River Clyde;

Page 13

13 
4.3 East View Towards the Carmelite Monastery;

Page 14

14 
4.4 North East View Towards Cardross Road;

Page 15

15 
5.0 DWA Landscaping Proposal for Development 
5.1 The following landscaping proposal has been undertaken by DWA Landscaping
and forms the basis of the overall development, however it should be noted that
the TPO area is of course supplemented with the proposal as detailed within
this report.

Page 16

16 
5.2 Landscaping drawing (also attached as an appendix for ease of reading)