Democracy Spraffa

Item 5b - DC21 217 FUL - Development of a Plastics to Hydrogen Facility, Hydrogen Vehicle Refuelling Station

West Dunbartonshire Council · 8 June 2022
Back to Planning Committee — 8 June 2022 and its agenda

Text extracted from the council's PDF. Layout and reading order may differ from the original.

Original council PDF · Download plain text

Page 1

WEST DUNBARTONSHIRE COUNCIL 
Report by Chief Officer – Regulatory and Regeneration 
Planning Committee: 8th June 2022 
DC21/217/FUL: Development of a Plastics to Hydrogen Facility,
Hydrogen Vehicle Refuelling Station and Associated
Infrastructure and Landscaping at Vacant Land at
Rothesay Dock, Dock Street/Cart Street, Clydebank by
AXIS PED 
1. REASON FOR REPORT 
1.1 This application, raises new or significant issues meriting determination at
Planning Committee.  Under the approved scheme of delegation it
therefore requires to be determined by the Planning Committee. 
2. RECOMMENDATION 
2.1 Grant planning permission subject to conditions set out in Section 9
below. 
3. DEVELOPMENT DETAILS 
3.1 The application site covers an area of approximately 1.54 hectares and is
located at Rothesay Dock, Dock Street/Cart Street in Clydebank. The site
is bounded to the north by Cart Street and to the east by vacant land and
Dock Street. To the west of a fuel storage depot which includes some
vacant land immediately to the west of the site. The southern boundary of
the development site is the quayside of Rothesay Dock and then the River
Clyde. Immediately surrounding the site to the north is primarily
industrial/commercial land situated between the River Clyde and A814
Glasgow Road, together with Holm Park the football ground for Clydebank
Football Club, and areas of formal green open space and vacant land. The
A814 corridor is predominately commercial with some residential uses. To
the south of the southern spur of Rothesay Dock is used as a boatyard
with associate storage and repair workshops. On the opposite bank of the
River Clyde is the Renfrew Golf Club, green space (woodland) and further
industrial land uses. The proposed application takes access from two
Page 1 of 16

Page 2

separate points from Cart Street and then onto Dock Street with a further
junction used to exit the site, also on Cart Street via Dock Street. 
3.2 The nearest residential property is the former Hamilton Memorial Church
on Glasgow Road, approximately 110m north from the site. This property
is separated from the site by an embankment and the National Cycle
Network 7 path, and two large industrial units and their yards/compounds.
After this the nearest residential properties are located on North Elgin
Street, approximately 240mm to the north of the site. 
3.3 The site is accessed from Cart Street via Dock Street, which in turn
provides access to the A814 Glasgow Road. At present Dock Street only
serves the site, the fuel storage depot to the west and the boatyard
located on the southern side of Rothesay Dock. Plans for a new road link
and bridge across the River Clyde were approved in 2019. The new bridge
crossing will link Renfrewshire with Yoker and Clydebank, with the
northern access route to the bridge via Dock Street to Meadowside Street
on the southern bank of the Clyde. 
3.4     Planning permission is sought for the construction and operation of a
Plastics to Hydrogen Facility and a hydrogen vehicle refuelling facility,
which would also be capable of generating and exporting electricity. The
development is proposed to include a thermal conversion plant that would
utilise an advanced thermal treatment process involving gasification to
convert waste plastic into hydrogen electricity and potentially heat. The
facility could generate approximately 3.9MW of electricity gross or up to
approximately 2 tonnes per day of 99.999% pure water free hydrogen. The
hydrogen produced would be used as vehicle fuel and either be dispersed
at the proposed refuelling station or would be exported to another
refuelling station in the local area to be dispersed there.  The electricity
generated by the facility would be exported to the local electricity
distribution network and used to power the proposed development. The
Plastics to Hydrogen facility also provides the opportunity to generate heat
in the future which could be used within a district heat network to supply
heat to local users. 
3.5 The proposed development would use innovative technology to transform
non-recyclable waste plastic into an energy rich syngas from which
hydrogen could be extracted in an environmentally sustainable manner.
The hydrogen produced would be vehicle grade and is most likely to be
used as a fuel for HGVs but could also be used in buses. The tail gas
remaining following hydrogen extraction would still be energy rich and
would be utilised for the generation of electricity. This electricity would be
used for parasitic energy requirements or would be exported to the
national grid or local electricity distribution network. 
Page 2 of 16

Page 3

3.6  The proposed development consists of the following: 
• A feedstock building measuring 63m long, 21m wide and 10.7m
high;
• A thermal conversion chamber building 27.5m long, 13.5m wide
and 10.7m high;
• Two stacks, one measuring 11m and one measuring 17m. The 11m
stack is used to safely disperse cleaned exhaust gasses from the
gas engines and the 17m one is used for the exhaust emissions
arising from the combustion of gasses used to heat the gasification
chamber; 
• A flare package of 11m in height used to dispose of syngas during
start-up and shutdown conditions (2-3 times a year);
• Three feedstock silos, each 14m in height which store shredded
plastic;
• Hydrogen production plant, gas engines and ancillary plant;
• Containment walls 8m in height and 44m long at the hydrogen
refuelling station to prevent spillages;
• Refuelling station plant and dispensing equipment, pipe racking and
boundary fencing, associated hard surfaces and landscaping. 
It is proposed that the feedstock building and thermal conversion changer
building would be clad in predominantly Corten steel. The containments
walls at the Hydrogen Refuelling Station would be finished in boardmarked
concrete. 
3.7  The process involves residual end of life plastic. The plastic is delivered in
bales by HGV vehicles and stored in silos. The plastic is put into the
Thermal Conversion Chamber where is undergoes a gasification process.
Gasification is a process where the waste plastic is heated in reduced
oxygen conditions to generate a gas that can be used as a fuel or to
produce hydrogen. The gas produced is known as a synthesis gas or
syngas. After further processing this syngas is compressed. It can then be
used for power generation or can be piped for further processing for
extraction of hydrogen. 
3.8  The Planning Statement notes that the proposed development would have
the potential to provide direct permanent employment for approximately 23
full time workers. In addition there would also be construction employment
during the development of the site, with the entire fabrication and
construction period supporting over 100 temporary jobs. The facility would
operate 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. There would be staff rotation on
a shift basis. The delivery of the waste plastic feedstock and exports of
hydrogen are proposed to be undertaken between 0700 hours and 1900
hours (replicating the approved hours of deliveries of planning permission
DC12/143). The Hydrogen Refuelling Station is proposed to operate
between 0700hours and 2300 hours. 
Page 3 of 16

Page 4

3.9 The site has previously been granted planning permission for waste
management and energy generation. Planning permission was granted in
2012 (DC12/143) for a recycling centre. This included a sorting facility, an
aerobic digestion facility and external plant including 2 gas engines. The
conditions of this application were amended under application DC15/251.
Conditions 3, 6 and 8 of permission DC15/251 which relate to details of
hard surfacing, pedestrian/cycle crossing facility on Cart Street and the
approved remediation scheme were discharged and the site access was
created but no further works were completed. The proposed hydrogen
development is smaller in scale in terms of height and footprint and would
process less waste than the previous planning permission for a recycling
centre. The proposed tonnage of end of life plastics being processed by
the facility is 13,500 tonnes compared to the 95,000 tonnes of the
previously approved facility. 
3.10 Supporting technical information has been provided as part of the
application and this includes a Planning Statement, Air Quality
Assessment, Design Evolution Document, Drainage Impact Assessment,
Ecological Assessment Report, Flood Risk Assessment, Human Health
Risk Assessment, Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment, Local
Consultation Report, Noise Impact Assessment, Preliminary Site
Investigation Report and Transport Statement. 
4. CONSULTATIONS 
4.1 Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) have no objection and is
satisfied that the proposal should have at least a neutral effect on flooding. 
4.2 West Dunbartonshire Council Environmental Health have no objection
subject to conditions relating to contaminated land, noise impact
assessment, noise control, dust control, air quality, lighting and odour. 
4.3  Health and Safety Executive (HSE), Scottish Water, Transport Scotland,
Renfrewshire Council and Historic Environment Scotland have no
objection to the proposed development. 
4.4  West of Scotland Archaeology Service have no objections subject to a
programme of archaeological works in accordance with a written scheme
of investigation.   
4.5 Glasgow Airport have no objections subject to a condition in relation to the
requirement for a Bird Hazard Management Plan. Advice also provided in
relation to cranes. 
4.6 West Dunbartonshire Council Roads Service has no objections subject to
conditions in regard to directional signage and a cycle crossing point. 
Page 4 of 16

Page 5

4.7 Glasgow City Council and West Dunbartonshire Councils Waste
Management and Greenspace Services have not responded at the time of
writing the report.   
5. REPRESENTATIONS 
5.1 None 
6. ASSESSMENT AGAINST THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 
West Dunbartonshire Adopted Local Plan 2010 
6.1 The development site is located within a Potential Marketable Industry and
Business Class Opportunity Site (Category 2). Policy LE1 states that
within the existing and proposed industrial and business class designated
site there shall be a presumption in favour of uses which positively extend
the permanent employment of the site. The site is listed as being
safeguarded for industrial and business uses. 
6.2 Policy SUS1 pursues a sustainable approach to development by seeking
to maintain and enhance the quality of the environment. The Council
seeks to encourage provisions for waste minimisation and recycling.
Policy PS4 states that proposals for new or extended waste management
infrastructure and facilities, including landfill sites, will be permitted within
general industrial areas. 
6.3 Policy UR1 promotes the re-use of land and buildings that become vacant,
derelict or underused in order to stimulate the process of urban renewal.
Policy T4 requires developers to ensure that sites are well integrated into
walking cycling and pubic routes and Policy GD1 requires all new
development to be of a high quality of design and to respect the character
and amenity of the area in which it is located. The proposed development
complies with the policies of the adopted local plan as discussed below.   
7. ASSESSMENT AGAINST MATERIAL CONSIDERATIONS  
West Dunbartonshire Local Development Plan (LDP2) Proposed Plan
7.1 The modified LDP 2 was approved by the Council in August 2020.  The
Scottish Government issued a direction to the Council on 18th December
2020 requiring modifications to the housing parts of LDP2. None of the
policies considered in the determination of these applications is affected
by the Direction. LDP2 is therefore the Council’s most up to date policy
Page 5 of 16

Page 6

position and has significant weight in the assessment and determination of
planning applications at this time.
7.2 The site is identified as a Business and Industrial Opportunity in Schedule
4 of the LDP2 and Policy E1 supports economic development by directing
proposals for business, industrial, or storage and distribution uses to the
sites. 
7.3 Policy ZW1 states that all development will require to meet with the aims
of the Zero Waste Plan and follow the principles of the Waste Hierarchy,
that is, give highest priority to the prevention of waste followed by reuse,
recycling, then recovery of other value (e.g. energy) with disposal as the
last option. The site has been identified as suitable for the management of
waste. 
7.4 Policies ENV6 does not support development which would have a
significant probability of being affected by flooding or would increase the
probability of flooding elsewhere. ENV8 requires developments to address
air quality, lighting and noise as part of the planning process. ENV9
requires all potentially contaminated sites to be remediated where
necessary to ensure that the site is suitable for the intended use.
7.5 Policy CON1 states that developments which maximise the extent to
which travel demands are met first through walking, then cycling, then
public transport and final through the use of private cars will be particularly
supported, and that all new developments will be required to link to
existing footpaths, cycle routes and public transport routes. 
7.6 Policy BE1 states all archaeological site should be preserved in situ where
possible. Where not possible, provision should be made by the developer
to undertake the excavation, recording analysis, publication and archiving
of the archaeological remains.
Principle of Development 
7.7 The relevant policies of the adopted local plan and LDP2 Proposed Plan
direct proposals for business, industrial and distribution uses to this site as
an appropriate site for industry. As such it is considered that this is an
appropriate location for such a facility in principle.  As the proposal takes
end of life plastics to create hydrogen this proposal is in line with the
designation. On the basis of the above, it is considered that this is an
appropriate location for the proposed development and the proposal is in
accordance with policy LE1 of the adopted local plan, and ED1 and ZW1
of the LDP2 Proposed Plan. 
Page 6 of 16

Page 7

7.8 The use of pure hydrogen as a fuel within electric fuel cell powered
vehicles significantly reduces the impacts of local air pollution. Hydrogen
vehicles do not produce any harmful NOx or particulate emission to the
atmosphere and hence provide significant benefit to the local air quality
and environmental health. Scotland has ambition targets to achieve 
net-zero greenhouse gas emission by 2045. At local level, initiatives such
as Climate Ready Clyde and Clyde Rebuilt recognise the increasing
effects of climate change on the 1.8 million people who live, work and play
in the Glasgow City Region and aim to gather resource and expertise in
order to bring about joined up actions to tackle the issue of climate change
in the region. Alongside the objectives to decarbonise and adapt to climate
change there is a real drive to rapidly transform the energy system to meet
the changing needs of consumer and society, and to grow a strong
hydrogen economy to deliver economic benefits for Scotland. Clyde
Mission aims to transform the riverside corridor running from Glasgow city
centre to the sea by bringing initiative for green transport and renewably
energy and freeing up large tracts of land in key locations for
development. The proposed development would contribute towards the
hydrogen economy whilst redeveloping a piece of brownfield land on the
river corridor and managing end of life plastic waste in a sustainable
manner. The proposed development is considered acceptable and will
bring wide ranging benefits to the local and wider area. 
Site Layout, Design and Appearance 
7.9 The site is currently vacant land. The proposal includes one entrance to
the site, one exit and one entrance/exit, associated access and parking, a
hydrogen refuelling station, feedstock building which would incorporate a
site office/control block as well as the hydrogen production facility. The
hydrogen production facility consists of the following main process items,
feed system, thermal conversion chamber, residue collection system, gas
clean-up equipment, hydrogen separation equipment, hydrogen storage,
gas engine generators and gas clean up equipment. The largest building
on the site is the feedstock building. This will be 63m in length, 21m wide
and 10.7m high. This creates a floor space of 1323m2. The design of the
building is simple, rectangular in shape with a gable ended roof and
typically industrial. The largest structure on the site will be a stack which
sits at 11m in height. Materials proposed are mixes of steel and concrete
all in grey and the designs are industrial in their style 
7.10 Landscaping is proposed to be provided along the frontage of the
proposed development with Cart Street. This includes retaining the
existing trees, proposed new trees and a landscape bund of approximately
1.3m in height with planting on top which runs along the frontage of the
site.  The Planning Statement notes that the landscaping will enhance the
experience of the area for users of the National Cycle Route (Route 7)
Page 7 of 16

Page 8

which runs parallel to Cart Street. The landscaping is also stated to
improve the visual appearance of the area for users of the new bridge
crossing linking Dock Street and Meadowside Street on the southern bank
of the Clyde. The proposal includes maximising the retention of existing
tree cover along the northern perimeter of the site and the reinforcement
of this with new native tree and shrub planting. If existing tree cover
cannot be retained further new native tree and shrub planting would be
provided. Some ground modelling is proposed to be carried out between
the retained vegetation and the proposed buildings in order to raise the
height of the intervening land by approximately 1-1.5m, with new planting
on top of this modified landform. Any granting of permission should be
conditioned to include full landscaping details to be provided. 
Environmental considerations
7.11 Initial concerns were raised by SEPA in regard to flooding. An initial Flood
Risk Assessment (FRA) was submitted in support of the application
however the FRA was not based on the most up to date information
available. This area is indicated in the SEPA Flood Maps as being at
potential medium-high flood risk. An updated FRA has since been
submitted which used the most up to date data. SEPA have now removed
their objection to the development as management measures are now
proposed and the development will have a neutral effect on flooding. As
such it is considered that the development will not have a significant
probability of being affected by flooding or would increase the probability
of flooding elsewhere in accordance with policy ENV6. 
7.12 Development brings with it the possibility of air quality, lighting and noise
issues. An Air Quality Assessment has been submitted in support of the
application. The assessment concludes that the construction and
operation of the proposed development would not have a significant
impact on local air quality, the general population or the local community.
Environmental Health are satisfied with  the Air Quality Assessment,
however the developer must ensure that there is adequate water supply is
available for works commencing on site to ensure that dust suppression
can be undertaken. The use of hydrogen will have significant benefits to
will improve local air quality.     
7.13 The submitted Noise Impact Assessment notes that there is the potential
for the development to be constructed in phases and so the calculations
are based on operation and construction. Noise levels predicted are below
the sleep disturbance criteria and within internal room noise allowances. 
Whilst the predictions are within acceptable levels it is still recommended
that conditions be applied to ensure that no noise disturbance is created. 
The same applies for lighting in that conditions should be applied to any
granting of permission to ensure that the lighting levels are appropriate.
Subject to conditions the development proposals comply with policy ENV8
Page 8 of 16

Page 9

which requires developments to address lighting and noise as part of the
planning process. 
7.14 As the site has previously been used as a ship yard and
industrial/commercial use, there is the potential for the land to be
contaminated. All potentially contaminated sites are required to be
remediated where necessary to ensure that the site is suitable for the
intended use. The Council’s Environmental Health Service have
recommended conditions to ensure that contaminated land is remediated,
the public health is protected and that the site is suitable for its intended
use. The addition of these conditions ensure compliance with policy
ENV9.
Transportation issues 
7.15 A Transport Statement examines the existing highway network and has
found them to be of a suitable nature to support the development. A total
of ten staff car parking spaces are proposed as well as ten secure,
covered cycle parking spaces. The statement predicts a total of 126 two
way vehicle trips during a typical day, 100 of which would be HGV
movements. This equates to less than one vehicles every nine minutes.
The extant recycling centre planning permission has an associated daily
total two way trip number of 331 movements, meaning this development
would create less traffic. It is not expected that the construction phase will
create any more traffic than the operational phase. 
7.16 The facility will be served by an existing industrial access. There have
been no objections from the Council’s Roads Service to the development
using Dock Street. Both vehicle and cycle parking has been provided for
both staff and visitors. Recommendations for directional signage and a
cycle crossing have been given from the Council’s Roads Service.  The
inclusion of cycle parking and cycle crossing are in accordance with policy
CON1 which requires developments to maximise the extent to which travel
demands are met first through walking, cycling and public transport. 
Community Engagement 
7.17  As the development is not a national or major development there was no
statutory requirement for pre-application consultation. The applicant
however commissioned a public consultation on the proposed
development. The community engagement included identifying and
notifying stakeholders (including local councillor, parliamentary
representative, Yoker Community Council and the
Grascadden/Scotstounhill Area Partnership). A website was created which
included a feedback form and meetings were offered. A press release on
the proposals was covered by the Clydebank Post and The Herald and
also in the trade and environmental press. One meeting was held with
Page 9 of 16

Page 10

Clyde Mission and Scottish Enterprise during the consultation period.
Overall the applicant notes that the consultation process received very
little feedback despite the range of stakeholders notified. 
Proximity to Petrol Storage site 
7.18 The site is located within close proximity to Inter Terminals UK Ltd which
is a large scale petrol storage site. Due to the way the proposed hydrogen
facility has been laid out, the part of the site in which people will be in
regular use, is outwith the Health and Safety Executive consultation zone.
As such the Health and Safety Executive had no objections to the
proposal. 
Archaeology 
7.19 The plot of ground that is proposed for development falls within an
archaeological consultation trigger. This is due to the dock, however it is
unlikely to be substantially affected by the construction. It has however
been highlighted that there is possibility that deeper excavations could
encounter surviving archaeological deposits, features or artefacts of a
farm named “East Barns of Clyde”. It has been recommended a condition
is applied requiring a written scheme of investigation. This would in
accordance with policy BE1. 
8. CONCLUSION 
8.1 The proposed development is considered to be in accordance with Policy
LE1 of the adopted Local Plan and Policy E1 of the LDP2 Proposed Plan
as this is a proposal for an industrial use which has been located on a site
which has been identified under both plans as being suitable for the
proposed use. Further as the proposal is identified as a suitable site for
waste disposal and the proposal is for a facility to turn end of life plastics
to hydrogen the proposal is in accordance with policy ZW1 of the LDP2
Proposed Plan. It is considered that the proposed use is to be supported
as it will transform non-recyclable waste plastic into a form that hydrogen
can be extracted in an environmentally sustainable manner which can be
used in heavy vehicles and electricity generation which reduces the
impacts of local air pollution but also contributes to sustainability targets
and the climate emergency. 
9.  CONDITIONS 
1. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, no development shall commence on
site until such time as full details of the design and location of all walls and
fences to be erected on site have been submitted to and approved in
Page 10 of 16

Page 11

writing by the Planning Authority, and these shall thereafter be
implemented as approved. 
2. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, no development shall commence on
site until such time as exact details and specifications of all proposed
external materials have been submitted to and approved in writing by the
Planning Authority, and these materials shall thereafter be implemented as
approved. 
3. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, no development shall commence on
site until such time as full details of all hard surfaces have been submitted
to and approved in writing by the Planning Authority, and these shall
thereafter be implemented as approved. 
4. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, no development shall commence on
site until such time as a landscaping scheme for the boundaries of the site
has been submitted to and approved by the Planning Authority.  Such
scheme shall take account of BAA Advice Note 3 ‘Potential Bird Hazards
from Amenity Landscaping & Building Design’, and shall include details of
the maintenance arrangements.  The approved landscaping shall
thereafter be implemented not later than the next appropriate planting
season after the opening of the facility (or, in the case of landscaping
which serves a noise attenuation function, not later that the opening of the
facility), and the landscaping shall thereafter be maintained in accordance
with the approved arrangements. 
5. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, no development shall commence on
site until such time as details of a pedestrian/cycle crossing facility on
Dock Street for use by persons using the cycle track along the former
railway line have been submitted to and approved in writing by the
Planning Authority. Such crossing shall be completed prior to the opening
of the facility. 
6. No development (other than investigative works) shall commence on site
until such time as a detailed report on the nature and extent of any
contamination of the site has been submitted to and approved in writing by
the Planning Authority. The report shall be prepared by a suitably qualified
person and shall include the following: 
a) A detailed site investigation identifying the extent, scale and nature of
contamination of the site (irrespective of whether this contamination
originates on the site); 
b) An assessment of the potential risks to : 
• Human health; 
• Property (existing and proposed), including buildings, crops, livestock,
pets, woodland and service lines and pipes; 
• Groundwater and surface waters;
Page 11 of 16

Page 12

• Ecological systems;
• Archaeological sites and ancient monuments.
c) An appraisal of remedial options, including a detailed remediation strategy
based on the preferred option. 
7. No development (other than investigative works) shall commence on site
until a detailed remediation scheme for the site has been submitted to, and
approved in writing by the Planning Authority. The scheme shall be
prepared by a suitably qualified person and shall detail the measures
necessary to bring the site to a condition suitable for the intended use by
removing unacceptable risks to human health, buildings and other
property, and the natural and historical environment. The scheme shall
include details of all works to be undertaken, the remediation objectives
and criteria, a timetable of works and/or details of the phasing of works
relative to the rest of the development and its management procedures.
The scheme shall ensure that upon completion of the remediation works of
the site will not qualify as contaminated land under Environmental Health
Protection Act 1990 Part IIA in relation to the intended use of the land after
remediation. 
8. The approved remediation scheme shall be carried out in accordance with
its terms prior to the commencement of development other than that
requiring to carry out the remediation, unless otherwise agreed in writing
by the Planning Authority. The Planning Authority shall be notified in
writing of the intended commencement of remediation works not less than
14 days before these works commence on site. Upon completion of the
remediation works and prior to the site being occupied, a verification report
which demonstrates the effectiveness of the completed remediation works
shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning
Authority. 
9. The presence of any previously unencountered contamination that
becomes evident during the development of the site shall be reported to
the Planning Authority in writing within one week, and work on the affected
area shall cease. At this stage, if requested by the Planning Authority, an
investigation and risk assessment shall be undertaken and an amended
remediation scheme shall be submitted to, and approved in writing by the
Planning Authority prior to the recommencement of works in the affected
area. The approved details shall be implemented as approved. 
10. If the remediation plan requires it then a monitoring and maintenance
scheme (including the monitoring of the long-term effectiveness of the
proposed remediation) shall be submitted to, and approved in writing by
the Planning Authority. Any actions/measures ongoing shall be
implemented within an agreed timescale with the Planning Authority.
Following completion of the actions/measures identified in the approved
Page 12 of 16

Page 13

remediation scheme a further report which demonstrates the effectiveness
of the monitoring and maintenance measures shall be submitted to and
approved by the Planning Authority. 
11. If there is a requirement to either re-use site won material on to import
material then the assessment criteria and sampling frequency that would
adequately demonstrate its suitability for use shall be submitted to and
approved by the Planning Authority prior to any material being used, in
addition to this and in accordance with bs3882:2015 and BS8601:2013,
materials to be used in the top 300mm shall also be free from metals,
plastic, wood, glass, tarmac, paper and odours. 
On completion of the works and at a time and or phasing agreed by the
Planning Authority, the developer shall submit a verification report
containing details on the source of the material and appropriate test
results to demonstrate its suitability for use. 
12. Prior to the commencement of development on site, details of the
Sustainable Drainage System (SuDS) and its maintenance following
installation shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Authority.
The SuDS shall be designed to ensure the contaminants present on the
site are not mobilised and that pollution pathways are not created. The
SuDS shall thereafter be formed and maintained on site in accordance
with the approved details prior to development 
13. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, deliveries shall take place between
0700 hours and 1900hours and HGV vehicles shall visit the site hydrogen
refuelling station only between 0700hours and 2300hours. 
14. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, no development shall commence on
site until a noise mitigation strategy as noted in Section 7.10 of the Noise
Impact Assessment (25th June 2021) has been submitted to, and
approved in writing by the Planning Authority and any measures arising
from the approved strategy shall be implemented as approved. 
15. Upon completion of the development hereby approved an
independently sourced Verification Report shall be submitted for the
written approval of the Planning Authority which shall demonstrate
compliance with noise conditions of this planning permission. The report
shall demonstrate that the projections as detailed within the approved
Noise Impact Assessment are reliable and mitigate the noise sources. 
16. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, no development shall commence on
site until such time as a noise control method statement for the
construction period has been submitted to, and approved in writing by the
Planning Authority. This statement shall identify likely sources of noise
Page 13 of 16

Page 14

(including specific noisy operations and items of plant/machinery), the
anticipated duration of any particular noisy phases of the construction
works, and details of the proposed means of limiting the impact of these
noise sources upon nearby residential properties and other noise-sensitive
properties. The construction works shall thereafter be carried out in
accordance with the approved method statement unless otherwise
approved in writing by the Planning Authority. 
17. During the period of construction, all works and ancillary operations which
are audible, at the site boundary (or at such other places(s) as may first be
agreed in writing within the Planning Authority), shall be carried out
between the following hours unless otherwise agreed in writing by the
Planning Authority: 
Monday to Fridays:    0800-1800
Saturdays:     0800-1300
Sundays and public holidays:  No working 
18. No piling works shall be carried out until a method statement has been
submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning authority. This
statement shall include an assessment of the impact on the piling on
surrounding properties, taking into account the guidance contained in
BS6472:1992 "Evaluation of Human Response to Vibration in Buildings". It
shall detail any procedures, which are proposed to minimise the impact of
noise and vibration on the occupants of surrounding properties. This
statement shall be prepared by a suitably qualified person, and the piling
works shall thereafter be carried out in accordance with the approved
method statement. 
19. Unless otherwise agreed in writing no development shall commence on
site, until an external lighting scheme shall be submitted to and approved
in writing by the Planning Authority. The scheme shall take into account all
of the lighting needs associated with the development during operational
hours and shall be the minimum required to perform the relevant lighting
task, it shall be specifically designed to minimise the risk of light spillage
beyond the development site boundary and into the sky and to avoid
dazzle of distract drivers on nearby road. 
The scheme shall include: 
• A statement settling out and justifying why the lighting scheme is required
• A report, prepared by a lighting engineer setting out the technical details of
the luminaries and columns, including their location, type, shape,
dimensions and expected luminance output and specifically explaining
what design attributes have been chosen to minimise light pollution. 
• A plan illustrating illuminance levels across the development site and at
the boundary of the site. The level of illuminance shall be appropriate to
Page 14 of 16

Page 15

the character of the surrounding area as a whole. Four environmental
zones are internationally recognised, and the design will require to show
that control of overspill light is limited to the level required by the particular
environmental setting. 
• A plan illustrating illuminance levels beyond the boundary or the site,
together with the downward light output ratio of the lights. 
• A statement which demonstrates how the lighting scheme will be viewed
against the wider landscape and, where appropriate, the potential role of
landscaping in minimising the date and night-time visual impact of the
installation. 
• An operational statement, the purpose of which is to ensure that the
developer and the lighting designer have considered operational regimes
that can provide energy savings. 
• Details of the proposed house of operation (unless explicitly agreed in
writing, all external lighting luminaires shall be turned off during daylight
hours and when not actively required). 
Applicants should have regard to the guidance document “Controlling light
pollution and energy consumption” produced by the Scottish Executive
(March 2007). 
20. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, no development shall commence on
site until a Bird Hazard Management Plan has been submitted to and
approved in writing by the Planning Authority in consultation with Glasgow
Airport. The submitted plan shall include details of the management of any
flat/shallow pitched/green roofs on buildings within the site which may be
attractive to nesting, roosting and loafing birds. The management plan
shall comply with Advice Note 8: Potential Bird Hazards from Building
Design.  The Bird Management Plan shall be implemented as approved,
on completion of the development and shall remain in force for the lifetime
of the development. No subsequent alterations to the plan are to take
place unless first submitted to and approved in writing by the Planning
Authority in consultation with Glasgow Airport. 
Peter Hessett
Chief Officer – Regulatory and Regeneration 
Date: 8th June 2022 
Person to Contact: Pamela Clifford, Planning & Building Standards
Manager
Email: Pamela.Clifford@west-dunbarton.gov.uk 
Appendix:   Appendix 1 - Location Plan
Page 15 of 16

Page 16

Background Papers:  1. Application forms and plans;    
2. Consultation responses;                                           
3. West Dunbartonshire Local Plan 2010;
4. West Dunbartonshire Local Development Plan
2 Proposed Plan. 
Wards affected:  6 – Clydebank Waterfront
Page 16 of 16